UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[Ö ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended ...............................................................September 30, 2005
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to _________________
Commission File Number000-28304
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware & nbsp; 33-0704889
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R. S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
3756 Central Avenue, Riverside, California 92506
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(951) 686-6060
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YesÖ . No .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YesÖ . No .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell corporation (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes . No Ö .
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title of class: As of November 2, 2005
Common stock, $ 0.01 par value, per share 6,927,163 shares*
* Includes 334,769 shares held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") that have not been released, committed to be
released, or allocated to participant accounts; and 9,588 shares held by the Management Recognition Plan ("MRP") that have
been committed to be released and allocated to participant accounts.
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Table of Contents
PART 1 - | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
| |||
ITEM 1 - | Financial Statements. The Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. | ||
filed as a part of the report are as follows: | |||
| |||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition | |||
as of September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005 | 1 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | |||
for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 | 2 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity | |||
for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 | 3 | ||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |||
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 | 4 | ||
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 5 | ||
| |||
ITEM 2 - | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of | ||
Operations: | |||
| |||
General | 10 | ||
Safe Harbor Statement | 11 | ||
Critical Accounting Policies | 11 | ||
Executive Summary and Operating Strategy | 13 | ||
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual Obligations | 13 | ||
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005 | 14 | ||
Comparison of Operating Results | |||
for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 | 15 | ||
Asset Quality | 20 | ||
Loan Volume Activities | 22 | ||
Liquidity and Capital Resources | 23 | ||
Commitments and Derivative Financial Instruments | 24 | ||
Stockholders' Equity | 24 | ||
Incentive Plans | 25 | ||
Supplemental Information | 25 | ||
| |||
ITEM 3 - | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 26 | |
| |||
ITEM 4 - | Controls and Procedures | 27 | |
| |||
PART II - | OTHER INFORMATION | ||
| |||
ITEM 1 - | Legal Proceedings | 28 | |
ITEM 2 - | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 28 | |
ITEM 3 - | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 28 | |
ITEM 4 - | Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders | 28 | |
ITEM 5 - | Other Information | 28 | |
ITEM 6 - | Exhibits | 29 | |
| |||
SIGNATURES | 30 | ||
|
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Unaudited)
Dollars In Thousands
September 30, | June 30, | ||||
2005 | 2005 | ||||
Assets | |||||
Cash and due from banks | $ 22,389 | $ 20,342 | |||
Federal funds sold | 59,000 | 5,560 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 81,389 | 25,902 | |||
Investment securities - held to maturity | |||||
(fair value $51,036 and $51,327, respectively) | 52,228 | 52,228 | |||
Investment securities - available for sale, at fair value | 161,850 | 180,204 | |||
Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses of | |||||
$9,280 and $9,215, respectively | 1,127,538 | 1,131,905 | |||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market | 13,918 | 5,691 | |||
Receivable from sale of loans | 124,605 | 167,813 | |||
Accrued interest receivable | 5,849 | 6,294 | |||
Real estate held for investment, net | 9,693 | 9,853 | |||
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") - San Francisco stock | 38,412 | 37,130 | |||
Premises and equipment, net | 7,424 | 7,443 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 8,323 | 7,659 | |||
| |||||
Total assets | $ 1,631,229 | $ 1,632,122 | |||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Non-interest bearing deposits | $ 52,651 | $ 48,173 | |||
Interest bearing deposits | 910,456 | 870,458 | |||
Total deposits | 963,107 | 918,631 | |||
Borrowings | 507,337 | 560,845 | |||
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities | 34,499 | 29,657 | |||
Total liabilities | 1,504,943 | 1,509,133 | |||
Commitments and Contingencies | |||||
Stockholders' equity: | |||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value (2,000,000 shares authorized; | |||||
- | - | ||||
Common stock, $.01 par value (15,000,000 shares authorized; | |||||
120 | 120 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 60,037 | 59,497 | |||
Retained earnings | 130,340 | 126,381 | |||
Treasury stock at cost (5,045,387 and 5,016,525 shares, | |||||
(62,865 | ) | (62,046 | ) | ||
Unearned stock compensation | (1,117 | ) | (1,272 | ) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax | (229 | ) | 309 | ||
| |||||
Total stockholders' equity | 126,286 | 122,989 | |||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ 1,631,229 | $ 1,632,122 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||||||
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||
Loans receivable, net | $ 19,043 | $ 14,683 | ||||||
Investment securities | 1,813 | 2,033 | ||||||
FHLB - San Francisco stock | 405 | 370 | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits | 40 | 5 | ||||||
Total interest income | 21,301 | 17,091 | ||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||
Checking and money market deposits | 287 | 295 | ||||||
Savings deposits | 904 | 1,235 | ||||||
Time deposits | 3,782 | 2,004 | ||||||
Borrowings | 5,358 | 3,605 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 10,331 | 7,139 | ||||||
Net interest income, before provision for loan losses | 10,970 | 9,952 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 65 | 642 | ||||||
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses | 10,905 | 9,310 | ||||||
Non-interest income: | ||||||||
Loan servicing and other fees | 643 | 399 | ||||||
Gain on sale of loans, net | 4,393 | 4,376 | ||||||
Real estate operations, net | 5 | 120 | ||||||
Deposit account fees | 494 | 455 | ||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities | - | 384 | ||||||
Other | 420 | 359 | ||||||
Total non-interest income | 5,955 | 6,093 | ||||||
Non-interest expense: | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 5,204 | 5,077 | ||||||
Premises and occupancy | 793 | 671 | ||||||
Equipment | 399 | 404 | ||||||
Professional expenses | 344 | 220 | ||||||
Sales and marketing expenses | 219 | 182 | ||||||
Other | 1,194 | 1,056 | ||||||
Total non-interest expense | 8,153 | 7,610 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 8,707 | 7,793 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 3,774 | 3,538 | ||||||
Net income | $ 4,933 | $ 4,255 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ 0.75 | $ 0.64 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ 0.71 | $ 0.60 | ||||||
Cash dividends per share | $ 0.14 | $ 0.10 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited)
Dollars In Thousands
For the Quarters Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Common | Additional |
Retained |
Treasury | Unearned | Accumulated | ||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Compensation | Income | Total | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2005 | 6,956,815 | $ 120 | $ 59,497 | $ 126,381 | $ (62,046 | ) | $ ( 1,272 | ) | $ 309 | $ 122,989 | |||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||
Net income | 4,933 | 4,933 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss on | (538 | ) | (538 | ) | |||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 4,395 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock (1) | (28,862 | ) |
|
|
|
| (819 | ) |
|
|
|
| (819 | ) | |
Exercise of stock options | 3,659 | - | 43 | 43 | |||||||||||
Amortization of MRP (2) | 34 | 34 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options | 93 | 93 | |||||||||||||
Tax benefit from non-qualified | |||||||||||||||
equity compensation | 29 | 29 | |||||||||||||
Allocations of contribution to ESOP (3) | 375 | 68 | 443 | ||||||||||||
Prepayment of ESOP loan | 53 | 53 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends | (974 | ) | (974 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2005 | 6,931,612 | $ 120 | $ 60,037 | $ 130,340 | $ (62,865 | ) | $ ( 1,117 | ) | $ (229 | ) | $ 126,286 |
(2) Management Recognition Plan ("MRP")
(3) Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")
Common | Additional |
Retained |
Treasury | Unearned | Accumulated | ||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Compensation | Income | Total | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2004 | 7,091,719 | $ 119 | $ 57,186 | $ 111,329 | $ (56,753 | ) | $ ( 1,889 | ) | $ (10 | ) | $ 109,982 | ||||
Comprehensive income: | |||||||||||||||
Net income | 4,255 | 4,255 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gain on | 588 | 588 | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 4,843 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock (1) | (110,690 | ) |
|
|
|
| (2,571 | ) |
|
|
|
| (2,571 | ) | |
Exercise of stock options | 12,000 | - | 82 | 82 | |||||||||||
Amortization of MRP | 33 | 33 | |||||||||||||
Tax benefit from non-qualified | |||||||||||||||
equity compensation | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||
Allocations of contribution to ESOP | 302 | 68 | 370 | ||||||||||||
Prepayment of ESOP loan | 44 | 44 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends | (708 | ) | (708 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2004 | 6,993,029 | $ 119 | $ 57,573 | $ 114,876 | $ (59,324 | ) | $ ( 1,744 | ) | $ 578 | $ 112,078 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Dollars In Thousands
Three Months Ended | |||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||
Net income | $ 4,933 | $ 4,255 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) | |||||
operating activities: | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 874 | 778 | |||
Amortization of servicing rights | 130 | 123 | |||
Valuation allowance for impairment of servicing assets | (6 | ) | 84 | ||
Addition to servicing assets | (60 | ) | (262 | ) | |
Provision for loan losses | 65 | 642 | |||
Gain on sale of loans | (4,393 | ) | (4,376 | ) | |
Net gain on sale of investment securities | - | (384 | ) | ||
Stock compensation | 547 | 403 | |||
FHLB - San Francisco stock dividend | (385 | ) | (323 | ) | |
Tax benefit from non-qualified equity compensation | - | 3 | |||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities | 5,308 | (414 | ) | ||
Increase in prepaid expense and other assets | (285 | ) | (36 | ) | |
Loans originated for sale | (389,257 | ) | (299,270 | ) | |
Proceeds from sale of loans and net change in receivable from sale of loans | 410,155 | 286,904 | |||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | 27,626 | (11,873 | ) | ||
| |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans held for investment | 22,654 | (94,560 | ) | ||
Maturity and call of investment securities held to maturity | - | 5,165 | |||
Principal payments from mortgage-backed securities | 17,137 | 16,547 | |||
Purchase of investment securities available for sale | - | (37,791 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale | - | 390 | |||
Purchase of FHLB - San Francisco stock | (897 | ) | (2,617 | ) | |
Net additions of real estate | - | (172 | ) | ||
Net purchases of premises and equipment | (280 | ) | (133 | ) | |
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities | 38,614 | (113,171 | ) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||
Net increase in deposits | 44,476 | 23,723 | |||
(Repayment of) proceeds from borrowings, net | (53,508 | ) | 101,492 | ||
Exercise of stock options | 43 | 82 | |||
Tax benefit from non-qualified equity compensation | 29 | - | |||
Cash dividends | (974 | ) | (708 | ) | |
Treasury stock purchases | (819 | ) | (2,571 | ) | |
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities | (10,753 | ) | 122,018 | ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 55,487 | (3,026 | ) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 25,902 | 38,349 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ 81,389 | $ 35,323 | |||
Supplemental information: | |||||
Cash paid for interest | $ 10,303 | $ 6,505 | |||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ 600 | $ 1,800 | |||
Transfer of loans held for investment to loans held for sale | $ 18,472 | $ - |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
September 30, 2005
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The balance sheet data at June 30, 2005 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. (collectively, the "Corporation"). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") with respect to interim financial reporting. It is recommended that these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005, as amended (SEC File No. 000-28304). Certain amounts in the prior periods' financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. The results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2006.
Note 2: Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 154:
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections," that addresses accounting for changes in accounting principle, changes in accounting estimates, changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions, and error correction. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle and error correction unless impracticable to do so. SFAS No. 154 states an exception to retrospective application when a change in accounting principle, or the method of applying it, may be inseparable from the effect of a change in accounting estimate. When a change in principle is inseparable from a change in estimate, such as depreciation, amortization or depletion, the change to the financial statements is to be presented in a prospective manner. SFAS No. 154 and the required disclo sures are effective for accounting changes and error corrections in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
SFAS No. 123R:
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, "Share-Based Payment." This Statement supersedes Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 and its related implementation guidance and is a revision of SFAS No. 123. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during w hich an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.
5
<PAGE>
The Corporation adopted the revised accounting for stock-based compensation requirements on July 1, 2005. SFAS No. 123R allows for two alternative transition methods. The Corporation intends to follow the modified prospective method, which requires application of the new statement to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite services are rendered on or after the effective date. The compensation cost of that portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro-forma disclosures under the original SFAS No. 123.
EITF No. 03-1:
In June 2005, the FASB decided not to provide additional guidance on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment, and directed the staff to issue proposed FASB Staff Position ("FSP") Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 03-1-a, "Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1," as final. The final FSP will supersede EITF Issue No. 03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments," and EITF Topic No. D-44, "Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value." The final FSP (retitled FSP FAS 115-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments") will replace the guidance set forth in paragraphs 10-18 of EITF Issue 03-1 with references to existing other-than-temporary impairment guidance, such as SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59, "Accounting for Non-Current Marketable Equity Securities," and APB Opinion No. 18, "The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock." FSP FAS 115-1 will codify the guidance set forth in EITF Topic D-44 and clarify that an investor should recognize an impairment loss no later than when the impairment is deemed other than temporary, even if a decision to sell has not been made. FAS 115-1 will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005.
Note 3: Earnings Per Share and Stock-Based Compensation
Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that would then share in the earnings of the entity. The following table provides the basic and diluted EPS computations for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
6
<PAGE>
For the Quarter Ended | ||||
(In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share) | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
Numerator: | ||||
Net income - numerator for basic earnings | ||||
$ 4,933 | $ 4,255 | |||
Denominator: | ||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share: | ||||
6,585 | 6,602 | |||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||
Stock option dilution | 332 | 457 | ||
Stock award dilution | 10 | 14 | ||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share: | ||||
Adjusted weighted-average shares | 6,927 | 7,073 | ||
Basic earnings per share | $ 0.75 | $ 0.64 | ||
Diluted earnings per share | $ 0.71 | $ 0.60 |
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2005, stock options were accounted for under APB Opinion No. 25 using the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, no stock option expense was recorded in periods prior to the three months ended September 30, 2005, since the exercise price of the options issued has always been equal to the market value at the date of grant. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and directors. Effective July 1, 2005, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method under which the provisions of SFAS No. 123R are applied to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after June 30, 2005 and to awards outstanding on June 30, 2005 for which requisite service has not yet been rendered.
Had the Corporation determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for stock options exercisable under SFAS No. 123R prior to July 1, 2005, the Corporation's results of operations would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts for the period indicated below:
For the Quarter | ||||
(In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share) | Ended September 30, | |||
2005 | 2004 | |||
Net income, as reported | $ 4,933 | $ 4,255 | ||
Add: | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense included in the reported | ||||
net income, net of tax | 60 | 19 | ||
Deduct: | ||||
Total stock-based compensation expense, determined using fair value | ||||
method, net of tax | (60 | ) | ( 116 | ) |
Pro forma net income | $ 4,933 | $ 4,158 | ||
Earnings per share: | ||||
Basic - as reported | $ 0.75 | $ 0.64 | ||
Basic - pro forma | $ 0.75 | $ 0.63 | ||
Diluted - as reported | $ 0.71 | $ 0.60 | ||
Diluted - pro forma | $ 0.71 | $ 0.59 |
7
<PAGE>
Note 4: Operating Segment Reports
The Corporation operates in two business segments: community banking (Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. ("Bank")) and mortgage banking (Provident Bank Mortgage ("PBM"), a division of the Bank). The following tables set forth condensed statements of operations and total assets for the Corporation's operating segments for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively (in thousands).
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005 | |||||
Provident | |||||
Provident | Bank | Consolidated | |||
Bank | Mortgage | Totals | |||
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses | $ 10,109 | $ 796 | $ 10,905 | ||
Non-interest income: | |||||
Loan servicing and other fees (1) | (652 | ) | 1,295 | 643 | |
Gain on sale of loans, net (2) | 146 | 4,247 | 4,393 | ||
Real estate operations, net | 5 | - | 5 | ||
Deposit account fees | 494 | - | 494 | ||
Other | 419 | 1 | 420 | ||
Total non-interest income | 412 | 5,543 | 5,955 | ||
Non-interest expense: | |||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 3,283 | 1,921 | 5,204 | ||
Premises and occupancy | 547 | 246 | 793 | ||
Operating and administrative expenses | 1,161 | 995 | 2,156 | ||
Total non-interest expense | 4,991 | 3,162 | 8,153 | ||
Income before taxes | $ 5,530 | $ 3,177 | $ 8,707 | ||
Total assets, end of period | $ 1,492,934 | $ 138,295 | $ 1,631,229 |
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $997 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.
(2) Includes an inter-company charge of $60 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a
servicing retained basis.
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 | |||||
Provident | |||||
Provident | Bank | Consolidated | |||
Bank | Mortgage | Totals | |||
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses | $ 8,186 | $ 1,124 | $ 9,310 | ||
Non-interest income: | |||||
Loan servicing and other fees (1) | (1,461 | ) | 1,860 | 399 | |
Gain on sale of loans, net (2) | 108 | 4,268 | 4,376 | ||
Real estate operations, net | 120 | - | 120 | ||
Deposit account fees | 455 | - | 455 | ||
Gain on sale of investment securities | 384 | - | 384 | ||
Other | 357 | 2 | 359 | ||
Total non-interest income | (37 | ) | 6,130 | 6,093 | |
Non-interest expense: | |||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 3,218 | 1,859 | 5,077 | ||
Premises and occupancy | 500 | 171 | 671 | ||
Operating and administrative expenses | 1,083 | 779 | 1,862 | ||
Total non-interest expense | 4,801 | 2,809 | 7,610 | ||
Income before taxes | $ 3,348 | $ 4,445 | $ 7,793 | ||
Total assets, end of period | $ 1,324,231 | $ 122,147 | $ 1,446,378 |
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $1.6 million credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.
(2) Includes an inter-company charge of $142 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a
servicing retained basis.
8
<PAGE>
Note 5: Commitments and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, and forward loan sale agreements to third parties. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in entering into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
September 30, | June 30, | ||
Commitments | 2005 | 2005 | |
(In Thousands) | |||
Undisbursed loan funds - Construction loans | $ 96,869 | $ 95,162 | |
Undisbursed lines of credit - Single-family loans | 7,336 | 7,823 | |
Undisbursed lines of credit - Commercial business loans | 11,900 | 9,052 | |
Undisbursed lines of credit - Consumer loans | 1,484 | 1,631 | |
Commitments to extend credit on loans held for investment | 56,639 | 13,312 | |
Total | $ 174,228 | $ 126,980 |
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 and interpretations of the Derivative Implementation Group of the FASB, the fair value of the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, forward loan sale agreements and put option contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet, and are included in other assets or other liabilities. The Corporation does not apply hedge accounting to its derivative financial instruments; therefore, all changes in fair value are recorded in earnings. The net impact of derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations during the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was a gain of $319,000 and a gain of $41,000, respectively.
September 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | September 30, 2004 | ||||||||||
Fair | Fair | Fair | ||||||||||
Derivative Financial Instruments | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||
(In Thousands) | ||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | ||||||||||||
on loans to be held for sale (1) | $ 55,058 | $ 12 | $ 84,037 | $ (56 | ) | $ 47,117 | $ (15 | ) | ||||
Forward loan sale agreements | 26,721 | 115 | 48,000 | (85 | ) | 21,000 | 32 | |||||
Put option contracts | 13,000 | 85 | 20,000 | 50 | 10,000 | 27 | ||||||
Total | $ 94,779 | $ 212 | $ 152,037 | $ (91 | ) | $ 78,117 | $ 44 |
(1) Net of estimated commitments of 24.9 percent at September 30, 2005, 25.0 percent at June 30, 2005 and 25.1 percent at
September 30, 2004, which may not fund.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Corporation adopted the SEC guidance regarding loan commitments that are recognized as derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133. As a result of implementing the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, "Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments," the Corporation excludes the recognition of servicing released premiums in the valuation of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale. The Corporation's previous practice had been to recognize, at the inception of the rate lock, the anticipated servicing released premiums on the underlying loans. The Corporation elected to prospectively apply this guidance to new loan commitments initiated after January 1, 2004. This action delays the recognition of servicing released premiums until the underlying loans are funded and sold.
9
<PAGE>
Note 6: Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
As discussed in Note 5, the Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.As of September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005, the Corporation had commitments to extend credit of $111.7 million and $97.3 million, respectively.
Note 7: Pending Transaction
On September 13, 2005, the Corporation announced the signing of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell a commercial office building located in Riverside, California. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and contingencies such as the buyer's ability to secure financing and the buyer's due diligence review, among others. The Corporation anticipates that the transaction will close during the quarter ending December 31, 2005. The successful completion of the transaction is expected to result in a gain (net of taxes) of approximately $3.4 million.
Note 8: Subsequent Events
On October 27, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Bank declared a cash dividend of $2.0 million to the Corporation, which was paid on October 31, 2005.
On October 28, 2005, the Corporation announced a cash dividend of $0.14 per share on the Corporation's outstanding shares of common stock for shareholders of record at the close of business on November 22, 2005, payable on December 16, 2005.
On October 31, 2005, the Corporation announced the signing of a Lease Agreement with the intention of opening a new retail/business banking office in the La Sierra area in Riverside, California. The La Sierra Branch will become the Bank's 13thfull-service branch and is scheduled to open in the summer of 2006 subject to the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision and the completion of the shopping center.
ITEM 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was organized in January 1996 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. upon the Bank's conversion from a federal mutual to a federal stock savings bank ("Conversion"). The Conversion was completed on June 27, 1996. At September 30, 2005, the Corporation had total assets of $1.6 billion, total deposits of $963.1 million and total stockholders' equity of $126.3 million. The Corporation has not engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank and its subsidiaries.
The Bank, founded in 1956, is a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Riverside, California. The Bank is regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), the insurer of its deposits. The Bank's deposits are federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC under the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF"). The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System since 1956.
The Bank's business consists of community banking activities and mortgage banking activities. Community banking activities primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding the Bank's full service offices and investing these funds in single-family loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, consumer loans and other real estate loans. In addition, the Bank also offers business checking accounts, other business banking services, and services loans for others. Mortgage banking activities consist of the origination and sale of mortgage and consumer loans secured primarily by single-family residences. The
10
<PAGE>
Bank's revenues are derived principally from interest on its loan and investment portfolios and fees generated through its community banking and mortgage banking activities. There are various risks inherent in the Bank's business including, among others, interest rate changes and the prepayment of loans and investments.
The Corporation, from time to time, may repurchase its common stock as a way to enhance the Corporation's earnings per share. The Corporation evaluates the repurchase of its common stock when the market price of the stock is lower than its book value and/or the Corporation believes that the current market price is not commensurate with its current and future earnings potential. Consideration is also given to the Corporation's liquidity, regulatory capital requirements and future capital needs based on the Corporation's current business plan. The Corporation's Board of Directors authorizes each stock repurchase program, the duration of which is typically one year. Once the stock repurchase program is authorized, management may repurchase the Corporation's common stock from time to time in the open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending upon market conditions and the factors described above. On June 24, 2005, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors authoriz ed the repurchase of up to five percent of its common stock, or approximately 347,840 shares, over a one-year period. Please refer to the Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities table under Part II, Item 2 - "Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds" on page 28.
The Corporation began to distribute quarterly cash dividends in the quarter ended September 30, 2002. On July 26, 2005, the Corporation announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share for the Corporation's shareholders of record at the close of the business day on August 17, 2005, which was paid on September 8, 2005. Future declarations or payments of dividends will be subject to the consideration of the Corporation's Board of Directors, which will take into account the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations, tax considerations, capital requirements, industry standards, economic conditions and other factors, including the regulatory restrictions which affect the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation. Under Delaware law, dividends may be paid either out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is declared.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Selected Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Safe-Harbor Statement
Certain matters in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to, among others, expectations of the business environment in which the Corporation operates, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding the Corporation's mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations, and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. The Corporation's actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide range of factors including, but not limited to, the general business environment, interest rates, the California real estate market, the demand for loans, competitive con ditions between banks and non-bank financial services providers, regulatory changes, and other risks detailed in the Corporation's reports filed with the SEC, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as amended. Forward-looking statements are effective only as of the date that they are made and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update this information.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of the Corporation's financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to prevailing
11
<PAGE>
practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management considers the accounting for the allowance for loan losses and accounting for derivatives to be critical accounting policies.
Accounting for the allowance for loan losses involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of net loans. The allowance is based on two principles of accounting: (i) SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and can be estimated; and (ii) SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," and SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures," which require that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. The allowance has three components: (i) a formula allowance for groups of homogeneous loans; (ii) a specific allowance for identified problem loans; and (iii) an unallocated allowance. Each of these component s is based upon estimates that can change over time. The formula allowance is based primarily on historical experience and as a result can differ from actual losses incurred in the future. The history is reviewed at least quarterly and adjustments are made as needed. Various techniques are used to arrive at specific loss estimates, including historical loss information, discounted cash flows and fair market value of collateral. The use of these values is inherently subjective and the actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. For further details, see the "Provision for Loan Losses" narrative on page 18.
Interest is generally not accrued on any loan when its contractual payments are more than 90 days delinquent. In addition, interest is not recognized on any loan for which management has determined that collection is not reasonably assured. A non-accrual loan may be restored to accrual status when delinquent principal and interest payments are brought current, the loan is paying in accordance with its payment terms for a minimum six-month period, and future monthly principal and interest payments are expected to be collected.
Properties acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are transferred to the real estate owned portfolio and carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the estimated costs to sell the property. The fair values of the properties are based upon current appraisals. The difference between the fair value of the real estate collateral and the loan balance at the time of the transfer is recorded as a loan charge-off if fair value is lower. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs additional valuations and the properties are adjusted, if necessary, to the lower of carrying value or fair value, less estimated selling costs. The determination of a property's estimated fair value includes revenues projected to be realized from disposal of the property, construction and renovation costs.
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, requires that derivatives of the Corporation be recorded in the consolidated financial statements at fair value. The Bank's derivatives are primarily the result of its mortgage banking activities in the form of commitments to extend credit, commitments to sell loans and option contracts to mitigate the risk of the commitments. Estimates of the percentage of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale that may not fund are based upon historical data and current market trends. The fair value adjustments of the derivatives are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations with offsets to other assets or other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Executive Summary and Operating Strategy
Community banking operations primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding its full service offices and investing those funds in single-family, multi-family, commercial real estate, construction, commercial business, consumer and other loans. Additionally, certain fees are collected from depositors for services provided to them such as, non-sufficient fund fees, deposit account service charges, ATM fees, IRA/KEOGH fees, safe deposit box fees, travelers check fees, and wire transfer fees, among others. The primary source of income in community banking is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income produced by loans and securities, and the interest
12
<PAGE>
expense paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowed funds. During the next three years the Corporation intends to increase the community banking business by growing total assets; restructure the balance sheet by decreasing the percentage of investment securities to total assets and increasing the percentage of loans held for investment to total assets; and increase the concentration of multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans. In addition, over time, the Corporation also intends to emphasize the growth of checking and savings accounts. This strategy is intended to improve core revenue through a higher net interest margin and ultimately, coupled with the growth of the Corporation, an increase in net interest income.
Mortgage banking operations primarily consist of the origination and sale of mortgage loans secured by single-family residences. The primary sources of income in mortgage banking are gain on sale of loans and certain fees collected from borrowers in connection with the loan origination process. During the next three years the Corporation intends to originate and sell high margin mortgage banking products such as alt-A fixed rate, alt-A adjustable rate and second trust deed loans. Additionally, mortgage banking operations will continue to originate loans held for investment secured by single-family residences.
Investment services primarily consists of selling alternative investment products such as annuities and mutual funds to our depositors and real estate operations primarily consists of deriving net rental income from tenants that occupy the Corporation's real estate held for investment. Each of these businesses generates a relatively small portion of the Corporation's net income.
There are a number of risks associated with the business activities of the Corporation, many of which are beyond the Corporation's control, including: general economic conditions, either nationally or locally; changes in interest rates; changes in real estate values; changes in accounting principles; changes in regulation; changes in deposit and funding flows; and changes in competition among financial institutions or non-financial institutions, among others. The Corporation attempts to mitigate many of these risks through prudent banking practices such as interest rate risk management, credit risk management, operational risk management, and liquidity management. The current economic environment presents heightened risk for the Corporation primarily with respect to rising short-term interest rates and an increased concern that rising real estate values are unsustainable. Rising short-term interest rates have led to a flatter yield curve placing pressure on the Corporation's net interes t margin since the Corporation's assets are generally priced at the intermediate or long end of the yield curve and interest-bearing liabilities are generally priced at the short end of the yield curve. Rising real estate values may prove unsustainable which may lead to higher loan losses since the majority of the Corporation's loans are secured by real estate located within California. Significant declines in California real estate may inhibit the Corporation's ability to recover losses on defaulted loans from selling the underlying real estate.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Corporation's contractual obligations at September 30, 2005 and the effect these obligations are expected to have on the Corporation's liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||
1 year | Over 1 to | Over 3 to | Over | ||||||
or less | 3 years | 5 years | 5 years | Total | |||||
Operating lease obligations | $ 893 | $ 1,444 | $ 743 | $ 63 | $ 3,143 | ||||
Time deposits | 298,741 | 180,147 | 31,403 | - | 510,291 | ||||
FHLB - San Francisco advances | 145,246 | 155,369 | 116,107 | 161,226 | 577,948 | ||||
Total | $ 444,880 | $ 336,960 | $ 148,253 | $ 161,289 | $ 1,091,382 |
The expected obligation for time deposits and FHLB - San Francisco advances include anticipated interest accruals based on respective contractual terms.
13
<PAGE>
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005
Total assets remained unchanged at $1.6 billion at September 30, 2005 as compared to June 30, 2005. The decreases in investment securities and receivable from sale of loans were primarily offset by the increase in federal funds sold.
Federal funds sold increased to $59.0 million at September 30, 2005 from $5.6 million at June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to incoming funds received late in the day on September 30, 2005 that could not be used in a timely manner to pay down short-term FHLB - San Francisco advances.
Total investment securities decreased $18.3 million, or eight percent, to $214.1 million at September 30, 2005 from $232.4 million at June 30, 2005. The decrease was primarily the result of scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities. The Bank evaluates all of its investment securities quarterly for other-than-temporary declines in the market value of individual investment securities. The Bank has not recorded impairment losses as of September 30, 2005.
Loans held for investment remained unchanged at $1.13 billion at September 30, 2005 as compared to June 30, 2005. In the first three months of fiscal 2006, the Bank originated $166.1 million of loans held for investment, of which $60.2 million, or 36 percent, were "preferred loans" (multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans), including the purchase of $3.2 million of loans during the period. The collateral that secures the purchased loans is located primarilyin Southern California. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Bank sold $18.5 million of loans held for investment which contained certain higher risk characteristics (stated income, interest only, loan to value ratio greater than 74 percent, combined loan to value ratio greater than 95 percent and credit scores less than 700). During the quarter, the Bank tightened its underwriting criteria for Alt "A" loans eligible for loans held for investment and develop ed an "A" loan program designed to provide sufficient volume to replace the volume lost in the Alt "A" program. These actions were taken to reduce the credit risk exposure of loans held for investment. Total loan repayments during the first three months of fiscal 2006 were $143.8 million. The balance of preferred loans increased to $318.9 million, or 28 percent of loans held for investment at September 30, 2005, as compared to $318.2 million or 28 percent of loans held for investment, at June 30, 2005. Purchased loans serviced by others at September 30, 2005 were $57.6 million, or five percent of loans held for investment, compared to $63.9 million, or six percent of loans held for investment at June 30, 2005.
Loans held for sale increased $8.2 million, or 144 percent, to $13.9 million at September 30, 2005 from $5.7 million at June 30, 2005. The increase was the result of timing differences between loan funding and loan sale dates.
Receivable from the sale of loans decreased $43.2 million, or 26 percent, to $124.6 million at September 30, 2005 from $167.8 million at June 30, 2005. The decrease was the result of timing differences between loan sale and loan sale settlement dates.
Total deposits increased $44.5 million, or five percent, to $963.1 million at September 30, 2005 from $918.6 million at June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $54.2 million in time deposits, partly offset by a decrease of $9.7 million in transaction accounts. The increase in time deposits and the decrease in transaction accounts were attributable primarily to the increase in short-term interest rates and the Bank's advertising campaign for time deposits during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Borrowings, which consisted entirely of FHLB - San Francisco advances, decreased $53.5 million, or 10 percent, to $507.3 million at September 30, 2005 from $560.8 million at June 30, 2005. The decrease in borrowings was primarily the result of the increase in deposits and the decreases in loans held for investment and receivable from sale of loans. The weighted-average maturity of the Bank's existing FHLB - San Francisco advances was approximately 38 months (32 months, based on put dates) at September 30, 2005 as compared to the weighted-average maturity of 36months (31 months, based on put dates) at June 30, 2005.
Total stockholders' equity increased $3.3 million, or three percent, to $126.3 million at September 30, 2005, from $123.0 million at June 30, 2005, primarily as a result of the net income during the first three months of fiscal 2006, which was partly offset by common stock repurchases and a quarterly cash dividend
14
<PAGE>
paid during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. During the first three months of fiscal 2006, a total of 28,000 shares were repurchased under the existing stock repurchase program at an average price of $28.30 per share. As of September 30, 2005, eight percent of the authorized shares of the June 2005 stock repurchase plan were purchased, leaving approximately 319,840 shares available for future repurchase. The total cash dividend paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was $974,000.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarters Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
The Corporation's net income for the first quarter ended September 30, 2005 was $4.9 million, an increase of $678,000, or 16 percent, from $4.3 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in net interest income and a decrease in provision for loan loss, partly offset by an increase in non-interest expense.
The Corporation's net interest income before provision for loan losses increased by $1.0 million, or 10 percent, to $11.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $10.0 million during the comparable period of fiscal 2005. This increase was the result of higher average earning assets, partly offset by a lower net interest margin. The average balance of earning assets increased $252.0 million, or 19 percent, to $1.6 billion in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $1.3 billion in the comparable period of fiscal 2005. The net interest margin decreased to 2.80 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, down 23 basis points from 3.03 percent during the same period of fiscal 2005. The decrease in the net interest margin during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was primarily attributable to an increase in the average cost of funds, partly offset by an increase in the average yield of earning assets.
The Corporation's efficiency ratio increased slightly to 48 percent in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from 47 percent in the same period of fiscal 2005. Return on average assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 decreased 2 basis points to 1.22 percent from 1.24 percent in the same period last year; while return on average equity for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 increased to 15.80 percent from 15.35 percent in the same period last year. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were $0.71, an increase of 18 percent from $0.60 for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
Interest Income.Total interest income increased by $4.2 million, or 25 percent, to $21.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $17.1 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2005. This increase was primarily the result of a higher average balance of earning assets and a higher average earning asset yield. The average yield on earning assets during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was 5.44 percent, 24 basis points higher than the average yield of 5.20 percent during the same period of fiscal 2005. Increases in the average yield on loans, investment securities and interest-earning deposits were partly offset by a decrease in the average yield on FHLB - San Francisco stock.
Loan interest income increased $4.3 million, or 29 percent, to $19.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $14.7 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2005. This increase was attributable to a higher average loan balance and a higher average loan yield. The average balance of loans outstanding, including receivable from sale of loans and loans held for sale, increased $274.8 million, or 27 percent, to $1.3 billion during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $1.0 billion during the same quarter of fiscal 2005. The average loan yield during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 increased to 5.86 percent from 5.73 percent during the same quarter last year. The increase in the average loan yield was primarily attributable to new mortgage loans originated with higher interest rates and the repricing of adjustable rate loans during the period.
Interest income from investment securities decreased $220,000, or 11 percent, to $1.8 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $2.0 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2005. This decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in average balance, partly offset by an increase in average yield. The average balance of investment securities decreased $35.1 million, or 14 percent, to $224.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $259.5 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2005. The average yield on the investment securities portfolio increased 10 basis points to 3.23 percent during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from 3.13 percent during the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The increase in the average yield of investment securities was primarily a result of a decline in the accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") with a corresponding reduction to the MBS premium amortization. The accelerated amortization in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 declined by $75,000 to $118,000 as
15
<PAGE>
compared to $193,000 in the same quarter of fiscal 2005. This decline in the accelerated amortization resulted in an increase of 13 basis points in the investment yield.
FHLB - San Francisco stock dividends increased by $35,000, or nine percent, to $405,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $370,000 in the same period of fiscal 2005. This increase was attributable to a higher average balance, partly offset by a lower average yield. The average balance of FHLB - San Francisco stock increased $9.1 million to $37.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $28.8 million during the same period of fiscal 2005. The increase in FHLB - San Francisco stock was in accordance with the borrowing requirements of the FHLB - San Francisco. The average yield on FHLB - San Francisco stock decreased 87 basis points to 4.27 percent during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from 5.14 percent during the same period last year. The decrease in the average yield was primarily a result of lower dividend accruals, which are based upon the actual dividends received in the prior periods.
Interest Expense.Total interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 was $10.3 million as compared to $7.1 million for the same period of fiscal 2005, an increase of $3.2 million, or 45 percent. This increase was primarily attributable to a higher average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and an increase in the average cost. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $235.8 million, or 19 percent, to $1.5 billion during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from $1.2 billion during the same period of fiscal 2005. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 2.80 percent during the quarter ended September 30, 2005, up 49 basis points from 2.31 percent during the same period of fiscal 2005.
Interest expense on deposits for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 was $5.0 million as compared to $3.5 million for the same period of fiscal 2005, an increase of $1.5 million, or 43 percent. The increase in interest expense on deposits was primarily attributable to a higher average balance and a higher average cost. The average balance of deposits increased $65.7 million, or eight percent, to $936.9 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $871.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2005. The average balance of transaction accounts decreased by $81.4 million, or 15 percent, to $473.9 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $555.3 million in the same quarter ended September 30, 2004. The decrease was attributable to a decline in money market and savings accounts, partly offset by an increase in checking accounts. The average balance of time deposits increased by $147.1 million, or 47 percent, to $463.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as compared to $315.9 million in the same quarter ended September 30, 2004. The increase in time deposits is primarily attributable to the successful time deposit marketing campaign and depositors switching from money market accounts to time deposits. The average balance of transaction account deposits to total deposits in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was 51 percent, as compared to 64 percent in the same period of fiscal 2005. The average cost of deposits increased to 2.11 percent during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from 1.61 percent during the same quarter of fiscal 2005, an increase of 50 basis points. The increase in the average cost of deposits was attributable to the general rise in interest rates.
Interest expense on borrowings for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 increased $1.8 million, or 50 percent, to $5.4 million from $3.6 million for the same period of fiscal 2005. The increase in interest expense on borrowings was primarily a result of a higher average balance and a slightly higher average cost. The average balance of borrowings increased $170.1 million, or 48 percent, to $526.3 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $356.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2005. The average cost of borrowings increased to 4.04 percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from 4.02 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2005, an increase of two basis points. The increase in the average cost of borrowings was the result of new long-term advances at a higher average cost, partly offset by a higher percentage of overnight borrowings to total borrowings, which generally have a lower average cost.
16
<PAGE>
The following table depicts the average balance sheets for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively:
Average Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands)
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||
September 30, 2005 | September 30, 2004 | |||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||
Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | |||||||
Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable, net (1) | $ 1,300,225 | $ 19,043 | 5.86% | $ 1,025,428 | $ 14,683 | 5.73% | ||||||
Investment securities | 224,366 | 1,813 | 3.23% | 259,483 | 2,033 | 3.13% | ||||||
FHLB - San Francisco stock | 37,921 | 405 | 4.27% | 28,783 | 370 | 5.14% | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits | 4,699 | 40 | 3.40% | 1,467 | 5 | 1.36% | ||||||
Total interest-earning assets | 1,567,211 | 21,301 | 5.44% | 1,315,161 | 17,091 | 5.20% | ||||||
Non interest-earning assets | 52,127 | 55,912 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Total assets | $ 1,619,338 | $ 1,371,073 | ||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Checking and money market accounts (2) | $ 222,790 | 287 | 0.51% | $ 219,179 | 295 | 0.53% | ||||||
Savings accounts | 251,118 | 904 | 1.43% | 336,148 | 1,235 | 1.46% | ||||||
Time deposits | 463,024 | 3,782 | 3.24% | 315,866 | 2,004 | 2.52% | ||||||
Total deposits | 936,932 | 4,973 | 2.11% | 871,193 | 3,534 | 1.61% | ||||||
Borrowings | 526,281 | 5,358 | 4.04% | 356,209 | 3,605 | 4.02% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 1,463,213 | 10,331 | 2.80% | 1,227,402 | 7,139 | 2.31% | ||||||
Non interest-bearing liabilities | 31,201 |
|
| 32,775 | ||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,494,414 | 1,260,177 | ||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 124,924 | 110,896 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' | ||||||||||||
$ 1,619,338 | $ 1,371,073 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | $ 10,970 | $ 9,952 | ||||||||||
Interest rate spread (3) | 2.64% | 2.89% | ||||||||||
Net interest margin (4) | 2.80% | 3.03% | ||||||||||
Ratio of average interest-earning | ||||||||||||
107.11% | 107.15% | |||||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.22% | 1.24% | ||||||||||
Return on average equity | 15.80% | 15.35% | ||||||||||
(1) Includes receivable from sale of loans, loans held for sale and non-accrual loans, as well as net deferred loan (cost) fee amortization of ($120) and $93 for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. | ||||||||||||
(2) Includes average balance of non-interest bearing checking accounts of $51.3 million and $45.6 million during the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. | ||||||||||||
(3) Represents the difference between weighted-average yield on all interest-earning assets and weighted-average rate on all interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||||||||||
(4) Represents net interest income before provision for loan losses as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
17
<PAGE>
The following table provides the rate/volume variances for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively:
Rate/Volume Variance
(In Thousands)
Quarter Ended September 30, 2005 Compared | |||||||||||
to Quarter Ended September 30, 2004 | |||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||
Rate/ | |||||||||||
Rate | Volume | Volume | Net | ||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | |||||||||||
Loans receivable (1) | $ 335 | $ 3,936 | $ 89 | $ 4,360 | |||||||
Investment securities | 64 | (275 | ) | (9 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||
FHLB - San Francisco stock | (62 | ) | 117 | (20 | ) | 35 | |||||
Interest-bearing deposits | 8 | 11 | 16 | 35 | |||||||
Total net change in income | |||||||||||
345 | 3,789 | 76 | 4,210 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |||||||||||
Checking and money market accounts | (13 | ) | 5 | - | (8 | ) | |||||
Savings accounts | (24 | ) | (313 | ) | 6 | (331 | ) | ||||
Time deposits | 576 | 935 | 267 | 1,778 | |||||||
Borrowings | 21 | 1,723 | 9 | 1,753 | |||||||
Total net change in expense on | |||||||||||
560 | 2,350 | 282 | 3,192 | ||||||||
Net change in net interest | |||||||||||
$ (215 | ) | $ 1,439 | $ (206 | ) | $ 1,018 | ||||||
(1) Includes receivable from sale of loans, loans held for sale and non-accrual loans. For purposes of calculating volume, rate and rate/volume variances, non-accrual loans were included in the weighted-average balance outstanding. |
Provision for Loan Losses.Provision for loan losses in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 decreased to $65,000 from $642,000 during the same period of fiscal 2005. The decrease was primarily attributable to a smaller provision on impaired loans, partly offset by an increase in non-performing loans.
The allowance for loan losses was $9.3 million at September 30, 2005 as compared to $9.2 million at June 30, 2005. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment was 0.82 percent at September 30, 2005 as compared to 0.81 percent at June 30, 2005. Management considers the allowance for loan losses sufficient to absorb potential losses inherent in loans held for investment.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon management's continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. These factors include changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, current economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectibility may not be assured, and determination of the realizable value of the collateral securing the loans. Provisions for losses are charged against operations on a monthly basis as necessary to maintain the allowance at appropriate levels. Management believes that the amount maintained in the allowance will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Corporati on's loan portfolio, will not request the Corporation to significantly increase its allowance for loan losses. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions beyond the control of the Corporation.
18
<PAGE>
The following table is provided to disclose additional details on the Corporation's allowance for loan losses and asset quality:
Three Months Ended | |||||
September 30, | |||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | |||
Allowance at beginning of period | $ 9,215 | $ 7,614 | |||
Provision for loan losses | 65 | 642 | |||
Recoveries | - | - | |||
Charge-offs: | |||||
Consumer loans | - | (3 | ) | ||
Total charge-offs | - | (3 | ) | ||
Net charge-offs | - | (3 | ) | ||
Balance at end of period | $ 9,280 | $ 8,253 | |||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for | |||||
0.82% | 0.86% | ||||
Net charge offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding | |||||
- | - | ||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans | |||||
512.42% | 768.44% |
Non-Interest Income.Total non-interest income decreased $138,000, or two percent, to $6.0 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $6.1 million during the same period of fiscal 2005. The decrease in non-interest income was primarily the result of the gain on sale of investment securities in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 which was not replicated in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, partly offset by an increase in loan servicing and other fees. The increase in loan servicing and other fees was primarily attributable to higher brokered loan fees and other loan fees.
The gain on sale of loans remained unchanged at $4.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2005. A higher volume of loans originated for sale in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was offset by a decrease in average loan sale margin. The average loan sale margin for PBM during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was 1.23 percent, down 30 basis points from 1.53 percent in the same period of fiscal 2005. The volume of loans originated for sale remained relatively strong, totaling $389.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to $299.3 million during the same period last year, a result of relatively low mortgage interest rates and continued strength in the Southern California real estate market. Total loan originations (including purchased loans) were $555.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, up from $521.2 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2005. Loan sale volume, which is defined as PBM loans originated for s ale adjusted for the change in commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, was $346.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to $279.7 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2005.
The average profit margin for PBM in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 and 2005 was 68 basis points and 102 basis points, respectively. The average profit margin is defined as income before taxes divided by total loans funded during the period (including brokered loans) adjusted for the change in commitments to extend credit. The decrease in the profit margin was primarily attributable to a lower average loan sale margin.
19
<PAGE>
Non-Interest Expense.Total non-interest expense increased $543,000 to $8.2 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 from $7.6 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase in non-interest expense was primarily the result of an increase in variable compensation expense related to loan production volume in the community banking business and the mortgage banking business, lease expense on new loan production offices and compliance expenses associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Also, on July 1, 2005, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 123R (Share-Based Payment) and recorded $93,000 of stock option compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. This stock option expense was partially offset by a recovery of $23,000 resulting from the quarterly revaluation of the accelerated stock option vesting expense announced on April 28, 2005. The efficiency ratio in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 increased slightly to 48 percent from 47 percent in the same period of fiscal 2005.
Income taxes.Income tax expense was $3.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as compared to $3.5 million during the same period of fiscal 2005. The effective tax rate for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was approximately 43.3 percent and 45.4 percent, respectively. The Corporation believes that the effective income tax rate applied in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 reflects its current income tax obligations.
Asset Quality
Non-accrual loans, which primarily consisted of single-family loans increased to $1.8 million at September 30, 2005 from $590,000 at June 30, 2005. No interest accruals were made for loans that were past due 90 days or more.
The non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of net loans held for investment increased to 0.16 percent at September 30, 2005 from 0.05 percent at June 30, 2005. Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets also increased to 0.11 percent at September 30, 2005 from 0.04 percent at June 30, 2005.
The Bank reviews loans individually to identify when impairment has occurred. A loan is identified as impaired when it is deemed probable that the borrower will be unable to meet the scheduled principal and interest payments under the terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, the Bank may measure impairment based on a loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
20
<PAGE>
The following table is provided to disclose details on asset quality (dollars in thousands):
At September 30, | At June 30, | ||
2005 | 2005 | ||
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis: | |||
Mortgage loans: | |||
Single-family | $ 1,811 | $ 590 | |
Total | 1,811 | 590 | |
Accruing loans which are contractually | - | - | |
Total of non-accrual and 90 days past due loans | 1,811 | 590 | |
Real estate owned | - | - | |
Total non-performing assets | $ 1,811 | $ 590 | |
Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans | |||
0.16% | 0.05% | ||
Non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans | |||
0.11% | 0.04% | ||
Non-performing assets as a percentage of | 0.11% | 0.04% |
21
<PAGE>
The following table is provided to disclose details related to the volume of loans originated, purchased and sold:
Loan Volume Activities
(In Thousands)
For the Quarter Ended | |||||
September 30, | |||||
2005 | 2004 | ||||
Loans originated for sale: | |||||
Retail originations | $ 133,102 | $ 82,312 | |||
Wholesale originations | 256,155 | 216,958 | |||
Total loans originated for sale (1) | 389,257 | 299,270 | |||
Loans sold: | |||||
Servicing released | (392,860 | ) | (283,385 | ) | |
Servicing retained | (6,637 | ) | (19,752 | ) | |
Total loans sold (2) | (399,497 | ) | (303,137 | ) | |
Loans originated for portfolio: | |||||
Mortgage loans: | |||||
Single-family | 103,023 | 145,330 | |||
Multi-family | 6,751 | 10,895 | |||
Commercial real estate | 12,038 | 7,374 | |||
Construction | 39,679 | 28,507 | |||
Commercial business loans | 865 | 2,513 | |||
Other loans | 618 | 3,962 | |||
Total loans originated for portfolio | 162,974 | 198,581 | |||
Loans purchased for portfolio: | |||||
Mortgage loans: | |||||
Multi-family | - | 9,133 | |||
Commercial real estate | - | 2,375 | |||
Construction | - | 10,553 | |||
Commercial business loans | 900 | - | |||
Other loans | 2,250 | 1,250 | |||
Total loans purchased | 3,150 | 23,311 | |||
Mortgage loan principal repayments | (143,809 | ) | (129,547 | ) | |
Decrease in other items, net (3) | (8,215 | ) | (2,223 | ) | |
Net increase in loans held for investment and loans held for sale | $ 3,860 | $ 86,255 |
(1) Primarily comprised of PBM loans originated for sale, totaling $368.7 million and $291.0 million for the quarters ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(2) Primarily comprised of PBM loans sold, totaling $389.0 million and $297.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
(3) Includes net changes in undisbursed loan funds, deferred loan fees or costs, discounts or premiums on loans and allowance
for loan losses.
22
<PAGE>
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Corporation's primary sources of funding include deposits, proceeds from loan interest and scheduled principal payments, sales of loans, loan prepayments, interest income on investment securities, the maturity or principal payments on investment securities, and FHLB - San Francisco advances. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans and investment securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, loan sales, and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.
The Bank has a standard credit facility available from the FHLB - San Francisco equal to 40 percent of its total assets, collateralized by loans and securities. As of September 30, 2005, the Bank's available credit facility from the FHLB - San Francisco was $653.9 million. In addition to the FHLB - San Francisco credit facility, the Bank has an unsecured line of credit in the amount of $45.0 million with its correspondent bank.
The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth, to cover deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and take advantage of investment opportunities. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash to meet short-term liquidity needs. At September 30, 2005, cash and cash equivalents totaled $81.4 million, or five percent of total assets. Depending on market conditions and the pricing of deposit products and FHLB - San Francisco advances, the Bank may rely on FHLB - San Francisco advances or unsecured lines of credit for its liquidity needs.
The OTS has no statutory liquidity requirement for savings institutions, but rather a policy that liquidity be maintained at a level, which assures safe and sound operation. The Bank's average liquidity ratio for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 decreased to 6.9 percent from 19.3 percent during the same period in 2004. This decrease was primarily the result of redeployment of available cash flows into loans held for investment and the pledging of investment securities as collateral for certain interest-bearing liabilities.
The Bank continues to experience a large volume of loan prepayments in its loan portfolio and it continues to be a challenge to reinvest these cash flows in assets that carry similar or better interest rate risk characteristics. The Bank has mitigated the impact of this in several ways. The Bank has generated more loans for portfolio from its mortgage banking, business banking and commercial real estate divisions and purchased commercial real estate, multi-family and construction loans from other financial institutions. This has been accomplished with prudent interest-rate-risk management practices.
The Bank is committed to changing the loan portfolio composition with more emphasis on preferred loans. These loans generally have higher yields than single-family loans. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the volume of loans generated for portfolio was $166.1 million as compared to $221.9 million in the comparable period last year. Of the total loans generated for portfolio in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, $60.2 million, or 36 percent were preferred loans. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the total loans generated for portfolio was $221.9 million, of which $71.4 million, or 32 percent, were preferred loans.
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum requirements can initiate certain mandatory actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet certain specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.
23
<PAGE>
The Bank's actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of September 30, 2005 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Amount | Percent | ||
Tangible capital | $ 112,034 | 6.90% | |
Requirement | 32,473 | 2.00 | |
Excess over requirement | $ 79,561 | 4.90% | |
Tier 1 (core) capital | $ 112,034 | 6.90% | |
Requirement to be "Well Capitalized" | 81,183 | 5.00 | |
Excess over requirement | $ 30,851 | 1.90% | |
Total risk-based capital | $ 118,358 | 12.32% | |
Requirement to be "Well Capitalized" | 96,106 | 10.00 | |
Excess over requirement | $ 22,252 | 2.32% | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital | $ 109,156 | 11.36% | |
Requirement to be "Well Capitalized" | 57,663 | 6.00 | |
Excess over requirement | $ 51,493 | 5.36% |
Commitments and Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, and forward loan sale agreements to third parties. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counter party to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in entering into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. For discussion on commitments and derivative financial instruments, see Note 5 on page 9.
Stockholders' Equity
The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends depends primarily on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its net worth to be reduced below either the amounts required for the liquidation account established by the Bank in connection with the Conversion or the regulatory capital requirements imposed by federal and state regulation. The Corporation paid $974,000 of cash dividends to its shareholders in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
The Corporation repurchased 28,000 shares under the existing authorized stock repurchase program during the first quarter of fiscal 2006 at an average price of $28.30 per share. As of September 30, 2005, eight percent of the authorized shares of the June 2005 stock repurchase plan were purchased, leaving approximately 319,840 shares available for future repurchase.
24
<PAGE>
Incentive Plans
Management Recognition Plan (MRP):
The Corporation established the MRP to provide key employees and eligible directors with a proprietary interest in the growth, development and financial success of the Corporation through the award of restricted stock. The Corporation acquired 461,250 shares of its common stock in the open market to fund the MRP in 1997. All of the MRP shares have been awarded. Awarded shares vest over a five-year period as long as the employee or director remains an employee or director of the Corporation. The Corporation recognizes compensation expense for the MRP based on the fair value of the shares at the award date. MRP compensation expense was $34,000 and $33,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As of September 30, 2005, a total of 19,290 shares were allocated and outstanding, pending their respective distribution schedules.
Stock Option Plan:
The Corporation established the 1996 Stock Option Plan ("1996 SOP") for certain of its directors and key employees under which options to acquire up to 1.15 million shares of common stock may be granted. On November 18, 2003, shareholders approved the 2003 Stock Option Plan ("2003 SOP") for certain of its directors and key employees under which options to acquire up to 352,500 shares of common stock may be granted. Under the Stock Option Plans, options may not be granted at a price less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Options vest over a five-year period as long as the employee or director remains an employee or director of the Corporation. The options are exercisable after vesting for up to the remaining term of the original grant. The maximum term of the options granted is 10 years.
On April 28, 2005, the Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of certain unvested stock options, totaling 136,950 options, which were previously granted to directors, officers and key employees who had three or more continuous years of service with the Corporation or an affiliate of the Corporation. The Board believed that it was in the best interest of the shareholders to accelerate the vesting of these options which were granted prior to January 1, 2004, since it would have a positive impact on the future earnings of the Corporation. This action was taken prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R on July 1, 2005.
As a result of accelerating the vesting of these options, the Corporation recorded a charge to compensation expense of $320,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. This charge represents a new measurement of compensation cost for these options as of the modification date. The modification introduced the potential for an effective renewal of the awards as some of these options may have been forfeited by the employees. This charge requires adjustment in future periods for actual forfeiture experience. Because these options are now fully vested, they are not subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 123R.
The Corporation recorded $93,000 of stock option compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as a result of implementing SFAS No. 123R. This stock option expense was partially offset by a recovery of $23,000 resulting from the quarterly revaluation of the accelerated stock option vesting described above.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, a total of 9,000 options were granted, 2,000 options were forfeited and 3,659 options were exercised. As of September 30, 2005, the number of options available for future grants (under both plans) were 82,200 shares. As of September 30, 2005, a total of 977,966 options were outstanding with an average exercise price of $14.75 per option and an average remaining life of 5.30 years.
Supplemental Information
At | At | At | |||
September 30, | June 30, | September 30, | |||
2005 | 2005 | 2004 | |||
Loans serviced for others (in thousands) | $ 262,412 | $ 275,129 | $ 274,318 | ||
Book value per share | $ 18.22 | $ 17.68 | $ 16.03 |
25
<PAGE>
ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The principal financial objective of the Corporation's interest rate risk management function is to achieve long-term profitability while limiting its exposure to the fluctuation of interest rates. The Bank, through its Asset and Liability Committee seeks to reduce the exposure of its earnings to changes in market interest rates by managing the mismatch between asset and liability maturities. The principal element in achieving this objective is to manage the interest-rate sensitivity of the Bank's assets by holding loans with interest rates subject to periodic market adjustments. In addition, the Bank maintains a liquid investment portfolio comprised of government agency securities, including mortgage-backed securities, and investment grade securities. The Bank relies on retail deposits as its primary source of funding while utilizing FHLB - San Francisco advances as a secondary source of funding. As part of its interest rate risk ma nagement strategy, the Bank promotes transaction accounts and time deposits with terms up to five years.
Through the use of an internal interest rate risk model and the OTS interest rate risk model, the Bank is able to analyze its interest rate risk exposure by measuring the change in net portfolio value ("NPV") over a variety of interest rate scenarios. NPV is the net present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The calculation is intended to illustrate the change in NPV that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates of at least 100 basis points with no effect given to steps that management might take to counter the effect of the interest rate movement.
The results of the internal interest rate risk model are reconciled with the results provided by the OTS on a quarterly basis. Any significant deviations are researched and adjusted where applicable. Generally, the internal model has reflected a more conservative position than the OTS model.
The following table is derived from the OTS interest rate risk model and represents the NPV based on the indicated changes in interest rates as of September 30, 2005 (dollars in thousands).
NPV as Percentage | ||||||||||||||
Net | NPV | Portfolio | of Portfolio Value | Sensitivity | ||||||||||
Basis Points ("bp") | Portfolio | Change | Value of | Assets | Measure | |||||||||
Change in Rates | Value | (1) | Assets | (2) | (3) | |||||||||
+300 bp | $ 156,647 | (21,637 | ) | $ 1,604,855 | 9.76% | -87 bp | ||||||||
+200 bp | 168,756 | (9,528 | ) | 1,632,508 | 10.34% | -29 bp | ||||||||
+100 bp | 176,454 | (1,830 | ) | 1,657,207 | 10.65% | +2 bp | ||||||||
0 bp | 178,284 | - | 1,677,482 | 10.63% | ||||||||||
-100 bp | 173,379 | (4,905 | ) | 1,691,739 | 10.25% | -38 bp | ||||||||
-200 bp | 161,919 | (16,365 | ) | 1,700,152 | 9.52% | -110 bp | ||||||||
(1) Represents the (decrease) increase of the NPV at the indicated interest rate change in comparison to the NPV at
September 30, 2005 ("base case").
(2) Calculated as the NPV divided by the portfolio value of total assets.
(3) Calculated as the change in the NPV ratio from the base case amount assuming the indicated change in interest rates
(expressed in basis points).
The following table is derived from the OTS interest rate risk model and represents the change in the NPV at a -200 basis point rate shock at September 30, 2005 and a -200 basis point rate shock at June 30, 2005.
Risk measure: +200/-200 basis point rate shock | At September 30, 2005 | At June 30, 2005 | ||||
(-200 bp rate shock) | (-200 bp rate shock) | |||||
Pre-shock NPV ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets | 10.63 | % | 10.13 | % | ||
Post-shock NPV ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets | 9.52 | % | 8.83 | % | ||
Sensitivity measure: Change in NPV Ratio | 110 | bp | 130 | bp | ||
26
<PAGE>
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from time deposits could likely deviate significantly from those assumed when calculating the tables above. It is also poss ible that, as a result of an interest rate increase, the higher mortgage payments required from ARM borrowers could result in an increase in delinquencies and defaults. Changes in market interest rates may also affect the volume and profitability of the Corporation's mortgage banking operations. Accordingly, the data presented in the tables above should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in the event of changes in interest rates. Furthermore, the NPV presented in the foregoing tables is not intended to present the fair market value of the Bank, nor does it represent amounts that would be available for distribution to shareholders in the event of the liquidation of the Corporation.
The Bank also models the sensitivity of net interest income for the 12-month period subsequent to any given month-end assuming a dynamic balance sheet (accounting for the Bank's current balance sheet, 12-month business plan, embedded options, rate floors, periodic caps, lifetime caps, and loan, investment, deposit and borrowing cash flows, among others), and immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates of plus 100, plus 200, minus 100 and minus 200 basis points. The following table describes the results of the analysis for September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005.
At September 30, 2005 | At June 30, 2005 | |||||
Basis Point (bp) | Change in | Basis Point (bp) | Change in | |||
Change in Rates | Net Interest Income | Change in Rates | Net Interest Income | |||
+200 bp | -6.10% | +200 bp | -13.39% | |||
+100 bp | -1.84% | +100 bp | -6.28% | |||
-100 bp | +2.84% | -100 bp | +3.48% | |||
-200 bp | -1.21% | -200 bp | -3.74% |
In both of the periods described above, the Bank is liability sensitive. Therefore, in a rising interest rate environment, the results project a decline in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month period, and in a falling interest rate environment, the results project an increase in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month period, except in the -200 basis point scenario where net interest income is also projected to decline.
Management believes that the assumptions used to complete the analysis described in the table above are reasonable. However, past experience has shown that immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates will not necessarily occur. Additionally, while the analysis provides a tool to evaluate the projected net interest income to changes in interest rates, actual results may be substantially different if actual experience differs from the assumptions used to complete the analysis. Therefore, the model results that we disclose should be thought of as a risk management tool to compare the trends of our current disclosure to previous disclosures, over time, within the context of the actual performance of the treasury yield curve.
ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures.
An evaluation of the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedure (as defined in Section 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act")) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the Corporation's Disclosure Committee as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Corporation's management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
27
<PAGE>
Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
In the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Corporation did not make any significant changes in, nor were any corrective actions required, regarding its internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, the Corporation or its subsidiaries are engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently considered to have a material impact on the Corporation's financial position or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The table below represents the issuer purchases of equity securities for the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | (b) Average Price | (c) Total Number of | (d) Maximum |
July 1 - 31, 2005 | 862 | $ 30.57 | - | 347,840 |
August 1 - 31, 2005 | - | - | - | 347,840 |
September 1 - 30, 2005 | 28,000 | 28.30 | 28,000 | 319,840 |
Total | 28,862 | $ 28.37 | 28,000 | 319,840 |
(*) On June 24, 2005 the Corporation announced a plan to repurchase up to 5 percent of its common stock, or approximately 347,840 shares, over a one-year period depending on market conditions and the capital requirements of the Corporation.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
28
<PAGE>
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibits:
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
29
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.
November 7, 2005 /s/Craig G. Blunden
Craig G. Blunden
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
November 7, 2005 /s/Donavon P. Ternes
Donavon P. Ternes
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
30
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Craig G. Blunden, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15-(f)) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 7, 2005 /s/ Craig G. Blunden
Craig G. Blunden
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Donavon P. Ternes, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15-(f)) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 7, 2005 /s/ Donavon P. Ternes
Donavon P. Ternes
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Craig G. Blunden, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
Date: November 7, 2005 /s/Craig G. Blunden
Craig G. Blunden
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Donavon P. Ternes, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
Date: November 7, 2005 /s/ Donavon P. Ternes
Donavon P. Ternes
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>