The Bank had no loans 90 days past due still accruing interest at September 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005. The following table presents the categories of nonperforming assets and certain ratios as of the dates indicated.
The following is a summary of the Company’s credit management policies and procedures.
The Company’s credit management policies and procedures focus on identifying, measuring, and controlling credit exposure. These procedures employ a lender-initiated system of rating credits, which is ratified in the loan approval process and subsequently tested in internal loan reviews and regulatory bank examinations. The system requires rating all loans at the time they are made, at each renewal date and as conditions warrant.
Downgrades of loan risk ratings may be initiated by the responsible loan officer, internal loan review, or the credit analyst department at any time. Upgrades of certain risk ratings may only be made with the concurrence of the Senior Credit Administration Officer, Chief Credit Officer and Loan Review Officer.
In determining the allowance and the related provision for loan losses, three principal elements are considered:
Based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of the above elements, provisions are made to the allowance for loan losses. Such provisions are reflected in our consolidated statements of income. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Wealth Management revenue increased $2.0 million, or 136%, from $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2005 to $3.5 million for the same period of 2006. The increase includes $1.9 million of commission income earned by Millennium in the third quarter of 2006. Excluding one-time insurance gains, organic revenue from the Company’s Trust operations increased 17% over third quarter of 2005. The Company’s ratio of fee income to total revenue was 24% versus 17% in the same period of 2005 as the Wealth Management segment continues to expand in line with the Company’s income diversification strategies.
Wealth Management assets under administration were $1.57 billion at September 30, 2006, a 21% increase over one year ago after adjusting for the $250 million in common trust fund assets that were distributed in December 2005 in accordance with a related contract.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, noninterest income was $12.3 million compared to $6.3 million for the same period in 2005. Wealth management revenue increased $5.9 million, or 141%, to $10.0 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, compared to $4.2 million for the same period in 2005 as a result of the reasons stated above.
Service charges on deposit accounts continue to be unchanged year over year due to a rising earnings credit rate on commercial accounts, which was offset by increased account activity.
Noninterest Expense
Our efficiency ratio, which expresses noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and other income, was 60.3% for third quarter of 2006, improved from 63.5% in the same quarter of 2005.
Noninterest expenses increased $2.4 million from $8.5 million in the third quarter of 2005 to $11.0 million in the same quarter of 2006. Approximately $806,000 of the increase was related to the addition of Millennium (including amortization of intangibles.) An additional $1.1 million of the increase was related to NorthStar (including amortization of intangibles.)
Quarter over quarter increases in employee compensation and benefits of $369,000 and $540,000 were related to Millennium and NorthStar, respectively. Excluding Millennium and NorthStar, employee compensation and benefits increased 6.2%, or $342,000. The increase is due to the salaries and related benefits of new senior level banking associates along with new associates in various areas of our organization including marketing, wealth management and other support areas. The additional costs are offset by declines in wealth management commissions and the deferral of direct loan origination costs. ��
The addition of Millennium and NorthStar contributed $57,000 and $120,000, respectively, to the increase in occupancy expense.
Furniture and equipment increases were due to the new St. Charles bank location, Millennium, NorthStar and the expansion of the Operations Center.
Data processing expenses increased due to upgrades to the Company’s AS400, licensing fee increases for our core banking system as a result of our increased asset size and increased maintenance fees for various Company systems. Expenses incurred to upgrade NorthStar technology to our platform have been capitalized and will be amortized according to the Company’s depreciation policies.
Other noninterest expense includes $354,000 for Millennium expenses (including $228,000 for amortization of intangibles.) Other noninterest expenses also includes $282,000 for NorthStar expenses (including $108,000 for amortization of intangibles.) The remaining increase in other noninterest expense is related to increases in travel, meals and entertainment, charitable contributions and loan-related expenses along with increases in general operating expenses such as telephone, marketing, postage, and courier charges.
Noninterest expenses were $29.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $5.2 million, or 21%, over the same period of 2005. Approximately $2.5 million, or 48%, of the increase was related to the addition of Millennium (including amortization of intangibles.) NorthStar represented $1.1 million of the increase (including amortization of intangibles.) On a year-to-date basis, our efficiency ratio was 59.7%% and improved from 62.6% in the first nine months of 2005.
Minority Interest in Net Income of Consolidated Subsidiary
On October 21, 2005, the Company acquired a 60% controlling interest in Millennium. The Company records the 40% non-controlling interest in Millennium, related to Millennium’s results of operations, in minority interest on the consolidated statements of income. Contractually, the Company is entitled to a priority return of 23.1% pre-tax on its current $15 million investment in Millennium before the minority interest holders are entitled to any distributions. The Company adjusted minority interest by $86,000 during the quarter in order to recognize its priority return in line with its contractual rights. Year to date, the Company has adjusted minority interest by $544,000. In effect, rather than receiving 40% of the earnings during the first nine months, the minority interest holders accrued 25%, while the Company accrued 75%. Millennium’s business continued to expand despite operational issues with certain consolidating carriers and a tighter underwriting environment. Case submissions were up substantially in August and September. Assuming that this trend continues and normal progression of submitted cases to paid status, we would expect Millennium to have a strong fourth quarter.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $2.4 million and $6.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $1.6 million and $4.7 million for the same periods in 2005. The effective tax rates for the
23
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were 36.1% and 36.0%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 were 36.1% and 35.8%, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the Company has the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as they become due. Funds are available from a number of sources, such as from the core deposit base and from loans and securities repayments and maturities. Liquidity is also provided from sales of the securities portfolio, lines of credit with major banks, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Home Loan Bank, the ability to acquire large and brokered deposits and the ability to sell loan participations to other banks.
The Company’s liquidity management framework includes measurement of several key elements, such as the loan to deposit ratio, wholesale deposits as a percentage of total deposits, and various dependency ratios used by banking regulators. The Company’s liquidity framework also incorporates contingency planning to assess the nature and volatility of funding sources and to determine alternatives to these sources.
Strong capital ratios, credit quality and core earnings are essential to retaining cost-effective access to the wholesale funding markets. Deterioration in any of these factors could have an impact on the Company’s ability to access these funding sources and, as a result, these factors are monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the liquidity management process.
While core deposits and loan and investment repayments are principal sources of liquidity, funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management. Diversity is achieved by strategically varying depositor types, terms, funding markets, and instruments.
The parent company’s liquidity is managed to provide the funds necessary to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in the Bank as necessary, and satisfy other operating requirements. The parent company’s primary funding sources to meet its liquidity requirements are dividends from subsidiaries, borrowings against its $15 million line of credit with a major bank, and proceeds from the issuance of equity (i.e. stock option exercises). Another source of funding for the parent company includes the issuance of subordinated debentures. As of September 30, 2006, the Company has $34 million of outstanding subordinated debentures as part of five Trust Preferred Securities Pools. These securities are classified as debt but are included in regulatory capital and the related interest expense is tax-deductible, which makes them a very attractive source of funding.
Investment securities are an important tool to the Company’s liquidity objective. As of September 30, 2006, the entire investment portfolio was available for sale. Of the $115 million investment portfolio available for sale, $27.5 million was pledged as collateral for public deposits, treasury, tax and loan notes, and other requirements. The remaining securities could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity if necessary.
The Bank has a variety of funding sources (in addition to key liquidity sources, such as core deposits, loan repayments, loan participations sold, and investment portfolio sales) available to increase financial flexibility. At September 30, 2006, on a combined basis, the Bank and NorthStar, had $157 million available from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines under blanket loan pledges, absent the Bank or NorthStar being in default of their respective credit agreements, and $161 million available from the Federal Reserve Bank under pledged loan agreements. The Bank also has access to over $70 million in overnight federal funds lines purchased from various banking institutions, while NorthStar had $13 million available in the form of overnight federal funds lines from various banking institutions. Finally, because the Bank plans to remain a “well-capitalized” institution, it has the ability to sell certificates of deposit through various national or regional brokerage firms, if needed.
Over the normal course of business, the Company enters into certain forms of off-balance sheet transactions, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. These transactions are managed through the Company’s various risk management processes. Management considers both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions in its evaluation of the Company’s liquidity. The Company has $458 million in unused loan commitments as of September 30, 2006. While this commitment level would be very difficult to fund on a short term basis given the Company’s current liquidity resources, our experience is that the nature of these commitments are such that the likelihood of such a funding demand is very low.
The Company and its banking affiliates are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its banking affiliates must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
24
assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banking affiliate’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its banking affiliates to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, that the Company and its banking affiliates meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, both banking affiliates were categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” banks must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios.
The following table summarizes the Company’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios at the dates indicated.
(in thousands) | | At September 30, 2006 | | At December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets | | | 9.53 | % | | 10.31 | % |
Total capital to risk weighted assets | | | 10.78 | % | | 11.55 | % |
Leverage ratio (Tier I capital to average assets) | | | 8.64 | % | | 8.75 | % |
Tangible capital to tangible assets | | | 6.26 | % | | 5.98 | % |
Tier I capital | | $ | 126,965 | | $ | 107,538 | |
Total risk-based capital | | $ | 143,639 | | $ | 120,528 | |
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The disclosures set forth in this item are qualified by the section captioned “Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” included in Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report.
Market risk arises from exposure to changes in interest rates and other relevant market or price risks. The Company faces market risk in the form of interest rate risk through transactions other than trading activities. Market risk from these activities, in the form of interest rate risk, is measured and managed through a number of methods. The Company uses financial modeling techniques to measure interest rate risk. These techniques measure the sensitivity of future earnings due to changing interest rate environments. Guidelines established by the Asset/Liability Management Committees and approved by the Boards of Directors are used to monitor exposure of earnings at risk. General interest rate movements are used to develop sensitivity as the banking affiliate feels it has no primary exposure to a specific point on the yield curve. These limits are based on the banking affliate’s exposure to a 100 bp and 200 bp immediate and sustained parallel rate move, either upward or downward.
25
The following table represents the estimated interest rate sensitivity and periodic and cumulative gap positions calculated as of September 30, 2006.
(in thousands) | | Year 1 | | Year 2 | | Year 3 | | Year 4 | | Year 5 | | Beyond 5 years or no stated maturity | | Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest-Earning Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in debt and equity securities | | $ | 2,047 | | $ | 35,604 | | $ | 38,016 | | $ | 28,923 | | $ | 3,176 | | $ | 7,094 | | $ | 114,860 | |
Interest-bearing deposits | | | 1,214 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,214 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 6,959 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 6,959 | |
Loans | | | 805,386 | | | 157,112 | | | 101,698 | | | 92,271 | | | 69,277 | | | 43,647 | | | 1,269,391 | |
Loans held for sale | | | 5,268 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,268 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-earning assets | | $ | 820,874 | | $ | 192,716 | | $ | 139,714 | | $ | 121,194 | | $ | 72,453 | | $ | 50,741 | | $ | 1,397,692 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Savings, NOW and Money market deposits | | $ | 608,669 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 608,669 | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 345,608 | | | 58,329 | | | 16,461 | | | 23,293 | | | 6,922 | | | — | | | 450,613 | |
Subordinated debentures | | | 24,744 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 10,310 | | | — | | | 35,054 | |
Other borrowings | | | 21,982 | | | 150 | | | 5,050 | | | 5,650 | | | 1,100 | | | 17,961 | | | 51,893 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest-bearing liabilities | | $ | 1,001,003 | | $ | 58,479 | | $ | 21,511 | | $ | 28,943 | | $ | 18,332 | | $ | 17,961 | | $ | 1,146,229 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest-sensitivity GAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GAP by period | | $ | (180,129 | ) | $ | 134,237 | | $ | 118,203 | | $ | 92,251 | | $ | 54,121 | | $ | 28,656 | | $ | 251,463 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cumulative GAP | | $ | (180,129 | ) | $ | (45,892 | ) | $ | 72,311 | | $ | 164,562 | | $ | 218,683 | | $ | 251,463 | | $ | 251,463 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Periodic | | | 0.82 | | | 3.30 | | | 6.50 | | | 4.19 | | | 3.95 | | | 2.83 | | | 1.22 | |
Cumulative GAP | | | 0.82 | | | 0.96 | | | 1.07 | | | 1.15 | | | 1.20 | | | 1.22 | | | 1.22 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of September 30, 2006, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2006, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is processed, recorded, summarized and reported when required. There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal controls or in the other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.
PART II
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
There have not been any material changes in the risk factors disclosure from that contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
26
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
a) | On July 5, 2006, the Company issued 1,091,500 of unregistered common stock in conjunction with the acquisition of NorthStar. All shares issued by EFSC were issued in reliance upon exemptions from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated under said Act. Of such shares, approximately 274,000 shares are being retained in escrow pending resolution of certain matters under the agreement. |
| |
b) | Not applicable. |
| |
c) | The Company has authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of its common stock. There were no repurchases of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. |
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
| Exhibit Number | | Description |
|
| |
|
| *4.1 | | Indenture dated July 28, 2006 between Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company relating to Floating Rate Junior Subordinate Deferrable Interest Debenture due September 15, 2036. |
| | | |
| *4.2 | | Floating Rate Junior Subordinate Deferrable Interest Debenture due September 15, 2036. |
| | | |
| *4.3 | | Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of EFSC Capital Trust V dated July 28, 2006. |
| | | |
| *4.4 | | Guarantee Agreement between Registrant and Wilmington Trust dated July 28, 2006. |
| | | |
| *31.1 | | Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a). |
| | | |
| *31.2 | | Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a). |
| | | |
| *32.1 | | Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | |
| *32.2 | | Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Clayton, State of Missouri on the day of November 9, 2006.
| ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Kevin C. Eichner |
| |
|
| | |
| | Kevin C. Eichner |
| | Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Frank H. Sanfilippo |
| |
|
| | Frank H. Sanfilippo |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
28