including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.
Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.
Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Funds’ risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized as unrealized appreciation in the statements of financial condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the assets is CGM.
The General Partner monitors and controls the Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Funds’ are subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.
The majority of these instruments traded by the Funds’ mature within one year of June 30, 2007. However, due to the nature of the Funds’ businesses, these instruments may not be held to maturity.
Table of ContentsItem 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. Its only assets are investments in the Funds and cash. The Funds’ only assets are their equity in its commodity futures trading accounts, consisting of cash, net unrealized appreciation on open futures and forward contracts, commodity options, if applicable, and interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial losses could lead to a decrease in liquidity, no such losses occurred during the second quarter of 2007.
The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners, as increased or decreased by its investment in the Funds, expenses, interest income, additions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, Partnership capital increased 1.0% from $45,246,167 to $45,712,836. This increase was attributable to a net income from operations of $3,270,696 coupled with the addition of 278.1823 General Partner equivalent units totaling $430,679 which was partially offset by the redemptions of 1,991.4891 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest resulting in an outflow of $3,234,706. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contract positions in subsequent periods.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in the Funds’ reflects the Partnership’s proportional interest in the Funds.
All commodity interests of the Partnership are held by the Funds’, (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) and are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded in the statements of financial condition at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available or other measures of fair value deemed appropriate by management of the General Partner for those commodity interests and foreign currencies for which market quotations are not readily available. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the last business day of the period. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on open positions are recognized in the period in which the contract i s closed or the changes occur and are included in net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests of the Funds.
Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership/Funds agree to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership’s net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the date of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting dates, is included in the statement of financial condition. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in the statements of income and expenses and partners’ capital.
The Partnership may purchase and write (sell) options. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Partnership writes an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the statements of financial condition and marked to market daily. When the Partnership purchases an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily.
14
Table of ContentsIn July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the ‘‘FASB’’) the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48 ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes’’ (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are ‘‘more-likely-than-not’’ of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. The Partnership has adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and the application of this standard did not impact the financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This accounting standard establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. As of June 30, 2007, the Partnership is still evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on the financial statement amounts; however, additional disclosures will be required about the inputs used to develop the measurements and the effect of certain measurements on changes in Partners’ Capital for the period.
Results of Operations
During the Partnership’s second quarter of 2007, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 16.6% from $1,548.19 to $1,804.66, as compared to an increase of 0.6% in the second quarter of 2006. The Partnership experienced an unrealized gain, through its investments in the Funds’ before brokerage commissions and related fees in the second quarter of 2007 of $7,873,998. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds’ of commodity futures in currencies, energy, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals, softs and indices and were partially offset by losses in grains, lumber and livestock. The Partnership experienced an unrealized gain, through its investments in the Funds’ before brokerage commissions and related fees in the second quarter of 2006 of $1,454,380. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds’ of commodity futures in energy, U.S and non-U.S. interest rates, metals and lumber and were p artially offset by losses in currencies, grains, livestock, softs and indices.
Favorable trading conditions during the second quarter, especially in the financial sectors, provided gains for the Partnership. Profits earned in global and U.S. fixed income markets, equity indices and currency were more than sufficient to offset small losses accumulated in trading grains and livestock.
The global economy remained stable in the quarter as relatively low interest rates and high levels of liquidity in the capital markets were the backdrop to the highest corporate activities in recent history. Gains were realized from trading in fixed income markets domestically and globally on stronger than expected economic data and increased inflationary pressures. Equity indices added to gains for the quarter as the global equity rally continued unabated. Profits were also earned in trading currency as trends in Japanese yen, the New Zealand dollar and the Pound Sterling persisted.
Slightly offsetting gains were losses in grains and livestock. Losses were also accumulated from trading wheat as prices fell as a spring freeze lowered supply expectations early in the quarter. Corn prices also remained directionless. In livestock, prices of hog futures declined to the lowest levels in more than three months due to a drop in corn prices, reducing the likelihood that farmers will thin herds to reduce feed costs. Cattle futures prices were also dominated by sharp reversals, resulting in losses for the sector.
During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2007, the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 7.9% from $1,673.08 to $1,804.66, as compared to an increase of 6.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Partnership experienced an unrealized gain, through its investments in the Funds’ before brokerage commissions and related fees during the six months ended June 30, 2007 of $5,343,559. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds’ of commodity futures in currencies, grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals, softs, lumber and indices and were partially offset by losses in energy and livestock. The Partnership experienced an unrealized gain, through its investments in the Funds’ before brokerage commissions and related fees during the six months ended
15
Table of ContentsJune 30, 2006 of $5,491,740. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds’ of commodity futures in U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, energy, grains, livestock, softs and lumber.
Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.
CGM will pay monthly interest to the Partnership on its allocable share of 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Funds’ brokerage account at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined by CGM and/or will place up to all of the Funds’ assets in 90-day Treasury bills. The Partnership will receive 80% of its allocable share of the interest earned on the Treasury bills through its investments in Partnerships and CGM will be paid 20% of the interest.
Brokerage commissions are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased by $76,657 and $135,997, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2006. The decrease in brokerage commissions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was due to lower average net assets as compared to the corresponding periods in 2006.
Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased by $23,299 and $41,413, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2006. The decrease in management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was due to lower average net assets as compared to the corresponding periods in 2006.
Incentive fees paid annually by the Partnership are based on the new trading profits of the Partnership as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 resulted in an incentive fee accrual of $447,440. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 resulted in an incentive fee acrrual of $163,644 and $574,452, respectively.
16
Table of ContentsItem 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
All of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investments in the Funds. The Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by them are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and substantially all of the Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Funds’ main lines of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Funds’ open positions and, consequently in their earnings and cash flow. The Funds’ market risks are influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Funds’ open positions and the liquidity of the market in which they trade.
The Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Funds’ past performances are not necessarily indicative of their future results.
Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Funds’ experiences to date (i.e., ‘‘risk of ruin’’). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Funds’ attempts to manage their market risks.
Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Funds as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.
The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s investments in the Funds’ by market category as of June 30, 2007 and the highest, lowest and average values at any point during the three months ended June 30, 2007. All open position trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. There have been no material changes in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
As of June 30, 2007, Campbell Master’s total capitalization was $309,805,967. The Partnership owned 4.4% of Campbell Master.
June 30, 2007
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 8,078,023 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.61 | % |  |  |  | $ | 11,367,341 |  |  |  |  | $ | 6,780,223 |  |  |  |  | $ | 8,267,143 |  |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 969,350 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.31 | % |  |  |  |  | 969,350 |  |  |  |  |  | 357,600 |  |  |  |  |  | 735,117 |  |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 4,120,200 |  |  |  |  |  | 1.33 | % |  |  |  |  | 4,293,650 |  |  |  |  |  | 53,207 |  |  |  |  |  | 2,943,000 |  |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 7,860,338 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.54 | % |  |  |  |  | 10,281,295 |  |  |  |  |  | 3,366,038 |  |  |  |  |  | 8,412,667 |  |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  |  | 296,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.10 | % |  |  |  |  | 390,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 124,000 |  |  |  |  |  | 299,333 |  |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  |  | 1,143,021 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.37 | % |  |  |  |  | 2,315,924 |  |  |  |  |  | 854,405 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,303,427 |  |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 5,742,025 |  |  |  |  |  | 1.85 | % |  |  |  |  | 10,594,273 |  |  |  |  |  | 5,347,848 |  |  |  |  |  | 8,194,370 |  |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 28,208,957 |  |  |  |  |  | 9.11 | % |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
17
Table of ContentsAs of June 30, 2007, Aspect Master’s total capitalization was $229,531,294. The Partnership owned 6.8% of Aspect Master.
June 30, 2007
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 6,515,051 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.84 | % |  |  |  | $ | 6,845,415 |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,442,322 |  |  |  |  | $ | 4,009,357 |  |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 1,030,450 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.45 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,462,150 |  |  |  |  |  | 227,012 |  |  |  |  |  | 600,308 |  |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 425,485 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.19 | % |  |  |  |  | 621,635 |  |  |  |  |  | 178,578 |  |  |  |  |  | 375,019 |  |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 1,631,300 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.71 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,793,250 |  |  |  |  |  | 353,750 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,342,633 |  |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 6,565,535 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.86 | % |  |  |  |  | 7,251,434 |  |  |  |  |  | 3,124,428 |  |  |  |  |  | 6,120,581 |  |
Livestock |  |  |  |  | 40,750 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.02 | % |  |  |  |  | 84,405 |  |  |  |  |  | 12,550 |  |  |  |  |  | 44,370 |  |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  |  | 352,250 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.15 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,020,250 |  |  |  |  |  | 352,250 |  |  |  |  |  | 684,500 |  |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  |  | 1,145,094 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.50 | % |  |  |  |  | 3,084,837 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,145,094 |  |  |  |  |  | 2,142,578 |  |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 1,009,708 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.44 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,265,792 |  |  |  |  |  | 950,198 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,066,595 |  |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 5,892,497 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.56 | % |  |  |  |  | 7,736,923 |  |  |  |  |  | 3,145,113 |  |  |  |  |  | 6,238,276 |  |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 24,608,120 |  |  |  |  |  | 10.72 | % |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
As of June 30, 2007, Altis Master’s total capitalization was $65,641,787. The Partnership owned 26.6% of Altis Master.
June 30, 2007
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  | $ | 761,425 |  |  |  |  |  | 1.16 | % |  |  |  | $ | 1,216,483 |  |  |  |  | $ | 637,693 |  |  |  |  | $ | 814,561 |  |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 2,433,233 |  |  |  |  |  | 3.71 | % |  |  |  |  | 2,545,683 |  |  |  |  |  | 916,628 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,856,766 |  |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 698,428 |  |  |  |  |  | 1.06 | % |  |  |  |  | 689,246 |  |  |  |  |  | 209,371 |  |  |  |  |  | 450,356 |  |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 594,550 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.91 | % |  |  |  |  | 626,028 |  |  |  |  |  | 122,275 |  |  |  |  |  | 478,780 |  |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 1,058,209 |  |  |  |  |  | 1.61 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,133,841 |  |  |  |  |  | 640,048 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,060,953 |  |
Livestock |  |  |  |  | 55,810 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.09 | % |  |  |  |  | 155,950 |  |  |  |  |  | 55,810 |  |  |  |  |  | 95,170 |  |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
– Exchange Traded Contracts |  |  |  |  | 334,380 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.51 | % |  |  |  |  | 420,250 |  |  |  |  |  | 145,860 |  |  |  |  |  | 337,147 |  |
– OTC Contracts |  |  |  |  | 1,731,510 |  |  |  |  |  | 2.64 | % |  |  |  |  | 1,749,757 |  |  |  |  |  | 785,461 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,478,475 |  |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 557,935 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.84 | % |  |  |  |  | 653,532 |  |  |  |  |  | 512,328 |  |  |  |  |  | 572,048 |  |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 2,476,456 |  |  |  |  |  | 3.77 | % |  |  |  |  | 2,996,649 |  |  |  |  |  | 1,224,245 |  |  |  |  |  | 2,290,544 |  |
Lumber |  |  |  |  | 7,150 |  |  |  |  |  | 0.01 | % |  |  |  |  | 53,300 |  |  |  |  |  | 7,150 |  |  |  |  |  | 28,783 |  |
Total |  |  |  | $ | 10,709,086 |  |  |  |  |  | 16.31 | % |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
18
Table of ContentsItem 4. Controls and Procedures.
The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.
Management is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.
The General Partner’s CEO and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2007 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s CEO and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These controls include policies and procedures that:
 |  |
• | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership; |
 |  |
• | provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and |
 |  |
• | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
19
Table of ContentsPART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 ‘‘Legal Proceedings’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
Research
Customer Class Actions.
On May 3, 2007, the District Court remanded DISHER V. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., to Illinois state court. On June 13, 2007, Citigroup moved in state court to dismiss the action.
Mutual Funds
In May 2007, CGMI finalized its settlement agreement with the NYSE and the New Jersey Bureau of Securities on the matter related to its market-timing practices prior to September 2003.
IPO Securities Litigation
On May 18, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing en banc of the Second Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s class certification.
IPO Antitrust Litigation
On June 18, 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the securities law precludes application of the antitrust laws to the claims asserted by plaintiffs, effectively terminating the litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and under Part II, Item 1A, ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in the Partnership’s Quarterly Report ended March 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Period |  |  | (a) Total Number of Units Purchased* |  |  | (b) Average Price Paid per Unit** |  |  | (c) Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |  |  | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
April 1, 2007 – April 30, 2007 |  |  |  |  | 256.0283 |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,618.61 |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |
May 1, 2007 – May 31, 2007 |  |  |  |  | 150.9523 |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,704.25 |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |
June 1, 2007 – June 30, 2007 |  |  |  |  | 275.8949 |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,804.66 |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |  |  |  |  | N/A |  |
|  |  |  |  | 682.8755 |  |  |  |  | $ | 1,709.17 |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  | |  |
* Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners. |
** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. |
20
Table of ContentsItem 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None
Item 5. Other Information – None
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Exhibit – 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
21
Table of ContentsSIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

 |  |  |  |
By: |  |  | Citigroup Managed Futures LLC |
|  |  | (General Partner) |
By: |  |  | /s/ Jerry Pascucci |
|  |  | Jerry Pascucci President and Director |
Date: |  |  | August 14, 2007 |
By: |  |  | /s/ Jennifer Magro |
|  |  | Jennifer Magro Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Date: |  |  | August 14, 2007 |
22