The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $64,700 to its foreign and domestic pension plans in 2004.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid on the domestic defined benefit plans.
The approximate weighted-average interest rates on borrowings outstanding (primarily foreign) at the end of 2003 and 2002 were 4.91% and 4.38%, respectively.
Unused lines of credit for short-term bank borrowings aggregated $8,255 at year-end 2003, all of which were available outside the United States and Canada in various currencies at interest rates consistent with market conditions in the respective countries.
Interest costs incurred (including dividends on preferred security) in 2003, 2002, and 2001 were $95,722, $84,297, and $85,184, respectively, of which $307, $1,368, and $718, respectively, were capitalized.
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
10. | Corporate and Other Debt and Notes Payable to Affiliate |
Corporate Debt — The Company, through its subsidiary Foster Wheeler LLC, has $200,000 Senior Notes in the public market, which bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.75% per annum, payable semiannually, and mature November 15, 2005. The Senior Notes were issued under an indenture between the Company and BNY Midwest Trust Company. The Senior Notes are not redeemable prior to maturity and are not subject to any sinking fund requirements.
As a result of the reorganization on May 25, 2001, Foster Wheeler LLC, as successor to Foster Wheeler Corporation, became obligor for the Senior Notes due November 15, 2005. In connection with the Company’s finalizing the Senior Credit Facility, Foster Wheeler Ltd., the Company, and the following 100% owned companies issued guarantees in favor of the holders of the Senior Notes: Equipment Consultants, Inc., Foster Wheeler Asia Limited, Foster Wheeler Capital & Finance Corporation, Foster Wheeler Constructors, Inc., Foster Wheeler Development Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Manufacturing, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Services, Inc., Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, Foster Wheeler Facilities Management, Inc., Foster Wheeler Inc., Foster Wheeler International Corporation, Foster Wheeler International Holdings, Inc., Foster Wheeler North America Corp. (formerly known as “Foster Wheeler Power Group, Inc.”), Foster Wheeler Power Systems, Inc., Foster Wheeler Pyropower, Inc., Foster Wheeler Real Estate Development Corporation, Foster Wheeler Realty Services, Inc., Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Foster Wheeler Virgin Islands, Inc., Foster Wheeler Zack, Inc., FW Mortshal, Inc., FW Technologies Holding LLC, HFM International, Inc., Process Consultants, Inc., Pyropower Operating Services Company, Inc., and Perryville III Trust. Each of the guarantees is full and unconditional and joint and several. The Company and each of the subsidiary guarantors are 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by Foster Wheeler Ltd.
Holders of the Company’s Senior Notes due November 15, 2005 have a security interest in the stock and debt of certain of Foster Wheeler LLC’s subsidiaries and on facilities owned by Foster Wheeler LLC or its subsidiaries that exceed 1% of consolidated net tangible assets, in each case to the extent such stock, debt and facilities secure obligations under the revolving portion of the Senior Credit Facility. As permitted by Indenture, the Term Loan and the obligations under the letter of credit facility (collectively approximating $164,900 at December 26, 2003) have priority to the Senior Notes in these assets while the security interest of the Senior Notes ranks equally and ratably with $69,000 of revolving credit borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility.
In August 2002, the Company finalized a Senior Credit Facility with its lender group. This facility included a $71,000 term loan, a $69,000 revolving credit facility, and a $149,900 letter of credit facility which expires on April 30, 2005. The Senior Credit facility is secured by the assets of the domestic subsidiaries, the stock of the domestic subsidiaries, and in connection with Amendment No. 3 discussed below, 100% of the stock of the first-tier foreign subsidiaries. The Senior Credit Facility has no required repayments prior to maturity on April 30, 2005. The agreement requires prepayments from proceeds of assets sales, the issuance of debt or equity, and from excess cash flow. The Company retained the first $77,000 of such amounts and also retains a 50% share of the balance. With the Company’s sale of the Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation net assets on March 7, 2003, and an interest in a corporate office building on March 31, 2003, the $77,000 threshold was exceeded. Accordingly, principal prepayments of $11,800 were made on the term loan during 2003.
The term loan and revolving loans bear interest at the Company’s option of (a) LIBOR plus 6.00% or (b) the Base Rate plus 5.00%. The “Base Rate” means the higher of (i) the Bank of America prime rate or (ii) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%.
Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Credit Facility, obtained on November 8, 2002, provides covenant relief of up to $180,000 of gross pretax charges recorded by the Company in the third quarter of 2002. The amendment further provides that up to an additional $63,000 pretax charges related to specific contingencies may be excluded from the covenant calculation, if incurred, through December 31, 2003.
Amendment No. 2 to the Senior Credit Facility, entered into on March 24, 2003, modifies (i) certain definitions of financial measures utilized in the calculation of the financial covenants and (ii) the Minimum EBITDA, and Senior Debt Ratio, as specified in section 6.01 of the Credit Agreement. In connection with this amendment of the Credit Agreement, the Company made a prepayment of principal in the aggregate amount of $10,000 in March 2003.
Amendment No. 3 to the Senior Credit Facility, entered into on July 14, 2003, modified certain affirmative and negative covenants to permit the exchange offers described elsewhere in this report, other internal restructuring
F-105
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
10. | Corporate and Other Debt and Notes Payable to Affiliate — (Continued) |
transactions as well as transfers, cancellations and setoffs of certain intercompany obligations. In connection with this amendment to the Senior Credit Facility, the Company agreed to pay on March 31, 2004 a fee equal to 5% of the lenders’ credit exposure on March 31, 2004 if the Company has not made a prepayment of principal under the Senior Credit Facility of $100,000 on or before March 31, 2004. The Company expects the gross amount of this fee, if required, will be approximately $14,000, which has been accrued and included in the Company’s liquidity forecast for 2004.
As of December 26, 2003, $128,163 was borrowed under the Senior Credit Facility. This amount appears on the Consolidated Balance Sheet under the caption “Corporate and Other Debt.” As of December 26, 2003, $105,777 of standby letters of credit was outstanding.
Corporate and other debt consisted of the following:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Senior Credit Facility (average interest rate 7.16%) | | $ | 128,163 | | $ | 140,000 | |
Senior Notes at 6.75% due November 15, 2005 | | | 200,000 | | | 200,000 | |
Other | | | 5,637 | | | 6,707 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | 333,800 | | | 346,707 | |
Less: Current portion | | | 71 | | | 5,005 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | $ | 333,729 | | $ | 341,702 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Principal payments are payable in annual installments of: | | | | | | | |
2004 | | $ | — | | | | |
2005 | | | 333,039 | | | | |
2006 | | | 647 | | | | |
2007 | | | 43 | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | |
| | $ | 333,729 | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | |
Notes Payable to Affiliate and Guarantee of Convertible Subordinated Notes — In May and June 2001, Foster Wheeler Ltd. issued convertible subordinated notes having an aggregate principal amount of $210,000. The notes are due in 2007 and bear interest at 6.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing December 2001. The proceeds of these securities were loaned to the Company and are included in the caption “Notes payable to affiliate” on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Debt issuance costs are amortized over the term of the notes and are a component of interest expense. Interest expense was $14,927 and $14,917 for 2003 and 2002, respectively. Foster Wheeler LLC has issued a guarantee in favor of the holders of the convertible subordinated notes.
For the years ended December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the Company recorded $14,927 and $14,917, respectively of intercompany interest expense on this note payable. This interest expense is included in the caption interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Of these amounts, $1,138 and $1,138 as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively, were unpaid and included in accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
11. | Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company operates on a worldwide basis. The Company’s activities expose it to risks related to the effect of changes in foreign-currency exchange rates. The Company maintains a foreign-currency risk-management strategy that uses derivative instruments to protect it from unanticipated fluctuations in cash flows that may arise from volatility in currency exchange rates. The Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts solely for hedging purposes, whether or not they qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. At December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the Company did not meet the requirements for deferral under SFAS No. 133 and recorded in the years ended December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002 $5,160 pretax ($3,400 after tax) net loss and $8,470 pretax ($5,500 after tax) net gains on derivative instruments, respectively, which were recorded as reductions in cost of operating revenues on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties. All of these counterparties are significant financial institutions that are primarily rated “A” or better by Standard & Poor’s or “A2” or better by Moody’s. As of December 26, 2003, approximately $67,100 was owed to the Company by counterparties and $17,800 was owed by the Company to counterparties. A $3,834 net of tax gain was recorded in other comprehensive loss as of
F-106
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
December 28, 2001. This amount was reclassified to earnings in 2002 as the Company no longer qualified for deferral under SFAS No. 133.
The maximum term over which the Company is hedging exposure to the variability of cash flows is 12 months.
12. | Subordinated Robbins Facility Exit Funding Obligations |
Foster Wheeler’s subordinated obligations entered into in connection with the restructuring of debt incurred to finance construction of a waste-to-energy facility in the Village of Robbins, Illinois (the “Exit Funding Agreement”) are limited to funding:
1999C Bonds at 7¼% interest, due October 15, 2009 of $12,130 and October 15, 2024 of $77,155 | | $ | 89,285 | |
1999D Accretion Bonds at 7% Interest, due October 15, 2009 | | | 23,994 | |
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 113,279 | |
| |
|
| |
1999C Bonds — The 1999C Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund reduction prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued interest to the redemption date by application by the Trustee of funds on deposit to the credit of the 1999C Sinking Fund Installment Subaccount on October 15 in the years and in the principal amounts as follows:
| | 1999C BONDS | |
| | | |
Year | | Due 2009 | | Due 2024 | | Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004 | | $ | 1,690 | | | | | $ | 1,690 | |
2005 | | | 1,810 | | | | | | 1,810 | |
2006 | | | 1,940 | | | | | | 1,940 | |
2007 | | | 2,080 | | | | | | 2,080 | |
2008 | | | 2,225 | | | | | | 2,225 | |
2009 | | | 2,385 | | | | | | 2,385 | |
2023 | | | | | $ | 37,230 | | | 37,230 | |
2024 | | | | | | 39,925 | | | 39,925 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 12,130 | | $ | 77,155 | | $ | 89,285 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1999D Bonds — The 1999D Accretion Bonds were originally issued for $18,000. The total amount due on October 15, 2009 is $35,817.
13. | Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities |
On January 13, 1999, FW Preferred Capital Trust I, a Delaware business trust which is a 100% owned finance subsidiary of the Company, issued $175,000 in Preferred Trust Securities. The Preferred Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and Foster Wheeler Ltd. These Preferred Trust Securities are entitled to receive cumulative cash distributions at an annual rate of 9.0%. Distributions are paid quarterly in arrears on April 15, July 15, October 15, and January 15 of each year. Such distributions may be deferred for periods up to five years during which time additional interest accrues at 9.0%. In accordance with this provision, the Company has deferred all quarterly distributions beginning with the distribution due on January 15, 2002. Such deferred interest totals $38,021. The maturity date is January 15, 2029. Foster Wheeler can redeem these Preferred Trust Securities on or after Janu ary 15, 2004.
14. | Special-Purpose Project Debt |
Special-purpose project debt represents debt incurred to finance the construction of cogeneration facilities or waste-to-energy projects. The notes and/or bonds are collateralized by certain assets of each project. The Company’s obligations with respect to this debt are limited to guaranteeing the operating performance of the projects.
F-107
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
14. | Special-Purpose Project Debt — (Continued) |
| | | 2003 | | | | 2002 | |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
Note payable, interest varies based on one of several money market rates (2003-year-end rate 1.985%), due semiannually through July 30, 2006 | | $ | 21,887 | (1) | | $ | 27,907 | |
Senior Secured Notes, interest 11.443%, due annually April 15, 2004 through 2015 | | | 37,782 | (2) | | | 40,077 | |
Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery System Revenue Bonds, interest 7.125% to 7.5%, due annually December 1, 2004 through 2010 | | | 77,508 | (3) | | | 88,920 | |
Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds, interest 7.9% to 10%, due annually December 15, 2003 through 2012 | | | — | | | | 48,936 | (4) |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
| | | 137,177 | | | | 205,840 | |
Less: Current portion | | | 17,896 | | | | 24,227 | |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 119,281 | | | $ | 181,613 | |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
(1) | The note payable for $21,887 represents a loan under a bank credit facility to a limited partnership whose general partner is a special-purpose subsidiary. |
(2) | The Senior Secured Notes of $37,782 were issued for a total amount of $42,500. The notes are collateralized by certain revenues and assets of a special-purpose subsidiary which is the indirect owner of the project. |
(3) | The Solid Waste Disposal and Resource Recovery System Revenue Bonds totaling $77,508 were issued for a total amount of $133,500. The bonds are collateralized by a pledge of certain revenues and assets of the project, but not the plant. |
(4) | The Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds were issued for a total amount of $86,780. The bonds are collateralized by a pledge of certain revenues and assets of the project. This facility was sold in 2003 along with the debt obligation. |
Principal payments are payable in annual installments as follows:
2005 | | $ | 19,215 | |
2006 | | | 20,422 | |
2007 | | | 12,972 | |
2008 | | | 13,792 | |
2009 | | | 14,588 | |
Thereafter | | | 38,292 | |
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 119,281 | |
| |
|
| |
15. | Guarantees and Warranties |
The Company has provided indemnifications to third parties relating to businesses and/or assets the Company previously owned. Such indemnifications relate primarily to potential environmental and tax exposures for activities conducted by the Company prior to the sale.
| | Maximum Potential Payment | | Carrying Amount of Liability | |
| |
| |
| |
Environmental indemnifications | | No limit | | $ | 5,300 | |
Tax indemnifications | | No limit | | $ | 0 | |
The Company provides for make good/warranty reserves on certain of its long-term contracts. Generally, these reserves are accrued over the life of the contract so that a sufficient balance is maintained to cover the exposures at the conclusion of the contract.
F-108
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
15. | Guarantees and Warranties — (Continued) |
Balance as of December 28, 2001 | | $ | 52,700 | |
Accruals | | | 45,600 | |
Settlements | | | (8,600 | ) |
Adjustments to provisions | | | (7,800 | ) |
| |
|
| |
Balance as of December 27, 2002 | | | 81,900 | |
Accruals | | | 72,800 | |
Settlements | | | (13,800 | ) |
Adjustments to provisions | | | (9,300 | ) |
| |
|
| |
Balance as of December 26, 2003 | | $ | 131,600 | |
| |
|
| |
The Company owns a non-controlling equity interest in three energy projects and one waste-to-energy project; three of which are located in Italy and one in Chile. Two of the projects in Italy are each 42% owned while the third is 49% owned by the Company. The project in Chile is 85% owned by the Company; however, the Company does not have a controlling financial interest in the Chilean project. Following is summarized financial information for the Company’s equity affiliates combined, as well as the Company’s interest in the affiliates.
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Italian Project | | Chilean Project | | Italian Project | | Chilean Project | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Sheet Data : | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | $ | 95,977 | | $ | 23,891 | | $ | 80,966 | | $ | 22,352 | |
Other assets (primarily buildings and equipment) | | | 409,267 | | | 185,315 | | | 344,993 | | | 218,990 | |
Current liabilities | | | 32,735 | | | 17,188 | | | 20,665 | | | 14,748 | |
Other liabilities (primarily long-term debt) | | | 385,047 | | | 121,362 | | | 344,148 | | | 152,949 | |
Net assets | | | 87,462 | | | 70,656 | | | 61,146 | | | 73,645 | |
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | | December 28, 2001 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Italian Project | | Chilean Project | | Italian Project | | Chilean Project | | Italian Project | | Chilean Project | | Venezuela Project | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income Statement Data for twelve months: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 219,818 | | $ | 39,114 | | $ | 171,565 | | $ | 38,425 | | $ | 159,845 | | $ | 40,546 | | $ | 4,428 | |
Gross earnings | | | 56,699 | | | 20,739 | | | 43,133 | | | 20,777 | | | 44,457 | | | 21,764 | | | 2,902 | |
Income before income taxes | | | 38,405 | | | 10,712 | | | 31,358 | | | 10,087 | | | 21,618 | | | 10,467 | | | 2,684 | |
Net earnings | | | 23,144 | | | 8,891 | | | 17,648 | | | 8,372 | | | 11,955 | | | 8,689 | | | 2,582 | |
As of December 26, 2003, the Company’s share of the net earnings and investment in the equity affiliates totaled $17,142 and $98,651, respectively. Dividends of $7,997 were received during the year 2003. The Company has guaranteed certain performance obligations of such projects. The Company’s average contingent obligations under such guarantees are approximately $2,700 per year for the four projects. The Company has provided a $10,000 debt service reserve letter of credit providing liquidity should the performance of the Chilean project be insufficient to cover the debt service payments. No amounts have been drawn under the letter of credit.
The undistributed retained earnings of the Company’s equity investees amounted to approximately $28,765 and $20,143 at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively.
F-109
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
The components of loss before income taxes for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001 were taxed under the following jurisdictions:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic | | $ | (155,538 | ) | $ | (506,639 | ) | $ | (244,809 | ) |
Foreign | | | 45,993 | | | (3,751 | ) | | 31,992 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | (109,545 | ) | $ | (510,390 | ) | $ | (212,817 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The provision for income taxes on those earnings was as follows:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | $ | 14,939 | | $ | 5,931 | | $ | 5,486 | |
Foreign | | | 31,887 | | | 10,978 | | | 22,597 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total current | | | 46,826 | | | 16,909 | | | 28,083 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax (benefit)/expense: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic | | | (84 | ) | | — | | | 102,147 | |
Foreign | | | 684 | | | (2,252 | ) | | (6,783 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total deferred | | | 600 | | | (2,252 | ) | | 95,364 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total provision for income taxes | | $ | 47,426 | | $ | 14,657 | | $ | 123,447 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Difference between book and tax depreciaion | | $ | (13,654 | ) | $ | (35,002 | ) | $ | (34,369 | ) |
Pensions | | | 46,160 | | | 61,279 | | | (7,584 | ) |
Capital lease transactions | | | 263 | | | (7,376 | ) | | (8,612 | ) |
Revenue recognition | | | 12,192 | | | 7,210 | | | (5,999 | ) |
Other | | | — | | | — | | | (192 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross deferred tax assets (liabilities) | | | 44,961 | | | 26,111 | | | (56,756 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current taxability of estimated costs to complete long-term contracts | | | 19,039 | | | 14,278 | | | 4,297 | |
Income currently taxable deferred for financial reporting | | | 1,706 | | | 4,175 | | | 5,307 | |
Expenses not currently deductible for tax purposes | | | 200,084 | | | 129,917 | | | 122,983 | |
Investment tax credit carryforwards | | | 20,538 | | | 30,893 | | | 30,893 | |
Postretirement benefits other than pensions | | | 62,369 | | | 67,113 | | | 47,242 | |
Asbestos claims | | | 40,328 | | �� | 6,200 | | | 7,000 | |
Minimum tax credits | | | 17,917 | | | 10,883 | | | 11,073 | |
Foreign tax credits | | | 28,178 | | | 9,579 | | | 6,485 | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | | | 99,076 | | | 178,067 | | | 15,332 | |
Effect of write-downs and restructuring reserves | | | 11,234 | | | 40,873 | | | 63,680 | |
Other | | | 30,020 | | | 15,621 | | | 19,871 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (502,444 | ) | | (444,427 | ) | | (268,851 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | 28,045 | | | 63,172 | | | 65,312 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net deferred tax assets | | $ | 73,006 | | $ | 89,283 | | $ | 8,556 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
F-110
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
17. | Income Taxes — (Continued) |
The domestic investment tax credit carryforwards, if not used, will expire in the years 2004 through 2008. Foreign tax credit carryforwards are recognized based on their potential utilization and, if not used, will expire in the years 2004 through 2008. As reflected above, the Company has recorded various deferred tax assets. Realization is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the various credits. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the remaining net deferred tax assets (after consideration of the valuation allowance) will be realized through future earnings and/or tax planning strategies. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could change in the near future if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are changed. In 2003 and 2002, the valuation allowance increased by $58,017 and $175,576, respectively. Such increase is required under SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” when there is an evidence of losses from operations in the three most recent fiscal years. For statutory purposes, the majority of deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance is provided do not begin expiring until 2020 and beyond, based on the current tax laws.
If the Company completes the exchange offer as discussed in Note 2, it will be subject to substantial limitations on the use of pre-change losses and credits to offset U.S. federal taxable income in any post-change year. Since a valuation allowance has already been reflected to offset these losses and credits, this limitation will not result in a significant write-off by the Company.
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory rate to earnings before income taxes, as a result of the following:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate | | | (35.0 | )% | | (35.0 | )% | | (35.0 | )% |
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit | | | 6.8 | | | 0.4 | | | 1.9 | |
Increase in valuation allowance | | | 52.9 | | | 34.4 | | | 86.2 | |
Difference in estimated income taxes on foreign income and losses, net of previously provided amounts | | | 15.1 | | | 2.0 | | | 2.2 | |
Deferred charge | | | 1.7 | | | .4 | | | .9 | |
Other | | | 1.8 | | | .7 | | | 1.8 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | | 43.3 | % | | 2.9 | % | | 58.0 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are obligated under other operating lease agreements primarily for office space. Rental expense for these leases total $26,700 in 2003, $32,000 in 2002, and $29,800 in 2001. Future minimum rental commitments on non-cancelable leases are as follows:
Fiscal year: | | | | |
2004 | | $ | 25,100 | |
2005 | | | 22,800 | |
2006 | | | 19,400 | |
2007 | | | 17,200 | |
2008 | | | 15,700 | |
Thereafter | | | 159,500 | |
| |
|
| |
| | $ | 259,700 | |
| |
|
| |
The Company entered into sale/leaseback transactions for an office building in Spain in 2000 and an office building in the U.K. in 1999. In connection with these transactions, the Company recorded deferred gains which are being amortized to income over the term of the respective leases. The amortization was $3,622, $3,197 and $3,080, for the years ended December 26, 2003, December 27, 2002 and December 28, 2001, respectively. As of December 27, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the balance of the deferred gains was $74,151 and $69,540, respectively, and is included in other long-term liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The year-over-year increase in the deferred gain balance was primarily due to a change in foreign currency translation rates.
F-111
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
During 2002, the Company entered into sale-leaseback transactions for office buildings in both Finland and the United States. The transactions qualified as capital leases. Assets under capital leases are summarized as follows:
| | | 2003 | | | 2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Buildings and improvements | | $ | 38,522 | | $ | 35,755 | |
Less accumulated amortization | | | 1,276 | | | 342 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net assets under capital leases | | $ | 37,246 | | $ | 35,413 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the years indicated for the capital leases in effect as of December 26, 2003:
Fiscal year: | | | | |
2004 | | $ | 6,830 | |
2005 | | | 6,797 | |
2006 | | | 7,246 | |
2007 | | | 6,973 | |
2008 | | | 7,449 | |
Thereafter | | | 131,435 | |
Less: Interest | | | (103,035 | ) |
| |
|
| |
Net minimum lease payments under capital leases | | | 63,695 | |
Less: current portion of net minimum lease payments | | | 1,322 | |
| |
|
| |
Long-term net minimum lease payments | | $ | 62,373 | |
| |
|
| |
20. | Litigation and Uncertainties |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries enter into contracts providing for assessment of damages for nonperformance or delays in completion. Suits and claims have been or may be brought against the Company by customers alleging deficiencies in either equipment or plant construction and seeking resulting alleged damages. Based on its knowledge of the facts and circumstances relating to the Company’s liabilities, if any, and to its insurance coverage, management of the Company believes that the disposition of such suits will not result in material charges against assets or earnings materially in excess of amounts previously provided in the accounts.
Some of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries, along with many other companies, are codefendants in numerous asbestos-related lawsuits and out-of-court informal claims pending in the United States. Plaintiffs claim damages for personal injury alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with work allegedly performed by the Company’s subsidiaries during the 1970s and prior. A summary of claim activity for the three years ended December 26, 2003 is as follows:
| | Number of Claims | |
| |
| |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance, beginning of year | | | 139,800 | | | 110,700 | | | 92,100 | |
New claims | | | 48,260 | | | 45,200 | | | 54,700 | |
Claims resolved | | | (17,200 | ) | | (16,100 | ) | | (36,100 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, end of year | | | 170,860 | * | | 139,800 | | | 110,700 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
*Includes approximately 24,500 claims on inactive court dockets.
F-112
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
20. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
The amount spent on asbestos litigation defense and case resolution, substantially all of which was reimbursed or will be reimbursed from insurance coverage, was $66,000 in 2003, $57,200 in 2002, and $66,900 in 2001.
The overall average combined indemnity and defense cost per closed claim since 1993 was approximately $1.8. In view of the many uncertainties associated with asbestos bodily injury claims, the Company believes that the average cost may increase in the future.
The Company has recorded assets of $555,400 relating to probable insurance recoveries of which approximately $60,000 is recorded in accounts and notes receivables, and $495,400 is recorded as long-term. The asset is an estimate of recoveries from insurers based upon assumptions relating to cost allocation and resolution of pending proceedings with certain insurers, as well as recoveries under settlements with other insurers. The total liability recorded is comprised of an estimated liability relating to open (outstanding) claims of approximately $372,200 and an estimated liability relating to future unasserted claims of approximately $214,000. Of the total, $60,000 is recorded in accrued expenses and $526,200 is recorded in asbestos-related liability on the consolidated balance sheet. These estimates are based upon the following information and/or assumptions: number of open claims; forecasted number of future claims; estimated average cost per claim by disease type; and the breakdown of known and future claims into disease type. The total estimated liability includes both the estimate of forecasted indemnity amounts and forecasted defense expenses. Total estimated defense costs and indemnity payments are expected to be incurred over the next fifteen years during which period new claims are expected to decline from year to year. Recently received claims also suggest that the percentage of claims to be closed without payment of indemnity costs should increase as claims are resolved during the next few years. The Company believes that it is likely that there will be new claims filed after 2018, but in light of uncertainties inherent in long-term forecasts, the Company does not believe that it can reasonably estimate defense and/or indemnity costs which might be incurred after 2018. Nonetheless, the Company plans to update its forecasts periodically to take into consideration its future experience and other considerations such as legislation to continuously update its estimate of future costs and expected insurance recoveries. Historically, defense costs have represented approximately 24% of total costs. Through December 26, 2003, total indemnity costs paid, prior to insurance recoveries, were approximately $354,000 and total defense costs paid were approximately $109,000.
The Company recorded charges related to increases in the valuation allowance for insurance claims receivable of $68,100, $26,200 and $0 for the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These charges were recorded in other deductions in the consolidated statement of operations. The 2003 non-cash asbestos charge was due to the Company receiving a somewhat larger number of claims in 2003 than had been expected, which resulted in an increase in the projected liability related to asbestos. In addition, the size of the Company’s insurance assets was reduced due to the insolvency of a significant carrier in 2003. The 2002 charge was recorded due to allocation of future costs to an insurer who became insolvent.
As of December 26, 2003, $257,700 was contested by the subsidiaries’ insurers in ongoing litigation. The litigation relates to the proper allocation of the coverage liability among the subsidiaries various insurers and the subsidiaries as self-insurers. The Company believes that any amounts that its subsidiaries might be allocated as self-insurer would be immaterial. Based on the nature of the litigation and opinions received from outside counsel, the Company also believes that the possibility of not recovering the full amount of the asset is remote.
In July 2003, several subsidiaries of the Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, one of their insurers, entered into a settlement and release agreement that resolves the coverage litigation between the subsidiaries and Liberty Mutual in both state courts in New York and New Jersey. The agreement provides for a buy-back of insurance policies and the settlement of all disputes between the subsidiaries and Liberty Mutual with respect to asbestos-related claims. The agreement requires Liberty Mutual to make payments over a nineteen-year period, subject to annual caps, which payments decline over time, into a special account, established to pay the subsidiaries’ indemnity and defense costs for asbestos claims. These payments, however, would not be available to fund the subsidiaries’ required contributions to any national settlement trust that may be established by future federal legislation. The subsidiaries received in July an initial payment under the agreement of approximately $6,000, which was used to pay asbestos-related defense and indemnity costs.
In September 2003, the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a settlement and release agreement that resolves coverage litigation between them and certain London Market and North River Insurers. This agreement provides for cash payment of $5,900, which has been received by the subsidiaries, and additional amounts which have been deposited in a trust for use by the subsidiaries for defense and indemnity of asbestos claims.
In January 2004, the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a settlement and release agreement that resolves coverage litigation between them and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and certain of its affiliates. This
F-113
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
20. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
agreement provides for cash payment of $5,000, which has been received by the subsidiaries, an additional amount which has been deposited in a trust for use by the subsidiaries and a further amount to be deposited in that trust in 2005.
The pending litigation and negotiations with other insurers is continuing.
The Company’s management after consultation with counsel, has considered the ongoing proceedings with insurers and the financial viability and legal obligations of its insurers, and believes that except for those insurers that have become or may become insolvent, the insurers or their guarantors will continue to adequately fund claims and defense costs relating to asbestos litigation. It should be noted that the estimate of the assets and liabilities related to asbestos claims and recovery is subject to a number of uncertainties that may result in significant changes in the current estimates. Among these are uncertainties as to the ultimate number of claims filed, the amounts of claim costs, the impact of bankruptcies of other companies with asbestos claims, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, as well as potential legislative changes. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs to resolve those claims will cause the Company to increase further the estimates of the costs associated with asbestos claims and could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
A subsidiary of the Company in the United Kingdom has also received a limited number of claims alleging personal injury arising from exposure to asbestos. None of these claims have resulted in material costs to the Company.
A San Francisco, California jury returned a verdict on March 26, 2002 finding Foster Wheeler Corporation liable for $10,600 in the case of Todak vs. Foster Wheeler Corporation. The case was brought against Foster Wheeler Corporation, the U.S. Navy, and several other companies by a 59-year-old man suffering from mesothelioma which allegedly resulted from exposure to asbestos. The case has been amicably resolved by the parties and the appeal of the verdict has been dismissed. The terms of the settlement are confidential. The Company’s financial obligation was covered by insurance.
On April 3, 2002 the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered an amended final judgment in the matter of Koch Engineering Company. et al vs. Glitsch, Inc. et al. Glitsch, Inc. (now known as Tray, Inc). is an indirect subsidiary of the Company. This lawsuit claimed damages for patent infringement and trade secret misappropriations and has been pending for over 18 years. A judgment was entered in this case on November 29, 1999 awarding plaintiffs compensatory and punitive damages plus prejudgment interest in an amount yet to be calculated. This amended final judgment in the amount of $54,283 included such interest for the period beginning in 1983 when the lawsuit was filed through entry of judgment. Post-judgment interest accrued at a rate of 5.471 percent per annum from November 29, 1999. The management of Tray, Inc. believes that the Court’s decision contained numerous factual and legal errors subject to reversal on appeal. Tray, Inc. filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On April 1, 2003, Tray, Inc. filed for bankruptcy. In the third quarter of 2003, the parties amicably resolved the cases. Management assessed the liability associated with the legal proceeding and determined that the previously recorded provision in the financial statements for this liability was adequate to address the terms of the settlement.
The Company has a long-term contract with a government agency that is to be completed in four phases. The first phase was for the design, permitting and licensing of a spent fuel facility. This phase was completed for a price of $66,700. The first phase of this project was profitable, but the close out of this phase resulted in increased costs. An $11,900 charge was recorded in 2003 and the remaining cash outlay of $4,000 will be expended in 2004. The Company is in the process of submitting requests for equitable adjustment related to this contract and at December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the Company’s financial statements reflect anticipated collection of $0 and $9,000, respectively, from these requests for equitable adjustment.
The second phase is billed on a cost plus fee basis and is expected to conclude in June 2004. In this phase, the Company must respond to any questions regarding the initial design included in phase one. Phase three, which is for the construction, start-up and testing of the facility for a fixed price of $114,000, subject to escalation, is scheduled to commence in 2004. This phase will begin with the purchase of long lead items followed in 2005 by the construction activities. Construction is expected to last two years and requires that a subsidiary of the Company fund the construction cost. Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, the parent company of Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, provided a performance guarantee on the project. In addition, a surety bond for the full contract price is required. The cost of the facility is expected to be recovered in the first nine months of operations under phase four, during which a subsidiary of the Company will operate the facility at fixed rates, subject to escalation, for approximately four years. The Company and the government agency are interested in restructuring the contract and have commenced discussions about the possible restructuring or withdrawal from the contract. If the project were to
F-114
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
20. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
proceed, the Company intends to seek third party financing to fund the majority of the construction costs, but there can be no assurance that the Company will secure such financing on acceptable terms, or at all. There also can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the required surety bond. If the Company cannot obtain third party financing or the required surety bond, the Company’s participation would be uncertain; this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow.
In 1997, the United States Supreme Court effectively invalidated New Jersey’s long-standing municipal solid waste flow rules and regulations. The immediate effect was to eliminate the guaranteed supply of municipal solid waste to the Camden County Waste-to-Energy Project (the “Project”) with its corresponding tipping fee revenue. As a result, tipping fees have been reduced to market rate in order to provide a steady supply of fuel to the Project. Those market-based revenues have not been, and are not expected to be, sufficient to service the debt on outstanding bonds which were issued to construct the Project and to acquire a landfill for Camden County’s use.
The Company’s project subsidiary, Camden Country Energy Recovery Associates, LP (“CCERA”), has filed suit against the involved parties, including the State of New Jersey, seeking among other things to void the applicable contracts and agreements governing the Project. (Camden County Energy Recovery Assoc. v. N.J. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County, L-268-98). Since 1999, the State of New Jersey has provided subsidies sufficient to ensure the payment of each of the Project’s debt service payments as it became due. In January 2002, the State of New Jersey enacted legislation providing a mechanism for state-supported refinancing of bond debt on solid waste facilities located within the state. The legislation expired on December 31, 2002, without any refinancing having been accomplished. Press reports indicate that it is unlikely that any state-supported refinancing will occur in the near future, but those same reports include statements by state officials that the State will continue to ensure that debt service payments are made when due.
Under U.S. Federal statutes, such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and similar state and local laws, the current owner or operator of real property and the past owners or operators of real property (if disposal or release took place during such past ownership or operation) may be jointly and severally liable for the costs of removal or remediation of toxic or hazardous substances on or under their property, regardless of whether such materials were released in violation of law or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such substances, and are subject to additional liabilities if they do not comply with applicable laws regulating such hazardous substances. In either case, such liabilities can be substantial. Moreover, under CERCLA and similar state laws, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be jointly and severally liable for the costs of the removal or mediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment site, whether or not such site was owned or operated by such person (“off-site facility”). Liability at such off-site facilities is typically allocated among all of the viable responsible parties based on such factors as the relative amount of waste contributed to a site, toxicity of such waste, relationship of the waste contributed by a party to the remedy chosen for the site, and other factors.
The Company currently owns and operates industrial facilities and has also transferred its interests in industrial facilities that it formerly owned or operated. It is likely that as a result of its current or former operations, such facilities have been impacted by hazardous substances. The Company is not aware of any conditions at its currently owned facilities in the United States that it expects will cause the Company to incur material costs which have not been accrued.
The Company also may receive claims, pursuant to indemnity obligations from owners of recently sold facilities that may require the Company to incur costs for investigation and/or remediation. Based on the available information, the Company does not believe that such costs will be material. No assurance can be provided that the Company will not discover environmental conditions at its currently owned or operated properties, or that additional claims will not be made with respect to formerly owned properties, requiring the Company to incur material expenditures to investigate and/or remediate such conditions.
The Company had been notified that it was a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) under CERCLA or similar state laws at three off-site facilities, excluding sites as to which the Company has resolved its liability. At each of these sites, the Company’s liability should be substantially less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste attributable to the Company compared to that attributable to all other PRPs is low. The Company does not believe that its share of cleanup obligations at any of the off-site facilities as to which it has received a notice of potential liability will exceed $500 in the aggregate.
The Company’s project claims have increased as a result of the increase in lump-sum contracts between the years 1992 and 2000. Project claims are claims brought by the Company against project owners for costs exceeding the contract price or amounts not included in the original contract price. These claims typically arise from changes
F-115
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
20. | Litigation and Uncertainties — (Continued) |
in the initial scope of work or from owner-caused delays. These claims are often subject to lengthy arbitration or litigation proceedings. The costs associated with these changes or owner-caused delays include additional direct costs, such as labor and material costs associated with the performance of the additional works, as well as indirect costs that may arise due to delays in the completion of the project, such as increased labor costs resulting from changes in labor markets. The Company has used significant additional working capital in projects with cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant project claims. The Company cannot assure that project claims will not continue in the future.
The Company established a provision for the balance of outstanding commercial claims as of December 27, 2002 to bring the net book value of such claims to $0. At that time, the Company revised its estimates of claim revenues to reflect recent adverse recovery experience due to management’s desire to monetize claims, and the poor economic conditions impacting the markets served by the Company. The Company continues to pursue these claims, but there can be no assurance that it will recover the full amount of the claims, or anything at all.
The Company also faces a number of counterclaims brought against it by certain project owners in connection with several of the project claims described above. If the Company were found liable for any of these counterclaims, it would have to incur write-downs and charges against earnings to the extent a reserve is not established. Failure to recover amounts under these claims and charges related to counterclaims could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s liquidity and financial condition.
The ultimate legal and financial liability of the Company in respect to all claims, lawsuits and proceedings cannot be estimated with certainty. As additional information concerning the estimates used by the Company becomes known, the Company reassesses its position both with respect to gain contingencies and accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future change relate to legal matters as these are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administration and litigation process. Increases in the number of claims filed or costs to resolve those claims will cause the Company to increase further the estimates of the costs associated with such claims and could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
21. | Financial Instruments and Risk Management |
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate values:
Cash and Short-term Investments — All investments are considered available for sale and the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Long-term Debt — The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt (including current installments) is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.
Foreign Currency Contracts — The fair values of these financial instruments (used for hedging purposes) are estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers. The Company is exposed to market risks from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Financial instruments are utilized by the Company to reduce this risk. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties. All of these financial instruments are with significant financial institutions that are primarily rated “A” or better by Standard & Poor’s or “A2” or better by Moody’s (see Notes 3 and 11).
Carrying Amounts and Fair Values — The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Nonderivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and short-term investments | | $ | 377,485 | | $ | 377,485 | | $ | 344,576 | | $ | 344,576 | |
Restricted Cash | | | 52,685 | | | 52,685 | | | 84,793 | | | 84,793 | |
Long-term debt | | | (1,032,951 | ) | | (591,080 | ) | | (1,109,788 | ) | | (569,985 | ) |
Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency contracts | | | 3,310 | | | 3,310 | | | 8,470 | | | 8,470 | |
F-116
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
21. | Financial Instruments and Risk Management — (Continued) |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is contingently liable for performance under standby letters of credit, bank guarantees and surety bonds totaling $609,000 and $1,182,394 as of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, respectively. These balances include the standby letters of credit issued under the Senior Credit Facility discussed in Note 10. In the Company’s past experience, no material claims have been made against these financial instruments. Management of the Company does not expect any material losses to result from these off-balance-sheet instruments and, therefore, is of the opinion that the fair value of these instruments is zero.
As of December 26, 2003, the Company had $84,922 of foreign currency contracts outstanding. These foreign currency contracts mature in 2004. The contracts have been established by various international subsidiaries to sell a variety of currencies, and receive their respective functional currencies or other currencies for which they have payment obligations to third parties.
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its cash equivalents with financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across different business and geographic areas. As of December 26, 2003 and December 27, 2002, the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk. The Company had issued a third-party financial guarantee totaling $2,750 at year-end 2003 and $2,750 at year-end 2002 with respect to a partnership interest in a commercial real estate project.
22. | Business Segments — Data |
The business of the Company and its subsidiaries falls within two business groups. THE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION GROUP (“E & C”) designs, engineers and constructs petroleum, chemical, petrochemical and alternative-fuels facilities and related infrastructure, including power generation and distribution facilities, production terminals, pollution control equipment, water treatment facilities and process plants for the production of fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals, dyestuffs, fragrances, flavors, food additives and vitamins. Also, the E & C Group provides a broad range of environmental remediation services, together with related technical, design, and regulatory services, however, the domestic environmental remediation business was sold in 2003. THE ENERGY GROUP designs, manufactures and erects steam generating and auxiliary equipment for power stations and industrial markets worldwide. Steam generating equipment includes a full range of fluidized-bed and conventional boilers firing coal, oil, gas, biomass and other municipal solid waste, waste wood and low-Btu gases. Auxiliary equipment includes feedwater heaters, steam condensers, heat-recovery equipment and low-NOX burners. Site services related to these products encompass plant erection, maintenance engineering, plant upgrading and life extension and plant repowering. The Energy Group also provides research analysis and experimental work in fluid dynamics, heat transfer, combustion and fuel technology, materials engineering and solids mechanics. In addition, the Energy Group also builds, owns and operates cogeneration, independent power production and resource recovery facilities, as well as facilities for the process and petrochemical industries.
The Company conducts its business on a global basis. The E & C Group accounted for the largest portion of the Company’s operating revenues and operating income over the last ten years. In 2003, the E & C Group accounted for approximately 62% of the operating revenues. The geographic dispersion of these operating revenues was as follows: 12% North America, 11% Asia, 58% Europe, 6% Middle East, and 13% other. The Energy Group accounted for 38% of the operating revenues of the Company. The geographic dispersion of these operating revenues was as follows: 42% North America, 43% Europe, 6% Asia, 8% Middle East, and 1% South America.
Management uses several financial metrics to measure the performance of the Company’s business segments. EBITDA, as discussed and defined below, is the primary earnings measure used by the Company’s chief decision makers. Previously, gross margin, which is equal to operating revenues less cost of operating revenues, was considered the primary financial measure. Segment information for 2002 and 2001 has been restated to conform to the current presentations.
EBITDA is a supplemental, non-GAAP financial measure. EBITDA is defined as earnings/(loss) before taxes (before goodwill charge), interest expense, depreciation and amortization. The Company has presented EBITDA because it believes it is an important supplemental measure of operating performance. EBITDA, adjusted for certain unusual and infrequent items specifically excluded in the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, is also used as a measure for certain covenants under the Senior Credit Facility. The Company believes that the line item on its consolidated statement of earnings entitled “net earnings/(loss)” is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to
F-117
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
22. | Business Segments — Data — (Continued) |
EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net earnings/(loss) as an indicator of operating performance. EBITDA, as the Company calculates it, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure does not necessarily represent funds available for discretionary use, and is not necessarily a measure of the Company’s ability to fund its cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information compared with net earnings/(loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, users of this financial information should consider the type of events and transactions which are excluded. A reconciliation of EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to net earnings/(loss) a GAAP measure, is shown on the next page.
Export revenues account for 4.5% of operating revenues. No single customer represented 10% or more of operating revenues for 2003, 2002, or 2001.
Identifiable assets by group are those assets that are directly related to and support the operations of each group. Corporate assets are principally cash, investments and real estate.
F-118
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
22. | Business Segments — Data — (Continued) |
Summary financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table:
| | Total | | Engineering and Construction | | Energy Group | | Corporate and Financial Services (1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Third party revenue | | $ | 3,801,308 | | $ | 2,342,660 | | $ | 1,450,162 | | $ | 8,486 | |
Intercompany revenue | | | — | | | 10,733 | | | 4,315 | | | (15,048 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenue | | $ | 3,801,308 | | $ | 2,353,393 | | $ | 1,454,477 | | $ | (6,562 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
EBITDA | | | 21,444 | | $ | 60,655 | | $ | 140,394 | | $ | (179,605 | ) |
Less: Interest expense (2)(3) | | | 95,415 | | | 3,201 | | | 17,453 | | | 74,761 | (3) |
Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 35,574 | | | 10,133 | | | 21,713 | | | 3,728 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Loss)/earnings before income taxes | | | (109,545 | ) | | 47,321 | (4)(5) | | 101,228 | (4)(5) | | (258,094 | ) (5) |
Tax provision/(benefits) | | | 47,426 | | | 15,906 | | | 43,403 | | | (11,883 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net (loss)/earnings | | $ | (156,971 | ) | $ | 31,415 | | $ | 57,825 | | $ | (246,211 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Identifiable assets | | $ | 2,506,942 | | $ | 1,030,737 | | $ | 1,229,270 | | $ | 246,935 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 12,870 | | $ | 5,688 | | $ | 6,582 | | $ | 600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Third party revenue | | $ | 3,574,537 | | $ | 2,014,678 | | $ | 1,544,706 | | $ | 15,153 | |
Intercompany revenue | | | — | | | 12,853 | | | 32,068 | | | (44,921 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenue | | $ | 3,574,537 | | $ | 2,027,531 | | $ | 1,576,774 | | $ | (29,768 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
EBITDA | | $ | (219,136 | ) | $ | (41,438 | ) | $ | (31,148 | ) | $ | (146,550 | ) |
Less: Interest expense (2)(3) | | | 82,929 | | | (415 | ) | | 21,621 | | | 61,723 | (3) |
Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 57,825 | | | 15,490 | (9) | | 37,622 | (9) | | 4,713 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loss before income taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for goodwill | | | (359,890 | ) | | (56,513 | ) (6)(8) | | (90,391 | ) (6)(7)(8) | | (212,986 | ) (6)(7)(8) |
Tax provision/(benefits) | | | 14,657 | | | (11,485 | ) | | (62,859 | ) | | 89,001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss prior to cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for goodwill | | | (374,547 | ) | | (45,028 | ) | | (27,532 | ) | | (301,987 | ) |
Cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle for goodwill | | | (150,500 | ) | | (48,700 | ) | | (101,800 | ) | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss | | $ | (525,047 | ) | $ | (93,728 | ) | $ | (129,332 | ) | $ | (301,987 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Identifiable assets | | $ | 2,842,597 | | $ | 1,100,401 | | $ | 1,431,211 | | $ | 310,985 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 53,395 | | $ | 9,907 | | $ | 9,317 | | $ | 34,171 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Third party revenue | | $ | 3,392,474 | | $ | 1,931,523 | | $ | 1,439,153 | | $ | 21,798 | |
Intercompany revenue | | | — | | | 12,495 | | | 29,691 | | | (42,186 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenue | | $ | 3,392,474 | | $ | 1,944,018 | | $ | 1,468,844 | | $ | (20,388 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
EBITDA | | $ | (72,601 | ) | $ | 32,661 | | $ | (27,223 | ) | $ | (78,039 | ) |
Less: Interest expense (2)(3) | | | 84,466 | | | (179 | ) | | 26,493 | | | 58,152 | (3) |
Less: Depreciation and amortization | | | 55,750 | | | 17,721 | | | 34,470 | | | 3,559 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Loss)/earnings before income taxes | | | (212,817 | ) | | 15,119 | (10) | | (88,186 | ) (10)(11) | | (139,750 | )(10)(11) |
Tax provision/(benefits) | | | 123,447 | | | 10,982 | | | (27,430 | ) | | 139,895 | (12) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net (loss)/earnings | | $ | (336,264 | ) | $ | 4,137 | | $ | (60,756 | ) | $ | (279,645 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Identifiable assets | | $ | 3,325,985 | | $ | 1,289,207 | | $ | 1,758,399 | | $ | 278,379 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 33,998 | | $ | 11,494 | | $ | 15,463 | | $ | 7,041 | |
F-119
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
22. | Business Segments — Data — (Continued) |
| Includes general corporate income and expense, the Company’s captive insurance operation and eliminations. |
(2) | Includes intercompany interest charged by Corporate and Financial Services to the business groups on outstanding borrowings. |
(3) | Includes dividends on Preferred Security of $18,130 in 2003, $16,610 in 2002, and $15,750 in 2001. |
(4) | Includes in 2003, revaluation of contract estimates and revisions of contract claims of $30,800; Engineering and Construction Group (E & C) $33,900 and Energy Group (Energy) $(3,100). |
(5) | Includes in 2003, a gain on the sale of Environmental in E & C of $16,700 and an impairment on the anticipated sale of domestic corporate office building in the Corporate and Financial Services (C & F) of $15,100. Includes gain on sale of waste-to-energy plant of $4,300 in Energy, and provision for asbestos claims of $68,100 in C & F in 2003, $58,700 of performance intervention activities, debt restructuring efforts, accrual for legal settlement, severance costs, increased pension and post retirement costs; $8,900 in E & C, $2,800 in Energy, and $47,000 in C & F. |
(6) | Includes in 2002, revaluation of contract estimates and provisions for uncollectible receivables of $216,700 $(210,800 after-tax): Engineering and Construction Group (E & C) $121,650, Energy Group (Energy) $86,450 and Corporate and Financial Services (C & F) $8,600; and a provision for mothballing a domestic manufacturing facility of $18,700 for Energy. |
(7) | Includes in 2002, anticipated loss on sale of assets of $54,500 in Energy and provisions for asbestos claim of $26,200 in C & F. |
(8) | Includes in 2002, $79,300 $(79,000 net of tax) performance intervention activities, debt restructuring efforts, accrual for legal settlements, severance costs and increased pension, postretirement cost: $6,500 in E & C, $12,700 in Energy, and $60,100 in C & F. |
(9) | Excluded cumulative effect in 2002, goodwill change in accounting principle of $48,700 in E & C and $101,800 in Energy. |
(10) | Includes in 2001, contract write-downs of $160,600 $(104,400 after-tax): Engineering and Construction Group $51,700, Energy Group $103,900, and Corporate and Financial Services $5,000. |
(11) | Includes in 2001, loss on sale of cogeneration plants in Energy Group of $40,300 $(27,900 after-tax), increased pension and postretirement benefit cost in Corporate and Financial Services of $9,100 $(6,000 after-tax), provision for domestic plant impairment of $6,100 $(4,000 after-tax), severance of $4,700 $(3,100 after-tax), cancellation of company owned life insurance of $20,000 $(13,000 after-tax) and legal settlements and other provisions of $13,500 $(8,800 after-tax). |
(12) | Includes in 2001, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $194,600 on Corporate and Financial Services. |
F-120
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
22. | Business Segments — Data — (Continued) |
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity earnings in unconsolidated subsidiaries were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | |
Engineering and Construction Group | | $ | 9,738 | | $ | 7,334 | | $ | 4,432 | |
Energy Group | | | 7,404 | | | 6,672 | | | 8,404 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 17,142 | | $ | 14,006 | | $ | 12,836 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Geographic Concentration | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 996,831 | | $ | 1,544,827 | | $ | 1,673,457 | |
Europe | | | 2,741,413 | | | 1,923,211 | | | 1,669,409 | |
Canada | | | 69,626 | | | 136,267 | | | 126,851 | |
Corporate and Financial Services, including eliminations | | | (6,562 | ) | | (29,768 | ) | | (77,243 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 3,801,308 | | $ | 3,574,537 | | $ | 3,392,474 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-lived assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 258,261 | | $ | 345,934 | | $ | 534,345 | |
Europe | | | 215,101 | | | 195,359 | | | 174,058 | |
Canada | | | 1,255 | | | 1,537 | | | 1,958 | |
Corporate and Financial Services, including eliminations | | | 56,338 | | | 76,394 | | | 47,894 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 530,955 | | $ | 619,224 | | $ | 758,255 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues and long-lived assets are based on the country in which the contracting subsidiary is located.
Operating revenues by industry segment for the three years ending December 2003 were as follows:
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Power | | $ | 1,731,339 | | $ | 1,647,135 | | $ | 1,399,450 | |
Oil and gas/refinery | | | 1,254,052 | | | 922,267 | | | 807,367 | |
Pharmaceutical | | | 300,507 | | | 404,825 | | | 485,786 | |
Chemical | | | 204,738 | | | 156,606 | | | 177,777 | |
Environmental | | | 124,724 | | | 353,981 | | | 337,248 | |
Power production | | | 167,594 | | | 130,843 | | | 150,990 | |
Eliminations and other | | | (59,139 | ) | | (96,480 | ) | | (43,304 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Operating Revenues | | $ | 3,723,815 | | $ | 3,519,177 | | $ | 3,315,314 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
23. | Related Party Transactions |
Mr. Kenneth A. Hiltz served as Chief Financial Officer of Foster Wheeler Ltd. from April 7, 2003 until January 30, 2004 pursuant to an agreement between Foster Wheeler and AP Services, LLC, a subsidiary of AlixPartners to provide financial management and consulting services. Mr. Hiltz is also a principal with AlixPartners, LLC. Mr. Ryan J. Esko, an employee of AlixPartners, served as Treasurer of the Company from November 26, 2002 to January 30, 2004 pursuant to an agreement between Foster Wheeler and AP Services, LLC, a subsidiary of AlixPartners to also provide financial management services to the Company. The Company paid AlixPartners, LLC approximately $743 for Mr. Hiltz’s services and $1,017 for Mr. Esko’s services during 2003 based upon the agreement terms. An additional $8,613 was paid to AlixPartners for financial management and consulting services.
The Company entered into an agreement in the first quarter of 2004 to sell a domestic corporate office building for estimated net cash proceeds of $17,000, which approximates carrying value. The Company recorded an
F-121
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
24. | Subsequent Events — (Continued) |
impairment loss of $15,100 on this building in the third quarter of 2003 in anticipation of a sale. The loss was recorded in other deductions on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The carrying value of the building is included in land, buildings, and equipment on the consolidated balance sheet. The sale is expected to close in the second quarter of 2004. Under the terms of the Senior Credit Facility, 50% of the net proceeds of this transaction will be paid to the lenders.
25. | Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
| | 2003 | |
| |
| |
Description | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Additions Charged to Other Accounts | | Deductions | | Balance at the End of the Year | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Insurance Claims Receivable | | $ | 37,877 | | $ | 68,081 | | $ | — | | $ | 8,989 | | $ | 96,969 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | $ | 73,048 | | $ | 26,261 | | $ | 1,457 | | $ | 63,360 | | $ | 37,406 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2002 | |
| |
| |
Description | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Additions Charged to Other Accounts | | Deductions | | Balance at the End of the Year | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Insurance Claims Receivable | | $ | 18,836 | | $ | 26,200 | | $ | — | | $ | 7,159 | | $ | 37,877 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts(3) | | $ | 2,988 | | $ | 19,608 | | $ | 56,451 | | $ | 5,999 | | $ | 73,048 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| | 2001 | |
| |
| |
Description | | Balance at Beginning of Year | | Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Additions Charged to Other Accounts | | Deductions | | Balance at the End of the Year | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Insurance Claims Receivable | | $ | 7,192 | | $ | — | | $ | 11,300 | (2) | $ | (344 | ) | $ | 18,836 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts(1) | | $ | 3,379 | | $ | 1,190 | | $ | — | | $ | 1,581 | | $ | 2,988 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1. | Provisions for non-payments of customer balances are normally addressed within the overall profit calculation of the contracts and are not specifically covered by allowances for doubtful accounts. As a result the amount considered to be in the receivable qualifying account (allowance for doubtful accounts) does not represent the full allowance. |
| |
2. | Primarily due to additional recoveries from insurers. |
| |
3. | For 2002, provisions for non-payments of customer balances have been reclassified to the allowance for doubtful accounts to conform to the current period presentation. |
26. | Condensed Financial Information of Parent |
Condensed financial information of the parent only is required (per SEC regulation S-X Rule 4-08(e)(3)) when “restricted net assets” of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25 percent of consolidated net assets as of the end of the most recent fiscal year. One of the Company’s subsidiaries has entered into a bonding arrangement with a bank, which contains covenants limiting its ability to make distributions to the Company. The covenants include a
F-122
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
26. | Condensed Financial Information of Parent — (Continued) |
restriction on the distribution of dividends to 75% of statutory earnings and the requirement to maintain an equity ratio (calculated as equity divided by the sum of equity and total liabilities) of at least 30%. In addition, the subsidiary is not permitted to make intercompany loans to the Company. As a result, the net assets of the subsidiary can only be distributed annually through dividends, after the subsidiary’s statutory financial statements have been issued. As of December 26, 2003 and 2002, $37,148 and $30,638 respectively, of the subsidiary’s retained earnings are considered restricted. The condensed financial statements of the parent are presented using the equity method of accounting.
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS, LTD.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | | December 28, 2001 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in loss of subsidiaries | | $ | (156,953 | ) | $ | (374,506 | ) | $ | (336,251 | ) |
Costs and Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
Other deductions | | | 16 | | | 40 | | | 20 | |
Interest expense - intercompany | | | 2 | | | 1 | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Costs and Expenses | | | 18 | | | 41 | | | 20 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Earnings before income taxes | | | (156,971 | ) | | (374,547 | ) | | (336,271 | ) |
Benefit for income taxes | | | — | | | — | | | (7 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss prior to cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle | | | (156,971 | ) | | (374,547 | ) | | (336,264 | ) |
Cumulative effect on prior years of a change in accounting principle for goodwill, net of $0 tax | | | — | | | (150,500 | ) | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss | | $ | (156,971 | ) | $ | (525,047 | ) | $ | (336,264 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | |
| |
| |
| |
ASSETS | | | | | | | |
Investment and advances | | $ | (872,020 | ) | | (780,629 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | (872,020 | ) | $ | (780,629 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S DEFICIT | | | | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 61 | | | 49 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 6 | | | — | |
Income taxes | | | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total current liabilities | | | 60 | | | 42 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 60 | | | 42 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER’S DEFICIT | | | (872,080 | ) | | (780,671 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S DEFICIT | | $ | (872,020 | ) | $ | (780,629 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
F-123
Back to Contents
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(in thousands of dollars)
26. | Condensed Financial Information of Parent — (Continued) |
FOSTER WHEELER HOLDINGS, LTD.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
| | December 26, 2003 | | December 27, 2002 | | December 28, 2001 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by Operating Activities | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by Investing Activities | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by Financing Activities | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
F-124