Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 30, 2015 |
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
1.Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Nature of Business |
|
The Company is organized under the laws of the State of California. Effective October 18, 2013, 99¢ Only Stores converted from a California corporation to a California limited liability company, 99 Cents Only Stores LLC, that is managed by its sole member, Number Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”). The term “Company” refers to 99¢ Only Stores and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the Conversion (as defined below) and to 99 Cents Only Stores LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries at the time of or after the Conversion. The Company is an extreme value retailer of consumable and general merchandise and seasonal products. As of January 30, 2015, the Company operated 383 retail stores with 277 in California, 49 in Texas, 36 in Arizona, and 21 in Nevada. The Company is also a wholesale distributor of various products. |
|
Merger |
|
On January 13, 2012, the Company was acquired through a merger (the “Merger”) with a subsidiary of Number Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation with the Company surviving. In connection with the Merger, the Company became a subsidiary of Parent, which is controlled by affiliates of Ares Management, L.P. (“Ares”), Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPPIB”) (together, the “Sponsors”) and, prior to the Gold-Schiffer Purchase (as described in Note 9, “Related-Party Transactions”), the Rollover Investors (as described in Note 9, “Related-Party Transactions”). As a result of the Merger, the Company’s common stock was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and the Company ceased to be a publicly held and traded equity company. |
|
Conversion to LLC |
|
On October 18, 2013, 99¢ Only Stores converted (the “Conversion”) from a California corporation to a California limited liability company, 99 Cents Only Stores LLC (“99 LLC”), that is managed by its sole member, Parent. In connection with the Conversion, each outstanding share of Class A common stock of 99¢ Only Stores, par value $0.01 per share, was converted into one membership unit of 99 LLC, and each outstanding share of Class B common stock of 99¢ Only Stores, par value $0.01 per share, was cancelled and forfeited. Pursuant to the laws of the State of California, all rights and property of 99¢ Only Stores were vested in 99 LLC and all debts, liabilities and obligations of 99¢ Only Stores continued as debts, liabilities and obligations of 99 LLC. 99 LLC has elected to be treated as a disregarded entity for United States federal income tax purposes. The Conversion did not have any effect on deferred tax assets or liabilities, and the Company will continue to use the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The Company and Parent will continue to file consolidated or combined income tax returns with its subsidiaries in all jurisdictions. |
|
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries required to be consolidated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Intercompany accounts and transactions between the consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
Change in Fiscal Year |
|
On December 16, 2013, the board of directors of the Company’s sole member, Parent, approved a resolution changing the end of the Company’s fiscal year. Prior to the change, the fiscal year of the Company ended on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. The Company’s new fiscal year end is the Friday closest to the last day of January, with each successive quarterly period ending the Friday closest to the last day of April, July, October or January, as applicable. |
|
The Company follows a fiscal calendar consisting of four quarters with 91 days, each ending on the Friday closest to the calendar quarter-end, and a 52-week fiscal year with 364 days, with a 53-week year every five to six years. Unless otherwise stated, references to years in this report relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years. The Company’s fiscal year 2015 (“fiscal 2015”) began on February 1, 2014, and ended January 30, 2015 and consisted of 52 weeks. The Company’s fiscal year 2014 (“transition fiscal 2014” or the “ten months ended January 31, 2014”) began on March 31, 2013 and ended on January 31, 2014 and consisted of 44 weeks. The Company’s fiscal year 2013 (“fiscal 2013”) began on April 1, 2012 and ended on March 30, 2013 and consisted of 52 weeks. |
|
See Note 2, “Change in Fiscal Year” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the comparative Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the ten months ended January 31, 2014 (a 44-week period) and ten months ended January 26, 2013 (a 43-week period). |
|
Change in Presentation of Financial Statements |
|
In the first quarter ended May 2, 2014 (the “first quarter of fiscal 2015”), the Company changed the presentation of its financial statements to include receiving, distribution, warehouse costs and transportation to and from stores in its cost of sales. Previously, these costs were included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Depreciation expense related to these costs, which was historically included in selling, general and administrative expense, is now also included in cost of sales. Also, depreciation and amortization expense previously included in selling, general and administrative expense is no longer presented separately. Reclassifications of $87.0 million and $88.8 million from selling, general and administrative expense to cost of sales were made for transition fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, respectively, to conform to current year presentation. This change does not change previously reported operating income or net income. |
|
This change in presentation of financial statements was made in order to be in line with the Company’s peers in the retail industry. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
|
Cash |
|
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash includes cash on hand, cash at the stores and cash in financial institutions. The majority of payments due from financial institutions for the settlement of debit card and credit card transactions are processed within three business days and therefore are also classified as cash. Cash balances held at financial institutions are generally in excess of federally insured limits. These accounts are only insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company’s cash balances held at financial institutions and exceeding FDIC insurance totaled $2.1 million and $35.0 million as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. The Company historically has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company places its temporary cash investments with what it believes to be high credit, quality financial institutions. Under the Company’s cash management system, checks issued but not presented to the bank may result in book cash overdraft balances for accounting purposes. The Company reclassifies book overdrafts to accounts payable, which are reflected as an operating activity in its consolidated statements of cash flows. Book overdrafts included in accounts payable were $16.5 million and $9.3 million as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
In connection with its wholesale business, the Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In cases where the Company is aware of circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations subsequent to the original sale, the Company will record an allowance against amounts due and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers and tenants, the Company recognizes allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, industry and geographic concentrations, the current business environment and the Company’s historical experiences. |
|
Inventories |
|
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is established using a methodology that approximates first in, first out, which for store inventories is based on a retail inventory method. Valuation allowances for shrinkage as well as excess and obsolete inventory are also recorded. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of sales for the period from the last physical inventory date to the end of the applicable period. Such estimates are based on experience and the most recent physical inventory results. Physical inventory counts are completed at each of the Company’s retail stores at least once a year by an outside inventory service company. The Company performs inventory cycle counts at its warehouses throughout the year. The Company also performs inventory reviews and analysis on a quarterly basis for both warehouse and store inventory to determine inventory valuation allowances for excess and obsolete inventory. The valuation allowances for excess and obsolete inventory are based on the age of the inventory, sales trends and future merchandising plans. The valuation allowances for excess and obsolete inventory require management judgment and estimates that may impact the ending inventory valuation and valuation allowances that may affect the reported gross margin for the period. |
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company revised its inventory merchandising and liquidation philosophies to significantly reduce and liquidate slow moving inventories prospectively as directed by the then current management team. As a result of this change, the Company recorded a charge to cost of sales and a corresponding reduction in inventory of approximately $9.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. This was a prospective change and did not have an effect on prior periods. |
|
At the end of the third quarter of transition fiscal 2014, based on new merchandising plans, the Company increased its valuation allowances for excess and obsolete inventory. The Company recorded a charge to cost of sales and a corresponding reduction in inventory of approximately $9.6 million. This was a prospective change and did not have an effect on prior periods. |
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company recorded a charge for additional inventory shrinkage based upon the results of annual physical inventory counts completed during the quarter. This resulted in a net charge to cost of sales and a corresponding reduction in inventory of approximately $10.0 million, which was primarily related to the implementation of certain strategic initiatives, including the “Go Taller” store remodeling program. |
|
In order to obtain inventory at attractive prices, the Company takes advantage of large volume purchases, closeouts and other similar purchases. As such, the Company’s inventory fluctuates from period to period and the inventory balances vary based on the timing and availability of such opportunities. |
|
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over the following useful lives: |
|
Owned buildings and improvements | | Lesser of 30 years or the estimated useful life of the improvement | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | Lesser of the estimated useful life of the improvement or remaining lease term | | | | | | | | |
Fixtures and equipment | | 3-5 years | | | | | | | | |
Transportation equipment | | 3-5 years | | | | | | | | |
Information technology systems | | For major corporate systems, estimated useful life up to 7 years; for functional standalone systems, estimated useful life up to 5 years | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company’s policy is to capitalize expenditures that materially increase asset lives and expense ordinary repairs and maintenance as incurred. |
|
Long-Lived Assets |
|
The Company assesses the impairment of depreciable long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company groups and evaluates long-lived assets for impairment at the individual store level, which is the lowest level at which individual identifiable cash flows are available. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to expected future net cash flows generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying amount is compared to its fair value and an impairment charge is recognized to the extent of the difference. Factors that the Company considers important that could individually or in combination trigger an impairment review include the following: (1) significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (2) significant changes in the manner of the Company’s use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business; and (3) significant changes in the Company’s business strategies and/or negative industry or economic trends. On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses whether events or changes in circumstances occur that potentially indicate that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable (Level 3 measurement, see Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”). Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate projected future operating cash flows. Accordingly, if actual results fall short of such estimates, significant future impairments could result. During fiscal 2015, the Company wrote down the carrying value of a held for sale property to the estimated net realizable value, net of expected disposal costs, and accordingly recorded an asset impairment charge of $0.1 million. During transition fiscal 2014, the Company did not record any long-lived asset impairment charges. During fiscal 2013, the Company wrote down the carrying value of a held for sale property to the estimated net realizable value, net of expected disposal costs, and accordingly recorded an asset impairment charge of $0.5 million. |
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
|
In connection with the Merger purchase price allocation, the fair values of long-lived and intangible assets were determined based upon assumptions related to the future cash flows, discount rates and asset lives using then available information, and in some cases were obtained from independent professional valuation experts. The Company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives unless such lives are deemed indefinite. |
|
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead tested annually for impairment or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the reporting unit to the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned. The Company has the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit (i.e., step one of the goodwill impairment test). If the Company does not perform a qualitative assessment, or determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not impaired; otherwise, goodwill is impaired and the loss is measured by performing step two. Under step two, the impairment loss is measured by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. Management has determined that the Company has two reporting units, the retail reporting unit and the wholesale reporting unit. The amount of goodwill allocated to the retail reporting unit and wholesale reporting unit was $467.2 and $12.5 million, respectively, as of January 30, 2015. |
|
The Company performs the annual test for impairment in January of the fiscal year and determines fair value based on a combination of the income approach and the market approach. The income approach is based on discounted cash flows to determine fair value. The market approach uses a selection of comparable companies and transactions in determining fair value. The fair value of the trade name is also tested for impairment in the fourth quarter by comparing the carrying value to the fair value. Fair value of a trade name is determined using a relief from royalty method under the income approach, which uses projected revenue allocable to the trade name and an assumed royalty rate (Level 3 measurement, see Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”). |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company completed step one of its goodwill impairment test for the two reporting units and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill since the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the carrying amount. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company completed its annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test and determined there was no impairment since the fair value of the trade name exceeded the carrying amount. |
|
Amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable based on undiscounted cash flows, and, if impaired, written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values. Significant judgment is required in determining whether a potential indicator of impairment of long-lived assets exists and in estimating future cash flows used in the impairment tests (Level 3 measurement, see Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”). |
|
Derivatives |
|
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with authoritative guidance for derivative instrument and hedging activities. All financial instrument positions taken by the Company are intended to be used to manage risks associated with interest rate exposures. |
|
The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, and are recorded in either current or noncurrent assets or liabilities based on their maturity. Changes in the fair values of derivatives are recorded in net earnings or other comprehensive income (“OCI”), based on whether the instrument is designated and effective as a hedge transaction and, if so, the type of hedge transaction. Gains or losses on derivative instruments reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) are reclassified to earnings in the period the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffectiveness is recognized in earnings in the period incurred. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company’s ability to realize deferred tax assets is assessed throughout the year and a valuation allowance is established accordingly. The Company recognizes the impact of a tax position only if it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The Company recognizes potential interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Refer to Note 5, “Income Tax Provision” for further discussion of income taxes. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company accounts for stock-based payment awards based on their fair value. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense ratably over the requisite service periods. For awards classified as equity, the Company estimates the fair value for each option award as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or other appropriate valuation models. The Black-Scholes model considers, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of the stock price. Stock options are generally granted to employees at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the stock at the dates of grant. Former executive put rights were classified as equity awards and revalued using a binomial model at each reporting period with changes in the fair value recognized as stock-based compensation expense. The fair value of the options that will vest based on the Company’s and Parent’s achievement of certain performance hurdles were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation method. Refer to Note 11, “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” for further discussion of stock-based compensation. |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
The Company recognizes retail sales in its retail stores at the time the customer takes possession of merchandise. All sales are net of discounts and returns and exclude sales tax. Wholesale sales are recognized in accordance with the shipping terms agreed upon on the purchase order. Wholesale sales are typically recognized free on board origin, where title and risk of loss pass to the buyer when the merchandise leaves the Company’s distribution facility. |
|
The Company has a gift card program. The Company does not charge administrative fees on gift cards and the Company’s gift cards do not have expiration dates. The Company records the sale of gift cards as a current liability and recognizes a sale when a customer redeems a gift card. The liability for outstanding gift cards is recorded in accrued expenses. |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
Cost of sales includes the cost of inventory, freight in, obsolescence, spoilage, scrap and inventory shrinkage, and is net of discounts and allowances. Cost of sales also includes receiving, warehouse costs and distribution costs (which include payroll and associated costs, occupancy, transportation to and from stores and depreciation expense). Cash discounts for satisfying early payment terms are recognized when payment is made, and allowances and rebates based upon milestone achievements such as reaching a certain volume of purchases of a vendor’s products are included as a reduction of cost of sales when such contractual milestones are reached. In addition, the Company analyzes its inventory levels and the related cash discounts received to arrive at a value for cash discounts to be included in the inventory balance. |
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the costs of selling merchandise in stores (which include payroll and associated costs, occupancy and other store-level costs) and corporate costs (which include payroll and associated costs, occupancy, advertising, professional fees and other corporate administrative costs). Selling, general and administrative expenses also include depreciation and amortization expense relating to these costs. |
|
Leases |
|
The Company follows the policy of capitalizing allowable expenditures that relate to the acquisition and signing of its retail store leases. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term. |
|
The Company recognizes rent expense for operating leases on a straight-line basis (including the effect of reduced or free rent and rent escalations) over the applicable lease term. The difference between the cash paid to the landlord and the amount recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis is included in deferred rent. Cash reimbursements received from landlords for leasehold improvements and other cash payments received from landlords as lease incentives are recorded as deferred rent. Deferred rent related to landlord incentives is amortized as an offset to rent expense using the straight-line method over the applicable lease term. |
|
In certain lease arrangements, the Company can be involved with the construction of the building. If it is determined that the Company has substantially all of the risks of ownership during construction of the leased property and therefore is deemed to be the owner of the construction project, the Company records an asset for the amount of the total project costs and an amount related to the value attributed to the pre-existing leased building in property and equipment, net and the related financing obligation as part of current and non-current liabilities. Once construction is complete, if it is determined that the asset does not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting treatment, the Company amortizes the obligation over the lease term and depreciates the asset over the life of the lease. The Company does not report rent expense for the portion of the rent payment determined to be related to the assets which are owned for accounting purposes. Rather, this portion of the rent payment under the lease is recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and interest expense. |
|
For store closures where a lease obligation still exists, the Company records the estimated future liability associated with the rental obligation on the cease use date (when the store is closed). Liabilities are established at the cease use date for the present value of any remaining operating lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, and at the communication date for severance and other exit costs. Key assumptions in calculating the liability include the timeframe expected to terminate lease agreements, estimates related to the sublease potential of closed locations, and estimates of other related exit costs. If actual timing and potential termination costs or realization of sublease income differ from the Company’s estimates, the resulting liabilities could vary from recorded amounts. These liabilities are reviewed periodically and adjusted when necessary. |
|
During fiscal 2013, the Company sold and leased back three stores and the resulting leases qualify and are accounted for as operating leases. The net proceeds from the sale-leaseback transactions amounted to $5.3 million. Gains of $0.4 million were deferred and are being amortized over the term of lease (12-15 years). |
|
Self-Insured Workers’ Compensation Liability |
|
The Company self-insures for workers’ compensation claims in California and Texas. The Company establishes a liability for losses from both estimated known and incurred but not reported insurance claims based on reported claims and actuarial valuations of estimated future costs of known and incurred but not yet reported claims. Should an amount of claims greater than anticipated occur, the liability recorded may not be sufficient and additional workers’ compensation costs, which may be significant, could be incurred. The Company has not discounted the projected future cash outlays for the time value of money for claims and claim-related costs when establishing its workers’ compensation liability in its financial reports for January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014. |
|
Self-Insured Health Insurance Liability |
|
The Company self-insures for a portion of its employee medical benefit claims. The liability for the self-funded portion of the Company health insurance program is determined actuarially, based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. The Company maintains stop loss insurance coverage to limit its exposure for the self-funded portion of its health insurance program. |
|
Pre-Opening Costs |
|
The Company expenses, as incurred, pre-opening costs such as payroll, rent and marketing related to the opening of new retail stores. |
|
Advertising |
|
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were $6.2 million for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2015. Advertising expenses were $4.4 million for the ten months ended January 31, 2014. Advertising expenses were $5.4 million for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2013. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, interest rate derivatives, accounts payable, accruals, debt, and other liabilities. Cash and interest rate derivatives are measured and recorded at fair value. Accounts receivable and other receivables are financial assets with carrying values that approximate fair value. Accounts payable and other accrued expenses are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. Refer to Note 8, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for further discussion of the fair value of debt. |
|
The Company uses the authoritative guidance for fair value, which includes the definition of fair value, the framework for measuring fair value, and disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value measurements reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information available. Assumptions include the risks inherent in a particular valuation technique (such as a pricing model) and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the model. |
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
Other comprehensive income (“OCI”) includes unrealized gains or losses on investments and interest rate derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. The following table sets forth the calculation of comprehensive income, net of tax effects, for the periods indicated (in thousands): |
|
| | Year Ended | | Ten Months | | Year Ended | |
Ended |
| | January 30, | | January 31, | | March 30, 2013 | |
2015 | 2014 |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 5,502 | | $ | (12,485 | ) | $ | (8,909 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Unrealized holding gains on marketable securities, net of tax effects of $0 in fiscal 2015, $0 in transition fiscal 2014 and $3 in fiscal 2013 | | — | | — | | 4 | |
Unrealized losses on interest rate cash flow hedge, net of tax effects of $(384) in fiscal 2015, $(190) in transition fiscal 2014 and $(835) in fiscal 2013 | | (576 | ) | (284 | ) | (1,252 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax effects of $647 in fiscal 2015, $97 in transition fiscal 2014 and $(18) in fiscal 2013 | | 969 | | 145 | | (27 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total unrealized holding gains (losses), net | | 393 | | (139 | ) | (1,275 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | 5,895 | | $ | (12,624 | ) | $ | (10,184 | ) |
|
Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss as January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014 consisted of unrealized losses on interest rate cash flow hedges. Reclassifications out of AOCI in fiscal 2015 and transition fiscal 2014 are presented in Note 7, “Derivative Financial Instruments.” |
|
New Authoritative Standards |
|
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” (“ASU 2013-11”), which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-11 provides guidance regarding the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. Under certain circumstances, unrecognized tax benefits should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward. The Company adopted ASU 2013-11 in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. There is no material impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. Under ASU 2014-08, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. ASU 2014-08 is effective for all disposals or classifications as held for sale of components of an entity that occur within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and such adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2014-09 was to be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of the effective date of this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.” This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this standard during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” This ASU requires management to assess whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued. If substantial doubt exists, additional disclosures are required. This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and such adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-17, “Business Combinations: Pushdown Accounting.” This ASU provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual change-in-control event, that election is irrevocable. ASU 2014-17 was effective on November 18, 2014. The adoption of this ASU had no impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements. |
|
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, “Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items: Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items.” This ASU eliminates the concept of extraordinary items under GAAP, which, among other things, required an entity to segregate extraordinary items considered to be unusual and infrequent from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and such adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|