EXHIBIT 1.2
MANAGEMENT’S STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management and approved by the Board of Directors of Sierra Wireless, Inc. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and, where appropriate, reflect management’s best estimates and judgments. Where alternative accounting methods exist, management has chosen those methods deemed most appropriate in the circumstances. Management is responsible for the accuracy, integrity and objectivity of the consolidated financial statements within reasonable limits of materiality. Financial information provided elsewhere in the Annual Report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.
To assist management in the discharge of these responsibilities, the Company maintains a system of internal controls over financial reporting as described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on page 31 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
The Company’s Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors annually and is comprised exclusively of outside, independent directors. The Audit Committee meets with management as well as with the independent auditors to satisfy itself that management is properly discharging its financial reporting responsibilities and to review the consolidated financial statements and the independent auditors’ report. The Audit Committee reports its findings to the Board of Directors for consideration in approving the consolidated financial statements for presentation to the shareholders. The Audit Committee considers, for review by the Board of Directors and approval by the shareholders, the engagement or reappointment of the independent auditors. KPMG LLP has direct access to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
The consolidated financial statements have been independently audited by KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, on behalf of the shareholders, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) with respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. Their report outlines the nature of their audit and expresses their opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Jason W. Cohenour | David G. McLennan |
President and | Chief Financial Officer |
Chief Executive Officer | |
| |
| |
Vancouver, Canada | |
March 5, 2012 | |
1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Sierra Wireless, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (“the Company”) and subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 5, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
“KPMG LLP” | |
Chartered Accountants | |
Vancouver, Canada | |
| |
March 5, 2012 | |
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Sierra Wireless, Inc.
We have audited Sierra Wireless, Inc. (“the Company”)’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, and our report dated March 5, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
“KPMG LLP” | |
Chartered Accountants | |
Vancouver, Canada | |
| |
March 5, 2012 | |
3
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
| | As at December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 101,375 | | $ | 85,443 | |
Short-term investments (note 6) | | 9,347 | | 26,405 | |
Accounts receivable (note 7) | | 107,367 | | 117,397 | |
Inventories (note 8) | | 16,168 | | 22,134 | |
Deferred income taxes (note 15) | | 6,540 | | 9,577 | |
Prepaids and other (note 9) | | 20,674 | | 24,542 | |
| | 261,471 | | 285,498 | |
Property, plant and equipment (note 10) | | 22,087 | | 22,635 | |
Intangible assets (note 11) | | 42,557 | | 69,024 | |
Goodwill (note 12) | | 89,961 | | 90,953 | |
Deferred income taxes (note 15) | | 6,205 | | 836 | |
Other assets | | 606 | | 622 | |
| | $ | 422,887 | | $ | 469,568 | |
Liabilities | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 13) | | $ | 123,547 | | $ | 139,264 | |
Deferred income taxes (note 15) | | 336 | | — | |
Deferred revenue and credits | | 1,721 | | 987 | |
| | 125,604 | | 140,251 | |
Long-term obligations (note 14) | | 25,143 | | 24,987 | |
Deferred income taxes (note 15) | | 236 | | 1,143 | |
| | 150,983 | | 166,381 | |
Equity | | | | | |
Shareholders’ equity | | | | | |
Common stock: | no par value; unlimited shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 31,306,692 shares (December 31, 2010 — 31,222,786 shares) | | 328,440 | | 327,668 | |
Preferred stock: | no par value; unlimited shares authorized; Issued and outstanding: nil shares | | — | | — | |
Treasury stock: | at cost; 877,559 shares (December 31, 2010 — 643,042 shares) | | (6,141 | ) | (3,908 | ) |
Additional paid-in capital | | 20,087 | | 16,926 | |
Deficit | | (62,482 | ) | (33,167 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (note 16) | | (8,000 | ) | (5,471 | ) |
| | 271,904 | | 302,048 | |
Non-controlling interest (note 24) | | — | | 1,139 | |
| | 271,904 | | 303,187 | |
| | $ | 422,887 | | $ | 469,568 | |
Commitments and Contingencies (note 27)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
On behalf of the Board:
/s/ Jason W. Cohenour | | /s/ S. Jane Rowe |
Jason W. Cohenour | S. Jane Rowe |
Director | Director |
4
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Revenue | | $ | 578,185 | | $ | 650,341 | | $ | 526,384 | |
Cost of goods sold | | 414,735 | | 459,976 | | 349,092 | |
Gross margin | | 163,450 | | 190,365 | | 177,292 | |
| | | | | | | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | |
Sales and marketing | | 45,499 | | 51,599 | | 54,835 | |
Research and development (note 17) | | 89,000 | | 88,035 | | 80,066 | |
Administration | | 34,677 | | 36,357 | | 36,553 | |
Acquisition costs (note 5) | | — | | — | | 7,785 | |
Restructuring (note 18) | | 837 | | 7,640 | | 20,605 | |
Integration (note 19) | | 1,426 | | 5,110 | | 3,859 | |
Impairment of intangible asset (note 11) | | 11,214 | | — | | — | |
Amortization | | 10,709 | | 11,990 | | 11,313 | |
| | 193,362 | | 200,731 | | 215,016 | |
| | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | (29,912 | ) | (10,366 | ) | (37,724 | ) |
Foreign exchange gain (loss) | | (460 | ) | (7,000 | ) | 1,261 | |
Other income (expense) (note 20) | | 35 | | (241 | ) | (4,399 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | | (30,337 | ) | (17,607 | ) | (40,862 | ) |
Income tax expense (recovery) (note 15) | | (965 | ) | (2,808 | ) | 340 | |
Net loss | | (29,372 | ) | (14,799 | ) | (41,202 | ) |
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | | (57 | ) | (258 | ) | (1,303 | ) |
Net loss attributable to the Company | | $ | (29,315 | ) | $ | (14,541 | ) | $ | (39,899 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss per share attributable to the Company’s common shareholders (in dollars) (note 21) | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (1.29 | ) |
Diluted | | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (1.29 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net loss | | $ | (29,372 | ) | $ | (14,799 | ) | $ | (41,202 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: | | | | | | | |
Release of foreign currency translation relating to acquisition of non- controlling interest, net of taxes of $nil | | 42 | | 32 | | 31 | |
Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on investments, net of taxes of $nil | | — | | — | | 21 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $nil | | (2,571 | ) | (5,466 | ) | 587 | |
Total comprehensive loss | | (31,901 | ) | (20,233 | ) | (40,563 | ) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest: | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | (57 | ) | (258 | ) | (1,303 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $nil | | (49 | ) | 228 | | 30 | |
Comprehensive loss attributable to the company | | $ | (31,795 | ) | $ | (20,203 | ) | $ | (39,290 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
6
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
| | Equity attributable to the Company | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | Non- | | | |
| | Common stock | | Treasury Shares | | Additional | | | | other | | controlling | | | |
| | # of shares | | $ | | # of shares | | $ | | paid-in capital | | Deficit | | comprehensive income (loss) | | interest (deficit) | | Total | |
Balance as at December 31, 2008 | | 31,031,954 | | $ | 325,893 | | 121,022 | | $ | (1,487 | ) | $ | 12,518 | | $ | 21,273 | | $ | (749 | ) | — | | $ | 357,448 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest (note 5) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,357 | | 13,357 | |
Exercise of Wavecom S.A. stock options | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (2,751 | ) | — | | 166 | | 6,733 | | 4,148 | |
Subsequent tender offer and squeeze-out of Wavecom S.A. (note 5) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,647 | ) | — | | (93 | ) | (17,829 | ) | (19,569 | ) |
Purchase of Wavecom S.A. shares | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,568 | ) | — | | 31 | | 1,537 | | — | |
Stock option exercises (note 23) | | 16,953 | | 150 | | — | | — | | (54 | ) | — | | — | | — | | 96 | |
Stock-based compensation (note 23) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 8,097 | | — | | — | | — | | 8,097 | |
Purchase of treasury shares for RSU distribution | | — | | — | | 1,141,388 | | (6,417 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | | (6,417 | ) |
Distribution of vested RSUs | | — | | — | | (175,758 | ) | 1,462 | | (1,462 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Net loss | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (39,899 | ) | — | | (1,303 | ) | (41,202 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for realized loss on investments | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 21 | | — | | 21 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 587 | | 30 | | 617 | |
Balance as at December 31, 2009 | | 31,048,907 | | $ | 326,043 | | 1,086,652 | | $ | (6,442 | ) | $ | 13,133 | | $ | (18,626 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 2,525 | | $ | 316,596 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of Wavecom S.A. shares | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (229 | ) | — | | 32 | | (1,356 | ) | (1,553 | ) |
Stock option tax benefit for U.S. employees | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 151 | | — | | — | | — | | 151 | |
Stock option exercises (note 23) | | 173,879 | | 1,625 | | — | | — | | (551 | ) | — | | — | | — | | 1,074 | |
Stock-based compensation (note 23) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 6,956 | | — | | — | | — | | 6,956 | |
Distribution of vested RSUs | | — | | — | | (443,610 | ) | 2,534 | | (2,534 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Net loss | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (14,541 | ) | — | | (258 | ) | (14,799 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (5,466 | ) | 228 | | (5,238 | ) |
Balance as at December 31, 2010 | | 31,222,786 | | $ | 327,668 | | 643,042 | | $ | (3,908 | ) | $ | 16,926 | | $ | (33,167 | ) | $ | (5,471 | ) | $ | 1,139 | | $ | 303,187 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of Wavecom S.A. shares | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (796 | ) | — | | 42 | | (1,033 | ) | (1,787 | ) |
Stock option exercises (note 23) | | 83,906 | | 772 | | — | | — | | (253 | ) | — | | — | | — | | 519 | |
Stock-based compensation (note 23) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 6,449 | | — | | — | | — | | 6,449 | |
Purchase of treasury shares for RSU distribution | | — | | — | | 613,638 | | (4,472 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | | (4,472 | ) |
Distribution of vested RSUs | | — | | — | | (379,121 | ) | 2,239 | | (2,239 | ) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
Net loss | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (29,315 | ) | — | | (57 | ) | (29,372 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (2,571 | ) | (49 | ) | (2,620 | ) |
Balance as at December 31, 2011 | | 31,306,692 | | $ | 328,440 | | 877,559 | | $ | (6,141 | ) | $ | 20,087 | | $ | (62,482 | ) | $ | (8,000 | ) | $ | — | | $ | 271,904 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
7
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
| | Years ended December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Cash flows provided (used) by: | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (29,372 | ) | $ | (14,799 | ) | $ | (41,202 | ) |
Items not requiring (providing) cash | | | | | | | |
Amortization | | 32,386 | | 34,990 | | 32,704 | |
Stock-based compensation (note 23(a) and (e)) | | 6,449 | | 6,956 | | 8,097 | |
Non-cash restructuring and other | | — | | (859 | ) | 5,911 | |
Tax benefit on stock option deduction | | — | | 151 | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | (2,903 | ) | (3,374 | ) | 282 | |
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment | | 40 | | (95 | ) | 204 | |
Impairment of intangible assets | | 11,214 | | — | | — | |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on restricted cash | | — | | — | | 15,653 | |
Unrealized foreign exchange loss on term loan | | — | | — | | 1,215 | |
Changes in non-cash working capital | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | 9,067 | | (35,671 | ) | 20,175 | |
Inventories | | 5,664 | | (11,399 | ) | 15,676 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | 4,248 | | 7,104 | | 3,888 | |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and obligations | | (13,783 | ) | 12,116 | | (14,094 | ) |
Deferred revenue and credits | | 733 | | 480 | | (810 | ) |
Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities | | 23,743 | | (4,400 | ) | 47,699 | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | |
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (note 5) | | — | | — | | (26,493 | ) |
Acquisition of OCEANE convertible bonds (note 5) | | — | | — | | (104,767 | ) |
Decrease in restricted cash | | — | | — | | 175,820 | |
Purchase of Wavecom S.A. shares (note 24) | | (1,787 | ) | (1,553 | ) | — | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | | (14,268 | ) | (12,580 | ) | (13,296 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | | 31 | | 99 | | 155 | |
Increase in intangible assets | | (3,740 | ) | (3,976 | ) | (6,543 | ) |
Net change in short-term investments | | 17,058 | | 489 | | (8,773 | ) |
Cash flows provided (used) by investing activities | | (2,706 | ) | (17,521 | ) | 16,103 | |
Financing activities | | | | | | | |
Proceeds on issuance of term loan | | — | | — | | 102,716 | |
Repayment of term loan | | — | | — | | (103,931 | ) |
Financing costs | | — | | — | | (3,971 | ) |
Issuance of common shares, net of share issue costs | | 519 | | 1,074 | | 96 | |
Purchase of treasury shares for RSU distribution | | (4,472 | ) | — | | (6,417 | ) |
Proceeds on exercise of Wavecom options | | — | | — | | 4,148 | |
Decrease in other long-term obligations | | (905 | ) | (2,615 | ) | (2,238 | ) |
Cash flows used by financing activities | | (4,858 | ) | (1,541 | ) | (9,597 | ) |
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | (247 | ) | 1,414 | | (9,972 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, increase (decrease) in the year | | 15,932 | | (22,048 | ) | 44,233 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | | 85,443 | | 107,491 | | 63,258 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year | | $ | 101,375 | | $ | 85,443 | | $ | 107,491 | |
Supplemental disclosures: | | | | | | | |
Net income taxes paid (received) | | $ | (1,926 | ) | $ | 1,112 | | $ | 3,514 | |
Net interest paid (received) | | 32 | | 173 | | 129 | |
Non-cash purchase of property, plant and equipment (funded by obligation under capital lease) | | 148 | | 227 | | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
8
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| | Page |
Note 1 | Nature of Operations | 10 |
Note 2 | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 10 |
Note 3 | Recently Implemented Accounting Standards | 15 |
Note 4 | Changes in Future Accounting Standards | 16 |
Note 5 | Acquisition of Wavecom S.A. | 16 |
Note 6 | Short-term Investments | 17 |
Note 7 | Accounts Receivable | 17 |
Note 8 | Inventories | 18 |
Note 9 | Prepaids and Other | 18 |
Note 10 | Property, Plant and Equipment | 18 |
Note 11 | Intangible Assets | 19 |
Note 12 | Goodwill | 20 |
Note 13 | Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities | 20 |
Note 14 | Other Long-term Obligations | 20 |
Note 15 | Income Taxes | 20 |
Note 16 | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | 23 |
Note 17 | Research and Development | 23 |
Note 18 | Restructuring | 24 |
Note 19 | Integration | 25 |
Note 20 | Other Income (Expense) | 26 |
Note 21 | Loss Per Share | 26 |
Note 22 | Share Capital | 26 |
Note 23 | Stock-based Compensation Plans | 26 |
Note 24 | Non-controlling Interest | 30 |
Note 25 | Fair Value Measurement | 30 |
Note 26 | Financial Instruments | 31 |
Note 27 | Commitments and Contingencies | 32 |
Note 28 | Segmented information | 36 |
9
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Sierra Wireless, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “company, we, our”) was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on May 31, 1993. We are a global leader in the development of wireless technologies and solutions. We focus on wireless devices and applications, offering a comprehensive portfolio of products and services that reduce complexity for our customers. With sales, engineering, and research and development teams located in offices around the world, we provide leading edge wireless solutions for the machine-to-machine (“M2M”) and mobile computing markets. We develop and market a range of products that include wireless modems for mobile computers, embedded modules and software for original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), intelligent wireless gateway solutions for industrial, commercial and public safety applications, and an innovative platform for delivering device management and end-to-end application services. We also offer professional services to OEM customers during their product development and launch process, leveraging our expertise in wireless design, software, integration and certification to provide built-in wireless connectivity for mobile computing devices and M2M solutions. Our products, services and solutions connect people, their mobile computers and machines to wireless voice and data networks around the world.
We implemented a new organizational structure during the fourth quarter of 2010 and we have two reportable segments effective January 1, 2011.
Mobile Computing | — | | includes AirCard mobile broadband devices and AirPrime wireless embedded modules for PC OEM customers. |
| | | |
Machine-to-Machine | — | | includes AirPrime embedded wireless modules (excluding embedded module sales to PC OEMs), AirLink Intelligent Gateways and routers, and AirVantage M2M Cloud Platform. |
The primary markets for our products is North America, Europe and Asia Pacific.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
(a) Basis of consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries from their respective dates of acquisition of control. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. The ownership of the other non-controlling interest holders of consolidated subsidiaries is reflected as non-controlling interest and is not significant.
(b) Use of estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to inventory obsolescence, estimated useful lives of assets, valuation of intangible assets, goodwill, royalty and warranty accruals, lease provisions, other liabilities, stock-based compensation, bad debt and doubtful accounts, income taxes, restructuring costs, and commitment and contingencies, based on currently available information. Actual amounts could differ from estimates.
(c) Translation of foreign currencies
Our functional or primary operating currency is the U.S. dollar (“US$”).
Revenue and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated at exchange rates prevailing during the period. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the
10
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
period-end exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect when the assets are acquired or the obligations are incurred. Foreign exchange gains and losses are reflected in net earnings (loss) for the period.
We have foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be self-contained and integrated within their foreign jurisdiction, and accordingly, use the Euro dollar as their functional currency. The assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated to US$ at exchange rates at the balance sheet dates, equity is translated at historical rates, and revenue and expenses are translated at exchange rates prevailing during the period. The foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the translation are reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), as presented in note 16, Accumulated Other Comprehensive loss.
(d) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term deposits with original maturities of less than three months. Short-term deposits are valued at amortized cost. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
(e) Short-term investments
Short-term investments, categorized as available-for-sale, are carried at fair value. Unrealized holding gains (losses) related to available-for-sale investments, after deducting amounts allocable to income taxes, are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These gains (losses) are removed from comprehensive income (loss) when the investments mature or are sold on an item-by-item basis.
We regularly evaluate the realizable value of short-term investments, and if circumstances indicate that a decline in value is other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment charge. To determine whether to recognize an impairment charge, we consider various factors, such as the significance of the decline in value, the length of time the investment has been below market value, changes that would impact the financial condition of the investee, and the likelihood that the investment will recover its value before it matures or is disposed of.
(f) Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
We maintain an allowance for our accounts receivable for estimated losses that may result from our customers’ inability to pay. We determine the amount of the allowance by analyzing known uncollectible accounts, aged receivables, economic conditions, historical losses, insured amounts, if any, and changes is customer payment cycles and credit-worthiness. Amounts later determined and specifically identified to be uncollectible are charged against this allowance.
If the financial condition of any of our customers deteriorates resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, we may increase our allowance.
(g) Inventories
Inventories consist of electronic components and finished goods and are valued at the lower of cost or estimable realizable value, determined on a first-in-first-out basis. Cost is defined as all costs that relate to bringing the inventory to its present condition and location under normal operating conditions.
We review the components of our inventory and our inventory purchase commitments on a regular basis for excess and obsolete inventory based on estimated future usage and sales. Write-downs in inventory value or losses on inventory purchase commitments depend on various items, including factors related to customer demand, economic and competitive conditions, technological advances and new product introductions that vary from current expectations. We believe that the estimates used in calculating the inventory provision are reasonable and properly reflect the risk of excess and obsolete inventory. If customer demands for our inventory are substantially less than our estimates, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
11
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
(h) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We amortize our property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the following estimated economic lives:
Furniture and fixtures | | 3-5 years |
Research and development equipment | | 3-10 years |
Production equipment | | 3-5 years |
Tooling | | 1.5-3 years |
Computer equipment | | 1-5 years |
Software | | 1-5 years |
Office equipment | | 3-5 years |
Research and development equipment related amortization is included in research and development expense. Tooling and production equipment related amortization is included in cost of good sold. All other amortization is included in amortization expense.
Leasehold improvements and leased vehicles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their expected average service life or term of the initial lease.
When we sell property, plant and equipment, we net the historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization against the sale proceeds and include the difference in Other income (expense).
(i) Intangible assets
The estimated useful life of intangible assets with definite life is the period over which the assets are expected to contribute to our future cash flows. When determining the useful life, we consider the expected use of the asset, useful life of a related intangible asset, any legal, regulatory or contractual provisions that limit the useful life, any legal, regulatory, or contractual renewal or extension provisions without substantial costs or modifications to the existing terms and conditions, the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors, and the expected level of maintenance expenditures relative to the cost of the asset required to obtain future cash flows from the asset.
We amortize our intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the following specific periods:
Patents and trademarks | | - three to five years |
| | |
License fees | | - over the shorter of the term of the license or an estimate of their useful life, ranging from three to ten years. |
| | |
Intellectual property, customer relationships and databases | | - over three to nine years |
| | |
Non-compete covenants | | - over the term of the agreement |
Amortization related to intangible assets is included in research and development expense.
In-process research and development (“IPRD”) are intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations. IPRD are intangible assets with indefinite life prior to their completion. They are not amortized and are subject to impairment test on an annual basis.
(j) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired enterprise over the fair value assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Prior to January 1, 2011, goodwill was allocated as of the date of the business combination to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. We implemented a new organization structure during the fourth quarter of 2010 and effective January 1, 2011, we have three reporting units. Goodwill
12
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
has been allocated to the reporting units affected using a relative fair value allocation approach as at January 1, 2011.
Goodwill has an indefinite life, is not amortized, and is subject to a two-step impairment test on an annual basis. Step (i) compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, which includes the goodwill. When the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, step (ii) measures the amount of the impairment loss. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess.
(k) Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets other than goodwill, are assessed for potential impairments when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to operating results. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment and in interim periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying value of the intangible assets may be impaired.
(l) Research and Development costs
Research and development costs are expensed as they are incurred. Certain software development costs for costs associated with the development of computer software to be sold, leased or marketed are capitalized once technological feasibility is reached.
We follow the cost reduction method of accounting for government research and development funding, whereby the benefit of the funding is recognized as a reduction in the cost of the related expenditure when certain criteria stipulated under the terms of those funding agreements have been met, and there is reasonable assurance the research and development funding will be received. Certain research and development funding is repayable on the occurrence of specified future events. We recognize the liability to repay research and development funding in the period in which conditions arise that will cause research and development funding to be repayable.
(m) Warranty costs
Warranty costs are accrued upon the recognition of related revenue, based on our best estimates, with reference to past and expected future experience. Warranty obligations are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.
(n) Royalty costs
We have intellectual property license agreements which generally require us to make royalty payments based on a percentage of the revenue generated by sales of products incorporating the licensed technology. We recognize royalty obligations in accordance with the terms of the respective royalty agreements. Royalty costs are recorded as a component of cost of revenues in the period when incurred.
(o) Market development costs
Co-operative advertising costs are accrued at later of the recognition date of the related revenue or the date at which the co-operative advertising is available. Market development costs are charged to sales and marketing expense to the extent that the advertising benefit is separable from the revenue transaction and the fair value of that benefit is determinable. To the extent that such allowances either do not provide a separable benefit, or the fair value of the benefit cannot be reliably estimated, such amounts are recorded as a reduction of revenue.
13
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
(p) Revenue recognition
Revenue from sales of products and services is recognized upon the later of transfer of title or upon shipment of the product to the customer or rendering of the service, so long as persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.
Cash received in advance of the revenue recognition criteria being met is recorded as deferred revenue.
Revenues from contracts with multiple-element arrangements are recognized as each element is earned based on the relative fair value of each element and only when there are no undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of the delivered elements.
Revenue from licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term. Revenue from software maintenance, unspecified upgrades and technical support contracts is recognized over the period such items are delivered or services are provided. Technical support contracts extending beyond the current period are recorded as deferred revenue.
Funding from research and development agreements, other than government research and development arrangements, is recognized as revenue when certain criteria stipulated under the terms of those funding agreements have been met, and when there is reasonable assurance the funding will be received. Certain research and development funding will be repayable on the occurrence of specified future events. We recognize the liability to repay research and development funding in the period in which conditions arise that would cause research and development funding to be repayable.
(q) Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments
Stock options and restricted share units granted to the company’s key officers, directors and employees are accounted for using the fair value-based method. Under this method, compensation cost for stock options is measured at fair value at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and is expensed over the award’s vesting period using the straight-line method. Any consideration paid by plan participants on the exercise of stock options or the purchase of shares is credited to Common stock together with any related stock-based compensation expense. Compensation cost for restricted share units is measured at fair value at the date of grant which is the market price of the underlying security, and is expensed over the award’s vesting period using the straight-line method. Stock-based compensation is described further in note 23.
(r) Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Future income tax assets and liabilities are based on temporary differences (differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities) and non-capital loss carry-forwards and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply when these differences reverse. Future tax benefits, including non-capital loss carry-forwards, are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is considered more likely than not. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that enactment occurs.
We include interest and penalties related to income taxes, including unrecognized tax benefits, in income tax expense (recovery).
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recorded based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of examinations by tax authorities in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, income taxes payable and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
14
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
We recognize the windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options by U.S. employees to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) when realized. This tax benefit is not recognized until the deduction reduces U.S. taxes payable and all U.S. loss carryforwards have been utilized.
(s) Derivatives
Derivatives, such as foreign currency forward and option contracts, are occasionally used to hedge the foreign exchange risk on cash flows from commitments denominated in a foreign currency. Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are measured at fair value at each balance sheet date and any resulting gains and losses from changes in the fair value are recorded in other income (expense). Gains and losses from the effective portion of foreign currency forward and option contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). As at December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had no material contracts in place.
(t) Earnings (loss) per common share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) attributable to the company for the period by the weighted average number of company common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the treasury stock method. When the effect of options and other securities convertible into common shares is anti-dilutive, including when the company has incurred a loss for the period, basic and diluted loss per share are the same.
Under the treasury stock method, the number of dilutive shares, if any, is determined by dividing the average market price of shares for the period into the net proceeds of in-the-money options.
(u) Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings (loss) as well as changes in equity from other non-owner sources. The other changes in equity included in comprehensive income (loss) are comprised of foreign currency cumulative translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments. The reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary losses on marketable securities included in net earnings (loss) results from the recognition of the unrealized losses in the statements of operations when they are no longer viewed as temporary. Comprehensive income (loss) is presented in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.
(v) Investment tax credits
Investment tax credits are accounted for using the flow-through method whereby such credits are accounted for as a reduction of income tax expense in the period in which the credit arises.
(w) Comparative figures
Comparative figures disclosed in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted for the current year.
3. RECENTLY IMPLEMENTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU No. 2009-13) pertaining to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The new guidance affects accounting and reporting for companies that enter into multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements with their customers when those arrangements are within the scope of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605-25 “Revenue Recognition - Multiple-Element Arrangements”. The new guidance eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The new guidance is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. This guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (ASU 2010-017). ASU 2010-017 provides guidance in applying the milestone method of revenue recognition to research or development arrangements. Under this guidance management may recognize revenue contingent upon the
15
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
achievement of a milestone in its entirety, in the period in which the milestone is achieved, only if the milestone meets all the criteria within the guidance to be considered substantive. This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for research and development milestones achieved in fiscal years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. This guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as we have no material research and development arrangements which are accounted for under the milestone method.
4. CHANGES IN FUTURE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — goodwill and other. This guidance amends the guidance in ASU 350-20 on testing goodwill for impairment. Entities testing goodwill for impairment now have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit (i.e. step 1 of the goodwill impairment test). If entities determine, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the two-step impairment test would be required. The ASU does not amend the requirement to test goodwill for impairment between annual tests if events or circumstances warrant; however, it does revise the examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairments tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is permitted. We early adopted this guidance for our annual goodwill impairment test for year ended December 31, 2011.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income — Presentation. This guidance increases the prominence of other comprehensive income by requiring comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or two consecutive statements. This eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments do not change what items are reported in other comprehensive income. This ASU is effective on a retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance is not expected to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements as we currently report comprehensive income as a single statement.
5. ACQUISITION OF WAVECOM S.A.
On December 2, 2008, we announced an all-cash offer to purchase all of the ordinary shares and OCEANE convertible bonds (“OCEANEs”) of Wavecom, a global leader in wireless M2M solutions headquartered in Issy-les-Moulineaux, France. The total value of the transaction was approximately €218,000. Consideration consisted of €8.50 per share of Wavecom and €31.93 per OCEANE. The transaction was implemented by way of concurrent but separate public tender offers in both France and the United States for all Wavecom shares, all American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) representing Wavecom shares and all OCEANEs issued by Wavecom.
On February 27, 2009, we completed our acquisition of 84.32% of the outstanding shares and 99.97% of the outstanding OCEANEs of Wavecom, representing 90.57% of the voting rights of Wavecom, for cash consideration of $144,859 (€113,508) and $104,767 (€82,093), respectively. During March 2009, we purchased 160,643 shares on the open market for cash consideration of $1,850 (€1,365), resulting in the acquisition of 85.34% of the outstanding shares. Following a statutory re-opening of the tender offer, we increased our ownership of the voting rights of Wavecom from 90.57% to 95.4% for cash consideration of $11,817 (€8,908). On April 29, 2009, we completed our acquisition of all of the remaining Wavecom shares, except for certain shares held by employees that are subject to a hold period, and OCEANEs by way of a squeeze-out for cash consideration of $7,752 (€5,851). The Wavecom shares and OCEANEs were delisted from Euronext and the ADSs were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market (“Nasdaq”).
The results of Wavecom have been included in our consolidated financial statements from February 27, 2009. The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009 include revenue of $119,607 and net loss attributable to the Company of $43,758. Wavecom acquisition and financing costs recognized of $11,756 were expensed in 2009 as follows: $7,785 in acquisition costs and $3,971 in other income (expense).
The following amounts have been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on an estimate of their fair value at February 27, 2009:
16
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
Assets acquired | | | |
Cash and marketable securities | | $ | 139,785 | |
Other current assets | | 51,753 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | 9,916 | |
Intangible assets | | 71,354 | |
Goodwill | | 56,911 | |
Other long-term assets | | 5,231 | |
Deferred income tax | | 1,110 | |
| | 336,060 | |
Liabilities assumed | | | |
Current liabilities | | 52,284 | |
OCEANE convertible bonds | | 104,870 | |
Capital lease obligations | | 657 | |
Long-term liabilities | | 18,107 | |
Deferred income tax | | 76 | |
Non-controlling interest | | 13,357 | |
| | 189,351 | |
Fair value of net assets acquired | | $ | 146,709 | |
The fair value of the non-controlling interest at February 27, 2009 of $13,357 was based on the fair market price determined in the tender offer of $10.85 (€8.50) per ordinary share.
The following table presents details of the estimated purchased intangible assets:
| | Estimated Useful life (in years) | | Amount | |
| | | | | | |
Intellectual property | | 3-6 | | $ | 30,510 | |
In-process research and development | | 3-9 | | 18,425 | |
Customer relationships | | 5 | | 16,387 | |
Brand portfolio | | 5 | | 3,295 | |
Non-compete covenant | | 2 | | 2,737 | |
| | | | $ | 71,354 | |
6. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Short-term investments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale, were comprised of Canadian federal government issued securities with outstanding maturities less than 60 days.
7. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The components of accounts receivable at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
Trade receivables | | $ | 101,130 | | $ | 113,000 | |
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts | | (3,642 | ) | (4,606 | ) |
| | 97,488 | | 108,394 | |
Sales taxes receivable | | 1,825 | | 2,358 | |
Other receivables | | 8,054 | | 6,645 | |
| | $ | 107,367 | | $ | 117,397 | |
17
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
The movement in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 4,606 | | $ | 6,504 | |
Bad debt expense | | (83 | ) | 443 | |
Write-offs and settlements | | (827 | ) | (2,462 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | (54 | ) | 121 | |
| | $ | 3,642 | | $ | 4,606 | |
8. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Electronic components | | $ | 4,826 | | $ | 5,578 | |
Finished goods | | 11,342 | | 16,556 | |
| | $ | 16,168 | | $ | 22,134 | |
9. PREPAIDS AND OTHER
The components of prepaids and other at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | | |
Supplier prepayment | | $ | 16,486 | | $ | 15,615 | |
Insurance and licenses | | 2,024 | | 2,585 | |
Other | | 2,164 | | 6,342 | |
| | $ | 20,674 | | $ | 24,542 | |
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The components of property, plant and equipment at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net book value | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | $ | 4,799 | | $ | 3,856 | | $ | 943 | |
Research and development equipment | | 37,106 | | 29,204 | | 7,902 | |
Tooling | | 44,149 | | 37,298 | | 6,851 | |
Computer equipment | | 8,390 | | 6,764 | | 1,626 | |
Software | | 9,352 | | 7,338 | | 2,014 | |
Leasehold improvements | | 5,141 | | 3,955 | | 1,186 | |
Leased vehicles | | 1,126 | | 546 | | 580 | |
Office equipment | | 3,076 | | 2,091 | | 985 | |
| | $ | 113,139 | | $ | 91,052 | | $ | 22,087 | |
18
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
| | 2010 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net book value | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | $ | 4,570 | | $ | 3,548 | | $ | 1,022 | |
Research and development equipment | | 33,266 | | 24,822 | | 8,444 | |
Tooling | | 39,095 | | 31,548 | | 7,547 | |
Computer equipment | | 7,209 | | 5,760 | | 1,449 | |
Software | | 8,152 | | 6,489 | | 1,663 | |
Leasehold improvements | | 6,000 | | 4,728 | | 1,272 | |
Leased vehicles | | 979 | | 521 | | 458 | |
Office equipment | | 2,535 | | 1,755 | | 780 | |
| | $ | 101,806 | | $ | 79,171 | | $ | 22,635 | |
Amortization expense relating to property, plant and equipment was $14,528, $17,638, and $18,113 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
11. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The components of intangible assets at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net book value | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Patents and trademarks | | $ | 10,822 | | $ | 5,368 | | $ | 5,454 | |
Licenses | | 58,842 | | 33,325 | | 25,517 | |
Intellectual property | | 6,856 | | 6,614 | | 242 | |
Customer relationships | | 26,565 | | 18,499 | | 8,066 | |
Non-compete | | 2,764 | | 2,764 | | — | |
In-process research and development | | 5,419 | | 2,141 | | 3,278 | |
| | $ | 111,268 | | $ | 68,711 | | $ | 42,557 | |
| | 2010 | |
| | Cost | | Accumulated amortization | | Net book value | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Patents and trademarks | | $ | 10,877 | | $ | 4,250 | | $ | 6,627 | |
Licenses | | 58,024 | | 25,309 | | 32,715 | |
Intellectual property | | 6,856 | | 6,086 | | 770 | |
Customer relationships | | 26,678 | | 13,520 | | 13,158 | |
Non-compete | | 2,872 | | 2,632 | | 240 | |
In-process research and development | | 16,767 | | 1,253 | | 15,514 | |
| | $ | 122,074 | | $ | 53,050 | | $ | 69,024 | |
During the fourth quarter of 2011, we recorded an impairment charge of $11,214, primarily related to a software development program we decided not to complete. This asset was acquired through the acquisition of Wavecom. We did not record an impairment charge for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
19
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
Amortization expense relating to intangible assets was $17,858, $17,352, and $14,591 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Annual amortization expense for the future 5 years is estimated to approximate the levels recorded in 2011.
At December 31, 2011, a net carrying amount of $2,069 included in intangible assets was not subject to amortization.
12. GOODWILL
Goodwill of $89,961 (2010 — $90,953) primarily relates to the February 2009 acquisition of Wavecom (note 5), the May 2007 acquisition of AirLink Communications, Inc., and the August 2003 acquisition of AirPrime, Inc.
We assessed the realizability of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2011 and determined that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, the second step of the impairment test that measures the amount of an impairment loss by comparing the implied fair market value with the carrying amount of goodwill for each reporting unit was not required. There was no impairment of goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.
13. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
The components of accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Trade payables | | $ | 60,805 | | $ | 63,451 | |
Inventory commitments | | 4,898 | | 9,352 | |
Accrued royalties | | 15,053 | | 24,551 | |
Accrued payroll and related liabilities | | 9,770 | | 10,430 | |
Taxes payable (including sales taxes) | | 9,849 | | 7,159 | |
Product warranties | | 4,537 | | 4,059 | |
Marketing development funds | | 5,323 | | 2,378 | |
Other | | 13,312 | | 17,884 | |
| | $ | 123,547 | | $ | 139,264 | |
14. OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
The components of other long-term obligations at December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Accrued royalties | | $ | 18,442 | | $ | 14,756 | |
Marketing development funds | | 4,668 | | 7,253 | |
Other | | 2,033 | | 2,978 | |
| | $ | 25,143 | | $ | 24,987 | |
15. INCOME TAXES
The components of earnings (loss) before income taxes consist of the following:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Canadian | | $ | (16,201 | ) | $ | (4,343 | ) | $ | 5,883 | |
Foreign | | (14,136 | ) | (13,264 | ) | (46,745 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | | $ | (30,337 | ) | $ | (17,607 | ) | $ | (40,862 | ) |
20
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
The income tax expense (recovery) consists of:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Canadian: | | | | | | | |
Current | | $ | 123 | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Deferred | | 1,981 | | (71 | ) | (1,910 | ) |
| | 2,104 | | (71 | ) | (1,910 | ) |
Foreign: | | | | | | | |
Current | | 1,815 | | 379 | | — | |
Deferred | | (4,884 | ) | (3,116 | ) | 2,250 | |
| | (3,069 | ) | (2,737 | ) | 2,250 | |
Total: | | | | | | | |
Current | | 1,938 | | 379 | | — | |
Deferred | | (2,903 | ) | (3,187 | ) | 340 | |
| | $ | (965 | ) | $ | (2,808 | ) | $ | 340 | |
The reconciliation of income taxes calculated at the statutory rate to the actual income tax provision for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Income tax recovery at Canadian statutory income tax rates | | $ | (8,023 | ) | $ | (6,288 | ) | $ | (11,989 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in income taxes for: | | | | | | | |
Permanent and other differences | | 4,167 | | 32 | | (8,969 | ) |
Change in tax legislation | | — | | — | | (20,839 | ) |
Change in statutory/foreign tax rates | | (1,973 | ) | (1,470 | ) | (1,759 | ) |
Change in valuation allowance | | 3,973 | | (6,077 | ) | 42,801 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | 891 | | 1,125 | | 1,095 | |
Adjustment to prior years | | — | | 6,347 | | — | |
Foreign exchange gain adjustment | | — | | 3,523 | | — | |
Income tax expense (recovery) | | $ | (965 | ) | $ | (2,808 | ) | $ | 340 | |
Future tax assets and liabilities
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant future tax assets and future tax liabilities were as follows at December 31:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Future income tax assets | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | $ | 3,032 | | $ | 3,645 | |
Non capital Loss carry-forwards | | 64,980 | | 62,451 | |
Capital loss carry-forwards | | 2,607 | | 2,748 | |
Scientific research and development expenses | | 23,524 | | 20,753 | |
Share issue costs | | — | | 211 | |
Reserves and other | | 11,075 | | 18,561 | |
| | 105,218 | | 108,369 | |
Future income tax liabilities | | | | | |
Acquired intangibles | | 9,893 | | 11,034 | |
| | 95,325 | | 97,335 | |
Valuation allowance | | 83,152 | | 88,065 | |
| | $ | 12,173 | | $ | 9,270 | |
21
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Classification: | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | |
Current | | $ | 6,540 | | $ | 9,577 | |
Non-current | | 6,205 | | 836 | |
Liabilities | | | | | |
Current | | (336 | ) | — | |
Non-current | | (236 | ) | (1,143 | ) |
| | $ | 12,173 | | $ | 9,270 | |
At December 31, 2011, we have provided for a valuation allowance on our future tax assets of $83,152 (2010 - $88,065).
At December 31, 2011, we have Canadian allowable capital loss carry-forwards of $9,676 that are available, indefinitely, to be deducted against future Canadian taxable capital gains. In addition, we have $64,784 in scientific research and development expenditures available to be deducted against future Canadian taxable income that may be carried forward indefinitely and investment tax credits of $34,107 available to offset future Canadian federal and provincial income taxes payable. The investment tax credits expire between 2012 and 2031. At December 31, 2011, our US subsidiary has $1,821 and $4,589 of federal and California R&D tax credit carried forward which expire between 2029 and 2031.
At December 31, 2011, net operating loss carry-forwards for our foreign subsidiaries were $14,143 for U.S. income tax purposes that expire in 2023, $1,074 for Hong Kong income tax purposes, $55 for Brazil income tax purposes, $239 for Korea income tax purposes, $258 for Luxembourg income tax purposes, $242 for German income tax purpose, and $166,284 for French income tax purposes. Our foreign subsidiaries may be limited in their ability to use foreign net operating losses in any single year depending on their ability to generate significant taxable income. In addition, the utilization of these net operating losses is also subject to ownership change limitations provided by U.S. federal and specific state income tax legislation. French net operating losses carryforward is limited to 60% of French taxable income in excess of Euro 1,000. Our French subsidiaries also have research tax credit carried forward to $4,384 as at December 31, 2011. The French research tax credit may be used to offset against corporate income tax and if any credit is not fully utilized within a three year period following the year the research tax credit is earned, it may be refunded by the French tax authorities. Tax loss and research tax credit carry-forwards are denominated in the currency of the countries in which the respective subsidiaries are located and operate. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent value of these tax loss and research tax credit carry forwards in future years.
In assessing the realizability of our future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the future tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making our assessment.
Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
At December 31, 2011, we had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $9,464 (2010 — $8,754). Of this total, $6,815 (2010 - $6,909) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favourably impact our effective tax rate.
22
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
Below is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year | | $ | 8,754 | | $ | 7,754 | |
Increases — tax positions taken in prior periods | | 1,508 | | 1227 | |
Increases — tax positions taken in current period | | — | | — | |
Settlements and lapse of statute of limitations | | (798 | ) | (227 | ) |
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year | | $ | 9,464 | | $ | 8,754 | |
We recognize interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income tax expense on the consolidated statement of operations. At December 31, 2011, we had accrued $1,642 (2010 - $1,474) for interest and penalties.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to audits by the Canadian federal and provincial taxing authorities, by the U.S. federal and various state taxing authorities and by the taxing authorities in various foreign jurisdictions. Tax years ranging from 2004 to 2011 remain subject to examination in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Australia, China, Hong Kong, Brazil, South Africa, Japan, Korea, and Luxembourg.
16. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, net of taxes, were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | | | | |
Release of foreign currency translation relating to acquisition of non-controlling interest | | $ | 178 | | $ | 136 | |
Translation adjustment related to change in functional currency | | (728 | ) | (728 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | (7,450 | ) | (4,879 | ) |
| | $ | (8,000 | ) | $ | (5,471 | ) |
17. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The components of research and development costs consist of the following:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Gross research and development | | $ | 91,521 | | $ | 90,165 | | $ | 81,382 | |
Government tax credits | | (2,521 | ) | (2,130 | ) | (1,316 | ) |
| | $ | 89,000 | | $ | 88,035 | | $ | 80,066 | |
23
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
18. RESTRUCTURING
The following table provides the activity in the restructuring liability:
| | 2011 | |
| | Workforce Reduction | | Facilities | | Total | |
| | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 1,975 | | $ | 1,771 | | $ | 3,746 | |
Expensed in year | | 1,201 | | (364 | ) | 837 | |
Disbursements | | (2,321 | ) | (861 | ) | (3,182 | ) |
Adjustments | | (224 | ) | 11 | | (213 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | (6 | ) | 5 | | (1 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 625 | | $ | 562 | | $ | 1,187 | |
| | | | | | | |
Classification: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 625 | | $ | 396 | | $ | 1,021 | |
Other long-term obligations | | — | | 166 | | 166 | |
| | $ | 625 | | $ | 562 | | $ | 1,187 | |
| | | | | | | |
By restructuring initiative: | | | | | | | |
September 2010 | | $ | 377 | | $ | — | | $ | 377 | |
May 2009 | | — | | 562 | | 562 | |
Wavecom S.A. and prior | | 248 | | — | | 248 | |
| | $ | 625 | | $ | 562 | | $ | 1,187 | |
| | 2010 | |
| | Workforce Reduction | | Facilities | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 5,161 | | $ | 4,839 | | $ | 10,000 | |
Expensed in year | | 7,376 | | 2,296 | | 9,672 | |
Disbursements | | (9,512 | ) | (3,281 | ) | (12,793 | ) |
Non-cash stock-based compensation | | (540 | ) | — | | (540 | ) |
Adjustments | | (317 | ) | (1,771 | ) | (2,088 | ) |
Foreign exchange | | (193 | ) | (312 | ) | (505 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 1,975 | | $ | 1,771 | | $ | 3,746 | |
| | | | | | | |
Classification: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 1,975 | | $ | 1,028 | | $ | 3,003 | |
Other long-term obligations | | — | | 743 | | 743 | |
| | $ | 1,975 | | $ | 1,771 | | $ | 3,746 | |
| | | | | | | |
By restructuring initiative: | | | | | | | |
September 2010 | | $ | 1,487 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,487 | |
May 2009 | | 8 | | 1,554 | | 1,562 | |
Wavecom S.A. and prior | | 480 | | 217 | | 697 | |
| | $ | 1,975 | | $ | 1,771 | | $ | 3,746 | |
24
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
September 2010
In September 2010, we implemented a new business unit structure that resulted in a reduction of our workforce by 60 employees. These reductions were substantially completed during the fourth quarter of 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded restructuring costs of $4,420 primarily related to severance and benefits associated with the terminated employees. The remaining liability of $377 (December 31, 2010 - $1,487) is expected to be substantially paid by December 31, 2012.
May 2009
In May 2009, we implemented further cost reduction initiatives related to the integration of Wavecom with Sierra Wireless that included combining the research and development (“R&D”) and product operations of both organizations. As a result, the Wavecom location in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina was closed in the fourth quarter of 2009. R&D activities from this location were transitioned primarily to the location in Carlsbad, California. The cost reduction initiatives related to the workforce reduction were substantially completed during the third quarter of 2010. The facilities related restructuring obligation of $562 (December 31, 2010 — $1,554) is expected to be substantially paid by the second quarter of 2014.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Wavecom location in Brazil was closed resulting in $217 of restructuring charges related to employee terminations. The liability related to this workforce reduction was paid by March 31, 2010.
Wavecom S.A. and prior restructurings
In January 2009, we implemented an expense reduction program to reduce labor costs. We reduced our workforce by 56 employees, all of whom were terminated in the first quarter of 2009. The total workforce reduction charges recognized in the first quarter of 2009 of $1,622 included $501 for accelerated stock-based compensation and the remainder represented severance and benefits associated with the termination. The liability related to this program was substantially paid by the end of the third quarter of 2009.
In October 2008, prior to our acquisition of Wavecom, Wavecom announced a cost savings program and a proposed reorganization. The first portion of this plan, related to its operations in the United States, began in late 2008. In the second quarter of 2009, the staff reduction program in France related to this reorganization was implemented and a total of 77 positions were phased out by September 2010. In the third quarter of 2009, the restructuring charge of $4,504 primarily related to the exit of a portion of our building in France. The remaining liability related to the workforce reduction has been substantially paid. The Wavecom facilities restructuring liability is nil as at December 31, 2011.
In the year ended December 31, 2010, additional employees were terminated resulting in restructuring charges of $2,739, including $66 of accelerated stock-based compensation. The remaining liability related to employee termination costs is expected to be substantially paid by December 31, 2012.
19. INTEGRATION
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we incurred integration costs related to the acquisition of Wavecom S.A. of $1,426 (2010 — $5,110; 2009 - $3,859), primarily for costs related to the office space optimization in France, implementation of an integrated Customer Relationship Management system, and the integration of our Enterprise Resource Planning system.
25
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
20. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
The components of other income (expense) for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(Loss) gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment | | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 95 | | $ | (204 | ) |
Interest income | | 199 | | 202 | | 583 | |
Interest expense | | (124 | ) | (538 | ) | (4,778 | ) |
| | $ | 35 | | $ | (241 | ) | $ | (4,399 | ) |
21. LOSS PER SHARE
The following table provides the reconciliation between basic and diluted loss per share:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to the company | | $ | (29,315 | ) | $ | (14,541 | ) | $ | (39,899 | ) |
Weighted average shares used in computation of basic earnings per share (in thousands) | | 31,275 | | 31,083 | | 31,035 | |
Weighted average shares from assumed conversion of dilutive options (in thousands) | | — | | — | | — | |
Weighted average shares used in computation of diluted earnings per share (in thousands) | | 31,275 | | 31,083 | | 31,035 | |
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to the company’s common shareholders (in dollars) | | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (1.29 | ) |
22. SHARE CAPITAL
On December 13, 2011, we received regulatory approval allowing us to purchase for cancellation up to 1,564,914 of our common shares by of a normal course issuer bid (“the Bid”) on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ Global Market. The Bid commenced on December 19, 2011 and will terminate on the earlier of December 18, 2012, the date we complete our purchases, or the date of notice by us of termination. As at December 31, 2011, no shares have been purchased in the open market. As of March 5, 2012, we had purchased 400,000 common shares in the open market at an average price of $7.59 per share.
23. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
(a) Stock-based compensation expense:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of goods sold | | $ | 385 | | $ | 492 | | $ | 552 | |
Sales and marketing | | 1,288 | | 1,403 | | 1,411 | |
Research and development | | 1,574 | | 1,315 | | 1,215 | |
Administration | | 3,175 | | 3,143 | | 3,131 | |
Restructuring | | — | | 540 | | 905 | |
Integration | | — | | — | | 42 | |
| | $ | 6,422 | | $ | 6,893 | | $ | 7,256 | |
Stock option plan | | $ | 2,817 | | $ | 3,296 | | $ | 3,989 | |
Restricted stock plan | | 3,605 | | 3,597 | | 3,267 | |
| | $ | 6,422 | | $ | 6,893 | | $ | 7,256 | |
26
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
(b) Stock option plan
Under the terms of our employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), our Board of Directors may grant options to employees, officers and directors. The maximum number of shares available for issue under the Plan shall be the lesser of a rolling number equal to 10% of the number of issued and outstanding common shares from time to time or 7,000,000 common shares. Based on the number of shares outstanding as at December 31, 2011, stock options exercisable into 832,794 common shares are available for future allocation under the Plan.
The Plan provides that the exercise price of an option will be determined on the date of grant and will not be less than the closing market price of our stock at that date. Options generally vest over four years, with the first 25% vesting at the first anniversary date of the grant and the balance vesting in equal amounts at the end of each month thereafter. We determine the expiry date of each option at the time it is granted, which cannot be more than five years after the date of the grant.
The fair value of share options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 2.07 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.84 | % |
Annual dividends per share | | Nil | | Nil | | Nil | |
Expected stock price volatility | | 60 | % | 60 | % | 57 | % |
Expected option life (in years) | | 4.0 | | 4.0 | | 4.0 | |
Estimated forfeiture rate | | 3.5 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.5 | % |
Average fair value of options granted (in dollars) | | $ | 5.11 | | $ | 4.21 | | $ | 1.89 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
There is no dividend yield because we do not pay, and do not plan to pay, cash dividends on our common shares. The expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of our average monthly stock closing prices over a period equal to the expected life of each option grant. The risk-free interest rate is based on yields from risk-free instruments with a term equal to the expected term of the options being valued. The expected life of options represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding based on historical data of option holder exercise and termination behavior. We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and, if necessary, revise that estimate if actual forfeitures differ and adjust stock-based compensation expense accordingly.
Changes in the number of options outstanding during the years ended December 31 was as follows:
| | Number of | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
| | Shares | | Cdn.$ | | U.S.$ | | In Years | | U.S.$ | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 | | 2,230,970 | | 19.68 | | 16.13 | | 2.5 | | — | |
Granted | | 502,414 | | 4.97 | | 4.05 | | | | | |
Exercised | | (16,953 | ) | 6.01 | | 5.57 | | | | 54 | |
Forfeited | | (558,343 | ) | 25.71 | | 21.47 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 | | 2,158,088 | | 13.51 | | 12.83 | | 2.5 | | 3,246 | |
Granted | | 698,972 | | 9.12 | | 8.76 | | | | | |
Exercised | | (173,879 | ) | 6.38 | | 6.18 | | | | 792 | |
Forfeited | | (423,453 | ) | 12.36 | | 11.84 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 | | 2,259,728 | | 12.51 | | 12.54 | | 2.4 | | 7,878 | |
Granted | | 658,452 | | 10.88 | | 10.89 | | | | | |
Exercised | | (83,906 | ) | 6.06 | | 6.19 | | | | 417 | |
Forfeited | | (536,399 | ) | 13.91 | | 13.97 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 | | 2,297,875 | | 12.11 | | 11.86 | | 2.5 | | 705 | |
27
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options is calculated as the quoted market price of the stock at the balance sheet date, or date of exercise, less the exercise price of the option. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised in the year ended December 31, 2011 was $417 (year ended December 31, 2010 - $792; year ended December 31, 2009 - $54).
The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011:
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable | |
| | | | Weighted | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Average | | Weighted | | | | Weighted | |
| | Number | | Remaining | | Average | | Number | | Average | |
Range of | | of | | Option Life | | Exercise Price | | Of options | | Exercise Price | |
Exercise Prices | | Options | | (years) | | Cdn.$ | | U.S.$ | | Exercisable | | Cdn.$ | | U.S.$ | |
$3.98 – $8.82 U.S. $4.06 – $9.00 Cdn | | 653,755 | | 2.8 | | 6.96 | | 6.82 | | 313,018 | | 6.68 | | 6.54 | |
$8.83 – $11.05 U.S. $9.01 – $11.29 Cdn | | 537,865 | | 3.8 | | 10.26 | | 10.05 | | 93,392 | | 9.24 | | 9.05 | |
$11.06 – $15.66 U.S. $11.30 – 15.99 Cdn | | 466,047 | | 3.0 | | 13.02 | | 12.75 | | 166,549 | | 15.77 | | 15.44 | |
$15.67 – $28.49 U.S. $16.00 – $29.10 Cdn | | 640,208 | | 0.7 | | 18.27 | | 17.89 | | 629,545 | | 18.30 | | 17.92 | |
| | 2,297,875 | | 2.5 | | 12.11 | | 11.86 | | 1,202,504 | | 14.22 | | 13.93 | |
The options outstanding at December 31, 2011 expire between May 2, 2012 and August 22, 2016.
As at December 31, 2011, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options was $3,969 (2010 — $3,782; 2009 - $4,412), which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years (2010 — 2.2 years; 2009 — 1.9 years).
(c) Restricted share units
We have two market based restricted share unit plans, one for U.S. employees and the other for all non-U.S. employees, and a new treasury based restricted share unit plan, approved May 17, 2011 (collectively, the “RSPs”). The RSPs further our growth and profitability objectives by providing long-term incentives to certain executives and other key employees and also encourage our objective of employee share ownership through the granting of restricted share units (“RSUs”). There is no exercise price or monetary payment required from the employees upon the grant of an RSU or upon the subsequent delivery of shares (or, in certain jurisdictions, cash in lieu at the option of the company) to settle vested RSUs. With respect to the treasury based RSP, the maximum number of common shares which the company may issue from treasury is 1,000,000 common shares. With respect to the two market based RSPs, independent trustees purchase Sierra Wireless common shares over the facilities of the TSX and Nasdaq, which are used to settle vested RSUs. The existing trust funds are variable interest entities and are included in these consolidated financial statements as shares held for RSU distribution.
Generally, RSUs vest over three years, in equal one-third amounts on each anniversary date of the date of the grant. However, RSU grants to employees who are resident in France for french tax purposes will not vest before the second anniversary from the date of grant, and any shares issued are subject to an additional two year tax hold period. All vested RSUs will be settled upon vesting by delivery of one common share of Sierra Wireless, Inc. (or, in certain jurisdictions, cash in lieu at the option of the company) for each vested unit.
28
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
The following table summarizes the RSU activity since the inception of the RSPs:
| | Number of | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
| | RSUs | | Cdn.$ | | U.S.$ | | In years | | U.S.$ | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 | | 312,062 | | 19.61 | | 16.08 | | 1.9 | | 1,819 | |
Granted | | 842,131 | | 5.08 | | 4.18 | | | | | |
Vested | | (175,758 | ) | 16.54 | | 14.01 | | | | 1,186 | |
Forfeited | | (2,551 | ) | 17.18 | | 14.43 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 | | 975,884 | | 6.88 | | 6.53 | | 1.9 | | 10,349 | |
Granted | | 328,496 | | 9.10 | | 8.75 | | | | | |
Vested | | (443,610 | ) | 8.21 | | 7.82 | | | | 4,159 | |
Forfeited | | (32,779 | ) | 6.56 | | 6.29 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 | | 827,991 | | 6.81 | | 6.83 | | 1.3 | | 12,346 | |
Granted | | 486,343 | | 10.83 | | 10.84 | | | | | |
Vested | | (379,121 | ) | 11.10 | | 11.11 | | | | 4,170 | |
Forfeited | | (31,184 | ) | 8.54 | | 8.43 | | | | | |
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 | | 904,029 | | 8.94 | | 8.76 | | 1.3 | | 6,346 | |
As at December 31, 2011, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost associated with the RSUs totalled $4,176 (2010 — $2,972; 2009 - $3,812), which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years (2010 — 1.6 years; 2009 — 1.7 years).
(d) Employee stock purchase plan
On March 31, 2009, we terminated our employee stock purchase plans for U.S. and Canadian and other non-U.S employees (together, the “ESPP Plans”) that enabled eligible employees and directors to acquire common shares over the facilities of the TSX and Nasdaq. In the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, participants purchased a total of 10,734 and 36,183 common shares, respectively at a weighted-average price of $5.51 per share and $12.27 per share, respectively.
(e) Wavecom stock options, warrant plans and free shares
Prior to our acquisition of Wavecom, Wavecom granted founders’ warrants and stock options to its employees, stock options to employees of its subsidiaries, warrants to some members of its board of directors and free shares to its employees of its subsidiaries. Under the terms of the plans, the options and warrants gave the right to purchase one share of Wavecom per option or warrant at an exercise price based either on the stock market price of Wavecom shares on the grant date, or on the average stock market price of Wavecom shares over the twenty trading days prior to the date of grant (in accordance with French Law).
The stock-based compensation related to the pre-acquisition Wavecom plans recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Cost of goods sold | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 11 | |
Sales and marketing | | 3 | | 11 | | 150 | |
Research and development | | 4 | | 14 | | 218 | |
Administration | | 20 | | 38 | | 462 | |
| | $ | 27 | | $ | 63 | | $ | 841 | |
29
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
24. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
The non-controlling interest represents shares held by former Wavecom employees under their long-term incentive plan. The shares had vested, but were subject to a hold period for tax purposes. We had entered into a put/call agreement with these employees to purchase back the shares at €8.50 per share upon expiry of the tax hold period. Until that time, the shares were considered non-controlling interest. On June 8, 2011, the tax hold period expired on these vested shares. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired 142,400 shares, respectively, at €8.50 per share. The obligation for the remaining 4,750 shares at €8.50 per share has been recorded as at December 31, 2011 and is classified under accrued liabilities.
The following table summarizes the effects of changes in our ownership interest of Wavecom on our equity:
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company | | $ | (29,315 | ) | $ | (14,541 | ) | $ | (39,899 | ) |
Transfer (to) from non-controlling interest: | | | | | | | |
Decrease on exercise of stock options | | — | | — | | (2,751 | ) |
Decrease in subsequent tender and squeeze-out | | — | | — | | (1,647 | ) |
Increase on issuance of free shares | | (796 | ) | (229 | ) | (1,568 | ) |
| | $ | (30,111 | ) | $ | (14,770 | ) | $ | (45,865 | ) |
25. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
(a) Fair value presentation
An established fair value hierarchy requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | - | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 | - | Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, such as quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
Level 3 | - | Inputs that are generally unobservable and are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value determination of the assets or liabilities. |
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and current portions of long-term liabilities, approximate their fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Short-term investments are recorded at fair value and their carrying value as at December 31, 2011 was $9,347 (December 31, 2010 — $26,405). Our short-term investments are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Based on borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar terms, the carrying values of our obligations under capital leases, long-term obligations and other long-term liabilities approximate their fair values.
(b) Credit Facilities
We signed a credit agreement on December 1, 2008 with The Toronto Dominion Bank and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce that provided, among other things, a one-year revolving term credit facility (“Revolving Facility”). The Revolving Facility, not to exceed $55,000, was to be used for working capital requirements and was secured by a pledge against all of our assets. On January 29, 2010, we signed an amended and restated credit agreement which renewed our Revolving Facility to January 28, 2011, and reduced the maximum amount from $55,000 to $10,000. On January 27, 2011, we signed an amended and
30
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
restated credit agreement, on similar terms, which extended our revolving facility to January 28, 2013. As at December 31, 2011, we had $10,000 available on our revolving facility and were in compliance with the associated covenants.
(c) Letters of credit
We have entered into a standby letter of credit facility agreement under which we have issued a performance bond to a third party customer in accordance with specified terms and conditions. At December 31, 2011, we had a performance bond of $176 (December 31, 2010 — $315) and the value of this bond approximated its fair market value. The expiry on this letter of credit is May 2012.
26. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial Risk Management
Financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Our financial instruments also include derivatives which we occasionally use to reduce our exposure to currency associated with its revenues.
We have exposure to the following business risks:
We depend on a small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue. In 2011, three customers individually accounted for more than 10% of our revenue and, in aggregate, these three customers represented 36% of our revenue. In the years ended 2010 and 2009, two customers individually accounted for more than 10% of our revenue and, in aggregate, represented 26% and 40% of our revenue, respectively.
At December 31, 2011, three customers individually accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable (2010 — two customers individually accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable).
We maintain substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions or government instruments. Our deposits with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits.
We outsource manufacturing of our products to third parties and, accordingly, we are dependent upon the development and deployment by third parties of their manufacturing abilities. The inability of any supplier or manufacturer to fulfill our supply requirements could impact future results. We have supply commitments to our contract manufacturers based on our estimates of customer and market demand. Where actual results vary from our estimates, whether due to execution on our part or market conditions, we are at risk.
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily accounts receivable. We perform on-going credit evaluations of our customer’s financial condition and require letters of credit or other guarantees whenever deemed appropriate.
Although substantially all of our revenues are received in U.S. dollars, we incur operating costs and have obligations related to our facilities restructuring that are denominated in other currencies. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between these currencies could have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are generating an increasing portion of our revenue from sales to customers outside of North America including Europe, the Middle East and Asia. We have experienced increased exposure to Euro fluctuations due to the acquisition of Wavecom. Wavecom, whose functional currency is the Euro, occasionally uses derivatives such as foreign currency forward and options contracts, to reduce the foreign exchange risk on cash flows from firm and highly probable commitments denominated in U.S. dollars. To manage our foreign currency risks, we may enter into more such contracts should we consider it to be advisable to reduce our exposure to future foreign exchange fluctuations. As at December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had no such contracts in place.
31
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
We are subject to risks typical of an international business including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures other regulations and restrictions and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be materially affected by changes in these or other factors.
27. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Operating leases
We have entered into operating leases for property, plant and equipment. The minimum future payments under various operating leases in each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:
2012 | | $ | 2,780 | |
2013 | | 2,633 | |
2014 | | 2,611 | |
2015 | | 1,456 | |
2016 | | 1,351 | |
Subsequent years | | 3,302 | |
| | $ | 14,133 | |
(b) Contingent liability on sale of products
(i) �� Under license agreements, we are committed to make royalty payments based on the sales of products using certain technologies. We recognize royalty obligations as determinable in accordance with agreement terms. Where agreements are not finalized, we have recognized our current best estimate of the obligation. When the agreements are finalized, the estimate will be revised accordingly.
(ii) We are a party to a variety of agreements in the ordinary course of business under which we may be obligated to indemnify a third party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise as a result of contracts for sale of our products to customers where we provide indemnification against losses arising from matters such as potential intellectual property infringements and product liabilities. The impact on our future financial results is not subject to reasonable estimation because considerable uncertainty exists as to whether claims will be made and the final outcome of potential claims. To date, we have not incurred material costs related to these types of indemnifications.
(iii) In March 2004, we entered into an agreement with the Government of Canada’s Technology Partnerships Canada (“TPC”) program, under which we were eligible to receive conditionally repayable research and development funding up to Cdn. $9,540 to support the development of a range of third generation wireless technologies. Under the terms of the agreement, all or part of the contribution was repayable upon the occurrence of certain prescribed events of default. In March 2009, we signed an amended agreement under which we will repay a total of $2,155 (Cdn. $2,500), with payments due on March 1 for each of the next five years beginning March 1, 2009, in full and final satisfaction of all amounts owing, or to be owed, to TPC under this agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we repaid $500 (Cdn. $500) (2010 — $476 or Cdn. $500; 2009 - $394 or Cdn. $500).
(iv) We accrue product warranty costs, when we sell the related products, to provide for the repair or replacement of defective products. Our accrual is based on an assessment of historical experience and on management’s estimates. An analysis of changes in the liability for product warranties follows:
32
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
| | 2011 | | 2010 | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 4,059 | | $ | 4,630 | |
Provisions | | 7,254 | | 5,945 | |
Expenditures | | (6,776 | ) | (6,516 | ) |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 4,537 | | $ | 4,059 | |
(c) Other commitments
We have entered into purchase commitments totaling approximately $85,071, net of related electronic components inventory of $4,239 (December 31, 2010 — $79,946, net of electronic components inventory of $5,578), with certain contract manufacturers under which we have committed to buy a minimum amount of designated products between January and March 2012. In certain of these agreements, we may be required to acquire and pay for such products up to the prescribed minimum or forecasted purchases.
(d) Legal proceedings
We are from time to time involved in litigation, certain other claims and arbitration matters arising in the ordinary course of our business. We accrue for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. These accruals are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and technical experts and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility (within the meaning of ASC 450, Contingencies) that the losses could exceed the amounts already accrued for those cases for which an estimate can be made, management believes that the amount of any such additional loss would not be material to our results of operations or financial condition.
In some instances, we are unable to reasonably estimate any potential loss or range of loss. The nature and progression of litigation can make it difficult to predict the impact a particular lawsuit will have on the company. There are many reasons that we cannot make these assessments, including, among others, one or more of the following: the early stages of a proceeding, which does not require the claimant to specifically identify the patent that has allegedly been infringed; damages sought that are unspecified, unsupportable, unexplained or uncertain; discovery not having been started or incomplete; the complexity of the facts that are in dispute (e.g., once a patent is identified, the analysis of the patent and a comparison to the activities of the Company is a labor-intensive and highly technical process); the difficulty of assessing novel claims; the parties not having engaged in any meaningful settlement discussions; the possibility that other parties may share in any ultimate liability; and the often slow pace of patent litigation.
We are required to apply judgment with respect to any potential loss or range of loss in connection with litigation. While we believe we have meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against us in our currently outstanding litigations, and intend to defend ourselves vigorously in all the cases, in light of the inherent uncertainties in litigation, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves currently accrued by us for those cases for which an estimate can be made, and losses in connection with any litigation for which we are not presently able to reasonable estimate any potential loss or range of loss could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.
In January 2012, a patent holding company, M2M Solutions LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware asserting patent infringement by us. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating
33
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In September 2011, a patent holding company, Wi-Lan, Inc., filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement by a number of parties, including us. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In September 2011, a patent holding company, Mayfair Wireless, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware asserting patent infringement by one or more of our customers. The litigation makes certain allegations concerning the wireless hotspots sold to certain telecommunication carriers by us and our competitors. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. In December 2010, this same plaintiff filed a similar lawsuit in the same court assessing patent infringement by a number of parties, including us. The plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice in respect of this earlier lawsuit in March 2011.
In August 2011, a patent holding company, Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida asserting patent infringement by a number of parties including Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Sprint Nextel Corporation. Sprint has notified us that the lawsuit makes certain allegations concerning the modems sold to them by us and our competitors. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend our products.
In July 2011, a patent holding company, GPNE Corp., filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii asserting patent infringement by a number of parties including Barnes & Noble Inc., selling e-readers and computerized tablet and communication devices with the ability to function with GPRS. Barnes & Noble has notified us that the lawsuit makes certain allegations concerning the modules sold by us and incorporated in their Nook e-reader. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In October 2010, a patent holding company, Eon Corp. IP Holdings, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement by a number of parties including one or more of our customers. In January 2012, the lawsuit was transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Also in January 2012, the plaintiff filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico asserting patent infringement by a number of parties, including one or more of our customers. In each case, the litigation makes certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to certain telecommunication carriers by us and our competitors. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend our products.
In July 2010, Americans for Fair Patent Use, LLC filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting false patent marking by a number of device manufacturers, including Sierra Wireless America, Inc., and telecommunication carrier companies, including Sprint Nextel Corporation and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless. The litigation made certain allegations that products sold by us and our competitors were falsely marked with a number of patents that had expired or
34
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
that did not cover the marked products. In April 2011, a mutually agreeable settlement was reached by the parties which will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
In May 2010, a patent holding company, Golden Bridge Technology Inc., filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware asserting patent infringement by a number of telecommunication carrier companies, including AT&T Mobility LLC. AT&T Mobility LLC has since been dismissed from this lawsuit. In February 2011, the plaintiff filed a similar lawsuit in the same court asserting patent infringement by a number of additional parties, including us and certain of our customers. In both cases, the litigation makes certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold by us and our competitors. Both lawsuits have been stayed pending the outcome of mediation occurring in Q1, 2012. We are currently assessing our obligations and our liability, if any, in respect of this litigation. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In February 2010, a patent holding organization, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement by a number of telecommunication carriers, including one or more of our customers. The litigation initially made certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to the carriers by us; however, these allegations have since been withdrawn.
In September 2009, a patent holding company, Xpoint Technologies Inc., filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware asserting patent infringement by a number of parties, including AT&T Mobility LLC. In the first quarter of 2011, the plaintiff filed a third amended complaint asserting a number of allegations including certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to AT&T Mobility LLC by us. AT&T Mobility LLC has advised us that this litigation has been settled, and we believe that the settlement will have no adverse material effect upon us.
In July 2009, a patent holding company, WIAV Networks, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement by a number of wireless device manufacturers, including us. The Texas court has transferred the litigation to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The California court has dismissed the litigation against a number of parties, including us, and there is no right of appeal with respect to this decision.
In July 2009, a patent holding company, SPH America, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia asserting patent infringement by a number of device manufacturers, including us, and computer manufacturers, including one or more of our customers. The litigation, which has been transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and is in the discovery stage, makes certain allegations concerning the wireless modules sold to the computer manufacturers by us or our competitors. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In July 2009, a patent holding company, Celltrace, LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement by a number of telecommunication carrier companies including Sprint Spectrum, LP and AT&T Mobility LLC. The litigation makes certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to the carriers by us and our competitors. The Court issued a Final Judgment on July 5, 2011 dismissing all claims, counterclaims and third-party claims.
In March and June 2009, a patent holding company, MSTG Inc., filed patent litigation lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting patent infringement by a number of telecommunication carrier companies, including AT&T Mobility LLC and Sprint Spectrum, LP,
35
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
respectively. The carriers have notified us that the lawsuits make certain allegations concerning the wireless data cards and modems sold to those carriers by us and our competitors. In respect of the first matter, the claim construction process has concluded and discovery in the matter is ongoing. The second matter has been settled by Sprint Spectrum, LP, and we believe that the settlement will have no adverse material effect on our operating results. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In September 2007, a patent holding company, NTP, Inc., filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia asserting patent infringement by a telecommunication carrier, AT&T Mobility LLC. In December 2010, AT&T Mobility LLC made certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to them by us and we have responded to them. A decision of the Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit ordered reconsideration by the Patent Office of its re-examination decision regarding the patent that the plaintiff claims has been infringed in this lawsuit. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
In November 2007, a patent holding company, Technology Patents LLC, filed a patent litigation lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern Division of the District of Maryland asserting patent infringement by companies in the cellular phone industry, including a telecommunication carrier, AT&T Mobility LLC. In August 2010, AT&T Mobility LLC made certain allegations concerning the wireless modems sold to them by us and we have responded to them. On summary judgment, AT&T Mobility LLC was found not to have infringed the asserted patents. In September 2011, Technology Patents LLC filed an appeal to the Federal Circuit. Although there can be no assurance that an unfavorable outcome would not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position, we believe the claims are without merit and will vigorously defend the lawsuit.
We are engaged in certain other claims, legal actions and arbitration matters, all in the ordinary course of business, and believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims, legal actions and arbitration matters will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results, liquidity or financial position.
28. SEGMENTED INFORMATION
Effective January 1, 2010, we integrated the legacy Sierra Wireless and Wavecom segments, and as a result, our reportable segments changed from those reported at December 31, 2009. For 2010, we operated in one segment, and all our products and services were included in this segment.
We implemented a new organizational structure during the fourth quarter of 2010 and we have two reportable segments effective January 1, 2011.
· Mobile Computing
· Machine-to-Machine
Our segments have changed from those reported at December 31, 2010. We have not restated our comparative information as discrete financial information for these two segments is not available for periods prior to January 1, 2011.
We sell certain products through resellers, original equipment manufacturers, and wireless service providers who sell these products to end-users. We had three significant customers during the year ended December 31, 2011 that each accounted for more than 10% of our revenue, comprising sales of $77,216, $68,361, and $66,001 (year ended December 31, 2010 - two significant customers comprising sales of $105,469 and $65,691; year ended December 31, 2009 - two significant customers comprising sales of $119,635 and $92,489).
36
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
As we do not evaluate the performance of our operating segment based on segment assets, management does not classify asset information on a segmented basis. Despite the absence of discrete financial information we do measure our revenue based on other forms of categorization such as by the products we produce and the geographic distribution in which our products are sold.
BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
| | Year ended December 31, 2011 | |
| | Mobile Computing | | Machine-to -Machine | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 284,966 | | $ | 293,219 | | $ | 578,185 | |
Cost of goods sold | | 216,464 | | 198,271 | | 414,735 | |
Gross Margin | | 68,502 | | 94,948 | | 163,450 | |
Gross Margin % | | 24.0 | % | 32.4 | % | 28.3 | % |
Expenses | | n/a | | n/a | | 193,362 | |
Loss from operations | | n/a | | n/a | | (29,912 | ) |
Total assets | | n/a | | n/a | | 422,887 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, 2010 | |
| | Mobile Computing | | Machine -to-Machine | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 317,896 | | $ | 332,445 | | $ | 650,341 | |
Cost of goods sold | | n/a | | n/a | | 459,976 | |
Gross Margin | | n/a | | n/a | | 190,365 | |
Gross Margin % | | n/a | | n/a | | 29.3 | % |
Expense | | n/a | | n/a | | 200,731 | |
Loss from operations | | n/a | | n/a | | (10,366 | ) |
Total assets | | n/a | | n/a | | 469,568 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, 2009 | |
| | Mobile Computing | | Machine -to-Machine | | Consolidated | |
| | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | 309,916 | | $ | 216,468 | | $ | 526,384 | |
Cost of goods sold | | n/a | | n/a | | 349,092 | |
Gross Margin | | n/a | | n/a | | 177,292 | |
Gross Margin % | | n/a | | n/a | | 33.7 | % |
Expenses | | n/a | | n/a | | 215,016 | |
Loss from operations | | n/a | | n/a | | (37,724 | ) |
Total assets | | n/a | | n/a | | 422,887 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
37
SIERRA WIRELESS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except where otherwise stated)
REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Americas | | $ | 252,762 | | $ | 303,311 | | $ | 312,991 | |
Europe, Middle East and Africa | | 100,078 | | 89,048 | | 87,547 | |
Asia-Pacific | | 225,345 | | 257,982 | | 125,846 | |
| | 578,185 | | 650,341 | | 526,384 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
REVENUE BY PRODUCT
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Mobile Computing | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
AirCard Mobile Broadband Devices | | $ | 241,454 | | $ | 291,464 | | $ | 294,981 | |
AirPrime Wireless Embedded Modules for PC OEMs | | 39,422 | | 23,420 | | 12,506 | |
Other | | 4,090 | | 3,012 | | 2,429 | |
| | 284,966 | | 317,896 | | 309,916 | |
Machine-to-Machine | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
AirPrime Embedded Wireless Modules (exludes PC OEMs) | | $ | 242,791 | | $ | 274,964 | | $ | 168,873 | |
AirLink Intelligent Gateways and Routers | | 39,013 | | 48,626 | | 41,005 | |
Airvantage and other | | 11,415 | | 8,855 | | 6,590 | |
| | 293,219 | | 332,445 | | 216,468 | |
| | 578,185 | | 650,341 | | 526,384 | |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
Americas | | $ | 14,108 | | $ | 14,609 | | $ | 13,281 | |
Europe, Middle East and Africa | | 5,197 | | 4,831 | | 5,718 | |
Asia-Pacific | | 2,782 | | 3,195 | | 8,957 | |
| | 22,087 | | 22,635 | | 27,956 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
38