Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” (“MD&A”) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, which are not historical facts, may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. In particular, economic recession and changes in general economic conditions, including, fluctuations in demand for equipment, lease rates, and interest rates, may result in delays in leasing, re-leasing, and disposition of equipment, and reduced returns on invested capital. The Company’s performance is subject to risks relating to lessee defaults and the creditworthiness of its lessees. The Company’s performance is also subject to risks relating to the value of its equipment at the end of its leases, which may be affected by the condition of the equipment, technological obsolescence and the markets for new and used equipment at the end of lease terms. Investors are cautioned not to attribute undue certainty to these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.
Overview
ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VIII, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) is a California limited liability company that was formed in July 1998 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability investment units and acquiring equipment to generate revenues from equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States.
The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units, at a price of $10 per Unit. The offering was terminated in November 2000. Total proceeds of the offering were $135.7 million. During early 2001, the Company completed its initial acquisition stage with the investment of the net proceeds from the public offering of Units. Subsequently, throughout the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), the Company reinvested cash flow in excess of certain amounts required to be distributed to the Other Members and/or utilized its credit facilities to acquire additional equipment.
The Company may continue until December 31, 2019. However, pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement, the Company began to liquidate its assets and distribute the proceeds thereof after the end of the Reinvestment Period which ended in December 2006.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company continues in its liquidation phase. Accordingly, assets that mature will be returned to inventory and most likely subsequently sold, which will result in decreasing revenue as earning assets decrease. Periodic distributions are paid at the discretion of the Managing Member.
Results of Operations
The three months ended March 31, 2014 versus the three months ended March 31, 2013
The Company had net income of $417 thousand and $578 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The results for the first quarter of 2014 primarily reflect decreases in total revenues and total expenses when compared to the prior year period.
Revenues
Total revenues for the first quarter of 2014 decreased by $373 thousand, or 29%, as compared to the prior year period. The net decrease in total revenues was comprised of decreases in operating lease revenues and in other revenue offset, in part, by an increase in gain on sales of assets.
The decrease in operating lease revenues totaled $347 thousand and was primarily attributable to the $193 thousand decrease in usage-based rental income during the current year period, and the impact of continued run-off and dispositions of lease assets since March 31, 2013. Other revenue decreased by $107 thousand due to fees realized during the prior year period relative to the termination of a marine vessel lease. There were no such fees realized during the current year period.