SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrantþ
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto
Check the appropriate box:
| | |
o | | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| | |
o | | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| | |
þ | | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| | |
o | | Definitive Additional Materials |
| | |
o | | Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| | |
þ | | No fee required. |
| | |
o | | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| | |
| | (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| | (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| | (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | |
| | (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | |
| | (5) Total fee paid: |
| | |
o | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| | |
o | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| | |
| | (1) Amount Previously Paid: |
| | |
| | (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | |
| | (3) Filing Party: |
| | |
| | (4) Date Filed: |
PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2005
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Plumtree Software, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation with offices located at 500 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111, will be held on Friday, May 20, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., local time, at the Omni San Francisco Hotel’s Nob Hill Room, 500 California Street at Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104 for the following purposes:
1. To elect two (2) Class II directors to serve for the ensuing three-year term and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2. To consider and ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2005; and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice. Each of these items will be discussed at the Annual Meeting with reasonable time allotted for stockholder questions.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2005 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. A copy of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes certified financial statements, was mailed with this Notice and Proxy Statement on or about April 25, 2005 to all stockholders of record on the Record Date.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. However, to assure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose, or to vote by telephone pursuant to instructions provided on the proxy card. Any stockholder attending the meeting may vote in person even if he or she has previously returned a proxy.
| |
| Sincerely, |
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/605b8/605b8443b92b146242c92bdad2ca46a24056ac7d" alt="-s- Adriana G. Chiocchi" |
|
| ADRIANA G. CHIOCCHI |
| Secretary |
San Francisco, California
April 25, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, INC.
500 Sansome Street
San Francisco, California 94111
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
General
This proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”) is furnished by Plumtree Software, Inc. (“Plumtree” or the “Company”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Friday, May 20, 2005, at 8:00 a.m. local time or at any postponement or continuation of the meeting, if applicable, or at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Annual Meeting will be held at the Omni San Francisco Hotel’s Nob Hill Room, 500 California Street at Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104. These proxy solicitation materials were mailed on or about April 25, 2005 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Record Date and Share Ownership
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2005 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 33,009,778 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were issued and outstanding and no shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding. Holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share of Common Stock held.
Revocability of Proxies
The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by delivering to the Company a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.
Voting and Solicitation
A quorum will be present if a majority of the votes entitled to be cast are present in person or by valid proxy. Except with respect to the election of directors, all matters to be considered and acted upon by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting must be approved by a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Consequently, abstentions will have the same legal effect as votes against a proposal. In contrast, broker “non-votes” resulting from a broker’s inability to vote a client’s shares on non-discretionary matters will have no effect on the approval of such matters.
If the enclosed proxy is properly executed and returned to the Company in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting, it will be voted as specified on the proxy, unless it is properly revoked prior thereto. Telephone voting will also be allowed pursuant to instructions provided on the proxy card submitted with this proxy.
1
The cost of this solicitation will be borne by the Company. The Company has hired The Altman Group to assist it in the distribution of proxy materials and the solicitation of votes described above. The Company will pay The Altman Group a fee of $3,500 plus customary costs and expenses for these services. The Company has agreed to indemnify The Altman Group against certain liabilities arising out of or in connection with its agreement. The Company may also reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by certain of the Company’s directors, officers and regular employees, personally or by telephone or telecopier, without additional compensation.
Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals
Proposals of stockholders of the Company that are intended to be presented by such stockholders at the annual meeting of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 (“2006 Annual Meeting”) must be received by the Company no later than December 23, 2005 in order to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2006 Annual Meeting. Stockholders who wish to present a proposal for consideration for our 2006 Annual Meeting but do not want such proposal included in our proxy statement must submit such proposals in accordance with our bylaws between February 19, 2006 and March 21, 2006. Proposals we receive after that date will be considered untimely and may not be presented at our 2006 Annual Meeting.
ELECTION OF CLASS II DIRECTORS (Proposal No. 1)
Nominees. Two Class II directors are to be elected to the Board at the Annual Meeting. The nominees named below are currently directors of the Company. In the event that a nominee of the Company becomes unavailable for any reason or if a vacancy should occur before election (which events are not anticipated), the shares represented by the enclosed proxy may be voted for such other person as may be determined by the holders of such proxy. In such event, the specific nominee(s) to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders in their discretion. The term of office of each person elected as a Class II director will continue for three (3) years and until his successor has been duly elected and qualified.
The names of each nominee and certain biographical information relating to each nominee as of December 31, 2004 are set forth below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name of Nominees | | Age | | | Current Position(s) | | | Director Since | |
| |
John Kunze | | | 41 | | | | President, CEO and Director | | | | August 1998 | |
Bernard Whitney | | | 48 | | | | Director | | | | November 2000 | |
John Kunzehas been President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board since August 1998. Before joining Plumtree, Mr. Kunze spent his entire professional career, from 1985 to 1998, at Adobe Systems. Mr. Kunze led development for the first releases of Adobe Illustrator and PhotoShop. Mr. Kunze became Director and then Vice President of Product and Marketing at Adobe Systems, with responsibility for all product marketing and strategic acquisitions. Mr. Kunze was later promoted to Vice President of Adobe Systems Internet Products Division, which defined Adobe Systems’ Internet strategy. Mr. Kunze also serves on the board of a private company.
Bernard Whitneyhas been a director of Plumtree since November 2000. Mr. Whitney served as Chief Financial Officer of Handspring, Inc. from June 1999 to July 2002. From August 1997 to June 1999, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sanmina, Inc., an electronics manufacturing company. From
2
June 1995 to August 1997, Mr. Whitney served as Vice President of Finance for Network General Corporation, a network fault tolerance and performance management solutions company. From 1987 to June 1995, Mr. Whitney held a variety of corporate finance positions at Conner Peripherals, a storage device manufacturer.
The vote required to elect these nominees to the Board is a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS UNANIMOUSLY THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.
BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPENSATION
Classified Board of Directors
Our certificate of incorporation provides for a classified Board consisting of three classes of directors, each serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, a portion of our Board will be elected each year for three-year terms.
Messrs. Kunze and Whitney are designated Class II directors whose terms expire at the 2005 Annual Meeting. If re-elected, their term will expire at the 2008 Annual Meeting. Mr. Richardson is designated as a Class III director whose term expires at the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders. Messrs. Dillon, Dolasia and Pratt are designated Class I directors whose terms expire at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders.
Executive officers are appointed by the Board and serve at the pleasure of the Board until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. There are no family relationships among any of our directors, officers or key employees.
Board Meetings and Committees
The Board held a total of eight regularly scheduled meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, no incumbent director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of meetings of the Board while he served on the Board; and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he served.
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at our annual meeting of stockholders, we strongly encourage directors to attend. In 2004, all of our directors attended our annual meeting, with the exception of Mr. Dillon and Mr. Richardson. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee expects to consider during the upcoming year adopting a formal policy, so as to encourage further attendance by directors.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Audit Committee of the Board consisted of directors Bernard Whitney, John Dillon and James Richardson. Each of the Audit Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director as established in the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. During 2004, in accordance with section 407 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Plumtree identified Bernard Whitney as the Audit Committee’s “financial expert.” Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee reviews, acts and reports to the full Board on various auditing and accounting matters, including the appointment of the Company’s independent accountants, the scope of the Company’s annual audits, fees to be paid to the Company’s independent accountants, the performance of the Company’s independent accountants and the Company’s ac-
3
counting and financial management practices. The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board on September 7, 2000 and most recently amended on March 4, 2004. A copy of the current Audit Committee charter is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and posted on our website at www.plumtree.com. A report of the Audit Committee is set forth below. The Audit Committee met 5 times during 2004.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Compensation Committee consisted of directors John Dillon, James Richardson and David Pratt. Each of the Compensation Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director as established in the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. The Compensation Committee reviews employee and Board compensation and makes recommendations thereon to the Board, and advises the Board on administration of the Company’s stock incentive plans. The Compensation Committee also advises the Board, upon review of relevant information, on the employees to whom options shall be granted. The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a written charter which was most recently amended by the Board on April 13, 2004. A copy of the current Compensation Committee charter is posted on our website atwww.plumtree.com. A report of the Compensation Committee is set forth below. The Compensation Committee met twice during 2004.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Nominating Committee consisted of Rupen Dolasia, Bernard Whitney, and David Pratt. Each of the Nominating Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director as established in the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. The Nominating Committee, which was reconstituted as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee on March 4, 2004, reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the responsibilities and functions of the Board and Board committees; makes recommendations to the Board concerning the composition and governance of the Board, including recommending candidates to fill vacancies on, or to be elected or re-elected to, the Board; oversees evaluations of the directors, Board committees and the Board; and makes recommendations to the Board concerning candidates for election as Chief Executive Officer and other corporate officers. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee acts pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board on March 4, 2004 and most recently amended on April 13, 2004. A copy of the current Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on our website atwww.plumtree.com. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee did not meet during 2004.
Discussion of Board Considering Stockholder Nominees
In evaluating director nominees, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the following factors:
| | |
| • | the business-related knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including their understanding of the enterprise software industry and the Company’s business in particular; |
|
| • | the resulting mix of talents and experience of our directors as a group; |
|
| • | experience with corporate governance matters and the compliance obligations of public companies, including experience with disclosure and accounting rules and practices; |
|
| • | the desire to maintain diversity, in the broadest sense, in the directors then comprising the Board; |
|
| • | the integrity of the nominee; |
4
| | |
| • | the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity with the periodic introduction of the fresh perspective provided by new members; and |
|
| • | the other business and professional commitments of the nominee, including the number of other boards on which the nominee serves, including public and private company boards as well as not-for-profit boards. |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may also consider such other factors, in addition to the ones listed above, as it may deem are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s goal is to assemble a board that encompasses a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high-quality business and professional experience.
We have no stated minimum criteria for director nominees. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does, however, believe it appropriate for at least one member of the Board to meet the criteria for an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules, and that a majority of the members of the Board meet the definition of “independent director” under rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also believes it may be appropriate for certain members of our management, in particular the Chief Executive Officer, to participate as a member of the Board.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies nominees for the class of directors being elected at each annual meeting of stockholders by first evaluating the current members of such class of directors willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of obtaining a new perspective. If any member of such class of directors does not wish to continue in service or if the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the Board decides not to re-nominate a member of such class of directors for re-election, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. Current members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Research may also be performed to identify qualified individuals. The Board may, in its discretion, engage third party search firms to identify and assist in recruiting potential nominees to the Board. Candidates may also come to the attention of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee through management, stockholders or other persons.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider persons properly recommended by the Company’s stockholders in the same manner as set forth above as persons recommended by the Board, individual directors or management. Stockholder nominations must be timely submitted, in the manner described above, in writing to the Secretary of the Company and include the recommended candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications, in each case, in accordance with the Company’s bylaws, certificate of incorporation and applicable federal proxy rules. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter permits any stockholder to make a nomination.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person recommending the candidate, engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board or management.
5
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors consisted of John Dillon, James Richardson and David Pratt. None of the Company’s executive officers serve on the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, there was not, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or are to be a party in which the amount involved exceeds $60,000 and in which any director, director nominee, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of our common stock, or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, had or will have a direct or indirect interest other than compensation arrangements, which are described where required under “Management.” In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors. Such indemnification agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Contacting the Board of Directors
Any stockholder who desires to contact our chairman of the Board or any of the other members of our Board may do so electronically by sending an email to the following address: investor.relations@plumtree.com, Attn: Board of Directors. Alternatively, a stockholder can contact our chairman of the Board or any of the other members of our Board by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o Chief Financial Officer, Plumtree Software, Inc., 500 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111. Communications received electronically or in writing will be collected, organized and processed by our Chief Financial Officer, who will ensure that the communications are distributed to the chairman of the Board or the other members of the Board as appropriate depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication received. Where the nature of a communication warrants, the Chief Financial Officer may decide to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the Board or an independent director, or the Company’s management or independent advisors, as the Chief Financial Officer considers appropriate.
Director Independence
The Board follows Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4200 for director independence standards. In accordance with these standards, the Board has determined that, except for Mr. Kunze, each of our directors qualifies as an independent director under the Nasdaq rules. Mr. Kunze is not considered independent because he serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
6
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
We did not pay directors who are also employees of the Company any compensation for their service as directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. During 2004, compensation for each non-employee director included the following:
| | | | |
Description | | |
Annual stipend for members | | $ | 20,000 | |
Annual stipend for Board chairman | | $ | 20,000 | |
Annual additional stipend for Audit Committee members | | $ | 10,000 | |
Annual additional stipend for Audit Committee chairman | | $ | 20,000 | |
Annual additional stipend for Compensation Committee members | | $ | 7,500 | |
Annual additional stipend for Compensation Committee chairman | | $ | 10,000 | |
Annual additional stipend for Nominating Committee members | | $ | 7,500 | |
Annual additional stipend for Nominating Committee chairman | | $ | 10,000 | |
Expenses of attending Board and Committee meetings and expenses incurred for director education | | $ | 5,418 | |
Annual stock option grants to purchase shares of Common Stock, pursuant to the Company’s 2002 Director Option Plan, at the fair market value on the date of the annual stockholder meeting | | | 20,000 | |
During fiscal year 2004, compensation for each independent director included cash compensation and stock options. Directors received automatic stock option grants under the 2002 Director Option Plan. Directors also received separate discretionary grants under the 2002 Stock Plan. Pursuant to the 2003 Independent Director Compensation Plan adopted by the Board in March 2003, cash compensation for directors during fiscal year 2003 was as follows: $20,000 per annum for each independent director; an additional $10,000 per annum for each independent director serving on the Audit Committee (except for the chairman of the Audit Committee who will receive an additional $20,000 per annum), paid quarterly in arrears; and reimbursement for travel and other expenses incurred in attending meetings or participating in professional development and education activities. The 2002 Director Option Plan provides that each independent director who has been a director for at least six months shall receive an option to purchase 20,000 shares following each annual meeting of our stockholders. This option will vest as to 1/12 of the shares subject to the option each month following the date of grant, provided that the independent director remains a director on such dates.
Under the 2004 Outside Director Stock in Lieu of Fees Plan, adopted by the Board on March 4, 2004, each independent director may elect to receive shares of the Company’s stock in lieu of cash payment for compensation due to such director under the 2003 Independent Director Compensation Plan. The number of shares received by any outside director electing to receive stock in lieu of cash shall equal the amount of foregone cash compensation divided by the fair market value of the share on the last market trading day of the calendar quarter in respect of which the cash compensation otherwise would have been paid to such outside director. The fair market value is determined to be the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq. Directors must make their election in writing at least three months prior to the beginning of the calendar quarter to which the election relates. Directors may make a revocable standing election for up to two years at a time.
7
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
(Proposal No. 2)
Subject to ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Board has reappointed KPMG LLP as independent auditors to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2005. KPMG LLP has issued its report, included in the Company’s Form 10-K, on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004.
FEES BILLED BY KPMG LLP DURING FISCAL 2004 AND 2003. The following tables set forth the approximate aggregate fees billed to Plumtree during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 by KPMG LLP:
| | | | | |
2004 Fees | | | | |
| Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 922,758 | |
| Audit-Related Fees(2) | | | 0 | |
| Tax-Related Services(3) | | | 0 | |
| All Other Fees(4) | | | 0 | |
| Total Fees | | $ | 922,758 | |
|
2003 Fees | | | | |
| Audit Fees(1) | | $ | 409,306 | |
| Audit-Related Fees(2) | | | 0 | |
| Tax-Related Services(3) | | | 0 | |
| All Other Fees(4) | | | 0 | |
| Total Fees | | $ | 409,306 | |
(1) Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the annual audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-Q quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by KPMG LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
(2) Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”
(3) Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (domestic and international). These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, acquisitions and international tax planning.
| |
(4) | All Other Fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services described above. |
The Audit Committee has the sole authority to approve all audit engagement fees and terms and all non-audit engagement fees as may be permissible. The Audit Committee approved all of the KPMG LLP fees, as set
8
forth above, in fiscal 2003 and 2004. We did not engage KPMG LLP to provide advice regarding financial information systems design and implementation during fiscal 2004.
Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, to have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal shall constitute ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS UNANIMOUSLY THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR FISCAL 2005.
Directors and Officers of the Company
The following table sets forth information regarding the executive officers, directors, and key employees of Plumtree as of December 31, 2004, unless otherwise noted:
| | | | |
John Kunze | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 41 |
Eric Borrmann | | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | 43 |
Paul Ciandrini | | Chief Operating Officer | | 47 |
Ira Pollack | | Vice President of Worldwide Sales | | 45 |
Eric Zocher | | Vice President of Engineering | | 44 |
John Dillon | | Director | | 55 |
Rupen Dolasia | | Director | | 42 |
David Pratt | | Director | | 65 |
James Richardson | | Director | | 57 |
Bernard Whitney | | Director | | 48 |
Eric Borrmannhas been Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2000. Before joining Plumtree, Mr. Borrmann served as Corporate Treasurer at Network Associates (formerly Network General) from July 1999 until July 2000, where he was responsible for all financial planning and investor relations at the global security and network management company. From September 1995 to July 1999, he held several senior management positions at Network Associates where he served most recently as its Vice President of Finance and Operations for Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Mr. Borrmann’s experience also includes a management position at Conner Peripherals from 1990 to 1995 and a systems engineering position at Electronic Data Systems from 1985 to 1988.
Paul Ciandrinihas been Chief Operating Officer, responsible for worldwide sales, consulting, marketing, product management, channel and business development since March 2004. From December 2002 to March 2004, Mr. Ciandrini was Senior Vice President of North American Application Sales at Oracle Corporation. Prior to his work at Oracle, from July 1993 to November 2002, Mr. Ciandrini held several positions at BearingPoint, Inc. (formerly KPMG Consulting, Inc.) in the firm’s high technology practice and most recently served as its Group Executive Vice President for Product Services Consulting, with responsibilities for over $700 million in annual revenue and served on BearingPoint’s executive committee. From January 1988 until July 1993, Mr. Ciandrini held several positions at Walker Interactive Systems, where he was most recently its Vice President of Marketing.
9
Ira Pollackhas been Vice President of Worldwide Sales since March 2004. Before joining Plumtree, Mr. Pollack held several positions with BearingPoint, Inc. (formerly KPMG Consulting, Inc.) from July 1995 to March 2004, where he was most recently the Vice President of North America Sales for the firm’s Consumer Industrial and Technology (CIT) industry vertical. In this capacity, Mr. Pollack was responsible for all aspects of demand creation, pipeline development, forecasting and bookings for BearingPoint Consulting Solutions. Previously, from 1990 to 1995, Mr. Pollack held several positions with Walker Interactive Systems where he most recently served as Regional Sales Manager.
Eric Zocherhas been Vice President of Engineering since September 2003. Before joining Plumtree, Mr. Zocher was Executive Vice President of Product Development and Chief Technology Officer at WildTangent from February 2002 to September 2003. Mr. Zocher also has led engineering efforts as Executive Vice President and Chief Scientist as InfoSpace from October 2000 to March 2001. Prior to the acquisition of Go2Net by InfoSpace, Mr. Zocher was the Chief Technology Officer from May 2000 to October 2000. Mr. Zocher was also the Executive Vice President and Managing Director of Broadband at Go2Net from August 1999 to May 2000. From March 1999 to August 1999, Mr. Zocher was Executive Vice President and General Manager, Internet Division of FlashPoint Technology.
John Dillonhas been a director of Plumtree since September 1997. Since April 2002, Mr. Dillon has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Navis, Inc. Mr. Dillon served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Salesforce.com from September 1999 to November 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Dillon spent six years with Hyperion Solutions (formerly Arbor Software) from December 1993 to May 1999 as Vice President of Sales and then as President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Dillon’s professional history also includes management positions in sales and engineering for Oracle Corporation and EDS. Mr. Dillon currently serves on the boards of directors of several private companies. Mr. Dillon served on active duty in the United States Navy as an officer in the nuclear submarine service.
Rupen Dolasiahas been a director of Plumtree since June 1998 and Chairman of the Board since May 2003. Mr. Dolasia is a founding member and Managing Director of Granite Ventures LLC (formerly H&Q Venture Associates, LLC), a venture capital firm formed in July 1998. Prior to founding H&Q Venture Associates, Mr. Dolasia was a Vice President in Hambrecht & Quist’s Venture Capital Department, which he joined in 1994. Prior to joining H&Q, Mr. Dolasia was the Manager of Information Systems consulting at PEI Consultants. Prior to joining PEI Consultants, Mr. Dolasia co-founded Grata Systems, Inc., a vendor of PC-based control and monitoring software. Mr. Dolasia focuses on information technology investments. Mr. Dolasia currently serves on the boards of directors of several private companies.
David Pratthas been a director of Plumtree since December 2003. Since June 2004, Mr. Pratt has served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Callidus Software, Inc. Mr. Pratt served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of AvantGo, Inc. from October 2002 to February 2003. From April 2002 until October 2002, he volunteered as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the YMCA of the Mid-Peninsula and remains a member of its board of directors. From January 2000 to March 2001, Mr. Pratt served as President and Chief Executive Officer of gForce Systems, an enterprise software company focusing on e-learning. Prior to joining gForce in January 2000, Mr. Pratt was President and Chief Executive Officer of Flashpoint Technologies from October 1998 to January 2000. From May 1988 to January 1998, Mr. Pratt was also Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Adobe Systems, Inc., where he helped to lead the company from $50 million in revenue to almost $1 billon in revenue. Mr. Pratt currently serves on the board of directors of Callidus Software,
10
Inc., as well as on the boards of two non-profit organizations, the YMCA of the Mid-Peninsula and the SETI Institute, and the boards of several private companies.
James Richardsonhas been a director of Plumtree since January 2003. Since April 2001, Mr. Richardson has been a consultant to several high technology companies. From July 1998 to June 2001, Mr. Richardson was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WebTrends Corporation, a web server management and web analytics company which merged with Net IQ Corporation in March 2001. Prior to joining WebTrends Corporation, Mr. Richardson was the Chief Financial Officer at Network General Corporation from April 1994 until January 1998, which merged with McAfee Associates in December 1997 resulting in the creation of Network Associates, Inc. Before joining Network General Corporation, Mr. Richardson was Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Logic Modeling Corporation from August 1992 to March 1994, now a division of Synopsys. From November 1989 to June 1992, Mr. Richardson was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Logic Research. Mr. Richardson currently serves on the board of directors of FEI Company and Digimarc Corporation, as well as on the board of a private company. Mr. Richardson also served as the chairman of the board of AvantGo, Inc, which was acquired by Sybase in February 2003.
For the biographies of Messrs. Kunze and Whitney, please see disclosure under Proposal No. 1, Election of Directors.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table and footnotes thereto set forth the beneficial ownership of Common Stock of the Company as of the Record Date, by (a) each director and nominee for director of the Company who owned shares as of such date, (b) each of the Named Officers (defined below), (c) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group and (d) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 1, 2005 are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unvested options granted from the Company’s inception through July 2000 were immediately exercisable upon grant, provided that upon the optionee’s cessation of service, any unvested shares would be subject to repurchase by the Company at the original exercise price paid per share. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person, shares that are subject to options that are not exercisable and will not be vested for at least 60 days after April 1, 2005 are not included.
The percentages in the table below are based on shares of our common stock outstanding as of the Record Date. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder named in the table has had sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholders’ name.
11
The address for each of the directors and officers of the Company listed in the table below is: Plumtree Software, Inc., 500 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111.
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Number Of | | | |
| | Shares | | | |
| | Beneficially | | | Percent | |
Name | | Owned | | | of Total | |
| | | | | | |
John Kunze | | | 1,386,190 | (1) | | | 4.2 | % |
Eric Borrmann | | | 326,248 | (2) | | | 1.0 | |
Paul Ciandrini | | | 145,835 | (3) | | | 0.4 | |
Ira Pollack | | | 58,334 | (4) | | | 0.2 | |
Eric Zocher | | | 130,000 | (5) | | | 0.4 | |
John Dillon | | | 135,000 | (6) | | | 0.4 | |
Rupen Dolasia | | | 186,050 | (7) | | | 0.6 | |
David Pratt | | | 40,666 | (8) | | | 0.1 | |
James Richardson | | | 73,889 | (9) | | | 0.2 | |
Bernard Whitney | | | 130,000 | (10) | | | 0.4 | |
All executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons) | | | 12,247,466 | (11) | | | 37.1 | |
Ashford Capital Management, Inc. | | | 2,084,815 | (12) | | | 6.3 | |
| P.O. Box 4172 | | | | | | | | |
| Wilmington, DE 19807 | | | | | | | | |
Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. | | | 1,887,440 | (13) | | | 5.8 | |
| 10829 Olive Blvd. | | | | | | | | |
| St. Louis, MO 63141 | | | | | | | | |
Artis Capital Management, LLC | | | 1,848,690 | (14) | | | 5.6 | |
| One Market Plaza | | | | | | | | |
| Spear Street Tower, Suite 1700 | | | | | | | | |
| San Francisco, CA 94105 | | | | | | | | |
FMR Corp. | | | 1,722,900 | (15) | | | 5.2 | |
| 82 Devonshire Street | | | | | | | | |
| Boston, MA 02109 | | | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Includes 1,386,190 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. |
|
(2) | Includes 326,248 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. |
|
(3) | Includes 145,835 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. |
12
| |
(4) | Includes 58,334 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date |
|
(5) | Includes 125,000 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 5,000 shares of Common Stock Mr. Zocher purchased independently. |
|
(6) | Includes 80,000 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 17,500 shares of Common Stock Mr. Dillon purchased independently. Also includes 37,500 shares from stock options that have been previously exercised. |
|
(7) | Includes 100,000 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable as of within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 86,050 shares of Common Stock received by Mr. Dolasia upon pro rata distribution by H&Q Plumtree Investors, L.P. In addition, 143, 783 shares of Common Stock are held by Todd U.S. Ventures LLC. Mr. Dolasia is a general partner of Todd U.S. Ventures LLC and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares to the extent of his pecuniary interest. |
|
(8) | Includes 35,666 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Also includes 5,000 shares of Common Stock which are held in trust by Pratt Trust DTD 10-15-92, David B and Marilyn M Pratt, TTEES. |
|
(9) | Includes 73,889 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. Includes 10,300 shares of Common Stock Mr. Richardson purchased independently. |
| |
(10) | Includes 130,000 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. |
|
(11) | Includes 2,461,162 shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to stock options exercisable within 60 days after the Record Date. |
|
(12) | Shares reported for Ashford Capital Management, Inc. are based on an Amended Schedule 13G filed by Ashford Capital Management, Inc. on February 28, 2005. |
|
(13) | Shares reported for Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. are based on a Schedule 13G filed by Kennedy Capital Management, Inc. on February 15, 2005. |
|
(14) | Shares reported for Artis Capital Management, LLC are based on a Schedule 13G filed by Artis Capital Management, LLC on February 3, 2005. |
|
(15) | Shares reported for FMR Corp. are based on a Schedule 13G filed by FMR Corp. on February 14, 2005. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten (10%) percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent
13
(10%) stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To the Company’s knowledge, based on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations from such filing persons that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2004, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and ten percent stockholders were complied with, with the exceptions noted herein. One late Form 4 report was filed by Rupen Dolasia on February 2, 2004 to report a sale of shares of Common Stock made by H&Q Plumtree Investors, L.P., an entity with which Mr. Dolasia is affiliated. In addition, one late Form 4 report was filed by Rupen Dolasia on February 9, 2004 to report a sale of shares of Common Stock made by H&Q Plumtree Investors, L.P., an entity with which Mr. Dolasia is affiliated. In addition, one late Form 4 was filed by Rupen Dolasia on March 11, 2004 to clarify holdings of H&Q Plumtree Investors, L.P. and Todd U.S. Ventures LLC. In addition, one late Form 4 was filed by Rupen Dolasia on May 28, 2004 to report an option grant to Mr. Dolasia from the 2002 Director’s Option Plan. In addition, one late Form 4 was filed by John Dillon on May 28, 2004 to report an option grant to Mr. Dillon from the 2002 Director’s Option Plan. In addition, one late Form 4 was filed by James Richardson on May 28, 2004 to report an option grant to Mr. Richardson from the 2002 Director’s Option Plan. In addition, one late Form 4 was filed by Bernard Whitney on May 28, 2004 to report an option grant to Mr. Whitney from the 2002 Director’s Option Plan.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
The Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors, as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and it operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the responsibilities of the Committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter on at least an annual basis. Each of the Audit Committee members satisfies the definition of independent director as established in the Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. During the year, in accordance with section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Plumtree identified Bernard Whitney as the Audit Committee’s “Financial Expert.”
As described more fully in its charter, the purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in its general oversight of the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions. Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards, applicable laws and regulations. KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent auditing firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
The Audit Committee members are not professional accountants or auditors, and their functions are not intended to duplicate or to certify the activities of management or the independent auditor, nor can the Committee certify that the independent auditor is “independent” under applicable rules. The Audit Committee serves a Board-level oversight role, in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the auditors on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with management and the auditors and the experience of the Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.
14
Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors the activities and performance of the Company’s internal and external auditors, including the audit scope, external audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which the independent auditors may be retained to perform non-audit services. The Audit Committee and the Board have ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee also reviews the results of the internal and external audit work with regard to the adequacy and appropriateness of the Company’s financial, accounting and internal controls. The Audit Committee also covers with management and the independent auditors various topics and events, including the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives that may have a significant financial impact on the Company or that are the subject of discussions between management and the independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee generally oversees the Company’s internal compliance programs. The Audit Committee regularly reports its activities to the full Board, as appropriate.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent auditors the materials required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standard 61, or SAS 61. The independent auditor provided the Audit Committee with written disclosures required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committees,” and the Committee discussed with the independent auditor that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee considered whether the provision by the independent auditor of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining independence of the independent auditor.
Based on the foregoing review and discussion, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for filing by the Company with the SEC.
The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP to be the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2005. In doing so, the Audit Committee considered the results from its review of KPMG LLP’s independence, including all relationships between KPMG LLP and the Company and any disclosed relationships or services that may impact their objectivity and independence, and KPMG LLP’s performance and qualifications as independent auditors. The Audit Committee also gave due consideration to the fact that the engagement partner of KPMG LLP for the Company is rotated on a regular basis as required by law. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Audit Committee has determined to submit its selection of independent auditors to stockholders for ratification.
Audit Committee
Bernard Whitney, Chairman
James Richardson
John Dillon
15
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table indicates information concerning compensation of our chief executive officer and the company’s four other executive officers other than the chief executive officer (collectively, the “Named Officers”)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Long-Term | | | |
| | | | | | | | Compensation | | | |
| | | | Awards | | | |
| | Annual Compensation | | | | | | |
| | | | | Underlying | | | All Other | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | | Salary($) | | | Bonus($) | | | Options (#) | | | Compensation($) | |
| |
John Kunze | | | 2004 | | | | 279,167 | | | | 128,000 | | | | —— | | | | —— | |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | | | 2003 | | | | 250,000 | | | | —— | | | | 300,000 | | | | —— | |
| | | 2002 | | | | 250,000 | | | | —— | | | | —— | | | | —— | |
Eric Borrmann | | | 2004 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 60,000 | | | | —— | | | | —— | |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | | 2003 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 25,875 | | | | 200,000 | | | | —— | |
| | | 2002 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 54,683 | | | | —— | | | | —— | |
Paul Ciandrini (1) | | | 2004 | | | | 278,429 | | | | 383,500 | | | | 1,000,000 | | | | —— | |
| Chief Operating Officer | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ira Pollack (2) | | | 2004 | | | | 338,026 | | | | —— | | | | 400,000 | | | | —— | |
| Vice President of Worldwide Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eric Zocher (3) | | | 2004 | | | | 230,000 | | | | 60,000 | | | | 200,000 | | | | —— | |
| Vice President of Engineering | | | 2003 | | | | 64,000 | | | | —— | | | | 300,000 | | | | —— | |
| |
(1) | Mr. Ciandrini was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer in March 2004. On an annualized basis, Mr. Ciandrini’s salary was $350,000 for 2004. Mr. Ciandrini received a one time signing bonus of $100,000 and a performance-related bonus of $283,500 in 2004. |
|
(2) | Mr. Pollack was appointed as our Vice President of Worldwide Sales in March 2004. On an annualized basis, Mr. Pollack’s salary was $300,000 for 2004. This includes sales commissions of $103,795. |
|
(3) | Mr. Zocher was appointed as our Vice President of Engineering in September 2003. On an annualized basis, Mr. Zocher’s salary was $230,000 for 2003. |
Employment Agreements
We have offer letters or employment agreements with each of our Named Officers. Each of the Named Officers may leave or be terminated at any time.
Mr. Kunze’s and Mr. Borrmann’s offer letters provide that if the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in the relevant offer letters), he will receive six months of base salary at the time of termination.
Mr. Ciandrini’s offer letter provides that if Mr. Ciandrini’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in his offer letter), he will receive six months of base salary at the time of termination and a minimum bonus of $125,000 (to the extent such termination occurs within the first two calendar years of his employment with us). Mr. Ciandrini will also be eligible for severance benefits in accordance with our established policies, if
16
and as then in effect, if his employment with us is terminated voluntarily, other than for cause, due to his death or becoming permanently and totally disabled or for certain other reasons.
Mr. Zocher’s offer letter provides that if Mr. Zocher’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in his offer letter), he will receive six months of base salary at the time of termination.
Mr. Pollack’s offer letter provides that Mr. Pollack will be eligible for severance benefits in accordance with our established policies, if and as then in effect, if his employment is terminated voluntarily, other than for cause (as defined in his offer letter), due to his death or becoming permanently and totally disabled or for certain other reasons.
As provided in their respective offer letters, in the event of a change of control: (i) 50% of Mr. Kunze’s then unvested shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to his offer letter vest immediately; (ii) if Mr. Borrmann loses job responsibility as a result of such change of control, 50% of Mr. Borrmann’s then unvested shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to his offer letter vest immediately; (iii) if within six months following such change of control, Mr. Zocher’s employment is terminated without cause, or his base compensation or job responsibilities are materially reduced, or he is relocated outside the San Francisco Bay Area, 100% of Mr. Zocher’s then unvested shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to his offer letter vest immediately; and (iv) if within six months following such change of control, Mr. Ciandrini’s or Mr. Pollack’s employment, respectively, is terminated other than voluntarily or for cause, or if Mr. Ciandrini or Mr. Pollack, respectively, is subject to a material reduction in compensation or responsibility, or if Mr. Ciandrini or Mr. Pollack, respectively, is required to relocate more than 75 miles from our then current headquarters, 100% of Mr. Ciandrini’s or Mr. Pollack’s then unvested shares subject to stock options granted pursuant to the respective offer letter vest immediately.
Under their current employment arrangements, in respect of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005, Mr. Kunze is expected to earn an annual salary of $300,000 and is eligible for a potential bonus of $150,000; Mr. Borrmann is expected to earn an annual salary of $230,000 and is eligible for a potential bonus of $115,000; Mr. Zocher is expected to earn an annual salary of $240,000 and is eligible for a potential bonus of $120,000; Mr. Ciandrini is expected to earn an annual salary of $350,000 and is eligible for a potential bonus of $400,000; and Mr. Pollack is expected to earn an annual salary of $300,000 and is eligible for a potential target commission of $200,000. Payment of bonuses is dependent on the attainment of objectives established by our board of directors under the Plumtree Software, Inc. 2005 Employee Bonus Plan. In the case of Mr. Pollack, his potential target commission is payable pursuant to the Company’s Sales Commission Plan.
Option Grants In Last Fiscal Year
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, we granted options to purchase up to an aggregate of 4,238,500 shares to employees, directors and consultants. All options were granted under our 2002 Stock Plan and 2002 Director’s Option Plan at exercise prices at the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined in good faith by the Board. All options have a term of ten years. Generally, option shares vest over four years, with 25% of the option shares vesting one year after the option grant date, and the remaining option shares vesting ratably each month for the next thirty-six months. Initial grants under the 2002 Director’s Option Plan vest ratably over three years,1/3 on each anniversary and subsequent grants vest ratably over twelve months,1/12 per month.
17
The following table shows all grants of options to acquire shares of Plumtree common stock granted to the Named Officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Potential Realizable | |
| | Number of | | | % of Total | | | | | | | Value at Assumed Annual Rates | |
| | Securities | | | Options Granted | | | | | | | of Stock Price Appreciation | |
| | Underlying | | | to Plumtree | | | Exercise or | | | | | for Option Term (&) | |
| | Options | | | Employees in | | | Base Price | | | Expiration | | | | |
Name | | Granted (#) | | | Fiscal Year | | | ($/Share)(1) | | | Date | | | 5%(2) | | | 10%(2) | |
| |
John Kunze | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Eric Borrmann | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Paul Ciandrini | | | 1,000,000 | (3) | | | 23.6 | % | | | 4.10 | | | | 3/15/2014 | | | | 2,578,468 | | | | 6,534,344 | |
Ira Pollack | | | 400,000 | (4) | | | 9.4 | % | | | 4.05 | | | | 3/21/2014 | | | | 1,018,809 | | | | 2,581,863 | |
Eric Zocher | | | 200,000 | (5) | | | 4.7 | % | | | 3.50 | | | | 6/1/2014 | | | | 440,226 | | | | 1,115,620 | |
| |
(1) | The options were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Plumtree common stock on the grant date, calculated as the closing price on that date. |
|
(2) | Potential realizable value assumes that the common stock appreciates at the rate shown (compounded annually) from the grant date until the option expiration date. It is calculated based on the SEC requirements and does not represent the estimated growth of the future stock price by Plumtree nor the present value of the stock options. |
|
(3) | These shares are represented by two option grants of 500,000 shares each. Shares subject to one option become fully exercisable on March 16, 2008. However, if at any time, the daily closing bid price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market during any 30 consecutive trading day period exceeds: $10, then 125,000 shares shall vest; $18, then 100,000 shares shall vest; $25, then 100,000 shares shall vest; $35, then 100,000 shares shall vest; and $45, then 75,000 shares shall vest. Shares subject to the other option vest cumulatively at the rate of 1/48 on April 16, 2004 and 1/48 of the shares subject to the option per month thereafter. |
|
(4) | These shares are represented by two option grants of 200,000 shares each. Shares subject to one option become fully exercisable on March 22, 2008. However, if, at any time, the daily closing bid price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market during any 30 consecutive trading day period exceeds: $10, then 50,000 shares shall vest; $18, then 40,000 shares shall vest; $25, then 40,000 shares shall vest; $35, then 40,000 shares shall vest; and $45, then 30,000 shares shall vest. Shares subject to the other option vest at the rate of 25% on March 22, 2005 and 1/48 of the total number of shares subject to the option each month thereafter. |
|
(5) | These shares are represented by two option grants of 100,000 shares each. Shares subject to one option become fully exercisable on June 2, 2008. However, if, at any time, the daily closing bid price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market during any 30 consecutive trading day period exceeds: $10, then 25,000 shares shall vest; $18, then 20,000 shares shall vest; $25, then 20,000 shares shall vest; $35, then 20,000 shares shall vest; and $45, then 15,000 shares shall vest. Shares subject to the other option vest at the rate of 25% on June 2, 2005 and 1/48 of the total number of shares subject to the option each month thereafter. |
18
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table shows aggregate exercises of options to purchase Plumtree’s common stock in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 by the named executive officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | | | |
| | Acquired | | | | | Number of Securities | | | Value of Unexercised | |
| | On | | | Value | | | Underlying Unexercised | | | In The Money Options | |
| | Exercise | | | Realized | | | Options at Fiscal Year End (#) | | | at Fiscal Year End ($)(1) | |
Name | | (#) | | | ($) | | | Exercisable | | | Unexercisable | | | Exercisable | | | Unexercisable | |
| |
John Kunze | | | 20,000 | | | | 91,768 | | | | 1,344,523 | | | | 224,305 | | | | 4,702,633 | | | | 259,555 | |
Eric Borrmann | | | 35,211 | | | | 29,549 | | | | 300,207 | | | | 114,582 | | | | 408,396 | | | | 99,999 | |
Paul Ciandrini | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 93,751 | | | | 906,249 | | | | 39,375 | | | | 380,625 | |
Ira Pollack | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 400,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 188,000 | |
Eric Zocher | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 93,750 | | | | 406,250 | | | | 15,938 | | | | 239,063 | |
| |
(1) | The “Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year End” is based on a value of $4.52 per share, the fair market value of our common stock as of December 31, 2004, as determined by the Board, less the per share exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares issued upon exercise of the option. Options were granted under our 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and our 2002 Stock Plan. |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to align stockholder interests with our business strategy, values and management initiatives. The compensation guidelines of the Compensation Committee were developed to combine competitive levels of compensation and rewards for superior performance and to align relative compensation with the achievement of essential corporate goals, satisfaction of customers, and the maximization of stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes that stock option grants to management are beneficial in aligning management and stockholder interests, and consequently serve to increase stockholder value.
Executive officers’ and employees’ compensation is comprised of the following components: annual cash compensation (consisting of base salary and annual incentive awards paid in cash); long-term incentive awards; and additional features which are available to most other employees, including a 401(k) plan, health insurance, life insurance, and an employee stock purchase plan, some of which allocate payments generally based on an individual’s level of annual cash compensation. Benefits under some of these general plans are indirectly tied to our performance.
The cornerstone of our compensation program is to pay for performance. In addition to base salary, all major elements of our compensation program vary directly with both corporate and individual performance.
Annual Cash Compensation
Amounts paid as base salary, including merit salary increases, are determined by performance, placement in the salary range established for a given position and the salaries offered in the industry for comparable positions.
19
Salaries for our executive officers are determined primarily on the basis of the executive officer’s responsibility, general salary practices of peer companies and the executive’s individual qualifications and experience. The Compensation Committee monitors and approves changes in base salary for executive officers.
Bonus
The Plumtree Software, Inc. 2004 Employee Bonus Plan (“2004 Bonus Plan”) provided for cash compensation to be paid quarterly and annually to eligible employees (mostly managers, director-level employees and above) when certain individual and company performance targets were achieved. During fiscal year 2004, the executive officers participated in the 2004 Bonus Plan. Actual bonuses paid to executive officers were based on achievement of revenue and earnings goals established for each performance period.
On March 10, 2005, we adopted a 2005 Employee Bonus Plan for certain employees, including certain executive officers, which was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. The bonus plan is designed to attract, retain and reward the employee participants of the plan for their performance. The Plan is a discretionary bonus plan and all payments thereunder are made solely at the discretion of management and the Board of Directors.
The bonus amounts for manager-level employees are determined by the performance of both the individual and the Company for the quarter or year, as the case may be. The bonus amounts for the executive team members are based exclusively on the Company’s performance, which is primarily measured by annual revenue growth and earnings performance to a lesser extent. The Compensation Committee establishes the performance measures for each year, and has the authority to modify these measures quarterly throughout the year as appropriate.
John Kunze has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since 1998. The Compensation Committee used the executive compensation practices described above to determine Mr. Kunze’s fiscal 2004 compensation. In setting Mr. Kunze’s compensation, the Compensation Committee made an overall assessment of Mr. Kunze leadership in reaching our long-term and short-term strategic, operational and business goals for 2004. Mr. Kunze’s total compensation reflects a consideration of both competitive forces and our performance. More specifically, the Compensation Committee reviewed salaries paid to CEOs in other comparable companies in our geographic area and industry. During 2004, Mr. Kunze received an increase in his base salary from $250,000 to $300,000 and an annual cash bonus award increase from $125,000 to $150,000. Mr. Kunze earned a cash bonus of $128,000 in respect of the Company’s performance in 2004.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Long-term incentive awards are made under the 2002 Stock Plan, as amended (the “Plan”). The Plan, which is administered by the Compensation Committee, is an omnibus plan and provides stock based awards to eligible employees, including the Company’s executive officers.
Stock option awards are based on guidelines that provide for larger awards commensurate with position levels that reflect competitive grant practices within a broad peer group of companies in the software and technology industries. Because of the direct relationship between the value of an option and the Company’s stock price, the Compensation Committee believes that options motivate executive officers to manage the Company in a manner consistent with stockholder interests. The Plan does not provide any quantitative method for weighting
20
these factors, and a decision to grant an award is primarily based upon a subjective evaluation of past as well as future anticipated performance.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Plumtree has considered the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and the related Treasury Department regulations which restrict deductibility of executive compensation paid to each of the Named Officers at the end of any fiscal year to the extent the compensation exceeds $1,000,000 for any of those officers in any year and does not qualify for an exception under the Internal Revenue Code or regulations. Income from options granted under the 2002 Stock Plan should qualify for an exemption from these restrictions as “performance based” compensation. The Compensation Committee does not believe that other components of Plumtree’s compensation will be likely to exceed $1,000,000 for any executive officer in the foreseeable future and therefore concluded that no further action with respect to qualifying this compensation for deductibility was necessary as of the date of this report. In the future, the Compensation Committee will carefully continue to evaluate the advisability of qualifying its executive compensation for deductibility of such compensation under Section 162(m). The Compensation Committee’s policy is to qualify its executive compensation for deductibility under applicable tax laws as practicable, while reserving the right to award future compensation which would not comply with the Section 162(m) requirements for nondeductibility if the Compensation Committee concluded that this was in the Company’s best interests.
Compensation Committee
James Richardson, Chairman
John Dillon
David Pratt
21
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURNS
AMONG PLUMTREE, PEER GROUP AND NASDAQ MARKET
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Returns
Performance Graph for
Plumtree Software Inc.
Produced on 04/06/2005 including data to 12/31/2004
22
OTHER MATTERS
The Board is not aware of any matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named on the accompanying Proxy will have the authority to vote on those matters in accordance with their own judgment.
10-K Report
A copy of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is available without charge upon receipt of a written request. Such requests should be directed to: Investor Relations, Plumtree Software, Inc., 500 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111. Copies of filings made with the SEC are also available through the SEC’s electronic data gathering analysis retrieval system (EDGAR) at www.sec.gov.
| |
| By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/605b8/605b8443b92b146242c92bdad2ca46a24056ac7d" alt="-s- Adriana G. Chiocchi" |
|
| Adriana G. Chiocchi, Secretary |
| April 25, 2005 |
23
Appendix A
PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, INC.
CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose of the Committee
The Committee’s purpose is to
| | |
| • | Oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of Plumtree Software, Inc., (the “Corporation”) and audits of the financial statements of the Corporation; |
|
| • | Appoint independent auditors to audit the Corporation’s financial statements; |
|
| • | Assist the Board in oversight and monitoring of (i) the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, (ii) the Corporation’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters, (iii) the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, and (iv) the Corporation’s internal accounting and financial controls; |
|
| • | Prepare the report that the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) require be included in the Corporation’s annual proxy statement; |
|
| • | Provide the Corporation’s Board with the results of its monitoring and recommendations derived therefrom; and |
|
| • | Provide to the Board such additional information and materials as it may deem necessary to make the Board aware of significant financial matters that require the attention of the Board. |
In addition, the Audit Committee will undertake those specific duties and responsibilities listed below and such other duties as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe.
Composition of the Committee
The Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors as determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. The Chairman of the Committee shall be designated by the Board,providedthat if the Board does not so designate a Chairman, the members of the Committee, by majority vote, may designate a Chairman. Each member of the Committee shall be qualified to serve on the Committee pursuant to the following requirements (as well as any criteria required by the SEC)
| | |
| • | Each member will be an independent director, as defined in (i) NASDAQ Rule 4200,(ii) Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (iii) the rules and regulations of the SEC provide that one non-independent, non-employee director may serve on the Audit Committee if (i) the Board has made the required determination under Nasdaq Rule 4350(d); and (ii) such Nasdaq rule is in effect or has not otherwise been superseded; |
|
| • | Each member will be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, in accordance with the NASDAQ National Market Audit Committee requirements; and |
24
| | |
| • | At least one member will have past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background, including a current or past position as a principal financial officer or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities. |
Meetings of the Committee
The Committee shall meet with such frequency and at such intervals as it shall determine is necessary to carry out its duties and responsibilities; provided, however, that the Committee shall meet at least four (4) times per year. The Committee, in its discretion, will ask members of management or others to attend its meetings (or portions thereof) and to provide pertinent information as necessary. The Committee will meet separately with the Chief Executive Officer and separately with the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation at such times as are appropriate to review the financial affairs of the Corporation. The Committee will also meet with the Corporation’s independent auditors, investment bankers or financial analysts who follow the Corporation. The Committee may establish its own schedule and shall maintain minutes of its meetings and records relating to those meetings and provide copies of such minutes to the Board.
Duties and Responsibilities of the Committee
In carrying out its duties and responsibilities, the Committee’s policies and procedures should remain flexible, so that it may be in a position to best react or respond to changing circumstances or conditions. While there is no “blueprint” to be followed by the Committee in carrying out its duties and responsibilities, the following should be considered within the authority of the Committee:
| | |
| • | Appointing, compensating and overseeing the work of the independent auditors (including resolving disagreements between management and the independent auditors regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services or related work; |
|
| • | Pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided to the Corporation by the independent auditors (or subsequently approving non-audit services in those circumstances where a subsequent approval is necessary and permissible); in this regard, the Committee shall have the sole authority to approve the hiring and firing of the independent auditors, all audit engagement fees and terms and all non-audit engagements, as may be permissible, with the independent auditors; |
|
| • | Review the performance of the Corporation’s independent auditors and make recommendations to the Board regarding the replacement or termination of the independent auditors when circumstances warrant, including a determination of whether it is appropriate to adopt a policy of rotating independent auditors on a regular basis; |
|
| • | Oversee the independence of the Corporation’s independent auditors by, among other things: |
|
| • | requiring the independent auditors to deliver to the Committee on a periodic basis a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the independent auditors and the Corporation; |
|
| • | actively engaging in a dialogue with the independent auditors with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditors and recommending that the Board take appropriate action in to satisfy itself of the auditors’ independence; |
|
| • | reviewing the independent auditors’ peer review conducted every three years; |
25
| | |
| • | discussing with the Corporation’s independent auditors the financial statements and audit findings, including any significant adjustments, management judgments and accounting estimates, significant new accounting policies and disagreements with management and any other matters described in SAS No. 61, as may be modified or supplemented; and |
|
| • | reviewing reports submitted to the audit committee by the independent auditors in accordance with the applicable SEC requirements; |
|
| • | Instruct the Corporation’s independent auditors that they are ultimately accountable to the Committee and the Board, and that the Committee and the Board are responsible for the selection, evaluation and termination of the Corporation’s independent auditors; |
|
| • | Review and accept, if appropriate, the annual audit plan of the Corporation’s independent auditors, including the scope of audit activities, and monitor such plan’s progress and results during the year; |
|
| • | Review and discuss the results of the year-end audit of the Corporation, including any comments or recommendations of the Corporation’s independent auditors, and the audited financial statements and related MD&A to be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K; |
|
| • | Directing the Corporation’s independent auditors to review before filing with the SEC the Corporation’s interim financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, using professional standards and procedures for conducting such reviews; |
|
| • | Review with management and the Corporation’s independent auditors such accounting policies (and changes therein) of the Corporation, including any financial reporting issues which could have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements, as are deemed appropriate for review by the Committee prior to any interim or year-end filings with the SEC or other regulatory body; |
|
| • | Review with management and the independent auditors the Corporation’s interim financial statements and the related MD&A included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, including the results of the independent auditor’s reviews of the quarterly financial statements; |
|
| • | Review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporation’s accounting and internal control policies and procedures through inquiry discussion and periodic meetings with the Corporation’s independent auditors and management of the Corporation and to review before release the disclosure regarding such system of internal controls required under SEC rules to be contained in the Corporation’s periodic filings and the attestations or reports by the independent auditors relating to such disclosure; |
|
| • | Conducting a post-audit review of the financial statements and audit findings, including any significant suggestions for improvements provided to management by the independent auditors; |
|
| • | Reviewing before release the unaudited quarterly operating results in the Corporation’s quarterly earnings release; |
|
| • | Overseeing compliance with the requirements of the SEC for disclosure of auditor’s services and audit committee members, member qualifications and activities; |
|
| • | Review with management the Corporation’s administrative, operational and accounting internal controls, and evaluate whether the Corporation is operating in accordance with its prescribed policies, procedures and codes of conduct; |
26
| | |
| • | Receive periodic reports from the Corporation’s independent auditors and management of the Corporation to review the selection, application and disclosure of Corporation’s significant accounting and access the impact of other financial reporting developments that may have a bearing on the Corporation, including an analysis of the effect of alternative GAAP methods on the Corporation’s financial statements and a description of any transactions as to which management obtained Statement on Auditing Standards No. 50 letters; |
|
| • | Review with management and the independent auditor the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives as well as off-balance sheet structures on the Corporation’s financial statements; |
|
| • | Review the experience and qualifications of the senior members of the independent auditor team and the quality control procedures of the independent auditor; |
|
| • | Recommend to the Board guidelines for the Corporation’s hiring of employees of the independent auditor who were engaged on the Corporation’s account; |
|
| • | Review with management and the independent auditor any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any employee complaints or published reports which raise material issues regarding the Corporation’s financial statements or accounting policies; |
|
| • | Establish and maintain free and open means of communication between and among the Board, the Committee, the Corporation’s independent auditors, the Corporation’s internal auditing department and management, including providing such parties with appropriate opportunities to meet privately with the Committee; |
|
| • | Review and reassess annually the adequacy of the Committee’s charter-structure, process and membership requirements; |
|
| • | Meet annually with the general counsel, and outside counsel when appropriate, to review legal and regulatory matters, including any matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements of the Corporation; |
|
| • | Prepare the report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in the Corporation’s annual proxy statement; |
|
| • | Review the Corporation’s policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interest and review past or proposed transactions between the Corporation and members of management as well as policies and procedures with respect to officers’ expense accounts and perquisites, including the use of corporate assets. The Committee shall consider the results of any review of these policies and procedures by the Corporation’s independent auditors; |
|
| • | Review the Corporation’s program to monitor compliance with the Corporation’s Code of Conduct or similar ethics codes, and meet periodically with the Corporation’s Compliance Officer to discuss compliance with the Code of Conduct, including obtaining reports relating to the compliance of the Corporation’s subsidiaries/foreign affiliated entities with applicable legal requirements and the Corporation’s Code of Conduct, including disclosures of insider and affiliated party transactions; |
|
| • | Obtain from the Corporation’s independent auditors any information pursuant to Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; |
|
| • | Review analyst reports and press reports about the Corporation’s accounting and disclosure practices; |
27
| | |
| • | Reviewing, in conjunction with counsel, any legal matters that could have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements; |
|
| • | Providing oversight and review at least annually of the Corporation’s risk management policies, including its investment policies; |
|
| • | Reviewing the Corporation’s compliance with employee benefit plans; |
|
| • | Overseeing and reviewing the Corporation’s policies regarding information technology and management information systems; |
|
| • | If necessary, instituting special investigations with full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Corporation; |
|
| • | Providing for appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, for payment of compensation (i) to the independent auditors for the purpose of rendering or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services; and (ii) to any legal, accounting or other advisors employed by the Audit Committee; |
|
| • | Report regularly to the Board on its activities, as appropriate; |
|
| • | Meet at least quarterly with the chief financial officer, the senior internal auditing executive and the independent auditor in separate executive sessions; |
|
| • | Establishing procedures for receiving, retaining and treating complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; |
|
| • | Perform such additional activities, and consider such other matters, within the scope of its responsibilities, as the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate; |
|
| • | Review the findings of any examination by regulatory agencies regarding the Corporation’s financial statements or accounting policies; and |
|
| • | Reviewing and approving in advance any proposed related party transactions. |
While the Committee has the duties and responsibilities set forth in this charter, the Committee is not responsible for planning or conducting the audit or for determining whether the Corporation’s financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Similarly, it is not the responsibility of the Committee to resolve disagreements, if any, between management and the independent auditors or to ensure that the Corporation complies with all laws and regulations and its Code of Conduct.
Compensation
Members of the Committee shall receive such fees, if any, for their service as Committee members as may be determined by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion. Such fees may include retainers or per meeting fees. Fees may be paid in such form of consideration as is determined by the Board of Directors. Members of the Committee may not receive any compensation from the Corporation except the fees that they receive for service as a member of the Board if Directors or any committee thereof.
28
Minutes
The Audit Committee will maintain written minutes of its meetings, which minutes will be filed with the minutes of the meetings of the Board.
Reports
In addition to preparing the report in the Corporation’s proxy statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee will summarize its examinations and recommendations to the Board as may be appropriate, consistent with the Audit Committee’s charter.
Delegation of Authority
The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more designated members of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services, provided such pre-approval decision is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
29
PLUMTREE SOFTWARE, INC. ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Friday, May 20, 2005, 8:00 A.M.
Omni San Francisco Hotel’s Nob Hill Room, 500 California Street at Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on May 20, 2005.
The shares of stock you hold in your account will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.
If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” Items 1 and 2.
By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Eric Borrmann, Chief Financial Officer and Adriana G. Chiocchi, Secretary, and each of them (the “Named Proxies”), with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments.
There are two ways to vote your Proxy. Your telephone votes authorize the Named Proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
| | |
1. | | VOTE BY PHONE |
| | |
| | • Call toll-free |
| | |
| | • 1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) |
| | |
| | Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until 11:59 p.m. on May 19, 2005. |
| | |
| | • Enter your Voter Control Number listed above and follow the easy recorded instructions. |
| | |
| | If you vote by Phone, please do not mail your Proxy Card. |
| | |
2. | | VOTE BY MAIL |
| | |
| | • Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to: Plumtree Software, Inc. c/o EquiServe Trust Company N.A. PO Box 8687 Edison, NJ 08818-9247 |
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH PROPOSAL.
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR Items 1 and 2.
| | |
1. | | Election of directors. |
(01) John Kunze, (02) Bernard Whitney
| | |
For all Nominees | | Withheld from All Nominees |
| | |
o | | o |
| | |
o | | |
|
| | |
For all nominees except as written above |
| | |
| | |
2. | | To consider and ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent auditors. |
| | |
Mark box at right if you plan to attend the meetingo
Mark box at right if an address change has been noted on this cardo
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear on Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons must sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the proxy.
By my signature below, I confer to the named proxies discretionary authority on any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.
Date:
Signature(s) in Box: