ELECTION OF TRUSTEES
In accordance with the Fund’s Declaration of Trust, the Fund’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) is divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III. At the Meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect one Class II Trustee to hold office until the year 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or thereafter when their respective successors are elected and duly qualified. Shareholders will also be asked to elect one Class III Trustee to hold office until the year 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or thereafter when their respective successors are elected and duly qualified. The terms of office of the current Class I Trustees expire at the year 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or thereafter when their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.
The current Class III independent board members, Messrs. R. Jan LeCroy and Harold W. Hartley, are scheduled to retire from the Board concurrent with the December 15, 2005 Meeting. Further, current Class II independent board member Mr. David N. Walthall has also indicated his intention to resign from the Board on December 15, 2005.
On June 28, 2005, Mr. Gregory J. Hahn resigned from the Board. On the same day, the Board, including a majority of those trustees not considered “interested persons” as that term is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”) (“Independent Trustees”) appointed Ms. Audrey L. Kurzawa as President and Trustee to replace Mr. Hahn. On September 27, 2005, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, nominated Ms. Kurzawa to be elected by the Fund’s shareholders to serve Mr. Hahn’s unexpired term of office as a Class II Trustee expiring in 2007. Also on September 27, 2005, Mr. Vincent J. Otto was nominated by the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, to be elected as trustee by the Fund’s shareholders to serve as a Class III trustee with a term expiring in 2008. Ms. Kurzawa and Mr. Otto will both serve until her or his successor is duly elected and qualified.
Ms. Kurzawa and Mr. Otto have each been nominated by the Nominating Committee of the Board. Mr. Otto does not currently serve as a Board Trustee.
At the September 27, 2005 board meeting, the Board voted unanimously to reduce the number of Board members to five (5) from six (6), effective as of the Meeting, pursuant to the power granted to the Board in Article IX, Section 9.1 of the Amended Declaration of Trust of 40|86 Strategic Income Fund (the “Declaration of Trust”). It is anticipated that the vacancy existing on the Board will be filled by the Trustees in 2006 and such individual will be nominated to be elected by shareholders at the Fund’s 2006 annual meeting of shareholders.
Further, a majority of the Board voted unanimously to revise the number of Trustees in each specific class pursuant to the power granted to the Board in Article II, Section 2.2 of the Declaration of Trust. Accordingly, Class I and II will each have two (2) trustees and Class III will have one (1) trustee. This change affects the number of Class III trustees only, which will decrease from two (2) trustees to one (1) trustee. There is no change to the number of trustees in Classes I and II.
Mr. Jeffrey Stautz and Ms. Sarah Bertrand, the persons named on the accompanying proxy card, intend to vote each received proxy for the election of the Nominees, unless shareholders specifically indicate on their proxy card the desire to withhold authority to vote for election to office. It is not contemplated that any Nominee will be unable to serve as a Board member for any reason, but if that should occur prior to the meeting, the proxyholders reserve the right to substitute another person of their choice as nominee.
The following information regarding the Nominees, and each Trustee whose term will continue after the Meeting, includes such person’s age, positions with the Adviser (if any), principal occupation and business experience for the last five years, and the number of years each has served as a Trustee. No Trustee or Nominee is related to any other.
NAME OF TRUSTEE OR NOMINEE | AGE | TERM OF OFFICE AND LENGTH OF TIME SERVED | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE | NUMBER OF 40|86 FAMILY OF FUNDS AND PORTFOLIOS OVERSEEN** | PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS |
Class II: Term Expires 2007 Interested Trustee Nominee |
AUDREY L. KURZAWA* | 38 | President and Trustee Since June 2005 | President and Trustee of the Trust; Certified Public Accountant; Controller and Senior Vice President, Adviser. President and Trustee of one other investment company managed by the Adviser. | 2 registered investment companies consisting of 7 portfolios | None |
Class III: Term Expires 2008 Independent Trustee Nominee |
VINCENT J. OTTO | 46 | None | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Waterfield Mortgage Company and Union Federal Bank. Director, Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. | None | None |
OTHER TRUSTEES |
Class I: Term Expires 2006 Independent Trustees |
DIANA H. HAMILTON | 49 | Trustee Since December 2004 | President Sycamore Advisors, LLC, a municipal finance advisory firm; Formerly, State of Indiana Director of Public Finance. Trustee of one other investment company managed by the Adviser. | 2 registered investment companies consisting of 7 portfolios | None |
|
R. MATTHEW NEFF | 50 | Trustee Since December 2004 | Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Office of Senex Financial Corp., a financial services company engaged in the healthcare finance field. Trustee of one other investment company managed by the Adviser. | 2 registered investment companies consisting of 7 portfolios | None |
__________
* | The Trustee so indicated is considered an “interested person,” of the Fund as defined in the 1940, due to her employment with the Adviser and its affiliates. |
| |
** | The 40|86 Family of Funds consists of 40|86 Strategic Income Fund and 40|86 Series Trust. |
All Trustees and officers have a mailing address c/o 40|86 Advisors, Inc., 535 College Drive, Carmel, IN 46032.
Compensation of Trustees
Each Independent Trustee receives an annual retainer fee of $7,500 and a meeting fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting, Independent Trustee meeting or separate committee meeting (that is, committee meeting(s) not conducted in conjunction with a Board meeting or Independent Trustee meeting) he or she attends. Additionally, each Independent Trustee receives a fee of $500 for attending telephonic Board of Trustees meetings and
separate telephonic committee meetings. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional per-meeting fee of $375 for in-person Board meetings. The Fund also reimburses each Independent Trustee for travel and out-of-pocket expenses. The Adviser pays all compensation of officers and Trustees of the Fund who are affiliated with the Adviser.
The Fund does not pay any other remuneration to its officers and Trustees, and the Fund does not have a bonus, pension, profit-sharing or retirement plan.
During the Fund’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Board held nine meetings. Each of the Trustees then in office attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and committee meetings held during the fiscal year.
The aggregate amount of compensation paid to each Independent Trustee by the Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, and by all funds in the 40|86 Family of Funds for which such Trustee was a Board member (the number of which is set forth in parenthesis next to each Trustee’s total compensation) was as follows:
NAME OF TRUSTEE/NOMINEE | | AGGREGATE COMPENSATION FROM FUND* | | TOTAL COMPENSATION FROM FUND AND FUND COMPLEX PAID TO TRUSTEE** | |
Independent Trustees/Nominee | | | | | |
Diana H. Hamilton. | | $ | 13,250 | | $ | 28,250 | |
Harold W. Hartley | | $ | 18,167 | | $ | 39,125 | |
R. Jan LeCroy | | $ | 18,417 | | $ | 39,625 | |
R. Matthew Neff | | $ | 14,750 | | $ | 31,250 | |
Vincent J. Otto | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
David N. Walthall | | $ | 23,292 | | $ | 49,562 | |
| | | | | | | |
Interested Trustee/Nominee and Officers | | | | | | | |
Audrey L. Kurzawa | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Daniel J. Murphy | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
William T. Devanney, Jr. | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Jeffrey M. Stautz. | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
Sarah L. Bertrand | | $ | 0 | | $ | 0 | |
__________
* | Amount does not include reimbursed expenses for attending Board meetings, which amounted to $12,005 for all Trustees as a group. |
| |
** | Represents total compensation from all investment companies in the fund complex, Hartley, including the Fund and 40|86 Series Trust, for which the Trustee or Officer serves as a Board Member. Messrs. LeCroy and Walthall also served as directors of Conseco StockCar Stocks Mutual Fund, Inc. (1 portfolio) until October 29, 2004. |
Beneficial Ownership of Shares Held in the Fund by Each Trustee and Nominees for Election as Trustee
TRUSTEES | AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF EQUITY IN THE FUND | | AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF SECURITIES IN ALL 40|86 FUND COMPLEX |
Independent Trustees/Nominees | | | |
Diana H. Hamilton | None | | None |
R. Matthew Neff | None | | None |
Vincent J. Otto | None | | None |
Interested Trustee/Nominees* | | | |
Audrey L. Kurzawa | None | | None |
__________
* | The Trustee so indicated is considered an “interested person,” of the Fund as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), due to his employment with the Adviser and its affiliates. |
For the preceding five years, to the knowledge of the Fund, none of the Independent Trustees, nor his or her immediate family members, beneficially owned any class of securities in, or had any direct or indirect business
relationships with, the Adviser, the Fund’s independent registered public accountants, nor any person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser of the Fund.
To the knowledge of the Fund’s management, as of the Record Date, the Trustees and officers of the Fund owned an aggregate of less than one percent of the outstanding shares of the Fund.
Audit Committee
The Fund has an Audit Committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees who are “independent” as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The principal responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to (1) review and recommend to the Board for its consideration the Fund’s independent registered public accountants; (2) review with the independent registered public accountants the scope and performance of the audit; (3) discuss with the independent registered public accountants certain matters relating to the Fund’s financial statements, including any adjustment to such financial statements recommended by such independent registered public accountants; (4) review on a periodic basis a formal written statement from the independent registered public accountants with respect to their independence, and discuss with the independent registered public accountants any relationships or services disclosed in the statement that may impact their objectivity and independence; and (5) consider the comments of the independent registered public accountants and management’s responses thereto with respect to the quality and adequacy of the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting policies, practices and internal controls.
The Fund adopted an amended Audit Committee Charter (the “Charter”) on August 19, 2004. In accordance with proxy rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), a fund audit committee charter is required to be filed at least once every three years as an exhibit to a fund’s proxy statement. The Audit Committee Charter for the Fund was filed as Exhibit A to the Fund’s proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2004. The Fund’s Audit Committee has received written disclosures and the letter required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (“PwC”), Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Fund.
Representatives of PwC are not expected to be present at the Meeting but have been given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available by telephone to respond to appropriate questions.
The Report of the Audit Committee, dated August 18, 2005 is attached as Exhibit A to this proxy statement.
Set forth in the tables below are fees billed by PwC to the Fund for the Fund’s last two fiscal years ended June 30:
2003 |
Audit Fee | Audit Related Fees | | Tax Fees | Other Fees |
$23,400 | $0 | | $2,700 | $0 |
|
2004 |
Audit Fee | Audit Related Fees | | Tax Fees | Other Fees |
$23,400 | $0 | | $2,700 | $0 |
The Audit Committee approved the tax related services listed above and determined that the provision of such services is compatible with PwC maintaining its independence. PwC’s tax services include reviewing both federal and state income tax returns and capital gains distributions.
The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve permitted non-audit services provided by PwC to the Adviser and certain of its affiliates to the extent that the services related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. No such non-audit services were provided by PwC during the Fund’s 2004 or 2005 fiscal years.
The aggregate fees paid by the Fund, its Adviser and certain of its affiliates to PwC for non-audit services that did not require Audit Committee pre-approval totaled approximately $10,436 for 2004 and $62,067 for 2005. These services and fees were disclosed to the Audit Committee subsequent to the engagement of PwC to audit the Fund’s financial statements. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence.
Nominating Committee
The Trust has a Nominating Committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. The Nominating Committee is responsible for nominating individuals to serve as Trustees, including as Independent Trustees. Each member of the Nominating Committee must be an Independent Trustee. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Nominating Committee held three meetings.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Committee members met to discuss matters relating to the nomination of Class II and III Trustees. In the interim, the Committee Members reviewed resumes and questionnaires for prospective nominees. The Nominating Committee met on August 18, 2005 to interview a prospective nominee and on September 27, 2005, nominated two individuals to be elected by shareholders.
Information Regarding the Fund’s Process for Nominating Trustee Candidates
Nominating Committee Charter. The Nominating Committee has a written charter. A copy of the Fund’s Nominating Committee Charter is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement.
Nominee Qualifications. The Committee requires that Trustee candidates have a college degree or equivalent business experience. While there is no formal list of qualifications, the Nominating Committee considers, among other things, whether prospective nominees have distinguished records in their primary careers, integrity, and substantive knowledge in areas important to the Board of Trustees’ operations, such as background or education in finance, auditing, securities law, the workings of the securities markets, or investment advice. For candidates to serve as Independent Trustees, they must be independent from the Adviser, its affiliates and other principal service providers. The Nominating Committee also considers whether the prospective candidates’ workloads would allow them to attend meetings of the Board of Trustees, be available for service on Board committees, and devote the time and effort necessary to attend to Board matters and the rapidly changing regulatory environment in which the Trust operates.
Different substantive areas may assume greater or lesser significance at particular times, in light of the Board’s present composition and the Nominating Committee’s (or the Board’s) perceptions about future issues and needs.
Identifying Nominees. In identifying potential nominees for the Board, the Nominating Committee may consider candidates recommended by one or more of the following sources: (i) the Fund’s current Trustees, (ii) the Fund’s officers, (iii) the Adviser, and (iv) any other source the Committee deems to be appropriate, including shareholders. Resumes of candidates may be sent to the Secretary of the Trust at 11825 N. Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032. The Committee may, but is not required to, retain a third party search firm at the Fund’s expense to identify potential candidates. The Nominating Committee initially evaluates prospective candidates on the basis of their resumes, considered in light of the criteria discussed above. Those prospective candidates that appear likely to be able to fill a significant need of the Board would be contacted by a Nominating Committee member by telephone to discuss the position; if there appeared to be sufficient interest, an in-person meeting with one or more Nominating Committee members would be arranged. If the Nominating Committee, based on the results of these contacts, believed it had identified a viable candidate, it would air the matter with all Trustees for input. The Trust has not paid a fee to third parties to assist in finding the current nominees. The Nominating Committee may consider candidates proposed by personnel of the Adviser or its affiliates.
Other Committees
Compensation Committee
The Trust has a Compensation Committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the compensation of the Independent Trustees and recommends any appropriate changes, as necessary. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Compensation Committee held one meeting.
Insurance Committee
The Trust has an Insurance Committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. The Insurance Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the insurance coverage that protects the Trust and the Trustees. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Insurance Committee held one meeting.
Retirement Committee
The Trust has a Retirement Committee comprised of all of the Independent Trustees. The Retirement Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the retirement policy and recommends any appropriate changes, as necessary. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, the Retirement Committee held one meeting.
Trustee Attendance at the Shareholder Meeting
The Fund has not formal policy regarding Trustee attendance at shareholder meetings. None of the Fund’s Independent Trustees attended the Annual Meeting held in December 2004. The former President of the Fund, who was also a Trustee, attended the Annual Meeting held in December 2004.
The Fund’s Board of Trustees, Including the “Independent” Trustees,
Recommends that Shareholders Vote “For” Election of Each of the
Nominees to Serve as Trustees of the Fund.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires the officers and Trustees of the Fund and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Fund’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and NYSE. Officers, Trustees and greater than ten percent stockholders of the Fund are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Fund with copies of all filed Forms 3, 4 and 5.
Based solely on the Fund’s review of the copies of such forms, and amendments thereto, furnished to it during or with respect to its most recent fiscal year, and written representations from certain reporting persons that they were not required to file Form 5 with respect to the most recent fiscal year, the Fund believes that all of its officers, Trustees, greater than ten percent beneficial owners and other persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act due to the requirements of Section 30 of the 1940 Act (i.e. any advisory board member, investment adviser or affiliated person of the Adviser) have complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during the Fund’s most recent fiscal year except for the late filings of Form 3 by Leo J. Dierckman, R. Matthew Neff, Diana H. Hamilton, Audrey L. Kurzawa, Jeffrey M. Stautz, Amy L. Gibson, Richard M. Matas and Daniel J. Murphy. An administrative error with regard to personnel changes resulted in the untimely Form 3 filings for these individuals.
OTHER MATTERS
If a proxy card is properly executed and returned accompanied by instructions to withhold authority to vote, represents a broker “non-vote” (that is, a proxy card from a broker or nominee indicating that such person has not received instructions from the beneficial owner or other person entitled to vote shares of the Fund on a particular matter with respect to which the broker or nominee does not have discretionary power) or marked with an abstention (collectively, “Abstentions”), the Fund’s shares represented thereby will be considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum for the transaction of business. Under Massachusetts law, Abstentions do not constitute a vote “for” or “against” a matter and will be disregarded in determining “votes cast” on an issue.
The Fund’s Board is not aware of any other matter, which may come before the meeting. However, should any such matter with respect to the Fund properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the proxy holders to vote the proxy in accordance with their judgment on any such matter.
The Fund will request broker/dealer firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record. The Fund will reimburse such broker/dealer firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with such proxy solicitation. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, officers of the Fund and employees of the Adviser and its affiliates, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or otherwise.
The Fund will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone, by telegraph, or by electronic transmission (e-mail).
SHAREHOLDERS COMMUNICATION AND PROPOSALS
Shareholder Communications
Shareholders may send written communications to the Fund’s Board of Trustees or to an individual Trustee by mailing such correspondence to the Secretary of the Fund (addressed to 11815 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032). Such communications must be signed by the shareholder and identify the number of shares held by the shareholder. Properly submitted shareholder communications will, as appropriate, be forwarded to the entire Board of to the individual Trustee. Any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, as amended, must continue to meet all the requirements of Rule 14a-8.
Shareholder Proposals
Proposals that shareholders wish to include in the Fund’s proxy statement for the Fund’s next Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by the Fund at the principal executive offices of the Fund at 11815 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032 no later than June 30, 2006, and must satisfy the other requirements of the federal securities laws.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE FUND
NAME AND POSITION WITH THE FUND | AGE | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION AND BUSINESS EXPERIENCE FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS |
Audrey L. Kurzawa, President Since June 2005 | 38 | President and Appointed Trustee of the Trust; Certified Public Accountant; Controller and Senior Vice President, Adviser. President and Trustee of one other investment company managed by the Adviser. |
| | |
Jeffrey M. Stautz, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer Since May 2005 | 47 | Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, 40|86 Advisors, Inc. Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of one other mutual fund managed by the Adviser. Previously, Partner, Baker & Daniels, LLP. |
| | |
Daniel J. Murphy, Treasurer Since June 2005 | 49 | Certified Public Accountant; Senior Vice President, President of Conseco Services, LLC and Senior Vice President and Treasurer of various Conseco affiliates. Treasurer of one other mutual fund managed by the Adviser. |
| | |
William T. Devanney, Vice President Since June 1993 | 48 | Senior Vice President, Corporate Taxes of Conseco Services, LLC and various Conseco affiliates. Vice President of one other mutual fund managed by the Adviser. |
| | |
Sarah L. Bertrand, Assistant Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer Since December 2004 | 37 | Assistant Vice President, Legal & Compliance, and Assistant Secretary, 40|86 Advisors, Inc. Chief Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary of one other fund managed by the Adviser. |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
40|86 Advisors, Inc., located at 535 College Drive, Carmel, Indiana 46032, serves as the Fund’s investment adviser.
PFPC, Inc., located at 400 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, Delaware 19809, serves as the Fund’s transfer agent and accounting servicing agent.
NOTICE TO BANKS, BROKER/DEALERS VOTING TRUSTEES AND THEIR NOMINEES
Please advise the Fund, in care of PFPC, Inc., whether other persons are the beneficial owners of the shares for which proxies are being solicited and, if so, the number of copies of the proxy statement and other soliciting material you wish to receive in order to supply copies to the beneficial owners of shares.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXY CARDS BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, SHAREHOLDERS WHO DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED STAMPED ENVELOPE.
Dated: November 16, 2005
EXHIBIT A
40|86 STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Trustees in its oversight of the 40|86 Strategic Income Fund (the “Fund”) financial reporting process. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a Charter that was most recently amended and approved by the Board on August 19, 2004. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter was filed as Exhibit A to the Fund’s proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2004. As set forth in the Charter, management of the Fund is responsible for maintaining appropriate systems for accounting and internal control. The Fund’s independent registered accounting firm is responsible for planning and conducting an audit to determine whether the financial statements present fairly in all material respects the financial position and results of the operations of the Fund.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PwC”) was the Independent Registered Public Accountants for the Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. In performing its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the Fund’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 with Fund management and PwC. The Audit Committee discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, COMMUNICATIONS WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES, as modified or supplemented. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures from PwC required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, INDEPENDENT DISCUSSIONS WITH AUDIT COMMITTEES, as currently in effect. Finally, the Committee considered whether the provision by PwC relating to non-audit services to the Fund, or of professional services to the Adviser and those affiliates thereof that provide services to the Fund, is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence and has discussed with PwC its independence. PwC has not provided to the Fund, the Adviser or those affiliates thereof that provide services to the Fund, any information technology services relating to financial information design and implementation or internal audit services.
Members of the Fund’s Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting and are not employed by the Fund for accounting, financial management or internal control. Moreover, the Audit Committee relies on, and makes no independent verification of, the facts presented and the representations made to it by Fund management and PwC. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and/or financial reporting principles and policies, or internal controls and procedures, designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not provide assurance that the audit of the Fund’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards or that the financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Based on its consideration of the Fund’s audited financial statements and the discussions referred to above with Fund management and PwC, and subject to the limitations on the responsibilities and role of the Audit Committee as set forth in the Charter and discussed above, the Audit Committee recommended the inclusion of the Fund’s audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2005 in the Fund’s Annual Report dated June 30, 2005.
At a meeting held on August 18, 2005, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, a majority of the Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund (as defined in the 1940 Act) selected PwC as Independent Registered Public Accountants for the Fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. It is expected that representatives of PwC will not be present at the Meeting, but will be available by telephone to answer any questions that may arise. In reliance on Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, the Fund is not seeking shareholder ratification of the selection of PwC as independent auditors.
SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE FUND:
Harold W. Hartley, Chairman of Audit Committee Diana H. Hamilton
Dr. R. Jan LeCroy
R. Matthew Neff
David N. Walthall, Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT B
40|86 STRATEGIC INCOME FUND (“FUND”)
NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER
Adopted as of December 2, 2004
The Board of Trustees (the "Board") of 40|86 Strategic Income Fund (the "Fund") has adopted this Charter to govern the activities of the Nominating Committee (the "Committee") of the Board.
Statement of Purpose and Responsibility
The selection and nomination of the independent Trustees of the Fund is committed to the discretion of the then independent Trustees of the Fund. The primary purpose and responsibility of the Committee is the screening and nomination of candidates for election to the Board as independent trustee.
Organization and Governance
The Committee shall be comprised of as many Trustees as the Board shall determine, but in any event not fewer than two (2) Trustees. The Committee must consist entirely of Board members who are not "interested persons" of the Fund, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Board may remove or replace any member of the Committee at any time in its sole discretion.
One or more members of the Committee may be designated by the Board as the Committee’s chairman or co-chairman, as the case may be.
The Committee will not have regularly scheduled meetings. Committee meetings shall be held as and when the Committee of the Board determines necessary or appropriate in accordance with the Fund’s Bylaws.
Qualifications for Trustee Nominees
The Committee requires that Trustee candidates have a college degree or equivalent business experience. The Committee may take into account a wide variety of factors in considering Trustee candidates, including (but not limited to): (i) availability and commitment of a candidate to attend meetings and perform his or her responsibilities on the Board, (ii) relevant industry and related experience, (iii) educational background, and (iv) ability, judgment and experience.
Identification of Nominees
In identifying potential nominees for the Board, the Committee may consider candidates recommended by on or more of the following sources: (i) the Fund’s current Trustees, (ii) the Fund’s officers, (iii) the Fund’s investment adviser, and (iv) any other source the Committee deems to be appropriate. The Committee may, but is not required to, retain a third party search firm at the Fund’s expense to identify potential candidates.