UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________
FORM 10-Q
_________________________
| ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
OR
| ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No.: 0-25223
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)
Nevada | 88-0326480 |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
601 Cien Street, Suite 235, Kemah, TX | 77565-3077 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (ZIP Code) |
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (281) 334-9479
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer x |
At March 31, 2008, the Registrant had 7,115,159 shares of common stock issued.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 8 |
| |
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 |
| |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Assets | | | | | (Audited) | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,483,621 | | | $ | 3,891,156 | |
Certificate of deposit | | | 3,939,800 | | | | 5,195,000 | |
Trading securities | | | 5,675,581 | | | | 6,810,382 | |
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts | | | | | | | | |
of $230,310 at March 31, 2008 and $231,870 at December 31, 2007 | | | 3,730,410 | | | | 4,835,452 | |
Current portion of notes receivable | | | 3,875,746 | | | | 3,898,831 | |
Accounts and notes receivable from related parties | | | 33,277 | | | | 30,000 | |
Inventories | | | 6,638,867 | | | | 5,811,997 | |
Real estate acquired for resale | | | 1,909,066 | | | | 1,909,066 | |
Drilling rigs held for sale | | | 1,734 | | | | 187,611 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 212,250 | | | | 296,981 | |
Total current assets | | | 29,500,352 | | | | 32,866,476 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term notes receivable, less current portion | | | 581,977 | | | | 618,129 | |
Investment in Las Vegas Premium Gold Products | | | 250,000 | | | | 250,000 | |
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | 4,827,698 | | | | 4,619,940 | |
Goodwill, less accumulated amortization of | | | | | | | | |
$205,295 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | | | 674,539 | | | | 674,539 | |
Patents and trademarks, net of amortization | | | 5,305,785 | | | | 5,457,365 | |
Other assets | | | 158,309 | | | | 100,105 | |
Total assets | | $ | 41,298,660 | | | $ | 44,586,554 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 3,037,003 | | | $ | 3,197,415 | |
Margin loans from financial institutions | | | 1,293,588 | | | | 1,443,424 | |
Short-term notes payable | | | 122,492 | | | | 219,970 | |
Current installments of long-term capital lease obligations | | | 26,740 | | | | 29,967 | |
Current installments of long-term debt | | | 1,187,487 | | | | 185,328 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 5,667,310 | | | | 5,076,104 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt, less current installments | | | 10,313,839 | | | | 10,766,951 | |
Long-term capital lease obligations, less current installments | | | 252,124 | | | | 123,100 | |
Deferred tax liability | | | 156,535 | | | | 156,535 | |
Minority interest | | | 886,754 | | | | 1,370,196 | |
Total liabilities | | | 17,276,562 | | | | 17,492,886 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001par value, 1,000,000 authorized: none issued | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 authorized: | | | | | | | | |
7,115,159 shares issued and 7,073,214 shares outstanding at March 31, 2008; | | | | | | | | |
7,107,842 shares issued and 7,070,480 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007 | | | 7,115 | | | | 7,108 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 46,501,235 | | | | 46,327,209 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (22,271,564 | ) | | | (19,045,752 | ) |
| | | 24,236,786 | | | | 27,288,565 | |
Less treasury stock, at cost (41,945 shares at March 31, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
and 37,362 shares at December 31, 2007) | | | (214,688 | ) | | | (194,897 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 24,022,098 | | | | 27,093,668 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 41,298,660 | | | $ | 44,586,554 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | | | | | |
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | |
Three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited) | |
| |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 5,716,062 | | | $ | 6,612,570 | |
Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales | | | 3,889,401 | | | | 4,603,524 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 3,940,100 | | | | 3,453,868 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 7,829,501 | | | | 8,057,392 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | | | (2,113,439 | ) | | | (1,444,822 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Other income (expenses): | | | | | | | | |
Interest and dividend income | | | 150,112 | | | | 160,689 | |
Realized losses on investments | | | (55,427 | ) | | | (598,705 | ) |
Unrealized gain (losses) on trading securities | | | (1,304,853 | ) | | | 642,919 | |
Interest expense | | | (161,595 | ) | | | (219,812 | ) |
Texas Emissions Reduction Plan Grant | | | 57,589 | | | | | |
Other income (expense) | | | 21,567 | | | | 214,867 | |
Total other income (expenses) | | | (1,292,607 | ) | | | 199,958 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss before income taxes | | | (3,406,046 | ) | | | (1,244,864 | ) |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 23,008 | | | | - | |
Net loss before minority interest | | | (3,429,054 | ) | | | (1,244,864 | ) |
Minority interest | | | 248,242 | | | | (48,036 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (3,180,812 | ) | | $ | (1,292,900 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Preferred dividends | | | (45,000 | ) | | | (45,000 | ) |
Net loss applicable to common shareholders | | | (3,225,812 | ) | | | (1,337,900 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss applicable to common shareholders: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.45 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 7,112,258 | | | | 5,460,951 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | |
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | |
Three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited) | |
| |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (3,180,812 | ) | | $ | (1,292,900 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 339,097 | | | | 277,549 | |
Common shares issued for services | | | 85,970 | | | | 172,775 | |
Compensation - stock warrants | | | 88,063 | | | | 70,685 | |
Realized (gains) losses on the sale of trading securities | | | 55,427 | | | | 598,705 | |
Unrealized (gain) losses on the sale of trading securities | | | 1,304,853 | | | | (642,919 | ) |
Stock returned in lawsuit settlement | | | - | | | | (39,600 | ) |
Texas Emissions Reduction Plan Grant | | | (57,589 | ) | | | - | |
Minority interest | | | (483,442 | ) | | | 48,036 | |
(Increase) decrease of operating assets, net of acquisitions and dispositions: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | 1,105,043 | | | | 1,161,066 | |
Trading securities | | | (225,479 | ) | | | (90,303 | ) |
Inventories | | | (826,871 | ) | | | (767,986 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 84,731 | | | | (212,092 | ) |
Other assets | | | (58,204 | ) | | | (182,549 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (205,411 | ) | | | (144,050 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (1,974,624 | ) | | | (1,043,583 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | (188,268 | ) | | | (267,470 | ) |
Patents and trademarks | | | (9,978 | ) | | | (4,840 | ) |
Investment in Rigs held for Sale | | | (14,123 | ) | | | - | |
Proceeds from the sale of drilling rigs | | | 200,000 | | | | - | |
Issuance of note receivable | | | - | | | | (25,000 | ) |
Loans to related parties | | | (3,277 | ) | | | - | |
Investment in certificate of deposit | | | (244,800 | ) | | | (3,100,000 | ) |
Redemption of certificate of deposit | | | 1,500,000 | | | | 3,214,000 | |
Receipts of principal payments on notes receivable | | | 59,238 | | | | 307,427 | |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 1,298,792 | | | | 124,117 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net borrowings under line-of-credit agreements | | | 598,000 | | | | 324,218 | |
Principal payments under capital lease obligations | | | (13,645 | ) | | | - | |
Proceeds from short-term debt | | | - | | | | 300,000 | |
Proceeds from long-term debt | | | - | | | | 264,946 | |
Margin loans | | | (149,836 | ) | | | 15,501 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock of subsidiary | | | - | | | | 694,672 | |
Principal payments on short-term debt | | | (97,478 | ) | | | (257,664 | ) |
Principal payments on long-term debt | | | (48,954 | ) | | | (27,768 | ) |
Acquisition on treasury stock | | | (19,790 | ) | | | (18,340 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 268,297 | | | | 1,295,565 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | (407,535 | ) | | | 376,099 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 3,891,156 | | | | 3,275,803 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | $ | 3,483,621 | | | $ | 3,651,902 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 161,595 | | | $ | 219,812 | |
Non-cash transactions | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of fixed assets under capital lease obligations | | | 139,441 | | | | - | |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements | |
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization, Ownership and Business
American International Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), a Nevada corporation, operates as a diversified holding company with a number of wholly-owned subsidiaries and two majority-owned subsidiaries. The Company is a diversified corporation with interests in industrial/commercial companies and an oil and gas service business. The Company's business strategy is to acquire controlling equity interests in businesses that it considers undervalued. The Company's management takes an active role in providing its subsidiaries with access to capital, leveraging synergies and providing management expertise in order to improve its subsidiaries' growth.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Northeastern Plastics, Inc., and its majority owned subsidiary, Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc., and its 48.1% owned subsidiary, Hammonds Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: "HMDI"), formerly International American Technologies, Inc. (“Hammonds”). In accordance with FIN46(r), the Company consolidates Hammonds although its ownership is less than 51%, because the Company appoints the members of Hammonds' board of directors. Since Hammonds is incurring losses and the minority interest has no recorded equity value, the Company recognizes 100% of Hammond’s losses. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Presentation of certain amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2007 have been reclassified to conform to the presentations for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Cash and Cash-Equivalents
The Company considers cash and cash-equivalents to include cash on hand and certificates of deposits with banks with an original maturity of three months or less, that the Company intends to convert.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist primarily of trade receivables, net of a valuation allowance for doubtful accounts.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company extends credit to customers and other parties in the normal course of business. The Company regularly reviews outstanding receivables and provides for estimated losses through an allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of established reserves, the Company makes judgments regarding its customers' ability to make required payments, economic events and other factors. As the financial condition of these parties change, circumstances develop or additional information becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required. When the Company determines that a customer may not be able to make required payments, the Company increases the allowance through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower-of-cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company assesses the realizability of its inventories based upon specific usage and future utility. A charge to results of operations is taken when factors that would result in a need for a reduction in the valuation, such as excess or obsolete inventory, are noted.
Freight and Shipment Policy
The Company's policy is to expense all freight and shipment expenses on a monthly basis. The Company prepays any shipments greater than $1,250 and to reduce our freight and shipping costs the Company receives at least three quotations.
Investment Securities
The Company accounts for its investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determination at each balance sheet date. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities. Debt securities for which the Company does not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity and equity securities not classified as trading securities are classified as available-for-sale. The cost of investments sold is determined on the specific identification or the first-in, first-out method. Trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings, and available-for-sale securities are also reported at fair value but unrealized gains and losses are shown in the caption "unrealized gains (losses) on shares available-for-sale" included in stockholders' equity. Management determines fair value of its investments based on quoted market prices at each balance sheet date.
Property, Plant, Equipment, Depreciation, Amortization and Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include:
Property, Plant and equipment – Assets acquired in the normal course of business are recorded at original cost and may be adjusted for any additional significant improvements after purchase. We depreciate the cost evenly over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, with any resultant gain or loss being recognized as a component of other income or expense. As required by SFAS No. 141, the acquisition of Hammonds has been recorded using the purchase method of accounting with the purchase price allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their respective estimated fair values at the acquisition date. For more information on the acquisition of Hammonds see note 2.
Identifiable intangible assets – These assets are recorded at acquisition cost. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized evenly over their estimated useful lives.
The Company reviews long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be fully recoverable. The Company performs undiscounted operating cash flow analyses to determine if impairment exists. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment for assets held for use, the Company groups assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which cash flows are separately identified. If an impairment is determined to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based on fair value. Impairment losses on assets to be disposed of, if any, are based on the estimated proceeds to be received, less costs of disposal.
Goodwill is assessed for impairment annually and more frequently if triggering events occur. In performing this assessment, management relies on various factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, comparable transactions and other market data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill for impairment. The Company performed its annual impairment test for goodwill as of December 31, 2007.
When testing for goodwill impairment, the Company first compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered potentially impaired and further tests are performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. In the second step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the carrying amount of goodwill over its implied fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The Company allocates the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities represents the implied fair value of goodwill.
During April, 2005, the Company's subsidiary International American Technologies, Inc., n/k/a Hammonds Industries, Inc., acquired Hammonds Technical Services, Inc. for a purchase price of approximately $2,455,700. Long-lived assets totaling $2,958,900 were recognized as a result of the acquisition. The operations of Hammonds Technical Services are included in the consolidated statements of operations from date of acquisition.
The following table contains a summary of the tangible and of the intangible assets acquired:
Acquired Assets | | Amount | | Life |
Machinery & Equipment | | $ | 408,162 | | 2-10 years |
Patents | | | 1,621,500 | | 5-17 lives |
Trade Marks | | | 465,199 | | 10 years |
Sole Source Contract | | | 464,039 | | 7 years |
| | $ | 2,958,900 | | |
SFAS No. 142 eliminated the amortization of goodwill, and requires annual impairment testing of goodwill and introduces the concept of indefinite life intangible assets. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002.
On August 1, 2006, Hammonds acquired the 49% minority interest of Hammonds Technical Services, Inc., Hammonds Fuel Additives, Inc., and Hammonds Water Treatment Systems, Inc., by issuing Carl Hammonds 16,000,000 restricted shares or 44.4% of HMDI common stock at a conversion rate of $0.25 a share. The additional cost of $4,000,000 has been allocated to patents, trademarks, and sole source contract and is being amortized in a manner equivalent to the amortization used on the intangible assets acquired in the initial purchase of 51% of Hammonds.
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 balances for long-lived assets are detailed in later footnotes: Property and Equipment (note 7) and Intangible Assets (note 8).
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the earning process is completed, the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which is generally the same day as delivery or shipment of the product, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Delta receives purchase orders for all of its service work and related pipe sales. All sales are recorded when the work is completed or when the pipe is sold. The Hammonds Companies and NPI have purchase orders for all sales, of which many of the items are requested to be container shipped and shipped directly to the end users. All sales are recorded when the inventory items are shipped. Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are incurred as a result of a revenue transaction are not included in revenues. The Company has no significant sales returns or allowances.
Income Taxes
The Company is a taxable entity and recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. The effect on the deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the year that includes the enactment date of the rate change. A valuation allowance is used to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Interest and penalties associated with income taxes are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Earnings Per Share
The basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during a period. Diluted net earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings, adjusted on an as if converted basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, potential dilutive securities that had an anti-dilutive effect were not included in the calculation of diluted net earnings (loss) per common share. These securities include options to purchase shares of common stock.
Advertising Costs
The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred.
Management's Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company sometimes grants shares of stock for goods and services and in conjunction with certain agreements. These grants are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 123R, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" based on the grant date fair values.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company estimates the fair value of its financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the Company estimates of fair value are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumption and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The interest rates payable by the Company on its notes payable approximate market rates. The Company believes that the fair value of its financial instruments comprising accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate their carrying amounts.
New Standards Implemented
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option is elected would be reported in earnings.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, "Business Combinations". SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to record all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their respective acquisition-date fair values, changes the recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, changes the recognition and measurement of contingent consideration, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS 141R also requires additional disclosure of information surrounding a business combination, such that users of the entity's financial statements can fully understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-and Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133." This Statement requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
Management has reviewed these new standards and believes that they have no impact on the financial statements of the Company at this time; however, they may apply in the future.
(2) Acquisition of Hammonds Technical Services, Inc.
On February 28, 2005, the Company's subsidiary, International American Technologies, Inc. n/k/a Hammonds Industries, Inc. (“Hammonds”), entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to acquire a 51% interest in the capital stock of Hammonds Technical Services, Inc., a privately owned Texas corporation in consideration for Hammonds or its parent, American International Industries, Inc., providing: (i) $998,300 in cash to Hammonds for working capital; (ii) a secured revolving long-term line of credit in the amount of $2,000,000; and (iii) issuing 145,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to Hammonds in consideration for a $1,450,000 promissory note. The value of the stock at $10.00 per share was guaranteed. The sellers of 51% of Hammonds and Mr. Daniel Dror entered into a stock repurchase agreement as of April 28, 2005, where the sellers agreed to sell the 145,000 shares to Mr. Daniel Dror for $10.00 per share through the third anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. These restricted shares were exchanged for two minority equity interests in Hammonds owned by third parties, which minority interests were canceled. The total purchase price to acquire the 51% in Hammonds was $2,455,700 representing cash payments of $825,000, 145,000 shares of AMIN’s restricted common stock valued at $1,450,000 and the assumption of a note payable to one of the former shareholders in the amount of $173,300 and liabilities in excess of assets in the amount of $7,400. Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, which was effective on April 28, 2005, Hammonds became a 51% owned subsidiary of the Company.
In 2006, Hammonds Technical Services was separated into three separate entities, Hammonds Technical Services, Inc., Hammonds Fuel Additives, Inc., and Hammonds Water Treatment Systems, Inc.
As required by SFAS No. 141, the Company's subsidiary has recorded the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting with the purchase price allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their respective estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The purchase price of $2,455,700 had been allocated at follows:
Current assets | | $ | 1,435,939 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 826,765 | |
Patents and trademarks, net of amortization | | | 2,724,487 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 70,085 | |
Current liabilities | | | (2,098,376 | ) |
Deferred tax credits | | | (503,200 | ) |
| | $ | 2,455,700 | |
Revenues and expenses are included in HMDI’s statement of operations from May 1, 2005 through March 31, 2008.
(3) Trading Securities
Investments in marketable securities primarily include shares of common stock in various companies. The investments are considered trading securities, and accordingly any changes in market value are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations. At March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has unrealized trading losses of $1,304,853 and gains of $642,919, respectively, related to securities held on those dates. These unrealized gains / losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations for the respective periods. The Company recorded realized losses of $55,427 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and realized losses of $598,705 on the sales of trading securities and for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
On September 12, 2007, the Company acquired 170,345 shares, or approximately 7%, of OI Corporation's (NasdaqGM: OICO) common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 240,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $5.05 per common share based upon the closing market price on that date, for a total purchase price of $2,212,000. At March 31, 2008, our investment in the 170,345 shares of OICO common stock is classified on the balance sheet as trading securities for $2,015,971 valued at $11.80 per share based upon the closing market price on that date. At December 31, 2007, our investment in the 170,345 shares of OICO common stock is classified on the balance sheet as trading securities for $2,201,198 valued at $12.92 per share based upon the closing market price on that date. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for OICO was $13.23 per common share. The OICO shares were purchased from OI Corporation's former President and CEO, William W. Botts. OI Corporation engages in the design, manufacture, marketing, and service of analytical, monitoring, and sample preparation products, components, and systems.
On November 27, 2007, the Company acquired 1,000,000 restricted shares, or approximately 9% of Rubicon Financial Incorporated’s (OTCBB: RBCF.OB) common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $4.90 per common share based upon the closing market price on that date, for a total purchase price of $1,980,000. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for RBCF was $2.87 per common share. At March 31, 2008, our investment in the 1,000,000 shares of RBCF common stock is classified on the balance sheet as trading securities for $2,700,000, valued at $2.70 per share based upon the closing market price on that date. At December 31, 2007, our investment in the 1,000,000 shares of RBCF common stock is classified on the balance sheet as trading securities for $3,700,000, valued at $3.70 per share based upon the closing market price on that date. Rubicon Financial Incorporated is a development stage company, operating as a full service insurance agency offering personal and commercial lines, health, and life insurance products to individuals and companies in California.
The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $4,715,971 at March 31, 2008, or 83% of our portfolio of trading securities. The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $5,901,198 at December 31, 2007, or 87% of our portfolio of trading securities.
Equity markets can experience significant volatility and therefore are subject to changes in value. Based upon the current volatile nature of the U.S. securities markets and the decline in the U.S. economy, we believe that it is possible, that the market values of our marketable equity securities could decline in the near term. We have a policy in place to review our equity holdings on a regular basis. Our policy includes, but is not limited to, reviewing each company’s cash position, earnings/revenue outlook, stock price performance, liquidity and management/ownership. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse equity returns by maintaining diversified securities portfolios.
The following table represents the potential decrease in fair values of our marketable equity securities that are sensitive to changes in the stock market. Fair value deteriorations of 50%, 35% and 15% were selected for illustrative purposes because none is more likely to occur than another.
| | | 50% | | | | 35% | | | | 15% | |
Marketable equity securities | | $ | (2,837,791 | ) | | $ | (1,986,453 | ) | | $ | (851,337 | ) |
(4) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Part and materials | | $ | 1,584,342 | | | $ | 1,420,043 | |
Work in process | | | 19,066 | | | | 186,045 | |
Finished goods | | | 5,175,304 | | | | 4,346,867 | |
Less reserve | | | (139,845 | ) | | | (140,958 | ) |
| | $ | 6,638,867 | | | $ | 5,811,997 | |
(5) Real Estate Transactions
During the second quarter of 2007, the Company purchased for investment a 174 acre tract of land in Waller County, Texas for $1,684,066. This property is listed for sale with a real estate broker. This property is not going to be developed by nor is it being held as inventory by the Company. The Company continues to own 287 undeveloped acres of waterfront property on Dickinson Bayou and Galveston Bay in Galveston County, Texas. The book value for this property is $225,000. In November 2005, the Company signed a contract for sale of the property for a cash consideration of $16,000,000 with Lakeland Partners III. In January 2007, Lakeland assigned all of its interest in the contract to Westfield Forest, L.P. Westfield is a recognized developer of waterfront properties in the Houston, Texas area. Westfield deposited $95,000 in earnest money with the title company upon assignment of the contract, which had an initial feasibility period of one year. On November 12, 2007, the contract was amended to extend the feasibility period to July 31, 2008. No revenue has been recognized for this transaction because the development of the property requires permits from the City of Texas City and the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers, which the developer believes they can obtain timely within the terms of the contract. As a result, the transaction has not had all the elements necessary for it to be considered a completed revenue recognition event.
(6) Long-term Notes Receivable
Long-term notes receivable at March 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Net note receivable from sale of real estate, principal payment due on or before July 30, 2008 (a) | | $ | 3,020,044 | | | $ | 3,020,044 | |
Sale of machinery and equipment, principal payment due on or before December 1, 2008 | | | 164,000 | | | | 164,000 | |
Sale of former subsidiary, Marald, Inc., principal and interest due monthly through June 5, 2012 | | | 153,211 | | | | 160,892 | |
Sale of former subsidiary, Marald, Inc., principal and interest due monthly through July 2012 (b) | | | 200,000 | | | | 200,000 | |
Sale of refinery to settle lawsuit, principal and interest due on June 1 and December 1, through June 1, 2010 (c) | | | 725,000 | | | | 750,000 | |
Sale of drilling rig, principal and interest due monthly through December 31, 2009 | | | 195,468 | | | | 222,024 | |
Other | | | - | | | | - | |
Notes receivable | | | 4,457,723 | | | | 4,516,960 | |
Less current portion | | | 3,875,746 | | | | 3,898,831 | |
Notes receivable, less current portion | | $ | 581,977 | | | $ | 618,129 | |
(a) Net note receivable from sale of real estate, principal payment due on or before July 30, 2008. On July 30, 2004, the Company sold real estate to an unaffiliated third party for a cash payment equal to the first lien and $250,000 owed to Orion HealthCorp, Inc. and a note receivable in the amount of $5,000,000 secured by a lien on the real estate. The note is being amortized over a 20 year period, with a balloon payment at the end of five years in the amount of $4,012,084, and bears interest of 3% per annum. The note was discounted by $1.6 million to the present value of the lowest level of annual payments required by the sales contract, or $3.4 million, over the maximum period specified by SFAS No. 66. Principal payments have reduced the note balance to $3.0 million as of December 31, 2007. The Company recorded a gain, using the reduced profit method for recording the sale of land, in the amount of $1,815,070 on the sale of this real estate based on discounting the $5,000,000 note at a 7.6% interest rate (approximating the market rate for real estate transactions by the buyer).
(b) Sale of former subsidiary, Marald, Inc., principal and interest due monthly through July 2012. The original note was for $300,000 and was discounted to $200,000 for the receipt of full payment on or before October 25, 2007. New payment terms are being negotiated for this note receivable. Since the loan is reflected at a $100,000 discount to the original note, the Company believes that no further discounting of the loan is necessary as of December 31, 2007.
(c) Sale of refinery to settle lawsuit, principal and interest due on June 1 and December 1, through June 1, 2010. The Company received principal payments of $25,000 and $12,500 on February 15, 2008 and May 6, 2008, respectively, towards the $125,000 that was due on December 1, 2007. Notre Dame Investors, Inc. has agreed with Lazarus Energy LLC to catch up on the principal amounts due on June 16, 2008. Additionally, the loan is collateralized by the Nixon Refinery. We have reviewed SFAS No. 114: Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 15, and based on current information and events, management does not believe that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Therefore, we have not recognized an impairment of this loan.
(7) Property and Equipment
Major classes of property and equipment together with their estimated useful lives, consisted of the following:
| Years | | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Land | | | $ | 892,945 | | | $ | 892,945 | |
Building and improvements | 20 | | | 1,029,996 | | | | 1,029,996 | |
Machinery and equipment | 7-15 | | | 4,584,795 | | | | 4,314,861 | |
Office equipment and furniture | 7 | | | 988,724 | | | | 892,399 | |
Automobiles | 5 | | | 1,044,303 | | | | 1,025,264 | |
| | | | 8,540,763 | | | | 8,155,465 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | | (3,713,065 | ) | | | (3,535,525 | ) |
Net property and equipment | | | $ | 4,827,698 | | | $ | 4,619,940 | |
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $177,540 and $110,944, respectively.
During the fourth quarter of 2007 and first quarter of 2008, the Company entered into capital lease agreements for machinery and equipment included in the March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 balances as follows:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Machinery and equipment | | $ | 308,647 | | | $ | 163,174 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (11,817 | ) | | | - | |
Net property and equipment | | $ | 296,830 | | | $ | 163,174 | |
Principal repayment provisions of long-term capital leases are as follows at March 31, 2008:
2008 | | $ | 54,358 | |
2009 | | | 45,774 | |
2010 | | | 64,778 | |
2011 | | | 61,654 | |
2012 | | | 52,300 | |
Total | | $ | 278,864 | |
(8) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets at March 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
| | As of March 31, 2008 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | Average Weighted Lives |
Goodwill | | $ | 879,834 | | | $ | 205,295 | | N/A |
Patents | | $ | | | | $ | 936,991 | | 12 years |
Trademarks | | | 1,149,199 | | | | 249,683 | | 10 years |
Sole Source Contract | | | 1,144,039 | | | | 355,255 | | 7 years |
Patents, Trademarks, and Sole Source Contract | | $ | | | | $ | 1,541,929 | | 11 years |
Intangible assets at December 31, 2007 consisted of the following:
| | As of December 31, 2007 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | Average Weighted Lives |
Goodwill | | $ | 879,834 | | | $ | 205,295 | | N/A |
Patents | | $ | | | | $ | 845,022 | | 12 years |
Trademarks | | | 1,149,199 | | | | 220,953 | | 10 years |
Sole Source Contract | | | 1,144,039 | | | | 314,396 | | 7 years |
Patents, Trademarks, and Sole Source Contract | | $ | 6,837,736 | | | $ | 1,380,371 | | 11 years |
Aggregate Amortization Expense | | | |
For year ending December 31, 2008 | | $ | 646,855 | |
For year ending December 31, 2009 | | $ | 647,064 | |
For year ending December 31, 2010 | | $ | | |
For year ending December 31, 2011 | | $ | | |
For year ending December 31, 2012 | | $ | 602,766 | |
For year ending December 31, 2013 | | $ | 539,849 | |
For year ending December 31, 2014 | | $ | 482,819 | |
For year ending December 31, 2015 | | $ | 450,722 | |
For year ending December 31, 2016 | | $ | 404,102 | |
For year ending December 31, 2017 | | $ | 270,523 | |
For year ending December 31, 2018 | | $ | 128,341 | |
The Company’s patents, trademarks, and sole source contract resulted from the April 28, 2005 acquisition of 51% of Hammonds Technical Services and from the August 1, 2006 acquisition of the 49% minority interests of the three Hammonds subsidiaries.
The following table contains a summary of the intangible assets acquired from the acquisition of Hammonds Technical Services on April 28, 2005:
| | As of March 31, 2008 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | Average Weighted Lives |
Patents | | $ | 1,806,387 | | | $ | 561,087 | | 12 years |
Trademarks | | | 465,199 | | | | 135,683 | | 10 years |
Sole Source Contract | | | 464,039 | | | | 193,350 | | 7 years |
Patents, Trademarks, and Sole Source Contracts | | $ | 2,735,625 | | | $ | 890,120 | | 11 years |
On August 1, 2006, Hammonds acquired the 49% minority interest of Hammonds Technical Services, Inc., Hammonds Fuel Additives, Inc., and Hammonds Water Treatment Systems, Inc. owned by Carl Hammonds, in consideration for the issuance of 16,000,000 restricted shares of common stock at a price of $0.25 a share. The additional cost of $4,000,000 has been allocated to patents, trademarks, and sole source contract for the additive injection system and is being amortized in a manner equivalent to the amortization used on the intangible assets acquired in the initial purchase of 51% of Hammonds. Additionally, Hammonds incurred costs related to the securing of additional patents totaling $26,393 in 2006, $75,718 during the year ended December 31, 2007 and $9,978 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The following table contains a summary of the intangible assets acquired in 2006, during the year ended December 31, 2007, and during the three months ended March 31, 2008:
| | As of March 31, 2008 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | | Accumulated Amortization | | Average Weighted Lives |
Patents | | $ | 2,748,089 | | | $ | 375,904 | | 12 years |
Trademarks | | | 684,000 | | | | 114,000 | | 10 years |
Sole Source Contract | | | 680,000 | | | | 161,905 | | 7 years |
Patents, Trademarks, and Sole Source Contracts | | $ | 4,112,089 | | | $ | 651,809 | | 11 years |
Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $161,557 and $166,605, respectively.
(9) Short-term Notes Payable
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Note payable with interest at 10.5%, interest payments due monthly | | | 89,999 | | | | 89,999 | |
Insurance note payable with interest at 7.86%, principal and interest due in monthly payments of $32,492.73 through May 1, 2008 | | | 32,493 | | | | 129,971 | |
| | $ | 122,492 | | | $ | 219,970 | |
Each of the Company’s subsidiaries that have outstanding notes payable has secured such notes by that subsidiary’s inventory, accounts receivable, property and equipment and guarantees from the Company.
At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the average annual interest rates of our short-term borrowings were approximately 9.8% and 8.9%, respectively.
(10) Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Note payable to a bank, interest due quarterly at prime plus 1%, principal payment due August 26, 2009, secured by real property | | $ | 1,000,000 | | | $ | 1,000,000 | |
Note payable to bank, which allows the Company to borrow up to $2,000,000, interest due quarterly at prime plus 1%, principal payment due August 26, 2009, secured by assets of the Company's subsidiary, Hammonds Technical Services, Inc. | | | 1,992,189 | | | | 1,992,189 | |
Note payable to a bank, which allows the Company to borrow up to $2,000,000, due in monthly payments of interest only, with interest at prime floating rate, with the principal balance due in June 2009, secured by assets of the Company's subsidiary, Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. | | | 2,441,631 | | | | 1,876,631 | |
Note payable to bank due in monthly installments of principal and interest through July 2025 with interest at prime floating rate secured by real property | | | 421,690 | | | | 423,967 | |
Note payable to a bank, due in monthly installments of $6,170, including interest at 6.6% through May 2018, secured by real property | | | 542,959 | | | | 552,312 | |
Note payable to a bank, which allows the Company to borrow up to $5,000,000, interest due monthly at the prime rate, principal payment April 30, 2009, secured by assets of the Company's subsidiary, Northeastern Plastics, Inc. | | | 1,287,000 | | | | 1,254,000 | |
Note payable to a bank, due in monthly installments of interest only at prime plus 1%, with a principal balance due on August 26, 2009 | | | 400,000 | | | | 400,000 | |
Note payable to a bank, due in quarterly installments of interest only at 7.5%, with a principal balance due on January 19, 2009 | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 1,000,000 | |
Note payable to a bank, due in monthly installments of principal and interest of $2,119.65 through April 3, 2011 | | | 65,949 | | | | 72,389 | |
Note payable to a bank, with interest at 9.25%, due in monthly installments of principal and interest of $4,054.12 through February 26, 2012, secured by assets of the Company’s subsidiary, Hammonds Technical Services, Inc. | | | 270,733 | | | | 220,338 | |
Note payable to a bank, due in quarterly payments of interest only, with interest at 8.0%, with a principal balance due on June 1, 2009, secured by real property | | | 1,740,000 | | | | 1,740,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Note payable to a bank, due in monthly payments of $6,120.38, including interest at 8.25%, through August 9, 2012, secured by assets of the Company's subsidiary, Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. | | | 212,697 | | | | 279,204 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other notes with various terms | | | 126,478 | | | | 141,249 | |
| | | 11,501,326 | | | | 10,952,279 | |
Less current portion | | | (1,187,487 | ) | | | (185,328 | ) |
| | $ | 10,313,839 | | | $ | 10,766,951 | |
Each of the Company’s subsidiaries that have outstanding notes payable has secured such notes by that subsidiary’s inventory, accounts receivable, property and equipment and guarantees from the Company.
Principal repayment provisions of long-term debt are as follows at March 31, 2008:
2008 | | $ | 1,187,487 | |
2009 | | | 9,007,894 | |
2010 | | | 609,804 | |
2011 | | | 184,751 | |
2012 | | | 185,223 | |
Thereafter | | | 326,167 | |
Total | | $ | 11,501,326 | |
(11) Related Party Notes Payable and Accounts Receivable
Transactions related to accounts receivable from related parties arise from compensation arrangements, expense allowances and other similar items conducted in the ordinary course of business.
(12) Capital Stock and Stock Options
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share, of which no shares are presently outstanding. The Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors, without further action by stockholders, and may include voting rights (including the right to vote as a series on particular matters), preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions.
The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock, of which 864,000 are reserved for issuance pursuant to the exercise of warrants pursuant to an employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman, CEO. On March 30, 2007, the Company issued 144,000 stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman, CEO, with an exercise price of $7.00 per share, expiring in 2 years, at a cost of $70,685 to the Company. In connection with the Company's 20% stock dividend to all shareholders on September 19, 2007, the terms of these warrants were adjusted to reflect the dividend, resulting in the warrant being exercisable to buy 172,800 shares for $5.83 per share.
On March 30, 2008, the Company issued 172,800 stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman, CEO, with an exercise price of $5.83 per share, expiring in 2 years, at a cost of $88,063 to the Company.
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2008 and 2007 as follows:
| | March 30, 2008 | | | March 30, 2007 | |
Dividend yield | | | 0.00 | % | | | 0.00 | % |
Expected volatility | | | 38,64 | | | | 38.68 | |
Risk free interest | | | 2.5 | % | | | 6.25 | % |
Expected lives | | 2 years | | | 2 years | |
A summary of the status of the Company's stock options to employees as of March 31, 2008 is presented below:
| | Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise March 31, 2008 | |
Outstanding at beginning of period | | | 172,800 | | | $ | 5.83 | |
Granted | | | 172,800 | | | | 5.83 | |
Exercised | | | - | | | | N/A | |
Canceled | | | - | | | | N/A | |
Outstanding and exercisable at end of period | | | 345,600 | | | $ | 5.83 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period | | | 172,800 | | | | 5.83 | |
The following table summarizes information about fixed stock options to employees outstanding at March 31, 2008:
Exercise Price | | | Number Outstanding and Exercisable at March 31, 2008 | |
$ | 5.83 | | | | 345,600 | |
(13) Preferred Stock of Subsidiary
In August and September 2006, Hammonds entered into stock purchase agreement with Vision Opportunity Master Fund Limited (“VOMF”), an institutional investor, pursuant to which Hammonds sold to VOMF 833,333 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 833,333 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, respectively. (the “2006 Private Financing Transactions” respectively) and issued VOMF: (i) Series A Warrants to purchase 8,333,333 shares of common stock at $0.18 per share, expiring in August 2011; and (ii) Series B Warrants to purchase an additional 8,333,333 shares of common stock at $0.18 per share, expiring in August 2007. In connection with the sale of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, Hammonds issued VOMF: (i) Series C Warrants to purchase an additional 8,333,333 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share, expiring in September 2011; and (ii) Hammonds agreed to extend the expiration dates on the Series B Warrants issued in the 2006 Private Financing Transactions from August 2007 to August 2008. Hammonds received net proceeds of approximately $2,710,120 from the sale of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock.
On September 20, 2007, Hammonds and VOMF agreed to amend the Series A, B and C Warrants to: (i) adjust the exercise price of all of the Warrants to $0.10; and (ii) provide for the issuance of a total of 2,102,960 shares of Hammond's newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in lieu of 21,029,599 shares of common stock. On September 21, 2007, VOMF delivered a notice of exercise of all 21,029,599 Series A, B and C Warrants at an exercise price of $0.10 per Warrant from which Hammonds received net proceeds of $981,162 and VOMF cancelled a short-term promissory note in the amount of $1,000,000, representing a loan made by VOMF to Hammonds on August 17, 2007. As a result of this agreement, there are no warrants outstanding related to the Series A, B and C Convertible Preferred Stock.
The Company reviewed the following accounting standards to determine the appropriate accounting for these issuances:
- SFAS No. 133: Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
- SFAS No. 150: Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
- EITF 00-19: Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock
- EITF 98-5: Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios
- EITF 00-27: Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments
- EITF Topic D-98: Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities
- ASR No. 268: Redeemable Preferred Stocks
We concluded that all components of these issuances should be classified as equity, because the only way for the value of the conversion feature to be realized is through the issuance of shares. Hammonds has sufficient authorized and unissued shares available to settle the contracts after considering all other commitments that may require the issuance of stock.
Hammonds valued the warrants using the Black-Scholes model and allocated the proceeds from the preferred share issuances based on the relative fair values of the securities issued.
The Company determined that a beneficial conversion feature exists for the Series A, B and C Convertible Preferred Stock issuances. Based on our review of the "Emerging Issues Task Force" EITF 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios, and EITF 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, the amount of proceeds allocated to the Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock should be assigned to the embedded conversion feature with a corresponding amount recorded as a "deemed dividend" to the preferred shareholders. This is based on paragraph 6 of EITF 98-5, which states that "the discount assigned to the beneficial conversion feature is limited to the amount of the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument."
We allocated the following amounts to the embedded conversion feature and recorded a deemed dividend to the preferred shareholders:
Preferred A – August 8, 2006 | | $ | 387,499 | |
Preferred A – August 23, 2006 | | | 176,643 | |
Preferred B – September 30, 2006 | | | 726,756 | |
Preferred C – September 20, 2007 | | | 1,981,162 | |
Total deemed dividend | | $ | 3,272,060 | |
On July 25, 2007, Hammonds and VOMF entered into an agreement pursuant to which VOMF waived the cash dividends of $150,425 on the Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock accrued from August and September 2006, respectively, through September 30, 2007. Additionally, VOMF agreed that future accrued dividends may be paid, at Hammonds' option, in cash or in restricted shares of Hammond's common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be issued as payment of accrued and unpaid dividends shall be determined by dividing (i) the total amount of accrued and unpaid dividends to be converted into common stock by (ii) eighty percent (80%) of the average of the VWAP for the twenty (20) Trading Days immediately preceding the dividend payment date. The term "VWAP" means, for any date, (i) the daily volume weighted average price of the common stock for such date on the OTC Bulletin Board as reported by Bloomberg Financial L.P. (based on a trading day from 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time to 4:02 p.m. Eastern Time); (ii) if the common stock is not then listed or quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and if prices for the common stock are then reported in the "Pink Sheets" published by the Pink Sheets, LLC (or a similar organization or agency succeeding to its functions of reporting prices), the most recent bid price per share of the common stock so reported; or (iii) in all other cases, the fair market value of a share of common stock as determined by an independent appraiser selected in good faith by the Investor and reasonably acceptable to the Company.
(14) Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in commercial accounts at major financial institutions. Although the financial institutions are considered creditworthy, at March 31, 2008, the Company's cash balances exceeded the limits ($100,000) covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The terms of these deposits are on demand to minimize risk. The Company has not incurred losses related to these deposits.
Trade accounts receivable subject the Company to the potential for credit risk with customers in the retail and distribution sectors. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customer’s financial condition but generally does not require collateral. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company had one customer on a consolidated basis that accounted for 11% of the Company's revenues.
We are exposed to equity price risk on our portfolio of trading securities. As of March 31, 2008, our total equity holdings in publicly traded companies were valued at $5,675,581, compared to $6,810,382 as of December 31, 2007. On September 12, 2007, the Company acquired 170,345 shares, or approximately 7%, of OI Corporation's common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 240,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for a total purchase price of $2,212,000. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for OICO was $13.23 per common share. On November 27, 2007, the Company acquired 1,000,000 restricted shares, or approximately 9% of Rubicon Financial Incorporated’s common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for a total purchase price of $1,980,000. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for RBCF was $2.87 per common share. The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $4,715,971 at March 31, 2008, or 83% of our portfolio of trading securities. The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $5,901,198 at December 31, 2007, or 87% of our portfolio of trading securities.
Equity markets can experience significant volatility and therefore are subject to changes in value. Based upon the current volatile nature of the U.S. securities markets and the decline in the U.S. economy, we believe that it is possible, that the market values of our marketable equity securities could decline in the near term. We have a policy in place to review our equity holdings on a regular basis. Our policy includes, but is not limited to, reviewing each company’s cash position, earnings/revenue outlook, stock price performance, liquidity and management/ownership. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse equity returns by maintaining diversified securities portfolios.
The following table represents the potential decrease in fair values of our marketable equity securities that are sensitive to changes in the stock market. Fair value deteriorations of 50%, 35% and 15% were selected for illustrative purposes because none is more likely to occur than another.
| | | 50% | | | | 35% | | | | 15% | |
Marketable equity securities | | $ | (2,837,791 | ) | | $ | (1,986,453 | ) | | $ | (851,337 | ) |
(15) Texas Emissions Reduction Plan Grant
Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. is the recipient of a Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) grant from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in the amount of $1,157,273. TERP is a comprehensive set of incentive programs aimed at improving air quality in Texas. Through this grant, Delta’s rig engines are being replaced with engines certified to emit 25% less nitrogen oxide (NOx) than required under the current federal standard for the horsepower of the engines. The old engines must be destroyed or rendered permanently inoperable.
International Accounting Standard No. 20 (IAS 20): Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance provides guidance on recognizing, measuring and disclosing government grants, which requires that grants related to assets be presented in the balance sheet either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset. However, IAS 20 is under review because it is inconsistent with the "Framework" for International Accounting Standards. The "Framework" states that "Income is increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or enhancements of assets . . ., other than those relating to contributions from equity participants." The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) noted that recognizing an amount in the balance sheet as a deferred credit is inconsistent with the "Framework" in that the entity has no liability. The IASB has decided to replace the guidance in IAS 20 for accounting for government grants with the guidance in IAS 41: Agriculture. Also, the IASB noted that SFAS No. 116: Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made, while exempting government grants to business entities from its scope, provides an accounting model that can be applied to government grants and that is consistent with the "Framework." In both IAS 41 and SFAS No. 116, the guidance calls for establishing an asset and recording the grant (contribution) as income. The Company applied this guidance and during the three months ended March 31, 2008, Delta increased machinery and equipment and recognized other income for this grant in the amount of $57,589.
TERP grant recipients are required to monitor and track the total NOx emission reductions and cost-effectiveness. The grant contract includes provisions for the return of a prorated share of the grant if the NOx emission reductions originally projected are not achieved. The Company has not recorded any liabilities in connection with this matter because management has determined that return of any grant receipts is not likely. Based on the advice of the State of Texas authorities who administer the grant, the taxability of this grant has not been determined and the advice of the Internal Revenue Service has been inconsistent. The Company is still determining the effect this will have, but believes it will not materially affect the Company because of the tax loss carryforwards explained in note (16) below.
(16) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes as of March 31, 2008 and 2007 consists of the following:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Current taxes | | $ | (105,059 | ) | | $ | (681,658 | ) |
Deferred tax benefit | | | (238,917 | ) | | | - | |
Benefits of operating loss carryforwards | | | 343,976 | | | | 681,658 | |
Current Federal Taxes | | | - | | | $ | - | |
Texas Margin Tax | | | 23,008 | | | | - | |
Total provision for income taxes | | | 23,008 | | | $ | - | |
The tax provision differs from amounts that would be calculated by applying federal statutory rates to income before income taxes primarily because:
- the Company consolidates subsidiaries for financial statements which cannot be consolidated for income tax purposes; therefore, some subsidiaries may pay federal income tax despite the accumulated net operating losses of the Company as a whole;
- no tax benefits have been recorded for nondeductible expenses totaling $(172,459) and
- the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $1,770,309.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the statutory income tax for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
Net income (loss) before taxes | | $ | (3,406,046 | ) | | $ | (1,292,900 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit computed at statutory rate | | $ | (991,818 | ) | | $ | (439,586 | ) |
Permanent differences | | | (58,636 | ) | | | 84,600 | |
Net effects of temporary differences | | | 105,058 | | | | (326,672 | ) |
Effect of federal graduated rates | | | 1,359,425 | | | | - | |
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance | | | (414,029 | ) | | | 681,658 | |
Texas Margin Tax | | | 23,008 | | | | - | |
| | $ | 23,008 | | | $ | - | |
Deferred taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes. The differences relate primarily to depreciable assets (using accelerated depreciation methods for income tax purposes) and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | | $ | 5,688,405 | | | $ | 5,344,429 | |
Bad debts | | | | | | | 39,505 | |
Unrealized loss on trading securities | | | 466,218 | | | | 1,061 | |
Inventory | | | 79,723 | | | | 47,926 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (6,284,681 | ) | | | (4,573,456 | ) |
Deferred tax asset | | $ | (50,335 | ) | | $ | 859,465 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Fixed asset temporary difference | | $ | 5,478 | | | $ | 152,744 | |
Intangible asset temporary difference | | | 37,280 | | | | 7,415 | |
Current installments on long-term debt | | | 37,265 | | | | 35,012 | |
Unrealized gain on trading securities | | | 26,177 | | | | 817,515 | |
Other | | | - | | | | 3,314 | |
Deferred tax liability | | $ | 106,200 | | | $ | 1,016,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax liability | | $ | 156,535 | | | $ | 156,535 | |
The Company has loss carryforwards totaling $16,730,603 available at March 31, 2008 that may be offset against future taxable income. If not used, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
Operating Losses |
Amount | | Expires |
$ | 1,761,086 | | 2013 |
$ | 1,462,959 | | 2014 |
$ | 2,086,064 | | 2015 |
$ | 860,006 | | 2017 |
$ | 566,409 | | 2018 |
$ | 1,028,302 | | 2019 |
$ | 1,551,019 | | 2020 |
$ | 2,587,701 | | 2021 |
$ | 3,815,364 | | 2022 |
$ | 1,011,693 | | 2023 |
(17) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share, in addition to the weighted average determined for basic loss per share, include common stock equivalents, which would arise from the conversion of the preferred stock to common shares.
| | Quarter Ended | | | Quarter Ended | |
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
Basic income (loss) per share: | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (3,180,812 | ) | | $ | (1,292,900 | ) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 7,112,258 | | | | 5,460,951 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted net income (loss) per share | | | 7,112,258 | | | | 5,460,951 | |
Net income (loss) per share - basic | | $ | (0.45 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share - diluted | | $ | (0.45 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) |
(18) Commitments and Contingencies
Various key officials of the Company have entered into employment agreements with the Company. In March 2007, the CEO of the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement which provides for a monthly salary of $10,000 plus a bonus as determined by the Board of Directors. Also, the agreement provides for the grant of 144,000 warrants per annum with an exercise price of $7.00, beginning March 15, 2007. The CFO of the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement beginning June 1, 2007, which provides for an annual salary of $75,000 plus a bonus as determined by the Board of Directors. The president of NPI previously entered into an at-will employment agreement that provides an annual salary of $158,000 plus a bonus based upon operating results of this subsidiary. The employment agreement also grants the president of NPI an option to purchase NPI common stock equal to 5% of NPI's equity at an exercise price of 5% of the total stockholder's equity, if NPI conducts an initial public offering of its common stock during the time of his employment. Delta’s president and vice president entered into an employment agreement that provides for an annual base salary of $150,000 each. The employment agreement for Hammonds’ president provides for an annual base salary of $90,000.
As of December 31, 2007, our Delta subsidiary is involved in three related lawsuits. In the first lawsuit, Fort Apache Energy, Inc. v. Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc., Fort Apache alleges that Delta breached its contract with Fort Apache and violated the Texas Deceptive Trade and Practices Act. Fort Apache drilled a well which they subsequently decided to plug. Fort Apache contracted with Delta to plug the well. Fort Apache alleges that Delta bid the job with a specified lump sum plugging operation and that Delta went over the bid amount. Fort Apache claims that it never authorized the costs of the extra labor, operation or additional equipment to plug the well. Also, Fort Apache claims that the well is still commercially viable as Delta encountered pressure at the well site during its plugging operations. Fort Apache claims that Delta acted negligently in failing to contact Fort Apache regarding the pressure at the well so as to allow Fort Apache to determine the feasibility of production at the well. Fort Apache claims that it was damaged as a result of the omissions of Delta, and Delta’s actions in force-plugging the well and that its damages are the costs of drilling a new well.
The trial was divided into two phases: (i) Phase I to try the claims of Fort Apache against Delta: and (ii) Phase II to try the counterclaim and the issue of attorneys’ fees. Closing arguments of Phase I of the bench trial were heard by the judge on September 17, 2007. On January 30, 2008, the judge entered her Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and, as a result of a request by Delta, issued an Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on February 15, 2008, in which the judge found, among other things, that Delta breached its contract with Fort Apache and acted negligently, which actions and inactions caused the loss of Fort Apache’s wellbore. The judge found actual damages to be $1,508,846. The second phase of the trial occurred on March 6, 2008. On April 1, 2008, the judge entered Phase II Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, stating that Fort Apache is entitled to $373,000 in attorneys' fees through the time of trial and up to $76,500 in attorneys' fees for any appeal. As of this date, a final judgment has not been entered in the case. Management is vigorously defending this matter and Delta has retained the services of Byron Keeling of the firm Keeling & Downes to file an appeal if an adverse judgment is entered against Delta. An evaluation of the outcome of this case cannot be made at this time. In the unlikely event that Fort Apache successfully defends any judgment in this case on appeal, management believes that any damages assessed will be recoverable through favorable verdicts in the two lawsuits discussed below.
In the second lawsuit, Gemini Insurance Company v. Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc., Delta had a CGL insurance policy with Gemini Insurance Company ("Gemini") for 2003, naming Delta as an insured, which policy was in effect at such time as Delta began the plugging operation referenced in the first lawsuit. Delta made a claim under the policy for a defense in the Fort Apache case; however, Gemini has filed suit against Delta seeking a declaratory judgment that it owes no defense under the policy. In connection with such declaration, Delta has filed a counterclaim seeking to have the policy declared applicable as to the claims of Fort Apache against Delta and claims for breach of contract, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade and Practices Act, violations of the Insurance Code and bad faith on the part of Gemini in refusing coverage. Written discovery has been exchanged between both Gemini and Delta. No depositions have been taken in this matter. Summary judgment motions must be heard by June 20, 2008, and expert designations for parties seeking affirmative relief are due on that date. Defense expert designations are due July 21, 2008. The discovery deadline in this litigation is September 19, 2008, and a trial date has not yet been reset. Management is vigorously defending this matter and asserting its affirmative claims. An evaluation cannot be made at this time in connection with the outcome of the Gemini litigation.
In the third lawsuit, Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. v. Houstoun, Woodard, Eason, Gentle Tomforde and Anderson, Inc., D/B/A Insurance Alliance and Robert Holman, Delta’s position is that if there is not coverage under the Gemini policy, its broker failed to obtain appropriate insurance coverage and misrepresented the coverage it did obtain through the Gemini policy. The parties agreed to refrain from actively working on the Broker Lawsuit pending the outcome of the Fort Apache lawsuit and the Gemini lawsuit because the results of those two lawsuits could render the Broker Lawsuit unnecessary. One of the broker’s defenses is that all claims in the Broker Lawsuit are barred by the March 2007 settlement reached in Gemini Insurance Company, Houstoun, Woodard, Easton, Gentle Tomforde and Anderson, Inc., D/B/A Insurance Alliance and Robert Holman for a rig damaged in Hurricane Katrina, mentioned above. On April 15, 2008, the broker filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that this release applies to the claims in the Broker Lawsuit and thus, the broker is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The motion for summary judgment is set for oral hearing on May 23, 2008. The response to the motion is due May 16, 2008. If the release is found by the court to include the claims asserted in the Broker Lawsuit, the Broker Lawsuit will be barred and will be dismissed by the court. In such event, Delta would have a potential professional malpractice claim against the attorney that represented it in the Property Lawsuit for not properly advising Delta as to the scope and effect of the release. If the court finds that the release does not bar the Broker Lawsuit, then it will continue on the merits of the case. As a result, it is premature to analyze the potential outcome of the Broker Lawsuit. As part of the attorney’s work on the Broker Lawsuit, the attorneys determined that Delta has a potential claim against American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company (AISLIC) for coverage for the Fort Apache lawsuit under a commercial umbrella policy. AISLIC was first provided notice of the Fort Apache lawsuit in March 2008. On March 17, 2008, the attorneys received an initial response from AISLIC, acknowledging receipt of the notice and indicated that a claims technician would be assigned to the matter. An evaluation of these potential claims is premature because AISLIC has not taken a coverage position at this time.
In the event that Delta is found liable to Fort Apache for damages, and Delta does not prevail against Gemini, its insurance carrier, and / or Insurance Alliance and Robert Holman, its insurance agent, the Company’s financial condition could be adversely affected. However, Delta expects to prevail in these matters, the Company has not recorded any liabilities in connection with these lawsuits.
Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. is the recipient of a TERP grant from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality in the amount of $1,157,273, of which $561,711 has been recognized through March 31, 2008. TERP grant recipients are required to monitor and track the total NOx emission reductions and cost-effectiveness. The grant contract includes provisions for the return of a prorated share of the grant if the NOx emission reductions originally projected are not achieved. The Company has not recorded any liabilities in connection with this matter because management has determined that return of any grant receipts is not likely.
The Hammonds Companies lease office space under an operating lease which expires in October 2016. Future minimum lease payments under the operating lease are as follows:
Year December 31, | | Amount | |
2008 | | $ | 436,380 | |
2009 | | | 436,380 | |
2010 | | | 436,380 | |
2011 | | | 436,380 | |
2012 | | | 436,380 | |
Thereafter | | | 1,745,520 | |
| | $ | 3,927,420 | |
Delta leases space under a commercial lease which expires in June 2009. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:
Year December 31, | | Amount | |
2008 | | $ | 36,061 | |
2009 | | | 18,030 | |
| | $ | 54,091 | |
(19) Related Party Transactions
The stock grants to related parties mentioned below were accounted for under FASB Statement No. 123R, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" based on the grant date fair values.
On March 30, 2008, the Company issued 172,800 stock warrants to the Company’s Chairman, CEO, with an exercise price of $5.83 per share, expiring in 2 years, at a cost of $88,063 to the Company. See note 12 for additional valuation information.
(20) Segment Information
We have five reporting segments and corporate overhead:
- Hammonds Technical Services - a business engaged in fuel handling equipment for the United States military and industrial customers, a provider of fuel injection services for the aviation industry, and the designer of a new line of omni directional vehicles (ODV®) for a wide variety of uses;
- Hammonds Fuel Additives – produces and markets motor and aviation fuel additives;
- Hammonds Water Treatment – manufactures patented systems which provide water disinfection for a wide range of potable and waste water applications;
- Northeastern Plastics - a supplier of products to retailers and wholesalers in the automotive after-market and in the consumer durable electrical products markets;
- Delta Seaboard - an onshore rig-based well servicing contracting company providing service to the oil and gas industry;
- Corporate overhead - the Company's investment holdings including financing current operations and expansion of its current holdings as well as evaluating the feasibility of entering into additional businesses. Corporate overhead also includes Brenham Oil & Gas, a division that owns an oil, gas and mineral royalty interest in Washington County, Texas, which is carried on the Company's balance sheet at $0. Through Brenham Oil & Gas, the Company is engaged in negotiations with financial institutions for the purpose of financing potential acquisitions of existing oil and gas properties and reserves. The Company is seeking to enter into arrangements with third-party owners and potential partners with proven oil and gas reserves, but who lack the financial resources and/or the technical expertise possessed by the Company, to assist them with the resources required to develop their reserves.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performances based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, not including nonrecurring gains and losses and foreign exchange gains and losses.
The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different technology and marketing strategies. Most of the businesses were acquired as subsidiaries and the management at the time of the acquisition was retained.
The Company's areas of operations are principally in the United States. No single foreign country or geographic area is significant to the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated revenues from external customers, operating income/(losses), and identifiable assets were as follows:
| | March 31, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Hammonds Technical Services | | $ | 1,151,872 | | | $ | 650,483 | |
Hammonds Fuel Additives | | | 272,598 | | | | 309,008 | |
Hammonds Water Treatment | | | 780,687 | | | | 659,908 | |
Northeastern Plastics | | | 1,427,956 | | | | 2,332,925 | |
Delta Seaboard | | | 2,082,949 | | | | 2,660,246 | |
| | $ | 5,716,062 | | | $ | 6,612,570 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations: | | | | | | | | |
Hammonds Technical Services | | $ | (676,328 | ) | | $ | (761,401 | ) |
Hammonds Fuel Additives | | | 14,477 | | | | 40,162 | |
Hammonds Water Treatment | | | 29,266 | | | | 20,298 | |
Northeastern Plastics | | | (139,925 | ) | | | (51,295 | ) |
Delta Seaboard | | | (529,800 | ) | | | 81,127 | |
Corporate | | | (811,129 | ) | | | (773,713 | ) |
Income (loss) from operations | | | (2,113,439 | ) | | | (1,444,822 | ) |
Other income (expenses) | | | (1,292,607 | ) | | | 199,958 | |
Net income (loss) before income tax | | $ | (3,406,046 | ) | | $ | (1,244,864 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Identifiable assets: | | | March 31, 2008 | | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Hammonds Technical Services | | $ | 8,840,047 | | | $ | 8,925,595 | |
Hammonds Fuel Additives | | | 2,076,051 | | | | 2,025,761 | |
Hammonds Water Treatment | | | 758,902 | | | | 772,179 | |
Northeastern Plastics | | | 6,380,884 | | | | 6,592,980 | |
Delta Seaboard | | | 5,325,408 | | | | 5,974,714 | |
Corporate | | | 17,917,368 | | | | 20,295,325 | |
| | $ | 41,298,660 | | | $ | 44,586,554 | |
(21) Subsequent Events
On April 16, 2008, the board of directors of the Company declared a special dividend of shares of common stock of its subsidiary, Hammond Industries, Inc. to the Company's shareholders. Shareholders will be issued one share of HMDI common stock (free-trading to non-affiliates) for each share of the Company's common stock owned and held on the record date. According to the announcement of the special dividend, the shares of the Company's common stock should be issued on or about Tuesday, August 12, 2008. On May 7, 2008, the Company announced that the record date for the special dividend had to be postponed and would be rescheduled.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
Forward-Looking Statements; Market Data
As used in this Quarterly Report, the terms "we", "us", "our" and the "Company" means American International Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries. To the extent that we make any forward-looking statements in the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Quarterly Report, we emphasize that forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report reflect our current views about future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Generally, forward-looking statements include phrases with words such as "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "believe", "seek", "estimate" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Overview
American International Industries, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of Nevada in September 1994, is a diversified corporation with interests in industrial companies, oil and gas interests, oilfield supply and service companies, and interests in undeveloped real estate in the Galveston Bay, TX area. The Company’s business strategy is to acquire controlling equity interests in undervalued companies and take an active role in its new subsidiaries to improve their growth, by providing its subsidiaries with access to capital, leveraging synergies and providing its subsidiaries with the Company's management expertise. The Company is sometimes referred to as "we", "us", "our", and other such phrases as provided in Regulation F-D (Fair Disclosure).
American International Industries, Inc. is a holding company and has five reporting segments and corporate overhead:
- Hammonds Technical Services - a business engaged in fuel handling equipment for the United States military and industrial customers, a provider of fuel injection services for the aviation industry, and the designer of a new line of omni directional vehicles (ODV®) for a wide variety of uses;
- Hammonds Fuel Additives – produces and markets motor and aviation fuel additives;
- Hammonds Water Treatment – manufactures patented systems which provide water disinfection for a wide range of potable and waste water applications;
- Northeastern Plastics - a supplier of products to retailers and wholesalers in the automotive after-market and in the consumer durable electrical products markets;
- Delta Seaboard - an onshore rig-based well servicing contracting company providing service to the oil and gas industry;
- Corporate overhead - the Company's investment holdings including financing current operations and expansion of its current holdings as well as evaluating the feasibility of entering into additional businesses. Corporate overhead also includes Brenham Oil & Gas, a division that owns an oil, gas and mineral royalty interest in Washington County, Texas, which is carried on the Company's balance sheet at $0. Through Brenham Oil & Gas, the Company is engaged in negotiations with financial institutions for the purpose of financing potential acquisitions of existing oil and gas properties and reserves. The Company is seeking to enter into arrangements with third-party owners and potential partners with proven oil and gas reserves, but who lack the financial resources and/or the technical expertise possessed by the Company, to assist them with the resources required to develop their reserves.
Hammonds Industries, Inc. (OTCBB: "HMDI"), our 48.1% subsidiary, is a public reporting company, which owns 100% of Hammonds Technical Services, Inc., Hammonds Fuel Additives, Inc., and Hammonds Water Treatment Systems, Inc. (collectively "Hammonds"). The Company consolidates Hammonds although its ownership is less than 51%, because the Company appoints the members of Hammonds' board of directors. Since Hammonds is incurring losses and the minority interest has no recorded common stock equity value, the Company recognizes 100% of Hammonds' losses.
The historical financial statements of the Company include the acquisitions of acquired companies as of the effective dates of the acquisitions, and the results of those companies subsequent to closing, as these transactions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Our long-term strategy is to expand the operations of each of our subsidiaries in their respective fields by providing managerial and financial support to our subsidiaries. As part of our business model, we explore mergers, acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets from time to time, based upon the reasonable discretion of management and the value added of each potential transaction.
We encounter substantial competition in each of our subsidiaries product and service areas. Such competition is expected to continue. Depending on the particular market involved, our subsidiaries compete on a variety of factors, such as price, quality, delivery, customer service, performance, product innovation and product recognition. Other competitive factors for certain products include breadth of product line, research and development efforts and technical and managerial capability.
Corporate overhead includes our investment activities for financing current operations and expansion of our current holdings, as well as evaluating the feasibility of acquiring additional businesses.
The condensed consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive income, and cash flow included herein are unaudited, except for the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007. The unaudited financial statements include, in the opinion of management, all the adjustments, consisting only of the normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The unaudited financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-Q and accordingly do not include all footnote disclosures that would normally be included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, although the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future interim period or for a full year.
Results of Operations
Three months Ended March 31, 2008 Compared to Three months Ended March 31, 2007.
Net revenues. For the three month period ended March 31, 2008, our consolidated net revenues were $5,716,062, compared to $6,612,570 for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, or a decrease of $896,508.
Hammonds' revenues increased to $2,205,157 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $1,619,399 for the same period in 2007, or an increase of $585,758, or 36%. The increase in revenues was due to higher demand for Hammonds Water Treatment products and increased sales of Hammonds Technical Services’ transport mounted injection systems and Hammonds’ line of Omni Directional Vehicles (ODVs®). Hammonds Water Treatment revenues increased by $120,779, or 18%, and Hammonds Technical Services revenues increased by $501,389, or 77%. In addition, Hammonds projected backlog of orders is $4.2 million as of March 31, 2008.
NPI reported revenues of $1,427,956 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $2,332,925 for the same period in 2007. The decline in revenues of $904,969 is due to an overstock position from the 2007 holiday season from one large customer and an order for another large customer that was expected for the first quarter, but was delayed to the second quarter because the shipping vessel was overbooked. Sales under the MOTOR TREND® and Good Choice® programs have remained steady or grown slightly during the first quarter. A new 2008 "big box" customer has been ordering consistently and NPI received its first order from another new 2008 "big box" customer in the second quarter, which is ahead of NPI's forecast. NPI's business is seasonal and historically, most of NPI’s revenues have been generated in the third and fourth quarters. NPI is targeting one or two additional large accounts and adding more mid-size accounts.
Delta reported revenues of $2,082,949 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $2,660,246 for the same period in 2007, or a decrease of $577,297. Pipe sales revenues were $1,095,661 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $1,446,064 for the same period in 2007, representing a decrease of $350,403, or 24%. This decrease is primarily due to two of Delta's larger pipe customers completing their drilling programs and selling their production at the end of 2007. Delta is hopeful that these two companies will develop new drilling programs and pipe sales will begin to increase in the second or third quarter of 2008. Rig service revenues for the first quarter of 2008 were $987,289, compared to $1,214,182 for the same period in 2007, representing a decrease of $226,893, or 19%. This decrease is due to a rig being taken out of service for extensive maintenance in February. Delta anticipates putting the rig back into service and will activate a seventh service rig on or about May 15, 2008.
Net loss from operations. Our consolidated net loss from operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2008 was $2,113,439, compared to a loss of $1,444,822 during the same three month period in the prior year. The primary reason for the increase in loss from operations of $668,617 was due to an increase in net loss from operations from Delta of $610,927, to a net loss of $529,800 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to net income from operations of $81,127 for the three month period ended March 31, 2007. Delta's revenues declined by $577,297, as described above, and operating costs increased, primarily due to vendors passing along higher fuel costs for materials and services provided in the generation of rig service and pipe sales revenues.
Other income. Other expense was $1,292,607 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to other income of $199,958 for the same period in the prior year. Net realized/unrealized loss on trading securities was $1,360,280 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to $44,214 for the same three month period in the prior year. The net unrealized loss on trading securities of $1,304,853 was due primarily to declines in the market values of our investments in OI Corporation and Rubicon Financial Incorporated of $1,191,080. Interest expense was $58,217 lower in the first quarter of 2008 than it was in the same period in 2007.
Net loss. Net loss was $3,180,812 in the first quarter of 2008, compared to $1,292,900 in the same period in 2007. Our net loss of $3,180,812 included non-cash expenses of $1,817,983, including unrealized losses on the sale of trading securities of $1,304,853, depreciation and amortization of $339,097, and non-cash compensation of $174,033. Our net loss of $1,292,900 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 included non-cash expenses of $521,009, including compensation of $243,460 and depreciation and amortization expenses of $277,549.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total assets/working capital. Total assets at March 31, 2008 were $41,298,660, compared to $44,586,554 at December 31, 2007, representing a decrease of $3,287,894. At March 31, 2008, consolidated working capital was $23,833,042, compared to working capital of $27,790,372 at December 31, 2007, representing a decrease of $3,957,330. The primary reason for the decrease in working capital was a non-cash net unrealized loss on trading securities of $1,304,853. Additionally, working capital was used to fund operations and for the purchase of plant and equipment.
Cash flow from operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, we had negative cash flow from operations of $1,974,624, compared to negative cash flow from operations of $1,043,583 during the same period in the prior year. The decrease in cash flow from operations was the result of an increase in our net loss from $1,292,900 for three months ended March 31, 2007 to $3,180,812 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our net loss of $3,048,650 included non-cash expenses of $1,817,983, including unrealized losses on the sale of trading securities of $1,304,853, depreciation and amortization of $339,097, and non-cash compensation of $174,033. Our inventories increased by $826,871 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to an increase of $767,986 during the three months ended March 31, 2007. We increased our investments in trading securities by $225,479 during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Accounts receivable decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2008 by $1,105,043 compared to a decrease of $1,161,066 during the same three month period in the prior year. Prepaid expenses decreased by $84,731, other assets increased by $58,204, and accounts payable decreased by $205,411 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our net loss of $1,292,900 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 included non-cash expenses of $521,009, including compensation of $243,460 and depreciation and amortization expenses of $277,549. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, trading securities increased by $90,303, prepaid expenses increased by $212,092, other assets increased by $182,549, and accounts payable decreased by $144,050.
Cash flow from investing activities. Our investing activities provided $1,298,792 during the three month period ended March 31, 2008, as a result of a net reduction in investment in certificates of deposit of $1,255,200, proceeds from the sale of drilling rig equipment of $200,000, offset by purchases of property, equipment, and expenditures related to securing additional patents of $198,246. This is compared to cash provided by investing activities during the same period in the prior year in the amount of $124,117 during the three month period ended March 31, 2007, as a result of a net reduction in investment in certificates of deposit of $114,000, receipts of principal payments on notes receivable of $307,427, offset by purchases of property, equipment, and expenditures related to securing additional patents of $272,310.
Cash flow from financing activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, our financing activities provided $268,297 compared to $1,295,565 during the same period of 2007. During the 2008 period, we received proceeds from line-of-credit agreements of $598,000. We reduced our borrowings on margin loans by $149,836 and made payments of $146,432 on debt during the three month period ended March 31, 2008. During the 2007 period, we received net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of our subsidiary in the amount of $694,672, from short-term borrowings in the amount of $300,000, from long-term debt of $264,946, and from line-of-credit agreements of $324,218. We made payments of $257,664 on short-term notes and principal payments on long-term debt of $27,768 during the three month period ended March 31, 2007.
Real estate. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company purchased for investment a 174 acre tract of land in Waller County, Texas for $1,684,066. This property is listed for sale with a real estate broker. This property is not going to be developed by nor is it being held as inventory by the Company. The Company continues to own 287 undeveloped acres of waterfront property on Dickinson Bayou and Galveston Bay in Galveston County, Texas. The book value for this property is $225,000. In November 2005, the Company signed a contract for sale of the property for a cash consideration of $16,000,000 with Lakeland Partners III. In January 2007, Lakeland assigned all of its interest in the contract to Westfield Forest, L.P. Westfield is a recognized developer of waterfront properties in the Houston, Texas area. Westfield deposited $95,000 in earnest money with the title company upon assignment of the contract, which had an initial feasibility period of one year. On November 12, 2007, the contract was amended to extend the feasibility period to July 31, 2008. No revenue has been recognized for this transaction because the development of the property requires permits from the City of Texas City and the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers, which the developer believes they can obtain timely within the terms of the contract. As a result, the transaction has not had all the elements necessary for it to be considered a completed revenue recognition event.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Interest Rate Risk. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value at March 31, 2008, due to the generally short maturities of these items. At March 31, 2008, our investments were primarily in short-term dollar denominated bank deposits with maturities of a few days, or in longer-term deposits where funds can be withdrawn on demand without penalty. We have the ability and expect to hold our investments to maturity.
The Company’s outstanding long-term debt as of March 31, 2008, is at fixed interest rates, prime plus 1%, or prime floating rate. The Company does not believe that a change of 100 basis points in interest rates would have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition.
Equity Investments. We are exposed to equity price risk on our portfolio of trading securities. As of March 31, 2008, our total equity holdings in publicly traded companies were valued at $5,675,581, compared to $6,810,382 as of December 31, 2007. On September 12, 2007, the Company acquired 170,345 shares, or approximately 7%, of OI Corporation's common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 240,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for a total purchase price of $2,212,000. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for OICO was $13.23 per common share. On November 27, 2007, the Company acquired 1,000,000 restricted shares, or approximately 9% of Rubicon Financial Incorporated’s common stock for a $1,000,000 cash payment and the issuance of 200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock for a total purchase price of $1,980,000. The closing market price on the date of this transaction for RBCF was $2.87 per common share. The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $4,715,971 at March 31, 2008, or 83% of our portfolio of trading securities. The market value of the trading securities for these two companies was $5,901,198 at December 31, 2007, or 87% of our portfolio of trading securities.
Equity markets can experience significant volatility and therefore are subject to changes in value. Based upon the current volatile nature of the U.S. securities markets and the decline in the U.S. economy, we believe that it is possible, that the market values of our marketable equity securities could decline in the near term. We have a policy in place to review our equity holdings on a regular basis. Our policy includes, but is not limited to, reviewing each company’s cash position, earnings/revenue outlook, stock price performance, liquidity and management/ownership. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse equity returns by maintaining diversified securities portfolios.
The following table represents the potential decrease in fair values of our marketable equity securities that are sensitive to changes in the stock market. Fair value deteriorations of 50%, 35% and 15% were selected for illustrative purposes because none is more likely to occur than another.
| | | 50% | | | | 35% | | | | 15% | |
Marketable equity securities | | $ | (2,837,791 | ) | | $ | (1,986,453 | ) | | $ | (851,337 | ) |
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of March 31, 2008, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
In response to a letter from the SEC in connection with the review of HMDI’s Form 10-QSB for Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2006, the Company has reexamined the treatment of the valuation of the preferred stock issued by Hammonds. As a result of our reexamination and the analysis of professional literature related to this very technical and complex issue, we have restated the financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
Changes in internal controls. During the quarterly period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Fort Apache Energy, Inc. v. Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc.
The second phase of the trial occurred on March 6, 2008. On April 1, 2008, the judge entered Phase II Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, stating that Fort Apache is entitled to $373,000 in attorneys' fees through the time of trial and up to $76,500 in attorneys' fees for any appeal. As of this date, a final judgment has not been entered in the case.
Gemini Insurance Company v. Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc.
There have been no material developments in this case since December 31, 2007.
Delta Seaboard Well Service, Inc. v. Houstoun, Woodard, Eason, Gentle Tomforde and Anderson, Inc., D/B/A Insurance Alliance and Robert Holman
On April 15, 2008, the broker filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that this release applies to the claims in the Broker Lawsuit and thus, the broker is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The motion for summary judgment is set for oral hearing on May 23, 2008. The response to the motion is due May 16, 2008.
On March 17, 2008, the attorneys received an initial response from AISLIC, acknowledging receipt of the notice and indicated that a claims technician would be assigned to the matter. An evaluation of these potential claims is premature because AISLIC has not taken a coverage position at this time.
In the event that Delta is found liable to Fort Apache for damages, and Delta does not prevail against Gemini, its insurance carrier, and / or Insurance Alliance and Robert Holman, its insurance agent, the Company’s financial condition could be adversely affected. However, Delta expects to prevail in these matters, the Company has not recorded any liabilities in connection with these lawsuits.
There have been no material changes from Risk Factors as previously disclosed in the Registrant’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.
Exhibit No. | Description |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K During the Period Covered by this Report: The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on March 19, 2008 with disclosure under Item 4.02, "Non-reliance on previously issued financial statements or a related audit report or completed interim review." The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on April 16, 2008 with disclosure under Item 8.01, "Other Events" and Item 9.01, "Financial Statements and Exhibits."
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
/s/ DANIEL DROR
CEO, PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN
Dated: May 14, 2008
/s/ SHERRY L. COUTURIER
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Dated: May 14, 2008