UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 | |||
or | |||
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||
For the transition period from ___________________ to _________________. |
Commission File Number 001-12917
REIS, INC. | ||
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
Maryland | 13-3926898 | |||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |||
530 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY | 10036 | |||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 921-1122 | ||
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer | Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company | ||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The number of the Registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding was 10,596,370 as of August 3, 2010. |
Page Number | |||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | |||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | ||||||
3 | |||||||
4 | |||||||
5 | |||||||
6 | |||||||
7 | |||||||
Item 2. | 19 | ||||||
Item 3. | 32 | ||||||
Item 4T. | 32 | ||||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: | |||||||
Item 1. | 32 | ||||||
Item 1A. | 32 | ||||||
Item 2. | 33 | ||||||
Item 3. | 33 | ||||||
Item 4. | 33 | ||||||
Item 5. | 33 | ||||||
Item 6. | 33 | ||||||
35 |
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents �� | $ | 20,980,917 | $ | 22,735,240 | ||||||
Restricted cash and investments | 1,056,123 | 1,507,193 | ||||||||
Receivables, prepaid and other assets | 4,730,542 | 7,430,446 | ||||||||
Real estate assets | 1,501,382 | 3,709,166 | ||||||||
Total current assets | 28,268,964 | 35,382,045 | ||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net | 1,093,607 | 1,267,961 | ||||||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $12,720,917 and $10,454,529, respectively | 19,300,461 | 20,416,385 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 54,824,648 | 54,824,648 | ||||||||
Other assets | 213,484 | 313,389 | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 103,701,164 | $ | 112,204,428 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||
Current portion of Bank Loan | $ | 5,797,457 | $ | 7,933,332 | ||||||
Current portion of other debt | 71,609 | 185,517 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 4,939,548 | 6,317,480 | ||||||||
Reserve for option liability | 140,019 | 125,840 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue | 10,195,691 | 12,192,751 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities | 21,144,324 | 26,754,920 | ||||||||
Non-current portion of Bank Loan | 8,178,958 | 11,316,668 | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 720,773 | 745,450 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liability, net | 21,580 | 66,580 | ||||||||
Total liabilities | 30,065,635 | 38,883,618 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||||
Common stock, $0.02 par value per share, 101,000,000 shares authorized, 10,607,313 and 10,398,329 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 212,146 | 207,966 | ||||||||
Additional paid in capital | 99,426,758 | 99,045,546 | ||||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) �� | (26,003,375 | ) | (25,932,702 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 73,635,529 | 73,320,810 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 103,701,164 | $ | 112,204,428 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Subscription revenue | $ | 6,004,373 | $ | 5,909,109 | $ | 12,018,542 | $ | 12,264,320 | ||||||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | 467,934 | 4,260,483 | 3,217,934 | 5,808,684 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 6,472,307 | 10,169,592 | 15,236,476 | 18,073,004 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of subscription revenue | 1,536,637 | 1,361,724 | 2,999,749 | 2,768,279 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | 467,482 | 2,990,320 | 2,954,944 | 4,000,969 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 2,004,119 | 4,352,044 | 5,954,693 | 6,769,248 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 4,468,188 | 5,817,548 | 9,281,783 | 11,303,756 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,440,903 | 1,247,105 | 2,990,951 | 2,523,309 | ||||||||||||||
Product development | 464,751 | 413,417 | 934,031 | 930,787 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 129,450 | 264,791 | 196,241 | 485,218 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses, inclusive of costs (reductions) attributable to stock based liability amounts of $48,741, $0, $14,179 and $(55,830), respectively | 2,245,733 | 2,918,587 | 5,127,693 | 5,790,531 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 4,280,837 | 4,843,900 | 9,248,916 | 9,729,845 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 35,532 | 86,234 | 73,268 | 147,934 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (101,486 | ) | (150,330 | ) | (221,808 | ) | (330,695 | ) | ||||||||||
Total other income (expenses) | (65,954 | ) | (64,096 | ) | (148,540 | ) | (182,761 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 121,397 | 909,552 | (115,673 | ) | 1,391,150 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 15,000 | 378,000 | (45,000 | ) | 583,000 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 106,397 | $ | 531,552 | $ | (70,673 | ) | $ | 808,150 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 10,495,194 | 10,775,722 | 10,458,178 | 10,869,027 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted | 10,780,457 | 11,009,154 | 10,458,178 | 11,063,301 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
REIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
(Unaudited)
Common Shares | Paid in | Retained Earnings | Total Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | (Deficit) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 | 10,398,329 | $ | 207,966 | $ | 99,045,546 | $ | (25,932,702 | ) | $ | 73,320,810 | ||||||||||||
Shares issued for vested employees restricted stock units | 237,925 | 4,759 | (4,759 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation, net | — | — | 561,332 | — | 561,332 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases | (28,941 | ) | (579 | ) | (175,361 | ) | — | (175,940 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) | — | — | — | (70,673 | ) | (70,673 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 | 10,607,313 | $ | 212,146 | $ | 99,426,758 | $ | (26,003,375 | ) | $ | 73,635,529 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (70,673 | ) | $ | 808,150 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) provision | (45,000 | ) | 553,000 | |||||||
Depreciation | 194,989 | 273,789 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 2,266,388 | 2,227,384 | ||||||||
Stock based compensation charges | 771,121 | 709,924 | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | 1,070 | 941,569 | ||||||||
Real estate assets | 2,207,784 | 2,673,597 | ||||||||
Receivables, prepaid and other assets | 3,249,809 | 1,539,243 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (1,386,739 | ) | 176,364 | |||||||
Reserve for option liability | 14,179 | (55,830 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue | (1,997,060 | ) | (1,856,671 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 5,205,868 | 7,990,519 | ||||||||
cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||
Web site and database development costs | (1,150,464 | ) | (890,490 | ) | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment additions | (30,541 | ) | (13,111 | ) | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment disposition | 9,906 | — | ||||||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities | (1,171,099 | ) | (903,601 | ) |
cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Repayment of construction loans payable | — | (5,077,333 | ) | |||||||
Repayment of Bank Loan | (5,273,585 | ) | (1,750,000 | ) | ||||||
Repayments on capitalized equipment leases | (129,778 | ) | (92,815 | ) | ||||||
Payments for option cancellations and restricted stock units | (209,789 | ) | (21,038 | ) | ||||||
Stock repurchases | (175,940 | ) | (777,475 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (5,789,092 | ) | (7,718,661 | ) | ||||||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,754,323 | ) | (631,743 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 22,735,240 | 24,151,720 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 20,980,917 | $ | 23,519,977 | ||||||
supplemental information: | ||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 167,141 | $ | 278,969 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds | $ | 33,554 | $ | 30,761 | ||||||
supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||
Shares issued for vested employees restricted stock units | $ | 4,759 | $ | 522 | ||||||
Mortgage receivable on sale of real estate | $ | 450,000 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. | Organization and Business | ||
Reis, Inc. (the “Company” or “Reis”) is a Maryland corporation. The Company’s primary business is providing commercial real estate market information and analytical tools for its customers, through its Reis Services subsidiary. For disclosure and financial reporting purposes, this business is referred to as the Reis Services segment. | |||
Reis Services’s Historic Business | |||
Reis Services, including its predecessors, was founded in 1980. Reis maintains a proprietary database containing detailed information on commercial properties in metropolitan markets and neighborhoods throughout the U.S. The database contains information on apartment, office, retail and industrial properties and is used by real estate investors, lenders and other professionals to make informed buying, selling and financing decisions. In addition, Reis data is used by debt and equity investors to assess, quantify and manage the risks of default and loss associated with individual mortgages, properties, portfolios and real estate backed securities. Reis currently provides its information services to many of the nation’s leading lending institutions, equity investors, brokers and appraisers. Reis’s flagship product is Reis SE, which provides online access via a web browser to commercial real estate information and analytical tools designed to facilitate debt and equity transactions as well as ongoing evaluations. In addition to trend and forecast analysis at metropolitan and neighborhood levels, the product offers detailed building-specific information such as rents, vacancy rates, lease terms, property sales, new construction listings and property valuation estimates. Reis SE is designed to meet the demand for timely and accurate information to support the decision-making of property owners, developers and builders, banks and non-bank lenders, and equity investors, all of whom require access to in formation on both the performance and pricing of assets, including detailed data on market transactions, supply, absorption, rents and sale prices. This information is critical to all aspects of valuing assets and financing their acquisition, development and construction. Reis’s revenue model is based primarily on annual subscriptions that are paid in accordance with contractual billing terms. Reis recognizes revenue from its contracts on a ratable basis; for example, one-twelfth of the value of a one-year contract is recognized monthly. | |||
Wellsford’s Historic Business | |||
The Company was originally formed on January 8, 1997. Reis acquired the Reis Services business by merger in May 2007 (the “Merger”). Prior to May 2007, Reis operated as Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. (“Wellsford”). Wellsford’s primary operating activities immediately prior to the Merger were the development, construction and sale of its three residential projects and its approximate 23% ownership interest in the Reis Services business. The Company completed the sale of the remaining units at its Colorado project in September 2009 and sold its Claverack, New York project in February 2010. The Company ceased building new homes in 2008 and is seeking to exit the residential development business by selling its East Lyme, Connecticut project in one or more bulk transactions, in order to focus solely on the Reis Services business. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Company’s operating activities by segment. | |||
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | ||
Basis of Presentation Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investments in entities where the Company does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. These investments were initially recorded at cost and were subsequently adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of the investment’s income (loss) and additional contributions or distributions. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) | |||
Quarterly Reporting The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s balance sheets, statements of operations, statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. These c onsolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC on March 15, 2010. The consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and changes in cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of full year results. Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. From time to time, the Company has been, is or may in the future be a defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. The Company records a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, management does not believe that any legal actions to which the Company is a party, or which are proposed or threatened, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements. Reclassification Amounts in certain accounts as presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes, have been reclassified. These reclassifications do not result in a change to the previously reported net income (loss) or net income (loss) per common share for any of the periods presented to conform to the current period presentation. |
3. | Segment Information | ||
The Company is organized into two separately managed segments: the Reis Services segment and the Residential Development Activities segment. The following tables present condensed balance sheet and operating data for these segments: |
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Balance Sheet Data June 30, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,499 | $ | 77 | $ | 6,405 | $ | 20,981 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | 213 | 843 | — | 1,056 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables, prepaid and other assets | 4,350 | 355 | 26 | 4,731 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate assets | — | 1,501 | — | 1,501 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets | 19,062 | 2,776 | 6,431 | 28,269 | ||||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net | 1,091 | — | 3 | 1,094 | ||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net | 19,300 | — | — | 19,300 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 57,203 | — | (2,378 | ) | 54,825 | |||||||||||||
Other assets | 213 | — | — | 213 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 96,869 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 4,056 | $ | 103,701 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of Bank Loan and other debt | $ | 5,869 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,869 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 1,306 | 2,483 | 1,290 | 5,079 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 10,196 | — | — | 10,196 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 17,371 | 2,483 | 1,290 | 21,144 | ||||||||||||||
Non-current portion of Bank Loan | 8,179 | — | — | 8,179 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 721 | — | — | 721 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liability, net | 10,829 | — | (10,808 | ) | 21 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 37,100 | 2,483 | (9,518 | ) | 30,065 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 59,769 | 293 | 13,574 | 73,636 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 96,869 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 4,056 | $ | 103,701 |
Condensed Balance Sheet Data December 31, 2009 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15,629 | $ | 80 | $ | 7,026 | $ | 22,735 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | 213 | 1,294 | — | 1,507 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables, prepaid and other assets | 7,365 | (82 | ) | 148 | 7,431 | |||||||||||||
Real estate assets | — | 3,709 | — | 3,709 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets | 23,207 | 5,001 | 7,174 | 35,382 | ||||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net | 1,229 | 12 | 27 | 1,268 | ||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net | 20,416 | — | — | 20,416 | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 57,203 | — | (2,378 | ) | 54,825 | |||||||||||||
Other assets | 313 | — | — | 313 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 102,368 | $ | 5,013 | $ | 4,823 | $ | 112,204 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of Bank Loan and other debt | $ | 8,119 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,119 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 1,457 | 2,470 | 2,516 | 6,443 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 12,193 | — | — | 12,193 | ||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 21,769 | 2,470 | 2,516 | 26,755 | ||||||||||||||
Non-current portion of Bank Loan | 11,317 | — | — | 11,317 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 745 | — | — | 745 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liability, net | 9,997 | — | (9,931 | ) | 66 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 43,828 | 2,470 | (7,415 | ) | 38,883 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 58,540 | 2,543 | 12,238 | 73,321 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 102,368 | $ | 5,013 | $ | 4,823 | $ | 112,204 | ||||||||||
(A) | Includes the assets and liabilities of the Palomino Park, East Lyme and Claverack projects to the extent that such assets and liabilities existed at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. | ||
(B) | Includes cash, other assets and liabilities not specifically attributable to or allocable to a specific operating segment. |
Segment Information (continued) |
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Operating Data for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenue | $ | 6,004 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,004 | ||||||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | — | 468 | — | 468 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 6,004 | 468 | — | 6,472 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of subscription revenue | 1,536 | — | — | 1,536 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | — | 468 | — | 468 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 1,536 | 468 | — | 2,004 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 4,468 | — | — | 4,468 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,441 | — | — | 1,441 | ||||||||||||||
Product development | 465 | — | — | 465 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | 129 | — | 129 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,439 | (517 | ) | 1,324 | 2,246 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 3,345 | (388 | ) | 1,324 | 4,281 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 30 | — | 6 | 36 | ||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) | (102 | ) | — | — | (102 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total other income (expense) | (72 | ) | — | 6 | (66 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 1,051 | $ | 388 | $ | (1,318 | ) | $ | 121 |
Condensed Operating Data for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenue | $ | 5,909 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,909 | ||||||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | — | 4,261 | — | 4,261 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 5,909 | 4,261 | — | 10,170 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of subscription revenue | 1,362 | — | — | 1,362 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | — | 2,990 | — | 2,990 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 1,362 | 2,990 | — | 4,352 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 4,547 | 1,271 | — | 5,818 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,247 | — | — | 1,247 | ||||||||||||||
Product development | 414 | — | — | 414 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | 265 | — | 265 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,338 | 166 | 1,415 | 2,919 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 2,999 | 431 | 1,415 | 4,845 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 43 | 42 | 2 | 87 | ||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) | (142 | ) | (9 | ) | — | (151 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense) | (99 | ) | 33 | 2 | (64 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 1,449 | $ | 873 | $ | (1,413 | ) | $ | 909 | |||||||||
(A) | Primarily includes the operating results of the Palomino Park, East Lyme and Claverack projects to the extent that such revenues and expenses existed for such projects during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. | ||
(B) | Includes interest and other income, depreciation and amortization expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments. |
Segment Information (continued) |
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Condensed Operating Data for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenue | $ | 12,018 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,018 | ||||||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | — | 3,218 | — | 3,218 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 12,018 | 3,218 | — | 15,236 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of subscription revenue | 2,999 | — | — | 2,999 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | — | 2,955 | — | 2,955 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 2,999 | 2,955 | — | 5,954 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 9,019 | 263 | — | 9,282 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 2,991 | — | — | 2,991 | ||||||||||||||
Product development | 934 | — | — | 934 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | 196 | — | 196 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,873 | (444 | ) | 2,699 | 5,128 | |||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 6,798 | (248 | ) | 2,699 | 9,249 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 63 | — | 10 | 73 | ||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) | (222 | ) | — | — | (222 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total other income (expense) | (159 | ) | — | 10 | (149 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 2,062 | $ | 511 | $ | (2,689 | ) | $ | (116 | ) |
Condensed Operating Data for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities (A) | Other (B) | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenue | $ | 12,264 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,264 | ||||||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | — | 5,809 | — | 5,809 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 12,264 | 5,809 | — | 18,073 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of subscription revenue | 2,768 | — | — | 2,768 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | — | 4,001 | — | 4,001 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 2,768 | 4,001 | — | 6,769 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 9,496 | 1,808 | — | 11,304 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 2,523 | — | — | 2,523 | ||||||||||||||
Product development | 931 | — | — | 931 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | 485 | — | 485 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,735 | 267 | 2,789 | 5,791 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 6,189 | 752 | 2,789 | 9,730 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expenses): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income | 98 | 46 | 4 | 148 | ||||||||||||||
Interest (expense) | (291 | ) | (40 | ) | — | (331 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense) | (193 | ) | 6 | 4 | (183 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 3,114 | $ | 1,062 | $ | (2,785 | ) | $ | 1,391 | |||||||||
(A) | Primarily includes the operating results of the Palomino Park, East Lyme and Claverack projects to the extent that such revenues and expenses existed for such projects during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. | ||
(B) | Includes interest and other income, depreciation and amortization expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments. |
Segment Information (continued) | |||
Reis Services | |||
See Note 1 for a description of Reis Services’s business and products at June 30, 2010. No individual customer accounted for more than 2.5% and 2.7% of Reis Services’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The balance of outstanding customer receivables of Reis Services, which are included in receivables, prepaid and other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are as follows: |
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Customer receivables | $ | 4,229,000 | $ | 7,236,000 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (73,000 | ) | (53,000 | ) | ||||||
Customer receivables, net | $ | 4,156,000 | $ | 7,183,000 |
Seven customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 40.2% of Reis Services’s accounts receivable at June 30, 2010, including four customers in excess of 4.0% with the largest representing 15.4%. As of August 3, 2010, the Company had received payments of approximately $1,851,000 or 43.8% against the June 30, 2010 customer receivable balance. At June 30, 2010 no customer accounted for more than 6.0% of deferred revenue. Residential Development Activities East Lyme At June 30, 2010, the Company’s residential development activities were comprised solely of The Orchards, a single family home development in East Lyme, Connecticut, upon which the Company could build 161 single family homes on 224 acres (“East Lyme”). Sales commenced in June 2006 and an aggregate of 40 homes and lots (29 homes and 11 lots) were sold as of June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, the remaining East Lyme inventory included two improved lots and 119 fully approved lots. The Company sold one home during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 for gross sales proceeds of approximately $468,000, and sold three homes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 for gross sales proceeds of approximately $1,742,000. The Company is working with a broker to sell the two improved lots individually and to sell the 119 fully approved lots in one or more bulk sale transactions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell the remaining two improved lots individually or the 119 fully approved lots in one or more bulk transactions at acceptable prices, or within a specific time period, or at all. The Company had an agreement with a homebuilder to construct the homes for this project. The homebuilder was a 5% partner in the project and received other consideration. In March 2009, the Company and the homebuilder/partner terminated the partnership agreement and the related development agreement. As a result of the terminations, the Company paid approximately $343,000 to its partner to satisfy all remaining compensation under the development agreement and to purchase its 5% interest. Certain of the lots at East Lyme require remediation of pesticides which were used on the property when it was an apple orchard. Remediation is required prior to the development of those lots. The remediation plan, the cost of which is estimated by management to be approximately $1,000,000, has been approved by the health inspector for the municipality and the town planner. The estimated remediation cost is recognized as a liability in the June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheets. This estimate could change in the future if a change to the remediation plan is made, as contractors are hired and if the bulk sale of lots, as described above, were to occur. An expected time frame for the remediation has not been established as of the date of this report. |
Segment Information (continued) | |||
Completed Projects and Other Investments Claverack Prior to its sale in February 2010, the Company owned approximately 235 acres in Claverack, New York, known as The Stewardship, which was subdivided into 48 developable single family home lots. The Claverack project was sold in a bulk transaction for a gross sales price of $2,750,000, which included two model homes, amenities, 46 additional lots and $450,000 of cash collateralizing certain road completion obligations. Net cash received at closing, after expenses, aggregated approximately $2,187,000. The remaining $450,000 of the purchase price will be payable by the purchaser in February 2011 (or earlier if the road bond is released) and is secured by the outstanding road bond and a mortgage on the property. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a gro ss profit of approximately $263,000 in the first quarter of 2010. Gold Peak In September 2009, the Company sold the final unit at Gold Peak, the final phase of Palomino Park, a five phase multifamily residential development in Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Gold Peak was a 259 unit condominium project on the remaining 29 acre land parcel at Palomino Park. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, ten and 16 Gold Peak units, respectively, were sold for gross sale proceeds of approximately $2,519,000 and $4,067,000, respectively. | |||
4. | Restricted Cash and Investments | ||
Restricted cash and investments are comprised of the following: |
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Deposits and escrows related to residential development activities (A) | $ | 843,000 | $ | 1,294,000 | ||||||
Certificate of deposit/security for office lease | 213,000 | 213,000 | ||||||||
$ | 1,056,000 | $ | 1,507,000 | |||||||
(A) | The net reduction results from the sale of the Claverack project in February 2010. |
5. | Intangible Assets | ||
The amount of identified intangible assets, including the respective amounts of accumulated amortization, are as follows: |
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Database | $ | 10,650,000 | $ | 10,084,000 | ||||||
Accumulated amortization | (6,270,000 | ) | (5,115,000 | ) | ||||||
Database, net | 4,380,000 | 4,969,000 | ||||||||
Customer relationships | 14,100,000 | 14,100,000 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (2,970,000 | ) | (2,469,000 | ) | ||||||
Customer relationships, net | 11,130,000 | 11,631,000 | ||||||||
Web site | 4,472,000 | 3,887,000 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (2,527,000 | ) | (2,067,000 | ) | ||||||
Web site, net | 1,945,000 | 1,820,000 | ||||||||
Acquired below market lease | 2,800,000 | 2,800,000 | ||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (955,000 | ) | (804,000 | ) | ||||||
Acquired below market lease, net | 1,845,000 | 1,996,000 | ||||||||
Intangible assets, net | $ | 19,300,000 | $ | 20,416,000 |
Intangible Assets (continued) | |||
The Company capitalized approximately $337,000 and $226,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $566,000 and $468,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to the database intangible asset. The Company capitalized approximately $337,000 and $202,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $585,000 and $423,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to the web site intangible asset. Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $1,124,000 and $2,267,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, of which approximately $573,000 and $1,155,000 related to the database, which is charged to cost of sales, approximately $250,000 and $501,000 related to customer relationships, which is charged to sales and marketing expense, approximately $225,000 and $460,000 related to web site development, which is charged to product development expense, and approximately $76,000 and $151,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease, which is charged to general and administrative expense, all in the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $1,081,000 and $2,227,000 for the three and s ix months ended June 30, 2009, of which approximately $536,000 and $1,055,000 related to the database, approximately $252,000 and $505,000 related to customer relationships, approximately $218,000 and $516,000 related to web site development, and approximately $75,000 and $151,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease. | |||
6. | Debt | ||
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s debt consisted of the following: |
Maturity Date | Stated Interest Rate at June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
Reis Services Bank Loan | September 2012 | LIBOR + 1.50% | $ | 13,976,000 | $ | 19,250,000 | ||||||||
Other Reis Services debt | Various | Fixed/Various | 84,000 | 213,000 | ||||||||||
Total debt | $ | 14,060,000 | $ | 19,463,000 | ||||||||||
Total assets of Reis Services as a security interest for the Bank Loan | $ | 96,869,000 | $ | 102,368,000 |
Reis Services Bank Loan In connection with the Merger agreement, Private Reis entered into a credit agreement, dated October 11, 2006, with the Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, as administrative agent, and BMO Capital Markets, as lead arranger, which provided for a term loan of up to an aggregate of $20,000,000 and revolving loans up to an aggregate of $7,000,000. Loan proceeds were used to finance $25,000,000 of the cash portion of the Merger consideration. At June 30, 2010, approximately $833,000 may be borrowed for future working capital needs of Reis Services. The interest rate was LIBOR + 1.50% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (LIBOR was 0.35% and 0.23% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively). Reis Services is required to (1) make principal payments on the term loan on a quarterly basis commencing on June 30, 2007 in increasing amounts pursuant to the payment schedule provided in the credit agreement and (2) permanently reduce the revolving loan commitments on a quarterly basis commencing on March 31, 2010. Additional principal payments are payable if Reis Services’s annual cash flow exceeds certain amounts, or if certain defined operating ratios are not met, all of which are defined in the credit agreement. The final maturity date of all amounts borrowed pursuant to the credit agreement is September 30, 2012. In accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, beginning January 1, 2010 and through the maturity of the Bank Loan, the required leverage ratio was reduced to a maximum of 2.00 to 1.00 from a maximum of 2.50 to 1.00. In order to be in compliance with the leverage ratio test, management made a payment of $3,000,000 at March 31, 2010 in addition to the contractual minimum repayment of $1,000,000 due at that time. Although not required to do so, the Company made an additional prepayment of $500,000, in excess of the minimum repayment of approximately $774,000 due at June 30, 2010. The Company currently expects to make additional prepayments by December 31, 2010 and these additional estimated payments have been reflected as a current liability in the consolidated balance s heets. All prepayments ratably reduce Reis Services’s future quarterly contractual minimum payments through maturity. |
Debt (continued) | |||
The loans are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets, tangible and intangible, of Reis Services and a pledge by the Company of its membership interest in Reis Services. The Bank Loan restricts the flow of cash from Reis Services up to the Company. However, commencing in 2009, the Bank Loan allows for a portion of the cash of Reis Services to be distributed to the Company for qualifying operating expenses of the Company if certain ratios are met, as defined in the credit agreement. These ratios have been met; however no distributions from Reis Services up to the Company were made during 2009 or during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Bank Loan requires interest rate protection in an aggregate notional principal amount of not less than 50% of the outstanding balance of the Bank Loan for a minimum of three years. An interest rate cap was purchased in June 2007, which capped LIBOR at 5.50% on $15,000,000 from June 2007 to June 2010. The cap expired with no value at June 30, 2010 and had no value at December 31, 2009. Residential Development Debt During the first quarter of 2009, the Company made principal repayments of $900,000 and then in April 2009, repaid approximately $4,177,000, thereby retiring the outstanding balance of the East Lyme construction debt and eliminating a minimum liquidity requirement. After this repayment, there was no debt on any of the Company’s remaining real estate. | |||
7. | Income Taxes | ||
The components of the income tax expense are as follows: |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Current state and local tax expense | $ | — | $ | 21,000 | $ | — | $ | 30,000 | ||||||||||
Deferred Federal tax expense (benefit) | 12,000 | 284,000 | (36,000 | ) | 440,000 | |||||||||||||
Deferred state and local tax expense (benefit) | 3,000 | 73,000 | (9,000 | ) | 113,000 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 15,000 | $ | 378,000 | $ | (45,000 | ) | $ | 583,000 |
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax liability was approximately $22,000 and $67,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and is reflected as a non-current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The significant portion of the deferred tax items relates to the tax benefit of impairment charges before allowances and the net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards as they relate to deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liability resulting from the intangible assets recorded at the time of the Merger as they related to deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, management has determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $8,651,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was necessary. The allowances relate primarily to alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credits and to the excess of a portion of the tax basis of certain real estate development assets over their respective financial statement basis. Separately, the Company is not aware of any new uncertain tax positions to be considered in its reserve for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. | |||
8. | Stockholders’ Equity | ||
In June 2010, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an aggregate amount of $1,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. Previously, the Board had authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of $3,000,000 of the Company’s shares. The Company completed repurchases under the initial $3,000,000 authorization in April 2010. The program permits purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. |
Stockholders’ Equity (continued) | |||
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company purchased an aggregate of 3,440 and 28,941 shares of common stock, respectively, at an average price of $5.78 and $6.08 per share, respectively. From the inception of the share repurchase program in December 2008 through June 30, 2010, the Company purchased an aggregate of 691,785 shares of common stock at an average price of approximately $4.34 per share, for an aggregate of $3,000,000. Under the repurchase plan, the Company repurchased approximately 6.3% of the common shares outstanding at the time of the Board’s initial authorization in December 2008. | |||
9. | Stock Plans and Other Incentives | ||
The Company has adopted certain incentive plans for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company’s directors, officers and employees by having the ability to issue options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) or stock awards. Awards granted under the Company’s incentive plans expire ten years from the date of grant and vest over periods ranging generally from three to five years for employees. Option Awards The following table presents option activity and other plan data for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009: |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 473,620 | $ | 8.91 | 528,473 | $ | 8.53 | ||||||||||||
Cancelled through cash settlement | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Forfeited/cancelled/expired | — | $ | — | (7,000 | ) | $ | (9.57 | ) | ||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period | 473,620 | $ | 8.91 | 521,473 | $ | 8.51 | ||||||||||||
Options exercisable at end of period | 305,620 | $ | 8.49 | 276,473 | $ | 7.43 | ||||||||||||
Options exercisable which can be settled in cash | 88,620 | $ | 4.73 | 136,473 | $ | 4.68 |
Certain outstanding options allow the option holder to receive from the Company, in cancellation of the holder’s option, a cash payment with respect to each cancelled option equal to the amount by which the fair market value of the share of stock underlying the option exceeds the exercise price of such option. The Company accounts for these options as liability awards. This liability is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect (1) the net cash payments to option holders made during each period, (2) the impact of the exercise and expiration of options and (3) the changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock. Changes in the settlement value of option awards treated under the liability method are reflected as income or expense in the statements of operations. At June 30, 2010, the option liability was approximately $140,000 based upon the difference in the closing stock price of the Company at June 30, 2010 of $6.31 per share and the individual exercise prices of the outstanding 88,620 “in-the-money” options that were accounted for as a liability award at that date. At December 31, 2009, the option liability was approximately $126,000 based upon the difference in the closing stock price of the Company at December 31, 2009 of $6.15 per share and the individual exercise prices of the outstanding 88,620 “in-the-money” options that were accounted for as a liability award at that date. The Company recorded compensation expense of approximately $49,000 and $14,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations as a result of stock price increases during each of those periods. The Company recorded a compensation benefit of approximately $56,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of the stock price declines during the period, all of which was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
Stock Plans and Other Incentives (continued) | |||
RSU Awards The following table presents the changes in RSUs outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009: |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 507,668 | 343,320 | ||||||||
Granted | 200,460 | 204,528 | ||||||||
Common stock delivered (A)(B) | (272,226 | ) | (31,332 | ) | ||||||
Forfeited | (1,800 | ) | (3,600 | ) | ||||||
Outstanding at end of period | 434,102 | 512,916 | ||||||||
Intrinsic value at June 30, 2010 (C) | $ | 2,739,000 | ||||||||
(A) | Includes 17,431 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 12 employees of approximately $105,000 in the first quarter of 2010 and 16,870 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 63 employees of approximately $105,000 in the second quarter of 2010. A net of 167,530 and 237,925 shares of common stock were delivered in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. | ||
(B) | Includes 5,245 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for three employees of approximately $21,000 in 2009. A net of 26,087 shares of common stock were delivered at that time. | ||
(C) | For purposes of this calculation, the Company’s closing stock price of $6.31 per share on June 30, 2010 was used. |
In February 2010, an aggregate of 185,000 RSUs were granted to employees which vest one-third a year over three years and had a grant date fair value of $5.97 per RSU (which was determined based on the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on February 19, 2010). In February 2009, an aggregate of 169,500 RSUs were granted to employees which vest one-third a year over three years and have a grant date fair value of $4.76 per RSU (which was determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on February 4, 2009). The awards granted to employees in 2010 and 2009 are treated as equity awards and the grant date fair value is charged to compensation expense at the corporate level on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, an aggregate of 15,460 RSUs were granted to non-employee directors (with an average grant date fair value of $5.95 per RSU) related to the equity component of their compensation for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, an aggregate of 35,028 RSUs were granted to non-employee directors (with an average grant date fair value of $3.94 per RSU) related to the equity component of their compensation for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. In each case, the grant date fair value was determined as of the last trading day of the quarter for which the RSUs were being received as compensation. The RSUs are immediately vested, but are not deliverable to non-employee directors until six months after termination of their service as a director. Option and RSU Expense Information The Company recorded non-cash compensation expense of approximately $369,000 and $353,000, including approximately $50,000 and $65,000 related to non-employee director equity compensation, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to all stock options and RSUs accounted for as equity awards, as a component of general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded non-cash compensation expense of approximately $771,000 and $710,000, respectively, including approximately $96,000 and $134,000, respectively, related to non-employee director equity compensation. |
10. | Earnings Per Common Share | ||
Basic earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are based upon the increased number of common shares that would be outstanding assuming the exercise of dilutive common share options and the consideration of restricted stock awards. The following table details the computation of earnings per common share, basic and diluted: |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for basic calculation | $ | 106,397 | $ | 531,552 | $ | (70,673 | ) | $ | 808,150 | |||||||||
Adjustments to net income (loss) for the income statement impact of dilutive securities | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for dilution calculation | $ | 106,397 | $ | 531,552 | $ | (70,673 | ) | $ | 808,150 | |||||||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||||
Denominator for net income (loss) per common share, basic — weighted average common shares | 10,495,194 | 10,775,722 | 10,458,178 | 10,869,027 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||||
RSUs | 285,263 | 233,432 | — | 194,274 | ||||||||||||||
Stock options | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Denominator for net income (loss) per common share, diluted — weighted average common shares | 10,780,457 | 11,009,154 | 10,458,178 | 11,063,301 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.07 |
Potentially dilutive securities include all stock based awards. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, certain equity awards, in addition to the option awards accounted for under the liability method, were antidilutive. | |||
11. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments | ||
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s financial instruments included receivables, payables, accrued expenses, other liabilities and debt. The fair values of these financial instruments, excluding the Bank Loan, were not materially different from their recorded values at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Other than capital leases, all of the Company’s debt at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was floating rate based. Regarding the Bank Loan, the fair value of this debt is estimated to be approximately $13,453,000 and $18,316,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which is lower than the recorded amounts of $13,976,000 and $19,250,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated fair value reflects the effect of higher interest rate spreads and interest rate floors on debt being issued under curre nt market conditions, as compared to the conditions that existed when the Bank Loan was obtained. The Company’s interest rate cap expired at June 30, 2010 and had no value at December 31, 2009. See Note 6 for more information about the Company’s debt. |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Organization and Business Reis, Inc., which we refer to as either the Company or Reis, is a Maryland corporation. The Company’s primary business is providing commercial real estate market information and analytical tools for its customers, through its Reis Services subsidiary. For disclosure and financial reporting purposes, this business is referred to as the Reis Services segment. Reis Services’s Historic Business Reis Services, including its predecessors, was founded in 1980. Reis maintains a proprietary database containing detailed information on commercial properties in metropolitan markets and neighborhoods throughout the U.S. The database contains information on apartment, office, retail and industrial properties and is used by real estate investors, lenders and other professionals to make informed buying, selling and financing decisions. In addition, Reis data is used by debt and equity investors to assess, quantify and manage the risks of default and loss associated with individual mortgages, properties, portfolios and real estate backed securities. Reis currently provides its information services to many of the nation’s leading lending institutions, equity investors, brokers and appraisers. Reis’s flagship product is Reis SE, which provides online access via a web browser to commercial real estate information and analytical tools designed to facilitate debt and equity transactions as well as ongoing evaluations. In addition to trend and forecast analysis at metropolitan and neighborhood levels, the product offers detailed building-specific information such as rents, vacancy rates, lease terms, property sales, new construction listings and property valuation estimates. Reis SE is designed to meet the demand for timely and accurate information to support the decision-making of property owners, developers and builders, banks and non-bank lenders, a nd equity investors, all of whom require access to information on both the performance and pricing of assets, including detailed data on market transactions, supply, absorption, rents and sale prices. This information is critical to all aspects of valuing assets and financing their acquisition, development and construction. Reis’s revenue model is based primarily on annual subscriptions that are paid in accordance with contractual billing terms. Reis recognizes revenue from its contracts on a ratable basis; for example, one-twelfth of the value of a one-year contract is recognized monthly. Operations As commercial real estate markets have grown in size and complexity, Reis, over the last 30 years, has invested in the areas critical to supporting the information needs of real estate professionals in both the asset market and the space leasing market. In particular, Reis has: |
● | developed expertise in data collection across multiple markets and property types; | ||
● | invested in the analytical expertise to develop decision support systems around property valuation, credit analytics, transaction support and risk management; | ||
● | created product development expertise to collect market feedback and translate it into new products and reports; and | ||
● | invested in a robust technology infrastructure to disseminate these tools to the wide variety of market participants. |
These investments have established Reis as a leading provider of commercial real estate information and analytical tools to the investment community. Reis continues to develop and introduce new products, expand and add new markets and data, and find new ways to deliver existing information to meet and anticipate client demand, as more fully described below under “Products and Services.” The depth and breadth of Reis’s data and expertise are critical in allowing Reis to grow its business. |
Proprietary Databases Reis has expertise in collecting, screening and organizing large volumes of data into its proprietary databases. Each quarter, a rotating and statistically robust sample of building owners, leasing agents, and managers are surveyed to obtain key building performance statistics including, among others, occupancy rates, rents, rent discounts, free rent allowances, tenant improvement allowances, lease terms and operating expenses. All survey responses are subjected to an established quality assurance and validation process. At the property level, surveyors compare the data reported by building contacts with data previously collected on that property and similar properties, and question any unusual changes in rents and vacancies. Whenever deemed appropriate, follow-up calls are placed to building contacts for verification or clarification of the results. All aggregate market data at the neighborhood (submarket) and city (market) levels are also subjected to comprehensive quality controls. The following table lists the number of metropolitan markets covered by Reis for each of four types of commercial real estate at June 30, 2010: |
Number of metropolitan markets: | ||||||
Apartment | 169 | |||||
Retail | 140 | |||||
Office | 132 | |||||
Industrial | 44 |
At June 30, 2010, these metropolitan markets are further sub-divided into over 1,800 competitive submarkets based on property type. In addition to the core property database, Reis develops and maintains a new construction database that identifies and monitors projects that are being added to our covered markets. Detailed tracking of the supply side of the commercial real estate market is critical to projecting performance changes at the market and submarket levels. This database is updated weekly and reports relevant criteria such as project size, property type and location for projects that are planned, proposed, under construction, or nearing completion. Reis also maintains a sales comparables database containing transactions over $2,000,000 in 172 of our covered markets. The database captures key information on each transaction such as buyer, seller, purchase price, capitalization rate and financing details, where available. Products and Services Reis SE, available through the www.reis.com web site, serves as a delivery platform for the thousands of reports containing Reis’s primary research data and forecasts, as well as a number of analytical tools. Access to Reis SE is by secure password only and can be customized to accommodate the needs of subscribers. For example, the product can be tailored to provide access to all or only selected markets, property types and report combinations. The Reis SE interface has been refined over the past several years to accommoda te real estate professionals who need to perform market-based trend analysis, property specific research, comparable property analysis, and generate valuation and credit analysis estimates at the single property and portfolio levels. These analytical tools may increase in significance over the next few years as investors study opportunities in the secondary market for commercial mortgages and commercial mortgage backed securities. On a quarterly basis, Reis updates thousands of neighborhood and city level reports that cover historical trends, current conditions and, in a majority of its markets, five year forecasts on all key real estate market indicators. These updates are supported by property, neighborhood and city data collected during the prior quarter. Reports are retrievable by street address, property type (apartment, office, retail and industrial) or market/submarket and are available as full color, presentation quality documents or in spreadsheet formats. These reports are used by Reis’s customers to assist in due diligence and to support commercial real estate transactions, including loan originations, underwriting, acquisitions, risk assessment (including loan loss reserves and impairment analyses), portfolio monitoring and management, asset management, appraisal and market analysis. Other significant elements of Reis SE include: |
● | property comparables that allow users to identify buildings or new construction projects with similar characteristics (such as square footage, rents or sales price); |
● | quarterly “First Glance” reports that provide an early assessment of the apartment, office and retail sectors across the U.S. and preliminary commentary on new construction activity; | ||
● | Quarterly Briefings — two conference calls each quarter attended by hundreds of subscribers, during which Reis provides an overview of its latest high-level findings and forecasts for the commercial real estate space and capital markets; | ||
● | real estate news stories chosen by Reis analysts to provide information relevant to a particular market and property type; and | ||
● | customizable email alerts that let users receive proactive updates on only those reports and markets that they designate. |
Reis continuously enhances Reis SE by developing new products and applications. Recent examples include: |
● | the August 2009 enhancement of Reis’s Single Property Valuation module and its Asset and Portfolio AnalysisSM service, designed to help clients quantify the value and risk associated with their commercial real estate holdings. | ||
● | the February 2010 expansion of Reis’s custom research and advisory services, which enhances Reis’s ability to provide economic, market and investment advisory services, perform portfolio reviews, deliver custom data feeds, and conduct client-specific surveys of markets and property types that may not fall within the company’s standard coverage areas. |
Reis also expanded its coverage of retail markets during 2009. In May 2009, Reis initiated coverage of neighborhood and community shopping centers in 27 additional markets and in August 2009, Reis expanded retail coverage by 35 additional markets. Separately, Reis expanded its coverage of commercial real estate sale transactions by adding 90 additional markets in August 2009. Reis continues to develop new products and applications. Current initiatives include: (1) a platform tailored to the needs of smaller enterprises and individuals, professional investors, brokers and appraisers, which we refer to as Reis Reports, accessible at www.reisreports.com; (2) further geographic expansion of our market coverage and/or property types; (3) possible data redistribution relationships with other business vendors; and (4) the projected commencement of monthly publication of data in September 2010 as a premium offering for our subscriber s. Cost of Service Reis’s data is available to customers in five primary ways: (1) annual and multi-year subscriptions to Reis SE; (2) capped subscriptions allowing customers to download a limited number of reports; (3) online single report credit card purchases; (4) custom data requests; and (5) monthly subscriptions to Reis Reports, charged to a credit card. Annual subscription fees for Reis SE range from $1,000 to over $600,000, depending on the combination of markets, property types and reports subscribed to, for which the customer is typically allowed to download an unlimited number of reports over a 12-month period. Capped subscriptions generally range from $1,000 to $25,000 and allow clients to download a fixed retail value of reports over a 12-month period. Individual report sales typically range from $150 to $695 per report and are available to anyone who visits Reis’s retail web site or contacts Reis via telephone, fax or email. However, certain reports are only available by a subscription or capped subscription account. Custom data deliverables range in price from $1,000 for a specific data element to hundreds of thousands of dollars for custom portfolio valuation and credit analysis. Renewals are negotiated in advance of the expiration of an existing contract. Important factors in determining contract renewal rates include a subscriber’s historical and projected report consumption. The monthly fee for Reis Reports is $75 or $125 depending on the package chosen by the subscriber. Other Reis Services Information For additional information on the Reis Services business, refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010. Wellsford’s Historic Business The Company was originally formed on January 8, 1997. Reis acquired the Reis Services business by merger in May 2007, which we refer to as the Merger. Prior to May 2007, Reis operated as Wellsford Real Properties, Inc., which we refer to as Wellsford. Wellsford’s primary operating activities immediately prior to the Merger were the development, construction and sale of its three residential projects and its approximate 23% ownership interest in the Reis Services business. The Company completed the sale of the remaining units at its Colorado project in September 2009 and sold its Claverack, New York project in February 2010. The Company |
ceased building new homes in 2008 and is seeking to exit the residential development business by selling its East Lyme, Connecticut project in one or more bulk transactions, in order to focus solely on the Reis Services business. At June 30, 2010, the Company’s residential development activities were comprised solely of The Orchards, a single family home development in East Lyme, Connecticut, upon which the Company could build 161 single family homes on 224 acres, which we refer to as East Lyme. Sales commenced in June 2006 and an aggregate of 40 homes and lots (29 homes and 11 lots) were sold as of June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, the remaining East Lyme inventory included two improved lots and 119 fully approved lots. The Company is working with a broker to sell the two improved lots individually and to sell the 119 fully approved lots in one or more bulk sale transacti ons. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell the remaining two improved lots individually or the 119 fully approved lots in one or more bulk transactions at acceptable prices, or within a specific time period, or at all. Additional Segment Financial Information See Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements included in this filing for additional information regarding all of the Company’s segments. Selected Significant Accounting Policies For a description of our selected significant accounting policies and estimates, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Business Management considers certain metrics in evaluating the performance of the Reis Services business. These metrics are revenue, EBITDA (which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and EBITDA margin. Following is a presentation of these historical metrics for the Reis Services business (for a reconciliation of GAAP net income (loss) to EBITDA for the Reis Services segment and to Adjusted EBITDA on a consolidated basis for each of the periods presented here, see below). |
(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages) | For the Three Months Ended June 30, | Increase (Decrease) | Percentage Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
Reis Services | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 6,004 | $ | 5,909 | $ | 95 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 2,330 | $ | 2,740 | $ | (410 | ) | (15.0 | %) | |||||||||
EBITDA margin | 38.8 | % | 46.4 | % |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | Percentage (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||
Reis Services | 2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 12,018 | $ | 12,264 | $ | (246 | ) | (2.0 | %) | |||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 4,656 | $ | 5,756 | $ | (1,100 | ) | (19.1 | %) | |||||||||
EBITDA margin | 38.7 | % | 46.9 | % |
For the Three Months Ended | Percentage (Decrease) Increase | |||||||||||||||||
Reis Services | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | (Decrease) Increase | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 6,004 | $ | 6,014 | $ | (10 | ) | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 2,330 | $ | 2,326 | $ | 4 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
EBITDA margin | 38.8 | % | 38.7 | % |
Reis Services revenue increased by approximately $95,000, from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010. This quarterly revenue increase over the prior year corresponding quarter is the first such increase since the fourth quarter of 2008 over the fourth quarter of 2007. In general, the increase in revenue over the 2009 second quarter is the effect of (1) positive improvements in the overall renewal rates as the trailing twelve month renewal rate improved to 88% at June 30, 2010 as compared to 84% for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2009, (2) reduced budgeting restraints by current and prospective customers, both of which are discussed below, as well as (3) the cumulative impact of the strength of contract signings in the fourth quarter of 2009 and in the first half of 2010. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the 2009 cor responding six month period decreased |
$246,000. In general, this revenue decrease is the result of (1) the cumulative impact of Reis Services’s annual renewal rate declines during late 2008 and through June 30, 2009 and (2) the net effect of price increases and decreases on renewal contracts executed in the first half of 2009. Reis’s revenue model is based primarily on annual subscriptions that are paid in accordance with contractual billing terms. Reis recognizes revenue from its contracts on a ratable basis; for example, one-twelfth of the value of a one-year contract is recognized monthly. Therefore, increases in the dollar volume of new contracts will not translate immediately into equivalent increases in revenue. Similarly it took four q uarters to realize the full impact of contract declines on revenue in late 2008 and into 2009. EBITDA decreased $410,000 and $1,100,000 from the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010 as a result of (1) as it relates to the six month period, the revenue decreases described above, (2) cost increases, primarily in sales and marketing expenses for increases in commissions in 2010 over 2009, (3) salary and benefit increases in 2010 from hiring for product development and enhancement initiatives, (4) wage increases for existing employees, (5) a modest increase in the bad debt reserve in the second quarter of 2010 and (6) the continuing increase in the cost of employee benefits, primarily for medical insurance. Revenue declines in late 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009 stabilized in the fourth quarter of 2009 and returned to revenue growth in the first quarter of 2010. Revenue and EBITDA for the second quarter of 2010 were consistent with the amounts reported in the first quarter of 2010. The second quarter 2010 revenue was negatively impacted by a reduction of $78,000 from custom work as compared to the first quarter of 2010. Although the decline in revenue from custom work was minor, it impacted our financial results in the following ways: (1) it negated the continuing modest revenue growth in our core subscription services in the second quarter of 2010, causing the second quarter of 2010 revenues to be essentially flat as c ompared to the first quarter of 2010 and (2) flattened EBITDA growth as compared to the first quarter 2010. There is a delay between positive changes in renewal rates and contract signings and the recognition of revenue from those contracts in the statements of operations. Our renewal rates were 88% and 84% overall and were 90% and 86% for institutional customers for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The quarterly renewal rate was 80% overall and 83% for institutional customers in the second quarter of 2009, and then consistently improved to 88% overall and 89% for institutional customers in the third quarter of 2009, 89% overall and 90% for institutional customers in the fourth quarter of 2009, 92% overall and 93% for institutional customers in the first quarter of 2010 and receded to 85% overall and 88% for institutional customers in the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter renewal rate was negatively impacted, in part, due to the timing of certain renewals. The net effect of price increases and decreases on renewals negatively impacted revenue in 2009, with more limited residual effects being felt in the first and second quarters of 2010. Commencing in September 2008, contract price increases on renewals were constrained due to usage reductions at certain customers as well as budgetary pressures, predominantly among customers in the banking industry, which trend continued into the first half of 2009. Our pricing model is based on actual and projected usage; we believe it is generally not as susceptible to downturns and personnel reductions at our customers as a model based upon individual user licenses. We generally impose contractual restrictions limiting our immediate exposure ( during existing contract terms) to revenue reductions due to mergers and consolidations. However, we have been and we may in the future be impacted by consolidation among our customers and potential customers, or in the event that customers enter bankruptcy or otherwise go out of business. As budget restraints and economic pressure decrease, there has been an overall positive impact on revenue stabilization and growth. These impacts can be seen in the reported results for the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first and second quarters of 2010. Reconciliations of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, impairment losses on real estate assets and stock based compensation. Although EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, senior management uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to measure operational and management performance. Management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate metrics that may be used by investors as supplemental financial measures to be considered in addition to the reported GAAP basis financial information to assist investors in evaluating and understanding the Company’s business from year to year o r period to period, as applicable. Further, these measures provide the reader with the ability to understand our operational performance while isolating non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization expenses, as well as other non-operating items, such as interest income, interest expense and income taxes and, in the case of Adjusted EBITDA, isolates non-cash charges for stock based compensation. Management also believes that disclosing EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA will provide better comparability to other companies in Reis Services’s type of business. However, investors should not consider these measures in isolation or as substitutes for net income (loss), operating income (loss), or any other measure for determining operating performance that is calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, they may |
not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. Reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, net income (loss), follow for each identified period: |
(amounts in thousands) Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities and Other* | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 106 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 15 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 1,051 | $ | (930 | ) | 121 | ||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,207 | 20 | 1,227 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net | 72 | (6 | ) | 66 | ||||||||||
EBITDA | 2,330 | (916 | ) | 1,414 | ||||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense, net | — | 418 | 418 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 2,330 | $ | (498 | ) | $ | 1,832 |
Reconciliation of Net (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities and Other* | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (71 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 2,062 | $ | (2,178 | ) | (116 | ) | |||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 2,435 | 26 | 2,461 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net | 159 | (10 | ) | 149 | ||||||||||
EBITDA | 4,656 | (2,162 | ) | 2,494 | ||||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense, net | — | 785 | 785 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 4,656 | $ | (1,377 | ) | $ | 3,279 |
Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities and Other* | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 531 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 378 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 1,449 | $ | (540 | ) | 909 | ||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,192 | 29 | 1,221 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net | 99 | (35 | ) | 64 | ||||||||||
EBITDA | 2,740 | (546 | ) | 2,194 | ||||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense, net | — | 353 | 353 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 2,740 | $ | (193 | ) | $ | 2,547 |
Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities and Other* | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 808 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 583 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 3,114 | $ | (1,723 | ) | 1,391 | ||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 2,449 | 52 | 2,501 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net | 193 | (10 | ) | 183 | ||||||||||
EBITDA | 5,756 | (1,681 | ) | 4,075 | ||||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense, net | — | 654 | 654 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 5,756 | $ | (1,027 | ) | $ | 4,729 |
(amounts in thousands) Reconciliation of Net (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | Reis Services | Residential Development Activities and Other* | Consolidated | |||||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (177 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 1,011 | $ | (1,248 | ) | (237 | ) | |||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 1,228 | 6 | 1,234 | |||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net | 87 | (4 | ) | 83 | ||||||||||
EBITDA | 2,326 | (1,246 | ) | 1,080 | ||||||||||
Add back: | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense, net | — | 367 | 367 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 2,326 | $ | (879 | ) | $ | 1,447 | |||||||
* | Includes East Lyme and the Company’s other developments and corporate level income and expenses, to the extent that such income and expenses existed for such projects during the periods presented. |
Results of Operations Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 Subscription revenues and related cost of sales were approximately $6,004,000 and $1,536,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, resulting in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $4,468,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales for the database intangible asset was approximately $573,000 during this period. Subscription revenues and related cost of sales were approximately $5,909,000 and $1,362,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2009, resulting in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $4,547,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales was approximately $536,000 during this period. See “— Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Bus iness” for a discussion of the variances and trends in revenue and EBITDA of the Reis Services segment. Revenue and cost of sales of residential units were approximately $468,000 each for the three months ended June 30, 2010, all of which is with respect to the sale of one home at East Lyme in May 2010. Revenue and cost of sales of residential units were approximately $4,261,000 and $2,990,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 with respect to the sale of 10 condominium units at the Gold Peak development and three homes at East Lyme in the 2009 period. Sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $1,441,000 and $465,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and solely represent the costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses (for the customer relationships intangible asset) and product development expenses (for the web site intangible asset) were approximately $250,000 and $225,000, respectively, during this period. Sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $1,247,000 and $414,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $252,000 and $218,000 , respectively, during this period. The expense increase for sales and marketing expenses between the two periods generally reflects increased sale commissions in the second quarter of 2010 over 2009 consistent with the increase in sales activity in the 2010 period. Additionally, increases in 2010 expenses over 2009 expenses reflect wage increases for existing employees, as 2009 wages were frozen and bonus levels were reduced and 2010 reflects a return to base salary increases and higher employee bonus levels. Product development cost increases were also the result of new product initiatives. Property operating expenses were $129,000 and $265,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and represent the non-capitalizable project costs and other period expenses related to the Company’s residential development projects. The reduction results from the Gold Peak sell out in 2009, the Claverack sale in February 2010 and the cost reduction efforts to operate and maintain the unsold real estate with a minimal cost structure and allocated internal resources. General and administrative expenses of $2,246,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 include current period expenses of $1,649,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $179,000 for lease value and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $418,000 of net non-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense is comprised of compensation expense resulting from equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $369,000 and an approximate $49,000 increase in the reserve for option liability due to an increase in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $5.76 per share at March 31, 2010 to $6.31 per share at June 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses of $2,919,000 for the three |
months ended June 30, 2009 include current period expenses of $2,351,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $215,000 for lease value and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $353,000 of net non-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense is solely comprised of compensation expense resulting from equity awards for employees and directors. Excluding the non-cash items, the reduction in general and administrative expenses is a result of (1) concerted efforts to reduce public company and other administrative costs, (2) a reduction in staffing for management and accounting personnel who supported the Residential Development Activities segment, but for which the costs were not allocable to that segment, (3) the completion of certain employment related contractual obligations in May 2010, (4) the settlement of contingent obligations for amounts less than accrued in prior periods and (5) other cost saving measures. Interest expense of $102,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 includes interest and cost amortization on the Reis Services debt, which we refer to as the Bank Loan, of $100,000 and interest from other debt of $2,000. Interest expense of $151,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 includes interest and cost amortization on the Bank Loan of $136,000, non-capitalized interest relating to residential development activities of $9,000 and interest from other debt of $6,000. The reduction in interest expense reflects the reduction in the outstanding debt balance in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. The income tax expense during the three months ended June 30, 2010 of $15,000 reflects a deferred Federal provision of $12,000 and a deferred state tax provision of $3,000. The income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 of $378,000 results from a deferred Federal provision of $284,000, a deferred state tax provision of $73,000 and current state and local taxes of $21,000. Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 Subscription revenues and related cost of sales were approximately $12,018,000 and $2,999,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, resulting in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $9,019,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales for the database intangible asset was approximately $1,155,000 during this period. Subscription revenues and related cost of sales were approximately $12,264,000 and $2,768,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, resulting in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $9,496,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales was approximately $1,055,000 during thi s period. See “— Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Business” for a discussion of the variances and trends in revenue and EBITDA of the Reis Services segment. Revenue and cost of sales of residential units were approximately $3,218,000 and $2,955,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, of which revenue of $2,750,000 is from the sale of the Claverack project in February 2010 and the remainder is the sale of one home at East Lyme in May 2010. Revenue and cost of sales of residential units were approximately $5,809,000 and $4,001,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 with respect to the sale of 16 condominium units at the Gold Peak development and three homes at East Lyme in the 2009 period. Sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $2,991,000 and $934,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and solely represent the costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses (for the customer relationships intangible asset) and product development expenses (for the web site intangible asset) were approximately $501,000 and $460,000, respectively, during this period. Sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $2,523,000 and $931,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses and product development expenses were approximately $505,000 and $516,000, respectively, during this period. The expense increase for sales and marketing expenses between the two periods generally reflects increased commissions in the first six months of 2010 over 2009 consistent with the increase in sales activity in the 2010 period. Additionally, increases in 2010 expenses over 2009 expenses reflect wage increases for existing employees, as 2009 wages were frozen and bonus levels were reduced and 2010 reflects a return to base salary increases and higher employee bonus levels. Product development cost increases were also the result of new product initiatives. Property operating expenses were $196,000 and $485,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and represent the non-capitalizable project costs and other period expenses related to the Company’s residential development projects. The reduction results from the Gold Peak sell out in 2009, the Claverack sale in February 2010 and the cost reduction efforts to operate and maintain the unsold real estate with a minimal cost structure and allocated internal resources. General and administrative expenses of $5,128,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 include current period expenses of $3,997,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $346,000 for lease value and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $785,000 of net non-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense is comprised of compensation expense resulting from equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $771,000 and by an approximate |
$14,000 increase in the reserve for option liability due to an increase in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $6.15 per share at December 31, 2009 to $6.31 per share at June 30, 2010. General and administrative expenses of $5,791,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 include current period expenses of $4,712,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $425,000 for lease value and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $654,000 of net non-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense is comprised of (1) compensation expense resulting from equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $710,000, o ffset by (2) an approximate $56,000 decrease in the reserve for option liability due to a decrease in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $5.00 per share at December 31, 2008 to $3.91 per share at June 30, 2009. Excluding the non-cash items, the reduction in general and administrative expenses is a result of (1) concerted efforts to reduce public company and other administrative costs, (2) a reduction in staffing for management and accounting personnel who supported the Residential Development Activities segment, but for which the costs were not allocable to that segment, (3) the completion of certain employment related contractual obligations in May 2010, (4) the settlement of contingent obligations for amounts less than accrued in prior periods and (5) other cost saving measures. Interest expense of $222,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 includes interest and cost amortization on the Reis Services debt, of $215,000 and interest from other debt of $7,000. Interest expense of $331,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes interest and cost amortization on the Bank Loan of $277,000, non-capitalized interest relating to residential development activities of $40,000 and interest from other debt of $14,000. The reduction in interest expense reflects the reduction in the outstanding debt balance in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. The income tax benefit during the six months ended June 30, 2010 of $45,000 reflects a deferred Federal benefit of $36,000 and a deferred state tax benefit of $9,000 as a result of the pre-tax loss in the first six months of 2010. The income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $583,000 results from a deferred Federal provision of $440,000, a deferred state tax provision of $113,000 and current state and local taxes of $30,000. Income Taxes Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax liability was approximately $22,000 and $67,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and is reflected as a non-current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The significant portion of the deferred tax items relates to the tax benefit of impairment charges before allowances and the net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards as they relate to deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liability resulting f rom the intangible assets recorded at the time of the Merger as they related to deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, management has determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $8,651,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was necessary. The allowances relate primarily to alternative minimum tax, or AMT, credits and to the excess of a portion of the tax basis of certain real estate development assets over their respective financial statement basis. Separately, the Company is not aware of any new uncertain tax positions to be considered in its reserve for t he three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Liquidity and Capital Resources At June 30, 2010, the Company’s short-term liquidity requirements include: current operating and capitalizable costs; near-term product development and enhancement of the web site and databases; the current portion of long-term debt (including scheduled principal payments of approximately $4,797,000 on the Bank Loan, payable by June 30, 2011 and other expected additional principal payments of approximately $1,000,000 to be made in 2010); operating and capital leases; warranty costs related to construction; development costs; other capital expenditures; potential settlement of certain outstanding stock options in cash (the liability for which was approximately $140,000 at June 30 , 2010 based upon the closing stock price of the Company at June 30, 2010 of $6.31 per share); and repurchases of additional shares of Reis common stock (at June 30, 2010, $1,000,000 remained available to be purchased under our current authorization). The Company expects to meet these short-term liquidity requirements generally through the use of available cash, cash generated from subscription revenue of Reis Services, sales of the Company’s remaining East Lyme real estate assets either individually or in bulk transactions, releases from property-related escrow reserves and accounts, repayment of the Claverack mortgage receivable and interest revenue. The Company’s long-term liquidity requirements include: future operating and capitalizable costs; long-term product development and enhancements of the web site and databases; the non-current portion of long-term debt; operating and capital leases and other capital |
expenditures; and repurchases of additional shares of Reis common stock (at June 30, 2010, $1,000,000 remained available to be purchased under our current authorization). The Company expects to meet these long-term liquidity requirements generally through the use of available cash, cash generated from subscription revenue of Reis Services, sales of the Company’s remaining East Lyme real estate assets either individually or in bulk transactions (to the extent that any remain unsold after 2010), releases from property-related escrow reserves and accounts and interest revenue. Cash and cash equivalents aggregated approximately $20,981,000 at June 30, 2010, including approximately $14,499,000 in the Reis Services segment. Management considers such amounts to be adequate and expects its cash balances to continue to be adequate to meet operating, product development and enhancement initiatives and debt service requirements in both the short and long terms at both the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis. Reis Services Bank Loan In connection with the Merger agreement, Private Reis entered into a credit agreement, dated October 11, 2006, with the Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, as administrative agent, and BMO Capital Markets, as lead arranger, which provided for a term loan of up to an aggregate of $20,000,000 and revolving loans up to an aggregate of $7,000,000. Loan proceeds were used to finance $25,000,000 of the cash portion of the Merger consideration. At June 30, 2010, approximately $833,000 may be borrowed for future working capital needs of Reis Services. The interest rate was LIBOR + 1.50% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (LIBOR was 0.35% and 0.23% at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively). The balance of the Bank Loan was $13,976,000 and $19,250,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Reis Services is required to (1) make principal payments on the term loan on a quarterly basis commencing on June 30, 2007 in increasing amounts pursuant to the payment schedule provided in the credit agreement and (2) permanently reduce the revolving loan commitments on a quarterly basis commencing on March 31, 2010. Additional principal payments are payable if Reis Services’s annual cash flow exceeds certain amounts, or if certain defined operating ratios are not met, all of which are defined in the credit agreement. The final maturity date of all amounts borrowed pursuant to the credit agreement is September 30, 2012. In accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, beginning January 1, 2010 and through the maturity of the Bank Loan, the required leverage ratio was reduced to a maximum of 2.00 to 1.00 from a maximum of 2.50 to 1.00. In order to be in compliance with the leverage ratio test, management made a payment of $3,000,000 at March 31, 2010 in addition to the contractual minimum repayment of $1,000,000 due at that time. Although not required to do so, the Company made an additional prepayment of $500,000, in excess of the minimum repayment of approximately $774,000 due at June 30, 2010. The Company currently expects to make additional prepayments by Dece mber 31, 2010 and these additional estimated payments have been reflected as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheets. All prepayments ratably reduce Reis Services’s future quarterly contractual minimum payments through maturity. The loans are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets, tangible and intangible, of Reis Services and a pledge by the Company of its membership interest in Reis Services. The Bank Loan restricts the flow of cash from Reis Services up to the Company. However, commencing in 2009, the Bank Loan allows for a portion of the cash of Reis Services to be distributed to the Company for qualifying operating expenses of the Company if certain ratios are met, as defined in the credit agreement. These ratios have been met; however no distributions from Reis Services up to the Company were made during 2009 or during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Other Items Impacting Liquidity East Lyme At June 30, 2010, the remaining East Lyme inventory included two improved lots and 119 fully approved lots. The Company sold one home during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 for gross sales proceeds of approximately $468,000, and sold three homes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 for gross sales proceeds of approximately $1,742,000. The Company is working with a broker to sell the two improved lots individually and to sell the 119 fully approved lots in one or more bulk sale transactions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell the remaining two improved lots individually or the 119 fully approved l ots in one or more bulk transactions at acceptable prices, or within a specific time period, or at all. Certain of the lots at East Lyme require remediation of pesticides which were used on the property when it was an apple orchard. Remediation is required prior to the development of those lots. The remediation plan, the cost of which is estimated by management |
to be approximately $1,000,000, has been approved by the health inspector for the municipality and the town planner. The estimated remediation cost is recognized as a liability in the June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consolidated balance sheets. This estimate could change in the future if a change to the remediation plan is made, as contractors are hired and if the bulk sale of lots, as described above, were to occur. An expected time frame for the remediation has not been established as of the date of this report. Completed Projects Claverack Prior to its sale in February 2010, the Company owned approximately 235 acres in Claverack, New York, known as The Stewardship, which was subdivided into 48 developable single family home lots. The Claverack project was sold in a bulk transaction for a gross sales price of $2,750,000, which included two model homes, amenities, 46 additional lots and $450,000 of cash collateralizing certain road completion obligations. Net cash received at closing, after expenses, aggregated approximately $2,187,000. The remaining $450,000 of the purchase price will be payable by the purchaser in February 2011 (or earlier if the road bond is released) and is secured by the outstanding road bond and a mortgage on the property. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a gross profit of approximately $263,000 in the first quarter of 2010. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities In June 2010, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an aggregate amount of $1,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. Previously, the Board had authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of $3,000,000 of the Company’s shares. The Company completed repurchases under the initial $3,000,000 authorization in April 2010. The program permits purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, purchases could have been commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time, without prior notice and the program may be expanded with prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under S ecurities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods consistent with the Company’s “Policies for Transactions in Reis Stock and Insider Trading and Tipping.” During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company purchased an aggregate of 3,440 and 28,941 shares of common stock, respectively, at an average price of $5.78 and $6.08 per share, respectively. From the inception of the share repurchase program in December 2008 through June 30, 2010, the Company purchased an aggregate of 691,785 shares of common stock at an average price of approximately $4.34 per share, for an aggregate of $3,000,000. Under the repurchase plan, the Company repurchased approximately 6.3% of the common shares outstanding at the time of the Board’s initial authorization in December 2008. The Effects of Inflation/Declining Prices and Trends Reis Services The Company monitors commercial real estate industry and market trends to determine their potential impact on its products and product development initiatives. The volatility and uncertainty in the U.S. and global economy in 2008 and 2009, including the credit markets and real estate markets, negatively affected renewal rates, with the greatest impact on the Company being felt between the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing through June 30, 2009. Because of budget constraints at certain customers and potential customers, the effective shutdown of the CMBS markets and the flurry of mergers and bankruptcies of financial institutions in the fall of 2008 (some of which were customers of the Company), the Company was negatively impacted as e xhibited by our revenue reduction from the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. However, on a quarterly basis, we experienced a positive trend of revenue growth in the second quarter 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009. Our overall annual renewal rate is 88% for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2010; an improvement from 84% for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2009. This positive trend in renewal rates will continue to be reflected in future quarterly revenues. We experienced a slight decline in the quarterly renewal rates from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2010. There can be no assurance that the increase in renewal rates experienced from the middle of 2009 and into the first quarter of 2010 will continue and that subscription revenue will continue to grow in future quarters as compared to corresponding quarters of 2009 or on a consecutive basis. The Company has historically mitigated market pressures by continuing to add new customers, selling new products (such as our tertiary apartment, office and retail markets, rolled out in 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively) and identifying additional and/or alternative users within the organizations and institutions that are current customers. Historically, during periods of economic and |
commercial real estate market volatility, we generally experienced stable or only moderately lower demand for our market information and an increase in demand for our portfolio products, despite (or in many cases, because of) decreased transaction volumes, as investors placed greater emphasis on assessing portfolio risk. We cannot assure you that the level of demand for Reis Services’s products will be sustained or increase during 2010 or in the future. Lot and Land Sales in the Residential Development Activities Segment Although the Company sold its Claverack project in bulk in February 2010, the Company’s operations relating to the sale of individual and bulk lots have been negatively impacted by poor national, regional and local market conditions where the Company owns property. Illiquidity in the residential mortgage and construction/development loan markets has negatively impacted our marketing efforts and the ability of buyers (developers, local builders or land investors) to afford and/or finance the purchase of lots, either individually or in bulk, as well as their inability to finance required infrastructure work, causing us to reduce our asking price. The number and timing of future sales by the Company could be adversely impacted by the lack of availability of credi t to potential buyers and, in the case of developers and local builders, the inability to sell inventory they build to individual buyers who may be unable to obtain financing. Two improved lots and 119 fully approved lots remain in inventory at the East Lyme project at June 30, 2010. We intend to sell the remaining 119 East Lyme lots in one or more bulk transactions. Changes in Cash Flows Comparison of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 Cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows: |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 5,205,868 | $ | 7,990,519 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities | (1,171,099 | ) | (903,601 | ) | ||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (5,789,092 | ) | (7,718,661 | ) | ||||||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (1,754,323 | ) | $ | (631,743 | ) |
Cash flows provided by operating activities decreased $2,785,000 from $7,991,000 provided in the 2009 period to $5,206,000 provided in the 2010 period. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities is a function of increased uses of cash in the 2010 period related to accrued expenses due to the timing of payments and settlement of employment and other contractual obligations previously accrued for of $1,563,000, and a decrease in real estate sales between the two periods. These decreases were offset by an increase in the cash flows from operating activities of the Reis Services segment of $706,000 from $4,748,000 provided in the 2009 period to $5,454,000 provided in the 20 10 period primarily due to increased collections in the 2010 period (on a higher accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2009 than the December 31, 2008 amount). Cash flows used in investing activities increased $267,000 from $904,000 used in the 2009 period to $1,171,000 used in the 2010 period. This change primarily resulted from an increase in cash used in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period for web site and database development costs of $260,000 and furniture, fixture and equipment additions of $17,000, offset by $10,000 of furniture, fixtures and equipment dispositions in 2010. Cash flows used in financing activities decreased $1,930,000 from $7,719,000 used in the 2009 period to $5,789,000 used in the 2010 period. During the 2010 period, $5,274,000 was repaid on the Bank Loan whereas $1,750,000 was repaid in the 2009 period. During the 2009 period, $5,077,000 was repaid on the East Lyme construction loan. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company repurchased 255,057 shares of its outstanding common stock for approximately $777,000 as compared to the 2010 period where the Company repurchased 28,941 shares of its outstanding common stock for approximately $176,000. Other debt repayments in the 2010 period exceeded the payments in the 2009 period by $37,000. Payments for option cancellations and restricted stock unit settlements were approximately $210,000 and $21,000 in the 2010 and 2009 periods, respectively. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to the Company’s or management’s outlook or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses, asset quality, or other future financial or business performance, strategies, prospects or |
expectations, or the impact of legal, regulatory or supervisory matters on our business, operations or performance. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include: |
● | statements relating to future services and product development of the Reis Services segment; | |||
● | statements relating to future sales of the Company’s remaining real estate assets; | |||
● | statements relating to future business prospects, potential acquisitions, revenue, expenses, income (loss), cash flows, valuation of assets and liabilities and other business metrics of the Company and its businesses, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA; and | |||
● | statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “target” or similar expressions relating to future periods. |
Forward-looking statements reflect management’s judgment based on currently available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. With respect to these forward-looking statements, management has made certain assumptions. Future performance cannot be assured. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ include: |
● | revenues may be lower than expected; | ||
● | inability to retain and increase the Company’s customer base; | ||
● | additional adverse changes in the real estate industry and the local market in which the Company has property; | ||
● | inability to dispose of our remaining residential real estate at expected prices or at all; |
● | inability to execute properly on new products and services, or failure of customers to accept these products and services; | ||
● | competition; | ||
● | inability to attract and retain sales and senior management personnel; | ||
● | difficulties in protecting the security, confidentiality, integrity and reliability of the Company’s data; |
● | changes in accounting policies or practices; | ||
● | legal and regulatory issues; and | ||
● | the risk factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2010. |
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. The Company’s primary market risk exposure has been to changes in interest rates. This risk is generally managed by limiting the Company’s financing exposures, to the extent possible, by purchasing interest rate caps when deemed appropriate. At June 30, 2010, the Company’s only exposure to interest rates was variable rate based debt. This exposure has historically been minimized through the use of interest rate caps. The interest rate cap on the Bank Loan expired at June 30, 2010. The following table presents the effect of a 1% increase in the applicable base rates of variable rate debt at June 30, 2010: |
(amounts in thousands) | Balance at June 30, 2010 | LIBOR at June 30, 2010 | Additional Interest Incurred | |||||||||||
Variable rate debt: | ||||||||||||||
Bank Loan | $ | 13,976 | 0.35 | % | $ | 140 | (A) | |||||||
(A) | Reflects additional interest which could be incurred annually on the loan balance amount as a result of a 1% increase in LIBOR. It does not take into consideration contractual future periodic repayments. |
Reis holds cash and cash equivalents at various regional and national banking institutions. Management monitors the institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Management’s emphasis is primarily on safety of principal. Management, in its discretion, has diversified Reis’s cash and cash equivalents among banking institutions to potentially minimize exposure to any one of these entities. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse condi tions in the financial markets. Cash balances held at banking institutions with which we do business may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. While management monitors the cash balances in these bank accounts, such cash balances could be impacted if the underlying banks fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. Item 4T. Controls and Procedures. As of June 30, 2010, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, sum marized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings. Neither the Company nor any of its properties are subject to any material litigation. Item 1A. Risk Factors. A wide range of risks may affect our business and financial results, now and in the future; however, we consider the risks described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with the SEC on March 15, 2010, to be the most significant. There may be other currently unknown or unpredictable economic, business, competitive, governmental or other factors that could have material adverse effects on our business or future results. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities In June 2010, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to an aggregate amount of $1,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. Previously, the Board had authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of $3,000,000 of the Company’s shares. The Company completed repurchases under the initial $3,000,000 authorization in April 2010. The program permits purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, purchases could have been commenced or suspended at any time, or fr om time to time, without prior notice and the program may be expanded with prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods consistent with the Company’s “Policies for Transactions in Reis Stock and Insider Trading and Tipping.” During the second quarter of 2010, the Company repurchased the following shares of common stock: |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||||
April 1, 2010 to April 30, 2010 | 3,440 | $ | 5.78 | 3,440 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
May 1, 2010 to May 31, 2010 | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
June 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 1,000,000 |
Exhibit No. | Description | ||||
31.1 | Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
31.2 | Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
32.1 | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
10.1 | Separation Agreement and General Release dated as of June 3, 2010, among Jeffrey H. Lynford, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2010) | ||||
10.2 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of May 30, 2010, among Lloyd Lynford, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2010) | ||||
10.3 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of May 30, 2010, among Jonathan Garfield, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2010) | ||||
10.4 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of May 30, 2010, among Mark P. Cantaluppi, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2010) | ||||
10.5 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of May 30, 2010, between William Sander and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2010) | ||||
10.6 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of June 30, 2010, among Lloyd Lynford, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2010) |
Exhibit No. | Description | ||||
10.7 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of June 30, 2010, among Jonathan Garfield, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2010) | ||||
10.8 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of June 30, 2010, among Mark P. Cantaluppi, Reis, Inc. and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2010) | ||||
10.9 | Employment Agreement Extension dated as of June 30, 2010, between William Sander and Reis Services, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2010) |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
REIS, INC. | |||||
By: | /s/ Mark P. Cantaluppi | ||||
Mark P. Cantaluppi Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Dated: August 3, 2010 |
35