This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) toSchedule 14D-9 amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule14D-9 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the“Schedule 14D-9”) previously filed by Senomyx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Senonmyx”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2018, relating to the offer by (i) Firmenich Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“Firmenich”), and (ii) Sentry Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Firmenich (“Merger Sub”), to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Senomyx, $0.001 par value per share, (the “Shares”) for $1.50 per Share, to be paid to the seller in cash, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated October 4, 2018 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time).
Except as otherwise set forth below, the information set forth in theSchedule 14D-9 remains unchanged and is incorporated by reference as relevant to the items in this Amendment. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in theSchedule 14D-9. This Amendment is being filed to reflect certain updates as reflected below.
Item 8. Additional Information.
Item 8 of theSchedule 14D-9 is hereby amended and restated by deleting the paragraph under the heading “Legal Proceedings” on page 33 of theSchedule 14D-9 and replacing it with the following paragraph:
“Beginning on October 8, 2018, three putative class-action lawsuits were filed on behalf of purported Senomyx stockholders (captionedKim v. Senomyx, Inc., et al.,No. 1:18-cv-01547 (filed October 8, 2018 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware) (the “Kim Complaint”);Link v. Senomyx, Inc., et al., No.3:18-cv-02336 (filed October 10, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California) (the “Link Complaint”); andRowe v. Senomyx, Inc., et al.,No. 3:18-cv-02338 (filed October 10, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California) (the “Rowe Complaint” and together with the Kim Complaint and Link Complaint, the “Complaints”)). The Kim Complaint was filed against (a) Senomyx, (b) Firmenich, (c) Merger Sub and (d) the members of Senomyx’s board of directors (the “Individual Defendants”). The Link Complaint and the Rowe Complaint were each filed against (a) Senomyx and (b) the Individual Defendants. The Complaints generally allege that the defendants violated Section 14(e) and, in the case of the Kim Complaint, Section 14(d)(4), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by, among other things, failing to disclose material information in theSchedule 14D-9 regarding potential conflicts of interest in the Transactions, certain financial projections regarding the Company and certain inputs underlying Needham & Company’s financial analysis. The Complaints also allege the Individual Defendants and, in the case of the Kim Complaint, Firmenich, violated Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as controlling persons who had the ability to prevent theSchedule 14D-9 from being materially false and misleading. The Complaints seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the Transactions and an award of costs and expenses, including a reasonable allowance for attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
While Senomyx has no knowledge that any other purported Senomyx stockholder intends to file a similar complaint, it is possible additional similar cases may also be filed in connection with the Offer and the Merger.”