U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
2)
Comment:
The Financial Highlights for the International Equity Fund provide a footnote stating that the amount of total return for 2020 includes the effect of the Adviser pay-in for an economic loss, and the Registrant’s 2020 N-CEN did not include disclosure for Items B.14 or B.22, which might have explained the cause of the economic loss. Please describe in correspondence what this payment relates to and any internal control implications it may have.
Response: The reason for this pay-in was a trade error by an unaffiliated sub-adviser.
On June 24, 2020, a sub-adviser to the International Equity Fund, MFS Investment Management (“MFS”), intended to purchase an 85 million Euro trade basket program for the Fund. The Portfolio Specialist Team at MFS, the team that specializes in program trade basket creation and works with portfolio managers to create blocks of orders, modelled the program in Global Portfolio Modeler (GPM) according to the instructions from the portfolio manager (GPM is an internally developed program-order creation application utilized to create a large number of orders from cash flows, portfolio restructuring, transitions, or rebalances). Due to a technology glitch, two of the names in the portfolio were not purchased on June 24th as part of the buy program as intended, resulting in the trade error. The portion of the cash flow that should have been allocated to these two names was distributed across the other names in the portfolio.
On July 21, 2020, MFS identified the trade error and corrected the affected positions by running a new trade basket program; the names with an over-allocation were sold while the positions in the missing names with an under-allocation were added to, which brought the Fund’s portfolio in line with the sub-adviser’s model portfolio. The trade impact to the Fund’s portfolio was a loss of 435,904.97 EUR, for which MFS reimbursed the Fund. It was this pay-in amount to which the footnote related.
There was no disclosure on Items B.14 of Form N-CEN because the sub-adviser making the payment is not an affiliated person or principal underwriter of the Fund, or an affiliated person of an affiliated person or principal underwriter of the Fund. Likewise, no NAV error occurred with respect to the International Equity Fund, so there was no disclosure required in Item B.22.
3) Comment: The SEC adopted amendments to Form N-CEN in 2018, 2019, and 2020, amendments to Form N-CSR in 2020, and amendments to Form N-MFP in 2021. Please describe in correspondence any impact to your internal control environment in response to these amendments and whether the changes should have been disclosed in Item 11(b) of Form N-CSR.
Response: The Registrant continually reviews its internal controls over financial reporting. As part of its ongoing review, the Registrant’s compliance staff undertook a comprehensive review of the internal procedures for the production and/or review of Form N-CEN, Form N-CSR and Form N-MFP, taking into consideration the amendments to those Forms. This review resulted in some procedural enhancements at the