Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is omitted per conditions as set forth in General Instructions H (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-Q for wholly owned subsidiaries. It is replaced with management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations set forth in General Instructions H (2) (a) of Form 10-Q for wholly owned subsidiaries (reduced disclosure format). The Company does not believe the comparison of its results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 to the six months ended June 30, 2000, which includes predecessor revenues and expenses on a carve out basis for the period January 1, 2000 through March 30, 2000, is meaningful, given that Cajun Electric was operated under a bankruptcy court prior to being acquired by NRG Energy. Therefore, this analysis discusses the Company’s revenue and expense items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001.
For the six months ended June 30, 2001, the Company had total revenue of $203.1 million. This consisted primarily of sales from long-term agreements, which represent $158.0 million, approximately 77.8% of total revenue. The remaining revenue of $45.1 million consists primarily of sales from short-term spot and bilateral agreements.
Operating costs were $137.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, which equals 67.7% of revenues. Operating costs consist of expenses for fuel, and plant operations and maintenance. Additionally, within operating costs, are unrealized losses on energy contracts totaling approximately $14.6 million.
Fuel expense for the six months ended June 30, 2001 was $101.9 million. Fuel expense for the six months ended June 30, 2001 represents 50.2% of revenues and includes $64.6 million of coal, $1.5 million of natural gas, $0.6 million of other fuels and $35.2 million of purchased energy and transmission.
Plant operations and maintenance expense for the six months ended June 30, 2001, was $21.0 million. Plant operations and maintenance expense for the six months ended June, 2001, represents 10.3% of revenues, and includes labor and benefits under operating service agreements of $8.3 million, maintenance parts, supplies and services of $8.4 million, and property taxes and other expenses of $4.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization costs were $14.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, which primarily relate to the costs of the Cajun facilities, which are being depreciated over twenty-five to forty years.
General and administrative expenses were $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, and include costs for legal and other contract services, payments to NRG for corporate services, expenses related to office administration, as well as costs for certain employee benefits. General and administrative expense represents 1.9% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
Interest expense was $36.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, and relates to amortization of deferred finance costs and interest on the senior secured bonds issued to finance the acquisition of the Cajun facilities. Interest expense represents 18.0% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2001.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended June 30, 2001
Operating Revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2001, the Company had total revenue of $105.7 million. This consisted primarily of sales from long-term agreements, which represent $80.5 million, approximately 76.2% of total revenue. The remaining revenue of $25.2 million consists primarily of sales from short-term spot and bilateral agreements.
Operating Costs and Expenses
Operating costs were $77.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, which equals 73.2% of revenues. Operating costs for the three months ended June 30, 2001 represent an increase of $21.9 million over the same period in 2000. Operating costs for the three months ended June 30, 2001 consist of expenses for fuel, and plant operations and maintenance. Additionally, within operating costs, are unrealized losses on energy contracts totaling approximately $15.3 million.
Fuel expense for the three months ended June 30, 2001 was $51.0 million. Fuel expense for the three months ended June 30, 2001 represents 48.2% of revenues and includes $35.3 million of coal, $0.4 million of natural gas, $0.4 million of other fuels and $14.9 million of purchased energy and transmission.
Plant operations and maintenance expense for the three months ended June 30, 2001, was $11.1 million. Plant operations and maintenance expense for the three months ended June, 2001, represents 10.5% of revenues, and includes labor and benefits under operating service agreements of $3.7 million, maintenance parts, supplies and services of $5.3 million, and property taxes and other expenses of $2.1 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization costs were $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, which primarily relate to the costs of the Cajun facilities, which are being depreciated over twenty-five to forty years.
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses were $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, and include costs for legal and other contract services, payments to NRG for corporate services, expenses related to office administration, as well as costs for certain employee benefits. General and administrative expense represents 1.8% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and is an increase of $0.1 million over the same period in 2000.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $18.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, and relates to amortization of deferred finance costs and interest on the senior secured bonds issued to finance the acquisition of the Cajun facilities. Interest expense represents 17.4% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2001 and is approximately unchanged from the same period in 2000.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138. SFAS No. 133 requires the Company to record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of non-hedge derivatives will be immediately recognized in earnings. Changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as hedges will either be recognized in earnings as offsets to the changes in fair value of related hedged assets, liabilities and firm commitments or, for forecasted transactions, deferred and recorded as a component of other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged transactions occur and are recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedging derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. The Company also formally assesses both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. When it is determined that a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting.
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001, the Company reclassified from OCI into earnings $0 and $0.5 million, respectively, of accumulated net derivative gains. The net balance in OCI relating to SFAS No. 133 as of June 30, 2001 was $0. Unrealized gains and losses on derivatives are recorded in other current and long-term assets and liabilities.
The Company’s earnings for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001 were decreased by an unrealized loss of $15.3 million and $14.6 million, respectively, relating to derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges in accordance with SFAS No. 133.
SFAS No. 133 applies to the Company’s energy and energy related commodities financial instruments used to mitigate variability in earnings due to fluctuations in spot market prices, hedge fuel requirements at generation facilities and protect investment in fuel inventories.
Energy and energy related commodities
The Company is exposed to commodity price variability in electricity, emission allowances and natural gas, oil and coal used to meet fuel requirements. In order to manage these commodity price risks, the Company enters into financial instruments, which may take the form of fixed price, floating price or indexed sales or purchases, and options, such as puts, calls, basis transactions and swaps. Derivatives designated to be hedges by the Company are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the cumulative gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of OCI in shareholder’s equity and recognized into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings i.e., when electricity is generated, fuel is consumed etc. No ineffectiveness was recognized on commodity cash flow hedges during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2001. No gains or losses were recognized related to derivative instruments excluded from the assessment of effectiveness. At June 30, 2001, the Company had various commodity related contracts extending through March 2002. The Company does not expect to reclassify into earnings during the next twelve months any gains or losses from OCI.
The Company generally attempts to balance its fixed-price physical and financial purchase and sales commitments in terms of contract volumes, and the timing of performance and delivery obligations. However, within guidelines established by the board of directors and its Financial Risk Management Committee, the Company does take certain market positions. These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and, accordingly, changes in the fair value are reported in earnings in revenues from majority-owned operations and cost of majority-owned operations. Furthermore, for various commodity derivatives considered to be economic hedges, the Company has elected not to designate them as accounting hedges due to the burdensome documentation requirements under SFAS 133. The changes in fair value of these derivatives are also reported in earnings in revenues from majority-owned operations and cost of majority-owned operations.
Business Combinations, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business Combinations", and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". SFAS 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations subsequent to June 30, 2001 and specifies criteria for recognizing intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with definite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and 142 effective July 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002, respectively. The Company does not expect that the implementation of these guidelines will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The information presented in this Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements in addition to historical information. These Statements involve known and unknown risks and relate to future events, or projected business results. In some cases forward-looking statements may be identified by their use of such words as “may,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are only predictions, and actual results may differ materially from the expectations expressed in any forward-looking statement. While the Company believes that the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurances that these expectations will prove to have been correct. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
• | Economic conditions including inflation rates and monetary exchange rate fluctuations; |
• | Trade, monetary, fiscal, taxation, and environmental policies of governments, agencies and similar organizations in geographic areas where we have a financial interest; |
• | Customer business conditions including demand for their products or services and supply of labor and materials used in creating their products and services; |
• | Financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and similar entities with regulatory oversight; |
• | Availability or cost of capital such as changes in: interest rates; market perceptions of the power generation industry, the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or security ratings; |
• | Factors affecting power generation operations such as unusual weather conditions; catastrophic weather-related damage; unscheduled generation outages, maintenance or repairs; unanticipated changes to fossil fuel, or gas supply costs or availability due to higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other developments; environmental incidents; or electric transmission or gas pipeline system constraints; |
• | Employee workforce factors including loss or retirement of key executives, collective bargaining agreements with union employees, or work stoppages; |
• | Increased competition in the power generation industry; |
• | Cost and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; |
• | Technological developments that result in competitive disadvantages and create the potential for impairment of existing assets; |
• | Factors associated with various investments including competition, operating risks, dependence on certain suppliers and customers, and environmental and energy regulations; |
Other business or investment considerations that may be disclosed from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings or in other publicly disseminated written documents.
NRG South Central undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors that could cause NRG South Central’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q should not be construed as exhaustive.
Part II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On July 5, 2001, PG&E Energy Trading Power, L.P. (“PGET”), a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association stating a claim against SRW Cogeneration Limited Partnership (“SRW”). SRW is a Delaware limited partnership that will own and operate an approximately 450 MW natural gas-fired cogeneration plant now under construction at the DuPont Company’s Sabine River Works petrochemical facility near Orange, Texas. SRW is 50% owned by Sabine River Works LP and Sabine River Works GP. The remaining 50% of SRW is owned by subsidiaries of Conoco Inc.
PGET and SRW had entered into a Tolling Agreement under which PGET was to provide gas to SRW for use in generating electricity, a portion of which electricity would be delivered to PGET. Under the Tolling Agreement, both parties provided a corporate guarantee for the performance of their respective obligations under the agreement. PGET’s corporate guarantor was its ultimate parent, PG&E Corporation, whose credit rating dropped from the level required to be maintained under the terms of the Tolling Agreement, and SRW exercised its right to terminate the Tolling Agreement.
PGET is challenging that termination. In its arbitration petition it is claiming damages for SRW’s failure to deliver power to PGET pursuant to the Tolling Agreement and for SRW’s failure to accept natural gas from PGET pursuant to the Tolling Agreement. PGET alleges that the amount in dispute is in excess of $100 million. SRW considers that it properly terminated the Tolling Agreement in full accordance with the Tolling Agreement’s express and unambiguous terms, and that PGET is not entitled to the relief sought. SRW has counterclaimed for damages in excess of $100,000 and will continue vigorously to defend this claim.
There are no other material legal proceedings pending, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to NRG South Central’s business, to which NRG South Central or any of its subsidiaries are a party. There are no material legal proceedings to which an officer or director is a party or has a material interest adverse to NRG South Central or its subsidiaries.
There are no material administrative or judicial proceedings arising under environmental quality or civil rights statutes pending or known to be contemplated by governmental agencies to which NRG South Central is or would be a party.
NRG South Central may become involved in or threatened with various legal proceedings from time to time arising in the ordinary course of business. NRG South Central does not believe that any liability arising from any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the operation of its business or its financial position.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
None
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | NRG South Central Generating LLC. | |
| |
| |
| | (Registrant) | |
| | | |
| | /s/ | Craig A. Mataczynski |
| | |
| |
| | | Craig A. Mataczynski, President | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | /s/ | Brian B. Bird |
| | |
| |
| | | Brian B. Bird, Treasurer | |
| | | (Principal financial officer) | |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | August 14, 2001 | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | | | |