UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended February 29, 2008
Commission File Number: 000-30239
UNICO, INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Arizona | | 13-4171971 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th Floor, San Diego, California 92108 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
|
(619) 209-6124 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
| |
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: |
None (Title of each class) | N/A (Name of Exchange on which registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-KB is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-KB. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year. $2,460,541, based on the last sale price of $0.0005 as reported on the OTC bulletin board.
The Registrant had 4,940,363,072 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of May 08, 2008.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One)
Yes [ ] No [X]
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| |
PART I |
Page |
ITEM 1. BUSINESS | 3 |
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS | 12 |
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 12 |
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES | 12 |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 17 |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | 17 |
PART II |
|
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES | 18 |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 19 |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION | 19 |
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | |
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 23 |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 23 |
ITEM 9A(T).CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 23 |
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION | 24 |
PART III |
|
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 24 |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 26 |
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 27 |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 28 |
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES | 30 |
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 30 |
| |
| |
2
PART I
Forward Looking Statements
This document includes statements that may constitute forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company would like to caution certain readers regarding certain forward-looking statements in this document and in all of its communications to shareholders and others, on management’s projections, estimates and all other communications. Statements that are based on management’s projections, estimates and assumptions are forward-looking statements. The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. While the Company believes in the veracity of all statements made herein, forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates, and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies and known and unknown risks. Many of the uncertainties and contingencies can affect events and the Company’s actual results and could cause its actual results to differ materially from this expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf, of the Company.
Possible Reverse Stock Split
On January 28, 2008 the stockholders of Unico, Incorporated approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize the Board of Directors, in its discretion, to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of up to one for five hundred during the six month period following the date of the Special Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors has not yet approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. However, the Company believes that a reverse split of the Company’s common stock is in the Company’s best interest, as it will enable the Company to increase the number of authorized, but unissued common shares, which can then be used to permit the conversion of outstanding convertible debentures to shares of the Company’s common stock, and for raising additional needed capital. It will also assist the Company in increasing the trading price of the Company’s common stock to a level more acceptable to potential investors.
ITEM 1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
Unico, Incorporated (“the Company”, “Unico” or “UNCN”) an Arizona corporation, was formed as an Arizona corporation on May 27, 1966. It was incorporated under the name of Red Rock Mining Co., Incorporated. It was later known as Industries International, Incorporated and I.I. Incorporated before the name was eventually changed to Unico, Incorporated in 1979.
On July 12, 2004, Unico filed an election with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to become a business development company (“BDC”) pursuant to Section 54 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. On August 1, 2005, the Board of Directors unanimously approved a proposal to withdraw the Company’s election to be treated as a business development company as soon as practicable so that Unico could begin conducting business as an operating company rather than as a business development company subject to the Investment Company Act. On October 11, 2005, a Special Meeting of the Unico shareholders was held to consider and vote upon a proposal to authorize the Company’s Board of Directors to withdraw the Company’s election to be treated as a BDC and the proposal was approved. On October 12, 2005 a Notification of Withdrawal was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission so that Unico could begin conducting business as an operating company rather than as a BDC subject to the Investment Company Act.
The mining operations at the Deer Trail Mine have been conducted through Unico's subsidiary, Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC (“Deer Trail Mining Company” or “DTMC”) since soon after DTMC was formed in late June, 2004. The mining operations at the Bromide Basin Mines have been conducted through Unico's subsidiary, Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC (“Bromide Basin Mining Company” or "BBMC") since soon after BBMC was formed in late June, 2004. Future mining operations at the Silver Bell Mine will be conducted through Unico's subsidiary, Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc. ("SBMC").
Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC
On March 30, 1992, Unico, Incorporated entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase agreement with Deer Trail Development Corporation, with headquarters in Dallas, Texas. Deer Trail Development Corporation is now known as Crown Mines, L.L.C. The lease was to run for a period of 10 years, and cover 28 patented claims, 5 patented mill sites and 171 unpatented claims located approximately 5 miles South of Marysvale, Utah. It includes mine workings known as the Deer Trail Mine, the PTH Tunnel and the Carisa and Lucky Boy mines. There are no known, proven or probable reserves on the property.
Effective December 1, 2001, a new lease agreement was entered into between the parties (“Deer Trail Lease”) covering the same property for a period of thirty (30) months. It was subsequently extended through a series of amendments.
3
In July 2007, Deer Trail Mining Companycompleted the purchase of the claims covered by the Deer Trail Lease. A total of $4,000,000 was paid to purchase the property over a period of approximately three years. The purchase of the claims also included the purchase of a fifty percent (50%) interest in Water Right No. 63-37, said fifty percent (50%) portion including a maximum flow of 0.125 cubic feet of water per second and a maximum annual diversion of 90.5 acre feet of water from Three Mile Spring for year-round mining purposes. The purchase of the claims also included a fifty percent (50%) interest in a contractual right to use water diverted under Water Right No. 63-3043 as evidenced and described in the Agreement between Cottonwood Irrigation Company and Deer Trail Development Corporation dated July 28, 1977. The fifty percent (50%) interest in the contractual water right allows Deer Trail Mining Company to truck not more than 2,500 gallons of water per week from the Cottonwood Creek to the Deer Trail Mine for mining activities during the irrigation season (April 15 to October 15), and possibly more during the remaining portion of each year.
Deer Trail Mining Company also obtained a lease from Crown Mines, L.L.C. of the remaining fifty percent (50%) interest in Water Right No. 63-37 and the remaining 50% interest in the contractual water right (Water Right 63-3043. The lease is for an initial term of 5 years for no rent. The lease may be terminated by Crown Mines, L.L.C. upon 12 months’ written notice if Crown Mines determines that the water rights covered by the lease are necessary for the operation and development of any of Crown Mines’ mining claims or for other permitted uses. The lease may be extended if Crown Mines determines that the water rights covered by the lease are not required for the operation and development of any of Crown Mines’ mining claims or for other permitted uses during the extension period, provided that the parties can agree on other terms including a price or rent for the extended term.
Crown Mines, L.L.C. retained a perpetual royalty interest on minerals taken from the claims purchased by Deer Trail Mining Company. The perpetual royalty is three percent (3.0%) of net smelter returns on minerals other than gold. The royalty rate for gold is three percent (3.0%) when the price of gold is less than or equal to $500 per troy ounce, four percent (4.0%) when the price of gold is more than $500 and less than or equal to $600 per troy ounce, and five percent (5.0%) when the price of gold is greater than $600 per troy ounce. Crown Mines, L.L.C. also retained an undivided three percent (3.0%) interest in any oil and gas and associated hydrocarbons produced from the claims.
Crown Mines, L.L.C. also retained an access easement and a water line pipeline easement across the claims sold to Deer Trail Mining Company.
Deer Trail Mining Company has agreed to provide Crown Mines, L.L.C. with information obtained as a result of Deer Trail Mining Company’s exploration activities on the claims, and Deer Trail Mining Company granted to Crown Mines, L.L.C. a right of first refusal to repurchase the claims or any portion thereof.
In August 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company entered into a Mining Lease with Joel Johnson covering the Clyde, Clyde Intermediate and Crown Point claims. These claims are located near the Deer Trail Mine. Deer Trail Mining Company has leased the claims for the purpose of conducting mine exploration, evaluation, and possible mining activities on the claims. The Mining Lease is for two years, with options to extend the lease for 50 additional one year periods. Under the terms of the Mining Lease, Deer Trail Mining Company paid initial down payments totaling $31,000 with $4,000 due in the second year of the lease. If Deer Trail Mining Company elects to extend the lease, it must pay $3,000 for the first extension year, and the annual lease extension payment increases ten percent (10%) per year thereafter. Additionally, Deer Trail Mining Company will pay three percent (3%) of the gross sale proceeds from the sale of any ore concentrates, or other mineral resources extracted from the claims.
In September 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company entered into a Non-Patented Mining Claims Lease covering approximately 70 additional claims covering approximately 1,500 acres in Piute County Utah for the purpose of exploration, evaluation and mining activities. In consideration for the rights under the agreement, the Deer Trail Mining Company agreed to pay the lease holders $7,000 per year for each of the first three years. Deer Trail Mining Company has the right to extend the lease for 50 additional one year periods. If extended by Deer Trail Mining Company, the annual lease payment is $10,000 in each of years four and five, and thereafter the annual lease payment increases by ten percent (10%) per year. In addition to the annual lease payments, Deer Trail Mining Company has also agreed to pay an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the gross sales proceeds from all ore, concentrates, and all other productions of mineral resources extracted from the claims. The agreement contains an option to purchase the claims exercisable at $350,000 during the five first years of the lease. The exercise price increases $50,000 per year thereafter. It may only be exercised while the lease is effective.
Following the formation of the Deer Trail Mining Company in June 2004, Unico assigned all of the various assets, liabilities and operations associated with the Deer Trail Mine to Deer Trail Mining Company which has assumed responsibility for making payments under the Deer Trail Lease.
Since June 2004 Deer Trail Mining Company has assumed operations, ownership and management control of the Deer Trail Mine. Deer Trail Mining Company presently has 18 full time employees, 1 part time employee and 4 consultants. The necessary permits to commence mining activities at the Deer Trail Mine have been acquired, provided that the surface disturbance from the mining
4
activities does not exceed 10 acres for both mine and mill. In early 2005, Unico and Deer Trail Mining Company, received approval of the company's Large-Scale Mining Permit for the Deer Trail Mine in Marysvale, Utah. The State of Utah's Division of Oil, Gas and Mining granted approval of the company's application to expand its existing small mining project to a large mining operation, which is expected to significantly increase the area of mining activity and the capacity of the company's mill at the Deer Trail Mine. This Large-Scale permit takes the place of the previous two Small-Scale permits described above. In 2004, Unico filed to obtain a construction permit with the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality (both the Utah Division of Air Quality and the Utah Division of Water Quality) for the Deer Trail Mine tailings impoundment pond no. 2.
Prior to June 2004, Unico worked to reopen the Deer Trail Mine. Unico commenced limited mining activities in late March 2001 on the Deer Trail Mine. There were between 2 and 5 miners at various times working full time in the Deer Trail Mine both on mine development work and production work until approximately October 2003. Their efforts were concentrated in the 3400 Area of the mine, from which they removed approximately 1,000 tons of ore per month. The ore was stock-piled and some of it has been crushed. Some of the employees have worked on mine maintenance.
Unico completed a mill on site at the Deer Trail Mine. In November 2001, Unico began milling activities. Unico started screening and crushing ore dumps on the upper Deer Trail Mine and moved the materials to the ball mill. Currently the Deer Trail Mining Company is reconstructing the mill to enhance productivity and efficiency. In July 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company completed the upgrades to the screening plant and began screening the ore dumps at the upper Deer Trail Mine. Once screened, the material is moved to the mill facility and stockpiled for further processing. The Company anticipates running this material through its mill once reconstruction is complete.
On August 31, 2005, Deer Trail Mining Company entered into a five-year purchase contract with PGM, LLC of Los Angeles under which PGM will purchase precious metal bearing concentrates from the Deer Trail processing center. Most sales will not occur until the mill processing center is complete at the Deer Trail Mine. PGM has advanced Deer Trail Mining Company $25,000 for an initial shipment of concentrates that will be produced on a pilot plant basis.
The Company is currently in contact with several smelters and a trading company to determine how best to sell the lead concentrates, and zinc concentrates which will be produced by the Deer Trail Mine mining and milling operations. The concentrates can be transported by either rail or truck, and there are a variety of trucking companies that are willing and able to transport concentrates to smelters or other places designated by purchasers.
In September 2004, Deer Trail Mining Company completed its first phase of exploratory drilling at the Deer Trail Mine. The Deer Trail Mining Company contracted Lang Exploratory Drilling to complete the phase of drilling. Lang completed a total of 3,653 feet of reverse circulation drilling and finished 28 drill holes at specified targets located on the Upper Deer Trail Mine. 741 samples were safeguarded by Lang Exploratory Drilling during this phase and shipped to ALS Chemex at its Elko, Nevada facility for independent lab verification and analysis.
The first phase of exploration drilling was designed to identify near surface deposits, determine potential resources and define limits of mineralization south of the main ore channel mined at the Upper Deer Trail Mine. Historical data of the workings was sufficient to delineate the grade of mineralization remaining in the stopes, but no data was available to delineate the grade of mineralization outside the workings or how far that mineralization flowed into the surrounding formations. The initial phase of reverse circulation drilling serves as an adequate means to define the limits of mineralization south of the main ore channel, which is situated in the lower Toroweap formation, along the crest and down the northeast limb of the Deer Trail anticline.
This phase of drilling was accomplished with lower cost reverse circulation drill holes in order to establish the presence of mineralization at the Upper Deer Trail area. Once the limits of mineralization are established, work can begin to further define those zones by diamond core drilling. This initial phase of drilling is considered merely a starting point in generating data for pre-feasibility and feasibility studies for the Deer Trail Mine operations.
The most upper holes RC-1 through RC-7 were placed well above the elevation of the known workings of the No. 2 Tunnel and slightly south of the northwesterly trending ore channel. Significant mineralization was intercepted in holes RC-1 and RC-2, which were drilled in the area closest to the main ore channel.
Drill holes RC-5, 6, 8, 9, 13 and 14 were all drilled well south of the historically delineated mineralization, and on the southern most up-side of a post mineral fault. It can be concluded that mineralization intercepted in these holes is not directly related to the mineralization of the main Upper Deer Trail ore channel.
5
| | | | | |
Hole | Interval From – to-- (ft) | Gold (grams/troy oz.) | Silver (grams/ Troy oz.) | Lead (%) | Zinc (%) |
| | | | | |
RC-1 | 190 – 230 40 | 0.207 | 10.98 | 0.355 | 0.205 |
| | | | | |
RC-2 | 40 - 45 5 | 0.364 | 95.36 | 3.61 | 0.390 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 175 - 180 5 | 0.369 | 45.71 | 2.87 | 1.41 |
| | | | | |
RC-10 | 65 - 95 30 | 0.363 | 16.48 | 0.086 | 0.022 |
| | | | | |
RC-11 | 60 - 70 10 | 1.36 | 52.25 | 0.758 | 0.191 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 65 - 70 5 | 2.26 | 32.69 | 0.961 | 0.289 |
| | | | | |
RC-12 | 85 - 90 5 | 0.460 | 137.14 | 3.94 | 1.00 |
| | | | | |
RC-17 | 55 - 65 10 | 0.799 | 13.02 | 0.033 | 0.012 |
| | | | | |
RC-18 | 45 - 50 5 | 1.54 | 40.77 | 0.154 | 0.018 |
| | | | | |
RC-19 | 0 – 140 140 | 0.527 | 14.65 | 0.116 | 0.107 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 35 - 45 10 | 2.64 | 14.11 | 0.840 | 1.26 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 35 - 40 5 | 4.66 | 21.15 | 1.30 | 2.14 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 75 - 120 45 | 0.930 | 34.86 | 0.135 | 0.021 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 95 - 105 10 | 3.17 | 88.63 | 0.303 | 0.019 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 100 – 105 5 | 4.78 | 151.02 | 0.682 | 0.008 |
| | | | | |
RC-20 | 95 – 100 5 | 1.92 | 62.02 | 0.218 | 0.030 |
| | | | | |
RC-21 | 95 - 110 15 | 0.899 | 74.29 | 0.145 | 0.014 |
| | | | | |
RC-22 | 110 - 120 10 | 1.77 | 18.14 | 0.074 | 0.024 |
| | | | | |
Includes | 115 - 120 5 | 3.25 | 27.52 | 0.079 | 0.014 |
In early 2005, Deer Trail Mining Company contracted with Connors Drilling to commence an underground diamond core drill program. This 2nd phase of exploratory drilling inside the PTH Tunnel of the Deer Trail Mine has been completed. The Phase II underground diamond core drilling program was primarily designed to target known horizons of mineralization and identify new mineralized horizons throughout the main ore channel of the Deer Trail Mine. The Company completed 7,235 feet of diamond core drilling and finished 13 underground drill holes. According to preliminary reports by the Company’s geologist, all of the holes drilled were reported to intersect mineralization within their designated targets. That report states that a total of approximately 514 feet of mineralization was intersected and consisted mostly of sulfide minerals (e.g. tetrahedrite, galena, pyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite). Other intercepts were encountered through oxidized mineral not reported in this total, as well as zones of subtly altered rock that may contain high mineral values and offer significant potential. The company is now working on final independent core logging and splitting verification. Once complete, it plans to ship its core samples to an independent lab for analysis.
In March 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC entered into an agreement with Behre Dolbear and Company (USA), Inc. to conduct geological services and consulting at Unico’s Deer Trail Mine in Marysvale, Utah. The focus of Behre Dolbear’s work is related to the underground diamond core drilling program undertaken at the Deer Trail Mine in 2005. Behre Dolbear is currently performing the geological core logging and spitting verification on the samples and overseeing the shipment of those samples to ALS
6
Chemex for analysis. Behre Dolbear has also been contracted to report on the mineralization and provide additional technical advice on the project as desired by Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC.
Behre Dolbear and Company (USA) has issued the following information from the Interim Summary Report on their work completed thus far. The report from Behre Dolbear states:
“Unico, Incorporated drilled 7,235 feet of BQ diameter core at various inclinations and azimuths from four drill stations in the Patrick Thomas Henry (PTH) adit at the Deer Trail Mine from December 2004 to April 2005. At that time, the core was not logged in detail and no analyses were done. Table 1 summarizes the drilling statistics. The station locations are defined based on the approximate footage from the PTH adit portal.
Table 1
Unico Phase II Drill Holes
| | | | |
UDDH Drill Hole # | Station Location | Inclination (in degrees) | Azimuth | Total Length (Feet) |
1* | 4400 | -45 | 102 | 740 |
2 | 4400 | -40 | 102 | 648 |
3* | 4400 | -42 | 92 | 782 |
4* | 4400 | -42 | 150 | 554 |
5* | 4400 | -55 | 102 | 664 |
6 | 4400 | -45 | 21 | 409 |
7 | 4400 | -58 | 298 | 733 |
8 | 4400 | -75 | 300 | 565 |
9* | 4700 | -45 | 116 | 460 |
10 | 4900 | -75 | 0 | 460 |
11* | 3400 | +45 | 258 | 454 |
12* | 3400 | +45 | 162 | 355 |
13* | 3400 | -65 | 125 | 420 |
Total Footage | | | | 7,235 |
*Logged by Behre Dolbear
Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), Inc. (Behre Dolbear) contracted with Unico in March 2006 to geologically log the core, select intervals for analyses and assays, supervise the sawing of the selected intervals, submit those samples to a laboratory for analyses, opine on the mineralization observed, and provide technical advice to Unico. Between March 23, 2006 and October 6, 2006, Behre Dolbear logged in detail 4,429 feet of core from the eight holes indicated in Table1. A total of 550 samples totaling 611 feet of core containing trace to significant mineralization from six of the holes (UDDH 1, 5, 9, 11, 12, and 13) has been selected, sawed, submitted for analyses and assays, and the results received and evaluated. Analyses are pending from 228 samples from 385 feet of core in UDDH 3. UDDH 4 has been logged, but sample intervals have not been selected.
ALS Chemex (Chemex) did the analyses and assays at its laboratory in North Vancouver, British Columbia. Sample preparation, analyses, and assays were done as requested by Behre Dolbear using Chemex’s standard protocols. Gold was determined by fire assay with an atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) finish. All samples were also analyzed for a 34-element suite of major and potentially significant trace elements using an aqua regia digestion and an emission spectrographic scan. Chemex’s quality control-quality assurance system complies with the requirements of the international standards ISO 90001:2000 and ISO17025:1999.
The Pennsylvanian Callville Limestone is the host of the mineralization in the holes logged by Behre Dolbear at the Deer Trail Mine. Behre Dolbear has logged over 4,400 feet of core that traverses the various lithologies of the upper +700 feet of that formation. This detailed logging has resulted in the recognition of ten previously unrecognized informal members and/or other subdivisions that will enable future work to place the mineralized horizons in the vicinity of the mine into stratigraphic perspective.
The mineralization in the Callville Limestone typically consists of stratabound narrow conformable bands of semi-massive to massive sulfides separated by relatively long intervals of weakly mineralized to barren rock. Ore minerals include sphalerite, galena, chalcopyrite, and tetrahedrite-tennantite. Where the significantly mineralized zones are thicker, the mineralized bands are closer together.
7
Based on the analytical results received to date, Behre Dolbear combined 33 continuous assay intervals from six holes into gross assay intervals ranging from 2.3 feet to 95 feet in length, uncorrected to true stratigraphic width. Intervals within the gross intervals were combined into 113 detailed intervals based on their grades.
The best intervals based on thickness and grades in multiple metals in the six holes from which analyses have been received are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 shows that significant mineralization in most of the holes is confined to relatively narrow intervals ranging from 1.0 feet to 10.6 feet. The thickest intercept with significant mineralization is in UDDH 12 at 55.2 feet. The intervals are uncorrected for the true widths of the intercepts and will all be thinner than stated, some possibly as much as fifty percent thinner. Overall, silver contributes the most value of the metals in Table 2 with zinc second and gold, copper, and lead contributing subordinate values. In some of the intervals, the silver and gold are high but the base metals are low. Copper contributes more value than zinc in some of these intervals. Only one of the intervals (UDDH 11 at 105.0 to 110.6 feet) has high values in all of the metals. The highest gold and silver values are in UDDH 1 (5.273 ppm Au=0.167oz/t Au; 366.9 ppm Ag= 10.71 oz/t Ag), and UDDH 11 (4.564 ppm Au= 0.133 oz/t Au; 585.1 ppm Ag= 17.08oz/t Ag).
Table 2
Best Interval from Each Analyzed Hole
| | | | | | | | |
UDDH | Analyzed From | Analyzed To | Interval (Feet) | Au (ppm) | Ag (ppm) | Cu (%) | Pb (%) | Zn (%) |
1 | 365.5 | 370.4 | 4.9 | 5.723 | 366.9 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.42 |
| 406.6 | 417.2 | 10.6 | 1.062 | 177.6 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 1.58 |
| 456.0 | 462.5 | 6.5 | 0.350 | 156.4 | 0.24 | 1.38 | 2.08 |
| | | | | | | | |
5 | 322.0 | 327.0 | 5.0 | 0.870 | 164.1 | 0.25 | 2.09 | 1.27 |
| 419.0 | 419.9 | 0.9 | 1.510 | 116.0 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.18 |
| | | | | | | | |
9 | 293.7 | 300.1 | 6.4 | 0.372 | 46.8 | 0.15 | 1.28 | 1.78 |
| 434.6 | 435.6 | 1.0 | 0.310 | 102.0 | 0.39 | 5.20 | 6.59 |
| | | | | | | | |
11 | 7.7 | 13.4 | 5.7 | 4.564 | 585.1 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 0.83 |
| 105.0 | 110.6 | 5.6 | 1.600 | 550.6 | 0.96 | 2.0 | 2.43 |
| | | | | | | | |
12 | 5.8 | 61.0 | 55.2 | 0.608 | 183.1 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.67 |
| 220.0 | 221.9 | 1.9 | 2.170 | 128.0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.32 |
| | | | | | | | |
13 | 77.9 | 78.9 | 1.0 | 0.380 | 188.0 | 0.60 | 3.10 | 3.89 |
There is potential for an economic deposit at the Deer Trail Mine if the metals occur together in significant grades and in widths (generally greater than 10 feet) that are adequate for mining. Additional work is required to determine if those conditions exist. Before additional drilling is done, the results of the logging, analyses, and observations by Behre Dolbear should be combined with the data and results from previous work to develop a three-dimensional model of the deposit. Development of that model will require data from surface and underground mapping, previous mining, and drilling from this and previous campaigns. All of this data on lithologies, structures, mineralization, and alteration must be put together on maps and cross sections to build the model. Based on that model, the geometry (true widths and lateral extents) and grades of the mineralization as currently known will be indicated and decisions can be made if additional drilling has the potential to define economically mineable mineralization. It has not been determined if there is adequate data available from previous work to construct a good model.”
In November 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company modified and expanded the agreement with Behre Dolbear and Company (USA), Inc. forgeological services at Unico’s Deer Trail Mine. The new agreement and work order addsseveral new areas of consulting that will fall under Behre Dolbear’s scope of services on the Deer Trail project. Under these new revisions Behre Dolbear will assemble all the available data relating to the locations, volumes, and grades of the tailings that Deer Trail intends to process through the Project's mill. Based on the information available, Behre Dolbear will estimate the volumes, tonnages, and grades of those tailings and will, if needed, recommend a drilling program to better define those tonnages and grades. Behre Dolbear will summarize the results of the drill core logging completed to date and correlate those results with pertinent assays of material from those holes to determine the factors from the logging that relate to and facilitate the location of significant mineralization. With Deer Trail's assistance, Behre Dolbear will assemble all the available data (mineralization, rock types, structure, alteration, etc.) from past drilling and mining, focusing on the 3100-3400 zone in the PTH adit, i.e., the 3400 East Stope and 3400 East Stope Extension, which is the zone most
8
easily accessible for near-term mining. Behre Dolbear will correlate data from the extant logging effort and assays with the data from past drilling and mining to locate and model, to the extent possible, potentially mineable mineralization in the 3100-3400 zone. Behre Dolbear will determine if logging of the holes not yet logged in the 4400 zone of the PTH adit is warranted, based upon the logging to date of holes in that zone and any available data from past drilling and mining. Behre Dolbear will assist Deer Trail with judgments and potential approaches to exploitation of the Toroweap Sandstone in the 8600 area of the PTH adit. (It appears that this area has the greatest potential for hosting high grade, large tonnage mineralization at the Deer Trail Mine. That area is, however, the portion of the existing workings that is least accessible for mining in the near term.) The agreement calls for additional personnel and support for Behre Dolbear’s work at the Deer Trail Mine. Further, the modifications call for reorganizing and redirecting site efforts that have heretofore focused specifically on the logging, chemical analyses, and interpretation of the drill cores. Behre Dolbear will focus on those aspects of the expanded work scope that will most quickly lead to the definition and potential reporting of ore reserves in the form of mine tailings. They will also focus strongly on the development of mineralization models that facilitate judgments regarding the 3100-3400 area of the PTH adit and the timing of work in the 8600 area.
On May 14, 2008, Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), Inc. sent Unico, Inc. and Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC a proposed final report and appendices on Project J06-034 regarding the Relationship of Stratigraphy and Mineralization at the Lower (New) Deer Trail Mine. Upon approval by Unico, Inc and DTMC, LLC, submission of the report and appendices will complete the work relating to the core logging that Behre Dolbear, Unico and Deer Trail Mining Company have agreed upon in the Proposal and Consulting Agreement dated March 14, 2006 and the Work Change Order dated November 7, 2006. The report entitledEvaluation of the Deer Trail Tailings at the Deer Trail Mine, Piute County, Utahhas been removed from the revised report and a Conclusions and Recommendations section will be added in the Executive Summary which will be revised accordingly by Behre Dolbear. Executives and Management of Unico and Deer Trail Mining Company are currently reviewing the report and expect to announce details of the report once completed.
In September 2007, Deer Trail Mining Company completed the construction of a new electrical substation that will supply power to the reconstructed mill and processing facility. The substation is designed to supply up to 2.5 megawatts of electrical power well beyond the estimated 1.5 megawatts estimated to run the mill and processing facility. Additional power is expected to be used for future mining activities and expansion plans on site. The Company recently completed the construction of a secondary substation to interface directly with the mill and processing facility and it is now energized.
In February, 2008, the Deer Trail Mining Company completed underground rehabilitation work up through to the 3400 level of the PTH tunnel of the Deer Trail Mine. The work was contracted through Atlas Mining Company to conduct initial underground maintenance including the replacement of timber sets, clean up of the main haulage way and installation of ground support where needed to the main PTH haulage tunnel.
In April, 2008, the Deer Trail Mining Company completed reconstruction work of the floatation circuit at the mill and processing facility at the Deer Trail Mine. Testing of the floatation circuit is currently underway utilizing screened material from the stockpiles on site.
Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc.
Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Utah on April 26, 1993. It has acquired 26 patented mining claims located in American Fork Canyon, Utah County, Utah, which is organized into three separate parcels. The claims contain mining properties that have not been mined for production since 1983. The properties were mined primarily for silver, lead and zinc. There are no known, proven or probable reserves on the property.
Silver Bell Mining Company conducted some exploration work on the Silver Bell Mine through 2004. Silver Bell Mining Company plans to conduct a feasibility study in order to analyze the claims prior to commencing any future mining activities on the claims. Silver Bell Mining Company anticipates that any future ore mined from the Silver Bell Mine will be transported to the Deer Trail Mine site where it can be further processed. Silver Bell Mining Company may also seek a joint venture mining partner to jointly develop the Silver Bell Mine. Silver Bell Mining Company anticipates that any ore mined from the Silver Bell Mine will be transported to the Deer Trail Mine site where it will be crushed and milled.
In August 2006, Silver Bell Mining Company reached a preliminary agreement for a joint venture with the Polymet Company, LLC for mining at the Silver Bell Mine and executed a letter of intent. A subsequent definitive agreement to finalize the details of the joint venture was expected to be signed by August 31, 2006. However, the parties failed to reach a definitive agreement, and the parties are no longer involved in negotiations.
9
Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC
On July 20, 2001, Unico entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase with Kaibab Industries, Inc., an Arizona corporation. The parties then entered into a Revised Mining Lease and Option to Purchase in April 2003 (the "Revised Kaibab Mining Lease"). Following the formation of the Bromide Basin Mining Company in June 2004, Unico assigned all of its assets, liabilities and operations associated with the Bromide Basin Mines to Bromide Basin Mining Company. A Second Revised Mining Lease and Option to Purchase was entered into with Bromide Basin Mining Company in May 2005 which expired November 1, 2005. Effective May 1, 2006, the parties entered into a Third Revised Mining Lease and Option to Purchase (the “Third Revised Mining Lease”). At that time Unico paid approximately $63,592 to Kaibab Indutries, Inc. for past due lease payments, taxes and BLM fees. Under the Third Revised Mining Lease, Kaibab Industries, Inc. leased to Bromide Basin Mining Company certain mining claims located in the Henry Mountain Mining District in Garfield County, Utah containing approximately 400 acres, which included the Bromide Basin Mines. The Third Revised Mining Lease granted to Bromide Basin Mining Company the option to purchase six (6) fully permitted patented mining claims and twenty-one (21) located mining claims comprising in all over 400 acres of Bromide Basin in the Henry Mountain Mining District located in Garfield County, Utah. The option exercise price was $835,000 for all specified mining claims, mill sites and dumps being leased. The lease was extended until October 31, 2007 at which time it expired. The Company has chosen not to extend it or pursue the purchase option.
The primary purpose of the agreement was to allow Bromide Basin Mining Company access to the claims to conduct an extensive preproduction feasibility study prior to any additional mining production and to analyze the potential of the claims before exercising the purchase option from Kaibab Industries.
The Company has concluded its evaluation of the property, and has determined that the leased premises outlined under the Kaibab Mining Lease is not feasible for large scale mining activities by Bromide Basin Mining Company, and will not exercise its purchase option with Kaibab Industries.
Plan of Operation
During the next 12 months, the Company’s plan of operation is to raise approximately $2,500,000 for investment into two of its subsidiary companies: Deer Trail Mining Company and Silver Bell Mining Company. The funds are intended for the following purposes during the next twelve months:
§
Complete analytical certification by independent lab, ALS Chemex, and final reporting from consulting firm, Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), on the logging and shipment of core samples identified and taken from the completed 2nd phase of exploratory drilling at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue sampling and analyzing mineralized rock samples, stockpiles and dump material from the Deer Trail Mine to evaluate the most efficient means to conduct future mining and milling activities;
§
Expand metallurgical research department at the Deer Trail Mine and Mill Facility;
§
Purchase additional lab equipment for metallurgical purposes;
§
Upgrade mine infrastructure and begin underground mining activities including maintenance and rehabilitation work at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue to upgrade and complete the re-construction project on the existing mill at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Upgrade the crushing facility at the upper Deer Trail Mine and continue screening the ore dumps;
§
Begin milling and processing activities at the Deer Trail Mill and Processing Facility;
§
Acquire new mining equipment to improve operations at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Conduct additional survey and mapping work on the Clyde and Crown Point mining claims including improvements to the property and potentially underground and surface exploratory drilling on the claims; and
§
Commence a feasibility study on the potential of the mining claims at the Silver Bell Mine beginning in the Summer of 2008.
Accomplishing the 12-month plan of operations is dependent on: (a) the Company raising approximately $2,500,000 in equity and/or debt financing during the next 12 months to be used for the Company’s operations, of which approximately $1,000,000 is needed in the next 120 days.
Smelting and Refining
All of the smelting and refining of ore will be handled by other companies. Smelters capable of handling the Deer Trail concentrates include the Cominco Lead and Zinc smelters in Trail, British Columbia, Canada, and the Grupo Mexico (formerly Asarco) smelter in Torreon, Mexico. Occasionally, high grade copper-silver concentrates may be sent to the Noranda smelter in Belledune, New Brunswick, Canada.
10
Dependence on Metal Prices
Unico's mining activities will be largely dependent on metal prices. The prices may fluctuate on the world commodity markets and will be beyond the influence of Unico. A substantial reduction in the price of metals might impede Unico's ability to economically mine or to raise additional capital. Similarly, recent increases in metal prices have been beneficial to mining companies, and may increase Unico's ability to acquire new capital.
Competition
Unico competes with many mining companies in the U.S. and throughout the world. The majority of Unico's competitors are much larger and better financed than Unico. Some of Unico's competitors have closed mining operations in past years due to low metal prices. Some mining operations have been consolidated through mergers or other acquisitions. Recent increases in metal prices have helped mining companies in expanding operations and in their efforts to acquire new capital.
Employees
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 the Company and its subsidiaries had a total of 21 employees. Through its subsidiaries, the Company had 18 full time employees, 1 part time employee and 4 consultants. The full time employees include a general manager, senior engineer/mine manager, metalurgist and geologist. Unico believes the number of employees may increase to approximately 30 within the next twelve months. In the event the mining operations are successful, additional employees may be added in the future.
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company ended its agreement with Javelin Advisory Group to provide administrative support for a monthly fee of $10,000 and added a full time CFO.
Governmental Regulation
Mining and/or processing activities are subject to numerous permitting and environmental laws and regulations administered by active federal, state, and local authorities, particularly the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining. Although the permits necessary for mining operations on the patented and unpatented Deer Trail Mine claims and on the patented Silver Bell Mine claims have already been obtained, Unico may be required to expand such permitting in order to fully develop the properties. In order to obtain expanded permits, it may be necessary to gather and analyze baseline data, complete environmental assessments or environmental impact statements with appropriate steps to mitigate potential adverse impacts, and modify the proposed plans in order to accommodate environmental impacts, all of which may take an indeterminate amount of time to complete.
The mining operations are regulated under the jurisdiction of the Mine Safety and Health Administration or "MSHA" to some degree to insure safe operations. Without proper training of personnel and compliance to all MSHA rules, the mine could be subject to heavy fines and closure. Unico strives to comply with MSHA regulations and maintain a good working relationship with MSHA. The mining operations are subject to periodic inspections by MSHA which, depending on the outcome of an inspection, could curtail production until any violations have been cured.
During approximately the last two years Unico has received some minor citations from MSHA and fines have been assessed. Unico is current on its payment obligations with respect to outstanding fines.
Cost and Effect of Compliance with Environmental Laws
Environmental regulations and guidelines have been established by state and federal agencies to insure that the environment is not permanently adversely impacted. Deer Trail Mining Company presently has $215,799 in reclamation bonds with the U.S. Forest Service and the Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining. As Unico expands its operations it will become necessary to comply with further regulations for larger operations and more bonding will be required from time to time. Permitting will be an ongoing function of Unico's operations.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act imposes a wide variety of new regulatory requirements on publicly held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements will affect us. For example:
11
-
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer must now certify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in our periodic reports;
-
Our periodic reports must disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our controls and procedures;
-
Our periodic reports must disclose whether there were significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses; and
-
We may not make any loan to any director or executive officer and we may not materially modify any existing loans.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act has required us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the new regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.
Code of Ethics and Audit Committee Charter
The Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Code of Ethics and an Audit Committee Charter.
The Code of Ethics applies to our principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
·
Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
·
Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and in other public communications made by the Company;
·
Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
·
The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code; and
·
Accountability for adherence to the Code.
Unico’s code of ethics was filed as an exhibit to Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 28, 2006.
The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is to oversee the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Company's Board of Directors and report the result of their activities to the Board. Such responsibilities shall exclude but shall not be limited to, the selection, and if necessary the replacement of the Company's independent auditors, review and discuss with such independent auditors and the Company's internal audit department (i) the overall scope and plans for the audit, (ii) the adequacy and effectiveness of the accounting and financial controls, including the Company's system to monitor and manage business risks, and legal and ethical programs, and (iii) the results of the annual audit, including the financial statements to be included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB. Uinco’s audit committee charter was incorporated by reference from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Year Ended February 28, 2005 filed on June 20, 2005.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information specified by this item.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Deer Trail Lease
On March 30, 1992, Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase agreement with Deer Trail Development Corporation, with headquarters in Dallas, Texas. Deer Trail Development Corporation is now known as Crown Mines, L.L.C. The lease was to run for a period of 10 years, and cover 28 patented claims, 5 patented mill sites and 171 unpatented claims located approximately 5 miles South of Marysvale, Utah. It included mine workings known as the Deer Trail Mine, the PTH Tunnel and the Carisa and Lucky Boy mines. The lease was extended several times prior to the Company’s purchase of the claims in July 2007.
12
In July 2007, Deer Trail Mining Company completed the purchase of the claims covered by the Deer Trail Lease. A total of $4,000,000 was paid to purchase the property over a period of approximately three years. The purchase of the claims also included the purchase of a fifty percent (50%) interest in Water Right No. 63-37, said fifty percent (50%) portion including a maximum flow of 0.125 cubic feet of water per second and a maximum annual diversion of 90.5 acre feet of water from Three Mile Spring for year-round mining purposes. The purchase of the claims also included a fifty percent (50%) interest in a contractual right to use water diverted under Water Right No. 63-3043 as evidenced and described in the Agreement between Cottonwood Irrigation Company and Deer Trail Development Corporation dated July 28, 1977. The fifty percent (50%) interest in the contractual water right allows Deer Trail Mining Company to truck not more than 2,500 gallons of water per week from the Cottonwood Creek to the Deer Trail Mine for mining activities during the irrigation season (April 15 to October 15), and possibly more during the remaining portion of each year.
Deer Trail Mining Company also obtained a lease from Crown Mines, L.L.C. of the remaining fifty percent (50%) interest in Water Right No. 63-37 and the remaining 50% interest in the contractual water right (Water Right 63-3043. The lease is for an initial term of 5 years for no rent. The lease may be terminated by Crown Mines, L.L.C. upon 12 months’ written notice if Crown Mines determines that the water rights covered by the lease are necessary for the operation and development of any of Crown Mines’ mining claims or for other permitted uses. The lease may be extended if Crown Mines determines that the water rights covered by the lease are not required for the operation and development of any of Crown Mines’ mining claims or for other permitted uses during the extension period, provided that the parties can agree on other terms including a price or rent for the extended term.
Crown Mines, L.L.C. retained a perpetual royalty interest on minerals taken from the claims purchased by Deer Trail Mining Company. The perpetual royalty is three percent (3.0%) of net smelter returns on minerals other than gold. The royalty rate for gold is three percent (3.0%) when the price of gold is less than or equal to $500 per troy ounce, four percent (4.0%) when the price of gold is more than $500 and less than or equal to $600 per troy ounce, and five percent (5.0%) when the price of gold is greater than $600 per troy ounce. Crown Mines, L.L.C. also retained an undivided three percent (3.0%) interest in any oil and gas and associated hydrocarbons produced from the claims.
Crown Mines, L.L.C. also retained an access easement and a water line pipeline easement across the claims sold to Deer Trail Mining Company.
Deer Trail Mining Company has agreed to provide Crown Mines, L.L.C. with information obtained as a result of Deer Trail Mining Company’s exploration activities on the claims, and Deer Trail Mining Company granted to Crown Mines, L.L.C. a right of first refusal to repurchase the claims or any portion thereof.
In August 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company entered into a Mining Lease with Joel Johnson covering the Clyde, Clyde Intermediate and Crown Point claims. These claims are located near the Deer Trail Mine. Deer Trail Mining Company has leased the claims for the purpose of conducting mine exploration, evaluation, and possible mining activities on the claims. The Mining Lease is for two years, with options to extend the lease for 50 additional one year periods. Under the terms of the Mining Lease, Deer Trail Mining Company paid initial down payments totaling $31,000 with $4,000 due in the second year of the lease. If Deer Trail Mining Company elects to extend the lease, it must pay $3,000 for the first extension year, and the annual lease extension payment increases ten percent (10%) per year thereafter. Additionally, Deer Trail Mining Company will pay three percent (3%) of the gross sale proceeds from the sale of any ore concentrates, or other mineral resources extracted from the claims.
In September 2006, Deer Trail Mining Company entered into a Non-Patented Mining Claims Lease covering approximately 70 additional claims covering approximately 1,500 acres in Piute County Utah for the purpose of exploration, evaluation and mining activities. In consideration for the rights under the agreement, the Deer Trail Mining Company agreed to pay the lease holders $7,000 per year for each of the first three years. Deer Trail Mining Company has the right to extend the lease for 50 additional one year periods. If extended by Deer Trail Mining Company, the annual lease payment is $10,000 in each of years four and five, and thereafter the annual lease payment increases by ten percent (10%) per year. In addition to the annual lease payments, Deer Trail Mining Company has also agreed to pay an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the gross sales proceeds from all ore, concentrates, and all other productions of mineral resources extracted from the claims. The agreement contains an option to purchase the claims exercisable at $350,000 during the five first years of the lease. The exercise price increases $50,000 per year thereafter. It may only be exercised while the lease is effective.
The Deer Trail claims are located in the Tushar Mountains of East Central, Utah in the Mount Baldy and Ohio Mining districts. They are located on Deer Trail Mountain, approximately 5 miles South of Marysvale, Utah and are accessible by a gravel county road which is in good condition. There are no known, proven or probable reserves on the property.
The Deer Trail ore body was first discovered by deer hunters in 1878. The ore body originally cropped out at the surface. It is estimated that between 1878 and 1917, about 10,000 tons of ore were mined. A small mill was installed in 1918, and between 1918 and 1923 the mine produced about 138,000 tons of predominately oxidized ore averaging 1.38 opt gold, 11.49 opt silver and 3.26% lead. Zinc and copper were not recovered. In 1923, mining was suspended when the workings encountered a fault that cut off the ore,
13
and for more than 20 years production was limited to drawing stopes and removing pillars. In 1945, the PTH tunnel was started to explore for the faulted extension of the Deer Trail ore body. The 3,400 ore body was encountered unexpectedly by this tunnel and a total of 5,000 tons of ore averaging 2.84% lead, 0.76% copper, 6.26% zinc, 15.17 opt silver and 0.19 opt gold were shipped. By 1964, the PTH tunnel had intersected the offset part of the Deer Trail ore body. From 1964 until 1981 this segment of the ore body produced over 100,000 tons of unoxidized sulfide ore averaging 5% lead, 0.6% copper, 12% zinc, 15 opt silver, and 0.10 opt gold. The present working face is still in ore.
The PTH Tunnel penetrates more than 10,000 feet with a developed network of tunnels, shafts and raises at the 3,400 foot area and at the 8,000 foot area and was mined extensively for gold and silver for about 20 years. The timbered and ventilated tunnel includes more than two miles of track for ore cars accessed through a covered entrance structure.
The mine facilities also include ore cars, battery operated engines, an engine storage and charging house, an electric power substation, a miner's locker room, a compressor building, a 1,000 gallon underground gasoline storage tank with gas pump, two front end loaders, three dump trucks and a general office, two fully operational labs and a core sampling facility. Deer Trail Mining Company believes water is accessible to the site.
The Deer Trail mining property was developed by the Deer Trail Development Corporation, now known as Crown Mines, LLC, located in Dallas, Texas. The property has been leased out several times since production ceased in 1981 and is presently owned by Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC. There has been little production since then. Several major mining companies have explored the property. These include Noranda, Phelps Dodge and Goldfields. One smaller company drilled and analyzed the mill tailings from the upper Deer Trail Mine area in 1990. The results of the drilling and other tests were not conclusive, and at present there are no known proven or probable reserves on the claims.
Unico leased the property effective June 1, 1992. Unico has produced a few small lots of ore from the stopes in the 8600 area of the PTH tunnel for testing and evaluation purposes, and has developed several excellent targets within those workings. In April 2001, Unico began limited mining operations which were concentrated in the 3400 area of the mine until underground mining operations temporarily stopped in October 2003. Unico transferred all rights and obligations to the Deer Trail Mining Company in June 2004. Deer Trail Mining Company purchased the claims in July 2007, and is the current owner and operator of the Deer Trail Mine. Deer Trail Mining Company resumed underground mining operations at the Deer Trail Mine in late 2004. Underground mine operations have focused on infrastructure improvements during this past fiscal year along with continuing the exploration, testing and development of mineable reserves.
Deer Trail Mine Geological Information
The Deer Trail mine workings expose westerly dipping sedimentary rocks of three units: the Toroweap and Queantoweap Formations and the Callville Limestone. The Deer Trail ore body is in the lower part of the Toroweap Formation and consists of a nearly continuous group of semiconcordant replacement bodies flanking a central vein. About half of this ore body is exposed in the Old Deer Trail mine workings and is oxidized; the other half is located in the 8600 area workings and consists of unoxidized sulphide ore. The Queantoweap Formation, which underlies the Toroweap, is a quartzite and hosts no known mantos. The underlying Callville Limestone contained the 3400 ore body.
The Toroweap Formation exposed in the 8600 area consists of a wide range of interbedded lithologies, including quartzite, limestone, dolomite, shale, and chert, which form 50 or more recognizable units ranging in thickness from a inch to several feet. In contrast, the underlying Queantoweap Sandstone consists of a fairly uniform medium-grained, well-sorted massive quartzite.
The Calville Limestone in the Deer Trail mine lacks marker beds, and lithologic facies change rapidly. The rocks are cut by several faults of unknown displacement. The marked lateral variations in lithology have made it possible to identify only seven correatable stratigraphic assemblages. The upper 240 feet of the Callville Limestone in the 3400 area consists dominantly of mudstones containing quartz silt, evaporite nodules, and sponge spicules. Below 240 feet, dolomite containing microfossils and peloids is abundant and evaporites are absent. In the 8600 area, the Callville has been observed in drill core and there it contains thick beds of course-grained anhydrite.
The Toroweap Formation in the mine area strikes generally north-south and dips 201 W. The Deer Trail ore body rakes across this inclination with a bearing of N 701 W, so the average plunge of the ore zone into Deer Trail Mountain is about 181.
The mantos in the Old Deer Trail mine workings closely followed the axis of the Deer Trail anticline, a relationship that was used to guide development. In the 8600 area, however, the mantos and the anticline axis diverge and the deepest workings are about 1500 feet apart.
14
The Deer Trail ore body consists of a semicontinuous group of narrow, elongate strata-bound replacement bodies developed adjacent to a central vein. The ore body has a sinuous ribbon like shape in plain view and has been mined for a length of approximately 5,525 feet over a width averaging 32 to 38 feet and a height averaging about 15 to 30 feet.
A set of cross faults that trends east-northeast and dip steeply to the north are exposed in the mine workings in the 8600 area. These have an aggregate stratigraphic throw of about 150 feet, down to the north. One of these faults is the 18 Drift fault or 18 North fault. These faults are now occupied by quartz veins as much as 15 feet thick that contain substantial quantities of lead, zinc, arsenic, silver, gold, copper and molybdennum. The 18 north fault consists of quartz with good values in gold, silver and copper with very little other metals which could possibly be marketed to smelters as a flux.
Deer Trail Mine Workings
The mine workings at the Deer Trail consist of the upper Old Deer Trail mine workings and the PTH tunnel mine workings. The Old Deer Trail mine consists of three levels, approximately 100 vertical feet apart. The first level was first accessed from the surface through the discovery shaft of 1878, with several adits interconnecting from the surface. The second level or the No. 2 Tunnel level is accessed through one known tunnel and consists of several large stopes interconnected with a series of drifts, winzes, and raises. The third level or the No. 3 Tunnel level was used as a haulage tunnel and was the main level of the Old Deer Trail mine. It consists of drifts and raises all accessed by 18" narrow gauge track. The present workings are only partially accessible. Many drifts have caved. All three levels are interconnected allowing for good ventilation.
The PTH Tunnel workings underlie the Old Deer Trail workings by approximately 450 feet and accessed 4,000 feet to the south. The PTH Tunnel was started in 1945 to intersect the faulted Deer Trail ore body. It is a 5'x7' tunnel that extends over 10,000 feet into Deer Trail Mountain. Almost all areas of these workings are accessed by 18" narrow gauge track. The tunnel trends to the north-northwest paralleling the base of Deer Trail Mountain. At approximately 3,400 feet the tunnel intersected unexpectedly mineralization in the Callville Limestone. This mineralization was developed on the PTH Tunnel level as well as two levels below 100 vertical feet apart. Bedded mineralization associated with the Wet Fault was produced via a series of drifts, winzes, stopes and raises. A ventilation/escape shaft was driven to the surface in this area. The tunnel next encountered mineralization at approximately 8,600 feet, where the tunnel encountered the continuation of the Deer Trail ore body. Several thousand feet of drifts was driven to explore and exploit the deposit. An internal shaft was driven 250 feet to gain access to the shallowing dipping ore where three more levels were established. Again several hundred feet of drifts, stopes, raises and winzes were driven to mine the ore body.
Water was encountered in the 280 winze and pumps were installed in order to continue mining. Mining was stopped in 1981 due to lack of processing and smelting facilities. The present face in the 280 area is still in ore. The width of the face was increasing as well as the value of the ore. A raise to connect the PTH workings with the Old Deer Trail Mine was started located approximately where the PTH Tunnel crossed the 18 North fault. It is presently up 140 feet.
Deer Trail Mine Mineral Resources
The resources have been outlined above. However, further efforts to increase the mineable resources of the mine are being explored. Deer Trail Mining Company completed phase one which included a reverse circulation exploratory drill program in the upper Deer Trail Mine area. Deer Trail Mining Company also completed a second phase of underground diamond core drilling conducted in the PTH Tunnel of the Deer Trail Mine, which began in first quarter of 2005 to attempt to prove up reserves. Deer Trail Mining Company is also evaluating ways to mine more efficiently in order to mine lower grade ores economically. Deer Trail Mining Company is evaluating whether cyanide may be used in processing its ore. Deer Trail Mining Company acquired two heavy media separators. The heavy media separator is a method whereby low grade material can be upgraded underground. Areas left undeveloped in the mine due to the amount of waste rock between narrow mineralized beddings might effectively be produced by using heavy media separator technology.
The Deer Trail deposit is similar to many deposits in Utah, such as Tintic and Park City, where mine reserves were drilled approximately two years ahead of production due to the nature of the deposits and the costs involved in drilling out entire reserves before mining began. It is planned that reserves in the Deer Trail will be established two to three years ahead of production. Exploration drilling will be conducted in conjunction with mine production. Several prospective targets will be drilled from underground as the workings advance.
To date only two known mineralized horizons have been exploited. Deer Trail Mining Company believes the underlying formations contain very favorable horizons for mineralization, but they have yet to be tested. Deer Trail Mining Company believes the potential is excellent that more mineralization will be discovered.
15
Deer Trail Mining Company's Purchase of 680 Acres Near the Deer Trail Mine
On August 28, 2000, Unico purchased approximately 680 acres of raw ground located in Piute County, State of Utah for $200,000. This land is adjacent to the existing Deer Trail Mine property owned by Unico which is currently operated by the Deer Trail Mining Company. The property was purchased from Tech-Sym Corporation of Houston, Texas.
Deer Trail Mining Company purchased the property for the purpose of establishing a mill site on the property and to use as a place to store waste rock from mining operations, and for other general mining and business purposes.
In June 2002, this property was encumbered by a trust deed securing a loan in the amount of $200,000 which was used to finance general operations of Deer Trail Mining Company. On June 25, 2004, the balance and accrued interest related to this debt was repaid through the issuance of common stock.
Silver Bell Mine
On December 6, 2000, Unico acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock of Silver Bell Mining Company, Incorporated, a Utah corporation, in consideration for the issuance of 3,000,000 restricted shares of Unico common stock. In June 2002, all of the Silver Bell Mining claims were encumbered by a trust deed securing a loan in the amount of $350,000 which was used to finance general operations of Silver Bell Mining Company, Incorporated. On June 25, 2004, the balance and accrued interest related to this debt was repaid through the issuance of common stock.
Silver Bell Mining Company, Incorporated was incorporated in the State of Utah on April 26, 1993. It has acquired 26 patented mining claims located in American Fork Canyon, Utah County, Utah, which is organized into three separate parcels. The claims contain mining properties which have not been mined for production since 1983. The properties were mined primarily for silver, lead and zinc. There are no known, proven or probable reserves on the property.
The Silver Bell deposit was first discovered in 1871 by soldiers stationed at Fort Douglas in Salt Lake City. Mining was confined to select high grade ores averaging 100 ounces per ton in silver. The workings consisted of an adit and a winze and ore was lowered down the mountain by means of a cable and rail system. The mine was enlarged to accommodate larger equipment in 1980 and some ore was produced which averaged 22 ounces in silver per ton of ore. The deposit consists of a single fissure or vein known as the Silver Bell fissure which averages six feet in width and dips to the NW at 62 degrees. It has been exposed for over 300 feet in depth and over 1,200 feet of strike length. Associated with the fissure several mineralized horizons (mantos) have been encountered. Recent independent sampling done by Watts, Grifiths, and McQuat and others demonstrate that the mantos are far richer than the vein mineralization with values as high as 120 ounces per ton silver. The deposit contains both oxide and sulphide ore rich in silver, lead, zinc and copper. The sulphide mineralization contains more values than the oxides. The mineralized system is located within the Maxfield cambrian limestone unit and extends down through the Ophir units into the Tintic Quartzite. There is presently an estimated resources of over 100,000 tons.
Silver Bell Mining Company conducted some exploration work on the Silver Bell Mine in Summer, 2003 through 2004. Silver Bell Mining Company plans to commence an exploration and resource definition program at the Silver Bell Mine during Summer, 2006. Silver Bell Mining Company may also seek a joint venture mining partner to jointly develop the Silver Bell Mine. Silver Bell Mining Company anticipates that any ore mined from the Silver Bell Mine will be transported to the Deer Trail Mine site where it will be crushed and milled.
In August 2006, Silver Bell Mining Company reached a preliminary agreement for a joint venture with the Polymet Company, LLC for mining at the Silver Bell Mine and executed a letter of intent. A subsequent definitive agreement to finalize the details of the joint venture was expected to be signed by August 31, 2006. However, the parties failed to reach a definitive agreement, and the parties are no longer involved in negotiations.
Bromide Basin Mines
On July 20, 2001, Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase with Kaibab Industries, Inc., an Arizona corporation, covering certain mining claims at the Bromide Basin Mines. The lease was renewed several times until it expired on October 31, 2007. The Company has decided not to renew the lease or exercise its purchase option.
The primary purpose of the agreement was to allow Bromide Basin Mining Company access to the claims to conduct an extensive preproduction feasibility study prior to any additional mining production and to analyze the potential of the claims before exercising its purchase option from Kaibab Industries. It has been determined that the mine is not suitable for a large scale mining operation by the Company, and the Company will not renew the lease or exercise its purchase option.
16
Purchase of Mining Equipment
In April 2003, Unico purchased certain mining equipment from Kaibab Industries, Inc. for $165,000. To pay for the equipment, Unico executed a promissory note which Unico and Bromide Mining Company, LLC have collectively assumed liability to make payments of $2,000 per month, this promissory note was extended until July 1, 2005. The promissory note was paid in full in April 2006 when Unico paid approximately $125,785 to Kaibab Industries, Inc. All of this mining equipment was moved to the Deer Trail mine where it is being used.
Principal Offices
Our principal offices are located at 8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th Floor, San Diego, California 92108. We lease on a month-to-month basis at a rate of US $4,602 per month. We believe our office space is suitable for our needs for the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company settled six lawsuits filed in the Twelfth Circuit (State) Court in Florida stemming from defaulted convertible debentures totaling $1,025,000 and $36,406 of interest. Unico agreed to settle all of the actions by issuing a total of 3,926,315,790 shares of its common stock to the plaintiffs These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard from, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida which specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties.
The Company scheduled a special meeting of its shareholders on December 21, 2007 at which shareholders were to vote on a proposal to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to authorize the Company’s board of directors, in its discretion, to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of up to one-for-five hundred during the six month period following the date of a special meeting of shareholders. On December 17, 2007, plaintiff Legacy Trading Group (“Legacy”), a California limited liability company, filed an action against Unico alleging violation of Section 14(a) and (c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder, and Arizona Revised Statute § 19-705. The action was filed in the United States District Court, Southern Division of California (Civil No. 07CV 2344-L (RBB)). Legacy filed an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), contending that notice of the special meeting of Unico’s shareholders and/or the related proxy statement was not provided to all shareholders. At a hearing held on December 18, 2007, the Court granted the application for a TRO, and enjoined and restrained Unico from holding the special meeting of the shareholders on December 21, 2007 or at any other time until the preliminary injunction hearing in this matter was heard. The preliminary injunction hearing was held on January 8, 2008. Plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction was denied at the hearing on the grounds of being moot. Unico believes notice of the special meeting of Unico’s shareholders and the related proxy statement for the December 21, 2007 special meeting were sent to all shareholders entitled to receive such pursuant to applicable federal proxy rules and the Arizona Revised Statutes. However, since the TRO prevented the Company from holding the special meeting of shareholders on December 21, 2007, the Company rescheduled the special meeting which was held on January 28, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
On April 29, 2007, Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC was served with a lawsuit filed on April 10, 2008 by Kaibab Industries, Inc. in Maricopa County, Arizona state court (No. CV2008-008121). The plaintiff alleges that Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC owes $30,000 in rent for the months of May through October 2007, when the mining lease expired. The plaintiff also alleges that Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC has failed to vacate the premises and that it owes an additional $5,000 per month as a holdover tenant commencing November 1, 2007 until it vacates the premises. The plaintiff has also asked for interest, attorney’s fees and court costs. Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC has vacated the premises.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
A special meeting of the shareholders of Unico was held on January 28, 2008 to consider and vote upon a proposal to amend Unico’s Articles of Incorporation to authorize Unico’s board of directors, in its discretion, to effect a reverse stock split of Unico’s common stock at a ratio of up to 1 for 500 shares during the six month period following the date of the special meeting of shareholders. The proposal was approved by the shareholders with 2,194,297,224 shares voting in favor of the proposal, 1,724,664,523 shares voting against, and 7,923,462 shares abstaining.
Although Unico’s board of directors has not yet approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, the Company believes that a reverse stock split is in the Company’s best interests as it will enable the Company to increase the number of authorized, but unissued common shares, which can then be used to permit the conversion of outstanding convertible debentures into shares of the Company’s common stock, and for raising additional needed capital. It will also assist the Company to increase the trading price of the Company’s common stock to a level more acceptable to potential investors.
17
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Company’s common stock is traded on the OTCBB (Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board) under the symbol “UCOI”. The following table sets forth the trading history of the common stock on the Bulletin Board for each quarter during the last two fiscal years ended February 29, 2008, as reported by Dow Jones Interactive and/or Pink Sheets, LLC. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions. The quotations have been adjusted to reflect the Company’s 1 for 100 reverse stock split that occurred August 11, 2006 as though the reverse stock split had occurred March 1, 2006.
| | | | |
Quarter Ending | | Quarterly High | | Quarterly Low |
5/31/2006 | $ | .45 | $ | .08 |
8/31/2006 | $ | .13 | $ | .046 |
11/30/2006 | $ | .057 | $ | .0056 |
2/28/2007 | $ | .017 | $ | .0055 |
5/31/2007 | $ | .0093 | $ | .0021 |
8/31/2007 | $ | .0034 | $ | .0010 |
11/30/2007 | $ | .0021 | $ | .0006 |
2/29/2008 | $ | .0009 | $ | .0004 |
Holders of Record
As of May 15, 2008 there were approximately 624 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. The Company believes it has many additional shareholders who hold shares through brokerage accounts and/or in street name.
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends during the last two fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 or since then. We currently intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our operations and do not anticipate paying cash dividends or making any other distributions on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. Our future dividend policy will be determined by our board of directors on the basis of various factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, business opportunities and capital requirements.
Under Arizona state corporate law, no dividends may be paid if, after giving effect to the dividends, either: (a) Unico would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (b) Unico's total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless Unico's articles of incorporation provide otherwise, the amount that would be needed, if Unico were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights on dissolution of shareholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the dividend.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
From March 1, 2007 through February 29, 2008 Unico issued convertible debentures (“Debentures”) aggregating approximately $3,764,954 to Blue Marble, approximately $1,200,000 to Compass Capital Corporation and approximately $500,000 to Moore Investment Holdings that were unpaid, and of which $3,965,100 are in default. Some of these debentures, with the exception of those issued to Moore Investment Holdings, along with other debentures issued before March 1, 2007 were assigned to Blue Marble Investments, Outboard Investments, Umbrella Holdings and Yanzu, Inc. Because Unico, Incorporated failed to pay the Debentures when due, a total of approximately six (6) lawsuits were filed by these Debenture holders against Unico, Incorporated in the Twelfth Circuit (State) Court in Florida during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.
The Debentures provided that the principal amount and accrued interest were convertible, at the option of the holders of the Debentures, into shares of Unico’s common stock at a price per share equal to 50% of the closing bid price of Unico’s common stock as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on the immediately preceding trading day prior to the notice of conversion.
18
Unico agreed to settle each action by issuing shares of its common stock to the plaintiffs using a valuation of approximately 14% to 20% of the then existing bid price of Unico, Incorporated common stock. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard from, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida which specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties.
From March 1, 2007 until February 29, 2008, in connection with the exercise of conversion rights by the holders of the Debentures and pursuant to the litigation settlements, Unico issued an aggregate of 3,926,315,790 shares of its common stock.
Unico believes that there were no underwriters involved in any of the stock issuances described above, and there were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid. The stock in each transaction was issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 as “securities issued in exchange for one or more bona fide outstanding securities, claims or property interests . . . where the terms and conditions of such issuance and exchange are approved, after a hearing upon the fairness of such terms and conditions . . . .”
All convertible debentures issued to Compass Capital Corporation, Blue Marble and Reef Holdings that were unpaid as of January 2008 were purchased by, and assigned to, Moore Investment Holdings LLC.
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company issued a total of 8,627,463 shares of its common stock to Ray C. Brown pursuant to convertible debentures in consideration of the conversion of $16,566 in accrued interest and $7,079 in principal. These shares were issued without registration in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 for transactions not involving any public offering, and the certificates representing the shares were appropriately restricted. No underwriters were involved, and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid.
For information concerning sales of shares of Unico's Common Stock by Unico which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 during the fiscal years ended February 28, 2006 and February 28, 2007 please refer to Unico's annual reports on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2005, and February 28, 2006, respectively, and to Unico’s quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the quarters ended May 31, 2005 and 2006, August 31, 2005 and 2006 and November 30, 2005 and 2006.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not applicable.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Plan of Operation
During the next 12 months, the Company’s plan of operation is to raise approximately $2,500,000 for investment into two of its subsidiary companies: Deer Trail Mining Company and Silver Bell Mining Company. The funds are intended for the following purposes during the next twelve months:
§
Complete analytical certification by independent lab, ALS Chemex, and final reporting from consulting firm, Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), on the logging and shipment of core samples identified and taken from the completed 2nd phase of exploratory drilling at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue sampling and analyzing mineralized rock samples, stockpiles and dump material from the Deer Trail Mine to evaluate the most efficient means to conduct future mining and milling activities;
§
Expand metallurgical research department at the Deer Trail Mine and Mill Facility;
§
Purchase additional lab equipment for metallurgical purposes;
§
Upgrade mine infrastructure and begin underground mining activities including maintenance and rehabilitation work at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue to upgrade and complete the re-construction project on the existing mill at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Upgrade the crushing facility at the upper Deer Trail Mine and continue screening the ore dumps;
§
Begin milling and processing activities at the Deer Trail Mill and Processing Facility;
§
Acquire new mining equipment to improve operations at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Conduct additional survey and mapping work on the Clyde and Crown Point mining claims including improvements to the property and potentially underground and surface exploratory drilling on the claims; and
19
§
Commence a feasibility study on the potential of the mining claims at the Silver Bell Mine beginning in the Summer of 2008.
Accomplishing the 12-month plan of operations is dependent on: (a) the Company raising approximately $2,500,000 in equity and/or debt financing during the next 12 months to be used for the Company’s operations, of which approximately $1,000,000 is needed in the next 120 days. Subsequent to the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008, the Company received $575,000 through the issuance of new convertible debentures to Moore Investment Holdings, LLC. The new debentures were issued with terms of 180 days, bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and are convertible by the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of 50% of the closing bid price on the date of conversion. The Company intends to raise approximately an additional $1,925,000 during the fiscal year ending February 28, 2009 to fulfill the 12-month plan.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s financial statements present an impairment in terms of liquidity. As of February 29, 2008 the Company had $21,420 in current assets and the Company’s total liabilities exceeded total assets by approximately $8,653,503. The Company has accumulated $60,924,691 of net operating losses through February 29, 2008, which may be used to reduce taxes in future years through 2027. The use of these losses to reduce future income taxes will depend on the generation of sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the net operating loss carry-forwards. The potential tax benefit of the net operating loss carry-forwards have been offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount. Under continuing operations the Company has not yet established revenues to cover its operating costs. Management believes that the Company will soon be able to generate revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs. In the event the Company is unable to do so, and if suitable financing is unavailable, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s stockholders’ deficit increased $5,896,794 in the year ended February 29, 2008, from a deficit of ($2,756,709) as of February 28, 2007 to a deficit of ($8,653,503) as of February 29, 2008.
The Company’s cash as of February 29, 2008 was negative, but as explained above, the Company has raised $575,000 through the issuance of convertible debentures to sustain operations. The Company intends to raise an additional $2,000,000 during the current fiscal year. As explained above, the Company needs to raise approximately $2,000,000 following the filing of this report to be able to implement the Company’s 12-month plan of operations. No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to raise the needed funds, or that such funds could be raised on terms acceptable to the Company. Most of the funds raised during the last year by Unico have been raised through the issuance of debentures that permit the debenture holder to convert the debentures into shares of the Company’s common stock at 50% of the then existing bid price. The Company anticipates that future funding may occur on terms involving a similar amount of dilution, but no assurance can be given that adequate funding will be available on such terms, if at all.
Results of Operations
Unico reported no revenues for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. Unico reported no revenues for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007. Unico anticipates that it will begin to generate revenues from mining operations in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009.
Unico incurred total operating expenses of $2,061,242 during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, an increase of $264,128 from the total operating expenses of $1,797,114 incurred during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2007. The increase was primarily attributed to an increase of $190,412 in drilling, exploration and maintenance expense. The majority of the increase in operating expenses was due to an increase in Drilling and Exploration expenses associated with the rehabilitation of the PTH tunnel at the Deer Trail mine.
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, Unico incurred interest expense of $5,266,533, an increase of $2,413,158 over the $2,853,375 of interest expense incurred during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007. The Company attributes the increase in interest expense in the later period, to increases in the amount of convertible debentures outstanding in the later period. Loss on settlement of debt was $7,877,820 in the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, a decrease of $5,371,095 from the $13,248,915 loss on settlement of debt incurred in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007. Unico attributes the decrease in loss on settlement of debt in the later period to the fact that fewer defaulted debentures were settled in the later period through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock at substantial discounts through court ordered settlements. In January, 2008, Moore Investment Holdings, LLC purchased the Company’s outstanding debentures (most of which were in default) from other debenture holders. Although the Company has approximately $6,318,934 of outstanding debentures as of February 29, 2008 (of which approximately $4,819,080 were then in default), the Company does not anticipate that Moore Investment Holdings, LLC will seek the issuance of shares through court ordered settlements as prior debentures holders have done.
20
For the year ended February 29, 2008 the Company had a net loss of $16,039,928, or approximately ($0.005) per share, attributable to ongoing operations. Of this loss $13,144,353was attributable to interest expense and loss on settlement of debt associated with derivative expenses from financing operations. For the year ended February 28, 2007, the Company incurred a loss of $18,333,266. The decrease in loss this year of $2,293,338 is primarily due to a $5,371,095 decrease in loss on settlement of debt, partially offset by an increase of $2,413,158in interest expense and an increase in operating expenses of $264,128.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
As of February 29, 2008 the Company had $6,318,934 of convertible debentures that were due and payable. Of this amount, $4,819,080 is in default and is due to the following:
Moore Investment Holdings, LLC
$4,180,100
Joseph Lopez
114,466
Ray Brown
449,514
C. M. Anderson
75,000
Total in default
$4,819,080
Of the remaining debentures that are due and payable, $250,000 defaulted in March, $475,000 defaulted in April, $199,854 defaulted in May and $575,000 will default in June if not paid.
All of the outstanding convertible debentures that were due to Reef Holdings, Compass Capital Corporation, and Blue Marble were assigned to Moore Investment Holdings, LLC in January 2008. Prior to the assignment to Moore Investment Holdings, LLC the holders of the convertible debentures had assigned portions of the Debentures to Blue Marble Investments, Outboard Investments, Umbrella Holdings and Yanzu, Inc. Because Unico, Incorporated failed to pay the Debentures when due, a total of one hundred eight (108) lawsuits were filed in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 and six (6) lawsuits were filed in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, by these Debenture holders against Unico, Incorporated in the Twelfth Circuit (State) Court in Florida. The Debentures provided that the principal amount and accrued interest were convertible, at the option of the holders of the Debentures, into shares of Unico’s common stock at a price per share equal to 50% of the closing bid price of Unico’s common stock as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on the immediately preceding trading day prior to the notice of conversion. Unico agreed to settle each action by issuing shares of its common stock to the plaintiffs using a valuation of approximately 14% to 20% of the then existing bid price of Unico, Incorporated common stock. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard from, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida which specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties. From February 9, 2006 until February 28, 2007, in connection with the exercise of conversion rights by the holders of the Debentures and pursuant to the litigation settlements, Unico issued an aggregate of 995,835,541shares of its common stock. During the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008 an additional 3,926,315,790 shares of common stock were issued for a total of 4,922,151,331 shares of common stock pursuant to the litigation settlements. Unico does not presently anticipate issuing additional shares through Section 3(a)(10) settlements.
RISK FACTORS
We are subject to various risks that may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this filing before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.
We will need to raise additional capital to finance operations
Past operations have relied on monies generated from external financing to fund our operations. However, we anticipate that we will generate profits in the coming year so that we will not need to rely entirely on external financing to raise additional capital to fund our anticipated operating expenses and future expansion. External financing will be required for future expansion, however. We cannot assure you that financing whether from external sources or related parties will be available if needed or on favorable terms. The sale of our common stock to raise capital may cause dilution to our existing shareholders. Our inability to obtain adequate financing may result in the need to curtail business operations. Any of these events would be materially harmful to our business and may result in a lower stock price.
21
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses and working capital shortages, which means that we may not be able to continue operations unless we obtain additional funding
The report of our independent accountants on our February 29, 2008 financial statements included an explanatory paragraph indicating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern due to recurring losses and working capital shortages. Our ability to continue as a going concern will be determined by our ability to obtain additional funding. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
We are not likely to succeed unless we can overcome the many obstacles we face
As an investor, you should be aware of the difficulties, delays and expenses we encounter, many of which are beyond our control, including unanticipated market trends, employment costs, and administrative expenses. We cannot assure our investors that our proposed business plans as described in this report will materialize or prove successful, or that we will ever be able to finalize development of our products or services or operate profitably. If we cannot operate profitably, you could lose your entire investment. As a result of the nature of our business, initially we expect to sustain substantial operating expenses without generating significant revenues.
We could fail to retain or attract key personnel
Our future success depends, in significant part, on the continued services of Mark A. Lopez our Chief Executive. We cannot assure you that we would be able to find an appropriate replacement for key personnel. Any loss or interruption of our key personnel's services could adversely affect our ability to develop our business plan. We have no employment agreements or life insurance on Mr. Lopez.
Our officers and directors have the ability to exercise significant influence over matters submitted for stockholder approval and their interests may differ from other stockholders
Our executive officers and directors have the opportunity, whether acting alone or together, to have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our Board for approval, including appointing officers, which could have a material impact on mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. The interests of these board members may differ from the interests of the other stockholders.
Our common stock may be affected by limited trading volume and may fluctuate significantly
There has been a limited public market for our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop. As a result, this could adversely affect our shareholders' ability to sell our common stock in short time periods, or possibly at all. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations that could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Substantial fluctuations in our stock price could significantly reduce the price of our stock.
Our common stock is traded on the "over-the-counter bulletin board," which may make it more difficult for investors to resell their shares due to suitability requirements
Our common stock is currently traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) where we expect it to remain for the foreseeable future. Broker-dealers often decline to trade in OTCBB stocks given that the market for such securities is often limited, the stocks are more volatile, and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them. This could cause our stock price to decline.
Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Inasmuch as that the current bid and ask price of common stock is less than $5.00 per share, our shares are classified as “penny stock” under the rules of the SEC. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:
22
·
That a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
·
The broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
·
Obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
·
Make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
·
Sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
·
That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See the financial statements annexed to this report.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
During our two most recent fiscal years ended February 29, 2008, or any later interim period, Unico has not had a principal independent accountant or an independent accountant on whom the principal independent accountant expressed reliance in its report, resign, decline to stand for re-election, or be dismissed.
ITEM 9A(T).
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This rule defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
| | |
| • | Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; |
| | |
| • | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and |
| | |
| • | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
23
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
With the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and adequately designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms and that such information was accumulated and communication to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, in a manner that allowed for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the last fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2008, there has been no change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Section 404 Assessment. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management’s annual review and evaluation of our internal controls beginning with our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008, and an attestation of the effectiveness of these controls by our independent registered public accounting firm beginning with our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending on February 28, 2009. We are dedicating significant resources, including management time and effort, and incurring significant costs in connection with our ongoing Section 404 assessment. We are currently documenting and testing our internal controls and considering whether any improvements are necessary for maintaining an effective control environment at our company. The evaluation of our internal controls is being conducted under the direction of our senior management. In addition, our management is regularly discussing the results of our testing and any proposed improvements to our control environment with our Audit Committee. We will continue to work to improve our controls and procedures, and to educate and train our employees on our existing controls and procedures in connection with our efforts to maintain an effective controls infrastructure at our Company.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls. A system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the system will meet its objectives. The design of a control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The executive officers and directors of the Company as of May 11, 2008 are as follows:
| | |
Name | Age | Position |
Mark A. Lopez | 44 | CEO |
Wayne M. Ash | 68 | President |
Kenneth Wiedrich | 61 | Chief Financial Officer |
C. Wayne Hartle | 71 | Secretary and Director |
Kiyoshi Kasai | 91 | Director |
Ray C. Brown | 85 | Chairman of the Board of Directors |
24
The business experience of each of the persons listed above is as follows:
Mark A. Lopez has served as chief executive officer of Unico, Incorporated and as a co-manager of two of Unico's subsidiaries, Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC and Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC, since September 7, 2004. He served as a consultant to Unico from September 2003 until September 2004 when he became CEO. Mr. Lopez has served as a vice president of investments for Ashton Capital Management, Inc., a securities broker dealer, from December 2001. He has been licensed as a registered investment advisor since November, 2001. Mr. Lopez served as a general securities principal for American Pacific Securities, Inc. (formerly known as Sy Leavitt Company, Inc.) from June 1996 through December 2001. He served as a co-manager of KM Income Properties LLC, a real estate investment company, from June 1998 through May 2000. He served as a registered investment advisor with Centurion Capital Management, LLC from October 1998 until February 2001. He also served as a licensed life and disability insurance agent with Alliance Financial Investment Services, Inc. from June 1994 until May 2000.
Wayne M. Ash has served as president of Unico since February 2003. From 1986 to the present, Mr. Ash has served as president of Ash & Associates Consulting Ltd. Mr. Ash has evaluated over 100 mineral prospects and potential mining properties in Canada, the United States, Latin America and Asia. Mr. Ash has more than forty years experience in the mining industry.
Kenneth Wiedrich has served as the chief financial officer of Unico since April 2007. Mr. Wiedrich has over 33 years of experience in operational accounting and finance functions in a variety of businesses within the service, construction and manufacturing industries. Mr. Wiedrich has experience in the use of several automated accounting systems including MAS90, Peachtree, and QuickBooks. Mr. Wiedrich has experience with governmental cost accounting methods and related government acquisition regulations. In his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer for RI-Tech, Inc. (1990-2003), he was responsible for the day–to-day administrative functions of the company as well as all accounting and financial aspects of the business. Mr. Wiedrich was involved in raising money through private placement and long-term financing for Ri-Tech. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Wiedrich served as Controller for Javelin Advisory Group, Inc.
C. Wayne Hartle has served as the secretary and as a director of Unico since 1990. Mr. Hartle resigned as a director in July, 2004 and was re-elected as a director in May 2007. Mr. Hartle owns and operates Wayne's Service Center, an automobile repair and service business in Salt Lake City, Utah. Mr. Hartle is the former chief financial officer of Energy and Corrosion Research Company from 1979 to 1981. Mr. Hartle received a degree from Henagers Business College in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ray C. Brown began serving as the chief executive officer and as a director of Unico in 1983. On September 7, 2004 he voluntarily resigned as chief executive officer, and Mark Lopez was appointed chief executive officer. Mr. Brown continues to serve as chairman of the board of directors of Unico. He also served as the president of Unico from 1983 until February 2002. He is presently semi-retired. Mr. Brown served as the chairman of the board of directors of Energy and Corrosion Research Corporation from 1979 to 1982. He also served as president and as a director of Ecotech Corporation from 1971 to 1983. Mr. Brown served as president and as a director of Wasatch Mineral and Construction Company from 1963 to 1971. He served as president and as a director of Courtesy Finance Corporation from 1958 to 1963. Prior to 1958, Mr. Brown served in various capacities with other financial institutions. Mr. Brown attended the University of Utah majoring in banking and finance.
Kiyoshi Kasai served as vice president from 1987 until June 2004 and he has served as a director of Unico since 1987. Mr. Kasai is presently semi-retired. For over 35 years prior to 1987, Mr. Kasai worked as an engineer for various companies including Hughes Helicopter, Litton Systems, Inc., Hoffman Electronics Corporation, RCA Service Company, Convair Astronautics and other companies. Mr. Kasai attended U.C. Berkeley and the Illinois Institute of Technology.
Significant Employees
Unico has no employees (other than its executive officers) who are expected to make a significant contribution to Unico's business.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers of Unico, either by blood or by marriage.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
During the past five years, no present or former director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director or an executive officer of Unico:
(1) was a general partner or executive officer of any business against which any bankruptcy petition was filed, either at the time of the bankruptcy or two years prior to that time;
25
(2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3) was subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
(4) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Meetings
During the year ended February 29, 2008 the Board of Directors met on four occasions. Each incumbent Director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors in person or by telephone conference.
Compensation of Directors
Unico has no present arrangement for compensating its directors.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Unico's executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of Unico's equity securities, to file an initial report of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such officers, directors and ten percent (10%) shareholders are also required by the SEC rules to furnish Unico with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for such persons, Unico believes that its executive officers, directors and ten percent (10%) shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007.
Code of Ethics
The Company adopted a code of ethics on May 19, 2006. It was filed as Exhibit No. 14 in Unico’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 28, 2006. Unico has undertaken to provide to any person, without change, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics. Requests should be made in writing to Kenneth Wiedrich, CFO, Unico, Incorporated, 8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th Floor, San Diego, California 92108.
Audit Committee Expert
The Company’s Board of Directors presently serves as the Company’s Audit Committee. The Company does not currently have a financial expert serving on the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors is seeking to add a financial expert, but has not yet found a suitable individual. The Board of Directors will continue to search for someone that meets the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 paid to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and any other executive officers whose compensation paid by the Company for any of the two fiscal years exceeded $100,000. No other executive officers received compensation exceeding $100,000 during the two fiscal years ended February 29, 2008.
26
| | | | | | | | |
Summary Compensation Table |
|
| Annual Compensation | Long Term Compensation |
| | | | | Awards | |
Name and Principal
Position | Fiscal Year Ended Feb. 28 |
Salary |
Bonus |
Other Annual Compensation |
Restricted Stock Award(s) |
Securities Underlying Options |
All Other Compen- sation |
Total |
Mark A. Lopez, CEO | 2008 | $ 150,000(1) | $-0- | $-0- | -- | -- | -- | $ 150,000 |
Kenneth Wiedrich, CFO | 2008 | $ 82,000 | $-0- | $-0- | -- | -- | -- | $ 82,000 |
Mark A. Lopez, CEO, CFO | 2007 | $ 150,000(1) | $-0- | $-0- | -- | -- | -- | $ 150,000 |
Employment Agreements
The Company does not currently have any written employment agreements in place.
Indemnification
As permitted by the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Arizona, the Company has the power to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation if such officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Company. Any such person may be indemnified against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements in defense of any action, suit or proceeding. The Company maintains $1,000,000 of directors and officer’s liability insurance.
Stock Option Plan
Unico has not adopted a stock option plan at this time. Unico may adopt a stock option plan for its executive officers, directors and/or employees in the future.
Compensation of Directors
Unico has no present arrangement for compensating its directors.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
The following table sets forth information, to the best knowledge of the Company, as of May 11, 2008 with respect to each person known by Unico, Incorporated to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, each director and officer, and all directors and officers as a group.
| | | |
Name and Address | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Class | Percentage of Class(2) |
Mark A. Lopez Chief Executive Officer | 50,000 5,401,968 | Common Series A Preferred | * 55% |
Wayne Ash President | 2,000 | Common | * |
Kenneth Wiedrich Chief Executive Officer | - | Common | * |
Wayne Hartle Secretary | 2,994,224 348,989 | Common Series A Preferred | * 4% |
Ray C. Brown(4) Director | 16,227,474 3,549,043 | Common Series A Preferred | * 36% |
Kiyoshi Kasai(3) Director | 6,930 | Common | * |
All directors and executive officers | 19,280,628 | Common | * |
(6 persons) | 9,300,000 | Series A Preferred | 95% |
27
(1) Unless indicated otherwise, the address for each of the above listed is c/o Unico, Incorporated at 8880 Rio San Diego Drive, 8th Floor, San Diego, California 92108.
(2) The above percentages are based on 4,940,363,072 shares of common stock and 9,800,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding as of May 11, 2008.
(3) Of the shares listed as being beneficially owned by Kiyoshi Kasai, 400 are owned of record by his wife, Fumiko Kasai, and 1,500 are owned of record by the Kasai Family Trust. Kiyoshi Kasai is the trustee of the Kasai Family Trust, and has sole voting and investment power over the shares held by the Trust.
(4) In addition to the shares listed above as being beneficially owned by Mr. Brown, as of May 11, 2008, Mr. Brown held convertible debentures in the principal amount of $449,514, which are convertible to shares of Unico’s common stock. The debentures are convertible at 80% of the bid price of Unico common stock on the date of conversion.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Transactions with Management and Others
During the two fiscal years ended February 29, 2008, there have been no material transactions or series of similar transactions to which Unico or any of our subsidiaries were or are to be a party, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which anypromoter, founder,director or executive officer, or any security holder who is known to us to own of record or beneficially more than five percent of the our common stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had a material interest, and none is presently proposed, other than the following:
1. Unico has received advances in the past from three related parties; C. Wayne Hartle, Ray Brown and Mark Lopez. Portions of these advances were converted to convertible debentures that bear interest at 10% per annum and are convertible to common stock of the Company at a discounted rate equal to 80% of the closing bid price on the date of conversion. Both the Company and the note holders have the right to convert under these terms. Mr. Joseph Lopez, father of Mark Lopez, purchased a portion of the debentures held by Mr. Brown. In the event of a company liquidation, the notes automatically convert into common stock at the same rate. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007, Mr. Brown converted $100,527 of accrued interest and $74,073 of principal for which he received 7,900,000 shares of Unico common stock. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007, Mr. Hartle converted $6,859 of accrued interest and $30,642 of principal for which he received 1,953,165 shares of Unico common stock. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, Mr. Brown converted $16,567of accrued interest and $7,079 of principal for which he received 8,627,463 shares of Unico Common Stock. As of February 29, 2008, the principal balance of the convertible debentures held by Mr. Brown and Mr. Joseph Lopez, father of Chief Executive Officer Mark Lopez, was $449,514 and $114,486, respectively. Mark Lopez and Mr. Hartle held no debentures as of February 29, 2008.
2. On January 23, 2008, Moore Investment Holdings, LLC purchased $3,765,100 face value of Convertible Debentures issued by Unico from Blue Marble Investments, a BWI company. Effective the same date, Moore Investment Holdings, LLC purchased $1,200,000 face value of Convertible Debentures issued by Unico from Compass Capital Group, Inc., a New York Corporation, and $15,000 face value of Convertible Debentures issued by Unico from Reef Holdings, Ltd., a BWI company. Unico consented to these assignments which were made effective on January 23, 2008. Blue Marble Investments, Compass Capital Group, Inc., and Reef Holdings, Ltd. are private non-related companies. Moore Investment Holdings, LLC is a Nevada limited liability company controlled by Joseph A. Lopez, and his wife, Patricia A. Lopez. Joseph A. Lopez is the father of Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of Unico.
3. Moore Investment Holdings, LLC has purchased the following additional Convertible Debentures from Unico: (a) $250,000 on January 23, 2008; (b) $250,000 on January 30, 2008; (c) $250,000 on March 13, 2008; (d) $40,000 on March 10, 2008; (e) $10,000 on March 11, 2008; (f) $200,000 on March 27, 2008, (g) $50,000 on April 23, 2008; and (h) $25,000 on May 9, 2008. Unico received $1,075,000 from the issuance of these debentures. All of the Convertible Debentures bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8.0%) per annum, are convertible to shares of Unico’s common stock at fifty percent of the bid price of Unico’s common stock on the date of conversion, and are due and payable six (6) months from their issue date. These Convertible Debentures are identical in their terms to the Convertible Debentures issued by Unico numerous times to unrelated third parties during the last three years.
28
Director Independence
As of the date of this Report, our common stock traded on the OTC Bulletin Board (the “Bulletin Board”). The Bulletin Board does not impose on us standards relating to director independence or the makeup of committees with independent directors, or provide definitions of independence. Nevertheless, we have one director, Kiyoshi Kasai, who is independent under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules and those standards applicable to companies trading on NASDAQ.
The NASDAQ Stock Market has instituted director independence guidelines that have been adopted by the Securities & Exchange Commission. These guidelines provide that a director is deemed “independent” only if the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director has no relationship with the company which, in the board’s opinion, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Significant stock ownership will not, by itself, preclude a board finding of independence.
For NASDAQ Stock Market listed companies, the director independence rules list six types of disqualifying relationships that preclude an independence filing. The Company’s board of directors may not find independent a director who:
1. is an employee of the company or any parent or subsidiary of the company;
2. accepts, or who has a family member who accepts, more than $60,000 per year in payments from the company or any parent or subsidiary of the company other than (a) payments from board or committee services; (b) payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities; (c) compensation paid to a family member who is a non-executive employee of the company’ (d) benefits under a tax qualified retirement plan or non-discretionary compensation; or (e) loans to directors and executive officers permitted under Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act;
3. is a family member of an individual who is employed as an executive officer by the company or any parent or subsidiary of the company;
4. is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments for property or services that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more, other than (a) payments arising solely from investments in the company’s securities or (b) payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;
5. is employed, or who has a family member who is employed, as an executive officer of another company whose compensation committee includes any executive officer of the listed company; or
6. is, or has a family member who is, a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor who worked on the company’s audit.
Based upon the foregoing criteria, our Board of Directors has determined that Kiyoshi Kasai is an independent director under these rules. Specifically, Mr. Kasai:
| |
· | has not been any time during the past three years, employed by us or by any parent or subsidiary of ours; |
· | has not accepted or had a family member who accepted any compensation from us in excess of $60,000 during any period of twelve consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence. |
· | is not a family member of an individual who is, or at any time during the past three years was, employed by us as an executive officer; |
· | is not, and does not have a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which we made, or from which the company received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000. |
· | Is not, and does not have a family member who is, employed as an executive officer of another entity where at any time during the past three years any of the executive officers of ours serve on the compensation committee of such other entity; or |
· | is not, and does not have a family member who is, a current partner of our outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of our outside auditor who worked on our audit at any time during any of the past three years. |
29
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
During the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, the aggregate fees billed by HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP, for services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports or services provided in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years, was approximately $37,100 and $35,600, respectively.
Audit Related Fees
None
Tax Fees
None
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed by the Company's auditors for all other non-audit services rendered to the Company, such as attending meetings and other miscellaneous financial consulting in fiscal 2007 and 2006 were $0 and $0, respectively.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS
(a)(1)(2)
Financial Statements. See index to financial statements and supporting schedules.
(a)(3)
Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this statement:
The exhibits listed below are required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-KSB has been identified.
| | |
Exhibit No. | Description | Location |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation | (1) |
3.2 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated November 8, 1967 | (1) |
3.3 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated December 6, 1972 | (1) |
3.4 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated May 29, 1973 | (1) |
3.5 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated December 1, 1979 | (1) |
3.6 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated May 12, 1992 | (1) |
3.7 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated November, 1999 | (1) |
3.10 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated June 1, 2004 | (2) |
3.11 | Amendment to articles of incorporation, dated February 2, 2006 | (4) |
3.8 | By-laws | (1) |
3.9 | Board of directors resolution amending Unico’s by-laws, dated April 1, 1992 | (1) |
4.1 | Certificate of Designation, Number, Powers, Preferences and Relative, Participating, Optional and other Special Rights and the Qualifications, Limitations, Restrictions and other Distinguishing Characteristics of Series A Preferred Stock | (2) |
30
| | |
10.60 | Convertible Debenture No. 29 for $25,000 dated 03/02/06 issued to Umbrella Holdings | (5) |
10.61 | Convertible Debenture No. 30 for $75,000 dated 03/08/06 issued to Umbrella Holdings | (5) |
10.62 | Convertible Debenture No. 31 for $75,000 dated 03/15/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.63 | Convertible Debenture No. 32 for $150,000 dated 03/22/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.64 | Convertible Debenture No. 33 for $250,000 dated 0/06/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.65 | Convertible Debenture No. 34 for $250,000 dated 04/18/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.66 | Convertible Debenture No. 35 for $300,000 dated 05/4/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.67 | Convertible Debenture No. 36 for $500,000 dated 05/17/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (5) |
10.68 | Mining Lease with Joel Johnson dated 08/0706 | (6) |
10.69 | Convertible Debenture No. 37 for $250,000 dated 06/15/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (6) |
10.70 | Convertible Debenture No. 38 for $100,000 dated 08/15/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (6) |
10.71 | Convertible Debenture No. 39 for $100,000 dated 08/18/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (6) |
10.72 | Convertible Debenture No. 40 for $250,000 dated 08/31/06 issued to Outboard Investments, LTD | (6) |
10.73 | Third Modification of Mining Lease and Option to Purchase (Deer Trail Mine) dated 11/01/06 | (7) |
10.74 | Fourth Modification of Mining Lease and Option to Purchase (Deer Trail Mine) dated 4/26/07 | (8) |
10.75 | Convertible Debenture No. 41 for $200,000 dated 08/2/07 issued to Blue Marble Investments, LTD | (8) |
10.76 | Stock purchase agreement with Cherry Creek Holdings, LLC dated 12/29/06 | (8) |
10.77 | Stock purchase agreement with Cherry Creek Holdings, LLC dated 1/12/07 | (8) |
10.78 | Fifth Modification of the Deer Trail Lease dated June 29, 2007 | (9) |
10.79 | Convertible Debenture No. 42 for $400,000 dated 3/15/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.80 | Convertible Debenture No. 43 for $300,000 dated 3/19/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.81 | Convertible Debenture No. 44 for $200,000 dated 3/23/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.82 | Convertible Debenture No. 45 for $140,000 dated 4/5/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.83 | Convertible Debenture No. 46 for $200,000 dated 4/25/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.84 | Convertible Debenture No. 47 for $200,000 dated 4/30/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.85 | Convertible Debenture No. 48 for $800,000 dated 5/15/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.86 | Convertible Debenture No. 49 for $300,000 dated 5/30/07 to Blue Marble Investments | (9) |
10.87 | Agreement (concerning the sale of Deer Trail Mine claims) dated effective May 31, 2007 between Crown Mines, L.L.C. and Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC | (10) |
10.88 | Assignment of Contractual Water Right dated July 30, 2007 between Crown Mines, L.L.C. and Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC | (10) |
10.89 | Water Rights Lease and Water Pipeline Easement Agreement dated July 30, 2007 between Crown Mines, L.L.C. and Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC | (10) |
10.90 | Right of Way Easement dated June 21, 2007 granted to PacifiCorp | (10) |
10.91 | Convertible Debenture No. 50 for $300,100 dated June 1, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments | (10) |
10.92 | Convertible Debenture No. 51 for $375,000 dated June 8, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments | (10) |
10.93 | Convertible Debenture No. 52 for $100,000 dated June 11, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (10) |
10.94 | Convertible Debenture No. 53 for $50,000 dated June 20, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (10) |
10.95 | Convertible Debenture No. 54 for $250,000 dated July 2, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments | (10) |
31
| | |
10.96 | Convertible Debenture No. 55 for $200,000 dated July 30, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments | (10) |
10.97 | Convertible Debenture No. 56 for $100,000 dated August 21, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (10) |
10.98 | Convertible Debenture No. 57 for $50,000 dated August 29, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (10) |
10.99 | Convertible Debenture No 58 for $50,000 dated September 10, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (11) |
10.100 | Convertible Debenture No 59 for $100,000 dated September 14, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (11) |
10.101 | Convertible Debenture No 60 for $100,000 dated September 17, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (11) |
10.102 | Convertible Debenture No 61 for 200,000 dated October 10, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments. | (11) |
10.103 | Convertible Debenture No 62 for $150,000 dated October 30, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments. | (11) |
10.104 | Convertible Debenture No 63 for $50,000 dated November 20, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (11) |
10.105 | Convertible Debenture No 64 for $75,000 dated November 26, 2007 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | (11) |
10.106 | Convertible Debenture No 65 for $199,854.09 dated December 11, 2007 issued to Blue Marble Investments | Filed herewith |
10.107 | Convertible Debenture No 66 for $25,000 dated January 4, 2008 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | Filed herewith |
10.108 | Convertible Debenture No 67 for $15,000 dated January 15, 2008 issued to Compass Capital Group, Inc. | Filed herewith |
10.109 | Convertible Debenture No 68 for $35,000 dated January 18, 2008 issued to Blue Marble Investments | Filed herewith |
10.110 | Convertible Debenture No 69 for $250,000 dated January 23, 2008 issued to Moore Investment Holdings, LLC | Filed herewith |
10.111 | Convertible Debenture No 70 for $250,000 dated January 30, 2008 issued to Moore Investment Holdings, LLC | Filed herewith |
14 | Code of Ethics adopted May 19, 2006 | (4) |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith |
99.1 | Audit Committee Charter adopted July 7, 2004 | (3) |
(1) Incorporated by reference from Unico's Registration Statement on Form 10-SB filed on April 6, 2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended May 31, 2004 filed on July 22, 2004.
(3) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2005 filed on June 20, 2005.
32
(4) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2006 filed on July 18, 2006.
(5) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/.A for the Quarter Ended May 31, 2006 filed on October 24, 2006.
(6) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2006 filed on October 24, 2006.
(7) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended November 30, 2006 filed on January 17, 2007.
(8) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2007 filed on June 7, 2007.
(9) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/.A for the Quarter Ended May 31, 2007 filed on July 7, 2007.
(10) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2007 filed on October 12, 2007.
(11) Incorporated by reference from Unico’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended November 30, 2007 filed on January 14, 2008.
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Dated: June 2, 2008
/s/ Mark A. Lopez
Mark A. Lopez
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
SIGNATURE | | DATE |
| | |
/s/Ray C. Brown | | |
Ray C. Brown, Director | | June 2, 2008 |
| | |
/s/ Kiyoshi Kasai | | |
Kiyoshi Kasai, Director | | June 2, 2008 |
| | |
/s/ Wayne Hartle | | |
C. Wayne Hartle, Director | | June 2, 2008 |
| | |
34
| | | | | |
UNICO, INCORPORATED Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
| | For the Year Ending | |
February 29, | | February 28, |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
| | | | | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | | | | | |
Net Loss | $ | (16,039,928) | $ | (18,333,266) | |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by Operations: | | | | | |
Depreciation and accretion expense | | 173,849 | | 225,216 | |
Loss on sale of assets | | - | | 5,914 | |
Loss on settlement of debt | | 7,877,820 | | 13,682,975 | |
Derivative/Interest related to convertible debentures | | 5,743,857 | | 2,641,747 | |
Common stock issued for services | | - | | 30,500 | |
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: | | | | | |
(Increase) Decrease in: | | | | | |
Reclamation deposit | | (8,096) | | (28,588) | |
Prepaid expense | | (8,487) | | (14,800) | |
Accounts receivable | | (1,420) | | - | |
Increase (Decrease) in: | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | 328,499 | | (529,910) | |
Accounts payable and other liabilities | | 583,382 | | (203,160) | |
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities | | (1,350,524) | | (2,523,372) | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | | | | | |
Purchase of fixed assets- Construction in progress | | (448,091) | | (1,726,861) | |
Purchase of fixed assets | | (3,744,675) | | (72,281) | |
Sale of fixed assets | | - | | 26,200 | |
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities | | (4,192,766) | | (1,772,942) | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | | | | | |
Increase in bank overdraft | | 3,142 | | - | |
Proceeds from stock payable | | - | | 999,000 | |
Capital contributions from shareholders | | 68,000 | | 750,000 | |
Issuance of convertible debentures | | 5,464,954 | | 2,525,000 | |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | | 5,536,096 | | 4,274,000 | |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash | | (7,194) | | (22,314) | |
Cash at Beginning of Period | | 7,194 | | 29,508 | |
Cash at End of Period | $ | - | $ | 7,194 | |
Cash Paid For: | | | | | |
Interest | $ | 21,922 | $ | 25,000 | |
Income Taxes | $ | 350 | $ | - | |
Non-Cash Financing Activities: | | | | | |
Common stock issued for services | $ | - | $ | 30,500 | |
Common Stock issued for debt extinguishments | $ | 1,165,236 | $ | 3,043,725 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
41
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
This summary of significant accounting policies of Unico, Incorporated is presented to assist in understanding the Company's consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company's management who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
a.
Organization and Business Activities
Unico, Incorporated was formed as an Arizona corporation on May 27, 1966 under the name of Red Rock Mining Co., Incorporated. It was later known as Industries International, Incorporated and I.I. Incorporated before the name was eventually changed to Unico, Incorporated in 1979.
On July 12, 2004, Unico filed an election with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to become a business development company pursuant to Section 54 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Unico's Deer Trail Mine operations are conducted through Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company while Unico's Bromide Basin Mine operations are conducted through Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. Unico also owns Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc., which is not presently operational. On October 11, 2005, the Unico shareholders approved a proposal to authorize the Company’s Board of Directors to withdraw the Company’s election to be treated as a BDC. On October 12, 2005 a Notification of Withdrawal of BDC Election was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission so that Unico could begin conducting business as an operating company rather than as a BDC subject to the Investment Company Act.
The Company presently has three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC, Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc., and Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC. While the Company reported under the Investment Company Act as a Business Development Company, the operations of these entities were not consolidated but, rather, were treated as investments and were carried on the Company’s books at their fair market value. As a result of the Company’s withdrawal as a BDC, the equity method of accounting is now appropriate. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are those of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Deer Trail Mining Company, LLC, Silver Bell Mining Company, Inc. and Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC.
b.
Accounting Method
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a February 28th year-end. With the Company’s withdrawal as a BDC, the Company now reports the operations of itself and its subsidiaries under the equity method of accounting, resulting in the consolidation of all assets and operations of wholly-owned subsidiaries.
c.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the purpose of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of February 29, 2008 the company had $(3,142) in cash and $215,799 in CD’s deposited in banks.
d.
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.
42
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - continued
e. Fixed Assets
The Company’s property consists of mining equipment, vehicles, office furniture and computer equipment. The property is depreciated in a straight-line basis over five years. Fixed assets are recorded at cost. Major additions and improvement are capitalized. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of equipment retired or sold are removed from the accounts and any differences between the undepreciated amount and the proceeds from the sale are recorded as gain or loss on sale of assets. Mineral rights are recorded at cost of acquisition. When there is little likelihood of a mineral right being exploited, or the value of mineral rights have diminished below cost, a write-down is affected against income in the period that such determination is made.
| | | |
Fixed Asset Schedule | | | |
| | 2008 | 2007 |
Fixed Assets: | | | |
Furniture & Equipment | $ | 1,809,433 | 1,064,758 |
Land | | 200,000 | 200,000 |
Deer Trail Mining Claim | | 2,360,000 | - |
Deer Trail Patented Claims | | 640,000 | - |
Autos | | 65,814 | 65,814 |
Total | | 5,075,247 | 1,330,572 |
Less Depreciation | | (908,115) | (747,344) |
Net Equipment | $ | 4,167,132 | 583,228 |
Depreciation expense for the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 is $160,771 and $121,008 respectively.
f. Basic Loss Per Share
The computation of basic loss per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period of the financial statements. Fully diluted loss per share is not presented as any common stock equivalents are antidilutive in nature. Common stock equivalents consisting of convertible debt and preferred stock have not been included in the calculation of loss per share.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Loss from operations | $ | (16,039,928) | | $ | (18,333,266) |
Total loss per share | $ | (0.005) | | $ | (0.071) |
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding | | 3,446,230,098 | | | 257,245,898 |
g. Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
43
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - continued
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | 2008 | | 2007 | | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | |
NOL Carryover | | $ | 4,412,600 | $ | 3,576,630 | | |
Related Party Accruals | | | 138,800 | | 25,5000 | | |
Deferred tax liability: | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | (114,900) | | (92,400) | | |
Valuation allowance | | | (4,436,500) | | (3,509,730) | | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | - | $ | - | | |
The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 due to the following:
| | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | | |
Book income | $ | (6,255,572) | $ | (7,149,975) | | |
Depreciation | | (12,524) | | 68,835 | | |
Accrued Expense | | 113,307 | | (200,665) | | |
Stock for services | | - | | 11,895 | | |
Debentures | | 1,905,088 | | 5,167,075 | | |
Derivative Loss | | 335,016 | | 169,280 | | |
Other | | 222 | | 250 | | |
Sale of Assets | | - | | 7,710 | | |
Interest | | - | | 1,108,665 | | |
SFAS 84 | | 3,072,350 | | - | | |
Accretion | | 5,100 | | - | | |
Valuation allowance | | 837,013 | | 816,930 | | |
| $ | - | $ | - | | |
At February 29, 2008, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $11,314,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2008 through 2028. No tax benefit has been reported in the February 29, 2008 consolidated financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.
Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future years.
The Company files income tax returns in the U. S. federal jurisdiction, andi in the following state jurisdictions: California, Arizona, and Utah. With few exceptions, the Company os no longer subject to U. S. federal, state and local, or non-U. S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2000. The company has not filed tax returns since the year 2000 and is therefore subject to examination by the IRS under the rules of the statute of limitations.
The Company adopted the provisions of the FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007.
The Company’s policy is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.
44
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - continued
FIN 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 contains a two step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. This provision is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any; the adoption of this statement will have on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. Given the Company’s substantial loss carry-forward, it does not, in the near term, expect to have any impact of the Company’s tax position with the adoption of FIN 48.
h.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
During the year ended February 28, 2007, the Company adopted the following accounting pronouncements:
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of SFAS 109”,(“FIN 48”). FIN 48 provides interpretive guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets”, which will be effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2006. This statement amends SFAS 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement 125,or SFAS 140,regarding (1) the circumstances under which a servicing asset or servicing liability must be recognized, (2) the initial and subsequent measurement of recognized servicing assets and liabilities, and (3) information required to be disclosed relating to servicing assets and liabilities. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments”,or SFAS 155, which will be effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2006. This statement amends SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to narrow the scope exception for interest-only and principal-only strips on debt instruments to include only such strips representing rights to receive a specified portion of the contractual interest or principal cash flows. SFAS 155 also amends SFAS 140 to allow qualifying special-purpose entities to hold a passive derivative financial instrument pertaining to beneficial interests that itself is a derivative financial instrument. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements design to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluatin the impact that FAS 159 will have on our financial statemnents
45
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES - continued
i.
Revenue Recognition
The Company will recognize revenues from sales of minerals. Minerals will be milled at the Deer Trail site from ore that is mined or taken from existing stockpiles of previously mined ore and sent to outside firms for refining into metals. Revenue from all sources will be recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the amount is fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred, and collection is reasonably assured. Any amounts received in advance of the minerals being delivered will be recorded as deferred revenue.
j. Preferred Stock
There are 9,800,000 outstanding shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has designated ten million (10,000,000) shares of Series A preferred with the following rights and preferences: The Series A Preferred shall, at the option of the holder, be convertible on a one for one share basis to common stock of the Company. The holders of shares of Series A Preferred are not entitled to vote such shares. In lieu of voting rights the holders of Series A Preferred, voting together as a class, are entitled to elect two members of the Board of Directors at each meeting. Also the Series A Preferred is not affected by any capital reorganization of the Company.
k.
Accounting for Derivatives
Convertible debentures, the Company’s sole derivative instruments, are accounted for under EITF 00-27 unless liability classification of the derivative is more appropriate. Where the embedded conversion option appears to qualify for liability classification, derivatives are accounted for under EITF 00-19.
Under EITF 00-27, the Company records a beneficial conversion cost associated with the convertibility feature of the security that equals the value of any discount to market available at the time of conversion. This beneficial conversion cost is recorded at the time the convertible security is first issued. If the debenture is subsequently converted into stock, the liability is reduced and common stock is increased.
EITF 00-19 is applicable to debentures issued by the Company in instances where the number of shares into which a debenture can be converted is not fixed. For example, when a debentures converts at a discount to market based on the stock price on the date of conversion. In such instances, EITF 00-19 requires that the embedded conversion option of the convertible debentures be bifurcated from the host contract and recorded at their fair value. In accounting for derivatives under EITF 00-19, the Company records a liability representing the estimated present value of the conversion feature considering the historic volatility of the Company’s stock, and a discount representing the imputed interest associated with the beneficial conversion feature. The discount is then amortized over the life of the debentures and the derivative liability is adjusted periodically according to stock price fluctuations. At the time of conversion, any remaining derivative liability is charged to additional paid-in capital. For purposes of determining derivative liability, the Company uses Black-Schoels modeling for computing historic volatility.
46
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 2 – RELATED PARTY DEBENTURES
The Company previously issued convertible debentures of $645,132 to Ray Brown, a member of the board of directors. Ray Brown assigned $114,466 of his outstanding convertible debenture to Joseph Lopez, father of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mark Lopez, as satisfaction on a personal loan. These debentures bear interest at 10% per annum and were due September 2005, and December 25, 2004, respectively. The debentures are convertible into common stock of the Company at a discount of 20% off the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of conversion. The Company has recorded an accrued interest payable of $11,207for Ray Brown’s debenture and $39,200 for Joseph Lopez’s debenture as of February 29, 2008. During the year ended February 29, 2008, the Company converted $16,566 of interest and $7,079 of principal due Ray Brown through the issuance of 8,627,463 post-reverse restricted shares of common stock and paid Ray $21,921.51 in cash for interest due. The balance due Mr. Brown on his convertible debenture as of February 29, 2008 is $449,514. The balance due Joseph Lopez is $114,466.
In January of 2008 all of the debentures issued to Compass Capital Corporation, Blue Marble and Reef Holdings totaling $5,179,954 that remained unpaid by Unico were assigned to Moore Investment Holdings. Moore Investment Holdings is controlled by Joseph Lopez, the father of CEO Mark Lopez. The Company also issued convertible debentures of $500,000 to Moore Investment Holdings during the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008.
The debentures were issued with terms of 180 days, accrued interest at 8% per annum, and converted at a discount of 50% of the closing bid for the Company’s common stock on the date of conversion.
The summary of outstanding related party debt of $6,243,934 of which $4,744,080 is in default as of February 29, 2008 is as follows:
Moore Investment Holdings
$5,679,954
Ray Brown
$449,514
Joseph Lopez
$114,466
Total
$6,243,934
Less: Discount on debt
$747,113
Net related part debt
$5,496,821
As of February 29, 2008 the Company has accrued $355,845 for interest due to related parties in regard to these outstanding debentures..
NOTE 3 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company issued $5,464,954 of convertible debentures that were used primarily to support subsidiary operations. The debentures were issued with terms of 180 days, accrued interest at 8% per annum, and converted at a discount of 50% of the closing bid for the Company’s common stock on the date of conversion. The Company recorded interest expense of $5,266,533 during the year ended February 29, 2008 associated with the debentures and recorded a loss of $859,016 on the derivative portion of the debentures. The net derivative liability at February 29, 2008 was $8,311,182. In January of 2008 all of the debentures issued to Compass Capital Corporation, Blue Marble and Reef Holdings totaling $5,179,954 that remained unpaid by Unico were assigned to Moore Investment Holdings, a related party. As of February 29, 2008 there is only one non-affiliated convertible debenture, in the amount of $75,000, remaining on the Company’s books.
During the year ended February 29, 2008, the Company entered into a total of 5 settlement transactions in the Twelfth Circuit (State) Court in Florida stemming from defaulted convertible debentures totaling $1,025,000. Unico agreed to settle each action by issuing a total of 3,926,315,790 shares of its common stock to the note holders. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard from, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida which specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties. As a result of issuing shares under the settlements, the Company recorded an expense of $7,877,820. In addition, $68,000 was paid to the Company from the debenture holders resulting from an adjustment in the stock price subsequent to the court ordered settlement. This price adjustment was treated as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
47
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 4 –STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Common Stock
As of February 29, 2008, the Company had 4,940,363,072 shares of common stock issued and outstanding with 59,636,928 shares authorized but unissued.
During the year ended February 29, 2008 the Company issued 3,926,315,790 shares of free trading common stock under court ordered settlement agreements as satisfaction of convertible debentures totaling $1,025,000 which were in default. These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard form, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida who specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties. As a result of this settlement, the Company recorded an expense of $7,877,820 which represented the difference in market value of the stock issued compared with the value of the stock which would have been issuable under the conversion terms.
During the year ended February 29, 2008, the Company issued a total of 8,627,463 shares of common stock on the conversion of debentures payable plus interest to Ray Brown totaling $23,645.
Stock Options
During the year ended February 28, 2007, all stock options expired unexercised. As of February 29, 2008, there were no stock options outstanding.
Preferred Stock
As of February 29, 2007, the Company had 9,800,000 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding, all of which is Series A preferred stock.The Series A Preferred Stock entitle the holder to elect two of the Company’s directors and is convertible into shares of common stock on a 1:1 basis.
Stock Payable
During the year ended February 28, 2007, the Company sold a total of 76,119,033 shares of restricted common stock to a third party for total consideration of $999,000. As of February 29, 2008, these shares had not been issued, resulting in a stock payable.
NOTE 5 – LEGAL MATTERS
During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company settled six lawsuits filed in the Twelfth Circuit (State) Court in Florida stemming from defaulted convertible debentures totaling $1,025,000 and $36,406 of interest. Unico agreed to settle all of the actions by issuing a total of 3,926,315,790 shares of its common stock to the plaintiffs These shares were issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, after a hearing with notice to, and an opportunity to be heard from, interested parties, as to the fairness of each transaction, by a state court in Florida which specifically determined, prior to declaring that the transactions were exempt under Section 3(a)(10), that the transactions were fair to the interested parties.
The Company scheduled a special meeting of its shareholders on December 21, 2007 at which shareholders were to vote on a proposal to amend the Company’s articles of incorporation to authorize the Company’s board of directors, in its discretion, to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of up to one-for-five hundred during the six month period following the date of a special meeting of shareholders. On December 17, 2007, plaintiff Legacy Trading Group (“Legacy”), a California limited liability company, filed an action against Unico alleging violation of Section 14(a) and (c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder, and Arizona Revised Statute § 19-705. The action was filed in the United States District Court, Southern Division of California (Civil No. 07CV 2344-L (RBB)). Legacy filed an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”), contending that notice of the special meeting of Unico’s shareholders and/or
48
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 5 – LEGAL MATTERS - continued
the related proxy statement was not provided to all shareholders. At a hearing held on December 18, 2007, the Court granted the application for a TRO, and enjoined and restrained Unico from holding the special meeting of the shareholders on December 21, 2007 or at any other time until the preliminary injunction hearing in this matter was heard. The preliminary injunction hearing was held on January 8, 2008. Plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction was denied at the hearing on the grounds of being moot. Unico believes notice of the special meeting of Unico’s shareholders and the related proxy statement for the December 21, 2007 special meeting were sent to all shareholders entitled to receive such pursuant to applicable federal proxy rules and the Arizona Revised Statutes. However, since the TRO prevented the Company from holding the special meeting of shareholders on December 21, 2007, the Company rescheduled the special meeting which was held on January 28, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
On April 29, 2007, Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC was served with a lawsuit filed on April 10, 2008 by Kaibab Industries, Inc. in Maricopa County, Arizona state court (No. CV2008-008121). The plaintiff alleges that Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC owes $30,000 in rent for the months of May through October 2007, when a mining lease expired. The plaintiff also alleges that Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC has failed to vacate the premises and that it owes an additional $5,000 per month as a holdover tenant commencing November 1, 2007 until it vacates the premises. The plaintiff has also asked for interest, attorney’s fees and court costs. Bromide Basin Mining Company, LLC has vacated the premises.
NOTE 6 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008, the Company received $575,000 through the issuance of new convertible debentures. The new debentures were issued with terms of 180 days, bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and are convertible by the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of 50% of the closing bid price on the date of conversion.
NOTE 7 – GOING CONCERN
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred losses of $60,924,691 from its inception through February 29, 2008. It has not established any revenues with which to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern.
During the next 12 months, the Company’s plan of operation is to raise approximately $2,500,000 for investment into its subsidiary companies: Deer Trail Mining Company and Silver Bell Mining Company. The funds are intended for the following purposes during the next twelve months:
§
Complete analytical certification by independent lab, ALS Chemex, and final reporting from consulting firm, Behre Dolbear & Company (USA), on the logging and shipment of core samples identified and taken from the completed 2nd phase of exploratory drilling at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue sampling and analyzing mineralized rock samples, stockpiles and dump material from the Deer Trail Mine to evaluate the most efficient means to conduct future mining and milling activities;
§
Expand metallurgical research department at the Deer Trail Mine and Mill Facility;
§
Purchase additional lab equipment for metallurgical purposes;
§
Upgrade mine infrastructure and begin underground mining activities including maintenance and rehabilitation work at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Continue to upgrade and complete the re-construction project on the existing mill at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Upgrade the crushing facility at the upper Deer Trail Mine and continue screening the ore dumps;
§
Begin milling and processing activities at the Deer Trail Mill and Processing Facility;
§
Acquire new mining equipment to improve operations at the Deer Trail Mine;
§
Conduct additional survey and mapping work on the Clyde and Crown Point mining claims including improvements to the property and potentially underground and surface exploratory drilling on the claims; and
49
UNICO, INCORPORATED
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
NOTE 7 – GOING CONCERN - continued
§
Commence a feasibility study on the potential of the mining claims at the Silver Bell Mine beginning in the Summer of 2008.
Accomplishing the 12-month plan of operations is dependent on: (a) the Company raising approximately $2,500,000 in equity and/or debt financing during the next 12 months to be used for the Company’s operations, of which approximately $1,000,000 is needed in the next 120 days. Subsequent to the fiscal year ending February 29, 2008, the Company received $575,000 through the issuance of new convertible debentures to Moore Investments. The new debentures were issued with terms of 180 days, bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and are convertible by the holder in shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of 50% of the closing bid price on the date of conversion. The Company intends to raise approximately an additional $1,925,000 during the fiscal year ending February 28, 2009 to fulfill the 12-month plan.
50