UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
| | | | |
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | | o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
| | or | | |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 | | | For the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 000-28369
Geeknet, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) |
| |
Delaware | 77-0399299 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11216 Waples Mill Rd., Suite 100, Fairfax, VA 22030
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(877) 433-5638
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| |
Common Stock, $0.001 par value | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Nasdaq Global Market) |
(Title of Class) | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one): Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of February 12, 2014, there were 6,657,420 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013 (based on the closing price for the Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market for such date) was approximately $53 million. Shares of common stock held by each of our officers and directors and by each person or group who owns 5% or more of our outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons or groups may be deemed to be our affiliate. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be held on May 7, 2014, and which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the registrant’s year ended December 31, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Form 10-K") contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We use words such as “may,” “could,” "believe," "intend," “anticipate,” “potential,” "future," “expect," and variations of such words and similar expressions, to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to, statements regarding: our expectations and beliefs regarding future revenue growth; sources of revenue; wholesale arrangements; financial performance and results of operations; management's strategy, plans and objectives for future operations; our intent to continue to invest in establishing our brand identity; improving product safety and quality assurance testing; improving website user experience and functionality; upgrading technology, infrastructure, support systems and integrated enterprise resource planning system; investing in human resources; development of product offerings; expansion and diversification of our sales and marketing programs; optimization of manufacture and supplier relationships; liquidity and capital resources; our accounting policies; and sufficiency of our cash resources and investments to meet our operating and working capital requirements. We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized. Achievement of future results is subject to risk, uncertainties and assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, then these and other various factors, including those set forth in this Business section under "Competition" and in the Risk Factors contained in Item 1A "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in our Form 10-K, could cause our actual results to differ significantly from past results and from management's expectations. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Form 10-K.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
Introduction
Geeknet, Inc. ("Geeknet") and its subsidiary, ThinkGeek, Inc. (“ThinkGeek,” and together with Geeknet, "we" or the “Company”), operate a business aimed at the global geek community, which includes technology enthusiasts, pop-culture aficionados, and anyone who turns their interests into passions and feels a connection to other enthusiastic fans. ThinkGeek has sought to provide the tech, gadget and game-obsessed communities with all the things that geeks crave through its ThinkGeek.com website (the "website") and to the Company's wholesale channel customers. ThinkGeek was founded to serve the distinct needs and interests of technology professionals and enthusiasts and today has grown to become the place for innovative and imaginative products that appeal to the geek in everyone.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
You can access other information at our Investor Relations website at investors.geek.net. The content of this website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this report or any other report we file with the SEC. We make available, free of charge on our website, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC.
Business Overview
Geeknet was incorporated in California in January 1995 and reincorporated in Delaware in December 1999. From the date of its incorporation through October 2001, the Company sold Linux-based hardware systems and services under the name VA Linux Systems, Inc. In December 2001, the Company changed its name to VA Software Corporation to reflect its decision to pursue media, e-commerce, software and online images businesses. In May 2007, the Company changed its name to SourceForge, Inc. In November 2009, the Company changed its name to Geeknet to project a more accurate reflection of its business. On September 17, 2012, Geeknet sold its Media business to Dice Holdings, Inc.
Today, Geeknet sells collectibles, apparel, gadgets, electronics, toys and other retail products for technology enthusiasts and general consumers through the website and certain exclusive products to the Company's wholesale channel customers. Some ThinkGeek products are custom made and developed by the Company's product development team ("GeekLabs"). Revenue is generated by offering, in a single web property, a broad range of unique products that are typically not available in traditional brick-and-mortar stores and by introducing new products to the ThinkGeek audience and fans on a regular basis. The Company has several wholesale partnerships with brick-and-mortar retailers that allow the Company to reach a broader consumer audience and expand its unique brand. The Company has recently established and strengthened existing partnerships with certain retail store chains that have locations throughout the United States and Canada.
Due to the growth of our wholesale business, effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company reorganized our management reporting and reportable business segments into two operating segments: Website and Wholesale. Prior to September 17, 2012, the Company had two operating segments: e-Commerce and Media. The Media segment was discontinued in 2012 when it was sold to Dice Holdings, Inc.
Consumers can access information directly through our website or contact our customer care representatives and experts by e-mail at orders@thinkgeek.com or by telephone at 1-888-GEEKSTUFF. A third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider located in Lockbourne, Ohio receives purchased inventory, fulfills customers’ orders, and processes returns.
Sales and Marketing
Our marketing strategy is focused on acquiring new customers efficiently and building brand loyalty with existing customers to encourage repeat purchases. We market to prospects and customers through all core online marketing channels: email, paid search, affiliate marketing, online display advertising, and social media. In 2013, we began exhibiting at relevant trade shows, including PAX (Penny Arcade Expo) East and PAX Prime, San Diego ComicCon, and Minecon (for Minecraft enthusiasts).
We employ a dynamic promotional strategy, testing a diverse range of special offers and sales designed to maximize profitable incremental sales using tried-and-true direct marketing techniques. These offers are programmed around specific themes, including product launches and holidays. In addition to promotions, we continue to offer our Geek Points loyalty program. Through this free program, customers earn 10 points for every dollar they spend on most purchases, which they can redeem for a selection of products.
Our authentic relationship with customers and fans enables us to foster thriving social media communities on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and YouTube. On our website, we regularly perform testing of navigation, design, and promotional elements in order to improve the experience and increase conversion for desktop, tablet, and mobile customers. In addition, we performed an in-depth audience segmentation study in 2013 that will inform our marketing efforts going forward by providing us with a better understanding of current and potential customers.
In addition to our core business of selling products through our website, we also sell products through our wholesale channel. During 2013, our wholesale channel continued to deliver rapid growth. Our wholesale clients buy our ThinkGeek exclusive products to sell in their brick-and-mortar stores across the United States, in Canada and internationally. Our clients are well-known reputable retailers that have a strong presence in malls and in stand-alone stores. Our notable clients are Target, Walmart, Toys "R" Us, f.y.e., Meijer, Books-A-Million and Hot Topic.
Our international wholesale channel grew significantly in 2013. We have partnered with distributors in Australia and the United Kingdom. We believe selling to widely known popular retailers is an opportunity to expand our brand recognition and grow our wholesale business.
Technology and Design
GeekLabs
ThinkGeek has expanded its product offerings with innovative exclusive products created and developed internally by our GeekLabs team. Our talented group of designers and engineers create new and inventive geeky products that are first exclusively retailed on our website, and later offered to select well-known toy and specialty retailers. These additional wholesale channels have become a positive incremental revenue stream in brick-and-
mortar retailers. GeekLabs' innovations continue to be some of the top selling items on our website as the GeekLabs team has creative freedom to design the type of products which interest our customers. We hope to delight our customers with the unique products our GeekLabs team creates.
The portfolio of exclusive products created by our GeekLabs team has substantially increased over the previous year and we continue to sign key new licenses. GeekLabs leverages ThinkGeek's existing cache of over twenty licenses for various notable properties such as Star Wars, Star Trek, Game of Thrones, and Doctor Who. ThinkGeek is one of the few license holders for the popular video game Minecraft.
Currently GeekLabs manufactures products across several product categories including electronics, toys, apparel, housewares, jewelry and candy. Internal company brainstorm sessions are used to determine which products to develop. Some of the top selling GeekLabs products in 2013 included the Star Wars R2-D2 car charger, the Minecraft diamond sword, the Doctor Who TARDIS tea infuser, the Build-on Brick Mug and the Tactical Chef Apron. Minecraft continued its strong performance in 2013, and Doctor Who was one of our most successful new licenses.
ThinkGeek continues to expand our investment in GeekLabs. This includes hiring specialists for our GeekLabs group, expanding our partnership with Asian-based factories and increasing our compliance and safety testing team.
Website Engineering and Technology
We have implemented a broad array of services and systems for customer service, product searching, customer communication, order processing and order fulfillment. These services and systems use a combination of our own proprietary technologies and commercially available, licensed technologies. We focus our internal development efforts on creating and enhancing the specialized, proprietary software to improve our customer experience and ease of use and to increase the functionality of our website. We also invest in cyber security to protect our customers, maintain secure transactions, and minimize business interruptions.
Our core online merchandise catalog, customer interaction, order processing, and back-end systems are proprietary to ThinkGeek. The systems are designed to provide connectivity to our distribution center, and include an inventory tracking system, a real-time order tracking system, an executive information system and an inventory replenishment system. Our Internet servers use secure sockets layer (SSL) technology to help conduct secure communications and transactions.
During the past year, we have improved the search and navigation functions on our website by creating a cleaner, more intuitive product category structure. This became the foundation for our new top level drop down navigation menu. This helps our customers find products that are similar in nature or theme in fewer steps. We also have functionality that identifies products that may interest customers based upon the history of products visited, purchased or added to a wish list. We utilize targeted customer emails that notify customers if a product is in stock, if a new product is available for sale, or to remind customers of a product they recently viewed along with a special promotion or offer. This encourages our customers to revisit the website and potentially purchase that product. We continue to streamline our online shopping cart making it easier to use and consistent with industry practices. In 2013, we added PayPal Express and Bill Me Later as customer payment options. We continuously test website layout and functionality changes to determine the optimal page configurations. In the fourth quarter of 2013 we expanded our support for mobile traffic by creating a tablet optimized version of the website (targeted towards iPad users) that complements our existing smartphone optimized website.
Product Safety
During the second half of 2012, we transitioned part of our product safety and quality assurance function in-house. Prior to the transition we were relying solely on third-party vendors to perform these services. We have invested in certified personnel, who are highly qualified in conducting safety and quality assurance testing. We believe this dedicated in-house function will enable us to improve the quality of our products, minimize defective products, react in a timely manner and continue to exceed industry standards.
Competition
The market for retail products similar to those offered by ThinkGeek is highly competitive, and we compete in different consumer verticals. Our competition includes apparel companies such as Threadless and Zazzle, gadget providers such as Brookstone, and sources for unusual gifts such as Etsy, Fab, Jinx, UncommonGoods, and Vat19.
Large online marketplaces such as Amazon.com and eBay also provide competitive pressure by selling many of the products that are not manufactured exclusively for ThinkGeek.
More recently, some online retailers have developed sites targeted to the computer enthusiast and computer gaming markets. We believe that there are a number of competitive factors in our market, including company credibility, product selection and availability, price, website features, functionality and performance, ease of purchasing, customer service and reliability and speed of order shipment.
Many of the competitors in our e-commerce industry have substantial competitive advantages, including greater resources that can be devoted to the development, promotion and sale of their online products, more established sales channels, greater software and website development experience, and greater name recognition. To be competitive, we must respond promptly and effectively to changes in consumer preferences, technological change, evolving standards and our competitors’ innovations by continuing to enhance our services and products. Any pricing pressures or loss of customers resulting from our failure to compete effectively would reduce our revenue and margin.
Intellectual Property Rights
We protect our intellectual property through a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, and other methods of protection. Geeknet, ThinkGeek and their associated logos are some of our trademarks that we use in the United States and in other countries. We have 3 U.S. patents and 15 registered trademarks.
Seasonality
Our business is highly seasonal, reflecting the general pattern associated with the retail industry of peak sales and earnings during the holiday shopping season. As a result, we generated a substantial portion of our revenue in the fourth quarter, which began on October 1, and ended on December 31. As is typical in the retail industry, we generally experience lower revenue during the other quarters. Therefore, our revenue in a particular quarter is not necessarily indicative of future revenue for a subsequent quarter or our full year.
Employees
Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining organization; we have never experienced a work stoppage; and we believe that our relations with our employees are good. As of December 31, 2013, our employee base totaled 91, including 22 in operations, 18 in sales and marketing, 28 in technology and design and 23 in finance and administration.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS IN GEEKNET SECURITIES SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW BEFORE MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IN ADDITION, THESE RISKS ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES FACING OUR COMPANY. ADDITIONAL RISKS OF WHICH WE ARE NOT PRESENTLY AWARE OR THAT WE CURRENTLY BELIEVE ARE IMMATERIAL MAY ALSO IMPAIR OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS. OUR BUSINESS COULD BE HARMED BY ANY OF THESE RISKS. THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE DUE TO ANY OF THESE RISKS, AND INVESTORS MAY LOSE ALL OR PART OF THEIR INVESTMENT.
Risks Related To Our Business
If ThinkGeek fails to launch new and innovative products, the demand for our products may be limited and our revenue will be adversely affected.
In order to attract customers, we must continually release new and innovative products, including signature products internally developed by GeekLabs. In addition to the direct revenue we derive from product sales, the release of new and innovative products attracts media coverage and drives customers to our business. The successful development, sourcing, manufacturing and merchandising of products is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including certain factors specific to our business over which we have limited or no control.
There can be no assurance that our new products will appeal to customers or that demand for these products will be sufficient to generate revenue consistent with our estimates. In addition, there can be no assurance that new products will be developed in a timely or cost-effective manner, or that we will be able to procure appropriate quantities of such products. If we are unable to deliver new and innovative products that allow us to increase demand, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to grow our business. See also additional risks related to competition set forth elsewhere in these Risk Factors.
Our business is highly seasonal. In addition, we are exposed to significant inventory risks as a result of seasonality, new product launches, rapid changes in product cycles and changes in consumer tastes.
Our business is highly seasonal, with a disproportionate amount of our sales occurring in the fourth quarter which begins on October 1 and ends on December 31. To be successful, we must accurately predict our customers' tastes and demands to avoid purchasing too much or not enough inventory. If we purchase too much inventory, we may be required to discount those products or write-off products we are unable to sell, reducing our gross margins. If we do not purchase enough inventory, we may fail to meet customer demand and lose potential orders, which will adversely affect our financial results.
In addition, when we launch a new product, it is difficult to accurately forecast customer demand. Certain products, especially custom manufactured products or products purchased from outside the United States may require significant lead-time, payment or partial payment prior to shipment, and may not be returnable. We carry a broad selection of products and significant inventory levels of certain products and we may be unable to sell products in sufficient quantities or during the relevant selling seasons. Failure to properly assess our inventory needs could adversely affect our financial results.
We are dependent upon a single third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider. Any decrease in the quality of service offered by our fulfillment and warehouse provider will adversely affect our reputation and the growth of our business. If we fail to realize anticipated operating efficiencies at our third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider, our operating results will be adversely affected.
Our ability to receive inbound inventory and ship completed orders efficiently and in a timely manner to our customers is substantially dependent on a single third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider. We ship products to customers worldwide using the services of Exel, Inc. (“Exel”), located in Lockbourne, Ohio.
If Exel fails to meet our distribution and fulfillment needs, our relationship with and reputation among our customers will suffer and this will adversely affect our revenue. Additionally, if Exel is unable to meet our distribution and fulfillment needs, particularly during the holiday season, or our contract with Exel is terminated, we may be required to secure a second-source or replacement fulfillment and warehouse provider. If we fail to secure such a fulfillment and warehouse provider or are unable to secure a fulfillment and warehouse provider on comparable terms, our reputation and our financial results would be adversely affected.
If we do not continually enhance our website and order processing systems or respond to rapid technological changes, we could lose customers and our net revenues could decline.
If we are unable to continually upgrade our website in a timely manner to accommodate higher volumes of traffic, our website performance could suffer and we may lose customers. In addition, if we are unable to expand the computer systems that we use to process and ship customer orders and process customer payments, we may not be able to fulfill any potential growth in customer orders from the website successfully. As a result, we could lose customers and our net revenues could decline. Further, to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our website. The Internet and the online commerce industry are subject to rapid technological change. If competitors introduce new features and website enhancements, or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing website and systems may become obsolete or unattractive. Developing and enhancing our website and other systems entails significant technical and business risks. We may use new technologies ineffectively or we may fail to adapt our website, our transaction processing systems and our computer network to meet customer requirements or emerging industry standards. If we are unsuccessful in upgrading our systems to accommodate higher traffic or developing or implementing new technologies that enable us to meet evolving industry standards and remain competitive, our operating results would be seriously harmed.
If we do not successfully and cost-effectively implement one or more of these intended upgrades or modified processes or if we do not achieve desired efficiencies or cost savings as a result of these changes or if attempts to
enhance our website are unsuccessful or are not appealing to our customers, our business and operating results could be harmed, perhaps significantly.
Unplanned system interruptions and capacity constraints could harm our revenue and reputation.
Our business is dependent on the uninterrupted and highly-available operation of our website. We experience periodic service interruptions with our website. Service interruptions may be caused by a variety of factors, including capacity constraints, software design flaws and bugs, and third party denial of service attacks, such as the attack we experienced in March 2013. If we fail to provide customers with such access to our website at the speed and performance at which they require, our sales and business reputation will be adversely affected.
Our systems and operations remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, power loss, telecommunications failure and similar events. If our website experiences frequent or lengthy service interruptions, our business and reputation could be adversely affected.
Privacy concerns relating to our technology could damage our reputation and deter current and potential customers from using our website.
Concerns about our practices with regard to the collection, use, disclosure, or security of personal information, or other privacy related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and operating results. While we strive to comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, any failure or perceived failure to comply may result in proceedings or actions against us by government entities or others, or could cause us to lose customers, which could potentially have an adverse affect on our business.
Regulatory authorities around the world are considering a number of legislative and regulatory proposals concerning data protection. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse affect on our business and results of operations. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.
Our business could be adversely affected by cyber-attacks leading to misappropriation of sensitive personally identifiable information or our proprietary business information.
As our business sells goods and operates online, we are at risk of cyber-attacks. Our business involves the use of our proprietary information as well as the storage and transmission of customers' personally identifiable and proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation, and potential liability. While we take measures to protect personally identifiable information from unauthorized access or disclosure, it is possible that our security controls over personally identifiable information may not prevent improper access or disclosure. Our security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. As a result, an unauthorized party may be able to disrupt our operations or obtain access to our data or our customers' personally identifiable information or proprietary data. Due to the nature of sophisticated cyber-attacks, there is a risk that such attack may remain undetected for a period of time.
A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions or malfunctions in our Internet operations. In addition, a security breach that leads to disclosure of our proprietary information may compromise our ability to compete in the marketplace by allowing others to use our proprietary information to develop similar or competitive products. A security breach that leads to disclosure of user or consumer information (including sensitive personally identifiable information) could harm our reputation, compel us to comply with disparate breach notification laws in various jurisdictions and otherwise subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. A cyber-attack, such as a denial of service attack, that renders our site inoperable would result in adverse consequences, including significant loss of revenues. Any security breach may also cause us to expend significant resources to restore system functionality and incur costs to deploy additional personnel, protection technologies and third party consultants to defend against a future security breach.
We outsource the operation of our network connectivity and work actively to maintain up-to-date security and defense measures. If any of our outsourcing providers do not perform adequately, we may be exposed to greater risk of a cyber-attack. In addition to utilizing third party providers, we periodically review our security and privacy practices and we are continuing to implement and update policies and practices as a result of these reviews. We may not adequately identify risks and the policies and practices we implement may not be effective.
We are subject to risks as a result of our reliance on foreign sources of production for certain products.
In order to offer cost-effective and innovative products, we rely on manufacturers located outside of the United States, most of which are located in China, to supply us with sufficient quantities of these products based on our forecasts and to deliver these products in a timely manner.
Our arrangements with these manufacturers are generally limited to purchase orders tied to specific lots of goods. We are subject to the risks of relying on products manufactured outside of the United States, including political unrest, trade restrictions, customs and import/export regulations, local business practice and geo-political issues, such as political and social unrest and economic instability. Additionally, significant reliance on foreign sources of production increases the risks relating to compliance with domestic or international labor standards, customs and import/export laws and regulations, compliance with domestic or international manufacturing and product safety standards, currency fluctuations, restrictions on the transfer of funds, work stoppages or slowdowns and other labor issues, economic uncertainties including inflation and government regulations, availability and costs of raw materials, potentially adverse tax consequences and other uncertainties. China has experienced rapid social, political and economic change and further changes may adversely affect our ability to procure our products from Chinese suppliers.
Our ability to obtain goods on a cost effective basis is also subject to our ability to maintain relationships with our suppliers and our ability to negotiate and maintain supply arrangements on favorable terms. The Chinese Yuan (“CNY”) exchange rate to the U.S. Dollar (“USD”) has not historically been volatile. In the event that the CNY/USD exchange rate changes substantially, our suppliers could attempt to renegotiate our purchase orders with them and increase our costs. In addition, because our purchases are usually on a case by case basis, we are subject to the risk of unexpected changes in pricing or supply from these suppliers. We may also be unable to develop beneficial relationships with new vendors in the future.
We may be subject to product liability claims if people or property are harmed by the products we sell, which could be costly to defend and subject us to significant damage claims.
Some of the products we offer for sale may expose us to product liability or product safety claims relating to personal injury, death or property damage caused by such products and may require us to take actions such as product recalls, which could involve significant expense incurred by the Company. Although we maintain liability insurance, we cannot be certain that our coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred or that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all. The successful assertion of an uninsured product liability or other claim against us could cause us to incur significant expenses to pay such a claim and could adversely affect our financial results. Even a successfully defended product liability claim could cause us to incur significant expenses to defend and could adversely affect our financial results. In addition, some of our vendor agreements with our suppliers do not indemnify us from product liability and even if some agreements provide for indemnification, it may not be possible or practical to avail ourselves of the benefits of the protection.
As a seller of consumer products, we are subject to various government regulations and may be subject to additional regulations in the future, violation of which could subject us to sanctions or otherwise harm our business.
As an Internet retailer of consumer products, we are subject to significant government regulations, including, in the United States, the Consumer Products Safety Act, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the Flammable Fabrics Act, and the Fair Disclosure under the Federal Trade Commission, as well as product safety and consumer protection statutes in our international markets. In addition, certain of our products are subject to regulation by the Food and Drug Administration or similar international authorities. In addition, collecting information from children is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. We are taking steps we believe are necessary to comply with these acts, but there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance, and failure to comply with these acts could result in sanctions which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be subject to involuntary product recalls or may voluntarily conduct a product recall. While costs associated with product recalls have generally not been material to
our business, the costs associated with future product recalls individually or in the aggregate in any given fiscal year, could be significant. In addition, any product recall, regardless of direct costs of the recall, may harm consumer perceptions of our products and have a negative impact on our future revenues and results of operations.
Governments and regulatory agencies in the markets where we manufacture and sell products may enact additional regulations relating to product safety and consumer protection in the future, and may also increase the penalties for failure to comply with product safety and consumer protection regulations. Complying with any such additional regulations or requirements could impose increased costs on our business. Similarly, increased penalties for non-compliance could subject us to greater expense in the event any of our products were found to not comply with such regulations, and could have a negative impact on our future results of operations.
Increased focus on sales and use tax could subject us to liability for past sales and cause our future sales to decrease.
We currently collect sales taxes for merchandise shipped to Florida, Minnesota, Ohio, Virginia, and Washington, but we do not collect sales or other taxes on shipments of our goods into the remaining states in the United States or internationally. The relocation of our fulfillment center or customer service centers or any future expansion of them, along with other aspects of our business, may result in additional sales and other tax obligations. We do not collect consumption tax (including value added tax, goods and services tax, and provincial sales tax) as applicable on goods and services sold that are delivered outside of the United States as our terms of sale provide that the customer is responsible for such expenses. One or more states or foreign countries may seek to impose sales or other tax collection obligations on out-of-jurisdiction e-commerce companies. A successful assertion by one or more states or foreign countries that we should collect sales or other taxes on the sale of merchandise or services could result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales, decrease our ability to compete with traditional retailers, and otherwise harm our business.
Currently, U.S. Supreme Court decisions restrict the imposition of obligations to collect state and local sales and use taxes with respect to sales made over the Internet. However, a number of states and the U.S. Congress continue to consider initiatives that could limit or supersede the Supreme Court's position regarding sales and use taxes on Internet sales, and some states have adopted laws that attempt to impose obligations on out-of-state retailers to collect taxes on their behalf. If any of these initiatives are successful, we could be required to collect sales and use taxes in additional states. The imposition by state and local governments of various taxes upon Internet commerce could create administrative burdens for us, put us at a competitive disadvantage if they do not impose similar obligations on all of our online competitors and decrease our future sales.
Risks Related To Our Financial Results
We have a history of losses and may incur net losses in the foreseeable future. If we are unable to attain consistent profitability, the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We have an accumulated deficit of $743.4 million as of December 31, 2013. We may continue to incur net losses in the future. If we are unable to attain profitability on a sustained basis, the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital and continue operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes is subject to limitation and may be limited further.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its net operating losses (“NOLs”), to offset future taxable income. In general, an ownership change occurs if the aggregate stock ownership of certain stockholders increases by more than 50 percentage points over such stockholders' lowest percentage ownership during the testing period (generally three years). We determined that such an ownership change occurred as of November 2008. This ownership change resulted in limitations on the utilization of tax attributes, including net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits.
The occurrence of an additional ownership change could limit the ability to utilize NOLs that are not currently subject to limitation, and could further limit the ability to utilize NOLs that are currently subject to limitation. The amount of the annual limitation generally is equal to the value of the stock of the corporation immediately prior to the ownership
change multiplied by the adjusted federal tax-exempt rate, set by the Internal Revenue Service. Limitations imposed on the ability to use NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause U.S. federal income taxes to be paid earlier than otherwise would be paid if such limitations were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, in each case reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs. Similar rules and limitations may apply for state income tax purposes.
Certain factors specific to our business over which we have limited or no control may nonetheless adversely impact our total revenue and financial results.
The primary factors over which we have limited or no control that may adversely impact our total revenue and financial results include the following:
| |
• | specific economic conditions relating to our business |
| |
• | the spending habits of our customers |
| |
• | the performance of our suppliers |
| |
• | execution by our third party fulfillment center |
| |
• | our ability to retain qualified merchandising, sales and product development personnel. |
If our revenue and operating results fall below our expectations, the expectations of securities analysts or the expectations of investors, the trading price of our common stock will likely be materially and adversely affected. You should not rely on the results of our business in any past periods as an indication of our future financial performance.
If we are unable to maintain or acquire licenses to include intellectual property owned by others in our products, revenues and operating results could suffer.
A material portion of our revenue is derived from sales of products related to popular online or video games, films and television shows. We rely on our ability to acquire rights related to popular online or video games, films and television shows and pay royalties to branded content owners for the use of their content on these products. Competition for these licenses can be intense, and we may not be able to acquire or renew desirable licenses at reasonable rates or at all. In addition, while part of our business strategy involves predicting future trends, may be unsuccessful in predicting which video games, films, television shows or other pop culture phenomena will be popular in the future and target our license-acquisition activities accordingly. Our failure to maintain our existing licenses or acquire successful new licenses at reasonable rates could significantly impact our content sales or interrupt our supply chain and require use to modify our products or business plans and could adversely impact our results of operations.
Our wholesale business is heavily dependent on sales to several large retailers.
Our wholesale business grew significantly during 2013, primarily as a result of sales to several large retailers. These large retailers could reduce their purchasing levels or cease buying products from us at any time for any reason. They could also bring to market products that compete with our successful products. In addition, our wholesale customers have a variety of suppliers to choose from and therefore can make substantial demands on us, including demands on product pricing and returns. We have not experienced a material level of product returns to date, but the risk exists. If we lose a significant wholesale customer or if sales of our products to a significant wholesale customer materially decrease, it could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Increased shipping costs and labor stoppages may adversely affect sales of our products.
Many of our products are delivered to customers from our fulfillment center located in Ohio. We have established relationships with reputable common carriers for the delivery of these products. If these carriers were to increase the prices they charge to ship our goods, and we pass these increases on to our customers, our customers might choose to buy comparable products locally to avoid shipping charges. In addition, these carriers may experience labor stoppages or other issues, which could impact our ability to deliver products on a timely basis to our customers and adversely affect customer relationships.
Changes to financial accounting standards may affect our results of operations.
We prepare our financial statements to conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting standards. A change in an accounting policy can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. Changes to those rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results.
Risks Related To Competition
Our competition is intense. Our failure to compete successfully could adversely affect our revenue and financial results.
Our business is rapidly evolving and operates in an intensely competitive industry. We have many competitors, including other e-commerce businesses as well as traditional brick-and-mortar retailers. Increases in shipping costs or the taxation of Internet commerce may make our products less competitive when compared with traditional brick- and-mortar retailers. Additionally, our current and future competitors may have greater resources, more customers and greater brand recognition than we do. These competitors may secure better terms from vendors and adopt more competitive pricing for their products. They may also devote more resources to their technology infrastructure, product development, order fulfillment, distribution facilities and marketing and advertising campaigns. In addition, as we expand into new markets and broaden our product offering, our competition may intensify as our current and future competitors enter into similar markets and offer similar products. Local competitors in these new markets may have substantial competitive advantages because of greater focus on and knowledge of local customers and their preferences and greater brand recognition. Further, if we fail to maintain a customer loyalty program that is competitive in our industry, we may not attract or retain customers, and our sales may suffer.
Increased competition is likely to result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could seriously harm our net revenues and results of operations. We expect competition to intensify in the future because current and new competitors can enter our market with little difficulty and can launch new websites at a relatively low cost.
Risks Related To Intellectual Property
We are vulnerable to claims that our website and software infringe third-party intellectual property rights. Any resulting claims against us could be costly to defend or subject us to significant damages.
We expect that our website will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of web properties in different Internet industry segments overlap. The scope of United States patent protection for software is not well-defined and will evolve as the United States Patent and Trademark Office grants additional patents. Because patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until the patent is issued, applications may have been filed that would relate to our products. We may also receive patent infringement claims as companies increasingly seek to patent their software. Our developers may unknowingly infringe on third-party patent rights. We cannot prevent current or future patent holders or other owners of intellectual property from suing us and others seeking monetary damages or an injunction against our web offerings. We may seek licenses from such parties, but they could refuse to grant us a license or demand commercially unreasonable terms. We might not have sufficient resources to pay for the licenses. Such infringement claims could also cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to suspend or permanently cease the use of critical technologies or processes or the production or sale of major products. In either event, our operating results could be seriously harmed. In recent years, companies have also been subject to patent infringement claims from non-practicing entities, or "patent trolls." In addition, employees hired from competitors might utilize proprietary and trade secret information from their former employers without our knowledge, even though our employment agreements and policies clearly prohibit such practices.
Any litigation regarding our intellectual property, with or without merit, could be costly and time consuming to defend, divert the attention of our management and key personnel from our business operations and cause interruption in our website. Claims of intellectual property infringement may require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements that may not be available on acceptable terms. In addition, parties making claims against us may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to offer our products in the United States and
abroad and could result in an award of substantial damages against us. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain any required license could delay release of our products and increase our costs. If a successful claim is made against us and we fail to develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be immediately and materially adversely affected.
If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, competitors may use our technology and trademarks, which could weaken our competitive position, reduce our revenue, and increase our costs.
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, and other arrangements to protect our proprietary rights. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy our website, products and/or services offered thereon or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary to create sites that compete against ours. Some license provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying, transfer, and disclosure of our licensed programs may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions and foreign countries.
In addition, the laws of some countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. To the extent that we increase our international activities, our exposure to unauthorized copying and use of our website, proprietary information and original products will increase. Additionally, we manufacture most of our original products in China, where there is a risk that such products would be copied and enforcement of our intellectual property rights would be difficult.
Our collection of trademarks is important to our business. The protective steps we take or have taken may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our trademark rights. We have filed applications for registration of and registered some of our trademarks in the United States and internationally. Effective trademark protection may not be available in every country in which we offer or intend to offer our products and services. Failure to protect our trademark rights adequately could damage our brand identity and impair our ability to compete effectively. Furthermore, defending or enforcing our trademark rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.
Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary technology and information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technology and information, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of our offerings or to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology or information. We periodically discover products that are counterfeit reproductions of our products or designs, or that otherwise infringe our intellectual property rights. The actions we take to establish and protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to prevent imitation of our offerings by others or prevent others from seeking to block sales of our offerings as violations of proprietary rights. Existing copyright laws afford only limited protection, and the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do United States laws. Litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary technology and information. Such litigation may be costly and time-consuming and if we are unsuccessful in challenging a party on the basis of intellectual property infringement, our sales and intellectual property rights could adversely be affected and result in a shift of customer preference away from our offerings.
In addition, we cannot be certain that others will not develop substantially equivalent or superseding proprietary technology, or that equivalent offerings will not be marketed in competition with our offerings, thereby substantially reducing the value of our proprietary rights. We may not be able to protect our proprietary offerings or technologies via intellectual property rights and any patents not issued might not provide us with any competitive advantages or might be challenged by third parties.
Other Risks Related To Our Overall Business
We are exposed to risks associated with worldwide economic slowdowns and related uncertainties.
We are subject to macroeconomic fluctuations in the U.S. economy and elsewhere. Concerns about consumer and investor confidence, volatile corporate profits and reduced capital spending, international conflicts, terrorist and military activity, civil unrest and pandemic illness could cause a slowdown in sales revenue. In addition, political and social turmoil related to international conflicts and terrorist acts may put further pressure on economic conditions in the United States and abroad.
Macroeconomic issues involving the broader financial markets, including elevated unemployment, consumer access to credit for housing and other purposes, government debt and spending levels and general liquidity issues in the securities markets, have negatively impacted the economy and may negatively affect our business. In addition, weak economic conditions and declines in consumer spending and consumption may harm our operating results. Purchases of our products are discretionary. If the economic climate deteriorates, customers or potential customers could delay, reduce or suspend their purchases of our products. This could impact our business in a number of ways, including lowering prices for our products and reduced or delayed sales. There could be a number of follow-on effects from the recent financial crisis on our business, including insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; customer insolvencies; counterparty failures; and increased expense or inability to obtain future financing.
If weak macroeconomic conditions persist or worsen, our results of operations may be harmed.
Government laws and regulations are evolving and unfavorable changes could harm our business.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet and e-commerce. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede our growth. These regulations and laws may cover taxation, privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, mobile communications, electronic device certification, electronic waste, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, web services, the design and operation of websites, and the characteristics and quality of products and services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, libel, and personal privacy apply to the Internet and e-commerce.
Legislation and regulation in the United States as well as international laws and regulations could result in compliance costs which may reduce our revenue and income, as well as governmental action should our compliance measures not be deemed satisfactory.
We depend on third parties to provide a number of products and services, subjecting us to significant operational risks.
We currently depend on a number of third-party providers, and this reliance subjects us to significant operational risks, any of which could impair our ability to deliver products to our customers should they occur. These risks include:
| |
• | reduced management and control of our data, including the risk of unauthorized disclosure of customer and/or other protected information |
| |
• | reduced control over delivery schedule and quality assurance |
| |
• | misappropriation of our intellectual property |
| |
• | failures by the third parties on whom we rely to comply with all domestic and foreign laws relating to our business |
We have identified a continued material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. We may not detect other weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or at all.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 404"), we are required to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as well as our disclosure controls and procedures each fiscal year.
Management identified a material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, that is not yet fully remediated. The demand on the corporate accounting resources continues to be significant due to the manual nature of controls necessary to maintain effective control over our non-integrated legacy system.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In reaching the conclusion that, as of December 31, 2013, a material weakness existed, management evaluated the criteria established in Internal Control
- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework).
As described in Item 9A(b). Controls and Procedures - Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has made progress in addressing the material weakness but, while these improvements in internal controls are substantial, they have not eliminated our material weakness due to our continued reliance on manual controls and non-integrated legacy systems. Management believes we are addressing those areas of weakness through the implementation of our new integrated enterprise resource planning system beginning in the first quarter of 2014. Given the complexity of the new systems, the implementation may encounter problems and delays which require our continued reliance on manual control procedures.
We cannot be certain in future periods that other control deficiencies that may constitute one or more “significant deficiencies” (as defined by the relevant auditing standards) or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, including any failure to implement or difficulty in implementing required or new or improved controls, our business and results of operations could be harmed, the results of operations we report could be subject to adjustments, we may not be able to provide reasonable assurance as to our financial results or the effectiveness of our internal controls, we may not be able to meet our reporting obligations, we may experience a loss of investor confidence and any of the foregoing could have a negative impact on the trading price of our common stock.
We may encounter difficulties in the implementation or operation of our new enterprise resource planning system.
We are in the process of implementing a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system for our Company. We expect that, once fully implemented, the ERP system will enable us to improve our productivity, stream line processes, make our operations more cost efficient and obtain website, inventory and other financial data timely and accurately. The implementation of the new ERP system has required, and will continue to require, the involvement of significant financial and human resources. In addition, we may not be able to successfully complete the implementation of the new ERP system without experiencing difficulties. Any disruptions, delays or deficiencies in the design and implementation of the new ERP system could adversely affect the Company's business and our financial results.
If we lose key personnel or fail to integrate replacement personnel successfully, our ability to manage our business could be impaired.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain certain key personnel, including management, technical, sales, and other critical personnel. The competition for attracting and retaining key employees is intense. In the Internet and high technology industries, qualified candidates often consider equity awards in compensation arrangements and fluctuations in our stock price may make it difficult to recruit, retain, and motivate employees. The loss of any key employee could result in significant disruptions to our operations, including adversely affecting the timeliness of product releases, the successful implementation and completion of company initiatives, and the results of our operations. In addition, the integration of replacement personnel could be time consuming, may cause additional disruptions to our operations, and may be unsuccessful.
Our stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the closing sale prices of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market ranged from $12.51 to $19.84 per share and the closing sale price on December 31, 2013, the last trading day of the year, was $18.09 per share. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts, the operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable to us, and news reports relating to trends in our markets or general economic conditions.
In addition, the stock market in general and the market prices for Internet-related companies in particular have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance. Additionally, volatility or a lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, all of whom have been granted stock options.
Sales of our common stock by a significant stockholder may cause the price of our common stock to decrease.
Several of our stockholders own significant portions of our common stock. If these stockholders were to sell substantial amounts of their holdings of our common stock, then the market price of our common stock could be negatively impacted. The effect of such sales, or of significant portions of our stock being offered or made available for sale, could result in strong downward pressure on our stock price. Investors should be aware that they could experience significant short-term volatility in our stock if such stockholders decide to sell a substantial amount of their holdings of our common stock at once or within a short period of time.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our principal location is as follows: |
| | | | | | | |
Location | | Purpose | | Approximate Size (in square feet) | | Expiration of Lease |
Fairfax, Virginia | | Corporate headquarters; finance and administration, and business operations | | 17,699 |
| | 2014 |
We believe that our existing properties are in good condition and are adequate and suitable for the conduct of our business.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the normal course of business, we experience routine claims and legal proceedings. The disclosure under the caption “Legal Proceedings” in Note 4. Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements is incorporated by reference into this Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol GKNT. As of February 7, 2014, there were 368 holders of record of our common stock. We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. The high and low closing sales prices, as reported by NASDAQ, of our common stock are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
Quarter | | High | | Low | | High | | Low |
Fourth Quarter | | $ | 19.84 |
| | $ | 16.86 |
| | $ | 19.09 |
| | $ | 14.68 |
|
Third Quarter | | $ | 17.17 |
| | $ | 13.90 |
| | $ | 21.42 |
| | $ | 17.11 |
|
Second Quarter | | $ | 14.72 |
| | $ | 12.51 |
| | $ | 19.82 |
| | $ | 12.68 |
|
First Quarter | | $ | 17.67 |
| | $ | 14.77 |
| | $ | 18.57 |
| | $ | 14.35 |
|
The foregoing reflects interdealer prices without retail markup, markdown, or commissions and may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.
On June 17, 2013, the Company announced the commencement of a modified Dutch tender offer to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of its common stock at a price of not less than $12.00 nor greater than $14.00 per share. The Company's Board of Directors determined it was in the best interest of its stockholders to repurchase shares at that time given its cash position and stock price and the likelihood that the Company's common stock may be removed from the Russell 2000 Index. The Company was subsequently removed from the Russell 2000 Index on June 28, 2013. The tender offer expired on July 15, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, the Company purchased 53,884 shares at $14.00 per share for a total cost of $0.8 million, excluding fees and expenses related to the tender offer. These shares represented approximately 0.81% of the shares outstanding as of July 15, 2013.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth information regarding the Company's purchases of its common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2013.
|
| | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | | Average Price Paid Per Share |
October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013 | | 159 |
| | $ | 19.18 |
|
November 1, 2013 to November 30, 2013 | | — |
| | $ | — |
|
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 | | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Total | | 159 |
| | |
(1) All shares were repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations from restricted stock vestings.
Stock Performance Graph
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the percentage change in the cumulative return to the stockholders of our Common Stock with the cumulative return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index, the S&P 600 SmallCap Internet Retail Index and the RDG Internet Composite (“RDG”) Index for the period commencing July 31, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2013. Returns for the indices are weighted based on market capitalization at the beginning of each measurement point.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
You should read the selected consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction with Part II Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and with Part II Item 8. Financial statements and Financial Data and the related notes. Historical amounts have been restated to present the results of the Media business sold on September 17, 2012 and Geek.com, which was sold in December 2010, as discontinued operations. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future period.
Summary Financial Information
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 |
Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Net revenue from continuing operations (1) | $138,262 | | $118,913 | | $99,057 | | $76,335 | | $49,091 |
Cost of revenue from continuing operations | 111,145 |
| | 97,848 |
| | 83,602 |
| | 63,036 |
| | 38,343 |
|
Gross margin from continuing operations | 27,117 |
| | 21,065 |
| | 15,455 |
| | 13,299 |
| | 10,748 |
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations (2) | (167 | ) | | 1,805 |
| | (3,447 | ) | | (4,259 | ) | | (7,678 | ) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax (3) | (67 | ) | | 12,102 |
| | 1,932 |
| | (595 | ) | | (6,535 | ) |
Net (loss) income (4) | (234 | ) | | 13,907 |
| | (1,515 | ) | | (4,854 | ) | | (14,213 | ) |
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations: |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic | (0.03 | ) | | 0.28 |
| | (0.55 | ) | | (0.70 | ) | | (1.26 | ) |
Diluted | (0.03 | ) | | 0.28 |
| | (0.55 | ) | | (0.70 | ) | | (1.26 | ) |
(Loss) income per share from discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | (0.01 | ) | | 1.87 |
| | 0.31 |
| | (0.10 | ) | | (1.07 | ) |
Diluted | (0.01 | ) | | 1.85 |
| | 0.31 |
| | (0.10 | ) | | (1.07 | ) |
Net (loss) income per share: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | (0.04 | ) | | 2.15 |
| | (0.24 | ) | | (0.80 | ) | | (2.34 | ) |
Diluted | (0.04 | ) | | 2.12 |
| | (0.24 | ) | | (0.80 | ) | | (2.34 | ) |
Shares used in per share calculation: | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | 6,620 |
| | 6,466 |
| | 6,319 |
| | 6,073 |
| | 6,080 |
|
Diluted | 6,620 |
| | 6,556 |
| | 6,319 |
| | 6,073 |
| | 6,080 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet data: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash, cash equivalents and investments | 53,084 |
| | 57,294 |
| | 36,910 |
| | 35,341 |
| | 38,351 |
|
Working capital | 67,452 |
| | 65,254 |
| | 40,318 |
| | 37,198 |
| | 40,360 |
|
Total assets | 89,706 |
| | 85,872 |
| | 64,292 |
| | 66,757 |
| | 60,151 |
|
Non-current liabilities | — |
| | 29 |
| | 343 |
| | 302 |
| | 225 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | $69,967 | | $69,083 | | $49,781 | | $46,993 | | $47,792 |
| |
(1) | Net revenue from continuing operations has increased significantly over the last five years. Revenues increased 182% percent when comparing the year ended December 31, 2013 to the year ended December 31, 2009. |
| |
(2) | Net income from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2012 is primarily due to the sale of our investment in CollabNet that resulted in a gain on sale of $4.0 million. Net loss from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2011 includes investments in our ThinkGeek business, investments in new leadership and severance costs. Net loss from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2010 includes severance related to leadership changes and the decision to move our corporate headquarters from Mountain View, California to Fairfax, Virginia. Net loss from continuing operations in the year ended December 31, 2009 includes the write down of our investment in CollabNet of $4.6 million and the write down of internally developed software of $1.2 million. |
| |
(3) | (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax in each of the periods presented include Media business revenues, cost of sales and operating and non operating expenses, excluding general corporate costs. The year ended December 31, 2010 also includes $0.2 million of losses from discontinued operations from the sale of Geek.com. |
| |
(4) | Net income of $13.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 included a gain of $13.7 million for the sale of the Company's Media business. |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including the risks discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
We sell collectibles, apparel, gadgets, electronics, toys and other retail products for technology enthusiasts and general consumers through our website and certain exclusive products to our wholesale customers. We offer a broad range of unique products in a single web property that are typically not available in traditional brick-and-mortar stores. We introduce a range of new products to our audience on a regular basis and sell our own innovative GeekLabs products developed in-house. We have several wholesale partnerships with brick-and-mortar retailers that allow us to reach a broader consumer audience and expand our unique brand awareness. We have recently established new relationships and strengthened existing partnerships with certain specialty retail store chains with locations throughout the United States and Canada.
Our business is highly seasonal, reflecting the general pattern associated with the retail industry of peak sales and earnings during the calendar year-end holiday shopping season. In the past several years, a substantial portion of ThinkGeek revenue has occurred in the fourth quarter ending December 31. As is typical in the retail industry, we generally experience lower monthly revenue during the first nine months of the year.
Our business strategy is to increase revenue by expanding the range of new and innovative products we sell, including our exclusive GeekLabs products, to manage gross margin dollars at the product level, and to increase traffic to our website and customer conversion.
Our marketing strategy is focused on acquiring new customers efficiently and building brand loyalty with existing customers to encourage repeat purchases. We market to prospects and customers through all core online marketing channels: email, paid search, affiliate marketing, online display advertising, and social media. Our promotional strategy is focused on providing a range of special offers and sales designed to maximize profitable incremental sales using tried-and-true direct marketing techniques. These offers are programmed around specific themes, including product launches and holidays. We also utilize social networking platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and YouTube to communicate with customers, increase brand awareness and generate interest in our new product launches.
Prior to September 17, 2012, we had two operating segments: e-Commerce and Media. On September 17, 2012 (the “Closing Date”), Geeknet entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Dice Holdings, Inc. (“Dice”) and two of Dice’s subsidiaries, Dice Career Solutions, Inc. and eFinancialCareers Limited (collectively, the “Buyers”) pursuant to which the Buyers purchased our Media business, including the SourceForge, Slashdot and Freecode websites (the “Purchased Business”) and assumed certain related liabilities. In accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Buyers paid us $20.0 million in cash, of which $3.0 million was deposited by the Buyers into an escrow account for a period of twelve months after the Closing Date in order to secure our indemnification obligations to the Buyers for breaches of our representations, warranties, covenants and other obligations under the Purchase Agreement. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company received the $3.0 million held in escrow.
The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, each party has agreed to indemnify the other for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants and other specified matters. The Purchase Agreement generally limits the Company's liability for breaches of representations and warranties made in the Purchase Agreement to an aggregate of $10.0 million. The Purchase Agreement also contains covenants requiring us not to solicit or hire certain employees of the Buyers or compete with the Purchased Business for a period of three years. The Company's representations and warranties made under the Purchase Agreement generally expired on September 17, 2013, although certain representations, warranties and covenants survive pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. The Company and Dice also
agreed to provide certain transition services to one another through December 31, 2013, and the Company has completed providing these services to Dice.
During 2013, we restructured certain areas of the business and hired five new members of the senior leadership team. We believe the knowledge, creativity, experience and passion these talented individuals bring to the business will continue to have a positive impact on our operations in 2014. In addition, effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, we reorganized our management reporting and reportable business segments into two operating segments: Website and Wholesale.
We currently use the following key metrics to measure our sales derived from our website:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Daily unique visitors (in thousands) (1) | 91,212 |
| | 89,330 |
| | 73,076 |
|
Number of orders received (in thousands) (2) | 2,015 |
| | 2,009 |
| | 1,639 |
|
Conversion rate | 2.21 | % | | 2.25 | % | | 2.24 | % |
Average order value received (3) (5) | $ | 59 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 58 |
|
| | | | | |
Number of orders shipped (in thousands) (4) | 2,020 |
| | 2,010 |
| | 1,706 |
|
Average order value shipped (3) (5) | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 55 |
|
| |
(1) | Unique visitors is the total of unique visitors for the website during the periods presented. This data is accumulated daily and can include the same unique visitor on different days. We track unique visitors and the volume of traffic to our website to help us determine the effectiveness of our online marketing efforts. |
| |
(2) | The number of orders received represents all orders placed on the website during each period shown and does not necessarily correlate to revenue recognized during the period. For example, some orders placed on the website at the end of a reporting period are recognized as revenue in the subsequent reporting period because delivery had not yet occurred. |
| |
(3) | Average order value received or shipped is calculated by the total sales for orders received or shipped divided by the number of orders received or shipped, excluding wholesale orders. Average order value can vary depending on, but not limited to, seasonality, promotions, the competitive environment and economic conditions. |
| |
(4) | The number of orders shipped represents all orders associated with the amount of revenue recognized for ThinkGeek for the period presented, excluding wholesale revenue. |
| |
(5) | Average order value received and Average order value shipped has previously been shown including wholesale orders. Due to the increase in our wholesale revenues in the current year, we determined showing these amounts excluding wholesale orders will provide a more comparable basis. As such, Average order value received and Average order value shipped has been adjusted in all periods shown to reflect this change. |
In addition to our website sales, we also had sales through our wholesale channel of $22.4 million, $7.0 million, and $5.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. These wholesale revenues primarily consisted of sales of certain unique licensed ThinkGeek products.
Due to the fact that we are an e-commerce business, we have systems and processes in place to protect our business, website and customer information from cyber attacks or breaches. In March 2013, there was a Distributed Denial of Service (“DDoS”) cyber attack on our website that we were able to mitigate after several hours. Loss of revenue from the DDoS was insignificant. The systems and processes we have in place, and strive to continually improve, are designed to reduce the impact or prevent a cyber security attack or breach; however, they do not provide absolute security.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. Those judgments are based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management’s current judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our financial statements,
areas that are particularly significant include revenue recognition, orders in transit, provision for returns, inventory valuation, Geek Point accruals, stock-based compensation and income taxes.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sale price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Net revenue for the Website segment is derived from the online sale of consumer goods. Website net revenue includes shipping and is presented net of returns and allowances, discounts and sales taxes. Net revenue for the Wholesale segment is derived primarily from the sale of certain exclusive products through our wholesale channel. Wholesale net revenue is presented net of discounts or allowances.
Website revenue is deferred for orders shipped but not delivered before the end of the period. The amount recorded as deferred revenue is estimated because of our high volume of transactions and the use of multiple shipping carriers. These estimates are used to determine what orders that shipped at the end of the reporting period were delivered and should be recognized as revenue. When calculating these estimates, we consider historical experiences of shipping transit times for domestic and international orders using different carriers. On average, shipping transit times are approximately one to eight business days. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $1.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, were recognized as deferred revenue for orders shipped at the end of the reporting period but not yet delivered to the customer.
We reserve an amount for estimated returns on website orders at the end of each reporting period. We give website customers a 90-day right to return purchased products. These estimates are based on historical patterns and trends of customer returns. Reserves for returns at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $0.5 million, respectively.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories consist primarily of finished goods that are valued at the lower of cost, using the weighted average cost method, or market. We review inventories each quarter and, when required, reduce estimated excess and obsolete inventories to their net realizable values.
Geek Points Accruals
We maintain a customer loyalty program by issuing Geek Points to participating customers for certain purchases of products. Customers can redeem their Geek Points toward future purchases in accordance with program rules and promotions. Geek Points expire three years from the date they are earned. The Company accrues the cost of anticipated redemptions using an estimated redemption rate calculated based on historical experiences and trends. The cost of the redemptions is included in cost of revenues on the Company's consolidated statements of operations. During the first half of 2013, we evaluated the program and revised certain terms and conditions that took effect on August 1, 2013.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure compensation cost for stock awards at grant date fair value and recognize the expense net of estimated forfeitures for shares expected to vest over the service period of the award.
Calculating compensation expense for stock options requires the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected term of the stock option grant, stock price volatility, interest rates and the forfeiture rate. The fair value of the option grants are calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected life is based on historical settlement patterns. Expected volatility is based on the historical implied volatility of our stock. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical trends of our stock-based awards that cancel.
Income Taxes
We have recognized a deferred tax asset associated with previously reported net operating losses, which can result in a future tax benefit. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have recognized a valuation allowance for the full amount of the deferred tax asset as there is insufficient evidence to support that it is more-likely-than-not that the assets will be realized. We review our valuation allowance at each reporting period using, but not limited to, forecasted financial information to determine if the deferred tax assets could more-likely-than-not be realized and after considering the impact of limits on the use of net operating loss carryforwards in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
We provide for uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon management's assessment of whether a tax benefit is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.
Contingencies and Litigation
We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims. We assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of any loss contingency required is assessed and recorded, if probable, after careful analysis of each individual matter. The required loss contingencies may change in the future as the facts and circumstances of each matter change.
Results of Operations and Discontinued Operations
The following table sets forth our operating results for the periods indicated as a percentage of net revenue, represented by selected items from the consolidated statements of operations. This table should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in this Form 10-K.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | | | | |
Net revenue | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of revenue | 80.4 |
| | 82.3 |
| | 84.4 |
|
Gross margin | 19.6 | % | | 17.7 | % | | 15.6 | % |
Operating expenses: | |
| | |
| | |
Sales and marketing | 8.6 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 8.8 |
|
Technology and design | 4.4 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 1.9 |
|
General and administrative | 6.7 |
| | 8.4 |
| | 9.6 |
|
Total operating expenses | 19.7 | % | | 19.4 | % | | 20.3 | % |
Loss from operations | (0.1 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (4.7 | ) |
Gain on sale of non-marketable securities | — |
| | 3.4 |
| | — |
|
Interest and other (expense) income, net | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | (0.1 | ) | | 1.6 |
| | (4.7 | ) |
Income tax benefit | — |
| | — |
| | (1.1 | ) |
Net (loss) income from continuing operations | (0.1 | )% | | 1.5 | % | | (3.5 | )% |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | — | % | | 10.2 | % | | 2.0 | % |
Net (loss) income | (0.2 | )% | | 11.7 | % | | (1.5 | )% |
Net Revenue
Net revenue is derived from the online sale of consumer goods ("Website") and through our wholesale channel ("Wholesale"). Net revenue includes shipping and is presented net of returns and allowances and sales taxes. These consumer goods are typically collectibles, apparel, electronics, toys, gadgets, edibles, geek-themed and other specialty or unique items. Our customers are technology enthusiasts and general consumers. We sell and ship our products domestically and internationally.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Website revenue | $ | 115,909 |
| | $ | 111,938 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 111,938 |
| | $ | 93,691 |
| | 19 | % |
Wholesale revenue | 22,353 |
| | 6,975 |
| | 220 | % | | 6,975 |
| | 5,366 |
| | 30 | % |
Net revenue | $ | 138,262 |
| | $ | 118,913 |
| | 16 | % | | $ | 118,913 |
| | $ | 99,057 |
| | 20 | % |
Net revenue increased $19.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the prior period. This was primarily due to an increase in revenue through our wholesale channel and an increase in website revenue driven by higher daily unique visitors and average order value shipped. Net revenue increased $19.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase in the number of orders placed through our website and a slight increase in the revenue through our wholesale channel.
During 2013, we introduced a number of new products that included unique theme-based products developed in our GeekLabs. Our best selling products during 2013 were licensed products that related to Minecraft, Doctor Who, Star Wars and Star Trek. Our internally developed Minecraft foam pickaxe and Minecraft foam sword continued to be best sellers throughout the year. Other popular licensed products this year were the Doctor Who TARDIS throw blanket, the Bag of Holding messenger bag, Portal themed products, and the Star Trek pizza cutter. We are authorized to sell our unique GeekLabs products with licensed themes such as StarWars, StarTrek or Minecraft through the relationships we have with Lucas Films, CBS and Mojang, respectively.
Website
Website revenue increased $4.0 million and $18.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as compared to their respective prior periods. Daily unique visitors increased from 89.3 million to 91.2 million and average order value for shipped orders from the website improved from $56 to $57 during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the prior year. These improvements are due to increased sales of GeekLabs and exclusive products, customers taking advantage of certain sales promotions and free shipping, and website enhancements that allow customers to more easily identify products of interest.
ThinkGeek products are sold in the United States and internationally. Website revenues for international orders were $24.2 million, $22.3 million, and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The increase in international sales is primarily attributable to our offering a more economical international shipping option throughout the year.
Wholesale
Wholesale revenue increased $15.4 million and $1.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as compared to their respective prior periods. This increase is the result of strengthened relationships with our existing clients and acquiring new clients who have particular interest in certain unique licensed ThinkGeek products. During 2013, we executed wholesale agreements with several large retailers. These retailers are in the toy, gaming and pop culture industries and have many brick-and-mortar locations throughout the United States and Canada. Some of our current wholesale clients are Target, Walmart, Toys "R" Us, f.y.e., Meijer, Books-A-Million and Hot Topic. We continue to diversify our product offerings by introducing new products, including our innovative GeekLabs products and expanding licensing partnerships.
Cost of Revenue / Gross Margin
Cost of revenue consists of product, shipping and fulfillment costs and personnel and related overhead expenses associated with the operations and merchandising functions.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | |
Website cost of revenue | $ | 96,458 |
| | $ | 92,758 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 92,758 |
| | $ | 79,568 |
| | 17 | % |
Wholesale cost of revenue | 14,687 |
| | 5,090 |
| | 189 | % | | 5,090 |
| | 4,034 |
| | 26 | % |
Total cost of revenue | $ | 111,145 |
| | $ | 97,848 |
| | 14 | % | | $ | 97,848 |
| | $ | 83,602 |
| | 17 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross Margin | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total gross margin | $ | 27,117 |
| | $ | 21,065 |
| | 29 | % | | $ | 21,065 |
| | $ | 15,455 |
| | 36 | % |
Total gross margin % | 19.6 | % | | 17.7 | % | | | | 17.7 | % | | 15.6 | % | | |
Website gross margin % | 16.8 | % | | 17.1 | % | | | | 17.1 | % | | 15.1 | % | | |
Wholesale gross margin % | 34.3 | % | | 27.0 | % | | | | 27.0 | % | | 24.8 | % | | |
Gross margin as a percentage of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by approximately two percentage points from the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase is primarily due to higher sales of our unique GeekLabs products which generally have higher gross margins and improved margins from sales through our wholesale channel, despite higher royalty fees as a percentage of revenues. Gross margin as a percentage of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by approximately two percentage points from the year ended December 31, 2011, due to a decrease in personnel and related overhead expenses. During the first quarter of 2012, we began outsourcing our customer service department. We also redirected a portion of our workforce from merchandising, included as cost of revenue, to developing our own innovative products in our GeekLabs, included in technology and design. Also contributing to better margins was the reduction of shipping costs due to renegotiations with our largest shipping supplier.
We are continually analyzing gross margins by product and category levels to ensure that product mix and product costs are in line with our gross margin expectations. We work to manage gross margins through negotiations with our vendors to reduce product, materials and in-bound shipping costs.
Website
Gross margin as a percentage of revenue for Website remained constant at approximately 17% when comparing the year ended December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2012. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue for Website increased by two percentage points for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011 primarily due to lower shipping costs as a percentage of revenue.
Website cost of revenues increased $3.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in shipping costs of $3.1 million and an increase in royalty fees of $1.5 million. These costs were partially offset by a decrease in product costs of $0.5 million and cost savings of approximately $0.5 million in our customer service department. Shipping costs increased as a result of higher sales in the current year, and offering free upgraded shipping to our customers during the holiday season.
Website cost of revenues increased $13.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase in product costs of $11.7 million, an increase of royalty fees of $0.8 million and an increase in shipping costs of $0.7 million. The aforementioned increases were due to the increase in revenues and the number of orders. Royalties increased due to a higher volume of sales of our licensed product lines.
Wholesale
Gross margin as a percentage of revenue for Wholesale increased by approximately seven percentage points when comparing the year ended December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2012. This increase is primarily due to lower product costs as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by higher royalty fees and higher packaging and fulfillment costs as percentages of revenue. Wholesale product costs are lower as a percentage of revenue because we primarily sell GeekLabs products through our wholesale channel which generally have higher product margins. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue for Wholesale increased by approximately two percentage points for the year ended
December 31, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011 primarily due to lower product and shipping costs as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by higher royalty fees as a percentage of revenue.
Wholesale cost of revenues increased $9.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase in product costs of $4.4 million, an increase in royalty fees of $3.5 million, and an increase in packaging and fulfillment costs of $1.2 million. Product and packaging and fulfillment costs increased as a result of higher sales to our wholesale clients in the current year period compared to the prior year period. Royalty payments to our third-party licensors increased primarily as a result of higher sales of licensed products through our wholesale channel. Wholesale cost of revenues increased $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase of royalty fees of $0.8 million. Royalties increased due to a higher volume of sales of our licensed product lines.
Operating Expenses
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and related overhead expenses, including sales commissions, marketing and sales support functions, as well as costs associated with advertising and promotional activities.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | $ | 11,888 |
| | $ | 9,184 |
| | 29 | % | | $ | 9,184 |
| | $ | 8,681 |
| | 6 | % |
Percentage of total net revenue | 9 | % | | 8 | % | | | | 8 | % | | 9 | % | | |
Sales and marketing expenses increased $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to an increase of $2.5 million in marketing expenses related to market research, affiliate partnerships, paid search and online display advertising. Sales and marketing expenses were also higher due to an increase of $0.3 million in electronic payment services and credit card fees, and an increase of $0.3 million in accrued bonus and commission expense. These expenses were partially offset by a savings of $0.4 million in printed catalogs. The marketing related expenses increase is due to implementing new programs and building on existing marketing programs to attract more attention and visitors to our website. We also retained consultants to assist us in researching marketing matters such as revising certain terms and conditions of our Geek Points program and a market study of our current and potential customers. Electronic payment services and credit card fees have increased due to a higher volume of transactions. The savings in printed catalogs is due to the discontinuance of printed catalogs in the second half of 2012.
Sales and marketing expenses increased $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase of $0.7 million in personnel and related overhead expenses due to an increase in personnel in our marketing workforce as compared to 2011 and severance costs of $0.1 million. Also contributing to the increase was $0.1 million in marketing services and public relations costs used to increase brand awareness and traffic to our website. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $0.4 million in marketing expenses primarily due to the discontinuance of printed catalogs in the second half of 2012.
Technology and Design Expenses
Technology and design expenses consist of personnel and related overhead expenses for GeekLabs and developers that design and create new products to sell on our ThinkGeek website. It also includes personnel and related overhead and technology expenses for our engineering group that work to continually improve website design, functionality and capacity. We expense all of our technology and design costs as they are incurred.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Technology and design | $ | 6,076 |
| | $ | 3,968 |
| | 53 | % | | $ | 3,968 |
| | $ | 1,857 |
| | 114 | % |
Percentage of total net revenue | 4 | % | | 3 | % | | | | 3 | % | | 2 | % | | |
Technology and design expenses increased $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. This is primarily due to an increase of $0.9 million in personnel and related overhead expenses, an increase of $0.8 million in database costs, and an increase of approximately $0.3 million in equipment and facility related costs. We have hired specialists in custom manufacturing for our GeekLabs group, and we have hired specialists to support the infrastructure and functionality of the Company's website and reporting systems for our engineering group.
Technology and design expenses increased $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to our increased focus on testing and developing our own GeekLabs innovative products. We redirected a portion of our workforce and hired new employees for our internal development center, GeekLabs, which resulted in an increase of $1.2 million in personnel and related overhead expenses. Also contributing to the increase were $0.2 million in fees related to developing prototypes of GeekLabs custom products and $0.4 million rent expense for equipment used in our data recovery site built in 2012.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and related expenses for finance and accounting, human resources and legal personnel, professional fees for accounting and legal services as well as insurance and other public company related costs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative | $ | 9,296 |
| | $ | 10,001 |
| | (7 | )% | | $ | 10,001 |
| | $ | 9,501 |
| | 5 | % |
Percentage of total net revenue | 7 | % | | 8 | % | | | | 8 | % | | 10 | % | | |
General and administrative expenses decreased $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to a decrease of $0.9 million in stock based compensation and a decrease of $0.3 million in salaries and accrued bonus expenses, partially offset by an increase of $0.4 million in recruiting fees. Stock based compensation is lower due to the departure of key senior management over the past year. Recruiting fees are higher due to new executive hires.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase in professional services fees of $0.4 million, an increase in business consulting services of $0.3 million and an increase of $0.2 million in stock-based compensation. These increases were partially offset by severance costs of $0.6 million that occurred in 2011 primarily related to the resignation of our ThinkGeek Chief Executive Officer. During the second half of 2012, we transitioned part of our product safety and quality assurance function in-house. Prior to the transition we were relying solely on third-party vendors to perform these services. We have invested in certified personnel, who are highly qualified in conducting safety and quality assurance testing. We believe this dedicated in-house function will enable us to improve the quality of our products, minimize defective products, react in a timely manner and continue to exceed industry standards.
Gain on Sale of Non-Marketable Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
($ in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of non-marketable securities | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,021 |
| | nm | | $ | 4,021 |
| | $ | — |
| | nm |
nm= not meaningful
On April 5, 2012, we sold our Series C-1 preferred stock investment in CollabNet, Inc. to a third party for $6.0 million. The carrying value of the investment at the time of the sale was $2.0 million and as such, a gain of $4.0 million was recognized during 2012.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
($ in thousands) | | | | | |
Income tax provision (benefit) | $ | — |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (1,137 | ) |
The income tax benefit recognized in 2011 is offset by a tax provision in discontinued operations as there was a loss in continuing operations and income in discontinued operations in that same year. There was not a similar benefit in 2013 and 2012 as there was loss or income in both continuing and discontinued operations in those years.
In 2012, we performed a study addressing the recoverability of our net operating loss carryforwards. The results of the study indicated that there was a change of control as defined by section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) in 2008. As a result of the change of control, certain net operating losses previously included in our deferred tax disclosures will not be available to offset future taxable income as the IRC limits the annual utilization of these carryforwards. In the finalization of the 382 study in 2013, additional limitations were identified. Based upon receipt of the final report in the first quarter of 2013, the amount previously reported at December 31, 2012 as net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in 2013 and beyond of $35.5 million was reduced to $18.9 million, subject to annual limitations. Consistent with what we have done historically, we continue to fully reduce the net operating loss carryforwards and all other deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. This is due to our conclusion that it is more-likely-than-not that we would not recover the deferred tax assets. The amount of net operating losses available to offset taxable income in 2014 and beyond as of December 31, 2013 is $19.1 million. Additionally, the Company does not have a history of taxable income, therefore we have not recorded a benefit on the loss for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
($ in thousands) | | | | | |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | (1,509 | ) | | $ | 2,986 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | — |
| | $ | 13,712 |
| | — |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision from discontinued operations | (52 | ) | | 101 |
| | 1,054 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | 12,102 |
| | $ | 1,932 |
|
Due to the sale of our Media business on September 17, 2012, the results of the Media business are classified as (Loss) income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The results include Media business revenues, cost of sales and operating and non-operating expenses, excluding previously allocated general corporate costs.
On September 17, 2012, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Dice and two of Dice's subsidiaries, (collectively, the "Buyers") pursuant to which the Buyers purchased the Company's Media business segment, including the SourceForge, Slashdot and Freecode websites (the "Purchased Business") and assumed certain related liabilities. In accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Buyers paid the Company $20.0 million in cash of which $3.0 million was deposited by the Buyers into an escrow account. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company received the $3.0 million held in escrow. The $13.7 million gain on the sale of the Media business segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 is the selling price of $20.0 million less the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities assumed by the Buyers, offset by transaction costs of $1.1 million.
The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2013 represents federal and state tax receivables as a result of overpayments. The tax provision recorded on discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 represents the tax based upon the with and without method. The 2012 tax provision is significantly lower than the statutory rate as a result of net operating losses with a full valuation allowance. The tax provision for 2011 is offset by a tax benefit in continuing operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
($ in thousands) | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net cash (used in) provided by: | | | | | |
Continuing operations | | | | | |
Operating activities | $ | (5,975 | ) | | $ | (1,883 | ) | | $ | 1,070 |
|
Investing activities | 2,784 |
| | 21,787 |
| | (827 | ) |
Financing activities | (980 | ) | | (849 | ) | | 658 |
|
Discontinued operations | (39 | ) | | 1,329 |
| | 676 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (4,210 | ) | | $ | 20,384 |
| | $ | 1,577 |
|
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities increased $4.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. This was primarily due to a higher use of cash to fund changes in operating assets and liabilities of approximately $4.4 million, driven primarily by an increase in accounts receivable from our wholesale customers. This increase was partially offset by the change in our loss from operations, as adjusted for non-cash items of approximately $0.3 million.
Net cash used in operating activities increased $3.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in changes in assets and liabilities of $5.2 million, offset by improved profitability from continuing operations of $1.2 million, excluding the $4.0 million gain on sale of non-marketable securities and an increase in stock-based compensation of $0.5 million. The changes in assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in cash used to purchase inventory of $12.2 million, an increase of prepaid expenses of $2.3 million, other assets and liabilities of $2.8 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $12.1 million.
Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $2.8 million included $3.0 million in proceeds, previously held in escrow, from the sale of the Media business.
Cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $21.8 million included proceeds of $17.0 million for the sale of the Company's Media business and proceeds of $6.0 million for the sale of the Company's series C-1 preferred stock investment in CollabNet, Inc., partially offset by $1.1 million in transaction costs and $0.1 million in investments in property and equipment.
Cash used in investing activities for year ended December 31, 2011 of $0.8 million was primarily due to the expansion of our distribution equipment at our third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider and purchases of property and equipment related to computer and equipment and leasehold improvements for relocating our corporate
headquarters from Mountain View, California to Fairfax, Virginia. This was partially offset by cash received from the sale of intangible assets that had occurred in 2010.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $1.0 million included $0.8 million for the repurchase of 53,884 common stock in conjunction with the modified Dutch tender offer, $0.5 million for the repurchase of our common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose from the vesting of restricted stock, partially offset by $0.3 million cash provided by the issuance of common stock from stock option exercises.
Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 of $0.8 million included $1.2 million for the repurchase of our common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose from the vesting of restricted stock, partially offset by $0.4 million cash provided by the issuance of common stock from stock option exercises.
Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 of $0.7 million included $1.0 million in cash provided by the issuance of common stock from stock option exercises, partially offset by $0.4 million of repurchases of our common stock.
Cash Flows From Discontinued Operations
Cash flows from discontinued operations includes operating and investing activities that have been reported separately in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The absence of cash flows from discontinued operations in our ongoing operations is not expected to materially impact our future cash flow or liquidity due to the relatively modest amounts historically contributed by the discontinued operations.
Liquidity
Our liquidity and capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including our investment in inventory to support our business, the timing of the collection of our accounts receivables from our wholesale customers, market acceptance of our products, the resources we devote to developing, marketing, selling and supporting our products and website, the timing and expense associated with expanding our distribution channels, potential acquisitions and other factors.
On December 12, 2011, we entered into a secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), that provided us with a $5 million revolving line of credit including a $2 million sub-facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The revolving credit facility has the option of an applicable interest rate of 2.5% above one or three month LIBOR. We renewed the revolving credit facility during the fourth quarter of 2013, and the facility now expires October 15, 2014. To date, we have not drawn down on our line of credit and have no plans to do so at this time. As part of our agreement we must keep a minimum of $5 million in bank accounts at Wells Fargo at all times. This credit line is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. As of December 31, 2013, the borrowing capacity of our line of credit was reduced by a letter of credit outstanding with one of our vendors for less than $0.1 million.
We expect to devote capital resources to continue:
| |
• | investing in engineering and infrastructure that will provide us with opportunities and capabilities to support future growth; |
| |
• | improving our website user experience and functionality; |
| |
• | investing in marketing programs to expand our brand awareness; |
•investing and improving product safety and quality assurance testing;
•developing unique exclusive GeekLabs products;
•investing in human resources and leadership;
•investing in capital projects that support our distribution and related support systems;
•optimizing supplier and manufacturer relationships; and
•investing in other general corporate activities.
Stock Repurchase Program
On June 17, 2013, the Company announced the commencement of a modified Dutch tender offer to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of its common stock at a price of not less than $12.00 nor greater than $14.00 per share. The
Company's Board of Directors determined it was in the best interest of its stockholders to repurchase shares at that time given its cash position and stock price and the likelihood that the Company's common stock may be removed from the Russell 2000 Index. The Company was subsequently removed from the Russell 2000 Index on June 28, 2013. The tender offer expired on July 15, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, the Company purchased 53,884 shares at $14.00 per share for a total cost of $0.8 million, excluding fees and expenses related to the tender offer. These shares represented approximately 0.81% of the shares outstanding as of July 15, 2013.
Contractual Obligations
The contractual obligations presented in the table below represent our estimates of future payments under fixed contractual obligations and other commitments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments due by period |
| Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | Thereafter |
Operating Lease Obligations (1) | $ | 255 |
| | $ | 255 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Purchase Obligations (2) | 1,212 |
| | 963 |
| | 249 |
| | — |
|
Total Obligations | $ | 1,467 |
| | $ | 1,218 |
| | $ | 249 |
| | $ | — |
|
(1) Includes future payments for the Company's facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2014.
(2) Includes a one-time termination fee of approximately $0.2 million that we would be required to pay to our third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider if we were to cancel our contract with them and also includes committed licensing payments and other service agreements.
Financial Risk Management
We currently face limited exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and we do not engage in hedging activity. We do not anticipate significant currency gains or losses in the near term. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to amend previous guidance for income taxes and requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard update is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have operated primarily in the United States, and all of our sales have been made in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, we have not had any material exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations.
We do not currently hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in hedging activities.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
TABLE OF CONTENTS
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Geeknet, Inc:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Geeknet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2013. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited financial statement schedule II. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Geeknet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Geeknet, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 26, 2014 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 26, 2014
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Geeknet, Inc:
We have audited Geeknet Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control ‑ Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Item 9A(b), Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness related to ineffective process level controls impacting the existence and accuracy of accrued liabilities and cost of revenue as well as ineffective monitoring and management oversight over the process level controls related to the inventory purchase order accrual has been identified and included in management’s assessment in Item 9A(b). We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Geeknet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2013 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated February 26, 2014, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Geeknet Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to corrective actions taken after December 31, 2013, relative to the aforementioned material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 26, 2014
GEEKNET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands) |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
ASSETS |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 53,084 |
| | $ | 57,294 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $6 and $14 as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 9,719 |
| | 1,050 |
|
Inventories, net | 20,186 |
| | 16,657 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 4,202 |
| | 7,013 |
|
Total current assets | 87,191 |
| | 82,014 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 2,465 |
| | 3,523 |
|
Other long-term assets | 50 |
| | 335 |
|
Total assets | $ | 89,706 |
| | $ | 85,872 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
Current liabilities: | |
| | |
|
Accounts payable | $ | 10,250 |
| | $ | 10,192 |
|
Deferred revenue | 2,828 |
| | 2,303 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other | 6,661 |
| | 4,265 |
|
Total current liabilities | 19,739 |
| | 16,760 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 29 |
|
Total liabilities | 19,739 |
| | 16,789 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4) |
|
| |
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: | |
| | |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized — 25,000; issued — 6,901 and 6,738 shares, as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively; outstanding — 6,639 and 6,555 shares as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 7 |
| | 7 |
|
Treasury stock, 263 shares at December 31, 2013 and 183 shares at December 31, 2012 | (3,479 | ) | | (2,182 | ) |
Additional paid-in capital | 816,826 |
| | 814,411 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 16 |
| | 16 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (743,403 | ) | | (743,169 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 69,967 |
| | 69,083 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 89,706 |
| | $ | 85,872 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GEEKNET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net revenue | $ | 138,262 |
|
| $ | 118,913 |
| | $ | 99,057 |
|
Cost of revenue | 111,145 |
|
| 97,848 |
| | 83,602 |
|
Gross margin | 27,117 |
|
| 21,065 |
| | 15,455 |
|
Operating expenses: | |
|
| |
| | |
|
Sales and marketing | 11,888 |
|
| 9,184 |
| | 8,681 |
|
Technology and design | 6,076 |
|
| 3,968 |
| | 1,857 |
|
General and administrative | 9,296 |
|
| 10,001 |
| | 9,501 |
|
Total operating expenses | 27,260 |
|
| 23,153 |
| | 20,039 |
|
Loss from operations | (143 | ) |
| (2,088 | ) | | (4,584 | ) |
Gain on sale of non-marketable securities | — |
| | 4,021 |
| | — |
|
Interest and other (expense) income, net | (24 | ) |
| (122 | ) | | — |
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | (167 | ) |
| 1,811 |
| | (4,584 | ) |
Income tax provision (benefit) | — |
|
| 6 |
| | (1,137 | ) |
Net (loss) income from continuing operations | (167 | ) | | 1,805 |
| | (3,447 | ) |
Discontinued operations: | | | | | |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | (67 | ) | | 12,102 |
| | 1,932 |
|
Net (loss) income | $ | (234 | ) | | $ | 13,907 |
| | $ | (1,515 | ) |
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | (0.55 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | (0.55 | ) |
(Loss) income per share from discontinued operations: | |
|
| |
| | |
|
Basic | $ | (0.01 | ) |
| $ | 1.87 |
| | $ | 0.31 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 1.85 |
| | $ | 0.31 |
|
Net (loss) income per share: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 2.15 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 2.12 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Shares used in per share calculations: | |
|
| |
| | |
|
Basic | 6,620 |
| | 6,466 |
| | 6,319 |
|
Diluted | 6,620 |
| | 6,556 |
| | 6,319 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GEEKNET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ | (234 | ) | | $ | 13,907 |
| | $ | (1,515 | ) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation (loss) income | — |
| | 17 |
| | (11 | ) |
Comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (234 | ) | | $ | 13,924 |
| | $ | (1,526 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GEEKNET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Accumulated Deficit | | Total Stockholders' Equity |
| Shares | | Amount | | | | | |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010 | 6,273 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (622 | ) | | $ | 803,160 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | (755,561 | ) | | $ | 46,993 |
|
Issuance of common stock | 88 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1,013 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,014 |
|
Repurchase of restricted stock | — |
| | — |
| | (356 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (356 | ) |
Stock based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,656 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,656 |
|
Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,515 | ) | | (1,515 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2011 | 6,361 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | (978 | ) | | $ | 807,829 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (757,076 | ) | | $ | 49,781 |
|
Issuance of common stock | 194 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 355 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 355 |
|
Repurchase of restricted stock | — |
| | — |
| | (1,204 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,204 | ) |
Stock based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,227 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,227 |
|
Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,907 |
| | 13,907 |
|
Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 | 6,555 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | (2,182 | ) | | $ | 814,411 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | (743,169 | ) | | $ | 69,083 |
|
Issuance of common stock | 172 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 317 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 317 |
|
Repurchase of restricted stock | (34 | ) | | — |
| | (543 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (543 | ) |
Repurchase of common stock | (54 | ) | | — |
| | (754 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (754 | ) |
Stock based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,098 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,098 |
|
Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (234 | ) | | (234 | ) |
Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 | 6,639 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | (3,479 | ) | | $ | 816,826 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | (743,403 | ) | | $ | 69,967 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GEEKNET, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cash flows from operating activities from continuing operations: | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | $ | (234 | ) | | $ | 13,907 |
| | $ | (1,515 | ) |
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax | 67 |
| | (12,102 | ) | | (1,932 | ) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations | (167 | ) | | 1,805 |
| | (3,447 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile (loss) income from continuing operations to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
Depreciation | 1,258 |
| | 1,394 |
| | 1,203 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | 2,070 |
| | 3,559 |
| | 3,017 |
|
Provision for bad debts | 70 |
| | 38 |
| | 29 |
|
Change in reserve for excess and obsolete inventory | (15 | ) | | 120 |
| | 65 |
|
Gain on sale of non-marketable securities | — |
| | (4,021 | ) | | — |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets, net | 16 |
| | 53 |
| | (139 | ) |
Impairment of investments | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | (8,739 | ) | | (322 | ) | | 14 |
|
Inventories | (3,514 | ) | | (7,842 | ) | | 4,322 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 96 |
| | (1,855 | ) | | 450 |
|
Accounts payable | 58 |
| | 4,636 |
| | (7,482 | ) |
Deferred revenue | 525 |
| | 744 |
| | 2,287 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other | 2,396 |
| | 122 |
| | 678 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | (29 | ) | | (314 | ) | | 65 |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (5,975 | ) | | (1,883 | ) | | 1,070 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | |
| | |
Purchase of property and equipment | (216 | ) | | (113 | ) | | (1,733 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of non-marketable equity investment | — |
| | 6,000 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | 3,000 |
| | 17,000 |
| | — |
|
Transaction costs from sale of discontinued operations | — |
| | (1,100 | ) | | — |
|
Proceeds from sales of intangible assets, net | — |
| | — |
| | 906 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 2,784 |
| | 21,787 |
| | (827 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | |
| | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 317 |
| | 355 |
| | 1,014 |
|
Repurchase of stock | (1,297 | ) | | (1,204 | ) | | (356 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (980 | ) | | (849 | ) | | 658 |
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations: | | | | | |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (39 | ) | | 2,395 |
| | 1,479 |
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities | — |
| | (1,066 | ) | | (803 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations | (39 | ) | | 1,329 |
| | 676 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (4,210 | ) | | 20,384 |
| | 1,577 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 57,294 |
| | 36,910 |
| | 35,333 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 53,084 |
| | $ | 57,294 |
| | $ | 36,910 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GEEKNET, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Operations of the Company
Overview
Geeknet, Inc. ("Geeknet") and its subsidiary, ThinkGeek, Inc. (“Thinkgeek,”) and together with Geeknet, the "Company"), sells collectibles, apparel, gadgets, electronics, toys and other retail products for technology enthusiasts and general consumers through its ThinkGeek.com website (the "website") and certain exclusive products to the Company's wholesale channel customers. ThinkGeek offers a broad range of unique products in a single web property that are typically not available in traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The Company introduces a range of new products to ThinkGeek audiences on a regular basis. Some ThinkGeek products are custom made and developed by the Company's product development team ("GeekLabs"). The Company has several wholesale partnerships with brick-and-mortar retailers that allows the Company to reach a broader consumer audience and expand its unique brand. The Company has recently established and strengthened existing partnerships with certain retail store chains that have locations throughout the United States and Canada.
Effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company reorganized its management reporting and reportable business segments into two operating segments: Website and Wholesale. Prior to September 17, 2012, the Company had two operating segments: e-Commerce and Media. On September 17, 2012, Geeknet sold its Media business to Dice Holdings, Inc.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The results of the Company's Media business, which was sold on September 17, 2012, are classified as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations. The cash flows from the Media business' operating and investing activities are shown separately in cash flows from discontinued operations, with the exception of proceeds from the sale of the Media business and related transaction costs. See Note 9. Discontinued Operations for additional information.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. In the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012, there was $1.4 million of accrued royalties included in Accounts payable that has been reclassified to Accrued liabilities and other. In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows at December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were $1.0 million and $0.5 million of accrued royalties included in Accounts payable that have been reclassified to Accrued liabilities and other.
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of such financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods indicated. Estimates include, but are not limited to, orders in transit at the end of the reporting period, provision for returns, inventory valuation, Geek Point accruals, stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has not recently adopted any new accounting pronouncements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance to amend previous guidance for income taxes and requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit,
should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard update is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.
Principles of Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Segment and Geographic Information
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief decision-making group is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Due to the growth in the Company's wholesale business during 2013, the Company changed its management reporting and reportable business segments into two operating segments: Website and Wholesale. The Website segment sells geek-themed retail products to technology enthusiasts and general consumers through the website. The Wholesale segment sells primarily exclusive GeekLabs products through retailers and brick-and-mortar stores.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist principally of cash deposited in money market and checking accounts.
Credit Line
On December 12, 2011, the Company entered into a secured credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), that provided us with a $5 million revolving line of credit including a $2 million sub-facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit. The revolving credit facility has the option of an applicable interest rate of 2.5% above one or three month LIBOR. The revolving credit facility was renewed during the fourth quarter of 2013, and now expires October 15, 2014. To date, we have not drawn down on our line of credit and have no plans to do so at this time. As part of our agreement we must keep a minimum of $5 million in bank accounts at Wells Fargo Bank at all times. This credit line is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. As of December 31, 2013, the borrowing capacity of our line of credit was reduced by a letter of credit outstanding with one of our vendors for less than $0.1 million.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company holds certain of its cash and cash equivalents in money market funds which are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period using Level 1 inputs, which are considered the most reliable such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The following tables show the fair value of the amounts held in money market funds at each reporting period (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | |
Money market fund deposits | $ | 18,275 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18,275 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2012 |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | |
Money market fund deposits | $ | 18,265 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18,265 |
|
Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are primarily amounts related to customer receivables and are not interest bearing. The Company will record an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially uncollectible trade receivables. The Company also reviews its trade receivables by aging category to identify specific customers with known disputes or collectibility issues. The Company exercises judgment when determining the adequacy of these reserves and evaluates historical bad debt trends, general economic conditions in the United States and internationally, and changes in customer financial conditions.
Inventories, net
Inventories consist primarily of finished goods that are valued at the lower of cost, using the weighted average cost method, or market. Inventories are presented net of an allowance for excess and/or obsolete inventory, which reduces inventories to their estimated net realizable values. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the allowance for excess and/or obsolete inventory was $0.3 million, respectively.
Minimum Royalty and Content License Commitments
Royalty-based obligations are either paid in advance and capitalized as prepaid royalties or accrued as incurred and subsequently paid. Royalty-based obligations paid in advance are generally non-refundable. Royalty-based obligations are expensed to cost of revenues at the contractual royalty rate for the relevant product sales on a per transaction basis. Contracts with some licensors include minimum guaranteed royalty payments, which are payable regardless of the ultimate volume of sales. Prepaid royalties were $0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Royalty-based obligations were $4.0 million and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Accrued royalty obligations are classified as accrued liabilities and other in the consolidated balance sheets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful lives or the corresponding lease term.
Net Revenue
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sale price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Net revenue for the Website segment is derived from the online sale of consumer goods. Website net revenue includes shipping and is presented net of returns and allowances, discounts and sales taxes. Net revenue for the Wholesale segment is derived from the sale of certain exclusive products through the wholesale channel. Wholesale net revenue is presented net of discounts or allowances.
Website revenue is deferred for orders shipped but not delivered before the end of the period. The amount recorded as deferred revenue is estimated because of the Company's high volume of transactions and the use of multiple shipping carriers. These estimates are used to determine what orders that shipped at the end of the reporting period were delivered and should be recognized as revenue. When calculating these estimates, the Company considers historical experience of shipping transit times for domestic and international orders using different carriers. On average, shipping transit times are approximately one to eight business days. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $1.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, was recognized as deferred revenue for orders shipped by the end of the reporting period but not yet delivered to the customer.
The Company also engages in the sale of gift certificates. When a gift certificate is sold, Website revenue is deferred until the certificate is redeemed and the products are delivered. Deferred revenue at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 relating to gift certificates was $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
The Company reserves an amount for estimated returns on website orders at the end of each reporting period. The Company gives website customers a 90-day right to return purchased products purchased. These estimates are based on historical patterns and trends of customer returns. Reserves for returns at December 31, 2013 and December
31, 2012 were $0.5 million each respectively, and are recorded as accrued liabilities and other in the consolidated balance sheets.
Geek Points Loyalty Program
The Company maintains a customer loyalty program by issuing Geek Points to participating customers for certain purchases of products. Customers can redeem their Geek Points toward future purchases in accordance with program rules and promotions. Geek Points expire three years from the date they are earned. The Company accrues the cost of anticipated redemptions using an estimated redemption rate calculated based on historical experiences and trends. The cost of the redemptions is included in cost of revenues on the Company's consolidated statements of operations. During the first half of 2013, the Company evaluated the program and revised certain terms and conditions that took effect on August 1, 2013.
Income Taxes
The Company has recognized a deferred tax asset associated with previously reported net operating losses, which can result in a future tax benefit. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company has recognized a valuation allowance for the full amount of the deferred tax asset as there is insufficient evidence to support that it is more-likely-than-not that the assets will be realized. The Company reviews its valuation allowance at each reporting period, using, but not limited to, forecasted financial information to determine if the deferred tax assets could more-likely-than-not be realized and after considering the impact of limits on the use of net operating loss carryforwards in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
The Company provides for uncertain tax positions and the related interest and penalties based upon management's assessment of whether a tax benefit is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.
The Company performs Section 382 studies on an as needed basis to analyze if there was a change in control of ownership as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code that could limit the amount of net operating loss carry-forwards available to offset future federal taxable income. The Company completed a Section 382 study in the first quarter of 2013 of which the results are explained in Note 8. Income Taxes.
Computation of Per Share Amounts
Basic earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares are anti-dilutive when their conversion would reduce the loss per share. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2011, respectively, the Company excluded all stock options and restricted stock awards from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share because all such securities were anti-dilutive.
Employee stock options, nonvested shares, and similar equity instruments granted by the Company are treated as potential common shares outstanding in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options, calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
Foreign Currency Translation and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Prior to the sale of the Media business on September 17, 2012, the Company had a wholly-owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom, of which the functional currency was the local currency. Balance sheet accounts were translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates prevailing at balance sheet dates. Revenue and expenses were translated into U.S. dollars at average rates for the period and are included in discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company also has a wholly-owned subsidiary in Belgium of which there has been minimal activity in the periods presented in the Company's consolidated financial statements. Adjustments resulting
from translation were recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders' equity. Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation gains or losses.
Supplier Concentration
While no supplier concentration exists in the Company’s business, certain suppliers that the Company's GeekLabs uses to manufacture its unique products are located outside of the United States, most of which are located in China. ThinkGeek's ability to receive inbound inventory and ship completed orders to its customers is substantially dependent on a single third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
The Company’s investments are held with two reputable financial institutions; both institutions are headquartered in the United States. The Company’s investment policy limits the amount of risk exposure. The Company has cash in financial institutions that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $0.25 million per institution. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents in excess of the FDIC limits.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables in our Wholesale segment due from a limited number of large retailers. The Company provides credit, in the normal course of business, to a number of companies and performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. The credit risk in the Company’s trade receivables is substantially mitigated by its credit evaluation process and reasonably short collection terms. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, if any, and such losses have been within management’s expectations.
For the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, no one customer represented 10% or greater of net revenue.
3. Balance Sheet Components
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Prepaid expenses and deposits for inventory | $ | 3,426 |
| | $ | 2,794 |
|
Escrow receivable (Notes 4 and 9) | — |
| | 3,000 |
|
Other current assets (1) | 776 |
| | 1,219 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 4,202 |
| | $ | 7,013 |
|
(1) Other current assets at December 31, 2012 include $0.7 million receivable from the Buyers of the Media business for performance of transition services that was subsequently collected during the second quarter of 2013.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Computer and office equipment (useful lives of 2 to 4 years) | $ | 377 |
| | $ | 650 |
|
Distribution equipment (useful life of 5 years) | 5,475 |
| | 5,290 |
|
Furniture and fixtures (useful lives of 2 to 4 years) | 150 |
| | 143 |
|
Leasehold improvements (useful lives of lesser of estimated life or lease term) | 214 |
| | 220 |
|
Software (useful lives of 2 to 5 years) | 237 |
| | 393 |
|
Total property and equipment | 6,453 |
| | 6,696 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,988 | ) | | (3,173 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 2,465 |
| | $ | 3,523 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense from continuing operations for property and equipment was $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Non-marketable equity investments
As of December 31, 2011, the Company owned approximately 9% of the outstanding capital stock of CollabNet, Inc. (“CollabNet”), which consisted of shares of CollabNet’s Series C-1 preferred stock. This investment was accounted for under the cost method as the Company held less than 20% of the voting stock of CollabNet and did not otherwise exercise significant influence over CollabNet. On April 5, 2012, the Company sold its Series C-1 preferred stock investment in CollabNet, Inc. to a third party for $6.0 million. The carrying value of the investment at the time of the sale was $2.0 million and as such, a gain of $4.0 million was recognized during 2012.
Accrued liabilities and other
Accrued liabilities and other consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 |
Accrued royalties | $ | 3,959 |
| | $ | 1,449 |
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits | 894 |
| | 1,258 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 1,808 |
| | 1,558 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other | $ | 6,661 |
| | $ | 4,265 |
|
4. Commitments and Contingencies
During September 2012, the Company sold its Media business for $20.0 million of which $3.0 million was deposited by the Buyers into an escrow account for a period of twelve months after the Closing Date in order to secure the Company’s indemnification obligations to the Buyers for breaches of the Company’s representations, warranties, covenants and other obligations under the Purchase Agreement. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company received the $3.0 million held in escrow. The Company's representations and warranties made under the Purchase Agreement generally expired on September 17, 2013, although certain representations, warranties and covenants survive pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. The Company and Dice also agreed to provide certain transition services to one another through December 31, 2013, and the Company has completed providing these services to Dice.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved from time to time, in claims, proceedings and litigation arising in the normal course of business.
On June 10, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint filed by UbiComm LLC in U.S. District Court, for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Number 5,603,054. On September 3, 2013, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which was granted on November 15, 2013. On the same day, Ubicomm appealed the dismissal. Subsequently, two reexamination proceedings have been filed seeking to invalidate the patent at issue and the parties have agreed to stay the matter pending the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Alice
Corp v. CLS Bank. Ubicomm claims that their patent covers a method of triggering an email reminder when a shopper abandons their shopping cart on the website. Ubicomm is seeking damages as well as interest, expenses, costs and an accounting of all allegedly infringing acts. The Company believes the complaint to be without merit. Because of the early stage of this proceeding and lack of specific damages claims, we cannot predict the ultimate impact (if any) that this matter may have on our business, results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
On October 21, 2013, the Company was served with a complaint filed by Landmark Technologies (“Landmark”) in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Numbers 7,010,508 and 5,576,951 C2. Landmark claims that the patents cover execution of a search on the website and delivering requested information from the website. In January 2014, the case was dismissed with prejudice based on a mutually agreed upon settlement for an immaterial amount.
The Company reviews all claims and accrues a liability for those matters where it believes that the likelihood that a loss will occur is probable and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable.
Purchase Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations and other commitments as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Years Ending December 31, | | |
| Total | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | Thereafter |
Operating Lease Obligations (1) | 255 |
| | 255 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Purchase Obligations (2) | 1,212 |
| | 963 |
| | 249 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total Obligations | 1,467 |
| | 1,218 |
| | 249 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
(1) Includes future payments for the Company's facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2014.
(2) Includes a one-time termination fee of approximately $0.2 million that the Company would be required to pay to its third-party fulfillment and warehouse provider if the Company were to cancel the contract. This amount also includes committed licensing payments and other service agreements.
Rent Expense
Rent expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was approximately $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
5. Employee Benefit Plans
Retirement Savings Plan
The Company maintains an employee savings and retirement plan which is qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and is available to substantially all full-time employees of the Company. The plan provides for tax deferred salary deductions and after-tax employee contributions. Contributions include employee salary deferral contributions and beginning in 2012, matching employer contributions. Prior to 2012, there were no employer discretionary contributions. Employer matching contributions were $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In May 2012, the Company's Board of Directors and shareholders approved an Employee Stock Purchase Program (“ESPP”) to provide an opportunity for all employees to purchase the Company's common stock through accumulated payroll deductions. The Company's ESPP authorizes up to 100,000 shares to be granted. The per share price of the Company's common stock purchased pursuant to the ESPP is 95% of the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the offering period. The ESPP has two six month offering periods beginning September 1 and March 1. The number of shares issued under our ESPP was 557 shares as of December 31, 2013.
6. Common Stock and Stock Compensation
Stock Repurchase Program
On June 17, 2013, the Company announced the commencement of a modified Dutch tender offer to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of its common stock at a price of not less than $12.00 nor greater than $14.00 per share. The Company's Board of Directors determined it was in the best interest of its stockholders to repurchase shares at that time given its cash position and stock price and the likelihood that the Company's common stock may be removed from the Russell 2000 Index. The Company was subsequently removed from the Russell 2000 Index on June 28, 2013. The tender offer expired on July 15, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the tender offer, the Company purchased 53,884 shares at $14.00 per share for a total cost of $0.8 million, excluding fees and expenses related to the tender offer. These shares represented approximately 0.81% of the shares outstanding as of July 15, 2013.
Equity Incentive Plans
In December 2007, the Company's stockholders approved the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaced the Company's 1998 Stock Plan (the “1998 Plan”) and the 1999 Director Option Plan (the “Directors' Plan”), collectively referred to as the “Equity Plans”. The Equity Plans will continue to govern awards previously granted under each respective plan. There were initially 525,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan, subject to increase for stock options or awards previously issued under the Equity Plans which expire, cancel or are forfeited. In May 2011, the Company's stockholders approved the addition of 200,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. At December 31, 2013, a total of 313,577 shares of common stock were available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.
In May 2012 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan was amended to change the way restricted stock unit grants reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan. Prior to the amendment, for each grant or forfeiture of a restricted stock unit, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan decreased or increased by two. The amendment changed this 2:1 ratio to a 1:1 ratio.
Options granted under the 2007 Plan must be issued at a price equal to at least the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. All vested stock options under the 2007 Plan may be exercised at any time within 10 years of the date of grant or within 90 days of termination of employment, or such other time as may be provided in the stock option agreement, and vest as determined by the Board of Directors. The Company’s policy is to issue new shares upon exercise of options, granting of Restricted Stock Awards ("RSA") or vesting of Restricted Stock Units ("RSU") under the 2007 Plan.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes option activities from December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price per Share | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | | 208,862 |
| | $20.75 | | | | |
Granted | | 40,293 |
| | $15.67 | | | | |
Exercised | | (23,505 | ) | | $13.14 | | | | |
Forfeited | | (92,072 | ) | | $25.07 | | | | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | | 133,578 |
| | $17.57 | | 7.4 | | $365 |
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2013 | | 121,170 |
| | $17.63 | | 7.3 | | $340 |
Exercisable at December 31, 2013 | | 81,090 |
| | $17.53 | | 6.4 | | $266 |
The total intrinsic value of options exercised was negligible, $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of options. The weighted average grant date fair value was $6.11, $7.42 and $13.72 for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The total cash received from stock option exercises was $0.3 million, $0.4 million, and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no tax benefit was realized from exercised options.
The fair value of the option grants has been calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected life was based on historical settlement patterns. Expected volatility was based on historical implied volatility in the Company’s stock. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions for stock options granted:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Expected life (years) | 3.00 |
| | 3.02 |
| | 4.36 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | 0.5 | % | | 0.4 | % | | 1.2 | % |
Volatility | 58 | % | | 62 | % | | 74 | % |
Dividend yield | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Restricted Stock
Outstanding restricted stock units granted to employees vest over a three year period. Outstanding restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors typically vest in less than a year and represent compensation for serving on the Company's Board of Directors. The following table summarizes restricted stock activities from December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | 226,402 |
| | $21.70 |
Granted | 95,388 |
| | $14.33 |
Restricted Stock Release | (147,898 | ) | | $19.49 |
Canceled | (79,121 | ) | | $21.51 |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | 94,771 |
| | $17.91 |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense as recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cost of revenue | $ | (81 | ) | | $ | 376 |
| | $ | 193 |
|
| | | | | |
Sales and marketing | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | 148 |
| | $ | 55 |
|
Technology and design | 187 |
| | 133 |
| | 57 |
|
General and administrative | 1,996 |
| | 2,902 |
| | 2,712 |
|
Included in operating expenses | 2,151 |
| | 3,183 |
| | 2,824 |
|
| | | | | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | $ | 2,070 |
| | $ | 3,559 |
| | $ | 3,017 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight line basis over the vesting period. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of the grant, based on historical trends, and revised in subsequent periods as necessary.
As of December 31, 2013, total compensation cost not yet recognized and the weighted-average remaining term is as follows ($ in thousands):
|
| | | | | | |
| Expense not yet recognized | | Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years) |
Stock Options | $ | 286 |
| | 2.2 |
|
Restricted Stock Units | $ | 651 |
| | 1.6 |
|
7. Computation of Per Share Amounts
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | | |
Net (loss) income from continuing operations | $ | (167 | ) | | $ | 1,805 |
| | $ | (3,447 | ) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | (67 | ) | | 12,102 |
| | 1,932 |
|
Net (loss) income | $ | (234 | ) | | $ | 13,907 |
| | $ | (1,515 | ) |
| | | | | |
Weighted average shares - basic | 6,620 |
| | 6,466 |
| | 6,319 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards | — |
| | 90 |
| | — |
|
Weighted average shares - dilutive | 6,620 |
| | 6,556 |
| | 6,319 |
|
| | | | | |
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | (0.55 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | (0.55 | ) |
| | | | | |
(Loss) income per share from discontinued operations: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 1.87 |
| | $ | 0.31 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 1.85 |
| | $ | 0.31 |
|
| | | | | |
Net (loss) income per share: | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 2.15 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.04 | ) | | $ | 2.12 |
| | $ | (0.24 | ) |
The following potential common shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for all periods presented because they are anti-dilutive (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Anti-dilutive securities: | | | | | |
Options to purchase common stock | 96 |
| | 232 |
| | 192 |
|
Unvested restricted stock units | 38 |
| | 114 |
| | 174 |
|
Total | 134 |
| | 346 |
| | 366 |
|
8. Income Taxes
The Company provides for income taxes using an asset and liability approach, where deferred income taxes are provided based upon enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the taxes become payable. The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, as of December 31, 2013, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local, or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009.
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following components (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
United States | $ | (167 | ) | | $ | 1,811 |
| | $ | (4,584 | ) |
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company paid income taxes of $0.1 million. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011, the Company did not pay income taxes.
The components of the income tax provision (benefit) from continuing operations, by classification, included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Current: | | | | | |
Federal | $ | — |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (1,171 | ) |
State | — |
| | — |
| | 34 |
|
| $ | — |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (1,137 | ) |
The income tax benefit recognized in 2011 is offset by a tax provision in discontinued operations as there was a loss in continuing operations and income in discontinued operations in that same year. There was not a similar benefit in 2013 and 2012 as there was loss or income in both continuing and discontinued operations in those years.
Deferred tax assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Deferred tax assets: | | | |
Accruals and reserves | $ | 1,632 |
| | $ | 2,271 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards | 7,067 |
| | 14,816 |
|
Research and development credit carryforward | 1,260 |
| | 858 |
|
Other | 73 |
| | — |
|
Gross deferred tax asset | $ | 10,032 |
| | $ | 17,945 |
|
Valuation allowance | (10,032 | ) | | (17,945 | ) |
Net deferred tax asset | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
The Company has performed a study addressing the recoverability of its net operating loss carryforwards. The results of the study indicated that there was a change of control as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) in 2008. As a result of the change of control, certain net operating losses previously included in the Company's deferred tax disclosures will not be available to offset future taxable income as the IRC limits the annual utilization of these carryforwards. Based upon receipt of the final report in the first quarter of 2013, the amount previously reported at December 31, 2012 as net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in 2013 and beyond of $35.5 million was reduced to $18.9 million, subject to annual limitations. Consistent with historical practices, the Company continues to fully reduce the net operating loss carryforwards and all other deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. This is due to the conclusion that it is more-likely-than-not that the Company would not recover the deferred tax assets because of uncertainties about the Company's ability to generate taxable income in the future.
The amount of net operating losses available to offset taxable income in 2014 and beyond as of December 31, 2013 is $19.1 million. Approximately $1.1 million of the net operating loss carryforwards have not been recognized as they related to benefits associated with stock option exercises that have not reduced current taxes payable.
The net operating losses expire between 2014 and 2033. The net operating loss carryforwards stated above are reflective of various federal and state tax limitations. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company has gross federal research and development credit carryforwards of $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, which expire between 2019 and 2033.
Reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate on (loss) income from continuing operations is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Federal statutory income tax rate | 34.0 | % | | 34.0 | % | | 34.0 | % |
State, net of federal benefit | (61.8 | )% | | 0.9 | % | | (0.1 | )% |
Stock compensation | 1.7 | % | | — | % | | 0.3 | % |
Research and development credit | 287.8 | % | | — | % | | 6.5 | % |
Return to provision and true-ups | (3.9 | )% | | — | % | | (2.8 | )% |
Change in valuation allowance | (249.3 | )% | | (35.9 | )% | | (12.7 | )% |
Other | (8.5 | )% | | 1.3 | % | | (0.4 | )% |
Effective income tax rate | — | % | | 0.3 | % | | 24.8 | % |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period | $ | 344 |
| | $ | 1,192 |
| | $ | 1,234 |
|
Gross increases to current period tax positions | 161 |
| | — |
| | 59 |
|
Gross increases (decreases) to prior period tax positions | (90 | ) | | (848 | ) | | (101 | ) |
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of period | $ | 415 |
| | $ | 344 |
| | $ | 1,192 |
|
The Company classifies interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits and interest income on tax overpayments as components of its income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 no interest or penalties were recognized. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months. There are no unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the actual tax rate at December 31, 2013, as the full valuation is recorded as deferred tax asset.
9. Discontinued Operations
Media Business
On September 17, 2012, Geeknet, Inc. entered into a Purchase Agreement with Dice and two of Dice’s subsidiaries, (collectively, the “Buyers”) pursuant to which the Buyers purchased the Company’s Media business segment, including the SourceForge, Slashdot and Freecode websites (the “Purchased Business”) and assumed certain related liabilities.
In accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Buyers paid $20.0 million in cash to the Company, of which $3.0 million was deposited by the Buyers into an escrow account for a period of twelve months after the Closing Date in order to secure the Company’s indemnification obligations to the Buyers for breaches of the Company’s representations, warranties, covenants and other obligations under the Purchase Agreement. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company received the $3.0 million held in escrow.
The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, each party has agreed to indemnify the other for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants and other specified matters. The Purchase Agreement generally limits the Company's liability for breaches of representations and warranties made in the Purchase Agreement to an aggregate of $10.0 million. The Company's representations and warranties made under the Purchase Agreement generally expired on September 17, 2013, although certain representations, warranties and covenants survive pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreements. The Company and Dice also agreed to provide certain transition services to one another through December 31, 2013, and the Company has completed providing these services to Dice.
The following shows revenues, gross profit and (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax from discontinued operations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,797 |
| | $ | 20,409 |
|
Gross profit | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,421 |
| | $ | 15,503 |
|
| | | | | |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | (1,509 | ) | | $ | 2,986 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations | — |
| | 13,712 |
| | — |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision from discontinued operations | (52 | ) | | 101 |
| | 1,054 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | 12,102 |
| | $ | 1,932 |
|
Gross profit and (loss) income from discontinued operations do not include allocated corporate costs that were previously allocated to the Company's Media segment. The $13.7 million gain on the sale of the Media business is the selling price of $20.0 million less the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities assumed by the Buyers, offset by transaction costs of $1.1 million. The carrying value of the total assets and total liabilities included in the Purchased Business were $8.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
The income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2013 represents federal and state tax receivables as a result of overpayments. The tax provision recorded on discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 represents the tax based upon the with and without method. The 2012 tax provision is significantly lower than the statutory rate as a result of net operating losses with a full valuation allowance. The tax provision for 2011 is offset by a tax benefit in continuing operations.
10. Segment and Geographic Information
Due to the growth in the Company's wholesale business, effective for the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company reorganized its management reporting and reportable business segments into two operating segments: Website and Wholesale. The Website segment sells geek-themed retail products to technology enthusiasts and general consumers through the website. The Wholesale segment, which sells primarily exclusive GeekLabs products through retailers and brick-and-mortar stores, has higher gross margins because the products it sells generally have higher product margins. Prior to the sale of the Company's Media business on September 17, 2012, the Company had two operating segments that offered different products and services, e-Commerce and Media. The Media segment was discontinued in 2012 when it was sold.
The accounting policies of the segments are consistent with those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The majority of costs were specifically identifiable to each segment. However, where costs were not specifically identifiable, they were allocated based on the ratio of segment product costs to total product costs. The Company's chief decision-making group is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The Company's assets and liabilities are not allocated or reviewed by the chief decision-making group on a segment basis.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Website | | Wholesale | | Total Company |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | $ | 115,909 |
| | $ | 22,353 |
| | $ | 138,262 |
|
Cost of revenue | | 96,458 |
| | 14,687 |
| | 111,145 |
|
Gross margin | | $ | 19,451 |
| | $ | 7,666 |
| | $ | 27,117 |
|
Gross margin % | | 16.8 | % | | 34.3 | % | | 19.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | $ | 111,938 |
| | $ | 6,975 |
| | $ | 118,913 |
|
Cost of revenue | | 92,758 |
| | 5,090 |
| | 97,848 |
|
Gross margin | | $ | 19,180 |
| | $ | 1,885 |
| | $ | 21,065 |
|
Gross margin % | | 17.1 | % | | 27.0 | % | | 17.7 | % |
| | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | | | | | |
Net revenue | | $ | 93,691 |
| | $ | 5,366 |
| | $ | 99,057 |
|
Cost of revenue | | 79,568 |
| | 4,034 |
| | 83,602 |
|
Gross margin | | $ | 14,123 |
| | $ | 1,332 |
| | $ | 15,455 |
|
Gross margin % | | 15.1 | % | | 24.8 | % | | 15.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
ThinkGeek products are sold in the United States and internationally. Website revenues for international orders were $24.2 million, $22.3 million, and $13.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The increase in international sales is primarily attributable to the Company offering a more economical international shipping option.
11. Quarterly Financial Information
Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company’s quarters end on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each calendar year. You should read the following tables presenting our quarterly results of operations in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We have prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts in previously reported quarters have been adjusted to exclude discontinued operations as a result of the sale of the Company's Media business.
ThinkGeek sales are highly seasonal, reflecting the general pattern associated with the retail industry of peak sales and earnings during the holiday shopping season. As a result, a substantial portion of the 2013 and 2012 revenue occurred in the fourth quarter, which began on October 1 and ended on December 31. As is typical in the retail industry, the Company generally experiences lower revenue during the other quarters. Therefore, the revenue in a particular quarter is not necessarily indicative of future revenue for a subsequent quarter or a full year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the three months ended |
| March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 |
Year 2013 | | | | | | |
|
Net revenue | $ | 19,557 |
| | $ | 22,004 |
| | $ | 22,363 |
| | $ | 74,338 |
|
Gross margin | 3,620 |
| | 4,409 |
| | 4,250 |
| | 14,838 |
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations (1) | (2,308 | ) | | (1,490 | ) | | (1,435 | ) | | 5,066 |
|
Net (loss) income | $ | (2,336 | ) | | $ | (1,531 | ) | | $ | (1,436 | ) | | $ | 5,069 |
|
Net (loss) income per share from continuing operations: (1) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Basic | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.76 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.76 |
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Basic | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.76 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.35 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.76 |
|
Year 2012 (1) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Net revenue | $ | 17,510 |
| | $ | 17,804 |
| | $ | 17,260 |
| | $ | 66,339 |
|
Gross margin | 2,567 |
| | 2,096 |
| | 2,256 |
| | 14,147 |
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations | (2,163 | ) | | 1,291 |
| | (1,999 | ) | | 4,676 |
|
Net (loss) income (2) | $ | (2,121 | ) | | $ | 1,609 |
| | $ | 8,363 |
| | $ | 6,056 |
|
Net (loss) income per share from continuing operations: |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Basic | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.71 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.34 | ) | | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | (0.31 | ) | | $ | 0.71 |
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
| |
| |
| |
|
Basic | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.29 |
| | $ | 0.92 |
|
Diluted | $ | (0.33 | ) | | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | 1.27 |
| | $ | 0.92 |
|
(1) Certain amounts shown above that were previously reported have been adjusted for corrections of intra-period tax allocations.
(2) Included in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012, is a gain of $4.0 million from the sale of the Company's Series C-1
preferred stock investment in CollabNet, Inc.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the three months ended |
| March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 |
Year 2013 | | | | | | | |
Website: | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | $ | 17,981 |
| | $ | 18,254 |
| | $ | 16,990 |
| | $ | 62,684 |
|
Cost of revenue | 14,839 |
| | 15,155 |
| | 14,377 |
| | 52,087 |
|
Gross margin | $ | 3,142 |
| | $ | 3,099 |
| | $ | 2,613 |
| | $ | 10,597 |
|
Gross margin % | 17.5 | % | | 17.0 | % | | 15.4 | % | | 16.9 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Wholesale: | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | $ | 1,576 |
| | $ | 3,750 |
| | $ | 5,373 |
| | $ | 11,654 |
|
Cost of revenue | 1,098 |
| | 2,440 |
| | 3,736 |
| | 7,413 |
|
Gross margin | $ | 478 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| | $ | 1,637 |
| | $ | 4,241 |
|
Gross margin % | 30.3 | % | | 34.9 | % | | 30.5 | % | | 36.4 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Year 2012 | | | | | | | |
Website: | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | $ | 16,728 |
| | $ | 16,518 |
| | $ | 15,872 |
| | $ | 62,820 |
|
Cost of revenue | 14,374 |
| | 14,780 |
| | 13,987 |
| | 49,617 |
|
Gross margin | $ | 2,354 |
| | $ | 1,738 |
| | $ | 1,885 |
| | $ | 13,203 |
|
Gross margin % | 14.1 | % | | 10.5 | % | | 11.9 | % | | 21.0 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Wholesale: | | | | | | | |
Net revenue | $ | 782 |
| | $ | 1,286 |
| | $ | 1,388 |
| | $ | 3,519 |
|
Cost of revenue | 569 |
| | 928 |
| | 1,017 |
| | 2,576 |
|
Gross margin | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 358 |
| | $ | 371 |
| | $ | 943 |
|
Gross margin % | 27.2 | % | | 27.8 | % | | 26.7 | % | | 26.8 | % |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as amended, as of December 31, 2013. Disclosure controls are controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information was accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In conducting our evaluation, we concluded there is a material weakness in the operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting described below relating to ineffective process level controls impacting the existence and accuracy of accrued liabilities and cost of revenue, as well as ineffective monitoring and management oversight over the process level controls related to the inventory purchase order accrual.
As a result of the foregoing, we have concluded that as of December 31, 2013 we did not maintain disclosure controls and procedures that were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information was accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
(b) Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In connection with the preparation of the Company's annual financial statements, management of the Company, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework). A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
There were control deficiencies identified related to ineffective process level controls impacting the existence and accuracy of accrued liabilities and cost of revenue, as well as ineffective monitoring and management oversight over the process level controls related to the inventory purchase order accrual that were, in the aggregate, determined to be a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.
As a result of the above-described material weakness, there was a misstatement identified related to accrued liabilities and cost of revenue. While this misstatement was not deemed material, there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective under the COSO 1992 Framework criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an adverse audit report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which is included in this Form 10-K.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Remediation
As a result of management’s evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2013 due to ineffective process level controls impacting the existence and accuracy of accrued liabilities and cost of revenue, as well as ineffective monitoring and management oversight over the process level controls related to the inventory purchase order accrual.
Management had previously identified and disclosed a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting relating to the sufficiency of resources devoted to monitoring activities during the financial statement close process. Specifically, we did not previously maintain a sufficient complement of corporate accounting personnel necessary to consistently operate management review controls. The demand on the corporate accounting resources was, and continues to be, significant due to the manual nature of process level controls necessary to maintain effective control over our legacy system.
To remediate this material weakness, we undertook a process to determine the appropriate complement of corporate accounting personnel required to consistently execute process level controls, including management review controls. In addition, and to further enhance our internal controls, we hired a new Chief Financial Officer, Julie Pangelinan, who joined the Company on August 12, 2013. During 2013, the Company has been actively implementing additional internal control and process improvements including the following:
| |
• | we increased the headcount of our corporate accounting team, |
| |
• | we continue to enhance management reviews of account reconciliations and journal entries that support financial reporting, |
| |
• | we continue to implement new procedures and controls around electronic spreadsheets, |
| |
• | we collaborated with our outside consultants to review, update and assess our internal control structure and related documentation, and |
| |
• | we hired an experienced internal auditor as of December 2, 2013, to lead our Sarbanes Oxley Internal Controls Compliance Program and internal audit department. |
While we have made improvements to our internal controls, they have not eliminated our material weakness in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting relating to ineffective process level controls impacting the existence and accuracy of accrued liabilities and cost of revenue, as well as ineffective monitoring and management oversight over the process level controls related to the inventory purchase order accrual. Management believes we are further addressing those areas of weakness through the implementation of our new integrated enterprise resource planning system beginning in the first quarter of 2014.
Item 9B. Other Information
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The annual meeting of stockholders for 2014 is scheduled to be held on May 7, 2014. Under our bylaws as currently in effect notices of stockholder proposals must be received no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days prior to the first anniversary the date of the 2013 annual meeting in order to be timely. Accordingly, notices of stockholder proposals with respect to the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders must have been received no earlier than January 7, 2014, and no later than February 6, 2014, in order to be timely.
2013 Bonus Plan
On February 20, 2014 the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) approved the Company’s 2013 Executive Bonus Plan (“the 2013 Bonus Plan”) and the amounts to be paid under the 2013 Bonus Plan to the Company’s executive officers for their service in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. A copy of the 2013 Bonus Plan appears as Exhibit 10.16 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
The 2013 Bonus Plan provides for the payment of annual cash awards based on three independent components with the following weightings: revenue (32.5%), EBITDA (as defined in the 2013 Bonus Plan) (32.5%) and personal performance (35%). For the revenue and EBITDA components, the Company must achieve at least 90% of the Company’s budgeted performance for revenue and EBITDA, as applicable, for the 2013 fiscal year. If either the revenue or EBITDA component is met at between 90% and 100% of budget, the payout for that component would be 80% of target bonus. If either component is met at 100% or more of budget, the payout for that component would be 100% of target bonus. The personal performance component would be paid out based on the percent of personal goals accomplished by the individual. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion reduce any component of a bonus awarded to an individual.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company achieved 99% of the annual revenue budget, thus triggering an 80% payout under that component of the 2013 Bonus Plan. EBITDA was not achieved at more than 90% of budget and consequently no payout was owed based on that component. The target bonus, as a percentage of salary paid in 2013, available to each executive officer of the Company under the 2013 Bonus Plan are as follows: Kathryn McCarthy - 30%; Julie Pangelinan - 30%; Kirk Somers - 30%.
The Compensation Committee determined that each executive officer of the Company earned the following bonuses, as a percentage of salary paid in 2013, under the 2013 Bonus Plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013: Kathryn McCarthy - 15%; Julie Pangelinan - 15%; Kirk Somers - 15%.
Short-Term Incentive Plan
The Compensation Committee adopted the Geeknet Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “STIP”) on February 20, 2014. The purpose of the STIP is to promote our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy by providing cash incentive awards to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company’s executive officers. The STIP gives the Compensation Committee discretion to choose one or more appropriate performance measures by which to measure performance in any given performance period and to establish individual annual bonus opportunity levels. The performance measures are set at the beginning of each performance period, which are generally expected to relate to the Company’s fiscal year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may award and pay cash incentive awards (including, without limitation, discretionary bonuses) to eligible employees, including executive officers, under the STIP based upon such other terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may in its discretion determine. The material terms of the STIP are summarized below. A copy of the STIP appears as Exhibit 10.17 to this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
Administration. The Compensation Committee will administer the STIP, although with respect to the establishment of award opportunities for and the determination of cash incentive awards payable to eligible employees who are not executive officers of the Company, the Compensation Committee may delegate its authority under the Plan to an executive officer of the Company. References herein to the Compensation Committee include any such designee. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to select eligible employees, establish individual annual bonus opportunity levels and determine the amount of any cash incentive awards consistent with the terms of the STIP, as it considers appropriate. The Compensation Committee may amend or terminate the STIP and has the authority to interpret all provisions of the STIP, to adopt, amend and rescind rules and regulations pertaining to the
administration of the STIP and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the STIP. The STIP will remain in effect until terminated by the Compensation Committee.
Eligibility. Any employee (or groups of employees) of the Company or its subsidiaries, including an executive officer of the Company, as may be designated by the Compensation Committee from time to time is eligible to participate in the STIP for a given fiscal year of the Company or other performance period. With respect to employees who are not executive officers of the Company, the Compensation Committee shall consider the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer when designating eligible employees.
Establishment of Performance Measures. Awards may be based on one or more of the following performance measures chosen by the Compensation Committee: revenues, earnings before interest and taxes, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, earnings before taxes, net earnings, earnings per share and total shareholder return. In addition, the performance measures may include, alone or in combination with the performance measures listed above, any other measure of performance or discretionary bonuses as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also selects the relevant performance periods, which may not exceed four consecutive fiscal quarters. The Compensation Committee may select different performance measures for different participants in any performance period. In addition to selecting the performance measures, the Compensation Committee will also establish the level of attainment required to earn a cash incentive award. The required level of attainment can be measured as an absolute amount or relative to other periods or to a designated peer group. The performance measure may be tied to performance achieved by the Company or any segment, subsidiary, operating company, division, unit, test strategy or new venture of the Company, or based on individual performance.
Determination of Cash Incentive Amounts. The target opportunity for each participant will be determined by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the performance period. The target opportunity may be established as a set dollar amount or as a percentage of the participant’s compensation (typically based on a percentage of base salary). In addition, the Compensation Committee may establish an incentive pool and determine each participant’s award based on a ratio of the participant’s award to all awards earned under the STIP multiplied by the pool. At the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee will certify levels of achievement of the performance measures and pay out any earned awards in the form of cash payments. The Compensation Committee has discretion to exclude the effects of extraordinary items, unusual or non-recurring events, changes in accounting principles or methods, realized investment gains or losses, discontinued operations, acquisitions, divestitures, material restructuring or impairment charges, uninsured losses for natural catastrophes and any other items the Compensation Committee determines is necessary to provide appropriate period-to-period comparisons.
New Plan Benefits. The STIP will be effective February 20, 2014. As a result, the first awards granted under the STIP will relate to the Company’s 2014 fiscal year. Amounts payable under the STIP for the 2014 fiscal year are not determinable because the performance measures and target opportunities have not yet been established by the Compensation Committee. For the 2014 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee has established the following target bonuses, as a percentage of salary, available to each executive officer of the Company under STIP: Kathryn McCarthy - 40%; Julie Pangelinan - 30%; Kirk Somers - 30%.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Certain Beneficial Owners,” “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Information About The Directors, Nominees And Executive Officers” in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement, which will be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2014.
Code of Ethics
In addition to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all employees and directors, the Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers. The Company has posted the text of its Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers on its Internet web site at: investors.geek.net/governance.cfm
We will post on this section of our website any amendment to our Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC or The NASDAQ Stock Market.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement, which will be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2014.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Equity Compensation Plans
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement, which will be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2014 .
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013, all of which have been approved by our stockholders:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | A | | | B | | C |
Plan Category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options | | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column A) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | 133,578 |
| (1)(2) | | $ | 17.57 |
| | 313,577 |
|
______________________
| |
(1) | All options outstanding are under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| |
(2) | Does not include 94,771 restricted stock units outstanding under the Company's 2007 Equity Plan. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement, which will be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2014.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement, which will be delivered to stockholders in connection with the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2014.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule
| |
(a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
| |
1 | All Financial Statements: |
See the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8 above.
| |
2 | Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts are filed as part of this Form 10-K. |
See the Exhibit Index.
| |
(b) | Exhibits: We have filed, or incorporated into this Report by reference, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page to this Form 10-K. |
| |
(c) | Financial Statement Schedules: See Item 15(a) above. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| GEEKNET, INC. |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Kathryn K. McCarthy |
| | Kathryn K. McCarthy |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
| | |
| By: | /s/ Julie Pangelinan |
| | Julie Pangelinan |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
Date: February 26, 2014
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Kathryn K. McCarthy and Julie Pangelinan, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and does hereby ratify and confirm all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Kathryn K. McCarthy | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairperson of the Board of Directors | | February 26, 2014 |
Kathryn K. McCarthy | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Julie Pangelinan | | Chief Financial Officer | | February 26, 2014 |
Julie Pangelinan | | (principal financial officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Matthew C. Blank | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Matthew C. Blank | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Thomas Coughlin | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Thomas Coughlin | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Matt Carey | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Matt Carey | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Peter A. Georgescu | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Peter A. Georgescu | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Sir Ronald Hampel | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Sir Ronald Hampel | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Kenneth G. Langone | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Kenneth G. Langone | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Frank A. Riddick, III | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Frank A. Riddick, III | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Eric Semler | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Eric Semler | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Derek Smith | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Derek Smith | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Michael Solomon | | Director | | February 24, 2014 |
Michael Solomon | | | | |
| | | | |
GEEKNET, INC.
SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Balance Beginning of Period | | Charged to Expenses | | Deductions | | Discontinued from disposal of Media business | | Balance End of Period |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 27 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | $ | (24 | ) |
| $ | (27 | ) | | $ | 14 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | (78 | ) |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax valuation allowance | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | $ | 24,722 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 247 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24,969 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | $ | 24,969 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (7,024 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 17,945 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | $ | 17,945 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (7,913 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,032 |
|
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | EXHIBIT INDEX |
| | |
| | |
2 | — | Asset Purchase Agreement between Geeknet, Inc., Dice Holdings, Inc., Dice Career Solutions, Inc, and eFinancialCareers Limited dated September 17, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on From 8-K filed on September 18, 2012) |
| | |
3.1 | — | Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2011 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
3.2 | — | Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2011 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
4.1 | — | Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of the Registrant's form S-1 and the amendment thereto (Commission registration no. 333-88687)). |
| | |
10.1 ‡ | — | Form of Indemnification Agreement between Geeknet, Inc. and each of its directors and officers (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K filed on November 8, 2013 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.2 ‡ | — | 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference from Appendix A of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on November 1, 2007 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.3 ‡ | — | 2007 Equity Incentive Plan Award Agreements (incorporated by reference from Exhibits 10.1 through 10.4 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 31, 2007. |
| | |
10.4 ‡ | — | Amendments to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, dated May 16, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Appendix I of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 30, 2012 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.5 ‡ | — | 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated May 16, 2012 (incorporated by reference from Appendix II of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 30, 2012 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.6 ‡ | — | Employment Agreement, effective December 16, 2010, between Geeknet, Inc. and Kathryn McCarthy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2010 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.7 ‡ | — | Restricted Stock Award Agreement, dated December 30, 2010, between Geeknet, Inc. and Kathryn McCarthy (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on January 3, 2011 (Commission file number 333-171522)). |
10.8 ‡ | — | Employment Agreement, effective March 1, 2013, between Geeknet, Inc. and Kirk L. Somers (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2013 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.9 ‡ | — | Employment Agreement, effective August 12, 2013, between Geeknet, Inc. and Julie Anne Pangelinan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2013 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.10 ‡ | — | Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2011, between Geeknet, Inc. and Carol DiBattiste (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 6, 2011 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.11 ‡ | — | Separation Agreement, dated August 20, 2012, between Geeknet, Inc. and Colon Washburn (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2012 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.12 ‡ | — | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 14, 2012, between Geeknet, Inc. and Jeffrey Drobick (incorporated by reference from Appendix II of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 30, 2012 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.13 ‡ | — | Retention Letter Agreement, dated May 14, 2012, between Geeknet, Inc. and Jeffrey Drobick (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 14, 2012 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
|
| | |
10.14 ‡ | — | Separation Agreement, dated March 6, 2013, between Geeknet, Inc. and Ali R. Sorbi (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 10-Q filed May 9, 2013 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.15 | — | Office Lease Agreement, dated June 26, 2009, between ThinkGeek, Inc. and PS Business Parks, L.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.23 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2010 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
10.16 ‡ | — | 2013 Executive Bonus Plan, dated February 20, 2014 |
| | |
10.17 ‡ | — | Geeknet Short-Term Incentive Plan, dated February 20, 2014 |
| | |
20.1 | — | Tender Offer Statement, dated June 17, 2013 (incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Schedule to Tender Offer on Form SC-TO-I filed June 17, 2013 (Commission file number 000-28369)). |
| | |
21 | — | List of Subsidiaries |
| | |
23.1 | — | Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| | |
24.1 | — | Power of Attorney (see signature page) |
| | |
31.1 | — | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 |
| | |
31.2 | — | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 |
| | |
32.1 | — | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 |
| | |
32.2 | — | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 |
| | |
101.INS | — | XBRL Instance Document |
| | |
101.SCH | — | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| | |
101.CAL | — | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.DEF | — | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.LAB | — | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| | |
101.PRE | — | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
_______________________
‡ Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.