This filing contains a press release issued by Third Point LLC, dated September 7, 2018
*****
THIRD POINT NOMINATES “SHAREHOLDER SLATE” TO CHALLENGE CAMPBELL’S ENTRENCHED BOARD AND “#RefreshTheRecipe”
- Major Shareholder Sends Letter to Board Outlining Case for Board Changes -
- Says Time Has Come to Refresh the Recipe by Nominating a Highly-Qualified, Independent Slate of Directors To Set a Strategy That Will Benefit All Shareholders -
New York, New York – (BUSINESS WIRE) – Third Point (NYSE: TPRE; LSE: TPOU), a New York-based asset manager with $18 billion of capital, has announced that it will seek to replace the full Board at the Campbell Soup Company (NYSE: CPB) at the Company’s Annual Meeting.
Additional information, including the Third Point slate of Board nominees, can be found atwww.RefreshCampbells.com. The text of Third Point’s letter accompanying the Nomination Packet, addressed to Campbell Board Chairman Les Vinney, is below.
September 7, 2018
Les Vinney
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Campbell Soup Company
1 Campbell Place
Camden, NJ 08103
Dear Mr. Vinney:
Enclosed with this letter is a nomination package pursuant to which Third Point LLC, on behalf of funds it manages, nominates twelve individuals (the “Shareholder Slate”) to constitute a completely revamped board of directors (“Board”) of Campbell Soup Company (the “Company” or “Campbell”).
In Third Point’s previous proxy contests, we have sought only a few board seats to influence governance and implement change. Unfortunately, this Board’s persistent failure to discharge its fiduciary duties leaves us no choice but to seek to replace the entire Board with our Shareholder Slate.
Today, the shares of Campbell trade at a price that is ~20% lower than it was 20 years ago. The stock performance is a report card on this Board’s tenure of mismanagement, waste,ill-conceived strategy, and inept execution. On the Company’s earnings call last month, Interim CEO Keith McLoughlin detailed the Board’s years of failings with an extensive catalogue of the strategic and financial blunders that brought the business to the brink.1 Absent from his commentary, however, was any accountability for the damage. No changes to the Company’s Board or senior leadership were announced, making his contrite tone ring hollow.
1 | “Simply put, we lost focus. We lost focus strategically. We had too many initiatives that made the company unnecessarily complex. We were in the food business and the ag business. We had growth businesses and we had cash businesses. We were focused on startup businesses and venture capital investments. We aggressively pursued the important consumer megatrend of health and well-being without having clarity on our source of uniqueness or whether we brought a competitive advantage to the space, and we depended too much on M&A to shape our business strategy. |
We lost focus within our products and brands. We did not manage our portfolio in a differentiated manner. We pushed cash businesses for growth and we underfunded growth businesses. Our resource and capital allocation discipline was inadequate and we didn’t properly align our resources with our core business franchises where we have strong market positions unique capabilities and the right to win.
Lastly, we lost focus in process and execution. Our management processes lack the necessary operating discipline. We created too many silos throughout the company where decision rights were unclear. We lacked agility and we’re slow to react to customer needs. And finally, we didn’t have a culture of accountability, which led to poor execution.”