UNITED STATES | ||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||
FORM N-CSR | ||
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED | ||
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES | ||
Investment Company Act file number | 811-00816 | |
AMERICAN CENTURY MUTUAL FUNDS, INC. | ||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) | ||
4500 MAIN STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI | 64111 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
CHARLES A. ETHERINGTON | ||
4500 MAIN STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64111 | ||
(Name and address of agent for service) | ||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | 816-531-5575 | |
Date of fiscal year end: | 10-31 | |
Date of reporting period: | 04-30-2010 | |
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. | |
Semiannual Report | |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Balanced Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Market Returns | 4 |
Balanced | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Stock Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Stock Industries | 9 |
Key Fixed-Income Portfolio Statistics | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 27 |
Statement of Operations | 28 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 29 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 30 |
Financial Highlights | 37 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 39 |
Additional Information | 45 |
Index Definitions | 46 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Scott Wittman, Chief Investment Officer, Quantitative Equity and Asset Allocation
U.S. Stocks Continued to Advance
The U.S. stock market generated solid gains for the six months ended April 30, 2010, continuing the rally that began in early 2009. Improving economic conditions and unexpectedly strong corporate earnings were the key factors behind the market’s advance during the period.
Signs of improvement were evident across many segments of the economy during the six months—manufacturing activity picked up, consumer spending improved, and the unemployment rate began to fall after reaching a 26-year high in October 2009. Consequently, the U.S. economy generated positive growth in the second half of 2009—after more than a year of economic contraction—and this trend continued into early 2010.
In addition, corporate profits consistently exceeded expectations during the six-month period. Many companies implemented stringent cost-management programs that helped boost profit margins, allowing these businesses to generate surprisingly robust earnings growth despite stagnant revenues. Rising demand for delayed big-ticket purchases, such as cars and appliances, also contributed to stronger earnings.
The combination of better economic data and rising corporate profits helped the stock market advance steadily throughout the six-month period. Small- and mid-cap stocks generated the best results, outpacing large-cap shares (see the table below), while value-oriented issues outpaced growth across all market capitalizations.
Bonds Also Gained Ground
The U.S. bond market also advanced for the six months, though to a lesser degree than the equity market. The improving economic environment provided a lift to corporate securities, which were among the best performers in the bond market. Commercial mortgage-backed securities also generated strong returns as credit conditions in the commercial property sector improved markedly.
Residential mortgage-backed securities lagged as delinquencies and foreclosures continued to increase and the Federal Reserve ended its program of buying mortgage securities to support the housing market. Treasury bonds also underperformed as increased issuance to fund a widening fiscal deficit led to higher yields in the Treasury market. Although the improved economic environment was also a negative factor for Treasury securities, this was offset to a large degree by a lack of inflationary pressures as inflation remained at relatively low levels.
U.S. Market Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Stock Indices | Barclays Capital U.S. Bond Market Indices | |||
Russell 1000 Index (large-cap) | 16.77% | Aggregate | 2.54% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | Corporate Investment-Grade | 4.83% | |
Russell 2000 Index (small-cap) | 28.17% | Mortgage (mortgage-backed) | 2.01% | |
Agencies | 1.54% | |||
*Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | Treasury | 0.89% |
4
Performance |
Balanced | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWBIX | 10.07% | 25.14% | 3.70% | 2.69% | 7.77% | 10/20/88 | |
New blended index(2)(4) | — | 10.36% | 25.97% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 8.80%(3) | — | |
Old blended index(2) | — | 10.19% | 25.58% | 4.14% | 2.80% | 8.84%(3) | — | |
S&P 500 Index(5) | — | 15.66% | 38.84% | 2.63% | -0.19% | 9.36%(3) | — | |
Barclays Capital U.S. | ||||||||
Aggregate Index(4) | — | 2.54% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 6.43% | 7.27%(3) | — | |
Citigroup US Broad | ||||||||
Investment-Grade | ||||||||
Bond Index | — | 2.14% | 7.44% | 5.57% | 6.54% | 7.34%(3) | — | |
Institutional Class | ABINX | 10.18% | 25.48% | 3.92% | — | 2.82% | 5/1/00 | |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | See Index Definitions pages. | |||||||
(3) | Since 10/31/88, the date nearest the Investor Class’s inception for which data are available. | |||||||
(4) | In January 2010, the fund’s blended index changed. The old blended index was represented by 60% of the S&P 500 Index and the remaining | |||||||
40% was represented by the Citigroup US Broad Investment-Grade Bond Index. The new blended index is represented by 60% of the S&P 500 | ||||||||
Index and the remaining 40% is represented by the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index. This reflects a change in the portfolio management | ||||||||
analytics software used by American Century Investments’ fixed-income teams. The investment process is unchanged. | ||||||||
(5) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. – A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
5
Balanced
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |
Investor Class | Institutional Class |
0.91% | 0.71% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. As interest rates rise, bond values will decline.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Balanced
Equity Portfolio Managers: Bill Martin and Tom Vaiana
Fixed-Income Portfolio Managers: Dave MacEwen, Bob Gahagan, and Brian Howell
Performance Summary
Balanced returned 10.07%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, compared with the 10.36% return of its benchmark (a blended index consisting of 60% S&P 500 Index and 40% Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index). Please note that the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index replaced the Citigroup US Broad Investment-Grade Bond Index in the benchmark. This reflects a change in the portfolio management analytics system used by American Century Investments’ fixed-income team.
The double-digit gains for the fund and its benchmark reflected the positive performance in both the stock and bond markets during the six-month period. Stocks generated the best returns, advancing steadily throughout the period as the economic and earnings environment improved. Bonds posted more modest gains as the stronger economy led to slightly higher interest rates.
The fund’s return for the period was just behind the performance of its benchmark. Both the equity and fixed-income portions of the portfolio produced returns that were roughly in line with their respective benchmarks. (It’s worth noting that the fund’s results reflected operating expenses, while the benchmark’s return did not.)
Stock Component Posted Double-Digit Return
The S&P 500 delivered a gain of more than 15% for the reporting period, and so did the stock portion of the Balanced fund. Individual stock selection is typically the main driver of performance in the stock component, and stock selection added value in seven of ten market sectors during the six-month period, led by materials and consumer staples.
The outperformance in the materials sector resulted primarily from stock choices among chemicals producers. The leading contributor was Terra Industries, which produces fertilizer and other agricultural chemicals. After competitor CF Industries Holdings gave up on its year-long effort to take over the company, Terra agreed to a buyout from a Norwegian fertilizer company. In the consumer staples sector, stock selection among beverage makers and an underweight position in food and staples retailers contributed the bulk of the outperformance. The top contributor was Coca-Cola Enterprises, the largest North American bottler of Coca-Cola products, which was acquired by Coca-Cola during the period.
Other notable positive performers included auto parts maker TRW Automotive, online movie rental firm Netflix, and medical technology company Millipore. TRW Automotive reported robust earnings during the period thanks to improving demand and a lower cost structure; Netflix rallied as subscriber growth exceeded expectations and movie streaming activity increased; and Millipore agreed to be acquired by a German pharmaceutical company.
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Balanced
On the downside, stock selection in the financials sector had the biggest negative impact on relative results. Stock selection and an overweight position in capital markets firms were responsible for much of the under-performance in this sector. Several of the fund’s holdings in this segment were weighed down by uncertainty surrounding the federal government’s regulatory overhaul of the financial industry. Examples included investment bank Goldman Sachs, which also fell in response to a fraud lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and asset manager BlackRock.
Bond Portion Fared Well
The fixed-income component of the portfolio kept pace with the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index for the six-month period. The portfolio is managed with a relative value focus, and our sector allocation reflected this approach. The fund held an underweight position in Treasury bonds, where yields were at historically low levels and growing budget deficits resulted in increased issuance. At the same time, we held an overweight position in high-quality corporate bonds, which were trading at attractive levels relative to Treasury securities. This positioning paid off as Treasury bonds underperformed during the period and corporate bonds were among the best performers.
The fund also benefited from its exposure to Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS), which outperformed for the six months. In addition, we continued to favor commercial mortgage-backed securities and mortgage-backed bonds issued by non-government agencies over agency-issued mortgage securities. Agency mortgage-backed securities offered little yield advantage over Treasury bonds, and the Federal Reserve ended its explicit support of this market segment in early 2010.
The fund’s positioning for a flatter yield curve (a narrower gap between long- and short-term interest rates) weighed on results as the spread between long- and short-term yields was little changed, remaining near historically wide levels.
A Look Ahead
The U.S. economy appears to be on the road to recovery, but headwinds and uncertainty remain. Consumers still face persistently high unemployment levels and significant debt burdens, while the stress resulting from sovereign debt issues in Europe have called into question the ability of the global economy to sustain its current pace of recovery. We will continue to focus on our disciplined investment processes for both the equity and fixed-income components of the portfolio.
8
Balanced | ||
Top Ten Stock Holdings as of April 30, 2010 | ||
% of equity holdings | % of S&P 500 Index | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 3.2% | 3.0% |
Apple, Inc. | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Johnson & Johnson | 2.2% | 1.7% |
International Business Machines Corp. | 2.1% | 1.6% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Microsoft Corp. | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Bank of America Corp. | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.6% | 1.7% |
AT&T, Inc. | 1.6% | 1.4% |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Top Five Stock Industries as of April 30, 2010 | ||
% of equity holdings | % of S&P 500 Index | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 8.6% | 9.4% |
Pharmaceuticals | 5.0% | 5.8% |
Computers & Peripherals | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Insurance | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Diversified Financial Services | 4.4% | 4.6% |
Key Fixed-Income Portfolio Statistics | ||
As of 4/30/10 | ||
Weighted Average Life | 6.4 years | |
Average Duration (Effective) | 4.8 years | |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | ||
% of fund investments | ||
as of 4/30/10 | ||
Common Stocks | 60.4% | |
Mortgage-Backed Securities | 12.5% | |
U.S. Treasury Securities | 11.4% | |
Corporate Bonds | 10.6% | |
U.S. Government Agency Securities and Equivalents | 3.5% | |
Municipal Securities | 0.6% | |
Sovereign Governments & Agencies | 0.2% | |
Asset-Backed Securities | —(1) | |
Temporary Cash Investments | 0.8% | |
(1) Category is less than 0.05% of total net assets. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,100.70 | $4.69 | 0.90% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,101.80 | $3.65 | 0.70% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,020.33 | $4.51 | 0.90% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,021.32 | $3.51 | 0.70% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Balanced | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 60.3% | Legg Mason, Inc. | 3,715 | $ 117,728 | |||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 1.2% | Morgan Stanley | 22,897 | 691,947 | |||
Boeing Co. (The) | 31,125 | $ 2,254,384 | 6,888,687 | |||
L-3 Communications | CHEMICALS — 1.4% | |||||
Holdings, Inc. | 7,333 | 686,149 | Ashland, Inc. | 10,258 | 610,966 | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 10,341 | 701,430 | Cabot Corp. | 14,783 | 481,039 | |
Raytheon Co. | 40,574 | 2,365,464 | CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 14,534 | 1,216,060 | |
6,007,427 | Huntsman Corp. | 95,824 | 1,093,352 | |||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 0.6% | Lubrizol Corp. | 22,087 | 1,995,339 | |||
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. | 3,316 | 199,955 | OM Group, Inc.(1) | 21,134 | 797,808 | |
FedEx Corp. | 8,757 | 788,218 | Valspar Corp. | 14,655 | 458,995 | |
United Parcel Service, Inc., | W.R. Grace & Co.(1) | 6,201 | 179,147 | |||
Class B | 28,139 | 1,945,530 | 6,832,706 | |||
2,933,703 | COMMERCIAL BANKS — 2.2% | |||||
AIRLINES — 0.1% | Bank of Hawaii Corp. | 13,749 | 727,047 | |||
Southwest Airlines Co. | 25,297 | 333,414 | BB&T Corp. | 2,615 | 86,923 | |
AUTO COMPONENTS — 0.4% | Canadian Imperial | |||||
Gentex Corp. | 15,439 | 331,784 | Bank of Commerce | 309 | 22,671 | |
TRW Automotive | CapitalSource, Inc. | 25,675 | 153,280 | |||
Holdings Corp.(1) | 46,927 | 1,511,519 | Cathay General Bancorp. | 8,728 | 107,965 | |
1,843,303 | Fifth Third Bancorp. | 8,853 | 131,998 | |||
BEVERAGES — 0.4% | First Horizon National Corp.(1) | 10,514 | 148,773 | |||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 7,131 | 381,152 | Huntington Bancshares, Inc. | 100,510 | 680,453 | |
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. | 67,294 | 1,866,063 | KeyCorp | 28,583 | 257,819 | |
2,247,215 | Marshall & Ilsley Corp. | 14,583 | 132,705 | |||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 1.7% | PNC Financial Services | |||||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 62,030 | 3,558,041 | Group, Inc. | 13,769 | 925,414 | |
Biogen Idec, Inc.(1) | 31,815 | 1,694,149 | Regions Financial Corp. | 14,529 | 128,436 | |
Cephalon, Inc.(1) | 20,886 | 1,340,881 | Synovus Financial Corp. | 35,322 | 106,319 | |
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 19,023 | 426,496 | TCF Financial Corp. | 6,423 | 119,661 | |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 33,187 | 1,316,528 | Toronto-Dominion Bank (The) | 12,969 | 965,672 | |
8,336,095 | U.S. Bancorp. | 38,987 | 1,043,682 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.4% | Wells Fargo & Co. | 138,885 | 4,598,482 | |||
Apollo Investment Corp. | 9,604 | 116,785 | Wilmington Trust Corp. | 5,712 | 98,989 | |
Bank of New York Mellon | Zions Bancorp. | 23,398 | 672,225 | |||
Corp. (The) | 48,512 | 1,510,179 | 11,108,514 | |||
BlackRock, Inc. | 4,271 | 785,864 | COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 0.1% | |||
Blackstone Group LP (The) | 6,210 | 86,816 | R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | 17,740 | 381,233 | |
E*TRADE Financial Corp.(1) | 52,287 | 87,842 | Waste Management, Inc. | 2,370 | 82,191 | |
Fortress Investment | 463,424 | |||||
Group LLC, Class A(1) | 13,418 | 63,735 | COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 1.8% | |||
Goldman Sachs | ADC Telecommunications, | |||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 22,956 | 3,333,211 | Inc.(1) | 61,847 | 495,395 | |
Investment Technology | Arris Group, Inc.(1) | 36,508 | 448,683 | |||
Group, Inc.(1) | 5,445 | 94,580 |
12
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 160,522 | $ 4,321,252 | DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION | |||
CommScope, Inc.(1) | 12,819 | 417,643 | SERVICES — 1.3% | |||
Harris Corp. | 5,914 | 304,453 | AT&T, Inc. | 180,438 | $ 4,702,214 | |
Plantronics, Inc. | 12,196 | 404,907 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 58,076 | 1,677,816 | |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 42,438 | 1,644,048 | 6,380,030 | |||
Research In Motion Ltd.(1) | 6,713 | 477,899 | ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 0.5% | |||
Tellabs, Inc. | 34,467 | 312,960 | Entergy Corp. | 4,689 | 381,169 | |
8,827,240 | Exelon Corp. | 16,640 | 725,337 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 2.9% | FPL Group, Inc. | 23,239 | 1,209,590 | |||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 27,644 | 7,218,401 | 2,316,096 | |||
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS & | ||||||
Diebold, Inc. | 8,768 | 274,877 | COMPONENTS — 1.1% | |||
EMC Corp.(1) | 31,483 | 598,492 | ||||
Anixter International, Inc.(1) | 8,244 | 431,986 | ||||
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 29,624 | 1,539,559 | Arrow Electronics, Inc.(1) | 37,901 | 1,155,981 | |
Lexmark International, Inc., | Avnet, Inc.(1) | 12,938 | 413,628 | |||
Class A(1) | 15,102 | 559,529 | ||||
Celestica, Inc.(1) | 83,759 | 820,838 | ||||
SanDisk Corp.(1) | 31,290 | 1,248,158 | ||||
Seagate Technology(1) | 80,613 | 1,480,861 | Molex, Inc. | 3,254 | 72,922 | |
Tech Data Corp.(1) | 17,295 | 741,955 | ||||
Synaptics, Inc.(1) | 9,046 | 276,989 | ||||
Western Digital Corp.(1) | 37,076 | 1,523,453 | Tyco Electronics Ltd. | 52,724 | 1,693,495 | |
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.(1) | 8,829 | 91,910 | ||||
14,720,319 | ||||||
CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 0.5% | 5,422,715 | |||||
EMCOR Group, Inc.(1) | 45,994 | 1,313,589 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 0.9% | |||
Complete Production | ||||||
Shaw Group, Inc. (The)(1) | 19,322 | 739,646 | Services, Inc.(1) | 29,703 | 448,218 | |
URS Corp.(1) | 6,518 | 334,699 | Helix Energy Solutions | |||
2,387,934 | Group, Inc.(1) | 294 | 4,286 | |||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 0.4% | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 40,764 | 1,794,839 | |||
American Express Co. | 12,802 | 590,428 | Noble Corp.(1) | 1,298 | 51,258 | |
AmeriCredit Corp.(1) | 11,548 | 276,459 | Oil States International, Inc.(1) | 21,241 | 1,026,153 | |
Cash America | Schlumberger Ltd. | 15,066 | 1,076,014 | |||
International, Inc. | 24,415 | 904,820 | Transocean Ltd.(1) | 3,320 | 240,534 | |
Discover Financial Services | 7,534 | 116,476 | 4,641,302 | |||
1,888,183 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 0.6% | |||||
CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 0.3% | Safeway, Inc. | 67,774 | 1,599,467 | |||
Graphic Packaging | SUPERVALU, INC. | 24,347 | 362,770 | |||
Holding Co.(1) | 105,207 | 388,214 | ||||
Rock-Tenn Co., Class A | 17,461 | 900,987 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 19,874 | 1,066,240 | |
Silgan Holdings, Inc. | 1,481 | 89,349 | 3,028,477 | |||
Sonoco Products Co. | 4,717 | 156,274 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.5% | |||
1,534,824 | ConAgra Foods, Inc. | 59,989 | 1,467,931 | |||
Corn Products | ||||||
DIVERSIFIED CONSUMER SERVICES — 0.1% | International, Inc. | 12,718 | 457,848 | |||
Corinthian Colleges, Inc.(1) | 23,923 | 373,677 | Del Monte Foods Co. | 85,398 | 1,275,846 | |
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 2.7% | Dole Food Co., Inc.(1) | 32,510 | 368,013 | |||
Bank of America Corp. | 342,996 | 6,115,618 | Fresh Del Monte | |||
Citigroup, Inc.(1) | 195,375 | 853,789 | Produce, Inc.(1) | 2,569 | 53,615 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 149,303 | 6,357,322 | General Mills, Inc. | 144 | 10,250 | |
13,326,729 | Hershey Co. (The) | 2,799 | 131,581 |
13
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Kraft Foods, Inc., Class A | 23,529 | $ 696,458 | HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 1.3% | |||
Lancaster Colony Corp. | 3,790 | 208,336 | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 6,934 | $ 583,149 | |
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 5,442 | 280,862 | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 19,403 | 1,188,628 | |
Smithfield Foods, Inc.(1) | 22,335 | 418,558 | Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 77,042 | 4,788,931 | |
Tyson Foods, Inc., Class A | 111,703 | 2,188,262 | 6,560,708 | |||
7,557,560 | INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS & | |||||
GAS UTILITIES — 0.1% | ENERGY TRADERS — 0.9% | |||||
ONEOK, Inc. | 12,385 | 608,599 | Constellation Energy | |||
Group, Inc. | 78,882 | 2,788,479 | ||||
UGI Corp. | 4,550 | 125,079 | ||||
Mirant Corp.(1) | 79,108 | 922,399 | ||||
733,678 | ||||||
NRG Energy, Inc.(1) | 34,020 | 822,263 | ||||
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 0.6% | ||||||
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 5,036 | 384,599 | 4,533,141 | |||
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 13,014 | 1,126,101 | INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.1% | |||
Hospira, Inc.(1) | 2,355 | 126,676 | 3M Co. | 20,599 | 1,826,513 | |
Medtronic, Inc. | 15,535 | 678,724 | Carlisle Cos., Inc. | 35,282 | 1,331,190 | |
STERIS Corp. | 19,400 | 645,632 | General Electric Co. | 122,560 | 2,311,482 | |
2,961,732 | 5,469,185 | |||||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 2.1% | INSURANCE — 2.7% | |||||
Cardinal Health, Inc. | 66,152 | 2,294,813 | ACE Ltd. | 9,566 | 508,816 | |
Centene Corp.(1) | 17,773 | 407,002 | Allied World Assurance Co. | |||
Holdings Ltd. | 18,004 | 784,434 | ||||
Coventry Health Care, Inc.(1) | 58,574 | 1,390,547 | Allstate Corp. (The) | 3,369 | 110,065 | |
Humana, Inc.(1) | 48,766 | 2,229,581 | American Financial | |||
Magellan Health | Group, Inc. | 62,236 | 1,831,605 | |||
Services, Inc.(1) | 9,362 | 395,170 | American International | |||
Medco Health | Group, Inc.(1) | 3,277 | 127,475 | |||
Solutions, Inc.(1) | 18,652 | 1,098,976 | Arch Capital Group Ltd.(1) | 605 | 45,726 | |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 52,849 | 1,601,853 | Aspen Insurance | |||
WellPoint, Inc.(1) | 22,620 | 1,216,956 | Holdings Ltd. | 12,972 | 349,985 | |
10,634,898 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., | |||||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 0.5% | Class B(1) | 10,472 | 806,344 | |||
McDonald’s Corp. | 13,669 | 964,895 | Chubb Corp. (The) | 15,676 | 828,790 | |
Panera Bread Co., Class A(1) | 15,228 | 1,186,870 | CNA Financial Corp.(1) | 12,999 | 365,532 | |
Starbucks Corp. | 10,623 | 275,986 | Conseco, Inc.(1) | 17,731 | 104,613 | |
2,427,751 | Delphi Financial Group, Inc., | |||||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.5% | Class A | 5,580 | 153,450 | |||
Endurance Specialty | ||||||
American Greetings Corp., | Holdings Ltd. | 20,276 | 747,171 | |||
Class A | 18,942 | 465,216 | ||||
D.R. Horton, Inc. | 30,506 | 448,133 | Genworth Financial, Inc., | |||
Class A(1) | 8,051 | 133,003 | ||||
Harman International | Hartford Financial Services | |||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 12,678 | 500,527 | ||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 2,475 | 70,711 | ||||
NVR, Inc.(1) | 983 | 705,843 | ||||
Horace Mann Educators Corp. | 9,669 | 166,404 | ||||
Ryland Group, Inc. | 18,616 | 424,073 | Loews Corp. | 1,031 | 38,394 | |
2,543,792 | MetLife, Inc. | 2,313 | 105,427 | |||
Old Republic | ||||||
International Corp. | 5,627 | 84,461 |
14
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 12,347 | $ 360,779 | MEDIA — 1.4% | |||
Protective Life Corp. | 6,690 | 161,028 | CBS Corp., Class B | 3,051 | $ 49,457 | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | 51,813 | 3,293,234 | Comcast Corp., Class A | 151,323 | 2,987,116 | |
Reinsurance Group of | Gannett Co., Inc. | 7,431 | 126,476 | |||
America, Inc. | 2,560 | 132,173 | Scholastic Corp. | 12,412 | 335,248 | |
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. | 2,702 | 134,370 | Time Warner, Inc. | 93,972 | 3,108,594 | |
Travelers Cos., Inc. (The) | 40,991 | 2,079,883 | Walt Disney Co. (The) | 7,423 | 273,463 | |
WR Berkley Corp. | 415 | 11,205 | 6,880,354 | |||
13,535,078 | METALS & MINING — 1.1% | |||||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.5% | Commercial Metals Co. | 24,034 | 357,626 | |||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 5,873 | 804,953 | Freeport-McMoRan | |||
Netflix, Inc.(1) | 14,794 | 1,461,204 | Copper & Gold, Inc. | 25,347 | 1,914,459 | |
2,266,157 | Newmont Mining Corp. | 21,971 | 1,232,134 | |||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.0% | Reliance Steel & | |||||
AOL, Inc.(1) | 25,770 | 601,987 | Aluminum Co. | 25,724 | 1,255,588 | |
EarthLink, Inc. | 44,777 | 403,889 | Worthington Industries, Inc. | 51,508 | 822,583 | |
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 7,598 | 3,992,293 | 5,582,390 | |||
4,998,169 | MULTILINE RETAIL — 0.5% | |||||
Big Lots, Inc.(1) | 3,406 | 130,109 | ||||
IT SERVICES — 2.1% | ||||||
Acxiom Corp.(1) | 8,683 | 165,671 | Dillard’s, Inc., Class A | 22,955 | 644,576 | |
Dollar Tree, Inc.(1) | 10,769 | 653,894 | ||||
Automatic Data | ||||||
Processing, Inc. | 46,469 | 2,014,896 | Family Dollar Stores, Inc. | 14,337 | 567,172 | |
Convergys Corp.(1) | 92,398 | 1,167,911 | Macy’s, Inc. | 23,294 | 540,421 | |
International Business | 2,536,172 | |||||
Machines Corp. | 49,400 | 6,372,600 | MULTI-INDUSTRY — 0.3% | |||
NeuStar, Inc., Class A(1) | 8,502 | 208,044 | Financial Select Sector | |||
Western Union Co. (The) | 34,520 | 629,990 | SPDR Fund | 81,072 | 1,309,313 | |
Wright Express Corp.(1) | 6,394 | 217,204 | MULTI-UTILITIES — 1.0% | |||
10,776,316 | DTE Energy Co. | 29,431 | 1,417,691 | |||
LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 0.2% | Integrys Energy Group, Inc. | 56,507 | 2,803,312 | |||
Polaris Industries, Inc. | 20,534 | 1,214,997 | NiSource, Inc. | 18,943 | 308,771 | |
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.5% | Public Service Enterprise | |||||
Group, Inc. | 13,992 | 449,563 | ||||
Bruker Corp.(1) | 65,488 | 1,001,311 | ||||
4,979,337 | ||||||
Millipore Corp.(1) | 16,206 | 1,720,267 | ||||
OFFICE ELECTRONICS — 0.1% | ||||||
2,721,578 | Xerox Corp. | 41,695 | 454,475 | |||
MACHINERY — 1.3% | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 5.2% | |||||
Briggs & Stratton Corp. | 21,467 | 509,627 | Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | 13,908 | 864,521 | |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 7,310 | 497,738 | Apache Corp. | 14,506 | 1,476,131 | |
Cummins, Inc. | 16,090 | 1,162,181 | Canadian Natural | |||
Graco, Inc. | 11,509 | 399,132 | Resources Ltd. | 21,549 | 1,657,980 | |
Manitowoc Co., Inc. (The) | 22,979 | 321,936 | Chevron Corp. | 44,954 | 3,661,054 | |
Mueller Industries, Inc. | 14,430 | 427,849 | Cimarex Energy Co. | 10,738 | 731,043 | |
Oshkosh Corp.(1) | 34,429 | 1,329,648 | ConocoPhillips | 43,461 | 2,572,457 | |
Timken Co. | 40,109 | 1,411,035 | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 142,112 | 9,642,299 | |
WABCO Holdings, Inc.(1) | 13,987 | 464,228 | Murphy Oil Corp. | 17,447 | 1,049,437 | |
6,523,374 | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 23,652 | 2,096,986 |
15
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Peabody Energy Corp. | 20,414 | $ 953,742 | SOFTWARE — 2.5% | |||
World Fuel Services Corp. | 48,542 | 1,380,049 | ACI Worldwide, Inc.(1) | 7,989 | $ 150,113 | |
26,085,699 | Cadence Design | |||||
PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 0.1% | Systems, Inc.(1) | 58,931 | 439,625 | |||
International Paper Co. | 24,921 | 666,388 | Fair Isaac Corp. | 16,415 | 345,700 | |
PHARMACEUTICALS — 3.0% | Intuit, Inc.(1) | 67,117 | 2,426,951 | |||
Abbott Laboratories | 37,989 | 1,943,517 | Mentor Graphics Corp.(1) | 42,615 | 383,109 | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 19,691 | 497,985 | Microsoft Corp. | 201,720 | 6,160,529 | |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 93,351 | 3,264,485 | Oracle Corp. | 59,013 | 1,524,896 | |
Endo Pharmaceuticals | Quest Software, Inc.(1) | 9,006 | 157,875 | |||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 43,775 | 958,673 | Symantec Corp.(1) | 37,185 | 623,593 | |
Forest Laboratories, Inc.(1) | 45,548 | 1,241,639 | Synopsys, Inc.(1) | 18,527 | 420,748 | |
Johnson & Johnson | 101,341 | 6,516,226 | 12,633,139 | |||
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 72,904 | 714,459 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 1.5% | |||
15,136,984 | AutoZone, Inc.(1) | 1,066 | 197,221 | |||
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.6% | Barnes & Noble, Inc. | 20,285 | 447,081 | |||
Annaly Capital | Gap, Inc. (The) | 62,583 | 1,547,677 | |||
Management, Inc. | 9,189 | 155,754 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 2,223 | 78,361 | ||||
CBL & Associates | ||||||
Properties, Inc. | 8,730 | 127,458 | PetSmart, Inc. | 8,068 | 266,809 | |
Duke Realty Corp. | 7,107 | 96,158 | Rent-A-Center, Inc.(1) | 25,049 | 646,765 | |
Public Storage | 111 | 10,757 | Ross Stores, Inc. | 39,873 | 2,232,888 | |
Simon Property Group, Inc. | 2,627 | 233,855 | Sherwin-Williams Co. (The) | 8,014 | 625,653 | |
SPDR Dow Jones REIT Fund | 44,894 | 2,579,160 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 57,134 | 1,645,459 | |
3,203,142 | 7,687,914 | |||||
ROAD & RAIL — 0.5% | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 0.1% | |||||
CSX Corp. | 10,799 | 605,284 | Jones Apparel Group, Inc. | 30,077 | 654,475 | |
Norfolk Southern Corp. | 9,916 | 588,316 | THRIFTS & MORTGAGE FINANCE(2) | |||
Union Pacific Corp. | 16,857 | 1,275,401 | MGIC Investment Corp.(1) | 9,521 | 99,304 | |
2,469,001 | Ocwen Financial Corp.(1) | 8,925 | 103,084 | |||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | 202,388 | |||||
EQUIPMENT — 2.0% | TOBACCO — 0.7% | |||||
Advanced Micro | Altria Group, Inc. | 13,269 | 281,170 | |||
Devices, Inc.(1) | 53,920 | 488,515 | ||||
Philip Morris | ||||||
Broadcom Corp., Class A | 39,046 | 1,346,696 | International, Inc. | 66,036 | 3,241,047 | |
Integrated Device | 3,522,217 | |||||
Technology, Inc.(1) | 62,026 | 409,992 | ||||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 0.1% | ||||||
Intel Corp. | 175,018 | 3,995,661 | WESCO International, Inc.(1) | 12,756 | 518,149 | |
LSI Corp.(1) | 100,931 | 607,605 | ||||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.1% | ||||||
Marvell Technology | Sprint Nextel Corp.(1) | 110,034 | 467,644 | |||
Group Ltd.(1) | 9,169 | 189,340 | ||||
Micron Technology, Inc.(1) | 51,487 | 481,403 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
(Cost $245,406,239) | 302,334,049 | |||||
RF Micro Devices, Inc.(1) | 89,935 | 505,435 | ||||
Tessera Technologies, Inc.(1) | 9,481 | 192,275 | ||||
Texas Instruments, Inc. | 58,466 | 1,520,701 | ||||
Xilinx, Inc. | 11,913 | 307,117 | ||||
10,044,740 |
16
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
U.S. Treasury Securities — 11.4% | BEVERAGES — 0.2% | |||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, | Worldwide, Inc., 3.00%, | |||||
5.25%, 2/15/29(3) | $ 2,000,000 | $ 2,229,688 | ||||
10/15/12(3) | $ 300,000 | $ 308,730 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, | Anheuser-Busch InBev | |||||
6.25%, 5/15/30(3) | 310,000 | 388,614 | ||||
Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, | 11/15/19(4) | 250,000 | 290,017 | |||
4.75%, 2/15/37(3) | 929,000 | 969,789 | ||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds, | Worldwide, Inc., 5.00%, | |||||
4.375%, 11/15/39(3) | 1,000,000 | 975,469 | 4/15/20(3)(4) | 110,000 | 111,758 | |
U.S. Treasury Inflation | Dr Pepper Snapple Group, | |||||
Indexed Notes, | Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/18(3) | 230,000 | 267,907 | |||
1.625%, 1/15/15(3) | 3,405,300 | 3,598,976 | ||||
SABMiller plc, 6.20%, | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, | 7/1/11(3)(4) | 230,000 | 241,470 | |||
0.75%, 11/30/11(3) | 12,500,000 | 12,501,463 | ||||
1,219,882 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, | ||||||
1.875%, 6/15/12(3) | 12,200,000 | 12,422,077 | BIOTECHNOLOGY(2) | |||
U.S. Treasury Notes, | Amgen, Inc., 5.75%, | |||||
3/15/40(3) | 150,000 | 153,122 | ||||
1.375%, 9/15/12(3) | 4,200,000 | 4,222,642 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, | CAPITAL MARKETS — 0.7% | |||||
2.375%, 8/31/14(3) | 13,000,000 | 13,123,903 | Credit Suisse (New York), | |||
5.00%, 5/15/13(3) | 340,000 | 366,121 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes, | ||||||
3.125%, 5/15/19(3) | 7,000,000 | 6,764,842 | Credit Suisse (New York), | |||
5.50%, 5/1/14(3) | 200,000 | 219,331 | ||||
TOTAL U.S. TREASURY SECURITIES | ||||||
(Cost $56,528,359) | 57,197,463 | Credit Suisse (New York), | ||||
5.30%, 8/13/19(3) | 230,000 | 241,050 | ||||
Corporate Bonds — 10.5% | Credit Suisse AG, 5.40%, | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 0.4% | 1/14/20(3) | 60,000 | 61,199 | |||
Honeywell International, Inc., | Deutsche Bank AG (London), | |||||
5.30%, 3/15/17(3) | 262,000 | 284,088 | 4.875%, 5/20/13(3) | 330,000 | 354,515 | |
Honeywell International, Inc., | Deutsche Bank AG (London), | |||||
5.30%, 3/1/18(3) | 230,000 | 249,077 | 3.875%, 8/18/14(3) | 190,000 | 196,625 | |
L-3 Communications Corp., | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |||||
5.875%, 1/15/15(3) | 160,000 | 163,200 | (The), 6.00%, 5/1/14(3) | 150,000 | 161,502 | |
L-3 Communications Corp., | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |||||
5.20%, 10/15/19(3)(4) | 130,000 | 133,749 | (The), 7.50%, 2/15/19(3) | 850,000 | 945,300 | |
Lockheed Martin Corp., | Jefferies Group, Inc., 8.50%, | |||||
5.50%, 11/15/39(3) | 260,000 | 264,779 | 7/15/19(3) | 130,000 | 147,986 | |
United Technologies Corp., | Morgan Stanley, 4.20%, | |||||
6.05%, 6/1/36(3) | 454,000 | 496,014 | 11/20/14(3) | 200,000 | 199,761 | |
United Technologies Corp., | Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, | |||||
5.70%, 4/15/40(3) | 200,000 | 209,591 | 4/1/18(3) | 320,000 | 339,802 | |
1,800,498 | Morgan Stanley, 5.625%, | |||||
AUTOMOBILES — 0.1% | 9/23/19(3) | 250,000 | 247,012 | |||
American Honda Finance | UBS AG (Stamford Branch), | |||||
Corp., 2.375%, 3/18/13(3)(4) | 170,000 | 170,822 | 5.875%, 12/20/17(3) | 220,000 | 233,061 | |
Daimler Finance N.A. LLC, | 3,713,265 | |||||
5.875%, 3/15/11(3) | 260,000 | 269,888 | CHEMICALS — 0.1% | |||
Nissan Motor Acceptance | CF Industries, Inc., 6.875%, | |||||
Corp., 3.25%, 1/30/13(3)(4) | 50,000 | 51,033 | 5/1/18 | 210,000 | 219,450 | |
491,743 | Dow Chemical Co. (The), | |||||
8.55%, 5/15/19(3) | 130,000 | 159,110 |
17
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Rohm & Haas Co., 5.60%, | Capital One Bank USA N.A., | |||||
3/15/13(3) | $ 240,000 | $ 258,483 | 8.80%, 7/15/19(3) | $ 250,000 | $ 307,068 | |
637,043 | General Electric Capital Corp., | |||||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 0.4% | 3.75%, 11/14/14(3) | 200,000 | 205,234 | |||
Barclays Bank plc, 5.00%, | General Electric Capital Corp., | |||||
9/22/16(3) | 200,000 | 207,499 | 4.375%, 9/21/15(3) | 200,000 | 208,903 | |
BB&T Corp., 5.70%, | General Electric Capital Corp., | |||||
4/30/14(3) | 150,000 | 164,961 | 5.625%, 9/15/17(3) | 450,000 | 482,659 | |
Fifth Third Bancorp., 6.25%, | General Electric Capital Corp., | |||||
5/1/13(3) | 140,000 | 151,802 | 6.00%, 8/7/19(3) | 150,000 | 162,428 | |
National Australia Bank Ltd., | SLM Corp., 5.375%, | |||||
3.75%, 3/2/15(3)(4) | 100,000 | 102,240 | 1/15/13(3) | 110,000 | 110,540 | |
PNC Bank N.A., 6.00%, | 2,023,676 | |||||
12/7/17(3) | 290,000 | 308,975 | CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 0.1% | |||
SunTrust Bank, 7.25%, | Ball Corp., 7.125%, 9/1/16(3) | 130,000 | 138,775 | |||
3/15/18(3) | 110,000 | 119,901 | ||||
Ball Corp., 6.75%, 9/15/20(3) | 120,000 | 123,300 | ||||
Wachovia Bank N.A., 4.80%, | 262,075 | |||||
11/1/14(3) | 373,000 | 391,685 | ||||
Wachovia Bank N.A., 4.875%, | DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 0.7% | |||||
2/1/15(3) | 123,000 | 129,141 | Arch Western Finance LLC, | |||
6.75%, 7/1/13(3) | 100,000 | 101,250 | ||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 3.625%, | ||||||
4/15/15(3) | 110,000 | 111,801 | Bank of America Corp., | |||
4.50%, 4/1/15(3) | 190,000 | 191,949 | ||||
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.625%, | ||||||
12/11/17(3) | 50,000 | 53,928 | Bank of America Corp., | |||
6.50%, 8/1/16(3) | 320,000 | 345,615 | ||||
Westpac Banking Corp., | ||||||
4.875%, 11/19/19(3) | 100,000 | 101,746 | Bank of America Corp., | |||
7.625%, 6/1/19(3) | 150,000 | 171,515 | ||||
1,843,679 | ||||||
Bank of America N.A., | ||||||
COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 0.2% | 5.30%, 3/15/17(3) | 420,000 | 416,908 | |||
Allied Waste North America, | Citigroup, Inc., 5.50%, | |||||
Inc., 6.375%, 4/15/11(3) | 180,000 | 188,461 | ||||
4/11/13(3) | 470,000 | 496,665 | ||||
Corrections Corp. of America, | Citigroup, Inc., 6.01%, | |||||
6.25%, 3/15/13(3) | 250,000 | 255,000 | ||||
1/15/15(3) | 310,000 | 330,748 | ||||
Republic Services, Inc., | Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, | |||||
5.50%, 9/15/19(3)(4) | 250,000 | 262,940 | ||||
5/15/18(3) | 320,000 | 332,354 | ||||
Republic Services, Inc., | Citigroup, Inc., 8.50%, | |||||
6.20%, 3/1/40(3)(4) | 140,000 | 143,832 | ||||
5/22/19(3) | 100,000 | 118,246 | ||||
Waste Management, Inc., | CME Group Index Services | |||||
6.125%, 11/30/39(3) | 120,000 | 125,390 | ||||
LLC, 4.40%, 3/15/18(3)(4) | 150,000 | 149,482 | ||||
975,623 | JPMorgan Chase & Co., | |||||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT(2) | 4.65%, 6/1/14(3) | 330,000 | 351,686 | |||
Cisco Systems, Inc., 5.90%, | JPMorgan Chase & Co., | |||||
2/15/39(3) | 210,000 | 220,950 | 6.00%, 1/15/18(3) | 670,000 | 723,532 | |
CONSUMER FINANCE — 0.4% | 3,729,950 | |||||
American Express Centurion | DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION | |||||
Bank, 5.55%, 10/17/12(3) | 150,000 | 161,757 | SERVICES — 0.7% | |||
American Express Centurion | Alltel Corp., 7.875%, 7/1/32(3) | 100,000 | 123,486 | |||
Bank, 6.00%, 9/13/17(3) | 250,000 | 270,556 | ||||
AT&T, Inc., 6.80%, 5/15/36(3) | 350,000 | 384,083 | ||||
American Express Co., | AT&T, Inc., 6.55%, 2/15/39(3) | 470,000 | 505,709 | |||
7.25%, 5/20/14(3) | 100,000 | 114,531 |
18
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
British Telecommunications | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS & | |||||
plc, 5.95%, 1/15/18(3) | $ 120,000 | $ 126,134 | COMPONENTS — 0.1% | |||
Cellco Partnership/Verizon | Jabil Circuit, Inc., 7.75%, | |||||
Wireless Capital LLC, | 7/15/16(3) | $ 250,000 | $ 266,250 | |||
8.50%, 11/15/18(3) | 130,000 | 164,734 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 0.1% | |||
CenturyTel, Inc., 7.60%, | Pride International, Inc., | |||||
9/15/39(3) | 120,000 | 117,204 | 8.50%, 6/15/19(3) | 100,000 | 115,375 | |
Deutsche Telekom | Weatherford International | |||||
International Finance BV, | Ltd., 9.625%, 3/1/19(3) | 240,000 | 310,882 | |||
6.75%, 8/20/18(3) | 150,000 | 170,504 | ||||
426,257 | ||||||
Embarq Corp., 7.08%, | ||||||
6/1/16(3) | 219,000 | 241,844 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 0.3% | |||
New Communications | CVS Caremark Corp., 6.60%, | |||||
3/15/19(3) | 350,000 | 400,037 | ||||
Holdings, Inc., 8.50%, | ||||||
4/15/20(3)(4) | 130,000 | 134,550 | Kroger Co. (The), 6.40%, | |||
8/15/17(3) | 200,000 | 227,669 | ||||
Qwest Corp., 7.875%, | ||||||
9/1/11(3) | 120,000 | 127,950 | SYSCO Corp., 4.20%, | |||
2/12/13(3) | 100,000 | 106,703 | ||||
Qwest Corp., 7.50%, | ||||||
10/1/14(3) | 200,000 | 219,750 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., | |||
5.875%, 4/5/27(3) | 468,000 | 508,516 | ||||
Sprint Capital Corp., 7.625%, | ||||||
1/30/11(3) | 180,000 | 185,625 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., | |||
6.20%, 4/15/38(3) | 220,000 | 243,021 | ||||
Telecom Italia Capital SA, | ||||||
6.175%, 6/18/14(3) | 340,000 | 365,619 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., | |||
5.625%, 4/1/40(3) | 150,000 | 153,956 | ||||
Telefonica Emisiones SAU, | ||||||
5.88%, 7/15/19(3) | 220,000 | 234,298 | 1,639,902 | |||
Verizon Communications, Inc., | FOOD PRODUCTS — 0.2% | |||||
6.40%, 2/15/38(3) | 70,000 | 75,227 | General Mills, Inc., 5.65%, | |||
Windstream Corp., 7.875%, | 9/10/12(3) | 120,000 | 131,220 | |||
11/1/17(3) | 220,000 | 219,450 | Kellogg Co., 4.45%, | |||
3,396,167 | 5/30/16(3) | 200,000 | 214,829 | |||
ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 0.3% | Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.00%, | |||||
2/11/13(3) | 70,000 | 77,622 | ||||
Carolina Power & Light Co., | ||||||
5.15%, 4/1/15(3) | 100,000 | 110,390 | Kraft Foods, Inc., 5.375%, | |||
2/10/20(3) | 70,000 | 72,743 | ||||
Cleveland Electric | ||||||
Illuminating Co. (The), | Kraft Foods, Inc., 6.50%, | |||||
5.70%, 4/1/17(3) | 81,000 | 85,794 | 2/9/40(3) | 300,000 | 323,956 | |
Duke Energy Corp., 3.95%, | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., | |||||
9/15/14(3) | 130,000 | 135,204 | 3.50%, 11/1/14(3)(4) | 120,000 | 121,669 | |
EDF SA, 4.60%, 1/27/20(3)(4) | 210,000 | 210,542 | Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., | |||
6.625%, 8/15/39(3)(4) | 130,000 | 130,318 | ||||
Exelon Generation Co. LLC, | ||||||
5.20%, 10/1/19(3) | 150,000 | 155,227 | 1,072,357 | |||
FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 0.1% | |||||
6.05%, 8/15/21(3) | 300,000 | 304,475 | Baxter International, Inc., | |||
Florida Power Corp., 6.35%, | 5.90%, 9/1/16(3) | 130,000 | 148,921 | |||
9/15/37(3) | 230,000 | 259,169 | Baxter International, Inc., | |||
Southern California Edison | 5.375%, 6/1/18(3) | 220,000 | 241,243 | |||
Co., 5.625%, 2/1/36(3) | 60,000 | 62,013 | 390,164 | |||
1,322,814 |
19
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 0.2% | New York Life Global Funding, | |||||
Express Scripts, Inc., 5.25%, | 4.65%, 5/9/13(3)(4) | $ 150,000 | $ 161,076 | |||
6/15/12(3) | $ 230,000 | $ 246,504 | Prudential Financial, Inc., | |||
Express Scripts, Inc., 7.25%, | 7.375%, 6/15/19(3) | 120,000 | 141,584 | |||
6/15/19(3) | 360,000 | 426,351 | Prudential Financial, Inc., | |||
Medco Health Solutions, Inc., | 5.40%, 6/13/35(3) | 270,000 | 248,611 | |||
7.25%, 8/15/13(3) | 270,000 | 308,881 | Travelers Cos., Inc. (The), | |||
Quest Diagnostics, Inc., | 5.90%, 6/2/19(3) | 100,000 | 110,052 | |||
4.75%, 1/30/20(3) | 120,000 | 119,840 | 1,686,469 | |||
1,101,576 | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL(2) | |||||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 0.2% | Expedia, Inc., 7.46%, | |||||
McDonald’s Corp., 5.35%, | 8/15/18(3) | 170,000 | 189,125 | |||
3/1/18(3) | 170,000 | 188,755 | LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS(2) | |||
McDonald’s Corp., 6.30%, | Hasbro, Inc., 6.35%, | |||||
10/15/37(3) | 230,000 | 258,549 | 3/15/40(3) | 150,000 | 155,004 | |
Yum! Brands, Inc., 5.30%, | MACHINERY(2) | |||||
9/15/19(3) | 310,000 | 324,057 | ||||
Deere & Co., 5.375%, | ||||||
771,361 | 10/16/29(3) | 200,000 | 206,103 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.1% | MEDIA — 1.0% | |||||
Jarden Corp., 8.00%, 5/1/16 | 230,000 | 243,513 | CBS Corp., 8.875%, 5/15/19(3) | 120,000 | 148,852 | |
Toll Brothers Finance Corp., | CBS Corp., 5.75%, 4/15/20(3) | 110,000 | 114,514 | |||
6.75%, 11/1/19(3) | 100,000 | 101,149 | ||||
CBS Corp., 5.50%, 5/15/33(3) | 120,000 | 107,809 | ||||
Whirlpool Corp., 8.60%, | ||||||
5/1/14(3) | 60,000 | 70,290 | Comcast Corp., 5.90%, | |||
3/15/16(3) | 189,000 | 208,167 | ||||
414,952 | ||||||
Comcast Corp., 6.40%, | ||||||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 0.1% | 5/15/38(3) | 220,000 | 230,572 | |||
Kimberly-Clark Corp., | Comcast Corp., 6.40%, | |||||
6.125%, 8/1/17(3) | 230,000 | 263,312 | ||||
3/1/40(3) | 80,000 | 83,473 | ||||
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 0.1% | DirecTV Holdings LLC, | |||||
General Electric Co., 5.00%, | 3.55%, 3/15/15(3)(4) | 190,000 | 189,624 | |||
2/1/13(3) | 158,000 | 170,726 | ||||
DirecTV Holdings LLC/ | ||||||
General Electric Co., 5.25%, | DirecTV Financing Co., Inc., | |||||
12/6/17(3) | 230,000 | 245,012 | 4.75%, 10/1/14(3) | 380,000 | 402,186 | |
Hutchison Whampoa | DirecTV Holdings LLC/ | |||||
International 09/16 Ltd., | DirecTV Financing Co., Inc., | |||||
4.625%, 9/11/15(3)(4) | 230,000 | 239,222 | 6.375%, 6/15/15(3) | 210,000 | 218,663 | |
654,960 | Interpublic Group of Cos., Inc. | |||||
INSURANCE — 0.3% | (The), 10.00%, 7/15/17(3) | 300,000 | 344,625 | |||
Allstate Corp. (The), 7.45%, | Lamar Media Corp., 9.75%, | |||||
5/16/19 | 150,000 | 179,312 | 4/1/14(3) | 150,000 | 167,625 | |
American International Group, | News America, Inc., 6.90%, | |||||
Inc., 8.25%, 8/15/18(3) | 100,000 | 106,851 | 8/15/39(3) | 190,000 | 213,083 | |
Hartford Financial Services | Omnicom Group, Inc., 5.90%, | |||||
Group, Inc. (The), 4.00%, | 4/15/16(3) | 290,000 | 322,309 | |||
3/30/15(3) | 110,000 | 109,780 | Time Warner Cable, Inc., | |||
Lincoln National Corp., | 5.40%, 7/2/12(3) | 350,000 | 376,950 | |||
6.25%, 2/15/20(3) | 110,000 | 117,792 | Time Warner Cable, Inc., | |||
MetLife Global Funding I, | 6.75%, 7/1/18(3) | 240,000 | 272,540 | |||
5.125%, 4/10/13(3)(4) | 200,000 | 215,331 | Time Warner, Inc., 5.50%, | |||
MetLife, Inc., 6.75%, 6/1/16(3) | 260,000 | 296,080 | 11/15/11(3) | 195,000 | 206,865 |
20
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Time Warner, Inc., 4.875%, | Pacific Gas & Electric Co., | |||||
3/15/20(3) | $ 190,000 | $ 188,653 | 5.80%, 3/1/37(3) | $ 303,000 | $ 313,392 | |
Time Warner, Inc., 7.625%, | Pacific Gas & Electric Co., | |||||
4/15/31(3) | 70,000 | 81,588 | 6.35%, 2/15/38(3) | 220,000 | 244,690 | |
Time Warner, Inc., 7.70%, | PG&E Corp., 5.75%, 4/1/14(3) | 90,000 | 99,006 | |||
5/1/32(3) | 200,000 | 235,425 | Sempra Energy, 8.90%, | |||
Viacom, Inc., 6.25%, | 11/15/13(3) | 170,000 | 202,619 | |||
4/30/16(3) | 490,000 | 550,556 | Sempra Energy, 6.50%, | |||
Viacom, Inc., 6.875%, | 6/1/16(3) | 100,000 | 113,852 | |||
4/30/36(3) | 160,000 | 175,571 | Sempra Energy, 6.00%, | |||
Virgin Media Secured Finance | 10/15/39(3) | 80,000 | 82,220 | |||
plc, 6.50%, 1/15/18(3)(4) | 190,000 | 191,900 | 2,540,755 | |||
5,031,550 | OFFICE ELECTRONICS — 0.1% | |||||
METALS & MINING — 0.4% | Xerox Corp., 5.65%, | |||||
AngloGold Ashanti Holdings | 5/15/13(3) | 80,000 | 85,938 | |||
plc, 5.375%, 4/15/20(3) | 70,000 | 70,907 | Xerox Corp., 4.25%, | |||
ArcelorMittal, 9.85%, | 2/15/15(3) | 200,000 | 204,644 | |||
6/1/19(3) | 240,000 | 313,046 | 290,582 | |||
Barrick Gold Corp., 6.95%, | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 1.1% | |||||
4/1/19 | 170,000 | 199,510 | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., | ||||||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & | 6.45%, 9/15/36(3) | 250,000 | 260,537 | |||
Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 4/1/17(3) | 210,000 | 235,776 | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., | ||||||
Newmont Mining Corp., | 6.20%, 3/15/40(3) | 100,000 | 101,565 | |||
6.25%, 10/1/39(3) | 220,000 | 230,934 | ||||
Cenovus Energy, Inc., 4.50%, | ||||||
Rio Tinto Finance USA Ltd., | 9/15/14(3)(4) | 140,000 | 147,559 | |||
5.875%, 7/15/13(3) | 290,000 | 320,667 | ||||
ConocoPhillips, 5.75%, | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 5.375%, | 2/1/19(3) | 240,000 | 268,169 | |||
10/1/15(3) | 70,000 | 74,900 | ||||
ConocoPhillips, 6.50%, | ||||||
Teck Resources Ltd., 10.75%, | 2/1/39(3) | 370,000 | 428,731 | |||
5/15/19(3) | 70,000 | 87,500 | ||||
El Paso Corp., 7.875%, | ||||||
Vale Overseas Ltd., 5.625%, | 6/15/12(3) | 110,000 | 117,090 | |||
9/15/19(3) | 90,000 | 94,876 | ||||
Enbridge Energy Partners LP, | ||||||
Xstrata Finance Canada Ltd., | 6.50%, 4/15/18(3) | 130,000 | 147,424 | |||
5.80%, 11/15/16(3)(4) | 197,000 | 211,183 | ||||
Enbridge Energy Partners LP, | ||||||
1,839,299 | 5.20%, 3/15/20(3) | 100,000 | 103,457 | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL(2) | Enterprise Products | |||||
Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc., | Operating LLC, 6.30%, | |||||
5.35%, 3/15/12(3) | 175,000 | 183,750 | 9/15/17(3) | 390,000 | 438,014 | |
MULTI-UTILITIES — 0.5% | EOG Resources, Inc., 5.625%, | |||||
CenterPoint Energy | 6/1/19(3) | 150,000 | 164,960 | |||
Resources Corp., 6.125%, | Hess Corp., 6.00%, 1/15/40(3) | 110,000 | 112,216 | |||
11/1/17(3) | 230,000 | 249,944 | Kerr-McGee Corp., 6.95%, | |||
CenterPoint Energy | 7/1/24(3) | 170,000 | 192,480 | |||
Resources Corp., 6.25%, | Kinder Morgan Energy | |||||
2/1/37(3) | 330,000 | 334,178 | Partners LP, 6.85%, | |||
CMS Energy Corp., 8.75%, | 2/15/20(3) | 200,000 | 230,749 | |||
6/15/19(3) | 180,000 | 206,917 | Kinder Morgan Energy | |||
Dominion Resources, Inc., | Partners LP, 6.50%, 9/1/39(3) | 130,000 | 138,250 | |||
6.40%, 6/15/18(3) | 230,000 | 262,159 | Magellan Midstream Partners | |||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., | LP, 6.55%, 7/15/19(3) | 150,000 | 170,092 | |||
4.20%, 3/1/11(3) | 420,000 | 431,778 |
21
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Motiva Enterprises LLC, | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.2% | |||||
5.75%, 1/15/20(3)(4) | $ 160,000 | $ 171,834 | Digital Realty Trust LP, | |||
Nexen, Inc., 5.65%, | 5.875%, 2/1/20(3)(4) | $ 150,000 | $ 150,961 | |||
5/15/17(3) | 150,000 | 161,546 | ProLogis, 5.625%, 11/15/16(3) | 270,000 | 267,182 | |
Nexen, Inc., 6.40%, | ProLogis, 7.375%, 10/30/19(3) | 120,000 | 124,934 | |||
5/15/37(3) | 440,000 | 466,321 | ||||
ProLogis, 6.875%, 3/15/20(3) | 150,000 | 148,781 | ||||
Petrobras International | ||||||
Finance Co., 5.75%, | Simon Property Group LP, | |||||
1/20/20(3) | 120,000 | 122,480 | 5.75%, 12/1/15(3) | 220,000 | 237,957 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6.00%, | 929,815 | |||||
3/5/20(3)(4) | 120,000 | 124,020 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT(2) | |||
Plains All American Pipeline | AMB Property LP, 6.625%, | |||||
LP/PAA Finance Corp., | 12/1/19(3) | 160,000 | 171,256 | |||
8.75%, 5/1/19(3) | 190,000 | 236,625 | ||||
ROAD & RAIL — 0.1% | ||||||
Shell International Finance | CSX Corp., 7.375%, 2/1/19(3) | 150,000 | 179,841 | |||
BV, 6.375%, 12/15/38(3) | 200,000 | 227,531 | ||||
Shell International Finance | Union Pacific Corp., 5.75%, | |||||
11/15/17(3) | 340,000 | 370,428 | ||||
BV, 5.50%, 3/25/40(3) | 100,000 | 101,738 | ||||
Talisman Energy, Inc., 7.75%, | 550,269 | |||||
6/1/19(3) | 350,000 | 427,629 | SOFTWARE — 0.1% | |||
Williams Partners LP, 5.25%, | Intuit, Inc., 5.75%, 3/15/17(3) | 254,000 | 273,987 | |||
3/15/20(3)(4) | 120,000 | 123,662 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 0.2% | |||
XTO Energy, Inc., 6.50%, | Home Depot, Inc. (The), | |||||
12/15/18(3) | 150,000 | 176,545 | 5.40%, 3/1/16(3) | 350,000 | 384,384 | |
XTO Energy, Inc., 6.10%, | Home Depot, Inc. (The), | |||||
4/1/36(3) | 272,000 | 304,311 | 5.875%, 12/16/36(3) | 75,000 | 75,296 | |
5,665,535 | Lowe’s Cos., Inc., 4.625%, | |||||
PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 0.1% | 4/15/20(3) | 60,000 | 61,589 | |||
International Paper Co., | Staples, Inc., 9.75%, | |||||
9.375%, 5/15/19(3) | 250,000 | 318,511 | 1/15/14(3) | 240,000 | 294,213 | |
International Paper Co., | 815,482 | |||||
7.30%, 11/15/39(3) | 150,000 | 166,838 | TOBACCO(2) | |||
485,349 | Altria Group, Inc., 9.25%, | |||||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 0.4% | 8/6/19(3) | 150,000 | 185,595 | |||
Abbott Laboratories, 5.875%, | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.2% | |||||
5/15/16(3) | 100,000 | 114,394 | America Movil SAB de CV, | |||
AstraZeneca plc, 5.40%, | 5.00%, 10/16/19(3)(4) | 200,000 | 202,177 | |||
9/15/12(3) | 295,000 | 323,405 | America Movil SAB de CV, | |||
AstraZeneca plc, 5.90%, | 5.00%, 3/30/20(3)(4) | 110,000 | 111,305 | |||
9/15/17(3) | 200,000 | 226,835 | Rogers Cable, Inc., 6.25%, | |||
GlaxoSmithKline Capital, Inc., | 6/15/13(3) | 180,000 | 199,826 | |||
4.85%, 5/15/13(3) | 180,000 | 196,064 | Rogers Communications, Inc., | |||
Novartis Capital Corp., 4.40%, | 6.80%, 8/15/18(3) | 120,000 | 138,565 | |||
4/24/20(3) | 190,000 | 194,062 | SBA Telecommunications, | |||
Pfizer, Inc., 7.20%, 3/15/39(3) | 170,000 | 211,697 | Inc., 8.25%, 8/15/19(3)(4) | 120,000 | 129,300 | |
Watson Pharmaceuticals, | Vodafone Group plc, 5.45%, | |||||
Inc., 5.00%, 8/15/14(3) | 410,000 | 431,467 | 6/10/19(3) | 110,000 | 115,995 | |
Wyeth, 5.95%, 4/1/37(3) | 272,000 | 293,691 | 897,168 | |||
1,991,615 | TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS | |||||
(Cost $49,711,379) | 52,880,286 |
22
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
U.S. Government Agency | FNMA, 6.50%, 8/1/37(3) | $ 1,233,977 | $ 1,326,024 | |||
Mortgage-Backed Securities(5) — 10.5% | FNMA, 6.50%, 6/1/47(3) | 58,302 | 62,742 | |||
FNMA, 6.50%, 8/1/47(3) | 259,501 | 279,264 | ||||
FHLMC, 7.00%, 10/1/12(3) | $ 41,928 | $ 44,364 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 8/1/47(3) | 269,229 | 289,732 | ||||
FHLMC, 4.50%, 1/1/19(3) | 1,395,243 | 1,472,621 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 9/1/47(3) | 171,571 | 184,637 | ||||
FHLMC, 6.50%, 1/1/28(3) | 90,438 | 99,435 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 9/1/47(3) | 200,351 | 215,609 | ||||
FHLMC, 5.50%, 12/1/33(3) | 769,587 | 817,814 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 9/1/47(3) | 647,306 | 696,603 | ||||
FHLMC, 5.50%, 1/1/38(3) | 2,083,374 | 2,205,468 | ||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 4/20/26(3) | 151,685 | 169,536 | ||||
FHLMC, 6.00%, 8/1/38(3) | 682,897 | 731,977 | ||||
GNMA, 7.50%, 8/15/26(3) | 80,697 | 91,083 | ||||
FHLMC, 6.50%, 7/1/47(3) | 121,338 | 131,089 | ||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 2/15/28(3) | 32,480 | 36,456 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 5/1/11(3) | 3,732 | 3,891 | ||||
GNMA, 7.50%, 2/15/28(3) | 38,108 | 43,065 | ||||
FNMA, 7.50%, 11/1/11(3) | 43,247 | 45,147 | ||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 12/15/28(3) | 38,627 | 43,355 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 5/1/13(3) | 2,523 | 2,722 | ||||
GNMA, 7.00%, 5/15/31(3) | 170,289 | 191,325 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 5/1/13(3) | 5,154 | 5,560 | ||||
GNMA, 5.50%, 11/15/32(3) | 1,027,051 | 1,099,619 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 6/1/13(3) | 904 | 975 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 6/1/13(3) | 8,106 | 8,744 | TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES | ||||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 6/1/13(3) | 13,194 | 14,232 | (Cost $49,446,376) | 52,579,359 | ||
FNMA, 6.50%, 6/1/13(3) | 13,602 | 14,672 | U.S. Government Agency Securities | |||
FNMA, 6.00%, 1/1/14(3) | 48,183 | 51,884 | and Equivalents — 3.5% | |||
FNMA, 6.00%, 4/1/14(3) | 174,741 | 188,164 | ||||
FIXED-RATE U.S. GOVERNMENT | ||||||
FNMA, 4.50%, 5/1/19(3) | 1,611,239 | 1,698,330 | AGENCY SECURITIES — 2.5% | |||
FNMA, 5.00%, 9/1/20(3) | 2,383,094 | 2,538,265 | FHLB, 1.625%, 3/20/13(3) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,717 | |
FNMA, 6.50%, 1/1/28(3) | 26,128 | 28,514 | FHLB, 1.875%, 6/21/13 | 2,000,000 | 2,009,030 | |
FNMA, 7.00%, 1/1/28(3) | 86,448 | 96,590 | FHLMC, 2.875%, 2/9/15(3) | 2,900,000 | 2,933,350 | |
FNMA, 6.50%, 1/1/29(3) | 103,561 | 114,118 | FNMA, 2.75%, 3/13/14(3) | 4,000,000 | 4,088,908 | |
FNMA, 7.50%, 7/1/29(3) | 163,283 | 184,533 | FNMA, 5.00%, 2/13/17(3) | 2,200,000 | 2,418,605 | |
FNMA, 7.50%, 9/1/30(3) | 54,514 | 61,596 | 12,450,610 | |||
FNMA, 6.50%, 9/1/31(3) | 84,772 | 93,413 | GOVERNMENT-BACKED CORPORATE BONDS(6) — 1.0% | |||
FNMA, 7.00%, 9/1/31(3) | 35,031 | 39,228 | Citigroup Funding, Inc., | |||
1.875%, 11/15/12(3) | 1,800,000 | 1,821,726 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 1/1/32(3) | 146,986 | 161,970 | ||||
FNMA, 7.00%, 6/1/32(3) | 375,321 | 420,385 | GMAC, Inc., 1.75%, | |||
10/30/12(3) | 2,000,000 | 2,018,186 | ||||
FNMA, 6.50%, 8/1/32(3) | 154,468 | 170,214 | ||||
State Street Bank and Trust | ||||||
FNMA, 5.50%, 6/1/33(3) | 1,039,415 | 1,103,577 | Co., 1.85%, 3/15/11(3) | 1,000,000 | 1,011,987 | |
FNMA, 5.50%, 7/1/33(3) | 1,300,641 | 1,380,929 | 4,851,899 | |||
FNMA, 5.50%, 8/1/33(3) | 1,193,089 | 1,266,738 | TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||
FNMA, 5.50%, 9/1/33(3) | 753,311 | 799,812 | SECURITIES AND EQUIVALENTS | |||
(Cost $16,933,756) | 17,302,509 | |||||
FNMA, 5.00%, 11/1/33(3) | 3,793,092 | 3,961,884 | ||||
FNMA, 5.50%, 1/1/34(3) | 5,493,665 | 5,833,613 | Commercial Mortgage-Backed | |||
Securities(5) — 1.2% | ||||||
FNMA, 4.50%, 9/1/35(3) | 3,541,881 | 3,604,455 | ||||
FNMA, 5.00%, 2/1/36(3) | 4,050,043 | 4,216,348 | Commercial Mortgage | |||
Pass-Through Certificates, | ||||||
FNMA, 5.50%, 4/1/36(3) | 1,687,864 | 1,784,670 | Series 2004 LB3A, Class A4 | |||
FNMA, 5.50%, 5/1/36(3) | 3,362,250 | 3,555,089 | SEQ, VRN, 5.23%, 5/3/10(3) | 600,000 | 624,595 | |
FNMA, 5.50%, 2/1/37(3) | 1,163,389 | 1,228,296 | ||||
FNMA, 6.00%, 7/1/37 | 7,200,430 | 7,668,983 |
23
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Commercial Mortgage | Collateralized Mortgage | |||||
Pass-Through Certificates, | ||||||
Series 2005 F10A, Class A1, | Obligations(5) — 0.8% | |||||
VRN, 0.35%, 5/17/10, resets | PRIVATE SPONSOR COLLATERALIZED | |||||
monthly off the 1-month | MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS — 0.5% | |||||
LIBOR plus 0.10% with | Banc of America Alternative | |||||
no caps(3)(4) | $ 46,428 | $ 45,458 | ||||
Loan Trust, Series 2007-2, | ||||||
Credit Suisse Mortgage | Class 2A4, 5.75%, 6/25/37(3) | $ 736,078 | $ 535,452 | |||
Capital Certificates, Series | Countrywide Home Loan | |||||
2007 TF2A, Class A1, VRN, | Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, | |||||
0.43%, 5/17/10, resets | Series 2005-17, Class 1A11, | |||||
monthly off the 1-month | 5.50%, 9/25/35(3) | 477,275 | 456,790 | |||
LIBOR plus 0.18% with | ||||||
no caps(3)(4) | 584,918 | 519,653 | Countrywide Home Loan | |||
Mortgage Pass-Through Trust, | ||||||
Greenwich Capital | Series 2007-16, Class A1, | |||||
Commercial Funding Corp., | 6.50%, 10/25/37(3) | 403,011 | 349,344 | |||
Series 2006 FL4A, Class A1, | ||||||
VRN, 0.34%, 5/5/10, resets | Credit Suisse First Boston | |||||
monthly off the 1-month | Mortgage Securities Corp., | |||||
LIBOR plus 0.09% with | Series 2003 AR28, Class 2A1, | |||||
no caps(3)(4) | 79,625 | 75,039 | VRN, 3.05%, 5/3/10(3) | 692,963 | 662,690 | |
GS Mortgage Securities | MASTR Alternative Loans | |||||
Corp. II, Series 2005 GG4, | Trust, Series 2003-8, | |||||
Class A4A SEQ, 4.75%, | Class 4A1, 7.00%, 12/25/33(3) | 61,655 | 62,032 | |||
7/10/39(3) | 1,000,000 | 1,023,628 | Wells Fargo Mortgage- | |||
LB-UBS Commercial | Backed Securities Trust, | |||||
Mortgage Trust, Series | Series 2005-17, Class 1A1, | |||||
2004 C2, Class A4 SEQ, | 5.50%, 1/25/36 | 431,550 | 414,319 | |||
4.37%, 3/15/36(3) | 1,000,000 | 1,013,392 | 2,480,627 | |||
LB-UBS Commercial | U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY COLLATERALIZED | |||||
Mortgage Trust, Series | MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS — 0.3% | |||||
2005 C2, Class A2 SEQ, | FHLMC, Series 77, Class H, | |||||
4.82%, 4/15/30(3) | 870,688 | 870,679 | 8.50%, 9/15/20(3) | 164,791 | 182,989 | |
Merrill Lynch Floating Trust, | FHLMC, Series 2926, | |||||
Series 2006-1, Class A1, | Class EW SEQ, 5.00%, | |||||
VRN, 0.32%, 5/17/10, resets | 1/15/25(3) | 1,200,000 | 1,271,998 | |||
monthly off the 1-month | ||||||
LIBOR plus 0.07% with | 1,454,987 | |||||
no caps(3)(4) | 536,869 | 502,219 | TOTAL COLLATERALIZED | |||
Morgan Stanley Capital I, | MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS | |||||
Series 2003 T11, Class A3 | (Cost $4,026,280) | 3,935,614 | ||||
SEQ, 4.85%, 6/13/41(3) | 405,558 | 413,500 | Municipal Securities — 0.6% | |||
Wachovia Bank Commercial | California GO, (Building | |||||
Mortgage Trust, Series | Bonds), 7.30%, 10/1/39(3) | 400,000 | 430,636 | |||
2004 C11, Class A3, 4.72%, | ||||||
1/15/41(3) | 300,000 | 304,199 | Illinois GO, (Taxable Pension), | |||
5.10%, 6/1/33(3) | 300,000 | 259,758 | ||||
Wachovia Bank Commercial | ||||||
Mortgage Trust, Series | Illinois GO, Series 2010-3, | |||||
2006 C23, Class A4, VRN, | (Building Bonds), 6.73%, | |||||
5.42%, 5/3/10(3) | 500,000 | 508,810 | 4/1/35 | 110,000 | 114,303 | |
TOTAL COMMERCIAL | Missouri Highways & | |||||
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES | Transportation Commission | |||||
(Cost $5,986,517) | 5,901,172 | Rev., (Building Bonds), | ||||
5.45%, 5/1/33(3) | 130,000 | 130,424 |
24
Balanced | ||||||
Shares/ | Shares/ | |||||
Principal | Principal | |||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||
Municipal Electric Auth. | Sovereign Governments & | |||||
of Georgia Rev., (Building | ||||||
Bonds), 6.64%, 4/1/57(3) | $ 190,000 | $ 201,398 | Agencies — 0.2% | |||
New Jersey State Turnpike | BRAZIL — 0.1% | |||||
Auth. Rev., Series 2009 F, | Brazilian Government | |||||
(Building Bonds), 7.41%, | International Bond, 5.875%, | |||||
1/1/40(3) | 100,000 | 122,219 | 1/15/19(3) | $ 340,000 | $ 366,690 | |
New York GO, (Building | CANADA(2) | |||||
Bonds), 5.97%, 3/1/36(3) | 230,000 | 237,312 | ||||
Hydro Quebec, 8.40%, | ||||||
New York State Dormitory | 1/15/22(3) | 145,000 | 190,731 | |||
Auth. Rev., (Building Bonds), | ||||||
5.63%, 3/15/39(3) | 180,000 | 181,632 | MEXICO — 0.1% | |||
Oregon State Department of | United Mexican States, | |||||
5.95%, 3/19/19(3) | 420,000 | 454,020 | ||||
Transportation Highway | ||||||
Usertax Rev., Series 2010 A, | United Mexican States, | |||||
(Building Bonds), 5.83%, | 6.05%, 1/11/40(3) | 60,000 | 59,100 | |||
11/15/34(3) | 70,000 | 74,004 | 513,120 | |||
San Diego County Water | TOTAL SOVEREIGN | |||||
Auth. Rev., Series 2010 B, | GOVERNMENTS & AGENCIES | |||||
(Building Bonds), 6.14%, | (Cost $1,009,819) | 1,070,541 | ||||
5/1/49(3) | 220,000 | 229,027 | ||||
Asset-Backed Securities(2)(5) | ||||||
Texas GO, (Building Bonds), | ||||||
5.52%, 4/1/39(3) | 340,000 | 359,176 | CNH Equipment Trust, Series | |||
University of California Rev., | 2007 C, Class A3A SEQ, | |||||
(Building Bonds), 5.77%, | 5.21%, 12/15/11(3) | |||||
5/15/43(3) | 230,000 | 233,064 | (Cost $15,511) | 15,511 | 15,541 | |
Utah GO, Series 2009 D, | Temporary Cash Investments — 0.8% | |||||
(Building Bonds), 4.55%, | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||||
7/1/24(3) | 380,000 | 385,700 | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL SECURITIES | Agency Shares | |||||
(Cost $2,891,920) | 2,958,653 | (Cost $4,059,630) | 4,059,630 | 4,059,630 | ||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||||||
SECURITIES — 99.8% | ||||||
(Cost $436,015,786) | 500,234,817 | |||||
OTHER ASSETS AND | ||||||
LIABILITIES — 0.2% | 961,190 | |||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $501,196,007 |
25
Balanced | |||||
Futures Contracts | |||||
Underlying Face | |||||
Contracts Purchased | Expiration Date | Amount at Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||
36 | U.S. Long Bond | June 2010 | $4,286,250 | $ 97,465 | |
30 | U.S. Treasury 10-Year Notes | June 2010 | 3,537,188 | 55,714 | |
$7,823,438 | $153,179 | ||||
Underlying Face | |||||
Contracts Sold | Expiration Date | Amount at Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||
113 | U.S. Treasury 2-Year Notes | June 2010 | $24,586,328 | $(70,097) | |
Swap Agreements | |||||
Notional Amount Description of Agreement | Premiums Paid (Received) | Value | |||
CREDIT DEFAULT – BUY PROTECTION | |||||
$2,650,000 Pay quarterly a fixed rate equal to 0.12% per annum | — | $81,111 | |||
multiplied by the notional amount and receive from | |||||
Barclays Bank plc upon each default event of Pfizer, | |||||
Inc., par value of the proportional notional amount of | |||||
Pfizer, Inc., 4.65%, 3/1/18. Expires March 2017. |
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |
Equivalent = Security whose principal payments are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States | |
FHLB = Federal Home Loan Bank | |
FHLMC = Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation | |
FNMA = Federal National Mortgage Association | |
GMAC = General Motors Acceptance Corporation | |
GNMA = Government National Mortgage Association | |
GO = General Obligation | |
LB-UBS = Lehman Brothers, Inc. — UBS AG | |
LIBOR = London Interbank Offered Rate | |
MASTR = Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc. | |
resets = The frequency with which a security’s coupon changes, based on current market conditions or an underlying index. The more frequently a | |
security resets, the less risk the investor is taking that the coupon will vary significantly from current market rates. | |
SEQ = Sequential Payer | |
SPDR = Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipts | |
VRN = Variable Rate Note. Interest reset date is indicated. Rate shown is effective at the period end. | |
(1) | Non-income producing. |
(2) | Category is less than 0.05% of total net assets. |
(3) | Security, or a portion thereof, has been segregated for futures contracts and/or swap agreements. At the period end, the aggregate value of |
securities pledged was $32,491,000 | |
(4) | Security was purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 or is a private placement and, unless registered under the Act or |
exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. The aggregate value of these securities at the period end | |
was $5,765,945 which represented 1.2% of total net assets. | |
(5) | Final maturity indicated, unless otherwise noted. |
(6) | The debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and is backed by |
the full faith and credit of the United States. The expiration date of the FDIC’s guarantee is the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or | |
December 31, 2012. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $436,015,786) | $500,234,817 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 274,375 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 326,906 | ||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 44,438 | ||
Swap agreements, at value | 81,111 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 1,781,697 | ||
502,743,344 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 833,830 | ||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 322,473 | ||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 21,188 | ||
Accrued management fees | 369,846 | ||
1,547,337 | |||
Net Assets | $501,196,007 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $496,582,734 | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 618,115 | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (60,388,066) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 64,383,224 | ||
$501,196,007 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | 494,058,465 | 33,373,146 | $14.80 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | 7,137,542 | 482,055 | $14.81 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
27
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $4,367) | $ 2,799,582 |
Interest | 3,926,427 |
6,726,009 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 2,169,943 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 6,583 |
Other expenses | 17 |
2,176,543 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 4,549,466 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 20,742,373 |
Futures contract transactions | (451,376) |
Swap agreement transactions | (1,607) |
20,289,390 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 21,532,903 |
Futures contracts | 83,082 |
Swap agreements | 1,648 |
21,617,633 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 41,907,023 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $46,456,489 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
28
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 4,549,466 | $ 9,562,286 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 20,289,390 | (66,504,105) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 21,617,633 | 97,846,814 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 46,456,489 | 40,904,995 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (4,798,904) | (9,841,987) |
Institutional Class | (72,560) | (144,934) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (4,871,464) | (9,986,921) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (5,821,304) | (11,382,316) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 35,763,721 | 19,535,758 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 465,432,286 | 445,896,528 |
End of period | $501,196,007 | $465,432,286 |
Undistributed net investment income | $618,115 | $940,113 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
29
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Balanced Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth and current income. The fund pursues its objective by investing approximately 60% of its assets in equity securities and the remainder in bonds and other fixed-income securities. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class and the Institutional Class. The share classes differ principally in their respective distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Debt securities maturing in greater than 60 days at the time of purchase are valued at current market value as provided by a commercial pricing service or at the mean of the most recent bid and asked prices. Debt securities maturing within 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at cost, plus or minus any amortized disc ount or premium. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence.
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes paydown gain (loss) and accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
30
When-Issued and Forward Commitments — The fund may engage in securities transactions on a when-issued or forward commitment basis. In these transactions, the securities’ prices and yields are fixed on the date of the commitment. In a when-issued transaction, the payment and delivery are scheduled for a future date and during this period, securities are subject to market fluctuations. In a forward commitment transaction, the fund may sell a security and at the same time make a commitment to purchase the same security at a future date at a specified price. Conversely, the fund may purchase a security and at the same time make a commitment to sell the same security at a future date at a specified price. These types of transactions are executed simultaneously in what are known as “roll” transactions. The fund w ill segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet the purchase price. The fund accounts for “roll” transactions as purchases and sales; as such these transactions may increase portfolio turnover.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income are declared and paid quarterly. Distributions from net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
31
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if any, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 0.900% for the Investor Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 0.90% and 0.70% for the Investor Class and Institutional Class, respectively.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, American Century Investment Services, Inc., and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, totaled $180,226,936, of which $48,311,300 represented U.S. Treasury and Agency obligations. Sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, totaled $187,242,954, of which $47,561,426 represented U.S. Treasury and Agency obligations.
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 250,000,000 | 250,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,656,442 | $ 23,807,587 | 2,879,604 | $ 35,959,986 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 324,483 | 4,669,077 | 781,150 | 9,583,804 |
Redeemed | (2,411,292) | (34,626,888) | (4,611,319) | (56,808,243) |
(430,367) | (6,150,224) | (950,565) | (11,264,453) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | ||
Sold | 47,213 | 690,792 | 85,033 | 1,029,943 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 5,042 | 72,560 | 11,787 | 144,934 |
Redeemed | (30,158) | (434,432) | (104,985) | (1,292,740) |
22,097 | 328,920 | (8,165) | (117,863) | |
Net increase (decrease) | (408,270) | $ (5,821,304) | (958,730) | $(11,382,316) |
32
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $302,334,049 | — | — |
U.S. Treasury Securities | — | $ 57,197,463 | — |
Corporate Bonds | — | 52,880,286 | — |
U.S. Government Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 52,579,359 | — |
U.S. Government Agency Securities and Equivalents | — | 17,302,509 | — |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | — | 5,901,172 | — |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | — | 3,935,614 | — |
Municipal Securities | — | 2,958,653 | — |
Sovereign Governments & Agencies | — | 1,070,541 | — |
Asset-Backed Securities | — | 15,541 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 4,059,630 | — | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $306,393,679 | $193,841,138 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Futures Contracts | $83,082 | — | — |
Swap Agreements | — | $81,111 | — |
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Other Financial Instruments | $83,082 | $81,111 | — |
33
6. Derivative Instruments
Credit Risk — The fund is subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of a bond generally declines as the credit quality of its issuer declines. Credit default swap agreements enable a fund to buy/sell protection against a credit event of a specific issuer or index. A fund may attempt to enhance returns by selling protection or attempt to mitigate credit risk by buying protection. The buyer/ seller of credit protection against a security or basket of securities may pay/receive an up-front or periodic payment to compensate for/against potential default events. A fund will segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet requirements. Swap agreements are valued daily at current market value as provided by a c ommercial pricing service and/or independent brokers. Changes in value, including the periodic amounts of interest to be paid or received on swap agreements, are recorded as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap agreements. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon receipt or payment of a periodic settlement or termination of swap agreements. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of swap agreements are a component of net realized gain (loss) on swap agreement transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on swap agreements, respectively. The risks of entering into swap agreements include the possible lack of liquidity, failure of the counterparty to meet its obligations, and that there may be unfavorable changes in the underlying investments or instruments. The credit risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
Equity Price Risk — The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on an equity index in order to manage its exposure to changes in market conditions. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund is required to deposit either cash or securities in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (initial margin). Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. During the period, the fund infrequently purchased equity price risk derivative instruments for temporary investment purposes.
Interest Rate Risk — The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of bonds generally declines as interest rates rise. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on a bond index or a specific underlying security. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund will segregate cash, cash equivalents or other appropriate liquid securities on its records in amounts sufficient to meet requirements. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss when the futures contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. The interest rate risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
34
Value of Derivative Instruments as of April 30, 2010 | ||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||
Location on Statement | Location on Statement | |||
Type of Derivative | of Assets and Liabilities | Value | of Assets and Liabilities | Value |
Credit Risk | Swap agreements | $ 81,111 | Swap agreements | — |
Interest Rate Risk | Receivable for variation margin | 44,438 | Payable for variation margin | $21,188 |
on futures contracts | on futures contracts | |||
$125,549 | $21,188 |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended April 30, 2010
Change in Net Unrealized | ||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||
Location on Statement | Location on Statement | |||
Type of Derivative | of Operations | Value | of Operations | Value |
Credit Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | $ (1,607) | Change in net unrealized | $ 1,648 |
swap agreement transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on swap agreements | ||||
Equity Price Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | (336,473) | Change in net unrealized | — |
futures contract transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on futures contracts | ||||
Interest Rate Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | (114,903) | Change in net unrealized | 83,082 |
futures contract transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on futures contracts | ||||
$(452,983) | $ 84,730 |
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
35
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $446,167,892 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $57,786,925 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (3,720,000) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $54,066,925 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(68,611,958), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(7,757,812) and $(60,854,146) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
36
Financial Highlights |
Balanced | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $13.58 | $12.66 | $17.47 | $17.03 | $16.52 | $15.73 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.31 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.23 | 0.93 | (3.69) | 1.11 | 1.40 | 0.77 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.36 | 1.21 | (3.32) | 1.46 | 1.75 | 1.08 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.14) | (0.29) | (0.37) | (0.36) | (0.35) | (0.29) | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.12) | (0.66) | (0.89) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.14) | (0.29) | (1.49) | (1.02) | (1.24) | (0.29) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $14.80 | $13.58 | $12.66 | $17.47 | $17.03 | $16.52 | |
Total Return(3) | 10.07% | 9.81% | (20.52)% | 8.92% | 11.04% | 6.89% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.90%(4) | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.88%(4) | 2.21% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 2.13% | 1.89% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 110% | 153% | 161% | 197% | 206% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $494 | $459 | $440 | $636 | $637 | $615 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
37
Balanced | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $13.59 | $12.66 | $17.47 | $17.04 | $16.53 | $15.73 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.33 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.23 | 0.94 | (3.68) | 1.09 | 1.40 | 0.80 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.38 | 1.24 | (3.29) | 1.48 | 1.78 | 1.13 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.16) | (0.31) | (0.40) | (0.39) | (0.38) | (0.33) | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.12) | (0.66) | (0.89) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.16) | (0.31) | (1.52) | (1.05) | (1.27) | (0.33) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $14.81 | $13.59 | $12.66 | $17.47 | $17.04 | $16.53 | |
Total Return(3) | 10.18% | 10.11% | (20.37)% | 9.07% | 11.26% | 7.17% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.70%(4) | 0.70% | 0.70% | 0.70% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.08%(4) | 2.41% | 2.62% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.09% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 110% | 153% | 161% | 197% | 206% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $7,138 | $6,249 | $5,927 | $1,338 | $1,228 | $1,237 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
38
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
39
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
40
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
41
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management
42
Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data
43
compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
44
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
45
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Barclays Capital U.S. Agencies Index is the agencies component of the U.S. Aggregate: Government-Related Index.
The Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index represents securities that are taxable, registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and U.S. dollar-denominated. The index covers the U.S. investment-grade fixed-rate bond market, with index components for government and corporate securities, mortgage pass-through securities, and asset-backed securities.
The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate Investment-Grade Index is the Corporate component of the U.S. Credit Index, which includes publicly issued U.S. and foreign debentures and secured notes that are SEC-registered and meet the specified maturity, liquidity, and quality requirements.
The Barclays Capital U.S. Mortgage-Backed Securities Index is a component of the U.S. Aggregate Index and covers the mortgage-backed pass-through securities of Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FHLMC).
The Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Index includes public obligations of the U.S. Treasury with a remaining maturity of one year or more and excludes zero coupon strips.
The blended index is considered the benchmark for Balanced. It combines two widely known indices in proportion to the asset mix of the fund. Accordingly, 60% of the index is represented by the S&P 500 Index, which reflects the approximately 60% of the fund’s assets invested in stocks. The old blended index’s remaining 40% was represented by Citigroup US Broad Investment-Grade Bond Index, which reflects the roughly 40% of the fund’s assets invested in fixed-income securities. However, the new blended index’s remaining 40% is represented by the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Index. This reflects a change in the portfolio management analytics software used by American Century Investments’ fixed-income teams. The investment process is unchanged.
The Citigroup US Broad Investment-Grade (BIG) Bond Index is a market-capitalization-weighted index that includes fixed-rate Treasury, government-sponsored, mortgage, asset-backed, and investment-grade issues with a maturity of one year or longer.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
46
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The S&P 500 Index is a market value-weighted index of the stocks of 500 publicly traded U.S. companies chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation that are considered to be leading firms in dominant industries. Each stock’s weight in the index is proportionate to its market value. Created by Standard & Poor’s, it is considered to be a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance.
47
Notes |
48
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68434
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Select Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Select | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 14 |
Statement of Operations | 15 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 16 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 17 |
Financial Highlights | 24 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 30 |
Additional Information | 36 |
Index Definitions | 37 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity — Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Select | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWCIX | 12.97% | 35.11% | 1.96% | -2.47% | 12.15% | 6/30/71(2) | |
Russell 1000 | ||||||||
Growth Index(3) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 4.05% | -3.64% | N/A(4) | — | |
Institutional Class | TWSIX | 13.11% | 35.39% | 2.16% | -2.27% | 4.04% | 3/13/97 | |
A Class(5) | TWCAX | 8/8/97 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 12.82% | 34.75% | 1.70% | -2.71% | 2.10% | |||
With sales charge* | 6.32% | 26.99% | 0.50% | -3.29% | 1.62% | |||
B Class | ABSLX | 1/31/03 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 12.42% | 33.76% | 0.93% | — | 3.72% | |||
With sales charge* | 7.42% | 29.76% | 0.74% | — | 3.72% | |||
C Class | ACSLX | 1/31/03 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 12.41% | 33.71% | 0.94% | — | 3.73% | |||
With sales charge* | 11.41% | 33.71% | 0.94% | — | 3.73% | |||
R Class | ASERX | 12.70% | 34.44% | — | — | -0.25% | 7/29/05 | |
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | ||||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | ||||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | ||||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | ||||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Although the fund’s actual inception date was 10/31/58, this inception date corresponds with the investment advisor’s implementation of its | |||||||
current investment philosophy and practices. | ||||||||
(3) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(4) | Benchmark began 12/29/78. | |||||||
(5) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Select
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.00% | 0.80% | 1.25% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 1.50% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Select
Portfolio Managers: Keith Lee and Michael Li
Performance Summary
Select returned 12.97%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, compared with the 15.79% return of its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, and the 15.66%** return of the S&P 500 Index, a broader market measure.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of stabilizing economic conditions and improving investor sentiment. Price momentum and growth, two factors that the Select team looks for in portfolio holdings, were not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to drive market strength. As a result, Select’s focus on high-quality companies hurt relative performance.
Within the portfolio, security selection in the health care and financials sectors accounted for the bulk of Select’s underperformance relative to the benchmark, although the portfolio derived positive absolute results from these sectors. Stock selection in the industrials and materials sectors also trimmed relative returns. Partially offsetting those relative losses, effective stock decisions in the energy sector modestly helped relative performance.
Health Care, Financials Detracted from Relative Returns
The health care sector was a key source of underperformance relative to the benchmark. Holdings in the biotechnology industry included a detrimental overweight stake in Gilead Sciences, Inc. Although the drugmaker reported a 45% increase in quarterly profit for the first quarter of 2010, it lowered guidance for the upcoming 12-month period due to recently passed health care reform legislation. Similarly, within the health care equipment industry, a significant overweight stake in Baxter International hurt absolute and relative returns as the medical device company revised guidance downward to account for health care reform. Health care provider Medco Health Solutions Inc. also experienced a share price decline late in the reporting period due to fear of increasing price competition.
The financials sector also was home to underperforming holdings. Detrimental positions in the diversified financial services industry included JPMorgan Chase. Although the company has gained ground in the past 12 months, its share price stumbled during the period amid concerns about the potential impact of pending financial reforms. Late in the period, though, improved earnings levels for the first quarter of 2010 helped its share price recover some of those losses. Elsewhere in the financials sector, poor stock decisions in the insurance industry detracted from relative performance.
* All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
**The S&P 500 Index average annual returns were 38.84%, 2.63% and -0.19% for the one-, five- and 10-year periods ended April 30, 2010, respectively, and 10.00% since the fund’s inception.
7
Select
Industrials, Materials Lagged Benchmark
Within the industrials sector, Select avoided the airlines industry altogether. This decision proved detrimental as the industry group rebounded during the period as demand increased. Likewise, avoiding the air freight and logistics industry, as well as railroad stocks, hurt relative performance. Increased industrial production during the reporting period translated into rising shipping volumes, lifting the share prices of these companies in the benchmark. Select did not participate in this rebound.
Much of the underperformance in the materials sector came from the chemicals industry, and, in particular, a single company: agricultural products maker Monsanto. The company faced intense price competition with its Round-Up herbicide business, as well as tepid demand for its new seed products because of relatively high prices. However, Monsanto is making some pricing adjustments to improve sales of its new seeds, and we continue to believe that the company is well positioned to benefit from the long-term trend of growing global demand for food and agriculture.
Information Technology Hurt, but Some Holdings Helped
Select’s holdings in the information technology sector collectively underper-formed the benchmark. Some positions, however, contributed meaningfully to positive absolute and relative performance. Select maintained an overweight stake in internet search company Baidu, which represented the largest single contribution to relative returns for the period. Baidu’s share price gained 82% as it demonstrated strong growth in paid advertising for its traditional and wireless internet search platforms in China.
Energy, Utilities Helped
The energy sector was a source of outperformance relative to Select’s benchmark. Within the oil, gas, and consumable fuels industry group, Select benefited from avoiding diversified oil company Exxon Mobil, whose share price declined for the period. Select maintained a meaningful stake in Occidental Petroleum, which is not a member of the benchmark. The oil and gas exploration and production company has good production growth and a low risk profile compared with its peers, with an emphasis on developing existing oil wells rather than on new exploration.
Select also sidestepped the utilities sector altogether. This decision benefited relative returns as the sector lagged most other sectors in the benchmark.
Starting Point for Next Reporting Period
The environment for growth and momentum oriented investment styles continued to be challenging during the reporting period. Select’s investment process, which emphasizes these characteristics, experienced a significant headwind as a result. Going forward, we remain confident in our investment beliefs that stocks which exhibit high quality, accelerating fundamentals, positive relative strength, and attractive valuations will outperform in the long term.
8
Select | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Apple, Inc. | 5.2% |
Google, Inc., Class A | 4.0% |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2.8% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2.8% |
Microsoft Corp. | 2.6% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.5% |
EMC Corp. | 2.5% |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. | 2.3% |
TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 2.2% |
General Dynamics Corp. | 2.2% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 12.0% |
Software | 7.2% |
Pharmaceuticals | 5.8% |
Internet Software & Services | 5.7% |
Food & Staples Retailing | 4.8% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 89.4% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 9.7% |
Total Common Stocks | 99.1% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 0.5% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.4% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,129.70 | $5.28 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,131.10 | $4.23 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,128.20 | $6.60 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,124.20 | $10.53 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,124.10 | $10.53 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,127.00 | $7.91 | 1.50% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Select | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 99.1% | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 4.8% | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 3.8% | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 596,500 | $ 35,241,220 | |||
General Dynamics Corp. | 505,100 | $ 38,569,436 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 913,500 | 49,009,275 | |
Rockwell Collins, Inc. | 431,104 | 28,021,760 | 84,250,495 | |||
66,591,196 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.0% | |||||
BEVERAGES — 2.6% | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 339,000 | 17,495,790 | |||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 469,600 | 25,100,120 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 2.8% | |||
Diageo plc | 1,251,800 | 21,347,921 | Baxter International, Inc. | 234,900 | 11,091,978 | |
46,448,041 | Medtronic, Inc. | 587,400 | 25,663,506 | |||
Mindray Medical | ||||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 1.8% | International Ltd. ADR | 353,000 | 13,484,600 | |||
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 802,000 | 31,815,340 | ||||
50,240,084 | ||||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 3.5% | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 4.3% | |||||
Bank of New York | Medco Health | |||||
Mellon Corp. (The) | 1,125,900 | 35,049,267 | Solutions, Inc.(1) | 700,115 | 41,250,776 | |
Franklin Resources, Inc. | 229,300 | 26,516,252 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 1,124,374 | 34,079,776 | |
61,565,519 | 75,330,552 | |||||
CHEMICALS — 2.5% | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 3.8% | |||||
Monsanto Co. | 449,900 | 28,370,694 | International Game | |||
Potash Corp. of | Technology | 1,572,500 | 33,148,300 | |||
Saskatchewan, Inc. | 145,000 | 16,022,500 | McDonald’s Corp. | 475,655 | 33,576,486 | |
44,393,194 | 66,724,786 | |||||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 4.4% | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 1.4% | |||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 1,627,456 | 43,811,116 | Harman International | |||
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 892,000 | 34,556,080 | Industries, Inc.(1) | 626,400 | 24,730,272 | |
78,367,196 | HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 1.7% | |||||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 12.0% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 353,400 | 29,720,940 | |||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 352,000 | 91,914,240 | INSURANCE — 1.0% | |||
EMC Corp.(1) | 2,285,226 | 43,442,146 | Travelers Cos., Inc. (The) | 352,800 | 17,901,072 | |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 940,625 | 48,884,281 | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.7% | |||
Teradata Corp.(1) | 960,900 | 27,933,363 | Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 88,500 | 12,129,810 | |
212,174,030 | INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 5.7% | |||||
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 2.5% | Baidu, Inc. ADR(1) | 42,800 | 29,502,040 | |||
CME Group, Inc. | 52,200 | 17,143,002 | Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 133,700 | 70,251,328 | |
Hong Kong Exchanges | 99,753,368 | |||||
and Clearing Ltd. | 628,500 | 10,288,936 | IT SERVICES — 2.0% | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 405,900 | 17,283,222 | MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 143,600 | 35,618,544 | |
44,715,160 | LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 1.7% | |||||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 4.1% | Hasbro, Inc. | 761,800 | 29,222,648 | |||
ABB Ltd. ADR(1) | 1,850,600 | 35,457,496 | MACHINERY — 1.1% | |||
Emerson Electric Co. | 712,700 | 37,224,321 | Parker-Hannifin Corp. | 274,000 | 18,955,320 | |
72,681,817 | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 1.8% | |||||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 2.9% | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 364,000 | 32,272,240 | |||
National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 125,000 | 5,503,750 | ||||
Schlumberger Ltd. | 412,367 | 29,451,251 | ||||
Transocean Ltd.(1) | 213,300 | 15,453,585 | ||||
50,408,586 |
12
Select | |||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | ||||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 5.8% | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 2.7% | ||||||
Abbott Laboratories | 477,200 | $ 24,413,552 | Coach, Inc. | 756,900 | $ 31,600,575 | ||
Allergan, Inc. | 533,800 | 33,997,722 | Hanesbrands, Inc.(1) | 570,700 | 16,247,829 | ||
Johnson & Johnson | 413,800 | 26,607,340 | 47,848,404 | ||||
Teva Pharmaceutical | TOBACCO — 1.6% | ||||||
Industries Ltd. ADR | 287,100 | 16,861,383 | Philip Morris | ||||
101,879,997 | International, Inc. | 570,000 | 27,975,600 | ||||
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — 1.4% | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||||
Robert Half | (Cost $1,470,918,626) | 1,747,774,019 | |||||
International, Inc. | 504,900 | 13,824,162 | Temporary Cash Investments — 0.5% | ||||
Verisk Analytics, Inc., | |||||||
Class A(1) | 383,100 | 10,734,462 | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||||||
24,558,624 | Agency Shares | 9,545 | 9,545 | ||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | ||||||
EQUIPMENT — 2.2% | Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||||||
Linear Technology Corp. | 1,261,200 | 37,911,672 | U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, | ||||
SOFTWARE — 7.2% | 2/15/38, valued at $8,634,699), in a joint | ||||||
Adobe Systems, Inc.(1) | 1,005,800 | 33,784,822 | trading account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, | ||||
due 5/3/10 (Delivery value $8,400,105) | 8,400,000 | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. | 1,516,700 | 46,320,018 | TOTAL TEMPORARY | ||||
Nintendo Co. Ltd. | 39,600 | 13,309,172 | CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||
Nuance Communications, | (Cost $8,409,545) | 8,409,545 | |||||
Inc.(1) | 628,000 | 11,473,560 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||||
Oracle Corp. | 888,000 | 22,945,920 | SECURITIES — 99.6% | ||||
127,833,492 | (Cost $1,479,328,171) | 1,756,183,564 | |||||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 4.3% | OTHER ASSETS AND | ||||||
LIABILITIES — 0.4% | 7,710,814 | ||||||
Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 1,377,500 | 37,357,800 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $1,763,894,378 | |||
TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 839,500 | 38,902,430 | |||||
76,260,230 | |||||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||||||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||
7,135,260 | GBP for USD | 5/28/10 | $10,916,163 | $(81,199) | |||
625,680,000 | JPY for USD | 5/28/10 | 6,662,279 | 53,115 | |||
$17,578,442 | $(28,084) | ||||||
(Value on Settlement Date $17,550,358) | |||||||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||||||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||||||
GBP = British Pound | |||||||
JPY = Japanese Yen | |||||||
USD = United States Dollar | |||||||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
13
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||
Assets | ||||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $1,479,328,171) | $1,756,183,564 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 9,403,352 | |||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 168,820 | |||
Receivable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 53,115 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 1,509,016 | |||
1,767,317,867 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 1,386,678 | |||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 463,260 | |||
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 81,199 | |||
Accrued management fees | 1,485,774 | |||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 5,014 | |||
Distribution fees payable | 1,564 | |||
3,423,489 | ||||
Net Assets | $1,763,894,378 | |||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $1,662,634,210 | |||
Undistributed net investment income | 3,107,575 | |||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (178,671,327) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 276,823,920 | |||
$1,763,894,378 | ||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | ||
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,735,387,753 | 50,476,466 | $34.38 | |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $4,814,428 | 138,556 | $34.75 | |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $21,219,345 | 626,016 | $33.90* | |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,993,174 | 60,818 | $32.77 | |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $453,263 | 13,816 | $32.81 | |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $26,415 | 775 | $34.08 | |
*Maximum offering price $35.97 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $9,027) | $ 11,647,819 |
Interest | 3,117 |
11,650,936 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 8,604,501 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 7,765 |
C Class | 1,418 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 2,588 |
C Class | 473 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 25,955 |
R Class | 68 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 23,653 |
8,666,421 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 2,984,515 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 14,398,570 |
Foreign currency transactions | 1,495,405 |
15,893,975 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 188,970,549 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 80,178 |
189,050,727 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 204,944,702 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $207,929,217 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 2,984,515 | $ 11,116,283 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 15,893,975 | (174,653,037) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 189,050,727 | 412,450,732 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 207,929,217 | 248,913,978 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (8,227,971) | (14,095,648) |
Institutional Class | (28,810) | (1,087,962) |
A Class | (49,312) | (144,697) |
B Class | — | (1,824) |
C Class | — | (287) |
R Class | — | (175) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (8,306,093) | (15,330,593) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (53,524,667) | (181,643,233) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 146,098,457 | 51,940,152 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 1,617,795,921 | 1,565,855,769 |
End of period | $1,763,894,378 | $1,617,795,921 |
Undistributed net investment income | $3,107,575 | $8,429,153 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Select Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by purchasing stocks of larger-sized companies that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
17
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
18
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.00% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class and 0.80% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $218,613,408 and $287,614,227, respectively.
19
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 300,000,000 | 300,000,000 | ||
Sold | 701,100 | $ 23,398,994 | 1,400,628 | $ 36,567,221 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 238,915 | 7,886,605 | 571,178 | 13,496,935 |
Redeemed | (2,510,967) | (83,909,202) | (5,114,851) | (131,631,069) |
(1,570,952) | (52,623,603) | (3,143,045) | (81,566,913) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 40,000,000 | 40,000,000 | ||
Sold | 19,094 | 646,899 | 24,800 | 656,737 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 851 | 28,366 | 45,572 | 1,087,343 |
Redeemed | (9,060) | (309,143) | (3,498,181) | (98,618,933) |
10,885 | 366,122 | (3,427,809) | (96,874,853) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 75,000,000 | 75,000,000 | ||
Sold | 35,223 | 1,157,300 | 108,639 | 2,795,413 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 1,473 | 47,993 | 6,049 | 140,997 |
Redeemed | (69,000) | (2,247,644) | (208,719) | (5,214,096) |
(32,304) | (1,042,351) | (94,031) | (2,277,686) | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | ||
Sold | 925 | 27,964 | 3,185 | 78,585 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 76 | 1,743 |
Redeemed | (10,246) | (325,615) | (37,234) | (895,666) |
(9,321) | (297,651) | (33,973) | (815,338) | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | ||
Sold | 5,263 | 163,247 | 2,023 | 54,994 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 9 | 204 |
Redeemed | (2,202) | (69,724) | (7,003) | (170,151) |
3,061 | 93,523 | (4,971) | (114,953) | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 34 | 1,142 | 434 | 12,430 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 7 | 175 |
Redeemed | (675) | (21,849) | (276) | (6,095) |
(641) | (20,707) | 165 | 6,510 | |
Net increase (decrease) | (1,599,272) | $(53,524,667) | (6,703,664) | $(181,643,233) |
20
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $1,576,046,386 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 126,781,604 | $44,946,029 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 9,545 | 8,400,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $1,702,837,535 | $53,346,029 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(28,084) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
21
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an asset of $53,115 in receivable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts and a liability of $81,199 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $1,491,447 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $101,223 in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
7. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions.
8. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
9. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $1,482,804,375 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $320,856,455 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (47,477,266) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $273,379,189 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(190,625,293), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(14,707,162) and $(175,918,131) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
22
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
23
Financial Highlights |
Select | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $30.58 | $26.25 | $45.58 | $36.22 | $37.04 | $34.80 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.15 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.90 | 4.40 | (16.10) | 10.06 | (0.77) | 2.17 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.96 | 4.59 | (16.03) | 10.10 | (0.56) | 2.32 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.16) | (0.26) | — | (0.16) | (0.26) | (0.08) | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.16) | (0.26) | (3.30) | (0.74) | (0.26) | (0.08) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $34.38 | $30.58 | $26.25 | $45.58 | $36.22 | $37.04 | |
Total Return(3) | 12.97% | 17.77% | (37.71)% | 28.37% | (1.55)% | 6.67% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.35%(4) | 0.75% | 0.19% | 0.11% | 0.57% | 0.42% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $1,735 | $1,592 | $1,449 | $2,550 | $2,576 | $3,329 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Select | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $30.94 | $26.56 | $45.98 | $36.53 | $37.35 | $35.09 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 0.24 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.95 | 4.41 | (16.27) | 10.15 | (0.78) | 2.18 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 4.04 | 4.69 | (16.12) | 10.27 | (0.48) | 2.42 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.23) | (0.31) | — | (0.24) | (0.34) | (0.16) | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.23) | (0.31) | (3.30) | (0.82) | (0.34) | (0.16) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $34.75 | $30.94 | $26.56 | $45.98 | $36.53 | $37.35 | |
Total Return(3) | 13.11% | 18.00% | (37.60)% | 28.63% | (1.35)% | 6.87% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.80%(4) | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.55%(4) | 0.95% | 0.39% | 0.31% | 0.77% | 0.62% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $4,814 | $3,950 | $94,419 | $168,441 | $148,717 | $198,212 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Select | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $30.11 | $25.85 | $45.05 | $35.80 | $36.63 | $34.43 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.02 | 0.13 | (0.02) | (0.09) | 0.12 | 0.04 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.85 | 4.33 | (15.88) | 9.99 | (0.76) | 2.16 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.87 | 4.46 | (15.90) | 9.90 | (0.64) | 2.20 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.08) | (0.20) | — | (0.07) | (0.19) | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.08) | (0.20) | (3.30) | (0.65) | (0.19) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $33.90 | $30.11 | $25.85 | $45.05 | $35.80 | $36.63 | |
Total Return(4) | 12.82% | 17.47% | (37.88)% | 28.07% | (1.79)% | 6.39% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.10%(5) | 0.50% | (0.06)% | (0.14)% | 0.32% | 0.17% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $21,219 | $19,824 | $19,450 | $42,770 | $21,455 | $27,741 | |
(1) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Select | |||||||
B Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $29.15 | $25.03 | $44.03 | $35.21 | $36.12 | $34.21 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.10) | (0.06) | (0.29) | (0.34) | (0.12) | (0.22) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.72 | 4.20 | (15.41) | 9.74 | (0.79) | 2.13 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.62 | 4.14 | (15.70) | 9.40 | (0.91) | 1.91 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $32.77 | $29.15 | $25.03 | $44.03 | $35.21 | $36.12 | |
Total Return(3) | 12.42% | 16.60% | (38.36)% | 27.07% | (2.52)% | 5.58% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.65)%(4) | (0.25)% | (0.81)% | (0.89)% | (0.43)% | (0.58)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $1,993 | $2,045 | $2,605 | $5,567 | $5,880 | $2,501 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Select | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $29.19 | $25.05 | $44.07 | $35.24 | $36.15 | $34.23 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.10) | (0.06) | (0.29) | (0.34) | (0.16) | (0.22) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.72 | 4.22 | (15.43) | 9.75 | (0.75) | 2.14 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.62 | 4.16 | (15.72) | 9.41 | (0.91) | 1.92 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $32.81 | $29.19 | $25.05 | $44.07 | $35.24 | $36.15 | |
Total Return(3) | 12.41% | 16.58% | (38.34)% | 27.07% | (2.52)% | 5.58% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.65)%(4) | (0.25)% | (0.81)% | (0.89)% | (0.43)% | (0.58)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $453 | $314 | $394 | $1,001 | $1,540 | $3,511 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Select | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $30.24 | $25.96 | $45.33 | $36.05 | $37.00 | $38.34 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | (0.03) | 0.06 | (0.11) | (0.15) | 0.03 | (0.05) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.87 | 4.36 | (15.96) | 10.01 | (0.77) | (1.29) | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.84 | 4.42 | (16.07) | 9.86 | (0.74) | (1.34) | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.14) | — | — | (0.21) | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (3.30) | (0.58) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.14) | (3.30) | (0.58) | (0.21) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $34.08 | $30.24 | $25.96 | $45.33 | $36.05 | $37.00 | |
Total Return(4) | 12.70% | 17.17% | (38.03)% | 27.72% | (2.04)% | (3.50)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.15)%(5) | 0.25% | (0.31)% | (0.39)% | 0.07% | (0.50)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13% | 31% | 64% | 79% | 206% | 55%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $26 | $43 | $32 | $32 | $24 | $24 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
30
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
31
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
32
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management
33
Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data
34
compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
35
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
36
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The S&P 500 Index is a market value-weighted index of the stocks of 500 publicly traded U.S. companies chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation that are considered to be leading firms in dominant industries. Each stock’s weight in the index is proportionate to its market value. Created by Standard & Poor’s, it is considered to be a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance.
37
Notes |
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68435
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Capital Growth Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Capital Growth | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 31 |
Additional Information | 37 |
Index Definitions | 38 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations. After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small-Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Capital Growth | |||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Average Annual Returns | |||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | |||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | Inception | Date | ||
A Class | ACCGX | 2/27/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 15.93% | 36.58% | 4.78% | 3.87% | |||
With sales charge* | 9.21% | 28.78% | 3.54% | 2.88% | |||
Russell 1000 | |||||||
Growth Index(2) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 4.05% | 2.83% | — | |
Investor Class | ACLIX | 16.05% | 36.83% | — | 3.63% | 7/29/05 | |
Institutional Class | APLIX | 16.29% | 37.12% | — | 3.84% | 7/29/05 | |
B Class | ACGBX | 2/27/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 15.47% | 35.43% | 3.99% | 3.09% | |||
With sales charge* | 10.47% | 31.43% | 3.82% | 3.09% | |||
C Class | ACPGX | 2/27/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 15.47% | 35.60% | 3.99% | 3.09% | |||
With sales charge* | 14.47% | 35.60% | 3.99% | 3.09% | |||
R Class | APWRX | 15.87% | 36.24% | — | 3.12% | 7/29/05 | |
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | |||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | |||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | |||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | |||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | |||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | ||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | |||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | |||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | |||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | |||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects A Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Capital Growth
*From 2/27/04, the A Class’s inception date. Not annualized. Capital Growth A Class’s initial investment is $9,425 to reflect the maximum 5.75% | |||||
initial sales charge. | |||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.01% | 0.81% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects A Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Capital Growth
Portfolio Managers: Greg Woodhams and Prescott LeGard
Performance Summary
Capital Growth gained 15.93%* in the six months ended April 30, 2010. By comparison, the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the fund’s benchmark) returned 15.79%. The portfolio also continued to outperform its benchmark for the five years ended in April and the period since the fund’s February 2004 inception (see page 5).
In terms of the Capital Growth Fund’s absolute returns for the six months, information technology shares contributed most to performance; no sector had negative returns for the period. Relative to the benchmark, stock selection made the consumer discretionary and materials sectors the largest contributors. The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples and health care segments.
Leading Contributors
The key contributor to relative results came from stock choices in the consumer discretionary sector, led by holdings in the specialty retail; hotels, restaurant, and leisure; household durables; and auto components industry segments. A number of the leading contributors were retailers who did well after reporting better same-store sales and other business metrics. Good examples were The Home Depot, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Chipotle Mexican Grill. The largest contributor in the sector was Starwood Hotels & Resorts, which benefited from rising room rates and favorable supply/ demand factors as few new competing hotels and rooms are set to come online. Another top contributor was auto parts manufacturer BorgWarner, which benefited from the rebound in the auto industry and demand for new turbo-diesel and gasoline direct-injection engines.
Stock selection made the materials sector another key contributor to relative return. Positioning in the chemicals industry helped most, as our stake in Airgas benefited from a takeover bid, while Monsanto, a key index component to which we had no exposure, lagged. It was also beneficial to hold stakes in PPG Industries and Sigma-Aldrich.
Industrial and energy shares also helped performance compared with the benchmark. In industrials, positioning in the electrical equipment, air freight and logistics, and road and rail industries contributed most. The leading contributor in the industrial sector was a stake in Rockwell International, which saw a jump in orders for its factory automation products. In the energy sector, it helped relative results to be underrepresented in shares of integrated oil company Exxon Mobil.
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for A Class shares and are not reduced by sales charges. A Class shares are subject to a |
maximum sales charge of 5.75%. Had the sales charge been applied, returns would be lower than those shown. Total returns for periods less than |
one year are not annualized. |
7
Capital Growth
Leading Detractors
The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples sector. Stocks in the consumer staples sector, including Coca-Cola, General Mills and Kellogg, lagged the general market as investors sought stocks with greater economic sensitivity. The leading detractor in the space was drug retailer Walgreen, which underperformed after issuing a cautious outlook despite reporting positive results. A stake in agricultural products processor Archer Daniels Midland also hurt performance, as soy crush margins declined. We eliminated our position in Archer Daniels Midland during the period.
An overweight position and stock choices made the health care sector a detractor from relative performance, led by holdings in the health care equipment and biotechnology industries. Baxter International, which provides blood treatment products, was the leading detractor in this space after guiding future earnings expectations down. Stock selection among biotechnology shares also hurt relative results, led by a stake in Dendreon. Stock choices in the life sciences tools and services industry also hurt relative performance.
The leading individual detractor for the six months was a position in investment bank Goldman Sachs Group, which suffered from an unfavorable regulatory environment and a government investigation into its conduct in the buildup to the financial crisis.
Outlook and Positioning
We believe the portfolio can outperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index over time through stock selection in the large-cap growth universe, style adherence, risk management, and disciplined execution that contributes to greater consistency. And while we recognize that each investment environment presents its own unique challenges, our emphasis on stock selection as the principal generator of alpha and our focus on risk management remain constant.
As a result, the portfolio’s sector and industry selection as well as capitalization range allocations are primarily a result of identifying what we believe to be superior individual securities. As of April 30, 2010, we found opportunity in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors, two of the portfolio’s largest overweight positions relative to the benchmark. The most notable sector underweight was in consumer staples and information technology shares. On an absolute basis, information technology shares remain the portfolio’s single largest sector allocation by far, while the portfolio had no exposure to the tiny (less than 1% of the index) utilities sector.
8
Capital Growth | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Microsoft Corp. | 4.7% |
Apple, Inc. | 4.3% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2.9% |
Johnson & Johnson | 2.7% |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Abbott Laboratories | 2.1% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.0% |
Oracle Corp. | 2.0% |
United Parcel Service, Inc., Class B | 2.0% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 10.4% |
Software | 7.6% |
Pharmaceuticals | 6.3% |
Beverages | 4.3% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.2% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 98.6% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 2.3% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.9)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
10
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,160.50 | $5.36 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,162.90 | $4.29 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,159.30 | $6.69 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,154.70 | $10.68 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,154.70 | $10.68 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,158.70 | $8.03 | 1.50% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Capital Growth | |||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | ||||
Common Stocks — 98.6% | COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 10.4% | ||||||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 9,600 | $ 2,506,752 | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 2.3% | |||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. | 10,500 | $ 498,435 | Dell, Inc.(1) | 34,400 | 556,592 | ||
Rockwell Collins, Inc. | 12,708 | 826,020 | EMC Corp.(1) | 38,400 | 729,984 | ||
1,324,455 | Hewlett-Packard Co. | 32,941 | 1,711,944 | ||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 2.0% | Lexmark International, Inc., | ||||||
Class A(1) | 9,214 | 341,378 | |||||
United Parcel Service, Inc., | |||||||
Class B | 16,500 | 1,140,810 | QLogic Corp.(1) | 10,832 | 209,816 | ||
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.2% | 6,056,466 | ||||||
BorgWarner, Inc.(1) | 16,200 | 702,108 | CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.1% | ||||
AUTOMOBILES — 0.6% | American Express Co. | 14,100 | 650,292 | ||||
Ford Motor Co.(1) | 25,900 | 337,218 | DIVERSIFIED — 0.9% | ||||
BEVERAGES — 4.3% | iShares Russell 1000 Growth | ||||||
Index Fund | 9,682 | 508,402 | |||||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 26,500 | 1,416,425 | |||||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.7% | |||||||
PepsiCo, Inc. | 16,900 | 1,102,218 | |||||
Emerson Electric Co. | 5,884 | 307,321 | |||||
2,518,643 | |||||||
Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 11,622 | 705,688 | |||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 3.0% | |||||||
1,013,009 | |||||||
Alexion | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 3,066 | 168,262 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | ||||
INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 1.6% | |||||||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 15,933 | 913,917 | |||||
Corning, Inc. | 26,167 | 503,715 | |||||
Dendreon Corp.(1) | 1,310 | 71,028 | |||||
Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 27,100 | 415,172 | |||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 12,200 | 483,974 | |||||
918,887 | |||||||
Talecris Biotherapeutics | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.8% | ||||||
Holdings Corp.(1) | 5,526 | 103,613 | |||||
Cameron | |||||||
1,740,794 | International Corp.(1) | 4,700 | 185,462 | ||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.4% | Schlumberger Ltd. | 11,800 | 842,756 | ||||
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 34,118 | 658,136 | 1,028,218 | ||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 2.7% | ||||||
(The) | 1,000 | 145,200 | |||||
803,336 | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 4,011 | 236,970 | ||||
CHEMICALS — 2.4% | Walgreen Co. | 14,500 | 509,675 | ||||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 10,910 | 349,011 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 14,975 | 803,409 | ||
PPG Industries, Inc. | 9,700 | 682,589 | 1,550,054 | ||||
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | 6,700 | 397,310 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 2.5% | ||||
1,428,910 | General Mills, Inc. | 9,500 | 676,210 | ||||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 1.3% | Kellogg Co. | 9,223 | 506,712 | ||||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 23,098 | 764,775 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 4,801 | 247,779 | ||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 3.5% | 1,430,701 | ||||||
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 3.2% | |||||||
Arris Group, Inc.(1) | 8,700 | 106,923 | |||||
Baxter International, Inc. | 6,207 | 293,095 | |||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 44,200 | 1,189,864 | |||||
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 3,900 | 297,843 | |||||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 6,300 | 431,109 | |||||
Covidien plc | 11,700 | 561,483 | |||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 8,000 | 309,920 | Edwards | ||||
2,037,816 | Lifesciences Corp.(1) | 5,068 | 522,409 | ||||
Gen-Probe, Inc.(1) | 4,019 | 190,460 | |||||
1,865,290 |
12
Capital Growth | |||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | ||||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 2.6% | MULTILINE RETAIL — 2.4% | ||||||
AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 11,800 | $ 364,030 | Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 9,000 | $ 494,910 | ||
Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 9,775 | 978,771 | Target Corp. | 16,300 | 926,981 | ||
McKesson Corp. | 2,700 | 174,987 | 1,421,891 | ||||
1,517,788 | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 2.5% | ||||||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 1.7% | Apache Corp. | 2,445 | 248,803 | ||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 3,100 | 418,221 | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 9,514 | 645,525 | ||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 4,537 | 402,251 | ||||
Worldwide, Inc. | 10,101 | 550,605 | Southwestern Energy Co.(1) | 3,600 | 142,848 | ||
968,826 | 1,439,427 | ||||||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.9% | PERSONAL PRODUCTS — 0.3% | ||||||
Whirlpool Corp. | 4,700 | 511,689 | Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. | ||||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 3.2% | (The), Class A | 2,945 | 194,134 | ||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 5,300 | 445,730 | PHARMACEUTICALS — 6.3% | ||||
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 22,492 | 1,398,103 | Abbott Laboratories | 23,939 | 1,224,719 | ||
1,843,833 | Allergan, Inc. | 7,832 | 498,820 | ||||
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.8% | Johnson & Johnson | 24,739 | 1,590,718 | ||||
3M Co. | 6,800 | 602,956 | Novo Nordisk A/S B Shares | 3,600 | 294,039 | ||
Textron, Inc. | 18,700 | 427,108 | Perrigo Co. | 900 | 54,927 | ||
1,030,064 | 3,663,223 | ||||||
INSURANCE — 1.3% | ROAD & RAIL — 1.0% | ||||||
Aflac, Inc. | 14,600 | 744,016 | Union Pacific Corp. | 7,794 | 589,694 | ||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.8% | SEMICONDUCTORS & | ||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 3,400 | 466,004 | SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT — 4.2% | ||||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.8% | Altera Corp. | 15,400 | 390,544 | ||||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 2,000 | 1,050,880 | Broadcom Corp., Class A | 16,900 | 582,881 | ||
IT SERVICES — 2.5% | Cree, Inc.(1) | 3,100 | 226,951 | ||||
International Business | Intel Corp. | 18,200 | 415,506 | ||||
Machines Corp. | 5,000 | 645,000 | Linear Technology Corp. | 22,819 | 685,939 | ||
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 1,200 | 297,648 | MEMC Electronic | ||||
Paychex, Inc. | 17,800 | 544,680 | Materials, Inc.(1) | 11,400 | 147,858 | ||
1,487,328 | 2,449,679 | ||||||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.5% | SOFTWARE — 7.6% | ||||||
Thermo Fisher | Intuit, Inc.(1) | 11,062 | 400,002 | ||||
Scientific, Inc.(1) | 5,600 | 309,568 | Microsoft Corp. | 90,300 | 2,757,762 | ||
MACHINERY — 2.7% | Oracle Corp. | 44,300 | 1,144,712 | ||||
Caterpillar, Inc. | 4,600 | 313,214 | salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 1,200 | 102,720 | ||
Eaton Corp. | 8,700 | 671,292 | 4,405,196 | ||||
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 11,948 | 610,543 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 3.3% | ||||
1,595,049 | Abercrombie & Fitch Co., | ||||||
MEDIA — 1.8% | Class A | 9,000 | 393,570 | ||||
Scripps Networks | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 30,100 | 1,061,025 | ||||
Interactive, Inc., Class A | 9,566 | 433,722 | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 3,727 | 173,194 | ||
Walt Disney Co. (The) | 17,300 | 637,332 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 9,400 | 270,720 | ||
1,071,054 | 1,898,509 | ||||||
METALS & MINING — 0.8% | |||||||
Newmont Mining Corp. | 8,878 | 497,878 |
13
Capital Growth | ||||
Shares | Value | |||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.7% | ||||
American Tower Corp., | ||||
Class A(1) | 10,700 | $ 436,667 | ||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||
(Cost $47,321,512) | 57,412,581 | |||
Temporary Cash Investments — 2.3% | ||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
Agency Shares | 30,176 | 30,176 | ||
Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse | ||||
First Boston, Inc., (collateralized by | ||||
various U.S. Treasury obligations, 8.00%, | ||||
11/15/21, valued at $1,326,592), in a joint | ||||
trading account at 0.13%, dated 4/30/10, | ||||
due 5/3/10 (Delivery value $1,300,014) | 1,300,000 | |||
TOTAL TEMPORARY | ||||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||
(Cost $1,330,176) | 1,330,176 | |||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||||
SECURITIES — 100.9% | ||||
(Cost $48,651,688) | 58,742,757 | |||
OTHER ASSETS | ||||
AND LIABILITIES — (0.9)% | (496,616) | |||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $58,246,141 | |||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | ||||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
1,059,786 DKK for USD | 5/28/10 | $189,563 | $(177) | |
(Value on Settlement Date $189,386) | ||||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | ||||
DKK = Danish Krone | ||||
USD = United States Dollar | ||||
(1) Non-income producing. | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Assets | |
Investment securities, at value (cost of $48,651,688) | $58,742,757 |
Foreign currency holdings, at value (cost of $121) | 97 |
Receivable for investments sold | 731,963 |
Receivable for capital shares sold | 844,579 |
Dividends and interest receivable | 44,040 |
60,363,436 | |
Liabilities | |
Payable for investments purchased | 1,875,133 |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 185,285 |
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 177 |
Accrued management fees | 45,480 |
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 7,508 |
Distribution fees payable | 3,712 |
2,117,295 | |
Net Assets | $58,246,141 |
Net Assets Consist of: | |
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $50,486,620 |
Undistributed net investment income | 12,344 |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (2,343,741) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 10,090,918 |
$58,246,141 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $21,693,571 | 1,869,940 | $11.60 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,123,694 | 96,304 | $11.67 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $27,369,930 | 2,380,129 | $11.50* |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $930,398 | 84,815 | $10.97 |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $5,192,345 | 473,259 | $10.97 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,936,203 | 170,031 | $11.39 |
*Maximum offering price $12.20 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $313) | $ 318,062 |
Interest | 334 |
318,396 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 226,967 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 3,273 |
C Class | 15,774 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 1,091 |
C Class | 5,258 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 29,782 |
R Class | 4,085 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 1,063 |
287,293 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 31,103 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 1,101,762 |
Foreign currency transactions | 19,486 |
1,121,248 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 5,264,749 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (1,093) |
5,263,656 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 6,384,904 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $6,416,007 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 31,103 | $ 35,617 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 1,121,248 | (2,301,238) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 5,263,656 | 6,910,583 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 6,416,007 | 4,644,962 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (18,484) | (9,938) |
Institutional Class | (275) | (758) |
A Class | — | (15,944) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (18,759) | (26,640) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 14,163,897 | 21,332,418 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 20,561,145 | 25,950,740 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 37,684,996 | 11,734,256 |
End of period | $58,246,141 | $37,684,996 |
Undistributed net investment income | $12,344 | — |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Capital Growth Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by purchasing stocks of larger-sized companies that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
18
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Exchange Traded Funds — The fund may invest in exchange traded funds (ETFs). ETFs are a type of index fund bought and sold on a securities exchange. An ETF trades like common stock and represents a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. A fund may purchase an ETF to temporarily gain exposure to a portion of the U.S. or a foreign market while awaiting purchase of underlying securities. The risks of owning an ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities they are designed to track, although the lack of liquidity on an ETF could result in it being more volatile. Additionally, ETFs have fees and expenses that reduce their value.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
19
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.00% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class and 0.80% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $31,317,966 and $17,297,979, respectively.
20
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 300,000,000 | 300,000,000 | ||
Sold | 972,524 | $10,917,198 | 1,117,499 | $ 9,975,284 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 1,691 | 18,397 | 1,270 | 9,794 |
Redeemed | (200,680) | (2,201,810) | (281,276) | (2,531,353) |
773,535 | 8,733,785 | 837,493 | 7,453,725 | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 91,047 | 1,030,902 | 5,333 | 48,461 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 25 | 275 | 98 | 758 |
Redeemed | (2,128) | (22,688) | (12,698) | (93,153) |
88,944 | 1,008,489 | (7,267) | (43,934) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 | ||
Sold | 604,456 | 6,671,135 | 1,856,708 | 15,703,091 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 1,956 | 14,980 |
Redeemed | (369,521) | (4,013,102) | (604,116) | (5,102,611) |
234,935 | 2,658,033 | 1,254,548 | 10,615,460 | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 | ||
Sold | 6,461 | 67,497 | 27,631 | 227,843 |
Redeemed | (8,937) | (91,418) | (31,949) | (249,202) |
(2,476) | (23,921) | (4,318) | (21,359) | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 | ||
Sold | 169,290 | 1,761,374 | 340,491 | 2,957,794 |
Redeemed | (36,820) | (379,047) | (99,820) | (800,238) |
132,470 | 1,382,327 | 240,671 | 2,157,556 | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 60,000,000 | 60,000,000 | ||
Sold | 57,985 | 623,106 | 133,558 | 1,262,814 |
Redeemed | (20,315) | (217,922) | (11,015) | (91,844) |
37,670 | 405,184 | 122,543 | 1,170,970 | |
Net increase (decrease) | 1,265,078 | $14,163,897 | 2,443,670 | $21,332,418 |
21
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $57,118,542 | $ 294,039 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 30,176 | 1,300,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $57,148,718 | $1,594,039 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(177) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
22
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $177 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $19,268 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $(991) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $49,657,037 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $9,327,944 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (242,224) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $9,085,720 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(2,447,404) which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(769,263) and $(1,678,141) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
23
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
24
Financial Highlights |
Capital Growth | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.01 | $8.70 | $14.21 | $11.81 | $10.60 | $10.80 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | —(4) | —(4) | —(4) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.59 | 1.31 | (4.48) | 2.54 | 1.21 | (0.20) | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.61 | 1.35 | (4.46) | 2.54 | 1.21 | (0.20) | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.02) | (0.04) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.02) | (0.04) | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.60 | $10.01 | $8.70 | $14.21 | $11.81 | $10.60 | |
Total Return(5) | 16.05% | 15.58% | (33.67)% | 21.77% | 11.42% | (1.85)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(6) | 1.01% | 1.01% | 1.01% | 1.00% | 1.00%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.40%(6) | 0.43% | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.05% | (0.12)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110%(7) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $21,694 | $10,972 | $2,252 | $1,139 | $86 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||||
(7) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Capital Growth | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.07 | $8.76 | $14.28 | $11.84 | $10.61 | $10.80 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | —(4) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.63 | 1.29 | (4.51) | 2.54 | 1.20 | (0.19) | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.64 | 1.36 | (4.47) | 2.58 | 1.23 | (0.19) | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.04) | (0.05) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.04) | (0.05) | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.67 | $10.07 | $8.76 | $14.28 | $11.84 | $10.61 | |
Total Return(5) | 16.29% | 15.70% | (33.57)% | 22.06% | 11.59% | (1.76)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.80%(6) | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.80%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.60%(6) | 0.63% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.25% | 0.08%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110%(7) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $1,124 | $74 | $128 | $33 | $27 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||||
(7) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Capital Growth | |||||||
A Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $9.92 | $8.62 | $14.13 | $11.78 | $10.59 | $9.89 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.01 | 0.02 | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | —(3) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.57 | 1.30 | (4.45) | 2.50 | 1.21 | 0.70 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.58 | 1.32 | (4.46) | 2.49 | 1.19 | 0.70 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.50 | $9.92 | $8.62 | $14.13 | $11.78 | $10.59 | |
Total Return(4) | 15.93% | 15.32% | (33.88)% | 21.40% | 11.24% | 7.08% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.27% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.15%(5) | 0.18% | (0.10)% | (0.10)% | (0.20)% | (0.03)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $27,370 | $21,273 | $7,679 | $3,171 | $2,155 | $1,216 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes investment of net reinvestment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Capital Growth | |||||||
B Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $9.50 | $8.30 | $13.74 | $11.54 | $10.46 | $9.84 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.09) | (0.10) | (0.10) | (0.08) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.50 | 1.24 | (4.30) | 2.44 | 1.18 | 0.70 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.47 | 1.20 | (4.39) | 2.34 | 1.08 | 0.62 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $10.97 | $9.50 | $8.30 | $13.74 | $11.54 | $10.46 | |
Total Return(3) | 15.47% | 14.46% | (34.36)% | 20.54% | 10.33% | 6.30% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.02% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.60)%(4) | (0.57)% | (0.85)% | (0.85)% | (0.95)% | (0.78)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $930 | $829 | $760 | $865 | $960 | $772 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Capital Growth | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $9.50 | $8.30 | $13.74 | $11.54 | $10.46 | $9.84 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.03) | (0.05) | (0.09) | (0.10) | (0.10) | (0.08) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.50 | 1.25 | (4.30) | 2.44 | 1.18 | 0.70 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.47 | 1.20 | (4.39) | 2.34 | 1.08 | 0.62 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $10.97 | $9.50 | $8.30 | $13.74 | $11.54 | $10.46 | |
Total Return(3) | 15.47% | 14.46% | (34.36)% | 20.54% | 10.33% | 6.30% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.02% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.60)%(4) | (0.57)% | (0.85)% | (0.85)% | (0.95)% | (0.78)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $5,192 | $3,236 | $831 | $695 | $832 | $609 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Capital Growth | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $9.83 | $8.55 | $14.05 | $11.74 | $10.59 | $10.80 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.05) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.57 | 1.31 | (4.41) | 2.49 | 1.20 | (0.19) | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.56 | 1.28 | (4.45) | 2.45 | 1.15 | (0.21) | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.05) | (0.14) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.39 | $9.83 | $8.55 | $14.05 | $11.74 | $10.59 | |
Total Return(4) | 15.87% | 14.97% | (34.01)% | 21.13% | 10.86% | (1.94)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.50% | 1.50%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.10)%(5) | (0.07)% | (0.35)% | (0.35)% | (0.45)% | (0.62)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 38% | 131% | 129% | 160% | 140% | 110%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $1,936 | $1,301 | $84 | $36 | $27 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor
31
will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
32
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
33
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
34
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
35
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
36
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
37
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68436
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Fundamental Equity Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Fundamental Equity | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 16 |
Statement of Operations | 17 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 18 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 19 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 31 |
Additional Information | 37 |
Index Definitions | 38 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase – “The best is yet to be” – still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small-Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Average Annual Returns | |||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | |||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | Inception | Date | ||
A Class | AFDAX | 11/30/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 13.91% | 35.15% | 5.72% | 5.23% | |||
With sales charge* | 7.40% | 27.42% | 4.47% | 4.08% | |||
S&P 500 Index(2) | — | 15.66% | 38.84% | 2.63% | 2.29% | — | |
Investor Class | AFDIX | 14.08% | 35.49% | — | 4.35% | 7/29/05 | |
Institutional Class | AFEIX | 14.19% | 35.72% | — | 4.56% | 7/29/05 | |
B Class | AFDBX | 11/30/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 13.52% | 34.11% | 4.91% | 4.43% | |||
With sales charge* | 8.52% | 30.11% | 4.74% | 4.28% | |||
C Class | AFDCX | 11/30/04 | |||||
No sales charge* | 13.52% | 34.11% | 4.91% | 4.43% | |||
With sales charge* | 12.52% | 34.11% | 4.91% | 4.43% | |||
R Class | AFDRX | 13.86% | 34.89% | — | 3.84% | 7/29/05 | |
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | |||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | |||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | |||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | |||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | |||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | ||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | |||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | |||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | |||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | |||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects A Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Fundamental Equity
*From 11/30/04, the A Class’s inception date. Not annualized. The A Class’s initial investment is $9,425 to reflect the maximum 5.75% initial sales charge.
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.01% | 0.81% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects A Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Fundamental Equity
Portfolio Managers: Greg Woodhams, Prescott LeGard, Justin Brown, and Joe Reiland
Performance Summary
Fundamental Equity returned 13.91%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010. Its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, returned 15.66% over the same time frame. The portfolio’s performance since its inception in November 2004, however, continued to outpace that of its benchmark (additional performance comparisons are listed on the previous page).
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of stabilizing economic conditions and improving investor sentiment. Within the portfolio, poor security selection in the financials and health care sectors accounted for the bulk of underperformance relative to the benchmark, although Fundamental Equity derived positive absolute returns from both sectors. Holdings in the materials and consumer staples sectors partially offset those losses.
Financials, Health Care Detracted
The financials sector was the largest source of Fundamental Equity’s under-performance relative to its benchmark. Within the sector, the portfolio’s relative performance was hindered by an overweight position in the capital markets industry group, including an overweight stake in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. These companies came under pressure from government intentions to regulate the size and risk taking of many financial firms.
Detrimental positions in the diversified financial services industry included JPMorgan Chase. Although the company has gained ground in the past 12 months, its share price stumbled during the period as it reported lower-than-expected fourth quarter 2009 earnings amid rising credit costs. Late in the period, though, improved earnings levels for the first quarter of 2010 helped its share price to recover some of those losses.
The health care sector was also a source of relative underperformance. The portfolio maintained overweight positions in several underperforming pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, Inc. The drugmaker’s share price slid when it reduced guidance for revenue in 2012, when the patent on its blockbuster cholesterol drug Lipitor is set to expire.
An overweight stake in Amgen curbed relative returns. The biotechnology company reported increased earnings for the first quarter of 2010, but lowered guidance on full year results due to health care reform measures.
Stock choices in the health care provider industry group hurt performance relative to the benchmark. Fundamental Equity avoided pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts, whose share price gained as it reported healthy earnings growth during the period. Elsewhere in the industry, the portfolio
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for A Class shares and are not reduced by sales charges. A Class shares are subject to a |
maximum sales charge of 5.75%. Had the sales charge been applied, returns would be lower than those shown. Total returns for periods less than |
one year are not annualized. |
7
Fundamental Equity
held an overweight stake in health care provider Medco Health Solutions, Inc., which experienced a share price decline late in the reporting period as it lowered its forecast for future growth.
Materials, Consumer Staples Contributed
Stock selection in the materials sector helped absolute and relative returns. In the chemicals industry, Fundamental Equity was rewarded for effective stock choices, as it held overweight stakes in select companies while sidestepping sector laggards. Within the metals and mining industry group, an overweight position in Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. helped absolute and relative returns. The company, which benefited from improved pricing for iron ore as global economies improve, was the largest single contributor to Fundamental Equity’s relative gains for the period.
The consumer staples sector was also home to relative gains. In the beverages group, the portfolio avoided Coca-Cola, Inc. during the period. This decision proved beneficial as the company struggled with volume growth in developed markets. Meanwhile, an overweight stake in Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., the largest bottler of Coca-Cola beverages, further contributed to gains. The company entered into an agreement to sell its North American operations to Coca-Cola, which would relieve Coca-Cola Enterprises of $8.8 billion debt.
Outlook
Fundamental Equity generally invests in larger-sized companies, although it may invest in companies of any size. The managers use a quantitative model that combines fundamental measures of a stock’s value and growth potential. The fund seeks to provide better returns than, and a dividend yield comparable to, its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, without taking on significant additional risk. Regardless of market environment, we will remain focused on our methodology of identifying attractively valued companies.
8
Fundamental Equity | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3.0% |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 3.0% |
International Business Machines Corp. | 2.8% |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 2.5% |
Apple, Inc. | 2.4% |
Pfizer, Inc. | 2.3% |
Microsoft Corp. | 2.3% |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2.3% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.2% |
Amgen, Inc. | 1.9% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 9.3% |
Pharmaceuticals | 6.9% |
Computers & Peripherals | 4.3% |
IT Services | 4.3% |
Software | 3.8% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks & Futures | 98.6% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.5% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.1)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or Amer-ican Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 - 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,140.80 | $5.36 | 1.01% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,141.90 | $4.30 | 0.81% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,139.10 | $6.68 | 1.26% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,135.20 | $10.64 | 2.01% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,135.20 | $10.64 | 2.01% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,138.60 | $8.01 | 1.51% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.79 | $5.06 | 1.01% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.78 | $4.06 | 0.81% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.55 | $6.31 | 1.26% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.83 | $10.04 | 2.01% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.83 | $10.04 | 2.01% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.31 | $7.55 | 1.51% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Fundamental Equity | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 97.8% | COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 2.5% | |||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 176,200 | $ 4,743,304 | ||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 3.1% | ||||||
General Dynamics Corp. | 27,400 | $ 2,092,264 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 18,900 | 732,186 | |
Honeywell International, Inc. | 71,500 | 3,394,105 | 5,475,490 | |||
United Technologies Corp. | 17,800 | 1,334,110 | COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 4.3% | |||
6,820,479 | Apple, Inc.(1) | 20,000 | 5,222,400 | |||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 0.9% | EMC Corp.(1) | 172,900 | 3,286,829 | |||
United Parcel Service, Inc., | Hewlett-Packard Co. | 18,600 | 966,642 | |||
Class B | 27,800 | 1,922,092 | 9,475,871 | |||
AIRLINES — 0.2% | CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 0.7% | |||||
Allegiant Travel Co.(1) | 6,500 | 334,295 | EMCOR Group, Inc.(1) | 12,400 | 354,144 | |
AUTOMOBILES — 0.9% | Fluor Corp. | 20,500 | 1,083,220 | |||
Ford Motor Co.(1) | 159,400 | 2,075,388 | Foster Wheeler AG(1) | 2,500 | 74,950 | |
BEVERAGES — 0.5% | 1,512,314 | |||||
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. | 36,000 | 998,280 | CONSUMER FINANCE — 0.6% | |||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 2.0% | American Express Co. | 28,800 | 1,328,256 | |||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 71,800 | 4,118,448 | CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 0.5% | |||
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 5,400 | 214,218 | Pactiv Corp.(1) | 30,300 | 769,923 | |
4,332,666 | Sealed Air Corp. | 16,300 | 350,450 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 2.5% | 1,120,373 | |||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 5,800 | 1,067,200 | DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 3.6% | |||
Goldman Sachs | Bank of America Corp. | 71,800 | 1,280,194 | |||
Group, Inc. (The) | 20,500 | 2,976,600 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 153,500 | 6,536,030 | |
Knight Capital Group, Inc., | NYSE Euronext | 3,800 | 123,994 | |||
Class A(1) | 24,300 | 377,865 | ||||
7,940,218 | ||||||
TD Ameritrade | DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION | |||||
Holding Corp.(1) | 56,100 | 1,123,122 | ||||
SERVICES — 2.3% | ||||||
5,544,787 | AT&T, Inc. | 123,000 | 3,205,380 | |||
CHEMICALS — 1.0% | Qwest Communications | |||||
Ashland, Inc. | 8,600 | 512,216 | International, Inc. | 54,900 | 287,127 | |
E.I. du Pont | Verizon | |||||
de Nemours & Co. | 4,300 | 171,312 | Communications, Inc. | 51,600 | 1,490,724 | |
Eastman Chemical Co. | 1,500 | 100,380 | 4,983,231 | |||
International Flavors | ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 0.5% | |||||
& Fragrances, Inc. | 28,300 | 1,417,547 | FirstEnergy Corp. | 29,700 | 1,124,739 | |
Lubrizol Corp. | 1,000 | 90,340 | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.5% | |||
2,291,795 | Belden, Inc. | 15,300 | 420,138 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 3.7% | Emerson Electric Co. | 49,000 | 2,559,270 | |||
Bank of Hawaii Corp. | 16,400 | 867,232 | GrafTech International Ltd.(1) | 14,200 | 239,412 | |
U.S. Bancorp. | 64,800 | 1,734,696 | 3,218,820 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 163,600 | 5,416,796 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS | |||
8,018,724 | & COMPONENTS — 0.3% | |||||
COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 0.2% | Avnet, Inc.(1) | 19,100 | 610,627 | |||
Knoll, Inc. | 29,400 | 411,012 |
12
Fundamental Equity | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 2.2% | INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS | |||||
Ensco International plc ADR | 6,600 | $ 311,388 | & ENERGY TRADERS — 0.2% | |||
Nabors Industries Ltd.(1) | 54,800 | 1,182,036 | AES Corp. (The)(1) | 42,300 | $ 488,142 | |
National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 16,800 | 739,704 | INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.8% | |||
Noble Corp.(1) | 28,500 | 1,125,465 | General Electric Co. | 205,400 | 3,873,844 | |
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 55,100 | 842,479 | INSURANCE — 3.8% | |||
Rowan Cos., Inc.(1) | 20,400 | 607,920 | ACE Ltd. | 15,700 | 835,083 | |
4,808,992 | Aflac, Inc. | 26,700 | 1,360,632 | |||
FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 2.0% | American Financial | |||||
Group, Inc. | 8,000 | 235,440 | ||||
Safeway, Inc. | 16,600 | 391,760 | Assurant, Inc. | 15,800 | 575,594 | |
SUPERVALU, INC. | 15,700 | 233,930 | Chubb Corp. (The) | 9,500 | 502,265 | |
SYSCO Corp. | 12,300 | 387,942 | Travelers Cos., Inc. (The) | 49,600 | 2,516,704 | |
Walgreen Co. | 23,500 | 826,025 | Unum Group | 92,600 | 2,265,922 | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 49,000 | 2,628,850 | 8,291,640 | |||
4,468,507 | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.6% | |||||
FOOD PRODUCTS — 3.5% | ||||||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 9,600 | 1,315,776 | ||||
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. | 66,600 | 1,860,804 | ||||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.5% | ||||||
H.J. Heinz Co. | 54,900 | 2,573,163 | ||||
AOL, Inc.(1) | 6,800 | 158,848 | ||||
Kraft Foods, Inc., Class A | 60,900 | 1,802,640 | ||||
eBay, Inc.(1) | 9,800 | 233,338 | ||||
Tyson Foods, Inc., Class A | 76,300 | 1,494,717 | ||||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 5,600 | 2,942,464 | ||||
7,731,324 | ||||||
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 0.9% | 3,334,650 | |||||
Baxter International, Inc. | 11,600 | 547,752 | IT SERVICES — 4.3% | |||
Covidien plc | 2,100 | 100,779 | Accenture plc, Class A | 27,100 | 1,182,644 | |
Hospira, Inc.(1) | 20,400 | 1,097,316 | International Business | |||
Machines Corp. | 48,200 | 6,217,800 | ||||
Medtronic, Inc. | 6,300 | 275,247 | Western Union Co. (The) | 109,800 | 2,003,850 | |
2,021,094 | 9,404,294 | |||||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 1.6% | LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 0.4% | |||||
Aetna, Inc. | 30,300 | 895,365 | Hasbro, Inc. | 20,900 | 801,724 | |
Medco Health | LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.1% | |||||
Solutions, Inc.(1) | 14,700 | 866,124 | ||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 54,800 | 1,660,988 | Thermo Fisher | |||
Scientific, Inc.(1) | 4,100 | 226,648 | ||||
3,422,477 | MACHINERY — 1.6% | |||||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 1.1% | Caterpillar, Inc. | 1,100 | 74,899 | |||
Bally Technologies, Inc.(1) | 5,800 | 267,496 | ||||
Dover Corp. | 44,600 | 2,329,012 | ||||
Cheesecake | Oshkosh Corp.(1) | 18,500 | 714,470 | |||
Factory, Inc. (The)(1) | 4,300 | 116,831 | ||||
Starbucks Corp. | 10,300 | 267,594 | Wabtec Corp. | 7,500 | 356,850 | |
WMS Industries, Inc.(1) | 24,600 | 1,230,492 | 3,475,231 | |||
Wyndham Worldwide Corp. | 22,000 | 589,820 | MEDIA — 3.3% | |||
2,472,233 | Comcast Corp., Class A | 139,800 | 2,759,652 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.2% | Omnicom Group, Inc. | 13,900 | 592,974 | |||
D.R. Horton, Inc. | 30,300 | 445,107 | Time Warner Cable, Inc. | 18,900 | 1,063,125 | |
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 2.5% | Time Warner, Inc. | 75,000 | 2,481,000 | |||
Viacom, Inc., Class B(1) | 10,500 | 370,965 | ||||
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 9,800 | 600,348 | ||||
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 80,000 | 4,972,800 | 7,267,716 | |||
5,573,148 |
13
Fundamental Equity | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
METALS & MINING — 0.6% | ROAD & RAIL — 1.4% | |||||
Freeport-McMoRan | Avis Budget Group, Inc.(1) | 38,600 | $ 583,632 | |||
Copper & Gold, Inc. | 14,400 | $ 1,087,632 | Con-way, Inc. | 4,100 | 159,244 | |
Reliance Steel | Ryder System, Inc. | 25,300 | 1,176,956 | |||
& Aluminum Co. | 6,200 | 302,622 | ||||
Union Pacific Corp. | 14,100 | 1,066,806 | ||||
1,390,254 | ||||||
2,986,638 | ||||||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 1.1% | ||||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | ||||||
Big Lots, Inc.(1) | 44,300 | 1,692,260 | EQUIPMENT — 2.5% | |||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 15,000 | 824,850 | Altera Corp. | 47,900 | 1,214,744 | |
2,517,110 | Intel Corp. | 41,400 | 945,162 | |||
MULTI-UTILITIES — 2.4% | Marvell Technology | |||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 87,100 | 1,250,756 | Group Ltd.(1) | 69,000 | 1,424,850 | |
DTE Energy Co. | 8,500 | 409,445 | Texas Instruments, Inc. | 29,500 | 767,295 | |
NSTAR | 45,300 | 1,657,980 | Xilinx, Inc. | 44,200 | 1,139,476 | |
Public Service Enterprise | 5,491,527 | |||||
Group, Inc. | 3,300 | 106,029 | SOFTWARE — 3.8% | |||
Xcel Energy, Inc. | 81,500 | 1,772,625 | Microsoft Corp. | 163,000 | 4,978,020 | |
5,196,835 | Oracle Corp. | 84,200 | 2,175,728 | |||
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 9.3% | Red Hat, Inc.(1) | 9,300 | 277,791 | |||
Alpha Natural | Symantec Corp.(1) | 54,900 | 920,673 | |||
Resources, Inc.(1) | 22,700 | 1,068,716 | ||||
8,352,212 | ||||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | 24,600 | 1,529,136 | ||||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 1.9% | ||||||
Chevron Corp. | 45,400 | 3,697,376 | ||||
Gap, Inc. (The) | 96,200 | 2,379,026 | ||||
ConocoPhillips | 45,800 | 2,710,902 | ||||
Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 30,300 | 1,068,075 | ||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 95,500 | 6,479,675 | ||||
Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 27,200 | 737,664 | ||||
Murphy Oil Corp. | 13,100 | 787,965 | ||||
4,184,765 | ||||||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 30,300 | 2,686,398 | ||||
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 0.2% | ||||||
Peabody Energy Corp. | 15,400 | 719,488 | ||||
Coach, Inc. | 11,700 | 488,475 | ||||
Tesoro Corp. | 15,700 | 206,455 | ||||
THRIFTS & MORTGAGE FINANCE — 0.3% | ||||||
Valero Energy Corp. | 12,100 | 251,559 | ||||
Hudson City Bancorp., Inc. | 46,100 | 613,130 | ||||
Williams Cos., Inc. (The) | 11,200 | 264,432 | ||||
TOBACCO — 1.1% | ||||||
20,402,102 | ||||||
Altria Group, Inc. | 65,900 | 1,396,421 | ||||
PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 0.9% | ||||||
Philip Morris | ||||||
International Paper Co. | 74,700 | 1,997,478 | International, Inc. | 21,700 | 1,065,036 | |
PHARMACEUTICALS — 6.9% | 2,461,457 | |||||
Abbott Laboratories | 66,100 | 3,381,676 | TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 0.5% | |||
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 66,900 | 1,691,901 | United Rentals, Inc.(1) | 77,200 | 1,108,592 | |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 29,000 | 1,014,130 | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.7% | |||
Johnson & Johnson | 63,100 | 4,057,330 | American Tower Corp., | |||
Pfizer, Inc. | 299,000 | 4,999,280 | Class A(1) | 35,400 | 1,444,674 | |
15,144,317 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.8% | (Cost $179,217,034) | 214,507,283 | ||||
Annaly Capital | ||||||
Management, Inc. | 51,000 | 864,450 | ||||
Public Storage | 9,300 | 901,263 | ||||
1,765,713 |
14
Fundamental Equity | |||||
Shares | Value | Value | |||
Temporary Cash Investments — 1.5% | Temporary Cash Investments — | ||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | Segregated For Futures Contracts — 0.8% | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse First | ||||
Agency Shares | 29,733 | $ 29,733 | Boston, Inc., (collateralized by various U.S. | ||
Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse | Treasury obligations, 8.00%, 11/15/21, | ||||
First Boston, Inc., (collateralized by | valued at $1,812,328), in a joint trading | ||||
various U.S. Treasury obligations, | account at 0.13%, dated 4/30/10, due | ||||
8.00%, 11/15/21, valued at $3,391,993), | 5/3/10 (Delivery value $1,776,019) | ||||
in a joint trading account at 0.13%, | (Cost $1,776,000) | $ 1,776,000 | |||
dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||||
(Delivery value $3,324,036) | 3,324,000 | SECURITIES — 100.1% | |||
TOTAL TEMPORARY | (Cost $184,346,767) | 219,637,016 | |||
CASH INVESTMENTS | OTHER ASSETS | ||||
(Cost $3,353,733) | 3,353,733 | AND LIABILITIES — (0.1)% | (145,180) | ||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $219,491,836 |
Futures Contracts | |||
Underlying Face | |||
Contracts Purchased | Expiration Date | Amount at Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
30 S&P 500 E-Mini Futures | June 2010 | $1,775,100 | $54,868 |
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $184,346,767) | $219,637,016 | ||
Deposits at broker for futures contracts | 135,000 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 120,601 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 236,868 | ||
220,129,485 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 369,944 | ||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 32,850 | ||
Accrued management fees | 184,098 | ||
Service fees (and distribution fees – A Class and R Class) payable | 37,717 | ||
Distribution fees payable | 13,040 | ||
637,649 | |||
Net Assets | $219,491,836 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $311,100,857 | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 348,644 | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (127,302,782) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 35,345,117 | ||
$219,491,836 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $42,709,411 | 3,584,595 | $11.91 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $210,219 | 17,633 | $11.92 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $153,064,605 | 12,850,297 | $11.91* |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $4,220,509 | 357,686 | $11.80 |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $16,570,597 | 1,403,848 | $11.80 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $2,716,495 | 228,533 | $11.89 |
*Maximum offering price $12.64 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends | $ 2,263,282 |
Interest | 3,250 |
2,266,532 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 1,103,108 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 15,617 |
C Class | 59,893 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 5,205 |
C Class | 19,964 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 196,753 |
R Class | 6,672 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 5,756 |
1,412,968 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 853,564 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 3,369,290 |
Futures contract transactions | 502,988 |
3,872,278 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 24,240,366 |
Futures contracts | 125,412 |
24,365,778 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 28,238,056 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $29,091,620 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 853,564 | $ 2,517,261 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 3,872,278 | (75,469,025) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 24,365,778 | 85,640,660 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 29,091,620 | 12,688,896 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (497,306) | (570,427) |
Institutional Class | (3,938) | (8,437) |
A Class | (1,609,202) | (2,467,422) |
B Class | (10,268) | (21,956) |
C Class | (38,972) | (100,095) |
R Class | (20,874) | (4,280) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (2,180,560) | (3,172,617) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (27,575,317) | (69,431,177) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (664,257) | (59,914,898) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 220,156,093 | 280,070,991 |
End of period | $219,491,836 | $220,156,093 |
Undistributed net investment income | $348,644 | $1,675,640 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
18
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Fundamental Equity Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. Income is a secondary objective. The fund generally invests in larger-sized companies using a quantitative model that combines fundamental measures of a stock’s value and growth potential. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are
19
translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. Additionally, non-U.S. tax returns filed by the fund due to investments in certain foreign securities remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority for 7 years from the date of filing. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
20
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.00% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class, and 0.80% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $31,083,783 and $55,086,396, respectively.
21
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | ||
Sold | 443,400 | $ 5,076,142 | 2,936,657 | $ 25,135,556 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 41,430 | 466,086 | 57,636 | 509,506 |
Redeemed | (486,366) | (5,562,650) | (3,188,093) | (28,688,549) |
(1,536) | (20,422) | (193,800) | (3,043,487) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | ||
Sold | — | — | 6,979 | 64,975 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 261 | 2,933 | 843 | 7,449 |
Redeemed | (8,485) | (95,884) | (41,167) | (356,339) |
(8,224) | (92,951) | (33,345) | (283,915) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 | ||
Sold | 880,139 | 10,033,927 | 3,799,682 | 34,559,184 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 138,149 | 1,555,561 | 270,411 | 2,390,433 |
Redeemed | (3,320,081) | (37,737,950) | (10,954,111) | (100,378,119) |
(2,301,793) | (26,148,462) | (6,884,018) | (63,428,502) | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,032 | 11,312 | 32,197 | 295,530 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 787 | 8,796 | 2,063 | 18,109 |
Redeemed | (32,235) | (361,773) | (74,926) | (674,371) |
(30,416) | (341,665) | (40,666) | (360,732) | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 220,929 | 2,500,993 | 368,218 | 3,301,855 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 2,442 | 27,326 | 6,919 | 60,819 |
Redeemed | (288,643) | (3,233,872) | (839,097) | (7,652,952) |
(65,272) | (705,553) | (463,960) | (4,290,278) | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | 27,573 | 314,717 | 241,830 | 2,219,424 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 1,856 | 20,874 | 485 | 4,280 |
Redeemed | (52,770) | (601,855) | (27,315) | (247,967) |
(23,341) | (266,264) | 215,000 | 1,975,737 | |
Net increase (decrease) | (2,430,582) | $(27,575,317) | (7,400,789) | $(69,431,177) |
5. Fair Value Measurements |
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
22
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $214,507,283 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 29,733 | $5,100,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $214,537,016 | $5,100,000 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Futures Contracts | $54,868 | — | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Equity Price Risk — The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on an equity index in order to manage its exposure to changes in market conditions. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund is required to deposit either cash or securities in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (initial margin). Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss whe n the contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. The equity price risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
The value of equity price risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $32,850 in payable for variation margin on futures contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of equity price risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $502,988 in net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and $125,412 in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts.
7. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions.
8. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an
23
alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not utilize the program.
9. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $188,061,662 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $38,479,254 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (6,903,900) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $31,575,354 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(127,469,449), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(53,837,215) and $(73,632,234) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
24
Financial Highlights |
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.57 | $9.93 | $15.68 | $12.88 | $11.04 | $10.88 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.02 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.42 | 0.66 | (5.42) | 2.93 | 2.12 | 0.14 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.48 | 0.78 | (5.27) | 3.07 | 2.20 | 0.16 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.14) | (0.14) | (0.12) | (0.08) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.36) | (0.19) | (0.36) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.14) | (0.14) | (0.48) | (0.27) | (0.36) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.91 | $10.57 | $9.93 | $15.68 | $12.88 | $11.04 | |
Total Return(4) | 14.08% | 8.16% | (34.56)% | 24.18% | 20.37% | 1.47% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.01%(5) | 1.01% | 1.01% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.04%(5) | 1.37% | 1.15% | 0.99% | 0.74% | 0.59%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $42,709 | $37,918 | $37,535 | $53,908 | $3,836 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the period November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through | ||||||
October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.59 | $9.94 | $15.70 | $12.90 | $11.05 | $10.88 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.02 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.42 | 0.65 | (5.44) | 2.91 | 2.10 | 0.15 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.49 | 0.81 | (5.25) | 3.10 | 2.22 | 0.17 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.16) | (0.16) | (0.15) | (0.11) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.36) | (0.19) | (0.37) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.16) | (0.16) | (0.51) | (0.30) | (0.37) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.92 | $10.59 | $9.94 | $15.70 | $12.90 | $11.05 | |
Total Return(4) | 14.19% | 8.47% | (34.45)% | 24.43% | 20.51% | 1.56% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.81%(5) | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.24%(5) | 1.57% | 1.35% | 1.19% | 0.94% | 0.79%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $210 | $274 | $589 | $286 | $31 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the period November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through | ||||||
October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
A Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.56 | $9.91 | $15.65 | $12.85 | $11.03 | $10.00 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.42 | 0.66 | (5.41) | 2.92 | 2.11 | 1.01 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.46 | 0.77 | (5.29) | 3.03 | 2.17 | 1.03 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.11) | (0.12) | (0.09) | (0.04) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.36) | (0.19) | (0.35) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.11) | (0.12) | (0.45) | (0.23) | (0.35) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.91 | $10.56 | $9.91 | $15.65 | $12.85 | $11.03 | |
Total Return(4) | 13.91% | 8.00% | (34.73)% | 23.88% | 20.12% | 10.30% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.26%(5) | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.28%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.79%(5) | 1.12% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 0.49% | 0.17%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $153,065 | $159,959 | $218,469 | $246,322 | $37,314 | $1,636 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
B Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.42 | $9.78 | $15.45 | $12.74 | $10.96 | $10.00 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | —(4) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | (0.02) | (0.06) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.41 | 0.66 | (5.36) | 2.89 | 2.07 | 1.02 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.41 | 0.69 | (5.34) | 2.90 | 2.05 | 0.96 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.03) | (0.05) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.33) | (0.19) | (0.27) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.03) | (0.05) | (0.33) | (0.19) | (0.27) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.80 | $10.42 | $9.78 | $15.45 | $12.74 | $10.96 | |
Total Return(5) | 13.52% | 7.17% | (35.23)% | 23.01% | 19.04% | 9.60% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 2.01%(6) | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.03%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.04%(6) | 0.37% | 0.15% | (0.01)% | (0.26)% | (0.58)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $4,221 | $4,043 | $4,195 | $4,889 | $1,498 | $469 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.42 | $9.79 | $15.46 | $12.75 | $10.96 | $10.00 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | —(4) | 0.03 | 0.02 | —(4) | (0.03) | (0.06) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.41 | 0.65 | (5.36) | 2.90 | 2.09 | 1.02 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.41 | 0.68 | (5.34) | 2.90 | 2.06 | 0.96 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.03) | (0.05) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.33) | (0.19) | (0.27) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.03) | (0.05) | (0.33) | (0.19) | (0.27) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.80 | $10.42 | $9.79 | $15.46 | $12.75 | $10.96 | |
Total Return(5) | 13.52% | 7.06% | (35.20)% | 22.99% | 19.13% | 9.60% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 2.01%(6) | 2.01% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.03%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.04%(6) | 0.37% | 0.15% | (0.01)% | (0.26)% | (0.58)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $16,571 | $15,311 | $18,919 | $24,544 | $4,530 | $693 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Fundamental Equity | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $10.52 | $9.88 | $15.61 | $12.81 | $11.03 | $10.88 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.04 | —(4) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.42 | 0.68 | (5.41) | 2.90 | 2.08 | 0.15 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.45 | 0.74 | (5.32) | 2.99 | 2.12 | 0.15 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.08) | (0.10) | (0.05) | —(4) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.36) | (0.19) | (0.34) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.08) | (0.10) | (0.41) | (0.19) | (0.34) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $11.89 | $10.52 | $9.88 | $15.61 | $12.81 | $11.03 | |
Total Return(5) | 13.86% | 7.64% | (34.92)% | 23.60% | 19.67% | 1.38% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.51%(6) | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.54%(6) | 0.87% | 0.65% | 0.49% | 0.24% | 0.09%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15% | 64% | 97% | 82% | 174% | 101%(7) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $2,716 | $2,650 | $364 | $438 | $30 | $25 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||||
(7) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the period November 30, 2004 (fund inception) through | ||||||
October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the
31
circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
32
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confir-
mations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
33
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
34
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
35
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
36
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
37
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The S&P 500 Index is a market value-weighted index of the stocks of 500 publicly traded U.S. companies chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation that are considered to be leading firms in dominant industries. Each stock’s weight in the index is proportionate to its market value. Created by Standard & Poor’s, it is considered to be a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68437
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Focused Growth Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Focused Growth | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 14 |
Statement of Operations | 15 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 16 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 17 |
Financial Highlights | 23 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 29 |
Additional Information | 35 |
Index Definitions | 36 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Focused Growth | |||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Average Annual Returns | |||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | |||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | AFSIX | 14.59% | 33.74% | 4.04% | 3.19% | 2/28/05 | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index(2) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 4.05% | 3.16% | — | |
Institutional Class | AFGNX | 14.71% | 34.06% | — | -3.50% | 9/28/07 | |
A Class | AFGAX | 9/28/07 | |||||
No sales charge* | 14.55% | 33.51% | — | -3.90% | |||
With sales charge* | 7.99% | 25.79% | — | -6.08% | |||
B Class | AFGBX | 9/28/07 | |||||
No sales charge* | 14.01% | 32.58% | — | -4.64% | |||
With sales charge* | 9.01% | 28.58% | — | -5.90% | |||
C Class | AFGCX | 9/28/07 | |||||
No sales charge* | 14.01% | 32.58% | — | -4.64% | |||
With sales charge* | 13.01% | 32.58% | — | -4.64% | |||
R Class | AFGRX | 14.32% | 33.24% | — | -4.17% | 9/28/07 | |
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | |||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | |||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | |||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | |||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | |||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | ||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | |||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | |||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | |||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | |||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Focused Growth
*From 2/28/05, the Investor Class’s inception date. Not annualized. | |||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.01% | 0.81% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Focused Growth
Portfolio Managers: Greg Woodhams and Joe Reiland
Performance Summary
Focused Growth returned 14.59%* during the six months ended April 30, 2010. By comparison, the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the fund’s benchmark) rose 15.79%. The portfolio’s performance since its February 2005 inception is right in line with that of its benchmark (additional performance comparisons can be seen on pages 5-6).
In terms of Focused Growth’s absolute return for the six months, information technology shares contributed most to performance; no sector had negative returns for the period. Relative to the benchmark, stock choices in the consumer staples, information technology, and financials segments detracted most. Stock selection made the consumer discretionary and energy sectors the largest contributors to relative results.
Leading Detractors
Stock selection in the consumer staples sector was the leading detractor from relative results as investors sought more economically sensitive stocks. In that context, Coca-Cola, Kellogg, and General Mills lagged. Agricultural products processor Archer Daniels Midland detracted most, as soy crush margins declined. Our position in the stock was eliminated during the period.
Among technology shares, positioning in the communications equipment and internet software and services industries detracted most. Some of these stocks were vulnerable to profit-taking, and underperformed in early 2010 after big gains in 2009. The number-one detractor in the sector was network equipment maker QUALCOMM. The stock was punished for guiding expectations of future profit lower. Positioning in shares of Google also hurt relative results.
Financials stocks detracted from relative performance for the six months. The poor performance was concentrated in stocks of companies in the capital market industry segment, which was home to investment bank Goldman Sachs Group. This was the leading individual detractor for the six months after suffering from an unfavorable regulatory environment and a government investigation into its conduct in the buildup to the financial crisis.
Leading Contributors
The key contribution to relative results came from stock choices in the consumer discretionary sector, led by holdings in the household durables, specialty retail, auto components, and hotels, restaurant, and leisure industry segments. The number-one contributor to return relative to the benchmark came from a stake in Whirlpool, which saw margins improve and its international business do well. Another leading contributor in the sector was Starwood Hotels & Resorts, which benefited from rising room rates and favorable supply/demand factors as few new competing hotels and rooms are set to come online. Another top contributor was auto
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Focused Growth
parts manufacturer BorgWarner, which benefited from the rebound in the auto industry and demand for new turbo-diesel and gasoline direct-injection engines. Specialty retailers Home Depot and Lowe’s did well after reporting better same-store sales and other business metrics.
Positioning in the energy sector also helped performance compared with the benchmark—stock choices had a positive effect, and it was beneficial to be underrepresented in this lagging sector. It helped to have no exposure to big, diversified oil services firm Exxon Mobil, whose shares underper-formed during the market rebound.
Two of the top-10 individual contributors to performance for the last six months resided in the health care sector. Pharmaceutical firm Novo Nordisk enjoyed market share gains and benefited from approval of a drug in a new class of diabetes management therapies. Pharmacy benefits manager Express Scripts, which helps employers and insurers control prescription medicine costs, did well after reporting strong margins and some key business wins.
Outlook
We believe the portfolio can outperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index over time through stock selection in the large-cap growth universe, style adherence, risk management, and disciplined execution that contributes to greater consistency. And while we recognize that each investment environment presents its own unique challenges, our emphasis on stock selection as the principal generator of alpha and our focus on risk management remain constant.
As a result, the portfolio’s sector and industry selection as well as capitalization range allocations are primarily a result of identifying what we believe to be superior individual securities. As of April 30, 2010, we found opportunity in the consumer discretionary and telecommunication services sectors, two of the portfolio’s largest overweight positions relative to the benchmark. The most notable sector underweight was in consumer staples shares. On an absolute basis, information technology shares remain the portfolio’s single largest sector allocation by far, while the portfolio had no exposure to the tiny (less than 1% of the index) utilities sector.
8
Focused Growth | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Apple, Inc. | 5.4% |
Microsoft Corp. | 4.6% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 4.2% |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 4.0% |
Abbott Laboratories | 3.7% |
Google, Inc., Class A | 3.5% |
Express Scripts, Inc. | 3.1% |
Oracle Corp. | 3.0% |
Amgen, Inc. | 2.9% |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 2.8% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 13.2% |
Software | 7.6% |
Pharmaceuticals | 6.6% |
Food Products | 5.4% |
Multiline Retail | 4.6% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 97.9% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 2.3% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.2)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
10
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,145.90 | $5.32 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,147.10 | $4.26 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,145.50 | $6.65 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,140.10 | $10.61 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,140.10 | $10.61 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,143.20 | $7.97 | 1.50% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Focused Growth | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 97.9% | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 0.6% | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 1.0% | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1,366 | $ 82,943 | |||
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | ||||||
Honeywell International, Inc. | 2,611 | $ 123,944 | INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 2.4% | |||
Rockwell Collins, Inc. | 357 | 23,205 | Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 22,025 | 337,423 | |
147,149 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 0.3% | |||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 2.1% | Schlumberger Ltd. | 567 | 40,495 | |||
United Parcel Service, Inc., | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 0.8% | |||||
Class B | 4,356 | 301,174 | ||||
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.5% | Walgreen Co. | 2,995 | 105,274 | |||
BorgWarner, Inc.(1) | 4,732 | 205,085 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 5.4% | |||
AUTOMOBILES — 0.2% | General Mills, Inc. | 5,514 | 392,486 | |||
Kellogg Co. | 6,639 | 364,747 | ||||
Ford Motor Co.(1) | 1,955 | 25,454 | ||||
757,233 | ||||||
BEVERAGES — 4.0% | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 2.2% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 10,497 | 561,065 | Baxter International, Inc. | 1,609 | 75,977 | |
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 3.1% | Covidien plc | 4,991 | 239,518 | |||
Alexion | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 336 | 18,440 | 315,495 | |||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 7,193 | 412,590 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 3.1% | |||
Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 4,332 | 433,763 | ||||
431,030 | ||||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.7% | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 1.1% | |||||
Goldman Sachs | Starwood Hotels & | |||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 1,690 | 245,388 | Resorts Worldwide, Inc. | 2,803 | 152,792 | |
CHEMICALS — 2.0% | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 2.2% | |||||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 5,685 | 181,863 | Whirlpool Corp. | 2,833 | 308,429 | |
PPG Industries, Inc. | 1,315 | 92,537 | HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 1.0% | |||
274,400 | Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2,336 | 145,206 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 1.1% | INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.4% | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 4,808 | 159,193 | 3M Co. | 2,169 | 192,325 | |
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 2.1% | INSURANCE — 1.6% | |||||
Arris Group, Inc.(1) | 3,886 | 47,759 | Aflac, Inc. | 4,283 | 218,262 | |
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 890 | 60,902 | INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 3.5% | |||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 928 | 487,608 | ||||
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 4,762 | 184,480 | ||||
293,141 | IT SERVICES — 0.5% | |||||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 13.2% | Paychex, Inc. | 2,463 | 75,368 | |||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 2,912 | 760,382 | MACHINERY — 4.3% | |||
Dell, Inc.(1) | 6,163 | 99,717 | Eaton Corp. | 2,722 | 210,030 | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 7,824 | 399,806 | ||||
EMC Corp.(1) | 20,829 | 395,959 | ||||
609,836 | ||||||
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 11,418 | 593,394 | MEDIA — 2.0% | |||
1,849,452 | Scripps Networks | |||||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 2.2% | Interactive, Inc., Class A | 6,209 | 281,516 | |||
American Express Co. | 6,786 | 312,970 | MULTILINE RETAIL — 4.6% | |||
DIVERSIFIED — 0.6% | Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 6,365 | 350,011 | |||
iShares Russell 1000 Growth | Target Corp. | 5,163 | 293,620 | |||
Index Fund | 1,531 | 80,393 | ||||
643,631 |
12
Focused Growth | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 2.9% | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 2.1% | |||||
Apache Corp. | 2,393 | $ 243,512 | American Tower Corp., | |||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 1,919 | 170,138 | Class A(1) | 7,353 | $ 300,076 | |
413,650 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 6.6% | (Cost $11,005,061) | 13,735,584 | ||||
Abbott Laboratories | 10,202 | 521,934 | Temporary Cash Investments — 2.3% | |||
Novo Nordisk A/S B Shares | 4,872 | 397,933 | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||
919,867 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||||
ROAD & RAIL — 2.3% | Agency Shares | 28,442 | 28,442 | |||
Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse First | ||||||
Union Pacific Corp. | 4,177 | 316,032 | Boston, Inc., (collateralized by various U.S. | |||
SEMICONDUCTORS & | Treasury obligations, 8.00%, 11/15/21, | |||||
SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT — 2.1% | valued at $306,137), in a joint trading | |||||
Broadcom Corp., Class A | 2,164 | 74,636 | account at 0.13%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||
Linear Technology Corp. | 7,524 | 226,172 | 5/3/10 (Delivery value $300,003) | 300,000 | ||
300,808 | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||||
SOFTWARE — 7.6% | (Cost $328,442) | 328,442 | ||||
Microsoft Corp. | 21,159 | 646,196 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
Oracle Corp. | 16,030 | 414,215 | SECURITIES — 100.2% | |||
1,060,411 | (Cost $11,333,503) | 14,064,026 | ||||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 2.5% | OTHER ASSETS | |||||
Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 8,368 | 294,972 | AND LIABILITIES — (0.2)% | (27,244) | ||
J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 1,211 | 56,275 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $14,036,782 | ||
351,247 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
1,409,515 DKK for USD | 5/28/10 | $252,118 | $(235) |
(Value on Settlement Date $251,883) | |||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
DKK = Danish Krone | |||
USD = United States Dollar | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
13
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||
Assets | ||||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $11,333,503) | $14,064,026 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 199,878 | |||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 5,867 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 13,906 | |||
14,283,677 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 234,894 | |||
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 235 | |||
Accrued management fees | 11,524 | |||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 136 | |||
Distribution fees payable | 106 | |||
246,895 | ||||
Net Assets | $14,036,782 | |||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $13,509,585 | |||
Undistributed net investment income | 20,819 | |||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (2,223,974) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 2,730,352 | |||
$14,036,782 | ||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | ||
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $13,373,626 | 1,336,971 | $10.00 | |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $22,805 | 2,282 | $9.99 | |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $441,828 | 44,188 | $10.00* | |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $54,113 | 5,449 | $9.93 | |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $121,627 | 12,247 | $9.93 | |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $22,783 | 2,282 | $9.98 | |
*Maximum offering price $10.61 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $890) | $ 94,396 |
Interest | 84 |
94,480 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 66,963 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 192 |
C Class | 355 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 64 |
C Class | 118 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 521 |
R Class | 53 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 190 |
68,456 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 26,024 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 293,581 |
Foreign currency transactions | 24,073 |
317,654 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 1,487,049 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (1,371) |
1,485,678 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1,803,332 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $1,829,356 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 26,024 | $ 48,633 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 317,654 | (1,858,458) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 1,485,678 | 3,320,135 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 1,829,356 | 1,510,310 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (5,153) | (57,432) |
Institutional Class | (52) | (145) |
A Class | — | (1,030) |
R Class | — | (34) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (5,205) | (58,641) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (879,196) | 2,447,525 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 944,955 | 3,899,194 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 13,091,827 | 9,192,633 |
End of period | $14,036,782 | $13,091,827 |
Undistributed net investment income | $20,819 | — |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
16
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Focused Growth Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by purchasing stocks of larger-sized companies that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
17
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Exchange Traded Funds — The fund may invest in exchange traded funds (ETFs). ETFs are a type of index fund bought and sold on a securities exchange. An ETF trades like common stock and represents a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. A fund may purchase an ETF to temporarily gain exposure to a portion of the U.S. or a foreign market while awaiting purchase of underlying securities. The risks of owning an ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities they are designed to track, although the lack of liquidity on an ETF could result in it being more volatile. Additionally, ETFs have fees and expenses that reduce their value.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
18
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.00% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class and 0.80% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $3,624,024 and $4,533,749, respectively.
19
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 175,973 | $ 1,684,514 | 654,311 | $ 5,116,668 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 526 | 5,016 | 8,124 | 55,893 |
Redeemed | (275,839) | (2,598,658) | (366,700) | (2,889,415) |
(99,340) | (909,128) | 295,735 | 2,283,146 | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 5 | 52 | 21 | 145 |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | 6,097 | 56,933 | 44,859 | 360,028 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 149 | 1,030 |
Redeemed | (4,629) | (44,618) | (33,521) | (216,714) |
1,468 | 12,315 | 11,487 | 144,344 | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | — | — | 2,202 | 17,425 |
Redeemed | — | — | (660) | (4,449) |
— | — | 1,542 | 12,976 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | 5,913 | 54,733 | 3,456 | 29,290 |
Redeemed | (4,044) | (37,545) | (2,490) | (22,410) |
1,869 | 17,188 | 966 | 6,880 | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | 53 | 516 | — | — |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 5 | 34 |
Redeemed | (14) | (139) | — | — |
39 | 377 | 5 | 34 | |
Net increase (decrease) | (95,959) | $ (879,196) | 309,756 | $ 2,447,525 |
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
20
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $13,337,651 | $397,933 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 28,442 | 300,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $13,366,093 | $697,933 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(235) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $235 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $23,997 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $(1,351) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
21
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $11,456,270 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $2,675,594 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (67,838) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $2,607,756 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(2,419,403), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(677,282) and $(1,742,121) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
22
Financial Highlights |
Focused Growth | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.92 | $11.42 | $10.53 | $10.00 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | —(4) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.25 | 1.01 | (3.74) | 1.73 | 0.95 | 0.53 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.27 | 1.05 | (3.72) | 1.77 | 0.96 | 0.53 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | —(4) | (0.05) | (0.01) | (0.04) | —(4) | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (1.46) | (0.23) | (0.07) | — | |
Total Distributions | —(4) | (0.05) | (1.47) | (0.27) | (0.07) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $10.00 | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.92 | $11.42 | $10.53 | |
Total Return(5) | 14.59% | 13.77% | (32.19)% | 15.78% | 9.13% | 5.30% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(6) | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.41%(6) | 0.50% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.07% | 0.00%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275% | 313% | 95% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $13,374 | $12,541 | $8,814 | $13,381 | $15,837 | $12,175 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | February 28, 2005 (fund inception) through October 31, 2005. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Focused Growth | |||||
Institutional Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.93 | $12.59 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | —(4) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.25 | 1.01 | (3.75) | 0.34 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.28 | 1.06 | (3.71) | 0.34 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Investment Income | (0.02) | (0.06) | (0.03) | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.46) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.02) | (0.06) | (1.49) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $9.99 | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.93 | |
Total Return(5) | 14.71% | 14.00% | (32.09)% | 2.70% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 0.80%(6) | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | 0.61%(6) | 0.70% | 0.42% | (0.40)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275%(7) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $23 | $20 | $17 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||
between one class and another. | |||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||
(7) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Focused Growth | |||||
A Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $8.74 | $7.73 | $12.92 | $12.59 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | 0.01 | 0.02 | —(4) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.25 | 1.02 | (3.75) | 0.34 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.26 | 1.04 | (3.75) | 0.33 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Investment Income | — | (0.03) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.44) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.03) | (1.44) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $10.00 | $8.74 | $7.73 | $12.92 | |
Total Return(5) | 14.55% | 13.48% | (32.37)% | 2.62% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.25%(6) | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | 0.16%(6) | 0.25% | (0.03)% | (0.85)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275%(7) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $442 | $373 | $241 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||
(7) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Focused Growth | |||||
B Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $8.71 | $7.73 | $12.91 | $12.59 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.08) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.25 | 1.02 | (3.75) | 0.34 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.22 | 0.98 | (3.83) | 0.32 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.35) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $9.93 | $8.71 | $7.73 | $12.91 | |
Total Return(4) | 14.01% | 12.68% | (32.87)% | 2.54% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(5) | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.59)%(5) | (0.50)% | (0.78)% | (1.60)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $54 | $47 | $30 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Focused Growth | |||||
C Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $8.71 | $7.73 | $12.91 | $12.59 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.08) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.25 | 1.02 | (3.75) | 0.34 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.22 | 0.98 | (3.83) | 0.32 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.35) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $9.93 | $8.71 | $7.73 | $12.91 | |
Total Return(4) | 14.01% | 12.68% | (32.87)% | 2.54% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(5) | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.59)%(5) | (0.50)% | (0.78)% | (1.52)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $122 | $90 | $73 | $76 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Focused Growth | |||||
R Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.92 | $12.59 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.01) | —(4) | (0.02) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.26 | 1.02 | (3.76) | 0.34 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.25 | 1.02 | (3.78) | 0.33 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.41) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (1.41) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $9.98 | $8.73 | $7.73 | $12.92 | |
Total Return(5) | 14.32% | 13.19% | (32.56)% | 2.62% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.50%(6) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.09)%(6) | 0.00%(7) | (0.28)% | (1.10)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 28% | 125% | 130% | 275%(8) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $23 | $20 | $17 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||
between one class and another. | |||||
(6) | Annualized. | ||||
(7) | Ratio is less than 0.005%. | ||||
(8) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor
29
will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
30
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
31
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
32
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
33
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
34
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
35
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
36
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68438
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Capital Value Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Capital Value | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 23 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 26 |
Additional Information | 32 |
Index Definitions | 33 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase – “The best is yet to be” – still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Phil Davidson, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Value Equity
Stocks Soared on Mixed Economic Data
Stocks posted robust returns during the six-month period ended April 30, 2010, extending the rally that began in March 2009. Better-than-expected corporate earnings, driven primarily by cost-cutting, helped fuel the gains. Furthermore, signs the economy was recovering from the worst recession in decades provided a positive backdrop for stock investors. Despite an unemployment rate hovering near 10% and lackluster consumer spending and housing market data, stock investors focused on manufacturing and inventory gains and the steepening Treasury yield curve as indications the economy was rebounding.
The optimism that prevailed throughout most of the period gave way to a more pessimistic tone for the stock market late in the period, when concerns shifted to the mounting sovereign debt crisis in Greece and other European nations. In late April, Standard & Poor’s downgraded Greece’s sovereign debt to junk status, and investors feared other European nations would face similar fates. The financial crisis in Greece reminded investors of the fiscal dangers still facing many countries that borrowed heavily and incurred massive debt to combat the global financial crisis.
Value Outpaced Growth
All major stock benchmarks showed strong returns during the period, with small-cap stocks leading the charge, as investors positioned their portfolios for an improving economy. Across the capitalization spectrum, value stocks outperformed their growth counterparts, primarily due to a rebound in the financials sector, which represents a large weighting in many value indices. A recovery in dividend payments gains also helped boost performance among value stocks. In particular, February 2010 marked the best month for dividends in more than two years as 47 companies represented in the S&P 500 Index raised their dividends or began paying them.
Whether positive economic news continues to influence the stock market will increasingly depend on whether households—the real engine of economic growth—have the wherewithal and the desire to increase spending. In the second half of the period, the economy experienced some positive signs in that regard, as service industries stepped up their hiring and select retailers experienced higher demand.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Capital Value | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | ACTIX | 11.80% | 35.17% | 0.02% | 3.72% | 3.60% | 3/31/99 | |
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions(2) | 11.49% | 34.80% | -0.47% | 3.27% | 3.17% | |||
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions and | ||||||||
Sale of Shares(2) | 8.04% | 23.31% | 0.05% | 3.13% | 3.02% | |||
Russell 1000 | ||||||||
Value Index(3) | — | 17.77% | 42.28% | 1.93% | 3.48% | 3.60% | — | |
Institutional Class | ACPIX | 12.02% | 35.45% | 0.22% | — | 2.63% | 3/1/02 | |
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions(2) | 11.69% | 35.04% | -0.30% | — | 2.18% | |||
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions and | ||||||||
Sale of Shares(2) | 8.23% | 23.54% | 0.22% | — | 2.23% | |||
A Class(4) | ACCVX | 5/14/03 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 11.94% | 34.83% | -0.20% | — | 4.25% | |||
With sales charge* | 5.56% | 27.04% | -1.37% | — | 3.36% | |||
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions(2) | 5.32% | 26.74% | -1.82% | — | 2.98% | |||
Return After-Tax | ||||||||
on Distributions and | ||||||||
Sale of Shares(2) | 3.92% | 17.94% | -1.13% | — | 2.92% | |||
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | ||||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds | ||||||||
provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | After-tax returns are calculated with sales charge, as applicable, using the historical highest individual federal marginal income tax rates, and do | |||||||
not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on an investor’s tax situation and may differ from those shown. | ||||||||
After-tax returns shown are not relevant to investors who hold their fund shares through tax-deferred arrangements such as 401(k) plans or | ||||||||
individual retirement accounts. | ||||||||
(3) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(4) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Capital Value
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | ||
Investor Class | Institutional Class | A Class |
1.10% | 0.90% | 1.35% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fe es) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Capital Value
Portfolio Managers: Chuck Ritter and Brendan Healy
Performance Summary
Capital Value returned 11.80%(1) for the six months ended April 30, 2010. By comparison, its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index, returned 17.77%, while the broader market, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, returned 15.66%.(2) The portfolio’s return reflects operating expenses, while the indices’ returns do not. The average return for Morningstar’s Large Cap Value category (its performance, like Capital Value’s, reflects operating expenses) was 14.82%.(3)
Despite some setbacks, and as described in the Market Perspective on page 4, stock prices rose during the six-month reporting period. Economic conditions improved in response to government stimulus, corporate earnings were better than expected, and improving conditions in the capital markets helped the more highly leveraged or financially strapped companies. These factors led many investors to focus on riskier assets, and many of the period’s largest gains were made by the lower-quality businesses that fared the worst during the financial crisis. Furthermore, the names that lagged the rally tended to be the stable, less-risky businesses favored by Capital Value. In this environment, the portfolio received positive results in absolute terms from nine of the 10 sectors in which it was invested. On a relative basis, positions in the consumer discretionary, financials, and health care sectors detracted. The portf olio’s complement of industrials stocks enhanced results.
Consumer Discretionary Detracted
The benchmark’s top-performing sector was a source of relative weakness. Many consumer discretionary stocks, which had experienced steep declines during the recession, rallied on optimism about economic growth and improving consumer sentiment.
The portfolio’s relative underperformance was largely a result of what it didn’t own rather than what it did. Capital Value had no exposure to automobiles stocks, including Ford Motor. The car maker, which has been able to restructure its business without the help of the U.S. government, continued to gain market share and reported a solid first-quarter profit.
Similarly, the portfolio’s underweight in the media industry slowed results. Media companies outperformed as the economy strengthened and advertising revenues improved. Nevertheless, Capital Value benefited from a position in CBS Corp. Shares of the television network rose on news of record-breaking audiences for its sports programming, including golf’s Master’s tournament and college basketball’s March Madness.
(1) | All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. |
(2) | The S&P 500 Index average annual returns were 38.84%, 2.63% and -0.19% for the one-, five- and 10-year periods ended April 30, 2010, |
respectively, and 1.04% since the Investor Class’s inception. | |
(3) | The average returns for Morningstar’s Large Cap Value category were 38.57%, 1.92% and 3.28% on an average annualized basis for the one-, |
five- and ten-year periods ended April 30, 2010, respectively. Since the Investor Class’s inception, the average return for Morningstar’s Large Cap | |
Value category was 3.36%. © 2010 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar | |
and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither | |
Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. |
7
Capital Value
Financials Hindered Progress
Although financials contributed positively to Capital Value’s return, an underweight restrained relative performance as companies with stressed balance sheets outperformed stronger, higher-quality businesses. In particular, the portfolio was underweight commercial banks, which turned in strong performance for the benchmark.
An underweight in real estate investment trusts (REITs) also hampered relative results. For some time, the management team has been concerned about this segment’s operating trends, financial leverage, access to funding, and valuation. However, in spite of deterioration in the commercial real estate market, REIT stocks posted strong gains in the benchmark as investors sought out riskier assets during the period.
Health Care Slowed Results
The portfolio’s overweight in pharmaceuticals stocks dampened relative performance. A key detractor was Pfizer. Although Pfizer reported strong fourth-quarter 2009 earnings and increased growth because of its merger with Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, its shares declined on a lower-than-expected 2010 financial forecast.
Industrials Contributed
The industrials sector added to the portfolio’s total return. Many industrials stocks posted strong gains during the reporting period as economic conditions improved.
Capital Value benefited from effective security selection throughout the sector. The aerospace and defense industry provided two notable contributors, Northrop Grumman Corp. and Honeywell International. Northrop Grumman reported robust profits as U.S. defense spending increased. Honeywell raised its earnings outlook in response to stronger orders for its products.
The machinery industry supplied key contributor Dover Corp. The equipment manufacturer’s first-quarter profits doubled, driven by higher sales and acquisition gains.
Outlook
We continue to be bottom-up investment managers, evaluating each company individually and building our portfolio one stock at a time. Capital Value is broadly diversified, with ongoing overweight positions in the health care, information technology, and consumer staples sectors. Our valuation work is also directing us toward smaller relative weightings in financials and utilities stocks. In addition, we are still finding value opportunities among mega-cap stocks and have maintained our bias toward them.
8
Capital Value | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 5.0% |
General Electric Co. | 4.1% |
Chevron Corp. | 3.8% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3.7% |
AT&T, Inc. | 3.5% |
Bank of America Corp. | 3.5% |
Pfizer, Inc. | 3.4% |
ConocoPhillips | 3.1% |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 2.4% |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | 2.1% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 16.9% |
Pharmaceuticals | 8.6% |
Diversified Financial Services | 7.7% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services | 6.0% |
Media | 4.7% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 99.1% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 0.4% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.5% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending
10
account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 - 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,118.00 | $5.78 | 1.10% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,120.20 | $4.73 | 0.90% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,119.40 | $7.09 | 1.35% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.34 | $5.51 | 1.10% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.33 | $4.51 | 0.90% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.10 | $6.76 | 1.35% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Capital Value | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 99.1% | DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 7.7% | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 2.6% | Bank of America Corp. | 345,400 | $ 6,158,482 | |||
Citigroup, Inc.(1) | 234,600 | 1,025,202 | ||||
Honeywell International, Inc. | 32,600 | $ 1,547,522 | ||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | 11,400 | 967,746 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 151,000 | 6,429,580 | |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 30,100 | 2,041,683 | 13,613,264 | |||
4,556,951 | DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION | |||||
SERVICES — 6.0% | ||||||
BEVERAGES — 1.3% | AT&T, Inc. | 237,700 | 6,194,462 | |||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 42,900 | 2,293,005 | CenturyTel, Inc. | 19,700 | 671,967 | |
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 0.7% | Verizon | |||||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 16,100 | 923,496 | Communications, Inc. | 129,300 | 3,735,477 | |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 9,500 | 376,865 | 10,601,906 | |||
1,300,361 | ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 2.5% | |||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 3.6% | American Electric | |||||
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 25,800 | 1,196,088 | Power Co., Inc. | 22,500 | 771,750 | |
Bank of New York | Exelon Corp. | 47,900 | 2,087,961 | |||
Mellon Corp. (The) | 51,300 | 1,596,969 | PPL Corp. | 58,100 | 1,438,556 | |
Goldman Sachs | 4,298,267 | |||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 14,200 | 2,061,840 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.7% | |||
Morgan Stanley | 47,200 | 1,426,384 | Baker Hughes, Inc. | 16,900 | 840,944 | |
6,281,281 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 32,500 | 1,430,975 | |||
CHEMICALS — 2.3% | Transocean Ltd.(1) | 9,000 | 652,050 | |||
E.I. du Pont de Nemours | 2,923,969 | |||||
& Co. | 58,000 | 2,310,720 | ||||
PPG Industries, Inc. | 23,600 | 1,660,732 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 3.2% | |||
3,971,452 | Kroger Co. (The) | 51,100 | 1,135,953 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 4.6% | SYSCO Corp. | 34,000 | 1,072,360 | |||
PNC Financial Services | Walgreen Co. | 44,700 | 1,571,205 | |||
Group, Inc. | 22,700 | 1,525,667 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 35,600 | 1,909,940 | |
U.S. Bancorp. | 92,100 | 2,465,517 | 5,689,458 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 125,500 | 4,155,305 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.2% | |||
8,146,489 | Kraft Foods, Inc., Class A | 43,700 | 1,293,520 | |||
COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 1.2% | Unilever NV | |||||
Avery Dennison Corp. | 17,500 | 683,025 | New York Shares | 27,500 | 832,150 | |
Pitney Bowes, Inc. | 26,700 | 678,180 | 2,125,670 | |||
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | 35,700 | 767,193 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 0.4% | |||
2,128,398 | Medtronic, Inc. | 16,000 | 699,040 | |||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 0.8% | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 1.3% | |||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 50,100 | 1,348,692 | Aetna, Inc. | 26,600 | 786,030 | |
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 1.2% | Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | 9,100 | 520,156 | |||
WellPoint, Inc.(1) | 17,400 | 936,120 | ||||
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 38,800 | 2,016,436 | ||||
CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 0.3% | 2,242,306 | |||||
Shaw Group, Inc. (The)(1) | 14,500 | 555,060 | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 0.5% | |||
DIVERSIFIED CONSUMER SERVICES — 0.4% | Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 10,000 | 447,500 | |||
H&R Block, Inc. | 36,600 | 670,146 | Starbucks Corp. | 18,600 | 483,228 | |
930,728 |
12
Capital Value | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.6% | OFFICE ELECTRONICS — 0.4% | |||||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 64,400 | $ 1,099,308 | Xerox Corp. | 65,200 | $ 710,680 | |
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 0.5% | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 16.9% | |||||
Clorox Co. | 14,700 | 951,090 | Apache Corp. | 19,700 | 2,004,672 | |
INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS | Chevron Corp. | 81,000 | 6,596,640 | |||
& ENERGY TRADERS — 0.3% | ConocoPhillips | 91,700 | 5,427,723 | |||
NRG Energy, Inc.(1) | 20,200 | 488,234 | Devon Energy Corp. | 20,300 | 1,366,799 | |
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 4.6% | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 128,600 | 8,725,510 | |||
General Electric Co. | 379,100 | 7,149,826 | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 25,000 | 2,216,500 | |
Tyco International Ltd. | 24,400 | 946,476 | Royal Dutch Shell plc, | |||
8,096,302 | Class A ADR | 38,900 | 2,440,975 | |||
INSURANCE — 4.7% | Valero Energy Corp. | 45,300 | 941,787 | |||
Allstate Corp. (The) | 45,100 | 1,473,417 | 29,720,606 | |||
Chubb Corp. (The) | 29,100 | 1,538,517 | PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 0.5% | |||
Loews Corp. | 24,700 | 919,828 | International Paper Co. | 30,500 | 815,570 | |
Principal Financial | PHARMACEUTICALS — 8.6% | |||||
Group, Inc. | 33,100 | 967,182 | Abbott Laboratories | 29,400 | 1,504,104 | |
Torchmark Corp. | 20,000 | 1,070,800 | Eli Lilly & Co. | 29,500 | 1,031,615 | |
Travelers Cos., Inc. (The) | 34,700 | 1,760,678 | Johnson & Johnson | 51,100 | 3,285,730 | |
XL Capital Ltd., Class A | 28,400 | 505,520 | Merck & Co., Inc. | 94,800 | 3,321,792 | |
8,235,942 | Pfizer, Inc. | 361,600 | 6,045,952 | |||
IT SERVICES — 1.5% | 15,189,193 | |||||
Fiserv, Inc.(1) | 13,500 | 689,715 | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.6% | |||
International Business | Simon Property Group, Inc. | 12,100 | 1,077,142 | |||
Machines Corp. | 15,500 | 1,999,500 | SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | |||
2,689,215 | EQUIPMENT — 1.2% | |||||
MACHINERY — 1.4% | Applied Materials, Inc. | 43,400 | 598,052 | |||
Dover Corp. | 20,300 | 1,060,066 | Intel Corp. | 63,800 | 1,456,554 | |
Ingersoll-Rand plc | 39,200 | 1,449,616 | 2,054,606 | |||
2,509,682 | SOFTWARE — 2.4% | |||||
MEDIA — 4.7% | Activision Blizzard, Inc. | 50,700 | 561,756 | |||
CBS Corp., Class B | 76,300 | 1,236,823 | Microsoft Corp. | 68,100 | 2,079,774 | |
Comcast Corp., Class A | 105,200 | 2,076,648 | Oracle Corp. | 59,800 | 1,545,232 | |
Time Warner Cable, Inc. | 21,300 | 1,198,125 | 4,186,762 | |||
Time Warner, Inc. | 66,800 | 2,209,744 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 2.5% | |||
Viacom, Inc., Class B(1) | 45,600 | 1,611,048 | Best Buy Co., Inc. | 17,000 | 775,200 | |
8,332,388 | Gap, Inc. (The) | 26,600 | 657,818 | |||
METALS & MINING — 1.0% | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 63,800 | 2,248,950 | |||
Freeport-McMoRan | Staples, Inc. | 31,200 | 734,136 | |||
Copper & Gold, Inc. | 4,600 | 347,438 | 4,416,104 | |||
Nucor Corp. | 29,100 | 1,318,812 | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 0.6% | |||
1,666,250 | VF Corp. | 11,500 | 993,830 | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 0.9% | TOBACCO — 1.0% | |||||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 16,600 | 912,834 | Altria Group, Inc. | 58,300 | 1,235,377 | |
Macy’s, Inc. | 30,300 | 702,960 | Lorillard, Inc. | 5,700 | 446,709 | |
1,615,794 | 1,682,086 | |||||
MULTI-UTILITIES — 0.7% | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||
PG&E Corp. | 29,600 | 1,296,480 | (Cost $143,053,018) | 174,220,143 |
13
Capital Value | |||
Shares | Value | ||
Temporary Cash Investments — 0.4% | |||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||
Agency Shares | 12,632 | $ 12,632 | |
Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse | |||
First Boston, Inc., (collateralized by | |||
various U.S. Treasury obligations, | |||
8.00%, 11/15/21, valued at $714,319), | |||
in a joint trading account at 0.13%, | |||
dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | |||
(Delivery value $700,008) | 700,000 | ||
TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||
CASH INVESTMENTS | |||
(Cost $712,632) | 712,632 | ||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
SECURITIES — 99.5% | |||
(Cost $143,765,650) | 174,932,775 | ||
OTHER ASSETS | |||
AND LIABILITIES — 0.5% | 895,074 | ||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $175,827,849 | ||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
(1) Non-income producing. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $143,765,650) | $174,932,775 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 1,221,979 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 14,172 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 220,255 | ||
176,389,181 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 400,340 | ||
Accrued management fees | 160,025 | ||
Distribution and service fees payable | 967 | ||
561,332 | |||
Net Assets | $175,827,849 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $177,168,356 | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 745,146 | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (33,252,778) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 31,167,125 | ||
$175,827,849 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $162,574,322 | 27,823,172 | $5.84 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $8,589,472 | 1,469,434 | $5.85 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $4,664,055 | 799,016 | $5.84* |
*Maximum offering price $6.20 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends | $ 2,272,441 |
Interest | 354 |
2,272,795 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 949,237 |
Distribution and service fees | 5,840 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 2,436 |
957,513 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 1,315,282 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions | 340,214 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 18,110,087 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 18,450,301 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $19,765,583 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 1,315,282 | $ 3,819,622 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 340,214 | (24,311,422) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 18,110,087 | 27,203,273 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 19,765,583 | 6,711,473 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (2,997,083) | (5,825,919) |
Institutional Class | (160,186) | (358,398) |
A Class | (74,678) | (211,371) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (3,231,947) | (6,395,688) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (12,053,491) | (33,570,658) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 4,480,145 | (33,254,873) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 171,347,704 | 204,602,577 |
End of period | $175,827,849 | $171,347,704 |
Undistributed net investment income | $745,146 | $2,661,811 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Capital Value Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in common stocks that management believes to be undervalued at the time of purchase. The fund also seeks to minimize the impact of federal income taxes on shareholder returns by attempting to minimize taxable distributions to shareholders. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class and the A Class (formerly Advisor Class). The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated t o each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the
18
custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.90% to 1.10% for the Investor Class and A Class. The Institutional Class is 0.20% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.10% for the Investor Class and A Class, and 0.90% for the Institutional Class.
19
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan (the plan) for the A Class, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plan provides that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on A Class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plan during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $17,823,160 and $30,921,320, respectively.
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,278,846 | $ 7,167,397 | 3,022,048 | $ 13,900,445 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 451,737 | 2,507,145 | 1,062,378 | 4,759,452 |
Redeemed | (3,708,236) | (20,821,186) | (10,206,660) | (46,370,846) |
(1,977,653) | (11,146,644) | (6,122,234) | (27,710,949) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 | ||
Sold | 329,834 | 1,846,731 | 156,615 | 674,936 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 8,418 | 46,637 | 31,585 | 141,500 |
Redeemed | (378,122) | (2,138,035) | (1,004,483) | (4,643,987) |
(39,870) | (244,667) | (816,283) | (3,827,551) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 73,075 | 415,856 | 171,780 | 781,303 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 13,441 | 74,594 | 47,147 | 211,217 |
Redeemed | (207,741) | (1,152,630) | (657,655) | (3,024,678) |
(121,225) | (662,180) | (438,728) | (2,032,158) | |
Net increase (decrease) | (2,138,748) | $(12,053,491) | (7,377,245) | $(33,570,658) |
20
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $174,220,143 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 12,632 | $700,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $174,232,775 | $700,000 | — |
6. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
7. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
21
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $144,785,447 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $39,296,124 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (9,148,796) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $30,147,328 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(32,923,173), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(8,742,213) and $(24,180,960) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
8. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
22
Financial Highlights |
Capital Value | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.32 | $5.17 | $8.78 | $8.23 | $7.15 | $6.61 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.10 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.58 | 0.21 | (3.28) | 0.65 | 1.14 | 0.51 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 0.62 | 0.32 | (3.14) | 0.78 | 1.26 | 0.61 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.10) | (0.17) | (0.13) | (0.12) | (0.10) | (0.07) | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.34) | (0.11) | (0.08) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.10) | (0.17) | (0.47) | (0.23) | (0.18) | (0.07) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $5.84 | $5.32 | $5.17 | $8.78 | $8.23 | $7.15 | |
Total Return(3) | 11.80% | 6.85% | (37.52)% | 9.66% | 18.03% | 9.29% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.10%(4) | 1.10% | 1.10% | 1.10% | 1.10% | 1.10% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.51%(4) | 2.33% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.55% | 1.42% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 10% | 19% | 26% | 15% | 16% | 28% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $162,574 | $158,431 | $185,569 | $461,413 | $466,803 | $458,354 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Capital Value | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.32 | $5.17 | $8.79 | $8.24 | $7.16 | $6.62 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.12 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.59 | 0.21 | (3.28) | 0.65 | 1.15 | 0.51 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 0.64 | 0.33 | (3.13) | 0.80 | 1.28 | 0.63 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.11) | (0.18) | (0.15) | (0.14) | (0.12) | (0.09) | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.34) | (0.11) | (0.08) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.11) | (0.18) | (0.49) | (0.25) | (0.20) | (0.09) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $5.85 | $5.32 | $5.17 | $8.79 | $8.24 | $7.16 | |
Total Return(3) | 12.02% | 7.07% | (37.46)% | 9.88% | 18.24% | 9.50% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.90%(4) | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.71%(4) | 2.53% | 2.18% | 1.72% | 1.75% | 1.62% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 10% | 19% | 26% | 15% | 16% | 28% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $8,589 | $8,035 | $12,030 | $28,077 | $31,141 | $37,523 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Capital Value | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.30 | $5.15 | $8.76 | $8.21 | $7.14 | $6.60 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.08 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.59 | 0.21 | (3.28) | 0.65 | 1.13 | 0.52 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 0.63 | 0.31 | (3.16) | 0.76 | 1.23 | 0.60 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.09) | (0.16) | (0.11) | (0.10) | (0.08) | (0.06) | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.34) | (0.11) | (0.08) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.09) | (0.16) | (0.45) | (0.21) | (0.16) | (0.06) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $5.84 | $5.30 | $5.15 | $8.76 | $8.21 | $7.14 | |
Total Return(4) | 11.94% | 6.59% | (37.78)% | 9.40% | 17.62% | 9.04% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.35%(5) | 1.35% | 1.35% | 1.35% | 1.35% | 1.35% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.26%(5) | 2.08% | 1.73% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.17% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 10% | 19% | 26% | 15% | 16% | 28% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $4,664 | $4,881 | $7,004 | $16,059 | $16,973 | $14,744 | |
(1) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the
26
circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
27
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confir-
mations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
28
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
29
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
30
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
31
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
32
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The S&P 500 Index is a market value-weighted index of the stocks of 500 publicly traded U.S. companies chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation that are considered to be leading firms in dominant industries. Each stock’s weight in the index is proportionate to its market value. Created by Standard & Poor’s, it is considered to be a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance.
33
Notes |
34
Notes |
35
Notes |
36
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68439
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Giftrust® Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Giftrust | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 24 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 25 |
Additional Information | 31 |
Index Definitions | 32 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Giftrust | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Giftrust | TWGTX | 18.22% | 38.62% | 11.17% | -2.21%(2) | 11.27% | 11/25/83 | |
Russell 3000 | ||||||||
Growth Index(3) | — | 16.50% | 38.69% | 4.22% | -3.37% | 9.08%(4) | — | |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Returns would have been lower if American Century Investments had not voluntarily waived its management fees from 2/1/04 to 7/31/04. | |||||||
(3) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(4) | Since 11/30/83, the date nearest the fund’s inception for which data are available. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate those risks.
Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Giftrust
*Ending value would have been lower if American Century Investments had not voluntarily waived its management fees from 2/1/04 to 7/31/04. | |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |
Giftrust | 1.00% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve h igher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate those risks.
Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Giftrust
Portfolio Managers: David Hollond and Michael Orndorff
Performance Summary
Giftrust returned 18.22%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, outpacing the 16.50% return of the portfolio’s benchmark, the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of stabilizing economic conditions and improving investor sentiment. Price momentum and acceleration, two factors that the Giftrust team looks for in portfolio holdings, were not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to drive market strength. We have begun to see the extreme relative headwinds from price momentum and acceleration subside. In this environment, Giftrust’s investment process delivered portfolio returns that outperformed those of its benchmark.
The portfolio’s relative performance benefited the most from stock decisions in the information technology sector. Stock selection in the materials and industrials sectors also helped returns, as did avoiding the utilities sector altogether. These gains were partially trimmed by holdings in the financials, energy, and health care sectors.
Information Technology Led Gains
The information technology sector was the largest source of Giftrust’s outperformance relative to its benchmark. Within the sector, Giftrust was rewarded for an overweight stake in personal computer maker Apple, Inc. The company announced higher-than-expected earnings due to solid sales growth during the period, largely from the popularity of its iPhone smart phone. Similarly, data storage company Seagate Technology also contributed to absolute and relative gains. The company delivered earnings that exceeded analysts’ expectations amid rising sales levels. Within the electronic equipment industry group, a significant overweight stake in Agilent Technologies helped absolute and relative returns. The company saw improved earnings levels as demand for its scientific instruments strengthened.
Materials, Industrials Helped
The materials sector was also a source for absolute and relative portfolio gains. Here, an overweight stake in the metals and mining group drove relative outperformance in the sector. Cliffs Natural Resources, which benefited from improved pricing for iron ore as global economies improved, was the largest contributor to relative gains for the period. AK Steel Holding Corp., which is not a member of the benchmark, also contributed to returns as it benefited from improving economic conditions.
The industrials sector was a key source of outperformance for Giftrust. In the sector, an overweight stake in Fastenal Co. helped relative performance. The distributor of industrial and construction supplies experienced improved earnings during the reporting period as sales climbed.
*Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Giftrust
Elsewhere within the industrials sector, Giftrust was rewarded for an overweight position in railroad company Kansas City Southern, whose share price gained 67%. An improvement in economic activity during the period led to increased shipping demand, translating into accelerating volumes for the company.
Giftrust also sidestepped the utilities sector altogether. This decision proved advantageous as the sector lagged most other sectors in the benchmark.
Financials, Energy, Health Care Lagged
Within the financials sector, Giftrust held several detrimental capital markets companies, including Goldman Sachs. These companies came under pressure from government intentions to regulate the size and risk-taking of many financial firms.
The energy sector was also a source of underperformance for Giftrust. Within the sector, stock selection within the oil, gas, and consumable fuels industry weighed on relative returns. Oil and gas exploration and service company Petrohawk Energy, in particular, detracted from performance as it reported earnings that were below analysts’ expectations.
Holdings in the health care sector underperformed the benchmark. In the sector, poor stock selections in the health care technology and health care providers groups weighed on relative returns. Within the health care providers industry, a stake in Medco Health Solutions detracted from performance. The company experienced a share price decline late in the reporting period as it lowered its forecast for future growth.
Outlook
Giftrust’s investment process focuses on companies of all sizes with accelerating revenue and earnings growth rates, which are also exhibiting share-price strength. We believe that active investing in such companies will generate attractive absolute and relative investment performance over time. This process, which has historically added value, has faced unprecedented headwinds during the market rally that began in March 2009. Despite this challenge, Giftrust provided solid absolute and relative returns during the reporting period. Recently, we have seen the relative headwinds from price momentum and acceleration subside as markets appear to have moved past the inflection point driven by market sentiment and into a period where fundamentals, and specifically fundamental improvement, are being recognized and rewarded by the market.
8
Giftrust | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Apple, Inc. | 6.3% |
Microsoft Corp. | 3.5% |
Google, Inc., Class A | 2.6% |
priceline.com, Inc. | 2.5% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.4% |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 2.3% |
Fastenal Co. | 2.3% |
Express Scripts, Inc. | 2.2% |
Abbott Laboratories | 2.1% |
Philip Morris International, Inc. | 2.0% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 10.6% |
Software | 6.4% |
Communications Equipment | 5.8% |
Food & Staples Retailing | 4.4% |
Specialty Retail | 4.4% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 92.3% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 7.2% |
Total Common Stocks | 99.5% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 0.1% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.4% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
10
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | $1,000 | $1,182.20 | $5.41 | 1.00% |
Hypothetical | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
*Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Giftrust | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 99.5% | DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 1.3% | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 3.0% | Bank of America Corp. | 401,892 | $ 7,165,734 | |||
BE Aerospace, Inc.(1) | 163,574 | $ 4,859,783 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 120,624 | 5,136,170 | |
Goodrich Corp. | 114,504 | 8,493,907 | 12,301,904 | |||
Precision Castparts Corp. | 62,789 | 8,058,340 | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 2.4% | |||
American | ||||||
United Technologies Corp. | 96,684 | 7,246,466 | Superconductor Corp.(1) | 144,807 | 4,225,468 | |
28,658,496 | Cooper Industries plc | 194,243 | 9,537,331 | |||
AUTOMOBILES — 0.5% | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 153,504 | 9,320,763 | |||
Hyundai Motor Co. | 40,396 | 4,936,961 | 23,083,562 | |||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 2.4% | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | |||||
Alexion | INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 2.4% | |||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 99,777 | 5,475,762 | ||||
Agilent Technologies, Inc.(1) | 484,002 | 17,549,913 | ||||
Celgene Corp.(1) | 277,279 | 17,177,434 | ||||
Dolby Laboratories, Inc., | ||||||
22,653,196 | Class A(1) | 81,977 | 5,633,459 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.9% | 23,183,372 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 2.0% | |||||
(The) | 60,355 | 8,763,546 | Core Laboratories NV | 32,453 | 4,864,380 | |
Morgan Stanley | 325,013 | 9,821,893 | FMC Technologies, Inc.(1) | 67,959 | 4,600,145 | |
18,585,439 | Schlumberger Ltd. | 77,774 | 5,554,619 | |||
CHEMICALS — 1.9% | Tenaris SA ADR | 106,876 | 4,340,234 | |||
Albemarle Corp. | 129,267 | 5,902,331 | 19,359,378 | |||
Ecolab, Inc. | 141,544 | 6,913,009 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 4.4% | |||
International Flavors | Cia Brasileira de Distribuicao | |||||
& Fragrances, Inc. | 96,316 | 4,824,469 | Grupo Pao de Acucar | |||
17,639,809 | Preference Shares ADR | 68,828 | 4,715,407 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 0.8% | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 368,551 | 21,773,993 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 231,482 | 7,664,369 | Whole Foods Market, Inc.(1) | 387,858 | 15,134,219 | |
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 5.8% | 41,623,619 | |||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 847,952 | 22,826,868 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.5% | |||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 229,727 | 15,720,219 | General Mills, Inc. | 62,353 | 4,438,287 | |
JDS Uniphase Corp.(1) | 532,341 | 6,915,109 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 189,833 | 9,797,281 | |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 246,512 | 9,549,875 | 14,235,568 | |||
55,012,071 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 2.7% | |||||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 10.6% | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 101,525 | 8,784,958 | |||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 229,172 | 59,841,393 | Covidien plc | 195,748 | 9,393,947 | |
EMC Corp.(1) | 737,122 | 14,012,689 | ev3, Inc.(1) | 258,528 | 4,945,641 | |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 306,701 | 15,939,251 | Varian Medical | |||
Lexmark International, Inc., | Systems, Inc.(1) | 44,954 | 2,534,506 | |||
Class A(1) | 185,447 | 6,870,811 | 25,659,052 | |||
Seagate Technology(1) | 229,027 | 4,207,226 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 3.9% | |||
100,871,370 | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 207,646 | 20,791,594 | |||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.3% | Medco Health | |||||
AmeriCredit Corp.(1) | 197,246 | 4,722,069 | Solutions, Inc.(1) | 277,588 | 16,355,485 | |
Discover Financial Services | 514,937 | 7,960,926 | 37,147,079 | |||
12,682,995 |
12
Giftrust | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 0.5% | METALS & MINING — 1.0% | |||||
SXC Health | Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 83,639 | $ 5,229,947 | |||
Solutions Corp.(1) | 71,800 | $ 5,004,460 | United States Steel Corp. | 82,738 | 4,522,459 | |
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 2.7% | 9,752,406 | |||||
Ctrip.com International Ltd. | MULTILINE RETAIL — 1.8% | |||||
ADR(1) | 225,417 | 8,232,229 | ||||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 133,966 | 7,366,791 | ||||
Las Vegas Sands Corp.(1) | 225,904 | 5,615,973 | ||||
Nordstrom, Inc. | 236,916 | 9,791,738 | ||||
Royal Caribbean | ||||||
Cruises Ltd.(1) | 150,640 | 5,398,938 | 17,158,529 | |||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 1.0% | |||||
Worldwide, Inc. | 113,600 | 6,192,336 | Concho Resources, Inc.(1) | 86,594 | 4,920,271 | |
25,439,476 | Peabody Energy Corp. | 97,505 | 4,555,434 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 1.4% | 9,475,705 | |||||
Harman International | PHARMACEUTICALS — 3.6% | |||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 206,172 | 8,139,671 | Abbott Laboratories | 397,638 | 20,343,160 | |
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 77,654 | 4,826,196 | Shire plc | 162,898 | 3,594,398 | |
12,965,867 | Shire plc ADR | 157,478 | 10,368,352 | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 1.3% | 34,305,910 | |||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 76,461 | 6,430,370 | ROAD & RAIL — 2.4% | |||
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 102,332 | 6,360,957 | J.B. Hunt Transport | |||
12,791,327 | Services, Inc. | 124,497 | 4,588,959 | |||
INSURANCE — 1.1% | Kansas City Southern(1) | 325,245 | 13,188,685 | |||
Aflac, Inc. | 73,582 | 3,749,739 | Union Pacific Corp. | 65,400 | 4,948,164 | |
Genworth Financial, Inc., | 22,725,808 | |||||
Class A(1) | 420,507 | 6,946,775 | SEMICONDUCTORS & | |||
10,696,514 | SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT — 2.7% | |||||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 2.5% | Atheros | |||||
priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 90,295 | 23,661,805 | Communications, Inc.(1) | 162,021 | 6,292,896 | |
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 3.8% | Broadcom Corp., Class A | 217,842 | 7,513,371 | |||
Baidu, Inc. ADR(1) | 10,084 | 6,950,901 | Cypress | |||
Semiconductor Corp.(1) | 359,630 | 4,635,631 | ||||
Equinix, Inc.(1) | 46,037 | 4,633,624 | ||||
Veeco Instruments, Inc.(1) | 158,343 | 6,965,508 | ||||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 47,296 | 24,851,210 | ||||
25,407,406 | ||||||
36,435,735 | SOFTWARE — 6.4% | |||||
IT SERVICES — 3.6% | Autodesk, Inc.(1) | 169,001 | 5,747,724 | |||
Cognizant Technology | Citrix Systems, Inc.(1) | 111,164 | 5,224,708 | |||
Solutions Corp., Class A(1) | 149,453 | 7,649,005 | ||||
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 39,356 | 9,761,862 | Microsoft Corp. | 1,104,111 | 33,719,550 | |
Visa, Inc., Class A | 189,989 | 17,142,707 | Oracle Corp. | 636,778 | 16,454,343 | |
34,553,574 | 61,146,325 | |||||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 1.1% | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 4.4% | |||||
Life Technologies Corp.(1) | 184,408 | 10,088,962 | AnnTaylor Stores Corp.(1) | 216,595 | 4,700,111 | |
MACHINERY — 2.4% | Chico’s FAS, Inc. | 479,793 | 7,144,118 | |||
Bucyrus International, Inc. | 72,237 | 4,551,653 | Guess?, Inc. | 123,547 | 5,667,101 | |
Cummins, Inc. | 91,117 | 6,581,381 | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 130,511 | 6,064,846 | |
Deere & Co. | 81,858 | 4,896,745 | Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 173,498 | 4,705,266 | |
Ingersoll-Rand plc | 182,019 | 6,731,063 | O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) | 138,966 | 6,794,048 | |
22,760,842 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 225,959 | 6,507,619 | |||
41,583,109 |
13
Giftrust | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 0.5% | Temporary Cash Investments — 0.1% | |||||
Warnaco Group, Inc. (The)(1) | 106,839 | $ 5,111,178 | ||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||||||
TOBACCO — 2.5% | Plus Money Market Fund | |||||
Altria Group, Inc. | 215,529 | 4,567,059 | Agency Shares | 80,898 | $ 80,898 | |
Philip Morris | Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse First | |||||
International, Inc. | 386,574 | 18,973,052 | Boston, Inc., (collateralized by various U.S. | |||
23,540,111 | Treasury obligations, 8.00%, 11/15/21, | |||||
valued at $918,410), in a joint trading | ||||||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 2.3% | account at 0.13%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||||
Fastenal Co. | 393,478 | 21,519,312 | 5/3/10 (Delivery value $900,010) | 900,000 | ||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 1.7% | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||||
NII Holdings, Inc.(1) | 172,479 | 7,316,559 | CASH INVESTMENTS | |||
SBA Communications Corp., | (Cost $980,898) | 980,898 | ||||
Class A(1) | 263,331 | 9,314,018 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
SECURITIES — 99.6% | ||||||
16,630,577 | (Cost $682,025,761) | 949,034,076 | ||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | OTHER ASSETS | |||||
(Cost $681,044,863) | 948,053,178 | AND LIABILITIES — 0.4% | 4,265,215 | |||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $953,299,291 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
1,546,961 GBP for USD | 5/28/10 | $2,366,680 | $(15,918) |
(Value on Settlement Date $2,350,762) | |||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
GBP = British Pound | |||
USD = United States Dollar | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Assets | |
Investment securities, at value (cost of $682,025,761) | $949,034,076 |
Receivable for investments sold | 20,434,106 |
Receivable for capital shares sold | 38,372 |
Dividends and interest receivable | 495,044 |
970,001,598 | |
Liabilities | |
Payable for investments purchased | 15,701,864 |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 189,120 |
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 15,918 |
Accrued management fees | 795,405 |
16,702,307 | |
Net Assets | $953,299,291 |
Capital Shares, $0.01 Par Value | |
Authorized | 200,000,000 |
Outstanding | 38,657,876 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | $24.66 |
Net Assets Consist of: | |
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $ 823,283,360 |
Accumulated net investment loss | (827,226) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and | |
foreign currency transactions | (136,151,460) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation | |
of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 266,994,617 |
$ 953,299,291 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $16,636) | $ 3,674,143 |
Interest | 681 |
3,674,824 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 4,519,316 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 12,159 |
4,531,475 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (856,651) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 59,006,324 |
Foreign currency transactions | (22,848) |
58,983,476 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 92,448,345 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 15,104 |
92,463,449 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 151,446,925 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $150,590,274 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (856,651) | $ 1,404,307 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 58,983,476 | (167,958,880) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 92,463,449 | 239,760,500 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 150,590,274 | 73,205,927 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income | — | (2,424,540) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Proceeds from shares sold | 3,664,378 | 6,747,149 |
Proceeds from reinvestment of distributions | — | 2,404,219 |
Payments for shares redeemed | (38,794,782) | (45,864,082) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (35,130,404) | (36,712,714) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 115,459,870 | 34,068,673 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 837,839,421 | 803,770,748 |
End of period | $953,299,291 | $ 837,839,421 |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) | $(827,226) | $29,425 |
Transactions in Shares of the Fund | ||
Sold | 158,489 | 382,429 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | 148,502 |
Redeemed | (1,669,485) | (2,490,790) |
Net increase (decrease) in shares of the fund | (1,510,996) | (1,959,859) |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Giftrust Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing in equity securities of companies of any size that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
18
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. Additionally, non-U.S. tax returns filed by the fund due to investments in certain foreign securities remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority for 7 years from the date of filing. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
19
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee). The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. The annual management fee is 1.00%.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS), and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $354,468,914 and $396,017,514, respectively.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
20
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $879,718,080 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 59,803,739 | $8,531,359 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 80,898 | 900,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $939,602,717 | $9,431,359 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(15,918) | — |
5. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $15,918 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $19,366 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $13,507 in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
6. Risk Factors
The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. There are also certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
21
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $684,737,036 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $268,534,609 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (4,237,569) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $264,297,040 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(190,146,656), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(2,183,412), $(7,528,594) and $(180,434,650) expire in 2011, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
22
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
23
Financial Highlights |
Giftrust | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $20.86 | $19.08 | $31.53 | $20.13 | $17.28 | $13.81 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | 0.03 | (0.13) | (0.14) | (0.05) | (0.08) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.82 | 1.81 | (12.32) | 11.54 | 2.90 | 3.55 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.80 | 1.84 | (12.45) | 11.40 | 2.85 | 3.47 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.06) | — | — | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $24.66 | $20.86 | $19.08 | $31.53 | $20.13 | $17.28 | |
Total Return(3) | 18.22% | 9.72% | (39.49)% | 56.63% | 16.49% | 25.13% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.19)%(4) | 0.19% | (0.48)% | (0.57)% | (0.22)% | (0.46)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 40% | 167% | 171% | 147% | 229% | 223% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $953 | $838 | $804 | $1,421 | $985 | $927 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor
25
will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
26
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
27
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
28
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
29
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
30
Additional Information |
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
31
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market.
The Russell 3000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies (the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
32
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68440
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
New Opportunities Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
New Opportunities | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 16 |
Statement of Operations | 17 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 18 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 19 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 30 |
Additional Information | 36 |
Index Definitions | 37 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid-and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | * Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance | |||||||
New Opportunities | |||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Average Annual Returns | |||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | |||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | |
Investor Class | TWNOX | 29.45% | 44.27% | 5.97% | -4.78% | 5.78% | 12/26/96 |
Russell 2500 | |||||||
Growth Index(2)(3) | — | 25.81% | 47.69% | 6.55% | 0.62% | 5.47%(4) | — |
Russell 2000 | |||||||
Growth Index(2) | — | 25.49% | 45.20% | 6.06% | -0.06% | 3.58%(4) | — |
Institutional Class | TWNIX | 3/1/10 | |||||
Before redemption fee | — | — | — | — | 7.91%(1) | ||
Net of redemption fee(5) | — | — | — | — | 5.75%(1) | ||
A Class | TWNAX | 3/1/10 | |||||
No sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 7.91%(1) | ||
With sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 1.70%(1) | ||
C Class | TWNCX | 3/1/10 | |||||
No sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 7.74%(1) | ||
With sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 6.74%(1) | ||
R Class | TWNRX | 3/1/10 | |||||
Before redemption fee | — | — | — | — | 7.91%(1) | ||
Net of redemption fee(5) | — | — | — | — | 5.75%(1) |
* | Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. |
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. |
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | |
(3) | In December 2009, the fund’s benchmark changed from the Russell 2000 Growth Index to the Russell 2500 Growth Index. This reflects a change in the fund’s investment strategy to include stocks of small- and mid-sized companies. |
(4) | Since 12/31/96, the date nearest the fund’s inception for which data are available. |
(5) | Returns reflect the deduction of a 2.00% redemption fee, incurred if shares were redeemed with the 180 days after purchase. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. Historically, small company stocks have been more volatile than the stocks of larger, more established companies. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
New Opportunities
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | ||||
Investor Class | Institutional Class | A Class | C Class | R Class |
1.51% | 1.31% | 1.76% | 2.51% | 2.01% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. Historically, small company stocks have been more volatile than the stocks of larger, more establishe d companies. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
New Opportunities
Portfolio Managers: Stafford Southwick and Matthew Ferretti
Performance Summary
New Opportunities returned 29.45%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, outpacing the 25.81% return of its benchmark, the Russell 2500 Growth Index. Effective December 1, 2009, New Opportunities expanded its investment universe to include both small- and mid-cap stocks, and its benchmark changed to the Russell 2500 Growth Index, which consists of small- and mid-sized growth stocks.
The fund’s return of nearly 30% for the six-month period reflected the robust returns of small- and mid-cap stocks, which led the equity market’s overall advance. Furthermore, New Opportunities outperformed its growth-oriented benchmark and the broad small- and mid-cap indices despite some noteworthy performance headwinds. Value stocks outperformed growth by a considerable margin in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market, and price momentum and accelerating growth—two critical components of the fund’s investment process—were out of favor for most of the period.
The key factors behind the fund’s outperformance were favorable stock selection and an emphasis on stocks positioned to benefit the most from an economic recovery.
Industrials and Consumer Discretionary Outperformed
Stock selection was most successful in two of the more economically sensitive segments of the market—industrials and consumer discretionary. Security selection contributed positively to relative performance in nearly every segment of the industrials sector, led by road and rail companies and electrical equipment manufacturers. The top contributor in this sector, and in the portfolio as a whole, was rental car agency Dollar Thrifty Automotive. The rental car industry was forced to reduce their fleets during the economic downturn to pay down debt, but as rental traffic began to pick back up again, the reduced capacity allowed for rental price increases. In addition, Dollar Thrifty benefited from higher used car prices as the company sold off older rental vehicles. Toward the end of the period, competitor Hertz Global Holdings made a takeover offer, boosting Dollar Thrifty shares further.
Other noteworthy outperformers in the industrials sector included two foreign companies, Chinese solar module maker Trina Solar and Dutch commercial aircraft leasing company AerCap Holdings. Trina is a low-cost provider that has been taking market share in this segment of the solar market, and the company also saw an increase in orders from Europe. Improving fundamentals in the airline industry provided a boost to AerCap Holdings.
In the consumer discretionary sector, stock choices among auto components makers and household durables companies delivered the bulk of the outperformance. One of the top contributors in this sector was auto parts maker
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
New Opportunities
TRW Automotive, which rallied as the company reported robust earnings, benefiting from improving demand and a lower cost structure. Specialty mattress maker Tempur-Pedic International and home furnishings producer La-Z-Boy both benefited from increased demand as many consumers deferred purchases of big-ticket items during the economic downturn.
Materials Also Added Value
The portfolio’s materials holdings also contributed notably to the fund’s outperformance of the Russell 2500 Growth Index. The lion’s share of the outperformance in the materials sector came from chemicals producers, led by specialty chemicals maker Solutia. The company reported better-than-expected earnings as the improving economic environment boosted industrial demand, and the company restructured its debt to lower interest costs.
Other top contributors in the portfolio included online travel agency priceline.com and Acme Packet, which makes session border controllers that provide secure communications delivery across borders between IP networks. Priceline saw earnings growth accelerate as the improving economic environment led to an increase in travel, and the company also gained market share overseas. Acme raised 2010 revenue guidance significantly thanks to a substantial increase in IP network development, led by robust growth in the enterprise market.
Financials Lagged
The fund’s holdings in the financials sector underperformed their counterparts in the benchmark index for the six-month period. All of the underperformance in the financials sector resulted from stock selection in the consumer finance segment. The most significant detractor this sector was World Acceptance, which provides small short-term loans. Although the company reported strong earnings during the period, concerns about the possibility of a new consumer protection agency to regulate non-bank lending weighed on the stock.
Other notable underperformers in the portfolio included IT services provider TNS and specialty apparel retailer Pacific Sunwear of California. TNS, which provides data services to credit card and ATM transaction processors, fell as earnings disappointed and the company faced increased competition, while Pacific Sunwear tumbled after reporting losses and declining same-store sales during the period.
A Look Ahead
Although we remain focused on companies that are well positioned to benefit from further economic improvement, we have grown more cautious as the economy laps the one-year anniversary of the massive fiscal and monetary stimulus implemented to boost economic activity. Sovereign debt issues in Europe have further added to the uncertainty about the sustainability of the global economic recovery. Nonetheless, we will continue to focus on our disciplined investment process, in which we seek mid- and small-cap companies exhibiting accelerating business fundamentals, positive relative strength, and reasonable valuations.
8
New Opportunities | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. | 2.0% |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. | 1.9% |
priceline.com, Inc. | 1.8% |
Atheros Communications, Inc. | 1.4% |
Solutia, Inc. | 1.2% |
AerCap Holdings NV | 1.2% |
Steven Madden Ltd. | 1.1% |
Dollar Financial Corp. | 1.1% |
JDA Software Group, Inc. | 1.1% |
Iconix Brand Group, Inc. | 1.1% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Specialty Retail | 5.9% |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | 5.7% |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | 5.1% |
Software | 4.7% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.6% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 97.2% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 3.1% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.3)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 (except as noted).
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period(1) | Annualized | ||
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio(1) | ||
Actual | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,294.50 | $8.53 | 1.50% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,079.10(2) | $2.22(3) | 1.30% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,079.10(2) | $2.99(3) | 1.75% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,077.40(2) | $4.27(3) | 2.50% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,079.10(2) | $3.42(3) | 2.00% | |
Hypothetical | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,018.35(4) | $6.51(4) | 1.30% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,016.12(4) | $8.75(4) | 1.75% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,012.40(4) | $12.47(4) | 2.50% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88(4) | $9.99(4) | 2.00% | |
(1) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. | |||||
(2) | Ending account value based on actual return from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010. | ||||
(3) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 60, the number of days in the period from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010, divided by 365, to | |||||
reflect the period. Had the class been available for the full period, the expenses paid during the period would have been higher. | |||||
(4) | Ending account value and expenses paid during period assumes the class had been available throughout the entire period and are calculated | ||||
using the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
New Opportunities | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 97.2% | CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.6% | |||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 2.5% | BGC Partners, Inc., Class A | 91,308 | $ 595,328 | |||
AerCap Holdings NV(1) | 130,415 | $ 1,799,727 | Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 29,097 | 787,656 | |
Eaton Vance Corp. | 16,490 | 581,108 | ||||
Ladish Co., Inc.(1) | 14,726 | 404,818 | ||||
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 10,276 | 397,270 | ||||
Triumph Group, Inc. | 19,586 | 1,519,090 | 2,361,362 | |||
3,723,635 | CHEMICALS — 3.1% | |||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 1.5% | Lubrizol Corp. | 11,523 | 1,040,988 | |||
Atlas Air Worldwide | ||||||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 21,655 | 1,196,872 | OM Group, Inc.(1) | 38,447 | 1,451,374 | |
Hub Group, Inc., Class A(1) | 31,459 | 1,007,002 | Sensient Technologies Corp. | 9,408 | 296,634 | |
2,203,874 | Solutia, Inc.(1) | 102,604 | 1,805,831 | |||
AIRLINES — 1.0% | 4,594,827 | |||||
Continental Airlines, Inc., | COMMERCIAL BANKS — 3.6% | |||||
Class B(1) | 18,707 | 418,101 | Cathay General Bancorp. | 63,131 | 780,930 | |
UAL Corp.(1) | 51,246 | 1,105,889 | Columbia Banking System, Inc. | 48,741 | 1,095,698 | |
1,523,990 | East West Bancorp., Inc. | 62,434 | 1,223,082 | |||
AUTO COMPONENTS — 0.7% | First Midwest Bancorp., Inc. | 18,969 | 288,329 | |||
BorgWarner, Inc.(1) | 17,407 | 754,419 | Independent Bank Corp. | 21,495 | 557,580 | |
Goodyear Tire | Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. | 17,075 | 297,959 | |||
& Rubber Co. (The)(1) | 24,757 | 332,487 | United Bankshares, Inc. | 15,578 | 452,385 | |
1,086,906 | Westamerica Bancorp. | 9,430 | 554,201 | |||
BEVERAGES — 0.7% | 5,250,164 | |||||
Boston Beer Co., Inc., | COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 0.5% | |||||
Class A(1) | 2,762 | 157,462 | ||||
Waste Connections, Inc.(1) | 21,188 | 758,319 | ||||
Cott Corp.(1) | 94,557 | 791,442 | COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 2.2% | |||
948,904 | Acme Packet, Inc.(1) | 23,529 | 615,048 | |||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 2.8% | Blue Coat Systems, Inc.(1) | 17,647 | 574,057 | |||
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.(1) | 8,581 | 332,514 | ||||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 12,653 | 865,845 | ||||
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 14,671 | 805,144 | ||||
Netgear, Inc.(1) | 36,282 | 981,791 | ||||
Alkermes, Inc.(1) | 3,400 | 44,540 | ||||
RADWARE Ltd.(1) | 11,988 | 237,242 | ||||
Cepheid, Inc.(1) | 2,214 | 44,258 | ||||
3,273,983 | ||||||
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 26,124 | 585,700 | COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 0.2% | |||
Dendreon Corp.(1) | 18,577 | 1,007,245 | Xyratex Ltd.(1) | 13,696 | 241,050 | |
Human Genome | CONSUMER FINANCE — 2.5% | |||||
Sciences, Inc.(1) | 16,341 | 452,482 | ||||
Cash America International, Inc. | 27,696 | 1,026,414 | ||||
Incyte Corp. Ltd.(1) | 4,414 | 59,236 | ||||
Dollar Financial Corp.(1) | 68,506 | 1,603,725 | ||||
InterMune, Inc.(1) | 1,789 | 76,140 | ||||
World Acceptance Corp.(1) | 27,560 | 972,317 | ||||
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 12,526 | 361,626 | ||||
3,602,456 | ||||||
OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 3,821 | 224,178 | ||||
CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 1.8% | ||||||
Regeneron | Boise, Inc.(1) | 102,879 | 708,836 | |||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 2,807 | 71,663 | ||||
Crown Holdings, Inc.(1) | 29,277 | 761,202 | ||||
Theravance, Inc.(1) | 2,650 | 44,440 | ||||
4,109,166 | Silgan Holdings, Inc. | 20,024 | 1,208,048 | |||
2,678,086 |
12
New Opportunities | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
DIVERSIFIED CONSUMER SERVICES — 1.4% | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 5.7% | |||||
DeVry, Inc. | 14,723 | $ 918,568 | Align Technology, Inc.(1) | 14,071 | $ 238,926 | |
ITT Educational Services, Inc.(1) | 8,386 | 848,076 | American Medical Systems | |||
Sotheby’s | 10,424 | 348,162 | Holdings, Inc.(1) | 24,882 | 445,886 | |
2,114,806 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | 12,886 | 804,086 | |||
ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 0.5% | Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(1) | 8,992 | 926,895 | |||
Cleco Corp. | 11,972 | 328,033 | Haemonetics Corp.(1) | 11,897 | 688,360 | |
IDACORP, Inc. | 10,501 | 378,876 | IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.(1) | 8,526 | 563,910 | |
706,909 | Immucor, Inc.(1) | 19,834 | 424,646 | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.8% | Masimo Corp. | 16,466 | 385,469 | |||
AMETEK, Inc. | 19,054 | 824,086 | Mettler-Toledo | |||
Harbin Electric, Inc.(1) | 26,075 | 571,303 | International, Inc.(1) | 6,276 | 787,513 | |
Roper Industries, Inc. | 13,573 | 828,224 | NuVasive, Inc.(1) | 1,414 | 58,822 | |
Trina Solar Ltd. ADR(1) | 15,432 | 399,226 | Resmed, Inc.(1) | 13,040 | 892,327 | |
2,622,839 | STERIS Corp. | 21,319 | 709,496 | |||
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS | Thoratec Corp.(1) | 19,049 | 849,395 | |||
& COMPONENTS — 2.1% | West Pharmaceutical | |||||
FLIR Systems, Inc.(1) | 22,900 | 700,511 | Services, Inc. | 13,095 | 548,026 | |
Littelfuse, Inc.(1) | 28,208 | 1,191,224 | 8,323,757 | |||
OSI Systems, Inc.(1) | 10,814 | 281,597 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 4.6% | |||
Amedisys, Inc.(1) | 6,472 | 372,658 | ||||
Plexus Corp.(1) | 13,205 | 489,245 | ||||
SMART Modular Technologies | AMERIGROUP Corp.(1) | 15,045 | 545,231 | |||
(WWH), Inc.(1) | 55,404 | 388,936 | Bio-Reference Labs, Inc.(1) | 8,290 | 193,986 | |
3,051,513 | Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.(1) | 17,607 | 744,952 | |||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 0.6% | Chemed Corp. | 12,882 | 708,639 | |||
Dril-Quip, Inc.(1) | 4,324 | 250,489 | Emergency Medical Services | |||
Oceaneering International, Inc.(1) | 8,525 | 558,388 | Corp., Class A(1) | 16,313 | 862,631 | |
808,877 | HealthSouth Corp.(1) | 32,214 | 659,098 | |||
FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 0.3% | HMS Holdings Corp.(1) | 10,686 | 571,701 | |||
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. | 11,081 | 428,059 | Owens & Minor, Inc. | 28,449 | 894,721 | |
FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.7% | Patterson Cos., Inc. | 17,105 | 547,189 | |||
American Italian Pasta Co., | PSS World Medical, Inc.(1) | 24,304 | 569,443 | |||
Class A(1) | 3,006 | 117,925 | 6,670,249 | |||
Dean Foods Co.(1) | 49,864 | 782,865 | HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 0.7% | |||
Flowers Foods, Inc. | 29,266 | 771,452 | athenahealth, Inc.(1) | 4,250 | 123,335 | |
J&J Snack Foods Corp. | 12,407 | 578,042 | Eclipsys Corp.(1) | 18,915 | 391,162 | |
Lancaster Colony Corp. | 5,175 | 284,470 | Quality Systems, Inc. | 8,872 | 567,897 | |
2,534,754 | 1,082,394 | |||||
GAS UTILITIES — 1.9% | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 0.6% | |||||
AGL Resources, Inc. | 10,083 | 398,379 | Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 6,281 | 847,370 | |
Atmos Energy Corp. | 9,415 | 278,496 | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 2.9% | |||
Laclede Group, Inc. (The) | 22,595 | 770,038 | La-Z-Boy, Inc.(1) | 25,313 | 330,081 | |
Northwest Natural Gas Co. | 6,177 | 292,728 | Lennar Corp., Class A | 48,930 | 973,707 | |
Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc. | 7,204 | 198,110 | Tempur-Pedic | |||
South Jersey Industries, Inc. | 7,705 | 347,573 | International, Inc.(1) | 88,251 | 2,974,059 | |
Spectra Energy Partners LP | 11,567 | 364,707 | 4,277,847 | |||
WGL Holdings, Inc. | 3,710 | 132,595 | ||||
2,782,626 |
13
New Opportunities | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 0.8% | MACHINERY — 2.9% | |||||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 16,533 | $ 1,144,910 | Chart Industries, Inc.(1) | 15,842 | $ 364,207 | |
INSURANCE — 2.6% | EnPro Industries, Inc.(1) | 48,212 | 1,522,535 | |||
Allied World Assurance Co. | Middleby Corp.(1) | 12,497 | 763,817 | |||
Holdings Ltd. | 3,338 | 145,437 | Pall Corp. | 18,789 | 732,583 | |
Amtrust Financial Services, Inc. | 54,931 | 748,709 | Wabash National Corp.(1) | 84,472 | 821,068 | |
Erie Indemnity Co., Class A | 8,953 | 414,613 | 4,204,210 | |||
Genworth Financial, Inc., | ||||||
Class A(1) | 26,379 | 435,781 | MULTI-UTILITIES — 0.5% | |||
Harleysville Group, Inc. | 5,078 | 162,598 | CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 54,816 | 787,158 | |
Infinity Property & Casualty Corp. | 3,185 | 146,924 | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 3.6% | |||
Platinum Underwriters | Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.(1) | 14,043 | 661,144 | |||
Holdings Ltd. | 8,391 | 312,229 | BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust | 5,268 | 519,425 | |
ProAssurance Corp.(1) | 5,941 | 362,104 | Crosstex Energy LP(1) | 117,045 | 1,364,745 | |
RLI Corp. | 6,969 | 404,202 | DCP Midstream Partners LP | 25,651 | 858,026 | |
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | 17,827 | 664,769 | EXCO Resources, Inc. | 15,591 | 289,213 | |
3,797,366 | Forest Oil Corp.(1) | 6,619 | 193,937 | |||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 3.2% | Permian Basin Royalty Trust | 27,677 | 542,192 | |||
HSN, Inc.(1) | 42,379 | 1,276,879 | Sunoco Logistics Partners LP | 4,822 | 329,873 | |
PetMed Express, Inc. | 35,661 | 789,535 | Swift Energy Co.(1) | 5,818 | 210,495 | |
priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 10,036 | 2,629,934 | Teekay Tankers Ltd., Class A | 28,697 | 365,600 | |
4,696,348 | 5,334,650 | |||||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.1% | PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 0.7% | |||||
Akamai Technologies, Inc.(1) | 25,864 | 1,004,299 | Buckeye Technologies, Inc.(1) | 36,151 | 510,452 | |
Equinix, Inc.(1) | 6,592 | 663,485 | KapStone Paper and | |||
Packaging Corp.(1) | 34,676 | 447,321 | ||||
1,667,784 | ||||||
IT SERVICES — 3.9% | 957,773 | |||||
Acxiom Corp.(1) | 15,311 | 292,134 | PHARMACEUTICALS — 1.4% | |||
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 10,065 | 358,314 | ||||
Alliance Data Systems Corp.(1) | 8,699 | 652,947 | ||||
Nektar Therapeutics(1) | 25,293 | 353,090 | ||||
CACI International, Inc., Class A(1) | 27,799 | 1,318,507 | ||||
Forrester Research, Inc.(1) | 16,525 | 530,618 | Perrigo Co. | 15,387 | 939,069 | |
Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd.(1) | 10,678 | 429,255 | ||||
Global Payments, Inc. | 14,415 | 617,106 | ||||
ManTech International Corp., | 2,079,728 | |||||
Class A(1) | 20,448 | 920,773 | PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — 0.3% | |||
MAXIMUS, Inc. | 6,495 | 402,105 | Robert Half International, Inc. | 18,530 | 507,351 | |
SAIC, Inc.(1) | 41,304 | 719,103 | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.9% | |||
SPS Commerce, Inc.(1) | 19,501 | 263,263 | American Capital Agency Corp. | 9,393 | 258,402 | |
5,716,556 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 12,930 | 758,991 | |||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 1.8% | Hatteras Financial Corp. | 5,914 | 157,726 | |||
Covance, Inc.(1) | 10,443 | 596,713 | Universal Health | |||
Realty Income Trust | 5,622 | 186,763 | ||||
Dionex Corp.(1) | 6,839 | 557,857 | ||||
1,361,882 | ||||||
Millipore Corp.(1) | 9,731 | 1,032,946 | ||||
ROAD & RAIL — 2.1% | ||||||
PAREXEL International Corp.(1) | 18,367 | 433,094 | Dollar Thrifty Automotive | |||
2,620,610 | Group, Inc.(1) | 63,874 | 2,809,817 | |||
Kansas City Southern(1) | 5,529 | 224,201 | ||||
3,034,018 |
14
New Opportunities | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 5.1% | |||||
EQUIPMENT — 4.6% | Deckers Outdoor Corp.(1) | 8,664 | $ 1,217,985 | |||
Advanced Energy | G-III Apparel Group Ltd.(1) | 22,637 | 647,418 | |||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 13,362 | $ 196,689 | ||||
Iconix Brand Group, Inc.(1) | 90,447 | 1,561,115 | ||||
Atheros Communications, Inc.(1) | 51,406 | 1,996,609 | ||||
Maidenform Brands, Inc.(1) | 47,057 | 1,073,841 | ||||
Cirrus Logic, Inc.(1) | 101,810 | 1,294,005 | ||||
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 11,677 | 735,768 | ||||
Cree, Inc.(1) | 13,213 | 967,324 | ||||
Steven Madden Ltd.(1) | 28,125 | 1,630,125 | ||||
Cymer, Inc.(1) | 5,509 | 188,132 | ||||
True Religion Apparel, Inc.(1) | 21,669 | 677,156 | ||||
MKS Instruments, Inc.(1) | 12,766 | 289,533 | ||||
7,543,408 | ||||||
ON Semiconductor Corp.(1) | 77,255 | 613,405 | ||||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 1.0% | ||||||
Power Integrations, Inc. | 4,554 | 175,238 | Aircastle Ltd. | 119,521 | 1,435,447 | |
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.(1) | 61,054 | 1,028,149 | ||||
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE — 0.6% | ||||||
6,749,084 | Aegean Marine Petroleum | |||||
SOFTWARE — 4.7% | Network, Inc. | 31,227 | 819,396 | |||
ACI Worldwide, Inc.(1) | 22,786 | 428,149 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
ANSYS, Inc.(1) | 14,145 | 636,525 | (Cost $119,194,829) | 142,674,304 | ||
Epicor Software Corp.(1) | 47,945 | 440,135 | Temporary Cash Investments — 3.1% | |||
JDA Software Group, Inc.(1) | 55,067 | 1,591,436 | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||
Progress Software Corp.(1) | 36,415 | 1,174,384 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||
Radiant Systems, Inc.(1) | 30,954 | 435,523 | Agency Shares | 85,405 | 85,405 | |
Red Hat, Inc.(1) | 27,772 | 829,550 | Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | |||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||||||
Solera Holdings, Inc. | 7,334 | 285,073 | U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, 2/15/38, | |||
SS&C Technologies | valued at 4,522,938), in a joint trading | |||||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 5,194 | 87,155 | account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | |||
Sybase, Inc.(1) | 17,675 | 766,741 | (Delivery value $4,400,055) | 4,400,000 | ||
Taleo Corp., Class A(1) | 10,258 | 266,503 | TOTAL TEMPORARY CASH | |||
INVESTMENTS | ||||||
6,941,174 | (Cost $4,485,405) | 4,485,405 | ||||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 5.9% | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||||
CarMax, Inc.(1) | 23,914 | 587,567 | SECURITIES — 100.3% | |||
Children’s Place Retail | (Cost $123,680,234) | 147,159,709 | ||||
Stores, Inc. (The)(1) | 30,767 | 1,409,744 | OTHER ASSETS | |||
Finish Line, Inc. (The), Class A | 51,258 | 825,766 | AND LIABILITIES — (0.3)% | (441,861) | ||
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. | 32,334 | 1,159,497 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $146,717,848 | ||
PetSmart, Inc. | 22,973 | 759,717 | ||||
Systemax, Inc. | 40,460 | 939,886 | Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | ||||||
Talbots, Inc.(1) | 87,725 | 1,443,076 | ||||
(1) Non-income producing. | ||||||
Tiffany & Co. | 17,514 | 849,079 | ||||
Urban Outfitters, Inc.(1) | 18,459 | 692,397 | ||||
8,666,729 | ||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $123,680,234) | $147,159,709 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 3,480,446 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 19,047 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 24,307 | ||
150,683,509 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 3,751,628 | ||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 33,411 | ||
Accrued management fees | 180,583 | ||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 23 | ||
Distribution fees payable | 16 | ||
3,965,661 | |||
Net Assets | $146,717,848 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $206,383,304 | ||
Accumulated net investment loss | (588,504) | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (82,556,427) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 23,479,475 | ||
$146,717,848 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $146,598,632 | 22,363,739 | $6.56 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $27,001 | 4,119 | $6.56 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $34,200 | 5,221 | $6.55* |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $29,946 | 4,577 | $6.54 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $28,069 | 4,287 | $6.55 |
* Maximum offering price $6.95 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends | $ 554,637 |
Interest | 1,138 |
555,775 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 1,011,260 |
Distribution fees — C Class | 33 |
Service fees — C Class | 11 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 11 |
R Class | 22 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 1,798 |
1,013,135 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (457,360) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions | 22,116,365 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 12,845,140 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 34,961,505 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $34,504,145 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (457,360) | $ (592,241) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 22,116,365 | (32,090,793) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 12,845,140 | 28,631,261 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 34,504,145 | (4,051,773) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (7,076,734) | (23,600,401) |
Redemption Fees | ||
Increase in net assets from redemption fees | 3,576 | 7,327 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 27,430,987 | (27,644,847) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 119,286,861 | 146,931,708 |
End of period | $146,717,848 | $119,286,861 |
Accumulated net investment loss | $(588,504) | $(131,144) |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
18
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. New Opportunities Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in common stocks of small and mid-sized companies that management believes will increase in value over time. Prior to December 1, 2009, the fund invested primarily in common stocks of smaller-sized companies. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund ar e allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets. Sale of the Institutional Class, A Class, C Class and R Class commenced on March 1, 2010.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
19
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Exchange Traded Funds — The fund may invest in exchange traded funds (ETFs). ETFs are a type of index fund bought and sold on a securities exchange. An ETF trades like common stock and represents a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. A fund may purchase an ETF to temporarily gain exposure to a portion of the U.S. or a foreign market while awaiting purchase of underlying securities. The risks of owning an ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities they are designed to track, although the lack of liquidity on an ETF could result in it being more volatile. Additionally, ETFs have fees and expenses that reduce their value.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Redemption — The fund may impose a 2.00% redemption fee on shares held less than 180 days. The fee may not be applicable to all classes. The redemption fee is retained by a fund and helps cover transaction costs that long-term investors may bear when a fund sells securities to meet investor redemptions.
20
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 1.10% to 1.50% for the Investor Class, A Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.50% for the Investor Class, A Class, C Class and R Class and 1.30% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses — The fund may invest in mutual funds, exchange traded funds, and business development companies (the acquired funds). The fund will indirectly realize its pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the acquired funds in which it invests. These indirect fees and expenses are not paid out of the fund’s assets but are reflected in the return realized by the fund on its investment in the acquired funds.
21
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $117,908,568 and $129,136,257, respectively.
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010(1) | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 300,000,000 | ||
Sold | 681,022 | $ 4,109,905 | 972,792 | $ 4,381,201 |
Redeemed | (1,897,979) | (11,298,017) | (6,114,009) | (27,981,602) |
(1,216,957) | (7,188,112) | (5,141,217) | (23,600,401) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 4,119 | 25,000 | ||
A Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 5,221 | 32,314 | ||
C Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 4,577 | 28,000 | ||
R Class/Shares Authorized | 25,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 4,287 | 26,064 | ||
Net increase (decrease) | (1,198,753) | $ (7,076,734) | (5,141,217) | $(23,600,401) |
(1) March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 for the Institutional Class, A Class, C Class and R Class. |
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
22
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $142,674,304 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 85,405 | $4,400,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $142,759,709 | $4,400,000 | — |
6. Risk Factors
The fund’s investment process may involve high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $123,771,743 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $25,217,204 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (1,829,238) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $23,387,966 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
23
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(104,325,448), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The capital loss carryovers expire as follows:
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
$(37,698,539) | — | — | — | — | — | $(33,198,598) | $(33,428,311) |
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval. Management agreements for new share classes of the funds that were launched after February 16, 2010 did not terminate, have not been replaced by interim agreements, and do not require approval of new agreements.
24
Financial Highlights |
New Opportunities | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.06 | $5.12 | $8.58 | $6.44 | $5.63 | $5.06 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | (0.02)(2) | (0.02)(2) | (0.05)(2) | (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.06) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.52 | (0.04) | (3.41) | 2.21 | 0.87 | 0.63 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.50 | (0.06) | (3.46) | 2.14 | 0.81 | 0.57 | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $6.56 | $5.06 | $5.12 | $8.58 | $6.44 | $5.63 | |
Total Return(3) | 29.45% | (1.17)% | (40.33)% | 33.23% | 14.39% | 11.26% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.50%(4) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (0.68)%(4) | (0.51)% | (0.66)% | (0.83)% | (0.84)% | (0.98)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 90% | 206% | 159% | 201% | 298% | 260% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $146,599 | $119,287 | $146,932 | $270,428 | $247,876 | $240,464 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
New Opportunities | ||
Institutional Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $6.07 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | —(3) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.49 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 0.49 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $6.56 | |
Total Return(4) | 7.91% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.30%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.29)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 90%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $27 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | |
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | |
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | ||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | ||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | ||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | ||
between one class and another. | ||
(5) | Annualized. | |
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
New Opportunities | ||
A Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $6.07 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.49 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 0.48 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $6.55 | |
Total Return(3) | 7.91% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.75%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.74)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 90%(5) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $34 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | |
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | ||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | ||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | ||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | ||
(4) | Annualized. | |
(5) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
New Opportunities | ||
C Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $6.07 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.49 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 0.47 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $6.54 | |
Total Return(3) | 7.74% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.50%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (1.49)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 90%(5) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $30 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | |
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | ||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | ||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | ||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | ||
(4) | Annualized. | |
(5) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
New Opportunities | ||
R Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $6.07 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.49 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 0.48 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $6.55 | |
Total Return(3) | 7.91% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.99)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 90%(5) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $28 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | |
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | ||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | ||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | ||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | ||
between one class and another. | ||
(4) | Annualized. | |
(5) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.*
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
* Management agreements for new share classes of the Fund launched after February 16, 2010, did not terminate, have not been replaced by Interim |
Management Agreements, and do not require Board or shareholder approval at this time. |
30
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
31
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
32
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the
33
Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The
34
Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
35
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
36
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2500® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,500 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2500® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2500 Index companies (the 2,500 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
37
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68441
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Ultra® Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Ultra | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 31 |
Additional Information | 37 |
Index Definitions | 38 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Ultra | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWCUX | 15.23% | 36.35% | 1.57% | -2.97% | 11.04% | 11/2/81 | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index(2) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 4.05% | -3.64% | 10.04%(3) | — | |
S&P 500 Index(2) | — | 15.66% | 38.84% | 2.63% | -0.19% | 11.28%(3) | — | |
Institutional Class | TWUIX | 15.34% | 36.64% | 1.77% | -2.77% | 4.00% | 11/14/96 | |
A Class(4) | TWUAX | 10/2/96 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 15.02% | 35.97% | 1.31% | -3.22% | 3.82% | |||
With sales charge* | 8.39% | 28.18% | 0.11% | -3.79% | 3.36% | |||
B Class | AULBX | 9/28/07 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 14.65% | 34.97% | — | — | -6.41% | |||
With sales charge* | 9.65% | 30.97% | — | — | -7.71% | |||
C Class | TWCCX | 10/29/01 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 14.68% | 35.00% | 0.56% | — | 0.69% | |||
With sales charge* | 13.68% | 35.00% | 0.56% | — | 0.69% | |||
R Class | AULRX | 14.89% | 35.64% | 1.05% | — | 2.02% | 8/29/03 | |
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | ||||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | ||||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | ||||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | ||||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(3) | Since 10/31/81, the date nearest the Investor Class’s inception for which data are available. | |||||||
(4) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
5
Ultra
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.00% | 0.80% | 1.25% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 1.50% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Ultra
Portfolio Managers: Keith Lee and Michael Li
Performance Summary
Ultra returned 15.23%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, narrowly trailing the 15.79% return of its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, and the 15.66% return of the broad S&P 500 Index.
U.S. stocks posted solid gains for the six-month period thanks to broadening signs of economic improvement, both in the U.S. and on a global basis. In this environment, Ultra largely kept pace with its growth-oriented benchmark despite some considerable performance headwinds. The outperformance of smaller-cap stocks and value-oriented shares worked against the fund’s large-cap growth focus. Furthermore, price momentum and accelerating growth—two critical components of Ultra’s investment process—were out of favor for most of the period. In contrast, cyclical stocks (those with the greatest economic sensitivity) and high-beta stocks (those that experience greater volatility than the overall market) outperformed.
Our disciplined stock selection process helped Ultra overcome the difficult market environment and perform roughly in line with its benchmark and the broad equity indices.
Energy and Technology Added Value
Stock selection was most successful in the energy and information technology sectors. Stock choices among oil and gas producers generated all of the outperformance in the energy sector. The fund avoided energy titan Exxon Mobil, which posted a negative return for the six-month period as the company agreed to acquire natural gas producer XTO Energy at a considerable premium. Among energy stocks in the portfolio, oil and gas producer EOG Resources was the top contributor, advancing sharply as the company ramped up production volumes, which translated into robust earnings.
In the information technology sector, IT services providers and internet software companies contributed the most to the sector’s overall outperformance. The fund’s top relative performance contributor was Chinese search engine Baidu, which benefited from skyrocketing demand and competitor Google’s exit from the Chinese search engine market. Other favorable contributors in the information technology sector included software developer VMware, which enjoyed a sharp increase in service contract revenues, and consumer electronics maker Apple (the fund’s largest holding on average during the period), which continued to generate strong earnings and introduced the iPad tablet computer in April 2010.
Elsewhere in the portfolio, notable outperformers for the six-month period included engine manufacturer Cummins, electrical equipment maker Emerson Electric, and pharmacy benefits manager Express Scripts. Cummins reported improving global demand and captured additional market share thanks to its fuel-efficient engines; Emerson saw orders
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Ultra
increase as the economic environment improved; and Express Scripts completed a strategic acquisition that gave the company bigger scale and greater buying power, boosting overall profitability.
Non-Cyclical Underweights Paid Off
The fund’s underweight positions in the consumer staples and utilities sectors relative to the benchmark index also added value for the six-month period. These two sectors, with their general lack of economic sensitivity, were among the weakest-performing sectors in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. In particular, the fund benefited from underweight positions in household products makers in the consumer staples sector and electric utilities in the utilities sector.
Financials and Consumer Discretionary Lagged
The fund’s holdings in the financials and consumer discretionary sectors underperformed their counterparts in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. A number of the portfolio’s financial stocks were weighed down by uncertainty surrounding the federal government’s regulatory overhaul of the financial industry. These developments were especially hard on capital markets firms and diversified financial services companies, which were among the weaker performers in the financials sector. Examples included investment bank Goldman Sachs (which also fell in response to a fraud lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission), asset manager BlackRock, and financial services provider JPMorgan Chase. We eliminated our position in Goldman Sachs.
In the consumer discretionary sector, stock choices among retailers and a lack of exposure to media companies had the biggest negative impact on relative results. By far, the most significant individual detractor in this sector was department store chain Kohl’s, which underperformed as investors rewarded more cyclical retailers. However, Kohl’s continued to report solid earnings during the period, and we remain confident in the company’s prospects.
Other noteworthy underperformers within the portfolio included agricultural products maker Monsanto, biotechnology firm Gilead Sciences, and online advertising and search firm Google. Monsanto faced intense price competition in its Round-Up herbicide business and surprisingly tepid demand for its new seed products; Gilead was adversely impacted by health care reform and the end of a clinical trial for its hepatitis C drug; and Google slid in the wake of the controversy surrounding its decision to exit the Chinese search engine market, as well as ramping up expenses as the economy began to recover.
A Look Ahead
The sovereign debt issues in Europe have created greater uncertainty about the sustainability of the global economic recovery. Regardless of how these developments play out, we will continue to focus on our disciplined investment process, in which we seek high-quality, larger-cap companies exhibiting accelerating business fundamentals, positive relative strength, and reasonable valuations.
8
Ultra | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Apple, Inc. | 5.0% |
Google, Inc., Class A | 4.0% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.9% |
Express Scripts, Inc. | 2.9% |
Microsoft Corp. | 2.8% |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2.8% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2.6% |
Amazon.com, Inc. | 2.2% |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 2.1% |
General Dynamics Corp. | 1.9% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 9.0% |
Software | 7.7% |
Internet Software & Services | 5.8% |
Communications Equipment | 5.0% |
Health Care Providers & Services | 4.5% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 91.5% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 6.6% |
Total Common Stocks | 98.1% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.3% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.6% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,152.30 | $5.34 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,153.40 | $4.27 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,150.20 | $6.66 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,146.50 | $10.64 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,146.80 | $10.65 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,148.90 | $7.99 | 1.50% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Ultra | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 98.1% | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | |||||
INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 0.4% | ||||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 1.9% | Dolby Laboratories, Inc., | |||||
General Dynamics Corp. | 1,530,000 | $ 116,830,800 | Class A(1) | 391,000 | $ 26,869,520 | |
BEVERAGES — 2.0% | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.9% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 1,732,000 | 92,575,400 | Oceaneering | |||
PepsiCo, Inc. | 437,000 | 28,501,140 | International, Inc.(1) | 352,000 | 23,056,000 | |
121,076,540 | Schlumberger Ltd. | 1,342,000 | 95,845,640 | |||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 3.5% | 118,901,640 | |||||
Alexion | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 4.3% | |||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 747,000 | 40,995,360 | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 1,560,000 | 92,164,800 | |
Celgene Corp.(1) | 1,059,000 | 65,605,050 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 3,154,000 | 169,212,100 | |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 2,694,000 | 106,870,980 | 261,376,900 | |||
213,471,390 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.6% | |||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.6% | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 630,763 | 32,553,678 | |||
BlackRock, Inc. | 140,000 | 25,760,000 | Nestle SA | 1,353,000 | 66,032,480 | |
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 3,583,000 | 69,116,070 | 98,586,158 | |||
94,876,070 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 3.3% | |||||
CHEMICALS — 3.6% | Baxter International, Inc. | 810,000 | 38,248,200 | |||
Monsanto Co. | 1,612,000 | 101,652,720 | Edwards | |||
Mosaic Co. (The) | 965,000 | 49,350,100 | Lifesciences Corp.(1) | 423,000 | 43,602,840 | |
Nalco Holding Co. | 1,801,000 | 44,538,730 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) | 121,000 | 43,627,760 | |
RPM International, Inc. | 1,045,000 | 23,073,600 | NuVasive, Inc.(1) | 601,000 | 25,001,600 | |
218,615,150 | Varian Medical | |||||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 5.0% | Systems, Inc.(1) | 902,000 | 50,854,760 | |||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 6,656,000 | 179,179,520 | 201,335,160 | |||
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,241,000 | 125,556,340 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 4.5% | |||
304,735,860 | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 1,759,000 | 176,128,670 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 9.0% | Medco Health | |||||
Solutions, Inc.(1) | 206,000 | 12,137,520 | ||||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 1,167,000 | 304,727,040 | ||||
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 2,902,000 | 87,959,620 | ||||
EMC Corp.(1) | 4,315,000 | 82,028,150 | ||||
276,225,810 | ||||||
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 3,105,000 | 161,366,850 | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 3.1% | |||
548,122,040 | Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 162,000 | 21,855,420 | |||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 0.8% | Marriott International, Inc., | |||||
American Express Co. | 1,025,000 | 47,273,000 | Class A | 1,377,000 | 50,618,520 | |
DIVERSIFIED FINANCIAL SERVICES — 2.4% | McDonald’s Corp. | 1,651,000 | 116,544,090 | |||
CME Group, Inc. | 260,000 | 85,386,600 | 189,018,030 | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1,415,000 | 60,250,700 | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.6% | |||
145,637,300 | Toll Brothers, Inc.(1) | 1,630,000 | 36,789,100 | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 4.5% | HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 1.7% | |||||
ABB Ltd.(1) | 1,756,000 | 33,793,959 | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 1,224,000 | 102,938,400 | |
ABB Ltd. ADR(1) | 2,875,000 | 55,085,000 | INSURANCE — 1.5% | |||
Cooper Industries plc | 1,461,000 | 71,735,100 | MetLife, Inc. | 2,066,000 | 94,168,280 | |
Emerson Electric Co. | 2,171,000 | 113,391,330 | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 2.2% | |||
274,005,389 | Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 967,000 | 132,537,020 |
12
Ultra | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 5.8% | SOFTWARE — 7.7% | |||||
Baidu, Inc. ADR(1) | 102,000 | $ 70,308,600 | Adobe Systems, Inc.(1) | 3,216,000 | $ 108,025,440 | |
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 464,000 | 243,804,160 | Electronic Arts, Inc.(1) | 1,977,000 | 38,294,490 | |
Tencent Holdings Ltd. | 2,090,000 | 42,958,417 | Microsoft Corp. | 5,663,000 | 172,948,020 | |
357,071,177 | Oracle Corp. | 3,745,000 | 96,770,800 | |||
IT SERVICES — 3.1% | VMware, Inc., Class A(1) | 854,000 | 52,640,560 | |||
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 414,000 | 102,688,560 | 468,679,310 | |||
Visa, Inc., Class A | 941,000 | 84,906,430 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 2.9% | |||
187,594,990 | Guess?, Inc. | 441,000 | 20,228,670 | |||
LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 1.1% | Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 2,775,000 | 75,258,000 | |||
Hasbro, Inc. | 1,776,000 | 68,127,360 | TJX Cos., Inc. (The) | 1,783,000 | 82,624,220 | |
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.3% | 178,110,890 | |||||
Thermo Fisher | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 1.3% | |||||
Scientific, Inc.(1) | 342,609 | 18,939,425 | NIKE, Inc., Class B | 1,010,000 | 76,669,100 | |
MACHINERY — 3.8% | TOBACCO — 1.9% | |||||
Cummins, Inc. | 906,000 | 65,440,380 | Philip Morris | |||
Donaldson Co., Inc. | 697,000 | 32,271,100 | International, Inc. | 2,377,000 | 116,663,160 | |
Joy Global, Inc. | 1,264,000 | 71,807,840 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
Parker-Hannifin Corp. | 936,000 | 64,752,480 | (Cost $4,346,087,557) | 5,991,020,699 | ||
234,271,800 | Temporary Cash Investments — 1.3% | |||||
METALS & MINING — 0.6% | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||||
BHP Billiton Ltd. ADR | 479,000 | 34,866,410 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 1.2% | Agency Shares | 2,088 | 2,088 | |||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 1,341,000 | 73,741,590 | Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | |||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||||||
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 2.5% | U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, 2/15/38, | |||||
EOG Resources, Inc. | 437,000 | 48,996,440 | valued at $79,254,206), in a joint trading | |||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 800,000 | 70,928,000 | account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||
Southwestern Energy Co.(1) | 813,000 | 32,259,840 | 5/3/10 (Delivery value $77,100,964) | 77,100,000 | ||
152,184,280 | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 3.4% | (Cost $77,102,088) | 77,102,088 | ||||
Abbott Laboratories | 2,183,000 | 111,682,280 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
Teva Pharmaceutical | SECURITIES — 99.4% | |||||
Industries Ltd. ADR | 1,678,000 | 98,548,940 | (Cost $4,423,189,645) | 6,068,122,787 | ||
210,231,220 | OTHER ASSETS | |||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & | AND LIABILITIES — 0.6% | 39,526,337 | ||||
SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT — 3.1% | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $6,107,649,124 | ||||
Altera Corp. | 2,612,000 | 66,240,320 | ||||
Linear Technology Corp. | 2,486,000 | 74,729,160 | ||||
Microchip Technology, Inc. | 1,695,000 | 49,510,950 | ||||
190,480,430 |
13
Ultra | |||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
55,928,895 CHF for USD | 5/28/10 | $51,986,741 | $(535,636) |
(Value on Settlement Date $51,451,105) | |||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
CHF = Swiss Franc | |||
USD = United States Dollar | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||
Assets | ||||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $4,423,189,645) | $6,068,122,787 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 67,473,348 | |||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 879,514 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 5,242,580 | |||
6,141,718,229 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 22,714,718 | |||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 5,725,175 | |||
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 535,636 | |||
Accrued management fees | 5,075,746 | |||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 17,196 | |||
Distribution fees payable | 634 | |||
34,069,105 | ||||
Net Assets | $6,107,649,124 | |||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $5,330,574,260 | |||
Undistributed net investment income | 8,912,451 | |||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (876,184,278) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 1,644,346,691 | |||
$6,107,649,124 | ||||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | ||
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $5,959,802,383 | 291,584,475 | $20.44 | |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $70,911,600 | 3,396,399 | $20.88 | |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $72,413,531 | 3,640,258 | $19.89* | |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $99,983 | 4,971 | $20.11 | |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $915,383 | 49,245 | $18.59 | |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $3,506,244 | 176,774 | $19.83 | |
*Maximum offering price $21.10 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $305,446) | $ 38,962,324 |
Interest | 17,416 |
38,979,740 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 29,465,091 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 356 |
C Class | 3,437 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 119 |
C Class | 1,146 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 94,486 |
R Class | 8,217 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 81,623 |
Other expenses | 128,416 |
29,782,891 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 9,196,849 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 154,020,349 |
Foreign currency transactions | 3,337,019 |
157,357,368 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 668,863,079 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (881,835) |
667,981,244 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 825,338,612 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $834,535,461 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 9,196,849 | $ 34,692,826 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 157,357,368 | (664,963,753) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 667,981,244 | 1,318,667,736 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 834,535,461 | 688,396,809 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (26,725,188) | (25,630,818) |
Institutional Class | (528,963) | (491,887) |
A Class | (172,872) | (226,924) |
R Class | — | (1,496) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (27,427,023) | (26,351,125) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (289,954,353) | (513,655,552) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 517,154,085 | 148,390,132 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 5,590,495,039 | 5,442,104,907 |
End of period | $6,107,649,124 | $5,590,495,039 |
Undistributed net investment income | $8,912,451 | $27,142,625 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Ultra Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in equity securities of large companies, but may invest in companies of any size. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
18
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
19
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 0.99% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class, and 0.79% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $480,968,101 and $870,109,377, respectively.
20
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 3,500,000,000 | 3,500,000,000 | ||
Sold | 4,914,053 | $ 96,670,444 | 10,713,688 | $ 162,466,559 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 1,335,312 | 25,958,465 | 1,792,590 | 24,916,998 |
Redeemed | (19,597,741) | (383,776,148) | (44,276,980) | (673,015,336) |
(13,348,376) | (261,147,239) | (31,770,702) | (485,631,779) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | ||
Sold | 282,191 | 5,606,394 | 616,942 | 9,517,688 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 25,921 | 514,529 | 33,797 | 479,581 |
Redeemed | (969,098) | (19,232,490) | (1,359,616) | (20,634,403) |
(660,986) | (13,111,567) | (708,877) | (10,637,134) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 | ||
Sold | 331,693 | 6,324,188 | 761,220 | 11,227,185 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 8,809 | 166,840 | 16,176 | 219,026 |
Redeemed | (1,172,480) | (22,090,827) | (1,933,030) | (28,089,270) |
(831,978) | (15,599,799) | (1,155,634) | (16,643,059) | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 6 | 112 | 2,779 | 44,188 |
Redeemed | — | — | (429) | (7,449) |
6 | 112 | 2,350 | 36,739 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 2,934 | 51,486 | 11,640 | 167,046 |
Redeemed | (8,191) | (144,945) | (19,376) | (267,383) |
(5,257) | (93,459) | (7,736) | (100,337) | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 20,569 | 393,621 | 73,819 | 1,103,287 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 95 | 1,278 |
Redeemed | (20,849) | (396,022) | (112,765) | (1,784,547) |
(280) | (2,401) | (38,851) | (679,982) | |
Net increase (decrease) | (14,846,871) | $(289,954,353) | (33,679,450) | $(513,655,552) |
21
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $5,589,426,893 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 258,808,950 | $142,784,856 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 2,088 | 77,100,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $5,848,237,931 | $219,884,856 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward Foreign | |||
Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(535,636) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
22
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $535,636 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $3,467,025 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $(804,426) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
7. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions.
8. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
9. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $4,490,162,950 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $1,644,087,220 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (66,127,383) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $1,577,959,837 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(947,743,447), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(201,210,564) and $(746,532,883) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
23
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
24
Financial Highlights |
Ultra | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $17.82 | $15.67 | $33.48 | $28.55 | $29.02 | $27.17 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.08 | (0.01) | (0.06) | 0.02 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.68 | 2.12 | (9.95) | 6.95 | (0.37) | 1.83 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.71 | 2.23 | (9.87) | 6.94 | (0.43) | 1.85 | |
Distributions | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | (0.09) | (0.08) | — | — | (0.04) | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.09) | (0.08) | (7.94) | (2.01) | (0.04) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $20.44 | $17.82 | $15.67 | $33.48 | $28.55 | $29.02 | |
Total Return(3) | 15.23% | 14.35% | (38.02)% | 25.89% | (1.51)% | 6.81% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.00% | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.31%(4) | 0.69% | 0.36% | (0.04)% | (0.15)% | 0.09% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93% | 62% | 33% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $5,960 | $5,435 | $5,276 | $10,066 | $13,482 | $18,904 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Ultra | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $18.22 | $16.02 | $33.98 | $28.90 | $29.38 | $27.44 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.05 | —(3) | 0.07 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.74 | 2.17 | (10.17) | 7.04 | (0.38) | 1.87 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.79 | 2.31 | (10.02) | 7.09 | (0.38) | 1.94 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.13) | (0.11) | — | — | (0.10) | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.13) | (0.11) | (7.94) | (2.01) | (0.10) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $20.88 | $18.22 | $16.02 | $33.98 | $28.90 | $29.38 | |
Total Return(4) | 15.34% | 14.58% | (37.89)% | 26.14% | (1.33)% | 7.07% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.80%(5) | 0.80% | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.51%(5) | 0.89% | 0.56% | 0.16% | 0.05% | 0.29% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93% | 62% | 33% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $70,912 | $73,933 | $76,339 | $325,035 | $1,073,767 | $1,460,343 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Ultra | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $17.33 | $15.23 | $32.83 | $28.11 | $28.61 | $26.85 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.03 | (0.08) | (0.13) | (0.05) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.59 | 2.07 | (9.69) | 6.81 | (0.37) | 1.81 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.60 | 2.14 | (9.66) | 6.73 | (0.50) | 1.76 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.04) | (0.04) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.04) | (0.04) | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $19.89 | $17.33 | $15.23 | $32.83 | $28.11 | $28.61 | |
Total Return(4) | 15.02% | 14.14% | (38.19)% | 25.56% | (1.75)% | 6.55% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.24% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.06%(5) | 0.44% | 0.11% | (0.29)% | (0.40)% | (0.16)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93% | 62% | 33% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $72,414 | $77,484 | $85,723 | $235,217 | $405,173 | $639,792 | |
(1) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Ultra | |||||
B Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $17.54 | $15.49 | $33.45 | $31.63 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.16) | (0.04) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.64 | 2.11 | (9.86) | 1.86 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 2.57 | 2.05 | (10.02) | 1.82 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $20.11 | $17.54 | $15.49 | $33.45 | |
Total Return(4) | 14.65% | 13.23% | (38.64)% | 5.75% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(5) | 2.00% | 1.99% | 1.99%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.69)%(5) | (0.31)% | (0.64)% | (1.53)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $100 | $87 | $41 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Ultra | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $16.22 | $14.32 | $31.54 | $27.26 | $27.96 | $26.44 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.06) | (0.04) | (0.13) | (0.29) | (0.34) | (0.26) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.43 | 1.94 | (9.15) | 6.58 | (0.36) | 1.78 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.37 | 1.90 | (9.28) | 6.29 | (0.70) | 1.52 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $18.59 | $16.22 | $14.32 | $31.54 | $27.26 | $27.96 | |
Total Return(3) | 14.68% | 13.20% | (38.63)% | 24.64% | (2.50)% | 5.75% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.00% | 1.99% | 1.99% | 1.99% | 1.99% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.69)%(4) | (0.31)% | (0.64)% | (1.04)% | (1.15)% | (0.91)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93% | 62% | 33% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $915 | $884 | $891 | $2,129 | $3,342 | $5,601 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Ultra | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $17.26 | $15.17 | $32.80 | $28.15 | $28.72 | $27.01 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | 0.03 | (0.03) | (0.15) | (0.21) | (0.12) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.59 | 2.07 | (9.66) | 6.81 | (0.36) | 1.83 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.57 | 2.10 | (9.69) | 6.66 | (0.57) | 1.71 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.01) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.01) | (7.94) | (2.01) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $19.83 | $17.26 | $15.17 | $32.80 | $28.15 | $28.72 | |
Total Return(3) | 14.89% | 13.84% | (38.35)% | 25.26% | (1.98)% | 6.33% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.44%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.19)%(5) | 0.19% | (0.14)% | (0.54)% | (0.65)% | (0.36)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 53% | 152% | 93% | 62% | 33% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $3,506 | $3,056 | $3,276 | $5,971 | $8,922 | $8,367 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | During the year ended October 31, 2005, the class received a partial reimbursement of its distribution and service fee. Had fees not been | ||||||
reimbursed the ratio of operating expenses to average net assets and ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets would have | |||||||
been 1.49% and (0.41)%, respectively. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor
31
will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
32
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
33
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
34
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
35
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
36
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
37
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The S&P 500 Index is a market value-weighted index of the stocks of 500 publicly traded U.S. companies chosen for market size, liquidity, and industry group representation that are considered to be leading firms in dominant industries. Each stock’s weight in the index is proportionate to its market value. Created by Standard & Poor’s, it is considered to be a broad measure of U.S. stock market performance.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68442
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Veedot® Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Veedot | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 14 |
Statement of Operations | 15 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 16 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 17 |
Financial Highlights | 22 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 24 |
Additional Information | 30 |
Index Definitions | 31 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim – who celebrated his 86th birthday in January – founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase – “The best is yet to be” – still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Veedot | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | AMVIX | 22.36% | 35.29% | 2.84% | -1.58% | 1.37% | 11/30/99 | |
Russell 3000 Index(2) | — | 17.64% | 40.90% | 3.28% | 0.50% | 1.16% | — | |
Institutional Class | AVDIX | 22.65% | 35.67% | 3.03% | — | -0.42% | 8/1/00 | |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. – A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. The fund’s investment process may involve high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Veedot
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |
Investor Class | Institutional Class |
1.25% | 1.05% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. The fund’s investment process may involve high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Veedot
Portfolio Managers: John Small, Jr. and Stephen Pool
Performance Summary
Veedot returned 22.36%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, compared with its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, which returned 17.64% for the period.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of stabilizing economic conditions and improving investor sentiment. Price momentum, a factor that the Veedot team looks for in portfolio holdings, was not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to drive market strength. Even so, Veedot’s highly systematic investment process delivered portfolio returns that surpassed those of its benchmark.
Within the portfolio, stock selection in the information technology, consumer discretionary, and materials sectors accounted for the bulk of outperformance relative to Veedot’s benchmark. Partially trimming those gains, holdings in the industrials and financials sectors detracted from relative returns.
Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary Led Gains
Veedot was rewarded for a focus on the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors during the reporting period. Within the information technology sector, the semiconductor industry group contributed meaningfully to absolute and relative returns. In particular, Veeco Instruments, Inc., which produces components used in flat screen televisions, was a key contributor to returns. The company saw a share price gain amid surging demand. Sanmina-SCI Corp., which is not a benchmark constituent, was the largest contributor to Veedot’s relative returns. The electronics contract manufacturer swung to a profit during the reporting period amid rising sales.
In the consumer discretionary sector, an overweight stake in automotive supplier TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. helped absolute and relative returns. The company reported a sound profit for the fourth quarter and full year of 2009, reversing a loss in the previous year largely through cost cutting. Similarly, auto parts supplier Tenneco, Inc. reported a profit for the first quarter of 2010 as a result of increased auto production as well as cost-cutting measures. Within the specialty retail industry group, home décor company Kirkland’s, Inc. contributed meaningfully to gains. The company’s earnings improved amid rising sales levels.
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Veedot
Materials Helped, but Some Holdings Lagged
The materials sector was also a source for absolute and relative portfolio gains. Here, an overweight stake in the metals and mining group drove relative outperformance in the sector. Cliffs Natural Resources, which benefited from improved pricing for iron ore as global economies improve, was a key contributor to gains.
Elsewhere in the materials sector, select holdings in the containers and packaging, as well as the paper and forest products groups, added to positive performance. However, Schweitzer-Mauduit, a manufacturer and supplier of specialized papers to the cigarette industry, detracted from returns. The company’s share price fell as Philip Morris, which had a sole-supplier relationship with Schweitzer-Mauduit for low-ignition cigarette paper, announced that it planned to diversify its supplier base.
Industrials, Financials Detracted
Holdings in the industrials sector weighed on relative returns. In the commercial services and supplies industry, Rino International, which operates as an environmental protection and remediation company in the People’s Republic of China, experienced a share price decline. Stock choices in the electrical equipment industry also curbed relative gains. Holdings in the financials sector lagged the sector’s benchmark returns, but contributed positively to Veedot’s absolute returns. Within the sector, Veedot held several detrimental positions in the consumer finance and real estate management industry groups.
Outlook
Using a systematic and technically driven process, Veedot focuses on finding companies whose fundamental characteristics meet strict requirements for accelerating earnings and revenue growth. Such companies must also have historical stock price performance that suggests impending share price appreciation.
During the reporting period, the difficult environment for growth- and momentum-oriented investment styles continued. Despite the overall underperformance of the types of stocks that Veedot favors, however, the portfolio delivered solid results and outperformed its benchmark. Looking ahead, we remain confident that our systematic process of identifying companies with accelerating growth and price momentum will continue to successfully identify opportunities across industry sectors.
8
Veedot | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Kirkland’s, Inc. | 2.2% |
Sanmina-SCI Corp. | 1.8% |
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. | 1.7% |
Veeco Instruments, Inc. | 1.7% |
Tenneco, Inc. | 1.6% |
Oclaro, Inc. | 1.6% |
Western Digital Corp. | 1.5% |
Xyratex Ltd. | 1.5% |
Seagate Technology | 1.5% |
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 1.5% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 14.2% |
Specialty Retail | 12.0% |
Chemicals | 6.9% |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | 6.0% |
Computers & Peripherals | 5.4% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 87.1% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 9.8% |
Total Common Stocks | 96.9% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 0.9% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 2.2% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information
10
to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 - 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,223.60 | $6.89 | 1.25% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,226.50 | $5.80 | 1.05% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,019.59 | $5.26 | 1.05% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Veedot | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 96.9% | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | |||||
INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 6.0% | ||||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 1.2% | Arrow Electronics, Inc.(1) | 29,500 | $ 899,750 | |||
AerCap Holdings NV(1) | 79,500 | $ 1,097,100 | ||||
Avnet, Inc.(1) | 29,500 | 943,115 | ||||
AUTO COMPONENTS — 4.2% | Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 58,500 | 896,220 | |||
Amerigon, Inc.(1) | 84,000 | 824,040 | ||||
Littelfuse, Inc.(1) | 24,000 | 1,013,520 | ||||
Tenneco, Inc.(1) | 56,000 | 1,443,120 | ||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp.(1) | 91,500 | 1,631,445 | ||||
TRW Automotive | ||||||
Holdings Corp.(1) | 46,500 | 1,497,765 | 5,384,050 | |||
3,764,925 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 1.1% | |||||
CHEMICALS — 6.9% | Andersons, Inc. (The) | 26,500 | 957,710 | |||
Eastman Chemical Co. | 15,000 | 1,003,800 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 3.0% | |||
Lubrizol Corp. | 11,000 | 993,740 | Arthrocare Corp.(1) | 28,500 | 881,505 | |
Omnova Solutions, Inc.(1) | 119,500 | 914,175 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) | 2,500 | 901,400 | |
PolyOne Corp.(1) | 114,000 | 1,289,340 | Volcano Corp.(1) | 35,500 | 852,710 | |
Spartech Corp.(1) | 66,000 | 939,840 | 2,635,615 | |||
W.R. Grace & Co.(1) | 36,000 | 1,040,040 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 4.8% | |||
6,180,935 | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 41,500 | 1,280,275 | |||
Healthspring, Inc.(1) | 53,000 | 932,800 | ||||
COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 1.1% | ||||||
Odyssey HealthCare, Inc.(1) | 56,500 | 1,176,895 | ||||
United Stationers, Inc.(1) | 16,000 | 979,520 | ||||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 4.5% | Universal American Corp.(1) | 60,000 | 921,000 | |||
Aruba Networks, Inc.(1) | 67,500 | 847,800 | 4,310,970 | |||
KVH Industries, Inc.(1) | 38,600 | 581,702 | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 3.9% | |||
Netgear, Inc.(1) | 42,500 | 1,150,050 | Tempur-Pedic | |||
International, Inc.(1) | 39,500 | 1,331,150 | ||||
Oclaro, Inc.(1) | 90,800 | 1,391,964 | Tupperware Brands Corp. | 18,000 | 919,260 | |
3,971,516 | Whirlpool Corp. | 11,000 | 1,197,570 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 5.4% | 3,447,980 | |||||
Intevac, Inc.(1) | 52,500 | 730,800 | INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.1% | |||
Seagate Technology(1) | 73,500 | 1,350,195 | 3M Co. | 11,500 | 1,019,705 | |
Western Digital Corp.(1) | 33,500 | 1,376,515 | INSURANCE — 1.3% | |||
Xyratex Ltd.(1) | 77,000 | 1,355,200 | FBL Financial Group, Inc., | |||
4,812,710 | Class A | 45,000 | 1,162,800 | |||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.2% | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 1.2% | |||||
American Express Co. | 23,000 | 1,060,760 | priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 4,000 | 1,048,200 | |
CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 1.2% | LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 1.9% | |||||
Packaging Corp. of America | 45,000 | 1,112,850 | Eastman Kodak Co.(1) | 127,000 | 777,240 | |
DIVERSIFIED TELECOMMUNICATION | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc.(1) | 140,500 | 961,020 | |||
SERVICES — 1.2% | 1,738,260 | |||||
Telecom Argentina SA ADR | 56,500 | 1,104,575 | MACHINERY — 0.9% | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.0% | Oshkosh Corp.(1) | 21,000 | 811,020 | |||
Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 15,000 | 910,800 |
12
Veedot | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
METALS & MINING — 2.5% | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 12.0% | |||||
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 21,500 | $ 1,344,395 | Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(1) | 24,500 | $ 1,126,020 | |
Walter Energy, Inc. | 11,500 | 929,315 | CarMax, Inc.(1) | 40,000 | 982,800 | |
2,273,710 | DSW, Inc., Class A(1) | 33,500 | 1,011,700 | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 1.5% | Guess?, Inc. | 22,000 | 1,009,140 | |||
Nordstrom, Inc. | 32,000 | 1,322,560 | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 28,000 | 1,301,160 | |
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 4.9% | Kirkland’s, Inc.(1) | 87,000 | 1,937,490 | |||
Alpha Natural | Pier 1 Imports, Inc.(1) | 148,500 | 1,229,580 | |||
Resources, Inc.(1) | 18,500 | 870,980 | ||||
Select Comfort Corp.(1) | 103,000 | 1,165,960 | ||||
BP Prudhoe Bay | ||||||
Royalty Trust | 10,000 | 986,000 | Systemax, Inc. | 40,000 | 929,200 | |
Callon Petroleum Co.(1) | 111,500 | 676,805 | 10,693,050 | |||
Teekay Tankers Ltd., Class A | 73,000 | 930,020 | TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 3.3% | |||
World Fuel Services Corp. | 31,500 | 895,545 | Coach, Inc. | 25,000 | 1,043,750 | |
4,359,350 | Fossil, Inc.(1) | 24,500 | 953,050 | |||
PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 3.6% | Lululemon Athletica, Inc.(1) | 24,500 | 921,690 | |||
Buckeye Technologies, Inc.(1) | 65,500 | 924,860 | 2,918,490 | |||
Clearwater Paper Corp.(1) | 16,500 | 1,050,720 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
Domtar Corp.(1) | 17,000 | 1,204,280 | (Cost $68,107,306) | 86,536,796 | ||
3,179,860 | Temporary Cash Investments — 0.9% | |||||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 1.8% | JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||||
Impax Laboratories, Inc.(1) | 53,000 | 959,300 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 65,500 | 664,170 | Agency Shares | 62,172 | 62,172 | |
Repurchase Agreement, Bank of | ||||||
1,623,470 | America Securities, LLC, (collateralized | |||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | by various U.S. Treasury obligations, | |||||
EQUIPMENT — 14.2% | 4.375%, 2/15/38, valued at $719,558), | |||||
Advanced Micro | in a joint trading account at 0.15%, | |||||
Devices, Inc.(1) | 98,500 | 892,410 | dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | |||
Aixtron AG ADR | 26,500 | 832,630 | (Delivery value $700,009) | 700,000 | ||
Atheros | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||||
Communications, Inc.(1) | 30,500 | 1,184,620 | CASH INVESTMENTS | |||
(Cost $762,172) | 762,172 | |||||
Cree, Inc.(1) | 13,000 | 951,730 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||||||
Entropic | SECURITIES — 97.8% | |||||
Communications, Inc.(1) | 234,000 | 1,235,520 | (Cost $68,869,478) | 87,298,968 | ||
Kulicke & Soffa | OTHER ASSETS | |||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 110,500 | 906,100 | AND LIABILITIES — 2.2% | 1,999,781 | ||
Micron Technology, Inc.(1) | 98,500 | 920,975 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $89,298,749 | ||
Mindspeed | ||||||
Technologies, Inc.(1) | 115,500 | 1,158,465 | Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
Rubicon Technology, Inc.(1) | 48,500 | 1,316,290 | ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
Texas Instruments, Inc. | 34,500 | 897,345 | (1) Non-income producing. | |||
Veeco Instruments, Inc.(1) | 34,000 | 1,495,660 | ||||
Volterra | ||||||
Semiconductor Corp.(1) | 36,000 | 862,560 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. | ||||||
12,654,305 |
13
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $68,869,478) | $87,298,968 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 2,028,329 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 12,501 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 68,635 | ||
89,408,433 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 16,800 | ||
Accrued management fees | 92,884 | ||
109,684 | |||
Net Assets | $89,298,749 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $148,424,977 | ||
Accumulated net investment loss | (245,157) | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (77,310,561) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 18,429,490 | ||
$89,298,749 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $85,927,812 | 14,922,487 | $5.76 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $3,370,937 | 575,395 | $5.86 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends | $ 285,963 |
Interest | 414 |
286,377 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 528,319 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 1,138 |
529,457 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (243,080) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions | 5,668,103 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 11,643,305 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 17,311,408 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $17,068,328 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (243,080) | $ (21,889) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 5,668,103 | (22,607,756) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 11,643,305 | 9,998,811 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 17,068,328 | (12,630,834) |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (48,886) | — |
Institutional Class | (8,309) | — |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (57,195) | — |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (6,404,541) | (12,542,096) |
Redemption Fees | ||
Increase in net assets from redemption fees | 631 | 9,356 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 10,607,223 | (25,163,574) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 78,691,526 | 103,855,100 |
End of period | $89,298,749 | $ 78,691,526 |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) | $(245,157) | $55,118 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Veedot Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is nondiversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in common stocks that management believes to have better than average prospects for appreciation. The fund uses an approach to common stock investing developed by American Century Investments. This approach relies heavily on quantitative tools to identify attractive investment opportunities, regardless of company size, industry type or geographic location, on a disciplined, consistent basis. The foll owing is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class and the Institutional Class. The share classes differ principally in their respective distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
17
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Redemption — The fund may impose a 2.00% redemption fee on shares held less than 180 days. The fee may not be applicable to all classes. The redemption fee is retained by a fund and helps cover transaction costs that long-term investors may bear when a fund sells securities to meet investor redemptions.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
18
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if any, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 1.000% to 1.250% for the Investor Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.25% and 1.05% for the Investor Class and Institutional Class, respectively.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, American Century Investment Services, Inc., and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $77,216,138 and $81,073,213, respectively.
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | ||
Sold | 267,384 | $ 1,458,191 | 588,168 | $ 2,708,394 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 8,820 | 47,717 | — | — |
Redeemed | (1,411,787) | (7,545,911) | (3,060,477) | (14,058,883) |
(1,135,583) | (6,040,003) | (2,472,309) | (11,350,489) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 | ||
Sold | 13,621 | 72,473 | 59,551 | 280,976 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 1,511 | 8,309 | — | — |
Redeemed | (84,042) | (445,320) | (311,173) | (1,472,583) |
(68,910) | (364,538) | (251,622) | (1,191,607) | |
Net increase (decrease) | (1,204,493) | $(6,404,541) | (2,723,931) | $(12,542,096) |
19
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $77,741,106 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 8,795,690 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 62,172 | $700,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $86,598,968 | $700,000 | — |
6. Risk Factors
The fund’s investment process may involve high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
20
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $68,872,349 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $19,200,173 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (773,554) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $18,426,619 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(82,978,664), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(32,317,452), $(27,976,449) and $(22,684,763) expire in 2010, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
21
Financial Highlights |
Veedot | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $4.71 | $5.34 | $9.25 | $6.17 | $5.57 | $5.06 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | —(3) | (0.02) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.03) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.07 | (0.63) | (3.89) | 3.09 | 0.62 | 0.53 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.05 | (0.63) | (3.91) | 3.08 | 0.60 | 0.50 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | —(3) | — | — | — | — | — | |
Redemption Fees(2) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | 0.01 | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $5.76 | $4.71 | $5.34 | $9.25 | $6.17 | $5.57 | |
Total Return(4) | 22.36% | (11.80)% | (42.27)% | 49.92% | 10.77% | 10.08% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (0.58)%(5) | (0.03)% | (0.27)% | (0.18)% | (0.39)% | (0.51)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 95% | 320% | 257% | 207% | 330% | 399% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $85,928 | $75,603 | $98,991 | $195,105 | $154,374 | $178,078 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
22
Veedot | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $4.79 | $5.43 | $9.38 | $6.25 | $5.63 | $5.10 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.01) | 0.01 | (0.01) | —(3) | (0.01) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.09 | (0.65) | (3.94) | 3.13 | 0.63 | 0.54 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.08 | (0.64) | (3.95) | 3.13 | 0.62 | 0.52 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.01) | — | — | — | — | — | |
Redemption Fees(2) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | —(3) | 0.01 | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $5.86 | $4.79 | $5.43 | $9.38 | $6.25 | $5.63 | |
Total Return(4) | 22.65% | (11.79)% | (42.11)% | 50.08% | 11.01% | 10.39% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.05%(5) | 1.05% | 1.05% | 1.05% | 1.25% | 1.30% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (0.38)%(5) | 0.17% | (0.07)% | 0.02% | (0.19)% | (0.31)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 95% | 320% | 257% | 207% | 330% | 399% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $3,371 | $3,089 | $4,864 | $9,188 | $11,237 | $11,440 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the
24
circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders. Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
25
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confir-
mations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
26
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
27
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
28
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
29
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
30
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
31
Notes |
32
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68443
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Growth Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Growth | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 26 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 31 |
Additional Information | 37 |
Index Definitions | 38 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | * Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Growth | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWCGX | 16.18% | 36.98% | 5.00% | -2.08% | 13.52% | 6/30/71(2) | |
Russell 1000 | ||||||||
Growth Index(3) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 4.05% | -3.64% | N/A(4) | — | |
Institutional Class | TWGIX | 16.25% | 37.24% | 5.20% | -1.88% | 4.49% | 6/16/97 | |
A Class(5) | TCRAX | 6/4/97 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 16.01% | 36.63% | 4.74% | -2.34% | 4.44% | |||
With sales charge* | 9.32% | 28.80% | 3.51% | -2.92% | 3.96% | |||
C Class | TWRCX | 3/1/10 | ||||||
No sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 6.15%(1) | |||
With sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 5.15%(1) | |||
R Class | AGWRX | 15.89% | 36.31% | 4.48% | — | 5.08% | 8/29/03 | |
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a | ||||||||
5.75% maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed | ||||||||
within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance | ||||||||
information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Although the fund’s actual inception date was 10/31/58, this inception date corresponds with the investment advisor’s implementation of its | |||||||
current investment philosophy and practices. | ||||||||
(3) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(4) | Index data not available prior to 12/29/78. | |||||||
(5) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Growth
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | ||||
Investor Class | Institutional Class | A Class | C Class | R Class |
1.00% | 0.80% | 1.25% | 2.00% | 1.50% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Growth
Portfolio Managers: Greg Woodhams and Prescott LeGard
Performance Summary
Growth gained 16.18%* in the six months ended April 30, 2010. By comparison, the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the fund’s benchmark) returned 15.79%. The portfolio also continued to outperform its benchmark for the five- and 10-year periods ended in April (see pages 5–6).
In terms of Growth’s absolute returns for the six months, information technology shares contributed most to performance; no sector had negative returns for the period. Relative to the benchmark, stock selection made the consumer discretionary and materials sectors the largest contributors. The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples and health care segments.
Leading Contributors
The key contributor to relative results came from stock choices in the consumer discretionary sector, led by holdings in the specialty retail; hotels, restaurant, and leisure; household durables; and auto components industry segments. A number of the leading contributors were retailers who did well after reporting better same-store sales and other business metrics. Good examples were The Home Depot, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Chipotle Mexican Grill. The largest contributor in the sector was Starwood Hotels & Resorts, which benefited from rising room rates and favorable supply/ demand factors as few new competing hotels and rooms are set to come online. Another top contributor was auto parts manufacturer BorgWarner, which benefited from the rebound in the auto industry and demand for new turbo-diesel and gasoline direct-injection engines.
Stock selection made the materials sector another key contributor to relative return. Positioning in the chemicals industry helped most, as our stake in Airgas benefited from a takeover bid, while Monsanto, a key index component to which we had no exposure, lagged. It was also beneficial to hold stakes in PPG Industries and Sigma-Aldrich.
Industrials and energy shares also helped performance compared with the benchmark. In industrials, positioning in the electrical equipment, air freight and logistics, and road and rail industries contributed most. The leading contributor in the industrials sector was a stake in Rockwell International, which saw a jump in orders for its factory automation products. In the energy sector, it helped relative results to be underrepresented in shares of integrated oil company Exxon Mobil.
Leading Detractors
The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples sector. Stocks in the consumer staples sector, including Coca-Cola, General Mills and Kellogg, lagged the general market as investors sought stocks with greater economic sensitivity. The leading
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Growth
detractor in the space was drug retailer Walgreen, which underperformed after issuing a cautious outlook despite reporting positive results. A stake in agricultural products processor Archer Daniels Midland also hurt performance, as soy crush margins declined. We eliminated our position in Archer Daniels Midland during the period.
An overweight position and stock choices made the health care sector a detractor from relative performance, led by holdings in the health care equipment and biotechnology industries. Baxter International, which provides blood treatment products, was the leading detractor in this space after guiding future earnings expectations down. Stock selection among biotechnology shares also hurt relative results, led by a stake in Dendreon. Stock choices in the life sciences tools and services industry also hurt relative performance.
The leading individual detractor for the six months was a position in investment bank Goldman Sachs Group, which suffered from an unfavorable regulatory environment and a government investigation into its conduct in the buildup to the financial crisis.
Outlook and Positioning
We believe the portfolio can outperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index over time through stock selection in the large-cap growth universe, style adherence, risk management, and disciplined execution that contributes to greater consistency. And while we recognize that each investment environment presents its own unique challenges, our emphasis on stock selection as the principal generator of alpha and our focus on risk management remain constant.
As a result, the portfolio’s sector and industry selection as well as capitalization range allocations are primarily a result of identifying what we believe to be superior individual securities. As of April 30, 2010, we found opportunity in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors, two of the portfolio’s largest overweight positions relative to the benchmark. The most notable sector underweight was in consumer staples and information technology shares. On an absolute basis, information technology shares remain the portfolio’s single largest sector allocation by far, while the portfolio had no exposure to the tiny (less than 1% of the index) utilities sector.
8
Growth | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Microsoft Corp. | 4.7% |
Apple, Inc. | 4.3% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2.9% |
Johnson & Johnson | 2.7% |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Abbott Laboratories | 2.1% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.0% |
Oracle Corp. | 2.0% |
United Parcel Service, Inc., Class B | 2.0% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 10.4% |
Software | 7.6% |
Pharmaceuticals | 6.3% |
Beverages | 4.3% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.3% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 98.5% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.6% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.1)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 (except as noted).
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period(1) | Annualized | ||
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio(1) | ||
Actual | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,161.80 | $5.36 | 1.00% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,162.50 | $4.29 | 0.80% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,160.10 | $6.69 | 1.25% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,061.50(2) | $3.39(3) | 2.00% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,158.90 | $8.03 | 1.50% | |
Hypothetical | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88(4) | $9.99(4) | 2.00% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% | |
(1) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. | |||||
(2) | Ending account value based on actual return from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010. | ||||
(3) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 60, the number of days in the period from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010, divided by 365, to | |||||
reflect the period. Had the class been available for the full period, the expenses paid during the period would have been higher. | |||||
(4) | Ending account value and expenses paid during period assumes the class had been available throughout the entire period and are calculated | ||||
using the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Growth | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 98.5% | EMC Corp.(1) | 3,539,200 | $ 67,280,192 | |||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 2.3% | Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2,983,400 | 155,047,298 | |||
Honeywell International, Inc. | 967,500 | $ 45,927,225 | Lexmark International, Inc., | |||
Class A(1) | 833,400 | 30,877,470 | ||||
Rockwell Collins, Inc. | 1,149,400 | 74,711,000 | QLogic Corp.(1) | 979,700 | 18,976,789 | |
120,638,225 | ||||||
549,304,159 | ||||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 2.0% | ||||||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.1% | ||||||
United Parcel Service, Inc., | ||||||
Class B | 1,496,600 | 103,474,924 | American Express Co. | 1,273,800 | 58,747,656 | |
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.2% | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.8% | |||||
BorgWarner, Inc.(1) | 1,464,700 | 63,480,098 | Emerson Electric Co. | 532,200 | 27,796,806 | |
AUTOMOBILES — 0.6% | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1,074,000 | 65,213,280 | |||
Ford Motor Co.(1) | 2,388,500 | 31,098,270 | 93,010,086 | |||
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | ||||||
BEVERAGES — 4.3% | INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 1.6% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 2,394,900 | 128,007,405 | Corning, Inc. | 2,368,200 | 45,587,850 | |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 1,527,500 | 99,623,550 | Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 2,454,800 | 37,607,536 | |
227,630,955 | 83,195,386 | |||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 3.0% | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.8% | |||||
Alexion | Cameron | |||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 285,900 | 15,690,192 | ||||
International Corp.(1) | 462,200 | 18,238,412 | ||||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 1,452,600 | 83,321,136 | ||||
Schlumberger Ltd. | 1,065,000 | 76,062,300 | ||||
Dendreon Corp.(1) | 118,500 | 6,425,070 | 94,300,712 | |||
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 1,101,400 | 43,692,538 | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 2.7% | |||
Talecris Biotherapeutics | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 362,800 | 21,434,224 | |||
Holdings Corp.(1) | 520,200 | 9,753,750 | ||||
Walgreen Co. | 1,313,200 | 46,158,980 | ||||
158,882,686 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 1,354,500 | 72,668,925 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.4% | 140,262,129 | |||||
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 3,085,900 | 59,527,011 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 2.5% | |||
Goldman Sachs | ||||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 97,700 | 14,186,040 | General Mills, Inc. | 869,900 | 61,919,482 | |
73,713,051 | Kellogg Co. | 834,200 | 45,830,948 | |||
CHEMICALS — 2.5% | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 464,700 | 23,983,167 | |||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 1,029,600 | 32,936,904 | 131,733,597 | |||
PPG Industries, Inc. | 877,400 | 61,742,638 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 3.2% | |||
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | 629,900 | 37,353,070 | Baxter International, Inc. | 561,400 | 26,509,308 | |
132,032,612 | Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 359,800 | 27,477,926 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 1.3% | Covidien plc | 1,055,700 | 50,663,043 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 2,134,300 | 70,666,673 | Edwards | |||
Lifesciences Corp.(1) | 473,600 | 48,818,688 | ||||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 3.6% | Gen-Probe, Inc.(1) | 368,600 | 17,467,954 | |||
Arris Group, Inc.(1) | 883,800 | 10,861,902 | ||||
170,936,919 | ||||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 4,000,100 | 107,682,692 | ||||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 2.6% | ||||||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 588,300 | 40,257,369 | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 1,070,900 | 33,037,265 | |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 749,800 | 29,047,252 | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 884,100 | 88,524,933 | |
187,849,215 | McKesson Corp. | 243,200 | 15,761,792 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 10.4% | 137,323,990 | |||||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 865,100 | 225,894,912 | ||||
Dell, Inc.(1) | 3,166,100 | 51,227,498 |
12
Growth | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 1.7% | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 2.5% | |||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 290,500 | $ 39,191,355 | Apache Corp. | 218,800 | $ 22,265,088 | |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 864,300 | 58,642,755 | |||
Worldwide, Inc. | 936,700 | 51,059,517 | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 423,400 | 37,538,644 | |
90,250,872 | Southwestern Energy Co.(1) | 351,000 | 13,927,680 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.9% | 132,374,167 | |||||
Whirlpool Corp. | 422,000 | 45,943,140 | PERSONAL PRODUCTS — 0.3% | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 3.2% | Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. | |||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 481,600 | 40,502,560 | (The), Class A | 266,400 | 17,561,088 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2,037,300 | 126,638,568 | PHARMACEUTICALS — 6.3% | |||
167,141,128 | Abbott Laboratories | 2,165,300 | 110,776,748 | |||
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.8% | Allergan, Inc. | 708,400 | 45,117,996 | |||
3M Co. | 630,500 | 55,906,435 | Johnson & Johnson | 2,237,600 | 143,877,680 | |
Textron, Inc. | 1,738,000 | 39,695,920 | Novo Nordisk A/S B Shares | 333,900 | 27,272,088 | |
95,602,355 | Perrigo Co. | 89,100 | 5,437,773 | |||
INSURANCE — 1.3% | 332,482,285 | |||||
Aflac, Inc. | 1,317,800 | 67,155,088 | ROAD & RAIL — 1.0% | |||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.8% | Union Pacific Corp. | 705,100 | 53,347,866 | |||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 317,100 | 43,461,726 | SEMICONDUCTORS & | |||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.8% | SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT — 4.3% | |||||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 182,600 | 95,945,344 | Altera Corp. | 1,417,500 | 35,947,800 | |
IT SERVICES — 2.5% | Broadcom Corp., Class A | 1,528,200 | 52,707,618 | |||
International Business | Cree, Inc.(1) | 301,100 | 22,043,531 | |||
Machines Corp. | 448,100 | 57,804,900 | Intel Corp. | 1,676,900 | 38,283,627 | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 110,600 | 27,433,224 | Linear Technology Corp. | 2,104,600 | 63,264,276 | |
Paychex, Inc. | 1,609,100 | 49,238,460 | MEMC Electronic | |||
134,476,584 | Materials, Inc.(1) | 1,059,400 | 13,740,418 | |||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.5% | 225,987,270 | |||||
Thermo Fisher | SOFTWARE — 7.6% | |||||
Scientific, Inc.(1) | 507,600 | 28,060,128 | Intuit, Inc.(1) | 1,025,800 | 37,092,928 | |
MACHINERY — 2.8% | Microsoft Corp. | 8,175,000 | 249,664,500 | |||
Caterpillar, Inc. | 422,700 | 28,781,643 | Oracle Corp. | 4,009,000 | 103,592,560 | |
Eaton Corp. | 805,500 | 62,152,380 | salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 125,100 | 10,708,560 | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 1,082,400 | 55,310,640 | 401,058,548 | |||
146,244,663 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 3.3% | |||||
MEDIA — 1.9% | Abercrombie & Fitch Co., | |||||
Scripps Networks | Class A | 834,400 | 36,488,312 | |||
Interactive, Inc., Class A | 865,200 | 39,228,168 | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 2,725,100 | 96,059,775 | |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | 1,594,600 | 58,745,064 | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 365,300 | 16,975,491 | |
97,973,232 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 852,700 | 24,557,760 | |||
METALS & MINING — 0.9% | 174,081,338 | |||||
Newmont Mining Corp. | 803,000 | 45,032,240 | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.7% | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 2.5% | American Tower Corp., | |||||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 835,600 | 45,949,644 | Class A(1) | 967,400 | 39,479,594 | |
Target Corp. | 1,472,800 | 83,758,136 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
129,707,780 | (Cost $4,454,431,018) | 5,191,647,779 |
13
Growth | |||
Shares | Value | ||
Temporary Cash Investments — 1.6% | |||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||
Agency Shares | 22,793 | $ 22,793 | |
Repurchase Agreement, Credit Suisse First | |||
Boston, Inc., (collateralized by various U.S. | |||
Treasury obligations, 8.00%, 11/15/21, | |||
valued at $36,532,294), in a joint trading | |||
account at 0.13%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||
5/3/10 (Delivery value $35,800,388) | 35,800,000 | ||
Repurchase Agreement, Goldman Sachs | |||
Group, Inc., (collateralized by various U.S. | |||
Treasury obligations, 4.50%, 5/15/38, | |||
valued at $50,868,945), in a joint trading | |||
account at 0.10%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||
5/3/10 (Delivery value $49,800,415) | 49,800,000 | ||
TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||
CASH INVESTMENTS | |||
(Cost $85,622,793) | 85,622,793 | ||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
SECURITIES — 100.1% | |||
(Cost $4,540,053,811) | 5,277,270,572 | ||
OTHER ASSETS | |||
AND LIABILITIES — (0.1)% | (4,648,255) | ||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $5,272,622,317 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
98,295,152 DKK for USD | 5/28/10 | $17,581,935 | $(16,369) |
(Value on Settlement Date $17,565,566) | |||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
DKK = Danish Krone | |||
USD = United States Dollar | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $4,540,053,811) | $5,277,270,572 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 63,570,968 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 4,051,474 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 4,292,574 | ||
5,349,185,588 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 70,096,231 | ||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 2,205,841 | ||
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 16,369 | ||
Accrued management fees | 4,179,224 | ||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 65,572 | ||
Distribution fees payable | 34 | ||
76,563,271 | |||
Net Assets | $5,272,622,317 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $4,918,926,627 | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 10,136,084 | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (393,649,558) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 737,209,164 | ||
$5,272,622,317 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $4,264,022,865 | 181,464,036 | $23.50 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $701,785,566 | 29,618,096 | $23.69 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $294,582,703 | 12,734,403 | $23.13* |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $144,708 | 6,167 | $23.46 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $12,086,475 | 524,338 | $23.05 |
* Maximum offering price $24.54 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $17,312) | $ 33,355,310 |
Interest | 24,905 |
33,380,215 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 22,802,642 |
Distribution fees — C Class | 52 |
Service fees — C Class | 17 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 325,489 |
R Class | 23,952 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 66,709 |
23,218,861 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 10,161,354 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 319,606,479 |
Foreign currency transactions | 2,091,469 |
Futures contract transactions | (19,325) |
321,678,623 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 361,902,979 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (163,868) |
361,739,111 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 683,417,734 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $693,579,088 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 10,161,354 | $ 16,823,008 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 321,678,623 | (359,271,724) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 361,739,111 | 872,613,776 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 693,579,088 | 530,165,060 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | (9,474,325) | (12,789,814) |
Institutional Class | (2,809,220) | (2,136,538) |
A Class | (22,537) | (370,766) |
R Class | — | (790) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (12,306,082) | (15,297,908) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 447,551,251 | 580,646,064 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 1,128,824,257 | 1,095,513,216 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 4,143,798,060 | 3,048,284,844 |
End of period | $5,272,622,317 | $4,143,798,060 |
Undistributed net investment income | $10,136,084 | $12,280,812 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Growth Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in equity securities of larger-sized companies that management believes will increase in value but may purchase companies of any size. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class (formerly Advisor Class), the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets. Sale of the C Class commenced on March 1, 2010.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
18
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
19
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.800% to 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.200% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 0.99% for the Investor Class, A Class, C Class and R Class and 0.79% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $2,115,611,661 and $1,662,552,782, respectively.
20
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010(1) | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 800,000,000 | 800,000,000 | ||
Sold | 24,962,657 | $ 557,908,954 | 32,861,265 | $ 566,193,264 |
Issued in connection with reorganization | ||||
(Note 9) | — | — | 6,689,833 | 119,748,011 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 384,132 | 8,458,588 | 719,542 | 11,275,229 |
Redeemed | (10,142,535) | (225,800,124) | (21,943,388) | (378,453,255) |
15,204,254 | 340,567,418 | 18,327,252 | 318,763,249 | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 | ||
Sold | 5,090,317 | 113,622,042 | 18,025,182 | 335,314,338 |
Issued in connection with reorganization | ||||
(Note 9) | — | — | 199,166 | 3,596,938 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 122,616 | 2,720,853 | 135,395 | 2,136,538 |
Redeemed | (2,435,338) | (54,951,999) | (7,550,113) | (128,368,426) |
2,777,595 | 61,390,896 | 10,809,630 | 212,679,388 | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 310,000,000 | 310,000,000 | ||
Sold | 3,156,052 | 67,996,993 | 5,736,574 | 98,983,093 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 964 | 20,921 | 22,056 | 340,539 |
Redeemed | (1,171,642) | (25,621,124) | (3,140,611) | (53,536,555) |
1,985,374 | 42,396,790 | 2,618,019 | 45,787,077 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 20,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 6,375 | 148,874 | ||
Redeemed | (208) | (4,991) | ||
6,167 | 143,883 | |||
R Class/Shares Authorized | 30,000,000 | 50,000,000 | ||
Sold | 213,012 | 4,657,510 | 279,510 | 4,897,686 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 39 | 604 |
Redeemed | (73,495) | (1,605,246) | (83,745) | (1,481,940) |
139,517 | 3,052,264 | 195,804 | 3,416,350 | |
Net increase (decrease) | 20,112,907 | $ 447,551,251 | 31,950,705 | $ 580,646,064 |
(1) March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 for the C Class. |
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
21
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $5,164,375,691 | $ 27,272,088 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 22,793 | 85,600,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $5,164,398,484 | $112,872,088 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(16,369) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Equity Price Risk — The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on an equity index in order to manage its exposure to changes in market conditions. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund is required to deposit either cash or securities in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (initial margin). Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss whe n the contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. During the period, the fund infrequently purchased equity price risk derivative instruments for temporary investment purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
22
Value of Derivative Instruments as of April 30, 2010 | ||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||
Location on Statement | Location on Statement | |||
Type of Derivative | of Assets and Liabilities | Value | of Assets and Liabilities | Value |
Foreign Currency Risk | Receivable for forward foreign | Payable for forward foreign | ||
currency exchange contracts | — | currency exchange contracts | $ 16,369 | |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Six Months | ||||
Ended April 30, 2010 | ||||
Change in Net Unrealized | ||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | Appreciation (Depreciation) | |||
Location on Statement | Location on Statement | |||
Type of Derivative | of Operations | Value | of Operations | Value |
Equity Price Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | $ (19,325) | Change in net unrealized | — |
futures contract transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on futures contracts | ||||
Foreign Currency Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | 2,051,192 | Change in net unrealized | $(105,985) |
foreign currency transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | |||
on translation of assets and | ||||
liabilities in foreign currencies | ||||
$2,031,867 | $(105,985) |
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $4,562,318,396 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $768,010,270 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (53,058,094) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $714,952,176 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
23
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(688,111,820), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The capital loss carryovers expire as follows:
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
$(168,744,439) | — | — | — | — | $(17,354,465) | $(131,790,282) $(370,222,634) |
9. Reorganization Plan
On December 3, 2008, the Board of Directors of Life Sciences Fund (Life Sciences) and Technology Fund (Technology), two funds in a series issued by American Century World Mutual Funds, Inc., approved a plan of reorganization (the reorganization), pursuant to which Growth acquired all of the assets of Life Sciences and Technology in exchange for shares of equal value of Growth and assumption by Growth of certain ordinary course liabilities of Life Sciences and Technology. The financial statements and performance history of Growth were carried over in the post-reorganization. The reorganization was approved by shareholders of Life Sciences and Technology on May 5, 2009. The reorganization was effective at the close of business on May 29, 2009.
The reorganization was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of shares. On May 29, 2009, Life Sciences and Technology exchanged its shares for shares of Growth as follows:
Original Fund/Class | Shares Exchanged | New Fund/Class | Shares Received |
Life Sciences — Investor Class | 14,188,887 | Growth — Investor Class | 3,543,258 |
Life Sciences — Institutional Class | 292,636 | Growth — Institutional Class | 73,726 |
Technology — Investor Class | 3,955,315 | Growth — Investor Class | 3,146,575 |
Technology — Institutional Class | 156,129 | Growth — Institutional Class | 125,440 |
The net assets of Life Sciences, Technology and Growth immediately before the reorganization were $64,755,810, $58,589,139 and $3,253,531,971, respectively. Life Sciences’ unrealized depreciation of $(4,447,437) and Technology’s unrealized appreciation of $1,243,638 were combined with that of Growth. Immediately after the reorganization, the combined net assets were $3,376,876,920. Growth acquired capital loss carryovers of $(11,422,597) and $(91,949,746) from Life Sciences and Technology, respectively.
24
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval. Management agreements for new share classes of the funds that were launched after February 16, 2010 did not terminate, have not been replaced by interim agreements, and do not require approval of new agreements.
25
Financial Highlights |
Growth | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $20.28 | $17.69 | $26.78 | $21.99 | $19.80 | $18.43 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.08 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.23 | 2.58 | (9.10) | 4.76 | 2.26 | 1.30 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.28 | 2.67 | (9.06) | 4.80 | 2.28 | 1.38 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.06) | (0.08) | (0.03) | (0.01) | (0.09) | (0.01) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $23.50 | $20.28 | $17.69 | $26.78 | $21.99 | $19.80 | |
Total Return(3) | 16.18% | 15.25% | (33.86)% | 21.86% | 11.51% | 7.47% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.41%(4) | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.09% | 0.38% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 36% | 114% | 129% | 112% | 127% | 77% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $4,264 | $3,372 | $2,617 | $4,133 | $3,946 | $4,008 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Growth | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $20.47 | $17.86 | $27.03 | $22.19 | $19.98 | $18.59 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.11 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.25 | 2.61 | (9.17) | 4.81 | 2.27 | 1.33 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.32 | 2.73 | (9.09) | 4.90 | 2.33 | 1.44 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.10) | (0.12) | (0.08) | (0.06) | (0.12) | (0.05) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $23.69 | $20.47 | $17.86 | $27.03 | $22.19 | $19.98 | |
Total Return(3) | 16.25% | 15.45% | (33.71)% | 22.13% | 11.70% | 7.72% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.80%(4) | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.61%(4) | 0.70% | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.29% | 0.58% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 36% | 114% | 129% | 112% | 127% | 77% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $701,786 | $549,496 | $286,262 | $284,695 | $759,816 | $689,983 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Growth | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $19.94 | $17.40 | $26.36 | $21.68 | $19.53 | $18.22 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | 0.02 | 0.04 | (0.02) | (0.04) | (0.03) | 0.02 | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.17 | 2.54 | (8.94) | 4.72 | 2.22 | 1.29 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.19 | 2.58 | (8.96) | 4.68 | 2.19 | 1.31 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | —(4) | (0.04) | — | — | (0.04) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $23.13 | $19.94 | $17.40 | $26.36 | $21.68 | $19.53 | |
Total Return(5) | 16.01% | 14.99% | (34.03)% | 21.59% | 11.23% | 7.19% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.25%(6) | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.16%(6) | 0.25% | (0.09)% | (0.10)% | (0.16)% | 0.13% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 36% | 114% | 129% | 112% | 127% | 77% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $294,583 | $214,371 | $141,441 | $206,837 | $85,953 | $86,303 | |
(1) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(6) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Growth | ||
C Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $22.10 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | (0.03) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.39 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.36 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $23.46 | |
Total Return(3) | 6.15% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.89)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 36%(5) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $145 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | |
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | ||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | ||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | ||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | ||
(4) | Annualized. | |
(5) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Growth | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $19.90 | $17.35 | $26.37 | $21.74 | $19.59 | $18.32 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.08) | (0.10) | (0.11) | (0.07) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.16 | 2.56 | (8.94) | 4.73 | 2.26 | 1.34 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.15 | 2.55 | (9.02) | 4.63 | 2.15 | 1.27 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | —(3) | — | — | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $23.05 | $19.90 | $17.35 | $26.37 | $21.74 | $19.59 | |
Total Return(4) | 15.89% | 14.67% | (34.21)% | 21.30% | 10.97% | 6.93% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (0.09)%(5) | 0.00%(6) | (0.34)% | (0.35)% | (0.41)% | (0.12)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 36% | 114% | 129% | 112% | 127% | 77% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $12,086 | $7,656 | $3,280 | $2,383 | $298 | $49 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Ratio is less than 0.005%. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.*
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
* Management agreements for new share classes of the Fund launched after February 16, 2010, did not terminate, have not been replaced by Interim |
Management Agreements, and do not require Board or shareholder approval at this time. |
31
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
32
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
33
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed
34
Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The
35
Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
36
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
37
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68444
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
VistaSM Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Vista | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 30 |
Additional Information | 36 |
Index Definitions | 37 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Vista | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWCVX | 21.19% | 30.90% | 3.70% | -0.46% | 9.02% | 11/25/83 | |
Russell Midcap | ||||||||
Growth Index(2) | — | 23.23% | 46.95% | 5.74% | -0.39% | N/A(3) | — | |
Institutional Class | TWVIX | 21.20% | 31.10% | 3.89% | -0.25% | 4.68% | 11/14/96 | |
A Class(4) | TWVAX | 10/2/96 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 20.99% | 30.52% | 3.43% | -0.73% | 3.65% | |||
With sales charge* | 14.01% | 22.97% | 2.20% | -1.31% | 3.20% | |||
C Class | AVNCX | 3/1/10 | ||||||
No sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 6.92%(1) | |||
With sales charge* | — | — | — | — | 5.92%(1) | |||
R Class | AVTRX | 20.81% | 30.25% | — | — | 0.81% | 7/29/05 | |
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a | ||||||||
5.75% maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. C Class shares redeemed | ||||||||
within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that mutual funds provide performance | ||||||||
information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(3) | Index data not available prior to 12/31/85. | |||||||
(4) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Vista
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | ||||
Investor Class | Institutional Class | A Class | C Class | R Class |
1.01% | 0.81% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Vista
Portfolio Managers: Brad Eixmann and Bryan Unterhalter
Performance Summary
Vista returned 21.19%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, lagging the 23.23% return of its benchmark, the Russell Midcap Growth Index.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of improving economic conditions and investor sentiment. Acceleration and price momentum, two factors that the Vista team looks for in portfolio investments, were not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to lead the market’s strength.
Within the portfolio, security selection in the financials and health care sectors accounted for the majority of underperformance relative to the benchmark, although Vista derived positive absolute results in both sectors. Holdings in the materials sector further detracted from relative returns. Avoiding the utilities sector, as well as effective stock choices in the information technology, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors, helped to trim relative losses.
Financials, Health Care Gained, but Lagged Benchmark
The financials sector was Vista’s largest source of underperformance relative to its benchmark. Within the sector, a detrimental overweight stake in the capital markets industry included Jefferies Group, Inc. The company under-performed many of its peers during the period due to a slowdown in its trading operations. An overweight position in Lazard Ltd. also weighed on relative performance. Although the company’s earnings reflected improvement, particularly in the mergers and acquisitions area, unexpectedly higher deferred compensation created an earnings shortfall. A stake in Legg Mason, Inc., which is not a benchmark member, hurt relative returns. The company reported larger than expected asset outflows, representing a reversal from previous trends.
The health care sector was also a source of underperformance relative to the benchmark. Here, Vista did not own some of the stronger performers within the biotechnology and health care equipment sectors. Within the health care provider industry group, Vista held a detrimental overweight position in Medco Health Solutions, Inc. Although the company outperformed for part of the reporting period, it experienced a share price decline very late in the period as concerns over industry contract pricing and competition surfaced.
Materials Detracted
Although Vista’s holdings in the materials sector contributed to absolute gains, they collectively lagged the performance of the materials sector in the benchmark. Within the sector, Vista maintained a focus on the chemicals industry, where the portfolio held a position in fertilizer company Mosaic Co. While volume growth of its products accelerated significantly, pricing was not as strong as some analysts had predicted and increases in key input costs weighed on margins.
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Vista
Information Technology, Avoiding Utilities Helped
Within the information technology sector, the portfolio benefited from successful stock choices in the semiconductor industry group. Veeco Instruments, Inc., which produces equipment for manufacturing LED components used in flat screen televisions, computer monitors, and general lighting applications, was a key contributor to returns. The company, which is not a benchmark constituent, saw an 81% share price gain amid accelerating demand for LED televisions, which resulted in stronger revenue and earnings growth.
Vista also sidestepped the utilities sector altogether. This decision proved advantageous as the sector lagged most other sectors in the benchmark.
Industrials, Consumer Discretionary Contributed
In the industrials sector, Vista held a significant overweight stake in railroad company Kansas City Southern. Increased economic activity during the reporting period translated into rising shipping volumes, lifting the company’s share price.
Elsewhere in the industrials sector, Vista benefited from solid stock selection in the machinery industry through its exposure to mining equipment company Bucyrus International. As the economies of China and other emerging markets have rebounded this year and commodity prices have risen, the company has seen an improvement in orders for machinery used to mine coal, copper, oil sands, and iron ore.
The consumer discretionary sector was a source of outperformance relative to the benchmark. Within the sector, Vista held substantial overweight positions in a number of companies in the hotels, restaurants, and leisure industry group, including Starwood Hotels and Resorts. The hotel chain experienced an upswing in revenues, particularly among its Asian properties, amid an industry-wide improvement in travel trends.
Outlook
Our investment process focuses on medium-sized and smaller companies with accelerating earnings growth rates and share-price momentum. We believe that active investing in such companies will generate outperformance over time compared with the Russell Midcap Growth Index.
This process, which has historically added value over time, has faced unprecedented headwinds during the market rally that began in March 2009. Based on historical trends, we believe we will move past this environment of extreme underperformance for stocks exhibiting price momentum and acceleration and into a period where fundamentals, and specifically fundamental improvement, are recognized and rewarded by the market.
As always, we will rely on our process of identifying companies with accelerating growth and price momentum and currently see a number of companies demonstrating such characteristics.
8
Vista | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
SBA Communications Corp., Class A | 2.6% |
Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 2.2% |
Equinix, Inc. | 2.0% |
Express Scripts, Inc. | 2.0% |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. | 2.0% |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. | 2.0% |
Goodrich Corp. | 1.7% |
priceline.com, Inc. | 1.7% |
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 1.6% |
Whiting Petroleum Corp. | 1.6% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 6.1% |
Health Care Providers & Services | 5.9% |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | 5.5% |
Aerospace & Defense | 5.0% |
Specialty Retail | 4.9% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 90.2% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 8.0% |
Total Common Stocks | 98.2% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.1% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.7% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010 (except as noted).
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period(1) | Annualized | ||
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio(1) | ||
Actual | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,211.90 | $5.48 | 1.00% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,212.00 | $4.39 | 0.80% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,209.90 | $6.85 | 1.25% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,069.20(2) | $3.40(3) | 2.00% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,208.10 | $8.21 | 1.50% | |
Hypothetical | |||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% | |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% | |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% | |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88(4) | $9.99(4) | 2.00% | |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% | |
(1) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. | |||||
(2) | Ending account value based on actual return from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010. | ||||
(3) | Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 60, the number of days in the period from March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010, divided by 365, to | |||||
reflect the period. Had the class been available for the full period, the expenses paid during the period would have been higher. | |||||
(4) | Ending account value and expenses paid during period assumes the class had been available throughout the entire period and are calculated | ||||
using the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Vista | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 98.2% | CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 1.1% | |||||
AECOM Technology Corp.(1) | 396,000 | $ 11,907,720 | ||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 5.0% | ||||||
BE Aerospace, Inc.(1) | 996,000 | $ 29,591,160 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. | |||
NV New York Shares(1) | 580,683 | 13,611,209 | ||||
Goodrich Corp. | 534,000 | 39,612,120 | 25,518,929 | |||
L-3 Communications | CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.8% | |||||
Holdings, Inc. | 241,000 | 22,550,370 | ||||
AmeriCredit Corp.(1) | 1,154,000 | 27,626,760 | ||||
Precision Castparts Corp. | 173,000 | 22,202,820 | ||||
113,956,470 | Discover Financial Services | 833,000 | 12,878,180 | |||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 0.8% | 40,504,940 | |||||
Atlas Air Worldwide | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.5% | |||||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 324,000 | 17,907,480 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 557,000 | 33,821,040 | |
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.0% | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS & | |||||
Autoliv, Inc.(1) | 423,000 | 23,159,250 | COMPONENTS — 2.6% | |||
Agilent Technologies, Inc.(1) | 1,385,000 | 50,220,100 | ||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 1.0% | ||||||
Alexion | Dolby Laboratories, Inc., | |||||
Class A(1) | 108,825 | 7,478,454 | ||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 410,000 | 22,500,800 | ||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.7% | 57,698,554 | |||||
Jefferies Group, Inc. | 432,000 | 11,759,040 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.4% | |||
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 391,000 | 15,116,060 | Core Laboratories NV | 118,000 | 17,687,020 | |
Waddell & Reed | FMC Technologies, Inc.(1) | 207,600 | 14,052,444 | |||
Financial, Inc., Class A | 320,000 | 11,878,400 | 31,739,464 | |||
38,753,500 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.4% | |||||
CHEMICALS — 1.5% | H.J. Heinz Co. | 379,000 | 17,763,730 | |||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 353,000 | 11,292,470 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 241,000 | 12,438,010 | |
Cytec Industries, Inc. | 236,000 | 11,342,160 | 30,201,740 | |||
International Flavors & | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 1.8% | |||||
Fragrances, Inc. | 230,000 | 11,520,700 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 132,000 | 11,421,960 | |
34,155,330 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) | 33,000 | 11,898,480 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 2.7% | Varian Medical | |||||
Comerica, Inc. | 563,000 | 23,646,000 | Systems, Inc.(1) | 312,000 | 17,590,560 | |
Fifth Third Bancorp. | 1,358,000 | 20,247,780 | 40,911,000 | |||
Zions Bancorp. | 607,000 | 17,439,110 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 5.9% | |||
61,332,890 | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 996,000 | 30,726,600 | |||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 2.0% | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 447,000 | 44,758,110 | |||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 503,000 | 34,420,290 | Health Management | |||
JDS Uniphase Corp.(1) | 850,000 | 11,041,500 | Associates, Inc., Class A(1) | 1,412,000 | 13,159,840 | |
45,461,790 | Medco Health | |||||
Solutions, Inc.(1) | 757,000 | 44,602,440 | ||||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 4.0% | ||||||
133,246,990 | ||||||
Lexmark International, Inc., | ||||||
Class A(1) | 750,000 | 27,787,500 | HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 0.7% | |||
NetApp, Inc.(1) | 641,000 | 22,223,470 | Allscripts-Misys Healthcare | |||
Solutions, Inc.(1) | 776,000 | 15,651,920 | ||||
Seagate Technology(1) | 1,231,000 | 22,613,470 | ||||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 5.5% | ||||||
Western Digital Corp.(1) | 410,000 | 16,846,900 | ||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 83,000 | 11,197,530 | ||||
89,471,340 | Ctrip.com International Ltd. | |||||
ADR(1) | 516,000 | 18,844,320 |
12
Vista | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Las Vegas Sands Corp.(1) | 448,000 | $ 11,137,280 | METALS & MINING — 1.9% | |||
Royal Caribbean | Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 383,000 | $ 23,948,990 | |||
Cruises Ltd.(1) | 806,000 | 28,887,040 | Walter Energy, Inc. | 239,000 | 19,313,590 | |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | 43,262,580 | |||||
Worldwide, Inc. | 815,000 | 44,425,650 | MULTILINE RETAIL — 2.7% | |||
Wynn Resorts Ltd. | 125,000 | 11,030,000 | Dollar Tree, Inc.(1) | 489,000 | 29,692,080 | |
125,521,820 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 736,000 | 30,418,880 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 3.8% | 60,110,960 | |||||
Harman International | ||||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 453,000 | 17,884,440 | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 4.9% | |||
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 582,000 | 36,171,300 | Alpha Natural | |||
Resources, Inc.(1) | 701,000 | 33,003,080 | ||||
Tempur-Pedic | Brigham Exploration Co.(1) | 886,000 | 17,285,860 | |||
International, Inc.(1) | 394,000 | 13,277,800 | ||||
Whirlpool Corp. | 179,000 | 19,487,730 | Concho Resources, Inc.(1) | 231,000 | 13,125,420 | |
86,821,270 | Petrohawk Energy Corp.(1) | 525,000 | 11,334,750 | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 0.5% | Whiting Petroleum Corp.(1) | 399,000 | 36,041,670 | |||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 166,000 | 11,495,500 | 110,790,780 | |||
INSURANCE — 0.9% | PHARMACEUTICALS — 0.8% | |||||
Genworth Financial, Inc., | Shire plc | 829,000 | 18,292,159 | |||
Class A(1) | 1,237,000 | 20,435,240 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT & | |||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 1.7% | DEVELOPMENT — 1.5% | |||||
priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 145,000 | 37,997,250 | CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., | |||
Class A(1) | 995,000 | 17,233,400 | ||||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 3.7% | ||||||
Equinix, Inc.(1) | 445,000 | 44,789,250 | Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. | 215,000 | 16,959,200 | |
34,192,600 | ||||||
GSI Commerce, Inc.(1) | 398,000 | 10,845,500 | ||||
ROAD & RAIL — 1.4% | ||||||
MercadoLibre, Inc.(1) | 336,000 | 16,941,120 | ||||
Kansas City Southern(1) | 787,000 | 31,912,850 | ||||
WebMD Health Corp.(1) | 244,000 | 11,819,360 | ||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | ||||||
84,395,230 | EQUIPMENT — 6.1% | |||||
IT SERVICES — 2.0% | Altera Corp. | 684,000 | 17,346,240 | |||
Amdocs Ltd.(1) | 367,000 | 11,721,980 | Analog Devices, Inc. | 584,000 | 17,479,120 | |
Cognizant Technology | Atheros | |||||
Solutions Corp., Class A(1) | 674,000 | 34,495,320 | Communications, Inc.(1) | 503,000 | 19,536,520 | |
46,217,300 | Cree, Inc.(1) | 141,000 | 10,322,610 | |||
LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 0.7% | Marvell Technology | |||||
Mattel, Inc. | 724,000 | 16,688,200 | Group Ltd.(1) | 1,081,000 | 22,322,650 | |
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 2.4% | NVIDIA Corp.(1) | 648,000 | 10,186,560 | |||
Life Technologies Corp.(1) | 571,000 | 31,239,410 | Teradyne, Inc.(1) | 1,360,000 | 16,632,800 | |
PerkinElmer, Inc. | 483,000 | 12,099,150 | Veeco Instruments, Inc.(1) | 559,000 | 24,590,410 | |
Waters Corp.(1) | 164,000 | 11,806,360 | 138,416,910 | |||
55,144,920 | SOFTWARE — 3.9% | |||||
MACHINERY — 3.6% | Autodesk, Inc.(1) | 341,000 | 11,597,410 | |||
Bucyrus International, Inc. | 499,000 | 31,441,990 | Cerner Corp.(1) | 201,000 | 17,066,910 | |
Dover Corp. | 256,000 | 13,368,320 | Citrix Systems, Inc.(1) | 487,000 | 22,889,000 | |
Kennametal, Inc. | 569,000 | 18,697,340 | Informatica Corp.(1) | 432,000 | 10,804,320 | |
Manitowoc Co., Inc. (The) | 791,000 | 11,081,910 | Rovi Corp.(1) | 328,000 | 12,785,440 | |
Timken Co. | 163,750 | 5,760,725 | salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 150,000 | 12,840,000 | |
80,350,285 | 87,983,080 |
13
Vista | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 4.9% | Temporary Cash Investments — 1.1% | |||||
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(1) | 368,000 | $ 16,913,280 | ||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||||||
Chico’s FAS, Inc. | 1,467,000 | 21,843,630 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||
J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 360,000 | 16,729,200 | Agency Shares | 70,152 | $ 70,152 | |
Talbots, Inc.(1) | 684,000 | 11,251,800 | Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | |||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||||||
Tiffany & Co. | 244,000 | 11,829,120 | U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, | |||
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1,120,000 | 32,256,000 | 2/15/38, valued at $24,876,158), in a joint | |||
110,823,030 | trading account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, | |||||
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 1.0% | due 5/3/10 (Delivery value $24,200,302) | 24,200,000 | ||||
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 366,000 | 23,061,660 | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 2.0% | (Cost $24,270,152) | 24,270,152 | ||||
Fastenal Co. | 311,000 | 17,008,590 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 252,000 | 27,856,080 | SECURITIES — 99.3% | |||
44,864,670 | (Cost $1,755,225,332) | 2,248,291,973 | ||||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 4.4% | OTHER ASSETS AND | |||||
American Tower Corp., | LIABILITIES — 0.7% | 16,640,544 | ||||
Class A(1) | 419,000 | 17,099,390 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $2,264,932,517 | ||
NII Holdings, Inc.(1) | 575,000 | 24,391,500 | ||||
SBA Communications Corp., | ||||||
Class A(1) | 1,633,000 | 57,759,210 | ||||
99,250,100 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||||
(Cost $1,730,955,180) | 2,224,021,821 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
7,872,599 GBP for USD | 5/28/10 | $12,044,210 | $(81,009) |
(Value on Settlement Date $11,963,201) | |||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | |||
GBP = British Pound | |||
USD = United States Dollar | |||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Assets | |
Investment securities, at value (cost of $1,755,225,332) | $2,248,291,973 |
Receivable for investments sold | 107,217,023 |
Receivable for capital shares sold | 830,291 |
Dividends and interest receivable | 598,485 |
2,356,937,772 | |
Liabilities | |
Payable for investments purchased | 87,609,351 |
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 2,392,332 |
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 81,009 |
Accrued management fees | 1,863,892 |
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 58,654 |
Distribution fees payable | 17 |
92,005,255 | |
Net Assets | $2,264,932,517 |
Net Assets Consist of: | |
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $2,392,851,718 |
Accumulated net investment loss | (5,117,768) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (615,797,760) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 492,996,327 |
$2,264,932,517 |
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,849,967,168 | 125,876,644 | $14.70 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $164,614,969 | 10,906,546 | $15.09 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $222,835,623 | 15,644,183 | $14.24* |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $26,724 | 1,821 | $14.68 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $27,488,033 | 1,916,745 | $14.34 |
*Maximum offering price $15.11 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $2,124) | $ 6,458,950 |
Interest | 15,675 |
6,474,625 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 11,188,994 |
Distribution fees — C Class | 33 |
Service fees — C Class | 11 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 304,812 |
R Class | 63,878 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 34,665 |
11,592,393 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (5,117,768) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 260,641,311 |
Foreign currency transactions | 429,255 |
Futures contract transactions | 1,142,239 |
262,212,805 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 180,099,541 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (90,403) |
180,009,138 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 442,221,943 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $437,104,175 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (5,117,768) | $ (10,384,759) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 262,212,805 | (573,042,002) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 180,009,138 | 530,420,133 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 437,104,175 | (53,006,628) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (352,141,879) | (75,018,272) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 84,962,296 | (128,024,900) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 2,179,970,221 | 2,307,995,121 |
End of period | $2,264,932,517 | $2,179,970,221 |
Accumulated net investmnet loss | $(5,117,768) | — |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Vista Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in equity securities of companies that are medium-sized and smaller at the time of purchase that management believes will increase in value. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class (formerly Advisor Class), the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets. Sale of the C Class commenced on March 1, 2010.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at
18
the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
19
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. The annual management fee for each class is 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, C Class and R Class and 0.800% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the C Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareholder services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $1,434,505,044 and $1,778,206,969, respectively.
20
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010(1) | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 750,000,000 | 800,000,000 | ||
Sold | 5,020,442 | $ 68,682,062 | 22,067,745 | $ 246,859,389 |
Redeemed | (18,497,029) | (253,477,249) | (27,625,843) | (311,354,023) |
(13,476,587) | (184,795,187) | (5,558,098) | (64,494,634) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 80,000,000 | 80,000,000 | ||
Sold | 2,059,845 | 29,008,709 | 8,008,528 | 91,570,629 |
Redeemed | (8,132,615) | (116,018,366) | (9,788,881) | (116,857,411) |
(6,072,770) | (87,009,657) | (1,780,353) | (25,286,782) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 310,000,000 | 310,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,726,858 | 22,827,612 | 7,660,713 | 83,311,592 |
Redeemed | (7,780,127) | (103,284,624) | (7,227,808) | (79,354,013) |
(6,053,269) | (80,457,012) | 432,905 | 3,957,579 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 50,000,000 | N/A | ||
Sold | 1,821 | 25,000 | ||
R Class/Shares Authorized | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 | ||
Sold | 322,371 | 4,307,217 | 1,297,310 | 14,468,375 |
Redeemed | (311,573) | (4,212,240) | (326,357) | (3,662,810) |
10,798 | 94,977 | 970,953 | 10,805,565 | |
Net increase (decrease) | (25,590,007) | $(352,141,879) | (5,934,593) | $ (75,018,272) |
(1) March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 for the C Class. |
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
21
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $2,043,712,583 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 162,017,079 | $18,292,159 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 70,152 | 24,200,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $2,205,799,814 | $42,492,159 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(81,009) | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Equity Price Risk — The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on an equity index in order to manage its exposure to changes in market conditions. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund is required to deposit either cash or securities in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (initial margin). Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss whe n the contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. During the period, the fund infrequently purchased equity price risk derivative instruments for temporary investment purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The fund began investing in foreign currency risk derivatives in February 2010. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s t ypical volume since February 2010.
22
Value of Derivative Instruments as of April 30, 2010 | |||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||
Location on Statement | Location on Statement | ||||
Type of Derivative | of Assets and Liabilities | Value | of Assets and Liabilities | Value | |
Foreign Currency Risk | Receivable for forward foreign | Payable for forward foreign | |||
currency exchange contracts | — | currency exchange contracts | $81,009 |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended April 30, 2010
Change in Net Unrealized | |||||
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | Appreciation (Depreciation) | ||||
Location on | Location on | ||||
Type of Derivative | Statement of Operations | Value | Statement of Operations | Value | |
Equity Price Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | $1,142,239 | Change in net unrealized | — | |
futures contract transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
on futures contracts | |||||
Foreign Currency Risk | Net realized gain (loss) on | 398,558 | Change in net unrealized | $(81,009) | |
foreign currency transactions | appreciation (depreciation) | ||||
on translation of assets and | |||||
liabilities in foreign currencies | |||||
$1,540,797 | $(81,009) |
7. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions.
8. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
23
9. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $1,759,465,181 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $496,185,520 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (7,358,728) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $488,826,792 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(870,658,290), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(250,166,415) and $(620,491,875) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval. Management agreements for new share classes of the funds that were launched after February 16, 2010 did not terminate, have not been replaced by interim agreements, and do not require approval of new agreements.
24
Financial Highlights |
Vista | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $12.13 | $12.43 | $24.24 | $16.35 | $14.99 | $13.14 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.03) | (0.05) | (0.11) | (0.12) | (0.04) | (0.04) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.60 | (0.25) | (9.61) | 8.14 | 1.40 | 1.89 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.57 | (0.30) | (9.72) | 8.02 | 1.36 | 1.85 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (2.09) | (0.13) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $14.70 | $12.13 | $12.43 | $24.24 | $16.35 | $14.99 | |
Total Return(3) | 21.19% | (2.41)% | (43.58)% | 49.39% | 9.07% | 14.08% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.43)%(4) | (0.48)% | (0.56)% | (0.60)% | (0.23)% | (0.26)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 65% | 183% | 167% | 121% | 234% | 284% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $1,850 | $1,691 | $1,801 | $2,921 | $1,965 | $1,902 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Vista | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $12.45 | $12.73 | $24.72 | $16.64 | $15.22 | $13.32 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.01) | (0.03) | (0.07) | (0.08) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.65 | (0.25) | (9.83) | 8.29 | 1.43 | 1.91 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.64 | (0.28) | (9.90) | 8.21 | 1.42 | 1.90 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (2.09) | (0.13) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $15.09 | $12.45 | $12.73 | $24.72 | $16.64 | $15.22 | |
Total Return(3) | 21.20% | (2.12)% | (43.50)% | 49.68% | 9.33% | 14.26% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 0.80%(4) | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.23)%(4) | (0.28)% | (0.36)% | (0.40)% | (0.03)% | (0.06)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 65% | 183% | 167% | 121% | 234% | 284% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $164,615 | $211,357 | $238,727 | $254,528 | $132,325 | $98,439 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Vista | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $11.77 | $12.09 | $23.69 | $16.03 | $14.73 | $12.95 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | (0.04) | (0.08) | (0.15) | (0.16) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.51 | (0.24) | (9.36) | 7.95 | 1.38 | 1.86 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.47 | (0.32) | (9.51) | 7.79 | 1.30 | 1.78 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (2.09) | (0.13) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $14.24 | $11.77 | $12.09 | $23.69 | $16.03 | $14.73 | |
Total Return(4) | 20.99% | (2.65)% | (43.72)% | 48.94% | 8.83% | 13.75% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.68)%(5) | (0.73)% | (0.81)% | (0.85)% | (0.48)% | (0.51)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 65% | 183% | 167% | 121% | 234% | 284% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $222,836 | $255,419 | $257,057 | $380,555 | $210,576 | $190,635 | |
(1) | Prior to March 1, 2010, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Vista | ||
C Class | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||
2010(1) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $13.73 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(2) | (0.04) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 0.99 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 0.95 | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $14.68 | |
Total Return(3) | 6.92% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (1.65)%(4) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 65%(5) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $27 | |
(1) | March 1, 2010 (commencement of sale) through April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | |
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | ||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | ||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | ||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | ||
(4) | Annualized. | |
(5) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the six months ended April 30, 2010. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Vista | |||||||
R Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $11.87 | $12.22 | $23.98 | $16.25 | $14.97 | $15.32 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | (0.06) | (0.12) | (0.18) | (0.21) | (0.16) | (0.04) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 2.53 | (0.23) | (9.49) | 8.07 | 1.44 | (0.31) | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 2.47 | (0.35) | (9.67) | 7.86 | 1.28 | (0.35) | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Realized Gains | — | — | (2.09) | (0.13) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $14.34 | $11.87 | $12.22 | $23.98 | $16.25 | $14.97 | |
Total Return(4) | 20.81% | (2.86)% | (43.87)% | 48.71% | 8.55% | (2.28)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 1.99%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to | |||||||
Average Net Assets | (0.93)%(5) | (0.98)% | (1.06)% | (1.10)% | (0.73)% | (0.92)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 65% | 183% | 167% | 121% | 234% | 284%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $27,488 | $22,618 | $11,423 | $2,398 | $337 | $24 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | July 29, 2005 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2005. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.*
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
*Management agreements for new share classes of the Fund launched after February 16, 2010, did not terminate, have not been replaced by Interim |
Management Agreements, and do not require Board or shareholder approval at this time. |
30
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
31
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
32
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management
33
Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data
34
compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
35
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
36
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
37
Notes |
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68445
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Heritage Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Heritage | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 25 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 31 |
Additional Information | 37 |
Index Definitions | 38 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock. While less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Heritage | ||||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Average Annual Returns | ||||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | 10 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | TWHIX | 25.28% | 41.59% | 12.51% | 4.25% | 11.46% | 11/10/87 | |
Russell Midcap | ||||||||
Growth Index(2) | — | 23.23% | 46.95% | 5.74% | -0.39% | 10.43%(3) | — | |
Russell Midcap Index(2) | — | 24.93% | 50.84% | 5.65% | 5.74% | 11.87%(3) | — | |
Institutional Class | ATHIX | 25.40% | 41.81% | 12.73% | 4.46% | 8.05% | 6/16/97 | |
A Class(4) | ATHAX | 7/11/97 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 25.11% | 41.16% | 12.24% | 3.97% | 7.22% | |||
With sales charge* | 17.94% | 33.00% | 10.92% | 3.36% | 6.73% | |||
B Class | ATHBX | 9/28/07 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 24.72% | 40.16% | — | — | -5.55% | |||
With sales charge* | 19.72% | 36.16% | — | — | -6.83% | |||
C Class | AHGCX | 6/26/01 | ||||||
No sales charge* | 24.68% | 40.17% | 11.41% | — | 4.74% | |||
With sales charge* | 23.68% | 40.17% | 11.41% | — | 4.74% | |||
R Class | ATHWX | 25.00% | 40.82% | — | — | -5.07% | 9/28/07 | |
*Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | ||||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | ||||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | ||||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | ||||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | ||||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. – A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | ||||||||
(3) | Since 10/31/87, the date nearest the Investor Class’s inception for which data are available. | |||||||
(4) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class and did not have a front-end sales charge. Performance prior to that | |||||||
date has been adjusted to reflect this charge. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
5
Heritage
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.01% | 0.81% | 1.26% | 2.01% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the indices are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the indices do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Heritage
Portfolio Managers: Greg Walsh and David Hollond
Performance Summary
Heritage returned 25.28%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, outpacing the 23.23% return of the portfolio’s benchmark, the Russell Midcap Growth Index.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of stabilizing economic conditions and improving investor sentiment. Price momentum and acceleration, two factors that the Heritage team looks for in portfolio holdings, were not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to drive market strength. We have begun to see the extreme relative headwinds from price momentum and acceleration subside. In this environment, Heritage’s investment process delivered portfolio returns that outperformed those of its benchmark.
The portfolio’s relative performance benefited the most from investment decisions in the industrials and information technology sectors. Stock selection in the materials and financials sectors also helped returns, as did avoiding the utilities sector altogether. These gains were partially trimmed by holdings in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors.
Industrials, Information Technology Led Gains
The industrials sector was a key source of outperformance for Heritage. In the sector, the portfolio benefited from an overweight stake in Fastenal Co. The distributor of industrial and construction supplies experienced improved earnings during the reporting period as sales climbed.
Elsewhere within the industrials sector, Heritage was rewarded for an overweight position in railroad company Kansas City Southern Corp., whose share price gained 67%. An improvement in economic activity during the period led to increased shipping demand, translating into accelerating volumes for the company.
In the information technology sector, overweight stakes in data storage company Seagate Technology and personal computer maker Apple, Inc. helped absolute and relative performance. Both companies announced higher-than-expected earnings due to solid sales growth during the period. Within the communications equipment industry group, Heritage held an overweight stake in networking company F5 Networks, Inc. This position contributed meaningfully to outperformance as the company’s earnings grew amid increasing demand.
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Heritage
Materials, Financials Helped
The materials sector was also a source for absolute and relative portfolio gains. Here, an overweight stake in the metals and mining group drove relative outperformance in the sector. Cliffs Natural Resources, which benefited from improved pricing for iron ore as global economies improved, was the largest contributor to relative gains for the period. AK Steel Holding Corp., which is not a member of the benchmark, also contributed to returns as it benefited from improving economic conditions.
In the financials sector, Heritage focused on real estate management company CB Richard Ellis. The company swung to a profit in the fourth quarter of 2009 as a result of cost-cutting measures as well as improving economic conditions, particularly in Asia and parts of Europe.
Heritage also sidestepped the utilities sector altogether. This decision benefited relative returns as the sector lagged most other sectors in the benchmark.
Health Care, Consumer Discretionary Hindered
Holdings in the health care sector underperformed the benchmark. In the sector, poor stock selection in the health care equipment and biotechnology industries weighed on relative returns. Within the health care providers industry, a stake in Medco Health Solutions detracted from performance. The company experienced a share price decline late in the reporting period as it lowered its forecast for future growth.
Although Heritage derived positive absolute gains from consumer discretionary holdings, the portfolio’s positions collectively underperformed benchmark returns for the sector. In particular, Heritage held several detrimental positions in retail companies, including J.C. Penney Co. Because retailers like J.C. Penney sell staple goods that tend to be in demand regardless of economic conditions, they fared better in the weak economic environment than retailers of discretionary items, and investors viewed them as defensive positions. As market conditions improved, however, these types of securities were largely sidelined in favor of more-aggressive stocks.
Outlook
Heritage’s investment process focuses on medium-sized companies and smaller with accelerating revenue and earnings growth rates, which are also exhibiting share-price strength. This process, which has historically added value over time, has faced unprecedented headwinds during the market rally that began in March 2009. Despite this challenge, Heritage provided solid absolute and relative returns during the reporting period. Recently, we have seen the relative headwinds from price momentum and acceleration subside as markets appear to have moved past the inflection point driven by market sentiment and into a period where fundamentals, and specifically fundamental improvement, are being recognized and rewarded by investors.
8
Heritage | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
priceline.com, Inc. | 3.1% |
Fastenal Co. | 2.6% |
Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 2.2% |
F5 Networks, Inc. | 2.2% |
SBA Communications Corp., Class A | 2.1% |
Apple, Inc. | 2.1% |
Goodrich Corp. | 2.1% |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. | 1.7% |
Ctrip.com International Ltd. ADR | 1.6% |
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 1.6% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Specialty Retail | 6.6% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.6% |
Computers & Peripherals | 4.3% |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | 4.3% |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | 4.1% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 90.3% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 8.1% |
Total Common Stocks | 98.4% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.0% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.6% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information
10
to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 - 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,252.80 | $5.59 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,254.00 | $4.47 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,251.10 | $6.98 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,247.20 | $11.14 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,246.80 | $11.14 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,250.00 | $8.37 | 1.50% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,019.84 | $5.01 | 1.00% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,018.60 | $6.26 | 1.25% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,014.88 | $9.99 | 2.00% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,017.36 | $7.50 | 1.50% |
*Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Heritage | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 98.4% | CONSUMER FINANCE — 2.6% | |||||
AmeriCredit Corp.(1) | 1,482,000 | $ 35,479,080 | ||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 3.7% | ||||||
BE Aerospace, Inc.(1) | 507,200 | $ 15,068,912 | Discover Financial Services | 2,059,904 | 31,846,116 | |
Goodrich Corp. | 731,900 | 54,292,342 | 67,325,196 | |||
Precision Castparts Corp. | 219,900 | 28,221,966 | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 2.8% | |||
97,583,220 | American | |||||
Superconductor Corp.(1) | 437,100 | 12,754,578 | ||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 2.5% | Cooper Industries plc | 682,500 | 33,510,750 | |||
Alexion | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 471,900 | 28,653,768 | |||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 449,300 | 24,657,584 | ||||
Celgene Corp.(1) | 303,000 | 18,770,850 | 74,919,096 | |||
ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS | ||||||
United Therapeutics Corp.(1) | 407,900 | 23,205,431 | & COMPONENTS — 4.3% | |||
66,633,865 | Agilent Technologies, Inc.(1) | 1,587,300 | 57,555,498 | |||
BUILDING PRODUCTS — 0.6% | Amphenol Corp., Class A | 574,000 | 26,524,540 | |||
Lennox International, Inc. | 354,200 | 16,031,092 | Dolby Laboratories, Inc., | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.9% | Class A(1) | 429,319 | 29,502,802 | |||
Affiliated Managers | 113,582,840 | |||||
Group, Inc.(1) | 256,700 | 21,609,006 | ||||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.8% | ||||||
Jefferies Group, Inc. | 376,800 | 10,256,496 | Core Laboratories NV | 183,200 | 27,459,848 | |
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 458,070 | 17,708,986 | FMC Technologies, Inc.(1) | 281,300 | 19,041,197 | |
49,574,488 | 46,501,045 | |||||
CHEMICALS — 3.1% | FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 3.4% | |||||
Albemarle Corp. | 505,500 | 23,081,130 | Cia Brasileira de | |||
Ecolab, Inc. | 571,700 | 27,921,828 | Distribuicao Grupo | |||
International Flavors | Pao de Acucar Preference | |||||
& Fragrances, Inc. | 290,400 | 14,546,136 | Shares ADR | 179,900 | 12,324,949 | |
Valspar Corp. | 479,000 | 15,002,280 | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 590,800 | 34,904,464 | |
80,551,374 | Whole Foods Market, Inc.(1) | 1,052,800 | 41,080,256 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 1.2% | 88,309,669 | |||||
Comerica, Inc. | 722,500 | 30,345,000 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 0.8% | |||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 3.2% | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 430,100 | 22,197,461 | |||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 837,700 | 57,323,811 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 4.1% | |||
JDS Uniphase Corp.(1) | 2,075,500 | 26,960,745 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 475,100 | 41,110,403 | |
84,284,556 | ev3, Inc.(1) | 765,000 | 14,634,450 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 4.3% | Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) | 61,800 | 22,282,608 | |||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 208,027 | 54,320,010 | Varian Medical | |||
Lexmark International, Inc., | Systems, Inc.(1) | 549,800 | 30,997,724 | |||
Class A(1) | 874,100 | 32,385,405 | 109,025,185 | |||
Seagate Technology(1) | 1,474,800 | 27,092,076 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 2.7% | |||
113,797,491 | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 402,600 | 40,312,338 | |||
CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 0.3% | Medco Health | |||||
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. | Solutions, Inc.(1) | 513,700 | 30,267,204 | |||
NV New York Shares(1) | 309,662 | 7,258,477 | 70,579,542 | |||
HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 1.1% | ||||||
SXC Health | ||||||
Solutions Corp.(1) | 402,685 | 28,067,145 |
12
Heritage | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 3.5% | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 3.6% | |||||
Ctrip.com International | Alpha Natural | |||||
Ltd. ADR(1) | 1,136,640 | $ 41,510,093 | Resources, Inc.(1) | 443,400 | $ 20,875,272 | |
Royal Caribbean | Brigham Exploration Co.(1) | 691,797 | 13,496,960 | |||
Cruises Ltd.(1) | 815,900 | 29,241,856 | ||||
Concho Resources, Inc.(1) | 279,100 | 15,858,462 | ||||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | Petrohawk Energy Corp.(1) | 655,836 | 14,159,499 | |||
Worldwide, Inc. | 370,000 | 20,168,700 | ||||
Pioneer Natural | ||||||
90,920,649 | Resources Co. | 257,400 | 16,507,062 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 2.7% | Range Resources Corp. | 276,500 | 13,205,640 | |||
Harman International | 94,102,895 | |||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 624,609 | 24,659,563 | ||||
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 359,600 | 22,349,140 | PHARMACEUTICALS — 1.3% | |||
Whirlpool Corp. | 211,000 | 22,971,570 | Shire plc ADR | 529,700 | 34,875,448 | |
69,980,273 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT — 1.3% | |||||
INSURANCE — 0.9% | CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., | |||||
Class A(1) | 1,923,000 | 33,306,360 | ||||
Genworth Financial, Inc., | ROAD & RAIL — 2.3% | |||||
Class A(1) | 1,480,276 | 24,454,160 | ||||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 3.1% | J.B. Hunt Transport | |||||
Services, Inc. | 634,000 | 23,369,240 | ||||
priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 311,111 | 81,526,638 | ||||
Kansas City Southern(1) | 932,400 | 37,808,820 | ||||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 2.3% | 61,178,060 | |||||
Baidu, Inc. ADR(1) | 23,100 | 15,922,830 | ||||
SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | ||||||
Equinix, Inc.(1) | 258,400 | 26,007,960 | EQUIPMENT — 4.6% | |||
WebMD Health Corp.(1) | 388,400 | 18,814,096 | Analog Devices, Inc. | 681,200 | 20,388,316 | |
60,744,886 | Atheros | |||||
IT SERVICES — 2.4% | Communications, Inc.(1) | 695,400 | 27,009,336 | |||
Cognizant Technology | Cypress | |||||
Solutions Corp., Class A(1) | 778,200 | 39,828,276 | Semiconductor Corp.(1) | 2,575,500 | 33,198,195 | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 93,300 | 23,142,132 | MEMC Electronic | |||
Materials, Inc.(1) | 804,100 | 10,429,177 | ||||
62,970,408 | ||||||
Veeco Instruments, Inc.(1) | 694,900 | 30,568,651 | ||||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 1.2% | ||||||
Life Technologies Corp.(1) | 602,400 | 32,957,304 | 121,593,675 | |||
MACHINERY — 2.0% | SOFTWARE — 3.7% | |||||
Autodesk, Inc.(1) | 625,900 | 21,286,859 | ||||
Bucyrus International, Inc. | 237,000 | 14,933,370 | ||||
Citrix Systems, Inc.(1) | 644,500 | 30,291,500 | ||||
Cummins, Inc. | 360,500 | 26,038,915 | ||||
Flowserve Corp. | 108,087 | 12,384,608 | Parametric | |||
Technology Corp.(1) | 604,700 | 11,241,373 | ||||
53,356,893 | ||||||
Rovi Corp.(1) | 429,500 | 16,741,910 | ||||
MEDIA — 0.6% | ||||||
salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 204,500 | 17,505,200 | ||||
Imax Corp.(1) | 829,400 | 15,675,660 | ||||
METALS & MINING — 2.3% | 97,066,842 | |||||
Cliffs Natural | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 6.6% | |||||
Resources, Inc. | 393,500 | 24,605,555 | AnnTaylor Stores Corp.(1) | 588,400 | 12,768,280 | |
United States Steel Corp. | 679,100 | 37,119,606 | Chico’s FAS, Inc. | 1,704,500 | 25,380,005 | |
61,725,161 | Guess?, Inc. | 440,800 | 20,219,496 | |||
MULTI-INDUSTRY — 0.5% | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 448,600 | 20,846,442 | |||
Financial Select Sector | O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) | 939,300 | 45,922,377 | |||
SPDR Fund | 796,600 | 12,865,090 | Talbots, Inc.(1) | 807,300 | 13,280,085 | |
MULTILINE RETAIL — 1.5% | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1,265,100 | 36,434,880 | |||
Nordstrom, Inc. | 964,600 | 39,866,918 | 174,851,565 |
13
Heritage | ||
Shares | Value | |
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 0.5% | ||
Warnaco Group, Inc. (The)(1) | 276,530 | $ 13,229,195 |
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 3.5% | ||
Fastenal Co. | 1,258,100 | 68,805,489 |
MSC Industrial Direct Co., | ||
Class A | 429,064 | 23,379,697 |
92,185,186 | ||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 3.6% | ||
Millicom International | ||
Cellular SA | 138,400 | 12,217,952 |
NII Holdings, Inc.(1) | 677,100 | 28,722,582 |
SBA Communications Corp., | ||
Class A(1) | 1,542,432 | 54,555,820 |
95,496,354 | ||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||
(Cost $1,956,202,212) | 2,591,496,362 | |
Temporary Cash Investments — 1.0% | ||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||
Agency Shares | 9,021 | 9,021 |
Repurchase Agreement, Goldman Sachs | ||
Group, Inc., (collateralized by various | ||
U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.50%, | ||
5/15/38, valued at $27,783,841), | ||
in a joint trading account at 0.10%, | ||
dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | ||
(Delivery value $27,200,227) | 27,200,000 | |
TOTAL TEMPORARY | ||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||
(Cost $27,209,021) | 27,209,021 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||
SECURITIES — 99.4% | ||
(Cost $1,983,411,233) | 2,618,705,383 | |
OTHER ASSETS | ||
AND LIABILITIES — 0.6% | 15,334,832 | |
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $2,634,040,215 | |
Notes to Schedule of Investments | ||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | ||
SPDR = Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipts | ||
(1) Non-income producing. | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $1,983,411,233) | $2,618,705,383 | ||
Cash | 3,491 | ||
Foreign currency holdings, at value (cost of $2,844) | 2,861 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 87,135,283 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 4,710,787 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 397,653 | ||
2,710,955,458 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 72,881,147 | ||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 1,690,652 | ||
Accrued management fees | 2,130,706 | ||
Service fees (and distribution fees – A Class and R Class) payable | 163,832 | ||
Distribution fees payable | 48,906 | ||
76,915,243 | |||
Net Assets | $2,634,040,215 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $2,334,666,149 | ||
Accumulated net investment loss | (6,114,302) | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (329,805,067) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and | |||
liabilities in foreign currencies | 635,293,435 | ||
$2,634,040,215 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $1,728,015,007 | 96,322,366 | $17.94 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $111,560,208 | 6,094,594 | $18.30 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $701,233,312 | 40,090,222 | $17.49* |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $4,259,870 | 241,213 | $17.66 |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $77,060,684 | 4,678,028 | $16.47 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $11,911,134 | 669,124 | $17.80 |
*Maximum offering price $18.56 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $49,525) | $ 6,447,849 |
Interest | 10,677 |
6,458,526 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 11,402,818 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 14,642 |
C Class | 233,904 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 4,881 |
C Class | 77,968 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 759,252 |
R Class | 16,702 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 40,195 |
Other expenses | 13 |
12,550,375 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (6,091,849) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 156,452,149 |
Foreign currency transactions | 45,179 |
156,497,328 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 362,330,319 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 21,313 |
362,351,632 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 518,848,960 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $512,757,111 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (6,091,849) | $ (4,438,326) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 156,497,328 | (269,812,367) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 362,351,632 | 446,528,478 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 512,757,111 | 172,277,785 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income: | ||
Investor Class | — | (11,939,054) |
Institutional Class | (45,786) | (936,743) |
A Class | — | (2,902,861) |
B Class | — | (2,133) |
C Class | — | (43,759) |
R Class | — | (4,033) |
Decrease in net assets from distributions | (45,786) | (15,828,583) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 107,854,259 | 121,367,022 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 620,565,584 | 277,816,224 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 2,013,474,631 | 1,735,658,407 |
End of period | $2,634,040,215 | $2,013,474,631 |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) | $(6,114,302) | $23,333 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Heritage Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing in companies that are medium-sized and smaller at the time of purchase that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
18
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. Additionally, non-U.S. tax returns filed by the fund due to investments in certain foreign securities remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority for 7 years from the date of the filing. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve mon ths. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
19
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. The annual management fee schedule for each class of the fund is 1.000% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class, and 0.800% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $1,359,802,626 and $1,295,897,849, respectively.
20
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 400,000,000 | 400,000,000 | ||
Sold | 12,359,090 | $204,777,692 | 21,287,744 | $269,895,757 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 1,038,518 | 11,506,781 |
Redeemed | (9,798,641) | (158,774,513) | (24,501,467) | (300,017,434) |
2,560,449 | 46,003,179 | (2,175,205) | (18,614,896) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 40,000,000 | 40,000,000 | ||
Sold | 986,533 | 17,063,862 | 1,465,590 | 18,547,939 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | 2,804 | 45,786 | 83,029 | 936,563 |
Redeemed | (1,219,351) | (20,787,391) | (1,699,463) | (20,369,382) |
(230,014) | (3,677,743) | (150,844) | (884,880) | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 200,000,000 | 200,000,000 | ||
Sold | 8,065,258 | 129,142,249 | 20,552,782 | 250,958,298 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 257,512 | 2,791,428 |
Redeemed | (5,092,013) | (81,118,080) | (11,102,089) | (132,976,948) |
2,973,245 | 48,024,169 | 9,708,205 | 120,772,778 | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 35,000,000 | 35,000,000 | ||
Sold | 15,231 | 233,028 | 139,787 | 1,746,511 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 178 | 1,969 |
Redeemed | (15,847) | (250,713) | (34,173) | (415,624) |
(616) | (17,685) | 105,792 | 1,332,856 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 35,000,000 | 35,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,314,050 | 20,181,508 | 2,011,575 | 24,044,708 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 3,445 | 35,514 |
Redeemed | (552,852) | (8,414,283) | (802,497) | (9,141,997) |
761,198 | 11,767,225 | 1,212,523 | 14,938,225 | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 30,000,000 | 30,000,000 | ||
Sold | 461,874 | 7,860,493 | 385,148 | 5,060,155 |
Issued in reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 364 | 4,030 |
Redeemed | (128,042) | (2,105,379) | (88,131) | (1,241,246) |
333,832 | 5,755,114 | 297,381 | 3,822,939 | |
Net increase (decrease) | 6,398,094 | $107,854,259 | 8,997,852 | $121,367,022 |
21
5. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $2,379,450,043 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 212,046,319 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 9,021 | $27,200,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $2,591,505,383 | $27,200,000 | — |
6. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The fund held no foreign currency risk derivative instruments at period end. The fund held no foreign currency risk derivative instruments at period end. The fund participated in foreign currency risk derivative instrument s during the first three months of the period consistent with its exposure to foreign denominated securities.
22
At April 30, 2010, the fund did not have any derivative instruments disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $68,076 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $23,333 in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
7. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
8. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
9. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $1,988,397,092 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $641,590,273 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (11,281,982) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $630,308,291 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(473,848,171), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(184,471,004) and $(289,377,167) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
23
10. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
24
Financial Highlights |
Heritage | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $14.32 | $13.15 | $22.83 | $15.58 | $13.48 | $10.76 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.04) | (0.02) | (0.09) | (0.10) | (0.03) | (0.06) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.66 | 1.32 | (8.53) | 8.42 | 2.22 | 2.78 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.62 | 1.30 | (8.62) | 8.32 | 2.19 | 2.72 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.13) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.13) | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $17.94 | $14.32 | $13.15 | $22.83 | $15.58 | $13.48 | |
Total Return(3) | 25.28% | 10.16% | (39.54)% | 56.41% | 16.26% | 25.16% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.00%(4) | 1.01% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (0.44)%(4) | (0.19)% | (0.47)% | (0.56)% | (0.22)% | (0.46)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128% | 230% | 236% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in millions) | $1,728 | $1,342 | $1,262 | $2,478 | $1,037 | $801 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
25
Heritage | |||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $14.60 | $13.41 | $23.21 | $15.80 | $13.63 | $10.87 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | —(3) | (0.05) | (0.07) | —(3) | (0.03) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.73 | 1.34 | (8.69) | 8.55 | 2.26 | 2.79 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.71 | 1.34 | (8.74) | 8.48 | 2.26 | 2.76 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | (0.01) | (0.15) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.01) | (0.15) | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $18.30 | $14.60 | $13.41 | $23.21 | $15.80 | $13.63 | |
Total Return(4) | 25.40% | 10.33% | (39.41)% | 56.66% | 16.59% | 25.39% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 0.80%(5) | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (0.24)%(5) | 0.01% | (0.27)% | (0.36)% | (0.02)% | (0.26)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128% | 230% | 236% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $111,560 | $92,343 | $86,835 | $155,885 | $57,039 | $43,192 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Heritage | |||||||
A Class(1) | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(2) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $13.98 | $12.84 | $22.37 | $15.32 | $13.29 | $10.64 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(3) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.13) | (0.15) | (0.08) | (0.09) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.56 | 1.30 | (8.34) | 8.27 | 2.20 | 2.74 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.51 | 1.24 | (8.47) | 8.12 | 2.12 | 2.65 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.10) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.10) | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $17.49 | $13.98 | $12.84 | $22.37 | $15.32 | $13.29 | |
Total Return(4) | 25.11% | 9.89% | (39.69)% | 56.05% | 15.96% | 24.91% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.25%(5) | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (0.69)%(5) | (0.44)% | (0.72)% | (0.81)% | (0.47)% | (0.71)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128% | 230% | 236% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $701,233 | $518,768 | $351,962 | $291,674 | $57,995 | $19,953 | |
(1) | Prior to September 4, 2007, the A Class was referred to as the Advisor Class. | ||||||
(2) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Heritage | |||||
B Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $14.16 | $13.01 | $22.82 | $21.52 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.11) | (0.16) | (0.26) | (0.03) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.61 | 1.33 | (8.49) | 1.33 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 3.50 | 1.17 | (8.75) | 1.30 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (1.06) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $17.66 | $14.16 | $13.01 | $22.82 | |
Total Return(4) | 24.72% | 8.99% | (40.16)% | 6.04% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 2.00%(5) | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.00%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (1.44)%(5) | (1.19)% | (1.47)% | (1.81)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $4,260 | $3,425 | $1,770 | $83 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Heritage | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $13.21 | $12.13 | $21.35 | $14.77 | $12.91 | $10.41 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.11) | (0.14) | (0.26) | (0.29) | (0.18) | (0.17) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.37 | 1.24 | (7.90) | 7.94 | 2.13 | 2.67 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 3.26 | 1.10 | (8.16) | 7.65 | 1.95 | 2.50 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net | |||||||
Investment Income | — | (0.02) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.02) | (1.06) | (1.07) | (0.09) | — | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $16.47 | $13.21 | $12.13 | $21.35 | $14.77 | $12.91 | |
Total Return(3) | 24.68% | 9.07% | (40.16)% | 54.88% | 15.11% | 24.02% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 2.00%(4) | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | 2.00% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | (1.44)%(4) | (1.19)% | (1.47)% | (1.56)% | (1.22)% | (1.46)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128% | 230% | 236% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $77,061 | $51,745 | $32,812 | $21,692 | $2,334 | $898 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Heritage | |||||
R Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $14.24 | $13.08 | $22.83 | $21.52 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.08) | (0.11) | (0.17) | (0.02) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 3.64 | 1.34 | (8.52) | 1.33 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 3.56 | 1.23 | (8.69) | 1.31 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Investment Income | — | (0.07) | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (1.06) | — | |
Total Distributions | — | (0.07) | (1.06) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $17.80 | $14.24 | $13.08 | $22.83 | |
Total Return(4) | 25.00% | 9.58% | (39.86)% | 6.09% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.50%(5) | 1.51% | 1.50% | 1.50%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.94)%(5) | (0.69)% | (0.97)% | (1.22)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 57% | 155% | 172% | 128%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $11,911 | $4,775 | $496 | $27 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||
between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor
31
will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
32
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services – Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder confir-
mations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
33
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
34
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
35
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
36
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
37
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
38
Notes |
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68446
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
Small Cap Growth Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
Small Cap Growth | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 16 |
Statement of Operations | 17 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 18 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 19 |
Financial Highlights | 26 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 32 |
Additional Information | 38 |
Index Definitions | 39 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid-and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | * Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
Small Cap Growth | |||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Average Annual Returns | |||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | |||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | 5 years | Inception | Date | ||
Investor Class | ANOIX | 31.26% | 44.47% | 6.50% | 5.98% | 6/1/01 | |
Russell 2000 Growth Index(2) | — | 25.49% | 45.20% | 6.06% | 2.79% | — | |
Institutional Class | ANONX | 31.69% | 44.89% | — | -4.16% | 5/18/07 | |
A Class | ANOAX | 1/31/03 | |||||
No sales charge* | 31.24% | 44.31% | 6.25% | 9.94% | |||
With sales charge* | 23.69% | 36.02% | 5.00% | 9.06% | |||
B Class | ANOBX | 1/31/03 | |||||
No sales charge* | 30.80% | 43.04% | 5.44% | 9.13% | |||
With sales charge* | 25.80% | 39.04% | 5.28% | 9.13% | |||
C Class | ANOCX | 1/31/03 | |||||
No sales charge* | 30.87% | 43.06% | 5.45% | 9.18%(3) | |||
With sales charge* | 29.87% | 43.06% | 5.45% | 9.18%(3) | |||
R Class | ANORX | 31.05% | 43.81% | — | -8.56% | 9/28/07 | |
* Sales charges include initial sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges (CDSCs), as applicable. A Class shares have a 5.75% | |||||||
maximum initial sales charge for equity funds and may be subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. B Class shares redeemed within six | |||||||
years of purchase are subject to a CDSC that declines from 5.00% during the first year after purchase to 0.00% the sixth year after | |||||||
purchase. C Class shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase are subject to a maximum CDSC of 1.00%. The SEC requires that | |||||||
mutual funds provide performance information net of maximum sales charges in all cases where charges could be applied. | |||||||
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | ||||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | |||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | |||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | |||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | |||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. | |||||||
(3) | Class returns would have been lower if American Century Investments had not voluntarily waived its distribution and service fees from | ||||||
2/1/03 to 6/30/03. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. Historically, small company stocks have been more volatile than the stocks of larger, more established companies. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Small Cap Growth
* From 6/1/01, the Investor Class’s inception date. Not annualized. | |||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |||||
Institutional | |||||
Investor Class | Class | A Class | B Class | C Class | R Class |
1.42% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 1.92% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. Historically, small company stocks have been more volatile than the stocks of larger, more established companies. The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
Unless otherwise indicated, performance reflects Investor Class shares; performance for other share classes will vary due to differences in fee structure. For information about other share classes available, please consult the prospectus. Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of the taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption-of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
Small Cap Growth
Portfolio Managers: Stafford Southwick and Matthew Ferretti
Performance Summary
Small Cap Growth returned 31.26%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, outpacing the 25.49% return of its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index
The fund’s return of more than 30% for the six-month period reflected the robust returns of small-cap stocks, which led the equity market’s overall advance. Furthermore, the fund outperformed both its growth-oriented benchmark and the broad small-cap indices despite some noteworthy performance headwinds. Value stocks outperformed growth by a considerable margin in the small-cap segment of the market, and price momentum and accelerating growth—two critical components of Small Cap Growth’s investment process—were out of favor for most of the period.
The key factors behind Small Cap Growth’s outperformance were favorable stock selection, which added value in nine of ten market sectors, and an emphasis on stocks positioned to benefit the most from an economic recovery
Industrials and Consumer Discretionary Outperformed
Stock selection was most successful in two of the more economically sensitive segments of the market—industrials and consumer discretionary. Security selection contributed positively to relative performance in nearly every segment of the industrials sector, led by road and rail companies and electrical equipment manufacturers. The top contributor in this sector, and in the portfolio as a whole, was rental car agency Dollar Thrifty Automotive, which was the fund’s largest holding and biggest overweight position during the six-month period. The rental car industry was forced to reduce their fleets during the economic downturn to pay down debt, but as rental traffic began to pick back up again, the reduced capacity allowed for rental price increases. In addition, Dollar Thrifty benefited from higher used car prices as the company sold off older rental vehicles. Toward the end of the period, competitor Hertz Global Holdings made a takeover offer, boosting Dollar Thrifty shares further.
Other noteworthy outperformers in the industrials sector included two foreign companies, Chinese solar module maker Trina Solar and Dutch commercial aircraft leasing company AerCap Holdings. Trina is a low-cost provider that has been taking market share in this segment of the solar market, and the company also saw an increase in orders from Europe. Improving fundamentals in the airline industry provided a boost to AerCap Holdings.
In the consumer discretionary sector, stock choices among auto components makers and household durables companies delivered the bulk of the outperformance. One of the top contributors in this sector was auto parts maker TRW Automotive, which rallied as the company reported robust earnings, benefiting from improving demand and a lower cost structure. Specialty
*All fund returns referenced in this commentary are for Investor Class shares. Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
Small Cap Growth
mattress maker Tempur-Pedic International and home furnishings producer La-Z-Boy both benefited from increased demand as many consumers deferred purchases of big-ticket items during the economic downturn.
Materials and Technology Also Added Value
The portfolio’s materials and information technology holdings also contributed notably to the fund’s outperformance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The lion’s share of the outperformance in the materials sector came from paper and forest products companies, led by KapStone Paper & Packaging. As with the rental car industry, many paper companies reduced capacity during the economic downturn, but as demand began to recover along with the economy, companies like KapStone were able to raise prices and increase earnings.
In the information technology sector, stock selection among communications equipment makers generated virtually all of the outperformance. The big winner in this sector was Acme Packet, which makes session border controllers that provide secure communications delivery across borders between IP networks. Acme raised 2010 revenue guidance significantly thanks to a substantial increase in IP network development, led by robust growth in the enterprise market.
Financials Lagged
Small Cap Growth’s holdings in the financials sector underperformed their counterparts in the benchmark index for the six-month period. All of the underperformance in the financials sector resulted from stock selection in the consumer finance segment. The portfolio’s most significant individual detractor was World Acceptance, which provides small short-term loans. Although the company reported strong earnings during the period, concerns about the possibility of a new consumer protection agency to regulate non-bank lending weighed on the stock.
Other notable underperformers in the portfolio included IT services provider TNS and specialty apparel retailer Pacific Sunwear of California. TNS, which provides data services to credit card and ATM transaction processors, fell as earnings disappointed and the company faced increased competition, while Pacific Sunwear tumbled after reporting losses and declining same-store sales during the period.
A Look Ahead
Although we remain focused on companies that are well positioned to benefit from further economic improvement, we have grown more cautious as the economy laps the one-year anniversary of the massive fiscal and monetary stimulus implemented to boost economic activity. Sovereign debt issues in Europe have further added to the uncertainty about the sustainability of the global economic recovery. Nonetheless, we will continue to focus on our disciplined investment process, in which we seek small-cap companies exhibiting accelerating business fundamentals, positive relative strength, and reasonable valuations.
8
Small Cap Growth | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. | 2.4% |
Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. | 2.1% |
Wabash National Corp. | 1.7% |
G-III Apparel Group Ltd. | 1.5% |
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corp. | 1.5% |
priceline.com, Inc. | 1.5% |
Atheros Communications, Inc. | 1.5% |
Kirkland’s, Inc. | 1.4% |
Dollar Financial Corp. | 1.4% |
Solutia, Inc. | 1.4% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Health Care Providers & Services | 6.8% |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | 6.5% |
Specialty Retail | 5.7% |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | 5.1% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.4% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 97.3% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 3.5% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | (0.8)% |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,312.60 | $8.03 | 1.40% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,316.90 | $6.89 | 1.20% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,312.40 | $9.46 | 1.65% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,308.00 | $13.73 | 2.40% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,308.70 | $13.74 | 2.40% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,310.50 | $10.88 | 1.90% |
Hypothetical | ||||
Investor Class | $1,000 | $1,017.85 | $7.00 | 1.40% |
Institutional Class | $1,000 | $1,018.84 | $6.01 | 1.20% |
A Class | $1,000 | $1,016.61 | $8.25 | 1.65% |
B Class | $1,000 | $1,012.89 | $11.98 | 2.40% |
C Class | $1,000 | $1,012.89 | $11.98 | 2.40% |
R Class | $1,000 | $1,015.37 | $9.49 | 1.90% |
* Expenses are equal to the class’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
Small Cap Growth | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 97.3% | First Midwest Bancorp., Inc. | 67,729 | $ 1,029,481 | |||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 3.0% | Independent Bank Corp. | 58,513 | 1,517,827 | |||
AerCap Holdings NV(1) | 412,470 | $ 5,692,086 | Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. | 48,761 | 850,879 | |
United Bankshares, Inc. | 44,477 | 1,291,612 | ||||
Ladish Co., Inc.(1) | 85,836 | 2,359,632 | ||||
Westamerica Bancorp. | 34,209 | 2,010,463 | ||||
Triumph Group, Inc. | 55,857 | 4,332,269 | 16,102,183 | |||
12,383,987 | COMMERCIAL SERVICES & SUPPLIES — 0.6% | |||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 1.6% | ||||||
Consolidated Graphics, Inc.(1) | 7,063 | 296,010 | ||||
Atlas Air Worldwide | ||||||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 72,654 | 4,015,587 | Waste Connections, Inc.(1) | 60,424 | 2,162,575 | |
Hub Group, Inc., Class A(1) | 89,716 | 2,871,809 | 2,458,585 | |||
6,887,396 | COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 1.9% | |||||
AIRLINES — 0.8% | Acme Packet, Inc.(1) | 71,541 | 1,870,082 | |||
UAL Corp.(1) | 161,629 | 3,487,954 | Blue Coat Systems, Inc.(1) | 67,181 | 2,185,398 | |
BEVERAGES — 1.1% | Netgear, Inc.(1) | 124,467 | 3,368,077 | |||
Boston Beer Co., Inc., Class A(1) | 30,120 | 1,717,141 | RADWARE Ltd.(1) | 34,228 | 677,372 | |
Cott Corp.(1) | 321,715 | 2,692,755 | 8,100,929 | |||
4,409,896 | COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 0.5% | |||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 2.5% | Xyratex Ltd.(1) | 112,427 | 1,978,715 | |||
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.(1) | 43,054 | 1,668,343 | CONSUMER FINANCE — 3.2% | |||
Alkermes, Inc.(1) | 29,124 | 381,524 | Cash America International, Inc. | 108,446 | 4,019,009 | |
Cepheid, Inc.(1) | 14,747 | 294,793 | Dollar Financial Corp.(1) | 245,660 | 5,750,901 | |
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 110,370 | 2,474,495 | World Acceptance Corp.(1) | 99,266 | 3,502,104 | |
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.(1) | 88,795 | 2,458,734 | 13,272,014 | |||
Incyte Corp. Ltd.(1) | 25,203 | 338,224 | CONTAINERS & PACKAGING — 1.5% | |||
Boise, Inc.(1) | 293,391 | 2,021,464 | ||||
InterMune, Inc.(1) | 10,217 | 434,836 | ||||
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 32,483 | 937,784 | Silgan Holdings, Inc. | 69,024 | 4,164,218 | |
PDL BioPharma, Inc. | 162,525 | 945,895 | 6,185,682 | |||
Regeneron | DIVERSIFIED CONSUMER SERVICES — 0.4% | |||||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 16,029 | 409,220 | Sotheby’s | 49,601 | 1,656,673 | |
Theravance, Inc.(1) | 17,651 | 296,007 | ELECTRIC UTILITIES — 0.6% | |||
10,639,855 | Cleco Corp. | 45,077 | 1,235,110 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.4% | IDACORP, Inc. | 37,134 | 1,339,794 | |||
BGC Partners, Inc., Class A | 260,749 | 1,700,084 | 2,574,904 | |||
Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 100,000 | 2,707,000 | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 0.8% | |||
HFF, Inc., Class A(1) | 153,904 | 1,357,433 | Harbin Electric, Inc.(1) | 74,408 | 1,630,279 | |
5,764,517 | Trina Solar Ltd. ADR(1) | 63,641 | 1,646,393 | |||
CHEMICALS — 2.7% | 3,276,672 | |||||
OM Group, Inc.(1) | 126,334 | 4,769,109 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS & | |||
COMPONENTS — 1.9% | ||||||
Sensient Technologies Corp. | 29,287 | 923,419 | ||||
Littelfuse, Inc.(1) | 80,443 | 3,397,108 | ||||
Solutia, Inc.(1) | 324,692 | 5,714,579 | ||||
OSI Systems, Inc.(1) | 52,510 | 1,367,361 | ||||
11,407,107 | ||||||
Plexus Corp.(1) | 39,921 | 1,479,073 | ||||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 3.9% | ||||||
Sanmina-SCI Corp.(1) | 18,598 | 331,602 | ||||
Cathay General Bancorp. | 180,249 | 2,229,680 | ||||
Columbia Banking System, Inc. | 148,697 | 3,342,709 | SMART Modular Technologies | |||
(WWH), Inc.(1) | 225,115 | 1,580,307 | ||||
East West Bancorp., Inc. | 195,484 | 3,829,532 | 8,155,451 |
12
Small Cap Growth | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 0.2% | HealthSouth Corp.(1) | 91,913 | $ 1,880,540 | |||
Dril-Quip, Inc.(1) | 15,978 | $ 925,605 | HMS Holdings Corp.(1) | 46,631 | 2,494,759 | |
FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 0.3% | Owens & Minor, Inc. | 111,375 | 3,502,744 | |||
Casey’s General Stores, Inc. | 34,223 | 1,322,034 | PharMerica Corp.(1) | 53,190 | 1,026,567 | |
FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.4% | PSS World Medical, Inc.(1) | 107,584 | 2,520,693 | |||
American Italian Pasta Co., | Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.(1) | 30,042 | 966,451 | |||
Class A(1) | 8,584 | 336,750 | ||||
28,389,622 | ||||||
Flowers Foods, Inc. | 100,154 | 2,640,060 | HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 1.2% | |||
J&J Snack Foods Corp. | 44,517 | 2,074,047 | ||||
athenahealth, Inc.(1) | 14,560 | 422,531 | ||||
Lancaster Colony Corp. | 14,774 | 812,127 | ||||
Eclipsys Corp.(1) | 55,121 | 1,139,902 | ||||
5,862,984 | ||||||
MedAssets, Inc.(1) | 49,631 | 1,133,076 | ||||
GAS UTILITIES — 2.3% | ||||||
AGL Resources, Inc. | 37,297 | 1,473,604 | Quality Systems, Inc. | 37,776 | 2,418,042 | |
Atmos Energy Corp. | 36,800 | 1,088,544 | 5,113,551 | |||
Laclede Group, Inc. (The) | 73,031 | 2,488,896 | HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 3.1% | |||
La-Z-Boy, Inc.(1) | 109,981 | 1,434,152 | ||||
Northwest Natural Gas Co. | 22,053 | 1,045,092 | ||||
Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc. | 23,188 | 637,670 | Lennar Corp., Class A | 139,542 | 2,776,886 | |
South Jersey Industries, Inc. | 25,968 | 1,171,417 | Tempur-Pedic | |||
International, Inc.(1) | 262,758 | 8,854,945 | ||||
Spectra Energy Partners LP | 39,330 | 1,240,075 | 13,065,983 | |||
WGL Holdings, Inc. | 14,131 | 505,042 | INSURANCE — 2.7% | |||
9,650,340 | Allied World Assurance Co. | |||||
HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 5.1% | Holdings Ltd. | 14,304 | 623,225 | |||
Abaxis, Inc.(1) | 16,402 | 424,976 | Amtrust Financial Services, Inc. | 181,474 | 2,473,491 | |
Align Technology, Inc.(1) | 59,647 | 1,012,806 | Erie Indemnity Co., Class A | 29,096 | 1,347,436 | |
American Medical Systems | Harleysville Group, Inc. | 19,780 | 633,356 | |||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 81,990 | 1,469,261 | ||||
Infinity Property | ||||||
Haemonetics Corp.(1) | 46,362 | 2,682,505 | & Casualty Corp. | 9,878 | 455,672 | |
Immucor, Inc.(1) | 60,882 | 1,303,484 | Platinum Underwriters | |||
Integra LifeSciences Holdings | Holdings Ltd. | 27,366 | 1,018,289 | |||
Corp.(1) | 33,207 | 1,508,594 | ProAssurance Corp.(1) | 19,792 | 1,206,322 | |
Masimo Corp. | 44,717 | 1,046,825 | RLI Corp. | 23,585 | 1,367,930 | |
Meridian Bioscience, Inc. | 60,975 | 1,218,890 | Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | 63,353 | 2,362,433 | |
NuVasive, Inc.(1) | 9,083 | 377,853 | 11,488,154 | |||
STERIS Corp. | 82,969 | 2,761,208 | INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 3.1% | |||
Thoratec Corp.(1) | 83,854 | 3,739,050 | HSN, Inc.(1) | 137,754 | 4,150,528 | |
Volcano Corp.(1) | 31,461 | 755,693 | PetMed Express, Inc. | 110,781 | 2,452,691 | |
West Pharmaceutical | priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 23,852 | 6,250,417 | |||
Services, Inc. | 70,851 | 2,965,114 | 12,853,636 | |||
21,266,259 | INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 0.7% | |||||
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 6.8% | DivX, Inc.(1) | 214,463 | 1,792,910 | |||
Amedisys, Inc.(1) | 18,492 | 1,064,769 | Liquidity Services, Inc.(1) | 92,202 | 1,048,337 | |
AMERIGROUP Corp.(1) | 61,875 | 2,242,350 | 2,841,247 | |||
Bio-Reference Labs, Inc.(1) | 33,670 | 787,878 | IT SERVICES — 3.2% | |||
Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc.(1) | 73,429 | 3,106,781 | Acxiom Corp.(1) | 50,213 | 958,064 | |
Chemed Corp. | 55,079 | 3,029,896 | CACI International, Inc., | |||
Emergency Medical | Class A(1) | 91,853 | 4,356,588 | |||
Services Corp., Class A(1) | 70,124 | 3,708,157 | Cass Information Systems, Inc. | 13,207 | 419,983 | |
Genoptix, Inc.(1) | 53,193 | 2,058,037 | Forrester Research, Inc.(1) | 52,364 | 1,681,408 |
13
Small Cap Growth | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Lionbridge Technologies, Inc.(1) | 146,751 | $ 793,923 | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITs) — 0.9% | |||
ManTech International Corp., | Agree Realty Corp. | 30,433 | $ 779,998 | |||
Class A(1) | 64,033 | 2,883,406 | American Capital Agency Corp. | 26,823 | 737,901 | |
MAXIMUS, Inc. | 21,831 | 1,351,557 | Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.(1) | 123,781 | 1,151,163 | |
SPS Commerce, Inc.(1) | 55,501 | 749,263 | Hatteras Financial Corp. | 16,867 | 449,843 | |
13,194,192 | Universal Health | |||||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 1.0% | Realty Income Trust | 18,098 | 601,215 | |||
Dionex Corp.(1) | 35,299 | 2,879,339 | 3,720,120 | |||
PAREXEL International Corp.(1) | 52,308 | 1,233,423 | ROAD & RAIL — 2.4% | |||
4,112,762 | Dollar Thrifty Automotive | |||||
Group, Inc.(1) | 226,856 | 9,979,395 | ||||
MACHINERY — 3.8% | ||||||
Chart Industries, Inc.(1) | 52,479 | 1,206,492 | SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | |||
EQUIPMENT — 4.4% | ||||||
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.(1) | 71,993 | 675,294 | Advanced Energy | |||
EnPro Industries, Inc.(1) | 153,301 | 4,841,246 | Industries, Inc.(1) | 38,151 | 561,583 | |
Middleby Corp.(1) | 35,438 | 2,165,970 | Atheros Communications, Inc.(1) | 158,824 | 6,168,724 | |
Wabash National Corp.(1) | 709,998 | 6,901,181 | Cirrus Logic, Inc.(1) | 290,689 | 3,694,657 | |
15,790,183 | Cymer, Inc.(1) | 14,519 | 495,824 | |||
MEDIA — 1.0% | Entegris, Inc.(1) | 75,011 | 464,318 | |||
LodgeNet Interactive Corp.(1) | 634,317 | 4,186,492 | Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.(1) | 134,038 | 1,344,401 | |
METALS & MINING — 0.5% | MKS Instruments, Inc.(1) | 45,582 | 1,033,800 | |||
Mesabi Trust | 102,432 | 2,028,154 | PLX Technology, Inc.(1) | 61,716 | 324,009 | |
MULTILINE RETAIL — 0.1% | Power Integrations, Inc. | 18,418 | 708,725 | |||
Tuesday Morning Corp.(1) | 93,827 | 530,123 | Skyworks Solutions, Inc.(1) | 206,011 | 3,469,225 | |
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 3.7% | 18,265,266 | |||||
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust | 15,857 | 1,563,500 | SOFTWARE — 4.0% | |||
Crosstex Energy LP(1) | 374,575 | 4,367,545 | ACI Worldwide, Inc.(1) | 65,057 | 1,222,421 | |
DCP Midstream Partners LP | 94,669 | 3,166,678 | Epicor Software Corp.(1) | 155,143 | 1,424,213 | |
Forest Oil Corp.(1) | 18,788 | 550,488 | JDA Software Group, Inc.(1) | 173,827 | 5,023,600 | |
Permian Basin Royalty Trust | 143,263 | 2,806,522 | Progress Software Corp.(1) | 142,108 | 4,582,983 | |
Sunoco Logistics Partners LP | 13,773 | 942,211 | Radiant Systems, Inc.(1) | 88,377 | 1,243,464 | |
Swift Energy Co.(1) | 16,611 | 600,986 | ||||
Solera Holdings, Inc. | 46,310 | 1,800,070 | ||||
Teekay Tankers Ltd., Class A | 98,363 | 1,253,145 | SS&C Technologies | |||
15,251,075 | Holdings, Inc.(1) | 14,730 | 247,169 | |||
PAPER & FOREST PRODUCTS — 2.1% | Taleo Corp., Class A(1) | 42,308 | 1,099,162 | |||
Buckeye Technologies, Inc.(1) | 172,029 | 2,429,050 | 16,643,082 | |||
KapStone Paper and | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 5.7% | |||||
Packaging Corp.(1) | 500,149 | 6,451,922 | ||||
Children’s Place Retail Stores, | ||||||
8,880,972 | Inc. (The)(1) | 101,782 | 4,663,651 | |||
PHARMACEUTICALS — 1.0% | Finish Line, Inc. (The), Class A | 153,369 | 2,470,774 | |||
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 36,044 | 1,283,166 | Kirkland’s, Inc.(1) | 263,688 | 5,872,332 | |
Nektar Therapeutics(1) | 74,414 | 1,038,820 | Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. | 104,251 | 3,738,441 | |
Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd.(1) | 42,000 | 1,688,400 | Systemax, Inc. | 124,712 | 2,897,060 | |
4,010,386 | Talbots, Inc.(1) | 250,473 | 4,120,281 | |||
23,762,539 |
14
Small Cap Growth | ||
Shares | Value | |
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 6.5% | ||
Deckers Outdoor Corp.(1) | 28,960 | $ 4,071,197 |
G-III Apparel Group Ltd.(1) | 225,641 | 6,453,332 |
Iconix Brand Group, Inc.(1) | 263,165 | 4,542,228 |
Maidenform Brands, Inc.(1) | 132,778 | 3,029,994 |
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 19,944 | 1,256,671 |
Steven Madden Ltd.(1) | 94,708 | 5,489,276 |
True Religion Apparel, Inc.(1) | 67,263 | 2,101,969 |
26,944,667 | ||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 1.1% | ||
Aircastle Ltd. | 369,562 | 4,438,440 |
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE — 0.6% | ||
Aegean Marine Petroleum | ||
Network, Inc. | 89,157 | 2,339,480 |
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||
(Cost $315,800,367) | 405,599,263 | |
Temporary Cash Investments — 3.5% | ||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||
Agency Shares | 43,500 | 43,500 |
Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | ||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||
U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, 2/15/38, | ||
value at 15,110,724), in a joint trading | ||
account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, due 5/3/10 | ||
(Delivery value $14,700,184) | 14,700,000 | |
TOTAL TEMPORARY | ||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||
(Cost $14,743,500) | 14,743,500 | |
TOTAL INVESTMENT | ||
SECURITIES — 100.8% | ||
(Cost $330,543,867) | 420,342,763 | |
OTHER ASSETS | ||
AND LIABILITIES — (0.8)% | (3,239,490) | |
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $417,103,273 | |
Notes to Schedule of Investments | ||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | ||
(1) Non-income producing. | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |||
Assets | |||
Investment securities, at value (cost of $330,543,867) | $420,342,763 | ||
Receivable for investments sold | 12,201,337 | ||
Receivable for capital shares sold | 280,554 | ||
Dividends and interest receivable | 94,478 | ||
432,919,132 | |||
Liabilities | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 14,908,440 | ||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 403,052 | ||
Accrued management fees | 460,896 | ||
Service fees (and distribution fees — A Class and R Class) payable | 32,309 | ||
Distribution fees payable | 11,162 | ||
15,815,859 | |||
Net Assets | $417,103,273 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $ 671,479,825 | ||
Accumulated net investment loss | (1,915,945) | ||
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | (342,259,503) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 89,798,896 | ||
$ 417,103,273 | |||
Net assets | Shares outstanding | Net asset value per share | |
Investor Class, $0.01 Par Value | $146,306,446 | 20,366,346 | $7.18 |
Institutional Class, $0.01 Par Value | $114,670,636 | 15,866,964 | $7.23 |
A Class, $0.01 Par Value | $137,109,722 | 19,308,411 | $7.10* |
B Class, $0.01 Par Value | $3,350,522 | 487,009 | $6.88 |
C Class, $0.01 Par Value | $14,815,816 | 2,145,036 | $6.91 |
R Class, $0.01 Par Value | $850,131 | 119,917 | $7.09 |
*Maximum offering price $7.53 (net asset value divided by 0.9425) | |||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends | $ 1,793,212 |
Interest | 3,479 |
1,796,691 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 2,862,699 |
Distribution fees: | |
B Class | 12,173 |
C Class | 49,428 |
Service fees: | |
B Class | 4,058 |
C Class | 16,476 |
Distribution and service fees: | |
A Class | 158,247 |
R Class | 1,769 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 8,006 |
3,112,856 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (1,316,165) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions (including $531,419 from affiliates) | 77,657,449 |
Futures contract transactions | 827,160 |
78,484,609 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 39,859,992 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 118,344,601 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $117,028,436 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (1,316,165) | $ (1,860,087) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 78,484,609 | (103,796,885) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 39,859,992 | 87,749,913 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 117,028,436 | (17,907,059) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | (107,581,748) | (34,342,691) |
Redemption Fees | ||
Increase in net assets from redemption fees | 115,078 | 255,189 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 9,561,766 | (51,994,561) |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 407,541,507 | 459,536,068 |
End of period | $417,103,273 | $ 407,541,507 |
Accumulated net investment loss | $(1,915,945) | $(599,780) |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
18
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. Small Cap Growth Fund (formerly New Opportunities II Fund) (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in small cap companies that management believes will increase in value over time. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Multiple Class — The fund is authorized to issue the Investor Class, the Institutional Class, the A Class, the B Class, the C Class and the R Class. The A Class may incur an initial sales charge. The A Class, B Class and C Class may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge. The share classes differ principally in their respective sales charges and distribution and shareholder servicing expenses and arrangements. All shares of the fund represent an equal pro rata interest in the net assets of the class to which such shares belong, and have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and the same terms and conditions, except for class specific expenses and exclusive rights to vote on matters affecting only individual classes. Income, non-class specific expenses, and realized and unrealized capital gains and losses of the fund are allocated to each class of shares based on their relative net assets.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
19
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Exchange Traded Funds — The fund may invest in exchange traded funds (ETFs). ETFs are a type of index fund bought and sold on a securities exchange. An ETF trades like common stock and represents a fixed portfolio of securities designed to track the performance and dividend yield of a particular domestic or foreign market index. A fund may purchase an ETF to temporarily gain exposure to a portion of the U.S. or a foreign market while awaiting purchase of underlying securities. The risks of owning an ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities they are designed to track, although the lack of liquidity on an ETF could result in it being more volatile. Additionally, ETFs have fees and expenses that reduce their value.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The fund is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Redemption — The fund may impose a 2.00% redemption fee on shares held less than 180 days. The fee may not be applicable to all classes. The redemption fee is retained by the fund and helps cover transaction costs that long-term investors may bear when a fund sells securities to meet investor redemptions.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
20
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee) per class. The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the specific class of shares of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if a ny, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 1.10% to 1.50% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class. The Institutional Class is 0.20% less at each point within the range. The effective annual management fee for each class for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 1.40% for the Investor Class, A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class and 1.20% for the Institutional Class.
Distribution and Service Fees — The Board of Directors has adopted a separate Master Distribution and Individual Shareholder Services Plan for each of the A Class, B Class, C Class and R Class (collectively the plans), pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. The plans provide that the A Class will pay American Century Investment Services, Inc. (ACIS) an annual distribution and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the B Class and the C Class will each pay ACIS an annual distribution fee of 0.75% and service fee of 0.25%. The plans provide that the R Class will pay ACIS an annual distribution and service fee of 0.50%. The fees are computed and accrued daily based on each class’s daily net assets and paid monthly in arrears. The fees are used to pay financial intermediaries for distribution and individual shareh older services. Fees incurred under the plans during the six months ended April 30, 2010, are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, ACIS, and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $398,345,939 and $517,738,951, respectively.
21
4. Capital Share Transactions | ||||
Transactions in shares of the fund were as follows: | ||||
Six months ended April 30, 2010 | Year ended October 31, 2009 | |||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |
Investor Class/Shares Authorized | 165,000,000 | 165,000,000 | ||
Sold | 4,621,691 | $ 29,500,482 | 16,295,442 | $ 85,307,455 |
Redeemed | (15,378,741) | (100,288,401) | (25,021,496) | (122,029,987) |
(10,757,050) | (70,787,919) | (8,726,054) | (36,722,532) | |
Institutional Class/Shares Authorized | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,238,549 | 7,875,939 | 11,827,728 | 58,268,863 |
Redeemed | (5,075,400) | (33,002,186) | (8,547,304) | (43,412,649) |
(3,836,851) | (25,126,247) | 3,280,424 | 14,856,214 | |
A Class/Shares Authorized | 110,000,000 | 110,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,397,819 | 9,026,653 | 5,152,254 | 25,297,336 |
Redeemed | (3,163,906) | (20,072,939) | (7,556,245) | (37,383,702) |
(1,766,087) | (11,046,286) | (2,403,991) | (12,086,366) | |
B Class/Shares Authorized | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||
Sold | 1,718 | 9,986 | 161,020 | 741,803 |
Redeemed | (80,233) | (504,360) | (121,098) | (582,619) |
(78,515) | (494,374) | 39,922 | 159,184 | |
C Class/Shares Authorized | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||
Sold | 293,300 | 1,858,553 | 607,886 | 2,915,777 |
Redeemed | (345,747) | (2,108,142) | (797,746) | (3,877,579) |
(52,447) | (249,589) | (189,860) | (961,802) | |
R Class/Shares Authorized | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||
Sold | 39,036 | 252,012 | 97,427 | 497,692 |
Redeemed | (19,857) | (129,345) | (16,219) | (85,081) |
19,179 | 122,667 | 81,208 | 412,611 | |
Net increase (decrease) | (16,471,771) | $(107,581,748) | (7,918,351) | $ (34,342,691) |
5. Affiliated Company Transactions
If a fund’s holding represents ownership of 5% or more of the voting securities of a company, the company is affiliated as defined in the 1940 Act. A summary of transactions for each company which is or was an affiliate at or during the six months ended April 30, 2010, follows:
October 31, 2009 | April 30, 2010 | |||||||
Share | Purchase | Sales | Realized | Dividend | Share | Market | ||
Company | Balance | Cost | Cost | Gain (Loss) | Income | Balance | Value | |
LodgeNet | ||||||||
Interactive | ||||||||
Corp.(1)(2) | 955,978 | $806,262 | $2,388,616 | $531,419 | — | 634,317 | (2) | |
(1) | Non-income producing. | |||||||
(2) | Company was not an affiliate at April 30, 2010. |
22
6. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $405,599,263 | — | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 43,500 | $14,700,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $405,642,763 | $14,700,000 | — |
7. Derivative Instruments
Equity Price Risk — The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. A fund may enter into futures contracts based on an equity index in order to manage its exposure to changes in market conditions. A fund may purchase futures contracts to gain exposure to increases in market value or sell futures contracts to protect against a decline in market value. Upon entering into a futures contract, a fund is required to deposit either cash or securities in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (initial margin). Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received daily, in cash, by a fund. The variation margin is equal to the daily change in the contract value and is recorded as unrealized gains and losses. A fund recognizes a realized gain or loss whe n the contract is closed or expires. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of futures contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, respectively. One of the risks of entering into futures contracts is the possibility that the change in value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in value of the underlying securities. During the period, the fund infrequently purchased equity price risk derivative instruments for temporary investment purposes.
At period end, the fund did not have any equity price risk derivative instruments disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of equity price risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $827,160 in net realized gain (loss) on futures contract transactions.
23
8. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.
The fund concentrates its investments in common stocks of small companies. Because of this, it may be subject to greater risk and market fluctuations than a fund investing in larger, more established companies.
The fund’s investment process may result in high portfolio turnover, high commission costs and high capital gains distributions. In addition, its investment approach may involve higher volatility and risk.
9. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
10. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $332,675,624 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $90,474,558 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (2,807,419) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $87,667,139 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(416,415,429), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. The capital loss carryovers expire as follows:
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
$(13,145,846) | $(19,655,453) | $(42,248,002) | $(103,823,579) | – | $(125,173,360) | $(112,369,189) |
24
11. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement necessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
25
Financial Highlights |
Small Cap Growth | |||||||
Investor Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.47 | $5.57 | $9.42 | $7.63 | $6.75 | $6.29 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.04) | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.06) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.73 | (0.08) | (3.73) | 2.52 | 1.16 | 0.69 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.71 | (0.10) | (3.77) | 2.47 | 1.10 | 0.63 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.08) | (0.68) | (0.22) | (0.17) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $7.18 | $5.47 | $5.57 | $9.42 | $7.63 | $6.75 | |
Total Return(3) | 31.26% | (1.80)% | (40.34)% | 35.22% | 16.52% | 10.14% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.40%(4) | 1.41% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (0.56)%(4) | (0.40)% | (0.49)% | (0.70)% | (0.80)% | (0.93)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204% | 299% | 269% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $146,306 | $170,125 | $222,017 | $303,189 | $51,336 | $43,157 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||||
between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26
Small Cap Growth | |||||
Institutional Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $5.49 | $5.59 | $9.43 | $8.27 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.02) | (0.03) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.75 | (0.09) | (3.74) | 1.19 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.74 | (0.10) | (3.76) | 1.16 | |
Distributions | |||||
Return of capital | — | — | (0.08) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $7.23 | $5.49 | $5.59 | $9.43 | |
Total Return(4) | 31.69% | (1.79)% | (40.19)% | 14.03% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.20%(5) | 1.21% | 1.16% | 1.21%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (0.36)%(5) | (0.20)% | (0.29)% | (0.65)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $114,671 | $108,261 | $91,791 | $18,384 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | May 18, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||
between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
27
Small Cap Growth | |||||||
A Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.41 | $5.53 | $9.37 | $7.59 | $6.72 | $6.26 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.02) | (0.03) | (0.06) | (0.07) | (0.08) | (0.08) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.71 | (0.09) | (3.70) | 2.51 | 1.16 | 0.70 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.69 | (0.12) | (3.76) | 2.44 | 1.08 | 0.62 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.08) | (0.66) | (0.21) | (0.16) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $7.10 | $5.41 | $5.53 | $9.37 | $7.59 | $6.72 | |
Total Return(3) | 31.24% | (2.17)% | (40.45)% | 34.91% | 16.22% | 9.91% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 1.65%(4) | 1.66% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.75% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (0.81)%(4) | (0.65)% | (0.74)% | (0.95)% | (1.05)% | (1.18)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204% | 299% | 269% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $137,110 | $114,026 | $129,791 | $202,515 | $73,383 | $47,937 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
28
Small Cap Growth | |||||||
B Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.26 | $5.41 | $9.25 | $7.49 | $6.63 | $6.18 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.05) | (0.07) | (0.11) | (0.13) | (0.14) | (0.13) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.67 | (0.08) | (3.65) | 2.49 | 1.15 | 0.69 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.62 | (0.15) | (3.76) | 2.36 | 1.01 | 0.56 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.08) | (0.60) | (0.15) | (0.11) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $6.88 | $5.26 | $5.41 | $9.25 | $7.49 | $6.63 | |
Total Return(3) | 30.80% | (2.77)% | (40.97)% | 33.84% | 15.46% | 9.03% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 2.40%(4) | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 2.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (1.56)%(4) | (1.40)% | (1.49)% | (1.70)% | (1.80)% | (1.93)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204% | 299% | 269% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $3,351 | $2,976 | $2,846 | $4,549 | $3,383 | $2,367 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges. | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
29
Small Cap Growth | |||||||
C Class | |||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||||
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
Beginning of Period | $5.28 | $5.44 | $9.29 | $7.52 | $6.66 | $6.20 | |
Income From | |||||||
Investment Operations | |||||||
Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss)(2) | (0.05) | (0.07) | (0.11) | (0.13) | (0.14) | (0.13) | |
Net Realized and | |||||||
Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.68 | (0.09) | (3.66) | 2.50 | 1.15 | 0.70 | |
Total From | |||||||
Investment Operations | 1.63 | (0.16) | (3.77) | 2.37 | 1.01 | 0.57 | |
Distributions | |||||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.08) | (0.60) | (0.15) | (0.11) | |
Net Asset Value, | |||||||
End of Period | $6.91 | $5.28 | $5.44 | $9.29 | $7.52 | $6.66 | |
Total Return(3) | 30.87% | (2.94)% | (40.91)% | 34.02% | 15.24% | 9.16% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||||
Ratio of Operating | |||||||
Expenses to Average | |||||||
Net Assets | 2.40%(4) | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 2.50% | |
Ratio of Net Investment | |||||||
Income (Loss) | |||||||
to Average Net Assets | (1.56)%(4) | (1.40)% | (1.49)% | (1.70)% | (1.80)% | (1.93)% | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204% | 299% | 269% | |
Net Assets, End of Period | |||||||
(in thousands) | $14,816 | $11,608 | $12,983 | $16,406 | $4,424 | $3,414 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||||
(2) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||||
(3) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any, and does not reflect applicable sales charges | ||||||
Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | |||||||
The total return of the classes may not precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values | |||||||
to two decimal places. If net asset values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the | |||||||
class expense differences. The calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not | |||||||
result in any gain or loss of value between one class and another. | |||||||
(4) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
30
Small Cap Growth | |||||
R Class | |||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | |||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | |||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $5.41 | $5.54 | $9.42 | $9.02 | |
Income From Investment Operations | |||||
Net Investment Income (Loss)(3) | (0.03) | (0.06) | (0.06) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.71 | (0.07) | (3.74) | 0.41 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.68 | (0.13) | (3.80) | 0.40 | |
Distributions | |||||
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.08) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $7.09 | $5.41 | $5.54 | $9.42 | |
Total Return(4) | 31.05% | (2.35)% | (40.66)% | 4.43% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | |||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses to Average Net Assets | 1.90%(5) | 1.91% | 1.86% | 1.91%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) to Average Net Assets | (1.06)%(5) | (0.90)% | (0.99)% | (1.61)%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 96% | 204% | 148% | 204%(6) | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $850 | $545 | $108 | $26 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | ||||
(2) | September 28, 2007 (commencement of sale) through October 31, 2007. | ||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | ||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | ||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. The total return of the classes may not | |||||
precisely reflect the class expense differences because of the impact of calculating the net asset values to two decimal places. If net asset | |||||
values were calculated to three decimal places, the total return differences would more closely reflect the class expense differences. The | |||||
calculation of net asset values to two decimal places is made in accordance with SEC guidelines and does not result in any gain or loss of value | |||||
between one class and another. | |||||
(5) | Annualized. | ||||
(6) | Portfolio turnover is calculated at the fund level. Percentage indicated was calculated for the year ended October 31, 2007. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
31
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
32
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
33
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
34
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the
35
Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The
36
Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
37
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
38
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
39
Notes |
40
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68447
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
NT Growth Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
NT Growth | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 6 |
Top Ten Holdings | 8 |
Top Five Industries | 8 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 8 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 9 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 11 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 14 |
Statement of Operations | 15 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 16 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 17 |
Financial Highlights | 22 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 23 |
Additional Information | 29 |
Index Definitions | 30 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as a part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By Greg Woodhams, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Large Cap
Stocks Continued to Advance
U.S. stocks maintained their upward trajectory during the six months ended April 30, 2010. The main factors behind the market’s continued rally, which began in March 2009, included a strengthening economy and corporate earnings that exceeded expectations.
After a severe recession between mid-2008 and mid-2009, the U.S. economy delivered positive growth in the last two quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010. Improving economic indicators included an increase in manufacturing activity, rising consumer spending, and evidence that the worst of the housing market decline had passed. Although the unemployment rate remained near the 26-year high it set in October 2009, job growth turned positive during the last few months of the period.
In addition to improving economic data, stocks got a lift from better-than-anticipated corporate profits. Revenues for many companies began to improve, resulting in flat to modestly positive growth rates on a year-over-year basis, while corporate profits improved significantly as businesses effectively managed their cost structures. Furthermore, demand for big-ticket items such as appliances, automobiles, and computers increased sharply after many consumers and businesses postponed purchases of these products when the economy was in recession.
Toward the end of the period, the stock market rally eased as concerns about sovereign debt problems in Greece and elsewhere in Europe emerged. Overall, however, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% for the six months.
Small Cap and Value Outperformed
Small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance, returning more than 25% for the six-month period. Smaller stocks produced the strongest rebound after lagging during the market’s 2008 downturn. In addition, smaller companies enjoyed greater profitability thanks to significant operating leverage, which enabled them to benefit the most from improved cost management.
In the large-cap segment of the market, value shares modestly outpaced their growth-oriented counterparts for the period. The financials sector, which is by far the heaviest sector weighting in most value indices, was among the top-performing sectors in the stock market during the six-month period.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
NT Growth | ||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||
Average | ||||||
Annual | ||||||
Returns | ||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | Inception | Date | ||
Institutional Class | ACLTX | 16.25% | 37.27% | 3.66% | 5/12/06 | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index(2) | — | 15.79% | 38.16% | 1.88% | — | |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. — A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
*From 5/12/06, the Institutional Class’s inception date. Not annualized. | |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |
Institutional Class | 0.80% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com.
Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
Portfolio Commentary |
NT Growth
Portfolio Managers: Greg Woodhams and Prescott LeGard
Performance Summary
NT Growth gained 16.25%* in the six months ended April 30, 2010. By comparison, the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the fund’s benchmark) returned 15.79%. The portfolio also continued to outperform its benchmark in the period since its May 12, 2006 inception (see the previous page).
In terms of NT Growth’s absolute returns for the six months, information technology shares contributed most to performance; no sector had negative returns for the period. Relative to the benchmark, stock selection made the consumer discretionary and materials sectors the largest contributors. The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples and health care segments.
Leading Contributors
The key contributor to relative results came from stock choices in the consumer discretionary sector, led by holdings in the specialty retail; hotels, restaurant, and leisure; household durables; and auto components industry segments. A number of the leading contributors were retailers who did well after reporting better same-store sales and other business metrics. Good examples were The Home Depot, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Chipotle Mexican Grill. The largest contributor in the sector was Starwood Hotels & Resorts, which benefited from rising room rates and favorable supply/ demand factors as few new competing hotels and rooms are set to come online. Another top contributor was auto parts manufacturer BorgWarner, which benefited from the rebound in the auto industry and demand for new turbo-diesel and gasoline direct-injection engines.
Stock selection made the materials sector another key contributor to relative return. Positioning in the chemicals industry helped most, as our stake in Airgas benefited from a takeover bid, while Monsanto, a key index component to which we had no exposure, lagged. It was also beneficial to hold stakes in PPG Industries and Sigma-Aldrich.
Industrials and energy shares also helped performance compared with the benchmark. In industrials, positioning in the electrical equipment, air freight and logistics, and road and rail industries contributed most. The leading contributor in the industrials sector was a stake in Rockwell International, which saw a jump in orders for its factory automation products. In the energy sector, it helped relative results to be underrepresented in shares of integrated oil company Exxon Mobil.
Leading Detractors
The leading detractors from relative results came from stock choices in the consumer staples sector. Stocks in the consumer staples sector, including Coca-Cola, General Mills and Kellogg, lagged the general market as investors sought stocks with greater economic sensitivity. The leading
*Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
6
NT Growth
detractor in the space was drug retailer Walgreen, which underperformed after issuing a cautious outlook despite reporting positive results. A stake in agricultural products processor Archer Daniels Midland also hurt performance, as soy crush margins declined. We eliminated our position in Archer Daniels Midland during the period.
An overweight position and stock choices made the health care sector a detractor from relative performance, led by holdings in the health care equipment and biotechnology industries. Baxter International, which provides blood treatment products, was the leading detractor in this space after guiding future earnings expectations down. Stock selection among biotechnology shares also hurt relative results, led by a stake in Dendreon. Stock choices in the life sciences tools and services industry also hurt relative performance.
The leading individual detractor for the six months was a position in investment bank Goldman Sachs Group, which suffered from an unfavorable regulatory environment and a government investigation into its conduct in the buildup to the financial crisis.
Outlook and Positioning
We believe the portfolio can outperform the Russell 1000 Growth Index over time through stock selection in the large-cap growth universe, style adherence, risk management, and disciplined execution that contributes to greater consistency. And while we recognize that each investment environment presents its own unique challenges, our emphasis on stock selection as the principal generator of alpha and our focus on risk management remain constant.
As a result, the portfolio’s sector and industry selection as well as capitalization range allocations are primarily a result of identifying what we believe to be superior individual securities. As of April 30, 2010, we found opportunity in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors, two of the portfolio’s largest overweight positions relative to the benchmark. The most notable sector underweight was in consumer staples and information technology shares. On an absolute basis, information technology shares remain the portfolio’s single largest sector allocation by far, while the portfolio had no exposure to the tiny (less than 1% of the index) utilities sector.
7
NT Growth | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Microsoft Corp. | 4.7% |
Apple, Inc. | 4.3% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 2.9% |
Johnson & Johnson | 2.7% |
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 2.4% |
Abbott Laboratories | 2.1% |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.0% |
Oracle Corp. | 2.0% |
United Parcel Service, Inc., Class B | 2.0% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Computers & Peripherals | 10.4% |
Software | 7.6% |
Pharmaceuticals | 6.3% |
Beverages | 4.3% |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 4.3% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Common Stocks | 98.2% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.6% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.2% |
8
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
9
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | $1,000 | $1,162.50 | $4.29 | 0.80% |
Hypothetical | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
* Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
10
Schedule of Investments |
NT Growth | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 98.2% | EMC Corp.(1) | 187,300 | $ 3,560,573 | |||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 2.3% | Hewlett-Packard Co. | 158,000 | 8,211,260 | |||
Honeywell International, Inc. | 50,300 | $ 2,387,741 | Lexmark International, Inc., | |||
Class A(1) | 44,115 | 1,634,461 | ||||
Rockwell Collins, Inc. | 60,900 | 3,958,500 | QLogic Corp.(1) | 51,860 | 1,004,528 | |
6,346,241 | ||||||
29,081,886 | ||||||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 2.0% | ||||||
CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.1% | ||||||
United Parcel Service, Inc., | ||||||
Class B | 79,200 | 5,475,888 | American Express Co. | 67,400 | 3,108,488 | |
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.2% | DIVERSIFIED — 0.2% | |||||
BorgWarner, Inc.(1) | 77,600 | 3,363,184 | iShares Russell 1000 Growth | |||
Index Fund | 11,700 | 614,367 | ||||
AUTOMOBILES — 0.6% | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.8% | |||||
Ford Motor Co.(1) | 126,400 | 1,645,728 | ||||
Emerson Electric Co. | 28,172 | 1,471,423 | ||||
BEVERAGES — 4.3% | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 57,008 | 3,461,526 | |||
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 126,800 | 6,777,460 | 4,932,949 | |||
PepsiCo, Inc. | 80,900 | 5,276,298 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, | |||
12,053,758 | INSTRUMENTS & COMPONENTS — 1.6% | |||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 3.0% | Corning, Inc. | 125,299 | 2,412,006 | |||
Alexion | Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 127,800 | 1,957,896 | |||
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 15,100 | 828,688 | ||||
4,369,902 | ||||||
Amgen, Inc.(1) | 76,841 | 4,407,600 | ||||
ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.8% | ||||||
Dendreon Corp.(1) | 6,273 | 340,122 | ||||
Cameron International Corp.(1) | 23,900 | 943,094 | ||||
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | 57,400 | 2,277,058 | Schlumberger Ltd. | 56,400 | 4,028,088 | |
Talecris Biotherapeutics | 4,971,182 | |||||
Holdings Corp.(1) | 27,505 | 515,719 | ||||
FOOD & STAPLES RETAILING — 2.6% | ||||||
8,369,187 | Costco Wholesale Corp. | 19,204 | 1,134,572 | |||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.4% | Walgreen Co. | 69,200 | 2,432,380 | |||
Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 163,400 | 3,151,986 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 71,699 | 3,846,652 | |
Goldman Sachs | ||||||
Group, Inc. (The) | 5,200 | 755,040 | 7,413,604 | |||
3,907,026 | FOOD PRODUCTS — 2.5% | |||||
CHEMICALS — 2.5% | General Mills, Inc. | 46,100 | 3,281,398 | |||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 54,348 | 1,738,592 | Kellogg Co. | 44,158 | 2,426,040 | |
PPG Industries, Inc. | 46,400 | 3,265,168 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 24,154 | 1,246,588 | |
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | 33,600 | 1,992,480 | 6,954,026 | |||
6,996,240 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 3.2% | |||||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 1.3% | Baxter International, Inc. | 29,717 | 1,403,237 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 112,772 | 3,733,881 | Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 19,096 | 1,458,361 | |
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 3.5% | Covidien plc | 55,100 | 2,644,249 | |||
Edwards Lifesciences Corp.(1) | 24,700 | 2,546,076 | ||||
Arris Group, Inc.(1) | 45,000 | 553,050 | ||||
Gen-Probe, Inc.(1) | 19,000 | 900,410 | ||||
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | 211,700 | 5,698,964 | ||||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 31,100 | 2,128,173 | 8,952,333 | |||
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 39,700 | 1,537,978 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 2.6% | |||
9,918,165 | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 56,687 | 1,748,794 | |||
Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 46,800 | 4,686,084 | ||||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 10.4% | ||||||
Apple, Inc.(1) | 45,800 | 11,959,296 | McKesson Corp. | 12,400 | 803,644 | |
Dell, Inc.(1) | 167,600 | 2,711,768 | 7,238,522 |
11
NT Growth | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 1.7% | OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 2.5% | |||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 15,400 | $ 2,077,614 | Apache Corp. | 11,300 | $ 1,149,888 | |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | Exxon Mobil Corp. | 45,800 | 3,107,530 | |||
Worldwide, Inc. | 49,605 | 2,703,969 | Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 22,200 | 1,968,252 | |
4,781,583 | Southwestern Energy Co.(1) | 18,100 | 718,208 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 0.9% | 6,943,878 | |||||
Whirlpool Corp. | 22,300 | 2,427,801 | PERSONAL PRODUCTS — 0.3% | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 3.2% | Estee Lauder Cos., Inc. (The), | |||||
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 25,200 | 2,119,320 | Class A | 14,102 | 929,604 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | 107,900 | 6,707,064 | PHARMACEUTICALS — 6.3% | |||
8,826,384 | Abbott Laboratories | 114,618 | 5,863,857 | |||
INDUSTRIAL CONGLOMERATES — 1.8% | Allergan, Inc. | 37,499 | 2,388,311 | |||
3M Co. | 33,400 | 2,961,578 | Johnson & Johnson | 118,445 | 7,616,014 | |
Textron, Inc. | 92,000 | 2,101,280 | Novo Nordisk A/S B Shares | 17,700 | 1,445,690 | |
5,062,858 | Perrigo Co. | 4,600 | 280,738 | |||
INSURANCE — 1.3% | 17,594,610 | |||||
Aflac, Inc. | 70,000 | 3,567,200 | ROAD & RAIL — 1.0% | |||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 0.8% | Union Pacific Corp. | 37,300 | 2,822,118 | |||
Amazon.com, Inc.(1) | 16,500 | 2,261,490 | SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | |||
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 1.8% | EQUIPMENT — 4.3% | |||||
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | 9,700 | 5,096,768 | Altera Corp. | 75,000 | 1,902,000 | |
IT SERVICES — 2.5% | Broadcom Corp., Class A | 80,900 | 2,790,241 | |||
International Business | Cree, Inc.(1) | 15,600 | 1,142,076 | |||
Machines Corp. | 23,700 | 3,057,300 | Intel Corp. | 88,700 | 2,025,021 | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 5,800 | 1,438,632 | Linear Technology Corp. | 111,400 | 3,348,684 | |
Paychex, Inc. | 83,900 | 2,567,340 | MEMC Electronic | |||
7,063,272 | Materials, Inc.(1) | 56,100 | 727,617 | |||
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 0.5% | 11,935,639 | |||||
Thermo Fisher | SOFTWARE — 7.6% | |||||
Scientific, Inc.(1) | 26,900 | 1,487,032 | Intuit, Inc.(1) | 54,314 | 1,963,994 | |
MACHINERY — 2.7% | Microsoft Corp. | 432,900 | 13,220,766 | |||
Caterpillar, Inc. | 22,100 | 1,504,789 | Oracle Corp. | 212,300 | 5,485,832 | |
Eaton Corp. | 42,100 | 3,248,436 | salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 6,400 | 547,840 | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 57,300 | 2,928,030 | 21,218,432 | |||
7,681,255 | SPECIALTY RETAIL — 3.3% | |||||
MEDIA — 1.8% | Abercrombie & Fitch Co., | |||||
Scripps Networks Interactive, | Class A | 44,100 | 1,928,493 | |||
Inc., Class A | 45,200 | 2,049,368 | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 144,300 | 5,086,575 | |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | 83,300 | 3,068,772 | J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 18,600 | 864,342 | |
5,118,140 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 45,100 | 1,298,880 | |||
METALS & MINING — 0.8% | 9,178,290 | |||||
Newmont Mining Corp. | 42,500 | 2,383,400 | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 0.7% | |||
MULTILINE RETAIL — 2.5% | American Tower Corp., | |||||
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | 44,200 | 2,430,558 | Class A(1) | 51,200 | 2,089,472 | |
Target Corp. | 78,000 | 4,435,860 | TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||
6,866,418 | (Cost $218,307,404) | 274,782,201 |
12
NT Growth | |||||
Shares | Value | ||||
Temporary Cash Investments — 1.6% | |||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | |||||
Plus Money Market Fund | |||||
Agency Shares | 39,979 | $ 39,979 | |||
Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | |||||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | |||||
U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, 2/15/38, | |||||
valued at $4,420,144), in a joint trading | |||||
account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||||
5/3/10 (Delivery value $4,300,054) | 4,300,000 | ||||
TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||||
CASH INVESTMENTS | |||||
(Cost $4,339,979) | 4,339,979 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||||
SECURITIES — 99.8% | |||||
(Cost $222,647,383) | 279,122,180 | ||||
OTHER ASSETS | |||||
AND LIABILITIES — 0.2% | 572,581 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $279,694,761 | ||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | |||||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||
5,210,615 DKK for USD | 5/28/10 | $932,017 | $(868) | ||
(Value on Settlement Date $931,149) | |||||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | |||||
DKK = Danish Krone | |||||
USD = United States Dollar | |||||
(1) Non-income producing. | |||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
13
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Assets | |
Investment securities, at value (cost of $222,647,383) | $279,122,180 |
Foreign currency holdings, at value (cost of $33,273) | 32,070 |
Receivable for investments sold | 3,621,456 |
Receivable for capital shares sold | 687,693 |
Dividends and interest receivable | 232,022 |
283,695,421 | |
Liabilities | |
Payable for investments purchased | 3,818,800 |
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 868 |
Accrued management fees | 180,992 |
4,000,660 | |
Net Assets | $279,694,761 |
Institutional Class Capital Shares, $0.01 Par Value | |
Authorized | 150,000,000 |
Outstanding | 25,882,040 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | $10.81 |
Net Assets Consist of: | |
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $238,025,982 |
Undistributed net investment income | 404,283 |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (15,208,997) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 56,473,493 |
$279,694,761 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $171) | $ 1,685,434 |
Interest | 1,547 |
1,686,981 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 948,672 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 3,151 |
951,823 | |
Net investment income (loss) | 735,158 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 8,325,606 |
Foreign currency transactions | 102,352 |
8,427,958 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 26,271,891 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (7,815) |
26,264,076 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 34,692,034 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $35,427,192 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ 735,158 | $ 975,121 |
Net realized gain (loss) | 8,427,958 | (16,222,404) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 26,264,076 | 44,022,631 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 35,427,192 | 28,775,348 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income | (996,841) | (665,262) |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Proceeds from shares sold | 47,029,868 | 120,029,054 |
Payments for shares redeemed | (10,102,308) | (23,241,910) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 36,927,560 | 96,787,144 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 71,357,911 | 124,897,230 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 208,336,850 | 83,439,620 |
End of period | $279,694,761 | $208,336,850 |
Undistributed net investment income | $404,283 | $665,966 |
Transactions in Shares of the Fund | ||
Sold | 4,592,136 | 15,002,239 |
Redeemed | (1,007,803) | (2,964,057) |
Net increase (decrease) in shares of the fund | 3,584,333 | 12,038,182 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. NT Growth Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in equity securities of larger-sized companies that management believes will increase in value but may purchase companies of any size. The fund is not permitted to invest in any securities issued by companies assigned the Global Industry Classification Standard for the tobacco industry. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
17
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. All tax years for the fund remain subject to examination by tax authorities. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
18
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee). The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. For funds with a stepped fee schedule, the rate of the fee is determined by applying a fee rate calculation formula. This formula takes into account the fund’s assets as well as certain assets, if any, of other clients of the investment advisor outside the American Century Investments family of funds (such as subadvised funds and separate accounts) that have very similar investment teams and investment strategies (strategy assets). The annual management fee schedule ranges from 0.600% to 0.800%. The effective annual management fee for the six months ended April 30, 2010 was 0.79%.
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/ or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, American Century Investment Services, Inc., and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC. The fund is wholly owned, in aggregate, by various funds in a series issued by American Century Asset Allocation Portfolios, Inc. (ACAAP). ACAAP does not invest in the fund for the purpose of exercising management or control.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS) and a securities lending agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB). JPMCB is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $131,729,398 and $95,335,152, respectively.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
19
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial statements as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Common Stocks | $273,336,511 | $1,445,690 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 39,979 | 4,300,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $273,376,490 | $5,745,690 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(868) | — |
5. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are determine d daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments held at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’s typical volume during the period.
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $868 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $101,917 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $(5,253) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
6. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not util ize the program.
20
7. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $227,876,174 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $52,377,280 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (1,131,274) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $51,246,006 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(17,916,177), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(5,069,723) and $(12,846,454) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
8. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
21
Financial Highlights |
NT Growth | ||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $9.34 | $8.13 | $12.87 | $10.57 | $10.00 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income (Loss) | 0.03(3) | 0.06(3) | 0.04(3) | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.49 | 1.21 | (4.19) | 2.29 | 0.56 | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.52 | 1.27 | (4.15) | 2.33 | 0.57 | |
Distributions | ||||||
From Net Investment Income | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.03) | (0.03) | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.56) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | (0.05) | (0.06) | (0.59) | (0.03) | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $10.81 | $9.34 | $8.13 | $12.87 | $10.57 | |
Total Return(4) | 16.25% | 15.88% | (33.68)% | 22.12% | 5.70% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses | ||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.80%(5) | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.80%(5) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) | ||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.61%(5) | 0.67% | 0.38% | 0.35% | 0.36%(5) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 41% | 132% | 136% | 140% | 57% | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $279,695 | $208,337 | $83,440 | $88,446 | $58,983 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |||||
(2) | May 12, 2006 (fund inception) through October 31, 2006. | |||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |||||
(4) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | |||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||||||
(5) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
22
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as
23
under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/ or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
24
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
25
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board conc luded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
26
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense rat ios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
27
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
28
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
29
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
30
Notes |
31
Notes |
32
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68448
Semiannual Report |
April 30, 2010 |
American Century Investments® |
NT Vista Fund
Table of Contents |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Independent Chairman’s Letter | 3 |
Market Perspective | 4 |
U.S. Stock Index Returns | 4 |
NT Vista | |
Performance | 5 |
Portfolio Commentary | 7 |
Top Ten Holdings | 9 |
Top Five Industries | 9 |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | 9 |
Shareholder Fee Example | 10 |
Financial Statements | |
Schedule of Investments | 12 |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 15 |
Statement of Operations | 16 |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | 17 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 18 |
Financial Highlights | 23 |
Other Information | |
Board Approval of Management Agreements | 24 |
Additional Information | 30 |
Index Definitions | 31 |
Any opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author as of the date of the report, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of American Century Investments or any other person in the American Century Investments organization. Any such opinions are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and American Century Investments disclaims any responsibility to update such opinions. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions made by American Century Investments funds are based on numerous factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any American Century Investments fund. Security examples are used for representational purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Performance information for comparative indices and securities is provided to American Century Investments by third party vendors. To the best of American Century Investments’ knowledge, such information is accurate at the time of printing.
President’s Letter |
Dear Investor:
To learn more about the capital markets, your investment, and the portfolio management strategies American Century Investments provides, we encourage you to review this shareholder report for the financial reporting period ended April 30, 2010.
On the following pages, you will find investment performance and portfolio information, presented with the expert perspective and commentary of our portfolio management team. This report remains one of our most important vehicles for conveying the information you need about your investment performance, and about the market factors and strategies that affect fund returns. For additional information on the markets, we encourage you to visit the “Insights & News” tab at our Web site, americancentury.com, for updates and further expert commentary.
The top of our Web site’s home page also provides a link to “Our Story,” which, first and foremost, outlines our commitment—since 1958—to helping clients reach their financial goals. We believe strongly that we will only be successful when our clients are successful. That’s who we are.
Another important, unique facet of our story and who we are is “Profits with a Purpose,” which describes our bond with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research (SIMR). SIMR is a world-class biomedical organization—founded by our company founder James E. Stowers, Jr. and his wife Virginia—that is dedicated to researching the causes, treatment, and prevention of gene-based diseases, including cancer. Through American Century Investments’ private ownership structure, more than 40% of our profits support SIMR.
Mr. Stowers’ example of achieving financial success and using that platform to help humanity motivates our entire American Century Investments team. His story inspires us to help each of our clients achieve success. Thank you for sharing your financial journey with us.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thomas
President and Chief Executive Officer
American Century Investments
2
Independent Chairman’s Letter |
Fellow Shareholders,
The principal event at a recent board meeting was the retirement of Jim Stowers, Jr. from the American Century Mutual Funds Kansas City board. This was one of those times when you felt like you were living a historical moment. Jim—who celebrated his 86th birthday in January—founded what was known as Twentieth Century Mutual Funds over 50 years ago. Through the years, his number one priority has been to “Put Investors First!” The board presented Jim with a resolution acknowledging that, by building a successful investment company, he has impacted the lives of many by helping them on the path to financial success.
We respect Jim’s decision to focus his energy on the Stowers Institute for Medical Research and American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent company of the funds’ investment advisors. The pioneering medical research that Jim and his wife Virginia have made possible through the Institute should enrich the lives of millions in the future.
Shortly after his retirement from the board, we received word that ACC’s co-chairman Richard W. Brown had succeeded Jim as trustee of a trust that holds a significant interest in ACC stock as part of Jim’s long-standing estate and business succession plan. While holding less than a majority interest, the trust is presumed to control the funds’ investment advisors under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This change triggered the need for a shareholder proxy to approve new management and subadvisory agreements for the funds. If you have not already responded, I encourage you to take the time to read the proxy materials and send your vote as soon as possible.
On behalf of the board, I want to once again thank Jim for his mutual fund board service. More than three years ago, Jim and Richard Brown installed a strong and effective leadership team at American Century Investments and I look forward to continuing to work with them on behalf of fund shareholders. And while Jim no longer sits on the fund board, the inherent optimism captured by his favorite catch phrase—“The best is yet to be”—still resonates with all of us who have the privilege of serving you. I invite you to send your comments, questions or concerns to me at dhpratt@fundboardchair.com.
3
Market Perspective |
By David Hollond, Chief Investment Officer, U.S. Growth Equity—Mid & Small Cap
A Further Advance for Stocks
U.S. stocks continued to gain ground for the six months ended April 30, 2010, extending a rally that began in March 2009. The market’s advance was driven by an improving economic environment and better-than-expected corporate earnings.
The six-month period began with the federal government reporting that, after a year of declining output, the U.S. economy posted positive economic growth in the third quarter of 2009. This positive growth continued in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 as manufacturing activity increased, consumer spending picked up, and signs of stabilization in the housing sector emerged. Even the employment picture began to slowly improve, although the jobless rate remained persistently elevated throughout the six-month period.
Better economic data provided a boost to the equity market, as did corporate earnings that consistently exceeded expectations. The improvement in corporate profits occurred despite flat-to-declining revenues as businesses managed their cost structures more effectively, successfully lowering expenses. In addition, a number of industries benefited from pent-up demand after individuals and businesses deferred purchases on items ranging from automobiles to personal computers during the economic downturn in late 2008 and early 2009.
Although stocks generally rallied throughout the six-month period, the market’s advance slowed late in the period amid concerns about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Nonetheless, the major equity indices (as illustrated in the table below) returned more than 15% overall for the six months.
Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Outperformed
Mid- and small-cap stocks led the equity market’s advance for the six-month period. Small- and mid-sized stocks underperformed during the downturn, so they rebounded the most during the recent recovery. Furthermore, cost-cutting measures typically lead to greater operating leverage for smaller companies, boosting their profitability.
Growth issues trailed their value-oriented counterparts in both the mid- and small-cap segments of the market. One factor driving the outperformance of value shares was the financials sector, which is the largest sector weighting in many value indices and remained one of the better-performing sectors over the past six months.
U.S. Stock Index Returns | ||||
For the six months ended April 30, 2010* | ||||
Russell 1000 Index (Large-Cap) | 16.77% | Russell 2000 Index (Small-Cap) | 28.17% | |
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.77% | Russell 2000 Value Index | 30.66% | |
Russell 1000 Growth Index | 15.79% | Russell 2000 Growth Index | 25.49% | |
Russell Midcap Index | 24.93% | *Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | ||
Russell Midcap Value Index | 26.54% | |||
Russell Midcap Growth Index | 23.23% |
4
Performance |
NT Vista | ||||||
Total Returns as of April 30, 2010 | ||||||
Average | ||||||
Annual Returns | ||||||
Ticker | Since | Inception | ||||
Symbol | 6 months(1) | 1 year | Inception | Date | ||
Institutional Class | ACLWX | 21.24% | 31.23% | -2.34% | 5/12/06 | |
Russell Midcap | ||||||
Growth Index(2) | — | 23.23% | 46.95% | 1.10% | — | |
(1) | Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized. | |||||
(2) | Data provided by Lipper Inc. – A Reuters Company. © 2010 Reuters. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper | |||||
content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be | ||||||
liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. | ||||||
The data contained herein has been obtained from company reports, financial reporting services, periodicals and other resources believed to be | ||||||
reliable. Although carefully verified, data on compilations is not guaranteed by Lipper and may be incomplete. No offer or solicitations to buy or | ||||||
sell any of the securities herein is being made by Lipper. |
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
5
NT Vista
*From 5/12/06, the Institutional Class’s inception date. Not annualized. | |
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses | |
Institutional Class | 0.81% |
The total annual fund operating expenses shown is as stated in the fund’s prospectus current as of the date of this report. The prospectus may vary from the expense ratio shown elsewhere in this report because it is based on a different time period, includes acquired fund fees and expenses, and, if applicable, does not include fee waivers or expense reimbursements.
Data presented reflect past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and redemption value may be more or less than original cost. To obtain performance data current to the most recent month end, please call 1-800-345-2021 or visit americancentury.com. International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations.
Data assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, and none of the charts reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Returns for the index are provided for comparison. The fund’s total returns include operating expenses (such as transaction costs and management fees) that reduce returns, while the total returns of the index do not.
6
Portfolio Commentary |
NT Vista
Portfolio Managers: Brad Eixmann and Bryan Unterhalter
Performance Summary
NT Vista returned 21.24%* for the six months ended April 30, 2010, lagging the 23.23% return of its benchmark, the Russell Midcap Growth Index.
As discussed in the Market Perspective on page 4, U.S. stock indices gained during the reporting period amid signs of improving economic conditions and investor sentiment. Acceleration and price momentum, two factors that the NT Vista team looks for in portfolio investments, were not rewarded during the reporting period. Instead, lower-quality stocks continued to lead the market’s strength.
Within the portfolio, security selection in the financials and health care sectors accounted for the majority of underperformance relative to the benchmark, although NT Vista derived positive absolute results in both sectors. Holdings in the materials sector further detracted from relative returns. Avoiding the utilities sector, as well as effective stock choices in the information technology, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors, helped to trim relative losses.
Financials, Health Care Gained, but Lagged Benchmark
The financials sector was NT Vista’s largest source of underperformance relative to its benchmark. Within the sector, a detrimental overweight stake in the capital markets industry included Jefferies Group, Inc. The company underperformed many of its peers during the period due to a slowdown in its trading operations. An overweight position in Lazard Ltd. also weighed on relative performance. Although the company’s earnings reflected improvement, particularly in the mergers and acquisitions area, unexpectedly higher deferred compensation created an earnings shortfall. A stake in Legg Mason, Inc., which is not a benchmark member, hurt relative returns. The company reported larger than expected asset outflows, representing a reversal from previous trends.
The health care sector was also a source of underperformance relative to the benchmark. Here, NT Vista did not own some of the stronger performers within the biotechnology and health care equipment sectors. Within the health care provider industry group, NT Vista held a detrimental overweight position in Medco Health Solutions, Inc. Although the company outperformed for part of the reporting period, it experienced a share price decline very late in the period as concerns over industry contract pricing and competition surfaced.
Materials Detracted
Although NT Vista’s holdings in the materials sector contributed to absolute gains, they collectively lagged the performance of the materials sector in the benchmark. Within the sector, NT Vista maintained a focus on the chemicals industry, where the portfolio held a position in fertilizer company Mosaic Co. While volume growth of its products accelerated significantly, pricing was not as strong as some analysts had predicted and increases in key input costs weighed on margins.
*Total returns for periods less than one year are not annualized.
7
NT Vista
Information Technology, Avoiding Utilities Helped
Within the information technology sector, the portfolio benefited from successful stock choices in the semiconductor industry group. Veeco Instruments, Inc., which produces equipment for manufacturing LED components used in flat screen televisions, computer monitors, and general lighting applications, was a key contributor to returns. The company, which is not a benchmark constituent, saw an 81% share price gain amid accelerating demand for LED televisions, which resulted in stronger revenue and earnings growth.
NT Vista also sidestepped the utilities sector altogether. This decision proved advantageous as the sector lagged most other sectors in the benchmark.
Industrials, Consumer Discretionary Contributed
In the industrials sector, NT Vista held a significant overweight stake in railroad company Kansas City Southern. Increased economic activity during the reporting period translated into rising shipping volumes, lifting the company’s share price.
Elsewhere in the industrials sector, NT Vista benefited from solid stock selection in the machinery industry through its exposure to mining equipment company Bucyrus International. As the economies of China and other emerging markets have rebounded this year and commodity prices have risen, the company has seen an improvement in orders for machinery used to mine coal, copper, oil sands, and iron ore.
The consumer discretionary sector was a source of outperformance relative to the benchmark. Within the sector, NT Vista held substantial overweight positions in a number of companies in the hotels, restaurants, and leisure industry group, including Starwood Hotels and Resorts. The hotel chain experienced an upswing in revenues, particularly among its Asian properties, amid an industry-wide improvement in travel trends.
Outlook
Our investment process focuses on medium-sized and smaller companies with accelerating earnings growth rates and share-price momentum. We believe that active investing in such companies will generate outperformance over time compared with the Russell Midcap Growth Index.
This process, which has historically added value over time, has faced unprecedented headwinds during the market rally that began in March 2009. Based on historical trends, we believe we will move past this environment of extreme underperformance for stocks exhibiting price momentum and acceleration and into a period where fundamentals, and specifically fundamental improvement, are recognized and rewarded by the market.
As always, we will rely on our process of identifying companies with accelerating growth and price momentum and currently see a number of companies demonstrating such characteristics.
8
NT Vista | |
Top Ten Holdings | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
SBA Communications Corp., Class A | 2.5% |
Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 2.2% |
Express Scripts, Inc. | 2.0% |
Equinix, Inc. | 2.0% |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. | 2.0% |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc. | 1.9% |
Goodrich Corp. | 1.7% |
priceline.com, Inc. | 1.7% |
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 1.6% |
Whiting Petroleum Corp. | 1.6% |
Top Five Industries | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 6.1% |
Health Care Providers & Services | 5.8% |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | 5.5% |
Aerospace & Defense | 5.0% |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 4.9% |
Types of Investments in Portfolio | |
% of net assets | |
as of 4/30/10 | |
Domestic Common Stocks | 89.7% |
Foreign Common Stocks* | 7.9% |
Total Common Stocks | 97.6% |
Temporary Cash Investments | 1.9% |
Other Assets and Liabilities | 0.5% |
*Includes depositary shares, dual listed securities and foreign ordinary shares. |
9
Shareholder Fee Example (Unaudited) |
Fund shareholders may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and redemption/ exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing cost of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from November 1, 2009 to April 30, 2010.
Actual Expenses
The table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses for each class. You may use the information, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. First, identify the share class you own. Then simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
If you hold Investor Class shares of any American Century Investments fund, or Institutional Class shares of the American Century Diversified Bond Fund, in an American Century Investments account (i.e., not a financial intermediary or retirement plan account), American Century Investments may charge you a $12.50 semiannual account maintenance fee if the value of those shares is less than $10,000. We will redeem shares automatically in one of your accounts to pay the $12.50 fee. In determining your total eligible investment amount, we will include your investments in all personal accounts (including American Century Investments Brokerage accounts) registered under your Social Security number. Personal accounts include individual accounts, joint accounts, UGMA/UTMA accounts, personal trusts, Coverdell Education Savings Accounts and IRAs (including traditional, Roth, Rollover, SEP-, SARSEP- and SIMPLE-IRAs), and certain other retirement accounts. If you have only business, business retirement, employer-sponsored or American Century Investments Brokerage accounts, you are currently not subject to this fee. We will not charge the fee as long as you choose to manage your accounts exclusively online. If you are subject to the Account Maintenance Fee, your account value could be reduced by the fee amount.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio of each class of your fund and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of a fund’s share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
10
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption/exchange fees. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | ||
Account Value | Account Value | During Period* | Annualized | |
11/1/09 | 4/30/10 | 11/1/09 – 4/30/10 | Expense Ratio* | |
Actual | $1,000 | $1,212.40 | $4.39 | 0.80% |
Hypothetical | $1,000 | $1,020.83 | $4.01 | 0.80% |
*Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio listed in the table above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, | ||||
multiplied by 181, the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, divided by 365, to reflect the one-half year period. |
11
Schedule of Investments |
NT Vista | ||||||
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Common Stocks — 97.6% | CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING — 1.1% | |||||
AECOM Technology Corp.(1) | 22,324 | $ 671,282 | ||||
AEROSPACE & DEFENSE — 5.0% | ||||||
BE Aerospace, Inc.(1) | 57,200 | $ 1,699,412 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV | |||
New York Shares(1) | 32,954 | 772,442 | ||||
Goodrich Corp. | 30,700 | 2,277,326 | 1,443,724 | |||
L-3 Communications | CONSUMER FINANCE — 1.8% | |||||
Holdings, Inc. | 14,000 | 1,309,980 | ||||
AmeriCredit Corp.(1) | 66,000 | 1,580,040 | ||||
Precision Castparts Corp. | 9,900 | 1,270,566 | ||||
6,557,284 | Discover Financial Services | 46,800 | 723,528 | |||
AIR FREIGHT & LOGISTICS — 0.8% | 2,303,568 | |||||
Atlas Air Worldwide | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 1.5% | |||||
Holdings, Inc.(1) | 18,600 | 1,028,022 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 32,000 | 1,943,040 | |
AUTO COMPONENTS — 1.0% | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS & | |||||
Autoliv, Inc.(1) | 24,300 | 1,330,425 | COMPONENTS — 2.5% | |||
Agilent Technologies, Inc.(1) | 79,500 | 2,882,670 | ||||
BIOTECHNOLOGY — 1.0% | ||||||
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | 23,500 | 1,289,680 | Dolby Laboratories, Inc., | |||
Class A(1) | 6,237 | 428,607 | ||||
CAPITAL MARKETS — 1.7% | 3,311,277 | |||||
Jefferies Group, Inc. | 24,800 | 675,056 | ENERGY EQUIPMENT & SERVICES — 1.4% | |||
Lazard Ltd., Class A | 22,000 | 850,520 | Core Laboratories NV | 6,700 | 1,004,263 | |
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc., | FMC Technologies, Inc.(1) | 11,875 | 803,819 | |||
Class A | 18,400 | 683,008 | ||||
2,208,584 | 1,808,082 | |||||
CHEMICALS — 1.5% | FOOD PRODUCTS — 1.3% | |||||
Celanese Corp., Series A | 20,300 | 649,397 | H.J. Heinz Co. | 21,500 | 1,007,705 | |
Cytec Industries, Inc. | 13,300 | 639,198 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 13,800 | 712,218 | |
International Flavors & | 1,719,923 | |||||
Fragrances, Inc. | 13,200 | 661,188 | HEALTH CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES — 1.8% | |||
1,949,783 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 7,600 | 657,628 | |||
COMMERCIAL BANKS — 2.7% | Intuitive Surgical, Inc.(1) | 1,900 | 685,064 | |||
Comerica, Inc. | 31,700 | 1,331,400 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc.(1) | 17,600 | 992,288 | |
Fifth Third Bancorp. | 77,800 | 1,159,998 | 2,334,980 | |||
Zions Bancorp. | 34,900 | 1,002,677 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS & SERVICES — 5.8% | |||
3,494,075 | AmerisourceBergen Corp. | 56,900 | 1,755,365 | |||
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT — 2.0% | Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | 25,700 | 2,573,341 | |||
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | 28,700 | 1,963,941 | Health Management | |||
JDS Uniphase Corp.(1) | 48,400 | 628,716 | Associates, Inc., Class A(1) | 79,300 | 739,076 | |
2,592,657 | Medco Health Solutions, Inc.(1) | 43,000 | 2,533,560 | |||
COMPUTERS & PERIPHERALS — 3.9% | 7,601,342 | |||||
Lexmark International, Inc., | HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY — 0.7% | |||||
Class A(1) | 43,000 | 1,593,150 | Allscripts-Misys Healthcare | |||
NetApp, Inc.(1) | 37,300 | 1,293,191 | Solutions, Inc.(1) | 43,800 | 883,446 | |
Seagate Technology(1) | 70,400 | 1,293,248 | HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & LEISURE — 5.5% | |||
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(1) | 4,800 | 647,568 | ||||
Western Digital Corp.(1) | 23,000 | 945,070 | ||||
5,124,659 | Ctrip.com International Ltd. | |||||
ADR(1) | 29,500 | 1,077,340 |
12
NT Vista | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
Las Vegas Sands Corp.(1) | 25,700 | $ 638,902 | METALS & MINING — 1.9% | |||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.(1) | 46,000 | 1,648,640 | Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 21,600 | $ 1,350,648 | |
Starwood Hotels & Resorts | Walter Energy, Inc. | 13,500 | 1,090,935 | |||
Worldwide, Inc. | 46,800 | 2,551,068 | 2,441,583 | |||
Wynn Resorts Ltd. | 7,400 | 652,976 | MULTILINE RETAIL — 2.6% | |||
7,216,494 | Dollar Tree, Inc.(1) | 28,000 | 1,700,160 | |||
HOUSEHOLD DURABLES — 3.8% | Nordstrom, Inc. | 42,100 | 1,739,993 | |||
Harman International | 3,440,153 | |||||
Industries, Inc.(1) | 26,000 | 1,026,480 | ||||
OIL, GAS & CONSUMABLE FUELS — 4.9% | ||||||
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 33,200 | 2,063,380 | Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.(1) | 40,100 | 1,887,908 | |
Tempur-Pedic | Brigham Exploration Co.(1) | 50,900 | 993,059 | |||
International, Inc.(1) | 22,100 | 744,770 | ||||
Whirlpool Corp. | 10,200 | 1,110,474 | Concho Resources, Inc.(1) | 13,000 | 738,660 | |
4,945,104 | Petrohawk Energy Corp.(1) | 29,489 | 636,667 | |||
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS — 0.5% | Whiting Petroleum Corp.(1) | 22,800 | 2,059,524 | |||
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 9,300 | 644,025 | 6,315,818 | |||
INSURANCE — 0.9% | PHARMACEUTICALS — 0.8% | |||||
Genworth Financial, Inc., | Shire plc | 47,300 | 1,043,690 | |||
Class A(1) | 70,800 | 1,169,616 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT — 1.5% | |||
INTERNET & CATALOG RETAIL — 1.7% | CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., | |||||
priceline.com, Inc.(1) | 8,300 | 2,175,015 | Class A(1) | 57,100 | 988,972 | |
INTERNET SOFTWARE & SERVICES — 3.7% | Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. | 12,300 | 970,224 | |||
Equinix, Inc.(1) | 25,500 | 2,566,575 | 1,959,196 | |||
GSI Commerce, Inc.(1) | 22,800 | 621,300 | ROAD & RAIL — 1.4% | |||
MercadoLibre, Inc.(1) | 19,034 | 959,694 | Kansas City Southern(1) | 45,000 | 1,824,750 | |
WebMD Health Corp.(1) | 13,700 | 663,628 | SEMICONDUCTORS & SEMICONDUCTOR | |||
EQUIPMENT — 6.1% | ||||||
4,811,197 | Altera Corp. | 38,400 | 973,824 | |||
IT SERVICES — 2.0% | Analog Devices, Inc. | 33,300 | 996,669 | |||
Amdocs Ltd.(1) | 21,100 | 673,934 | ||||
Atheros Communications, Inc.(1) | 28,700 | 1,114,708 | ||||
Cognizant Technology | Cree, Inc.(1) | 8,000 | 585,680 | |||
Solutions Corp., Class A(1) | 38,700 | 1,980,666 | ||||
2,654,600 | Marvell Technology Group Ltd.(1) | 62,000 | 1,280,300 | |||
LEISURE EQUIPMENT & PRODUCTS — 0.7% | NVIDIA Corp.(1) | 36,000 | 565,920 | |||
Mattel, Inc. | 41,100 | 947,355 | Teradyne, Inc.(1) | 79,600 | 973,508 | |
LIFE SCIENCES TOOLS & SERVICES — 2.4% | Veeco Instruments, Inc.(1) | 32,000 | 1,407,680 | |||
Life Technologies Corp.(1) | 32,700 | 1,789,017 | 7,898,289 | |||
PerkinElmer, Inc. | 27,600 | 691,380 | SOFTWARE — 3.9% | |||
Waters Corp.(1) | 9,400 | 676,706 | Autodesk, Inc.(1) | 19,500 | 663,195 | |
3,157,103 | Cerner Corp.(1) | 11,500 | 976,465 | |||
MACHINERY — 3.5% | Citrix Systems, Inc.(1) | 27,400 | 1,287,800 | |||
Bucyrus International, Inc. | 28,600 | 1,802,086 | Informatica Corp.(1) | 24,700 | 617,747 | |
Dover Corp. | 14,600 | 762,412 | Rovi Corp.(1) | 18,700 | 728,926 | |
Kennametal, Inc. | 32,000 | 1,051,520 | salesforce.com, inc.(1) | 8,600 | 736,160 | |
Manitowoc Co., Inc. (The) | 44,700 | 626,247 | 5,010,293 | |||
Timken Co. | 9,421 | 331,431 | ||||
4,573,696 |
13
NT Vista | ||||||
Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |||
SPECIALTY RETAIL — 4.9% | Temporary Cash Investments — 1.9% | |||||
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.(1) | 21,100 | $ 969,756 | ||||
JPMorgan U.S. Treasury | ||||||
Chico’s FAS, Inc. | 83,200 | 1,238,848 | Plus Money Market Fund | |||
J. Crew Group, Inc.(1) | 20,300 | 943,341 | Agency Shares | 42,821 | $ 42,821 | |
Talbots, Inc.(1) | 39,300 | 646,485 | Repurchase Agreement, Bank of America | |||
Securities, LLC, (collateralized by various | ||||||
Tiffany & Co. | 13,700 | 664,176 | U.S. Treasury obligations, 4.375%, 2/15/38, | |||
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 64,100 | 1,846,080 | valued at $2,569,851), in a joint trading | |||
6,308,686 | account at 0.15%, dated 4/30/10, due | |||||
TEXTILES, APPAREL & LUXURY GOODS — 1.0% | 5/3/10 (Delivery value $2,500,031) | 2,500,000 | ||||
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 20,700 | 1,304,307 | TOTAL TEMPORARY | |||
CASH INVESTMENTS | ||||||
TRADING COMPANIES & DISTRIBUTORS — 2.0% | (Cost $2,542,821) | 2,542,821 | ||||
Fastenal Co. | 17,900 | 978,951 | TOTAL INVESTMENT | |||
W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 14,200 | 1,569,668 | SECURITIES — 99.5% | |||
2,548,619 | (Cost $104,673,269) | 129,541,151 | ||||
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES — 4.4% | OTHER ASSETS AND | |||||
American Tower Corp., Class A(1) | 24,100 | 983,521 | LIABILITIES — 0.5% | 616,958 | ||
NII Holdings, Inc.(1) | 32,600 | 1,382,892 | TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0% | $130,158,109 | ||
SBA Communications Corp., | ||||||
Class A(1) | 93,802 | 3,317,777 | ||||
5,684,190 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||||
(Cost $102,130,448) | 126,998,330 | |||||
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | ||||||
Contracts to Sell | Settlement Date | Value | Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |||
449,184 GBP for USD | 5/28/10 | $687,203 | $(4,622) | |||
(Value on Settlement Date $682,581) | ||||||
Notes to Schedule of Investments | ||||||
ADR = American Depositary Receipt | ||||||
GBP = British Pound | ||||||
USD = United States Dollar | ||||||
(1) Non-income producing. | ||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
14
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Assets | |
Investment securities, at value (cost of $104,673,269) | $129,541,151 |
Receivable for investments sold | 5,767,253 |
Receivable for capital shares sold | 15,070 |
Dividends and interest receivable | 29,745 |
135,353,219 | |
Liabilities | |
Payable for investments purchased | 5,104,761 |
Payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts | 4,622 |
Accrued management fees | 85,727 |
5,195,110 | |
Net Assets | $130,158,109 |
Institutional Class Capital Shares, $0.01 Par Value | |
Authorized | 150,000,000 |
Outstanding | 14,341,134 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | $9.08 |
Net Assets Consist of: | |
Capital (par value and paid-in surplus) | $115,465,175 |
Accumulated net investment loss | (153,626) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment and foreign currency transactions | (10,016,941) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | 24,863,501 |
$130,158,109 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
15
Statement of Operations |
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) | |
Investment Income (Loss) | |
Income: | |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $121) | $ 302,518 |
Interest | 1,404 |
303,922 | |
Expenses: | |
Management fees | 444,597 |
Directors’ fees and expenses | 1,445 |
446,042 | |
Net investment income (loss) | (142,120) |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |
Investment transactions | 7,461,379 |
Foreign currency transactions | 20,330 |
7,481,709 | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |
Investments | 13,538,177 |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | (5,045) |
13,533,132 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 21,014,841 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $20,872,721 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
16
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
SIX MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2009 | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2010 | 2009 |
Operations | ||
Net investment income (loss) | $ (142,120) | $ (229,807) |
Net realized gain (loss) | 7,481,709 | (11,458,592) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 13,533,132 | 13,715,758 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 20,872,721 | 2,027,359 |
Distributions to Shareholders | ||
From net investment income | (11,506) | — |
Capital Share Transactions | ||
Proceeds from shares sold | 20,923,118 | 56,403,239 |
Payments for shares redeemed | (2,862,939) | (7,329,572) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions | 18,060,179 | 49,073,667 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 38,921,394 | 51,101,026 |
Net Assets | ||
Beginning of period | 91,236,715 | 40,135,689 |
End of period | $130,158,109 | $ 91,236,715 |
Accumulated net investment loss | $(153,626) | — |
Transactions in Shares of the Fund | ||
Sold | 2,509,445 | 7,996,150 |
Redeemed | (341,195) | (1,091,260) |
Net increase (decrease) in shares of the fund | 2,168,250 | 6,904,890 |
See Notes to Financial Statements. |
17
Notes to Financial Statements |
APRIL 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization — American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. (the corporation) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as an open-end management investment company. NT Vista Fund (the fund) is one fund in a series issued by the corporation. The fund is diversified under the 1940 Act. The fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital growth. The fund pursues its objective by investing primarily in equity securities of companies that are medium-sized and smaller at the time of purchase that management believes will increase in value. The fund is not permitted to invest in any securities issued by companies assigned the Global Industry Classification Standard for the tobacco industry. The following is a summary of the fund’s significant accounting policies.
Security Valuations — Securities traded primarily on a principal securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price, or at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices where no last sales price is available. Depending on local convention or regulation, securities traded over-the-counter are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices, the last sales price, or the official close price. Investments in open-end management investment companies are valued at the reported net asset value. Discount notes may be valued through a commercial pricing service or at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets are normally completed before the close of business on days that the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) is open and may also take place on days when the Exchange is not open. If an event occurs after the value of a security was established but before the net asset value per share was determined that was likely to materially change the net asset value, that security would be valued as determined in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. If the fund determines that the market price of a portfolio security is not readily available, or that the valuation methods mentioned above do not reflect the security’s fair value, such security is valued as determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board of Directors, if such determination would materially impact a fund’s net asset value. Certain other circumstances may cause the fund to use alternative procedures to value a security such as: a security has been declared in default; trading in a security has been halted during the trading day; or there is a foreign market holiday and no trading will commence .
Security Transactions — For financial reporting purposes, security transactions are accounted for as of the trade date. Net realized gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis, which is also used for federal income tax purposes.
Investment Income — Dividend income less foreign taxes withheld, if any, is recorded as of the ex-dividend date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums.
Foreign Currency Translations — All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates at period end. The fund may enter into spot foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, spot foreign currency exchange contracts, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. For assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, net realized and unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translations arise from changes in currency exchange rates.
Net realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains or losses occurring during the holding period of investment securities are a component of net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, respectively. Certain countries may impose taxes on the contract amount of purchases and sales of foreign currency contracts in their currency. The fund records the foreign tax expense, if any, as a reduction to the net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions.
18
Repurchase Agreements — The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that American Century Investment Management, Inc. (ACIM) (the investment advisor) has determined are creditworthy pursuant to criteria adopted by the Board of Directors. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the collateral, represented by securities, received in a repurchase transaction be transferred to the custodian in a manner sufficient to enable the fund to obtain those securities in the event of a default under the repurchase agreement. ACIM monitors, on a daily basis, the securities transferred to ensure the value, including accrued interest, of the securities under each repurchase agreement is equal to or greater than amounts owed to the fund under each repurchase agreement.
Joint Trading Account — Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may transfer uninvested cash balances into a joint trading account. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase agreements that are collateralized by U.S. Treasury or Agency obligations.
Income Tax Status — It is the fund’s policy to distribute substantially all net investment income and net realized gains to shareholders and to otherwise qualify as a regulated investment company under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. All tax years for the fund remain subject to examination by tax authorities. Additionally, non-U.S. tax returns filed by the fund due to investments in certain foreign securities remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing authority for seven years from the date of filing. At this time, management believes there are no uncertain tax positions which, based on their technical merit, would not be sustained upon examination and for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Accordi ngly, no provision has been made for federal or state income taxes.
Distributions to Shareholders — Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, are generally declared and paid annually.
Indemnifications — Under the corporation’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against a fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered by management to be remote.
Use of Estimates — The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which may require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Subsequent Events — In preparing the financial statements, management evaluated the impact of events or transactions occurring through the date the financial statements were issued that would merit recognition or disclosure.
2. Fees and Transactions with Related Parties
Management Fees — The corporation has entered into a Management Agreement with ACIM, under which ACIM provides the fund with investment advisory and management services in exchange for a single, unified management fee (the fee). The Agreement provides that all expenses of managing and operating the fund, except brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, fees and expenses of the independent directors (including legal counsel fees), and extraordinary expenses, will be paid by ACIM. The fee is computed and accrued daily based on the daily net assets of the fund and paid monthly in arrears. The annual management fee is 0.80%.
19
Related Parties — Certain officers and directors of the corporation are also officers and/or directors of American Century Companies, Inc. (ACC), the parent of the corporation’s investment advisor, ACIM, the distributor of the corporation, American Century Investment Services, Inc., and the corporation’s transfer agent, American Century Services, LLC. The fund is wholly owned, in aggregate, by various funds in a series issued by American Century Asset Allocation Portfolios, Inc. (ACAAP). ACAAP does not invest in the fund for the purpose of exercising management or control.
The fund is eligible to invest in a money market fund for temporary purposes, which is managed by J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM). The fund has a Mutual Funds Services Agreement with J.P. Morgan Investor Services Co. (JPMIS). JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPMCB) is a custodian of the fund. JPMIM, JPMIS and JPMCB are wholly owned subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPM is an equity investor in ACC.
3. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months ended April 30, 2010, were $101,406,099 and $83,805,886, respectively.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The fund’s securities valuation process is based on several considerations and may use multiple inputs to determine the fair value of the positions held by the fund. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the inputs used to determine a valuation are classified into three broad levels as follows:
• Level 1 valuation inputs consist of unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical securities;
• Level 2 valuation inputs consist of significant direct or indirect observable market data (including quoted prices for similar securities, evaluations of subsequent market events, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.); or
• Level 3 valuation inputs consist of significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions).
The level classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair valuation measurement. The valuation inputs are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in these securities or other financial instruments.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used to determine the fair value of the fund’s securities and other financial instruments as of April 30, 2010. The Schedule of Investments provides additional details on the fund’s portfolio holdings.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |
Investment Securities | |||
Domestic Common Stocks | $116,712,474 | — | — |
Foreign Common Stocks | 9,242,166 | $1,043,690 | — |
Temporary Cash Investments | 42,821 | 2,500,000 | — |
Total Value of Investment Securities | $125,997,461 | $3,543,690 | — |
Other Financial Instruments | |||
Total Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Forward | |||
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | — | $(4,622) | — |
20
5. Derivative Instruments
Foreign Currency Risk — The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The value of foreign investments held by a fund may be significantly affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The dollar value of a foreign security generally decreases when the value of the dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the dollar declines against such foreign currency. A fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce a fund’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The net U.S. dollar value of foreign currency underlying all contractual commitments held by a fund and the resulting unrealized appreciation or depreciation are deter mined daily using prevailing exchange rates. Realized gain or loss is recorded upon the termination of the contract. Net realized and unrealized gains or losses occurring during the holding period of forward foreign currency exchange contracts are a component of net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies, respectively. A fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the foreign currency exchange rate underlying the forward contract. Additionally, losses, up to the fair value, may arise if the counterparties do not perform under the contract terms. The risk of loss from non-performance by the counterparty may be reduced by the use of master netting agreements. The fund began investing in foreign currency risk derivatives in February 2010. The foreign currency risk derivative instruments at period end as disclosed on the Schedule of Investments are indicative of the fund’ ;s typical volume since February 2010.
The value of foreign currency risk derivative instruments as of April 30, 2010, is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability of $4,622 in payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts. For the six months ended April 30, 2010, the effect of foreign currency risk derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations was $18,985 in net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions and $(4,622) in change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies.
6. Risk Factors
There are certain risks involved in investing in foreign securities. These risks include those resulting from future adverse political, social, and economic developments, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the possible imposition of exchange controls, and other foreign laws or restrictions.
7. Interfund Lending
The fund, along with certain other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds, may participate in an interfund lending program, pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This program provides an alternative credit facility allowing the fund to borrow from or lend to other funds in the American Century Investments family of funds that permit such transactions. Interfund lending transactions are subject to each fund’s investment policies and borrowing and lending limits. The interfund loan rate earned/paid on interfund lending transactions is determined daily based on the average of certain current market rates. Interfund lending transactions normally extend only overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. The program is subject to annual approval by the Board of Directors. During the six months ended April 30, 2010, the fund did not ut ilize the program.
21
8. Federal Tax Information
The book-basis character of distributions made during the year from net investment income or net realized gains may differ from their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. These differences reflect the differing character of certain income items and net realized gains and losses for financial statement and tax purposes, and may result in reclassification among certain capital accounts on the financial statements.
As of April 30, 2010, the components of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Federal tax cost of investments | $105,172,256 |
Gross tax appreciation of investments | $24,813,710 |
Gross tax depreciation of investments | (444,815) |
Net tax appreciation (depreciation) of investments | $24,368,895 |
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales.
As of October 31, 2009, the fund had accumulated capital losses of $(16,700,613), which represent net capital loss carryovers that may be used to offset future realized capital gains for federal income tax purposes. Future capital loss carryover utilization in any given year may be subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Capital loss carryovers of $(4,315,394) and $(12,385,219) expire in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
9. Corporate Event
As part of a long-standing estate and business succession plan established by ACC Co-Chairman James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, ACC Co-Chairman Richard W. Brown succeeded Mr. Stowers as trustee of a trust that holds a greater-than-25% voting interest in ACC, the parent corporation of each fund’s advisor. Under the 1940 Act, this is presumed to represent control of ACC even though it is less than a majority interest. The change of trustee may technically be considered a “change of control” of ACC and therefore also a change of control of each fund’s advisor even though there has been no change to their management and none is anticipated. The “change of control” resulted in the assignment of each fund’s investment advisory agreement. Under the 1940 Act, an assignment automatically terminated such agreement, making the approval of a new agreement ne cessary.
On February 18, 2010, the Board of Directors approved interim investment advisory agreements under which each fund will be managed until new agreements are approved by fund shareholders. On March 29, 2010, the Board of Directors approved new investment advisory agreements. The interim agreements and the new agreements are substantially identical to the terminated agreements (with the exception of different effective and termination dates) and will not result in changes in the management of American Century Investments, the funds, their investment objectives, fees or services provided. The new agreements have been submitted to shareholders for approval.
22
Financial Highlights |
NT Vista | ||||||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout the Years Ended October 31 (except as noted) | ||||||
2010(1) | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006(2) | ||
Per-Share Data | ||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $7.50 | $7.62 | $13.42 | $9.00 | $10.00 | |
Income From Investment Operations | ||||||
Net Investment Income (Loss) | (0.01)(3) | (0.02)(3) | (0.04)(3) | (0.04) | (0.01) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | 1.59 | (0.10) | (5.73) | 4.46 | (0.99) | |
Total From Investment Operations | 1.58 | (0.12) | (5.77) | 4.42 | (1.00) | |
Distributions | ||||||
From Net Investment Income | —(4) | — | — | — | — | |
From Net Realized Gains | — | — | (0.03) | — | — | |
Total Distributions | —(4) | — | (0.03) | — | — | |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $9.08 | $7.50 | $7.62 | $13.42 | $9.00 | |
Total Return(5) | 21.24% | (1.71)% | (43.09)% | 49.11% | (10.00)% | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | ||||||
Ratio of Operating Expenses | ||||||
to Average Net Assets | 0.80%(6) | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.80%(6) | |
Ratio of Net Investment Income (Loss) | ||||||
to Average Net Assets | (0.26)%(6) | (0.35)% | (0.35)% | (0.36)% | (0.27)%(6) | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79% | 190% | 183% | 147% | 109% | |
Net Assets, End of Period (in thousands) | $130,158 | $91,237 | $40,136 | $44,652 | $25,678 | |
(1) | Six months ended April 30, 2010 (unaudited). | |||||
(2) | May 12, 2006 (fund inception) through October 31, 2006. | |||||
(3) | Computed using average shares outstanding throughout the period. | |||||
(4) | Per-share amount was less than $0.005. | |||||
(5) | Total return assumes reinvestment of net investment income and capital gains distributions, if any. Total returns for periods less than one year | |||||
are not annualized. Total returns are calculated based on the net asset value of the last business day. | ||||||
(6) | Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
23
Board Approval of Management Agreements |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. (“ACIM” or the “Advisor”) currently serves as investment advisor to the Fund under an interim management agreement (the “Interim Management Agreement”) between the Advisor and the Fund approved by the Fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Advisor previously served as investment advisor to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement (the “Prior Management Agreement”) that terminated in accordance with its terms on February 16, 2010, as a result of a change of control of the Advisor’s parent company, American Century Companies, Inc. (“ACC”). The change in control occurred as the result of a change in the trustee of a trust created by James E. Stowers, Jr., the founder of American Century Investments, which holds shares representing a significant interest in ACC stock. Mr. Stowers previously serve d as the trustee of the trust. On February 16, 2010, Richard W. Brown, Co-Chairman of ACC with Mr. Stowers, became the trustee in accordance with the terms of the trust and Mr. Stowers’ long-standing estate and succession plan.
On February 18, 2010, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement in accordance with Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act to ensure continued management of the Fund by the Advisor after the termination of the Prior Management Agreement and until shareholder approval of a new management agreement (the “Proposed Management Agreement”) as required under the Act. The Board has approved the Proposed Management Agreement and has recommended its approval to shareholders. Fund shareholders are scheduled to consider approval of the Proposed Management Agreement at a meeting to be held on June 16, 2010.
The Interim Management Agreement and the Proposed Management Agreement are substantially identical to the Prior Management Agreement except for their effective dates and the termination provisions of the Interim Management Agreement. Under the Interim and Proposed Management Agreements, the Advisor will provide the same services to the Fund and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreement.
Basis for Board Approval of Interim Management Agreement
In considering the approval of the Interim Management Agreement, Rule 15a-4 requires the Board to approve the contract within ten business days of the termination of the prior agreement and to determine that the compensation to be received under the interim agreement is no greater than would have been received under the prior agreement. In connection with the approval, the Board noted that it oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations.
24
In evaluating the Interim Management Agreement, the Board, assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, considered a number of factors in addition to those required by the rule with no one factor being determinative to its analysis. Among the factors considered by the Board were the circumstances and effect of the change of control, the fact that the Advisor will provide the same services and receive the same compensation rate as under the Prior Management Agreements, and that the change of control did not result in a change of the personnel managing the Fund. Upon completion of its analysis, the Board approved the Interim Management Agreement, determining that the continued management of the Fund by the Advisor was in the best interests of the Fund and Fund shareholders.
Basis for Board Approval of Proposed Management Agreement
At a meeting held on March 29, 2010, after considering all information presented, the Board approved, and determined to recommend that shareholders approve, the Proposed Management Agreement. In connection with that approval, the Board requested and reviewed extensive data and information compiled by the Advisor and certain independent providers of evaluation data concerning the Fund and services provided to the Fund by the Advisor. The Board oversees on a continuous basis and evaluates at its quarterly meetings, directly and through the committees of the Board, the nature and quality of significant services provided by the Advisor, the investment performance of the Fund, shareholder services, audit and compliance functions and a variety of other matters relating to the Fund’s operations. The information considered and the discussions held at the meetings included, but were not limited to:
• the nature, extent and quality of investment management, shareholder services and other services provided to the Fund;
• the wide range of programs and services the Advisor provides to the Fund and its shareholders on a routine and non-routine basis;
• the compliance policies, procedures, and regulatory experience of the Advisor;
• data comparing the cost of owning the Fund to the cost of owning similar funds;
• the fact that there will be no changes to the fees, services, or personnel who provide such services as compared to the Prior Management Agreement;
• data comparing the Fund’s performance to appropriate benchmarks and/or a peer group of other mutual funds with similar investment objectives and strategies;
• financial data showing the profitability of the Fund to the Advisor and the overall profitability of the Advisor;
• data comparing services provided and charges to the Fund with those for other non-fund investment management clients of the Advisor; and
25
• consideration of collateral or “fall-out” benefits derived by the Advisor from the management of the Fund and potential sharing of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund.
The Board also considered whether there was any reason for not continuing the existing arrangement with the Advisor. In particular, the Board recognized that shareholders may have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Advisor’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Advisor will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund.
The Board considered all of the information provided by the Advisor, the independent data providers, and the Board’s independent legal counsel, and evaluated such information for the Fund. The Board did not identify any single factor as being all-important or controlling, and each Board member may have attributed different levels of importance to different factors. In deciding to approve the Proposed Management Agreement under the terms ultimately determined by the Board to be appropriate, the Board based its decision on a number of factors, including the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services — Generally. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor is responsible for providing or arranging for all services necessary for the operation of the Fund. The Board noted that under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor provides or arranges at its own expense a wide variety of services including:
• constructing and designing the Fund
• portfolio research and security selection
• initial capitalization/funding
• securities trading
• Fund administration
• custody of Fund assets
• daily valuation of the Fund’s portfolio
• shareholder servicing and transfer agency, including shareholder
confirmations, recordkeeping and communications
• legal services
• regulatory and portfolio compliance
• financial reporting
• marketing and distribution
26
The Board noted that many of these services have expanded over time both in terms of quantity and complexity in response to shareholder demands, competition in the industry, changing distribution channels and the changing regulatory environment.
Investment Management Services. The investment management services provided to the Fund are complex and provide Fund shareholders access to professional money management, instant diversification of their investments within an asset class, the opportunity to easily diversify among asset classes, and liquidity. As a part of its general oversight and in evaluating investment performance, the Board expects the Advisor to manage the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives and approved strategies. In providing these services, the Advisor utilizes teams of investment professionals who require extensive information technology, research, training, compliance and other systems to conduct their business. The Board, directly and through its Fund Performance Review Committee, regularly reviews investment performance information f or the Fund, together with comparative information for appropriate benchmarks and/or peer groups of similarly-managed funds, over different time horizons. If performance concerns are identified, the underperforming Fund receives special reviews until performance improves, during which time the Board discusses with the Advisor the reasons for such underperformance and any efforts being undertaken to improve performance.
Shareholder and Other Services. Under the Proposed Management Agreement, the Advisor will also provide the Fund with a comprehensive package of transfer agency, shareholder, and other services. The Board, directly and through the various committees of the Board, regularly reviews reports and evaluations of such services. These reports include, but are not limited to, information regarding the operational efficiency and accuracy of the shareholder and transfer agency services provided, staffing levels, shareholder satisfaction (as measured by external as well as internal sources), technology support, new products and services offered to Fund shareholders, securities trading activities, portfolio valuation services, auditing services, and legal and operational compliance activities. Certain aspects of shareholder and transfer ag ency service level efficiency and the quality of securities trading activities are measured by independent third party providers and are presented in comparison to other fund groups not managed by the Advisor.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability. The Advisor provided detailed information concerning its cost of providing various services to the Fund, its profitability in managing the Fund, its overall profitability, and its financial condition. The Board reviewed with the Advisor the methodology used to prepare this financial information. The Board has also reviewed with the Advisor its methodology for compensating the investment professionals that provide services to the Fund as well as compensation to the five highest paid personnel of the Advisor. This financial information regarding the Advisor is considered in order to evaluate the Advisor’s financial condition, its ability to continue to provide services under the Proposed Management
27
Agreement, and the reasonableness of the proposed management fees. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the Fund.
Ethics. The Board generally considers the Advisor’s commitment to providing quality services to shareholders and to conducting its business ethically. It noted that the Advisor’s practices generally meet or exceed industry best practices.
Economies of Scale. The Board also reviewed information provided by the Advisor regarding the possible existence of economies of scale in connection with the management of the Fund. The Board concluded that economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, especially on a fund-by-fund basis. The analysis of economies of scale is further complicated by the additional services and content provided by the Advisor and its reinvestment in its ability to provide and expand those services. Accordingly, the Board seeks to evaluate economies of scale by reviewing information, such as year-over-year profitability of the Advisor generally, the profitability of its management of the Fund specifically, and the expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing various functions to the Fund. The Board believes the Advisor i s appropriately sharing economies of scale through its competitive fee structure, offering competitive fees from fund inception, fee breakpoints as the Fund increases in size, and through reinvestment in its business to provide shareholders additional services and enhancements to existing services.
Comparison to Fees of Funds not Managed by the Advisor. Both the Prior and Proposed Management Agreements provide that the Fund pays the Advisor a single, all-inclusive (or unified) management fee for providing all services necessary for the management and operation of the Fund, other than brokerage expenses, taxes, interest, extraordinary expenses, and the fees and expenses of the Fund’s Independent Trustees (including their independent legal counsel) and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of shareholder services and distribution services under a plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the unified fee structure, the Advisor is responsible for providing all investment advisory, custody, audit, administrative, compliance, recordkeeping, marketing and shareholder services, or arranging and supervising third parties that provide such services. By contrast, most other funds are charged a variety of fees, including an investment advisory fee, a transfer agency fee, an administrative fee, distribution charges and other expenses. Other than their investment advisory fees and any applicable Rule 12b-1 distribution fees, the components of the total fees charged by these other funds may be increased without shareholder approval. The Board believes the unified fee structure is a benefit to Fund shareholders because it clearly discloses to shareholders the cost of owning Fund shares, and, since the unified fee cannot be increased without a vote of Fund shareholders, it shifts to the Advisor the risk of increased costs of operating the Fund and provides a direct incentive to minimize administrative inefficiencies. Part of the Board’s analysis of fee levels involves reviewing certain evaluative data
28
compiled by an independent provider comparing the Fund’s unified fee to the total expense ratios of similar funds not managed by the Advisor. The Board concluded that the management fee to be paid by the Fund to the Advisor under the Proposed Management Agreement is reasonable in light of the services to be provided to the Fund.
Comparison to Fees and Services Provided to Other Clients of the Advisor. The Board also requested and received information from the Advisor concerning the nature and extent of the services, fees, and profitability of its advisory services to advisory clients other than the Fund. They observed that these varying types of client accounts require different services and involve different regulatory and entrepreneurial risks than the management of the Fund. The Board analyzed this information and concluded that the fees charged and services provided to the Fund were reasonable by comparison.
Collateral or “Fall-Out” Benefits Derived by the Advisor. The Board considered the existence of collateral benefits the Advisor may receive as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board concluded that the Advisor’s primary business is managing mutual funds and it generally does not use Fund or shareholder information to generate profits in other lines of business, and therefore does not derive any significant collateral benefits from them. The Board noted that the Advisor receives proprietary research from broker-dealers that execute Fund portfolio transactions and concluded that this research is likely to benefit Fund shareholders. The Board also determined that the Advisor is able to provide investment management services to certain clients other than the Fund, at least in part, due to its existing infrastructure built to serve the fund complex. The Board concluded, however, that the assets of those other clients are not material to the analysis and, in any event, are included with the assets of the Fund to determine breakpoints in the Fund’s fee schedule, provided they are managed using the same investment team and strategy.
Conclusion of the Board. As a result of this process, the Board, in the absence of particular circumstances and assisted by the advice of its independent legal counsel, taking into account all of the factors discussed above and the information provided by the Advisor and others, concluded that the Proposed Management Agreement be approved and recommended its approval to Fund shareholders.
29
Additional Information |
Retirement Account Information
As required by law, distributions you receive from certain IRAs, or 403(b), 457 and qualified plans are subject to federal income tax withholding, unless you elect not to have withholding apply. Tax will be withheld on the total amount withdrawn even though you may be receiving amounts that are not subject to withholding, such as nondeductible contributions. In such case, excess amounts of withholding could occur. You may adjust your withholding election so that a greater or lesser amount will be withheld.
If you don’t want us to withhold on this amount, you must notify us to not withhold the federal income tax. You may notify us in writing or in certain situations by telephone or through other electronic means. You have the right to revoke your withholding election at any time and any election you make may remain in effect until revoked by filing a new election.
Remember, even if you elect not to have income tax withheld, you are liable for paying income tax on the taxable portion of your withdrawal. If you elect not to have income tax withheld or you don’t have enough income tax withheld, you may be responsible for payment of estimated tax. You may incur penalties under the estimated tax rules if your withholding and estimated tax payments are not sufficient. You can reduce or defer the income tax on a distribution by directly or indirectly rolling such distribution over to another IRA or eligible plan. You should consult your tax advisor for additional information.
State tax will be withheld if, at the time of your distribution, your address is within one of the mandatory withholding states and you have federal income tax withheld. State taxes will be withheld from your distribution in accordance with the respective state rules.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
American Century Investment Management, Inc., the fund’s investment advisor, is responsible for exercising the voting rights associated with the securities purchased and/or held by the fund. A description of the policies and procedures the advisor uses in fulfilling this responsibility is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021. It is also available on American Century Investments’ website at americancentury.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at sec.gov. Information regarding how the investment advisor voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the “About Us” page at americancentury.com. It is also available at sec.gov.
Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The fund also makes its complete schedule of portfolio holdings for the most recent quarter of its fiscal year available on its website at americancentury.com and, upon request, by calling 1-800-345-2021.
30
Index Definitions |
The following indices are used to illustrate investment market, sector, or style performance or to serve as fund performance comparisons. They are not investment products available for purchase.
The Russell 1000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted, large-cap index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 1000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 Index companies (the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a market-capitalization weighted index created by Frank Russell Company to measure the performance of the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell 2000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies (the 2,000 smallest of the 3,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization.
The Russell Midcap® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell Midcap® Value Index measures the performance of those Russell Midcap Index companies (the 800 smallest of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies, based on total market capitalization) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
31
Notes |
32
Contact Us | |
americancentury.com | |
Automated Information Line | 1-800-345-8765 |
Investor Services Representative | 1-800-345-2021 or |
816-531-5575 | |
Investors Using Advisors | 1-800-378-9878 |
Business, Not-For-Profit, Employer-Sponsored | |
Retirement Plans | 1-800-345-3533 |
Banks and Trust Companies, Broker-Dealers, | |
Financial Professionals, Insurance Companies | 1-800-345-6488 |
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf | 1-800-634-4113 |
American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
Investment Advisor: | |
American Century Investment Management, Inc. | |
Kansas City, Missouri |
This report and the statements it contains are submitted for the general
information of our shareholders. The report is not authorized for distribution to
prospective investors unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.
American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor
©2010 American Century Proprietary Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
1006
CL-SAN-68449
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS. | |
Not applicable for semiannual report filings. | |
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. | |
Not applicable for semiannual report filings. | |
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. | |
Not applicable for semiannual report filings. | |
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. | |
Not applicable. | |
ITEM 6. INVESTMENTS. | |
(a) | The schedule of investments is included as part of the report to stockholders filed under Item 1 |
of this Form. | |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR | |
CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. | |
Not applicable. | |
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT | |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES. | |
Not applicable. | |
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT | |
INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. | |
Not applicable. | |
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. | |
During the reporting period, there were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may | |
recommend nominees to the registrant’s board. |
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. | ||
(a) | The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that | |
the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the | ||
Investment Company Act of 1940) are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and | ||
procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. | ||
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in | |
Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the registrant's | ||
second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are | ||
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | ||
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS. | ||
(a)(1) | Not applicable for semiannual report filings. | |
(a)(2) | Separate certifications by the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial | |
officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the | ||
Investment Company Act of 1940, are filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CERT. | ||
(a)(3) | Not applicable. | |
(b) | A certification by the registrant’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, pursuant to | |
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is furnished and attached hereto as EX- | ||
99.906CERT. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant: | American Century Mutual Funds, Inc. | |
By: | /s/ Jonathan S. Thomas | |
Name: | Jonathan S. Thomas | |
Title: | President | |
Date: | June 29, 2010 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ Jonathan S. Thomas | |
Name: | Jonathan S. Thomas | |
Title: | President | |
(principal executive officer) | ||
Date: | June 29, 2010 |
By: | /s/ Robert J. Leach | |
Name: | Robert J. Leach | |
Title: | Vice President, Treasurer, and | |
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(principal financial officer) | ||
Date: | June 29, 2010 |