PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund
Matters Relating to the Trustees Consideration of the Investment Management and Portfolio Management Agreements (unaudited)
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees (the ‘‘Trustees’’) and a majority of the non-interested (‘‘Independent’’) Trustees, voting separately, approve the Funds’ Management Agreements (the ‘‘Advisory Agreements’’) with the Investment Manager and Portfolio Management Agreements (the ‘‘Sub-Advisory Agreements’’, and together with the Advisory Agreements, the ‘‘Agreements’’) between the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser. The Trustees met on June 20 and 21, 2006 (the ‘‘contract review meeting’’) for the specific purpose of considering whet her to approve the Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements. The Independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Agreements by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from Fund management during the contract review meeting (the ‘‘Meeting’’).
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described below, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements should be approved for a one-year period commencing July 1, 2006.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the Agreements, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment management, administrative and other services performed by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser under the Agreements.
In connection with the Meeting, the Trustees received and relied upon materials provided by the Investment Manager which included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the total return investment performance (based on net assets) of the Funds for various time periods and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives, (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Funds’ management fees and other expenses and the management fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc., (iii) information regarding the investment performance and management fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of the Sub-Adviser, inclu ding institutional separate account and other clients, (iv) an estimate of the profitability to the Investment Manager from its relationship with the Funds for the twelve months ended March 31, 2006, (v) descriptions of various functions performed by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser for the Funds, such as portfolio management, compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (vi) information regarding the overall organization of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, including information regarding senior management, portfolio managers and other personnel providing investment management, administrative and other services to the Funds.
The Trustees’ conclusions as to the continuation of the Agreements were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors.
As part of their review, the Trustees examined the Investment Manager’s and the Sub-Adviser’s abilities to provide high quality investment management and other services to the Funds. The Trustees considered the investment philosophy and research and decision-making processes of the Sub-Adviser; the experience of key advisory personnel of the Sub-Adviser responsible for portfolio management of the Funds; the ability of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser to attract and retain capable personnel; the capability and integrity of the senior management and staff of the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser; and the level of skill required to manage the Funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the quality of the In vestment Manager’s and the Sub-Adviser’s services with respect to regulatory compliance and compliance with the investment policies of the Funds; the nature and quality of certain administrative services the Investment Manager is responsible for providing to the Funds; and conditions that might affect the Investment Manager’s or the Sub-Adviser’s ability to provide high quality services to the Funds in the future under the Agreements, including each organization’s respective business reputation, financial condition and operational stability. Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that the Sub-Adviser’s investment process, research capabilities and philosophy were well suited to the Funds given their investment objectives and policies, and that the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser would be able to continue to meet any reasonably foreseeable obligations under the Agreements.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc., the Trustees also reviewed each Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by the Investment Manager in connection with the Meeting, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding each Fund’s performance.
10.31.06 | PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund Semi-Annual Report 17
PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund
Matters Relating to the Trustees Consideration of the Investment Management and Portfolio Management Agreements (unaudited)
In assessing the reasonableness of each Fund’s fees under the Agreements, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s management fee and the total expense ratio as a percentage of average net assets attributable to common shares and the management fee and total expense ratios of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc.
For each of the Funds, the Trustees specifically took note of how each Fund compared to its Lipper Inc. peers as to performance and management fee expenses. The Trustees noted that while the Funds are not charged a separate administration fee, it was not clear whether the peer funds in the Lipper Inc. categories were charged such a fee by their investment managers. Thus, the Trustees, at the recommendation of the Investment Manager, considered the total expenses of the Funds comparatively to the total expenses of the peer funds, recognizing that the fees for management and administrative services would be subsumed within the total expense ratio.
The Trustees noted that New York Municipal outperformed its peer median and average group for the three-year period and outperformed its peer median group for the one-year period ended April 30, 2006. The Trustees also noted that New York Municipal had slightly underperformed its peer group average for the one-year period ended April 30, 2006. The Trustees also noted that New York Municipal’s expense ratio (after taking into account waivers) including the effect of preferred shares was significantly below the average and median for its peer group and excluding the effect of preferred shares was slightly above the average and median for its peer group.
After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Agreements, that they were satisfied with the Investment Manager’s and the Sub-Adviser’s responses and efforts relating to investment performance and the comparative positioning of each Fund with respect to the management fee paid to the Investment Manager.
The Trustees also considered the management fees charged by the Sub-Adviser to other clients, including institutional separate accounts with investment strategies similar to those of the Funds. Regarding the institutional separate accounts, they noted that the management fees paid by the Funds are generally higher than the fees paid by these clients of the Sub-Adviser, but were advised that the administrative burden for the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser with respect to the Funds are also relatively higher, due in part to the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Funds are subject in comparison to institutional separate accounts. The Trustees noted that the management fees paid by the Funds are generally higher t han the fees paid by the open-end funds but were advised that there are additional portfolio management challenge in managing the Funds, such as the use of leverage and meeting a regular dividend.
The Trustees also took into account that the Funds have preferred shares outstanding, which increases the amount of fees received by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser under the Agreements (because the fees are calculated based on the Fund’s total managed assets, including assets attributable to preferred shares and other forms of leverage outstanding). In this regard, the Trustees took into account that the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser have a financial incentive for the Funds to continue to have preferred shares outstanding, which may create a conflict of interest between the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, on one hand, and the Fund’s common shareholders, on the other. In this regard, the T rustees considered information provided by the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser indicating that each Fund’s use of leverage through preferred shares continues to be appropriate and in the interests of the Fund’s common shareholders.
Based on a profitability analysis provided by the Investment Manager, the Trustees also considered the estimated profitability of the Investment Manager from its relationship with each Fund and determined that such profitability was not excessive.
The Trustees also took into account that, as closed-end investment companies, the Funds do not currently intend to raise additional assets, so the assets of the Funds will grow (if at all) only through the investment performance of each Fund. Therefore, the Trustees did not consider potential economies of scale as a principal factor in assessing the fee rates payable under the Agreements.
Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called ‘‘fall-out benefits’’ to the Investment Manager and the Sub-Adviser, such as reputational value derived from serving as Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser to the Funds.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the Agreements, that the fees payable under the Agreements represent reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided by the Investment Manager and Sub-Adviser to the Funds.
18 PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund Semi-Annual Report | 10.31.06
(This page intentionally left blank)
10.31.06 | PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund Semi-Annual Report 19
Trustees and Principal Officers
| | | | | | |
Robert E. Connor
Trustee | | Lawrence G. Altadonna
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |
Paul Belica
Trustee | | Thomas J. Fuccillo
Vice President, Secretary & Chief Legal Officer |
John J. Dalessandro II
Trustee | | Youse E. Guia
Chief Compliance Officer |
Hans W. Kertess
Trustee, Chairman of the Board of Trustees | | Kathleen Chapman
Assistant Secretary |
John C. Maney
Trustee | | William Healey
Assistant Secretary |
William B. Ogden IV
Trustee | | Richard Kirk
Assistant Secretary |
R. Peter Sullivan III
Trustee | | Lagan Srivastava
Assistant Secretary |
Brian S. Shlissel
President & Chief Executive Officer | | |
|
Investment Manager
Allianz Global Investors Fund Management LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
Sub-Adviser
Pacific Investment Management Company LLC
840 Newport Center Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Custodian & Accounting Agent
State Street Bank & Trust Co.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
Transfer Agent, Dividend Paying Agent and Registrar
PFPC Inc.
P.O. Box 43027
Providence, RI 02940-3027
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Legal Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP
One International Place
Boston, MA 02210-2624
This report, including the financial information herein, is transmitted to the shareholders of PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund for its information. It is not a prospectus, circular or representation intended for use in the purchase of shares of the Fund or any securities mentioned in this report.
The financial information included herein is taken from the records of the Fund without examination by an independent registered public accounting firm, who did not express an opinion hereon.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that from time to time the Fund may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) for the first and third quarter of its fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund has adopted to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information about how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 is available (i) without charge upon request by calling the Fund’s shareholder servicing agent at (800) 331-1710; (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds; and (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission website at sec.gov.
On December 30, 2005, the Fund submitted a CEO annual certification to the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) on which the Fund’s principal executive officer certified that he was not aware, as of that date, of any violation by the Fund of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules the Fund’s principal executive and principal financial officer made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q, relating to, among other things, the Fund’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, as applicable.
Information on the Fund is available at www.allianzinvestors.com/closedendfunds or by calling the Fund’s shareholder servicing agent at (800) 331-1710.
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANT
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS Schedule of Investments is included as part of
the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this form.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Not required in this Filing.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANY AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES
TOTAL NUMBER
OF SHARES PURCHASED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF
TOTAL NUMBER AVERAGE AS PART OF PUBLICLY SHARES THAT MAY YET BE
OF SHARES PRICE PAID ANNOUNCED PLANS OR PURCHASED UNDER THE PLANS
PERIOD PURCHASED PER SHARE PROGRAMS OR PROGRAMS
- -------------- ------------ ---------- ------------------- -------------------------
May 2006 N/A 13.737 5,317 N/A
June 2006 N/A 14.317 4,610 N/A
July 2006 N/A 14.013 4,653 N/A
August 2006 N/A 14.355 4,284 N/A
September 2006 N/A 14.963 4,021 N/A
October 2006 N/A 14.668 4,035 N/A
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may
recommend nominees to the Fund's Board of Trustees since the Fund last provided
disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant's
Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of
the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the
filing date of this report.
Fund management of the Registrant has determined that as of and prior to
October 31, 2006, the Registrant had a material weakness in its internal
control over financial reporting related to the review, analysis and
determination of whether certain transfers of municipal securities
qualified for sale accounting under the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 ("SFAS 140"). Since October 31,
2006, but prior to the date of this filing, fund management has revised its
internal controls over financial reporting to improve the effectiveness of
the controls to ensure that transactions in transfers of certain municipal
securities are accounted for properly. As a result of this weakness, the
statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments
as of October 31, 2006, the related statement of operations and statement
of changes in net assets for the six months then ended and the financial
highlights for the six months ended October 31, 2006 and for each of the
four years in the period ended April 30, and for the period June 29, 2001
(commencement of operations) through April 30, 2002 were restated in order
to appropriately account for such transfers of securities as secured
financings and report the related interest income and expense. However,
there was no impact to the net asset value of the Registrant's shares or
the Registrant's total return of any period.
(b) As discussed above, during the Registrant's last fiscal half year covered
by this report, the Registrant's Internal Controls over financial reporting
were enhanced to identify whether certain inverse floating rate
transactions require accounting treatment under SFAS 140.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS
(a) (1) Exhibit 99 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(b) Exhibit 99.906 Cert. - Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) PIMCO New York Municipal Income Fund
-------------------------------------------------------
By /s/ Brian S. Shlissel
-----------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date April 27, 2007
------------------
By /s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna
------------------------------
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer
Date April 27, 2007
-----------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
By /s/ Brian S. Shlissel
--------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date April 27, 2007
------------------
By /s/ Lawrence G. Altadonna
------------------------------
Treasurer, Principal Financial & Accounting Officer
Date April 27, 2007
------------------
