Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Plan-Based Awards Table
Employment Agreements
Mr. Malik has a written employment agreement with the Company, and Messrs. Chesser and Marshall have ongoing employment arrangements with the Company. Mr. Malik’s employment agreement is for a three-year period ending November 10, 2007; however, the term is automatically extended for one-year periods unless either we or Mr. Malik give 60 days notice prior to the expiration of the then-current term. We have also agreed to certain compensation arrangements with Messrs. Chesser and Marshall at the time of their employment. For Mr. Chesser, if he is terminated without cause prior to age 63, he will be paid a severance amount equal to three times his annual salary and bonus; if terminated without cause between the age of 63 and 65, he will be paid a severance amount equal to the aggregate of his annual salary and bonus. In addition, Mr. Chesser is credited with two years of service for every one year of service earned under our pension plan, with such amount payable under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). If Mr. Marshall is terminated without cause, he will be paid a severance amount equal to the target payment under the annual incentive plan plus two times his annual base salary.Mr. Marshall is also credited with two years of service for every one year of service earned under out pension plan, with such amount payable under our SERP.
Base salaries for our NEOs are set by our Board, upon the recommendations of our Compensation and Development Committee. For 2006, the base salaries were: Mr. Chesser, $650,000; Mr. Downey, $450,000; Mr. Bassham, $300,000; Mr. Malik, $420,000; and Mr. Marshall, $325,000. Our NEOs also participate in our health, welfare and benefit plans, our annual and long-term incentive plans, our pension and SERP plans (except for Mr. Malik), our non-qualified deferred compensation plan and receive certain other perquisites and personal benefits, such as car allowances, club memberships, executive financial planning services, parking, spouse travel, and personal use of company tickets.
Our NEOs have also entered into Change in Control Severance Agreements. Please see “Potential Payments Upon Termination” beginning on page 36 for a description of these agreements.
Awards
Restricted Stock
During 2006, our Board granted equity awards to each of the NEOs. Restricted stock awarded in 2006 under our LTIP will vest on February 7, 2008. Restricted stock awards include the right to vote. Dividends paid on the restricted stock are reinvested in stock through our DRIP, and carry the same restrictions as the underlying awards. The awards were: Mr. Chesser, 8,643 shares; Mr. Downey, 4,587 shares; Mr. Bassham, 2,260 shares; Mr. Malik, 5,585 shares; and Mr. Marshall, 2,449 shares.
Performance Shares
The Board also granted performance shares for the period 2006-2008 to the NEOs (except Mr. Malik). Performance shares are payable in our stock at the end of the performance period, depending on our total shareholder return for the period compared against the Edison Electric Institute index of electric utilities. The number of shares awarded can range from 0% to 200% of the target amount, as adjusted for the change in fair market value of our shares between the time of grant and the end of the award period. The following table describes the payout percentages:
30
Total Shareholder | |
Return Percentile Rank | Percentage Payout |
81stand Above | 200% |
65thto 80th | 150% |
50thto 64th | 100% |
35thto 49th | 50% |
34thand Below | 0 |
Dividends will be paid at the end of the period on the number of shares earned. The awards of performance shares, at target, were: Mr. Chesser, 25,930 shares; Mr. Downey, 13,763 shares; Mr. Bassham, 6,781 shares; and Mr. Marshall, 7,347 shares.
Cash-based Long-term Incentives
Mr. Malik’s long-term incentives that were earned and granted in 2006 under long-term incentive plans were comprised of time-based restricted stock (described above) and cash based on performance. The performance is based on Strategic Energy’s long-term goals, which for the 2005-2006 period included cumulative pre-tax net income, return on average book equity, increase in customer accounts under contract, cumulative reduction in general and administrative expenses, and reduction in supply costs. In October 2006, the return on average book equity metric was eliminated. For 2006-2008 long-term incentives, weightings of the goals changed to 31.3% for cumulative pre-tax net income, and 22.9% for each of the remaining three goals. Based upon performance for the period 2005-2006, Mr. Malik was awarded $592,744 in cash. For the period of 2006-2008, Mr. Malik’s target cash-based incentive is $472,500.
Annual Incentives
Under the annual incentive plans for 2006, our NEOs were eligible to receive up to 200% of a target bonus set as a percentage of their respective base salaries, including the following: Mr. Chesser, 100%; Mr. Downey, 70%; Mr. Bassham, 50%; Mr. Malik, 60%; and Mr. Marshall, 50%. The annual payout was based on the following weightings: 50% financial objective (core earnings for the applicable company); 30% business objectives; and 20% individual performance objectives. The Great Plains Energy and KCP&L business objectives included employee engagement, production availability, customer satisfaction and comprehensive energy plan milestones. Great Plains Energy business objectives also include financial ratios and Strategic Energy profitability. KCP&L's business objectives also include reliability and safety measures. Strategic Energy's business objectives are profitability, megawatthours under management and customer satisfaction. The annual incentives for Messrs. Chesser and Bassham were based on Great Plans Energy objectives. Mr. Downey's annual incentive was weighted equally between the Great Plains Energy and KCP&L objectives, and Mr. Malik's annual incentive was is weighted 30% and 70% between the Great Plains Energy and Strategic Energy objectives.
Based upon performance in 2006, the following annual incentives were paid: Mr. Chesser, $936,650; Mr. Downey, $424,305; Mr. Bassham, $223,650; Mr. Malik, $413,847; and Mr. Marshall, $203,450.
Salary and Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation
As we discuss in our CD&A, one objective of our compensation program is to align management interests with those of our shareholders. The Compensation and Development Committee believes that a substantial portion of total compensation for its officers should be delivered in the form of equity-based incentives. In 2006, 75% of the long-term incentive grants to Messrs. Chesser, Downey, Bassham, and
31
Marshall, was in the form of performance shares which, if earned after three years based on total return to shareholders, will be paid in Company stock. To mitigate potential volatility in payouts and provide a retention device, the remaining 25% of the long-term grant was in time-based restricted shares. For Mr. Malik, 25% of his long-term grant was in time-based restricted shares, with the remaining portion of his long-term grant eligible to be paid in cash.
In 2006, we determined cash and equity incentive grants using the following proportions of base salary:
| Annual Cash | Long-term Cash | Long-term |
| Incentive at | Incentive at | Equity Incentive |
| Target | Target | at Target |
Michael J. Chesser | 100% | - | 150% |
William H. Downey | 70% | - | 115% |
Terry Bassham | 50% | - | 85% |
Shahid Malik | 60% | 112.5% | 37.5% |
John R. Marshall | 50% | - | 85% |
We used the same percentages for determining annual and long-term incentives in 2007; however, Mr. Malik’s long-term incentive grant for the period 2007-2009 is split equally between cash and equity.
32
We have omitted from the table the columns for number of securities underlying unexercised options and Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| | | | | | Equity | Equity Incentive |
| Number of | | | | Market Value | Incentive Plan | Plan Awards: |
| Securities | | | Number of | of Shares of | Awards: | Market or Payout |
| Underlying | | | Shares of Stock | Stock That | Number of | Value of |
| Unexercised | Option | Option | That Have Not | Have Not | Shares That | Unearned Shares |
| Option (#) | Exercise | Expiration | Vested | Vested | Have Not | That Have Not |
Name | Exercisable | Price ($) | Date | (#) (1) | ($) (2) | Vested | Vested |
(a) | (b) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) (3) | ($) (j) (2) |
| | | | 14,467 | 460,051 | | |
Michael J. Chesser (4) | | | | 11,981 | 380,996 | | |
| | | | | | 30,233 | 961,409 |
| | | | 9,139 | 290,620 | | |
| | | | | | 25,930 | 824,574 |
| 20,000 | 25.55 | 2/6/11 | | | | |
William H. Downey (5) | 20,000 | 24.90 | 2/5/12 | | | | |
| 5,249 | 27.73 | 8/5/13 | | | | |
| | | | 10,522 | 334,600 | | |
| | | | 12,616 | 401,189 | | |
| | | | | | 16,719 | 531,664 |
| | | | 4,850 | 154,230 | | |
| | | | | | 13,763 | 437,663 |
| | | | | | 6,358 | 202,184 |
Terry Bassham (6) | | | | 10,004 | 318,127 | | |
| | | | 2,389 | 75,970 | | |
| | | | | | 6,781 | 215,636 |
| | | | 5,031 | 159,986 | | |
Shahid Malik (7) | | | | 5,534 | 175,981 | | |
| | | | 5,533 | 175,949 | | |
| | | | 5,905 | 187,779 | | |
| | | | 22,330 | 710,094 | | |
John R. Marshall(8) | | | | | | 7,096 | 225,653 |
| | | | 2,589 | 82,330 | | |
| | | | | | 7,347 | 233,635 |
| (1) | Includes reinvested dividends on restricted stock that carry the same restrictions. |
| (2) | Value of the shares is calculated by multiplying the number of shares by the closing market price ($31.80) as of December 29, 2006. |
| (3) | The payment of performance shares is contingent upon achievement of specific performance goals over a stated period of time as approved by the Compensation and Development Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The number of performance shares ultimately paid can vary from the number of shares initially granted depending on Company performance, based on internal and external measures, over stated performance periods. |
| (4) | Mr. Chesser received a restricted stock grant on September 13, 2003 for 36,405 shares, of which 12,135 shares were not vested as of December 31, 2006. He received a performance share grant of 30,233 shares, at target, on February 1, 2005 for 30,233 shares for a two year period ending December 31, 2006, of which 11,981 shares were earned and awarded in February 2007. He received a performance share grant on February 1, 2005 for 30,233 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2007. He received a restricted stock grant on February 7, 2006 for 8,643 shares that vest February 7, 2009. He also received a performance share grant on February 7, 2006 for 25,930 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2008. |
| (5) | Mr. Downey received a restricted stock grant on September 13, 2003 for 26,476 shares, of which 8,826 were not vested as of December 31, 2006. He received a performance share grant on February 1, 2005 for 16,719 shares, at target, for a two year period ending December 31, 2006, of which 12,616 shares were earned and awarded in February 2007. He received a performance share grant on February 1, 2005 for 16,719 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2007. He received a restricted stock grant on February 7, 2006 for 4,587 shares that vest February 7, 2009. He also received a performance share grant of 13,763 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2008. |
| (6) | Mr. Bassham received a performance share grant on March 28, 2005 for 6,358 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2007. He received a restricted stock grant on March 28, 2005 for 9,083 shares that vest on March 28, 2008. He received a restricted stock grant on February 7, 2006 for 2,260 shares that vest February 7, 2009. He also received a performance share grant on February 7, 2006, for 6,781 shares, at target, for the three-year period ending December 31, 2008. |
33
| (7) | | Mr. Malik received a restricted stock grant on November 1, 2004 for 13,333 shares, of which 4,445 have not vested as of December 31, 2006. He received a restricted stock grant on February 1, 2005 for 4,956 shares that vest on February 1, 2007. He received a restricted stock grant on February 1, 2005 for 4,956 shares that vest February 1, 2008. He also received a restricted stock grant on February 7, 2006 for 5,585 shares that vest February 7, 2009. |
| (8) | | Mr. Marshall received a restricted stock grant on May 25, 2005 for 20,275 shares that vest May 25, 2008. He received a performance share grant on May 25, 2005 for 7,096 shares, at target, for the three year period ending December 31, 2007. He received a restricted stock grant on February 7, 2006 for 2,449 shares that vest February 7, 2009. He also received a performance share grant of 7,347 shares for the three year period ending December 31, 2008. |
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
We have omitted the option award columns from this table, because none of our NEOs exercised options in 2006.
| Number of Shares Acquired on | Value Realized on Vesting |
Name | Vesting (#) | ($) |
(a) | (d) | (e) |
Michael J. Chesser | 26,260 (1) | 825,501 (1) |
William H. Downey | 23,000 (2) | 724,443 (2) |
Terry Bassham | - | - |
Shahid Malik | 4,964 (3) | 159,841 (3) |
John R. Marshall | - | - |
| (1) | | Restricted stock of 12,135 shares, plus 2,144 DRIP shares vested on October 1, 2006. The value realized on vesting is the closing price of $31.13 on October 2, 2006, the first business day after the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares vested. Mr. Chesser earned 11,981 shares pursuant to a performance share grant for the period of 2005-2006, which were issued in February 2007. The value realized on vesting is assumed in the table to be the closing price of $31.80 on December 29, 2006 (the last business day of the performance period) multiplied by the number of shares awarded. |
| (2) | | Restricted stock of 8,825 shares, plus 1,559 DRIP shares vested on October 1, 2006. The value realized on vesting is the closing price of $31.13 on October 2, 2006, the first business day after the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares vested. Mr. Downey earned 12,616 shares pursuant to a performance share grant for the period of 2005-2006, which were issued in February 2007. The value realized on vesting is assumed in the table to be the closing price of $31.80 on December 29, 2006 (the last business day of the performance period) multiplied by the number of shares awarded. |
| (3) | | Mr. Malik had a restricted stock grant of 4,444 shares, plus 520 DRIP shares, vest on November 10, 2006. The value realized on vesting is the closing price of $32.20 on November 10, 2006 multiplied by the number of shares vested. |
The following table outlines the pension benefits for the NEOs as of December 31, 2006. We have omitted the payments during the last fiscal year because no payments were made in 2006. For a more detailed description of the Company’s Management Pension Plan and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, see the CD&A in this Proxy on page 51.
34
PENSION BENEFITS
| | Number of Years | Present Value of |
| | Credited Service | Accumulated |
Name | Plan Name | (#) | Benefit ($) |
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) |
Michael J. Chesser | Management Pension Plan | 3.5 | 112,731 |
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 7 (1) | 660,196 |
William H. Downey | Management Pension Plan | 6.5 | 244,197 |
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 6.5 | 363,312 |
Terry Bassham | Management Pension Plan | 1.5 | 24,854 |
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 1.5 | 15,063 |
John R. Marshall | Management Pension Plan | 1.5 | 46,822 |
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 3 (1) | 120,719 |
Shahid Malik | Management Pension Plan | N/A | - |
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A | - |
(1) | | Messrs. Chesser and Marshall are credited with two years of service for every one year of service earned under our pension plan, with such amount payable under our SERP. Without this augmentation, Messrs. Chesser and Marshall would have accrued $273,732 and $36,949, respectively, under the SERP. |
Our NEOs, excluding Mr. Malik, participate in our management pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) and the SERP. The Pension Plan is a funded, tax-qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. Benefits under the Pension Plan are based on the employee’s years of service and the average annual base salary over a specified period. Employees who retire after they reach 65, or whose age and years of service add up to 85 are entitled to a total monthly annuity equal to 50% of their average base monthly salary for the period of 36 consecutive months in which their earnings were highest. The annuity will be proportionately reduced if years of credited service are less than 30 or if age and years of service do not add up to 85. Employees may elect to receive their retirement benefits in a lump sum equal to the actuarial equivalent of a single life pension under the Pension Plan. Of our NEOs, only Mr. Downey is eligible for early retirement benefits under the Pension Plan. His early retirement benefits would be a monthly annuity equal to 10.9% of his average base month salary during the period of 48 consecutive months in which his earnings were highest. The compensation covered by the Pension Plan excludes any bonuses or other compensation. The amount of annual earnings that may be considered in calculating benefits under the Pension Plan is limited by law. For 2006, the annual limitation is $220,000.
The SERP is unfunded and provides out of general assets an amount substantially equal to the difference between the amount that would have been payable under the Pension Plan in the absence of tax laws limiting pension benefits and earnings that may be considered in calculating pension benefits, and the amount actually payable under the Plan. It also adds an additional 1/3% of highest average annual base salary for each year of credited service when the executive was eligible for supplemental benefits, up to 30 years. As mentioned, Messrs. Chesser and Marshall are credited with two years of service for every one year of service earned under our Pension Plan, with such amount payable under the SERP.
In the table above, the present value of the current accrued benefits with respect to each listed officer is based on the following assumptions: retirement at the earlier of age 62 or when the sum of age and years of service equal 85; full vesting of accumulated benefits; a discount rate of 5.9%; and use of the Pension Plan’s mortality and lump sum tables.
35
We have omitted from the table the column for aggregate withdrawals/distributions because there were no withdrawals or distributions in 2006 to our NEOs.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
| Executive | Registrant | Aggregate | Aggregate |
| Contribution | Contributions | Earnings in | Balance at |
| in Last FY | in Last FY | Last FY | Last FYE |
Name | ($)(1) | ($) | ($)(2) | ($) |
(a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (f) |
Michael J. Chesser | 533,325 | 12,900 | 32,761 | 926,595 |
William H. Downey | 302,152 | 6,900 | 85,138 | 1,275,454 |
Terry Bassham | 111,825 | - | - | 111,825 |
Shahid Malik | 315,097 | - | 26,443 | 593,961 |
John R. Marshall | 361,162 | 6,703 | 28,524 | 647,538 |
(1) | | Amounts in this column are included in the “Salary” column in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2) | | Only the above-market earnings are reported in the Summary Compensation Table. The above-market earnings were: |
Chesser - $12,616; Downey - $32,862; Marshall - $10,973; and Malik - $9,963. |
Our deferred compensation plan is a nonqualified and unfunded plan. It allows selected employees, including our NEOs, to defer the receipt of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of awards under annual incentive plans. The plan provides for a matching contribution in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of the base salary deferred by participants, reduced by the amount of the matching contribution made for the year to the participant’s account under our Employee Savings Plus Plan, as described in CD&A. An earnings rate is applied to the deferral amounts. This rate is determined annually by the Compensation and Development Committee and is generally based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. The rate was set at 9.0% for 2006. Interest is compounded monthly on deferred amounts. Participants may elect prior to rendering services for which the compensation relates when deferred amounts are paid to them: either at a specified date, or upon separation from service. For our NEOs who elect payment on separation of service, amounts are paid the first business day of the seventh calendar month following their separation from service.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
Our NEOs are eligible to receive payments in connection with any termination of their employment. Payments made will vary depending on the circumstances of termination, as we discuss below.
Payments under Change in Control Severance Agreements.
We have Change in Control Severance Agreements (“Change in Control Agreements”) with our NEOs, specifying the benefits payable in the event their employment is terminated within two years of a “Change in Control” or within a “protected period”. Generally, a “Change in Control” occurs if:
- Any person (as defined by SEC regulations) becomes the beneficial owner of at least 35% of ouroutstanding voting securities;
- A change occurs in the majority of our Board;
- A merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar transaction is consummated (unless our shareholders continue to hold at least 60% of the voting power of the surviving entity), or a liquidation, dissolution or a sale of substantially all of our assets occurs or is approved by our shareholders.
36
A “protected period” starts when (i) we enter into an agreement that, if consummated, would result in a Change in Control; (ii) we or another person publicly announces an intention to take or to consider taking actions which, if consummated, would constitute a Change in Control; (iii) any person (as defined bySEC regulations) becomes the beneficial owner of 10% or more of our outstanding voting securities; or (iv) our Board or our shareholders adopt a resolution approving any of the foregoing matters or approving a Change in Control. The protected period ends when the Change in Control transaction is either consummated, abandoned or terminated.
The benefits under the Change in Control Agreements depend on the circumstances of termination. Generally, benefits are greater if the employee is not terminated for “Cause”, or if the employee terminates employment for “Good Reason”. “Cause” is defined to mean: (i) material misappropriation of any funds, confidential information or property; (ii) the conviction of, or the entering of, a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to a felony (or equivalent); (iii) willful damage, willful misrepresentation, willful dishonesty, or other willful conduct that can reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company; or (iv) gross negligence or willful misconduct in performance of the employee’s duties (after written notice and a reasonable period to remedy the occurrence).
An employee has “Good Reason” to terminate employment if: (i) there is any material and adverse reduction or diminution in position, authority, duties or responsibilities below the level provided at any time during the 90-day period prior to the “protected period”; (ii) there is any reduction in annual base salary after the start of the “protected period”; (iii) there is any reduction in benefits below the level provided at any time during the 90-day period prior to the “protected period”; or (iv) the employee is required to be based at any office or location that is more than 70 miles from where the employee was based immediately before the start of the “protected period”.
Our Change in Control Agreements have covenants prohibiting the disclosure of confidential information and preventing the employee from participating or engaging in any business that, during the employee’s employment, is in direct competition with the business of the Company within the United States (without prior written consent which, in the case of termination, will not be unreasonably withheld).
The following table sets forth our payment obligations under the Change in Control Agreements under the circumstances specified upon a termination of employment. The table and following discussion assumes that the termination took place on December 31, 2006.
| Termination Reason |
| | For Cause, |
| | Death, |
| Other than for | Disability or |
| Cause, Death | Other than |
Item | or Disability | Good Reason |
Unpaid base salary through date of termination. | X | X |
Bonus. | X (1) | |
Any amount credited to employee under any deferred contribution nonqualified deferred compensation | | |
plan and any other compensation previously deferred by employee (including any interest and earnings) not paid. | X (2) | |
Any accrued unpaid vacation pay. | X (3) | |
Cash amount equal to two or three times employee’s highest annual base salary in effect during the prior 12 month period plus two or three times employee’s average annualized annual incentive comp awards paid or deferred. | X (4) | |
Cash amount equal to the excess of (i) the actuarial equivalent value of the monthly accrued benefits payable at age 65 under the Pension Plan and SERP, assuming additional years of service over (ii) the actuarial equivalent value of employee’s vested accrued benefits under the Pension Plan and SERP. | X (5) | |
Cash amount equal to unvested portion of employer contributions under the Employee Savings Plus Plan. | X (6) | |
Two or three years of medical, accident, disability and life insurance coverage for employee and dependents. | X (7) | |
Tax gross-up payment. | X (8) | |
37
(1) | | The bonus must be an amount at least equal to the average annualized incentive awards paid or payable under any annual incentive compensation plan during the five fiscal years (or, if less, the years the officer was employed by the company) immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the Change in Control occurs, pro-rated for the number of days employed in the current year. The annual incentive awards payable in 2006 (and reflected in the Summary Compensation Table) exceed this average. |
(2) | | The amounts as of December 31, 2006, are shown in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table. |
(3) | | We assume for these calculations that all vacation had been taken during the year. |
(4) | | Messrs. Chesser and Downey receive three times their highest annual base salary and the average annualized annual incentive compensation awards during the five fiscal years (or, if less, the years they were employed by the company) immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the Change in Control occurs. Messrs. Bassham, Malik and Marshall receive two times salary and average annualized annual incentive compensation awards. These amounts are shown in the following table: |
Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
$3,492,207 | $1,942,775 | $971,536 | $2,077,622 | $1,425,891 |
(5) | | Mr. Chesser is credited with two years for every one year of credited service under the Pension Plan, plus six additional years of credited service. Mr. Downey is credited for three additional years of service. Mr. Marshall is credited for two years for every one year of credited service under the Pension Plan, plus four additional years of credit service. Mr. Bassham is credited for two additional years of service. Mr. Malik does not participate in the Pension Plan or SERP. The amounts resulting from these calculations, based on the same assumptions used to determine the benefits shown in the “Pension Benefits Table”, are: |
Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
$772,927 | $607,509 | $39,916 | - | $167,542 |
(6) | The unvested amounts at December 31, 2006 were: |
Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
$8,716 | - | $3,991 | - | $3,348 |
(7) | The following amounts are estimated based on our current COBRA premiums for medical coverage and indicative premiums for private insurance coverage for the individuals: |
Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
$67,716 | $67,716 | $45,144 | $45,144 | $67,716 |
38
(8) | | The Change in Control Agreements generally provide for an additional payment to cover excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (“Section 280G gross-up payments”). We have calculated these payments based on the estimated payments discussed above, as well as the acceleration of equity awards that are discussed below. In calculating these payments, we did not make any reductions for the value of reasonable compensation for pre-Change in Control period and post-Change in Control period service, such as the value attributed to non-compete provisions. In the event that payments are due under Change in Control Agreements, we would perform evaluations to determine the reductions attributable to these services. |
Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
$2,872,589 | $1,737,471 | $667,488 | $1,383,754 | $950,617 |
Acceleration of LTIP Awards
As of December 31, 2006 our LTIP provides that upon a “change in control” (which is generally consistent with the definition of Change in Control in the Change in Control Agreements, with the major difference being a lower beneficial ownership threshold percentage), (i) all stock options then outstanding are fully exercisable and all limited stock appreciation rights are automatically exercised, (ii) all restrictions on restricted stock grants are removed, and (iii) all performance share grants (unless awarded less than six months prior to the change in control) are deemed to have been fully earned. Assuming that a “change in control” occurred as of December 31, 2006, it would have had the following effects:
Stock Options. The outstanding stock options of Mr. Downey are currently exercisable. He has limited stock appreciation rights on 20,000 option shares, which entitle him to receive cash in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares underlying the stock appreciation rights being exercised on the date of exercise over the aggregate base or exercise price. Assuming that the limited stock appreciation rights were exercised on December 31, 2006, he would have received $125,000, less applicable withholding taxes.
Restricted Stock.Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 31, 2006, the following amounts of restricted stock would have become unrestricted. The market value is calculated using the closing price at December 29, 2006:
| Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
Number of shares | 23,606 | 15,372 | 12,393 | 22,003 | 24,919 |
Market Value | $750,671 | $488,830 | $394,097 | $699,695 | $792,424 |
Performance Shares. Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 31, 2006, the following amounts of common stock would have been payable under outstanding performance share grants. The market value is calculated using the closing price at December 29, 2006.
| Mr. Chesser | Mr. Downey | Mr. Bassham | Mr. Malik | Mr. Marshall |
Number of shares | 56,163 | 30,482 | 13,139 | - | 14,443 |
Market Value * | $1,929,400 | $1,047,682 | $447,546 | - | $492,097 |
*Market value includes cash dividends paid on the Performance Shares. Cash. Mr. Malik’s outstanding long-term incentive grants as of December 31, 2006, were in the form of both restricted stock and cash awards. Assuming a change in control occurred as of December 31, 2006, the cash awards, at target, would have been payable under the Change in Control Agreement in the aggregate amount of $922,500. This amount is included in the “Market Value of Accelerated LTIP Awards” column of the following summary table.
39
Summary
| Cash Payment to | Insurance | Market Value of | Section 280G | Total |
| NEO | Continuation | Accelerated LTIP | Gross-up | |
| | | Awards | Payment |
Mr. Chesser | $4,289,847 | $67,716 | $1,929,400 | $2,872,589 | $ | 9,159,552 | |
Mr. Downey | $2,550,284 | $67,716 | $1,661,512 | $1,737,471 | $ | 6,016,983 | |
Mr. Bassham | $1,015,443 | $45,144 | $841,643 | $667,488 | $ | 2,569,718 | |
Mr. Malik | $2,077,622 | $67,716 | $1,622,195 | $1,383,754 | $ | 5,151,287 | |
Mr. Marshall | $1,609,326 | $45,144 | $1,284,521 | $950,617 | $ | 3,889,608 | |
Retirement, resignation, death or disability
Upon retirement or resignation, the named executive officer would receive all accrued and unpaid salary and benefits, including the retirement benefits discussed above. In the event of death or disability, the officer (or his beneficiary) would receive group life insurance proceeds or group disability policy proceeds, as applicable. In addition, these events would have the following effects on outstanding LTIP awards: (i) if employment is terminated by either the Company or the officer, all restricted stock and performance share awards would be forfeited; (ii) if the officer retires, becomes disabled or dies, restricted stock and performance share awards would be prorated for service during the applicable periods; (iii) if the officer retires, outstanding options expire three months from the retirement date; (iv) if the officer resigns or is discharged, outstanding options terminate; and (v) if the officer becomes disabled or dies, outstanding options terminate twelve months after disability or death.
Payments under other compensation arrangements
Mr. Chesser
As discussed, Mr. Chesser’s employment arrangement with the Company provides that if he is terminated without cause, he will receive three times annual salary and bonus (if terminated prior to age 63), or onetime salary and bonus (if terminated between age 63 and before age 65). If Mr. Chesser were terminated without cause as of December 31, 2006 (and assuming that the Change in Control Agreement was not applicable), he would have received $4,759,950 under this arrangement.
Mr. Marshall
As discussed, Mr. Marshall’s employment arrangement with the Company provides that if he is terminated without cause, he will receive a severance amount equal to the target payment under the annual incentive plan plus two times his annual base salary. If Mr. Marshall were terminated without cause as of December 31, 2006 (and assuming that the Change in Control Agreement was not applicable), he would have received $812,500 under this arrangement.
Mr. Malik
Mr. Malik’s employment agreement provides for additional compensation if Mr. Malik’s employment is terminated without “cause” by the Company, or if Mr. Malik terminates his employment for “good reason”. This additional compensation is three times Mr. Malik’s annual base salary, the current year’s annual incentive (prorated through the termination date), and three times the average annual incentive compensation paid during the three most recent fiscal years (or such shorter period as Mr. Malik shall have been employed). “Cause” is generally defined as a (i) material breach of duties and responsibilities that is willful and deliberate and is not remedied within a reasonable period after notice, or (ii) commission of a felony involving moral turpitude. “Good reason” is generally defined as (i) assignment of duties that are inconsistent with those held on November 10, 2004; (ii) a change in reporting responsibilities, titles or offices; (iii) any removal or involuntary termination otherwise than as expressly permitted by the agreement; (iv) any failure to re-elect Mr. Malik to any position; (v) a reduction of more than 15% in annual base salary; or (vi) any requirement that Mr. Malik be based anywhere other than at his current location.
40
If Mr. Malik would have been terminated without cause, or terminated employment for good reason as of December 31, 2006 (and assuming that the Change in Control Agreement was not applicable), he would have received $1,857,598 under his employment agreement.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
This section provides information and a comprehensive analysis of the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to NEOs as well as material information regarding the Company’s compensation objectives, policies, and decisions pertaining to those officers. NEOs include the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. This section includes information regarding, among other things, the overall objectives of the Company’s compensation program, its linkage to our business objectives, and a summary of each element of compensation that we provide.
Great Plains Energy Incorporated, headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, is the holding company for KCP&L, a leading regulated provider of electricity in the Midwest, and Strategic Energy, L.L.C., a competitive electricity supplier. These two core businesses build value for Great Plains Energy shareholders through complementary operations that combine the reliable cash flows of a strong electric utility with growth in competitive energy management. The Company’s strategic intent is to demonstrate leadership in supplying and delivering electricity and energy solutions to meet the needs of our customers and achieve Tier I performance through daily exercise of our winning culture.
The Company’s compensation programs are a key element in attracting, retaining, and motivating NEOs with the skills necessary to create value for shareholders and succeed within our business environment. This includes ensuring that their compensation is competitive with market levels, structured to focus NEOs on achieving complementary goals, and recognizes the challenges, opportunities and differences of our regulated and unregulated operations.
Mr. Chesser is an officer of Great Plains Energy and Chairman of the Board of KCP&L; Messrs. Downey and Bassham are officers of both Great Plains Energy and KCP&L; Mr. Marshall is an officer of KCP&L; and Mr. Malik is an officer of Great Plains Energy and Strategic Energy.
Governance of the Company’s Compensation Program
The Compensation and Development Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is composed of six non-employee directors, each of whom is independent under the applicable standards of the NYSE. They include William C. Nelson (Chairman), Mark A. Ernst, Luis A. Jimenez, James A. Mitchell, Linda H. Talbott, and Robert H. West. The Committee is responsible for setting the executive compensation structure and administering the policies and plans that govern compensation for the NEOs and other executive officers. The Committee acts in accordance with a charter that has been approved by our Board and decisions by the Committee are reviewed with, and frequently approved by, the full Board. A copy of the charter, which may be amended from time to time, can be found on the company’s website athttp://www.greatplainsenergy.com/investor/charters.html.
41
Role of Executive Officers
Through an iterative process, Mr. Chesser develops preliminary recommendations for compensation actions for the other NEOs. The Committee reviews these preliminary recommendations and makes final recommendations for Board approval. Performance metrics and goals are also developed through an iterative process through which management, including NEOs, develop preliminary recommendations that the Committee considers in the development of final recommendations for Board approval.
Mr. Chesser’s compensation levels and performance goals are recommended by the Committee for approval by the Board. The SVP, Corporate Services & Corporate Secretary and Mercer Human Resource Consulting (“Mercer”) may be consulted in this process.
Changes proposed to the LTIP at this Annual Meeting would also allow, subject to certain limitations, the Company’s Board to delegate to a special committee consisting of two or more directors, who may also be officers of the Company, the authority, within specified parameters, to grant awards under the Company’s LTIP. Actions taken by those delegates would be generally treated as acts of the Board provided they are regularly reported back to the Board and Committee.
Role of Consultant
The Committee uses Mercer as its external independent compensation consultant. Mercer was selected by the Committee several years ago following presentations from other consulting firms and based on the knowledge and industry experience of the principal proposed by Mercer, as well as their overall capabilities in the area of executive compensation. Mr. David Cross is the Principal and senior consultant who works with the Committee, and has 20 years of industry compensation experience. On a periodic basis (last done in 2005), Mercer provides the Committee with a complete review of the Company’s executive compensation programs, including plan design, all executive benefit programs, and a review of pay positioning versus performance to evaluate the magnitude of pay versus performance. On an annual basis, Mercer performs a competitive review and analysis of base and variable components. In that review, Mercer assesses the competitiveness of the Company’s compensation for executives relative to survey market data and the companies in the Company’s identified peer group.
While Mercer is engaged by, and takes direction from, the Committee, the Senior Vice President-Corporate Services and Corporate Secretary (non-NEO) works with Mercer’s consultants in providing information, general coordination, and support. Effective in 2006, the Committee also pre-approves all other work unrelated to executive compensation proposed to be provided by Mercer to the Company and its subsidiaries, if the fees for such work would exceed $10,000.
42
Objectives of the Company’s Compensation Program
The three main objectives of the Company’s Executive Compensation Program are:
1.Attraction and Retention of Highly Qualified and Experienced Executives
First, the program should allow the attraction and retention of highly qualified and experienced executives. Shareholders and customers are best served when the Company is able to attract and retain talent. Most of the current NEOs have been hired from outside the Company in the last four years and in each case represented the addition of an executive with considerable industry and business expertise. In order to attract this caliber of talent, it is necessary to provide an attractive and competitive compensation package in addition to other employment aspects which are of interest to potential new employees, such as career and developmental opportunities. In general, it is the Company’s goal to provide base salaries at the median of comparable companies and opportunities for variable compensation at higher levels based on performance. Although the Company may need to pay above-market base salaries in order to attract specific talent, the Company’s intent is to work towards target levels based on market over time. The Committee also takes into account internal equity, Company NEOs to other senior executives in order to measure fairness on a comparable and relative basis. When evaluating its competitive positioning, the Committee considers the results of the Company’s success in attracting and retaining talent, recognizing, however, that compensation is just one element of a total rewards package that assists in the attraction and retention of key employees.
To help ascertain whether the Company is providing competitive compensation, the Committee utilizes Mercer’s report to the Committee, which includes detailed information with respect to base salaries, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and other specific aspects of executive compensation for each NEO, as well as Mercer’s overall findings and recommendations. Comparisons include, when appropriate, energy industry data, general industry data, and peer proxy data.
The proxy peer group, as recommended by Mercer and last approved by the Committee in October of 2006, consists of 13 organizations of similar character, revenue size, and market capitalization as compared to the Company. The peer group companies currently include:
Allete Inc. | Equitable Resources Inc. | TECO Energy Inc. |
Alliant Energy Corp. | Scana Corp. | Unisource Energy Corp. |
Ameren Corp. | Pinnacle West Capital Corp. | Vectren Corp. |
Black Hills Corp. | PNM Resources Inc. | Wisconsin Energy Corp. |
Avista Corp. | | |
In 2006, management also provided Committee members with tally sheets on all NEOs, which provided extensive detail on past and current compensation amounts, as well as payout estimates under various separation scenarios. Management also provided the chair of the Committee with various internal equity comparisons relating to CEO compensation.
As more fully discussed in Section 3 of this CD&A, the Committee utilizes multiple elements of compensation to successfully achieve its executive attraction and retention objectives. The Committee considers the competitiveness of each individual element of compensation, as well as the competitiveness of total cash comparisons and total direct compensation comparisons. However, the Committee has not elected to adopt policies for allocating between long-term and currently-paid-out compensation, or between cash, non-cash, and other forms of non-cash compensation.
43
2. | | Motivate Executives to Achieve Strong Short-term and Long-term Financial and Operational Results |
The second objective of the Company’s program is to motivate executives to achieve strong short-term and long-term financial and operational results. The Company believes that pay and performance should be linked with objectives for which employees can have a clear line of sight, and this is principally accomplished through variable compensation opportunities. Metrics used for incentive pay are aligned with the Company’s strategy, such as those associated with the Comprehensive Energy Plan for KCP&L or megawatt hours under management at Strategic Energy. Individual contributions to results are also reflected in variable compensation and include how those results are achieved. This encompasses, for example, an evaluation as to whether the executive is providing leadership by engaging employees or demonstrating accountability for results. Because there is no guarantee that any of the variable components will be paid, variable compensation arrangements put a significant aspect of pay “at risk.” The Company must achieve specific levels of financial and operating performance to allow executives to earn this portion of their compensation. In addition, utilizing a strong variable compensation element allows the Committee to recognize and reward outstanding performance. Great Plains Energy is a performance-driven company, reflecting a strong pay-for-performance culture that enables the Company to attract executives who are motivated, by the prospects of high levels of performance and rewards. The Company uses a balanced scorecard approach in setting the NEOs’ incentive plan goals, which include financial, operational, and individual components for the annual plan and key operational and/or financial measures for the long-term plan. The Committee reviews the alignment between executive pay and performance on an annual basis and works to ensure a balance of both short-term and long-term interests. Variable compensation targets for the NEOs have represented between 55-70% of total direct compensation, so it is a significant component of pay.
3.Ensure the Alignment of Management Interests with Those of Shareholders
The third objective of the Company’s Compensation Program is to align management interests with those of our shareholders. The Committee believes that a substantial portion of total compensation for its NEOs should be delivered in the form of equity-based incentives. In 2006, for Messrs. Chesser, Downey, Bassham, and Marshall, 75% of long-term incentive grants was in the form of performance shares which, if earned after three years based on total return to shareholders, will be paid out in Company stock. To mitigate potential volatility in payouts and provide a retention device, the remaining 25% of the long-term grant was in the form of time-based restricted shares. For Mr. Malik, 25% of his long-term grant was in time-based restricted shares, with the remaining portion of his long-term grant eligible to be paid in cash. In addition, the Committee has also implemented share ownership guidelines for executives to further align them with shareholder interests. For NEOs, the share ownership guidelines reflect a level of five times base salary for Mr. Chesser; four times base salary for Mr. Downey; and three times base salary for Messrs. Bassham, Marshall, and Malik. The Committee reviews the status of NEO share ownership on a regular basis.
Elements of Compensation
The primary elements of compensation include: |
- Cash compensation in the form of base salaries, annual incentives, discretionary bonuses, and the cash portion of Strategic Energy’s long-term incentives
- Equity compensation under the Company’s LTIP
- Perquisites
- Deferred compensation plan
- Post-termination compensation
- Pension plan and supplemental pension plan
- Employee savings plan
|
44
Cash Compensation
Cash compensation to NEOs includes (i) a base salary that is a fixed amount and considered periodically for adjustment based on individual performance and internal and external comparisons, and (ii) an annual incentive plan that motivates executives to pursue specific goals and objectives consistent with the strategic direction set by the Board. Mr. Malik’s long-term incentives, as an officer of Strategic Energy, also includes a payout which, if earned, is paid in cash. The Committee has not chosen to target a specific percentage of total compensation for NEOs to be delivered in cash or cash opportunities as it believes this will vary based on position and circumstance.
Base Salary
Base salaries are generally reviewed at the February Committee meeting, approved by the Board, and, if adjusted, made retroactive to the first of the year. The Committee considers base salaries for NEOs concurrently with an evaluation prepared by management of each NEO’s performance for the prior year. The Committee also considered preliminary base salary recommendations from Mr. Chesser with respect to the other NEOs. Salary recommendations are not determined by formula, but instead take into consideration job responsibilities, level of experience, individual performance, internal comparisons, comparisons of the salaries of executives in similar positions obtained from market surveys, and other competitive data and input provided by Mercer. For 2006, each of the NEO positions was matched to a comparable position in one to four surveys, including peer group proxies, utility surveys, and general industry surveys. The goal is for base salaries, in general, to approximate the median salaries of individuals in comparable positions in companies of similar size within the relevant industry or function. The Company believes this is necessary to meet the attraction and retention objective as discussed earlier. If an NEO or other executive’s base salary is above or below what is considered to be market median, the intent is generally to move the individual to market median within a three-year period, barring any other considerations the Committee believes are relevant, such as succession prospects, as one example. Messrs. Bassham, Chesser, Downey, Malik, and Marshall received base salary increases effective January 1, 2006, ranging from 1.6% to 9.1% . Larger increases were given when individuals were significantly less than market medians and demonstrated a high level of performance. For Mr. Chesser, the Committee considered the financial performance of the Company; the cost and quality of services provided; leadership in enhancing the long-term value of the Company; performance against other pre-established objectives; survey and peer group data; length of service; and prior year increases.
Effective January 1, 2007, base salary increases were given to the NEOs ranging from 3.0% to 11.5% .
Annual Incentives
The Company’s annual incentive program is based upon pre-established Company and business unit financial and operational metrics, as well as individual performance. Performance goals are developed through an iterative process. Based on a review of business plans, management, including the NEOs, develops preliminary recommendations relating to both the goals and metrics for Committee review. Metric levels, at the Committee’s direction, are established so that the target level reflects what is in the business plan and has a 50% probability of achievement. The threshold and maximum levels have 80% and 20% probabilities of achievement, respectively. The Committee reviews management’s preliminary recommendations, makes revisions to these preliminary recommendations as the Committee deems advisable or necessary and recommends the final goals and metrics to the Board for its approval. In establishing final goals, the Committee strives to ensure that: incentives are aligned with the strategic goals set by the Board; goals are sufficiently ambitious so as to provide a meaningful incentive; and bonus payments, assuming target levels of performance are attained, will be consistent with the overall compensation program established by the Committee.
45
Awards for 2005 performance were paid or eligible for deferral following the Board meeting in February 2006. For all executives, including NEOs, in the Great Plains Energy/KCP&L Annual Incentive Plan, the total amount available for payment was determined by corporate earnings per share initially set and approved by the Committee in January 2005. Corporate earnings per share results were at the maximum level of 150% of target. Other corporate and business unit measures considered in the calculation of incentive awards included return on invested capital, total earnings, operating cash flow, a customer satisfaction index, customer retention rate, net generation, delivery system reliability, supply cost reductions, megawatt hour sales, safety, culture initiatives implementation, diversity spend, and individual performance. Individual awards earned by NEOs are shown in Summary Compensation Table and ranged from 129% to 154% of target. Messrs. Chesser and Bassham’s award were based 80% on Great Plains Energy performance and 20% on individual performance. Mr. Downey’s award was based 40% on Great Plains Energy performance; 40% on KCP&L performance; and 20% on individual performance. Mr. Marshall’s award was based 20% on Great Plains Energy’s performance; 60% on KCP&L’s performance; and 20% on individual performance. Mr. Malik’s award was based 20% on Great Plain Energy’s performance; 60% on Strategic Energy’s performance; and 20% on individual performance. With the exception of Mr. Marshall, whose employment arrangement specified otherwise, annual awards to NEOs and other executives were prorated in the event they were employed for less than a full year.
For 2005 awards paid in 2006 for Strategic Energy executives, and including Mr. Malik, the total amount available for payment was determined by Strategic Energy’s pre-tax income. Other measures considered in the calculation of Strategic Energy’s incentive awards included customer retention, megawatt hour sales, supply costs reduction, retail price turnaround time, and implementation of a supply management system. Individual performance was also taken into account. Pre-tax net income was accomplished at 130% of target, and the remaining scorecard goals were accomplished at 100% of target.
In 2006, the Committee developed, with input from Mercer, a revised structure for the Annual Incentive Plan for all executives, including NEOs. The new structure provided a financial objective of core earnings weighted at 50% and relating to the earnings for the executive’s primary business or as determined by the Committee; 30% reflecting key Great Plains Energy, KCP&L, and/or Strategic Energy business objectives; and 20% as a discretionary individual performance component. Key business objectives for Great Plains Energy executives included financial ratios, expected future margin, customer satisfaction, equivalent plant availability, employee engagement, and comprehensive energy plan progress. Key business objectives for KCP&L included reliability, equivalent plant availability, safety, customer satisfaction, employee engagement, and comprehensive energy plan progress. Key business objectives for Strategic Energy included expected future margin and megawatt hours under management.
Target incentives for each of the NEOs were established as a percentage of base pay, using survey data provided by Mercer for comparable positions and markets, as well as comparisons for internal equity. In February of 2006, Mercer provided the Committee with market data on short-term incentive targets at both the 50th and 75th percentiles. With the exception of Mr. Malik, target percentiles for NEOs were increased for 2006 to reflect targets more in line with the 75th percentile of market data. Mr. Malik’s target was already within the 75th percentile range. The reason for the adjustment was that the Committee decided to adopt higher targets in recognition of the extraordinarily challenging business plans of the organization in 2006. The Committee will review this philosophy, however, on an annual basis. The maximum payout under the plan was also increased to 200%, following discussions with Mercer regarding competitive plan design and to provide a higher payout opportunity for higher levels of performance. For 2006, annual incentive plan targets ranged from 50% to 100% of base salaries.
46
The basic structure of the Annual Incentive Plan provides for payout at 100% for target performance for each goal. Fifty percent of the incentive is payable at the threshold level of performance for each goal and 200% of the incentive is payable at the maximum level of performance. If goal performance is below target but above threshold, the amount of the award payable is interpolated between the threshold and target levels. Similarly, goal performance above the target will result in an award for that goal that is higher than target. Performance for any goal which is less than threshold will result in a zero payment for that goal.
Management provides the Committee with individual performance summaries for each NEO, with the exception of the CEO position, and recommends the individual incentive amounts. After considering the performance criteria and results, the Committee approves, and occasionally uses discretion in determining, the final amounts of the individual award. Discretion is principally with regards to the individual performance component. For the 2005 awards paid in 2006, the Committee and Board approved exclusions from core earnings of Seams Elimination Cost Adjustment charges (SECA) based on the fact that these expenses could not have been foreseen or mitigated and were not related to current operations, and one-time severance expenses relating to top grading and a workforce realignment which had positive long-term benefits to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Effective in 2007, the Annual Incentive Plan structure was changed to provide a financial objective of core earnings weighted at 40%, business objectives weighted at 40%, and individual discretionary performance at 20%. The change was made to permit more emphasis on the individual business objectives. There were no changes to individual incentive plan target percentages.
Discretionary Bonuses
From time to time, the Committee may grant a discretionary bonus to an NEO or other executive for extraordinary accomplishments or achievements. This bonus would be paid outside of the normal Annual Incentive Plan. In December 2005, Mr. Downey was awarded a special one-time bonus in an amount of $100,000 in recognition of his contribution for exemplary work in conjunction with the execution of the Comprehensive Energy Plan. No discretionary bonuses were paid in 2006.
Cash Portion of Strategic Energy’s Long-Term Incentive
Strategic Energy’s Long-Term Incentives have been principally cash-based. An equity component, restricted stock, has also been utilized, as discussed below. Mr. Malik is the only NEO that receives cash-based long-term incentives.
Strategic Energy’s Long-Term Incentives are designed to reward sustained value creation by providing competitive incentives for the achievement of long-term financial and operational performance goals. For Mr. Malik, 80% of performance is based on Strategic Energy’s long-term goals, which for the 2005-2006 and 2005-2007 grants included cumulative pre-tax net income, return on average book equity, increase in customer accounts under contract, cumulative reduction in general and administrative expenses, and reduction in supply costs. In October 2006, the Committee modified the goals of both grants to eliminate the return on average book equity metric due to a discontinuity in the way the goal was originally structured in 2004. For 2006-2008 grants, weightings of the goals changed to 31.3% for cumulative pre-tax net income, and 22.9% for each of the remaining three goals. The remaining 20% of Mr. Malik’s long-term grant is in the form of restricted stock based on the Great Plains Energy Long-Term Plan, as described below.
47
Each executive, and including Mr. Malik, is assigned a long-term incentive target based on survey data provided by Mercer for comparable positions and markets, as well as internal equity comparisons. Mr. Malik’s long-term target is 150% of base pay, and, prior to 2007 awards, depending on performance over the period, the cash-based portion of the grant, or 75%, with payments ranging from 0% to 300%. In 2007, the structure of Strategic Energy’s Long-Term Plan changed so that the target award is granted 50% in performance shares and 50% in cash, with payouts ranging from 0% to 275%, plus earned dividends, if any.
No Long-Term Incentive payments were made in 2006 to any Strategic Energy executives based on prior normal annual grants. Mr. Malik did have Company stock vest in November 2006, which represented 1/3 of the restricted shares initially granted at the time of his employment in 2004, and upon which the restrictions had lifted. Grants made to Mr. Malik and other Strategic Energy executives in February 2006 were based on the performance period from 2006 through 2008 and were made 25% in time-based restricted stock and 75% in performance-based awards payable in cash. Performance metrics included cumulative pre-tax net income; return on average book equity; cumulative sales, general, and administrative expenses; and megawatt hours under management.
The Committee has chosen to provide significant long-term award opportunities to Strategic Energy executives to motivate the highest levels of performance within its highly competitive, unregulated environment. Strategic Energy’s executives do not have a defined benefit plan, as do other Great Plains Energy and KCP&L executives.
Equity Compensation
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
As described above, the Committee believes that a substantial portion of compensation for NEOs should be in the form of equity in order to best align the NEO’s interests with the interests of the shareholders. The Committee does not believe that any of the NEOs have amassed equity amounts, or previously been given the opportunity for significant amounts of equity ownership, that should be taken into account in granting normal equity awards.
The Great Plains Energy LTIP was last approved by shareholders in 2002 and allows for grants by the Committee of stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. The Committee discontinued making any new stock option grants in late 2003 because it believed motivating executives based solely on stock price appreciation was not entirely consistent with the interests of its shareholder base. Since that time, a mix of time-based restricted shares and performance shares that vest solely on the basis of the attainment of performance goals have been used. This mix changes somewhat from year to year based on the needs of the Company and the characteristics of its executive team. On an ongoing basis, however, the Committee believes that performance shares should account for the majority of annual long-term grants.
48
Each year, the Committee approves an equity award or awards for each executive, including NEOs, with a cash value that is determined by multiplying the executive’s base salary by a target percentage that is chosen by the Committee. The target percentage is based on both internal comparisons and survey data provided by Mercer which gives long-term incentive information on comparable positions at comparable companies and/or markets in which the Company competes for talent. Generally, the Committee has established total long-term incentive targets at the 50th percentile. Performance shares are typically granted at the February Board meeting, following Committee recommendation, but have also been granted by the Committee in conjunction with the employment of new executives. In those instances, the Committee has opted to grant restricted shares in an amount equal to one or two times annual salary, depending on the level of the executive, and used principally as an attraction device. For performance shares, the performance period is established by the Committee, and is that period during which any performance goals specified with respect to earning any award are to be measured. For the 2005, 2006, and 2007 grants, performance periods have been designated as multiple years beginning with January 1 of the year of the grant. Restricted stock are typically granted at the February Board meeting, effective with the meeting date. However, when restricted shares have been granted by the Committee in conjunction with the employment of a new executive or for other reasons, the effective dates have been at date of hire, date of Committee or Board action, or at a date following the Committee/Board meeting. We do not have any program, plan, or practice to time grants to any executive in coordination with the release of material non-public information. It is the Committee’s intent to generally issue equity grants effective as of the date of hire or date of a Committee/Board meeting, with the grant price determined by the average of the high and low prices for the common stock as reported by the NYSE on the Date of Grant. Changes to the LTIP to be taken for shareholders consideration in May would revise the Fair Market Value calculation to be based on the closing market price for the Company’s common stock as reported on the NYSE for the applicable date.
In 2006, Mr. Downey received performance share awards as a result of the Company’s performance associated with the 2003-2005 LTIP. Under that grant, total shareholder return was compared against the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) index of 64 companies and, based on the Company’s relative performance, the long-term plan provided payment of shares at 78% of target. Other NEOs were not eligible for the 2003 program due to their employment dates. Messrs. Chesser and Downey received restricted stock payouts in October of 2006 for 1/3 of the restricted shares granted at the time of Mr. Chesser’s employment and Mr. Downey’s promotion to Chief Operating Officer, both of which occurred in October of 2003. In 2006, all NEOs received 25% of their total equity grants in restricted stock units that vest solely on the passage of time and, for Messrs. Chesser, Downey, Bassham, and Marshall, 75% in the form of performance shares that become payable only upon the attainment of specific performance goals.
For 2006, long-term incentive target percentages for NEOs ranged from 85% to 150% of base pay. For Great Plains Energy/KCP&L NEOs, performance shares can pay out at the end of a three-year period from 0% to 200% based on performance. For the 2006-2008 performance period, the sole performance metric is total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to the EEI index of electric companies. The Committee believes TSR is a strong indicator of shareholder value and influenced both by successful execution by executives as well as market perceptions of the strength and future prospects of the Company. Depending on how Great Plains Energy ranks, the executives will receive a percentage of the performance share grant according to the following table:
Percentile Rank | | Percentage Payout |
81stand above | 200 | % |
65thto80th | 150 | % |
50thto64th | 100 | % |
35thto49th | 50 | % |
34thand below | 0 | |
49
There will not be any payment of performance shares for a negative return over the 3-year performance period. Awards are paid out in shares of Great Plains Energy common stock unless otherwise determined by the Board. Dividends which accrue on the performance shares will be paid in cash at the end of the performance period based on the number of performance shares earned, if any.
At its regular meeting in February 2007, the Board elected to make a special one-time grant of restricted stock to a number of executive officers (including all NEOs, except Mr. Malik), both to recognize performance over the last year and also to ensure their continued focus and commitment relating to the proposed acquisition of Aquila, Inc., and its subsequent operational integration with Great Plains Energy. The grants to the NEOs were: Mr. Chesser, 80,000 shares; Mr. Downey, 45,000 shares; Mr. Bassham, 25,000 shares and Mr. Marshall, 25,000 shares.
Perquisites
NEOs are eligible to receive various perquisites provided by or paid for by the Company. These perquisites are generally consistent with those offered to executives at comparable organizations and therefore necessary for retention and recruitment. In some cases, the Company requires the executives to pay taxes on the imputed income associated with the value of the perquisite.
All NEOs are eligible for participation in comprehensive financial planning services provided by a national financial counseling firm; a car allowance of $7200 per year; memberships in social and professional clubs and, in limited situations, country clubs; use of certain equipment for personal use, such as home computer equipment; and access to tickets for sporting events and other entertainment which may be used for personal use. In limited situations, the Company may also provide for spousal travel and accommodations when accompanying the executive on out-of-town trips. As required by current tax laws, the executive is assessed imputed income taxes on the subsidized or reimbursed amounts.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan allows selected employees, including NEOs, to defer the receipt of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of awards under the Annual Incentive Plan. An earnings rate is applied to the deferral amounts. This rate is determined annually by Committee members, and generally based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Mercer has advised the Committee that the Plan is generally in line with market practice, although other companies typically provide a lower crediting rate based on participant-directed investments. In addition, the Plan provides for a matching contribution in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of the base salary deferred by the participant, reduced by the matching contribution made for the year to the Participant’s account under the Employee Savings Plus Plan, as described in a later section. This provision addresses the fact that the Company match under the Employee Savings Plus Plan does not begin until after one year of employment. The Deferred Compensation Plan is a nonqualified and unfunded plan, and participants have only an unsecured promise from the Company to pay the amounts when they become due from the general assets of the Company. The Company offers this benefit to provide employees with an opportunity to save, on a tax-deferred basis, amounts in addition to what they can save under the Company’s qualified retirement plans for retirement or future dates. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits them to do this while also receiving earnings on deferred amounts, as described above. We believe the provision of this benefit is important as a retention and recruitment tool as most of the companies with which we compete for executive talent provide a deferral plan for their executives.
50
Post-Termination Compensation
The Company has entered into severance agreements and other compensation and benefit agreements with its executive officers, including NEOs, to help in securing their continued employment and dedication, particularly in situations such as a change in control when an executive may have concerns about his or her own continued employment. The Company believes these agreements and benefits are important as recruitment and retention devices, as virtually all of the companies with which we compete for executive talent have similar agreements in place for their senior executives.
Employment Agreements
Messrs. Chesser, Malik, and Marshall are the only NEOs with ongoing employment arrangements. While the use of employment agreements is considerably more prevalent for executives at comparable companies, the Committee has historically wished to minimize their use at the Company to the extent possible.
Under the terms of an employment arrangement, Mr. Chesser is entitled to receive three times annual salary and bonus if he is terminated without cause prior to reaching age 63. After age 63, any benefit for termination without cause would be one times annual salary and bonus until age 65. Similarly, under the terms of his employment arrangement, Mr. Marshall is entitled to receive two times annual salary and bonus in the event he is terminated other than for cause. Mr. Malik is the only NEO who has a full written employment agreement with Strategic Energy and Great Plains Energy. It provides for three times annual salary and bonus in the event he is terminated without cause or terminated for good reason.
Change-in-Control Severance Agreements
The Company offers change-in-control severance agreements with all its executive officers, including the NEOs, to ensure their continued service, dedication, and objectivity in considering, on behalf of the Company, any transaction that would change the control of the Company. These agreements provide for payments and other benefits if the officer’s employment terminates for a qualifying event or circumstance, such as being terminated without “Cause” or leaving employment for “Good Reason” as these terms are defined in the severance agreements.
In 2006, the Company terminated existing agreements with its officers, including the NEOs, and entered into new agreements which were competitive yet reflective of more modern-day good governance practices. Changes included revisions to definitions (including a revised definition of “change in control” to increase the level of ownership change that must occur for a “change in control” to be considered to have occurred); addition of several restrictive covenants; and other changes. The Company also eliminated a modified single trigger provision for payment, replacing it with a double trigger such that both a change in control and a termination (actual or constructive) of the executive’s employment by the Company must occur, with very limited exceptions. Additional information, including a quantification of benefits that would have been received by NEOs had termination occurred on December 31, 2006, is found under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” on pages 36-41 of this Proxy Statement.
Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan
The Company’s Pension Plan is a funded, tax-qualified, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers employees of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, including the NEOs of those companies. Mr. Malik is the only NEO not covered by a pension plan. Benefits under the Plan are based on the employee’s years of service and the average annual base salary over a specified period. Employees whose age and years of service add up to 85 are entitled to a total monthly annuity equal to 50% of their average base monthly salary for the period of 36 consecutive months in which their earnings were highest. The annuity will be proportionately reduced if years of credited service are less than 30 or if age and years of service do not add up to 85. The compensation covered by the Plan excludes any bonuses or other compensation.
51
The Company also has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan that applies to all Great Plains Energy/KCP&L executives, including NEOs of those companies. The Plan is unfunded and provides out of general assets an amount substantially equal to the difference between the amount that would have been payable under the Pension Plan in the absence of legislation limiting pension benefits and earnings that may be considered in calculating pension benefits, and the amount actually payable under the Plan. It also adds an additional 1/3% of highest average annual base salary for each year of credited service, up to 30 years.
The Committee understands that the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Plan are common among companies within the utility industry and therefore, make up an important element of an executive’s expected compensation package. As the benefits in these plans increase based on an executive’s tenure with the Company, the plans serve as useful retention devices.
Employee Savings Plan
The Great Plains Energy Employee Savings Plus Plan and the Strategic Energy L.L.C., 401(k) Plan are offered to all employees, including NEOs, to encourage them to save some percentage of their cash contribution for retirement. Under the Great Plains Energy plan, employees can contribute, on a pre-tax basis, from 2-40% of base pay, subject to IRS limits for 2006 of $15,000 per year. Participants age 50 and over may also contribute, on a before-tax basis, an additional $5,000 per year. After one year of employment, the Company matches 50% of each dollar contributed by the participant. However, a participant’s contributions in excess of 6% of his or her compensation (which for 2006 cannot be greater than $220,000) will not be matched. The Company match is made with Great Plains Energy stock, although a participant may diversify or transfer out of Company stock at any time and reinvest his or her plan account in different investments. Employees leaving the Company may take all or a portion of the Company match, and associated earnings, based on a vesting schedule over 6 years of service.Employees are always 100% vested in their own contributions and associated earnings on those contributions. Under IRS limits on contributions to qualified retirement plans, the total annual limit on both employer and employee contributions that could be made to the Employee Savings Plan in 2006 was $44,000. The additional $5,000 employee contribution that could be made by individuals age 50 or older in 2006 is not included in this $44,000.
Under the Strategic Energy 401(k) Plan, employees can contribute up to the maximum percentage and dollar amount permissible by IRS limits. The Company matches 100% of each dollar contributed by a participant. However, a participant’s contributions in excess of 6% of his or her compensation (which for 2006 cannot be greater than $220,000) will not be matched.
The Company maintains Savings Plans for its employees, including NEOs, because it wishes to encourage employees to save some percentage of their cash compensation for their eventual retirement. The Savings Plan permits employees to make such savings in a manner that is relatively tax efficient.
52
Tax and Accounting Implications
With respect to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Committee believes that the interests of the Company’s shareholders are best served by not restricting the Committee’s and Company’s discretion and flexibility in developing compensation programs. The additional costs incurred by the Company in 2006 as a result of lost deductions was less than $300,000.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Development Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed with management the CD&A contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the Company’s Proxy Statement filed in connection with the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, each of which will be filed with the SEC.
| Compensation and Development Committee |
| |
| William C. Nelson, Committee Chair |
| Mark A. Ernst, Committee Member |
| Luis A. Jimenez, Committee Member |
| James A. Mitchell, Committee Member |
| Linda H. Talbott, Committee Member |
| Robert H. West, Committee Member |
OTHER BUSINESS
Great Plains Energy is not aware of any other matters that will be presented for shareholder action at the Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly introduced, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the shares they represent according to their judgment.
| By Order of the Board of Directors |
| |
|  |
| |
| Barbara B. Curry |
| Senior Vice President-Corporate Services and Corporate |
| Secretary |
|
Kansas City, Missouri | |
March 19, 2007 | |
53
Appendix 1
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
AMENDED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
SECTION ONE. PURPOSE OF PLAN
The purposes of the Plan are to encourage officers, employees and non-employee directors of the Company to acquire proprietary and vested interest in the growth and performance of the Company, to generate an increased incentive to enhance the value of the Company for the benefit of its customers and shareholders, and to aid in the attraction and retention of exceptionally qualified individuals upon whom the Company's success largely depends.
SECTION TWO. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are applicable herein:
"Award" means the award to a Participant of Restricted Stock, Stock Options, Limited Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Shares or Director Deferred Share Units.
"Award Period" means that period established by the Committee during which any performance goals specified with respect to earning any Award are to be measured.
"Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company.
"Cause" means unless otherwise defined in a Participant's employment agreement or change in control severance agreement with the Company, in which case such definition will apply, (i) the material misappropriation of any of the Company's funds or property; (ii) the conviction of, or the entering of a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to, a felony, or the equivalent thereof; (iii) commission of an act of willful damage, willful misrepresentation, willful dishonesty, or other willful conduct that can reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, reputation, or financial situation of the Company; or (iv) gross negligence or willful misconduct in performance of a Participant's duties; provided, however, "cause" shall not exist under clause (iv), above, with respect to an act or failure to act unless (A) the Participant has been provided written notice describing in sufficient detail the acts or failure to act giving rise to the Company's assertion of such gross negligence or misconduct, (B) been provided a reasonable period to remedy any such occurrence and (C) failed to sufficiently remedy the occurrence.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Reference in the Plan to any section of the Code shall be deemed to include any amendments or successor provisions to such section and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Committee" means (i) the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board, composed of not less than two directors, each of whom is both a "non-employee director" (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act) and an "outside director" (within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)) or (ii) any other committee of the Board to whom the Board has delegated its authority under this Plan.
54
"Common Stock" means the common stock, without par value, of the Company, or such other class of shares or other securities as may be subject to the Plan as a result of an adjustment made pursuant to the provisions of Section Fifteen I.
"Company" means Great Plains Energy Incorporated and its successors, including any Company as provided in Section Fifteen J.
"Date of Disability" means the date on which a Participant is classified as disabled as defined in the Company's Long-Term Disability Plan.
"Date of Grant" means, unless the Committee otherwise specifies a later Date of Grant in the Committee's applicable granting resolution, the date on which an Award is granted by the Committee.
"Date of Retirement" means the date of normal retirement or early retirement as defined in the Company's pension plan.
"Deferred Compensation Plan" means the Great Plains Energy Incorporated Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended.
"Director" means a member of the Board, a member of the board of directors of any Subsidiary, or any honorary, advisory or emeritus director of the Company or any Subsidiary.
"Director Deferred Share Unit" means, pursuant to Section Twelve of this Plan, a Non-Employee Director's right to receive a payment following the Non-Employee Director's termination from service as a Director, in cash or Common Stock, of an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock.
"Director Equity Payment Fees" means any fees payable to a Non-Employee Director in the form of common stock of the Company for his or her service as a Director of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
"Director Shares" means, pursuant to Section Twelve of the Plan, shares of Common Stock issued to a Director, as payment for serving as a Director.
"Eligible Employee" means any person employed by the Company or a Subsidiary on a regularly scheduled basis during any portion of an Award Period and who satisfies all of the requirements of Section Six.
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
"Fair Market Value" means the closing market price for the Common Stock as reported on the New York Exchange Composite Transactions for the applicable measuring date.
"Good Reason" means, without a Participant's written consent and unless otherwise defined in a Participant's employment agreement or change in control severance agreement with the Company (in which case such definition will apply), any of the following:
55
(1) Any material and adverse reduction or material and adverse diminution in a Participant's position (including status, offices, titles and reporting requirements), authority, duties or responsibilities held, exercised or assigned at any time during the 90-day period immediately preceding the Change in Control;
(2) Any reduction in a Participant's annual base salary as in effect immediately preceding the Change in Control or as the same may be increased from time to time; or
(3) A Participant being required by the Company to be based at any office or location that is more than 70 miles from the location where the Participant was employed immediately preceding the Change in Control.
Provided, however, notwithstanding the occurrence of any of the events set forth above in this definition, Good Reason shall not include for the purpose of this definition (1) an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of notice thereof given by the Participant, or (2) any reduction in the Participant's base annual salary or reduction in benefits received by the Participant where such reduction is in connection with a company-wide reduction in salaries or benefits.
"Incentive Stock Option" means an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.
"Limited Stock Appreciation Right" means an Award granted under Section Nine.
"Non-Employee Director" means a Director who is not employed by the Company or any Subsidiary.
"Option" or "Stock Option" means either a non-qualified stock option or an Incentive Stock Option granted under Section Eight.
"Option Period" or "Option Periods" means the period or periods during which an Option is exercisable as described in Section Eight E.
"Participant" means an Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director who has been granted an Award under the Plan.
"Plan" means the Great Plains Energy Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended.
"Performance Award" means any Award that will be issued or granted, or become vested or payable, as the case may be, upon the achievement of certain performance goals (as described in Section Eleven B) to a Participant pursuant to Section Eleven.
"Performance Shares" means an Award granted under Section Ten.
"Restricted Stock" means an Award granted under Section Seven.
"Subsidiary" means any corporation of which 50% or more of its outstanding voting stock or voting power is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company.
56
"Termination" means resignation or discharge from employment with the Company or any one of its Subsidiaries, except in the event of death, disability, or retirement.
SECTION THREE. EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION AND STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL
A. | | Effective Date. |
|
| | The Plan originally became effective on May 5, 1992 and was subsequently amended effective on May 5, 1992. This Plan is amended effective May ____, 2007 and applies only with respect to Awards granted after such date. |
|
B. | | Period for Grants of Awards. |
|
| | Awards may be granted until May ___, 2017. |
|
C. | | Termination of the Plan. |
|
| | The Plan shall continue in effect until all matters relating to the payment of Awards and administration of the Plan have been settled. |
SECTION FOUR. ADMINISTRATION
A. | | General Powers. |
|
| | The Plan shall be administered by the Committee for, and on behalf of, the Board. The Committee shall have all of the powers (other than amending or terminating this Plan as provided in Section Fifteen) respecting the Plan. All questions of interpretation and application of the Plan, or of the terms and conditions pursuant to which Awards are granted, exercised or forfeited under the provisions hereof, shall be subject to the determination of the Committee. Any such determination shall be final and binding upon all parties affected thereby. |
|
B. | | Delegation. |
|
| | Notwithstanding the general administrative powers discussed above, the Board may, by resolution, expressly delegate to a special committee consisting of two or more directors, who may also be officers of the Company, the authority, within specified parameters, to (i) grant Eligible Employees Awards under the Plan, and (ii) determine the number of such Awards to be received by any such participants; provided, however, that if such delegation of duties and responsibilities is to officers of the Company or to directors who are not "non-employee directors" (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act) and "outside directors" (within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)), such officers or directors may not grant Awards to eligible participants (a) who are subject to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act at the time of grant, or (b) who, at the time of grant, are anticipated to become during the term of the Award, "covered employees" as defined in Section 162(m)(3) of the Code. The acts of such delegates shall be treated hereunder as acts of the Board and such delegates shall report regularly to the Board and the Compensation and Development Committee regarding the delegated duties and responsibilities and any Awards so granted. |
57
SECTION FIVE. | | GRANT OFAWARDSANDLIMITATIONOFNUMBEROFSHARES AWARDED |
The Committee may, from time to time, grant Awards to one or more Eligible Employees or Non-Employee Directors, provided that (i) subject to any adjustment pursuant to Section Fifteen I, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under this Plan may not exceed 5,000,000 shares; (ii) to the extent that an award lapses or the rights of the Participant to whom it was granted terminate, any shares of Common Stock subject to such Award shall again be available for the grant of an Award under the Plan; and (iii) shares delivered by the Company under the Plan may be authorized but unissued Common Stock, Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company or Common Stock purchased on the open market (including private purchases) in accordance with applicable securities laws. In determining the size of the Awards, the Committee shall assess the performance of theEligible Employees against criteria to be established by the Committee, from time to time, based on the Company's performance (such as stockholder and customer related factors) and shall take into account a Participant's responsibility level, potential, cash compensation level, and the Fair Market Value of the common stock at the time of Awards, as well as such other considerations as it deems appropriate. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which an Award or Awards may be granted to any Participant in any one taxable year of the Company shall not exceed 100,000 shares (increased, proportionately, in the event of any stock split or stock dividend with respect to the shares in accordance with Section Fifteen I).
SECTION SIX. ELIGIBILITY
Officers, other employees and Non-Employee Directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries (including officers or salaried full-time employees who are members of the Board) who, in the opinion of the Committee, make or are expected to make significant contributions to the continued growth, development, and financial success of the Company or one or more of its Subsidiaries shall be eligible to receive Awards. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall from time to time select from such eligible persons those to whom Awards shall be granted and determine the amount of such Awards. In no event shall the existence of this Plan create an obligation or duty of the Committee or the Company to grant an Award to any person under this Plan.
SECTION SEVEN. RESTRICTED STOCK
A. | | Grant of Restricted Stock. |
|
| | The Committee may grant an Award of one or more Shares of Restricted Stock to any Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director. |
|
| | A Restricted Stock Award made pursuant to this Section Seven shall be in the form of shares of Common Stock, restricted as provided herein. The Restricted Stock shall be issued in the name of the Participant and shall bear a restrictive legend prohibiting sale, transfer, pledge or hypothecation of the Restricted Stock until the expiration of the restriction period. |
|
| | The Committee may also impose such other restriction and conditions on the restricted stock as it deems appropriate. |
|
| | Upon issuance to the Participant of Restricted Stock, the Participant shall have the right to vote the Restricted Stock. |
58
B. | | Restriction Period. |
| | |
| | At the time Restricted Stock is granted, the Committee shall establish a restriction period applicable to such Award which shall not be less than one year nor more than ten years. Each Restricted Stock Award may have a different restriction period at the discretion of the Committee and the Committee is authorized, in its sole discretion and at any time, to accelerate the time at which any or all of the restrictions on the Restricted Stock shall lapse or to remove any or all of such restrictions. Notwithstanding the above, shares of Restricted Stock may not be sold or transferred by a Participant within six months of the date on which such shares become vested except to the extent necessary to satisfy any minimum withholding tax liability resulting from the vesting of the Restricted Stock. |
| | |
C. | | Forfeiture. |
|
| | Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, upon the termination of employment of a Participant holding Restricted Stock for any reason during the period of time in which some or all of the shares are subject to restrictions, all shares of Restricted Stock held by the Participant and still subject to restriction will be forfeited by the Participant and reacquired by the Company; provided that in the event of a Participant's retirement, Disability, death, or in cases of special circumstances, the Committee may, in its discretion, waive in whole or in part any or all of the remaining restrictions with respect to the Participant's shares of Restricted Stock. |
|
D. | | Payout of Award. |
|
| | Upon completion of the restriction period and satisfaction of any other restrictions required by the Award, all restrictions on the Restricted Stock will expire and certificates representing the underlying shares will be issued to the Participant. |
|
SECTION EIGHT. STOCK OPTION
A. | | Grant of Option. |
|
| | The Committee may grant an Award of one or more Options to any Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director. |
|
B. | | Stock Option Agreement. |
|
| | Each Option granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by a "Stock Option Agreement" between the Company and the Participant containing such terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee, including, without limitations, provisions to qualify Incentive Stock Options as such under Section 422 of the Code; provided, however, that each Stock Option shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: (i) the Options are exercisable either in total or in part with a partial exercise not affecting the exercisability of the balance of the Option; (ii) every share of Common Stock purchased through the exercise of an Option shall be paid for in full at the time of the exercise; (iii) each Option shall cease to be exercisable, as to any share of Common Stock, at the earliest of (a) the Participant's purchase of the Common Stock to which the Option relates, (b) the exercise of a related Limited Stock Appreciation Right, or (c) the lapse of the Option; and (iv) Options shall not be transferable by the Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order validly issued and approved by a Court of proper jurisdiction. Non-Employee Directors shall be ineligible to receive Incentive Stock Options. |
59
C. | | Option Price. |
|
| | The Option Price per share of Common Stock shall be set by the grant, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value at the Date of Grant. |
|
D. | | Form of Payment. |
|
| | At the time of an exercise of an Option, the Option price shall be payable in cash or in previously-owned shares of Common Stock or in a combination thereof. When Common Stock is used in full or partial payment of the Option price, it shall be valued at the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is exercised. |
E. | | Other Terms and Conditions. |
|
| | Each Option shall become exercisable in such manner and within such Option Period or periods not to exceed ten years from its Date of Grant, as set forth in the Stock Option Agreement. |
|
F. | | Lapse of Option. |
|
| | An Option will lapse upon the first occurrence of one of the following circumstances: (i) ten years from the Date of Grant; (ii) three months following the Participant's Date of Retirement; (iii) at the time of a Participant's Termination; (iv) at the expiration of the Option Period set by the grant; or (v) twelve months from the Date of Disability. If, however, the Participant dies within the Option Period and prior to the lapse of the Option, the Option shall lapse unless it is exercised within the Option Period or twelve months from the date of the Participant's death, whichever is earlier, by the Participant's legal representative or representatives or by the person or persons entitled to do so under the Participant's will or, if the Participant shall fail to make testamentary disposition of such Option or shall die intestate, by the person or persons entitled to receive said Option under the applicable laws of descent and distribution. |
|
G. | | Rights as a Stockholder. |
|
| | A participant or a transferee of a Participant shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any shares of common stock covered by an Option, until the date the Option is exercised, except as provided in Section Fifteen A. |
|
H. | | Early Disposition of Common Stock. |
|
| | If a Participant shall engage in a disqualifying disposition (as such term or successor term is then used under the Code) with respect to any shares of common stock purchased pursuant to an Incentive Stock Option (presently within one year from the date the shares were acquired or within two years from the Date of Grant of the Option), then, to provide the Company with the opportunity to claim the benefit of any income tax deduction which may be available to it under the circumstances, the Participant shall, within ten days of such disposition, notify the Company of the dates of acquisition and disposition of such shares of common stock, the number of shares so disposed and the consideration, if any, received therefore. |
60
I. | | Individual Dollar Limitations. |
|
| | The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of Award) of the common stock, with respect to which an Incentive Stock Option is exercisable for the first time by a Participant during any calendar year (whether under this Plan or another plan or arrangement of the Company) shall not exceed $100,000 (or such other limit as may be in effect under the Code on the date of Award). |
|
J. | | No Obligation to Exercise Option. |
|
| | The granting of an Option shall impose no obligation on the Participant to exercise such Option. |
| | |
K. | | Six Month Period. |
|
| | At least six months must elapse between the date the Option is acquired by the Participant and the date of disposition of the Option (other than upon exercise or conversion) or the common stock for which it is exercisable. |
|
L | | No Repricing of Options Unless Repricing Subject to Stockholder Approval. |
|
| | In no event may the Committee grant Options in replacement of Options previously granted under this Plan or any other compensation plan of the Company, or may the Committee amend outstanding Options (including amendments to adjust an Option price) unless such replacement or adjustment (i) is subject to and approved by the Company's stockholders or (ii) would not be deemed to be a repricing under the rules of the NYSE. |
SECTION NINE. LIMITED STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
A. | | Grant of Limited Stock Appreciation Rights. |
|
| | The Committee may grant Limited Stock Appreciation Rights to any Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director provided that the Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director is holding an Option granted under the Plan. |
|
| | Limited Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted with respect to an Option at the time of the Option grant or any time thereafter up to six months prior to the Option's expiration. |
|
B. | | Exercise of Limited Stock Appreciation Rights. |
|
| | Limited Stock Appreciation Rights will be automatically exercised one day after an event of Change of Control (as defined in Section Thirteen). A Limited Stock Appreciation Right cannot be exercised in any other manner. Notwithstanding the above, a Limited Stock Appreciation Right will only be exercised if the Change in Control event occurred six months after the date of the grant of the Limited Stock Appreciation Right and the Option to which it relates has not previously been exercised. |
|
| | The exercise of a Limited Stock Appreciation Right will cancel any related Option and allow the holder to receive in cash an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of one share of Common Stock over the Option price, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the related Option. |
|
| | In the event of an exercise of a Limited Stock Appreciation Right, the number of shares reserved for issuance shall be reduced by the number of shares covered by the Stock Option Award. |
61
SECTION TEN. PERFORMANCE SHARES
A. | | Grant of Performance Shares. |
| | |
| | The Committee may grant an Award of one or more Performance Shares to any Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director. |
| | |
| | A Performance Share is the right to receive a payment from the Company with respect to such Performance Share subject to satisfaction of such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. Performance Shares shall be credited to a Performance Share account to be maintained for each Participant. Each Performance Share shall be deemed to be equivalent of one share of Common Stock. The Award of Performance Shares under the Plan shall not entitle the participant to any interest in or to any dividend, voting, or other rights of a stockholder of the Company. |
|
| | A grant of Performance Shares may be made by the Committee during the term of the Plan. |
|
| | The Participant shall be entitled to receive payment for each Performance Share of an amount based on the achievement of performance measures for such Award Period as determined by the Committee. During or before the Award Period, the Committee shall have the right to establish requirements or other criteria for measuring such performance. |
|
B. | | Form and Timing of Payment. |
|
| | Except in the event of a Change of Control, no payment in respect of Performance Shares shall be made before the end of an Award Period or if the Participant is not or has not been at all times since the Performance Shares were granted, an employee of the Company. Any Payment to be made shall be made as soon as practicable following the end of the Award Period. |
|
| | The payment to which a Participant shall be entitled at the end of an Award Period shall be a dollar amount equal to the Fair Market Value (determined as of the business day immediately preceding the date of payment) of a number of shares of Common Stock equal in number to the quotient obtained by dividing (a) the Fair Market Value of a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the original number of Performance Shares granted by (b) the original Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant of the Performance Shares. Stock received in settlement of Performance Shares may not be disposed of within six months of the date on which the Performance Shares were granted. Payment shall normally be made in Common Stock. The Committee, however, in its sole discretion, may authorize payment in such combinations of cash and Common Stock or all in cash as it deems appropriate. |
62
Examples:For illustration purposes only, two hypothetical examples of the application of this Section Ten B are as follows:
If a Participant is granted 1,000 Performance Shares on March 1, 2004 when the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock is $30, and on the date the Performance Shares become entitled to payment, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock is $40 per share, the Participant will be entitled to receive a payment (either in cash or Shares of Common Stock, or both) equal in value to $53,320 (or 1,333 Shares of Common Stock). Such amount determined as follows:
1,000 Performance Shares (original grant) multiplied by $40 (current FMV) = $40,000.
$40,000 divided by $30 (the FMV of a Share of Common Stock on Date of Grant) = 1,333 shares.
1,333 shares multiplied by $40 per share = $53,320.
If, on the other hand, a Participant is granted 1,000 Performance Shares on March 1, 2004 when the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock is $30, and on the date the Performance Shares become entitled to payment, the Fair Market Value of a Share of Common Stock is $20 per share, the Participant will be entitled to receive a payment (either in cash or Shares of Common Stock) equal in value to $13,333.32 (or 666.666 Shares of Common Stock). Such amount being determined as follows:
1,000 Performance Shares (original grant) multiplied by $20 (current FMV) = $20,000.
$20,000 divided by $30 (the FMV of a Share of Common Stock on Date of Grant) = 666.666 shares.
666.666 shares multiplied by $20 per share = $13,333.32.
C. | | Forfeiture. |
|
| | Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, upon the termination of employment of a Participant holding Performance Shares for any reason before some or all of the Performance Shares have been paid, all Performance Shares which are not otherwise eligible to be paid will be forfeited by the Participant; provided that in the event of a Participant's retirement, Disability, death, or in cases of special circumstances, the Committee may, in its discretion, either accelerate payment on some or all of the Performance Shares or provide that the payout of any Performance Shares will be prorated for service during the Award Period and paid at the end of the Award Period. |
|
D. | | Dividend Equivalents |
|
| | The Committee may provide in an Award agreement that, as of the date any dividend is paid to holders of shares of Common Stock, one of more Performance Share shall also be credited with a hypothetical cash credit equal to the per share dividend paid on a share of Common Stock. Unless otherwise provided in an Award agreement, if the Award agreement provides for the payment of dividend equivalents, such dividend equivalents will be equal to the dividends paid during the entire Award Period for which the Performance Shares relate and not just that period of time after the Performance Shares were granted. At the end of an Award Period and provided the Performance Shares have not been forfeited in accordance with the terms of this Plan, the Participant shall be paid, in a lump sum cash payment, the aggregate amount of such hypothetical dividend equivalents. |
63
SECTION ELEVEN. PERFORMANCE AWARDS; SECTION 162(M) PROVISIONS.
A. | | Terms of Performance Awards. |
|
| | The Committee may grant one or more Performance Awards to any Eligible Employee or Non-Employee Director. |
| | |
| | Except as provided in Section Thirteen, Performance Awards will be issued or granted, or become vested or payable, only after the end of the relevant Award Period. The performance goals to be achieved for each Award Period and the amount of the Award to be distributed upon satisfaction of those performance goals shall be conclusively determined by the Committee. When the Committee determines whether a performance goal has been satisfied for any Award Period, the Committee, where the Committee deems appropriate, may make such determination using calculations which alternatively include and exclude one, or more than one, "extraordinary items" as determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), and the Committee may determine whether a performance goal has been satisfied for any Award Period taking into account the alternative which the Committee deems appropriate under the circumstances. The Committee also may establish performance goals that are determined using GAAP or other non-GAAP financial measures and may exclude or take into account mark-to-market gains and losses on energy contracts, any unusual or non-recurring items, including the charges or costs associated with restructurings of the Company, discontinued operations, and the cumulative effects of accounting changes and, further, may take into account any unusual or non-recurring events affecting the Company, changes in applicable tax laws or accounting principles or such other items and factors as the Committee may determine reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances (including any factors that could result in the Company's paying non-deductible compensation to an Employee or Non-Employee Director). |
| | |
B. | | Performance Goals. |
| | |
| | If an Award is subject to this Section Eleven, then the lapsing of restrictions thereon, or the vesting thereof, and the distribution of cash, shares of Common Stock or other property pursuant thereto, as applicable, shall be subject to the achievement of one or more objective performance goals established by the Committee, which shall be based on the attainment of one or any combination of the following metrics (which may be calculated on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis), and which may be established on an absolute or relative basis for the Company as a whole or any of its subsidiaries, operating divisions or other operating units: |
| 1. | | Earnings measures (either in the aggregate or on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 2. | | Growth or rate of growth in earnings measures (either in the aggregate or on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 3. | | Net income or loss (either in the aggregate or on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 4. | | Cash flow provided by operations (either in the aggregate or on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 5. | | Growth or rate of growth in cash flow (either in the aggregate or on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 6. | | Cash flow measures (either in the aggregate on a per-share basis); |
| |
| 7. | | Reductions in expense levels, determined either on a Company-wide basis or in respect of any one or more subsidiaries or business units; |
| |
| 8. | | Operating and maintenance cost management and employee productivity; |
64
| 9. | | Stockholder returns (including return on assets, investments, equity, or gross sales); |
| |
| 10. | | Return measures (including return on assets, equity, or sales); |
| |
| 11. | | Growth or rate of growth in return measures (including return on assets, equity, or sales); |
| |
| 12. | | Share price (including attainment of a specified per-share price during the Award Period; growth measures and total stockholder return or attainment by the shares of common stock of a specified price for a specified period of time); |
| |
| 13. | | Strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified revenue, market share, market penetration, geographic business expansion goals, objectively identified project milestones, production volume levels, cost targets, and goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures; |
| |
| 14. | | Achievement of business or operational goals such as market share and/or business development; and/or |
| |
| 15. | | Achievement of credit ratings or certain credit quality levels; |
| provided that applicable performance goals may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis; and provided further that the Committee may, when the applicable performance goals are established, provide that the formula for such goals may include or exclude items to measure specific objectives, including but not limited to losses from discontinued operations, extraordinary gains or losses, the cumulative effect of accounting changes, acquisitions or divestitures, foreign exchange impacts, mark-to-market gains and losses from energy contracts, and any unusual, nonrecurring gain or loss. In addition to the foregoing performance goals, the performance goals shall also include any performance goals which are set forth in a Company bonus or incentive plan, if any, which has been approved by the Company's stockholders, which are incorporated herein by reference. Such performance goals shall be set by the Committee within the time period prescribed by, and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of, Code Section 162(m). |
65
C. | | Adjustments. |
|
| | Except as provided in Section Fifteen I and Section Thirteen or as provided for in the immediately following sentence, with respect to any Award that is subject to this Section Eleven, the Committee may not adjust upwards the amount payable pursuant to such Award, nor may it waive the achievement of the applicable performance goals except in the case of the death or Disability of the Participant. The Committee may, at the time it initially establishes one or more performance goals, provide that the amount payable upon achievement of such performance goal may be increased in the discretion of the Committee or that the achievement of the applicable performance goals may be waived. If the Committee does not specifically provide for such flexibility at the time it establishes a performance goal, the Committee will not be permitted to adjust upwards the amount payable pursuant to the Award nor waive the achievement of the applicable performance goal except in the case of the death or Disability of the Participant. |
|
D. | | Other Restrictions. |
| | |
| | The Committee shall have the power to impose such other restrictions on Awards subject to this Section Eleven as it may deem necessary or appropriate to insure that such Awards satisfy all requirements for "performance-based compensation" within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)(4)(B). |
| | |
E. | | Section 162(m) Limitations. |
| | |
| | Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, if the Committee determines at the time any Award is granted to a Participant that such Participant is, or is likely to be at the time he or she recognizes income for federal income tax purposes in connection with such Award, a "Covered Employee," then the Committee may provide that this Section Eleven is applicable to such Award. |
SECTION TWELVE. DIRECTOR SHARES and DIRECTOR DEFERRED SHARE UNITS
A. | | Election to Receive Award of Director Shares or Director Deferred Share Units. |
|
| | Each Non-Employee Director may elect to have his/her Director Equity Payment Fees (i) paid on a current basis in the form of Director Shares, or, pursuant to this Section Twelve, on a deferred basis. Any election to have Director Equity Payment Fees converted into Director Deferred Share Units and paid on a deferred basis shall be made in accordance with Section Twelve B below. In the absence of any election made by a Non-Employee Director, all Director's Equity Payment Fees will be paid on a current basis though the issuance of Director Shares. |
|
B. | | Timing of Election to Convert Director Equity Payment Fees. |
|
| | Each Non-Employee Director that desires to convert all or a portion of his or her Director Equity Payment Fees into Director Deferred Share Units shall make such conversion election on the Director's Deferred Equity Payment Election Form (the "Election Form") and file such Election Form with the Plan Administrator before the first day of the calendar year in which services related to the Director Equity Payment Fees to be converted are to be performed. Any Election Form delivered by a Non-Employee Director shall be irrevocable with respect to any Director Equity Payment Fees covered by the elections set forth therein. Such Election Form shall remain in effect for subsequent calendar years until a written notice to revise the Election Form is delivered to the Plan Administrator before the first day of the calendar year in which the services related to the Director Equity Payment Fees subject to the revision are performed. As of each December 31, the election becomes irrevocable with respect to Director Equity Payment Fees payable with respect to services performed in the immediately following calendar year. |
|
| | Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, an election made by an individual in the calendar year in which he or she first becomes a Non-Employee Director may be made pursuant to an Election Form delivered to the Company within thirty (30) days after the date on which he or she becomes a Non-Employee Director and shall be effective with respect to Director Equity Payment Fees earned from and after the date such Election Form is delivered to the Company. |
66
C. | | Director Equity Payment Fees Conversion Into Director Deferred Share Units. |
|
| | Any Director Equity Payment Fees that are to be converted into Director Deferred Share Units shall be so converted on each day the Director Equity Payment Fees would otherwise have been payable to the Director. The number of Director Deferred Share Units to be granted to a Non-Employee Director shall be equal to the number of shares of Common Stock that otherwise would have been payable on such day to the Director. |
|
D. | | Director Deferred Share Units Account. |
|
| | The Company will create and maintain on its books a Director Deferred Share Unit Account for each Non-Employee Director who has made an election to convert Director Equity Payment Fees into Director Deferred Share Units. The Company will credit to such account the number of Director Deferred Share Units earned pursuant to the Non-Employee's Director's conversion election. |
|
E. | | Dividends. |
|
| | As of the date any dividend is paid to holders of shares of Common Stock, each Director Deferred Share Unit Account, regardless of whether the Non-Employee Director is then a Director, will be credited with additional Director Deferred Share Units equal to the number of shares of the Common Stock that could have been purchased with the amount which would have been paid as dividends on a number of shares (including fractions of a share to three decimals) of the Common Stock equal to the number of Director Deferred Share Units credited to such Director Deferred Share Unit Account as of the record date applicable to such dividend. The number of additional Director Deferred Share Units to be credited will be calculated to three decimals by dividing the amount which would have been paid as dividends by the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock as of the applicable dividend payment date. In the case of dividends paid in property other than cash, the amount of the dividend shall be deemed to be the fair market value of the property at the time of the payment of the dividend, as determined in good faith by the Committee. |
|
F. | | Distribution of Director Deferred Share Units. |
|
| | On the January 31stnext following the date the Non-Employee Director's service on the Board terminates for any reason, all of a Non-Employee Director's Director Deferred Share Units credited to the Non-Employee's Director Deferred Share Unit Account shall be converted into an equal amount of shares of Common Stock and all whole shares of Common Stock shall be distributed, in kind, to the Non-Employee Director, or to his beneficiaries in the event of his death, in a single lump sum. Any fractional Deferred Share Unit shall be paid in cash, calculated by multiplying the fractional Deferred Share Unit by the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock as of the business day immediately preceding the date of distribution. |
|
G. | | Director Deferred Share Unit Status. |
|
| | Except for purposes of the Company's Director Stock Ownership guidelines, Director Deferred Share Units are not, and do not constitute, shares of Common Stock, and no right as holder of shares of Common Stock devolves upon a Non-Employee Director by reason of having Director Share Units credited to his or her account. |
|
67
SECTION THIRTEEN. CHANGE IN CONTROL
In the event that, within the period commencing on a Change in Control (as defined below) of the Company and ending on the second anniversary of the Change in Control, and except as the Committee may expressly provide otherwise, a Participant's employment with the Company or one of its affiliates is terminated other than for Cause, or the Participant voluntarily resigns for Good Reason, then (i) all Stock Options then outstanding shall become fully exercisable unless Limited Stock Appreciation Rights were granted in connection with the Stock Options which in such event the Limited Stock Appreciation Rights will be automatically exercised as provided for in Section Nine herein; (ii) all restrictions (other than restrictions imposed by law) and conditions of all Restricted Stock Awards then outstanding shall be deemed satisfied as of the date of the Participant's termination of employment; and (iii) all Performance Share Awards shall be deemed to have been fully earned as of the date of the Participant's termination of employment, subject to the limitation that any Award which has been outstanding less than six months on the date of the Participant's termination of employment shall not be afforded such treatment.Notwithstanding the above paragraph, if a Participant is a "specified employee," as defined in Code section 409A(a)(1)(B)(i) and the payment of any Performance Share Awards would be required under Code section 409A to be delayed for a minimum of six months following the Participant's termination of employment, the payment of any Performance Share Awards shall be so delayed.
For purposes of this Plan, a "Change in Control" means the occurrence of one of the following events, whether in a single transaction or a series of related transactions:
1. any Person (as such term is defined in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its affiliates other than in connection with the acquisition by the Company or its affiliates of a business) representing 35% or more of either the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company or the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities; or
2. the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of directors then serving: individuals who, on the date hereof, constitute the Board and any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company, as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company's stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors on the date hereof or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved; or
68
3. the consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar corporate transaction of the Company, whether or not the Company is the surviving corporation in such transaction, other than (A) a merger, consolidation, or reorganization that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, at least 60% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger, consolidation or reorganization, or (B) a merger, consolidation or reorganization effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities Beneficially Owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its affiliates other than in connection with the acquisition by the Company or its affiliates of a business) representing 20% or more of either the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company or the combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities; or
4. the occurrence of, or the stockholders of the Company approve a Plan of, a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company's assets, other than a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company's assets to an entity, at least 60% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by Persons in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no "Change in Control" shall be deemed to have occurred if there is consummated any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the record holders of the common stock of the Company immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of the Company immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.
SECTION FOURTEEN. AMENDMENT OF PLAN
The Board may at any time and from time to time alter, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan in whole or in part, except (i) no such action may be taken without shareholder approval which increases the benefits accruing to Participants pursuant to the Plan, increases the number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued pursuant to the Plan (except as provided in Section Fifteen I), extends the period for granting Options under the Plan, modifies the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan, or requires shareholder approval under any law or regulation in effect at the time such amendment is proposed for adoption; (ii) no such action may be taken without the consent of the Participant to whom any Award shall theretofore have been granted, which adversely affects the rights of such Participant concerning such Award, except as such termination or amendment of the Plan is required by statute, or rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and (iii) no such action may be taken if the proposed amendment must be in the discretion of the Committee to comply with the disinterested administration requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.
69
SECTION FIFTEEN. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. | | Dividends. |
|
| | The recipient of an Award may, if so determined by the Committee, be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, dividends or their equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock covered by the Award and subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and any applicable Award agreement. |
|
B. | | Nontransferability. |
|
| | No benefit provided under this Plan shall be subject to alienation or assignment by a Participant (or by any person entitled to such benefit pursuant to the terms of this Plan), nor shall it be subject to attachment or other legal process of whatever nature. Any attempted alienation, assignment or attachment shall be void and of no effect whatsoever. Notwithstanding the above, Stock Options and Limited Stock Appreciation Rights may be transferred as provided in any Stock Option Agreement. |
|
| | Payment shall be made only into the hands of the Participant entitled to receive the same or into the hands of the Participant's authorized legal representative. Deposit of any sum in any financial institution to the credit of any Participant (or of a person entitled to such sum pursuant to the terms of this Plan) shall constitute payment into the hands of that Participant (or such person). |
|
C. | | No Employment Right. |
|
| | Neither this Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any right to be retained as an officer or employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. |
|
D. | | Tax Withholding. |
|
| | The Company shall be authorized to withhold under the Plan the amount of withholding taxes due in respect of an Award or payment hereunder and to take such other actions as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations for the payment of taxes. Such withholding may be deducted in cash from the value of any Award. |
|
E. | | Fractional Shares. |
|
| | Any fractional shares shall be eliminated at the time of payment or payout by rounding down for fractions of less than one-half and rounding up for fractions equal to or more than one-half. No cash settlements shall be made with respect to fractional shares eliminated by rounding. |
|
F. | | Government and Other Regulations. |
|
| | The obligation of the Company to make payment of Awards in common stock or otherwise shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any government agencies as may be required. Except as required by law, the Company shall be under no obligation to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Act"), any of the shares of common stock issued, delivered or paid in settlement under the Plan. If common stock granted under the Plan may in certain circumstances be exempt from registration under the Act, the Company may restrict its transfer in such manner as it deems advisable to ensure such exempt status. |
70
G. | | Indemnification. |
|
| | Each person who is or at any time serves as a member of the Committee shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from (i) any loss, cost liability, or expenses that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by such person in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which such person may be a party or in which such person may be involved by reason of any action or failure to act under the Plan; and (ii) any and all amounts paid by such person in satisfaction of judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding relating to the Plan. Each person covered by this indemnification shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before such person undertakes to handle and defend it on such person's own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Restated Articles of Consolidation or By-Laws of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify such person or hold such person harmless. |
|
H. | | Reliance on Reports. |
|
| | Each member of the Committee shall be fully justified in relying or acting in good faith upon any report made by the independent public accountants of the Company and its Subsidiaries and upon any other information furnished in connection with the Plan. In no event shall any person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee be liable for any determination made or other action taken or any omission to act in reliance upon any such report or information or for any action taken, including the furnishing of information, or failure to act, if in good faith. |
|
I. | | Changes in Capital Structure. |
|
| | If, without the receipt of consideration therefore by the Company, the Company shall at any time increase or decrease the number of its outstanding shares of Common Stock or change in any way the rights and privileges of such Common Stock such as, but not limited to, the payment of a stock dividend or any other distribution upon such Common Stock payable in Stock, or through a stock split, subdivision, consolidation, combination, reclassification or recapitalization involving the Common Stock, such that any adjustment is determined by the Committee to be appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, then in relation to the Stock that is affected by one or more of the above events, the numbers, rights and privileges of (i) the shares of Common Stock as to which Awards may be granted under the Plan, and (ii) the shares of Common Stock then included in each outstanding Award granted hereunder, shall be increased, decreased or changed in like manner as if they had been issued and outstanding, fully paid and non assessable at the time of such occurrence. |
|
| | If any adjustment or substitution provided for in this Section Fifteen I shall result in the creation of a fractional share of Common Stock under any Award, such fractional share shall be rounded to the nearest whole share and fractional shares shall not be issued. |
|
| | In the case of any such substitution or adjustment affecting an Option or a Limited Stock Appreciation Right, such substitution or adjustments shall be made in a manner that is in accordance with the substitution and assumption rules set forth in Treasury Regulations 1.424- 1 and the applicable guidance relating to Code Section 409A. |
71
J. | | Company Successors. |
|
| | In the event the Company becomes party to a merger, consolidation, sale of substantially all of its assets or any other corporate reorganization in which the Company will not be the surviving corporation or in which the holders of the common stock will receive securities of another corporation, then such Company shall assume the rights and obligations of the Company under this Plan. |
|
K. | | Governing Law. |
|
| | All matters relating to the Plan or to Awards granted hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of Missouri, without regard to the principles of conflict of laws. |
|
L. | | Code Section 409A. |
|
| | This Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and may be administered in a manner that is intended to meet those requirements and will be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. All payments hereunder are subject to Section 409A of the Code and will be paid in a manner that will meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, including regulations or other guidance issued with respect thereto, such that the payment will not be subject to the excise tax applicable under Section 409A of the Code. Any provision of this Plan that would cause the payment to fail to satisfy Section 409A of the Code will be amended (in a manner that as closely as practicable achieves the original intent of this Plan) to comply with Section 409A of the Code on a timely basis, which may be made on a retroactive basis, in accordance with regulations and other guidance issued under Section 409A of the Code. |
|
M. | | Relationship to Other Benefits. |
|
| | No payment under the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, profit sharing or group insurance plan of the Company or any Subsidiary, except as may be required by Federal law and regulation or to meet other applicable legal requirements. |
|
N. | | Expenses. |
|
| | The expenses of the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries if appropriate. |
|
O. | | Titles and Headings. |
|
| | The titles and headings of the sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only, and in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control. |
72
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
1201 WALNUT STREET
KANSAS CITY, MO 64106
VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER
COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Great Plains Energy Incorporated in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Great Plains Energy Incorporated, c/o ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | GRTPL1 | KEEP THISPORTION FORYOUR RECORDS |
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
| GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Items 1, 2 and 3.
Vote On Directors | For All | Withhold All | For All Except | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | |
| Item 1. | | Election ot Directors -Nominees | | o | o | o | | | | |
| ( ( ( ( ( ( | 01) D.L. Bodde (07) L.A. Jimenez 02) M.J. Chesser (08) J.A. Mitchell 03) W.H. Downey (09) W.C. Nelson 04) M.A. Ernst (10) L.H. Talbott 05) R.C. Ferguson, Jr. (11) R.H. West 06) W.K. Hall | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | For | Against | Abstain |
| Vote on Proposals | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Item 2. | | Ratification of appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for 2007. | o | o | o |
| |
| Item 3. | | Approve amendments to Long-Term Incentive Plan. | o | o | o |
| |
| Please be sure to sign and date this Proxy. |
| |
| For comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated. | | o | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | | | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date | | | |
THANK YOU FOR VOTING!
Great Plains Energy Incorporated
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 1, 2007
10:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
4525 Oak Street
Kansas City, MO 64111
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
1201 Walnut Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Tuesday, May 1, 2007.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Items 1, 2 and 3.
The undersigned hereby appoints M. J. Chesser and W. H. Downey, and each or either of them, proxies for the undersigned with power of substitution, to vote all the shares of common stock of Great Plains Energy Incorporated that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, and any adjournment or postponement of such meeting, upon the matters set forth on the reverse side of this card, and in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
This Proxy, if signed and returned, will be voted as directed on the reverse side. If this card is signed and returned without direction, such shares will be voted FOR the items.
Confidential Voting Instructions to Fidelity Management Trust Company, and its successors, as Trustee under
Great Plains Energy Incorporated’s Employee Savings Plus Plan
I hereby direct that the voting right pertaining to shares of Great Plains Energy Incorporated held by the Trustee and attributable to the account in the Employee Savings Plus Plan shall be exercised at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 1, 2007, or at any adjournment or postponement of such meeting, in accordance with the instructions on the reverse side of this card, to vote upon Items 1, 2 and 3 and on any other business that may properly come before the meeting.
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON THE REVERSE SIDE