Salomon Smith Barney Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
Notes to Financial Statements
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.
Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the other partnerships due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded.
Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Funds' risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized as unrealized appreciation in the statements of financial condition and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Funds have credit risk and concentration risk because the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Funds' assets is CGM.
The General Partner monitors and controls the Funds' risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Funds' are subject. These monitoring systems allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.
The majority of these instruments traded by the Funds mature within one year of September 30, 2006. However, due to the nature of the Funds' businesses, these instruments may not be held to maturity.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. Its only assets are investments in the Funds and cash. The Funds' only assets are their equity in its commodity futures trading accounts, consisting of cash, net unrealized appreciation on open futures and forward contracts, commodity options, if applicable, and interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership. While substantial losses could lead to a decrease in liquidity, no such losses occurred during the third quarter of 2006.
The Partnership's capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners, as increased or decreased by its investment in the Funds, expenses, interest income, additions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, Partnership capital decreased 9.9% from $46,557,403 to $41,964,088. This decrease was attributable to the redemptions of 4,733.8956 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership Interest resulting in an outflow of $7,564,753, which was partially offset by a net gain from operations of $1,471,438 and the additional sales of 904.4208 General Partner Units totalling $1,500,000. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contract positions in subsequent periods.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
All commodity interests of the Funds (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded in the statements of financial condition at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotations are readily available or other measures of fair value deemed appropriate by management of the General Partner for those commodity interests and foreign currencies for which market quotations are not readily available. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing on the last business day of the period. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on open positions are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests of the Funds.
Foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership/Funds agree to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. Foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership's net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the date of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting dates, is included in the statement of financial condition. Realized gains (losses) and changes in unrealized values on foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur and are included in the statements of income and expenses and partners' capital. Investment in Partnerships is recorded at fair value based upon the Partnership's proportionate interest held.
Results of Operations
During the Partnership's third quarter of 2006 the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreased 3.7% from $1,578.02 to $1,519.68 as compared to an increase of 6.8% in the third quarter of 2005. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2006 of $948,646. Losses were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds of commodity futures in energy, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals and livestock and were partially offset by gains
14
in currencies, grains, softs, lumber and indices. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2005 of $3,753,876. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in energy, grains, livestock, softs, metals and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, lumber and U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates.
The third quarter presented a challenging investment landscape for the Advisors. The Partnership was negatively impacted by a number of price trend reversals in both financial and commodity markets. Gains earned in currencies and equity indices were offset by losses in fixed income, metals, and energy.
In the currency sector, the Partnership posted modest gains as the dollar strengthened against the Japanese Yen on speculation that Japan's central bank would refrain from raising interest rates again this year. Trading in other major currencies was mixed for the quarter. Buoyant global equity markets were also beneficial for the fund as falling bond yields and energy prices supported global equity valuations. Advisors were also profitable in trading soft commodities, especially in sugar and cotton, as reports suggesting record production of new crops resulted in price declines.
Losses were taken in energy, fixed income and metals trading. In the energy markets, losses were accumulated due to unanticipated price declines across the petroleum complex. A series of unrelated events associated with favorable inventory data and moderated geopolitical concerns triggered a downward but non-orderly drop in crude prices. Losses were also realized in the fixed income markets for the quarter, primarily in July, as the Federal Reserve Chairman unexpectedly indicated that the campaign of raising interest rates was nearing its end. Gains from the industrial metals only partially offset losses in precious metals where prices reflected unfavorable trading ranges and sharp price reversals.
During the Partnership's nine months ended September 30, 2006 the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit increased 2.6% from $1,480.68 to $1,519.68 as compared to an increase of 7.3% during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of $4,543,094. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading by the Funds of commodity futures in U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals, lumber and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, energy, grains, livestock and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of $5,540,644. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in energy, livestock, non-U.S. interest rates, metals and indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, grains, softs and lumber.
Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.
CGM will pay monthly interest to the Partnership on its allocable share of 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Funds' brokerage account at a 30-day U.S. Treasury bill rate determined by CGM and/or will place up to all of the Funds' assets in 90-day Treasury bills. The Partnership will receive 80% of its allocable share of the interest earned on the Treasury bills through its investments in Partnerships and CGM will be paid 20% of the interest.
Brokerage commissions are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $47,608 and increased by $65,047, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The decrease in brokerage commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was due to lower average net assets as compared to the corresponding period in 2005. The increase in brokerage commissions for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was due to a higher average net assets as compared to the corresponding period in 2005.
15
Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by $7,132 and increased by $47,130 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2005. The decrease in management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was due to lower average net assets as compared to the corresponding period in 2005. The increase in management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was due to a higher average net assets as compared to the corresponding period in 2005.
Incentive fees paid annually by the Partnership are based on the new trading profits of the Partnership as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. Trading performance for the three months ended September 30, 2006 resulted in the reversal of an incentive fee accrual of $95,666 and an incentive fee accrual of $478,786 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Trading performance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 resulted in an incentive fee accrual of $16,312 and $195,898, respectively.
16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
All of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investments in the Funds. The Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by them are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Funds' assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Funds' main lines of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Funds' open positions and, consequently in their earnings and cash flow. The Funds' market risks are influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Funds' open positions and the liquidity of the market in which they trade.
The Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Funds' past performances are not necessarily indicative of their future results.
Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Funds' speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Funds' experiences to date (i.e., ‘‘risk of ruin’’). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Funds' losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Funds' attempts to manage their market risks.
Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Funds as the measure of their Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.
17
The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's investments in other Partnerships by market category as of September 30, 2006 and the highest, lowest and average values at any point during the three months ended September 30, 2006. All open position trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. There have been no material changes in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
As of September 30, 2006, Altis Master's total capitalization was $39,798,090. The Partnership owns 40.9% of Altis Master.
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Commodity Index |  |  |  | $ | 53,500 | |  |  |  |  | 0.13 | |  |  |  | $ | 61,000 | |  |  |  | $ | 4,000 | |  |  |  | $ | 34,167 | |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  | 606,083 | |  |  |  |  | 1.52 | |  |  |  |  | 941,862 | |  |  |  |  | 544,388 | |  |  |  |  | 670,873 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 1,760,800 | |  |  |  |  | 4.42 | |  |  |  |  | 1,760,800 | |  |  |  |  | 236,400 | |  |  |  |  | 1,047,346 | |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 348,202 | |  |  |  |  | 0.88 | |  |  |  |  | 804,907 | |  |  |  |  | 248,134 | |  |  |  |  | 339,793 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 68,009 | |  |  |  |  | 0.17 | |  |  |  |  | 400,600 | |  |  |  |  | 31,748 | |  |  |  |  | 97,746 | |
Interest Rates Non - -U.S. |  |  |  |  | 749,146 | |  |  |  |  | 1.88 | |  |  |  |  | 827,131 | |  |  |  |  | 399,697 | |  |  |  |  | 583,824 | |
Livestock |  |  |  |  | 92,425 | |  |  |  |  | 0.23 | |  |  |  |  | 174,650 | |  |  |  |  | 66,300 | |  |  |  |  | 103,492 | |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  | 294,000 | |  |  |  |  | 0.74 | |  |  |  |  | 318,000 | |  |  |  |  | 144,333 | |  |  |  |  | 222,833 | |
– OTC |  |  |  |  | 735,569 | |  |  |  |  | 1.85 | |  |  |  |  | 835,693 | |  |  |  |  | 384,690 | |  |  |  |  | 626,502 | |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 527,762 | |  |  |  |  | 1.33 | |  |  |  |  | 756,510 | |  |  |  |  | 346,202 | |  |  |  |  | 504,879 | |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 1,601,425 | |  |  |  |  | 4.02 | |  |  |  |  | 1,831,935 | |  |  |  |  | 544,760 | |  |  |  |  | 1,091,007 | |
Lumber |  |  |  |  | 29,700 | |  |  |  |  | 0.08 | |  |  |  |  | 39,600 | |  |  |  |  | 26,400 | |  |  |  |  | 31,900 | |
Totals |  |  |  | $ | 6,866,621 | |  |  |  |  | 17.25 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
As of September 30, 2006, Aspect Master's total capitalization was $195,933,306. The Partnership owns 6.9% of Aspect Master.
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– OTC |  |  |  | $ | 4,104,102 | |  |  |  |  | 2.09 | |  |  |  | $ | 4,222,798 | |  |  |  | $ | 2,216,294 | |  |  |  | $ | 3,797,115 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 3,066,400 | |  |  |  |  | 1.56 | |  |  |  |  | 4,310,900 | |  |  |  |  | 740,100 | |  |  |  |  | 2,533,500 | |
Grains |  |  |  |  | 476,910 | |  |  |  |  | 0.24 | |  |  |  |  | 984,281 | |  |  |  |  | 377,635 | |  |  |  |  | 714,899 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 132,381 | |  |  |  |  | 0.07 | |  |  |  |  | 2,011,350 | |  |  |  |  | 70,748 | |  |  |  |  | 758,344 | |
Interest Rates Non-U.S. |  |  |  |  | 2,900,765 | |  |  |  |  | 1.48 | |  |  |  |  | 10,270,797 | |  |  |  |  | 2,878,685 | |  |  |  |  | 5,365,014 | |
Livestock |  |  |  |  | 112,700 | |  |  |  |  | 0.06 | |  |  |  |  | 272,150 | |  |  |  |  | 52,373 | |  |  |  |  | 151,700 | |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  | 687,000 | |  |  |  |  | 0.35 | |  |  |  |  | 1,131,500 | |  |  |  |  | 341,500 | |  |  |  |  | 847,167 | |
– OTC |  |  |  |  | 1,980,610 | |  |  |  |  | 1.01 | |  |  |  |  | 2,925,433 | |  |  |  |  | 1,035,707 | |  |  |  |  | 2,050,168 | |
Softs |  |  |  |  | 977,909 | |  |  |  |  | 0.50 | |  |  |  |  | 1,733,252 | |  |  |  |  | 824,088 | |  |  |  |  | 1,118,053 | |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 6,867,871 | |  |  |  |  | 3.51 | |  |  |  |  | 8,758,977 | |  |  |  |  | 207,377 | |  |  |  |  | 5,651,007 | |
Totals |  |  |  | $ | 21,306,648 | |  |  |  |  | 10.87 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
18
As of September 30, 2006, Campbell Master's total capitalization was $317,680,507. The Partnership owns 4.2% of Campbell Master.
September 30, 2006
(Unaudited)

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |  | Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
Market Sector |  |  | Value at Risk |  |  | % of Total Capitalization |  |  | High Value at Risk |  |  | Low Value at Risk |  |  | Average Value at Risk* |
Currencies: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– OTC |  |  |  | $ | 13,041,103 | |  |  |  |  | 4.10 | |  |  |  | $ | 13,613,647 | |  |  |  | $ | 5,183,428 | |  |  |  | $ | 8,546,131 | |
Energy |  |  |  |  | 3,834,100 | |  |  |  |  | 1.21 | |  |  |  |  | 6,296,700 | |  |  |  |  | 2,756,800 | |  |  |  |  | 4,744,467 | |
Interest Rates U.S. |  |  |  |  | 410,829 | |  |  |  |  | 0.13 | |  |  |  |  | 1,620,310 | |  |  |  |  | 199,533 | |  |  |  |  | 629,917 | |
Interest Rates Non - -U.S. |  |  |  |  | 1,842,983 | |  |  |  |  | 0.58 | |  |  |  |  | 4,243,379 | |  |  |  |  | 1,754,068 | |  |  |  |  | 2,321,761 | |
Metals: |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
– Exchange Traded |  |  |  |  | 225,500 | |  |  |  |  | 0.07 | |  |  |  |  | 225,500 | |  |  |  |  | 129,000 | |  |  |  |  | 183,383 | |
– OTC |  |  |  |  | 1,160,142 | |  |  |  |  | 0.37 | |  |  |  |  | 1,212,500 | |  |  |  |  | 805,520 | |  |  |  |  | 986,106 | |
Indices |  |  |  |  | 9,569,298 | |  |  |  |  | 3.01 | |  |  |  |  | 9,569,298 | |  |  |  |  | 1,935,462 | |  |  |  |  | 5,920,076 | |
Totals |  |  |  | $ | 30,083,955 | |  |  |  |  | 9.47 | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |  |  |  |  | | |
 |
 |  |
* | Average month-end Values at Risk |
19
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The General Partner of the Partnership, with the participation of the General Partner's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) with respect to the Partnership as of the end of the period covered by the report, and, based on this evaluation, has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There was no change in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part 1, Item 3 ‘‘Legal Proceedings’’ in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and under Part II, Item I, ‘‘Legal Proceedings’’ in the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006.
Enron Corp.
In light of the settlement of the securities class action (Newby, et al. v. Enron Corp., et al.), the plaintiffs have agreed to dismiss the following lawsuits against Citigroup and its affiliates: California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Banc of America Securities LLC, et al., Headwaters Capital LLC v. Lay et al., and Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., et al. Plaintiffs in two other cases, which are not part of the Newby class, have also voluntarily dismissed their claims against Citigroup and its affiliates: Steiner v. Enron Corp., et al. and Town of New Hartford v. Lay, et al.
Research
On August 17, 2006, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the class action settlement of Citigroup and its affiliates in In Re Salomon Analyst AT&T Litigation, and on September 29, 2006 that same court approved the class action settlements in In Re Salomon Analyst Level 3 Litigation, In Re Salomon Analyst XO Litigation and In Re Salomon Analyst Williams Litigation.
On September 14, 2006, Citigroup and its affiliates settled all claims in Sturm, et al. v. Citigroup, et al. The settlement was covered by existing reserves.
On October 6, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals granted a review of the district court's decision certifying a plaintiff class in In Re Salomon Analyst Metromedia Litigation.
Adelphia Communications Corporation
Defendant banks in In Re Adelphia Communications Corporation Securities and Derivative Litigation, including the Citigroup Parties, have entered into settlement agreements with the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and with The Division of Investment of the New Jersey Department of Treasury. The Citigroup Parties' share of the settlement was covered by existing reserves.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. ‘‘Risk Factors’’ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
21
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Period |  |  | (a) Total Number of Units Purchased* |  |  | (b) Average Price Paid per Unit** |  |  | (c) Total Number of Units Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |  |  | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
July 1, 2006 – July 31, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 281.4779 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,518.10 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
August 1, 2006 – August 31, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 250.6961 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,531.39 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
September 1, 2006 – September 30, 2006 |  |  |  |  | 219.5935 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,519.68 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
|  |  |  |  | 751.7675 | |  |  |  | $ | 1,523.06 | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |  |  |  |  | N/A | |
 |
 |  |
| * Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days' notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners. |
 |  |
| ** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None
Item 5. Other Information – None
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Exhibit – 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of President and Director).
Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY GLOBAL DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

 |  |  |  |
By: |  |  | Citigroup Managed Futures LLC |
|  |  | (General Partner) |
By: |  |  | /s/ David J. Vogel |
|  |  | David J. Vogel President and Director |
Date: |  |  | November 14, 2006 |
By: |  |  | /s/ Jennifer Magro |
|  |  | Jennifer Magro Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Date: |  |  | November 14, 2006 |
 |
23