United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 | |
| OR | |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
Commission File Number 001-33046
WACCAMAW BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
NORTH CAROLINA | 52-2329563 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
110 North J.K. Powell Boulevard, Whiteville, N.C. | 28472 |
(address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(910) 641-0044
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports,) and (2) has been subject to such to filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES ¨ NO ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨ | | Accelerated filer ¨ |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ¨ | | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES ¨ NO x
As of May 14, 2009 there were 5,523,549 shares of the issuer’s common stock, no par value, outstanding.
WACCAMAW BANKSHARES, INC.
INDEX
| Page Number |
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| |
Item 1. Financial Statements | |
| |
Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2009 (Unaudited)and December 31, 2008 (Audited) | 1 |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Income, Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) | 2 |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) | 3 |
| |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) | 4-10 |
| |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 11-15 |
| |
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures | 15 |
| |
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION | 16 |
| |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 16 |
| |
Item 6. Exhibits | 16 |
| |
SIGNATURES | 17 |
| |
EXHIBIT INDEX | 18 |
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
| | (Unaudited) | | | (Audited) | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | $ | 37,620,362 | | | $ | 8,947,752 | |
Interest-bearing deposits with banks | | | 4,886,570 | | | | 2,684,741 | |
Federal funds sold | | | 93,000 | | | | 4,281,000 | |
Investment securities, available-for-sale | | | 85,238,841 | | | | 87,402,799 | |
Restricted equity securities | | | 4,187,706 | | | | 4,131,906 | |
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $8,081,431 in 2009, and $7,187,981 in 2008 | | | 376,419,608 | | | | 378,882,889 | |
Other real estate owned | | | 956,832 | | | | 956,832 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 17,434,650 | | | | 17,597,502 | |
Goodwill | | | 2,727,152 | | | | 2,727,152 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 366,127 | | | | 416,194 | |
Accrued income | | | 2,250,166 | | | | 2,448,477 | |
Bank owned life insurance | | | 18,028,099 | | | | 17,834,763 | |
Other assets | | | 10,083,956 | | | | 9,138,427 | |
Total assets | | $ | 560,293,069 | | | $ | 537,450,434 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Demand deposits | | $ | 32,700,567 | | | $ | 36,159,809 | |
Interest-bearing deposits | | | 408,920,239 | | | | 382,420,080 | |
Total deposits | | | 441,620,806 | | | | 418,579,889 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 23,563,000 | | | | 23,830,000 | |
Other short-term borrowings | | | 12,500,000 | | | | 10,000,000 | |
Long-term debt | | | 40,000,000 | | | | 42,500,000 | |
Junior subordinated debentures | | | 12,372,000 | | | | 12,372,000 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 1,289,609 | | | | 1,328,976 | |
Other liabilities | | | 1,650,361 | | | | 995,414 | |
Total liabilities | | | 532,995,776 | | | | 509,606,279 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, Series A, non-cumulative, non-voting, no par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 28,184 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively | | | 464,476 | | | | 464,476 | |
Common stock, no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 5,523,549 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively | | | 24,631,987 | | | | 24,591,884 | |
Retained earnings | | | 8,772,052 | | | | 8,907,591 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) | | | (6,571,222 | ) | | | (6,119,796 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 27,297,293 | | | | 27,844,155 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 560,293,069 | | | $ | 537,450,434 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three-months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
| | Three-Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Interest income | | | | | | |
Loans and fees on loans | | $ | 5,187,765 | | | $ | 6,611,967 | |
Federal funds sold and interest earning deposits | | | 1,330 | | | | 17,760 | |
Investment securities, taxable | | | 1,225,198 | | | | 1,329,745 | |
Investment securities, nontaxable | | | 163,103 | | | | 177,636 | |
Total interest income | | | 6,577,396 | | | | 8,137,108 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | | | | | | |
Deposits | | | 2,688,247 | | | | 3,772,531 | |
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | 185,777 | | | | 360,182 | |
Short-term borrowings | | | 78,878 | | | | 155,942 | |
Long-term borrowings | | | 543,623 | | | | 399,322 | |
Total interest expense | | | 3,496,525 | | | | 4,687,977 | |
Net interest income | | | 3,080,871 | | | | 3,449,131 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 987,650 | | | | - | |
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | | | 2,093,221 | | | | 3,449,131 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-interest income | | | | | | | | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | | 501,497 | | | | 496,001 | |
Mortgage origination income | | | 102,735 | | | | 104,414 | |
Income from financial services | | | 29,652 | | | | 72,772 | |
Earnings on bank owned life insurance | | | 193,336 | | | | 126,056 | |
Net realized gains on sale of or maturity of investment securities | | | 232,780 | | | | 40,446 | |
Other operating income | | | 285,154 | | | | 243,098 | |
Total noninterest income | | | 1,345,154 | | | | 1,082,787 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Non-interest expense | | | | | | | | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | | 1,929,888 | | | | 2,119,894 | |
Occupancy and equipment | | | 530,837 | | | | 483,851 | |
Data processing | | | 334,929 | | | | 305,550 | |
Amortization expense of intangible assets | | | 53,233 | | | | 70,295 | |
Other expense | | | 976,065 | | | | 883,374 | |
Total noninterest expense | | | 3,824,952 | | | | 3,862,964 | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | | | (386,577 | ) | | | 668,954 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | | | (251,038 | ) | | | 158,611 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (135,539 | ) | | $ | 510,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings income per share | | $ | (.02 | ) | | $ | .09 | |
Diluted earnings income per share | | $ | (.02 | ) | | $ | .09 | |
Weighted average shares outstanding | | | 5,523,549 | | | | 5,444,003 | |
Diluted average shares outstanding | | | 5,523,549 | | | | 5,485,457 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three-months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
| | Three-Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (135,539 | ) | | $ | 510,343 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operations: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 237,631 | | | | 227,049 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 40,103 | | | | 29,023 | |
Provision for loan losses | | | 987,650 | | | | - | |
Accretion of discount on securities, net of amortization of premiums | | | 25,407 | | | | 29,364 | |
Gain on sale of investment securities | | | (232,780 | ) | | | (40,446 | ) |
Income from bank owned life insurance | | | (193,336 | ) | | | (126,056 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accrued income | | | 198,311 | | | | (8,305 | ) |
Other assets | | | 24,233 | | | | 932,478 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | (39,367 | ) | | | (60,689 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 654,949 | | | | (693,585 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 1,567,262 | | | | 799,176 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale | | | (33,551,341 | ) | | | (18,131,778 | ) |
Purchases of restricted equity securities | | | (55,800 | ) | | | (196,200 | ) |
Principal repayments of investments available-for-sale | | | 7,709,364 | | | | 947,177 | |
Net (increase) decrease in loans | | | 1,475,630 | | | | (19,534,253 | ) |
Sales and maturities of investment securities available-for-sale | | | 26,792,119 | | | | 9,780,970 | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (24,712 | ) | | | (2,219,272 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | | 2,345,260 | | | | (29,353,356 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in non-interest-bearing deposits | | | (3,459,242 | ) | | | 236,341 | |
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits | | | 26,500,159 | | | | 36,467,198 | |
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase | | | (267,000 | ) | | | (3,338,000 | ) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | | | 2,500,000 | | | | - | |
(Repayments) of long-term debt | | | (2,500,000 | ) | | | - | |
Net decrease in federal funds purchased | | | - | | | | (5,153,300 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 22,773,917 | | | | 28,212,239 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 26,686,439 | | | | (341,941 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning | | | 15,913,493 | | | | 12,721,446 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, ending | | $ | 42,599,932 | | | $ | 12,379,505 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 3,535,892 | | | $ | 4,748,667 | |
Conversion of common stock to preferred stock | | $ | - | | | $ | 308,843 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Adoption of EITF 06-4 | | $ | - | | | $ | 220,680 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
WACCAMAW BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 was derived from the audited financial statements at that date.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for a complete presentation of financial statements. In the opinion of the management, the financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Waccamaw Bank (the “Bank”) as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and its results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. is located in Whiteville, North Carolina. Waccamaw Bank, the primary subsidiary of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. is a state chartered bank operating seventeen offices in Whiteville, Wilmington, Shallotte (2), Holden Beach, Chadbourn, Tabor City, Southport (2), Sunset Beach, Oak Island and Elizabethtown, North Carolina. Offices in South Carolina include Conway (2), Socastee, Little River and Heath Springs. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and Bank follow generally accepted accounting principles and general practices within the financial services industry.
PRESENTATION OF CASH FLOWS
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and amounts due from depository institutions, (including cash items in process of collection) interest-bearing deposits with banks which are considered to be cash equivalents and federal funds sold. Cash flows from demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts are reported net since their original maturities are less than three months. Loans and time deposits are reported net per Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 104. Federal funds purchased are shown separately.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investments classified as available for sale can be held for indefinite periods of time and include those securities that management may employ as part of asset/liability strategy or that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayments, regulatory capital requirements or similar factors. These securities are carried at fair value and are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. The declines in fair value are due to changes in market rates.
LOANS
Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, reduced by unearned fees and an allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered appropriate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operating expense and reduced by net charge-offs. The Bank performs credit reviews of the loan portfolio and considers economic conditions, historical loan loss experience, review of specific problem loans and other factors in determining the adequacy of the allowance balance.
Interest on all loans is accrued daily on the outstanding balance. Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when management believes, after considering collection efforts and other factors that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.
Allowance for loan losses, charge-offs, impaired loans and non-accrual loans along with market conditions and loan portfolio concentrations are discussed further under “Asset Quality” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
RECLASSIFICATION
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years' financial statements to place them on a comparable basis with the current year. Net income and stockholders' equity previously reported were not affected by these reclassifications.
NOTE 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of dilutive shares outstanding. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, there was no dilutive effect as the bank reported a loss on operations.
The following table details the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
| | March 31, 2009 | | | March 31, 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income (loss) (income available to common shareholders) | | $ | (135,539 | ) | | $ | 510,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | | 5,523,549 | | | | 5,444,033 | |
Effect of dilutive securities, options | | | - | | | | 11,624 | |
Effect of dilutive securities, preferred stock | | | - | | | | 29,800 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted | | | 5,523,549 | | | | 5,485,457 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic income (loss) per share | | $ | (.02 | ) | | $ | .09 | |
Diluted income (loss) per share | | $ | (.02 | ) | | $ | .09 | |
At March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, the Company had 296,889 warrants outstanding. At March 31, 2009 these warrants were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. There were 320,610 anti-dilutive options at March 31, 2009 and 223,124 anti-dilutive options at March 31, 2008 which have been excluded from the diluted weighted shares outstanding. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the stock compensation expense of the Company was $40,103 compared to $29,023 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The unrecognized stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $195,113 compared to $299,644 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
In 2008, the shareholders approved an equity compensation plan (the “2008 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”)) which replaced the Company’s Employee Stock and Director Stock Option Plans (the “Previous Plans”). After the approval of the Omnibus Plan, no further options have been or will be issued under the Previous Plans. The term of the Omnibus Plan is indefinite, except that no incentive stock option award can be granted after the tenth anniversary of the plan. The Omnibus Plan provides that shares of common stock may be granted to certain key employees and outside directors through non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards or any other award made under the terms of the plan. The Board of Directors determines the exercise price and all other terms of all grants.
NOTE 3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets.
The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the Bank’s commitments at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is as follows:
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Commitments to extend credit | | $ | 45,093,000 | | | $ | 41,067,000 | |
Standby letters of credit | | | 1,820,000 | | | | 3,194,000 | |
NOTE 4. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB ratified the consensuses reached by the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) relating to EITF 06-4, Accounting for the Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements. EITF 06-4 states that an employer accounting for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to postretirement periods should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, or Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion—1967. The Company adopted EITF 06-4 on January 1, 2008, and in connection therewith recorded a liability of $220,680 as a reduction of retained earnings. Subsequent increases in this liability will be reflected as an expense in determining operating results.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (“FSP SFAS No. 157-3”). The new FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. This FSP was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The adoption of FSP SFAS No. 157-3 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
FSP EITF 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20, ("FSP EITF 99-20-1") was issued in January 2009. Prior to the Staff Position, other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) was determined by using either EITF Issue No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets, ("EITF 99-20") or SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, ("SFAS 115") depending on the type of security. EITF 99-20 required the use of market participant assumptions regarding future cash flows regarding the probability of collecting all cash flows previously projected. SFAS 115 determined impairment to be other than temporary if it was probable that the holder would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. To achieve a more consistent determination of OTTI, the Staff Position amends EITF 99-20 to determine any OTTI based on the guidance in SFAS 115, allowing management to use more judgment in determining any OTTI. The Staff Position is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied prospectively. Retroactive application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP EITF 99-20-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FSP creates a new model for evaluating OTTI for debt securities. If an entity intends to sell a debt security, or cannot assert it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery, OTTI must be taken. If the entity does not intend to sell the debt security before recovery, but the entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis (i.e., PV of expected cash flows is less than amortized cost), then OTTI must be taken, but the amount of impairment is to be bifurcated between impairment due to credit (which is recorded through earnings) and noncredit impairment (which becomes a component of other comprehensive income for both AFS and HTM securities). For HTM securities, the amount in OCI will be amortized prospectively over the security’s remaining life. Upon adoption, a cumulative effect adjustment must be made to opening retained earnings in the period adopted that reclassifies the noncredit portion of previously taken OTTI from retained earnings to accumulated OCI. This FSP also requires that annual disclosures required by SFAS 115 be presented in interim financial statements, and new disclosures are also required.
Upon adoption of the FSP, an entity reclassifies from retained earnings to other comprehensive income the non-credit portion of an other-than-temporary impairment loss previously recognized on a security it holds if the entity does not intend to sell the security, and it is more-likely-than-not that it will not be required to sell the security, before recovery of the security’s amortized cost basis. The FSP also modifies the presentation of other-than-temporary impairment losses and increases related disclosure requirements. The potential impact from adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 could be an increase to retained earnings and a decrease to OCI of approximately $2 million to $4 million.
FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This FSP requires companies to consider factors to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity compared to normal market activity and to consider whether an observed transaction was not orderly based on the weight of available evidence. Additionally, this FSP includes all assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements and requires enhanced disclosures, including disclosure of investment securities by major security type. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s financial statements.
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”), effective January 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. From time to time, the Company may be required to adjust at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale and other certain assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting write-downs of individual assets.
SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Fair Value Hierarchy
| | Level 1 | | Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that United has the ability to access. |
| | | | |
| | Level 2 | | Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. |
| | | | |
| | Level 3 | | Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. United’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. |
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.
Loans
The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of Loans, (SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value, and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. As of March 31, 2009, the Bank identified $35.5 million in impaired loans. Of these impaired loans, $27.3 million were identified to have impairment of $4.0 million. The determination of impairment was based on the fair market value of collateral for each loan. In situations where management discounts appraised values in determining fair value of appraisals, these levels will be considered to be a Level 3 input.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to OREO. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the OREO as nonrecurring Level 3.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. The Company’s approach to testing goodwill for impairment is to compare the business unit’s carrying value to the implied fair value based on multiples of earnings and tangible book value for recently completed merger transactions. In the event the fair value is determined to be less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. As such, the Company classifies goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 2009 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Securities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available-for-Sale | | $ | 85,239 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 79,639 | | | $ | 5,600 | |
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 85,239 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 79,639 | | | $ | 5,600 | |
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the following tables:
(Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | 2009 | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans | | $ | 23,292 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 23,292 | |
Other real estate owned | | | 957 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 957 | |
Goodwill | | | 2,727 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,727 | |
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 26,976 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 26,976 | |
The following table, which presents additional information about financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2009, on a recurring basis and for which Level 3 inputs are utilized to determine fair value:
| | Available | |
| | for Sale | |
| | Securities | |
| | (In thousands) | |
| | | |
Balance, January 1, 2009 | | $ | 3,939 | |
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) | | | - | |
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) | | | - | |
Included in other comprehensive income | | | - | |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements | | | - | |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | | | 1,661 | |
Balance, March 31, 2009 | | $ | 5,600 | |
NOTE 6 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses must be included in net income or loss. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with the operating net income or loss, are components of comprehensive income or loss. A summary of comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):
| | Quarter ended | | | Quarter ended | |
| | March 31, | | | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (135,539 | ) | | $ | 510,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale | | | | | | | | |
investment securities | | | (1,421,189 | ) | | | 534,229 | |
Tax effect | | | 969,763 | | | | 181,638 | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (451,426 | ) | | | 352,591 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | | $ | (586,965 | ) | | $ | 862,934 | |
NOTE 7 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investments in available for sale securities of $85,238,841 consisted of corporate securities, municipal securities, U.S. Governmental agencies and mortgage backed securities (MBS) at March 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2009, we had 40 individual available for sale investments that were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses on investments in corporate securities, municipal securities, U.S. Governmental agencies and mortgage backed securities (MBS) summarized below were attributable to market turmoil and liquidity. The unrealized losses on the corporate securities is due to credit quality, as well as, liquidity. As of March 31, 2009, both of our CDOs have been downgraded below investment grade, by Moody’s. After analyzing the expected cash flows, one of these CDOs was written down in the previous quarter as the remaining CDO is performing based on the expected cash flows and collateral coverage. We have the intent and the ability to hold the remaining investments until a market price recovery or maturity, and therefore these investments are not considered impaired on an other-than-temporary basis.
The following is a summary of the securities portfolio by major classification at the dates presented.
| | March 31, 2009 | |
| | Amortized Cost | | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | | Fair Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
U. S. government agencies | | $ | 10,590,358 | | | $ | 65,482 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,655,840 | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 42,194,993 | | | | 667,562 | | | | 27,374 | | | | 42,835,181 | |
Municipal securities | | | 13,201,516 | | | | - | | | | 1,933,364 | | | | 11,268,152 | |
Corporate Securities | | | 29,945,582 | | | | 65,152 | | | | 9,531,066 | | | | 20,479,668 | |
| | $ | 95,932,449 | | | $ | 798,196 | | | $ | 11,491,804 | | | $ | 85,238,841 | |
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair values for our investments and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
| | March 31, 2009 | |
| | Less than 12 Months | | | 12 Months or More | | | Total | |
| | Fair Value | | | Unrealized losses | | | Fair Value | | | Unrealized losses | | | Fair Value | | | Unrealized losses | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 11,388,991 | | | | 26,618 | | | | 55,317 | | | | 756 | | | | 11,444,308 | | | | 27,374 | |
Municipal securities | | | 5,822,824 | | | | 662,120 | | | | 5,445,328 | | | | 1,271,244 | | | | 11,268,152 | | | | 1,933,364 | |
Corporate Securities | | | 14,102,286 | | | | 7,769,830 | | | | 1,723,008 | | | | 1,761,236 | | | | 15,825,294 | | | | 9,531,066 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total temporarily impaired securities | | $ | 31,314,101 | | | $ | 8,458,568 | | | $ | 7,223,653 | | | $ | 3,033,236 | | | $ | 38,537,754 | | | $ | 11,491,804 | |
The Company’s unrealized losses on other securities relate to its investment in bank-only pooled trust preferred securities, corporate securities, municipal securities and mortgage backed securities (MBS). The Company is closely monitoring its investments in these securities in light of recent price volatility in the market place. Due to uncertainty in the credit markets broadly, and the lack of both trading and new issuance in pooled trust preferred securities, market price indications generally reflect the illiquidity in these markets and not the credit quality of the individual securities. Due to this illiquidity, it is unlikely that the Company would be able to recover its investment in these securities if it sold them at this time. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until a recovery of costs, which may be at maturity. Based on an assessment of the credit quality of the underlying issuers, the Company did not consider the investment in these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. The Company will continue to monitor the market price of these securities and the default rates of the underlying assets and continue to evaluate these securities for possible other-than-temporary impairment, which could result in a future non-cash charge to earnings.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INTRODUCTION
This discussion, analysis and related financial information is presented to explain the significant factors which affected the financial condition and results of operations for the three months ending March 31, 2009 and 2008 of Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in this report.
Waccamaw Bank, the primary subsidiary of Waccamaw Bankshares, is a state chartered bank operating seventeen offices in Whiteville, Wilmington, Shallotte (2), Holden Beach, Chadbourn, Tabor City, Southport (2), Sunset Beach, Oak Island and Elizabethtown, North Carolina. Offices in South Carolina include Conway (2), Socastee, Little River and Heath Springs. The Bank began operations on September 2, 1997. Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. acquired all outstanding shares of Waccamaw Bank on July 1, 2001.
HIGHLIGHTS
Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was ($135,539) or ($.02) per weighted average basic share outstanding compared to a $510,343 net profit or $.09 per weighted average basic share outstanding for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
On March 31, 2009, Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. assets totaled $560,293,069 compared to $537,450,434 on December 31, 2008. Net loans on March 31, 2009 were $376,419,608 compared to $378,882,889 on December 31, 2008. Total deposits on March 31, 2009 were $441,620,806 compared to $418,579,889 at the end of 2008. Stockholders’ equity after adjustments for unrealized losses on securities available for sale as required by SFAS No. 115 decreased by $546,862 resulting in a March 31, 2009 book value of $4.94 per common share, down from $5.04 on December 31, 2008.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
INVESTMENTS
The Bank maintains a portfolio of securities as part of its asset/liability and liquidity management programs which emphasize effective yields and maturities to match its needs. The composition of the investment portfolio is examined periodically and appropriate realignments are initiated to meet liquidity and interest rate sensitivity needs for the Bank.
Held to maturity securities are bonds, notes and debentures for which the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and which are reported at cost, adjusted by premiums and discounts that are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity or to call dates. At March 31, 2009 and at December 31, 2008, the Bank had no investments classified as held to maturity.Available for sale securities are reported at fair value and consist of bonds, notes, debentures and certain equity securities not classified as trading securities or as held to maturity securities.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available for sale securities are reported as a net amount in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities are determined using the specific-identification method. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity or to call dates.
Declines in the fair value of individual held to maturity and available for sale securities below cost that are other than temporary are reflected as write-downs of the individual securities to fair value. Related write-downs are included in earnings as realized losses. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 there were no impairment write-downs.
Investments in available for sale securities of $85,238,841 consisted of corporate securities, municipal securities, U.S. Governmental agencies and mortgage backed securities (MBS) at March 31, 2009.
FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD
Federal funds sold consist of short-term loans to other financial institutions. These loans are made to various financial institutions and were $93,000 on March 31, 2009 and $4,281,000 on December 31, 2008.
LOANS
Net loans outstanding on March 31, 2009, were $376,419,608 compared to $378,882,889 on December 31, 2008. The Bank maintains a loan portfolio dominated by real estate and commercial loans diversified among various industries. The $2,463,281 decrease in loans was due to increases in housing inventory and fewer construction loans originated. With housing inventory higher in all of our markets, we are closely monitoring our builder relationships in some of the market areas covered by Waccamaw Bank. This resulted in decreased construction and development lending during the first three months of 2009. Management is confident in the adequacy of the reserve through collateral documentation and credit quality controls over construction and development lending.
DEPOSITS
Deposits on March 31, 2009, were $441,620,806 compared to $418,579,889 on December 31, 2008. Interest-bearing accounts represented 92.6% of total deposits at March 31, 2008 and 91.4% of total deposits at December 31, 2008. The significant increase in deposits was the result of a large municipal relationship of approximately $30,000,000.
LIABILITIES
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase on March 31, 2009, were $23,563,000 compared to $23,830,000 on December 31, 2008. Long-term debt on March 31, 2009 was $40,000,000 compared to $42,500,000 at December 31, 2008. All long-term debt is funded by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Short-term borrowings at March 31, 2009 were $12,500,000 compared to $10,000,000 at December 31, 2008. Included in short-term borrowings at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $8,500,000 and $6,000,000, respectively, funded by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Also included in other short-term borrowings at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $1,000,000 which is funded by Nexity Bank that will mature on July 1, 2020 at the Prime lending rate. Also included in other short-term borrowings is $3,000,000 of subordinated notes that will mature on July 1, 2015 and that bear interest at 3-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points. Other liabilities at March 31, 2009 were $1,650,361 compared to $995,414 on December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to an accrual for a future investment commitment.
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
In July 2008, the Company completed a private offering of trust preferred securities through a Delaware statutory trust sponsored by the Company. Waccamaw Statutory Trust II, wholly owned by the Company, issued $4.0 million of preferred securities. The proceeds from the offering have been used to continue to support Waccamaw Bank’s growth. The interest payable on the trust preferred securities resets quarterly, and is equal to LIBOR plus 4.00%. The underlying subordinated debt securities mature on October 1, 2038. The Company has provided a full, irrevocable, and unconditional guarantee on a subordinated basis of the obligations of the Trust under the preferred securities as set forth in such guarantee agreement.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. maintains a strong capital position which exceeds all capital adequacy requirements of Federal regulatory authorities. Total stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2009 was $27,297,293 compared to $27,844,155 at December 31, 2008. This $546,862 decrease was primarily due to unrealized losses on securities available for sale declining $451,426, net of tax, and an operating loss of $135,539 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The Company and the Bank exceed all capital requirements under the applicable Federal regulations.
ASSET QUALITY
During 2008, management refined its allowance for loan losses methodology taking into account existing Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and regulatory guidance. The refinement in methodology focused on revised loss factors that are more indicative of actual loss experience in recent years and current borrower analysis. The results of the allowance for loan loss model indicated that a $987,650 provision was needed for quarter ended March 31, 2009.
The increase in the provision is the result of an increase in non performing loans along with loans identified as impaired under SFAS 114 as discussed under “Fair Value”. As of March 31, 2009 the Bank identified $35.5 million in impaired loans. Of these impaired loans, $27.3 million were identified to have impairment of $4.0 million. This compared to $25.2 million in impaired loans of which $22.8 million were identified to have impairment of $3.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in impaired loans consisted of 18 business and development loan relationships totaling $8.2 million.
The allowance for loan losses on March 31, 2009, was $8,081,431 or 2.10% of period end loans compared to $7,187,981 and 1.86% at December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009 the Bank had loans totaling $19,014,659 in nonaccrual status as compared to $6,858,135 at March 31, 2008. The increase in non-accrual loans includes increases in ten non-performing commercial real estate loans totaling $12.3 million. The largest non-accrual loan relationship totaled $3.7 million with the average balance for the eighty-one non-accrual loans totaling $236,000. At March 31, 2009 there was $94,201 in net charge-offs compared to $143,708 at March 31, 2008. There was $100,738 in repossessed assets at March 31, 2009 and no repossessed assets at March 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009 there was $956,832 in other real estate owned compared to $318,235 at March 31, 2008.
In addition to the impact on our allowance for loan losses resulting from our loan portfolio rebalancing efforts, which have effectively reduced our concentrations in construction and development sector loans, our refined allowance for loan losses methodology, as previously discussed, has resulted in an overall increase in the allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans. In management’s judgment, an appropriate allowance for estimated losses has been established; however, there can be no assurance that actual losses will not exceed the estimated amounts in the future.
The level of the allowance for loan losses is established based upon management’s evaluation of portfolio composition, current and projected national and local economic conditions and results of independent reviews of the loan portfolio by internal and external examination. Management recognizes the inherent risk associated with commercial and consumer lending, including whether or not a borrower’s actual results of operations will correspond to those projected by the borrower when the loan was funded, economic factors such as the number of housing starts and fluctuations in interest rates, etc., depression of collateral values, and completion of projects within the original cost and time estimates. As a result, management continues to actively monitor the Bank’s asset quality and lending policies. Management believes that its loan portfolio is diversified so that it is less likely that a downturn in a particular market or industry will have a significant impact on the loan portfolio or the Bank’s financial condition.
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
The Company reported a net loss of ($135,539) or ($.02) per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared with net income of $510,343 or $.09 per basic and diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2008, a decrease of $645,882 or (126.6%) in net income. The Company had significant decreases in net interest income in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the first quarter of 2008. The decrease in net interest income in 2008 can primarily be attributed to the decrease of 450 basis points in the Prime lending rate, as a result of which the majority of the Company’s loans re-priced immediately, and the higher relative cost of funding loans, due to the fact that the Company’s deposits were not able to re-price as quickly as the loans. The Company has reduced noninterest expenses as a result of cost cutting initiatives in salaries and employee benefits.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Like most financial institutions, the primary component of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on loans, the investment portfolio and interest earning deposits and the cost of funds, consisting primarily of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. For this purpose, volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Margin is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by levels of non-interest bearing liabilities and stockholders’ equity.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the net interest income of the Company was $3,080,871 compared to $3,449,131 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in net interest income can primarily be attributed to the decrease of 450 basis points in the Prime lending rate, as a result of which the majority of the Company’s loans re-priced immediately, and the higher relative cost of funding loans, due to the fact that the Company’s deposits were not able to re-price as quickly as the loans. Interest rates paid on deposits decreased by 125 basis points and was the driver of the decrease of $1,191,452 or 25.4% in interest expense. As CDs with higher interest rates matured, they were replaced with new CDs at lower interest rates. Rates paid on other transaction accounts also declined in conjunction with the FOMC rate reductions.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Company expensed $987,650 as the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2009, as compared to no provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2008. The increase in the provision was due to higher levels of non performing loans over the periods under comparison. Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management. Management considers the current level of the loan loss allowance to be appropriate based on loan volume, the current level of delinquencies, other non performing-assets, prevailing economic conditions and other factors that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income totaled $1,345,154 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with $1,082,787 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The principal reason for the increase of $262,367 in total non-interest income for the current quarter was that the Company had realized gains of $232,780, had increases in service charges in deposit accounts of $5,496, increases of $67,280 in earnings on bank owned life insurance and increases in other operating income of $42,056. Decreases of $1,679 in fees from mortgage origination income from the recent slowdown in the housing market and decreases of $43,120 in financial services income accounted for the additional difference in non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Non-interest expenses totaled $3,824,952 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, a decrease of approximately $38,000 or 1.0% over the $3.9 million reported for the three months ended March 31, 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, personnel costs decreased by approximately $190,000, or 9.0% to approximately $1.9 million as compared to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Other expenses totaled approximately $976,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of approximately $93,000 or 10.5% over the approximately $883,000 reported for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The majority of the increases resulted from the additional expenses associated with the opening of the Little River branch in the third quarter of 2008.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $251,000 for income taxes during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to a provision for income taxes of approximately $159,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
INTEREST SENSITIVITY AND LIQUIDITY
One of the principal duties of the Bank’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is management of interest rate risk. The Bank utilizes quarterly asset/liability reports prepared by a regional correspondent bank to project the impact on net interest income that might occur with hypothetical interest rate changes. The committee monitors and manages asset and liability strategies and pricing in order to manage interest rate risk.
Another function of the ALCO is maintaining adequate liquidity and planning for future liquidity needs. Having adequate liquidity means the ability to meet current needs, including deposit withdrawals and commitments, in an orderly manner without sacrificing earnings. The Bank funds its investing activities, including making loans and purchasing investments, by attracting deposits and utilizing short-term borrowings when necessary.
The Company’s ALCO meets on a monthly basis in order to assess interest rate risk, liquidity, capital and overall balance sheet management through rate shock analysis measuring various interest rate scenarios over the future 12 months. Through ALCO, the Company is able to determine fluctuations to net interest income from changes in the Prime Rate of up to 300 basis points up or down during a 12-month period. ALCO also reviews policies and procedures related to funds management and interest rate risk based on local, national and global economic conditions along with funding strategies and balance sheet management to minimize the potential impact of earnings and liquidity from interest rate movements.
Additional information regarding interest rate risk is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company has not had any material changes in the overall interest rate risk profile since December 31, 2008.
At March 31, 2009, liquid assets (cash and due from banks, interest-earning deposits with banks, fed funds sold, and investment securities available for sale) were approximately $127.8 million, which represents 22.82% of total assets.
FORWARD – LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements contained in this report, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Amounts herein could vary as a result of market and other factors. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “might,” “planned,” “estimated,” and “potential.” Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to the financial condition, expected or anticipated revenue, results of operations and business of the Company that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values, and competition; changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulation; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting the Company's operations, pricing, products and services.
ITEM 4T. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Based on their evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On the normal course of business, Waccamaw Bankshares’ subsidiary, Waccamaw Bank, may be named as a party in legal disputes.
Currently, the Bank is a party to a legal proceeding arising out of a contract between Eastwood Homes Coastal Carolina, LLC, a home builder, and Landcraft Management, LLC, a developer. According to the lawsuit filed September 19, 2008, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Eastwood claims Landcraft did not act in a forthright manner and breached the terms of the contract. Therefore, Eastwood asserts that certain letters of credit it provided should be nullified and that it should be awarded both actual and punitive damages. The Bank has been named as a party to this suit due to a loan it provided to Landcraft. Although there is no assurance that this matter will be resolved favorably and that the Bank’s financial statements will not be adversely affected, management currently expects that there will be no material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations resulting from the resolution of this or any other pending legal proceeding.
EXHIBIT | | |
NUMBER | | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |
| | |
32 | | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Waccamaw Bankshares, Inc. |
| | |
Date: May 14, 2009 | By: | /s/ David A. Godwin |
| | David A. Godwin |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Principal Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
| | |
NUMBER | | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |
| | |
| | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (Filed herewith) |