I, Jill E. York, Chief Financial Officer of MB Financial, Inc. (“MBFI”), certify, based on my knowledge, that: |
| |
(i) | The compensation committee of MBFI has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk officers at least every six months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, senior executive officer (SEO) compensation plans and employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to MBFI; |
| |
(ii) | The compensation committee of MBFI has identified and limited during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period any features of the SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of MBFI, and has identified any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to MBFI and has limited those features to ensure that MBFI is not unnecessarily exposed to risks; |
| |
(iii) | The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every six months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, the terms of each employee compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of MBFI to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited any such features; |
| |
(iv) | The compensation committee of MBFI will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plans and employee compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above; |
| |
(v) | The compensation committee of MBFI will provide a narrative description of how it limited during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period the features in |
| (A) | SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of MBFI; |
| (B) | Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose MBFI to risks; and |
| (C) | Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of MBFI to enhance the compensation of an employee; |
| |
(vi) | MBFI has required that bonus payments to SEOs or any of the next twenty most highly compensated employees, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA (bonus payments), be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period if the bonus payments were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria; |
| |
(vii) | MBFI has prohibited any golden parachute payment, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to an SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; |
| |
(viii) | MBFI has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the regulations and guidance established thereunder during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period, |
| |
(ix) | MBFI and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period; and any expenses that, pursuant |