Income tax expense for the periods included benefits for tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments and general business tax credits offset by the effect of nondeductible expenses. The following table shows the Company’s income before income taxes, as well as applicable income taxes and the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
The Company recorded an income tax expense of $244 and $1,114 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective tax rates equaled 18.6% and 31.3% respectively, for such periods.
The Company’s effective tax rate was lower than statutory rates due to several factors. First, the Company derives interest income from municipal securities and loans, which are exempt from federal tax and certain U.S. government agency securities, which are exempt from state tax. Second, the Company derives income from bank owned life insurance policies, which is exempt from federal and state tax. Finally, state income taxes are recorded net of the federal tax benefit, which lowers the combined effective tax rate. The decreased effective tax rate compared to prior year was related to overall taxable income compared to tax-exempt income. The effective tax rate declines as the taxable income decreases due to the higher proportion of tax-exempt items offsetting taxable income. The lower taxable income in 2009 was caused by the non-cash impairment charge related to a trust preferred security as well as higher provision for loan loss recorded in 2009.
The Company’s internal reporting and planning process focuses on three primary lines of business: Retail, Commercial and Treasury. See Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the presentation of the condensed income statement and total assets for each Segment.
The financial information presented was derived from the Company’s internal profitability reporting system that is used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. This information is based on internal management accounting policies which have been developed to reflect the underlying economics of the Segments and, to the extent practicable, to portray the Segment as if it operated on a stand alone basis. Thus, each Segment, in addition to its direct revenues and expenses, assets and liabilities, includes an allocation of shared support function expenses. The Retail, Commercial, Treasury, and Wealth Management Segments also include funds transfer adjustments to appropriately reflect the cost of funds on loans made and funding credits on deposits generated. Apart from these adjustments, the accounting policies used are similar to those described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Since there are no comprehensive authorities for management accounting equivalent to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the information presented is not necessarily comparable with similar information from other financial institutions. In addition, methodologies used to measure, assign and allocate certain items may change from time-to-time to reflect, among other things, accounting estimate refinements, changes in risk profiles, changes in customers or product lines and changes in management structure.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Retail generated a loss of $480 or 45.1% of total Segment net income in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to a profit of $754 or 30.8% during the same period in 2008. Retail assets were $247,303 at March 31, 2009, $255,028 at December 31, 2008 and $300,540 as of March 31, 2008. This represented 18.1%, 18.2% and 21.7% of total consolidated assets, respectively.
During the period, net income decreased due to lower interest income on retail loans, fee income and exchange income. Net interest income was also affected by the lower interest rate environment and higher provision expense during the period. Excluding the gain on sale of branches of $458, noninterest income declined slightly in 2009 as consumer spending has declined impacting the fee environment. Due to the first quarter 2009 favorable interest rate environment for residential mortgages, mortgage lending has increased mostly offsetting much of the declines. Lower noninterest expenses offset some of the revenue declines as payroll, fixed asset expense, intangible expenses, and marketing were lower.
Commercial Segment. The Commercial Segment (“Commercial”) provides commercial banking services to business customers served through the Company’s full service branch channels located in Illinois and Missouri. The services provided by this Segment include lending, business checking and deposits, cash management, and other traditional as well as electronic commercial banking services.
Commercial showed a profit of $1,558 or 146.3% of total Segment income in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to $1,305 or 53.4% during the same period in 2008. Commercial assets were $793,624 at March 31, 2009, $803,069 at December 31, 2008 and $798,856 as of March 31, 2008. This represented 57.9%, 57.3% and 57.6% of total consolidated assets, respectively.
During the period net income increased due to a stronger margin as the lower cost of funding loans reduced interest costs and the rate floors instituted on variable rate loans increased interest income. Additionally, net income was further aided by decreased salary expense. Finally, these positive variances were partially offset by higher provision expenses of $2,060 compared to $766 in 2008.
Treasury Segment. The Treasury Segment (“Treasury”) is responsible for managing the investment portfolio and acquiring wholesale funding for loan activity. Additionally, this area is responsible for assisting in the management of liquidity and interest rate risk. Treasury generated a loss of $13 or (1.2%) of total segment net income in the first quarter of 2009 and a profit of $386 or 15.8% during the same period in 2008. Treasury assets were $256,262 at March 31, 2009, $277,597 at December 31, 2008 and $185,825 at March 31, 2008. This represented 18.7%, 19.8% and 13.4% of total consolidated assets, respectively.
During the period noninterest income declined due to impairment charges related to the securities portfolio. This negative variance was slightly offset by improved interest income due to higher average balances in the investment portfolio and reduced operating expenses.
Financial Condition
General
Following are highlights of the March 31, 2009 balance sheet when compared to December 31, 2008:
Securities. The primary strategic objective of the Company’s securities portfolio is to assist with liquidity and interest rate risk management. In managing the security portfolio, the Company minimizes any credit risk and avoids investments in sophisticated and complex investment products. The Company does not hold any securities containing sub-prime mortgages or any Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac equities.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Securities at March 31, 2009 totaled $232,983 as compared to $252,562 recorded at December 31, 2008. This represents a decrease of $19,579 or 7.8%. At quarter-end, the Company held nine pooled trust preferred securities involving three hundred issuers with a total book value of $24,023 and fair value of $12,371. The investments in trust-preferred securities receive principal and interest payments from several pools of subordinated capital debentures with each pool containing issuance by a minimum of twenty-three banks or, in a few instances, capital notes from insurance companies.
Management elected early adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. As a consequence, the Company recorded a $1,208 pre-tax non-cash impairment charge based upon management’s determination that a trust preferred security with an aggregate cost before impairment of $5,000 was other than temporarily impaired. This charge is largely a result of deteriorating cash flows within one of these pools and illiquidity and credit concerns within the financial markets. With adoption of the new accounting pronouncements, the Company calculated the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the cost basis, otherwise referred to as the credit loss.
Management has determined that the remaining $20,231 of trust-preferred securities is deemed to be only temporarily impaired at quarter-end. An unrealized loss of approximately $7,138 associated with all trust preferred securities has been recorded, on an after-tax basis, through stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income.
Should the economic climate deteriorate from current levels, the underlying credits may experience repayment difficulty, and the level of deferrals and defaults could increase requiring additional impairment charges in future quarters.
Loans.Outstanding loans totaled $985,464 at March 31, 2009 which compared to $1,004,390 at December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $18,926 or 1.9% as commercial lending requests slowed during the quarter. The loan reduction for the first quarter was largely due to payoff activity in the Kankakee and Streator markets and was slightly offset by the growth generated in the St. Louis market. We continued to make new loans available in our communities as evidenced by our origination of $46,000 in residential mortgages in the quarter. The Company has no direct exposure to subprime mortgages.
Deposit.Total deposits equaled $1,068,453 at March 31, 2009 compared to $1,049,220 recorded at December 31, 2008 representing an increase of $19,233 or 1.8%. The majority of the increase was concentrated in higher costing time deposits, representing a shift from lower costing non-maturing deposits. The improvement was generated primarily through in-market time deposits as brokered time deposits remained relatively unchanged from year-end 2008. Non-interest bearing deposits were 10.6% of total deposits at March 31, 2009 as compared to 11.3% recorded at December 31, 2008.
Nonperforming Assets
If a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the loan does not generate current period income for the Company. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there are serious doubts regarding the collectability of all principal and interest due under the terms of the loans. Amounts received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied first to principal and then to interest after all principal has been collected. A loan is generally transferred to nonaccrual status if it is not in the process of collection and is delinquent in payment of either principal or interest beyond 90 days. Other nonperforming assets consist of real estate acquired through loan foreclosures or other workout situations and other assets acquired through repossessions.
The classification of a loan as nonaccrual does not necessarily indicate that the principal is uncollectible, in whole or in part. The Bank makes a determination as to collectability on a case-by-case basis. The Bank considers both the adequacy of the collateral and the other resources of the borrower in determining the steps to be taken to collect nonaccrual loans. The final determination as to the steps taken is made based upon the specific facts of each situation. Alternatives that are typically considered to collect nonaccrual loans are foreclosure, collection under guarantees, loan restructuring or judicial collection actions.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Each of the Company’s loans is assigned a rating based upon an internally developed grading system. A separate credit administration department also reviews grade assignments on an ongoing basis. Management continuously monitors nonperforming, impaired and past due loans to prevent further deterioration of these loans. The Company has an independent loan review function which is separate from the lending function and is responsible for the review of new and existing loans.
The following table summarizes nonperforming assets and loans past due 90 days or more for the previous five quarters.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2009 | | 2008 | |
| | | | | |
| | Mar 31, | | Dec 31, | | Sep 30, | | Jun 30, | | Mar 31, | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonaccrual loans | | $ | 15,398 | | $ | 10,318 | | $ | 12,487 | | $ | 19,808 | | $ | 4,057 | |
Trouble Debt Restructurings | | | 75 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total nonperforming loans | | | 15,473 | | | 10,318 | | | 12,487 | | | 19,808 | | | 4,057 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other real estate owned | | | 12,772 | | | 12,723 | | | 12,445 | | | 4,317 | | | 1,153 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total nonperforming assets | | $ | 28,245 | | $ | 23,041 | | $ | 24,932 | | $ | 24,125 | | $ | 5,210 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nonperforming loans to total end of period loans | | | 1.57 | % | | 1.03 | % | | 1.28 | % | | 1.97 | % | | 0.44 | % |
Nonperforming assets to total end of period loans | | | 2.87 | % | | 2.29 | % | | 2.56 | % | | 2.40 | % | | 0.57 | % |
Nonperforming assets to total end of period assets | | | 2.06 | % | | 1.64 | % | | 1.87 | % | | 1.76 | % | | 0.38 | % |
The level of nonperforming loans at March 31, 2009 increased 50.0% to $15,473 compared to $10,318 that existed at December 31, 2008. As part of an ongoing review of the commercial real estate loan portfolio, four additional large credits with material deterioration in their financial condition were identified in the first quarter 2009. Action plans were implemented resulting in $7,700 being classified as watch list assets.
The increase in nonperforming loans was concentrated in our commercial real estate portfolio with borrowers dependent on the housing industry. The level of nonperforming loans to total end of period loans was 1.57% at March 31, 2009, as compared to 1.03% at December 31, 2008. The reserve coverage ratio (allowance to nonperforming loans) was reported at 103.47% as of March 31, 2009 as compared to 145.55% as of December 31, 2008.
Other Potential Problem Loans
The Company has other potential problem loans that are currently performing, but where some concerns exist regarding the nature of the borrower’s projects in current economic environment. Currently, management has identified $25,717 of loans that are currently performing but due to economic conditions facing these borrowers, were classified by management as impaired. Excluding nonperforming loans and loans that management has classified as impaired, there are other potential problem loans that totaled $9,052 at March 31, 2009 as compared to $9,181 at December 31, 2008. Included in this amount is a purchased participation for $7,234. Early in 2009, it came to our attention that the lead bank was reevaluating the relationship’s credit quality rating and status. At March 31, 2009 this loan was performing. The classification of these loans, however, does not imply that management expects losses on each of these loans, but believes that a higher level of scrutiny and closer monitoring is prudent under the circumstances. Such classifications relate to specific concerns for each individual borrower and do not relate to any concentration risk common to all loans in this group.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
At March 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $16,010 or 1.62% of total loans as compared to $15,018 or 1.50% of total loans at December 31, 2008. In originating loans, the Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the following:
| | |
| • | general economic conditions; |
| | |
| • | the type of loan being made; |
| | |
| • | the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; |
| | |
| • | in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such a loan. |
The allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of the allowance necessary to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio by analyzing the following:
| | |
| • | ultimate collectibility of the loans in its portfolio; |
| | |
| • | incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff; |
| | |
| • | the independent loan review function; |
| | |
| • | results of examinations performed by regulatory agencies. |
The Company regularly evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Commercial credits are graded using a system that is in compliance with regulatory classifications by the loan officers and the loan review function validates the officers’ grades. In the event that the loan review function downgrades the loan, it is included in the allowance analysis at the lower grade. To establish the appropriate level of the allowance, a sample of loans (including impaired and nonperforming loans) are reviewed and classified as to potential loss exposure.
Based on an estimation computed pursuant to the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and FASB Statements Nos. 114 and 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” the analysis of the allowance for loan losses consists of three components:
| | |
| • | specific credit allocation established for expected losses resulting from analysis developed through specific credit allocations on individual loans for which the recorded investment in the loan exceeds its fair value; |
| | |
| • | general portfolio allocation based on historical loan loss experience for each loan category; |
| | |
| • | subjective reserves based on general economic conditions as well as specific economic factors in the markets in which the Company operates. |
The specific credit allocation component of the allowance for loan losses is based on a regular analysis of loans over a fixed-dollar amount where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. The fair value of the loan is determined based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the market price of the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost of sale.
The general portfolio allocation component of the allowance for loan losses is determined statistically using a loss migration analysis that examines historical loan loss experience. The loss migration analysis is performed quarterly and loss factors are updated regularly based on actual experience. The general portfolio allocation element of the allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of the amounts necessary for concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume.
The allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, and ultimate losses will vary from current estimates. These estimates are reviewed monthly, and as adjustments, either positive or negative, become necessary, a corresponding increase or decrease is made in the provision for loan losses. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is consistent with prior years.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Management continues to diligently monitor the loan portfolio, paying particular attention to borrowers with residential real estate exposure. While virtually all of these relationships are performing, the economic outlook for this industry will likely remain extremely challenging throughout 2009. Should the economic climate deteriorate from current levels, more borrowers may experience repayment difficulty, and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies will rise requiring further increases in the provision for loan losses.
Liquidity
The Company manages its liquidity position with the objective of maintaining sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. In addition to the normal inflow of funds from core-deposit growth together with repayments and maturities of loans and investments, the Company utilizes other short-term funding sources such as brokered time deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, overnight federal funds purchased from correspondent banks and the acceptance of short-term deposits from public entities and Federal Home Loan Bank advances.
The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on several bases, which vary depending upon the time period. As the time period is expanded, other data is factored in, including estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan payoffs, investment portfolio maturities or calls and anticipated depository buildups or runoffs.
The Company classifies all of its securities as available-for-sale, thereby maintaining significant liquidity. The Company’s liquidity position is further enhanced by structuring its loan portfolio interest payments as monthly and by the significant representation of retail credit and residential mortgage loans in the Company’s loan portfolio, resulting in a steady stream of loan repayments. In managing its investment portfolio, the Company provides for staggered maturities so that cash flows are provided as such investments mature.
The Company’s cash flows are comprised of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities and investing activities offset by those used in financing activities, resulted in a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $8,067 from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009.
During the first three months of 2009, the Company experienced net cash inflows of $32,185 in investing activities due to maturities and calls on securities along with a reduction in loans and $7,102 in operating activities. In contrast, net cash outflows of $31,220 were used in financing activities largely due to the repayment on borrowed debt.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingencies, and Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
The Company has entered into contractual obligations and commitments and off-balance sheet financial instruments. The following tables summarize the Company’s contractual cash obligations and other commitments and off balance sheet instruments as of March 31, 2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due by Period | |
| | | |
| | Within 1 Year | | 1 – 3 Years | | 4 – 5 Years | | After 5 Years | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Contractual Obligations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-term debt | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 250 | | $ | 250 | |
Long-term debt | | | 165 | | | 2,356 | | | 2,190 | | | 6,000 | | | 10,711 | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 434,880 | | | 174,125 | | | 7,836 | | | 144 | | | 616,985 | |
Operating leases | | | 291 | | | 610 | | | 613 | | | 306 | | | 1,820 | |
Severance payments | | | 38 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 38 | |
Series B mandatory redeemable preferred stock | | | — | | | 268 | | | — | | | — | | | 268 | |
Subordinated debentures | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 20,620 | | | 20,620 | |
FHLB advances | | | 32,215 | | | 53,000 | | | 62 | | | 5,000 | | | 90,277 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 467,589 | | $ | 230,359 | | $ | 10,701 | | $ | 32,320 | | $ | 740,969 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | |
| | | |
| | Within 1 Year | | 1 – 3 Years | | 4 – 5 Years | | After 5 Years | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lines of credit | | $ | 208,038 | | $ | 19,326 | | $ | 1,425 | | $ | 22,385 | | $ | 251,174 | |
Standby letters of credit | | | 6,926 | | | 2,448 | | | — | | | 2,771 | | | 12,145 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total contractual cash obligations | | $ | 214,964 | | $ | 21,774 | | $ | 1,425 | | $ | 25,156 | | $ | 263,319 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital Resources
Stockholders’ Equity
The Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2009 was $146,647, an increase of $30,739 or 26.52%, from December 31, 2008. The change in stockholders’ equity was largely the result of the Company’s participation in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP” program) in the first quarter 2009 offset by a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the unrealized loss on the securities portfolio. Average quarterly equity as a percentage of average quarterly assets was 10.60% at March 31, 2009, compared to 8.82% at December 31, 2008. Book value per common share equaled $18.82 at March 31, 2009 compared to $19.14 at December 31, 2008.
Stock Repurchase
The Company did not repurchase shares of stock during the first quarter ended March 31, 2009. The 2006 repurchase program approved on November 13, 2006 expired on January 24, 2009. Restrictions set forth in the U.S. Treasury CPP program prohibit the Company from repurchasing its common stock until the CPP proceeds are paid back.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Capital Measurements
As discussed in Note 8, the Company’s current debt agreements include a covenant that require the Bank to maintain the status of being well capitalized which is a ratio of 10.0% for total risk based capital. The Bank is expected to meet a minimum risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8%, of which at least one-half (or 4%) must be in the form of Tier 1 (core) capital. The remaining one-half (or 4%) may be in the form of Tier 1 (core) or Tier 2 (supplementary) capital. The amount of loan loss allowance that may be included in capital is limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. The ratio of Tier 1 (core) and the combined amount of Tier 1 (core) and Tier 2 (supplementary) capital to risk-weighted assets for the Company was 11.9% and 14.0%, respectively, at March 31, 2009. The Company is currently, and expects to continue to be, in compliance with these guidelines.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company’s capital ratios:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | December 31, | | Minimum Capital Ratios | | Well Capitalized Ratios | |
| | Mar 31, 2009 | | | | | |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital | | $ | 139,128 | | $ | 105,581 | | $ | 101,831 | | | | | | | |
Tier 2 risk-based capital | | | 24,653 | | | 23,237 | | | 10,755 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capital | | $ | 163,781 | | $ | 128,818 | | $ | 112,586 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Risk-weighted assets | | $ | 1,170,891 | | $ | 1,057,188 | | $ | 1,102,602 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tier 1 risk-based capital | | | 11.9 | % | | 10.0 | % | | 9.2 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 6.0 | % |
Total risk-based capital | | | 14.0 | % | | 12.2 | % | | 10.2 | % | | 8.0 | % | | 10.0 | % |
Leverage ratio | | | 10.3 | % | | 8.1 | % | | 7.7 | % | | 4.0 | % | | 5.0 | % |
Recent Accounting Developments
See Note 11 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning recent accounting developments.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations of the Company, are generally identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “planned” or “potential” or similar expressions.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could effect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any forward-looking statements.
Among the factors that could have an impact on the Company’s ability to achieve operating results and the growth plan goals are as follows:
| | |
| • | management’s ability to reduce and effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest rates in general on the volatility of the Company’s net interest income; |
| | |
| • | fluctuations in the value of the Company’s investment securities; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s ability to ultimately collect on any downgraded loan relationships; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s ability to respond and adapt to economic conditions in our geographic market; |
| | |
| • | the Company’s ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace; |
| | |
| • | credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within the Company’s loan portfolio and individual large loans; |
| | |
| • | volatility of rate sensitive deposits; |
| | |
| • | operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud; |
| | |
| • | asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks; |
| | |
| • | the ability to successfully acquire low cost deposits or funding; |
| | |
| • | the ability to successfully execute strategies to increase noninterest income; |
| | |
| • | the ability to successfully grow non-commercial real estate loans; |
| | |
| • | the ability of the Company to continue to realize cost savings and revenue generation opportunities in connection with the synergies of centralizing operations; |
| | |
| • | the ability to adopt and implement new regulatory requirements as dictated by the SEC, FASB or other rule-making bodies which govern our industry; |
| | |
| • | changes in the general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in which the Company conducts business. |
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative disclosures About Market Risk |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity Management
The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of its asset/liability management practices. The net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of changes in net interest income in the event of a sudden and sustained 50, 100, and 200 basis point increase in market interest rates or a 50 basis point decrease in market rates. The interest rates scenarios are used for analytical purposes and do not necessarily represent management’s view of future market movements. The tables below present the Company’s projected changes in net interest income for the various rate shock levels at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon | |
| | | |
| | March 31, 2009 | | December 31, 2008 | |
| | | | | |
| | Change | | Change | |
| | | | | |
| | $ | | % | | $ | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | |
+200 bp | | $ | (2,111 | ) | | (5.16 | %) | $ | 728 | | | 2.08 | % |
+100 bp | | | (1,448 | ) | | (3.54 | ) | | 295 | | | 0.84 | |
+ 50 bp | | | (665 | ) | | (1.65 | ) | | 166 | | | 0.47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Base | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
- 50 bp | | | 1,074 | | | 2.63 | | | (179 | ) | | (0.51 | ) |
As shown above, the Company’s model at March 31, 2009, the effect of an immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease the Company’s net interest income by $2,111 or 5.16%. The effect of an immediate 50 basis point decrease in rates would increase the Company’s net interest income by $1,074 or 2.63%.
For the Company’s credit agreements with its commercial customers, management instituted new underwriting standards that incorporated interest rate floors into the terms for many of its commercial relationships in the past 90 to 120 days to maximize the net interest margin during the time when market interest rates are at extremely low levels. While these floors have held income to a higher level in this low rate environment, they will also make it necessary for rates to climb to somewhat higher levels before the yield of the adjustable rate assets move above the floors and add significantly to interest income. Management has begun positioning the balance sheet to take advantage of the lower rates over the longer term as we began extending out our funding over the three and five year terms and thereby mitigate the impact on the margin of the limited income benefit of moderately rising rates. We continue to take advantage of the lower funding costs in reaction to FOMC rate reductions.
Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay rates and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above, should market conditions vary from the assumptions used in preparing the analysis. Further, the computations do not contemplate actions the Company may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
|
Centrue Financial Corporation |
Item 4. Controls And Procedures |
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company has designed its disclosure controls and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and, based on the evaluation described above, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at reaching that level of reasonable assurance.
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings from time to time. The Company does not believe it is currently involved in any claim or action the ultimate disposition of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company did not experience any material changes in the Risk Factors during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. For specific information about the risks facing the Company refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
| | |
| (a) | On January 9, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $32.7 million of preferred stock and a warrant to purchase common stock to the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) under U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”). The Company issued and sold (1) 32,668 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock Series C, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series C Preferred Shares”), and (2) a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 508,320 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, or an aggregate purchase price of $4.9 million in cash. The issuance of the Series C Preferred Shares and the Warrant was exempt from registration as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering under Section 4(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The proceeds of the issuance will be used to meet the credit needs of the communities served by the Company and to support the Company’s continued growth. |
| | |
| (c) | The following table provides information about purchases of the Company’s common stock by the Company during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
| | | | | | | | | |
01/01/09 – 01/31/09 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | | 395,078 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
02/01/09 – 02/28/09 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
03/01/09 – 03/31/09 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total (1) | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) The Company repurchased no shares during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The 2006 repurchase program approved on November 13, 2006 expired on January 24, 2009.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits:
| | |
| 3.1 | Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Designations for the Series C Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 4.1 | Warrant to purchase up to 508,320 shares of Common Stock issued January 9, 2009 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 10.1 | Letter Agreement dated January 9, 2009 including the Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms incorporated by reference therein between the Company and the U.S. Treasury (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 10.2 | Form of Waiver of Senior Executive Officers (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 10.3 | Form of Omnibus Amendment Agreement (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on January 14, 2009) |
| | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Thomas A. Daiber, President and Principal Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a – 14(a). |
| | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Kurt R. Stevenson, Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer required by Rule 13a – 14(a). |
| | |
| 32.1(1) | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s President and Principal Executive Officer. |
| | |
| 32.2(1) | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. |
| | | | |
| | |
| (1) | This certification is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
| CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
| | |
Date: May 08, 2009 | By: | /s/ Thomas A. Daiber |
| | |
| | Thomas A. Daiber |
| | President and Principal Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: May 08, 2009 | By: | /s/ Kurt R. Stevenson |
| | |
| | Kurt R. Stevenson |
| | Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |