Centrue Financial 10-Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 0-28846

Centrue Financial Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	36-3145350
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation or organization)	Number)

7700 Bonhomme Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63105
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)

(314) 505-5500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	þ
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Shares outstanding at August 10, 2009
Common Stock, Par Value $1.00	6,043,176

Centrue Financial Corporation
Form 10-Q Index
June 30, 2009

			Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	•	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	•	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss)	2
	•	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	•	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		43
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		45
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		45
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		45
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		45
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		45
Item 5.	Other Information		45
Item 6.	Exhibits		46
SIGNATURES			47

Centrue Financial Corporation

Part I Financialinformation

Item 1. Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,638		$	35,014
Securities available-for-sale		215,094			241,851
Restricted securities		10,711			10,711
Loans		953,894			1,004,390
Allowance for loan losses		(26,894	)		(15,018	)
Net loans		927,000			989,372
Cash value of life insurance		28,432			27,917
Mortgage servicing rights		2,943			2,890
Premises and equipment, net		31,035			32,376
Goodwill		15,880			24,494
Intangible assets, net		8,281			9,088
Other real estate		13,582			12,723
Other assets		22,933			15,445
Total assets	$	1,313,529		$	1,401,881
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing	$	116,089		$	118,745
Interest-bearing		918,027			930,475
Total deposits		1,034,116			1,049,220
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		29,620			46,306
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		76,270			140,285
Notes payable		10,880			19,826
Series B mandatory redeemable preferred stock		268			268
Subordinated debentures		20,620			20,620
Other liabilities		10,388			9,448
Total liabilities		1,182,162			1,285,973
Commitments and contingent liabilities		—			—
Stockholders’ equity
Series A convertible preferred stock (aggregate liquidation preference of $2,762)		500			500
Series C fixed rate, cumulative perpetual preferred stock (aggregate liquidation preference of $32,668)		29,881			—
Common stock, $1 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 7,453,555 shares issued at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		7,454			7,454
Surplus		74,660			71,488
Retained earnings		45,655			62,476
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(4,587	)		(3,590	)
		153,563			138,328
Treasury stock, at cost 1,410,379 shares at June 30, 2009 and 1,425,064 shares at December 31, 2008		(22,196	)		(22,420	)
Total stockholders’ equity		131,367			115,908
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,313,529		$	1,401,881

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

1.

Centrue Financial Corporation

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
and Comprehensive Income (loss)

Three andSixMonthsEndedJune30, 2009 and2008

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Interest income
Loans	$	13,573		$	15,974	$	27,762		$	33,268
Securities
Taxable		2,151			2,106		4,656			4,581
Exempt from federal income taxes		308			355		625			713
Federal funds sold and other		16			25		27			80
Total interest income		16,048			18,460		33,070			38,642
Interest expense
Deposits		5,332			7,026		10,938			15,366
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		33			153		72			486
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		570			776		1,113			1,948
Series B mandatory redeemable preferred stock		4			13		8			25
Subordinated debentures		274			250		564			634
Notes payable		119			238		281			476
Total interest expense		6,332			8,456		12,976			18,935
Net interest income		9,716			10,004		20,094			19,707
Provision for loan losses		13,064			866		15,299			1,632
Net interest income (loss) after Provision for loan losses		(3,348	)		9,138		4,795			18,075
Noninterest income
Service charges		1,599			1,875		3,056			3,511
Mortgage banking income		811			389		1,509			835
Bank owned life insurance		259			254		515			506
Securities gains		232			—		246			848
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses		(10,082	)		—		(11,290	)		—
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)		5,373			—		5,373			—
Net impairment on securities		(4,709	)		—		(5,917	)		—
Gain on sale of OREO		29			142		36			238
Gain on sale of other assets		15			629		108			1,111
Other income		823			1,003		1,549			2,181
		(941	)		4,292		1,102			9,230

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

2.

Centrue Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
and Comprehensive Income (loss)
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Noninterest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		4,322			4,493			8,448			9,322
Occupancy, net		905			919			1,770			1,957
Furniture and equipment		564			624			1,124			1,406
Marketing		205			315			388			551
Supplies and printing		117			99			236			230
Telephone		297			201			490			442
Data processing		392			231			762			534
FDIC insurance		1,094			45			1,339			75
Goodwill impairment		8,451			297			8,451			694
Amortization of intangible assets		394			478			807			990
Other expenses		1,524			1,519			3,327			3,336
		18,265			9,221			27,142			19,537
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	(22,554	)	$	4,209		$	(21,245	)	$	7,768
Income taxes		(6,339	)		1,504			(6,095	)		2,618
Net income (loss)	$	(16,215	)	$	2,705		$	(15,150	)	$	5,150
Preferred stock dividends		460			52			875			104
Net income (loss) for common stockholders	$	(16,675	)	$	2,653		$	(16,025	)	$	5,046
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(2.77	)	$	0.44		$	(2.66	)	$	0.84
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(2.77	)	$	0.44		$	(2.66	)	$	0.83
Total comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$	(16,215	)	$	2,705		$	(15,150	)	$	5,150
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities for which a portion of an other- than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings, net of reclassifications and tax effect		(3,120	)		—			(6,738	)		—
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on other securities available for sale, net of reclassifications and tax effect		655			(5,428	)		(562	)		(6,131	)
Reclassification adjustment:
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		4,709			—			5,917			—
(Gains) recognized in earnings		(232	)		—			(246	)		(848	)
Net unrealized gains (loss)		2,012			(5,428	)		(1,629	)		(6,979	)
Tax expense (benefit)		779			(2,103	)		(632	)		(2,704	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		1,233			(3,325	)		(997	)		(4,275	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(14,982	)	$	(620	)	$	(16,147	)	$	875

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

3.

Centrue Financial Corporation

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (In Thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities
Net Income (Loss)	$	(15,150	)	$	5,150
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation		1,363			1,493
Goodwill impairment		8,451			694
Amortization of intangible assets		807			990
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net		570			284
Amortization of bond premiums, net		293			244
Share based compensation		211			265
Provision for loan losses		15,299			1,632
Provision for deferred income taxes		2,546			1,333
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		(515	)		(506	)
Other than temporary impairment, securities		5,917			—
Securities losses (gains), net		(246	)		(848	)
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO		(36	)		(238	)
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets		(108	)		—
(Gain) loss on sale of loans		(1,509	)		(835	)
(Gain) on sale of branches		—			(1,111	)
Loss related to sale of Wealth Management		163			—
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		93,325			70,658
Origination of loans held for sale		(91,935	)		(74,786	)
Change in assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(10,553	)		(3,733	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		1,485			1,617
Net cash provided by operating activities		10,378			2,303
Cash flows from investing activities
Securities available-for-sale
Proceeds from maturities, paydowns, and sales		44,253			103,761
Purchases		(24,895	)		(75,160	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		46,053			(79,033	)
(Purchase) disposal of premises and equipment		(22	)		(402	)
Proceeds from sale of OREO		297			3,215
Sale of Branches, net of premium received		—			(19,498	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		65,686			(67,117	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		(15,104	)		29,922
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		(16,686	)		19,364
Repayment of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		(241,015	)		(294,315	)
Proceeds from advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		177,000			301,000
Payments on notes payable		(8,946	)		(2,119	)
Proceeds from notes payable		—			10,250
Dividends on common stock		(482	)		(1,633	)
Dividends on preferred stock		(875	)		(104	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			233
Net proceeds from preferred stock issued		32,668			—
Purchase of treasury stock		—			(1,174	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(73,440	)		61,424
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,624			(3,390	)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period		35,014			51,628
End of period	$	37,638		$	48,238
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash payments for
Interest	$	13,145		$	20,506
Income taxes		1,028			2,270
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned		1,139			4,497

See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

4.

Centrue Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers located in markets extending from the far western and southern suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area across Central Illinois down to the metropolitan St. Louis area. These services include demand, time, and savings deposits; business and consumer lending; and mortgage banking. Brokerage, asset management, and trust services are provided to our customers on a referral basis to third party providers. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and nonfinancial institutions providing financial services. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiary, Centrue Bank (the “Bank”), are subject to regulations of certain regulatory agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Centrue Bank. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Company and, accordingly, are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Centrue Financial Corporation have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. The allowance for loan losses, carrying value of goodwill, value of mortgage servicing rights, deferred taxes, and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

For further information with respect to significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The annualized results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. All financial information is in thousands (000s), except shares and per share data.

Note 2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of the stock options and warrants. Computations for basic and diluted earnings per share are provided as follows:

5.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 2. Earnings Per Share (continued)

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
Net income (loss) for common shareholders	$	(16,675	)	$	2,653	$	(16,025	)	$	5,046
Weighted average common shares outstanding		6,027			6,027		6,028			6,039
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(2.77	)	$	0.44	$	(2.66	)	$	0.84
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
Weighted average common shares outstanding		6,027			6,027		6,028			6,039
Add: dilutive effect of assumed exercised stock options		1			22		—			30
Add: dilutive effect of assumed exercised common stock warrants		—			—		—			—
Weighted average common and dilutive potential shares outstanding		6,028			6,049		6,028			6,069
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(2.77	)	$	0.44	$	(2.66	)	$	0.83

There were approximately 674,669 and 406,300 options and 508,320 and 0 warrants outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. These options and warrants were anti-dilutive since the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock.

Note 3. Available for Sale Securities

The primary strategic objective related to the Company’s $215,094 investment securities portfolio is to assist with liquidity and interest rate risk management. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. The Company does not have any securities classified as trading or held-to-maturity.

The fair value of available-for-sale securities and the related, gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

	June 30, 2009
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost
U.S. government agencies	$	4,304	$	255	$	—		$	4,049
States and political subdivisions		37,467		780		(219	)		36,906
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		142,486		2,451		(194	)		140,229
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		17,771		97		(841	)		18,515
Equity securities		1,826		17		(51	)		1,860
Collateralized debt obligations		9,747		—		(9,778	)		19,525
Corporate		1,493		9		(13	)		1,497
	$	215,094	$	3,609	$	(11,096	)	$	222,581

6.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 3. Available for Sale Securities (continued)

	December 31, 2008
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost
U.S. government agencies	$	16,995	$	482	$	—		$	16,513
States and political subdivisions		38,202		530		(194	)		37,866
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		143,378		1,148		(887	)		143,117
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		20,004		53		(1,453	)		21,404
Equity securities		1,496		—		(75	)		1,571
Collateralized debt obligations		19,848		—		(5,400	)		25,248
Corporate		1,928		7		(70	)		1,991
	$	241,851	$	2,220	$	(8,079	)	$	247,710

The amounts below include the activity for available-for-sale securities related to sales, maturities and calls:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Proceeds from calls	$	7,695		$	—	$	16,045		$	83,897
Proceeds from sales		8,347			—		8,347			—
Realized gains		232			—		246			848
Realized losses		—			—		—			—
Net impairment loss recognized in earnings		(4,709	)		—		(5,917	)		—
Tax benefit (provision) related to to net realized gains and losses		89			—		94			329

Securities with unrealized losses not recognized in income are as follows presented by length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

June 30, 2009	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. government agencies	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
State and political subdivisions		6,190		(154	)		732		(65	)		6,922		(219	)
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		22,119		(179	)		3,246		(15	)		25,365		(194	)
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		497		(6	)		12,897		(835	)		13,394		(841	)
Equities		—		—			43		(51	)		43		(51	)
Collateralized debt obligations		—		—			9,747		(9,778	)		9,747		(9,778	)
Corporate		—		—			485		(13	)		485		(13	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	28,806	$	(339	)	$	27,150	$	(10,757	)	$	55,956	$	(11,096	)

7.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 3. Available for Sale Securities (continued)

December 31, 2008	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. government agencies	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
State and political subdivisions		7,284		(194	)		—		—			7,284		(194	)
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		59,742		(796	)		3,245		(91	)		62,987		(887	)
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		16,385		(1,453	)		—		—			16,385		(1,453	)
Equities		—		—			1,496		(75	)		1,496		(75	)
Collateralized debt obligations		7,579		(2,524	)		12,269		(2,876	)		19,848		(5,400	)
Corporate		1,423		(70	)		—		—			1,423		(70	)
Total temporarily impaired	$	92,413	$	(5,037	)	$	17,010	$	(3,042	)	$	109,423	$	(8,079	)

The fair values of securities classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, including mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and equity securities are shown separately.

Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	4,145
Due after one year through five years		24,004
Due after five years through ten years		7,536
Due after ten years		15,833
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		142,486
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		17,771
Equity and corporate securities		3,319
	$	215,094

The following table below presents a rollforward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the three month period ended June 30, 2009:

Beginning balance, April 1, 2009	$	3,943
Amounts related to credit loss for which
An other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized		2,923
Additions/Subtractions
Amounts realized for securities sold during the period		—
Amounts related to securities for which the company intends to sell or that it will be more likely than not that the company will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost basis		—
Reduction for increase in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security		—
Increases to the amount related to the credit loss for which other-than-temporary was previously recognized		1,786
Ending balance, June 30, 2009	$	8,652

See Note 9 on Fair Value for additional information about our analysis on the security portfolio related to the fair value and other-than-temporary impairment disclosures of these instruments.

8.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 4. Loans

The following table describes the composition of loans by major categories outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

	June 30, 2009						December 31, 2008
	$			%			$			%
Commercial	$	129,944			13.6	%	$	152,807			15.2	%
Agricultural		14,195			1.5			16,914			1.7
Real estate:
Commercial mortgages		450,543			47.2			460,920			45.9
Construction		168,101			17.6			164,820			16.4
Agricultural		16,763			1.8			17,339			1.7
1-4 family mortgages		168,502			17.7			185,666			18.5
Installment		4,552			0.5			5,267			0.5
Other		1,294			0.1			657			0.1
Total loans		953,894			100.0	%		1,004,390			100.0	%
Allowance for loan losses		(26,894	)					(15,018	)
Loans, net	$	927,000					$	989,372

The following table presents data on impaired loans:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Impaired loans for which an allowance has been provided	$	86,690	$	36,754
Impaired loans for which no allowance has been provided		69,146		1,880
Total loans determined to be impaired	$	155,836	$	38,634
Allowance for loan loss for impaired loans included in the allowance for loan losses	$	21,561	$	8,357

In originating loans, the Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, current economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such loan. The allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of the allowance necessary to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. In making this determination, the Company analyzes the ultimate collectability of the loans in its portfolio; incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff; the independent loan review function; and information provided by regulatory agencies. Included in the impaired loans above is $584 of trouble debt restructurings. These consist of 8 loans which are 1 to 4 family, installment, or home equity loans.

The Company has loans held for sale of $2,262 and $2,143 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively.

9.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 4. Loans (continued)

The Company conducts a quarterly evaluation as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Beginning balance	$	16,010		$	11,221		$	15,018		$	10,755
Charge-offs		(2,490	)		(622	)		(3,799	)		(1,020	)
Recoveries		310			77			376			175
Provision for loan losses		13,064			866			15,299			1,632
Ending balance	$	26,894		$	11,542		$	26,894		$	11,542
Period end total loans	$	953,894		$	1,003,689		$	953,894		$	1,003,689
Average loans	$	976,339		$	1,012,878		$	988,055		$	1,005,960
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans		0.22	%		0.05	%		0.35	%		0.08	%
Ratio of provision for loan losses to average loans		1.34			0.09			1.55			0.16
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to period end total loans		2.82			1.15			2.82			1.15
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total nonperforming loans		39.70			58.27			39.70			58.27
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to average loans		2.75			1.14			2.72			1.15

Note 5. Share Based Compensation

In 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Option Plan. Under the 1999 Option Plan, nonqualified options may be granted to employees and eligible directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to purchase the Company’s common stock at 100% of the fair market value on the date the option is granted. The Company has authorized 50,000 shares for issuance under the 1999 Option Plan. During 1999, 40,750 of these shares were granted and are 100% fully vested. The options have an exercise period of ten years from the date of grant. There are 9,250 shares available for grant under this plan.

In April 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Option Plan. Under the 2003 Option Plan, as amended on April 24, 2007, nonqualified options, incentive stock options, restricted stock and/or stock appreciation rights may be granted to employees and outside directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to purchase the Company’s common stock at an exercise price to be determined by the Executive and Compensation committee. Pursuant to the 2003 Option Plan, 570,000 shares of the Company’s unissued common stock have been reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options and rights granted under the 2003 Option Plan. The options have an exercise period of seven to ten years from the date of grant. There are 66,000 shares remaining for grants under this plan.

The Company awarded 5,000 restricted common stock awards in November, 2006 that were available under the restricted stock portion of the plan. The restricted shares were issued out of treasury shares with an aggregate grant date fair value of $90. The awards were granted using the fair value as the last sale price as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the date of grant of $18.03. The awarded shares vested at a rate of 20% of the initially awarded amount per year, beginning on the date of the award and were contingent upon continuous service by the recipient through the vesting date. As of April 3, 2009, the contingency was not fulfilled and the remaining 2,000 shares of unvested restricted stock were forfeited and returned to treasury stock.

10.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 5. Share Based Compensation (continued)

A summary of the status of the option plans as of June 30, 2009, and changes during the period ended on those dates is presented below:

	June 30, 2009
	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2009		635,519		$	18.68
Granted		143,000			8.13
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		(58,850	)		16.32
Outstanding at end of period		719,669		$	16.78		4.9 years	$	—
Vested or expected to vest		710,768		$	16.83		4.8 years	$	—
Options exercisable at period end		521,869		$	17.79		4.5 years	$	—

Options outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:

					Outstanding				Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices					Number		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
June 30, 2009:
$	5.24	-	$	13.00		170,381		5.7 years		77,381	$	7.96
	13.88	-		18.63		239,488		4.5 years		173,088		16.60
	19.03	-		23.31		309,800		4.9 years		271,400		21.35
						719,669		4.9 years		521,869	$	17.79
December 31, 2008:
$	11.25	-	$	11.75		46,381		1.6 years		46,381		11.60
	14.25	-		18.63		249,338		4.6 years		161,338		16.43
	19.03	-		23.31		339,800		5.1 years		247,800		21.55
						635,519		4.6 years		455,519	$	18.72

11.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 5. Share Based Compensation (continued)

Information related to the stock option plan during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:

	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Intrinsic value of options exercised	$	—	$	6
Cash received from option exercises		—		233
Tax benefit realized from option exercises		—		—

The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the stock options portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $155 and $232 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, it was $223 and $256. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $(17) and $4 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $(12) and $9 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, the negative amounts reflect the adjustment of previously recognized expense due to the forfeiture of the remainder of this restricted stock.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. (Employee and management options are tracked separately). The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		June 30, 2008
Fair value	$	1.79-3.70	$	3.36 - 3.69	$	3.69
Risk-free interest rate		1.53% - 2.01%		2.75% - 2.95%		2.95%
Expected option life (years)		6		6		6
Expected stock price volatility		68.84 – 116.39%		23.91% - 24.07%		23.91%
Dividend yield		5.71 - 7.31%		2.79 - 2.95%		2.79%

Unrecognized stock option compensation expense related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) for the remainder of 2009 and beyond is estimated as follows:

	Amount
July, 2009 – December, 2009	$	74
2010		149
2011		145
2012		96
2013		39
2014		1
Total	$	504

Note 6. Contingent Liabilities and Other Matters

Neither the Company nor its subsidiary is involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, in the aggregate, are not material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition.

12.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 7. Segment Information

The Company utilizes an internal reporting and planning process that focuses on lines of business (“LOB”). The reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered, primarily distinguished between retail, commercial, treasury, and other operations. Loans and deposits generate the revenues in the commercial segments; deposits, loans, secondary mortgage sales and servicing generates the revenue in the retail segment; investment income generates the revenue in the treasury segment; and holding company services generate revenue in the other operations segment. The “net allocations” line represents the allocation of the costs that are overhead being spread to the specific segments.

The accounting policies used with respect to segment reporting are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies as forth in Note 1. Segment performance is evaluated using net income.

Information reported internally for performance assessment follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2009
	Retail Segment			Commercial Segment			Treasury Segment			Other Operations			Total Company
Net interest income (loss)	$	2,435		$	6,829		$	1,261		$	(809	)	$	9,716
Other revenue		2,841			258			(4,478	)		438			(941	)
Other expense		3,006			581			53			13,462			17,102
Noncash items
Depreciation		509			3			—			257			769
Provision for loan losses		250			12,814			—			—			13,064
Other intangibles		394			—			—			—			394
Net allocations		5,909			6,266			1,915			(14,090	)		—
Income tax benefit		(1,140	)		(4,037	)		(1,162	)		—			(6,339	)
Segment profit (loss)	$	(3,652	)	$	(8,540	)	$	(4,023	)	$	—		$	(16,215	)
Goodwill	$	7,784		$	8,096		$	—		$	—		$	15,880
Segment assets	$	240,256		$	758,065		$	254,554		$	60,654		$	1,313,529

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2008
	Retail Segment			Commercial Segment		Treasury Segment			Other Operations			Total Company
Net interest income (loss)	$	3,593		$	7,538	$	363		$	(1,490	)	$	10,004
Other revenue		3,357			347		—			588			4,292
Other expense		2,972			654		(108	)		4,457			7,975
Noncash items
Depreciation		563			1		—			204			768
Provision for loan losses		—			866		—			—			866
Other intangibles		478			—		—			—			478
Net allocations		2,936			2,298		329			(5,563	)		—
Income tax expense (benefit)		34			1,500		(30	)		—			1,504
Segment profit (loss)	$	(33	)	$	2,566	$	172		$	—		$	2,705
Goodwill	$	11,927		$	12,404	$	—		$	473		$	24,804
Segment assets	$	294,634		$	785,542	$	216,047		$	77,325		$	1,373,548

13.

Centrue Financial Corporation
notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

Note 7. Segment Information (continued)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2009
	Retail Segment			Commercial Segment			Treasury Segment			Other Operations			Total Company
Net interest income (loss)	$	4,957		$	13,985		$	2,748		$	(1,596	)	$	20,094
Other revenue		5,436			536			(5,672	)		802			1,102
Other expense		6,180			1,178			106			17,508			24,972
Noncash items
Depreciation		838			4			—			521			1,363
Provision for loan losses		425			14,874			—			—			15,299
Other intangibles		807			—			—			—			807
Net allocations		7,652			8,840			2,331			(18,823	)		—
Income tax benefit		(1,377	)		(3,393	)		(1,325	)		—			(6,095	)
Segment profit (loss)	$	(4,132	)	$	(6,982	)	$	(4,036	)	$	—		$	(15,150	)
Goodwill	$	7,784		$	8,096		$	—		$	—		$	15,880
Segment assets	$	240,256		$	758,065		$	254,554		$	60,654		$	1,313,529

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2008
	Retail Segment		Commercial Segment		Treasury Segment		Other Operations			Total Company
Net interest income (loss)	$	6,849	$	13,449	$	965	$	(1,556	)	$	19,707
Other revenue		6,433		634		848		1,315			9,230
Other expense		6,311		1,755		110		8,878			17,054
Noncash items
Depreciation		994		3		—		496			1,493
Provision for loan losses		—		1,632		—		—			1,632
Other intangibles		990		—		—		—			990
Net allocations		3,877		4,738		1,000		(9,615	)		—
Income tax expense		389		2,084		145		—			2,618
Segment profit (loss)	$	721	$	3,871	$	558	$	—		$	5,150
Goodwill	$	11,927	$	12,404	$	—	$	473		$	24,804
Segment assets	$	294,634	$	785,542	$	216,047	$	77,325		$	1,373,548

Note 8. Borrowed Funds and Debt Obligations

On March 31, 2008, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Bank of America (BofA) consisting of three credit facilities: a secured revolving line of credit, a secured term facility, and a subordinated debt. In February, 2009, the loan agreement on the revolving line of credit was amended resulting in an aggregate principal amount of $20,250 in borrowings. The first credit facility consists of a $10,000 secured revolving line of credit which matured on June 30, 2009. The secured revolving line of credit was not renewed by BofA at maturity. When it matured on June 30, 2009, there was no balance on this line of credit while at December 31, 2008 it had a balance of $8,865. The second credit facility consists of a $250 secured term facility, which will mature on March 31, 2015. The balance on this facility was $250 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The third credit facility consists of $10,000 in subordinated debt, which also matures on March 31, 2015. The balance on this facility was $10,000 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The interest rate on the term and subordinated debt credit facilities is three month LIBOR plus 295 basis points. Repayment of each of the remaining two credit facilities is interest only on a quarterly basis, with the principal amount of the loan due at maturity. The term credit facilities are secured by a pledge of the stock of Centrue Bank. The subordinated debt credit facility is unsecured and is intended to qualify as Tier II capital for regulatory purposes.

14.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 8. Borrowed Funds and Debt Obligations (continued)

The loan agreement contains customary covenants, including but not limited to, Centrue Bank’s maintenance of its status as well-capitalized, Centrue Bank’s minimum return on average assets on an annual basis of 0.50%, Centrue Bank’s maximum nonperforming assets to primary capital below 20%, and Centrue Bank’s minimum loan loss reserves to total loans of 1.00%. The Company submitted to BofA its covenant certification as required that it was in compliance with all of the debt covenants with the exception of the covenant related to the return of assets percentage which requires a ROA of 0.50% at the Bank level and the nonperforming asset ratio which requires the ratio to be 20% or below at the Bank level. The ROA at the Bank level was (0.52%) for the period ending June 30, 2009. The nonperforming asset ratio is 49.68%. The Company is using these credit facilities for general working capital purposes. The loan agreement contains no penalty for early repayment of either the revolving credit facility or the subordinated debt credit facility. As of June 30, 2009, the outstanding balance on these lines is $10,250. Additionally, the Company has a note outstanding to an individual with an imputed interest rate of 5.25% maturing on October 24, 2012 for a prior acquisition. The balance as of June 30, 2009 was $630 and December 31, 2008 was $711.

Note 9. Fair Value

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

          Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

          Level 2 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

          Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:

Investment Securities: The fair value of securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). If the securities could not be priced using quoted market prices, observable market activity or comparable trades, the financial market was considered not active and the assets were classified as Level 3.

The assets included in Level 3 are trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). These securities were historically priced using Level 2 inputs. However, in 2008, the decline in the level of observable inputs and market activity for trust preferred CDOs by the measurement date was significant and resulted in unreliable external pricing. As such, the Company uses an internal OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to ensure there are no adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments.

15.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 9. Fair Value (continued)

We assume no recoveries on defaults and treat all interest payment deferrals as defaults. In addition we use the model to “stress” each CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of the Company’s note class.

Each bank in the tranche was analyzed so that additional defaults and deferrals could be factored into the cash flow model. Three scenarios were developed that had different assumptions regarding the impact of the economic environment on additional defaults and deferrals. The cash flow for each tranche was updated for each scenario. A discount rate of 450 BP over LIBOR was applied to arrive at the net present value of the cash flows. The discount rate used is approximately 105 basis points above the spread implied by the yield of BBB US Bank debt relative to 3-month LIBOR at quarter end. The results of the three net present value calculations were weighted and one overall value was developed to value the instrument.

Additionally an independent valuation of our portfolio was obtained. This was weighted as the final overall step to arrive at our valuation for June 30, 2009. Due to market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.

At June 30, 2009, the Company held nine pooled trust preferred CDOs with a book value of $19,525 (after second quarter 2009 impairment). These securities were rated high quality (A3 and above) at inception, but at June 30, 2009 S&P rated these securities as B+/B-, which are defined as highly speculative, and C, which is defined as default, with some recovery. The issuers in these securities are primarily banks, but some of the pools do include a limited number of insurance companies.

The Company performed a FAS 115 analysis and evaluated for other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) for each of the nine CDOs. Upon completion of the June 30, 2009 analysis, our model indicated other-than-temporary impairment on three of these CDOs, with an aggregate cost basis of $12,457. Total impairment for these three CDOs totaled $8,775, of which $4,538 was related to credit loss based on the Company’s analysis of future cash flows. Management has determined that the remaining CDOs is deemed to be only temporarily impaired at quarter-end due to the projected cash flows adjusted for the possible further deterioration is sufficient to return the outstanding principal balance with interest at the stated rate.

During further evaluation of the securities portfolio, a collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”) with an aggregate cost of $1,918 was identified as falling below management’s required collateral coverage of 4%. An impairment of $171 was taken on this instrument to bring the collateral coverage back to an acceptable level. This brought the total securities impairment charge for the quarter to $4,709.

The Company’s unrealized losses on other securities relate primarily to its investment in pooled trust preferred securities. The decline in fair value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. Due to the illiquidity in the market, it is unlikely that the Company would be able to recover its investment in these securities if the Company sold the securities at this time.

16.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 9. Fair Value (continued)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
	June 30, 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
U.S. government agencies	$	4,304	$	—	$	4,304	$	—
State and political subdivisions		37,467		—		37,467		—
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		142,486		—		142,486		—
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		17,771		—		16,419		1,352
Equities		1,826		—		1,826		—
Collateralized debt obligations		9,747		—		—		9,747
Corporate		1,493		—		1,493		—
Available-for-sale securities	$	215,094	$	—	$	203,995	$	11,099

			Fair Value measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
	December 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
U.S. government agencies	$	16,995	$	—	$	16,995	$	—
State and political subdivisions		38,202		—		38,202		—
U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities		143,378		—		143,378		—
Collateralized residential mortgage obligations		20,004		—		20,004		—
Equities		1,496		—		1,496		—
Collateralized debt obligations		19,848		—		—		19,848
Corporate		1,928		—		1,928		—
Available-for-sale securities	$	241,851	$	—	$	222,003	$	19,848

17.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 9. Fair Value (continued)

The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009:

	Available for Sale Securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2009	$	19,848
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings
Transfers into Level 3		1,330
Interest income on securities		—
Security impairment		(5,917	)
Other changes in fair value		—
Gains (losses) on sales of securities		—
Included in other comprehensive income		(4,162	)
Ending Balance, June 30, 2009	$	11,099

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

			Fair Value measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
Assets:	June 30, 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	65,129	$	—	$	65,129	$	—
Goodwill	$	15,880	$	—	$	—	$	15,880

			Fair Value measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
Assets:	December 31, 2008		Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	28,397	$	—	$	28,397	$	—

Impaired and restructured loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $86,690 with a valuation allowance of $21,561, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $11,401 for the period.

The majority of our impaired loans are collateralized by real estate. The carrying value for these real estate secured impaired loans was based upon information in independent appraisals obtained on the underlying collateral. The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

The carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, short-term borrowings, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short-term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. Security fair values are based on the methods described above. The carrying value and fair value of the subordinated debentures issued to capital trusts are estimated using market data for similarly risk weighted items to value them. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, the fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. The fair value of debt and redeemable stock is based on current rates for similar financing.

18.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 9. Fair Value (continued)

It was not practicable to determine the fair value of the restricted securities due to restrictions placed on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements.

U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires companies to perform an annual test for goodwill impairment. The Company performed its last annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2008. Results for that test indicated no impairment since the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Due primarily to the deterioration in the general economic environment, the resulting decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization in the second quarter, and in conjunction with the decline in earnings and increase in nonperforming loans, the Company engaged a third party consultant to conduct a goodwill impairment test in the second quarter 2009. The impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, involves a mark-to-market or fair value analysis of the Company’s balance sheet. Results of the test indicated that the Company record a non-cash charge of $8,451 for impairment of goodwill recorded at Centrue Bank, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

This non-cash impairment charge has no effect on liquidity, cash flows, operations, tangible book value, or regulatory capital ratios at Centrue Bank or Centrue Financial Corporation. The impairment charge represents 34.5% of the $24,494 in total goodwill (prior to impairment charge being taken) as of December 31, 2008 and the net goodwill after the impairment is now $15,880. The goodwill was primarily associated with the November 2006 merger of Centrue Financial Corporation and UnionBancorp, Inc.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:

	June 30, 2009 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,638	$	37,638	$	35,014	$	35,014
Securities		215,094		215,094		241,851		241,851
Restricted securities		10,711		N/A		10,711		N/A
Net loans		927,000		886,200		989,372		994,010
Accrued interest receivable		4,819		4,819		5,547		5,547
Financial liabilities
Deposits		1,034,116		1,038,096		1,049,220		1,050,795
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		29,620		29,620		46,306		46,306
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		76,270		77,047		140,285		141,430
Notes payable		10,880		8,946		19,826		18,921
Subordinated debentures		20,620		14,183		20,620		18,031
Series B mandatory redeemable preferred stock		268		268		268		268
Accrued interest payable		4,061		4,061		4,230		4,230

In addition, other assets and liabilities of the Company that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the above disclosures, such as property and equipment. Also, nonfinancial instruments typically not recognized in financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earnings power of core deposit accounts, the earnings potential of the trained work force, customer goodwill, and similar items.

19.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 10. Participation in the Treasury Capital Purchase Program

On January 9, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $32,668 in preferred shares to the U.S. Department of the Treasury as part of the government’s Capital Purchase Program. In exchange for the aggregate consideration of $32,668, the Company issued 32,668 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with a $1,000 per share liquidation preference, and a warrant to purchase up to 508,320 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $9.64 per share. Management is accreting the discount on the preferred stock over a five year life using an effective yield.

The preferred securities issued by Centrue pay cumulative dividends of 5% a year for the first five years and 9% a year thereafter. Centrue may, at its option, redeem the preferred securities at their liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends at any time. Both the preferred securities and the warrant will be accounted for as components of regulatory Tier 1 capital. The securities purchase agreement, between the Company and the Treasury, limits the payment of dividends on the Common Stock to a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share, limits the Company’s ability to repurchase its Common Stock, and subjects the Company to certain executive compensation limitations.

Note 11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill initially recorded is subject to the completion of the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Purchase accounting adjustments are the adjustments to the initial goodwill recorded at the time an acquisition is completed. Such adjustments generally consist of adjustments to the assigned fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the completion of appraisals or other valuations and adjustments to initial estimates recorded for transaction costs or exit liabilities. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis. Management performed its annual review of goodwill at December 31, 2008 using the comparable transaction approach and has updated that review each quarter as the stock prices in the financial services sector generally remained out of favor. Due to continued pressures created by the economy on asset quality, the Company hired a third party to conduct an in-depth step one analysis per FAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. The results of this analysis showed that the Company failed step one. The third party conducted a step two test which indicated an impairment of $8,451. However, if the economy remains stressed and bank stocks remain out of favor, no assurance can be given that future impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.

The change in balance of goodwill during the year is as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Beginning of period	$	24,494		$	25,498
Goodwill impairment due to sale of Wealth Management		(163	)		(724	)
Goodwill allocated to Brokerage & Asset Management sale		—			(280	)
Impairment		(8,451	)		—
End of period	$	15,880		$	24,494

In late 2008, the Company completed the sale of their asset management and brokerage product lines. Additionally, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its Trust product line to Hometown National Bank in LaSalle, Illinois. This transaction was completed during the first quarter of 2009. The goodwill impairment related to the sale of Wealth Management, Asset Management and Brokerage is the result of these transactions.

20.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued)

Acquired Intangible Assets

Acquired intangible assets were as follows as of the quarter ending:

	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles	$	14,124	$	6,424	$	14,124	$	5,617
Other customer relationship intangibles		—		—		—		—
Missouri charter		581		—		581		—
Total	$	14,705	$	6,424	$	14,705	$	5,617

The core deposit intangible asset recorded in the 2006 merger with Centrue Financial Corporation was $13,035. Aggregate amortization expense was $807 and $990 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

Estimated amortization expense for subsequent periods is as follows:

Remaining quarters in 2009	$	730
2010		1,257
2011		1,029
2012		951
2013		951
Thereafter		2,781

Note 12. Subsequent Events

As defined in FAS 165, subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Financial statements are considered issued when they are widely distributed to shareholders and other financial statement users for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 10, 2009, which is the date that the Company’s financial statements are being issued.

Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments

On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161), which is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Additional disclosures will be required that require disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in tabular format. It also requires disclosure of derivatives features that are credit risk-related. These changes will enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. It was effective for financial statements for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The impact of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

21.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments (continued)

In January 2009, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force finalized Issue No. 99-20-1,Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20. This issue amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20,Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other related guidance. If the fair value of an available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt security is less than its cost basis at the measurement date, generally accepted accounting principles require that the reporting entity assess the impaired security to determine whether the impairment is other than temporary. Other-than-temporary impairments are recognized through earnings. This amendment allows for changes which include using reasonable judgment of the probability that the holder will be unable to collect amounts due rather than using the EITF 99-20’s previous requirement to estimate a “market participant’s” view of cash flows. Beginning on March 31, 2009, the Company has applied this FSP in determining if our securities have any other-than-temporary impairments.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 115-2 and No. 124-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, which amends existing guidance for determining whether impairment is other-than-temporary for debt securities. The FSP requires an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in earnings. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Additionally, the FSP expands and increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP as of January 1, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recognized a $5,746 non-cash impairment charge to write down one of our collateralized debt obligations due to other-than- temporary impairment, which was credit related. Please see Note 9 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset and Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This FSP emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants. The FSP provides a number of factors to consider when evaluating whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity. In addition, when transactions or quoted prices are not considered orderly, adjustments to those prices based on the weight of available information may be needed to determine the appropriate fair value. The FSP also requires increased disclosures. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have a significant impact to the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 107,Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28,Interim Financial Reporting, to require these disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. This FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company elected to early-adopt this FSP for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and the fair value disclosures are included in this Form 10-Q.

22.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Notes toUnauditedConsolidatedFinancialStatements

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Note 13. Recent Accounting Developments (continued)

In April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 141(R)-1,Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies. This FSP amends and clarifies FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations, to address application issues raised by preparers, auditors, and members of the legal profession on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. This FSP is effective for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Shared-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”). This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively. The Company has adopted this FSP for the quarter ending March 31, 2009. There was no material impact to earnings per share. Please refer to Note 2. Earnings Per Share.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events, (FAS 165). Under FAS 165, the effects of events that occur subsequent to the balance-sheet date should be evaluated through the date the financial statements are either issued or available to be issued. Companies should disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. FAS 165 requires companies to reflect in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions at the balance-sheet date (recognized subsequent events). The Statement prohibits companies from reflecting in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance-sheet date (nonrecognized subsequent events), but requires information about the events to be disclosed if the financial statements would otherwise be misleading. FAS 165 was effective for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 with prospective application. At June 30, 2009, the Company applied this Statement and included the required disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

23.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company provides a full range of products and services to individual and corporate customers extending from the far western and southern suburbs of the Chicago metropolitan area across Central Illinois down to the metropolitan St. Louis area. These products and services include demand, time, and savings deposits; lending; mortgage banking, brokerage, asset management, and trust services. Brokerage, asset management, and trust services are provided to our customers on a referral basis to third party providers. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions, including banks, thrifts and credit unions, as well as nonfinancial institutions providing financial services. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiary Centrue Bank (the “Bank”) are subject to regulations of certain regulatory agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.

The following discussion provides an analysis of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

For further information with respect to significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The annualized results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. All financial information is in thousands (000s), except shares and per share data.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, changes in these assumptions and estimates could significantly affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those critical accounting policies that are of particular significance to the Company are discussed in Note 1 of the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

          Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required based on past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, current economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.

24.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Securities:Available-for-sale securities are those that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily to maturity. Any decision to sell a security classified as available-for-sale would be based on various factors, including significant movements in interest rates, changes in the maturity mix of the Company’s assets and liabilities, liquidity needs, regulatory capital considerations, and other similar factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses, net of the related income tax effect, reported in other comprehensive income. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses when the Company is unable to retain their position in the instrument allowing it to recover. If the Company is able to retain the instrument and allow it to recover its value, only the credit component of any identified impairment is recognized through the income statement. The fair values of securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). If the securities could not be priced using quoted market prices, observable market activity or comparable trades, the financial market was considered not active and the assets were classified as Level 3. The assets included in Level 3 are trust preferred CDOs and one CMO. These securities were historically priced using Level 2 inputs. In 2008, the decline in the level of observable inputs and market activity for trust preferred CDOs by the measurement date was significant and resulted in unreliable external pricing. As such, these investments are now considered Level 3 inputs and are priced using an internal model. The following information is incorporated into the pricing model utilized in determining individual security valuations:

• historical and current performance of the underlying collateral

• deferral/default rates

• collateral coverage ratios

• break in yield calculations

• cash flow projections

• required liquidity and credit premiums

• financial trend analysis with respect to the individual issuing financial institutions and insurance companies

Due to market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.

The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic and market concerns warrant such valuation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. For additional discussion on securities, see Notes 3 and 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q.

          Goodwill and other intangible assets: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified. Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank, and branch company acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which is ten years.

25.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

General

Second Quarter 2009 Results:

• Capital ratios remain strong. Total risk-based capital ratio was 14.29%, tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 12.11%, and tangible common equity to tangible assets was 5.75%.

• Nonperforming loans increased to 7.10% of total loans as compared to 1.57% at March 31, 2009, 1.03% at December 31, 2008 and 1.97% at June 30, 2008. The allowance for loan loss increased to 2.82% of total loans as compared to 1.62% at March 31, 2009, 1.50% at December 31, 2008 and 1.15% at June 30, 2008.

• Pre-tax operating income for the quarter, excluding goodwill impairment, provision for loan loss, non-cash impairment charges on securities, and other nonrecurring items, decreased 12.8% from second quarter 2008 due to lower net interest income and higher noninterest expenses.

• Loans decreased $50,496, or 5.0%, from year-end 2008 and deposits decreased $15,104, or 1.4%, in the same timeframe. Liquidity improved as in-market deposits increased $37,400, or 4.0%, primarily as result of an increase in certificates of deposit and money market accounts. Wholesale funding decreased $116,473, or 54.2%, as $52,458 in maturing brokered certificates of deposit and $64,015 in FHLB advances were not replaced.

• The net interest margin was 3.27%, decreasing 15 basis points from 3.42% recorded in the first quarter 2009 and 7 basis points from 3.34% recorded in the second quarter 2008.

• The Company’s Board of Directors has determined it will suspend the cash dividends on common stock, defer cash dividends on preferred stocks and defer interest payments on our trust preferred subordinated debentures. Though the Company has sufficient capital and liquidity to satisfy regulatory requirements, this action will allow further preservation of already strong capital levels.

Results of Operations

          Net Income (Loss)

Net income (loss) for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009 equaled $(16,215) or $(2.77) per common diluted share as compared to $2,705 or $0.44 per common diluted share in the same period of 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net income (loss) equaled $(15,150) or $(2.66) per common diluted share as compared to $5,150 or $0.83 per common diluted share in the same period during 2008. The results for the second quarter 2009 were adversely impacted by a $13,064 provision for loan losses related to asset quality downgrades in the Company’s land development, construction and commercial real estate credits and a non-cash charge of $8,451 for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Also contributing to the loss was a $4,709 non-cash impairment charge related to securities largely reflective of continued deterioration of general economic conditions and extraordinary volatility in the securities markets. Excluding the one-time non-cash goodwill impairment charge, the second quarter 2009 net loss equaled $8,500, or $1.48 per common diluted share.

Return on average equity was (45.09)% for the second quarter 2009 as compared to 9.26% for the same period in 2008. Return on average assets was (4.82)% for the second quarter 2009 compared to 0.80% for the same period in 2008.

Return on average equity was (20.97)% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 8.74% for the same period in 2008. Return on average assets was (2.23)% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to 0.76% for the same period in 2008.

26.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Net Interest Income/ Margin

The Company’s net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as “volume change.” It is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds referred to as “rate change.” The following table details each category of average amounts outstanding for interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, average rate earned on all interest-earning assets, average rate paid on all interest-bearing liabilities and the net yield on average interest-earning assets. In addition, the table reflects the changes in net interest income stemming from changes in interest rates and from asset and liability volume, including mix. The change in interest attributable to both rate and volume has been allocated to the changes in the rate and the volume on a pro rata basis.

Fully tax equivalent net interest income for the second quarter 2009 decreased 3.2% to $9,918 as compared to $10,251 for the same period in 2008. The decline in net interest income was due to downward pressure on the net interest margin and interest income lost due to non-accrual loans and loans charged-off.

The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.27% for the second quarter, representing decreases of 15 basis points from 3.42% recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and 7 basis points from 3.34% recorded in the second quarter of 2008. Over the past four quarters, declining loan yields outpaced the decline in funding costs, reducing both net interest spread and margin compared with the second quarter 2008. Due largely to continued competition in pricing loans and deposits, the protracted economic downturn, the increase of nonaccrual loans, and the Company’s interest rate sensitivity, the margin will likely remain under pressure throughout 2009.

Fully tax equivalent net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $20,504, representing an increase of $285 or 1.4% compared to the $20,219 earned during the same period in 2008. The increase of net interest income was driven by a decrease in the funding balances and a shift to less expensive funding as well as the decline in funding costs exceeded the decline in yields on the earning asset portfolio.

27.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET
AND ANALYIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009								2008
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate			Change Due To:
																	Volume			Rate			Net
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets
Interest-earning deposits	$	2,867		$	6		1.03	%	$	2,855		$	2		0.29	%	$	8		$	(4	)	$	4
Securities
Taxable		201,352			2,145		4.27			177,521			2,100		4.74			678			(633	)		45
Non-taxable		35,072			483		5.50			39,142			554		5.69			(24	)		(47	)		(71	)
Total securities (tax equivalent)		236,424			2,628		4.46			216,663			2,654		4.93			654			(680	)		(26	)
Federal funds sold		—			—		—			2,679			13		1.96			6			(19	)		(13	)
Loans
Commercial		155,949			2,255		5.80			203,604			3,121		6.17			(351	)		(515	)		(866	)
Real estate		815,071			11,237		5.53			798,308			12,755		6.43			(583	)		(935	)		(1,518	)
Installment and other		5,319			124		9.35			10,966			162		5.94			26			(64	)		(38	)
Gross loans (tax equivalent)		976,339			13,616		5.59			1,012,878			16,038		6.37			(908	)		(1,514	)		(2,422	)
Total interest-earnings assets		1,215,630			16,250		5.36			1,235,075			18,707		6.09			(240	)		(2,217	)		(2,457	)
Noninterest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents		38,613								29,373
Premises and equipment, net		31,450								34,443
Other assets		64,087								66,180
Total nonearning assets		134,150								129,996
Total assets	$	1,349,780							$	1,365,071
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities
NOW accounts		102,358			147		0.58			107,000			291		1.10			107			(251	)		(144	)
Money market accounts		151,048			561		1.49			165,208			1,107		2.69			319			(865	)		(546	)
Savings deposits		91,675			62		0.27			90,920			61		0.27			1			—			1
Time deposits		601,008			4,562		3.04			556,088			5,566		4.03			(238	)		(767	)		(1,005	)
Federal funds purchased and repurchase Agreements		24,910			33		0.53			39,585			154		1.56			(124	)		3			(121	)
Advances from FHLB		74,900			570		3.05			111,762			777		2.80			(214	)		7			(207	)
Notes payable & subordinated debt		32,008			397		4.97			46,769			500		4.30			(118	)		16			(102	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,077,907			6,332		2.36			1,117,332			8,456		3.04			(267	)		(1,857	)		(2,124	)
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits		61,778								57,222
Other liabilities		65,859								72,986
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities		127,637								130,208
Stockholders’ equity		144,236								117,531
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,349,780							$	1,365,071
Net interest income (tax equivalent)				$	9,918							$	10,251				$	27		$	(360	)	$	(333	)
Net interest income (tax equivalent) to total earning assets							3.27	%							3.34	%
Interest-bearing liabilities to earning assets		88.67	%							90.47	%

(1)	Average balance and average rate on securities classified as available-for-sale is based on historical amortized cost balances.
(2)	Interest income and average rate on non-taxable securities are reflected on a tax equivalent basis based upon a statutory federal income tax rate of 34%.
(3)	Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balances; overdraft loans are excluded in the balances.
(4)	Loan fees are included in the specific loan category.

28.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET
AND ANALYIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009								2008
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate			Change Due To:
																	Volume			Rate			Net
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets
Interest-earning deposits	$	2,715		$	10		0.67	%	$	2,916		$	9		0.61	%	$	(1	)	$	2		$	1
Securities
Taxable		209,380			4,646		4.47			185,096			4,553		4.95			593			(500	)		93
Non-taxable		35,477			974		5.55			39,261			1,129		5.78			(104	)		(51	)		(155	)
Total securities (tax equivalent)		244,857			5,620		4.63			224,357			5,682		5.09			489			(551	)		(62	)
Federal funds sold		—			—		—			3,440			50		2.93			(23	)		(27	)		(50	)
Loans
Commercial		162,430			4,577		5.68			212,135			6,863		6.51			(1,415	)		(871	)		(2,286	)
Real estate		819,966			23,016		5.66			781,892			26,203		6.74			990			(4,177	)		(3,187	)
Installment and other		5,659			257		8.72			10,867			347		6.41			(148	)		58			(90	)
Gross loans (tax equivalent)		988,055			27,850		6.20			1,004,894			33,413		6.69			(573	)		(4,990	)		(5,563	)
Total interest-earnings assets		1,235,627			33,480		5.46			1,235,607			39,154		6.37			(108	)		(5,566	)		(5,674	)
Noninterest-earning assets
Cash and cash equivalents		34,111								31,401
Premises and equipment, net		31,728								34,933
Other assets		67,591								68,837
Total nonearning assets		133,430								135,171
Total assets	$	1,369,057							$	1,370,778
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities
NOW accounts		102,424			333		0.66			109,505			694		1.28			(54	)		(307	)		(361	)
Money market accounts		148,541			1,273		1.73			160,723			2,428		3.04			(211	)		(944	)		(1,155	)
Savings deposits		89,347			119		0.27			90,167			203		0.45			(5	)		(79	)		(84	)
Time deposits		598,395			9,213		3.10			560,587			12,042		4.32			414			(3,243	)		(2,829	)
Federal funds purchased and repurchase Agreements		26,571			72		0.54			44,899			486		2.18			(161	)		(253	)		(414	)
Advances from FHLB		98,907			1,113		2.27			116,199			1,948		3.37			(287	)		(548	)		(835	)
Notes payable & subordinated debt		34,079			853		5.05			41,474			1,134		5.11			(165	)		(116	)		(281	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,098,264			12,976		2.38			1,123,554			18,935		3.39			(469	)		(5,490	)		(5,959	)
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits		114,568								117,706
Other liabilities		10,547								11,044
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities		125,115								128,750
Stockholders’ equity		145,678								118,474
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,369,057							$	1,370,778
Net interest income (tax equivalent)				$	20,504							$	20,219				$	361		$	(76	)	$	285
Net interest income (tax equivalent) to total earning assets							3.35	%							3.29	%
Interest-bearing liabilities to earning assets		88.88	%							90.93	%

(1)	Average balance and average rate on securities classified as available-for-sale is based on historical amortized cost balances.
(2)	Interest income and average rate on non-taxable securities are reflected on a tax equivalent basis based upon a statutory federal income tax rate of 34%.
(3)	Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balances; overdraft loans are excluded in the balances.
(4)	Loan fees are included in the specific loan category.

29.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Provision for Loan Losses

The amount of the provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluations of the loan portfolio, with particular attention directed toward nonperforming, impaired and other potential problem loans. During these evaluations, consideration is also given to such factors as management’s evaluation of specific loans, the level and composition of impaired loans, other nonperforming loans, other identified potential problem loans, historical loss experience, results of examinations by regulatory agencies, results of the independent asset quality review process, the market value of collateral, the estimate of discounted cash flows, the strength and availability of guarantees, concentrations of credits and various other factors, including concentration of credit risk in various industries and current economic conditions.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company increased its allowance for loan losses to $26,894, an increase of $11,876 from December 31, 2008 and $15,352 from June 30, 2008. The allowance for loan losses represented 2.82% of total loans outstanding at June 30, 2009, compared to 1.50% at December 31, 2008 and 1.15% at June 30, 2008.

The provision for loan losses for second quarter 2009 was $13,064, compared to $2,235 and $866 for first quarter 2009 and second quarter 2008, respectively. The second quarter 2009 provision for loan loss was driven by higher levels of nonperforming loans, declining real estate values on collateral for certain impaired credits where either new appraisals dictated further impairment charges of collateral-dependent loans or where other loans became totally collateral-dependent and were written down to the collateral value, and adverse risk rating changes.

Net charge-offs for the second quarter 2009 were $2,180 or 0.22% of average loans as compared to $1,243 or 0.12% reported in the first quarter 2009 and $545 in net charge-offs reported in the second quarter 2008. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $3,423 or 0.35% of average loans as compared to $845 or 0.08% of average loans for the comparable period in 2008.

Management continues to diligently monitor the loan portfolio, paying particular attention to borrowers with land development, residential real estate, and commercial development exposures. During the second quarter, many of these relationships showed duress due to continued economic downturn being experienced for this industry. This will likely remain to be extremely challenging throughout 2009. Should the economic climate deteriorate from current levels, more borrowers may experience repayment difficulty, and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies will rise requiring further increases in the provision for loan losses.

          Noninterest Income

Noninterest income consists of a wide variety of fee-based revenues from bank-related service charges on deposits and mortgage revenues. Also included in this category are revenues generated by the Company’s increases in cash surrender value on bank-owned life insurance.

30.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

The following table summarizes the Company’s noninterest income:

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Service charges	$	1,599		$	1,875	$	3,056		$	3,511
Mortgage banking income		811			389		1,509			835
Bank owned life insurance		259			254		515			506
Securities gains		232			—		246			848
Net impairment on securities		(4,709	)		—		(5,917	)		—
Gain on sale of OREO		29			142		36			238
Gain on sale of other assets		15			629		108			1,111
Other income		823			1,003		1,549			2,181
Total noninterest income	$	(941	)	$	4,292	$	1,102		$	9,230

Noninterest income decreased $5,233 during the second quarter 2009 to $(941) as compared to $4,292 for the same period in 2008. Excluding $4,709 of impairment charges taken on securities, noninterest income decreased $524 or 11.6%. This decrease largely stems from reduced consumer spending and the impact of that on overdraft fees. Further, trust and brokerage fees declined resulting from the impact of selling the wealth management product lines in late 2008 and first quarter 2009. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in revenue from the mortgage business as refinancing activity increased due to the favorable interest rate environment.

Noninterest income totaled $1,102 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $9,230 for the same period in 2008. Excluding the $5,917 of impairment charges taken on securities, noninterest income decreased $2,211 or 24.0%. The decrease was due mainly to the same reasons stated above for the second quarter 2009.

          Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense is comprised primarily of compensation and employee benefits, occupancy and other operating expense. The following table summarizes the Company’s noninterest expense:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,322	$	4,493	$	8,448	$	9,322
Occupancy, net		905		919		1,770		1,957
Furniture and equipment		564		624		1,124		1,406
Marketing		205		315		388		551
Supplies and printing		117		99		236		230
Telephone		297		201		490		442
Data processing		392		231		762		534
FDIC insurance		1,094		45		1,339		75
Goodwill impairment		8,451		297		8,451		694
Amortization of intangible assets		394		478		807		990
Other expenses		1,524		1,519		3,327		3,336
Total noninterest expense	$	18,265	$	9,221	$	27,142	$	19,537

Total noninterest expense for the second quarter 2009 was $18,265, an increase of $9,044, compared to $9,221 recorded during the same period in 2008. Results for the quarter included a $8,451 non-cash goodwill impairment charge and a $618 special FDIC insurance premium assessment imposed on all financial institutions in the second quarter 2009 in order to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge and the FDIC special assessment, total noninterest expense for the second quarter 2009 remained relatively unchanged in comparison to the same period of 2008. Additional FDIC special assessments could be announced to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund which could negatively impact earnings.

31.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Cost savings were experienced in salaries and benefits due to staffing reductions and suspension of bonus and incentive compensation plans and occupancy and equipment expense due to the realization of cost savings from the sale of four branches in the first half of 2008. These savings were partially offset by increases in recurring FDIC premiums, legal fees in connection with the higher volume of nonperforming loans, and data processing and telephone costs.

Noninterest expense totaled $27,142 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increasing by $7,605 or 38.9% from the same period in 2008. Excluding nonrecurring charges of $9,462 for 2009 and $1,776 for 2008, noninterest expense levels decreased $81 or 0.5% for the first six months of 2009 as compared to 2008. The decrease was due mainly to the same reasons as expressed for second quarter.

          Applicable Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the periods included benefits for tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments and general business tax credits offset by the effect of nondeductible expenses. The following table shows the Company’s income before income taxes, as well as applicable income taxes and the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	(22,554	)	$	4,209		$	(21,245	)	$	7,768
Applicable income taxes		(6,339	)		1,504			(6,095	)		2,618
Effective tax rates		28.1	%		35.7	%		28.7	%		33.7	%

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $(6,339) and income tax expense of $1,504 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective tax rates equaled 28.1% and 35.7% respectively, for such periods. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $(6,095) and income tax expense of $2,618 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective tax rates equaled 28.7% and 33.7% respectively, for such periods.

The Company’s effective tax rate was lower than statutory rates due to several factors. First, the Company derives interest income from municipal securities and loans, which are exempt from federal tax and certain U.S. government agency securities, which are exempt from state tax. Second, the Company derives income from bank owned life insurance policies, which is exempt from federal and state tax. Finally, state income taxes are recorded net of the federal tax benefit, which lowers the combined effective tax rate. The decreased effective tax rate compared to the prior year was related to overall taxable income compared to tax-exempt income. The effective tax rate declines as the taxable income decreases due to the higher proportion of tax-exempt items offsetting taxable income.

The income tax benefit was generated by the non-cash impairment charges related to trust preferred securities, the goodwill impairment charge, and higher provision for loan loss recorded in 2009. The Company recorded a second quarter 2009 income tax benefit of $6,339, as a result of the pre-tax loss of $22,554. It should be noted that $6,545 of the goodwill impairment charge of $8,451 was not deductible for income tax purposes. Excluding these items, the effective tax rate would have been approximately 31.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 31.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

32.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Earnings Review by Business Segment

The Company’s internal reporting and planning process focuses on three primary lines of business: Retail, Commercial and Treasury. See Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for the presentation of the condensed income statement and total assets for each Segment.

The financial information presented was derived from the Company’s internal profitability reporting system that is used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. This information is based on internal management accounting policies which have been developed to reflect the underlying economics of the Segments and, to the extent practicable, to portray the Segment as if it operated on a stand alone basis. Thus, each Segment, in addition to its direct revenues and expenses, assets and liabilities, includes an allocation of shared support function expenses. The Retail, Commercial and Treasury Segments also include funds transfer adjustments to appropriately reflect the cost of funds on loans made and funding credits on deposits generated. Apart from these adjustments, the accounting policies used are similar to those described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Since there are no comprehensive authorities for management accounting equivalent to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the information presented is not necessarily comparable with similar information from other financial institutions. In addition, methodologies used to measure, assign and allocate certain items may change from time-to-time to reflect, among other things, accounting estimate refinements, changes in risk profiles, changes in customers or product lines and changes in management structure.

          Retail Segment.The Retail Segment (“Retail”) provides retail banking services to individual customers through the Company’s branch locations in Illinois and Missouri. The services provided by this Segment include direct lending, checking, savings, money market, CD accounts, safe deposit rental, ATMs and other traditional and electronic banking services.

Retail generated a loss of $3,652 or 22.5% of total Segment loss in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to a loss of $33 or (1.2)% during the same period in 2008. Year to date Retail Segment net loss was $4,132 or 27.3% as compared to net income of $721 or 14.0% for the same period in 2008. Retail assets were $240,256 at June 30, 2009, $255,028 at December 31, 2008 and $294,634 as of June 30, 2008. This represented 18.3%, 18.2% and 21.5% of total consolidated assets, respectively.

The large impact on retail is the allocation of the goodwill impairment. Excluding this, the factors impacting retail for the second quarter are non-interest income is lower and net interest income is lower due to pressure on the yield on loans and higher balances on the funding portfolio. Additionally, the provision for loan losses related to retail was $250 in 2009 versus $0 in 2008. Offsetting these negative variances slightly is a positive expense variance.

The change in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was reflective of the same reasons discussed in the second quarter.

          Commercial Segment.The Commercial Segment (“Commercial”) provides commercial banking services to business customers served through the Company’s full service branch channels located in Illinois and Missouri. The services provided by this Segment include lending, business checking and deposits, cash management, and other traditional as well as electronic commercial banking services.

Commercial showed a loss of $8,540 or 52.7% of total Segment loss in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to a profit of $2,566 or 94.9% of total Segment income during the same period in 2008. Year to date Commercial Segment net loss was $6,982 or 46.1% of total Segment loss as compared to a profit of $3,871 or 75.2% of total Segment income during the same period in 2008. Commercial assets were $758,065 at June 30, 2009, $803,069 at December 31, 2008 and $785,542 as of June 30, 2008. This represented 57.7%, 57.3% and 57.2% of total consolidated assets, respectively.

33.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

The allocation of the goodwill impairment is negatively impacting this segment’s performance. Excluding this, the large provision in relation to land, construction and commercial real estate credits contributed to the decline from previous quarter. Additionally, non-interest income is lower. Offsetting these negative variances is lower non-interest expense and slightly better net interest income before provision.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the decrease in net income was due to the same reasons as stated above for the quarter.

          Treasury Segment.The Treasury Segment (“Treasury”) is responsible for managing the investment portfolio and acquiring wholesale funding for loan activity. Additionally, this area is responsible for assisting in the management of liquidity and interest rate risk. Treasury generated a loss of $4,023 or 24.8% of total Segment net loss in the second quarter of 2009 and a net income of $172 or 6.4% of total Segment net income during the same period in 2008. Year to date Treasury Segment net loss was $4,036 or 26.6% of total Segment net loss as compared to a profit of $558 or 10.8% of total Segment net income for the same period in 2008. Treasury assets were $254,554 at June 30, 2009, $277,597 at December 31, 2008 and $216,047 at June 30, 2008. This represented 19.4%, 19.8% and 15.7% of total consolidated assets, respectively.

Treasury was impacted by the non-cash impairment charge for securities of $4,709 during the second quarter 2009. Additionally, net interest income is lower due to the yield on earning asset portfolio being lower and interest expense being lower. The segment was also impacted by higher allocations as the goodwill impairment was allocated from other operations to the segments in the period.

Net income for the first six months of 2009 decreased in comparison to 2008 due to the same reasons as mentioned for the quarter.

Financial Condition

          General

Following are highlights of the June 30, 2009 balance sheet when compared to December 31, 2008:

          Securities.The primary strategic objective of the Company’s securities portfolio is to assist with liquidity and interest rate risk management. In managing the securities portfolio, the Company seeks to minimize any credit risk and avoid investments in sophisticated and complex investment products. The Company does not hold any securities containing sub-prime mortgages or any Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac equities.

Securities at June 30, 2009 totaled $225,805 as compared to $252,562 recorded at December 31, 2008. This represents a decrease of $26,757 or 10.6%. At quarter-end, the Company held nine pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) involving three hundred issuers with a total book value of $19,525 and fair value of $9,747. The investments in trust-preferred securities receive principal and interest payments from several pools of subordinated capital debentures with each pool containing issuances by a minimum of twenty-three banks or, in a few instances, capital notes from insurance companies.

Per Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, the Company recorded for the second quarter 2009 a $4,709 pre-tax non-cash impairment charge based upon management’s determination that three trust preferred securities with an aggregate cost before impairment of $12,456 and one collateralized mortgage obligation with a cost of $1,918 was other than temporarily impaired. This determination was based on the Company’s analysis which follows accounting pronouncements. The analysis showed an adverse change in estimated cash flows from these securities due to a significant number of deferrals in the second quarter. These values continued to decline as rating agencies downgraded the ratings of the securities. Per the accounting pronouncements, the Company calculated the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the cost basis, otherwise referred to as the credit loss.

34.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Management has determined that the remaining $11,607 of trust-preferred securities is deemed to be only temporarily impaired at quarter-end. An unrealized loss of approximately $5,991 associated with all trust preferred securities has been recorded, on an after-tax basis, through stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income.

Should the economic climate deteriorate from current levels, the underlying credits may experience repayment difficulty, and the level of deferrals and defaults could increase requiring additional impairment charges in future quarters.

          Loans.Outstanding loans totaled $953,894 at June 30, 2009 which compared to $1,004,390 at December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $50,496 or 5.0% due to a combination of normal attrition, pay-downs, and loan charge-offs. Due to economic conditions, the number of loan applications are decreasing and many borrowers are trying to reduce the amount of debt they have outstanding in order to reduce their interest expense.

          As of June 30, 2009, the Company had 17.6% of its total loan portfolio invested in real estate construction and development loans and 41.3% invested in commercial real estate (excluding construction and development).

          The Company does not have any material direct exposure to sub-prime loan products as it has focused its real estate lending activities on providing traditional loan products to relationship borrowers in locally known markets.

          Deposit.Total deposits equaled $1,034,116 at June 30, 2009 compared to $1,049,220 recorded at December 31, 2008 representing a decrease of $15,104 or 1.4%. In-market deposits increased $37,500 due to an increase in certificates of deposits, noninterest-bearing deposits and money market accounts. Wholesale funding decreased $116,473 as $52,458 in maturing brokered certificates of deposits and $64,015 in FHLB advances were not replaced. Non-interest bearing deposits were 11.2% of total deposits at June 30, 2009 as compared to 11.3% recorded at December 31, 2008.

          Goodwill.Goodwill was $15,880 as of June 30, 2009 as compared to $24,494 recorded at December 31, 2008. U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires companies to perform an annual test for goodwill impairment. The Company performed its last annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31, 2008. Results for that test indicated no impairment since the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Due primarily to the deterioration in the general economic environment, the resulting decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization in the second quarter, and in conjunction with the decline in earnings and increase in nonperforming loans, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,451 for impairment of goodwill recorded at Centrue Bank, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

This non-cash impairment charge has no effect on liquidity, cash flows, operations, tangible book value, or regulatory capital ratios at Centrue Bank or Centrue Financial Corporation. The impairment charge represents 34.5% of the $24,494 in total goodwill (prior to impairment charge being taken) as of December 31, 2008 and the net goodwill after the impairment is now $15,880. The goodwill was primarily associated with the November 2006 merger of Centrue Financial Corporation and UnionBancorp, Inc.

35.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Nonperforming Assets

If a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the loan does not generate current period income for the Company. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there are serious doubts regarding the collectability of all principal and interest due under the terms of the loans. Amounts received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied first to principal and then to interest after all principal has been collected. A loan is generally transferred to nonaccrual status if it is not in the process of collection and is delinquent in payment of either principal or interest beyond 90 days. Other nonperforming assets consist of real estate acquired through loan foreclosures or other workout situations and other assets acquired through repossessions.

The classification of a loan as nonaccrual does not necessarily indicate that the principal is uncollectible, in whole or in part. The Bank makes a determination as to collectability on a case-by-case basis. The Bank considers both the adequacy of the collateral and the other resources of the borrower in determining the steps to be taken to collect nonaccrual loans. The final determination as to the steps taken is made based upon the specific facts of each situation. Alternatives that are typically considered to collect nonaccrual loans are foreclosure, collection under guarantees, loan restructuring or judicial collection actions.

Each of the Company’s loans is assigned a rating based upon an internally developed grading system. A separate credit administration department also reviews grade assignments on an ongoing basis. Management continuously monitors nonperforming, impaired and past due loans to prevent further deterioration of these loans. The Company has an independent loan review function which is separate from the lending function and is responsible for the review of new and existing loans.

The following table summarizes nonperforming assets and loans past due 90 days or more for the previous five quarters.

	2009						2008
	Jun 30,			Mar 31,			Dec 31,			Sep 30,			Jun 30,
Nonaccrual loans	$	67,162		$	15,398		$	10,318		$	12,487		$	19,808
Trouble Debt Restructurings		584			75			—			—			—
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest		—			—			—			—			—
Total nonperforming loans		67,746			15,473			10,318			12,487			19,808
Other real estate owned		13,582			12,772			12,723			12,445			4,317
Total nonperforming assets	$	81,328		$	28,245		$	23,041		$	24,932		$	24,125
Nonperforming loans to total end of period loans		7.10	%		1.57	%		1.03	%		1.28	%		1.97	%
Nonperforming assets to total end of period loans		8.53	%		2.87	%		2.29	%		2.56	%		2.40	%
Nonperforming assets to total end of period assets		6.19	%		2.06	%		1.64	%		1.87	%		1.76	%

Credit quality performance in the second quarter was driven by the concentration of loan portfolio being 17.6% invested in real estate construction and development loans and 41.3% invested in commercial real estate (excluding construction and development). These sectors of the economy continue to be negatively impacted by the continued economic weakness across our markets.

The level of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2009 increased $52,273 or 337.8% from March 31, 2009 levels and $57,428 or 556.6% from the $10,318 that existed at December 31, 2008. The increase in nonperforming loans was concentrated in land, construction and commercial real estate credits as a result of the deterioration of general economic conditions, the ongoing implementation of action plans on previously identified relationships, and the identification of several additional deteriorating relationships. The increase was largely related to the following credits:

36.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

• The largest, a $13,400 loan to a land development company that has been negatively affected by the real estate downturn. This loan is secured by 165 developed and partially developed residential lots, as well as two display homes. Lots continue to be sold, but at a substantially slower pace than originally anticipated.

• An $11,300 loan relationship with a retailer and operator of recreational facilities has been negatively affected by the economy. Developed real estate and recreational facilities make up the bulk of the collateral value.

• A $10,900 loan relationship with a land development company. The Bank and borrower are currently negotiating a consent foreclosure. The loans are secured by 169 acres of raw land held for commercial and residential development.

• A $5,000 loan relationship with a residential building company. The loans are secured by two display homes, a spec home, a pre-sold home in the process of completion, and three partially complete spec homes.

• A $4,600 loan relationship with a land development company. The loans are secured by a display home, a spec home, a senior lien on the residential lots, as well as junior liens on lots in another development and the guarantor’s principal residence.

Nonaccrual real estate construction loans comprised 55.0% of total nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2009. Additionally, 91.4% of total nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2008 represented loans to 15 borrowers.

The increase in nonperforming loans was concentrated in our commercial real estate portfolio with borrowers dependent on the housing industry. The level of nonperforming loans to total end of period loans was 7.10% at June 30, 2009, as compared to 1.57% at March 31, 2009 and 1.03% at December 31, 2008. The reserve coverage ratio (allowance to nonperforming loans) was reported at 39.70% as of June 30, 2009 as compared to 145.55% as of December 31, 2008 and 103.47% as of March 31, 2009.

          Other Potential Problem Loans

The Company has other potential problem loans that are currently performing, but where some concerns exist regarding the nature of the borrower’s projects in current economic environment. Currently, management has identified $86,168 of loans that are currently performing and on accrual status but due to economic conditions facing these borrowers, were classified by management as impaired. Excluding nonperforming loans and loans that management has classified as impaired, there are other potential problem loans that totaled $9,113 at June 30, 2009 as compared to $9,181 at December 31, 2008. The classification of these loans, however, does not imply that management expects losses on each of these loans, but believes that a higher level of scrutiny and closer monitoring is prudent under the circumstances. Such classifications relate to specific concerns for each individual borrower and do not relate to any concentration risk common to all loans in this group.

          Allowance for Loan Losses

At June 30, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $26,894 or 2.82% of total loans as compared to $16,010 or 1.62% at March 31, 2009 and $15,018 or 1.50% of total loans at December 31, 2008. In originating loans, the Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, the following:

• general economic conditions;

• the type of loan being made;

• the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan;

• in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such a loan.

37.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

The allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of the allowance necessary to provide for probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio by analyzing the following:

• ultimate collectibility of the loans in its portfolio;

• incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff;

• the independent loan review function;

• results of examinations performed by regulatory agencies.

The Company regularly evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Commercial credits are graded using a system that is in compliance with regulatory classifications by the loan officers and the loan review function validates the officers’ grades. In the event that the loan review function downgrades the loan, it is included in the allowance analysis at the lower grade. To establish the appropriate level of the allowance, a sample of loans (including impaired and nonperforming loans) are reviewed and classified as to potential loss exposure.

Based on an estimation computed pursuant to the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and FASB Statements Nos. 114 and 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” the analysis of the allowance for loan losses consists of three components:

• specific credit allocation established for expected losses resulting from analysis developed through specific credit allocations on individual loans for which the recorded investment in the loan exceeds its fair value;

• general portfolio allocation based on historical loan loss experience for each loan category;

• subjective reserves based on general economic conditions as well as specific economic factors in the markets in which the Company operates.

The specific credit allocation component of the allowance for loan losses is based on a regular analysis of loans over a fixed-dollar amount where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. The fair value of the loan is determined based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the market price of the loan, or, if the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost of sale.

The general portfolio allocation component of the allowance for loan losses is determined statistically using a loss migration analysis that examines historical loan loss experience. The loss migration analysis is performed quarterly and loss factors are updated regularly based on actual experience. The general portfolio allocation element of the allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of the amounts necessary for concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume.

The allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, and ultimate losses will vary from current estimates. These estimates are reviewed monthly, and as adjustments, either positive or negative, become necessary, a corresponding increase or decrease is made in the provision for loan losses. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is consistent with prior years.

Management continues to diligently monitor the loan portfolio, paying particular attention to borrowers with residential real estate exposure. While most of these relationships are performing, the economic outlook for this industry will likely remain extremely challenging throughout 2009. Should the economic climate deteriorate from current levels, more borrowers may experience repayment difficulty, and the level of nonperforming loans, charge-offs and delinquencies will rise requiring further increases in the provision for loan losses.

38.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Liquidity

The Company manages its liquidity position with the objective of maintaining sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. In addition to the normal inflow of funds from core-deposit growth together with repayments and maturities of loans and investments, the Company utilizes other short-term funding sources such as brokered time deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, overnight federal funds purchased from correspondent banks and the acceptance of short-term deposits from public entities and Federal Home Loan Bank advances.

The Company can borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago’s discount window to meet short-term liquidity requirements. These borrowings are secured by commercial loans. The Company is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank-Chicago (FHLB) and as such has access to advances from FHLB secured generally by residential mortgage loans. At June 30, 2009, the Company maintained significant unused borrowing capacity from the Federal Reserve Bank discount window and FHLB based on current collateral requirements.

The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on several bases, which vary depending upon the time period. As the time period is expanded, other data is factored in, including estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan payoffs, investment portfolio maturities or calls and anticipated depository buildups or runoffs.

The Company classifies all of its securities as available-for-sale, thereby maintaining significant liquidity. The Company’s liquidity position is further enhanced by structuring its loan portfolio interest payments as monthly and by the significant representation of retail credit and residential mortgage loans in the Company’s loan portfolio, resulting in a steady stream of loan repayments. In managing its investment portfolio, the Company provides for staggered maturities so that cash flows are provided as such investments mature.

The Company’s cash flows are comprised of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities and investing activities offset by those used in financing activities, resulted in a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $2,624 from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009.

During the first six months of 2009, the Company experienced net cash inflows of $65,686 in investing activities due to maturities and calls on securities along with a reduction in loans and $10,378 in operating activities. In contrast, net cash outflows of $73,440 were used in financing activities largely due to the repayment on borrowed debt.

39.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingencies, and Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

The Company has entered into contractual obligations and commitments and off-balance sheet financial instruments.

The following tables summarize the Company’s contractual cash obligations and other commitments and off balance sheet instruments as of June 30, 2009.

	Payments Due by Period
	Within 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		4 – 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Contractual Obligations
Short-term debt	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	250	$	250
Long-term debt		417		2,366		2,097		5,750		10,630
Certificates of deposit		383,078		176,888		8,541		144		568,651
Operating leases		294		611		613		306		1,824
Severance payments		21		—		—		—		21
Series B mandatory redeemable preferred stock		—		268		—		—		268
Subordinated debentures		—		—		—		20,620		20,620
FHLB advances		3,209		53,000		15,061		5,000		76,270
Total contractual cash obligations	$	387,019	$	233,133	$	26,312	$	32,070	$	678,534

	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
	Within 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		4 – 5 Years		After 5 Years		Total
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Lines of credit	$	142,471	$	8,927	$	1,155	$	22,935	$	175,488
Standby letters of credit		6,906		2,455		—		2,771		12,132
Total contractual cash obligations	$	149,377	$	11,382	$	1,155	$	25,706	$	187,620

Capital Resources

          Stockholders’ Equity

The Company is committed to managing capital for maximum shareholder benefit and maintaining strong protection for depositors and creditors. Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2009 was $131,367, an increase of $15,459 or 13.34%, from December 31, 2008. The change in stockholders’ equity was largely the result of the Company’s participation in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP” program) partially offset by losses incurred in the second quarter, which were negatively impacted primarily by a goodwill impairment charge, and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the unrealized loss on the securities portfolio. Average quarterly equity as a percentage of average quarterly assets was 10.69% at June 30, 2009, compared to 8.82% at December 31, 2008. Book value per common share equaled $16.25 at June 30, 2009 compared to $19.14 at December 31, 2008.

          Stock Repurchase

Restrictions set forth in the U.S. Treasury CPP program prohibit the Company from repurchasing its common stock until the CPP proceeds are paid back.

40.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

          Capital Measurements

As discussed in Note 8, the Company’s current debt agreements include a covenant that require the Bank to maintain the status of being well capitalized which is a ratio of 10.0% for total risk based capital. The Bank is expected to meet a minimum risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 8%, of which at least one-half (or 4%) must be in the form of Tier 1 (core) capital. The remaining one-half (or 4%) may be in the form of Tier 1 (core) or Tier 2 (supplementary) capital. The amount of loan loss allowance that may be included in capital is limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. The ratio of Tier 1 (core) and the combined amount of Tier 1 (core) and Tier 2 (supplementary) capital to risk-weighted assets for the Company was 12.1% and 14.3%, respectively, at June 30, 2009. The Company is currently, and expects to continue to be, in compliance with these guidelines.

The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company’s capital ratios:

										Minimum			Well
	Jun 30,			December 31,						Capital			Capitalized
	2009			2008			2007			Ratios			Ratios
Tier 1 risk-based capital	$	131,468		$	105,581		$	101,831
Tier 2 risk-based capital		23,740			23,237			10,755
Total capital	$	155,208		$	128,818		$	112,586
Risk-weighted assets	$	1,086,051		$	1,058,969		$	1,102,602
Capital ratios:
Tier 1 risk-based capital		12.1	%		10.0	%		9.2	%		4.0	%		6.0	%
Total risk-based capital		14.3	%		12.2	%		10.2	%		8.0	%		10.0	%
Leverage ratio		9.9	%		8.1	%		7.7	%		4.0	%		5.0	%

Recent Accounting Developments

See Note 11 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for information concerning recent accounting developments.

Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectations of the Company, are generally identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “planned” or “potential” or similar expressions.

In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could effect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any forward-looking statements.

41.

CentrueFinancialCorporation
Item2. Management’sDiscussion andAnalysis ofFinancialCondition andResults ofOperations
(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Among the factors that could have an impact on the Company’s ability to achieve operating results and the growth plan goals are as follows:

• management’s ability to reduce and effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest rates in general on the volatility of the Company’s net interest income;

• fluctuations in the value of the Company’s investment securities;

• the Company’s ability to ultimately collect on any downgraded loan relationships;

• the Company’s ability to respond and adapt to economic conditions in our geographic market;

• the Company’s ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace;

• credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within the Company’s loan portfolio and individual large loans;

• volatility of rate sensitive deposits;

• operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud;

• asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks;

• the ability to successfully acquire low cost deposits or funding;

• the ability to successfully execute strategies to increase noninterest income;

• the ability to successfully grow non-commercial real estate loans;

• the ability of the Company to continue to realize cost savings and revenue generation opportunities in connection with the synergies of centralizing operations;

• the ability to adopt and implement new regulatory requirements as dictated by the SEC, FASB or other rule-making bodies which govern our industry;

• changes in the general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in which the Company conducts business.

42.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity Management

The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of its asset/liability management practices. The net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of changes in net interest income in the event of a sudden and sustained 50, 100, and 200 basis point increase in market interest rates or a 50 basis point decrease in market rates. The interest rates scenarios are used for analytical purposes and do not necessarily represent management’s view of future market movements. The tables below present the Company’s projected changes in net interest income for the various rate shock levels at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

		Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
		June 30, 2009						December 31, 2008
		Change						Change
		$			%			$			%
+	200 bp	$	(1,024	)		(2.54	)%	$	728			2.08	%
+	100 bp		(892	)		(2.22	)		295			0.84
+	50 bp		(397	)		(0.99	)		166			0.47
	Base		—			—			—			—
-	50 bp		976			2.43			(179	)		(0.51	)

As shown above, the Company’s model at June 30, 2009, the effect of an immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease the Company’s net interest income by $1,024 or 2.54%. The effect of an immediate 50 basis point decrease in rates would increase the Company’s net interest income by $976 or 2.43%. If rates increase approximately 250 basis points, there would be no impact to net interest income. Above a 250 basis point increase, there would be a positive impact to earnings.

For the Company’s credit agreements with its commercial customers, management instituted new underwriting standards that incorporated interest rate floors into the terms for many of its commercial relationships in the past three quarters to maximize the net interest margin during the time when market interest rates are at extremely low levels. While these floors have held income to a higher level in this low rate environment, they will also make it necessary for rates to climb to somewhat higher levels before the yield of the adjustable rate assets move above the floors and add significantly to interest income. Management has begun positioning the balance sheet to take advantage of the higher rates over the longer term as we began extending out our funding over the three and five year terms and thereby mitigate the impact on the margin of the limited income benefit of moderately rising rates. The Company continues to take advantage of the lower funding costs in reaction to FOMC rate reductions.

Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay rates and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above, should market conditions vary from the assumptions used in preparing the analysis. Further, the computations do not contemplate actions the Company may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

43.

CentrueFinancialCorporation

Item4. ControlsandProcedures

(InThousands, ExceptShare andPerShareData)

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company has designed its disclosure controls and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and, based on the evaluation described above, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at reaching that level of reasonable assurance.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

44.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings from time to time. The Company does not believe it is currently involved in any claim or action the ultimate disposition of which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Company did not experience any material changes in the Risk Factors during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. For specific information about the risks facing the Company refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

          None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

          None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the April 22, 2009 annual meeting of stockholders, Michael A. Griffith, Michael J. Hejna and John A. Shinkle were elected to serve as Class II directors until 2012. Continuing as Class III directors until 2010 are Thomas A. Daiber, Dennis J. McDonnell, Mark L. Smith and Scott C. Sullivan. Continuing as Class I directors until 2011 are Richard J. Berry, Walter E. Breipohl and Randall E. Ganim.

There were 6,028,491 issued and outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting. The voting on each item presented at the annual meetings was as follows:

	For		Withheld
Election of Directors
Michael A. Griffith		4,860,309		199,197
Michael J. Hejna		4,510,375		549,131
John A. Shinkle		4,856,623		202,883

	For		Against		Withheld
Non-binding proposal on executive compensation		4,157,283		762,373		139,850

Item 5. Other Information

          None

45.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits:
31.1	Certification of Thomas A. Daiber, President and Principal Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a – 14(a).
31.2	Certification of Kurt R. Stevenson, Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer required by Rule 13a – 14(a).
32.1(1)	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s President and Principal Executive Officer.
32.2(1)	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer.

⁽¹⁾ This certification is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

46.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	CENTRUE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: August 10, 2009	By:	/s/ Thomas A. Daiber
		Thomas A. Daiber
		President and Principal Executive Officer
Date: August 10, 2009	By:	/s/ Kurt R. Stevenson
		Kurt R. Stevenson
		Senior Executive Vice President and
		Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

47.