Versadial 10Q 2009 Q2 Quarterly report

	Six months ending December 31, 2008		Six months ending December 31, 2007		Three months ending December 31, 2008		Three months ending December 31, 2007

Customer A	$	880,000	$	1,039,000	$	562,000	$	1,012,000
Customer B		315,000		-		315,000		-

	$	1,195,000	$	1,039,000	$	877,000	$	1,012,000

VERSADIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2008

Accounts receivable from customer A aggregated approximately $314,000 at December 31, 2008.

Segment information

Assets, classified by geographic location are as follows:

	December 31,		June 30,
	2008		2008

United States	$	6,258,272	$	5,502,628
Other countries		7,778,054		7,111,064

	$	14,036,326	$	12,613,692

Assets in other countries are primarily inventory and equipment which are located at subcontractor production facilities in Germany and amounts classified as deposits on production equipment.

Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas was as follows:

	Six months ending December 31, 2008		Six months ending December 31, 2007		Three months ending December 31, 2008		Three months ending December 31, 2007

United States	$	1,012,174	$	1,113,131	$	664,956	$	1,012,161
Other countries		435,133		58,843		327,605		11,126


	$	1,447,307	$	1,171,974	$	992,561	$	1,023,287

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read along with our financial statements, which are included in another section of this 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our expectations for our business and financial needs. These expectations are subject to a variety of uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to vary significantly from our expectations. The cautionary statements made in this Report should be read as applying to all forward-looking statements in any part of this 10-Q. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those projected in such forward-looking statements.

NATURE OF BUSINESS AND COMPETITION

Versadial is engaged in the manufacture of a dual dispenser that enables the user to blend two liquids in varying proportions. The dispensers are currently manufactured in both Germany and the United States and are being utilized in the food, sun care, skincare, and cosmetic industries. Versadial’s business is designed to capitalize on the commercial opportunities for innovation in packaging and dispensing within the consumer products industries. Substantially all of our revenues come from wholesale sales and our customers are located both in the United States and in Europe. The manufacture of the dual dispensers are currently outsourced to third party subcontractors in the United States for our 40mm and 49mm size dispensers and in Germany for our 20mm size dispenser.

Innopump, our wholly owned subsidiary, holds the exclusive worldwide license for a patented dual-chambered variable dispensing system for all categories of uses, marketed under the registered trademark "Versadial®". The patented system utilizes multiple volumetric pumps, controlled by a rotating head and disc system, providing the dispensing of precise fixed or variable ratios of distinct and separate fluids. The Versadial® custom blending dual dispensing head provides consumer packaged goods manufacturers with a new and innovative dispensing technique permitting precision measured blending by the consumer of different lotions, gels, creams, and liquids, or combination thereof.

Although, we are not aware of any direct competition for our type of dual chamber variable dispensing product, there are other dispensing solutions available.

Other manufacturers within the sub-sector of dispensing valves, pumps and other dispensing systems are large multinational companies offering a range of products to all major personal care, pharmaceutical, OTC and food sectors. They include but are not limited to Owens-Illinois, Rexam plc., Aptar, Bespak, 3M, Calmar, Precision, Summit, Coster, Lindal and PAI Partners.

Other manufacturers within the personal care and food packaging sectors are large, well-financed, national and international manufacturers of caps, jars and bottles well as pumps and valves including but not limited to Owen-Illinois, Tetra Pak, Crown, Cork and Seal, Alcan, Rexam plc., Amcor Limited, Toyo Seikan, Ball, Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, and Alcoa.

Nearly all of the other manufacturers have longer operating histories, greater experience, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater manufacturing capabilities, and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Because of their greater resources, other manufacturers are able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns for their brands and products, and make more attractive offers to potential employees, retail affiliates, and others. Although, we believe our products are superior to any other product currently on the market, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors or that our business and financial results will not suffer from competition.

Recent Developments

The following developments took place during the six months ended December 31, 2008 and subsequent to December 31, 2008:

On September 20, 2006, we entered into a 30-month manufacturing agreement with Seidel GMBH (“Seidel”), an outside contractor located in Germany. The agreement calls for the contractor to develop certain production molds for us for a new size (20 millimeter) dispenser. On October 2, 2008, the agreement was amended for certain price adjustments based on current market conditions. We also agreed to pay the contractor an aggregate of $1.7 million for additional equipment to be purchased and for development costs related to the molds under the terms of an amortization agreement. The December 31, 2008 obligation due to the contractor of $1.7 million will be amortized over production on a per piece basis starting in January 2009, the date of the first commercial shipment of the product. Contemporaneously with this agreement, on October 2, 2008, we were fully relieved of our obligation to repay the $1.7 million advance received from our customer, Avon, provided that we shall instead pay the tooling and mold contractor this amount. The payment due the contractor is independent of the credit relief that Avon has provided us; however, if Avon does not forgive any or all of the $1.7 million advance, then we and the contractor shall promptly negotiate a mutually agreeable payment schedule for any balance due. The $1.7 million is to be paid to the contractor on a per piece amortization for all pieces produced through June 30, 2009, with any balance to be paid in six equal monthly payments from July 2009 through December 2009.

On July 10, 2007 we entered into a two-year Master Supply Agreement with Avon, a consumer products company for seventeen million units of certain of our Company’s products. On October 2, 2008, the agreement was amended and Avon’s commitment to purchase certain of our products was reduced in number in return for certain price adjustments based on current market conditions. In late January 2009, the initial shipment to Avon was made under this agreement.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Memo previously entered into with Avon, we were to repay Avon’s $1.7 million advance received in fiscal year 2007 by a credit against the purchase price of products sold to Avon. On October 2, 2008, we were fully relieved of our obligation to repay the $1.7 million advance provided that we shall instead pay the tooling and mold contractor this amount pursuant to a payment schedule to be determined between us and the contractor as consideration for additional equipment costs and development costs related to the tooling and mold expenses. In the event of a default by us in payment to the contractor, the credit relief granted shall immediately be null and void to the extent of any unpaid balance, and the customer shall have the right to enforce against us collection of the full amount of such unpaid balance. Upon our payment to the tooling and mold contractor, we will recognize the credit relief granted by Avon.

On October 20, 2008 Innopump entered into an unsecured loan agreement with SCG. SCG is an affiliate of the Company as members of the Board of Directors own approximately 69% of the outstanding membership interests of SCG. SCG is the sublicensor of the patented technology used in the manufacture of the Company’s proprietary products. The loan is for a principal amount of $3,445,750, matures on June 29, 2009 and bears interest at the rate of one and eighty three hundredths percent (1.83%) per month payable in arrears on the first day of each month or payable in kind at the option of Innopump with the interest being added to the principal balance. The agreement also obligates Innopump to pay a fully earned facility fee of $400,000 at maturity, a commitment fee of $250,000, which was paid upon execution of the loan, and an in kind non-interest bearing monitoring fee in the amount of $100,000 per month for five (5) consecutive months commencing on November 1, 2008 and terminating on March 1, 2009 payable at maturity. The loan is not prepayable before March 1, 2009.

In order to provide such funds to Innopump, SCG entered into a loan transaction with a third party lender. Innopump’s payment obligations under the terms of its loan agreement with SCG are equivalent to SCG’s payment obligations to its lender with the consequence that all loan payments made by Innopump to SCG will in turn be paid by SCG to its lender. As of December 31, 2008 the balance included in the consolidated interim financial statements in the notes, interest, and financing fees payable, net of the debt discount, includes the principle amount of $3,445,750, interest of $151,243, a facility fee of $400,000, and two months monitoring fees of $200,000, payable to the third party lender, under the terms stated above. In addition, the third party lender was granted a warrant to purchase a 10% membership interest in SCG at an aggregate price equal to $1. The warrant issued to the lender was valued at the grant date at approximately $98,000 and is being amortized as debt discount over the term of the loan. Debt discount expense aggregated approximately $24,000 for the six and three months ended December 31, 2008. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes model with an expected volatility of 105% and a risk free interest rate of .76%. The warrant is exercisable through October 2010. Innopump also executed a letter in favor of the third party lender to SCG providing an indemnity to such lender in the event the lender becomes subject to litigation commenced by creditors of the Company on account of its having made such loan.

Gerhard Brugger, who is the licensor to SCG of the patented technology sublicensed to Innopump, gave the third party lender his consent of a collateral assignment of the License by SCG to the lender and agreed that any outstanding indebtedness of SCG under the License Agreement, which aggregated approximately $907,000 at the date of the closing and $984,000 at December 31, 2008, would not be due prior to July 1, 2009. SCG, in consideration for Mr. Brugger’s cooperation, agreed to provide cash collateral for its payment obligations to Mr. Brugger under its License Agreement of $895,750, which Innopump agreed to fund out of the loan proceeds. Where Innopump complies with the terms of the loan agreement with SCG, this amount shall be a credit against its loan agreement obligations. No changes were made in the sublicense agreement with SCG in connection with this loan.

The net proceeds from the loan aggregated $1,227,611, after fees of $75,000, the required establishment of a cash collateral account of approximately $895,750 and payments made directly by the lender to our vendors of $1,247,389. From the net proceeds, we paid additional financing costs of $250,000 to the lender. The remaining proceeds of the loan were used primarily for working capital purposes including (i) payment of current accounts payable and other outstanding obligations and (ii) funding anticipated working capital requirements including product development and the acquisition of tooling and molds.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We believe that several accounting policies are important to understanding our historical and future performance. We refer to these policies as “critical” because these specific areas generally require us to make judgments and estimates about matters that are uncertain at the time we make the estimate, and different estimates, which also would have been reasonable, could have been used, which would have resulted in different financial results. The Company adopted changes to its critical accounting policies during the first six months of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 as set forth below.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. This Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It applies to other accounting pronouncements where the FASB requires or permits fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities for the first quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. The disclosures required under SFAS 157 are set forth in Note 6 to our condensed financial statements set forth in Item 1 of this quarterly report. We are currently in the process of evaluating the effect, if any, that the adoption of FSP 157-2 will have on our results of operations or financial position.

On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, “Fair Value Measurements” (FSP FAS 157-3), which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an inactive market and provides an example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 155” (“SFAS 159”). This statement permits entities to choose to measure selected assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company adopted SFAS 159 on July 1, 2008 resulting in no material impact to the Company’s financial condition, results of operation or cash flows.

The critical accounting policies we identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 related to various significant accounting policies. It is important that the discussion of our operating results that follows be read in conjunction with the critical accounting policies disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the SEC on November 14, 2008.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary

The table below sets forth a summary of financial highlights for the six and three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:

Overall, our revenue grew substantially by 23% during the current fiscal year as our operations began to grow in the skincare and cosmetic sectors. Our revenues to date in the current fiscal year were derived from nine customers as compared to four customers in the prior fiscal year for the same period. Our direct costs were 58% and 99% of revenues for the respective periods due to several factors, which were primarily the need for manual labor of certain functions in Germany in 2007 which have ceased as we relocated our operations to the U.S. in late 2007, the unfavorable Euro/US Dollar currency exchange fluctuation in 2007, which also has ceased as a result of this relocation, and high direct freight costs in 2007 due mainly to component parts being produced in the U.S. and shipped to Germany for assembly prior to completion of the U.S. facility becoming fully operational. Our indirect costs, which consist mainly of depreciation, costs for prototype samples for new customers and products, and costs for testing of new equipment, were approximately $.9 million in both periods. Our revenues did not increase enough to cover these indirect costs. Our general and administrative expenses decreased about 8% in the current fiscal period due to a decrease in consulting fees for primarily overseas consultants no longer required. These changes are explained in more detail below.

Our focus for the coming fiscal year and the future will be to grow our revenues and continue to decrease our direct costs per unit which we believe will be accomplished as our transition to the U.S. has been completed for production of our 40mm and 49mm dispensers and our new 20mm dispenser product line is now completed. First commercial production and shipping of our new 20mm dispenser commenced in January 2009 at the Seidel plant located in Germany. We estimate we will be able to produce approximately 15 million units annually of our 20mm dispenser. In addition, we believe the completion of our new U.S. based facility in February 2008 for our 40 and 49mm product line will enable us to increase production with substantially all new automated molds and assembly equipment. We estimate we will be able to produce approximately 20 million units annually of these products. We have commitments from several multi-national customers for in excess of four (4) million units at the current time for our various products. We also anticipate improving our costs and margins as both the injection molding and assembly functions will be performed together at both of these new subcontractor facilities and we will be better able to manage our costs as they will be on a per piece basis and we will no longer need to purchase individual component parts and contract assembly labor separately. Additionally, we will retain the services of Holzmann Montague, our prior assembly manufacturer in Germany, for development projects with new and existing customers, and possibly for assembly of foreign orders or additional production use if necessary.

For the six months ended December 31,	2008			2007			CHANGE

Net revenues	$	1,447,307		$	1,171,974			23	%

Cost of revenues
Direct costs		842,942			1,166,487			-28	%
Indirect costs		876,048			850,711			3	%

		1,718,990			2,017,198			-15	%

Gross margin		(271,683	)		(845,224	)		-68	%

Operating expenses
General and administrative		1,449,418			1,583,361			-8	%

Loss from operations		(1,721,101	)		(2,428,585	)		-29	%

Other income (expenses)
Sublease income, affiliates		25,830			24,330			6	%
Interest and other expense		(877,305	)		(896,958	)		-2	%
Interest expense, related parties		(111,628	)		(81,112	)		38	%
Amortization of debt discount		(152,643	)		(404,035	)		-62	%
Amortization of financing costs		(571,849	)		(220,644	)		159	%
Gain on derivative financial instruments		230,658			189,898			21	%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange		302,012			(94,625	)		-419	%

		(1,154,925	)		(1,483,146	)		-22	%

Net loss	$	(2,876,026	)	$	(3,911,731	)		-26	%

REVENUES. During the six months ended December 31, 2008, we had revenues of $1,447,308 as compared to revenues of $1,171,974 during the six months ended December 31, 2007, an increase of approximately 23%. In 2008, 82% of the revenue was primarily attributable to two customers in the cosmetic and food industries and the balance from seven additional customers. In 2007, 89% of the revenue was primarily attributable to one customer in the skincare, cosmetic and food industries and the balance from three additional customers. As discussed above, we anticipate our revenues to continue to increase in the coming fiscal year as to amount and customer base.

GROSS MARGIN. Cost of revenues – direct costs, which consist of direct labor, overhead and product costs, were $842,942 (58% of revenues) for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $1,166,487 (99% of revenues) for the six months December 31, 2007. The significant improvement in the percentage of direct costs as related to revenues for 2008 is a direct result of our relocation to the United States in late 2007 as more fully described above. Cost of revenues – indirect costs, which consist of indirect labor, quality control costs, factory maintenance, product development and depreciation, were $876,048 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $850,711 for the six months ended December 31, 2007. The increase was due primarily to increased depreciation of approximately $302,000 due to the purchase of more manufacturing equipment, which was offset by a decrease in additional costs for runoff testing of parts needed to validate the new U.S. equipment in 2007. Gross margin was a deficit of $(271,683) for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a deficit of $(845,224) for the six months ended December 31, 2007, representing gross margins of approximately (19) % and (72) % of revenues, respectively. We believe that indirect costs, which are primarily related to depreciation and the testing of new automated equipment, will decrease both in amount and as a percent of revenues as the equipment is placed in service and revenues increase to cover these costs. We also believe direct costs should remain at the current level as a percentage of revenues for our 40mm and 49mm dispensers as discussed above as our new U.S. facility became fully operational in February 2008 and our new 20mm facility in Germany began commercial production in January 2009. Our production capacity and customer base should continue to grow in the future resulting in revenue growth to support our direct and indirect costs.

OPERATING EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses totaled $1,449,418 for the six months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $1,583,361 for the six months ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of approximately 8%. This decrease of approximately $134,000 is primarily attributable to a decrease in consulting fees for primarily overseas consultants no longer required.

NET LOSS. We had a net loss of $2,876,026 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $3,911,731 for the six months ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of approximately $1,036,000. The decrease in net loss is attributable to the corresponding increases and decreases in revenues, general and administrative expenses and cost of revenues as described above aggregating an improvement of approximately $708,000. In addition, we incurred an increase in gain on foreign currency exchange due to the favorable fluctuation in the foreign currency rates of approximately $302,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a loss of approximately $(95,000) for 2007. We believe that revenues should increase in the coming fiscal year as we introduce our new product line and are able to grow our customer base, and direct costs should decrease as production becomes more automated and diversified in both the U.S. and in Germany, allowing operating expenses to decline on a per piece basis and indirect costs to be covered.

For the three months ended December 31,	2008			2007			CHANGE

Net revenues	$	992,561		$	1,023,287			-3	%

Cost of revenues
Direct costs		601,936			875,498			-31	%
Indirect costs		421,434			429,208			-2	%

		1,023,370			1,304,706			-22	%

Gross margin		(30,809	)		(281,419	)		-89	%

Operating expenses
General and administrative		751,312			795,724			-6	%

Loss from operations		(782,121	)		(1,077,143	)		-27	%

Other income (expenses)
Sublease income, affiliates		12,915			11,415			13	%
Interest and other expense		(559,663	)		(417,739	)		34	%
Interest expense, related parties		(56,411	)		(55,335	)		2	%
Amortization of debt discount		(88,571	)		(213,808	)		-59	%
Amortization of financing costs		(487,849	)		(95,322	)		412	%
Gain on derivative financial instruments		3,496			716,799			-100	%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange		72,438			(61,451	)		-218	%

		(1,103,645	)		(115,441	)		856	%

Net loss	$	(1,885,766	)	$	(1,192,584	)		58	%

REVENUES. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, we had revenues of $992,561 as compared to revenues of $1,023,287 during the three months ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of approximately 3%. In 2008, 88% of the revenue was primarily attributable to two customers in the cosmetic industry and the balance from three additional customers. In 2007, 99% of the revenue was primarily attributable to one customer in the cosmetic industry. In 2007, we experienced a large startup order from this customer for the initial product launch which has leveled off in the current period as inventory was acquired by the customer to meet their respective customer demands. As discussed above, we anticipate our revenues to continue to increase in the coming fiscal year as to amount and customer base in connection with the 40mm and 49mm product lines and the start of our 20mm product line in January 2009.

GROSS MARGIN. Cost of revenues – direct costs, which consist of direct labor, overhead and product costs, were $601,936 (61% of revenues) for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $875,498 (86% of revenues) for the three months December 31, 2007. The significant improvement in the percentage of direct costs as related to revenues for 2008 is a direct result of our relocation to the United States in late 2007 as more fully described above. Cost of revenues – indirect costs, which consist of indirect labor, quality control costs, factory maintenance, product development and depreciation, were $421,434 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $429,208 for the three months ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in additional costs for runoff testing of parts needed to validate the new U.S. equipment in 2007 which was offset by increased depreciation of approximately $124,000 due to the purchase of more manufacturing equipment. Gross margin was a deficit of $(30,809) for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a deficit of $(281,419) for the three months ended December 31, 2007, representing gross margins of approximately (3) % and (27) % of revenues, respectively. We believe that indirect costs, which are primarily related to depreciation and the testing of new automated equipment, will decrease both in amount and as a percent of revenues as the equipment is placed in service and revenues increase to cover these costs. We also believe direct costs should remain at the current level as a percentage of revenues for our 40mm and 49mm dispensers as discussed above as our new U.S. facility became fully operational in February 2008 and our new 20mm facility in Germany began commercial production in January 2009. Our production capacity and customer base should continue to grow in the future resulting in revenue growth to support our direct and indirect costs.

OPERATING EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses totaled $751,312 for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $795,724 for the three months ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of approximately 8%. This decrease of approximately $45,000 is primarily attributable to a decrease in consulting fees for primarily overseas consultants no longer required.

NET LOSS. We had a net loss of $1,885,766 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $1,192,584 for the three months ended December 31, 2007, an increase of approximately $693,000. The increase in net loss is attributable to the corresponding increases and decreases in revenues, general and administrative expenses and cost of revenues as described above aggregating an improvement to the net loss of approximately $295,000. In addition, we incurred an increase in gain on foreign currency exchange due to the favorable fluctuation in the foreign currency rates of approximately $72,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a loss of approximately $(61,000) for 2007. Interest expense and related financing costs increased by approximately $411,000 for the 2008 period due primarily to the financing costs associated with the new debt obligation effective in October 2008. For the three months ended December 31, 2007 we also had a gain from derivative financial instruments of approximately $717,000 as compared to approximately $4,000 in 2008 as a result of the decrease in the market price of our common shares in 2007. We believe that revenues should increase in the coming fiscal year as we introduce our new product line and are able to grow our customer base, and direct costs should decrease as production becomes more automated and diversified in both the U.S. and in Germany, allowing operating expenses to decline on a per piece basis and indirect costs to be covered.

GOING CONCERN, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table sets forth our working capital deficit as of December 31, 2008:

	At December 31,
	2008

Current assets	$	1,782,371
Current liabilities		26,385,739

Working capital deficit	$	(24,603,638	)

At December 31, 2008, we had incurred cumulative losses of approximately $22.9 million since inception and $2.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2008. We have a working capital deficit of approximately $24.6 million and a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $14.1 million as of December 31, 2008.

During the six months ended December 31, 2008, we utilized cash for operating activities of approximately $.2 million for operating activities primarily due to the revenues not yet great enough to cover general and administrative expenses and indirect costs. We generated net cash of approximately $.1 million from investing and financing activities primarily to purchase molds and equipment. Our cash balance decreased by approximately $.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2008.

At December 31, 2008, current liabilities include accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $4.2 million of which approximately $2.5 million is for the purchase and development of new equipment due to two vendors in Germany for which we have reached agreements to defer payment a portion of these costs. In October 2008, we reached an agreement with one of these vendors for the $1.7 million due that vendor at December 31, 2008 to amortize these costs over production on a per piece basis through June 2009 with any remaining unamortized balance due in monthly installments from July 2009 through December 2009. Actual startup production commenced in December 2008 and we received customer approval of the finished product in January 2009. The first commercial shipment of the product was completed in late January 2009. In October 2008, we reached an agreement with the other vendor whereby we would pay approximately $275,000 in October 2008 of the outstanding balance and the remaining balance at a rate of approximately $75,000 per month until paid with interest at 7%. At December 31, 2008, this vendor is owed approximately $.7 million for the equipment and other related charges and approximately $.1 million in accrued interest. The payments were made through December 2008 as scheduled with the proceeds from a financing as described below. Approximately $.9 million included in accounts payable is due to a vendor in the United States for; (a) the amortization of purchased equipment under a capital lease obligation of approximately $0.4 million and; (b) start up costs and additional equipment at a new U.S. based facility of approximately $0.5 million. We are in discussions with the vendor for deferred payment of the balance. Current capital lease obligations of approximately $3.5 million are to be repaid through amortization of production based on the number of units produced with any balance due 18 months from the start of production which commenced in November 2007. We anticipate revenues from production will not cover this obligation and that alternatively this obligation may be extended as to the term and amount of amortization per unit produced. Approximately $1.2 million of current liabilities relates to bridge loans which are due upon the earlier of March 31, 2009 or out of the proceeds from any new additional financings in excess of $7.0 million. Approximately $1.6 million of current liabilities relates to related party loans which are an obligation of SCG and are due on December 31, 2009. The convertible debt of approximately $9.9 million is due on November 9, 2009. We are presently in discussions with the lender as to possible conversion of the related debt prior to the maturity date. In addition, the royalty due to licensor included in current liabilities of approximately $1.0 million will not be due prior to July 1, 2009 as per the terms of an agreement with the licensor.

On October 20, 2008, Innopump entered into an unsecured loan agreement with SCG. SCG is the sublicensor of the patented technology used in the manufacture of our proprietary products. The loan is for a principal amount of $3,445,750, matures on June 29, 2009 and bears interest at the rate of one and eighty three hundredths percent (1.83%) per month. The net proceeds from the loan aggregated $1,227,611, after fees of $75,000, the required establishment of a cash collateral account of approximately $895,750 and payments made directly by the lender to our vendors of $1,247,389. From the net proceeds, we paid additional financing costs of $250,000 to the lender. The remaining proceeds of the loan were used primarily for working capital purposes including (i) payment of current accounts payable and other outstanding obligations and (ii) funding anticipated working capital requirements including product development and the acquisition of tooling and molds.

We recognize that we must generate additional revenue and gross profits to achieve profitable operations. Management's plans to increase revenues include the continued building of its customer base and product lines. In regard to these objectives, we commenced commercial production in connection with a supply agreement with Avon, a customer in the consumer products industry, as related to the manufacture of our new size (20mm) dispenser in January 2009. We have an initial order from Avon for 2.5 million units subject to increase to 4.0 million units upon us delivering product in the timeframe specified by Avon. In addition, we are involved in development projects with new customers with the potential to manufacture more than twenty (20) million units for the combined 2009 and 2010 seasons; the solidification of high potential customer interest equivalent to an additional twenty (20) million units for the same period deliverable upon demonstration of ability to manufacture; the realization that the above production is coming from a limited amount of potential customers whose demand is so great it may limit our opportunity to create capacity for other interested customers, and the resultant focus by us to identify production partners who will fund manufacturing equipment in consideration for customer commitment. In addition, we have relocated our operations for the production of our two current product lines (the 40mm and 49mm size dispensers) from Germany to the United States. The manufacturing facility in the United States commenced operations in November 2007 and became fully operational in February 2008. This new facility has increased both production capacity and gross profit margins on these product lines. We have currently manufactured and shipped approximately 6.2 million dispensers to date and have firm orders on hand from several customers for production of our 40 millimeter and 49 millimeter dual chambered dispensing pumps. We believe we will have recurring orders with these customers as well as new orders in the coming fiscal year from several customers we are working with on new products. Management believes that the capital received to date from previous financings will not be sufficient to pay current financial obligations, inclusive of capital equipment commitments which were incurred in order to expand our product lines and increase production capacity, fund operations, and repay debt during the next twelve months. Additional debt or equity financing will be required which may include receivables or purchase order financing, the issuance of new debt or equity instruments, additional amortization of a portion of construction costs through our production partners and possible restructuring of current amortization and debt agreements.

We are currently in negotiations with several other large consumer products companies regarding the introduction of a 20mm dual chamber pump similar to the pump assembled by Seidel. The fulfillment of these orders, if obtained, will require a similar capital investment as described above as related to our agreement with Seidel, our subcontractor located in Germany, and we are currently evaluating, in lieu of additional debt or equity financing, several opportunities for capitalization of same from existing and new production partners in consideration for a volume and amortization commitment. We believe that in the future we can finance all of our capital requirements through such arrangements due to the strength of the current customer commitments; the performance of our products currently in the marketplace; the consumer interest demonstrated in our products, as revealed by our customers market research investigations and resultant large initial order commitments; and the multiple indicators of support we are receiving from potential manufacturing partners.

The following is a table summarizing our significant commitments as of December 31, 2008, consisting of equipment commitments, debt repayments, royalty payments and future minimum lease payments with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year for the next fiscal 5 years.

Contractual Obligations (in millions):	Total		FYE 2009		FYE 2010-2011		FYE 2012-2013		FYE 2014 and Thereafter

Convertible Debt and interest	$	10.6	$	0.4	$	10.2	$	-	$	-
Notes and interest - related parties		3.1		1.5		1.6
Other notes and interest		4.4		4.4
Royalties including arrears		15.7		0.3		2.1		1.4		11.9
Equipment obligations and leases		2.6		2.6		-
Tooling Amortization		3.5		3.5		-

	$	39.9	$	12.7	$	13.9	$	1.4	$	11.9

Based on the current operating plan and available cash and cash equivalents currently available, we will need to obtain additional financing through the sale of equity securities, private placements, funding from new or existing production partners, and/or bridge loans within the next 12 months. Additional financing, whether through public or private equity or debt financing, arrangements with stockholders or other sources to fund operations, may not be available, or if available, may be on terms unacceptable to us. The ability to maintain sufficient liquidity is dependent on our ability to successfully build our customer base and product line with the required capital equipment. If additional equity securities are issued to raise funds or convert existing debt, the ownership percentage of existing stockholders would be reduced. New investors may demand rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. Debt incurred by us would be senior to equity in the ability of debt holders to make claims on our assets. The terms of any debt issued could impose restrictions on our operations.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in building our customer base and product line or that available capital will be sufficient to fund current operations and to meet financial obligations as related to capital expenditures and debt repayment until such time that revenues increase to generate sufficient profit margins to cover operating costs and amortization of capital equipment. If we are unsuccessful in building our customer base or are unable to obtain additional financing, if needed, on terms favorable to us, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET

As a smaller reporting company, the registrant is not required to provide a response to Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), which is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who serves as our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, and our Controller, who serves as our Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Controller concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were not effective due to an insufficient number of resources in the accounting and finance department that does not allow for a thorough review process.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, there were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

• Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

• Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

• Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The scope of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting includes all of our Company’s consolidated subsidiaries.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework.” Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to an insufficient number of resources in the accounting and finance department that does not allow for a thorough review process.

The material weakness will not be considered remediated until necessary remedial procedures are completed and tested and management has concluded that the procedures are operating effectively.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

None

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

As a smaller reporting company, the registrant is not required to provide a response to Item 1A.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

There have been no changes in the instruments defining the rights or rights evidenced by any class of registered securities.

There have been no dividends declared.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders

None

ITEM 5. Other Information

None

ITEM 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.

10.23

Loan Agreement dated October 20, 2008 between Sea Change Group, LLC and Innopump, Inc. (1)

31	Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to Securities Exchange Act rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(c) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

* Filed herewith

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K of the Company filed on October 24, 2008.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 19th day of February 2009.

		VERSADIAL, INC.

		/s/ Geoffrey Donaldson
	By:	Geoffrey Donaldson, Principal Executive and Financial Officer

		/s/ Karen Nazzareno
	By:	Karen Nazzareno,
		Controller

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. junior Avg

Nevada		11-3535204
(State or other jurisdiction of		(State or I.R.S. Employer
incorporation of organization)		Identification Number)

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1. Consolidated Interim Financial Statements:

Consolidated Interim Balance Sheet	1

Consolidated Interim Statements of Operations	2

Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows	3-4

Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements	5-16

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17-26

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	26

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	26-27

Part II. - Other Information	28

Signatures	29

Exhibit 31

Exhibit 32

		December 31,		June 30,
		2008		2008
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Current assets
Cash	$	93,629	$	216,705
Restricted cash		895,750
Due from affiliates		23,964		23,964
Accounts receivable		427,101		550,554
Sublease and other receivable		28,500		19,500
Inventories		182,291		261,349
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		131,136		19,425

Total current assets		1,782,371		1,091,497

Property and equipment, net		4,923,507		5,692,425

Other assets
Development of production equipment in progress		6,656,745		5,599,615
Deferred financing costs		639,548		196,000
Security deposit		34,155		34,155

Total other assets		7,330,448		5,829,770

	$	14,036,326	$	12,613,692


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current liabilities
Secured accounts receivable financing and interest, related party	$	271,278	$	108,705
Notes, interest and financing fees payable, net of debt discount of $73,500 and $nil		4,365,148		233,439
Notes and interest payable, related parties		2,849,379		1,162,434
Convertible note and interest payable, net of debt discount of $26,462 and $nil		9,894,253		116,665
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		4,200,397		4,679,186
Due to licensor		984,239
Capital lease obligations		3,468,749		3,772,599
Due to related parties		226,067		275,775
Deferred revenue		107,318		153,264
Customer deposits		18,911		45,570

Total current liabilities		26,385,739		10,547,637

Long-term liabilities
Convertible note and interest payable, net of debt discount of $154,605				9,017,266
Notes and interest payable, related parties				1,595,381
Due to licensor				809,027
Customer advance		1,700,000		1,700,000
Derivative financial instruments		4,545		235,203
Sublease security deposit, affiliate		6,830		6,830

Total long-term liabilities		1,711,375		13,363,707

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 2 million shares authorized,
zero issued and outstanding
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 35 million shares authorized,
18,309,194 issued and outstanding		1,831		1,831
Additional paid-in-capital		8,835,392		8,722,502
Accumulated deficit		(22,898,011)		(20,021,985)

Total stockholders' deficit		(14,060,788)		(11,297,652)

	$	14,036,326	$	12,613,692

	Six Months Ended
	December 31,
	2008			2007
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(2,876,026	)	$	(3,911,731	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		768,918			467,385
Amortization of debt discount		152,643			404,035
Amortization of financing costs		571,849			220,644
Gain on derivative financial instruments		(230,658	)		(189,898	)
Compensation expense for issuance of warrants		14,890
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Due from affiliates					6,175
Accounts receivable		123,453			(487,201	)
Sublease and other receivable		(9,000	)		3,431
Inventories		79,058			(50,651	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(111,711	)		(193,193	)
Due to licensor		175,212			202,414
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		678,203			1,819,413
Payments on capital leases		(303,850	)		(244,532	)
Due to related parties		(49,708	)		90,196
Deferred revenue		(45,946	)		231,406
Customer deposits		(26,659	)
Interest payable		888,376			797,442

Net cash used in operating activities		(200,956	)		(834,665	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of equipment					(251,586	)
Payments of development of production equipment in progress		(1,057,130	)		(2,232,879	)
Payments for registration costs					(38,054	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,057,130	)		(2,522,519	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from secured accounts receivable financing, related party		627,000
Proceeds from issuance of notes, related parties					2,225,000
Proceeds from issuance of notes, net		1,227,611			1,200,000
Payments on secured accounts receivable financing, related party		(469,601	)
Payments for financing costs		(250,000	)		(30,000	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,135,010			3,395,000

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(123,076	)		37,816

Cash, beginning of period		216,705			134,361

Cash, end of period	$	93,629		$	172,177

Versadial (VSDL) Inactive 10-Q2009 Q2 Quarterly report

Content analysis

Machinery and equipment	7 Years
Molds	2-7 Years
Computer equipment	3 Years

	December 31,		June 30,
	2008		2008

Raw materials	$	59,300	$	116,368
Work-in-process		127		3,303
Finished goods		122,864		141,678
	$	182,291	$	261,349