EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| | | | Annual Compensation
| | Long-Term Compensation Awards
| | | |
Name and Principal Position
| | Year
| | Salary($)
| | Bonus($)
| | Other Annual Compensation ($)(5)
| | Restricted Stock Award(s) ($)(4)
| | Securities Underlying Options/ SARs (#)
| | All Other Compensation ($)(1)
|
K. J. Hunt | | 2005 | | 439,704 | | | 432,500 | | | 5,370 | | | 0 | | | 70,000 | | | 52,032 | |
Co-CEO & | | 2004 | | 350,000 | | | 348,000 | | | 4,756 | | | 1,071,000 | | | 51,405 | | | 34,035 | |
President | | 2003 | | 237,504 | | | 185,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 30,843 | | | 15,676 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
D. P. Skarie | | 2005 | | 439,704 | | | 432,500 | | | 3,276 | | | 0 | | | 70,000 | | | 50,532 | |
Co-CEO & | | 2004 | | 350,000 | | | 375,000 | | | 1,616 | | | 1,071,000 | | | 51,405 | | | 39,375 | |
President | | 2003 | | 229,008 | | | 185,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 30,843 | | | 10,741 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
D. L. Beré(2) | | 2005 | | 86,154 | | | 40,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
Former VP & CEO | | 2004 | | 285,100 | | | 80,649 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 25,000 | | | 0 | |
Bakery Chef | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
T. G. Granneman | | 2005 | | 207,708 | | | 99,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 20,000 | | | 13,082 | |
VP & Controller | | 2004 | | 166,008 | | | 89,600 | | | 0 | | | 428,400 | | | 20,562 | | | 7,534 | |
| | 2003 | | 160,008 | | | 81,400 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 20,562 | | | 5,670 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. R. Koulouris | | 2005 | | 217,260 | | | 109,700 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 23,000 | | | 15,859 | |
VP & President | | 2004 | | 189,798 | | | 97,500 | | | 0 | | | 535,500 | | | 23,646 | | | 93,351 | |
of Bremner Inc. & Nutcracker Brands, Inc.(3) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
R. D. Wilkinson | | 2005 | | 246,456 | | | 139,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 23,000 | | | 11,091 | |
VP & Director | | 2004 | | 208,000 | | | 126,000 | | | 0 | | | 535,500 | | | 23,646 | | | 8,580 | |
of Product Supply | | 2003 | | 200,508 | | | 125,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 23,646 | | | 7,558 | |
(1) The amounts shown in this column consist of the following for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003:
• Company Matching Contributions or Accruals to the Company’s SIP and Executive SIP:
| | Fiscal Year 2005 | Fiscal Year 2004 | Fiscal Year 2003 | |
| Mr. Hunt | $52,032 | $34,035 | $13,071 | | |
| Mr. Skarie | $50,532 | $39,375 | $ 9,243 | | |
| Mr. Granneman | $13,082 | $ 7,534 | $ 5,670 | | |
| Mr. Koulouris | $15,859 | $15,512 | $ (3 | ) | |
| Mr. Wilkinson | $11,091 | $ 8,580 | $ 6,015 | | |
(2) | Mr. Beré became a Corporate Officer on December 3, 2003. On June 17, 2005 he resigned from the Company. |
| |
(3) | Mr. Koulouris became a Corporate Officer on November 6, 2003. |
| |
(4) | Restricted stock awards are valued by multiplying the closing market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant by the number of shares awarded. The Company pays dividends on shares of restricted stock at the same rate, if any, as paid to all Shareholders. Dividends are held in an account bearing interest at the prime rate until restrictions lapse. The restrictions lapse as follows: one-third on September 24 in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The number of shares of restricted stock awarded are as follows: Mr. Hunt - 30,000; Mr. Skarie - 30,000; Mr. Granneman - 12,000; Mr. Koulouris - 15,000; and Mr. Wilkinson - 15,000. |
| |
(5) | Amounts reflect reimbursement for taxes associated with spouse/immediate family accompaniment on business travel. Consistent with applicable regulations, this column does not include perquisites that when aggregated did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of any such officer’s salary and bonus. All arrangements under which the named executive officers would receive perquisites are described under the heading “Other Benefit Plans” located on page 14 this Proxy Statement. |
| |
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
| | | Individual Grants | | | Grant Date Value | |
Name | | | Number of SAR’s Granted(#)(1) | | | % of Total Stock Awards Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year(2) | | | Exercise or Base Price ($/Sh) | | | Expiration Date | | | Grant Date Present Value($)(3) | |
K. J. Hunt | | | 70,000 | | | 11.5 | | | 42.00 | | | 9/28/15 | | | 948,752 | |
D. P. Skarie | | | 70,000 | | | 11.5 | | | 42.00 | | | 9/28/15 | | | 948,752 | |
D. L. Beré | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | — | | | — | | | 0 | |
T. G. Granneman | | | 20,000 | | | 3.3 | | | 42.00 | | | 9/28/15 | | | 271,072 | |
R. R. Koulouris | | | 23,000 | | | 3.8 | | | 42.00 | | | 9/28/15 | | | 311,733 | |
R. D. Wilkinson | | | 23,000 | | | 3.8 | | | 42.00 | | | 9/28/15 | | | 311,733 | |
(1) | 331/3% of the total number of SAR’s become exercisable on September 29 of 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively. |
| |
(2) | The number of stock awards granted to all employees in fiscal year 2005 was 606,984. |
| |
(3) | Grant date valuation amounts were determined by application of the Black-Scholes valuation method. Assumptions used were as follows: (i) the expected life of the awards equals 6 years; (ii) the expected share price volatility equals 22.5%; (iii) the risk free interest rate equals 4.17%, the interpolated grant date Treasury rate for a term equal to the expected life of the awards; and (iv) the dividend yield equals 0%. |
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND
FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
| | | | | | | | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at FY-End(#) | | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at FY-End($) |
Name* | | Shares Acquired on Exercise(#) | | Value Realized($) | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable |
K. J. Hunt | | | 35,183 | | | | 1,087,197 | | | | 56,522 | | | | 216,301 | | | | 1,360,665 | | | | 2,663,400 | |
D. P. Skarie | | | 19,277 | | | | 568,711 | | | | 45,749 | | | | 211,366 | | | | 1,075,162 | | | | 2,514,165 | |
T. G. Granneman | | | 7,000 | | | | 211,500 | | | | 27,955 | | | | 92,996 | | | | 657,532 | | | | 1,299,837 | |
R. R. Koulouris | | | 5,012 | | | | 140,739 | | | | 13,622 | | | | 67,981 | | | | 324,835 | | | | 729,876 | |
R. D. Wilkinson | | | 36,497 | | | | 944,310 | | | | 17,735 | | | | 121,441 | | | | 393,899 | | | | 1,933,174 | |
* Mr. Beré did not exercise any stock options during the fiscal year. His stock options terminated upon his resignation in June. |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
FOR FISCAL YEAR END
Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options(a) | | Weighted Average of Exercise Price of Outstanding Options($) | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column a) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | 2,702,327 | | | | 23.35 | | | | 789,024 | (1) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Total | | | 2,702,327 | | | | 23.35 | | | | 789,024 | |
(1) | Approximately 73,500 shares of this number are reserved for issuance under the equity option of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees. This amount equals the dollar value of previous deferrals of income by executive officers and key employees. Also, approximately 100,000 shares of this number are reserved for issuance under stock appreciation rights. |
EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS
The Company has Management Continuity Agreements with the named executive officers and each of the other corporate officers. The agreements provide severance compensation to each corporate officer in the event of the officer’s voluntary or involuntary termination after a change-in-control of the Company. The compensation provided would be in the form of a lump sum payment equal to the present value of continuing the executive officer’s salary and bonus for a specified period following the executive officer’s termination of employment, and the continuation of other executive benefits for the same period. The initial applicable period is three years in the event of an involuntary termination of employment (including a constructive termination), two years in the event of a voluntary termination within six months of a change-in-control and one year in the event of any other voluntary termination of employment.
No payments would be made if the executive officer’s termination is due to death, disability or normal retirement, or is “for cause”, nor would any payments continue beyond the executive officer’s normal retirement date. Contracts governing stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock provide that upon a change-in-control of the Company, any unexercised, unvested, unearned restricted or unpaid shares become 100% vested. The agreements provide that executives with a Management Continuity Agreement be indemnified from any tax under Section 4999 and Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that is attributable to a parachute payment under the Code and any tax upon the payment of such amounts. In addition, vesting of stock based incentive compensation awards accelerate upon a change of control.
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS
Retirement Plan
The Ralcorp Retirement Plan may provide pension benefits in the future to the named executive officers. Certain regular U.S. employees having one year of service with the Company or certain Company subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Retirement Plan. Employees become vested after five years of service. Normal retirement is at age 65; however, employees who work beyond age 65 may continue to accrue benefits.
Annual benefits are computed by multiplying the participant’s Final Average Earnings (average of participant’s five highest consecutive annual earnings during ten years prior to retirement or earlier termination) by the product of 1.5% times the participant’s years of service (to a maximum of 40 years) and by subtracting from that amount up to one half of the participant’s primary social security benefit at retirement (with the actual amount of offset determined by age and years of service at retirement).
The following table shows the estimated annual retirement benefits that would be payable from the Retirement Plan to salaried employees, including the named executive officers, assuming age 65 retirement. To the extent an employee’s compensation or benefits exceed certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the table also includes benefits payable from an unfunded supplemental retirement plan. The table reflects benefits prior to the subtraction of social security benefits as described above. Effective December 31, 2003, the Company froze retirement benefits for administrative employees including corporate officers. Consequently, they no longer accrue defined pension benefits.
PENSION PLAN TABLE
| | Years of Service |
Remuneration (Final Average Earnings) | | 10 | | 15 | | 20 | | 25 | | 30 | | 35 | | 40 |
$ 100,000 | | $ | 15,000 | | | $ | 22,500 | | | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | 37,500 | | | $ | 45,000 | | | $ | 52,500 | | | $ | 60,000 | |
$ 200,000 | | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | 45,000 | | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 75,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 105,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | |
$ 300,000 | | $ | 45,000 | | | $ | 67,500 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 112,500 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 157,500 | | | $ | 180,000 | |
$ 400,000 | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | $ | 210,000 | | | $ | 240,000 | |
$ 500,000 | | $ | 75,000 | | | $ | 112,500 | | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 187,500 | | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 262,500 | | | $ | 300,000 | |
$ 600,000 | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 270,000 | | | $ | 315,000 | | | $ | 360,000 | |
$ 700,000 | | $ | 105,000 | | | $ | 157,500 | | | $ | 210,000 | | | $ | 262,500 | | | $ | 315,000 | | | $ | 367,500 | | | $ | 420,000 | |
$ 800,000 | | $ | 120,000 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | $ | 240,000 | | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 360,000 | | | $ | 420,000 | | | $ | 480,000 | |
$ 900,000 | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 202,500 | | | $ | 270,000 | | | $ | 337,500 | | | $ | 405,000 | | | $ | 472,500 | | | $ | 540,000 | |
$1,000,000 | | $ | 150,000 | | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 375,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | 525,000 | | | $ | 600,000 | |
For the purpose of calculating retirement benefits, the named executive officers had, as of September 30, 2005, the following years of credited service, calculated to the nearest year: Mr. Hunt—18 years; Mr. Skarie—18 years; Mr. Granneman—7 years; Mr. Koulouris—24 years; and Mr. Wilkinson—8 years. Credited service includes service with Ralston Purina Company, the Company’s former parent corporation. Earnings used in calculating benefits under the Retirement Plan and any unfunded supplemental retirement plan previously described are approximately equal to amounts included in the Salary and Bonus columns in the Summary Compensation Table on page 11.
Other Benefit Plans
Beneficiaries of eligible retired executive officers will be provided a death benefit in an amount equal to 50% of the earnings recognized under the Company’s benefit plans for the executive officer during the last full year of employment. This benefit is not presently insured or funded.
In addition, the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan would provide benefits to its corporate officers, including certain executive officers, in the event they become disabled. The Long-Term Disability Plan, which is available to certain regular employees of the Company and in which officers must participate at their own expense in order to be eligible for the Executive Long-Term Disability Plan, imposes a limit of $10,000 per month (60% of a maximum annual salary of $200,000) on the amount paid to a disabled employee. The Executive Long-Term Disability Plan will provide a supplemental benefit equal to 60% of the difference between the executive officer’s previous year’s earnings recognized under the Company’s benefit plans and $200,000, with appropriate taxes withheld.
The Company’s Executive Health Plan provides eligible employees and their eligible dependents with supplemental health insurance coverage. The Executive Health Plan provides reimbursement for covered out-of-pocket expenses not reimbursed by a Company sponsored health plan.
The Company’s corporate officers are entitled to an annual Company-paid physical exam.
The Company’s corporate officers are eligible to receive reimbursement for eligible financial planning, tax and estate planning. The first year’s allowance is $5,000 ($8,000 for the CEO’s) with subsequent annual allowances of $4,000 ($6,000 for CEO’s). There is a carryforward maximum of $4,000 ($6,000 for CEO’s) if the annual allowance is not used in future years.
The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan, which permits the deferral of all or part of an eligible individual’s bonus and up to 50% of their annual salary. Income taxes on the amounts deferred and any investment gains are deferred until distributed. A number of investment funds are available as “benchmark” investment options. Amounts contributed continue to grow on a tax-deferred basis until distributed. As with any deferred compensation plan, there are restrictions on deferral and distribution elections as well as potential financial exposure to changes in the Company’s financial health.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee consists entirely of independent directors. It approves direct and indirect compensation of all executive officers, administers and makes awards under the Company’s existing Incentive Stock Plan. Stock-based awards such as stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights may be granted under that Plan to officers and other key employees of the Company.
Compensation Philosophy
The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to provide total compensation that can attract, retain and motivate key employees. The Committee’s intent is to provide overall cash compensation packages that have a greater “at risk” element than competitive norms, i.e., salaries below industry medians and performance-based bonuses which may permit recipients to achieve total cash compensation packages exceeding medians. The Committee generally reviews executive officer compensation including salaries, bonuses and any long-term compensation each September near the end of the Company’s fiscal year.
Salaries
The Committee establishes the salaries for executive officers based on its assessment of each individual’s responsibilities, experience, individual performance and contribution to the Company’s performance. The Committee also takes into account compensation data from other companies; length of service in current position and with the Company overall, historical compensation levels at the Company; the competitive environment for attracting and retaining executives; entitlement to employee retirement benefits (pension, 401k, etc.) and the recommendation of Messrs. Hunt and Skarie, except with respect to their own compensation. The Company attempts to set base salary levels at or below the median level for executives holding positions of similar responsibility and complexity at corporations as reflected in published surveys. In addition, with respect to Messrs. Hunt and Skarie, the Committee considered the Company’s improved financial performance and their leadership in connection with the review of strategic matters. Further, in September 2004, the Committee reviewed compensation analyses of an independent consultant with respect to Messrs. Hunt and Skarie and the other corporate officers. The salaries and other compensation information for the Company’s named executive officers are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 11.
Bonuses
On September 29, 2005, the Committee awarded bonuses to all of the named executive officers for the Company’s 2005 fiscal year. The amount of each such bonus was based on the officer’s total compensation package including salary, bonus, stock options, and long-term stock based awards; the financial performance of the officer’s business unit relative to the business plan (including such measures as sales volume, revenues, costs, cash flow and operating profit); Company financial performance (including the measures of business unit performance listed above and, in addition, earnings per share); the officer’s individual performance (including the quality of strategic plans, organizational and management development, participation in evaluations of potential acquisitions and similar manifestations of individual performance); and the business environment for the officer’s business unit. With the exception of their own bonuses, the Committee considered recommendations of Messrs. Hunt and Skarie, which were based on bonus targets (as a percent of salary) set prior to the beginning of the fiscal year.
The Committee identified a bonus target goal equal to a percentage of an executive officer’s salary. After reviewing the factors identified above, the Committee approved individual bonuses based on the Committee’s subjective judgement and discretion. The bonuses granted were not based on a strict adherence to the target. For the CEO’s, the target was 100% and for each named executive officer, the target goal was between 47% and 50%.
Long-Term Compensation
Long-term compensation currently consists of stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation rights.
| • | Stock options entitle the recipient to purchase a specified number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock after a specified period of time at an option price, which is ordinarily equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of grant. |
| | |
| • | Restricted stock awards provide the awardee with a long-term incentive. The restricted stock awards provide for a one-third vesting in years 2011, 2012 and 2013. |
| | |
| • | Stock appreciation rights are based on a set number of shares, and upon exercise, they will receive the number of shares equal in value to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value at the date of exercise, less all applicable taxes. |
All stock-based compensation provides executives with an opportunity to buy and maintain an equity interest in the Company while linking the executive’s compensation directly to shareholder value since the executive receives no benefit from the option unless all shareholders have benefited from an appreciation in the value of the Common Stock. In addition, since all stock based incentive awards “vest” serially over a period of time after the date of grant (usually three to six years), they enhance the ability of the Company to retain the executive while encouraging the executive to take a longer-term view on decisions impacting the Company. All stock based compensation will vest upon a change-in-control, normal retirement, death, disability, or an involuntary termination.
Stock appreciation rights were awarded in September 2005. The amount awarded to each Company officer was recommended by Messrs. Hunt and Skarie after consultation with the Committee’s Chairman. With respect to each of Messrs. Hunt and Skarie, the Committee authorized 70,000 stock appreciation rights. Messrs. Hunt and Skarie recommended the amounts awarded to all other officers after consultation with the Committee’s Chairman. The awards were designed to link compensation to long-term share price performance. Consequently, the awards do not begin vesting until 2008.
Additional Information
In April 2005, the Committee retained an independent consulting firm to study existing salary, bonus and stock based compensation paid to corporate officers. The results confirmed that, after giving effect to the 2004 restricted stock awards, total direct compensation (salary, bonus and present value of long-term incentives) for corporate officers was consistent with or below median market levels. With respect to Messrs. Hunt and Skarie, the analysis compared their total direct compensation against that of the Chief Operating Officer at other companies using published data and an average of the first and second highest paid individuals against a publicly-traded peer group. The peer group was comprised of twelve U.S.-based publicly traded food companies with revenue ranging from $422 million to $3.8 billion.
Deductibility of Certain Executive Compensation
A feature of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 sets a limit on deductible compensation of $1,000,000 per person, per year for the Chief Executive Officer and the next four highest-paid executives. While it is the general intention of the Committee to meet the requirements for deductibility, the Committee may, in the exercise of its judgment, approve payment of compensation from time to time that may not be fully deductible. The Committee believes this flexibility will enable it to respond to changing business conditions, or to an executive’s exceptional individual performance. The Committee will continue to review and monitor its policy with respect to the deductibility of compensation.
| J. W. Goodall—Chairman B. G. Armstrong | D. R. Banks R. A. Liddy | D. W. Kemper W. P. Stiritz |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
As noted previously, the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Armstrong, Banks, Goodall, Liddy, Kemper and Stiritz. There are no relationships involving the members of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee or the executive officers of Ralcorp that are required to be disclosed under Item 402 (j) of Regulation S-K.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Board has determined, in its judgment, that the Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors as defined in the NYSE listing standards, Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, adopted by the entire Board, which is available on the Company’s website at www.ralcorp.com/corporategovernance.htm.
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls, financial reporting process and compliance with laws and regulations and ethical business standards. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent accountants, are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report thereon. Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company’s internal auditor, assists the Audit Committee with its responsibility to monitor and oversee the financial reporting process and internal controls. The Committee discussed with the Company’s internal auditors and independent accountants the overall scopes and plans for their respective audits. The Committee met, at least quarterly, with the internal auditors and independent accountants, with and without management present, and discussed the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
With respect to the Company’s audited financial statements for the Company’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, management of the Company has represented to the Committee that the financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the Committee has reviewed and discussed those financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees) as modified or supplemented.
The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as modified or supplemented, and has discussed the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers with members of that firm.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for that year.
| D. R. Banks—Chairman B. G. Armstrong | D. W. Kemper J. W. Goodall | R. A. Liddy |
OTHER RELATIONSHIPS INVOLVING DIRECTORS, OFFICERS,
OR THEIR ASSOCIATES
Mr. Kemper is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Commerce Bancshares, Inc., which is one of eight banks that participate in the Company’s committed credit facility. Commerce Bancshares’ lending commitment under that facility in Fiscal 2005 was limited to $15 million out of a total syndicate commitment of $150 million. During the fiscal year, the Company paid approximately $5,000 in interest to Commerce Bancshares, Inc. The Company’s corporate credit card program is administered through
Commerce Bancshares, Inc., but there is no charge made to or fee paid by the Company for this service. Instead, the Company is paid a fee ($6,159.28 was paid in fiscal 2005) for using credit cards administered by Commerce and therefore find the relationship to be immaterial. The Board does not believe Mr. Kemper has a material interest in the transactions between the Company and Commerce Bancshares, Inc. The transactions are disclosed on a voluntary basis.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following performance graph compares the changes, for the period indicated, in the cumulative total value of $100 hypothetically invested in each of (a) Ralcorp Common Stock, (b) the Russell 2000 Index, and (c) the Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index.

Graph Data Points
| | Ralcorp ($) | | Russell 2000 Index ($) | | Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
9/30/2000 | | | 100.00 | | | | 100.00 | | | | 100.00 | |
9/30/2001 | | | 137.77 | | | | 79.14 | | | | 133.28 | |
9/30/2002 | | | 150.58 | | | | 72.16 | | | | 120.39 | |
9/30/2003 | | | 196.11 | | | | 97.32 | | | | 131.24 | |
9/30/2004 | | | 255.58 | | | | 114.89 | | | | 145.72 | |
9/30/2005 | | | 303.86 | | | | 134.66 | | | | 176.48 | |
OTHER MATTERS
Proxy Solicitation
Ralcorp has paid for preparing this Proxy Statement and the Proxy Card. Ralcorp will also pay for the solicitation of proxies. The Company hired Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $9,000 plus expenses. Ralcorp will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for costs, including postage and handling, reasonably incurred by them in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Ralcorp’s Common Stock. In addition to the use of the mail, employees of the Company may make proxy solicitations, via telephone or personal contact.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP acted as Ralcorp’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2005 and has served in that capacity since 1994. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants for the current fiscal year. A representative of that firm will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement, if they desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
The following fees were paid for audit services rendered in conjunction with reviewing and auditing the Company’s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 financial statements, and for other services during those fiscal years:
| | FY 2004 | | FY 2005 |
| | | | | | | | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 556,500 | | | $ | 1,211,935 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | $ | 66,700 | | | $ | 25,300 | |
Tax Fees | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | |
All Other Fees | | $ | 1,400 | | | $ | 1,500 | |
The “Audit-Related Fees” paid for fiscal year 2004 and 2005 were for an audit of the employee benefit plans. For Fiscal 2004, “Audit-Related Fees” also included assistance related to compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 covering reporting on internal controls over financial reporting. For fiscal years 2004 and 2005, “All Other Fees” was an amount paid for the use of a proprietary accounting research database.
With regard to the fees listed above, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP of services other than audit services is compatible with its ability to maintain its independence. Regardless of the size or nature of the other services, if any, to be provided, it is the Audit Committee’s policy and practice to approve any services not under the heading “Audit Fees” before any such other services are undertaken. The audit performed on behalf of the Company was staffed primarily by full-time, permanent employees of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Executive officers and directors of Ralcorp are required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of Ralcorp Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Copies of those reports must also be furnished to Ralcorp.
Based solely on a review of copies of those reports, other documents furnished to Ralcorp and written representations that no other reports were required, Ralcorp believes that all filing requirements applicable to executive officers and directors have been complied with during the preceding fiscal year except that the Company’s legal counsel filed one report late for a single transaction on behalf of Kevin J. Hunt.
Shareholder Proposals for 2007 Meeting
Under the Company’s Bylaws, shareholders who desire to nominate a director or present any other business at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders must follow certain procedures. Generally, to be considered
at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a shareholder nomination or proposal not to be included in the Proxy Statement and Notice of Meeting must be received by the Company’s Secretary between November 4, 2006, and December 4, 2006. However, if the shareholder desires that the proposal be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement and Notice of Meeting for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders then it must be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than August 23, 2006 and must also comply in all respects with the rules and regulations of the SEC and the laws of the State of Missouri. A copy of the Bylaws will be furnished to any shareholder without charge upon written request to the Company’s Secretary.
Form 10-K and Other Filings
Upon written request and at no charge, the Company will provide a copy of any of its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including its Annual Report on Form 10-K, with financial statements and schedules for its most recent fiscal year. The Company may impose a reasonable fee for expenses associated with providing copies of separate exhibits to the report when such exhibits are requested. These documents are also available on the Company’s website, http://www.ralcorp.com, and the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov.
Householding
SEC rules allow delivery of a single annual report and proxy statement to households at which two or more shareholders reside. Accordingly, shareholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker or its intermediary will receive only one copy of the annual report and proxy statement, unless the shareholder has provided contrary instructions. Individual proxy cards or voting instruction forms (or electronic voting facilities) will, however, continue to be provided for each shareholder account. This procedure, referred to as “householding,” reduces the volume of duplicate information received by shareholders, as well as the Company’s expenses. Shareholders having multiple accounts may have received householding notifications from their respective brokers and, consequently, such shareholders may receive only one proxy statement and annual report. Shareholders who prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy statement and annual report, either now or in the future, may request to receive separate copies of the proxy statement and annual report by notifying the Company’s Secretary. Shareholders currently sharing an address with another shareholder who wish to have only one proxy statement and annual report delivered to the household in the future should also contact the Company’s Secretary.
Notices, Requests or Communications with Directors
Any notice or request discussed above, or any communication intended for any member or members of the Company’s Board of Directors, should be directed to the Company’s Secretary, Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., PO Box 618, St. Louis, Missouri 63188-0618. The Company’s Secretary will forward the communication to the designated member or members of the Company’s Board of Directors.
We maintain a confidential telephone number and post office box through which you can send concerns regarding accounting matters or business practices. The toll-free number in the U.S. is 1-800-877-7055 or if you prefer, you may write to: Corporate Vice President and Controller, Ralcorp Holdings, Inc., PO Box 618, St. Louis, Missouri 63188-0618.
| By Order of the Board of Directors,
|
| |
| Charles G. Huber, Jr. |
December 14, 2005
APPENDIX A
RALCORP HOLDINGS, INC.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
Adopted December 4, 2003
Role of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors selects and supervises the officers of the Company in the interest and for the benefit of the stockholders. The Board of Directors has delegated to the Co-Chief Executive Officers, together with the other officers of the Company, the authority and responsibility for managing the business of the Company under the direction of the Board. Each director is expected to spend the time and effort necessary to properly discharge the director’s responsibilities.
Composition of the Board of Directors
1. Size of the Board of Directors
The Board believes that it should generally have no fewer than five and no more than ten directors. This range permits diversity of experience without hindering effective discussion or diminishing individual accountability. The size of the Board could, however, be increased or decreased if determined to be appropriate by the Board.
2. Board Membership Criteria
The Board of Directors is responsible for nominating individuals for election to the Board of Directors by the stockholders and for appointing individuals as directors between annual meetings of the stockholders. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee identifies, reviews and makes recommendations concerning potential members of the Board of Directors.
The Board should be comprised of individuals who, after taking into account their skills, expertise, integrity, knowledge of the industries in which the Company operates, and other qualities, have the ability of the Board to enhance the long-term interest of the shareholders. The Board will evaluate each individual in the context of the entire Board of Directors with the objective of assembling a Board of Directors that can enhance the success of the Company and promote the interests of stockholders. Annually (or more often, if necessary), the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee reviews the qualifications and backgrounds of the directors and makes recommendation to the Board as to the directors to be nominated for election by the stockholders at the next annual meeting or to be appointed as directors between annual meetings of the stockholders.
3. Selection of Chairman
The Board of Directors selects a Chairman from among the directors. Presently the Board has determined that the offices of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman should not be held by the same person. However, the Board can determine that to enhance the management of the Company, one person should hold the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.
4. Term Limits
The Board has not established term limits for directors. The Board believes term limits deprive the Company of the knowledge and expertise developed by directors from extended service on the Board of Directors.
5. Retirement of Board Members
The policy of the Board of Directors is that it will not nominate any individual for election as a director by the shareholders or appoint any individual as a director if such person is 70 years or older.
6. Directors Who Change Their Present Job Responsibility
Directors who retire or significantly change the position they held when they became a member of the Board should not leave the Board of Directors simply because of such a change. However, upon any such
event, the Corporate Governance Committee will review the appropriateness of continued service on the Board of Directors by that director.
7. No Specific Limitation on Other Board Service
Directors are not prohibited from serving on boards and committees of other organizations, and the Board has not adopted any guidelines limiting such activities. Instead, each director is expected to ensure that other commitments do not interfere with the director’s discharge of his or her duties. Directors are expected to inform the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee upon becoming a director of any other public company or becoming a member of the audit committee of any other public company.
8. Director Orientation and Continuing Education
The Company shall provide new directors with a director orientation program to familiarize such directors with, among other things, the Company’s business, strategic plans, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, compliance programs, conflicts policies, code of business ethics, corporate governance guidelines, principal officers, internal auditors and independent auditors. The Company encourages and supports continuing director education and shall reimburse directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection therewith.
9. Determination of Director Independence
The Board shall be comprised of a majority of directors who qualify as independent directors under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Further, a director is deemed to be independent if the Board has determined that the director has no material relationship with the Company.
The Board of Directors has established the following categorical standards in connection with determining the independence of directors:
| • | A director will not be considered to be independent if, during the past five years, the Company has employed the director or any of the director’s immediate family (except in a non-officer capacity); |
| | |
| • | A director will not be considered to be independent if, during the past five years, the director has been employed by (or affiliated with) the Company’s present or former independent accountants or any of the director’s immediate family members have been so employed or affiliated (except in a non-partner capacity not involving the Company’s business); |
| | |
| • | A director’s independence will not be considered to be impaired if the director or any immediate family member of the director is employed by (or affiliated with) an entity that loans the Company an amount of money less than 5% of the Company’s total assets; |
| | |
| • | A director will not be considered to be independent if the director is a partner, shareholder, or officer of a company or firm that provides significant consulting, legal, or financial advisory services to the Company. For purposes of this categorical standard, a company or firm will be considered to provide non-significant services if the fees represent less than (i) 2% of the Company’s or firm’s gross revenues for its last full fiscal year and (ii) 2% of the Company’s gross revenues for its last full fiscal year; |
| | |
| • | A director’s independence will not be considered to be impaired if the director or any immediate family member of the director is employed by (or affiliated with) a non-significant supplier or customer of the Company. For the purposes of this categorical standard, a supplier or customer will be considered non-significant if its sales to, or purchases from, the Company represent less than (i) 2% of the gross revenues of the customer or supplier for its last full fiscal year and (ii) 2% of the Company’s gross revenues, for its last full fiscal year; |
| | |
| • | A director’s independence will not be considered to be impaired if the director is an employee, officer, or director of a foundation, university or other non-profit organization to which the |
| | Company gives directly, or indirectly through its foundation, no more than $200,000 per annum or 5% of the organization’s gross revenues for its last full fiscal year (whichever is greater); and |
| | |
| • | A director’s independence will not be considered to be impaired if such director is an executive officer of an entity for which another director of the Company serves as a director and member of any board committee of that entity, provided such service does not occur while that other director also serves as an executive officer of the Company. |
An individual will be considered to be affiliated with a corporation or other entity, if that individual controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the corporation or other entity.
The Board of Directors will determine the independence of any director with a relationship to the Company that is not covered by the above standards.
Board Meetings
1. Frequency of Meetings
The Board of Directors determines its schedule of board meetings each year. The current schedule is for four regular meetings each year. The Audit Committee has six regularly scheduled meetings. A director is expected to regularly attend (in person or telephonically) meetings of the Board and of the committees on which the director serves, and to review materials distributed in advance of meetings.
2. Selection of Agenda Items
The Chairman of the Board of Directors establishes the agenda for each meeting. Each member of the Board may suggest additional items for the agenda.
3. Distribution of Materials
The minutes of the prior Board meeting, an agenda for the forthcoming meeting, and selected Company financial information and agenda item background materials must be distributed to Board members in advance of the meetings.
4. Access to Management and Advisors
Board members shall have unrestricted access to management of the Company. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to retain independent legal, accounting or other consultants to advise the Board.
5. Separate Session of Non-Management Directors
The non-management directors of the Company shall meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management no fewer than four times a year. The presiding director at these meetings shall be the Chairman or other Board appointed non-management director in the event the Chairman is unavailable.
Director Compensation
The Company believes that the compensation paid to directors should be competitive and should encourage ownership of the Company’s stock by directors. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee shall periodically review the compensation paid to directors by the Company and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning such compensation.
Employees of the Company serving as directors shall not receive any additional compensation for service on the Board of Directors.
Board Committees
1. Number and Names of Board Committees
The Board of Directors shall establish committees from time to time to assist it in discharging its obligations. There are currently three standing committees:
Audit Committee
Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee
Executive Committee
Each committee shall have a written charter, adopted and periodically reviewed by the Board of Directors. The purpose and responsibility of each committee shall be described in its respective charter. After each of its meetings, the committee shall report on the meeting to the Board of Directors.
2. Independence of Committee Members
The Audit and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committees shall be composed entirely of independent directors. The membership of each committee and the compensation paid to the members of each committee will comply with all applicable laws and regulations and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
3. Committee Agendas
The Chairman of each committee, in consultation with appropriate members of management, establishes the agenda for each meeting. Each member of the committee may suggest additional items for the agenda.
4. Assignment of Committee Members
The Chairman of the Board, after consideration of the advice, experience and expertise of individual directors and in consultation with the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee, recommends to the Board of Directors the assignment of directors to the committees of the Board of Directors, including the chairmen of the committees.
The Board of Directors does not mandate rotation of committee assignments or chairmen. The Board of Directors believes that the knowledge and expertise developed by directors through extended service on a committee outweigh the benefits obtained through mandatory rotation.
Planning
1. Management Succession
The Board of Directors plans for the succession to the position of co-Chief Executive Officers. To assist the Board of Directors, the co-Chief Executive Officers annually provide to the Board an assessment of the Company’s executive officers and their potential to succeed him or her. The co-Chief Executive Officers must also provide to the Board of Directors an assessment of persons considered potential successors to the other executive officers. In addition, the co-Chief Executive Officers must prepare a short-term succession plan providing for temporary delegation of authority in the event either co-Chief Executive Officer become unexpectedly unable to perform his or her duties.
2. Performance
Annually, the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee shall evaluate the performance of the Board of Directors and each committee thereof. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee shall discuss the results of their evaluations with the Board of Directors. Annually the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee in connection with salary and wage determinations will evaluate officer performance.
Annually the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommends such changes to the Board of Directors as it determines to be necessary or appropriate.

