Yankee Candle (YCC) 10-Q 2007 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2006

Commission File Number: 001-15023

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MASSACHUSETTS	04 259 1416
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

16 YANKEE CANDLE WAY
SOUTH DEERFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01373
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

(413) 665-8306

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filerþ       Accelerated filero       Non-accelerated filero

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ

The registrant had 39,934,337 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of November 2, 2006.

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.

FORM 10-Q – Quarter Ended September 30, 2006

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains a number of forward-looking statements. Any statements contained herein, including without limitation statements to the effect that The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Yankee Candle”, the “Company”, “we”, and “us”) or its management “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “plans” and similar expressions, that relate to prospective events or developments should be considered forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. There are a number of important factors that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation, those set forth below in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Future Operating Results.” Management undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Table of Contents

Item	Page
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements-Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Thirteen and Thirty-Nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Thirty-Nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005		5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		26
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		26
Item 1A. Risk Factors		26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		31
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		31
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		31
Item 5. Other Information		31
Item 6. Exhibits		31
Signatures		32
Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification of CEO
Ex-31.2 Section 302 Certification of CFO
Ex-32.1 Section 906 Certification of CEO
Ex-32.2 Section 906 Certification of CFO

2

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements.

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,756	$	12,655
Accounts receivable, net		67,366		42,546
Inventory		87,404		55,528
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12,383		9,060
Deferred tax assets		5,704		6,734
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		182,613		126,523
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT-NET		136,859		139,089
MARKETABLE SECURITIES		2,194		2,223
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS		69,515		73,975
GOODWILL		13,719		6,035
INTANGIBLE ASSETS		16,797		6,849
OTHER ASSETS		751		440
TOTAL ASSETS	$	422,448	$	355,134
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	20,320	$	21,068
Accrued payroll		12,928		14,319
Accrued income taxes		4,070		20,828
Accrued purchases of property and equipment		743		5,944
Accrued repurchases of common stock		—		5,463
Other accrued liabilities		19,160		22,919
Short-term debt		40,000		—
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		97,221		90,541
DEFERRED COMPENSATION OBLIGATION		2,330		2,418
LONG-TERM DEBT		241,000		178,000
DEFERRED RENT		16,688		16,031
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		65,209		68,144
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	422,448	$	355,134

See notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	For the Thirteen Weeks						For the Thirty-Nine Weeks
	Ended						Ended
	September 30,			October 1,			September 30,			October 1,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Sales	$	159,604		$	136,500		$	409,768		$	364,303
Cost of sales		72,981			60,368			188,032			161,485
Gross profit		86,623			76,132			221,736			202,818
Selling expenses		40,670			34,767			114,519			99,382
General and administrative expenses		17,015			14,689			47,534			41,964
Income from operations		28,938			26,676			59,683			61,472
Interest income		(7	)		(5	)		(20	)		(17	)
Interest expense		4,682			2,347			11,211			4,809
Other (income) expense		(165	)		(897	)		(459	)		(200	)
Income before provision for income taxes		24,428			25,231			48,951			56,880
Provision for income taxes		9,527			9,840			16,753			22,183
Net income	$	14,901		$	15,391		$	32,198		$	34,697
Basic earnings per share	$	0.37		$	0.35		$	0.80		$	0.77
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.37		$	0.35		$	0.79		$	0.76
Weighted average shares:
Basic		39,784			43,787			40,405			45,237
Diluted		40,085			44,223			40,737			45,709

See notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	For the Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
	September 30,			October 1,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	32,198		$	34,697
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		19,652			18,355
Unrealized loss (gain) on marketable securities		29			(30	)
Stock-based compensation expense		4,348			2,587
Deferred taxes		5,490			7,004
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		144			253
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(24,261	)		(28,251	)
Inventory		(28,547	)		(22,594	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(3,225	)		(2,523	)
Investments in marketable securities		(597	)		(520	)
Accounts payable		(810	)		9,337
Accrued income taxes		(15,972	)		(22,146	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(9,948	)		(1,065	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(21,499	)		(4,896	)
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment		(19,410	)		(22,344	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		11			14
Payment of contingent consideration on GBI acquisition		(1,333	)		—
Payment for Illuminations acquisition		(22,111	)		—
Purchase of intangible assets		—			(604	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(42,843	)		(22,934	)
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net borrowings under bank credit agreements		103,000			125,000
Deferred financing costs		(279	)		(343	)
Payments for redemption of common stock		(41,977	)		(119,998	)
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options		924			—
Dividends paid		(5,093	)		(5,757	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		4,714			2,350
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		61,289			1,252
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		154			(98	)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(2,899	)		(26,676	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		12,655			36,424
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	9,756		$	9,748
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	10,567		$	3,888
Income taxes	$	26,301		$	37,489
Net decrease in accrued purchases of property and equipment	$	5,201		$	—

See notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles”). The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

Certain information and disclosures normally included in the notes to consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, as amended, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). SFAS 123(R) eliminates the alternative to use the intrinsic value method of accounting that was permitted under SFAS 123. SFAS 123(R) requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. SFAS 123(R) establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all companies to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for all share-based payment transactions with employees.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R). The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using a modified prospective application, as permitted under SFAS 123(R). Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.

Before the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 using the prospective transition method provided by SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123.” Under the prospective transition method, the Company had recorded charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income representing the grant date fair value of stock options beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003. The fair value of these options is being expensed over the vesting period based on the fair value at the date of the grant.

Stock-based compensation charges amounted to $1,586 and $880 for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively, and $4,348 and $2,587 for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Stock-based compensation cost recognized in the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 represents compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to September 30, 2006 based upon the grant date fair values estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) or SFAS 123 depending upon the date of grant. Stock-based compensation cost recognized in the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 includes compensation cost for all share-based payments granted between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123.

Awards under the Company’s option plans vest, in general, over a four year period. Therefore, the cost related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 presented in the Company’s historical Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period. The reported and pro forma net income and earnings per share for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 in the table below are the same since stock-based compensation expense is calculated under the provisions of SFAS 123(R).

6

These amounts for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 are included in the table below only to provide the detail for a comparative presentation to the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

	For the Thirteen Weeks						For the Thirty-Nine Weeks
	Ended						Ended
	September 30,			October 1,			September 30,			October 1,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income, as reported	$	14,901		$	15,391		$	32,198		$	34,697
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects		967			537			2,652			1,578
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(967	)		(666	)		(2,652	)		(1,966	)
Pro forma net income	$	14,901		$	15,262		$	32,198		$	34,309
Earnings per share:
Basic-as reported	$	.37		$	0.35		$	.80		$	0.77
Basic-pro forma	$	.37		$	0.35		$	.80		$	0.76
Weighted average basic shares outstanding		39,784			43,787			40,405			45,237
Diluted-as reported	$	.37		$	0.35		$	.79		$	0.76
Diluted-pro forma	$	.37		$	0.35		$	.79		$	0.75
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		40,085			44,223			40,737			45,709

As of September 30, 2006, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the Company’s awards that are expected to vest was approximately $10,772 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.0 years.

Stock Options

Options to purchase common stock were granted to key employees and directors of the Company in 1998 under the Yankee Candle Employee Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”). The options granted under the 1998 Plan were “nonqualified” for tax purposes. Stock options under this plan were generally granted with a 4-year vesting period and a 10-year term. The stock options vest in equal annual installments over the nominal vesting period.

In addition to the 1998 Plan described above, the Company adopted the 1999 Employee Stock Option and Award Plan in June 1999 (the “1999 Plan”) and the 2005 Employee Stock Option and Award Plan in June 2005 (the “2005 Plan”). The 1999 and 2005 Plans provide for the grant of both incentive stock awards intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and nonqualified options. Options granted to date under both the 1999 and 2005 Plans generally have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, are non-qualified and expire after 10 years. Options granted under the 1999 and 2005 Plans generally vest ratably over four years.

The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant which most closely correlates with the expected life of the options. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected volatility was based on a combination of implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock and historical volatility of the Company’s stock. Expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s dividend policy at the time the options were granted. Forfeitures are estimated based on the Company’s historical data. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company recognized forfeitures as they occurred.

The following weighted average assumptions were used to compute the pro forma stock-based compensation expense and the stock option expense that was recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005:

7

	2006			2005
Volatility		33.0	%		32.8	%
Dividend yield		0.2	%		0.0	%
Risk free interest rate		3.5	%		3.3	%
Expected lives	4.1 years			4.0 years

Changes in the Company’s stock options for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

				Weighted Average
				Exercise Price
	Options			Per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		2,054,080		$	22.35
Granted		370,850			27.85
Exercised		(278,471	)		17.01
Forfeited		(108,075	)		27.64
Outstanding at September 30, 2006		2,038,384		$	23.80
Exercisable at September 30, 2006		1,091,795		$	20.09

The weighted average grant date fair value was $8.15 for options granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006. The weighted average remaining contractual term was 5.8 years for stock options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2006. The total intrinsic value was $10,285 for stock options exercisable as of September 30, 2006 and $12,187 for stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2006. The total intrinsic value for stock options exercised during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was $316 and $3,079, respectively.

The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $1,310 and the related tax benefit was $81 for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006. For the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $4,714 and the related tax benefit was $1,709.

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock options outstanding at September 30, 2006:

						Average
Range of		Options		Options		Remaining Life
Exercise Prices		Outstanding		Exercisable		(Years)
$	4.25		13,702		13,702		1.8
	11.88-16.20		352,500		347,500		4.6
	16.80-18.00		123,407		120,282		3.6
	21.13-21.30		415,750		332,750		6.3
	22.32-29.75		761,975		185,550		8.7
	30.10-32.81		371,050		92,011		8.6
$	4.25-$32.81		2,038,384		1,091,795		7.1

Restricted Stock and Performance Shares

The 1999 and 2005 Plans also provide for grants of restricted stock and performance shares. The Company generally grants restricted stock with a 3-year vesting period. Restricted stock vests at the end of each of the three years in accordance with the terms outlined in the restricted stock agreement between the Company and the recipient. The fair value of restricted stock award is the excess of the market price of Common Stock at the date of grant over the amount paid, which is zero.

Performance share awards entitle recipients to receive shares of the Company’s common stock without payment of any purchase price, with the number of shares actually received, if any, contingent upon the Company satisfying specified financial performance metrics (such as earnings per share) over the time period specified in the award, all as pre-approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The performance share grants were valued on the grant date by multiplying the number of performance shares covered by the awards that are expected to vest by the Yankee Candle closing stock price on the grant date. The cost is recognized within the Condensed

8

Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight line basis over the period specified in the award (generally three years for each grant) based upon the number of shares which are considered probable of vesting.

Included in the Company’s stock-based compensation expense is a portion of the cost related to restricted stock awarded in 2006 and performance shares awarded in fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006.

Changes in the Company’s restricted stock and performance shares for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 were as follows:

							Weighted Average
	Restricted			Performance			Grant Date
	Shares			Shares			Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 31, 2005		—			188,700		$	31.31
Granted		101,000			38,000			27.63
Vested		(2,700	)		—			28.01
Forfeited		(4,600	)		(15,425	)		30.44
Unvested shares at September 30, 2006		93,700			211,275		$	29.69

3. INVENTORIES

The components of inventory were as follows:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Finished goods	$	83,403		$	52,164
Work-in-process		676			1
Raw materials and packaging		6,322			5,918
		90,401			58,083
Less LIFO adjustment		(2,997	)		(2,555	)
	$	87,404		$	55,528

4. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

On July 30, 2006, the Company acquired certain assets of Candle Acquisition Corp. (“Illuminations”), including the Illuminations^® brand, 14 Illuminations retail stores located in California, Arizona and Washington, and the Illuminations Consumer Direct business. Illuminations designs and markets premium scented candles, candle accessories, and other home décor products through retail satellite stores and the consumer direct channel. The total cash purchase price was approximately $22,111. The cash purchase price was borrowed under the Company’s $100,000 unsecured Credit Facility. The following table provides a preliminary allocation of the purchase price for the acquired assets of Illuminations:

Cash purchase price	$	22,111
Assets acquired:
Property, plant and equipment		2,010
Inventory		2,666
Favorable lease agreements		877
Tradename		10,100
Goodwill		6,351
Other assets		312
Total assets acquired:		22,316
Liabilities acquired:
Gift card liability		(205	)
	��
Total allocation	$	22,111

9

The favorable lease agreements are being amortized over the remaining lease terms of the related leases. The Company plans to continue to sell the Illuminations branded products and utilize the Illuminations brand name. Accordingly, the tradename is deemed to have an indefinite life and is not being amortized. The goodwill is tax deductible over a 15 year period. For segment reporting purposes, Illuminations is included in the Retail segment. Illuminations’ results of operations were immaterial to the Company’s operations during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and, therefore historical pro forma results of operations have not been provided. The preliminary price allocation is subject to final adjustment as the Company completes its determination of the fair value of assets acquired.

5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

During the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, the Company recorded an additional purchase price payment of $1,333 related to the acquisition of our GBI fundraising division purchased in 2004. This purchase price payment resulted in additional goodwill and was earned as a result of the GBI fundraising division achieving certain revenue growth targets previously established in the asset purchase agreement. The asset purchase agreement has provisions for an additional payment in 2007 contingent on achievement of certain revenue targets.

The following sets forth the intangible assets, excluding goodwill, by major category:

	September 30, 2006
	Average								December 31, 2005
	Useful Life	Gross							Gross
	(in	Carrying		Accumulated			Net Book		Carrying		Accumulated			Net Book
	years)	Amount		Amortization			Value		Amount		Amortization			Value
	(in thousands)
Indefinite life:
Trade names	N/A	$	12,620	$	—		$	12,620	$	2,520	$	—		$	2,520
Finite life:
Deferred financing costs	5		1,265		(558	)		707		987		(393	)		594
Customer lists	4		3,880		(2,009	)		1,871		3,880		(1,283	)		2,597
Non-competes	3 – 4		1,123		(582	)		541		1,123		(361	)		762
Favorable lease agreements	4		877		(77	)		800
Trademarks	15		231		(189	)		42		231		(178	)		53
Formulas	3		431		(215	)		216		431		(108	)		323
			7,807		(3,630	)		4,177		6,652		(2,323	)		4,329
Total intangible assets		$	20,427	$	(3,630	)	$	16,797	$	9,172	$	(2,323	)	$	6,849

On March 28, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement (more fully discussed below) which amended certain terms of the Company’s existing credit facility. As a result of this transaction, approximately $135 of deferred financing costs were incurred. The deferred financing costs are being amortized over the life of the Amended Credit Facility which expires on May 18, 2010.

On April 25, 2006, the Company entered into a new $100,000 364-day senior unsecured revolving credit facility with Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (more fully discussed below). Approximately $111 of deferred financing costs were incurred. The deferred financing costs are being amortized over the life of the Credit Facility which expires on April 25, 2007.

Total amortization expense from finite-lived intangible assets was $501 and $335 for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Total amortization expense from finite-lived intangible assets was $1,307 and $1,019 for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively.

Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets at September 30, 2006 for the remainder of fiscal 2006 and in each of the next four fiscal years is expected to be as follows:

10

(in thousands)

2006	$	576
2007		1,983
2008		1,062
2009		449
2010		104
Thereafter		3
Total	$	4,177

6. DEBT

On March 28, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement (“Existing Credit Facility”) which amended certain terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 19, 2004 and amended on May 18, 2005 among the Company, Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (“Citizens Bank”) and the other lending institutions named therein. The Company’s Existing Credit Facility has a single $250,000 line which expires on May 18, 2010. The Existing Credit Facility is being used by the Company for, among other things, working capital, letters of credit, repurchase of the Company’s common stock and other general corporate purposes. The primary changes affected by the Second Amendment are:

• A required consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00. The original Credit Facility required a consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 2.25 to 1.00.

• A fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of the sum of consolidated EBITDA plus rent expense, less cash taxes paid and capital expenditures to the sum of consolidated cash interest expense plus rent expense and dividends) of no less than 2.00 to 1.00. The original Credit Facility required a fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 2.25 to 1.00.

• Amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, Citizens Bank prime rate or a Eurodollar rate that ranges from 0.50% to 1.125% above LIBOR. Under the original Credit Facility, the Eurodollar rate ranged from 0.50% to 0.85% above LIBOR.

• The Company is required to pay the lenders a quarterly commitment fee on the unused revolving loan commitment amount which ranges from 0.125% to 0.25%. Under the original Credit Facility, the commitment fee ranged from 0.125% to 0.20%.

On April 25, 2006, the Company entered into a new $100,000 364-day senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (“Citizens”). The New Credit Facility may be used by the Company for, among other things, working capital, repurchase of the Company’s common stock, and other general corporate purposes. Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, the Prime Rate or LIBOR Rate. LIBOR Rate borrowings under the Credit Facility include a margin rate ranging from 0.50% to 1.125%. These rates vary depending on the Company’s outstanding borrowings. In addition, the Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused revolving loan commitment amount ranging from 0.125% to 0.250%. The Company is also required to pay a utilization fee of 0.125% once outstanding borrowings exceed $50,000.

The New Credit Facility supplements the Company’s existing $250,000 Revolving Credit Agreement discussed above.

Both the New Credit Facility and the Existing Credit Facility require that the Company comply with several financial and other covenants, including requirements that the Company maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter the following financial ratios as set forth in the New Credit Facility and the Existing Credit Facility:

• a consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly (at September 30, 2006 this ratio was 1.76 to 1.00); and

• a fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of the sum of consolidated EBITDA plus rent expense, less cash taxes paid and capital expenditures to the sum of consolidated cash interest expense plus rent expense and dividends) of no less than 2.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly (for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 this ratio was 2.40 to 1.00).

The New Credit Facility and the Existing Credit Facility define EBITDA as the Company’s consolidated net income, plus the amount of net interest expense, depreciation and amortization, income taxes, and certain non-cash compensation expenses.

As of September 30, 2006, $40,000 was outstanding under the New Credit Facility, $241,000 was outstanding under the Existing Credit Facility and $3,486 was outstanding for letters of credit, leaving $65,514 in availability. As of

11

September 30, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the New Credit Facility and the Existing Credit Facility.

7. RESTRUCTURING RESERVE

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company initiated a restructuring plan designed to close 17 underperforming stores and re-invest in talent and other strategic growth initiatives. In connection with this restructuring plan, a charge of $5,546 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Included in the restructuring charge was $2,404 related to lease termination costs, $2,559 related to non-cash fixed assets write-offs and other costs, and $583 in employee related costs. All of the 17 underperforming stores have been closed and the Company anticipates no further accruals related to this restructuring.

In accounting for the restructuring charges, the Company complied with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, which requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value when the liability is incurred.

The following is a summary of restructuring charge activity during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006:

	Accrued				Accrued				Accrued				Accrued
	as of				as of				as of				as of
	December		Costs		April		Costs		July		Costs		September
	31, 2005		Paid		1, 2006		Paid		1, 2006		Paid		30, 2006
	(in thousands)
Occupancy	$	1,150	$	809	$	341	$	64	$	277	$	119	$	158
Other expenses		84		26		58		30		28		4		24
Employee related		473		133		340		125		215		—		215
Total	$	1,707	$	968	$	739	$	219	$	520	$	123	$	397

8. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was 39.0% and 34.2%, respectively. For the comparable periods in 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was 39.0%. The decrease in the Company’s effective tax rate for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was related to a benefit of $2,338 associated with the closure of an IRS audit for prior years. The benefit was primarily due to favorable transfer pricing adjustments associated with sales to the Company’s international subsidiary and was recognized during the first fiscal quarter of 2006.

The Company has provided a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets of its international operations in both 2005 and 2006.

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE

SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” requires two presentations of earnings per share, “basic” and “diluted.” Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) for the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued. The denominator in the calculation is based on the following weighted-average number of common shares (in thousands):

	For the Thirteen Weeks Ended				For the Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
	September 30,		October 1,		September 30,		October 1,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(in thousands)
Basic		39,784		43,787		40,405		45,237
Add:
Shares issuable pursuant to stock awards		301		436		332		472
Diluted		40,085		44,223		40,737		45,709

12

For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, approximately 1,075 and 1,040 shares, respectively, issuable pursuant to option grants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect. For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005, approximately 401 and 526 shares, respectively, issuable pursuant to option grants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect.

10. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On July 27, 2005 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $150,000 of Yankee Candle common stock. Pursuant to this authorization, the Company purchased a total of 1,436,700 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $41,977 during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006. The Company did not repurchase any common stock during the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006. During the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 the Company repurchased a total of 673,798 and 3,932,384 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000 and $119,998, respectively, pursuant to a previous authorization from its Board of Directors. At September 30, 2006, the Company had $23,017 in authorized funds available to be used for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to the above July 27, 2005 authorization.

11. SEGMENTS OF ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION

The Company has segmented its operations in a manner that reflects how its chief operating decision-maker (the “CEO”) currently reviews the results of the Company and its subsidiaries’ businesses. The Company has two reportable segments — retail and wholesale. The identification of these segments results from management’s recognition that while the product sold is similar, the type of customer for the product and services and methods used to distribute the product are different.

The CEO evaluates both its retail and wholesale operations based on an “operating earnings” measure. Such measure gives recognition to specifically identifiable operating costs such as cost of sales and selling expenses. Administrative charges are generally not allocated to specific operating segments and are accordingly reflected in the unallocated/corporate/other category. Other components of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, which are classified below operating income, are also not allocated by segments. The Company does not account for or report assets or depreciation and amortization by segment to the CEO.

13

The following are the relevant data for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005:

	(in thousands)
								Balance per
					Unallocated/			Consolidated
					Corporate/			Statements of
Thirteen Weeks Ended September 30, 2006	Retail		Wholesale		Other			Income
Sales	$	72,127	$	87,477	$	—		$	159,604
Gross Profit		47,782		38,841		—			86,623
Selling Expenses		34,846		5,824		—			40,670
Operating Margin		12,936		33,017		(17,015	)		28,938
Other expense		—		—		(4,510	)		(4,510	)
Income before provision for income taxes		—		—		—			24,428

					Unallocated/			Balance per
					Corporate/			Consolidated
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 1, 2005	Retail		Wholesale		Other			Statements of Income
Sales	$	57,878	$	78,622	$	—		$	136,500
Gross Profit		39,313		36,819		—			76,132
Selling Expenses		30,268		4,499		—			34,767
Operating Margin		9,045		32,320		(14,689	)		26,676
Other expense		—		—		(1,445	)		(1,445	)
Income before provision for income taxes		—		—		—			25,231

					Unallocated/			Balance per
					Corporate/			Consolidated
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended September 30, 2006	Retail		Wholesale		Other			Statements of Income
Sales	$	192,832	$	216,936	$	—		$	409,768
Gross Profit		125,419		96,317		—			221,736
Selling Expenses		98,056		16,463		—			114,519
Operating Margin		27,363		79,854		(47,534	)		59,683
Other expense		—		—		(10,732	)		(10,732	)
Income before provision for income taxes		—		—		—			48,951

					Unallocated/			Balance per
					Corporate/			Consolidated
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 1, 2005	Retail		Wholesale		Other			Statements of Income
Sales	$	159,586	$	204,717	$	—		$	364,303
Gross Profit		104,946		97,872		—			202,818
Selling Expenses		86,499		12,883		—			99,382
Operating Margin		18,447		84,989		(41,964	)		61,472
Other expense		—		—		(4,592	)		(4,592	)
Income before provision for income taxes		—		—		—			56,880

International Operations

Revenues from the Company’s International operations were approximately $6,928 and $6,206 for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. For the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, revenues from the Company’s International operations were approximately $18,620 and $15,582, respectively. Long lived assets of the Company’s International operations were approximately $929 and $912 as of September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively.

14

12. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS 157.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 establishes a two-step process for evaluating a tax position. The Interpretation prescribes a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting FIN 48.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108), “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”, which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company has completed its analysis related to the implementation of SAB 108 and has concluded it will not be material to the financial statements.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 25, 2006, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) under which an affiliate of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (“MDP”), a private equity investment firm, has agreed to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company for approximately $34.75 per share in cash (the “Merger”). The Board of Directors has approved the Merger Agreement and has resolved to recommend that the Company’s shareholders adopt the agreement. The transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007, is not subject to a financing condition, but is subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders, as well as other customary closing conditions, including the expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock shall be converted into a right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, of $34.75 (the “Merger Consideration”). In this regard, with respect to the Company’s outstanding stock option grants and restricted stock and performance share awards, in the event that the Merger is consummated then, in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company’s equity plan documents and various actions taken by its Board of Directors:

• All options outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger, whether or not then vested or exercisable, shall be deemed vested and shall be canceled as of such effective date, with each holder of an option receiving for each share of common stock subject to the option, an amount equal to the Merger Consideration less the per share exercise price of such option;

• All shares of restricted stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger shall vest and become free of restrictions as of such effective date and each such share of restricted stock shall be converted into a right to receive the Merger Consideration; and

• Immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger, the Company shall issue to each holder of a performance share award the following number of shares of common stock: (i) with respect to the performance share award covering fiscal years 2004 — 2006, a number of shares equal to 60% of the target number of each recipient’s performance share award, (ii) with respect to the performance share award covering fiscal years 2005 — 2007, a number of shares equal to 66.67% of the target number of each recipient’s performance share award, and (iii) with respect to the performance share award covering fiscal years 2006 — 2008, a number of shares equal to 33.33% of the target number of each recipient’s performance share award.

On the same day as the announcement of the Merger, a putative shareholder class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and its directors, as well as against MDP, in state court in Massachusetts. The complaint alleges that the Company and its directors breached their fiduciary duties to the Company’s shareholders in approving the proposed transaction between the Company and MDP, and that MDP aided and abetted the directors’ alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. Specifically, among other things, the complaint alleges that the directors (i) failed to properly value the Company; (ii) failed to take steps to maximize the value of the Company by failing to adequately solicit alternative potential acquirers or alternative transactions; and (iii) favored the MDP transaction over other potential transactions due to loyalty to current management. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction preventing the completion of the proposed transaction, rescission if the transaction is consummated, monetary damages, attorneys’ fees and expenses associated with the lawsuit, and any other further equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and plans to vigorously defend it.

15

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to inventories, restructuring costs, bad debts, intangible assets, income taxes, promotional allowances, sales returns, self-insurance, debt service and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about operating results and the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, involve its more significant estimates and judgments and are therefore particularly important to an understanding of our results of operations and financial position.

Sales/receivables

We sell our products both directly to retail customers and through wholesale channels. Merchandise sales are recognized upon transfer of ownership, including passage of title to the customer and transfer of the risk of loss related to those goods. In our wholesale segment, products are shipped Free On Board shipping point; however revenue is recognized at the time the product is received by the customer due to our practice of absorbing risk of loss in the event of damaged or lost shipments. In our retail segment, transfer of title takes place at the point of sale (i.e., at our retail stores). There are no situations, either in our wholesale or retail segments, where legal risk of loss does not transfer immediately upon receipt by our customers. Although we do not provide a contractual right of return, in the course of arriving at practical business solutions to various claims, we have allowed sales returns and allowances. In these situations, customer claims for credit or return due to damage, defect, shortage or other reason must be pre-approved by us before credit is issued or such product is accepted for return. Such returns have not precluded sales recognition because we have a long history with such returns, which we use in constructing a reserve. In addition to returns, we bear credit risk relative to our wholesale customers. We have provided a reserve for bad debts in our financial statements based on our estimates of the creditworthiness of our customers. In our wholesale segment, we have included a reserve in our financial statements representing our estimated obligation related to promotional marketing activities. These reserves are subject to change. Changes in these reserves could affect our operating results.

Other income statement accounts

Included within Cost of Sales in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income are the cost of the merchandise we sell through our Retail and Wholesale segments, inbound and outbound freight costs, the operational costs of our distribution facilities (which include receiving costs, inspection and warehousing costs and salaries) and expenses incurred by the Company’s merchandising and buying operations.

Included within Selling Expenses are costs directly related to both Wholesale and Retail operations and primarily consist of payroll, occupancy, advertising and other operating costs, as well as pre-opening costs, which are expensed as incurred.

Included within General and Administrative Expenses are costs associated with corporate overhead departments, including senior management, accounting, information systems, legal, management incentive programs including stock based compensation and bonus and costs that are not readily allocable to either the retail or wholesale segments.

Inventory

We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value, based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. In addition, our inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a last-in first-out (“LIFO”) basis. Fluctuations in inventory levels along with the cost of raw materials could impact the carrying value of our inventory. Changes in the carrying value of inventory could affect our operating results.

16

Taxes

We have a significant deferred tax asset recorded on our financial statements. This asset arose at the time of our recapitalization in 1998 and is a future tax benefit for us. The realization of this future tax benefit is dependent upon our future profitability. We have made an assessment that this asset is more likely than not to be recovered and therefore no valuation allowance is recorded for domestic deferred tax assets. Should we find that we are not able to utilize this benefit in the future, we would have to record a valuation allowance for all or a part of this asset, which would adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

We file income tax returns in two countries and in all relevant states and localities. We must estimate our income tax expense after considering, among other factors, differing tax rates between jurisdictions, allocation factors, tax credits, non-deductible items and changes in enacted tax rates. We recognize liabilities for potential tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that these reserves are greater or less than the amounts paid, we will adjust the reserves and recognize a tax benefit or charge during the period in which we make the determination. During the first quarter of 2006, we completed a United States Federal income tax audit for 2003-2004 that resulted in a reduction of the recorded reserve and the recognition of a tax benefit of $2.3 million.

Value of long-lived assets, including intangibles

Long-lived assets on our balance sheet consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, customer list, trade names, goodwill and trademarks. We periodically review the carrying value of all of these assets based, in part, upon our projections of anticipated undiscounted future cash flows. We undertake this review when facts and circumstances suggest that cash flows emanating from those assets may be diminished, and at least annually in the case of tradename and goodwill. Any impairment charge that we record reduces our earnings. While we believe that our future estimates are reasonable, different assumptions regarding items such as future cash flows and the volatility inherent in markets which we serve could affect our evaluations and result in impairment charges against the carrying value of those assets. To date, we have not recorded any impairment charges except in connection with the stores closed under the 2005 restructuring plan.

During the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006, we recorded additional intangible assets, including goodwill, amounting to $17.3 million in connection with the acquisition of Illuminations.

Stock-based compensation

Effective as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, as amended, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). SFAS 123(R) eliminates the alternative to use the intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in SFAS 123 and requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. SFAS 123(R) establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all companies to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for all share-based payment transactions with employees. We adopted SFAS 123(R) using a modified prospective application, as permitted under SFAS 123(R). Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, we are required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.

Before the adoption of SFAS 123(R), we applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 using the prospective transition method provided by SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123.” Under the prospective transition method, we had recorded charges in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income representing the value of stock option grants beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003. The fair value of these options is being expensed over the vesting period based on the fair value at the date of the grant.

Stock-based compensation charges amounted to $1.6 million and $0.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively, and $4.3 million and $2.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively.

17

The fair value of the stock options granted was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant which most closely correlates with the expected life of the options. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected volatility was based on a combination of implied volatilities from traded options on the Company’s stock, historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other factors. Expected dividend yield was based on the Company’s dividend policy at the time the options were granted.

Our estimates of the fair value of future equity awards will be affected by the future market price of our common stock, as well as the actual results of certain assumptions used to value the equity awards. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the related income tax impact, the expected volatility of the common stock, the number of stock options to be forfeited and exercised by employees, and the expected term of options granted.

Self-insurance

We are self-insured for certain losses related to health insurance and worker’s compensation, although we maintain stop-loss coverage with third-party insurers to limit our liability exposure. Liabilities associated with these losses are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, industry factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

We measure the performance of our retail and wholesale segments through a segment margin calculation, which specifically identifies not only gross profit on the sales of products through the two channels but also costs and expenses specifically related to each segment.

FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS

We have experienced, and may experience in the future, fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. There are numerous factors that can contribute to these fluctuations; however, the principal factors are seasonality, new store openings and the addition of new wholesale accounts.

Seasonality.We have historically realized higher revenues and operating income in our fourth quarter, particularly in our retail business. We believe that this has been due to increased sales in the giftware industry during the holiday season of the fourth quarter.

New Store Openings.The timing of our new store openings may also have an impact on our quarterly results. First, we incur certain one-time expenses related to opening each new store. These expenses, which consist primarily of occupancy, salaries, supplies and marketing costs, are expensed as incurred. Second, most store expenses vary proportionately with sales, but there is a fixed cost component. This typically results in lower store profitability when a new store opens because new stores generally have lower sales than mature stores. Due to both of these factors, during periods when new store openings as a percentage of the base are higher, operating profit may decline in dollars and/or as a percentage of sales. As the overall store base matures, the fixed cost component of selling expenses is spread over an increased level of sales, assuming sales increase as stores age, resulting in a decrease in selling and other expenses as a percentage of sales.

New Wholesale Accounts.The timing of new wholesale accounts may have an impact on our quarterly results due to the size of initial opening orders.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are the leading designer, manufacturer and branded marketer of premium scented candles, based on sales, in the giftware industry. We have a 36-year history of offering our distinctive products and marketing them as affordable luxuries and consumable gifts. Our candle products are available in a variety of fragrances and include a wide variety of jar candles, Samplers^® votive candles, Tarts^® wax potpourri, pillars and other candle products, the vast majority of which are marketed under the Yankee Candle^® brand. We also sell a wide range of coordinated candle and home décor accessories and have extended our brand into the growing premium home fragrance market segment with products such as our Housewarmer^® electric home fragrancers, Yankee Candle^® branded potpourri, sachets, room sprays and linen sprays and Yankee Candle Car Jars^® air fresheners. We have a vertically integrated business model that enables us to manufacture and distribute high quality products, provide excellent customer service and achieve cost efficiencies.

18

Our multi-channel distribution strategy enables us to offer Yankee Candle^® products through a wide variety of locations and venues. We sell our products through an extensive and growing wholesale customer network in North America and through our growing retail store base located primarily in malls. As of September 30, 2006, we had 409 Company-owned and operated stores (including 15 Illuminations stores) and 19,882 wholesale locations, including our European operations. In addition, we own and operate a 90,000 square foot flagship store in South Deerfield, Massachusetts and a 42,000 square foot flagship store in Williamsburg, Virginia. We also sell our products directly to consumers through our catalogs and our Internet web sites at www.yankeecandle.com and www.illuminations.com. Outside North America, we sell our products through international distributors and to an international wholesale customer network through our distribution center located in Bristol, England.

Due to the seasonal nature of our business, interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year. Our revenue and earnings are typically greater during our fiscal fourth quarter, which includes the majority of the holiday selling season.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

• For the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006, we reported net earnings of $14.9 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.37 compared to net earnings of $15.4 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.35 for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. Net sales increased 16.9% to $159.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $136.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005.

• For the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, we reported net earnings of $32.2 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.79 compared to net earnings of $34.7 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.76 for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. Net sales increased 12.5% to $409.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $364.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

• We opened nine new Yankee Candle retail stores, acquired 14 Illuminations stores and opened one new Illuminations store during the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006. We opened 18 new Yankee Candle retail stores, acquired 14 Illuminations stores, opened one new Illuminations store and closed 14 underperforming Yankee Candle stores during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, 12 of which were closed pursuant to the restructuring plan announced in fiscal 2005, bringing our total retail store count to 409. We added 1,298 net new wholesale doors during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, bringing our total wholesale count to 19,882 including our European operations.

• We ended the third quarter with $281.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facilities as compared to $200.0 million at October 1, 2005. The increase was primarily due to using the Credit Facilities to fund share repurchases, the Illuminations acquisition, capital expenditures and our seasonal borrowing requirements. Additional borrowing availability totaled $65.5 million at September 30, 2006.

Thirteen and Thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 versus October 1, 2005

SALES

Sales increased 16.9% to $159.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $136.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 12.5% to $409.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $364.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

Retail Sales

Retail sales increased 24.6% to $72.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $57.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 20.8% to $192.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $159.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in retail sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the prior year, was due primarily to increased sales attributable to the 27 stores opened in 2005 that have not entered the comparable store base (which in 2005 were open for less than a full year) of approximately $5.3 million, increased comparable store sales of $4.0 million, sales attributable to the Illuminations stores acquired in July 2006 of $3.1 million, sales attributable to new Yankee Candle stores opened in 2006 of $1.6 million and an increase in our catalog and Internet sales of $1.3 million, offset in part by a decrease in revenue of $1.1 million related to the 17 stores closed as a part of the 2005 restructuring plan. The increase in retail sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the prior year was due primarily to increased sales attributable to the 27 stores opened in 2005 that have not entered the comparable store base (which in 2005 were open for less than a full year) of approximately $17.4 million, increased comparable store sales of

19

$9.2 million, an increase in our catalog and Internet sales of $4.9 million, sales attributable to the Illuminations stores acquired in July 2006 of $3.1 million and sales attributable to new stores opened in 2006 of $2.6 million, offset in part by a decrease in revenue of $3.3 million in revenue related to the 17 stores closed as a part of the 2005 restructuring plan, and the decrease in gift card breakage income of $0.7 million.

Comparable store and catalog and Internet sales for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 increased 9.7% and 9.4%, respectively, compared to the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. Retail comparable store sales for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 increased 7.9% and 6.7%, respectively, compared to the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. Comparable store sales represent a comparison of the sales, during the corresponding fiscal periods of the two fiscal years compared, of the stores included in our comparable store sales base. A store first enters our comparable store sales base in the fourteenth fiscal month of operation. There were 349 stores included in the comparable store base as of September 30, 2006, and 37 of these stores were included for less than a full year. There were 409 retail stores open as of September 30, 2006, including 15 Illuminations stores, compared to 372 retail stores open as of October 1, 2005 and 390 retail stores open as of December 31, 2005. Permanently closed stores are excluded from the comparable store calculation beginning in the month in which the store closes.

Wholesale Sales

Wholesale sales, including European operations, increased 11.3% to $87.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $78.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 6.0% to $216.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $204.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily driven by sales to wholesale locations opened during the last 12 months of approximately $7.8 million, an increase in sales from wholesale locations in operation prior to October 1, 2005 of $3.3 million, increased sales in our European operations of approximately $0.9 million, an increase in sales at our Aroma Naturals division (acquired in November of 2005) of $0.8 million and increased sales at our GBI fundraising division of $0.2 million, offset in part by the absence of sales to closed or inactive accounts which had accounted for approximately $4.1 million of the prior year sales.

The increase for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily achieved by sales from wholesale locations opened during the last 12 months of approximately $17.5 million, increased sales in our European operations of approximately $3.1 million, an increase in sales at our Aroma Naturals division of $2.2 million and increased sales at our GBI fundraising division of $1.2 million, offset in part by a $5.6 million decrease in sales from wholesale locations opened prior to October 1, 2005 and the absence of sales to closed or inactive accounts which had accounted for approximately $6.2 million of the prior year sales.

GROSS PROFIT

Gross profit is sales less cost of sales. Included within cost of sales are the cost of the merchandise we sell through our retail and wholesale segments, inbound and outbound freight costs, the operational costs of our distribution facilities, which include receiving costs, inspection and warehousing costs, and salaries and expenses incurred by the Company’s buying and merchandising operations.

Gross profit increased 13.8% to $86.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $76.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 9.3% to $221.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $202.8 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of sales, gross profit decreased to 54.3% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 55.8% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and decreased to 54.1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 55.7% for the thirty-nine weeks October 1, 2005.

Retail Gross Profit

Retail gross profit dollars increased 21.5% to $47.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $39.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in retail gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to increased sales in our Yankee Candle stores which contributed approximately $4.6 million of the increase, the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 which contributed approximately $4.4 million of the increase, and the acquisition of Illuminations which contributed approximately $1.4 million of the increase, offset in part by increased costs in our manufacturing and distribution operations (“supply chain operations”) of approximately $1.9 million, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs. As a percentage of sales, retail gross profit decreased to 66.2% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 67.9% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. The decrease in retail gross profit rate was primarily the result of increased costs in our supply chain operations of 2.1%, primarily driven by increased wax

20

and freight costs, the addition of our Illuminations division which negatively impacted our retail gross margin by approximately 0.8%, increased promotional activity of 0.7%, and an adverse change in the merchandise rate and mix of 0.2%, offset in part by the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of approximately 2.2%.

Retail gross profit dollars increased 19.5% to $125.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $104.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in retail gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to increased sales in our Yankee Candle stores which contributed approximately $18.0 million of the increase, the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 which contributed approximately $9.0 million of the increase, and the acquisition of Illuminations which contributed approximately $1.4 million of the increase, offset in part by increased promotional activity of $6.3 million, and increased costs in supply chain operations of approximately $1.6 million, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs. As a percentage of sales, retail gross profit decreased to 65.0% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 65.8% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The decrease in retail gross profit rate was primarily the result of increased promotional activity of 1.5%, increased costs in our supply chain operations of 1.4%, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, and the addition of our Illuminations division which negatively impacted our retail gross profit by approximately 0.3%, offset in part by a favorable change in the merchandise rate and mix of 0.7% and the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of approximately 1.7%.

Wholesale Gross Profit

Wholesale gross profit dollars increased 5.5% to $38.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $36.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of sales, wholesale gross profit decreased to 44.4% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 46.8% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in wholesale gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 which contributed approximately $5.4 million of the increase and increased sales in our wholesale channel which contributed approximately $4.0 million of the increase, offset in part by increased promotional activity of $5.2 million, and increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately $2.2 million, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs. The decrease in wholesale gross profit rate was primarily the result of increased promotional activity of approximately 3.9%, increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately 1.3%, and an adverse change in our wholesale merchandise rate and mix of approximately 0.9%, offset in part by a 3.7% increase attributable to the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006.

Wholesale gross profit dollars decreased 1.6% to $96.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $97.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of sales, wholesale gross profit decreased to 44.4% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 47.8% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The decrease in wholesale gross profit dollars was primarily attributable to increased promotional activity of $11.8 million and increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately $7.6 million primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, offset in part by the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 which contributed approximately $12.2 million and increased sales in our wholesale channel which contributed approximately $5.6 million. The decrease in wholesale gross profit rate was primarily the result of increased promotional activity of approximately 3.6%, an adverse change in our wholesale merchandise rate and mix of approximately 1.6%, and increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately 1.5%, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, offset in part by a 3.3% increase attributable to the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006.

SELLING EXPENSES

Selling expenses increased 17.0% to $40.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $34.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 15.2% to $114.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $99.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. These expenses are related to both wholesale and retail operations and consist of payroll, occupancy, advertising and other operating costs, as well as pre-opening costs, which are expensed as incurred. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses remained flat at 25.5% for both the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005; and increased to 28.0% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 27.3% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

Retail Selling Expenses

Retail selling expenses increased 15.1% to $34.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $30.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of retail sales, retail selling expenses decreased

21

to 48.3% from 52.3% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. The increase in retail selling expenses in dollars was primarily related to the 18 new retail stores opened in 2006 and the 53 new retail stores opened in 2005 of approximately $3.9 million and the addition of our Illuminations stores of approximately $2.4 million. The decrease in selling expense rate was primarily due to the leveraging of selling expenses by 3.9% as a result of increased comparable retail sales and the price benefit initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006, and the closure of the stores identified in the 2005 restructuring which increased our selling expense rate by approximately 0.9%, offset in part by the addition of our Illuminations stores which increased the retail selling expense rate by approximately 1.2%.

Retail selling expenses increased 13.4% to $98.1 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $86.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of retail sales, retail selling expenses decreased to 50.9% from 54.2% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. The increase in retail selling expenses in dollars was primarily related to the 18 new retail stores opened in 2006 and the 53 new retail stores opened in 2005 of approximately $11.9 million and the addition of our Illuminations stores of approximately $2.4 million. The decrease in selling expense rate was primarily due to the leveraging of selling expenses by 4.0% as a result of increased comparable retail sales and the price benefit initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006, and the closure of the stores identified in the 2005 restructuring which increased our selling expense rate by approximately 0.9%, offset in part by the increase in selling expenses related to our two most recent store classes, 2006 and 2005, of 0.7%. These two store classes are considered immature stores, which are generally stores that are less than three years old. Immature stores typically generate higher selling expenses as a percentage of sales than stores that have been open for more than three years since fixed costs, as a percent of sales, are higher in the early sales maturation period.

Wholesale Selling Expenses

Wholesale selling expenses increased 29.5% to $5.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $4.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of wholesale sales, wholesale selling expenses were 6.7% and 5.7% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. The increase in wholesale selling expenses in dollars was primarily the result of $0.5 million of increased costs associated with Aroma Naturals, Inc. (acquired in November 2005), $0.4 million of increased commission costs in our domestic wholesale operations, and $0.3 million of increased selling expenses related to our European operations. The increase in wholesale selling expense as a percentage of wholesale sales was primarily attributable to increased costs associated with our Aroma Naturals business which has a higher selling expense structure than our core wholesale business of approximately 0.5% and increased commission costs in our domestic wholesale operations of approximately 0.5%.

Wholesale selling expenses increased 27.8% to $16.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $12.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of wholesale sales, wholesale selling expenses were 7.6% and 6.3% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. The increase in wholesale selling expenses in dollars was primarily the result of $1.5 million of increased costs associated with Aroma Naturals, Inc., $0.9 million of increased commission costs in our domestic wholesale operations, $0.7 million of increased selling expenses related to our European operations, and $0.3 million of increased selling expenses associated with our GBI Fundraising division. The increase in wholesale selling expense as a percentage of wholesale sales was primarily attributable to increased costs associated with our Aroma Naturals business which has a higher selling expense structure than our core wholesale business of approximately 0.6% and increased commission costs in our domestic wholesale operations of approximately 0.4%.

SEGMENT PROFITABILITY

Segment profitability is sales less cost of goods sold and selling expenses.

Retail Operations

Segment profitability for our retail operations was $12.9 million or 17.9% of retail sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to $9.0 million or 15.6% of retail sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. Segment profitability for our retail operations was $27.4 million or 14.2% of retail sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to $18.4 million or 11.6% of retail sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in retail segment profitability in dollars and rate for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005 was primarily due to the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of $4.4 million or 5.4%, and the effect of the 17 stores closed under the 2005 restructuring plan of $0.5 million or 1.1%, offset in part by the acquisition of our Illuminations division which decreased retail segment profit by $1.0 million or 2.2%. The increase in retail segment

22

profitability in dollars and rate for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 was primarily due to the price increase initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of $8.9 million or 4.2% and the effect of the 17 stores closed under the 2005 restructuring plan of $1.4 million or 0.9%, offset in part by the acquisition of our Illuminations division which decreased retail segment profit by $1.0 million or 0.7%.

Wholesale Operations

Segment profitability for our wholesale operations, including Europe, was $33.0 million or 37.7% of wholesale sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to $32.3 million or 41.1% of wholesale sales for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005. Segment profitability for our wholesale operations, including Europe, was $79.9 million or 36.8% of wholesale sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to $85.0 million or 41.5% of wholesale sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

The increase in wholesale segment profitability in dollars for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of $12.2 million, an increase in sales which contributed approximately $4.0 million in segment profit, offset in part by increased promotional activity of $5.2 million, increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately $2.3 million primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, and increased selling expenses of approximately $1.3 million.

The decrease in wholesale segment profitability in rate for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily the result of increased promotional activity of approximately 3.9%, increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately 1.3%, an adverse change in our wholesale merchandise rate and mix of approximately 0.9%, and increased selling expenses of approximately 1.0%, offset in part by a 3.7% increase attributable to the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006.

The decrease in wholesale segment profitability in dollars for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to increased promotional activity of $11.7 million, increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately $7.6 million primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, increased selling expenses of approximately $3.6 million , offset in part by the impact of the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006 of $12.2 million and increased sales which contributed approximately $5.6 million in segment profit.

The decrease in wholesale gross segment profitability in rate for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily the result of increased promotional activity of approximately 3.6%, an adverse change in our wholesale merchandise rate and mix of approximately 1.6%, increased costs in our supply chain operations of approximately 1.5%, primarily driven by increased wax and freight costs, and increased selling expenses of approximately 1.3%, offset in part by a 3.3% increase attributable to the price increases initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of personnel-related costs incurred in support functions, increased 15.8% to $17.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $14.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased 13.3% to $47.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from $42.0 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 10.7% for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 10.8% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and increased to 11.6% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 from 11.5% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005.

The increase in general and administrative expense in dollars for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005 was primarily attributable to increased expense associated with the fiscal 2006 bonus program of $1.3 million, an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and increased consulting costs of $0.3 million. The decrease in general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to the leveraging of general and administrative expenses as a result of the price benefit initiated on selected products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and September 2006.

The increase in general and administrative expense in dollars for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 compared to the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 was primarily attributable to an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million, increased expense associated with the fiscal 2006 bonus program of $1.5

23

million, and increased consulting costs of $1.1 million. The increase in general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to the increase in stock compensation and bonus expense.

NET OTHER EXPENSE

Net other expense was $4.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 30, 2006, compared to $1.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2005; and was $10.7 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, compared to $4.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005. The increase in interest expense for both periods was primarily due to an increase in bank lending rates and to a lesser extent to an increase in our average daily debt outstanding primarily due to borrowings associated with prior repurchases of our common stock and the acquisitions of Illuminations.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

In the first quarter ended April 1, 2006, we recognized a benefit of $2.3 million, or approximately $0.05 of diluted earnings per share, associated with the closure of an IRS audit for prior years. The benefit was primarily due to favorable audit adjustments associated with sales to our international subsidiary.

Our effective tax rate for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 was 39.0% and 34.2%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2005 was 39.0%. The lower effective tax rate in the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 is due to the benefit associated with the closure of the IRS audit.

We have provided and expect to continue to provide in 2006 a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset for our international operations.

It is anticipated that our effective tax rate for the full year 2006 will be approximately 37.5% inclusive of the aforementioned tax benefit.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2006 decreased by $2.9 million compared to December 31, 2005. This decrease was due primarily to cash used in operating activities of $21.5 million, which includes total payments of $26.3 million of corporate income taxes for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006, and cash paid for capital expenditures of $19.4 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $61.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006, which includes net borrowings of $103.0 million under our credit facility used to repurchase common stock, acquire Illuminations and fund operations.

On October 25, 2006, we announced that we entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) under which an affiliate of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (“MDP”), a private equity investment firm, has agreed to acquire all of our outstanding shares for approximately $34.75 per share in cash (the “Merger”). The Board of Directors has approved the Merger Agreement and has resolved to recommend that our shareholders adopt the agreement. The transaction, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2007, is not subject to a financing condition but is subject to approval by our shareholders, as well as other customary closing conditions, including the expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.

On April 25, 2006, we entered into a new $100.0 million 364-day senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) with Citizens Bank of Massachusetts (“Citizens”) which supplements our Existing Credit Facility. The New Credit Facility may be used for, among other things, working capital, repurchase of our common stock, and other general corporate purposes. Amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, the Prime Rate or LIBOR Rate. LIBOR Rate borrowings under the New Credit Facility include a margin rate ranging from 0.50% to 1.125%. These rates vary depending on our outstanding borrowings. In addition, we are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused revolving loan commitment amount ranging from 0.125% to 0.250%. We are also required to pay a utilization fee of 0.125% once outstanding borrowings exceed $50 million. The New Credit Facility also requires that we comply with several financial and other covenants, including requirements that we maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter the following financial ratios as set forth in the New Credit Facility:

• a consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly; and

24

• a fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of the sum of consolidated EBITDA plus rent expense, less cash taxes paid and capital expenditures to the sum of consolidated cash interest expense plus rent expense and dividends) of no less than 2.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly.

At September 30, 2006, we were in compliance with all covenants under our New Credit Facility and Existing Credit Facility. We had $40.0 million outstanding under the New Credit Facility, $241.0 million outstanding under the Existing Credit Facility and $3.5 million outstanding for letters of credit, leaving $65.5 million in availability.

On July 27, 2005 we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $150 million of Yankee Candle common stock. Pursuant to this authorization, we purchased a total of 1,436,700 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $42.0 million during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2006, we had $23.0 million in authorized funds available to be used for the repurchase of our common stock.

On June 1, 2006 we paid the first semi-annual dividend for fiscal 2006, of $0.125 per share of common stock to shareholders of record on May 11, 2006. Under the terms of our New and Existing Credit Facilities, we may not declare or pay dividends on common stock unless our Consolidated Net Worth (as defined in the New and Existing Credit Facilities) is more than one dollar. As of September 30, 2006, our Consolidated Net Worth was approximately $65.2 million. While it is our current intention to pay semi-annual cash dividends in the future, any decision to pay future cash dividends will be made by our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings, financial condition and other factors.

On July 30, 2006, we acquired certain assets of Candle Acquisition Corp. (“Illuminations”), a privately owned company that designs and markets premium scented candles, candle accessories, and other home décor products through retail satellite stores and the consumer direct channel. The total cash purchase price was approximately $22.1 million.

We expect that the principal sources of funding for our planned store openings and other working capital needs, capital expenditures, debt service obligations, payment of dividends and stock repurchase program will be a combination of our available cash and cash equivalents, funds generated from operations, and borrowings under our credit facility. We believe that our current funds and sources of funds will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months. However, there are a number of factors that may negatively impact our available sources of funds. The amount of cash generated from operations will be dependent upon factors such as the successful execution of our business plan and general economic conditions. In addition, borrowings under our credit facilities are dependent upon our continued compliance with the financial and other covenants contained therein.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our market risks relate primarily to changes in interest rates. We bear this risk in two specific ways. First, we have debt outstanding. At September 30, 2006, we had $281.0 million outstanding under our New and Existing Credit Facilities, which bears interest at variable rates. At September 30, 2006, the weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 6.6%. These facilities are intended to fund operating needs and stock repurchases if necessary. Because these facilities carry a variable interest rate pegged to market indices, our results of operations and cash flows will be exposed to changes in interest rates. Based on September 30, 2006 borrowing levels, a 1.0% increase or decrease in current market interest rates would have the effect of causing an approximately $2.8 million additional annual pre-tax charge or credit to the statement of income.

The second component of interest rate risk involves the short-term investment of excess cash. This risk impacts fair values, earnings and cash flows. Excess cash is primarily invested in interest bearing accounts that fluctuate with market interest rates. Based on September 30, 2006 cash equivalents, a 1.0% increase or decrease in current market interest rates would have the effect of causing an approximately $0.1 million additional pre-tax credit or charge to the annual statements of income.

We buy a variety of raw materials for inclusion in our products. The only raw material that is considered to be of a commodity nature is wax. Wax is a petroleum-based product. Its market price has not historically fluctuated with the movement of oil prices and has instead generally moved with inflation. However, since 2004 the price of wax has increased at a rate significantly above the rate of inflation. Continued increases in wax prices could have an adverse affect on our cost of goods sold and could lower our margins.

At this point in time, operations outside of the United States do not expose us to substantial risks arising from foreign currency exchange rates.

25

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

          Not Applicable

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are a number of factors that might cause our actual results to differ significantly from the results reflected by the forward-looking statements contained herein. In addition to factors generally affecting the political, economic and competitive conditions in the United States and abroad, such factors include those set forth below. Investors should consider the following factors before investing in our common stock.

There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, except that the following risk factors have been updated to reflect developments subsequent to the filing of that report.

If we fail to grow our business as planned, our future operating results may suffer. As we grow, it will be difficult to maintain our historical growth rates.

We intend to continue to pursue a business strategy of increasing sales and earnings by expanding our retail and wholesale operations both in the United States and internationally. Because our ability to implement our growth strategy successfully will be dependent in part on factors beyond our control, including consumer preferences, macro-economic conditions, the competitive environment in the markets in which we compete and other factors, we may not be able to achieve our planned growth or sustain our financial performance. Our ability to anticipate changes in the candle, home fragrance and giftware industries, and identify industry trends, will be critical factors in our ability to grow as planned and remain competitive.

We expect that, as we continue to grow, it will become more difficult to maintain our historical growth rate, which could negatively impact our operating margins and results of operations. New stores typically generate lower operating margin contributions than mature stores because fixed costs, as a percentage of sales, are higher and because pre-opening costs are fully expensed in the year of opening. In addition, our retail sales generate lower margins than our wholesale sales. Our wholesale business has historically grown by increasing sales to existing customers and by adding new customers. If we are not able to continue this, our sales growth and profitability could be adversely affected. In addition, as we expand our wholesale business into new channels of trade that we believe to be appropriate, sales in some of these new channels may, for competitive reasons within the channels, generate lower margins than do our existing wholesale sales. Similarly, as we continue to broaden our product offerings in order to meet consumer demand, we may do so in part by adding products that, while still very profitable, have lower product margins than those of our extremely profitable core candle products. We cannot assure you that we will continue to grow at a rate comparable to our historic growth rate or that our historic financial performance will continue as we grow.

26

We may be unable to continue to open new stores successfully.

Our retail growth strategy depends in large part on our ability to successfully open new stores in both existing and new geographic markets. For our growth strategy to be successful, we must identify and lease favorable store sites on favorable economic terms, hire and train managers and associates and adapt management and operational systems to meet the needs of our expanded operations. These tasks may be difficult to accomplish successfully and any changes in the availability of suitable real estate locations on acceptable terms could adversely impact our retail growth. If we are unable to open new stores as quickly as planned, then our future sales and profits could be materially adversely affected. Even if we succeed in opening new stores, these new stores may not achieve the same sales or profit levels as our existing stores. Also, our retail growth strategy includes opening new stores in markets where we already have a presence so we can take advantage of economies of scale in marketing, distribution and supervision costs, or the opening of new malls or centers in the market. However, these new stores may result in the loss of sales in existing stores in nearby areas, thereby negatively impacting our comparable store sales. A decrease in our retail comparable store sales will have an adverse impact on our cash flows and earnings. This is due to the fact that a significant portion of our expenses are comprised of fixed costs, such as lease payments, and our ability to decrease expenses in response to negative comparable store sales is limited in the short term. If comparable store sales decline it will negatively impact earnings. However, we do not believe that it will significantly impact our working capital, our ability to exist as a going concern or our compliance with bank covenant requirements in the near future. Our retail growth strategy also depends upon our ability to successfully renew the expiring leases of our profitable existing stores. If we are unable to do so at planned levels and upon favorable economic terms, then our future sales and profits could be negatively affected.

We face significant competition in the giftware industry. This competition could cause our revenues or margins to fall short of expectations which could adversely affect our future operating results, financial condition and liquidity and our ability to continue to grow our business.

We compete generally for the disposable income of consumers with other producers and retailers in the giftware industry. The giftware industry is highly competitive with a large number of both large and small participants and relatively low barriers to entry. Our products compete with other scented and unscented candle, home fragrance and personal care products and with other gifts within a comparable price range, like boxes of candy, flowers, wine, fine soap and related merchandise. Our retail stores compete primarily with specialty candle retailers and a variety of other retailers including department stores, gift stores and national specialty retailers that carry candles along with personal care items, giftware and houseware. In addition, while we focus primarily on the premium scented candle segment, scented and unscented candles are also sold outside of that segment by a variety of retailers including mass merchandisers. In our wholesale business, we compete with numerous manufacturers and importers of candles, home fragrance products and other home décor and gift items for the limited space available in our wholesale customer locations for the display and sale of such products to consumers. Some of our competitors are part of large, diversified companies which have greater financial resources and a wider range of product offerings than we do. Many of our competitors source their products from low cost manufacturers outside of the United States. This competitive environment could adversely affect our future revenues and profits, financial condition and liquidity and our ability to continue to grow our business.

A material decline in consumers’ discretionary income could cause our sales and income to decline.

Our results depend on consumer spending, which is influenced by general economic conditions and the availability of discretionary income. Accordingly, we may experience declines in sales during economic downturns or during periods of uncertainty like that which followed the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States or which result from the threat of war or the possibility of further terrorist attacks. Any material decline in the amount of discretionary spending could have a material adverse effect on our sales and income.

Because we are not a diversified company and are effectively dependent upon one industry, we have less flexibility in reacting to unfavorable consumer trends, adverse economic conditions or business cycles.

We rely primarily on the sale of premium scented candles and related products in the giftware industry. In the event that sales of these products decline or do not meet our expectations, we cannot rely on the sales of other products to offset such a shortfall. As a significant portion of our expenses is comprised of fixed costs, such as lease payments, our ability to decrease expenses in response to adverse business conditions is limited in the short term. As a result, unfavorable consumer trends, adverse economic conditions or changes in the business cycle could have a material and adverse impact on our earnings.

If we lose our senior executive officers, or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business, our business could be disrupted and our financial performance could suffer.

27

Our success is in part dependent upon the retention of our senior executive officers. If our senior executive officers become unable or unwilling to participate in our business, our future business and financial performance could be materially affected. In addition, as our business grows in size and complexity we must be able to continue to attract, develop and retain qualified personnel sufficient to allow us to adequately manage and grow our business. If we are unable to do so, our operating results could be negatively impacted. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract and retain personnel as and when necessary in the future.

Many aspects of our manufacturing and distribution facilities are customized for our business; as a result, the loss of one of these facilities would disrupt our operations.

Approximately 74% of our sales in 2005 were generated by products we manufacture at our manufacturing facility in Whately, Massachusetts and we rely primarily on our distribution facilities in South Deerfield, Massachusetts to distribute our products. Because most of our machinery is designed or customized by us to manufacture our products, and because we have strict quality control standards for our products, the loss of our manufacturing facility, due to natural disaster or otherwise, would materially affect our operations. Similarly, our distribution facilities rely upon customized machinery, systems and operations, the loss of which would materially affect our operations. Although our manufacturing and distribution facilities are adequately insured, we believe it would take up to twelve months to resume operations at a level equivalent to current operations.

Seasonal, quarterly and other fluctuations in our business, and general industry and market conditions, could affect the market for our common stock.

Our sales and operating results vary from quarter to quarter. We have historically realized higher sales and operating income in our fourth quarter, particularly in our retail business, which accounts for a larger portion of our sales. We believe that this has been due primarily to an increase in giftware industry sales during the holiday season of the fourth quarter. As a result of this seasonality, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. In addition, we may also experience quarterly fluctuations in our sales and income depending on various factors, including, among other things, the number of new retail stores we open in a particular quarter, changes in the ordering patterns of our wholesale customers during a particular quarter, pricing and promotional activities of our competitors, and the mix of products sold. Most of our operating expenses, such as rent expense, advertising and promotional expense and employee wages and salaries, do not vary directly with sales and are difficult to adjust in the short term. As a result, if sales for a particular quarter are below our expectations, we might not be able to proportionately reduce operating expenses for that quarter, and therefore a sales shortfall could have a disproportionate effect on our operating results for that quarter. Further, our comparable store sales from our retail business in a particular quarter could be adversely affected by competition, the opening nearby of new retail stores or wholesale locations, economic or other general conditions or our inability to execute a particular business strategy. As a result of these factors, we may report in the future sales, operating results or comparable store sales that do not match the expectations of market analysts and investors. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. In addition, broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

Sustained interruptions in the supply of products from overseas may affect our operating results.

We source various accessories and other products from East Asia. A sustained interruption of the operations of our suppliers, as a result of the impact of health epidemics, natural disasters or other factors, could have an adverse effect on our ability to receive timely shipments of certain of our products, which might in turn negatively impact our operating results.

Provisions in our corporate documents and Massachusetts law could delay or prevent a change in control of Yankee Candle.

Our Articles of Organization and By-Laws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving Yankee Candle that our stockholders may consider favorable, by:

• authorizing the issuance of preferred stock, the terms of which may be determined at the sole discretion of the board of directors,

• providing for a classified board of directors, with staggered three-year terms, and

• establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at meetings.

28

Massachusetts law may also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us.

We are subject to a class action lawsuit in California.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against us for alleged violations of certain California state wage and hour and employment laws with respect to certain employees in our California retail stores. The discovery phase of the litigation has not yet begun. Procedural motions are currently pending in the applicable California courts. While we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against the allegations, pending any rulings on the outstanding procedural motions, it is too early in the litigation process for us to fully evaluate or predict the outcome of the litigation. An adverse outcome could potentially negatively impact our financial and operating results.

Further increases in oil prices will negatively impact our cost of goods sold and margins. Any shortages in refined oil supplies could impact our wax supply. Further increases in wax prices above the rate of inflation may also negatively impact our cost of goods sold and margins.

Since 2004 significant increases in the price of crude oil have negatively impacted our transportation and freight costs and have contributed to significant increases in the cost of various raw materials. This in turn negatively impacts our cost of goods sold and margins. In addition, we believe that rising oil prices and corresponding increases in raw materials and transportation costs negatively impact not only our business but consumer sentiment and the economy at large. Continued weakness in consumer confidence and the macro-economic environment could negatively impact our sales and earnings.

Wax is a petroleum-based product. Therefore, any shortages in refined oil supplies may impact our wax supply. In 2005, due to the 2005 hurricanes in the Gulf Coast region and the closing and disruption of oil refineries located there, one of our primary wax suppliers placed us on allocation, whereby our wax purchases were allocated at the rate of seventy percent of 2004 purchases. While we took steps to manage this issue and mitigate any impacts, in 2005 the wax allocation had a negative impact on our ability to fulfill customer orders and our costs of production. While we are no longer currently on allocation, any future prolonged interruption or reduction in wax supplies could negatively impact our operations, sales and earnings.

Historically, the market price of wax has generally moved with inflation. However, in 2005 and to date in 2006 the price of wax increased at a rate significantly above the rate of inflation. Future significant increases in wax prices could have an adverse affect on our cost of goods sold and could lower our margins.

Failure to complete the proposed Merger could negatively affect us.

On October 25, 2006, we entered into the Merger Agreement. There is no assurance that the Merger Agreement and the Merger will be approved by our stockholders, and there is no assurance that the other conditions to the completion of the Merger will be satisfied. In connection with the Merger, we will be subject to several risks, including the following:

• the current market price of our common stock may reflect a market assumption that the Merger will occur, and a failure to complete the Merger could result in a decline in the market price of our common stock,

• certain costs relating to the Merger, such as legal, accounting and certain financial advisory fees, are payable by us whether or not the Merger is completed,

• under certain circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement, if the Merger is not completed we may be required to pay the buyer a termination fee of up to approximately $56,548,000,

• there may be substantial disruption to our business and a distraction of our management and employees from day-to-day operations, because matters related to the Merger may require substantial commitments of their time and resources,

• uncertainty about the effect of the Merger may adversely affect our relationships with our employees, customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we have business relationships, and

• a putative shareholder class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, its board of directors and MDP upon the announcement of the Merger, which seeks, among other things, an injunction and monetary damages, and it is possible that there could be additional similar lawsuits filed relating to the Merger.

29

Other factors may also cause our actual results to differ materially from our estimates and projections.

In addition to the foregoing, there are other factors which may cause our actual results to differ materially from our estimates and projections. Such factors include the following:

a) changes in levels of competition from our current competitors and potential new competition from both retail stores and alternative methods or channels of distribution;

b) loss of a significant vendor or prolonged disruption of product supply; loss of a significant customer or customers;

c) the successful introduction of new products and technologies in our product categories, including the frequency of such introductions, the level of consumer acceptance of new products and technologies, and their impact on demand for existing products and technologies;

d) the impact of changes in pricing and profit margins associated with our sourced products or raw materials;

e) changes in income tax laws or regulations, or in interpretations of existing income tax laws or regulations;

f) changes in the general economic conditions in the United States including, but not limited to, consumer debt levels, financial market performance, interest rates, consumer sentiment, inflation, commodity prices, unemployment and other factors that impact consumer confidence and spending;

g) changes in availability and cost of working capital financing from vendors and lending institutions, including the availability and cost of long-term financing to support our businesses;

h) adverse outcomes from significant litigation matters;

i) the imposition of additional restrictions or regulations regarding the sale of products we offer;

j) changes in our ability to attract, retain and develop highly-qualified employees or changes in the cost or availability of a sufficient labor force to manage and support our operations;

k) changes in our ability to meet objectives with regard to business acquisitions or new business ventures;

l) the occurrence of severe weather events prohibiting or discouraging consumers from traveling to retail or wholesale locations;

m) the disruption of global, national or regional transportation systems;

n) the occurrence of certain material events including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, the outbreak of war or other significant national or international events;

o) our ability to react in a timely manner and maintain our critical business processes and information systems capabilities in a disaster recovery situation; and

p) changes in our ability to manage our existing computer systems and technology infrastructures, and our ability to implement successfully new computer systems and technology infrastructures.

30

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table provides information about purchases by us of our common stock during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006.

							Approximate
							Dollar Value of
					Total Number of Shares		Shares that May
					Purchased as Part of		Yet be Purchased
	Total Number of		Average Price		Publicly Announced		Under the Plans or
Period	Shares Purchased (1)		Paid per Share		Plans or Programs (2)		Programs
1/1/06-4/1/06		—	$	—		—	$	64,989,535
4/2/06-5/6/06		333,200		29.91		333,200	$	55,023,523
5/7/06-6/3/06		845,700		29.57		845,700	$	30,016,174
6/4/06-7/1/06		257,800		27.15		257,800	$	23,016,904
7/2/06-9/30/06		—		—		—		—
Total		1,436,700	$	29.21		1,436,700	$	23,016,904

(1)	All repurchases by us of our common stock during the thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 were done pursuant to the repurchase programs that we publicly announced on July 27, 2005.
(2)	Our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $150 million of our common stock pursuant to the stock repurchase program announced on July 27, 2005. There is currently no expiration date for this stock repurchase program. Unless terminated earlier by resolution of our Board of Directors, this stock repurchase program will expire when we have reached the $150 million threshold.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not Applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

10.1	Form of Executive Severance Agreement*
10.2	Special Retention Bonus Plan dated as of September 14, 2006*
10.3	Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan*
31.1	Certification of Craig W. Rydin Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 2, 2006.
31.2	Certification of Bruce H. Besanko Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 2, 2006.
32.1	Certification of Craig W. Rydin Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 2, 2006.
32.2	Certification of Bruce H. Besanko Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, dated November 2, 2006.

* Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-k filed on September 20, 2006.

31

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.
Date: November 2, 2006	/s/ Bruce H. BesankoBy: Bruce H. Besanko
	Senior Vice President, Finance
	and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

32