UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| | |
(mark one) | | |
|
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009 |
OR |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-15157
PACTIV CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 36-2552989 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
| | |
1900 West Field Court Lake Forest, Illinois | | 60045 (Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | |
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code:(847) 482-2000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: Common stock, par value $0.01 per share: 132,316,451 as of October 31, 2009. (See Notes to Financial Statements.)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | |
| | Page |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | 3 | |
| | | 4 | |
| | | 5 | |
| | | 6 | |
| | | 7 | |
| | | 8 | |
| | | 18 | |
| | | 29 | |
| | | 30 | |
| | | | |
| | | 31 | |
| | | 31 | |
| | | 31 | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities* | | | 31 | |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders* | | | 31 | |
| | | 31 | |
| | | 31 | |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
| | |
* | | No response to this item is included herein because either it is inapplicable or there is nothing to report. |
2
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
Consolidated Statement of Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
(In millions, except share and per share data) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Sales | | $ | 839 | | | $ | 925 | | | $ | 2,506 | | | $ | 2,684 | |
Costs and expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization | | | 573 | | | | 711 | | | | 1,621 | | | | 2,013 | |
Selling, general, and administrative | | | 83 | | | | 67 | | | | 263 | | | | 208 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 46 | | | | 46 | | | | 138 | | | | 138 | |
Other | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Restructuring and other | | | — | | | | (2 | ) | | | — | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 702 | | | | 823 | | | | 2,023 | | | | 2,374 | |
Operating income | | | 137 | | | | 102 | | | | 483 | | | | 310 | |
Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | |
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized | | | (23 | ) | | | (25 | ) | | | (70 | ) | | | (79 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 114 | | | | 78 | | | | 414 | | | | 233 | |
Income tax expense | | | 41 | | | | 24 | | | | 153 | | | | 80 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 73 | | | | 54 | | | | 261 | | | | 153 | |
Discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 15 | | | | — | | | | 14 | | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 88 | | | | 54 | | | | 275 | | | | 149 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 148 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amounts attributable to Pactiv common shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations, net of tax | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | 152 | |
Discontinued operations, net of tax | | | 15 | | | | — | | | | 14 | | | | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 148 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of shares of common | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
stock outstanding | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 131,972,681 | | | | 130,907,540 | | | | 131,860,351 | | | | 130,762,298 | |
Diluted | | | 133,193,283 | | | | 132,098,844 | | | | 132,819,294 | | | | 132,050,604 | |
Basic earnings per share of common stock attributable to Pactiv common shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 1.97 | | | $ | 1.16 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 0.12 | | | | — | | | | 0.11 | | | | (0.03 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 2.08 | | | $ | 1.13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share of common stock attributable to Pactiv common shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | $ | 0.54 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 1.96 | | | $ | 1.15 | |
Discontinued operations | | | 0.11 | | | | — | | | | 0.10 | | | | (0.03 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 0.65 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 2.06 | | | $ | 1.12 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
(In millions, except share data) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and temporary cash investments | | $ | 104 | | | $ | 80 | |
Accounts and notes receivable | | | | | | | | |
Trade, less allowances of $6 and $7 at the respective dates | | | 249 | | | | 264 | |
Other | | | 26 | | | | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total accounts and notes receivable | | | 275 | | | | 311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Inventories | | | | | | | | |
Finished goods | | | 198 | | | | 161 | |
Work in process | | | 52 | | | | 55 | |
Raw materials | | | 77 | | | | 78 | |
Other materials and supplies | | | 48 | | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total inventories | | | 375 | | | | 344 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred income tax assets | | | 7 | | | | 14 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 14 | | | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 775 | | | | 765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property, plant, and equipment, net | | | 1,181 | | | | 1,209 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill | | | 1,129 | | | | 1,124 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 379 | | | | 396 | |
Pension asset | | | 6 | | | | 5 | |
Noncurrent deferred income tax asset | | | 31 | | | | 161 | |
Other | | | 62 | | | | 65 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other assets | | | 1,607 | | | | 1,751 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 3,563 | | | $ | 3,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 147 | | | $ | 115 | |
Taxes accrued | | | 23 | | | | 14 | |
Interest accrued | | | 28 | | | | 20 | |
Accrued promotions, rebates, and discounts | | | 79 | | | | 68 | |
Accrued payroll and benefits | | | 87 | | | | 66 | |
Other | | | 45 | | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 409 | | | | 333 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term debt | | | 1,275 | | | | 1,345 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Pension and postretirement benefits | | | 798 | | | | 1,266 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 100 | | | | 96 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent liabilities related to discontinued operations | | | 13 | | | | 30 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Pactiv shareholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock — $0.01 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized, 131,995,376 and 131,510,270 shares issued and outstanding, after deducting 39,787,801 and 40,272,907 shares held in treasury, at the respective dates | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Premium on common stock and other capital surplus | | | 719 | | | | 710 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | (8 | ) | | | (16 | ) |
Pension and postretirement plans | | | (1,666 | ) | | | (1,689 | ) |
Gain (loss) on derivatives | | | 6 | | | | 7 | |
Retained earnings | | | 1,900 | | | | 1,626 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Pactiv shareholders’ equity | | | 952 | | | | 639 | |
Noncontrolling interest | | | 16 | | | | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total equity | | | 968 | | | | 655 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 3,563 | | | $ | 3,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | |
For the nine months ended September 30(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 275 | | | $ | 149 | |
Discontinued operations | | | (14 | ) | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 261 | | | | 153 | |
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to cash provided (used) by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 138 | | | | 138 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 114 | | | | 41 | |
Restructuring and other | | | (1 | ) | | | 13 | |
Pension income | | | (27 | ) | | | (37 | ) |
Noncash compensation expense | | | 13 | | | | 12 | |
Net working capital | | | 92 | | | | (104 | ) |
Pension contributions | | | (400 | ) | | | — | |
Other | | | 4 | | | | (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided (used) by operating activities — continuing operations | | | 194 | | | | 211 | |
Cash provided (used) by operating activities — discontinued operations | | | (3 | ) | | | (7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided (used) by operating activities | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 204 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Expenditures for property, plant, and equipment | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | (109 | ) |
Acquisitions of businesses and assets | | | (20 | ) | | | — | |
Other investing activities | | | 2 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided (used) by investing activities | | $ | (96 | ) | | $ | (109 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 2 | |
Purchase of common stock | | | — | | | | (2 | ) |
Revolving credit facility payment | | | (70 | ) | | | (150 | ) |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Other | | | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash provided (used) by financing activities | | $ | (71 | ) | | $ | (152 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and temporary cash investments | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and temporary cash investments | | | 24 | | | | (58 | ) |
Cash and temporary cash investments, January 1 | | | 80 | | | | 95 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and temporary cash investments, September 30 | | $ | 104 | | | $ | 37 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
(In millions, except share amounts)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pactiv Shareholders | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Premium on
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | common stock
| | | | | | Accumulated
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | and other
| | | | | | other
| | | | | | | |
| | Common
| | | capital
| | | Retained
| | | comprehensive
| | | Noncontrolling
| | | Total
| |
| | stock | | | surplus | | | earnings | | | income (loss) | | | interest | | | equity | |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 710 | | | $ | 1,626 | | | $ | (1,698 | ) | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 655 | |
Premium on common stock issued (485,106 shares) | | | | | | | 12 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12 | |
Translation of foreign currency statements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8 | | | | | | | | 8 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | (3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (3 | ) |
Gain (loss) on derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | | | | | (1 | ) |
Change in pension and postretirement plan funded status, net of tax of $14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 23 | | | | | | | | 23 | |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | 274 | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 275 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2009 | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 719 | | | $ | 1,900 | | | $ | (1,668 | ) | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 968 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2007 | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 683 | | | $ | 1,402 | | | $ | (862 | ) | | $ | 15 | | | $ | 1,239 | |
Premium on common stock issued (574,165 shares) | | | | | | | 13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13 | |
Treasury stock repurchased (75,218 shares) | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (2 | ) |
Translation of foreign currency statements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (4 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (3 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — | |
Gain (loss) on derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | | | | | (1 | ) |
Impact of adopting ASC715-20-65 measurement date change, net of tax of $4 | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | 7 | |
Change in pension and postretirement plan funded status, net of tax of $17 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 27 | | | | | | | | 27 | |
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | 148 | | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 149 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2008 | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 694 | | | $ | 1,557 | | | $ | (840 | ) | | $ | 16 | | | $ | 1,428 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
6
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Nine months
| |
| | ended
| | | ended
| |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Consolidated net income | | $ | 88 | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 275 | | | $ | 149 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pension and postretirement plans | | | 8 | | | | 7 | | | | 23 | | | | 27 | |
Net currency translation gain (loss) | | | 2 | | | | (13 | ) | | | 8 | | | | (3 | ) |
Gain (loss) on derivatives | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss ) | | | 9 | | | | (6 | ) | | | 30 | | | | 23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated comprehensive income (loss) | | | 97 | | | | 48 | | | | 305 | | | | 172 | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 96 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 304 | | | $ | 170 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.
7
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
| |
Note 1. | Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated statement of income for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, the condensed consolidated statement of financial position at September 30, 2009, the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, the consolidated statement of changes in equity for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, and 2008 are unaudited. In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the periods and at the dates indicated. These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with Pactiv’sForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which may be found at www.pactiv.com, under the Investor Relations link, in the subsection entitled “SEC Filings,” or a free copy may be obtained by contacting Investor Relations at(866) 456-5439. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial information to conform with the current year presentation.
We acquired 100% of the stock of Prairie Packaging, Inc. (Prairie) on June 5, 2007. The results of Prairie’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of that date.
On January 5, 2009, we purchased the polypropylene cup business of WinCup for $20 million. This business operated one manufacturing facility in North Carolina with approximately 100 employees. The results of this business have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of that date.
We have three reporting segments:
| | |
| • | Consumer Productsmanufactures disposable plastic, foam, molded fiber, pressed paperboard, and aluminum packaging products, and sells them to customers such as grocery stores, mass merchandisers, and discount chains. Products include waste bags, food storage bags, and disposable tableware and cookware. We sell many of our consumer products under well-known trademarks, such as Hefty®. |
|
| • | Foodservice/Food Packagingmanufactures foam, clear plastic, aluminum, pressed paperboard, and molded fiber packaging products, and sells them to customers in the food distribution channel, who prepare and process food for consumption. Customers include foodservice distributors, restaurants, other institutional foodservice outlets, food processors, and grocery chains. |
|
| • | Otherincludes corporate and administrative service operations and retiree benefit income and expense. |
The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those for Pactiv as a whole. Where discrete financial information is not available by segment, reasonable allocations of expenses and assets/liabilities are used.
We have evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, the filing date of thisForm 10-Q, and have determined that there were no subsequent events to recognize or disclose in these financial statements.
| |
Note 2. | Summary of Accounting Policies |
For a complete discussion of our accounting policies, refer to Pactiv’s most recent filing onForm 10-K.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
On a recurring basis, we sell an undivided interest in a pool of trade receivables meeting certain criteria to a third party as an alternative to debt financing. Such sales, which represent a form of off-balance-sheet financing, are recorded as a reduction of accounts and notes receivable in the statement of financial position.
8
Related proceeds are included in cash provided by operating activities in the statement of cash flows. At September 30, 2009, receivables totaling $110 million were sold, while receivables totaling $130 million were sold at September 30, 2008. Discounts and fees related to such sales were immaterial for the three-month period and $1 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to $1 million for the three-month period and $3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. These expenses are included in “other expense” in the statement of income. In the event that either Pactiv or the third-party purchaser of the trade receivables were to discontinue this program, our debt would increase, or our cash balance would decrease, by an amount corresponding to the level of sold receivables at such time.
Changes in Accounting Principles
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)105-10, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, ending after September 15, 2009. ASC105-10 establishes an authoritative United States GAAP superseding all pre-existing accounting standards and literature. ASC105-10 is effective for our September 30, 2009 interim financial reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption. We have updated all references to specific authoritative guidance within our interim financial reporting to reflect the new Accounting Standards Codification structure.
The FASB issued ASC820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” which was effective as of January 1, 2008. ASC820-10 establishes a framework for measuring fair value by providing a standard definition of fair value as it applies to assets and liabilities. ASC820-10, which does not require the use of any new fair value measurements, clarifies the application of other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. ASC820-10 did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC715-20, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits,” of which we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions on December 31, 2006. We recorded a charge to accumulated other comprehensive income of $41 million upon adoption. We adopted the measurement provisions of ASC715-20-65 on January 1, 2008, using the transition method based on the data as of our September 30, 2007, measurement date. As a result, we increased “retained earnings” by $7 million after tax in 2008.
The FASB issued ASC825-10, “Financial Instruments” which was effective January 1, 2008. ASC825-10 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value as of specified election dates. ASC825-10 expands the use of fair value measurement, but does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including ASC820-10. ASC825-10 did not impact our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009. We did not choose to measure any financial instruments at fair value as permitted under the statement.
The FASB issued ASC805-10, “Business Combinations,” which replaces prior authoritative guidance on business combinations, and is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations that occur in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with the exception of accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. ASC805-10 retains the underlying concepts of the prior authoritative guidance in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value using the acquisition method of accounting, but it changes the application of the acquisition method in a number of significant ways. In this regard, the pronouncement requires that (1) acquisition-related costs generally be expensed as incurred, (2) noncontrolling interests be recorded at fair value, (3) in-process research and development costs be recorded at fair value as an indefinite lived intangible asset, (4) restructuring costs associated with a business combination generally be expensed subsequent to the date of such a combination, and (5) changes in valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally be recorded as income tax expense. ASC805-10 amends ASC740-10, “Income Taxes” such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of ASC805-10 would also be subject to the
9
provisions of ASC805-10. ASC805-10 was effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC810-10-45, “Consolidation” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. ASC810-10-45 requires that noncontrolling (minority) interests be recognized as equity (but separate from parent’s equity) in consolidated financial statements, and that net earnings related to noncontrolling interests be included in consolidated net income, but identified separately on the face of the income statement. ASC810-10-45 also amends prior authoritative guidance, and expands disclosure requirements regarding the interests of parents and noncontrolling interests. ASC810-10-45 was effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued the disclosure requirements within ASC815-10-65, “Derivatives and Hedging” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008. ASC815-10-65 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, specifically how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under ASC815-10 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The disclosure requirements of ASC815-10-65 were effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued the disclosure requirements within ASC825-10-65, “Financial Instruments” which was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. ASC825-10-65 amends prior authoritative guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. ASC825-10-65 also amends ASC270-10, “Interim Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The disclosure requirements of ASC825-10-65 were effective for our June 30, 2009 interim reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC855-10, “Subsequent Events” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, ending after June 15, 2009. ASC855-10 requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. ASC855-10 was effective for our June 30, 2009 interim reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC860-10 “Transfers and Servicing” which is effective for interim and annual periods ending after November 15, 2009. ASC860-10 requires additional information about transfers of financial assets and where companies have continuing exposure to the risk related to transferred financial assets. ASC860-10 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. We are currently reviewing ASC860-10, and evaluating the potential impact of its adoption on our financial statements.
| |
Note 3. | Restructuring and Other |
In 2008, we implemented a cost reduction program that included the consolidation of two small facilities, asset rationalizations, and headcount reductions. The program is essentially complete with the exception of a small idle plant held for sale. The accrued restructuring balance of $1 million as of September 30, 2009, and $2 million as of December 31, 2008, is for remaining severance payments. Cash payments related to restructuring and other were $1 million pretax for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009.
In the first nine months of 2008, we recorded a charge of $9 million after tax, or $0.07 per share. Cash payments related to restructuring and other charges were cash neutral for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008.
10
| |
Note 4. | Business Combination |
On January 5, 2009, we purchased the polypropylene cup business of WinCup for $20 million. The results of this business have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of that date.
The total cost of the acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. Goodwill and other intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition totaled $1 million and $3 million, respectively, and all of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Recorded intangible assets pertain to customer relationships and are being amortized over a15-year period.
Preliminary appraisals of the fair-market value and physical counts of the assets acquired during the third quarter of 2009 resulted in goodwill being decreased by $1 million, and property, plant, and equipment being increased by the same amount.
The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date.
| | | | |
(In millions) | | | |
|
Current assets | | $ | 4 | |
Property, plant, and equipment | | | 13 | |
Intangible assets | | | 3 | |
Goodwill | | | 1 | |
| | | | |
Total assets acquired | | | 21 | |
| | | | |
Current liabilities | | | 1 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities assumed | | | 1 | |
| | | | |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 20 | |
| | | | |
| |
Note 5. | Discontinued Operations |
On October 12, 2005, we completed the sale of most of our protective and flexible packaging businesses to Pregis Corporation for $523 million. Amounts recorded in our financial statements related to those businesses are classified as being applicable to discontinued operations.
In the third quarter of 2009, we recorded $15 million of income from discontinued operations related to the expiration of the statute of limitations on the 2005 tax year for tax liabilities which had been recorded in conjunction with divested businesses.
Liabilities related to discontinued operations totaled $13 million at September 30, 2009, and $30 million at December 31, 2008.
| |
Note 6. | Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements |
We have a revolving credit facility, against which there were no borrowings at September 30, 2009.
As a part of the Prairie acquisition, we assumed its liability for $5 million borrowed from the Illinois Department Finance Authority (IDFA), which was funded by industrial development revenue bonds issued by the IDFA. This debt will mature on December 1, 2010, and bears interest at varying rates (0.60% as of September 30, 2009) not to exceed 12% per annum.
11
| |
Note 7. | Financial Instruments |
Asset and Liability Instruments
At September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the fair value of cash and temporary cash investments, short- and long-term receivables, accounts payable, and short-term debt were the same as, or not materially different from, the amount recorded for these assets and liabilities. The fair value of long-term debt was approximately $1.5 billion at September 30, 2009, and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2008. The recorded amount was $1.3 billion at September 30, 2009, and at December 31, 2008. The fair value of long-term debt was based on quoted market prices for our debt instruments.
Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk (Including Derivatives)
We use derivative instruments, principally swaps, forward contracts, and options, to manage our exposure to movements in foreign currency values, interest rates, and commodity prices.
Cash Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges are assessed both at inception and quarterly thereafter to ensure they are effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the related underlying exposures. The fair value of the hedge instruments are reclassified from OCI to earnings if the hedge ceases to be highly effective or if the hedged transaction is no longer probable.
Foreign Currency
From time to time, we use derivative financial instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, principally using foreign currency purchase and sale contracts with terms of less than one year. We do so to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate changes related to third-party trade receivables and accounts payable. Net gains or losses on such contracts are recognized in the statement of income as offsets to foreign currency exchange gains or losses on the underlying transactions. In the statement of cash flows, cash receipts and payments related to hedging contracts are classified in the same way as cash flows from the transactions being hedged. We had no open foreign currency contracts as of September 30, 2009.
Interest Rates
We entered into interest rate swap agreements in connection with the acquisition of Prairie. The agreements were terminated on June 20, 2007, resulting in a gain of $9 million. This gain is being recorded as a reduction of interest expense over the average life of the underlying debt. Amounts recognized in earnings related to our hedging transactions were $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008.
Commodity
During the third quarter of 2009, we entered into natural gas purchase agreements with third parties, hedging a portion of the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010 purchases of natural gas used in the production processes at certain of our plants. These purchase agreements are marked to market, with the resulting gains or losses recognized in earnings when hedged transactions are recorded. Themark-to-market adjustments at September 30, 2009, were immaterial.
To minimize volatility in our margins due to large fluctuations in the price of commodities, in the second quarter of 2009 we entered into swap contracts to manage risks associated with market fluctuations in resin prices. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted commodity purchases. As of
12
September 30, 2009, we have hedged, on a monthly basis, approximately 4% of the expected resin purchase volume for the remainder of 2009. Assuming the market prices of the swap contracts remain unchanged from the prices at September 30, 2009, the estimated gain expected to be reclassified to earnings in the remainder of 2009 is immaterial.
Fair Value Measurements
Financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value consist of derivative contracts that are used to hedge exposures to interest rate, commodity, and currency risks. ASC820-10-35 sets out a fair value hierarchy that groups fair value measurement inputs into three classifications: Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. All of our fair value measurements for derivative contracts use Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of our derivative instruments recorded in the consolidated balance sheet was immaterial as of September 30, 2009, and as of December 31, 2008.
The following table indicates the amounts recognized in OCI for those derivatives designated as cash flow hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and September 30, 2008.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (Gain) or Loss
|
| | | | | | | | Reclassified from OCI into
|
| | Gain or (Loss)
| | | | Income
|
| | Recognized in OCI
| | Location of Gain or (Loss)
| | (Effective
|
| | (Effective Portion) | | Reclassified from OCI into
| | Portion) |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | Income (Effective Portion) | | 2009 | | 2008 |
|
Commodity Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | Cost of Sales | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | — | |
Interest Rate Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | Interest Expense | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) |
There were no transactions that ceased to qualify as a cash flow hedge in the first nine months of 2009 or 2008.
| |
Note 8. | Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The changes in the carrying values of goodwill between December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2009, are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Consumer
| | | Foodservice/
| | | | |
(In millions) | | Products | | | Food Packaging | | | Total | |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 | | $ | 289 | | | $ | 835 | | | $ | 1,124 | |
Goodwill additions | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 1 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, September 30, 2009 | | $ | 290 | | | $ | 839 | | | $ | 1,129 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
Intangible assets are summarized in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2009 | | | December 31, 2008 | |
| | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| | | Carrying
| | | Accumulated
| |
(In millions) | | value | | | amortization | | | value | | | amortization | |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Patents | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 69 | |
Customer relationships | | | 209 | | | | 32 | | | | 206 | | | | 21 | |
Other | | | 145 | | | | 86 | | | | 145 | | | | 81 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 441 | | | | 191 | | | | 438 | | | | 171 | |
Intangible assets not subject to amortization (primarily trademarks) | | | 129 | | | | — | | | | 129 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 570 | | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 567 | | | $ | 171 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Intangible assets of $3 million were recorded in connection with the acquisition of WinCup and are being amortized over a15-year period for both book and tax purposes. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $19 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and $20 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Amortization expense is estimated to total $26 million for 2009, $25 million for 2010, $24 million for 2011, $23 million for 2012, and $19 million for 2013.
We review the carrying value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for possible impairment on an annual basis. Our annual review is conducted in the fourth quarter of the year, or earlier if warranted by events or changes in circumstances. There were no events or changes in circumstances in the first nine months of 2009 that warranted an impairment review of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles.
| |
Note 9. | Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net |
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30,
| | | December 31,
| |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Original cost | | | | | | | | |
Land, buildings, and improvements | | $ | 661 | | | $ | 654 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 1,879 | | | | 1,808 | |
Other, including construction in progress | | | 126 | | | | 125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,666 | | | $ | 2,587 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (1,485 | ) | | | (1,378 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net property, plant, and equipment | | $ | 1,181 | | | $ | 1,209 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Capitalized interest was $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and was $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Total gross unrecognized income tax benefits were $41 million as of September 30, 2009, and $57 million as of December 31, 2008. The total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact our effective tax rate for continuing operations in future periods was $32 million at September 30, 2009, and $34 million at December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized income tax benefits may increase or decrease during the following twelve months. However, it is not expected that any such changes, individually or in total, would significantly affect our operating results or financial condition.
It is our continuing practice to record accruals for interest and penalties related to income tax matters as income tax expense. Such accruals totaled $9 million as of September 30, 2009, and $10 million as of
14
December 31, 2008. Expense recorded in the first nine months of 2009 for interest and penalties for continuing operations was $1 million.
U.S. federal income tax returns filed for the years 2006 through 2008 are open for examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Various state, local, and foreign tax returns filed for the years 2002 through 2008 are open for examination by tax authorities in those jurisdictions.
Total gross unrecognized income tax benefits related to discontinued operations were $1 million as of September 30, 2009, and $14 million as of December 31, 2008. The total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact income related to discontinued operations in future periods was $1 million at September 30, 2009, and $14 million at December 31, 2008. In the first nine months of 2009, an income tax benefit of $14 million was recorded, which included the reversal of $2 million of interest and penalties as a result of the expiration of the 2005 tax year statute of limitations.
In connection with the adoption of ASC718-10, “Share-Based Payment,” we elected to use the simplified method in calculating our additional paid-in capital pool, as described in prior authoritative guidance. ASC718-10 requires that tax deductions for compensation costs in excess of amounts recognized for accounting purposes be reported as cash flow from financing activities, rather than as cash flow from operating activities. Such “excess” amounts totaled $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings from continuing operations per share of common stock outstanding were computed as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months ended September 30, | | | Nine months ended September 30, | |
(In millions, except share and per share data) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Basic earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | 152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding | | | 131,972,681 | | | | 130,907,540 | | | | 131,860,351 | | | | 130,762,298 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings from continuing operations per share attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 1.97 | | | $ | 1.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 53 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | 152 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding | | | 131,972,681 | | | | 130,907,540 | | | | 131,860,351 | | | | 130,762,298 | |
Effect of dilutive securities Stock options | | | 512,681 | | | | 667,501 | | | | 293,795 | | | | 705,627 | |
Performance shares | | | 707,921 | | | | 522,591 | | | | 665,148 | | | | 580,876 | |
Restricted shares | | | — | | | | 1,212 | | | | — | | | | 1,803 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including dilutive securities | | | 133,193,283 | | | | 132,098,844 | | | | 132,819,294 | | | | 132,050,604 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings from continuing operations per share attributable to Pactiv | | $ | 0.54 | | | $ | 0.40 | | | $ | 1.96 | | | $ | 1.15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15
We did not repurchase stock in the first nine months of 2009. In the same period of 2008, we acquired 75,218 shares of our common stock at an average price of $26.38 per share, for a total of $2 million.
Rabbi Trust
In November 1999, we established a rabbi trust and reserved 3,200,000 shares of Pactiv common stock for the trust. These shares were issued to the trust in January 2000. This trust is designed to assure the payment of deferred compensation and supplemental pension benefits. These shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of financial reporting.
| |
Note 12. | Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits |
The impact of pension plans on pretax income was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Nine months
| |
| | Three months
| | | ended
| |
| | ended September 30, | | | September 30, | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Components of net periodic benefit income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost of benefits earned | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) |
Interest cost of benefit obligations | | | (60 | ) | | | (60 | ) | | | (180 | ) | | | (180 | ) |
Expected return on plan assets | | | 87 | | | | 87 | | | | 256 | | | | 262 | |
Amortization of unrecognized net losses | | | (13 | ) | | | (11 | ) | | | (38 | ) | | | (33 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net periodic benefit income (expense) | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 27 | | | $ | 37 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We have postretirement health care and life insurance plans that cover certain of our salaried and hourly employees who retire in accordance with the various provisions of such plans. Benefits may be subject to deductibles, copayments, and other limitations. These postretirement plans are not funded, and we reserve the right to change them.
The impact of postretirement plans on pretax income was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Nine months
| |
| | ended
| | | ended
| |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
|
Components of net periodic benefit income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Service cost of benefits earned | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) |
Interest cost of benefit obligations | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (3 | ) | | | (4 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Amortization of unrecognized net losses | | | — | | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net periodic benefit income (expense) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | (5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Note 13. | Segment Information |
Our three segments are Consumer Products, Foodservice/Food Packaging, and Other. See Note 1 for additional details.
16
The following table sets forth certain segment information.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Consumer
| | | Foodservice/Food
| | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | Products | | | Packaging | | | Other | | | Total | |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales to external customers | | $ | 312 | | | $ | 527 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 839 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 72 | | | | 70 | | | | (5 | ) (b) | | | 137 | |
For the three months ended September 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales to external customers | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 583 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 925 | |
Operating income (loss) (a) | | | 51 | | | | 52 | | | | (1 | ) (b) | | | 102 | |
At September 30, 2009, and for the nine months then ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales to external customers | | $ | 951 | | | $ | 1,555 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,506 | |
Operating income (loss) | | | 240 | | | | 254 | | | | (11 | ) (b) | | | 483 | |
Total assets | | | 1,248 | | | | 2,099 | | | | 216 | (c) | | | 3,563 | |
At September 30, 2008, and for the nine months then ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales to external customers | | $ | 990 | | | $ | 1,694 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,684 | |
Operating income (loss) (a) | | | 142 | | | | 167 | | | | 1 | (b) | | | 310 | |
Total assets | | | 1,351 | | | | 2,181 | | | | 328 | (c) | | | 3,860 | |
| | |
(a) | | Includes restructuring and other charges/(credits) of ($2) million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 ($3 million of credits for Consumer Products and $1 million of charges for Foodservice/Food Packaging), and $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 ($4 million for Consumer Products, $9 million for Foodservice/Food Packaging, and $1 million for Other). |
|
(b) | | Includes pension plan income and unallocated corporate expenses. |
|
(c) | | Includes administrative service operations. |
| |
Note 14. | Noncontrolling Interests |
The FASB issued ASC810-10-45, “Consolidation” which is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. ASC810-10-45 requires that noncontrolling (minority) interests be recognized as equity (but separate from parents’ equity) in consolidated financial statements, and that net earnings related to noncontrolling interests be included in consolidated net income, but identified separately on the face of the income statement. ASC810-10-45 also amends prior authoritative guidance, and expands disclosure requirements regarding the interests of parents and noncontrolling interests. In order to meet the ASC810-10-45 disclosure requirements upon adoption, we have added a statement of shareholders’ equity and a statement of comprehensive income (loss) to our interim reporting.
There were no changes in ownership interest in our subsidiaries for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, or September 30, 2008.
The preceding notes are an integral part of the foregoing financial statements.
17
| |
ITEM 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Basis of Presentation
Financial statements for all periods presented in this report were prepared on a consolidated basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. All per share information is presented on a diluted basis unless otherwise noted. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to the current year presentation.
We acquired 100% of the stock of Prairie Packaging, Inc. (Prairie) on June 5, 2007. The results of Prairie’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of that date.
On January 5, 2009, we purchased the polypropylene cup business of WinCup for $20 million. This business operated one manufacturing facility in North Carolina with approximately 100 employees. The results of this business have been included in the consolidated financial statements as of that date.
We have three reporting segments:
| | |
| • | Consumer Productsmanufactures disposable plastic, foam, molded fiber, pressed paperboard, and aluminum packaging products, and sells them to customers such as grocery stores, mass merchandisers, and discount chains. Products include waste bags, food storage bags, and disposable tableware and cookware. We sell many of our consumer products under well-known trademarks, such as Hefty®. |
|
| • | Foodservice/Food Packagingmanufactures foam, clear plastic, aluminum, pressed paperboard, and molded fiber packaging products, and sells them to customers in the food distribution channel, who prepare and process food for consumption. Customers include foodservice distributors, restaurants, and other institutional foodservice outlets, food processors, and grocery chains. |
|
| • | Otherincludes corporate and administrative service operations and retiree benefit income and expense. |
The accounting policies of the reporting segments are the same as those for Pactiv as a whole. Where discrete financial information is not available by segment, reasonable allocations of expenses and assets/liabilities are used.
Restructuring and Other
In 2008, we implemented a cost reduction program that included the consolidation of two small facilities, asset rationalizations, and headcount reductions. The program is essentially complete with the exception of a small idle plant held for sale. The accrued restructuring balance of $1 million as of September 30, 2009, and $2 million as of December 31, 2008, is for remaining severance payments. Cash payments related to restructuring and other were $1 million pretax for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009.
In the first nine months of 2008, we recorded a charge of $9 million after tax, or $0.07 per share. Cash payments related to restructuring and other charges were cash neutral for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008.
18
Significant Trends, Opportunities and Challenges
The primary raw materials used to manufacture our products are plastic resins, principally polystyrene and polyethylene. Average industry prices for polystyrene and polyethylene as published by Chemical Market Associates, Inc. are depicted in the following graphs.
| | |
CMAI Polystyrene (cents/lb) | | CMAI Polyethylene (cents/lb) |
|
| | |
The prices of plastic resins are affected by the prices of crude oil and natural gas, as well as supply and demand factors of various intermediate petrochemicals. In recent years, there have been significant movements in resin prices, which rose to historic highs in 2008, and dropped precipitously at the end of 2008 and into early 2009. In the third quarter of 2009, prices rose moderately from the second quarter of 2009. We have historically adjusted our selling prices to reflect changes in raw material costs, although there is usually a lag of several months. Some of our business is pursuant to contracts that have price indices that automatically adjust after a set number of months, usually three or six, to reflect changes in certain raw materials.
Our business is sensitive to other energy-related cost movements, particularly those that affect transportation and utility costs. Historically, we have been able to mitigate the effect of higher energy-related costs with productivity improvements and other cost reductions. As energy costs have declined, we have seen a favorable impact on our margins in the first nine months of 2009.
The economic downturn that began in late 2007 has impacted consumer spending in many areas and has reduced demand for some of our products. However, our overall volume has not been adversely impacted by the economic downturn.
In 2006, we began to introduce “lean” principles and tools in many of our operating facilities. We are expanding the use of lean principles to help us accelerate productivity improvements by reducing inventory and scrap levels, providing rapid stock replenishment, shortening scheduling cycles, improving our “one-stop shopping” service, eliminating nonvalue-added activities, and streamlining processes. As this is a long-term process, we expect our ability to use these tools throughout the organization will have a positive effect on our operating results in future years.
Worldwide stock markets declined significantly in 2008, and, as a result, our U.S. pension plan was substantially underfunded at December 31, 2008. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section for further discussion of the impact on the company of this underfunding.
We believe that cash flow from operations, available cash reserves, and the ability to obtain cash under our credit facility and asset securitization program will be sufficient to meet current and future potential pension funding, liquidity, and capital requirements.
19
Results of Continuing Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009, Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Sales
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | | |
| | ended
| | | Increase
| |
| | September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 312 | | | $ | 342 | | | $ | (30 | ) | | | (8.8 | )% |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 527 | | | | 583 | | | | (56 | ) | | | (9.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 839 | | | $ | 925 | | | $ | (86 | ) | | | (9.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales declined 9%, reflecting lower pricing of 11% offset partially by volume growth of 2%.
Sales for Consumer Products decreased 9%, reflecting lower pricing of 8% and a volume decline of 1%. The price decline reflects normal reductions due to lower raw material costs. Volume was negatively impacted by a decline in waste bags, which was offset partially by strength in tableware. Waste bag volume was down due to a decline in the overall waste bag market, as well as lower shipments related to Hefty® waste bag promotions in the non-grocery channels.
Foodservice/Food Packaging sales fell 10%, driven by lower average selling prices of 13% and unfavorable foreign exchange of 1%, offset partially by volume growth of 4%. The lower pricing was related to decreases in raw material costs. The volume increase primarily was related to continued growth in cups and cutlery, as well as growth in a number of other product areas, including polypropylene and paper-based items.
Operating Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | | |
| | ended
| | | Increase
| |
| | September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 21 | | | | 41.2 | % |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 70 | | | | 52 | | | | 18 | | | | 34.6 | |
Other | | | (5 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (400.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 102 | | | $ | 35 | | | | 34.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income increased primarily as a result of lower operating costs of $23 million driven by productivity and lower freight and utility rates, a $19 million improvement in spread (the difference between selling prices and raw material costs), and higher volume of $10 million. This was offset, in part, by higher selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expense of $16 million. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily a result of more normal advertising spending and incentive compensation accruals this year, as well as lower pension income.
The following table shows the impact of restructuring and other charges (credits) on 2008 operating income by segment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating income - three months ended September 30, 2008 | |
| | GAAP
| | | Restructuring and
| | | Excluding restructuring
| |
(In millions) | | basis | | | other | | | and other | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 51 | | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 48 | |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 52 | | | | 1 | | | | 53 | |
Other | | | (1 | ) | | | — | | | | (1 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 102 | | | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
20
We believe that focusing on operating income excluding the effect of restructuring and other charges is a meaningful alternative way of evaluating our operating results. The restructuring and other charges relate to actions that will have an ongoing effect on our company. Considering such charges as being only applicable to the periods in which they are recognized could make our operating performance in those periods more difficult to evaluate relative to other periods in which there are no such charges. We use operating income excluding restructuring and other charges to evaluate operating performance and, along with other factors, in determining management compensation.
The following table shows operating income excluding restructuring and other charges.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three months
| | | Increase
| |
| | ended September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 48 | | | $ | 24 | | | | 50.0 | % |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 70 | | | | 53 | | | | 17 | | | | 32.1 | |
Other | | | (5 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (4 | ) | | | (400.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | 37 | | | | 37.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The increase in operating income for Consumer Products was driven mainly by favorable spread of $21 million, lower operating costs of $11 million, offset partially by higher SG&A expense of $8 million. The increase in SG&A expense primarily was due to higher advertising expense in support of the launch of Hefty® Odor Block® unscented odor control waste bags.
Higher operating income for Foodservice/Food Packaging was driven primarily by lower operating costs of $12 million, and increased volume of $11 million, partially offset by higher SG&A expense of $4 million.
The decrease in Other operating income was due mainly to lower pension income.
Income from Continuing Operations
We recorded income from continuing operations of $73 million, or $0.54 per share, compared with $54 million, or $0.40 per share, in 2008. The change was driven primarily by higher operating income of $22 million ($35 million before tax) as described previously.
Discontinued Operations
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
In the third quarter of 2009, we recorded $15 million of income from discontinued operations related to the expiration of the statute of limitations on the 2005 tax year for tax liabilities which had been recorded in conjunction with divested businesses.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009, Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Sales
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months
| | | Increase
| |
| | ended September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 951 | | | $ | 990 | | | $ | (39 | ) | | | (3.9 | )% |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 1,555 | | | | 1,694 | | | | (139 | ) | | | (8.2 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,506 | | | $ | 2,684 | | | $ | (178 | ) | | | (6.6 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
21
Sales decreased 7%, reflecting lower pricing of 7% and unfavorable foreign exchange of 1%, offset in part by higher volume of 1%. The decrease in pricing was due to normal price declines related to lower raw material costs.
Sales for Consumer Products declined 4%, reflecting lower pricing.
Foodservice/Food Packaging sales fell 8%, as higher volume of 2% was more than offset by average selling price decreases of 8% and unfavorable foreign exchange of 2%.
Operating Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months
| | | | |
| | ended
| | | Increase
| |
| | September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 240 | | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 98 | | | | 69.0 | % |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 254 | | | | 167 | | | | 87 | | | | 52.1 | |
Other | | | (11 | ) | | | 1 | | | | (12 | ) | | | (1,200.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 483 | | | $ | 310 | | | $ | 173 | | | | 55.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income increased primarily as a result of a $147 million improvement in spread, lower operating costs of $51 million driven by productivity and lower freight and utility rates, and lower restructuring costs of $14 million. This was offset, in part, by higher SG&A expense of $55 million, primarily due to higher incentive compensation accruals, increased advertising expense, and lower pension income.
The following table shows the impact of restructuring and other charges on 2008 operating income by segment.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Operating income - nine months ended September 30, 2008 | |
| | GAAP
| | | Restructuring and
| | | Excluding restructuring
| |
(In millions) | | Basis | | | other | | | and other | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 142 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 146 | |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 167 | | | | 9 | | | | 176 | |
Other | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 310 | | | $ | 14 | | | $ | 324 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
We believe that focusing on operating income excluding the effect of restructuring and other charges is a meaningful alternative way of evaluating our operating results. The restructuring and other charges relate to actions that will have an ongoing effect on our company. Considering such charges as being only applicable to the periods in which they are recognized could make our operating performance in those periods more difficult to evaluate relative to other periods in which there are no such charges. We use operating income excluding restructuring and other charges to evaluate operating performance and, along with other factors, in determining management compensation.
The following table shows operating income excluding restructuring and other charges.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months
| | | | |
| | ended
| | | Increase
| |
| | September 30, | | | (decrease) | |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
|
Consumer Products | | $ | 240 | | | $ | 146 | | | $ | 94 | | | | 64.4 | % |
Foodservice/Food Packaging | | | 254 | | | | 176 | | | | 78 | | | | 44.3 | |
Other | | | (11 | ) | | | 2 | | | | (13 | ) | | | (650.0 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 483 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 159 | | | | 49.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
22
The increase in operating income for Consumer Products was driven mainly by favorable spread of $98 million and lower operating costs of $28 million, offset partially by higher SG&A expense of $29 million, primarily related to higher advertising expense as well as higher incentive compensation accruals.
Higher operating income for Foodservice/Food Packaging was driven primarily by favorable spread of $49 million, lower operating costs of $23 million, and higher volume of $21 million, partially offset by increased SG&A expense of $14 million, primarily related to increased incentive compensation accruals.
The decrease in Other operating income was due mainly to higher compensation accruals and lower pension income.
Income from Continuing Operations
We recorded income from continuing operations of $261 million, or $1.96 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with $153 million, or $1.15 per share, in 2008. The change was driven primarily by higher operating income of $109 million ($173 million before tax) as described previously.
Discontinued Operations
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
In 2009, we recorded $14 million of income from discontinued operations primarily related to the expiration of the statute of limitations on the 2005 tax year for tax liabilities which had been recorded in conjunction with divested businesses. In 2008, we recorded expense from discontinued operations of $4 million which was attributed to taxes associated with business dispositions, which occurred in prior years.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capitalization
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30,
| | | December 31,
| | | Increase
| |
(In millions) | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | (decrease) | |
|
Short-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Long-term debt | | | 1,275 | | | | 1,345 | | | | (70 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total debt | | | 1,275 | | | | 1,345 | | | | (70 | ) |
Noncontrolling interest | | | 16 | | | | 16 | | | | — | |
Pactiv shareholders’ equity | | | 952 | | | | 639 | | | | 313 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total capitalization | | $ | 2,243 | | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 243 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratio of total debt to total capitalization | | | 56.8 | % | | | 67.3 | % | | | | |
Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine months
| | Increase
|
| | ended September 30, | | (decrease)
|
(In millions) | | 2009 | | 2008 | | in cash flow |
|
Cash provided (used) by: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 191 | | | $ | 204 | | | $ | (13 | ) |
Investing activities | | | (96 | ) | | | (109 | ) | | | 13 | |
Financing activities | | | (71 | ) | | | (152 | ) | | | 81 | |
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was driven primarily by a $400 million pretax contribution to our U.S. pension plan, reduced by related favorable cash tax effects of approximately
23
$100 million. This was offset partially by higher income from continuing operations of $108 million. In addition, a smaller inventory build versus prior year added $55 million, a reduction in accounts receivable compared with an increase in accounts receivable the previous year contributed $48 million, an increase in other current liabilities added $41 million, an increase in tax accruals added $23 million, and lower pension income accounted for $10 million.
The decrease in cash used by investing activities was driven by lower capital expenditures of $31 million, partially offset by the acquisition of the WinCup polypropylene cup business for $20 million.
The decrease in cash used by financing activities was a result of lower long-term revolving debt repayments of $80 million.
Capital Commitments
Commitments for authorized capital expenditures totaled approximately $75 million at September 30, 2009. It is anticipated that the majority of these expenditures will be funded from existing cash and short-term investments and internally generated cash.
Contractual Obligations
There has been no material change in the company’s aggregate contractual obligations since December 31, 2008.
Liquidity and Off-Balance-Sheet Financing
We use various sources of funding to manage liquidity. Sources of liquidity include cash flow from operations and a5-year revolving credit facility of $750 million, under which no balance was outstanding at September 30, 2009. We were in full compliance with the financial and other covenants of our revolving credit agreement at the end of the period. The two financial covenant ratios contained in our debt agreements are an interest coverage ratio and the total debt to EBITDA ratio. The interest coverage ratio is defined as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other unusual noncash items (EBITDA) divided by interest expense. The minimum required ratio is 3.50 to 1. The total debt to EBITDA ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by EBITDA. The maximum permitted total debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.50 to 1.
24
The interest coverage ratio and the debt to EBITDA ratio are shown in the following table.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Plus
| | | Less
| | | | |
| | Twelve months
| | | Nine months
| | | Nine months
| | | Twelve months
| |
| | ended
| | | ended
| | | ended
| | | ended
| |
(In millions) | | December 31, 2008 | | | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2008 | | | September 30, 2009 | |
|
Net income attributable to Pactiv (1) | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 274 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 343 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Noncash restructuring and other (2) | | | 12 | | | | (1 | ) | | | 13 | | | | (2 | ) |
Discontinued operations, net of tax (1) | | | — | | | | (14 | ) | | | — | | | | (14 | ) |
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized (1) | | | 106 | | | | 70 | | | | 79 | | | | 97 | |
Income tax expense (1) | | | 120 | | | | 153 | | | | 80 | | | | 193 | |
Depreciation and amortization (1) | | | 182 | | | | 138 | | | | 138 | | | | 182 | |
Noncontrolling interest (1) | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 638 | | | $ | 621 | | | $ | 459 | | | $ | 800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | $ | 638 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 800 | |
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized (1) | | | 106 | | | | | | | | | | | | 97 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest coverage ratio | | | 6.02 | | | | | | | | | | | | 8.25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total debt (3) | | $ | 1,345 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,275 | |
EBITDA | | | 638 | | | | | | | | | | | | 800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total debt to EBITDA ratio | | | 2.11 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.59 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amounts per the consolidated statement of income (for 2008 information, refer to our 200810-K and third quarter 200810-Q). |
|
(2) | | Amounts per the consolidated statement of cash flows (for 2008 information, refer to our 200810-K and third quarter 200810-Q). |
|
(3) | | Amounts per the consolidated statement of financial position. |
We also use an asset securitization facility as a form of off-balance-sheet financing. At September 30, 2009, $110 million was securitized under this facility, and $130 million was securitized at December 31, 2008. We do not participate in financial commercial paper markets.
We have a U.S. qualified pension plan that covers approximately 7,000 of our employees, as well as approximately 65,000 others, mostly retirees and persons who worked for predecessor companies that were part of Tenneco Inc. The requirement to make contributions to this plan is a function of several factors, the most important of which are the return on plan assets and applicable funding discount rate used in calculating plan liabilities. We are not required to make a contribution to this plan in 2009; however, we have elected to make contributions in 2009 to lessen the impact of possible required contributions in the future. We contributed $400 million pretax in the first nine months of 2009. The related cash tax benefits of the contributions are $140 million ($120 million to be realized in 2009 and $20 million that will carry over into 2010).
As of September 30, 2009, the plan assets on ayear-to-date basis had earned approximately 22% and the IRS full yield curve discount rate was 5.6% for the month of September. The return on plan assets for 2009 could be as low as 5% and there would be no required cash contribution to the U.S. pension plan in 2010. Each one
25
percentage-point decrease in the annual actual rate of return below 5% would increase the minimum cash contribution on an after-tax basis by approximately $17 million.
The above funding scenarios all assume we would maintain a funded ratio above 80% as defined in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 in order to avoid certain benefit restrictions on our plan. However, as long as our funded ratio is above 60%, those benefit restrictions do not have a meaningful impact on us or the plan. This allows us more flexibility in the timing of pension contributions.
We believe that cash flow from operations, available cash reserves, and the ability to obtain cash under our credit facility and asset securitization program will be sufficient to meet current and future potential pension funding, liquidity, and capital requirements.
Changes in Accounting Principles
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)105-10, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, ending after September 15, 2009. ASC105-10 establishes an authoritative United States GAAP superseding all pre-existing accounting standards and literature. ASC105-10 is effective for our September 30, 2009 interim financial reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption. We have updated all references to specific authoritative guidance within our interim financial reporting to reflect the new Accounting Standards Codification structure.
The FASB issued ASC820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” which was effective as of January 1, 2008. ASC820-10 establishes a framework for measuring fair value by providing a standard definition of fair value as it applies to assets and liabilities. ASC820-10, which does not require the use of any new fair value measurements, clarifies the application of other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. ASC820-10 did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC715-20, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits,” of which we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions on December 31, 2006. We recorded a charge to accumulated other comprehensive income of $41 million upon adoption. We adopted the measurement provisions of ASC715-20-65 on January 1, 2008, using the transition method based on the data as of our September 30, 2007, measurement date. As a result, we increased “retained earnings” by $7 million after tax in 2008.
The FASB issued ASC825-10, “Financial Instruments” which was effective January 1, 2008. ASC825-10 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value as of specified election dates. ASC825-10 expands the use of fair value measurement, but does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other accounting standards, including ASC820-10. ASC825-10 did not impact our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009. We did not choose to measure any financial instruments at fair value as permitted under the statement.
The FASB issued ASC805-10, “Business Combinations,” which replaces prior authoritative guidance on business combinations, and is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations that occur in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with the exception of accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. ASC805-10 retains the underlying concepts of the prior authoritative guidance in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value using the acquisition method of accounting, but it changes the application of the acquisition method in a number of significant ways. In this regard, the pronouncement requires that (1) acquisition-related costs generally be expensed as incurred, (2) noncontrolling interests be recorded at fair value, (3) in-process research and development costs be recorded at fair value as an indefinite lived intangible asset, (4) restructuring costs associated with a business combination generally be expensed subsequent to the date of such a combination, and (5) changes in valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally be recorded as income tax expense. ASC805-10 amends ASC740-10, “Income
26
Taxes” such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of ASC805-10 would also be subject to the provisions of ASC805-10. ASC805-10 was effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC810-10-45, “Consolidation” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. ASC810-10-45 requires that noncontrolling (minority) interests be recognized as equity (but separate from parent’s equity) in consolidated financial statements, and that net earnings related to noncontrolling interests be included in consolidated net income, but identified separately on the face of the income statement. ASC810-10-45 also amends prior authoritative guidance, and expands disclosure requirements regarding the interests of parents and noncontrolling interests. ASC810-10-45 was effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued the disclosure requirements within ASC815-10-65, “Derivatives and Hedging” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008. ASC815-10-65 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, specifically how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under ASC815-10 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The disclosure requirements of ASC815-10-65 were effective on January 1, 2009, and did not have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued the disclosure requirements within ASC825-10-65, “Financial Instruments” which was effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. ASC825-10-65 amends prior authoritative guidance to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. ASC825-10-65 also amends ASC270-10, “Interim Reporting”, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The disclosure requirements of ASC825-10-65 were effective for our June 30, 2009 interim reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC855-10, “Subsequent Events” which was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within such fiscal years, ending after June 15, 2009. ASC855-10 requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. ASC855-10 was effective for our June 30, 2009 interim reporting, and did not have a material effect on our financial statements upon adoption and as of September 30, 2009.
The FASB issued ASC860-10 “Transfers and Servicing” which is effective for interim and annual periods ending after November 15, 2009. ASC860-10 requires additional information about transfers of financial assets and where companies have continuing exposure to the risk related to transferred financial assets. ASC860-10 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. We are currently reviewing ASC860-10, and evaluating the potential impact of its adoption on our financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
For a complete discussion of the company’s critical accounting policies, refer to Pactiv’s most recent filing onForm 10-K.
27
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS
OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q, including statements in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and in the notes to the financial statements, are “forward-looking statements.” All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding prospects and future results, are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “will”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “may”, “might”, “could”, “expect”, “estimated”, “projects”, “intends”, “foreseeable future”, and similar terms and phrases. These forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on our current expectations or projections about future events. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. While we believe that the assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements are reasonable and make the statements in good faith, actual results almost always vary from expected results, and the differences could be material.
See “Risk Factors” section (Item 1A) in our most recently filed Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)Form 10-K and Part II (Item 1A) of this report for some of the factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include the following:
| | |
| • | Changes in consumer demand and selling prices for our products, including new products that our competitors or we may introduce that could impact sales and margins. |
|
| • | Material substitutions and changes in costs of raw materials, including plastic resins, labor, utilities, or transportation that could impact our expenses and margins. |
|
| • | Changes in laws or governmental actions, including changes in regulations such as those relating to air emissions or plastics generally. |
|
| • | The availability or cost of capital could impact growth or acquisition opportunities. |
|
| • | Workforce factors such as strikes or other labor interruptions. |
|
| • | The general economic, political, and competitive conditions in countries in which we operate, including currency fluctuations and other risks associated with operating outside of the U.S. |
|
| • | Changes in (1) assumptions regarding the long-term rate of return on pension assets and other factors, (2) the discount rate, and (3) the level of amortization of actuarial gains and losses. |
|
| • | Changes inU.S. and/or foreign governmental regulations relating to pension plan funding. |
|
| • | Changes enacted by the SEC, the FASB, or other regulatory or accounting bodies. See “Changes in Accounting Principles.” |
|
| • | Competition from producers located in countries that have lower labor and other costs. |
|
| • | Our ability to integrate new businesses that we have acquired and may acquire, or to dispose of businesses or business segments that we may wish to divest. |
28
| |
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to market risks related to changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. To manage these risks we may enter into various hedging contracts in accordance with established policies and procedures. We do not use hedging instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any transactions involving leveraged derivatives.
Commodity Derivatives
During the third quarter of 2009, we entered into natural gas purchase agreements with third parties, hedging a portion of the fourth quarter of 2009 and first quarter of 2010 purchases of natural gas used in the production processes at certain of our plants. These purchase agreements are marked to market, with the resulting gains or losses recognized in earnings when hedged transactions are recorded. Themark-to-market adjustments at September 30, 2009, were immaterial.
Cash Flow Hedges
To minimize volatility in our margins due to large fluctuations in the price of commodities, in the second quarter of 2009 we entered into swap contracts to manage risks associated with market fluctuations in resin prices. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted commodity purchases. As of September 30, 2009, we have hedged, on a monthly basis, approximately 4% of the expected resin purchase volume for the remainder of 2009. Assuming the market prices of the swap contracts remain unchanged from the prices at September 30, 2009, the estimated gain expected to be reclassified to earnings in the remainder of 2009 is immaterial.
Interest Rates
At September 30, 2009, we had public debt securities of $1.276 billion outstanding, with fixed interest rates and maturities ranging from 3 to 18 years. Should we decide to redeem these securities prior to their stated maturity, we would incur costs based on the fair value of the securities at that time.
In addition, we have a5-year revolving credit facility of $750 million, which expires in 2011, under which no balance was outstanding at September 30, 2009.
As a part of the acquisition of Prairie Packaging Inc. (Prairie), we assumed its liability for $5 million borrowed from the Illinois Development Finance Authority (IDFA), which was funded by industrial development revenue bonds issued by the IDFA. The debt matures on December 1, 2010, and bears interest at varying rates (0.60% as of September 30, 2009), not to exceed 12% per annum.
The following table provides information about Pactiv’s financial instruments that are sensitive to interest rate risks.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maturities | | |
(In millions, except percentages) | | 2010 | | 2012 | | Thereafter | | Total |
|
Fixed rate debt | | | | | | $ | 250 | | | $ | 1,026 | | | $ | 1,276 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | | | 5.7 | % | | | 7.7 | % | | | 7.3 | % |
Fair value | | | | | | $ | 266 | | | $ | 1,212 | | | $ | 1,478 | |
Floating rate debt | | $ | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | |
Average interest rate | | | 0.6 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 0.6 | % |
Fair value | | $ | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 5 | |
29
Prior to our spin-off from Tenneco Inc., we entered into an interest rate swap to hedge our exposure to interest rate movements. We settled this swap in November 1999, incurring a $43 million loss, which is being recognized as additional interest expense over the average life of the underlying debt.
In April 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate risk related to $250 million of the debt expected to be issued in connection with the acquisition of Prairie. The swap agreements were terminated on June 20, 2007, resulting in a gain of $9 million. This gain is being recorded as a reduction of interest expense over the average life of the underlying debt.
| |
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the appropriate time periods. We, under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, and we and such officers have concluded that such controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of September 30, 2009.
There were no changes in internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
30
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We are party to various legal proceedings arising from our operations. We establish reserves for claims and proceedings when it is probable that liabilities exist and where reasonable estimates of such liabilities can be made. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of any of these matters, based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances now known, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, actual outcomes may be different from those expected and could have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a particular period.
There has been no material change in the risk factors disclosed in ourForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
| |
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
In July 2006, the board of directors approved the repurchase of 10 million shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2009, the remaining number of shares authorized to be repurchased was 522,361. We repurchase shares using open market or privately negotiated transactions. Repurchased shares are held in treasury for general corporate purposes. There is no expiration date for the current share repurchase authorization.
We did not repurchase stock in the first nine months of 2009.
ITEM 3-5. None
Exhibits designated with an asterisk in the following index are furnished or filed herewith; all other exhibits are incorporated by reference.
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
|
| 2 | | | Distribution Agreement by and between Tenneco Inc. and the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to Pactiv Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated November 11, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 3 | .1 | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 3 | .2 | | Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pactiv Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated September 4, 2009, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .1 | | Specimen Stock Certificate of Pactiv Corporation Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .2(a) | | Qualified Offer Plan Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4, 1999, by and between the registrant and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .2(b) | | Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2002, by and between the registrant and National City Bank, as rights agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4(a) to Pactiv Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-8 dated November 8, 2002, FileNo. 333-101121). |
31
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
|
| 4 | .3(a) | | Indenture, dated September 29, 1999, by and between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Tenneco Packaging Inc.’s Registration Statement onForm S-4, FileNo. 333-82923). |
| 4 | .3(b) | | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to Indenture dated as of September 29, 1999, between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3(b) to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(c) | | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to Indenture dated as of September 29, 1999, between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3(c) to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(d) | | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to Indenture dated as of September 29, 1999, between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3(d) to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(e) | | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to Indenture dated as of September 29, 1999, between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3(e) to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(f) | | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to Indenture dated as of September 29, 1999, between the registrant and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3(f) to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(g) | | Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 25, 2007 to Indenture, dated as of September 29, 1999, between Pactiv Corporation and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pactiv Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated June 25, 2007, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .3(h) | | Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 25, 2007 to Indenture, dated as of September 29, 1999, between Pactiv Corporation and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pactiv Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated June 25, 2007, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 4 | .4 | | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 4, 1999, by and between the registrant and the trustees under the Pactiv Corporation Rabbi Trust (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .1 | | Pactiv Corporation (formerly known as Tenneco Packaging Inc.) Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .2 | | Pactiv Corporation (formerly known as Tenneco Packaging Inc.) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .3 | | Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Executives (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Pactiv Corporation’s Current Report onForm 8-K dated September 4, 2009, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .4 | | Pactiv Corporation (formerly known as Tenneco Packaging Inc.) Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .5 | | Pactiv Corporation Rabbi Trust (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
32
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
|
| 10 | .6 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 11, 1997, by and between Richard L. Wambold and Tenneco Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .7 | | Pactiv Corporation 2002 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Pactiv Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-8 dated November 8, 2002, FileNo. 333-101121). |
| 10 | .8 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, among the registrant, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent and L/C Issuer, BNP Paribas, SunTrust Bank, and Citibank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .9 | | Pactiv Corporation Deferred Retirement Savings Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Pactiv Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .10 | | Form of Pactiv Corporation Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Pactiv Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .11 | | Form of Pactiv Corporation Performance Share Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Pactiv Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .12 | | Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2006, among the registrant and Atlantic Asset Securitization LLC and Calyon New York Branch, as agent for Purchasers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Pactiv Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .13 | | Continuing Agreement for Standby Letters of Credit between Pactiv Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. dated June 5, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 10 | .14 | | Credit Agreement between Pactiv Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. dated June 5, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Pactiv Corporation’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, FileNo. 1-15157). |
| 11 | | | None. |
| 15 | | | None. |
| 18 | | | None. |
| 19 | | | None. |
| 22 | | | None. |
| 23 | | | None. |
| 24 | | | None. |
| *31 | .1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
| *31 | .2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification. |
| **32 | .1 | | Section 1350 Certification. |
| **32 | .2 | | Section 1350 Certification. |
| | |
* | | Filed herewith |
|
** | | Furnished herewith |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACTIV CORPORATION
| | |
| By: | /s/ EDWARD T. WALTERS |
Edward T. Walters
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 6, 2009
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PACTIV CORPORATION
Donald E. King
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 6, 2009
35