The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated average balance sheet and analysis of net interest income and expense:
Results of Operations
The Company’s results of operations are dependent to a large degree on net interest income. Interest income and cost of funds are affected significantly by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities. The Company generates noninterest income generally through service charges and fees, gain on sale of loans and other sources. The Company’s noninterest expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefit expense, and occupancy expense.
Net Income.Net income for the second quarter of 2004 decreased 12.3% to $1.2 million or $0.22 per diluted share as compared to the second quarter of 2003. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased 12.0% to $2.3 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, from $2.7 million, or $0.48 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease was due largely to the increase in noninterest expense, the reduction in gain on sale of loans, and the operating losses and costs associated with closing the Washington Funding Group, Inc. subsidiary.
Income from continuing operations for the second quarter of 2004 increased 3.3% to $1.5 million from $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2003. The Company’s loss from discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2004 increased to a loss of $247,000 from a loss of $24,000 for the second quarter of 2003. The major portion of this loss was attributable to the costs of closing the operations of WFG.
Income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 remained level at $2.7 million for both periods. The Company’s loss from discontinued operations for the six month period in 2004 increased to a loss of $370,000 from a loss of $81,000 for the like period one year ago.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the second quarter of 2004 increased 6.4% to $7.3 million from $6.9 million for the second quarter of 2003. For the first six months of 2004, net interest income increased 7.3% to $14.4 million from $13.4 million for the like period in 2003. The increase is largely due to interest income from increased average loan volume, combined with a decrease in the cost of funds.
Average interest-earning assets for the second quarter increased to $581.4 million at June 30, 2004, compared to $520.6 million at June 30, 2003, a growth of 11.7%, while the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 6.59% compared to 7.08% in second quarter of the prior year. The average yield on loans decreased to 6.79% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 from 7.52% for the second quarter of 2003.
The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased in the second quarter of 2004 to 1.77% from 2.01% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the quarter increased to $493.6 million at June 30, 2004 compared to $447.0 million a year ago, a growth of 10.4%.
The overall result of these changes was a decrease in the net interest spread to 4.82% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 from 5.07% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets) decreased to 5.09% in the second quarter of 2004 from 5.35% in the second quarter of 2003.
Noninterest Income.Noninterest income increased $264,000, or 20.3%, in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the like period in 2003. For the first six months of 2004, noninterest income increased $297,000, or 11.5% compared to the like period a year ago. This increase was primarily due to an increase in service charges and fees on deposits in association with the Bank’s new overdraft product, Whidbey Overdraft Coverage and a gain on sale of securities offset by a decrease in gain on sale of loans.
In the past, selling single-family residential loans to the secondary market contributed significantly to the noninterest income, but slowing of mortgage activity caused a decrease in income from the gain on sale of loans.
Noninterest Expense.Noninterest expense increased $760,000 in the second quarter of 2004, or 14.8% from a year ago. Three major components of noninterest expense — employee compensation, occupancy and other noninterest expense — increased 13.5%, 13.3% and 20.1%, respectively, for the quarter compared with the like period in 2003.
For the first six months of 2004, noninterest expense rose to $11.6 million from $10.2 million one year ago, a 13.7% increase. Employee compensation, occupancy and other noninterest expense increased 14.4%, 14.7% and 12.0%, respectively, compared with the like period in 2003.
15
The Company experienced a cost increase in employee benefits. Additionally, increased costs associated with insurance, operating fees and advertising have contributed to other noninterest expense, primarily as a result of the expansion of the Company. With the purchase of an office building on Oak Harbor, WA to consolidate back office operations into one building, the Company expects to improve operating efficiencies.
The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income less non-recurring gains) was 66.25% for the second quarter 2004 compared to 62.69% for the like period in 2003. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the efficiency ratio was 67.18% and 63.78%, respectively.
Income Taxes.For the second quarters of 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $742,000 and $781,000, respectively. For the first six months of 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded income tax provisions of $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The overall effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 35% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the overall effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 35%, respectively.
The results from discontinued operations disclosed on the consolidated statement of income are net of tax.
Lending Activities
Loan Portfolio Composition.The Company originates a wide variety of loans including commercial, real estate and consumer loans. The following table sets forth the Company’s loan portfolio composition by type of loan:
| June 30, 2004
| December 31, 2003
|
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance
| % of total
| Balance
| % of total
|
---|
Commercial | | | $ | 84,098 | | | 15.1 | % | $ | 87,371 | | | 17.2 | % |
Real estate mortgages: | | |
1 – 4 Family residential | | | | 42,994 | | | 7.7 | % | | 43,460 | | | 8.5 | % |
Commercial | | | | 159,344 | | | 28.7 | % | | 133,539 | | | 26.3 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total real estate mortgages | | | | 202,338 | | | 36.4 | % | | 176,999 | | | 34.8 | % |
Real estate construction | | | | 87,611 | | | 15.8 | % | | 70,974 | | | 14.0 | % |
Consumer | | | | 181,717 | | | 32.7 | % | | 172,406 | | | 34.0 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Subtotal | | | | 555,764 | | | 100.0 | % | | 507,750 | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | |
| | | | |
| |
Less: allowance for loan losses | | | | (6,926 | ) | | | | | (6,116 | ) | | | |
Deferred loan fees, net | | | | 431 | | | | | | 420 | | | | |
|
| | |
| | | | |
Loans, net | | | $ | 549,269 | | | | | $ | 502,054 | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total loans, net, were $549.3 million at June 30, 2004, representing a 9.4% increase from year-end 2003. The majority of the increase was in real estate mortgage and real estate construction loans, which increased 14.3% and 23.4%, respectively, at June 30, 2004 from year-end 2003. Included in real estate mortgages are loans originated and held for sale on the secondary market. At June 30, 2004, loans held for sale were $15.9 million as compared to $8.3 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of 92.2%. The Company has $10.0 million of indirect consumer loans in loans held for sale as of June 30, 2004. Due to the liability sensitivity of our balance sheet, the Company opted to sell these fixed rate loans without recourse to increase liquidity for core lending activity. WBCO plans on selling the loans by the end of the third quarter. Of the remaining loans held for sale, $2.8 million were originated by WFG and $3.1 million were originated by the Bank’s retail real estate division, compared to $3.8 million originated by WFG and $4.5 million originated from the Bank’s retail real estate division at December 31, 2003. The majority of the increase in real estate construction loans was due to residential construction, residential land development projects and a few large commercial construction loans.
16
The Company makes automobile and recreational vehicle loans for new and used vehicles originated indirectly by selected automobile dealers located in the Company’s market areas. Indirect loans were $109.0 million, or 60.00% of the consumer loan portfolio and 19.60% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2004. At December 31, 2003, indirect loans were $105.6 million, or 61.27% of the consumer loan portfolio and 20.79% of the total loan portfolio.
Nonperforming Assets.The following table sets forth an analysis of the composition of the Company's nonperforming assets:
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2004
| December 31, 2003
| |
---|
Nonaccrual loans | | | $ | 4,829 | | $ | 4,158 | | | | |
Restructured loans | | | | — | | | — |
|
| |
| |
Total nonperforming loans | | | | 4,829 | | | 4,158 | |
Other real estate owned | | | | 426 | | | 504 | |
|
| |
| |
Total nonperforming assets | | | $ | 5,255 | | $ | 4,662 | |
|
| |
| |
Impaired loans | | | $ | — | | $ | 2,563 | |
Accruing loans past due> 90 days | | | | — | | | — |
Potential problem loans | | | | 120 | | | 314 | |
Allowance for loan losses | | | | 6,926 | | | 6,116 | |
Nonperforming loans to loans(1) | | | | 0.89 | % | | 0.83 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to loans(1) | | | | 1.28 | % | | 1.22 | % |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | | | | 143.43 | % | | 147.09 | % |
Nonperforming assets to total assets | | | | 0.83 | % | | 0.80 | % |
| | | |
(1) Excludes loans held for sale
Nonperforming loans increased to $4.8 million, or 0.89% of loans (excluding loans held for sale), at June 30, 2004 from $4.2 million, or 0.83% of loans (excluding loans held for sale), at December 31, 2003. The current allowance for loan losses of $6.9 million represents 143.43% of nonperforming loans as compared to 147.09% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2003. The allowance for loan losses is 1.28% of loans (excluding loans held for sale) at June 30, 2004 as compared to 1.22% at December 31, 2003. A loan in the amount of $2.6 million listed as impaired since December 2003 has been removed from impaired status. The balance has been significantly reduced and the credit is performing. Due to subsequent events since quarter end, nonaccraul loans have been reduced by $1.2 million from $4.8million to $3.6 million as of the date of this report.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses.The Company recorded a $775,000 provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2004, compared with $837,000 for the like period a year ago. Net loan charge-offs were $329,000, representing 0.06% of average loans (excluding loans held for sale), for the second quarter of 2004, compared with $765,000, or 0.17% of average loans (excluding loans held for sale), for the like period last year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a $1.6 million provision for loan losses in both periods. The Company recorded $790,000 in net loan charge-offs, representing 0.15% of average loans (excluding loans held for sale) during the first six months of 2004, compared with $1.2 million or 0.26% for the like period in 2003.
Indirect loans may involve greater risk than other consumer loans, including direct automobile loans, due to the nature of third-party transactions. To mitigate these risks, the Company limits its indirect automobile loan purchases primarily to dealerships that are established and well known in their market areas and to applicants that are not classified as sub-prime. In addition, the Company has increased its oversight of the approval process and uses a loan grading system, which limits the risks inherent in dealer originated loans.
17
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Company’s indirect and other net charge-offs to average loans:
| Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 |
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004
| 2003
| 2004
| 2003
|
---|
Indirect net charge-offs | | | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (252 | ) | $ | (534 | ) | $ | (448 | ) |
Other net charge-offs | | | | (85 | ) | | (513 | ) | | (256 | ) | | (719 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total net charge-offs | | | $ | (329 | ) | $ | (765 | ) | $ | (790 | ) | $ | (1,167 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Average indirect loans | | | $ | 107,454 | | $ | 101,531 | | $ | 106,846 | | $ | 99,074 | |
Average other loans(1) | | | | 426,962 | | | 350,497 | | | 414,207 | | | 345,115 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total average loans(1) | | | $ | 534,416 | | $ | 452,028 | | $ | 521,053 | | $ | 444,189 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Indirect net charge-offs to average indirect loans | | | | 0.23 | % | | 0.25 | % | | 0.50 | % | | 0.45 | % |
Other net charge-offs to average other loans(1) | | | | 0.02 | % | | 0.15 | % | | 0.06 | % | | 0.21 | % |
Net charge-offs to average loans(1) | | | | 0.06 | % | | 0.17 | % | | 0.15 | % | | 0.26 | % |
(1) Excludes loans held for sale
Net loan charge-offs attributed to indirect loans were $244,000, representing 69.32% of net consumer charge-offs during the second quarter of 2004, compared to $252,000 or 92.65% of net consumer charge-offs for the like period in 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, net charge-offs attributed to indirect dealer loans were $534,000, or 73.35% of net consumer charge-offs, as compared with $448,000, or 77.64%, for the like period in 2003.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for anticipated loan losses based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio. This includes a review of problem loans, general business and economic conditions, seasoning of the loan portfolio, bank regulatory examination results and findings of internal credit examiners, loss experience and an overall evaluation of the quality of the underlying collateral. Management reviews the allowance quarterly. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries.
The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses. The provision is based on an evaluation of defined loan problems, historical ratios of loan losses and other factors that may affect future loan losses in the categories of loans shown:
18
| Three Months Ended June 30 | Six Months Ended June 30 |
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004
| 2003
| 2004
| 2003
|
---|
Balance at beginning of period | | | $ | 6,480 | | $ | 5,875 | | $ | 6,116 | | $ | 5,514 | |
Charge-offs: | | |
Commercial | | | | (67 | ) | | (451 | ) | | (198 | ) | | (522 | ) |
Real estate | | | | (23 | ) | | (65 | ) | | (23 | ) | | (95 | ) |
Consumer | | | | (411 | ) | | (345 | ) | | (943 | ) | | (722 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total charge-offs | | | $ | (501 | ) | $ | (861 | ) | $ | (1,164 | ) | $ | (1,339 | ) |
Recoveries: | | |
Commercial | | | | 97 | | | 23 | | | 141 | | | 27 | |
Real estate | | | | 16 | | | — | | | 18 | | | — | |
Consumer | | | | 59 | | | 73 | | | 215 | | | 145 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total recoveries | | | $ | 172 | | $ | 96 | | $ | 374 | | $ | 172 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net charge-offs | | | | (329 | ) | | (765 | ) | | (790 | ) | | (1,167 | ) |
Provision for loan losses | | | | 775 | | | 837 | | | 1,600 | | | 1,600 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at end of period | | | $ | 6,926 | | $ | 5,947 | | $ | 6,926 | | $ | 5,947 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen market conditions could result in adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, and net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination. Management anticipates that normal growth of the loan portfolio may require continued increases in the allowance for loan losses.
Deposits
The Company provides an array of deposit services, including noninterest-bearing checking accounts, interest-bearing checking and savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit (“CDs”). These accounts generally earn interest at rates established by management based on competitive market factors and management’s desire to increase or decrease certain types or maturities of deposits. The Company does not pay brokerage commissions to attract deposits. It strives to establish customer relationships to attract core deposits in noninterest-bearing transactional accounts and thus reduce its costs of funds.
The following table sets forth the average balances outstanding and average interest rates for each major category of deposits:
| Three Months Ended June 30 |
---|
| 2004
| 2003
|
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Average balance
| Average rate
| Average balance
| Average rate
|
---|
Interest-bearing demand and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
money market deposits | | | $ | 210,606 | | | 0.75 | % | $ | 187,958 | | | 0.89 | % |
Savings deposits | | | | 45,075 | | | 0.78 | % | | 34,519 | | | 0.83 | % |
CDs | | | | 212,380 | | | 2.66 | % | | 194,359 | | | 2.91 | % |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total interest-bearing deposits | | | | 468,061 | | | 1.62 | % | | 416,836 | | | 1.83 | % |
Demand and other | | |
noninterest-bearing deposits | | | | 81,561 | | | | | | 66,196 | | | | |
|
| | |
| |
Total average deposits | | | $ | 549,622 | | | | | $ | 483,032 | | | | |
|
| | |
| |
19
Average balances in noninterest-bearing deposits increased 23.2% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003. For the same period, average balances in total interest-bearing deposits increased 12.3%, while the smallest portion of the increase was in the higher cost CDs.
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
Sources of Funds.The Company’s sources of funds are customer deposits, loan repayments, current earnings, cash and demand balances due from other banks, federal funds, short-term investments, investment securities available for sale and trust preferred securities. These funds are used for loan originations and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy other financial commitments and to support continuing operations. The Company relies primarily upon customer deposits and investments to provide liquidity. The Company will mainly use such funds to make loans and to purchase securities, the majority of which are issued by federal, state and local governments. Additional funds are available through established Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and correspondent bank lines of credit, which the Company may use to supplement funding sources.
The Company’s strategy includes maintaining a “well-capitalized” status for regulatory purposes, while maintaining a favorable liquidity position and proper asset/liability mix. With this strategy in mind, management evaluated potential capital-raising alternatives such as trust preferred securities, issuance of common stock and other sources. Management determined that issuing trust preferred securities would be in the best interest of the Company and on June 27, 2002, the Trust issued $15.0 million of trust preferred securities. Trust preferred securities are held as debt for tax purposes, while the proceeds of the offering count as Tier I capital without increasing the shareholder base, and therefore not diluting earnings per share. Due to FIN 46R, the Trust was deconsolidated in current period financial statements.
Deposits. Total deposits increased 11.3% to $558.0 million at June 30, 2004 from $501.5 million at December 31, 2003. Certificates of deposit are the only deposit group that has stated maturity dates. At June 30, 2004, the Company had $215.0 million in CDs, of which approximately $125.0 million, or 58.11%, are scheduled to mature within one year. Management anticipates that a sizable portion of outstanding CDs will renew upon maturity.
The Company has not accepted brokered deposits. It has made a concerted effort to attract deposits in the market area it serves through competitive pricing and delivery of quality service. Historically, the Company has been able to retain a considerable amount of its deposits as they mature.
Borrowings. At June 30, 2004 the Company had a line of credit with the FHLB of $94.8 million, of which $7.5 million was advanced in short-term borrowings and $4.0 million in federal funds. The Company also had unused lines of credit with correspondent banks in the amount of $27.0 million at June 30, 2004.
Investments. The Company’s total portfolio of investment securities decreased 36.2% to $19.3 million at June 30, 2004 from $30.2 million at December 31, 2003. The Company transferred its held-to-maturity municipal security portfolio of $14.3 million to available-for-sale investments. Available-for-sale investments are recorded at market value and this transfer caused an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $272,000. During the second quarter of 2004, $5.8 million were sold to help reposition the Company’s liability sensitive balance sheet against the anticipation of a rising rate environment. The investment portfolio consists of government agency securities, pass-through securities, corporate securities, municipal securities and preferred stock. No investment exceeds 10% of the shareholders’ equity.
20
The following table summarizes the amortized cost, market value and recorded value of securities in the Company’s portfolio by contractual maturity groups:
| June 30, 2004
|
---|
(Dollars in thousands) | Amortized cost
| Market value
| Recorded value
|
---|
Amounts maturing: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Within one year | | | $ | 1,756 | | $ | 1,785 | | $ | 1,785 | |
One to five years | | | | 15,153 | | | 15,286 | | | 15,286 | |
Six to ten years | | | | 1,679 | | | 1,684 | | | 1,684 | |
Over ten years | | | | 504 | | | 504 | | | 504 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | | $ | 19,092 | | $ | 19,259 | | $ | 19,259 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
At June 30, 2004, the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of no held-to-maturity investments, as compared with $14.7 million, or 48.88% at December 31, 2003. Available-for-sale securities, which are carried at market value, were $19.3 million, or 100.0% of the investment portfolio as compared with $15.4 million, or 51.12% at December 31, 2003. In the second quarter of 2004, the Company changed the designation of the municipal securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale. For liquidity purposes, the Company’s future security purchases will primarily be designated as available-for-sale and will increase as a percent of total investment securities at market value.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Bank made a $10.0 million investment in bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”). These policies insure the lives of officers of the Bank, and names the Bank as beneficiary. Noninterest income is generated tax-free from the increase in the policies’ underlying investments made by the insurance company. WIB is capitalizing on the ability to partially offset costs associated with employee compensation and benefit programs with the BOLI.
Capital and Capital Ratios
The Company’s shareholders’ equity increased to $46.3 million at June 30, 2004 from $44.4 million at December 31, 2003. This increase is due to net income of $2.3 million, proceeds from stock options exercised in the amount of $155,000, stock option compensation of $11,000 and an increase in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (net of tax) of $141,000, offset by the payment of cash dividends of $735,000 during the first six months of 2004. Total assets increased to $633.5 million at June 30, 2004 from $581.7 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of 8.9%. Shareholders’ equity to total assets was 7.3% at June 30, 2004 compared to 7.6% at December 31, 2003.
Banking regulations require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted average total assets of at least 4%. In addition, banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines, under which risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Tier I capital generally consists of common shareholders’ equity (which does not include unrealized gains and losses on securities), less goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets, while Tier II capital includes the allowance for loan losses and subordinated debt, both subject to certain limitations.
The FDIC established the qualifications necessary to be classified as a “well-capitalized” bank, primarily for assignment of FDIC insurance premium rates. As the following table indicates, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank qualified as “well-capitalized” at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
21
| FDIC Requirements
| Actual Ratios
|
---|
| Adequately- capitalized
| Well- capitalized
| June 30, 2004
| December 31, 2003
|
---|
Total risk-based capital ratio | | | | |
Consolidated | 8% | 10% | 11.14% | 12.01% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 8% | 10% | 10.83% | 11.69% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
Consolidated | 4% | 6% | 10.01% | 10.85% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 4% | 6% | 9.69% | 10.56% |
Leverage ratio |
Consolidated | 4% | 5% | 9.81% | 10.17% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 4% | 5% | 9.50% | 9.89% |
There can be no assurance that additional capital will not be required in the near future due to greater-than-expected growth, unforeseen expenses or revenue shortfalls, or otherwise.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
The Company purchased a building commonly known as the Bayshore building located in Oak Harbor, WA. The building was purchased as a new operations center to consolidate back office functions and improve efficiencies.
Significant Accounting Policies
See “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Anticipated Future Performance
Future events are difficult to predict, and the expectations of management are necessarily subject to uncertainty and risk that may cause actual results to differ materially from those stated here. In making the following statements, management has made a number of assumptions including that: (1) the interest rate environment will gradually increase throughout the remainder of 2004, (2) the local economy will continue on a steady course of improvement, and (3) residential real estate loan volumes will decline from 2003.
WBCO expects to continue its growth strategy and expand its presence in the Pacific Northwest. The Company’s commitment to maintaining asset quality, improving operating efficiency, being attentive to customer satisfaction and maximizing shareholder value remains strong. WBCO has identified long-term performance measurement targets. Those targets include a return on equity in excess of 18%, an efficiency ratio in the mid-50% range, earnings per share growth of at least 10% per year, and dividend growth of at least 8% annually. Management does not expect to attain these targets in the short-term, but rather measures its business plan progression against these long-term goals.
Management anticipates that 2004 performance will be affected by a number of factors. A primary consideration, and one that is subject to uncertainty, is the stability of the economy. In management’s opinion, the Company is in a transition from that of heavy residential mortgage loan volumes into a period of increasing commercial lending activity. In light of this transition and an expected increase in competition for loans, management believes that the Company will achieve loan growth in the range of 10% — 15% for the year 2004.
The Company is projecting a modest increase in deposits for 2004. If deposit rate repricing is required to maintain deposits or should rates increase more than expected, the net interest margin could be negatively impacted due to the Company’s current position of being slightly liability sensitive. Other unexpected changes, such as significant changes in the economy, substantial credit deterioration, or depositors moving sizeable amounts of their funds back into the stock market, could also affect the anticipated performance of the Company.
Residential real estate loan volumes have declined from the high volumes experienced in recent years, and therefore have generated less fee income. WFG, the Company’s wholesale lending subsidiary, continued to negatively impact earnings. In response, the Company closed WFG during the second quarter of 2004.
22
Management had expected WFG to contribute to 2004 earnings when earnings growth projections were identified earlier in the year. Considering the impact caused by the closure and losses of the mortgage subsidiary, and given the preceding assumptions, management expects that it will be difficult to substantially increase profits over 2003. The Bank has a large portion of market share in Island County, which is where the Company was founded and has an established identity and reputation within the community. Management believes there are significant opportunities to gain a larger share of the market in the other three counties where the branches are still relatively young and not as well known. Opportunities will be pursued while applying credit discipline and deliberate analysis to ensure quality growth.
Readers should not construe these statements as assurances of future performance, and should note that management does not plan to update these projections as the year progresses.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
A number of measures are used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, including income simulations and interest sensitivity (gap) analyses. An income simulation model is the primary tool used to assess the direction and magnitude of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates. Key assumptions in the model include prepayment speeds on mortgage-related assets, cash flows and maturities of other investment securities, loan and deposit volumes, and pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. At June 30, 2004, based on the measures used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, there had not been a material change in the Company’s interest rate risk since December 31, 2003. Should rates increase, the Company could be negatively impacted due to its current slightly liability sensitive position. For additional information, refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the SEC on March 24, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the chief executive and financial officer each concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the periodic reports to the SEC. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of the Company’s plans, products, services or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors known to management that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the most recent evaluation. Management found no facts that would require WBCO to take any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
23
PART II
(a) – (e) Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of shareholders was held at Oak Harbor, Washington at 3:00 p.m. on April 29, 2004. The total number of shares of common stock were 4,746,637 and were represented in person or by proxy at the meeting. This represented 88% of the 5,401,274 shares held by shareholders as of March 10, 2004 and entitled to vote at the meeting. The following issue came before the shareholders for vote:
| Election of directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2007, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified - three of the nine director position terms had expired and were open for election. The nominees for these positions were Michal D. Cann; Jerry C. Chambers; and Marlen L. Knutson, who were each elected with the following vote totals: |
| | For
| Against
| Withheld
|
---|
| Michal D. Cann | 4,721,050 | 0 | 25,587 |
| Jerry C. Chambers | 4,720,321 | 0 | 26,316 |
| Marlen L. Knutson | 4,716,372 | 0 | 30,265 |
The other six directors who continue in office are: Karl C. Krieg, III; Jay T. Lien; Robert B. Olson; Anthony B. Pickering; Alvin J. Sherman; and Edward J. Wallgren.
(a) Not applicable
(b) There have been no material changes in the procedures for shareholders to nominate directors to the Company’s board.
(a) Exhibits
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(a) and Section 302 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(a) and Section 302 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the Company filed two reports on Form 8-K. The first 8-K filed during the quarter announced the release of the Company’s first quarter 2004 earnings and the second quarter cash dividend and was filed on May 3, 2004. The second Form 8-K contained the Company’s press release announcing the Company’s intent to close WFG, and was filed on June 16, 2004.
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON BANKING COMPANY
Date: August 13, 2004 | By | /s/ Michal D. Cann |
| |
|
| | Michal D. Cann President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
Date: August 13, 2004 | By | /s/ Phyllis A. Hawkins |
| |
|
| | Phyllis A. Hawkins Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
25