The following table sets forth the amounts of the changes in consolidated net interest income attributable to changes in volume and to changes in interest rates, presented on a 91/365 and 181/365-day basis. Changes attributable to the combined effect of volume and interest rates have been allocated proportionately:
The net interest spread widened to 5.00% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 from 4.78% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. Net interest margin (net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average interest-earning assets) increased to 5.32% in the second quarter of 2005 from 5.04% in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 net interest spread was 4.97% and 4.82%, respectively. Net interest margin increased to 5.27% for the first six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to 5.10% for the like period one year ago.
Average interest-earning assets for the second quarter of 2005 grew to $633.9 million, compared to $581.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, an increase of 9.0%, while the average yield on interest-earning assets increased to 7.09% compared to 6.54% in the second quarter of the prior year.
Average interest-earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $622.1 million, compared to $567.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a growth of 9.6%. The year-to-date average yield on interest-earning assets increased to 6.99% at June 30, 2005 compared to 6.61% at June 30, 2004.
Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, for the second quarter of 2005 increased 15.4% to $8.4 million from $7.3 million for the second quarter of 2004, which was primarily due to earning higher yields on higher average volumes of loans. The average yield on loans increased to 7.22% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 from 6.72% for the second quarter 2004. For the first six months of 2005, net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, increased 13.0% to $16.2 million from $14.4 million for the like period in 2004. The increase is primarily due to interest income from higher average loan volumes and the re-pricing of loans, as well as the growth in noninterest-bearing deposits. The average yields on loans for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 were 7.11% and 6.79%, respectively.
On both a year-over-year and sequential quarter basis, the increase in interest income from loans was partially offset by the decrease in average investment securities. The Company sold $5.8 million in available-for-sale investment securities during the second quarter of 2004 in anticipation of shifts in the interest rate market, as well as management’s review of the Company’s liquidity needs and asset/liability position.
Due to the increased costs associated with interest-bearing deposits and the intensified competitive pressures to offer higher deposit interest rates, the Company incurred more expense in generating additional funding during the first six months of 2005 compared to the like period in 2004. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 increased to $536.4 million compared to $493.6 million a year ago, a growth of 8.7%. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased in the second quarter of 2005 to 2.09% from 1.76% in the second quarter of 2004. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $529.1 million compared to $479.8 million a year ago, a growth of 10.3%. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased in the first six months of 2005 to 2.02% from 1.79% for the like period in 2004.
The Company’s junior subordinated debentures continued to contribute to the overall increase in interest expense during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. The Company’s recorded cost of the junior subordinated debentures is tied to the Three-Month LIBOR index plus 3.65% and is adjusted quarterly. The index increased 200 basis points to 3.14% at June 30, 2005 from 1.14% at June 30, 2004.
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company recorded a $525,000 provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2005, compared to $775,000 for the like period one year ago. Net loan charge-offs were $23,000 for the second quarter of 2005, compared with $329,000 for the like period one year ago. Due to improvements in credit quality, changes in the loan mix, and moderate loan growth during the second quarter of 2005, the Company reduced the provision for loan losses comparable to the like period one year ago. See additional discussion in the “Total Loans” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded $950,000 and $1.6 million provision for loan losses, respectively. The Company recorded $299,000 in net loan charge-offs, representing 0.10% of average loans, annualized (excluding loans held for sale), during the first six months of 2005, compared with $790,000 or 0.30%, annualized, for the like period in 2004.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $172,000, or 10.0%, in the second quarter of 2005 compared to the like period in 2004. For the first six months of 2005, noninterest income increased $446,000, or 14.4% compared to the like period one year ago. Changes in noninterest income were primarily due to an increase of $314,000 from the combination of check printing fees, premiums from the sale of SBA loans, and a nominal gain from the sale of the Company’s former operations center located in Oak Harbor, Washington. In addition, the Company earned $546,000 in noninterest income generated by its Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) investment and annuity income from non-deposit investment products. The Company’s BOLI investment and annuity products were first introduced in the second quarter of 2004, hence the levels of income between both periods are not comparable. Primary changes offsetting these increases were a decline of $47,000 in income from service charges and fees, and a reduction of $294,000 in income from the sale of loans. In the past, selling single-family residential loans to the secondary market contributed significantly to noninterest income, but income from the sale of loans during the first six months of 2005 decreased as mortgage refinancing activity has declined. In addition, the Company’s noninterest income was negatively impacted by $50,000 after incurring a loss from the sale of an investment security during the second quarter of 2005, compared to a net gain of $144,000 during the second quarter of 2004.
14
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $253,000 in the second quarter of 2005, or 4.3%, from a year ago. Two major components of noninterest expense — salaries and benefits, and occupancy and equipment— increased 11.1% and 10.6%, respectively, offset by a 21.0% decline in other noninterest expense for the quarter compared with the like period in 2004. Other noninterest expense was favorably impacted during the second quarter of 2005 compared to the like period one year ago as a result of changes in the timing of certain expenses.
For the first six months of 2005, noninterest expense rose to $12.1 million from $11.6 million one year ago, a 4.6% increase. Salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment, and other noninterest expense increased 4.7%, 4.6% and 2.9%, respectively, during the six month period ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the like period in 2004.
The Company focused its efforts on controlling expenses despite initial costs generated by the opening of a new branch in Friday Harbor, Washington and the ongoing costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance. As a result of consolidating back office operations and improving operating efficiencies, the Company successfully managed noninterest expense during the first six months of 2005.
The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, plus noninterest income) was 59.83% for the second quarter 2005 compared to 65.59% for the like period in 2004. For the first six months of 2005 and 2004, the efficiency ratio was 61.39% and 66.44%, respectively.
Income Taxes. For the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded income tax provisions of $1.2 million and $742,000, respectively. For the first six months of 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded income tax provisions of $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The effective tax rate was 33.8% and 33.2%, respectively, for second quarters of 2005 and 2004. The effective tax rate was 33.1% and 33.4%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
Financial Condition
Total Assets. Total assets grew to $705.6 million at June 30, 2005 from $657.7 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of 7.3%. This increase resulted mainly from growth in loans, loans held for sale, and fed funds sold. Funding was provided primarily by deposit growth, earnings and the maturity and sale of investment securities.
Investment Securities. Total investment securities were $18.2 million and $19.3 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The decrease of 5.6% was a result of the sale and maturity of available-for-sale investment securities and the reallocation of corporate resources toward anticipated increases in the market demand for loans.
Total Loans. Total loans were $610.7 million at June 30, 2005, an increase of 5.3% from $580.0 million at December 31, 2004.
15
Loan Portfolio Composition. The Company originates a wide variety of loans including commercial, real estate and consumer loans. The following table sets forth the Company’s loan portfolio composition by type of loan:
| | June 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) | | Balance | | % of total | | Balance | | % of total |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Commercial | $ | 84,403 | | 13.8% | $ | 80,927 | | 14.0% |
Real estate mortgages: | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential (1) | | 42,741 | | 7.0% | | 46,242 | | 8.0% |
Commercial | | 192,127 | | 31.5% | | 173,280 | | 29.9% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total real estate mortgages | | 234,868 | | 38.5% | | 219,522 | | 37.9% |
| | | | | | | | |
Real estate construction: | | | | | | | | |
One-to-four family residential | | 67,798 | | 11.1% | | 65,190 | | 11.2% |
Commercial | | 45,593 | | 7.5% | | 40,750 | | 7.0% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total real estate construction | | 113,391 | | 18.6% | | 105,940 | | 18.2% |
Consumer: | | | | | | | | |
Indirect (1) | | 95,996 | | 15.7% | | 97,856 | | 16.9% |
Direct | | 81,771 | | 13.4% | | 75,360 | | 13.0% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total consumer | | 177,767 | | 29.1% | | 173,216 | | 29.9% |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Subtotal | | 610,429 | | 100.0% | | 579,605 | | 100.0% |
Less: allowance for loan losses | | (8,554) | | | | (7,903) | | |
Deferred loan fees, net | | 269 | | | | 375 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total loans, net | $ | 602,144 | | | $ | 572,077 | | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
(1) Excludes loans held for sale. |
Allowance for Loan Losses. The Company increased its allowance for loan losses to $8.6 million at June 30, 2005, representing 1.40% of loans (excluding loans held for sale), from $7.9 million or 1.36% of loans (excluding loans held for sale) at December 31, 2004.
16
The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s allowance for loan losses:
| | Three Months Ended June 30 | | Six Months Ended June 30 |
(Dollars in thousands) | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 8,052 | $ | 6,480 | $ | 7,903 | $ | 6,116 |
Charge-offs: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | (32) | | (67) | | (141) | | (198) |
Real estate | | (1) | | (23) | | (26) | | (23) |
Consumer: | | | | | | | | |
Direct | | (55) | | (121) | | (185) | | (246) |
Indirect | | (116) | | (290) | | (434) | | (697) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total charge-offs | $ | (204) | $ | (501) | $ | (786) | $ | (1,164) |
| | | | | | | | |
Recoveries: | | | | | | | | |
Commercial | | 22 | | 97 | | 104 | | 141 |
Real estate | | 8 | | 16 | | 130 | | 18 |
Consumer: | | | | | | | | |
Direct | | 31 | | 13 | | 52 | | 52 |
Indirect | | 120 | | 46 | | 201 | | 163 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total recoveries | $ | 181 | $ | 172 | $ | 487 | $ | 374 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net charge-offs | | (23) | | (329) | | (299) | | (790) |
Provision for loan losses | | 525 | | 775 | | 950 | | 1,600 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at end of period | $ | 8,554 | $ | 6,926 | $ | 8,554 | $ | 6,926 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Indirect net charge-offs to average indirect loans (1) | | (0.02%) | | 0.91% | | 0.48% | | 1.00% |
Other net charge-offs to average other loans (1) | | 0.02% | | 0.08% | | 0.03% | | 0.12% |
Net charge-offs to average loans (1) | | 0.02% | | 0.25% | | 0.10% | | 0.30% |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes loans held for sale. | | | | | | | | |
Net loan charge-offs attributed to indirect loans resulted in a net recovery of $4,000 during the second quarter of 2005, compared to net loan charge-offs of $244,000 for the like period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net charge-offs attributed to indirect loans were $233,000 as compared with $534,000 for the like period in 2004.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses inherent in the portfolio based on management’s assessment of various factors. This includes a review of problem loans, general business and economic conditions, seasoning of the loan portfolio, bank regulatory examination results and findings of internal credit examiners, loss experience and an overall evaluation of the quality of the underlying collateral. Management reviews the allowance quarterly. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries.
While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen market conditions could result in adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, and net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination. Management anticipates that normal growth of the loan portfolio may require continued increases in the allowance for loan losses.
Nonperforming Assets. Nonperforming loans decreased to $2.6 million, or 0.42% of loans (excluding loans held for sale), at June 30, 2005 from $2.8 million, or 0.48% of loans (excluding loans held for sale), at December 31, 2004. The current allowance for loan losses of $8.6 million represents 331.68% of nonperforming loans as compared to 281.05% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2004. Total impaired loans were $2.6 million at June 30, 2005, compared to $2.8 million at December 31, 2004.
17
The following table sets forth an analysis of the composition of the Company’s nonperforming assets:
(Dollars in thousands) | | June 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
| |
| |
|
Nonaccrual loans | $ | 2,579 | $ | 2,812 |
Restructured loans | | — | | — |
| |
| |
|
Total nonperforming loans | | 2,579 | | 2,812 |
Other real estate owned | | 870 | | 1,222 |
| |
| |
|
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 3,449 | $ | 4,034 |
| |
| |
|
Impaired loans (1) | | 2,579 | | 2,812 |
Accruing loans past due > 90 days | | — | | — |
Potential problem loans | | 1,606 | | 356 |
Allowance for loan losses | | 8,554 | | 7,903 |
| | | | |
Nonperforming loans to loans (2) | | 0.42% | | 0.48% |
Allowance for loan losses to loans (2) | | 1.40% | | 1.36% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | | 331.68% | | 281.05% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets | | 248.01% | | 195.91% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets | | 0.49% | | 0.61% |
(1) Certain non-accrual loans outstanding as of December 31, 2004 were reclassified as impaired loans in accordance with FASB Statement No. 114 to conform to the current presentation. |
(2) Excludes loans held for sale. |
Premises and Equipment. Premises and equipment, net of depreciation, was $20.9 million at June 30, 2005 and $20.4 million on December 31, 2004. The Company sold its former operations building located in Oak Harbor, Washington, earning a nominal gain of $95,000 during the first quarter of 2005. In addition, the Company made leasehold improvements to the new Friday Harbor branch location during the six months of 2005.
The Company purchased property in the Burlington, WA area during the first half of 2005 to protect the ingress and egress of the Company’s existing branch facility.
Other Assets. Other assets were $8.4 million and $7.5 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The balances reflect the interest accrual on loans and investments and an increase to deferred tax assets. Offsetting these increases, the Company recorded, at amortized cost, a valuation allowance of $85,000 and disposed of $320,000 in other real estate owned properties (“OREO”) during the first six months of 2005.
Deposits. Deposits grew 10.7% to $623.0 million at June 30, 2005 from $563.0 million at December 31, 2004. Certificates of deposit is the only deposit group that has stated maturity dates. At June 30, 2005, the Company had $228.8 million in CDs, of which approximately $132.6 million, or 57.9%, are scheduled to mature within one year. To date, the Company has not accepted brokered deposits. It has made a concerted effort to attract deposits in the market area it serves through competitive pricing and delivery of quality service. Historically, the Company has been able to retain a considerable amount of its deposits as they mature.
Noninterest-bearing deposits increased by 28.2% in the first six months of 2005 compared to year-end 2004. For the same comparable periods, total interest-bearing deposits increased 7.8%, while the weighted average rate of interest-bearing deposits increased to 1.83% from 1.63% as a result of the Company’s objective to remain competitive and increase its market share of deposits.
Savings deposits and CDs represented 10.6% and 43.7%, respectively, of total interest-bearing deposits at June 30, 2005 compared to 11.5% and 43.3%, respectively, at December 31, 2004. All interest-bearing deposit products increased during the second quarter of 2005 as management focused on establishing and expanding customer relationships and attracting deposits.
18
Other Borrowings. At June 30, 2005 the Company had a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of $105.6 million. The Company’s total other borrowings was $10.0 million at June 30, 2005 compared to $27.0 million at year-end 2004. The reductions during the six months ended June 30, 2005 consisted of $22.0 million in FHLB overnight borrowings and $5.0 million in a long-term advance that matured during the second quarter of 2005. These reductions were offset by an origination of a $10.0 million short-term note that will mature within one year. The Company also had unused lines of credit with correspondent banks in the amount of $33.0 million at June 30, 2005.
Off-Balance Sheet Items. WBCO is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. Among the off-balance sheet items entered into in the ordinary course of business are commitments to extend credit and the issuance of letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the balance sheet. Certain commitments are collateralized. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company’s commitments under letters of credit and financial guarantees amounted to $857,000 and $467,000, respectively. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, these total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Shareholders’ Equity. The Company’s shareholders’ equity increased 7.5% to $53.3 million at June 30, 2005 from $49.6 million at December 31, 2004. The increase reflects earnings, proceeds from stock options exercised, the realization of restricted stock, stock option compensation and the tax benefit associated with the disposition of non-qualified stock options, offset by an unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax, and the payment of cash dividends during the first six months of 2005. During the second quarter of 2005, the Company realized a loss of $50,000 from the sale of an investment security, which was adjusted, net of tax, under Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
Liquidity and Sources of Funds
Sources of Funds. The Company’s sources of funds are customer deposits, loan repayments, current earnings, cash and demand balances due from other banks, federal funds, short-term investments, investment securities available for sale and trust preferred securities. These funds are used for loan originations and deposit withdrawals to satisfy other financial commitments and to support continuing operations. The Company relies primarily upon customer deposits and investments to provide liquidity. The Company will mainly use such funds to make loans and to purchase securities, the majority of which are issued by federal, state and local governments. Additional funds are available through established FHLB and correspondent bank lines of credit, which the Company may use to supplement funding sources.
Capital and Capital Ratios
Banking regulations require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted average total assets of at least 4%. In addition, banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines, under which risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Tier I capital generally consists of common shareholders’ equity (which does not include unrealized gains and losses on securities), less goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets, while Tier II capital includes the allowance for loan losses and subordinated debt, both subject to certain limitations.
19
The FDIC established the qualifications necessary to be classified as a “well-capitalized” bank, primarily for assignment of FDIC insurance premium rates. As the following table indicates, the Bank qualified as “well-capitalized” at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
| Regulatory Requirements | | Actual Ratios |
|
| |
|
| Adequately-capitalized | | Well-capitalized | | June 30, 2005 | | December 31, 2004 |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
Total risk-based capital ratio | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | 8% | | N/A | | 11.31% | | 11.40% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 8% | | 10% | | 11.04% | | 11.03% |
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | 4% | | N/A | | 10.06% | | 10.15% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 4% | | 6% | | 9.79% | | 9.79% |
Leverage ratio | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | 4% | | N/A | | 9.95% | | 9.87% |
Whidbey Island Bank | 4% | | 5% | | 9.68% | | 9.51% |
There can be no assurance that additional capital will not be required in the near future due to greater-than-expected growth, unforeseen expenses or revenue shortfalls, or otherwise.
Capital Expenditures and Commitments
The Company entered into an option to purchase agreement for a 70,000 square-foot property located in the Smokey Point / Arlington, WA area for the purpose of relocating the Smokey Point branch, which is currently in leased space. The agreement stipulates the performance of several conditional items by the seller prior to closing the purchase transaction.
Significant Accounting Policies
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
At June 30, 2005, based on the measures used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, there were no material changes in the Company’s interest rate risk since December 31, 2004. To manage the risk from interest rate fluctuations, the Company’s strategy is to attain a near-neutral position. Should rates increase, the Company may, or may not be negatively impacted due to its current slightly asset-sensitive position. For additional information, refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on March 25, 2005.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The principal executive and financial officers supervised and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the chief executive and financial officer each concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the periodic reports to the SEC. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon various assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any of the Company’s plans, products, services or procedures will succeed in achieving their intended goals under future conditions. In addition, there have been no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors known to management that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the most recent evaluation. Management found no facts that would require WBCO to take any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.
20
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company may be involved in legal proceedings in the regular course of business. At this time, management does not believe that there is any pending litigation, which would result in an unfavorable outcome, which would result in a material adverse change to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company’s annual meeting of shareholders was held at Oak Harbor, Washington at 3:00 p.m. on April 28, 2005. The total number of shares of common stock represented at the meeting, in person or by proxy, was 6,382,376. This represented 88.0% of the 7,255,169 shares held by shareholders as of March 1, 2005 who were entitled to vote at the meeting. The following issues came before the shareholders for vote:
Election of directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the Annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2008, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified – three of the nine director position terms had expired and two were open for election. Mr. Sherman, having reached the retirement age as determined by a resolution of the Board of Directors, did not stand for re-election. WBCO’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the number of directors to be elected by the shareholders shall be not less than five nor more than 12 and that, within such minimum and maximum, the exact number of directors shall be fixed by resolution of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors fixed the number of directors at eight, effective immediately upon retirement of director Sherman. The nominees for the two open positions were Jay T. Lien and Edward J. Wallgren, who were each elected with the following vote totals:
| For | Withheld |
|
|
|
Jay T. Lien | 5,445,788 | 307,173 |
Edward J. Wallgren | 5,682,865 | 70,096 |
The other six directors who continue in office are: Michal D. Cann; Jerry C. Chambers; Marlen L. Knutson; Karl C. Krieg, III; Robert B. Olson; and Anthony B. Pickering.
At the Company’s annual meeting, the shareholders were also presented with the proposal to approve the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2005 Stock Incentive Plan was approved with the following vote totals:
For | Against | Abstain |
|
|
|
3,443,848 | 1,126,653 | 100,318 |
(b) | There have been no material changes in the procedures for shareholders to nominate directors to the Company’s board. |
21
Exhibits
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON BANKING COMPANY
Date: August 12, 2005 | By /s/ Michal D. Cann Michal D. Cann President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: August 12, 2005 | By /s/ Richard A. Shields Richard A. Shields Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
23