The following table sets forth at the Company’s consolidated average balance sheet and analysis of net interest income and expense:
Results of Operations
The Company’s results of operations are dependent to a large degree on net interest income. Interest income and cost of funds are affected significantly by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities. The Company generates noninterest income generally through service charges and fees, gain on sale of loans and other sources. The Company’s noninterest expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefit expense, and occupancy expense.
Net Income.Net income for the third quarter of 2003 increased 32.6% to $1.8 million or $0.36 per diluted share as compared to the third quarter of 2002. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 increased 6.3% to $4.4 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, from $4.1 million, or $0.87 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2003 increased 18.5% to $7.2 million from $6.1 million for the third quarter of 2002. For the first nine months of 2003, net interest income increased 14.0% to $20.7 million from $18.1 million for the like period in 2002. The increase is largely due to interest income from increased average loan volume, combined with a decrease in the cost of funds. The continued low rate environment has improved the Company’s cost of funds and helped offset the lower interest-earning asset yield.
Average interest-earning assets for the third quarter increased to $547.1 million at September 30, 2003, compared to $476.7 million at September 30, 2002, a growth of 14.8%, while the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 6.89% compared to 7.59% in third quarter of the prior year. The average yield on loans decreased to 7.33% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 from 8.07% for the third quarter of 2002.
The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased in the third quarter of 2003 to 1.86% from 2.79% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the quarter increased to $457.6 million at September 30, 2003 compared to $413.4 million a year ago, a growth of 10.7%.
The overall result of these changes was a increase in the net interest spread to 5.03% for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 from 4.80% for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets) increased to 5.33% in the third quarter of 2003 from 5.18% in the third quarter of 2002.
Noninterest Income.Noninterest income increased $1.4 million, or 152.7%, in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the like period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to the gain on sale of loans.
For the first nine months of 2003, noninterest income increased $2.2 million, or 72.7% compared to the like period a year ago. This increase was due to secondary market fees and the gain on sale of loans offset by the sale of the vacated North Whidbey branch property in the first quarter of 2002.
The Company began hedging mortgage interest rate risk for WFG real estate loans in the second quarter of 2003. At September 30, 2003, net loss on hedging activities was $135,000. The net loss is included in the gain on sale of loans.
Noninterest Expense.Noninterest expense increased $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2003, or 38.3% from a year ago. Three major components of noninterest expense, employee compensation, occupancy and other noninterest expense, increased 36.0%, 35.6% and 44.3%, respectively, for the quarter compared with the like period in 2002.
For the first nine months of 2003, noninterest expense rose to $16.8 million from $12.4 million one year ago, a 35.4% increase. The majority of these expenses reflect costs associated with the newly formed Washington Funding Group, the overall expansion of the Company and the increasing costs of doing business. This was primarily due to employee compensation, including a cost increase in employee benefits.
15
The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income less non-recurring gains) was 63.54% for the third quarter 2003 compared to 62.71% for the like period in 2002. For the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, the efficiency ratio was 64.79% and 58.62%, respectively.
Income Taxes.For the third quarters of 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $919,000 and $720,000, respectively. For the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded income tax provisions of $2.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The overall effective tax rate was approximately 34% and 35% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, the overall effective tax rate was approximately 34%.
Lending Activities
Loan Portfolio Composition.The Company originates a wide variety of loans including commercial, real estate and consumer loans. The following table sets forth the Company’s loan portfolio composition by type of loan:
| September 30, 2003
| December 31, 2002
|
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance
| % of total
| Balance
| % of total
|
---|
Commercial | | | $ | 90,918 | | | 18.5% | | $ | 91,816 | | | 21.0% | |
Real estate mortgages: | | |
One-to-four family residential | | | | 49,532 | | | 10.1% | | | 46,806 | | | 10.7% | |
Five-or-more family | | |
residential and commercial | | | | 123,146 | | | 25.1% | | | 94,404 | | | 21.7% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total real estate mortgages | | | | 172,678 | | | 35.2% | | | 141,210 | | | 32.4% | |
| | |
Real estate construction | | | | 61,570 | | | 12.6% | | | 40,112 | | | 9.2% | |
Consumer | | | | 165,512 | | | 33.7% | | | 163,368 | | | 37.4% | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Subtotal | | | | 490,678 | | | 100.0% | | | 436,506 | | | 100.0% | |
| |
| | |
| |
Less: allowance for loan losses | | | | (6,342 | ) | | | | | (5,514 | ) | | | |
Deferred loan fees, net | | | | 393 | | | | | | 197 | | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Loans, net | | | $ | 484,729 | | | | | $ | 431,189 | | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Total loans, net, increased to $484.7 million at September 30, 2003, representing a 12.4% increase from year-end 2002. The majority of the increase was in real estate mortgage and real estate construction loans, which increased 22.3% and 53.5%, respectively at September 30, 2003 from year-end 2002. Included in real estate mortgages are loans originated and held for sale on the secondary market. At September 30, 2003, loans held for sale were $12.3 million as compared to $6.6 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of 85.9%. Of those loans, $8.9 million were originated by WFG and $3.4 million were originated by the Bank’s retail real estate division, as compared to all of the loans originating from the Bank’s retail real estate division at December 31, 2002. The majority of the increase in real estate construction loans was due to residential construction, residential land development projects and a few large commercial construction loans.
The Company makes automobile and recreational vehicle loans for new and used vehicles originated indirectly by selected automobile dealers located in the Company’s market areas. Indirect dealer loans were $100.6 million, or 60.76% of the consumer loan portfolio and 20.48% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2003. At December 31, 2002, indirect dealer loans were $94.2 million, or 57.64% of the consumer loan portfolio and 21.56% of the total loan portfolio.
16
Nonperforming Assets.The following table sets forth an analysis of the composition of the Company's nonperforming assets:
(Dollars in thousands) | September 30, 2003
| December 31, 2002
|
---|
Nonaccrual loans | | | $ | 4,122 | | $ | 3,222 | |
Restructured loans | | | | — | | | — | |
|
| |
| |
Total nonperforming loans | | | | 4,122 | | | 3,222 | |
Other real estate owned | | | | 504 | | | 592 | |
|
| |
| |
Total nonperforming assets | | | $ | 4,626 | | $ | 3,814 | |
|
| |
| |
Accruing loans past due > 90 days | | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Potential problem loans | | | | — | | | — | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | 6,342 | | | 5,514 | |
| | | | |
Nonperforming loans to loans | | | | 0.84 | % | | 0.74 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to loans | | | | 1.29 | % | | 1.26 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | | | | 153.86 | % | | 171.14 | % |
Nonperforming assets to total assets | | | | 0.79 | % | | 0.71 | % |
Nonperforming loans increased to $4.1 million, or 0.84% of total loans, at September 30, 2003 from $3.2 million, or 0.74% of total loans, at December 31, 2002. The current allowance for loan losses of $6.3 million represents 153.86% of nonperforming loans as compared to 171.14% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2002. The allowance for loan losses is 1.29% of total loans at September 30, 2003 as compared to 1.26% at December 31, 2002.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.The Company recorded an $838,000 provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2003, compared with $589,000 for the like period a year ago. Net loan charge-offs were $443,000, representing 0.09% of average loans for the third quarter of 2003, compared with $691,000, or 0.16% of average loans for the like period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded a $2.4 million provision for loan losses, compared with $2.5 million for the like period a year ago. The Company recorded $1.6 million in net loan charge-offs, representing 0.34% of average loans during the first nine months of 2003, compared with $1.3 million or 0.32% of average loans in net charge-offs for the like period in 2002. The increase in charge-offs is attributed to a progressively tighter stance on consumer delinquencies and to certain loans to the construction trades. Management has tightened consumer-lending standards, formalized its credit review department, and established additional commercial guidelines and limits on lending to certain industries to mitigate risk.
Indirect vehicle loans may involve greater risk than other consumer loans, including direct automobile loans, due to the nature of third-party transactions. To mitigate these risks, the Company limits its indirect automobile loan purchases primarily to dealerships that are established and well known in their market areas and to applicants that are not classified as sub-prime. In addition, the Company has increased its oversight of the approval process and uses a loan grading system, which limits the risks inherent in dealer originated loans.
17
The following table sets forth the Company’s consumer charge-offs and recoveries:
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 |
---|
| 2003
| 2002
| 2003
| 2002
|
---|
Consumer charge-offs | | | $ | (377 | ) | $ | (474 | ) | $ | (1,099 | ) | $ | (932 | ) |
Consumer recoveries | | | | 87 | | | 49 | | | 232 | | | 165 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net consumer charge-offs | | | $ | (290 | ) | $ | (425 | ) | $ | (867 | ) | $ | (767 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net dealer charge-offs | | | $ | (234 | ) | $ | (312 | ) | $ | (682 | ) | $ | (574 | ) |
Average dealer loans | | | | 100,978 | | | 91,709 | | | 99,447 | | | 84,187 | |
|
Net dealer charge-offs to net consumer charge-offs | | | | 80.69 | % | | 73.41 | % | | 78.66 | % | | 74.84 | % |
Net dealer charge-offs to average dealer loans | | | | 0.23 | % | | 0.34 | % | | 0.69 | % | | 0.68 | % |
Net loan charge-offs attributed to indirect dealer loans were $234,000, representing 80.69% of net consumer charge-offs during the third quarter of 2003, compared to $312,000, or 73.41% of net consumer charge-offs for the like period in 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, net charge-offs attributed to indirect dealer loans were $682,000, or 78.66%, of net consumer charge-offs, as compared with $574,000, or 74.84%, for the like period in 2002.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for anticipated loan losses based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio. This includes a review of problem loans, general business and economic conditions, seasoning of the loan portfolio, bank regulatory examination results and findings of internal credit examiners, loss experience and an overall evaluation of the quality of the underlying collateral. Management reviews the allowance quarterly. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries.
The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses. The allocation is based on an evaluation of defined loan problems, historical ratios of loan losses and other factors that may affect future loan losses in the categories of loans shown:
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 |
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | 2003
| 2002
| 2003
| 2002
|
---|
Balance at beginning of period | | | $ | 5,947 | | $ | 5,569 | | $ | 5,514 | | $ | 4,308 | |
Charge-offs: | | |
Commercial | | | | (276 | ) | | (234 | ) | | (798 | ) | | (508 | ) |
Real estate | | | | — | | | (33 | ) | | (95 | ) | | (43 | ) |
Consumer | | | | (377 | ) | | (474 | ) | | (1,099 | ) | | (932 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total charge-offs | | | $ | (653 | ) | $ | (741 | ) | $ | (1,992 | ) | $ | (1,483 | ) |
Recoveries: | | |
Commercial | | | | 123 | | | 1 | | | 150 | | | 10 | |
Real estate | | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Consumer | | | | 87 | | | 49 | | | 232 | | | 165 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total recoveries | | | $ | 210 | | $ | 50 | | $ | 382 | | $ | 175 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net charge-offs | | | | (443 | ) | | (691 | ) | | (1,610 | ) | | (1,308 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | | 838 | | | 589 | | | 2,438 | | | 2,467 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at end of period | | | $ | 6,342 | | $ | 5,467 | | $ | 6,342 | | $ | 5,467 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net charge-offs to average loans | | | | 0.09 | % | | 0.16 | % | | 0.34 | % | | 0.32 | % |
18
While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen market conditions and/or circumstances that differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination could result in adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, and net income could be significantly affected. Management anticipates that normal growth of the loan portfolio, coupled with potential credit weakness that could occur, may require increases in the provisions to the allowance for loan losses.
Deposits
The Company provides an array of deposit services, including noninterest-bearing checking accounts, interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit (“CDs”). These accounts generally earn interest at rates established by management based on competitive market factors and management’s desire to increase or decrease certain types or maturities of deposits. The Company does not pay brokerage commissions to attract deposits. It strives to establish customer relations to attract core deposits in noninterest-bearing transactional accounts and thus reduce its costs of funds.
The following table sets forth the average balances outstanding and average interest rates for each major category of deposits:
| Three Months Ended September 30 |
---|
| 2003
| 2002
|
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Average balance
| Average rate
| Average balance
| Average rate
|
---|
Interest-bearing demand and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
money market deposits | | | $ | 199,273 | | | 0.80 | % | $ | 155,850 | | | 1.74 | % |
Savings deposits | | | | 37,907 | | | 0.78 | % | | 29,743 | | | 1.40 | % |
CDs | | | | 190,615 | | | 2.78 | % | | 193,894 | | | 3.51 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | | 427,795 | | | 1.68 | % | | 379,487 | | | 2.62 | % |
Demand and other | | |
noninterest-bearing deposits | | | | 81,482 | | | | | | 56,087 | | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Total average deposits | | | $ | 509,277 | | | | | $ | 435,574 | | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
Sources of Funds.The Company’s sources of funds are customer deposits, loan repayments, current earnings, cash and demand balances due from other banks, federal funds, short-term investments, investment securities available for sale and trust preferred securities. These funds are used for loan originations and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy other financial commitments and to support continuing operations. The Company relies primarily upon customer deposits and investments to provide liquidity. The Company will mainly use such funds to make loans and to purchase securities, the majority of which are issued by federal, state and local governments. Additional funds are available through established Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and correspondent bank lines of credit, which the Company may use to supplement funding sources.
The Company’s strategy includes maintaining a “well-capitalized” status for regulatory purposes, while maintaining a favorable liquidity position and proper asset/liability mix. With this strategy in mind, management evaluated potential capital-raising alternatives such as trust preferred securities, issuance of common stock and other sources. Management determined that issuing trust preferred securities would be in the best interest of the Company and on June 27, 2002, the Trust issued $15.0 million of trust preferred securities. Trust preferred securities are held as debt for tax purposes, while the proceeds of the offering count as Tier I capital without increasing the shareholder base, and therefore not diluting earnings per share.
19
Deposits. Total deposits increased 10.3% to $510.9 million at September 30, 2003 from $463.0 million at December 31, 2002. The Company has not accepted brokered deposits. It has made a concerted effort to attract deposits in the market area it serves through competitive pricing and delivery of quality service. Historically, the Company has been able to retain a considerable amount of its deposits as they mature.
The Company’s deposits are expected to fluctuate according to the level of the Company’s deposit market share, economic conditions and normal seasonal variations, among other things. Certificates of deposit are the only deposit group that has stated maturity dates. At September 30, 2003, the Company had $187.1 million in CDs, of which approximately $119.0 million, or 63.6%, are scheduled to mature within one year. Declining interest rate markets and uncertain economic conditions may cause some customers to choose to move funds into core deposit accounts or withdraw funds, rather than renew CDs as they mature. That notwithstanding, management anticipates that a sizable portion of outstanding CDs will renew upon maturity.
Borrowings. At September 30, 2003 the Company had a line of credit with the FHLB of $87.9 million, of which $15.0 million was advanced in long-term borrowings. The Company also had unused lines of credit with correspondent banks in the amount of $17.0 million at September 30, 2003.
Investments. The Company’s total portfolio of investment securities increased 28.8% to $31.1 million at September 30, 2003 from $24.2 million at December 31, 2002. The investment portfolio consists of government agency securities, pass-through securities, corporate securities, municipal securities and preferred stock. No investment exceeds 10% of the shareholders’ equity. The following table summarizes the amortized cost, market value and recorded value of securities in the Company’s portfolio by contractual maturity groups:
| September 30, 2003 |
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Amortized cost
| Market value
| Recorded value
|
---|
Amounts maturing: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Within one year | | | $ | 3,526 | | $ | 3,570 | | $ | 3,537 | |
One to five years | | | | 18,384 | | | 18,832 | | | 18,311 | |
Six to ten years | | | | 8,696 | | | 9,010 | | | 8,700 | |
Over ten years | | | | 589 | | | 597 | | | 589 | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 31,195 | | $ | 32,009 | | $ | 31,137 | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
At September 30, 2003, the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of $16.1 million, or 51.58% in held-to-maturity investments at carrying value, as compared with $15.1 million, or 62.35%, at December 31, 2002, and $15.1 million, or 48.42%, in available-for-sale securities at carrying value, as compared with $9.1 million, or 37.65%, at December 31, 2002. For liquidity purposes, the Company’s future security purchases will primarily be designated as available-for-sale and will increase as a percent of total investment securities at carrying value.
Capital and Capital Ratios
The Company’s shareholders’ equity increased to $43.1 million at September 30, 2003 from $39.4 million at December 31, 2002. This increase is due to net income of $4.4 million, proceeds from stock options exercised in the amount of $311,000 and stock option compensation of $17,000 offset by the payment of cash dividends of $977,000 and a decrease in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $81,000, during the first nine months of 2003. Total assets increased to $587.2 million at September 30, 2003 from $535.4 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of 9.7%. Shareholders’ equity to total assets was 7.3% at September 30, 2003 compared to 7.4% at December 31, 2002.
Banking regulations require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted average total assets of at least 4%. In addition, banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines, under which risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Tier I capital generally consists of common shareholders’ equity (which does not include unrealized gains and losses on securities), less goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets, while Tier II capital includes the allowance for loan losses and subordinated debt, both subject to certain limitations.
20
The FDIC established the qualifications necessary to be classified as a “well-capitalized” bank, primarily for assignment of FDIC insurance premium rates. As the following table indicates, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank qualified as “well-capitalized” at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002:
| FDIC Requirements
| Actual Ratios
|
---|
| Adequately- capitalized
| Well- capitalized
| September 30, 2003
| December 31, 2002
|
---|
Total risk-based capital ratio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | | | | 8 | % | | 10 | % | | 12 | .23% | | 12 | .80% |
Whidbey Island Bank | | | | 8 | % | | 10 | % | | 11 | .91% | | 12 | .61% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | | |
Consolidated | | | | 4 | % | | 6 | % | | 10 | .91% | | 11 | .22% |
Whidbey Island Bank | | | | 4 | % | | 6 | % | | 10 | .71% | | 11 | .43% |
Leverage ratio | | |
Consolidated | | | | 4 | % | | 5 | % | | 9 | .85% | | 9 | .89% |
Whidbey Island Bank | | | | 4 | % | | 5 | % | | 9 | .64% | | 10 | .07% |
There can be no assurance that additional capital will not be required in the near future due to greater-than-expected growth, unforeseen expenses or revenue shortfalls, or otherwise.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
On July 23, 2003, the Company purchased the land and building that houses the Burlington Financial Center for $719,000. In addition, the Company has entered into an agreement to purchase land at an estimated price of $625,000 for a future site of a Whidbey Island Bank branch in the northern Bellingham area. The purchase is expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Significant Accounting Policies
See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Anticipated Financial Performance
In March 2003 the Company announced its 2003 targets of 10% – 15% earnings growth, 10% – 15% loan growth, and 5% – 10% deposit growth. While management believes, at this time, that the targets will be met, it anticipates that 2003 fourth quarter performance will be negatively affected by a number of factors. These include: fluctuating mortgage interest rates, resulting in decreasing residential real estate loan volumes; slowing deposit rate repricing contributing to the tightening of the net interest margin; an increase in operating expenses due to the rising costs of doing business; and a commercial loan environment recovering from a stagnate economy coupled with strong rate competition. Management has begun to see a significant decline in residential loan volumes.
Historically, as real estate loan volumes decline, commercial loan activity increases. In management’s opinion, the banking industry is currently in the transition period from that of heavy mortgage loan volumes into a period of increasing commercial lending activity.
The Company’s long-term targets over the next several years include ROE in excess of 18%, an efficiency ratio in the mid-50% range, earnings per share growth rate of at least 10% annually and cash dividend per share increases of 8% per year. The Company believes that these long-term goals can be attained through continuing its strategy of qualitative and sustainable growth.
21
Future events are difficult to predict, and the expectations of management are necessarily subject to uncertainty and risk that may cause actual results to differ materially from those stated here. One of the areas subject to uncertainty is economic stability. Although there are concerns regarding the economy, management expects growth to continue in the Pacific Northwest region and believes that the Company will have opportunities to participate in that growth. These opportunities will be pursued while applying rigorous credit discipline and thorough analysis to ensure quality growth. Other unexpected changes, such as significant declines in the economy or substantial credit deterioration, could further reduce the anticipated performance of the Company.
Readers should not construe these goals as assurances of future performance, and should note that management does not plan to update these projections.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
A number of measures are used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, including income simulations and interest sensitivity (gap) analyses. An income simulation model is the primary tool used to assess the direction and magnitude of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates. Key assumptions in the model include prepayment speeds on mortgage-related assets, cash flows and maturities of other investment securities, loan and deposit volumes, and pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. At September 30, 2003, based on the measures used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, there had not been a material change in the Company’s interest rate risk since December 31, 2002. Should rates increase, the Company could be negatively impacted due to its current slightly liability sensitive position. For additional information, refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the SEC on March 20, 2003.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the chief executive and financial officer each concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the periodic reports to the SEC. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of the Company’s plans, products, services or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors known to management that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the most recent evaluation. Management found no facts that would require WBCO to take any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
22
PART II
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
| During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K in regard to the release of the Company’s second quarter 2003 earnings and cash dividend notification. The report was filed on July 25, 2003. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON BANKING COMPANY
Date: November 13, 2003 | By | /s/ Michal D. Cann |
| |
|
| | Michal D. Cann President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: November 13, 2003 | By | /s/ Phyllis A. Hawkins |
| |
|
| | Phyllis A. Hawkins Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
24