Dr. Peter Traumann, Vorsitzender des Vorstandes der Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Ernährungsindustrie e.V., Bonn
Präsident a.D. Dr. Johannes Ströh, Bundesverband der Agrargewerblichen Wirtschaft e.V., Bonn
Eva-Maria Pfeil, Geschäftsführerin der IG BAU Mitglieder-Service GmbH, Frankfurt am Main
Klaus Wiesehügel, Bundesvorsitzender der IG Bauen-Agrar-Umwelt, Frankfurt am Main
Hans-Joachim Wilms, Stellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender der IG Bauen-Agrar-Umwelt, Berlin
Dr. Uwe Färber, Staatsrat, Der Senator für Wirtschaft und Häfen, Bremen
Back to contents
Schleswig-Holstein:
Ingrid Franzen, Ministerin für ländliche Räume, Landesplanung,
Landwirtschaft und Tourismus, Kiel (until January 31, 2003)
Klaus Müller, Minister für Umwelt, Naturschutz und
Landwirtschaft, Kiel (since March 1, 2003)
Vertreter der Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau:
Detlef Leinberger, Mitglied des Vorstandes, Frankfurt am Main
Vertreter der DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank:
Dr. Ulrich Brixner, Vorsitzender des Vorstandes, Frankfurt am Main
Hinzugewählte Sachverständige:
Dr. Rolf-E. Breuer, Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates der Deutschen Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main
Dr. Dietrich Hoppenstedt, Präsident des Deutschen Sparkassen- und Giroverbandes e.V., Berlin
Dr. h.c. Friedel Neuber, ehem. Vorsitzender des Vorstandes der
Westdeutschen Landesbank Girozentrale, Düsseldorf
General Meeting (Anstaltsversammlung )
Nominated by the upper house of the German parliament
(Vom Bundesrat berufen):
Adolf Abs, Landwirt, Pfeffingen
Präsident Leonhard Blum, Bauern- und Winzerverband Rheinland-Nassau e.V., Niederbettingen
Otto Deppmeyer, Vizepräsident des Landesverbandes des
Niedersächsischen Landvolks e.V., Hessisch Oldendorf-Hermeringen
Rainer Fabel, Vorsitzender des Kreisverbandes Uelzen im Landesverband des Niedersächsischen Landvolks e.V., Suhlendorf
Peter Förster, Landwirt, Darmstadt
Franz Xaver Mayer, Vorstandsvorsitzender der Landwirtschaftlichen Alterskasse Niederbayern-Oberpfalz, Ganacker
Carsten Mumm, Vizepräsident, Schleswig-Holsteinischer Bauernverband e.V., Dahme
Johannes Potthast, Landwirt, Marienmünster
Franz Sauter, Vorsitzender der Katholischen Landvolkbewegung e.V., Epfendorf
Wilhelm Sturm, Landwirt, Willanzheim
68
Back to contents
Nominated by the not-for-profit German Farmers’ Association
(Vom Deutschen Bauernverband e.V. berufen):
Präsident Hinrich Bavendam, Bremischer Landwirtschaftsverband e.V., Bremen
Präsident Friedhelm Decker, Rheinischer Landwirtschaftsverband, Bonn
Jürgen Görg, Vorsitzender des Bundesverbandes Landwirtschaftlicher Pächter e.V., Goslar
Werner Hilse, Präsident des Landesverbandes des Niedersächsischen Landvolks e.V., Hannover
Ehrenpräsident Viktor Klein, Landwirt, Bauernverband Saar e.V., Merzig
Werner Reihl, Bezirkspräsident Oberfranken im Bayerischen Bauernverband, Arzberg
Präsident Wendelin Ruf, Badischer Landwirtschaftlicher Hauptverband e.V., Freiburg
Präsident Michael Prinz Salm zu Salm, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Waldbesitzerverbände e.V., Schloss Wallhausen
Jürgen Ströbel, Vizepräsident, Bayerischer Bauernverband, München
Präsident Karl Zwermann, Zentralverband Gartenbau e.V., Usingen-Wernborn
Nominated by the not-for-profit Farmers’ Mutual Savings Institution
(Vom Deutschen Raiffeisenverband e.V. berufen):
Dipl.-Ing. agr. Jörn Christern, Landwirt, Geesthacht-Grünhof
Verbandsdirektor Dr. Franz Honikel, Württ. Genossenschaftsverband Raiffeisen/Schulze-Delitzsch e.V., Stuttgart
Wolfgang Kirsch, Mitglied des Vorstandes DZ Bank AG
Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (since May 27, 2003)
Gerhard Meloh, Vorstandsvorsitzender der WESTFLEISCH Vieh- und Fleischzentrale Westfalen eG, Münster
Direktor Dr. Manfred W. Tag, Mitglied des Vorstandes NORDMILCH eG, Zeven
Dr. Manfred Wächtershäuser, Bankdirektor DZ Bank AG
Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (until May 26, 2003)
Nominated by the not-for-profit Federation of State Chambers of Agriculture
(Vom Verband der Landwirtschaftskammern e.V. berufen):
Siegfried Hensel, Vizepräsident, Landwirtschaftskammer Hannover, Hannover
Präsident Wilhelm Lieven, MdL, Landwirtschaftskammer Rheinland, Bonn
Präsident Friedrich Scholten, Landwirtschaftskammer Weser-Ems, Oldenburg
69
Back to contents
Präsident Fritz Stegen, Landwirtschaftskammer Hannover, Hannover
Präsident Hermann Sündermann, Landwirtschaftskammer Bremen, Bremen
Commissioner (Kommissar der Bundesregierung)
Ministerialdirektor Professor Dr. Hermann Schlagheck, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bonn
Deputy (Vertreter):
Ministerialdirigent Dietrich Jahn, Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Berlin
Trustee (Treuhänder)
Ministerialdirektor i. R. Dr. Bernhard Lohmann, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bonn
Deputy (Vertreter):
Ministerialdirigent i.R. Dr. Karl-Wilhelm Schopen, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bonn
70
Back to contents
Accountant’s Report
For the complete annual financial statements and the complete consolidated financial statements we have issued an unqualified Auditors’ Report according to § 322 HGB (“German Commercial Code”). The translation of the Auditors’ Report reads as follows:
Independent Auditors’ Report
We have audited the annual financial statements, together with the bookkeeping system, of the Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, Frankfurt am Main, as well as the consolidated financial statements and its report on the position of the Bank and the Group prepared by the Bank for the business year from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003. The preparation of these documents in accordance with German commercial law are the responsibility of the Bank’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the annual financial statements, together with the bookkeeping system, as well as on the consolidated financial statements and the report on the position of the Bank and the Group, based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of the annual and consolidated financial statements in accordance with § 317 HGB (“German Commercial Code”) and German generally accepted standards for the audit of financial statements promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit such that misstatements materially affecting the presentation of the net assets, financial position and results of operations in the annual and the consolidated financial statements in accordance with German principles of proper accounting and in the report on the position of the Bank and the Group are detected with reasonable assurance. Knowledge of the business activities and the economic and legal environment of the Bank and the Group and evaluations of possible misstatements are taken into account in the determination of audit procedures. The effectiveness of the accounting-related internal control system and the evidence supporting the disclosures in the books and records, the annual and consolidated financial statements and the report on the position of the Bank and the Group are examined primarily on a test basis within the framework of the audit. The audit includes assessing the accounting and consolidation principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the annual and the consolidated financial statements and the report on the position of the Bank and the Group. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit has not led to any reservations.
In our opinion, the annual and the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the net assets, financial position and results of operations of the Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank, Frankfurt am Main, and the Group, respectively, in accordance with German principles of proper accounting. On the whole the report on the position of the Bank and the Group provides a suitable understanding of the Bank’s and the Group’s position and suitably presents the risks of future development.
Düsseldorf, March 9, 2004
Deloitte & Touche GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Dr. Göttgens Theileis
Wirtschaftsprüfer Wirtschaftsprüfer
71
Back to contents
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON CONSOLIDATED FUNDED DEBT(1)
Consolidated Funded Debt Outstanding
| | | | | | | Principal | |
| | | | | | | Amount | |
| | | | | | | Outstanding at | |
| | | Year of | | | | December 31, | |
| Interest Rate | | Incurrence | | Maturity | | 2003 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | ( € in millions) | |
1. Promissory Notes/Internat. Loans | | | | | | | | |
(Schuldscheindarlehen) | 0% - 10.00% | | 1994 - 2003 | | 2004 - 2014 | | 1,494 | |
| | | | | | | | |
2. Registered Bonds | | | | | | | | |
(Namensschuldverschreibungen) | 2.144% - 7.95% | | 1973 - 2003 | | 2004 - 2015 | | 7,793 | |
| | | | | | | | |
3. Bearer Bonds | | | | | | | | |
Secured | 2.0% - 8.785% | | 1994 - 2003 | | 2004 - 2015 | | 2,863 | |
Unsecured | 0% – 13.02% | | 1995 - 2003 | | 2004 - 2049 | | 39,983 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total consolidated funded debt | | | | | | | 52,133 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Rentenbank’s funded debt includes the following debt in foreign currencies:
| | Principal Amount Outstanding |
Currency | | at December 31, 2003 |
| |
|
| | ( € in millions) |
Australian dollar | | 1,161 |
Canadian dollar | | 424 |
Danish kroner | | 48 |
Hong Kong dollar | | 56 |
Hungarian forint | | 27 |
Japanese Yen | | 2,661 |
New Zealand dollar | | 246 |
Norwegian kroner | | 128 |
Pound sterling | | 1,410 |
Swedish kroner | | 65 |
Swiss francs | | 1,210 |
U.S. dollar | | 18,440 |
| |
|
| | 25,876 |
72
Back to contents
Repayment Schedule for Consolidated Funded Debt
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After | | | |
| ( € in millions) | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2008 | | 2009 | | 2010 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2013 | | Total | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 1. | Promissory Notes/Intern.Loans: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Schuldscheindarlehen) | 457 | | 315 | | 227 | | 139 | | 54 | | 8 | | 180 | | 59 | | — | | — | | 55 | | 1,494 | |
| 2. | Registered Bonds | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Namensschuldverschreibungen) | 1,037 | | 725 | | 919 | | 791 | | 1,065 | | 1,044 | | 534 | | 363 | | 397 | | 798 | | 120 | | 7,793 | |
| 3. | Bearer Bonds | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Secured | 292 | | 263 | | 726 | | 121 | | 86 | | 1,305 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 70 | | 2,863 | |
| | Unsecured | 7,558 | | 7,309 | | 5,386 | | 6,562 | | 5,396 | | 2,125 | | 2,896 | | 272 | | 328 | | 1,174 | | 977 | | 39,983 | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Total | 9,344 | | 8,612 | | 7,258 | | 7,613 | | 6,601 | | 4,482 | | 3,610 | | 694 | | 725 | | 1,972 | | 1,222 | | 52,133 | |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
73
Back to Contents
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
GENERAL
Area, Location and Population
The Federal Republic is situated in central Europe and comprises an area of about 138,000 square miles. Its total population was in the range of 82.3 million in 2001. Approximately 14% of the total population is concentrated in metropolitan areas with more than 500,000 inhabitants; the largest of these areas are Berlin, Hamburg, Munich, Cologne, Frankfurt am Main, Essen, Dortmund, Stuttgart, Dusseldorf and Bremen.
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, Tables 3.1, 3.4, 3.6 and 3.7)
Government
The Federal Republic is a federated republic whose constitution is codified in the Grundgesetz of 1949. It consists of 16 Federal States (Länder). The capital of the Federal Republic is Berlin. The Länder have legislative sovereignty over matters not expressly reserved to the legislative, executive and judicial bodies of the Federal Republic.
The Grundgesetz provides for a Federal President (Bundespräsident), two Houses of Parliament (the Bundestag, which currently has 603 members and the Bundesrat, which consists of representatives of the 16 Länder governments), a Chancellor (Bundeskanzler) and a Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht). The Chancellor heads the Federal Government, consisting of the Chancellor and the Federal Ministers. The Bundespräsident acts as head of state.
General elections for the Bundestag are held every four years. The last general election was held on September 22, 2002, and the next general election will be held in 2006. A political party is not entitled to party representation in the Bundestag unless it receives at least 5% of the votes cast or three direct mandates in a general election. The Chancellor is elected by and is responsible to the Bundestag and cannot be removed from office during his or her four-year term unless the Bundestag has agreed on a successor.
Political Parties
The political parties currently represented in the Bundestag are the Social Democrats (SPD), the Christian Democrats (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bündnis 90/Grüne and the Free Democrats (FDP). In addition, two candidates of the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS) were elected into the new parliament via direct constituency seats.
Since 1949, the Federal Republic has been governed by seven Chancellors over 15 electoral periods. Since the general elections in 1998 the Federal Government represents a coalition between the SPD and the Bündnis 90/Grüne and is led by Chancellor Gerhard Schröder of the SPD. This coalition was confirmed in the general elections of 2002.
The following table shows the results of the five most recent general elections to the Bundestag.
| 2002 | | 1998 | | 1994 | | 1990 | | 1987 | |
| Elections | | Elections | | Elections | | Elections(1) | | Elections(2) | |
| % of | | | | % of | | | | % of | | | | % of | | | | % of | | | |
| Votes | | Seats | | Votes | | Seats | | Votes | | Seats | | Votes | | Seats | | Votes | | Seats | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SPD | 38.5 | | 251 | | 40.9 | | 298 | | 36.4 | | 252 | | 33.5 | | 239 | | 37.0 | | 186 | |
CDU/CSU | 38.5 | | 248 | | 35.1 | | 245 | | 41.4 | | 294 | | 43.8 | | 319 | | 44.3 | | 223 | |
Bündnis 90/Grüne(3) | 8.6 | | 55 | | 6.7 | | 47 | | 7.3 | | 49 | | 5.0 | | 8 | | 8.3 | | 42 | |
FDP. | 7.4 | | 47 | | 6.2 | | 43 | | 6.9 | | 47 | | 11.0 | | 79 | | 9.1 | | 46 | |
PDS | 4.0 | | 2 | | 5.1 | | 36 | | 4.4 | | 30 | | 2.4 | | 17 | | — | | — | |
Others | 2.8 | | — | | 5.9 | | — | | 3.6 | | — | | 4.2 | | — | | 1.4 | | — | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Total | | | 603 | | | | 669 | | | | 672 | | | | 662 | | | | 497 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| |
(1) | In 1990, Bündnis 90 (east German Grüne) and PDS were represented in the Bundestag pursuant to special provisions in the Treaty on Unity, relating to the political parties of the eastern Länder. |
(2) | Does not include 22 members of the Bundestag from Berlin (West) without voting rights. |
G-1
Back to Contents
(3) | For 1987 includes only the results of the west German Grüne party; for 1990 includes the results of the west German Grüne party and of Bündnis 90 (east German Grüne); for 1994 and all subsequent periods includes the results of the combined Bündnis 90/Grüne. |
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, Tables 4.3 and 4.6)
International Organizations
In addition to the European Union (“EU”) and the European Monetary Union (“EMU”) (described below), the Federal Republic is also a member of various major multilateral institutions, including the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association (“World Bank”), the Council of Europe, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”), the West European Union (“WEU”), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”). In addition, it is a signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”) and a member of the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). The Federal Republic is also a shareholder of, among others, the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the European Atomic Energy Community.
The European Union and European Integration
The Federal Republic was a founding member of the European Coal and Steel Community (“ECSC”) in 1951, which later developed into the European Union (“EU”). Today, the Federal Republic is one of 25 member states of the EU. On May 1, 2004, ten new countries, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia became part of the EU, joining its previous members Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom (the “Member States”). The aggregate population of the Member States is now approximately 455 million. Furthermore negotiations with Bulgaria and Romania on their accession are still ongoing, and both countries are supported by the EU to prepare them for membership in 2007. Turkey was recognized as an applicant country in December 1999 and an “Accession Partnership” presented a road map for its preparation for potential membership.
(Source: www.europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/enlargement.htm; www.europa.eu.int/abc/history/index_en.htm; http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat/Public/datashop/print-product/EN?catalogue=Eurostat&product=KS-NK-04-001-__-N-EN&mode=download)
Economic integration
From its inception, a fundamental objective of the EU and its predecessors has been the economic integration of its Member States. Culminating a long process, an internal market that provides for the free movement of goods and services, persons and capital among the Member States was established as of January 1, 1993. The integration of the Member States’ economies and the completion of a single market are also promoted by a European competition policy, which aims at creating a level playing field for Member States’ companies and promoting economic efficiency. In addition, various liberalization and harmonization measures are being implemented. Among other things, the telecommunications and energy sectors are being liberalized and opened for private competitors. In the financial sector, the single market has been fostered by providing for the free movement of capital and the freedom to perform banking services throughout the EU under the so-called “European Passport”, which enables financial institutions to provide financial services throughout the common market based on a single license obtained in one Member State.
Another important policy area for the EU has been agriculture. Under the “Agenda 2000” reform, measures have been introduced to prepare the Member States’ agricultural sectors for the 2004 enlargement. Subsidies to this sector, which comprised 40% of the EU’s budget or EUR 45 billion in 2002, have been restructured to keep European farming competitive and reduce costs.
A further tool with which the EU promotes economic integration is regional aid, which is designed to focus development efforts on certain disadvantaged regions and sections of population of the EU.
(Source: http://europa.eu.int/abc/index_en.htm; http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l24002.htm; European Commission, Europe in 12 lessons, 2003)
G-2
Back to Contents
Monetary integration
The Federal Republic is a signatory to, and has ratified, the Treaty on European Union of February 1992 (also known as the “Maastricht Treaty”). The Maastricht Treaty was the basis for the establishment of the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”). EMU in turn led to the adoption, on December 31, 1998, of irrevocable conversion rates between the euro and the national currencies of the initial participating Member States and the introduction of the euro as the single European currency in the euro area on January 1, 1999. On January 1, 2002, banknotes and coins denominated in euro were introduced as legal tender in the 12 Member States now forming the euro area (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) to replace the national currencies.
The European Central Bank (“ECB”) was established on June 1, 1998, as part of the European System of Central Banks (“ESCB”) and assumed sole responsibility for the monetary policy in the euro area on January 1, 1999. According to the Maastricht Treaty, the primary objective of the ESCB is to maintain price stability. The ESCB supports the general economic policies of the EU. See “Federal Republic of Germany — Monetary and Financial System” for more information on the ECB and ESCB.
(Source: European Commission, press release dated May 3, 2000, document number IP/00/422; “The History of the European Union: 2001”, http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/history/2002/index_en.htm; European Commission, press release dated May 3, 2000, document number IP/00/422; www.europa.eu.int/abc/history/2001/index_en.htm; www.europa.eu.int/abc/history/1998/index_en.htm; www.europa.eu.int/abc/history/1999/index_en.htm; http://www.ecb.de/enlargement/)
To ensure continuous budgetary discipline in the euro area, the participating Member States agreed on the main elements of a Stability and Growth Pact (the “Pact”) in 1996, substantiating Article 104 of the Maastricht Treaty. According to the Pact, participating Member States must pursue the medium-term objective of achieving a balanced budget or even a budget surplus so as to create a margin that enables them to deal with cyclical fluctuations.
Under the Maastricht Treaty, implementing regulations and the Pact, a participating Member State whose total public deficit exceeds the reference limit of 3% of GDP becomes subject to the “excessive deficit procedure”. Under this procedure, the Ecofin Council, based on recommendations by the Commission, suggests corrective measures aiming at a deficit reduction and then reviews the corrective measures taken by a Member State. If it determines that such corrective measures are not adequate, the Maastricht Treaty and the Pact provide for a wide range of remedies, up to and including the imposition of annual financial penalties of as much as 0.5% of a Member State’s GDP. Financial penalties may not be imposed, however, until the end of a further review period. However, the Pact provides that the 3% limit may be exceeded without triggering the risk of fines in the event of a severe economic downturn or an unusual event outside that participating Member State’s control (e.g., a significant natural disaster or a war having an impact on that Member State).
The first excessive deficit procedure was initiated against Portugal in October 2002 and terminated in May 2004. A second such procedure was initiated against the Federal Republic in November 2002 and a third excessive deficit procedure was initiated against France in March 2003. In addition, the Commission has issued reports on the budgetary situation with respect to other Member States, including the Netherlands, Italy and Greece, and is currently considering whether to initiate early-warning or excessive deficit procedures with respect to these Member States.
(Sources: European Commission, press release dated October 16, 2002, April 2, 2003, April 28, 2004 and May 12, 2004; Ecofin Council, press release dated May 11, 2004; Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report February 2003, p. 55; Eurostat, Euro indicators news release dated March 17, 2003)
Political integration
The EU’s three main institutions are the Council of the European Union (representing the governments of the Member States), the European Parliament (elected by and representing the citizens of the Member States) and the European Commission (the executive body of the EU). In order to ensure that the decision-making process within the EU’s institutions continues to work effectively, the European Convention was formed in 2001. Its goal was to draft a European Constitution which sets out the powers and responsibilities of the institutions and the decision-making process, thus enabling the EU to cope with its main challenges in the mid-
G-3
Back to Contents
term future, the enlargement of the EU and the increased involvement of EU citizens by introducing more democracy and transparency into the governance of the EU. The draft constitution was presented in July 2003.
The Member States of the EU have agreed that a longer-term objective is the formation of a European Political Union. Current areas of close cooperation include foreign and security policy as well as internal and social affairs. However, the Member States, for the time being, retain sovereignty in most important areas of policy.
(Source: http://europa.eu.int/futurum/constitution/index_en.htm; European Commission, Europe in 12 lessons, 2003)
Statistical Disclosure Standards of the International Monetary Fund
The Federal Republic currently meets the Special Data Dissemination Standard (“SDDS”) of the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) relating to coverage, periodicity and timeliness of economic data. Although subscription by member countries to the SDDS is voluntary, it carries a commitment by subscribing members to observe the standard and to provide certain information to the IMF about its practices in disseminating economic and financial data.
G-4
Back to Contents
THE ECONOMY
Overview
The Federal Republic’s economic system has developed since 1945 into a social market economy, combining the free initiative of the individual with progressive social principles. The Grundgesetz guarantees freedom of private enterprise and private property, provided that these basic rights must not be exercised against the public good. The state mainly has a regulatory function in the market economy, setting the general framework of conditions within which market processes take place. State intervention in price setting is limited to a very small number of industries.
Key Economic Figures
The German economy is one of the world’s largest economies. In 2003, its gross domestic product (“GDP”) expressed at current prices was EUR 2,129.2 billion compared to EUR 2,110.4 billion in 2002. At constant prices (1995 = 100), real GDP for western Germany rose from EUR 897.0 billion in 1970 to EUR 1,479.6 billion in 1990 (the year of the German reunification). At 1995 prices, GDP for all of Germany, i.e. including the eastern Länder, rose from EUR 1,710.8 billion in 1991 to EUR 1,987.7 billion in 2003. This growth in GDP is primarily a result of gains in productivity. At 1995 prices, real GDP per person employed was EUR 52,000 in 2003, at which point 38.2 million persons were either employed or self-employed.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1; Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, Table 24.2, Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.1, Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen 2003, Tables 1.1, 2.5 and 2.10; Statistisches Bundesamt, Ergänzung zur Fachserie 18, Reihe S.21, Table 3.1.1)
As in many advanced economies, the services sector of the Federal Republic has become a more important contributor to GDP than any other sector. In 2003, 22.4% of GDP, measured at 1995 prices, was generated by the producing sector (excluding construction), while construction contributed 4.3%. Distribution, catering trade and transportation services accounted for 18.8%, financing, rents and corporate services accounted for 30.1%, and other public and private services accounted for 19.9% of GDP. Private consumption totaled 56.6% of GDP, investment amounted to 19.0%, and state consumption equaled 19.7%. Exports and imports of goods and services accounted for 36.8% and 32.1% of GDP in 2003 at 1995 prices, respectively. Thus, the foreign balance of trade showed a surplus equal to 4.7% of GDP in 2003.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
During the first half of 2003, the German economy was suffering from slow growth of major trading partners due in part to increased geopolitical risks mainly associated with the Iraq conflict. However, the economy recovered slightly during the second half of the year, benefiting from rising exports resulting from the world-wide upswing. Nevertheless, the recovery was not big enough to compensate the growth loss of the first half and overall economic growth in the Federal Republic decreased further in 2003. Real GDP declined by 0.1%, compared to a growth of 0.2% in 2002, each expressed at 1995 prices.
(Source: Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Jahresgutachten 2003/04, pp. 47-48; Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 2004 der Bundesregierung)
In April 2004, the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Labor forecast that German real economic growth would be in the range of 1.5% to 2.0% in 2004 and 2005. However, it expects that the growth rate will be at the lower end of this range with 1.5% in 2004. The increase in the growth rate is partially due to an increase in the number of working days compared to the year before. Furthermore, growth is expected to be driven mainly by rising exports as a result of the general global upswing, which is also expected to provide a modest stimulus to investments during the year. However, private consumption is expected to remain weak due to the difficult employment situation. Public spending is reduced by the reforms of the social security system and other efforts to reduce public deficits. Public households remain under significant pressure to cut spending. Public spending is expected to stagnate in 2004 on a nominal basis, and decline slightly in real terms. This is in part a result of shifting spending for medication and medical services from public to private households in the course of the health reform, as patients are now required to make higher contributions for these services. Furthermore, continued reductions in headcount on all levels of public authorities and significant reductions in
G-5
Back to Contents
benefits have an additional restraining effect. As growth is primarily driven by exports, the main risks to economic growth consist in a slowdown of the global upswing and a continued appreciation of the euro versus the U.S. dollar.
(Source: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 2004 der Bundesregierung; http://www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten-,417.545913/artikel/Clement-Reformen-fuer-konjunkt.htm; http://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/root,did=31916.html)
Exports of the Federal Republic totaled EUR 731.1 billion in 2003 at 1995 prices, corresponding to an increase of 1.2% compared to 2002 (in 2002, German exports increased by 3.4% compared to 2001). The unemployment rate rose from 9.8% of the civil workforce in 2002 to 10.5% in 2003 (as computed under the “national definition” used by the German authorities). Based on the method of calculation promulgated by the International Labour Organization (ILO) (the “ILO definition”), the unemployment rate increased from 8.1% to 8.7%. For an explanation of the differences between the national definition and the ILO definition, see “Employment and Labor”. The rate of consumer price inflation decreased from 1.4% in 2002 to 1.1% in 2003. This decrease was mainly caused by domestic consumers’ sluggish demand, which limited the scope for price increases in the retail sector, and the considerable appreciation of the euro versus the U.S. dollar, which led to falling prices of imported goods and commodities. General government debt totaled EUR 1,283.5 billion at year-end 2002 and amounted to EUR 1,365.9 billion at year-end 2003.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Tables VIII.3, IX.1, IX.6 and IX.7; Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.1, Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen 2003, Table 1.10; Statistisches Bundesamt, Wirtschaft und Statistik 1/2004, Preisentwicklung im Jahr 2003, p. 94)
The following table shows certain key economic figures for the Federal Republic for the past five years.
KEY ECONOMIC FIGURES
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| (EUR in billions) | |
GDP – at current prices | 2,129.2 | | 2,110.4 | | 2,073.7 | | 2,030.0 | | 1,978.6 | |
(change in %) | 0.9 | | 1.8 | | 2.2 | | 2.6 | | 2.6 | |
GDP – at 1995 prices | 1,987.7 | | 1,989.7 | | 1,986.2 | | 1,969.5 | | 1,914.8 | |
(change in %) | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | | 0.8 | | 2.9 | | 2.0 | |
Unemployment Rate (national definition) | | | | | | | | | | |
(in %) | 10.5 | | 9.8 | | 9.4 | | 9.7 | | 10.5 | |
Rate of Inflation | | | | | | | | | | |
(year-to-year change in consumer price | | | | | | | | | | |
index in %) | 1.1 | | 1.4 | | 2.0 | | 1.4 | | 0.6 | |
Balance of Payments – current account | 46.8 | | 45.7 | | 1.7 | | (27.9 | ) | (22.5 | ) |
General government debt(1) | 1,365.9 | | 1,283.5 | | 1,232.8 | | 1,221.8 | | 1,210.3 | |
| |
(1) | Definition according to Maastricht Treaty. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report December 2002, Table IX.6; Monthly Report July 2003, Table IX.1; Monthly Report March 2004, Tables VIII.3, IX.1, IX.6, IX.7 and X.2)
Germany’s Budget Deficit and the Excessive Deficit Procedure
Lower than expected total public sector receipts and higher labor market and social security expenditures resulted in a general government budget deficit for the Federal Republic in 2002 and 2003 exceeding the limit of 3% of GDP permitted under the Maastricht Treaty. The Federal Republic’s gross debt in 2002 and 2003 also exceeded the thresholds set by the Maastricht Treaty.
The following table shows historical information on the Federal Republic’s general government deficit and debt as a percentage of GDP. The general government deficit refers to the excess of consolidated public sector expenditures over consolidated public sector proceeds. The public sector according to this definition includes the Federal Government, the Länder governments, the municipalities and the social security system. For the calculation of the fiscal Maastricht criteria, the accounting principles of the European System of National Accounts 1995 (“ESA95”) generally apply.
G-6
Back to Contents
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC ’S FISCAL MAASTRICHT CRITERIA | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2003(1) |
| 2002 |
| 2001 |
| 2002(2) |
| 1999 | |
General Government Deficit as | | | | | | | | | | |
% of GDP | 3.9 | | 3.5 | | 2.8 | | 1.2 | | 1.5 | |
General Government Debt as | | | | | | | | | | |
% of GDP | 64.2 | | 60.8 | | 59.5 | | 60.2 | | 61.2 | |
| |
(1) | Provisional figures, partly estimated. |
(2) | Adjusted for proceeds from the UMTS auction (EUR 50.85 billion). In the accounts of the Federal Statistical Office, UMTS proceeds are recorded under “net increase in non-produced assets”. As a result, according to the Federal Statistical Office, government spending in 2000 was lower and a surplus in the amount of EUR 22.8 billion, or 1.1 % of GDP, rather than a deficit, was achieved. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table VIII.3)
In view of the excessive deficit, in November 2002, the European Commission announced the initiation of the excessive deficit procedure against the Federal Republic. In January 2003, the Council of Economics and Finance Ministers of the European Union (“Ecofin Council”) recommended that the Federal Government adopt certain measures to reduce the deficit and required that immediate measures be implemented to reduce the deficit by at least 1% of GDP on a cyclically adjusted basis. In addition, to support economic growth potential, the Ecofin Council urged the Federal Government to reform the German labor market and social security system. The Federal Government responded by initiating certain reform measures, in particular with general proposals known as “Agenda 2010” and certain tax reforms intended to promote growth. See “– Economic Policy – Agenda 2010” and “Public Finance – Tax Structure – Current tax reform measures”.
(Sources: www.europa.eu.int/news/index_en.htm; www.destatis.de/presse/deutsch/pm2003/p0200121.htm; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report March 2003, pp. 35-55; European Commission, press release PRES/03/15 dated January 21, 2003; Bundesregierung, news release dated May 14, 2003; http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=SPEECH/03/259|0|RAPID&lg=EN)
In view of the Commission’s estimates that the general government deficit for 2003 would further increase despite the measures that had been taken by the Federal Republic, and that the deficit was likely to exceed 3% of GDP again in 2004, the Commission proceeded with the excessive deficit procedure and issued further recommendations to the Council pursuant to Article 104 sections 8 and 9 of the Maastricht Treaty. However, in November 2003, the Ecofin Council did not follow the Commission’s recommendation to proceed with the excessive deficit procedure, as it was of the opinion the Federal Government overall complied with the Council recommendations of January 2003. At the same time, the Federal Government committed itself to keep up its consolidation targets, including, among other things, to achieve a reduction in the cyclically-adjusted deficit of 0.6% of GDP in 2004 and of at least 0.5% of GDP in 2005 in order to reduce the general government deficit below 3%. The Federal Government believes that its reform program “Agenda 2010” (described below) is an integral part of the overall policy strategy to comply with the commitments entered into at the Ecofin Council meeting and expects to reduce the general government deficit to 2.5% by 2005.
The Commission has challenged the resolution by the Ecofin Council of November 2003, claiming it violates the Pact. On January 28, 2004, the Commission filed an action with the European Court of Justice, requesting an accelerated proceeding with a decision due in three to six months.
(Source:http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.getfile=gf&doc=IP/03/1560|0|AGED&lg=EN &type=PDF; www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten-,417.589337/artikel/EU-Defizitverfahren-Kooperatio.htm; www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Aktuelles/Pressemitteilungen-.395.22178/Pressemitteilung/Positive-Entwicklung-beim-Bund.htm; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report February 2004, p. 99; http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.getfile=gf&doc=IP/04/35|0|RAPID&lg=EN&type=PDF; http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.getfile=gf&doc=PRES/03/320|0|AGED&lg=EN&type =PDF)
G-7
Back to Contents
Economic Policy
The Federal Government’s foremost economic policy objectives are to promote economic growth and employment. In addition, in light of the challenges resulting from European integration, globalization and the emergence of a knowledge-based economy, the Federal Government aims to modernize the German economy and German society on every level. The Federal Government considers the aforesaid measures necessary also to improve the Federal Republic’s position as a business location in the worldwide competition for ideas and capital, innovation and investment. To achieve its goals, the Federal Government has adopted several major economic policy initiatives, including a consolidation of the budget, a reform of the social security system, a further opening up of product markets and a comprehensive tax reform. The recent tax reform, known as “Tax Reform 2000”, is designed to reduce the tax burden of businesses, families and employees, to promote economic growth and employment, and to strengthen the competitiveness of the German economy. See “Public Finance –Tax Structure – Tax Reform 2000”, below. In addition, the Federal Government has formulated a range of ecologically motivated policy measures geared towards the conservation of energy and the protection of the environment. It has also taken steps to facilitate raising venture capital and to improve the efficiency of the German capital markets.
Agenda 2010
In order to continue and reinforce the course of reform, especially in respect of the social security system, the Federal Government has announced a bundle of measures designated as “Agenda 2010”. The “Agenda 2010” comprises, among other things, measures to strengthen the financial position of the municipalities, to make the labor markets more flexible, to reform the system of unemployment and welfare benefits, and to reform labor, social and tax laws to promote employment and economic growth.
2004 Federal budget
On February 13, 2004, after an objection by the Bundesrat in the legislative procedure and a mediation procedure between the Bundestag and the Bundesrat, the Bundestag approved the 2004 Federal Budget. Among other things, the 2004 Federal Budget provides for net borrowings in the amount of EUR 29.3 billion and investments in the amount of EUR 24.6 billion.
On December 19, 2003, the Bundesrat approved the Law accompanying the 2004 Federal Budget (Haushaltsbegleitgesetz). Among other things, the law accelerates the implementation of certain steps of the third stage of the Tax Reform 2000, which was originally scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2004. The law is designed to stimulate economic growth by lowering the total tax burden on companies and individuals by EUR 15 billion in 2004 and, when the final phase of the Tax Reform 2000 will become effective on January 1, 2005, by a further EUR 6.5 billion in 2005. The Federal Government expects to finance the additional deficit primarily through a mixture of privatization proceeds and additional borrowings, as well as a reduction of subsidies.
(Sources: http://www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten/Artikel-,434.606281/artikel/Bundestag-beschliesst-Bundesha.htm; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report March 2004; http://www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten/Artikel-,434.578914/artikel/Reformen-der-Agenda-2010-verab.htm; http://www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten/Artikel-,434.509737/artikel/Bundeskabinettbeschliesst-wei.htm; http://www.bundesregierung.de/Nachrichten/Artikel-,434.509246/artikel/Finanzierung-der-dritten-Steue.htm; http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Aktuelles/Pressemitteilungen-.395.19850/Pressemitteilung/Vorziehender-Steuerreform-200...htm)
Tax revenues and other Federal income
The Federal budget is based on projected 2004 tax revenues of EUR 197.7 billion, which would represent an increase of EUR 5.8 billion, or 3.0%, compared to 2003. Other Federal income included in the budget is estimated to amount to EUR 30.1 billion in 2004, an increase of EUR 4.5 billion compared to 2003. This other income includes EUR 18.4 billion of anticipated proceeds from privatizations and the repayment of loans.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Bundeshaushalt 2004: Tabellen und Übersichten, November 2003, page 8; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report, February 2004, p.62; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report, March 2004, p. 85)
G-8
Back to Contents
Social security expenditures
Projected social security expenditures are budgeted at EUR 122.6 billion, or 47.6% of total expenditures, in 2004. This figure includes EUR 77.9 billion in Federal contributions to the compulsory pension insurance system (gesetzliche Rentenversicherung), an increase of approximately EUR 0.6 billion compared to 2003.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Bundeshaushalt 2004: Tabellen und Übersichten, November 2003, page 10; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report, February 2004, p. 48)
Promotion of the economy
The 2004 budget provides for an amount of EUR 7.5 billion, or 2.9% of total budgeted expenditures, to promote the German economy. This amount includes EUR 1.2 billion in regional subsidies. An amount of EUR 2.2 billion has been budgeted for the promotion of the coal-mining industry. Furthermore, the Federal Government provides subsidies in the amount of EUR 0.8 billion to small and medium-sized enterprises to improve their productive performance and their ability to innovate.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report April 2004, pp. 46 - 48)
Interest payments
The Federal budget projects EUR 37.7 billion in interest payments in 2004, an increase of 2.1% compared to the previous year.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Bundeshaushalt 2003: Tabellen und Übersichten, November 2003, page 13; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report, March 2004, p. 86)
Privatizations
In 2003, the Federal Government continued its policy of privatizing state-owned businesses. The Federal Government thereby intends to improve the competitiveness of the German economy and to foster employment and economic growth. The largest privatizations in the last two years included Nassauische Heimstätte Wohnungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH and GEWOBAG Gemeinnützige Wohnungsbau-AG Berlin. The 2004 Federal budget is based on expected proceeds from privatizations of EUR 7.1 billion.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Bundeshaushalt 2004: Tabellen und Übersichten, November 2003, page 8; Beteiligungsbericht 2003, pages 3-7)
Gross Domestic Product
The following tables show the structure of the Federal Republic’s real GDP at 1995 prices by expenditure and origin for each of the years indicated along with changes over the respective preceding period.
STRUCTURE OF REAL GDP– EXPENDITURE(1) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| (EUR in billions) | | (change in %) | |
Private consumption | 1,124.1 | | 1,125.3 | | 1,136.9 | | 1,120.6 | | 1,099.1 | | (0.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | 1.4 | | 2.0 | |
Government consumption | 391.7 | | 388.4 | | 382.0 | | 378.0 | | 374.3 | | 0.9 | | 1.7 | | 1.0 | | 1.0 | |
Machinery and equipment | 147.9 | | 152.5 | | 167.8 | | 176.5 | | 160.3 | | (3.0 | ) | (9.1 | ) | (4.9 | ) | 10.1 | |
Construction | 209.8 | | 217.1 | | 230.5 | | 242.1 | | 248.7 | | (3.4 | ) | (5.8 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (2.6 | ) |
Other investment | 27.9 | | 27.4 | | 27.0 | | 25.5 | | 23.4 | | 1.8 | | 1.6 | | 5.6 | | 9.0 | |
Changes in stocks(2) | (7.4 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (24.7 | ) | (8.1 | ) | (5.7 | ) | | | | | | | | |
Domestic demand | 1,894.0 | | 1,888.6 | | 1,919.4 | | 1,934.7 | | 1,900.2 | | 0.3 | | (1.6 | ) | (0.8 | ) | 1.8 | |
Net exports(2) | 93.7 | | 101.1 | | 66.8 | | 34.8 | | 14.6 | | | | | | | | | |
Exports | 731.1 | | 722.6 | | 698.8 | | 661.5 | | 581.8 | | 1.2 | | 3.4 | | 5.6 | | 13.7 | |
Imports | 637.4 | | 621.5 | | 632.0 | | 626.7 | | 567.2 | | 2.6 | | (1.7 | ) | 0.9 | | 10.5 | |
Gross domestic product | 1,987.7 | | 1,989.7 | | 1,986.2 | | 1,969.5 | | 1,914.8 | | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | | 0.8 | | 2.9 | |
| |
(1) | Figures computed in February 2004, assuming 1995 prices. |
(2) | Percentage changes are not presented. |
G-9
Back to Contents
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
STRUCTURE OF REALGDP – ORIGIN(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
Agriculture, forestry and fishing(2) | 23.8 |
| 24.0 |
| 24.5 |
| 24.5 |
| 24.7 |
| (0.8 | ) | (2.0 | ) | 0.0 |
| (0.8 | ) |
Producing sector (excluding construction) | 445.7 |
| 443.8 |
| 444.3 |
| 447.3 |
| 430.5 |
| 0.4 |
| (0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | 3.9 |
|
Construction | 86.1 | | 90.1 | | 95.8 | | 102.1 | | 105.1 | | (4.5 | ) | (5.9 | ) | (6.1 | ) | (2.9 | ) |
Distribution, catering trade, transportation and telecommunications services | 373.8 | | 371.3 | | 367.6 | | 353.5 | | 334.5 | | 0.7 | | 1.0 | | 4.0 | | 5.7 | |
Financing, rents and corporate services | 599.3 | | 595.9 | | 589.7 | | 570.9 | | 546.6 | | 0.6 | | 1.1 | | 3.3 | | 4.4 | |
Public and private services(3) | 395.1 | | 394.8 | | 389.6 | | 388.4 | | 382.1 | | 0.1 | | 1.3 | | 0.3 | | 1.6 | |
All economic sectors | 1,923.8 | | 1,919.9 | | 1,911.5 | | 1,886.7 | | 1,823.5 | | 0.2 | | 0.4 | | 1.3 | | 3.5 | |
Economic sectors, adjusted(4) | 1,817.3 | | 1,815.2 | | 1,806.6 | | 1,786.4 | | 1,730.5 | | 0.1 | | 0.5 | | 1.1 | | 3.2 | |
Gross domestic product | 1,987.7 | | 1,989.7 | | 1,986.2 | | 1,969.5 | | 1,914.8 | | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | | 0.8 | | 2.9 | |
| |
(1) | Figures computed in February 2004, assuming 1995 prices. |
(2) | The gross value added of the sector “Agriculture, forestry and fishing” is computed by subtracting the gross value added of all other economic sectors from the total, using the official figures provided in Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report, March 2004, Table IX.1. |
(3) | Includes care-at-home services. |
(4) | Gross value added after deduction of assumed bank charges, but excluding taxes on products (offset against subsidies on products). |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
Sectors of the Economy
Producing sector
The producing sector of the Federal Republic grew rapidly after 1945. The main cause for this development was the Federal Government’s transition from a state-controlled economy to a social market economy, in which state intervention is limited to furthering social welfare and creating favorable economic conditions. Following German re-unification in 1990, the industry in the eastern Länder has undergone a restructuring process. Today, the German producing sector is characterized by a balanced mix of small, medium and large enterprises and is almost entirely privately owned. It is geographically concentrated in the western Länder of North-Rhine Westphalia, Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg, Hesse, Lower Saxony, Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein, and in the eastern Länder of Saxony, Thuringia and Saxony-Anhalt. The main segments of the producing sector are motor vehicle manufacturing, electrical engineering, chemicals and mechanical engineering. In 2003, the sector’s aggregate contribution to real GDP was 26.7% (including construction).
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
The following table shows the output of the producing sector in index form using 2000 as the base year (2000 = 100) for each of the years indicated.
G-10
Back to Contents
OUTPUT IN THE PRODUCING SECTOR(1)
(2000= 100)
| | 2003(2) | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Producing sector, total | | 98.5 | | 98.3 | | 99.6 | | 99.9 | | 95.3 |
Industry(3) | | 99.6 | | 99.3 | | 100.5 | | 99.9 | | 94.0 |
of which | | | | | | | | | | |
Intermediate goods(4) | | 99.7 | | 98.9 | | 99.7 | | 99.9 | | 94.5 |
Capital goods(5) | | 102.2 | | 101.1 | | 102.3 | | 99.9 | | 91.1 |
Durable goods | . | 86.2 | | 92.0 | | 100.4 | | 99.9 | | 96.2 |
Nondurable goods(6) | | 97.4 | | 98.2 | | 98.8 | | 99.9 | | 98.4 |
Energy(7) | | 99.7 | | 97.4 | | 97.3 | | 99.9 | | 100.2 |
Construction(8) | | 85.2 | | 89.0 | | 92.4 | | 100.0 | | 103.7 |
| |
(1) | Adjusted for working-day variations. |
(2) | Provisional figures. |
(3) | Manufacturing sector, unless assigned to the main grouping energy, plus mining and quarrying. |
(4) | Including mining and quarrying except energy-producing goods. |
(5) | Including manufacture of motor vehicles and components. |
(6) | Including printing and service activities related to printing. |
(7) | Electricity, gas, steam and hot water supply, mining and quarrying of energy-producing materials, and especially manufacture of refined petroleum products. |
(8) | The figures refer to the economic classifications “Site preparation” and “Building of complete constructions or parts thereof; civil engineering”. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.2)
Services sector
As in most other industrialized countries, the services sector, which comprises distribution, catering trade and transportation services, financing, rents and corporate services, as well as other public and private services, has expanded rapidly in recent years and is currently the largest contributor to real GDP. In 2003, the sector’s aggregate contribution to real GDP was 68.8%. Within the services sector, financing, rents and corporate services is the largest segment in terms of contribution to GDP, contributing 30.1% of real GDP in 2003.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
Employment and Labor
Following German reunification, the unemployment rate of the combined workforce of the western and eastern Länder, calculated in accordance with the national definition used by the German authorities, rose from 7.7% in 1992, reaching a peak of 11.4% in 1997. Under the ILO definition, the unemployment rate rose from 6.2% in 1992 to 9.3% in 1997. In the period 1998 to 2001, the rate decreased to 9.4% under the national definition or 7.4% under the ILO definition. In the period 2002 to 2003, however, the unemployment rate rose again to 10.5% (national definition) or 8.7% (ILO definition) in the wake of sluggish economic growth. Since January 2004, the national definition of the unemployment rate has been modified. Now, the rate excludes unemployed persons who participate in certain training procedures (“Eignungsfeststellungs- und Trainingsmaßnahmen”). The effect on the unemployment rate amounts to a reduction of 0.2 percent. Under the new definition, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate amounted to 10.4% in March 2004. A person is considered unemployed under the national definition used by the German authorities if he or she is registered as such and seeking work. The employed workforce also includes part-time employees working up to 15 hours a week. The ILO definition considers only those persons as unemployed who are available and seeking work. The number of people who were either employed or self-employed in 2003 was approximately 38.2 million.
(Source: http://www1.arbeitsamt.de/hst/services/statistik/aktuell/iiia4/zr_alob.xls; Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.6; Deutsche Bundesbank, Seasonally Adjusted Business Statistics, April 2004, Table II.8 and “Erläuterungen”, p. 85; www.pub.arbeitsamt.de/hst/services/statistik/detail/hinweis.html; Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.1, Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen 2003, Tables 1.10 and 2.5)
G-11
Back to Contents
The following table shows data with respect to employment and unemployment for each of the years indicated. In the unemployment rates shown below, persons are counted as employed who are involved in programs such as vocational training, job creation plans or early retirement, which are designed to reduce unemployment, particularly in the eastern Länder.
EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT
| 2003(1) | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Employed | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | 38,247 | | 38,668 | | 38,914 | | 38,750 | | 38,078 | |
Unemployed | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) national definition(2) | 4,376 | | 4,060 | | 3,852 | | 3,889 | | 4,099 | |
Unemployment rate | | | | | | | | | | |
(in %) national definition (3) | 10.5 | | 9.8 | | 9.4 | | 9.7 | | 10.5 | |
Unemployed | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) ILO definition (4) | 3,661 | | 3,396 | | 3,110 | | 3,065 | | 3,333 | |
Unemployment rate | | | | | | | | | | |
(in %) ILO definition (3) | 8.7 | | 8.1 | | 7.4 | | 7.3 | | 8.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Provisional figures. |
(2) | Registered unemployed persons, available and seeking work (but including persons working up to 15 hours per week). |
(3) | As a percentage of the total work force (excluding armed forces). |
(4) | Unemployed persons, available and seeking work. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.6; Monthly Report December 2002, Table IX.6; Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 3, 4th Quarter 2003, page 15)
Beginning in 1989, increasing numbers of immigrants of German descent from eastern Europe and of Germans from the former GDR resulted in an accelerated growth of the workforce and contributed in part to the subsequent increase in the number of registered unemployed persons. As a result of the fundamental restructuring of the eastern German economy following reunification, a significant number of employees in the eastern Länder lost their jobs. In 2003, the unemployment rate in the eastern Länder was 18.5%, which is more than twice the unemployment rate of the western Länder (8.4%).
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.6)
In the past, wages in Germany typically experienced only moderate increases over time, partly as a consequence of high unemployment rates. The growth in unit labor costs, taking into account the increase in labor productivity, was even more moderate (average annual growth rate around 0.9% for the years 1999 to 2003). The following table shows changes in the wage level for each of the years indicated by reference to 1995 figures as reflected in various economic indices.
WAGE TRENDS
(1995=100)
| 2003(1) | | 2002(1) | | 2001(1) | | 2000(1) | | 1999(1) | |
|
| |
Wages and salaries per employee(2) | 110.9 | | 109.5 | | 107.9 | | 105.9 | | 104.3 | |
Change from previous year in % | 1.3 | | 1.5 | | 1.9 | | 1.6 | | 1.5 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Figures computed in February 2004. |
(2) | Work place concept. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.9)
Approximately one-third of the German work force is organized in unions. The German Trade Union Federation (Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund) serves as an umbrella organization for eight such unions. Each member union typically covers employees of an entire industry sector, regardless of the precise type of work done by these employees (so-called “one union, one industry” principle). As a result, employers usually deal with only one negotiating partner on the labor side in each industry sector.
G-12
Back to Contents
The unions and employers of each industry sector enter into collective labor agreements (Tarifverträge), typically without government intervention. As a practical matter, the Tarifverträge apply to all employees of a given industry sector, regardless of whether or not a particular employee is unionized, so long as that employee’s employer is a member of the relevant association of employers, which is typically the case. In the eastern Länder, unions and employers have agreed on Tarifverträge that provide for a gradual increase in wages and salaries with a view to adjusting them over time to the levels paid in the western Länder. Tarifverträge are binding on both sides. Individual employment contracts may deviate from the terms of any applicable Tarifvertrag only if such deviations are expressly allowed by the Tarifvertrag or if they benefit solely the employee.
Several German laws contain provisions that regulate labor disputes. These laws provide, for example, that any strike be approved by a vote of three-quarters of the members of the competent trade union. As a result, there are relatively few strikes in the Federal Republic compared to other countries.
Social Security Legislation
The comprehensive system of social security legislation and services in effect in the Federal Republic includes health insurance, retirement and disability pensions, workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, child welfare programs, care for physically and mentally handicapped persons, allowances to orphans and to single persons with dependents, and the provision of general public assistance to needy persons. The majority of the German population is covered by mandatory retirement and public health insurance. Most of the hospitals and institutions caring for children and handicapped persons are operated by municipalities, churches and charitable institutions. In 1995, compulsory nursing care insurance was introduced.
Two-thirds of the financing of the various social security programs mentioned above is funded through social security contributions from employers and employees, and one-third is funded through direct contributions by the Federal Republic, the Länder, municipalities and other public institutions. The most important part of the social security system — retirement pensions, health insurance and unemployment insurance — is funded primarily through equal contributions by employers and employees.
The Retirement Funds Act (Altersvermögensgesetz), effective since 2002, aims to ensure the long-term viability of the public pension scheme by off-setting the expected decline of public pension payments by payments from private pension schemes. The act is designed to encourage investments in private pension schemes on a capital-cover basis and to promote pension schemes run by employers by granting certain bonuses and tax benefits to employees.
In 2002, the social security funds generated income in an aggregate amount of EUR 458.7 billion as shown in the national accounts, thereby falling short of the funds’ expenditures by EUR 6.6 billion. In 2003, the social security income amounted to EUR 468.7 billion, and expenditures were EUR 475.9 billion. The social security budget thus incurred a deficit of EUR 7.2 billion in 2003.
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.2, 2003, Table 3.4.3.7)
In light of a difficult global economic situation and a changing population structure, the Federal Government is aware that structural reforms must take place to safeguard the sustainability of the social security systems over the long term. The restructuring and renewal of the welfare state is a part of the “Agenda 2010” referred to above.
A first step to implement Agenda 2010 regarding health insurance was taken last year, when representatives of the Federal Government and of the opposition parties agreed on a law which aims at modernizing the system of health insurance and eliminating the budget deficit of public health insurance funds (Gesetz zur Modernisierung der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung). The law became effective on January 1, 2004. Its main elements include additional contributions for health services by insured persons, changes to the system for physicians’ remuneration and changes in the market structure of the retail pharmacy business. The aim of the reform measures is to reduce the expenditures of public health insurance funds and thereby allow for lower insurance contributions. As these contributions are paid by both employees and employers, this will also reduce labor costs.
G-13
Back to Contents
Other recent steps to implement Agenda 2010 include changes to the public pension system designed to adapt the system to respond to the ageing of the population. Pension contribution payments and pensions are not being increased in 2004, which should have a stabilizing effect on labor costs. The introduction of a sustainability factor for public pension in 2005, reflecting the ratio between retirees and working people, will have a confining effect on pension payments if the number of retirees increases in proportion to working people. Legislative changes in the unemployment insurance include cuts in the benefits paid to unemployed persons. Furthermore, unemployment benefits to unemployed persons who refuse to accept job offers will be curtailed beginning in 2005.
(Source: www.bundeskanzler.de/Weitere-Meldungen-.8106.472179/Regierungserklaerung-von-Bundeskanzler-Schroeder.htm; www.bundesregierung.de/Themen-A-Z/Gesundheit-und-Soziales-,9950/Gesundheitsreform.htm; www.bundesregierung.de/Anlage589860/pdf_datei.pdf; www.bundesregierung.de/Artikel/-,413.620797/dokument.htm)
International Economic Relations
International economic relations are of major importance to the German economy. In 2003, exports and imports of goods and services amounted to 36.8% and 32.1% of GDP at 1995 prices, respectively. The Federal Republic pursues a liberal foreign trade policy aimed at dismantling tariffs and other barriers to trade.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.1)
Because the Federal Republic’s economy depends on exports it is particularly vulnerable to trade barriers, such as protective tariffs. The Federal Government therefore supports the efforts to reduce trade barriers, for example through the current negotiations by the World Trade Organization under the Doha Development Agenda.
(Source: www.bmwi.de/Navigation/Aussenwirtschaft-und-Europa/Aussenwirtschaftspolitik/handelspolitik-eu-wto.html; www.bmwi.de/Navigation/aussenwirtschaft-und-europa,did=10246.html)
Balance of payments
The Federal Republic typically achieves a surplus as far as the trading of goods is concerned. Traditionally, however, this surplus has been partially offset by deficits in other fields, such as in services, as well as by remittances by foreign employees to their home countries, the Federal Republic’s net payments to the EU and various other payments. Throughout most of the 1980s, the trade surplus more than offset these other deficits, resulting in positive current account balances. Since 1991, increases in expenditures for services and in transfer payments have resulted in persistent current account deficits. In 1997, the current account deficit was DM 14.9 billion (approximately EUR 7.6 billion), the lowest level since German reunification. During the following years, the current account deficit increased again reaching a peak of EUR 27.9 billion in 2000 due, among other things, to a rise in oil prices, structural readjustments of the capital markets in connection with the introduction of the euro and increases in the services deficit owing to expenditures of German tourists abroad. Since 2001, however, the Federal Republic returned to current account surpluses again, rising to EUR 46.8 billion in 2003.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2001, pp. 63 and 67; Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table X.2)
Since the beginning of 2002, the euro has appreciated by about 40% against the U.S. dollar. This has raised fears that Germany’s export growth could weaken. The negative impact of the euro’s increase in external value on the German economy is potentially mitigated by a number of factors. Other EMU countries accounted for 42% of German exports in 2002, indicating that a major part of German sales abroad may not be affected by the dollar weakening. Therefore, according to preliminary data of the Deutsche Bundesbank, Germany’s price competitiveness vis-à-vis 19 industrial countries decreased by only 5% since the beginning of 2002. Furthermore, there may be positive influences of the stronger currency on the domestic economy. Lower import prices potentially cap consumer price inflation.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Reports March 2003 and 2004,Tables X.11; Deutsche Bundesbank, Zahlungsbilanzstatistik, February 2004, Table I. 3c; Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table X.13)
G-14
Back to Contents
The following table shows the Federal Republic’s balance of payments for each of the years indicated.
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS (BALANCES)
| 2003(1) | | 2002(1) | | 2001(1) | | 2000(1) | | 1999(1) | |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Current account(2) | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign trade(3) | 129,644 | | 132,788 | | 95,495 | | 59,128 | | 65,211 | |
Supplementary trade items | (6,768 | ) | (5,968 | ) | (5,368 | ) | (6,905 | ) | (6,982 | ) |
Services(4) | (34,778 | ) | (36,422 | ) | (50,272 | ) | (49,067 | ) | (46,067 | ) |
Factor Income | (12,515 | ) | (16,844 | ) | (10,680 | ) | (2,641 | ) | (9,599 | ) |
Current transfers | (28,767 | ) | (27,883 | ) | (27,425 | ) | (28,366 | ) | (25,016 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current account | 46,816 | | 45,670 | | 1,749 | | (27,851 | ) | (22,454 | ) |
Capital transfers and purchases/ sales of | | | | | | | | | | |
intangible non-produced assets | 316 | | (212 | ) | (387 | ) | 6,823 | | (154 | ) |
Capital account | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net capital (capital exports) | (55,015 | ) | (68,715 | ) | (26,233 | ) | 28,343 | | (22,931 | ) |
of which: | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net German investment abroad | | | | | | | | | | |
(increase/capital exports: negative figure) | (174,719 | ) | (247,663 | ) | (270,632 | ) | (364,291 | ) | (346,737 | ) |
Total net foreign investment in Germany | | | | | | | | | | |
(increase/capital imports: positive figure) | 119,704 | | 178,948 | | 244,399 | | 392,634 | | 323,806 | |
Balance of unclassifiable transactions | 7,439 | | 21,192 | | 18,838 | | (13,159 | ) | 33,003 | |
Change in the Deutsche Bundesbank’s net | | | | | | | | | | |
external assets at transaction values | | | | | | | | | | |
(increase: negative figure) | 2,658 | | (33,292 | ) | 32,677 | | 48,230 | | (36,999 | ) |
| |
(1) | Figures are subject to considerable uncertainty owing to changes in the method of data collection in foreign trade. |
(2) | Foreign trade and services are recorded on the basis of exports (f.o.b.)/imports (c.i.f.), i.e. including the freight and insurance costs of imports. |
(3) | Special trade according to the official foreign trade statistics. Special Trade consists principally of goods that are imported into the Federal Republic for use, consumption, adaptation or processing, as well as goods that are produced, manufactured, adapted or processed in the Federal Republic and are exported. The reported figures are based on imports c.i.f. and exports f.o.b. (Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, page 275). |
(4) | Excluding the freight and insurance costs included in the c.i.f. import value. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Balance of payments statistics, March 2004, Tables I.1 and I.9)
Balance of trade
The following tables show information relating to foreign trade of the Federal Republic for each of the years indicated:
FOREIGN TRADE OF GOODS
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Exports of goods (f.o.b.) | 661,613 | | 651,320 | | 638,268 | | 597,440 | | 510,008 | |
Imports of goods (c.i.f.) | 531,970 | | 518,532 | | 542,774 | | 538,311 | | 444,797 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Trade surplus | 129,644 | | 132,788 | | 95,495 | | 59,128 | | 65,211 | |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Balance of payments statistics, March 2004, Table I.1)
The Federal Republic’s principal export goods are motor vehicles, machinery of all kinds, electrical engineering and chemical products.
The principal import goods are chemical products, motor vehicles, machinery and metals. The Federal Republic has relatively few resources of industrial raw materials. It therefore largely depends on imports to
G-15
Back to Contents
satisfy its demand for raw materials. This dependence on foreign supplies is particularly significant in the case of metals such as copper, bauxite, manganese, titanium, rock phosphate, tungsten and tin. The Federal Republic currently imports nearly two-thirds of its energy requirements, including virtually all of its oil and a significant portion of its natural gas requirements as well as all enriched uranium needed for nuclear energy.
COMPOSITION OF EXPORTED AND IMPORTED GOODS
| 2003(1) | |
| Exports | | Imports | |
| (EUR in billions) | |
Total | 661.6 | | 532.0 | |
of which: | | | | |
Coal and turf | 0.2 | | 1.0 | |
Petroleum and gas | 3.3 | | 35.3 | |
Nutrition | 24.3 | | 26.6 | |
Textiles | 11.2 | | 12.0 | |
Clothing | 7.3 | | 16.0 | |
Paper | 14.1 | | 12.3 | |
Chemical products | 82.3 | | 55.9 | |
Iron and steel, non-ferrous metals | 28.9 | | 25.3 | |
Machinery | 91.1 | | 37.0 | |
Office machines and automatic data processing equipment | 17.2 | | 27.0 | |
Electrical machinery | 32.1 | | 23.4 | |
Special mechanical and optical goods | 26.3 | | 15.2 | |
Motor vehicles and components | 128.8 | | 57.0 | |
| |
(1) | Preliminary data, last update March 5, 2004. |
(Source: http://www.destatis.de/basis/d/aussh/aushtab2.htm)
G-16
Back to Contents
FOREIGN TRADE (SPECIAL TRADE) BY GROUPS OF COUNTRIES AND COUNTRIES(1)
|
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | (EUR in millions) | | | |
Exports to: | | | | | | |
Total | 661,613 | | 651,320 | | 638,268 | |
| Central and eastern Europe | 79,970 | | 75,373 | | 69,914 | |
| France | 70,006 | | 68,721 | | 69,601 | |
| United States | 61,669 | | 68,263 | | 67,824 | |
| United Kingdom | 55,307 | | 53,761 | | 52,764 | |
| Italy | 48,785 | | 47,335 | | 47,119 | |
| The Netherlands | 40,997 | | 40,463 | | 40,011 | |
| Belgium/Luxembourg | 36,393 | | 34,108 | | 35,187 | |
| Austria | 35,188 | | 33,863 | | 33,486 | |
| Spain | 32,504 | | 29,436 | | 27,841 | |
| Switzerland | 25,903 | | 26,702 | | 27,489 | |
| Southeast Asia(2) | 24,557 | | 25,282 | | 24,735 | |
| China(3) | 18,201 | | 14,571 | | 12,118 | |
| Sweden | 14,305 | | 13,496 | | 12,978 | |
| OPEC Countries | 14,003 | | 14,689 | | 13,669 | |
| Japan | 11,838 | | 12,576 | | 13,103 | |
|
| | | | | | |
Imports from: | | | | | | |
Total | 531,970 | | 518,532 | | 542,774 | |
| Central and eastern Europe | 76,332 | | 70,686 | | 68,701 | |
| France | 48,832 | | 48,200 | | 49,743 | |
| The Netherlands | 44,404 | | 40,751 | | 43,233 | |
| United States | 39,046 | | 40,376 | | 45,982 | |
| Italy | 33,670 | | 33,482 | | 35,280 | |
| United Kingdom | 31,961 | | 33,075 | | 37,259 | |
| Belgium/Luxembourg | 27,710 | | 26,505 | | 28,521 | |
| Southeast Asia(2) | 26,581 | | 26,660 | | 28,351 | |
| China(3) | 25,024 | | 21,338 | | 19,942 | |
| Austria | 21,026 | | 21,047 | | 20,664 | |
| Japan | 19,139 | | 19,896 | | 22,910 | |
| Switzerland | 19,036 | | 19,461 | | 19,753 | |
| Spain | 16,421 | | 15,532 | | 15,226 | |
| Sweden | 9,472 | | 8,868 | | 8,999 | |
| OPEC countries | 7,304 | | 6,977 | | 8,220 | |
| | | | | | | |
(1) | Exports f.o.b. by country of destination, imports c.i.f. by country of origin. Special trade consists mainly of goods that are imported into the Federal Republic for use, consumption, adaptation or processing, as well as goods that are produced, manufactured, adapted or processed in the Federal Republic and subsequently are exported. (Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003,page 275). |
(2) | Includes Brunei, Darussalam, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand. |
(3) | Does not include Hong Kong. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table X.3)
G-17
Back to Contents
MONETARY AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM
Background of the European System of Central Banks
The European System of Central Banks (ESCB) comprises the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the 25 Member States of the EU, while the Eurosystem consists of the ECB and the national central banks of the twelve Member States that have adopted the euro as their legal currency, Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
The Eurosystem is responsible for the single monetary policy for the euro area. Its decision-making bodies are the Governing Council and the Executive Board of the ECB. The national central banks of the Member States that are not part of the Eurosystem are represented in the General Council, but have no voting right in the decision-making process. The Eurosystem’s primary objective is to maintain price stability. It supports the general economic policies of the EU.
The Deutsche Bundesbank – Germany’s national central bank within the ESCB – now has the responsibility of implementing the single monetary policy in Germany and continues to perform various other tasks, including acting as the Federal Government’s fiscal agent and playing an important role in banking and financial market supervision, as further described below under the caption “– Financial System”.
(Source: European Central Bank, Annual Report 1999, pages 135-138; www.ecb.int/about/escb.htm; www.bundesbank.de/aufgaben/aufgaben.en.php)
Monetary Policy Instruments of the ESCB
To achieve its operational goals, the ESCB conducts open market operations, offers standing facilities and requires credit institutions to maintain minimum reserves in accounts with the ESCB. Open market operations play an important role in the ESCB’s monetary policy because they steer interest rates and manage the liquidity situation in the market. Available open market operations are reverse transactions, outright transactions, the issuance of debt certificates or foreign exchange swaps, and the collection of fixed-term deposits. Standing facilities are designed to provide or absorb overnight liquidity and the imposition of minimum reserve requirements allows the ESCB to stabilize money market interest rates, create (or enlarge) a structural liquidity shortage and possibly contribute to the control of monetary expansion.
(Source: European Central Bank, Annual Report 1999, pages 48-54; www.ecb.int/about/monetarypolicy.htm)
Money Supply and Prices
The ECB’s primary goal is to maintain medium-term price stability, defined as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices for the euro area of less than 2%. However, the ECB has clarified that it aims, within this definition, at an inflation rate close to 2%. This indicates the commitment to provide an adequate margin to avoid the risk of deflation. The stability-oriented monetary policy strategy of the Eurosystem used by the ECB to achieve this goal is based on two pillars: (i) analysis and assessment of short- to medium-term risks to price stability (economic analysis) and (ii) assessment of medium- to long-term monetary developments (monetary analysis) including a “natural” benchmark (reference value for the euro area money supply M3). The euro area money supply M3 is broadly defined as the sum total of currency in circulation, overnight deposits, deposits with an agreed maturity of up to two years, deposits redeemable at up to three months’ notice, repurchase agreements, money market fund shares/units and money market papers, and debt securities with a term of up to two years. Holdings by non-residents of the euro area of money market fund shares/units, money market papers and debt securities with a term of up to two years are excluded from M3 and its components. The Governing Council set the reference value for M3 at 4.5% growth per annum. In 2003, the annual growth rate of euro area M3 was 8.0%, thereby exceeding the reference value. This monetary growth is believed to be due to a large extent to investors’ preference for safe and liquid assets in the context of a low level of interest rates and a high volatility in financial markets. Against the background of declining financial market uncertainty, a steepening yield curve and the improved economic outlook, M3 growth decelerated in the final months of 2003.
(Source: European Central Bank, Monthly Bulletin, January 1999, pages 45-50, Monthly Bulletin, February 2004, page 9 and page S 5 Table 1; press release “Review of the Quantitative Reference Value for Monetary Growth”, December 2002)
G-18
Back to Contents
The following table shows price trends in Germany for the periods indicated.
PRICE TRENDS
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | (change from previous year in %) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Harmonized Consumer Price Index | 1.0 | | 1.3 | | 1.9 | | 1.4 | | 0.6 | |
Consumer price index for all households | 1.1 | | 1.4 | | 2.0 | | 1.4 | | 0.6 | |
Index of producer prices of industrial products sold on the domestic market | 1.7 | | (0.6 | ) | 3.0 | | 3.1 | | (1.0 | ) |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IX.7; www.destatis.de/indicators/d/vpi020vj.htm)
The following table shows the principal indicators relating to money supply for each of the years indicated.
MAIN MONETARY INDICATORS
| | | As per December 31,(1) | | | |
| | |
| | | |
| 2003(3) | | 2002(3) | | 2001(3) | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (EUR in billions) | |
Currency in circulation(2) | 388.7 | | 333.0 | | 233.4 | | 348.4 | | 349.9 | |
Money Stock M1 | 2,673.7 | | 2,439.3 | | 2,222.3 | | 2,077.1 | | 1,964.0 | |
Money Stock M2 | 5,225.3 | | 4,913.6 | | 4,618.2 | | 4,290.0 | | 4,133.3 | |
Money Stock M3 | 6,136.9 | | 5,768.1 | | 5,408.0 | | 4,900.7 | | 4,775.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Annual change in %, December comparison(4) | |
Money Stock M1 | 10.5 | | 9.7 | | 5.9 | | 5.7 | | 10.0 | |
Money Stock M2 | 7.5 | | 6.6 | | 6.5 | | 3.7 | | 5.2 | |
Money Stock M3 | 7.0 | | 6.9 | | 8.0 | | 4.2 | | 6.1 | |
| |
(1) | Monetary aggregates comprise monetary liabilities of MFIs and central government (post office, treasury) vis-à-vis non-MFI euro area residents excluding central government. M1 is the sum of currency in circulation and overnight deposits; M2 is the sum of M1, deposits with an agreed maturity of up to two years and deposits redeemable at notice of up to three months; and M3 is the sum of M2, repos, money market fund shares/units and debt securities up to two years. |
(2) | Excluding credit institutions’ cash in hand, including notes and coins held abroad. |
(3) | Euro area enlargement in 2001. |
(4) | Annual changes of euro area M3 are calculated from monthly differences in levels adjusted for reclassification, other revaluations, exchange rate variations and any other changes which do not arise from transactions. |
(Source: European Central Bank, Monthly Bulletin, March 2004, Tables 2.3.1, 2.3.2; Monthly Bulletin July 2002, Tables 2.4.1, 2.4.2; Monthly Bulletin July 2001, Tables 2.4.1, 2.4.2)
G-19
Back to Contents
Official Foreign Exchange Reserves
The following table shows the breakdown of the Federal Republic’s official foreign exchange reserves as of the end of the years indicated.
OFFICIAL FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC
| | | | As of December 31, | | | |
| |
| |
| | 2003(1) | | 2002(1) | | 2001(1) | | 2000(1) | | 1999(1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (EUR in millions) | |
Gold | | 36,533 | | 36,208 | | 35,005 | | 32,676 | | 32,287 | |
Foreign Currency Balances | 32,538 | | 40,522 | | 49,489 | | 53,377 | | 52,420 | |
International Monetary Fund Reserve Position and Special Drawing Rights | 7,609 | | 8,272 | | 8,721 | | 7,762 | | 8,332 | |
Claims on the European Central Bank (net) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | 76,680 | | 85,002 | | 93,215 | | 93,815 | | 93,039 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(1) | External position of the Deutsche Bundesbank in the European Monetary Union. Assets and liabilities vis-a-vis all EMU member countries and non-EMU member countries. |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table X.9)
The Federal Republic’s foreign reserve assets are currently managed by the Deutsche Bundesbank. The 12 participating Member States in the EMU have transferred foreign reserve assets in an aggregate amount equivalent to approximately EUR 40.5 billion to the ECB, consisting of foreign currency reserves and gold. The ECB manages the foreign reserve assets transferred to it. The foreign reserve assets not transferred to the ECB continue to be held and managed by the national central banks of the twelve participating Member States. In order to ensure consistency within the single monetary and foreign exchange policies of the EMU, the ECB monitors and coordinates market transactions conducted with those assets.
(Source: European Central Bank, Annual Report 1998, page 74; European Central Bank, Annual Report 2002, page 199)
External Positions of Banks
The following table shows the external assets and liabilities of the Deutsche Bundesbank and the commercial banks of the Federal Republic as of the end of each of the years indicated.
FOREIGN FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES BY SECTOR
| | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | (EUR in billions) | |
Deutsche Bundesbank | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets | | 95.4 | | 103.9 | | 76.1 | | 100.8 | | 142.0 | |
Liabilities | | 10.4 | | 9.0 | | 8.8 | | 6.6 | | 6.2 | |
Net Position | | 85.0 | | 94.9 | | 67.4 | | 94.2 | | 135.8 | |
Banks | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans to foreign banks | | 769.6 | | 690.6 | | 596.1 | | 507.7 | | 427.1 | |
Loans to foreign non-banks | 576.3 | | 558.8 | | 570.3 | | 475.8 | | 396.1 | |
Loans from foreign banks | 590.7 | | 614.2 | | 622.7 | | 586.0 | | 483.6 | |
Loans from foreign non-banks | 307.3 | | 319.2 | | 350.6 | | 314.9 | | 284.4 | |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Tables IV.4, X.9)
G-20
Back to Contents
Foreign Exchange Rates and Controls
The euro is a freely convertible currency. Since its introduction, it has become the second most widely used currency internationally. Currency transactions do not require licenses or other permissions. Capital market transactions are equally not subject to any license or similar requirements. Gold may be imported and exported freely, subject only to the levy of VAT on some transactions.
The following table shows the exchange rates for selected currencies into the euro for the past five years.
ANNUAL AVERAGE EXCHANGE RATES OF THE EURO(1)
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
U.S. dollars per 1 euro | 1.1312 | | 0.9456 | | 0.8956 | | 0.9236 | | 1.0658 | |
Pound sterling per 1 euro | 0.6920 | | 0.6288 | | 0.6219 | | 0.6095 | | 0.6587 | |
Japanese yen per 1 euro | 130.97 | | 118.06 | | 108.68 | | 99.47 | | 121.32 | |
Swiss franc per 1 euro | 1.5212 | | 1.4670 | | 1.5105 | | 1.5579 | | 1.6003 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Calculated from daily quotations. | | | | | | | | | |
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table X.11)
Financial System
As of January 31, 2004, 2,224 financial institutions in Germany reported an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 6,463.7 billion to the Deutsche Bundesbank. According to the Deutsche Bundesbank’s own classification, these institutions included 259 commercial banks with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 1,821.8 billion and 128 subsidiaries and branches of foreign banks located in the Federal Republic with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 381.9 billion.
In addition to the commercial banks, there were 491 savings banks and their 13 central institutions, and 14 special purpose credit institutions. As of January 31, 2004, the aggregate balance sheet total of the savings banks was EUR 984.2 billion, and the aggregate balance sheet total of their 13 central institutions was EUR 1,345.5 billion. The aggregate balance sheet total of the special purpose credit institutions was EUR 530.8 billion.
Furthermore, the Federal Republic’s banking system comprises 1,393 credit cooperatives (with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 560.6 billion as of January 31, 2004) and their two regional institutions (with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 185.8 billion), 25 mortgage banks (with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 862.4 billion) and 27 building and loan associations (with an aggregate balance sheet total of EUR 172.6 billion).
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table IV.2)
All banks other than the Deutsche Bundesbank and KfW are regulated by the German Banking Act. German commercial banking institutions operate as “universal” banks and are not restricted by law or otherwise from offering a complete range of diverse financial services.
The system of supervision of financial services in Germany was reorganized in 2002. The task of the new Financial Supervisory Authority is to provide integrated financial services supervision, intended to better address the needs of the capital markets for the protection of investors and insured persons, and to enable financial services providers to install more adequate cross-sector risk-management devices. Overall, the reform was intended to strengthen the German financial markets, especially in respect of competition with other European countries. The Deutsche Bundesbank is closely integrated into the ongoing supervision of the banking sector by the Financial Supervisory Authority.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, press release dated March 22, 2002; Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, press release dated April 29, 2002; Deutsche Bundesbank and Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, joint press release dated November 4, 2002)
G-21
Back to Contents
Securities Market
The Federal Republic’s securities market is among Europe’s largest. Trading in listed securities is not legally or otherwise confined to the stock exchanges. It is estimated, however, that most transactions in equity securities are executed through stock exchanges. By contrast, debt securities, although typically listed, are predominantly traded over-the-counter.
Highly developed secondary markets, combined with the distribution strength of an extensive network of commercial banks, provide the basis for the Federal Republic’s position in the world’s capital markets. Equity and debt issues are generally underwritten and distributed through banking syndicates, which typically include commercial banks as well as certain regional and specialized institutions.
In 2003, sales of debt securities and shares amounted to EUR 170.2 billion and EUR 17.4 billion, respectively. The most important stock exchange in the Federal Republic is the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, operated by Deutsche Börse AG with a total turnover in 2003 of EUR 2,776.3 billion, accounting for 87.7% of the total turnover on German securities exchanges.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table VII.1 and Deutsche Börse, Cash Market: Monthly Statistics – January 2004; http://deutsche-boerse.com/dbag/dispatch/s/B72F5397492B57473DBDA0E56F6CE2C5/de/notescontent/gdb_navigation/
information_services/40_Statistics_Analysis/20_Spot_Market/INTEGRATE/statistic?notesDoc=Monatsstatistik+Kas samarkt)
G-22
Back to Contents
PUBLIC FINANCE
Receipts and Expenditures
The Federal Government, each of the Länder governments and each of the municipalities have separate budgets. The federal budget is the largest single public budget.
The fiscal year of the Federal Republic is the calendar year. The annual Federal budget is passed by an act of Parliament. On the basis of a proposal prepared by the Ministry of Finance, the Federal Government introduces the Federal Budget Bill to the Parliament, generally in the fall of each year. The proposal has to pass through three Bundestag sessions, the budget committee and the Bundesrat, which deliberates the proposal twice. The final vote on the proposal is taken by the Bundestag in its third session.
In addition to the federal, Länder and municipal budgets, there are separate budgets of the social security system and various special funds (Sondervermögen) of the federal administration that are created for specific public purposes.
Starting with the 2001 fiscal year, a new budgetary classification took effect. Because receipts and expenditures are allocated differently under the new classification, line items contained in the budgets drawn up for the 2001 and subsequent fiscal years are not necessarily comparable with the respective line items contained in budgets for prior periods. This is true especially with respect to General Services and General Financing.
In 2003, total consolidated public sector receipts as shown in the national accounts amounted to EUR 959.2 billion, with tax receipts of EUR 482.3 billion and social security contributions of EUR 395.5 billion.
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.2, 2003, Table 3.4.3.2)
In 2003, turnover taxes (i.e., VAT and import-turnover tax) and income taxes amounted to EUR 137.0 billion and EUR 162.6 billion, respectively. In addition to these taxes, the Federal Government, the Länder governments and the municipal authorities each levied special taxes, for example on tobacco, beer and motor vehicles. The joint taxes are distributed among the Federal Government, the Länder governments and municipal authorities, according to a predetermined formula.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Table VIII.5)
Consolidated public sector expenditures in 2003, as shown in the national accounts, amounted to a total of EUR 1,041.3 billion. The most significant consolidated public sector expenditures were social transfers and benefits (EUR 588.3 billion) and employee compensation (EUR 168.2 billion). Other significant consolidated public sector expenditures included gross capital formation, which totaled EUR 31.1 billion, and interest on public debt, which totaled EUR 66.2 billion.
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.2, 2003, Table 3.4.3.2)
The consolidated budget deficit shown in the national accounts increased from an amount of EUR 74.3 billion in 2002 to EUR 82.1 billion in 2003. In 2003, the budget deficit was 3.9% of GDP.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2003, Table VIII.3)
G-23
Back to Contents
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTS(1)
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (EUR in billions) | |
Federal Government, Länder | | | | | | | | | | |
governments and municipalities | | | | | | | | | | |
Receipts | 581.0 | | 577.3 | | 575.2 | | 593.2 | | 575.9 | |
of which taxes(2) | 482.3 | | 477.6 | | 476.3 | | 498.4 | | 478.7 | |
Expenditures | 655.9 | | 645.0 | | 630.8 | | 566.7 | | 610.7 | |
Balance | (74.9 | ) | (67.7 | ) | (55.6 | ) | 26.5 | | (34.8 | ) |
Social security | | | | | | | | | | |
Receipts | 468.7 | | 458.7 | | 445.8 | | 434.8 | | 430.4 | |
Expenditures | 475.9 | | 465.3 | | 449.1 | | 434.5 | | 425.0 | |
Balance | (7.2 | ) | (6.6 | ) | (3.3 | ) | 0.3 | | 5.4 | |
Consolidated public sector | | | | | | | | | | |
Receipts | 959.2 | | 949.5 | | 942.5 | | 955.3 | | 935.1 | |
Expenditures | 1,041.3 | | 1,023.9 | | 1,001.4 | | 928.5 | | 964.5 | |
Balance | (82.1 | ) | (74.3 | ) | (58.9 | ) | 26.8 | | (29.4 | ) |
| |
(1) | Definition according to the national accounts. |
(2) | Excluding taxes of domestic sectors to EU. |
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.2, 2003, Tables 3.4.3.2, 3.4.3.3, 3.4.3.7)
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTS(1)
| 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | | 1999 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (EUR in billions) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Receipts | 274.5 | | 267.6 | | 262.6 | | 267.5 | | 259.2 | |
of which taxes(2) | 245.9 | | 240.8 | | 236.6 | | 244.7 | | 234.2 | |
Expenditures | 312.4 | | 301.8 | | 291.0 | | 239.6 | | 289.7 | |
Total balance | (38.0 | ) | (34.2 | ) | (28.3 | ) | 27.9 | | (30.5 | ) |
| |
(1) | Definition according to the national accounts. |
(2) | Excluding taxes of domestic sectors to EU. |
(Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 18, Reihe 1.2, 2003, Table 3.4.3.4)
G-24
Back to Contents
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES(1)
| 2005(2) | | 2004(2) | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Expenditures total | 251,200 | | 257,300 | | 256,703 | | 249,286 | | 243,145 | |
Selected categories: | | | | | | | | | | |
Education, science, research, | | | | | | | | | | |
cultural affairs | 11,951 | | 11,887 | | 10,936 | | 10,956 | | 10,633 | |
Social security | 111,573 | | 122,583 | | 118,299 | | 111,855 | | 102,034 | |
of which: | | | | | | | | | | |
Subsidies to social | | | | | | | | | | |
welfare insurance | | | | | | | | | | |
(including unemployment | | | | | | | | | | |
insurance) | 86,982 | | 88,689 | | 88,350 | | 83,926 | | 75,896 | |
Family and child benefits | 2,804 | | 2,989 | | 3,171 | | 3,314 | | 3,325 | |
Labor market policy | 13,415 | | 22,551 | | 17,478 | | 15,408 | | 13,462 | |
Promotion of savings and | | | | | | | | | | |
investments | 500 | | 500 | | 612 | | 482 | | 486 | |
Defense | 28,489 | | 28,121 | | 28,384 | | 28,391 | | 27,958 | |
Transportation / | | | | | | | | | | |
communication | 10,776 | | 10,836 | | 10,096 | | 10,021 | | 9,775 | |
General financing | 41,332 | | 37,711 | | 39,591 | | 40,119 | | 43,530 | |
of which: | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt service | 41,183 | | 37,693 | | 36,895 | | 37,093 | | 37,662 | |
Other expenditures | | | | | | | | | | |
Economic cooperation | 3,790 | | 3,721 | | 3,675 | | 3,672 | | 3,697 | |
Health | 340 | | 365 | | 441 | | 357 | | 403 | |
Housing, regional | | | | | | | | | | |
planning, municipal | | | | | | | | | | |
community services | 2,134 | | 2,025 | | 1,826 | | 2,237 | | 2,200 | |
Food, agriculture, | | | | | | | | | | |
forestry | 1,119 | | 1,099 | | 1,097 | | 1,180 | | 1,371 | |
| |
(1) | The information presented in this table concerning expenditures is not comparable to the information concerning expenditures presented in the table “Federal Government Accounts” as the information is derived from different sources and is the result of different methods of data compilation. |
(2) | Government projection. |
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Finanzbericht 2004, Table 2, pages 212-214, Table 4, pages 224-229; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report February 2004, pp. 35-64; Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Monthly Report April 2004, pp. 33-56, and Tables 3-5, pp. 85-91)
Tax Structure
Income tax
The Federal Government’s largest source of revenue is income tax. Employees pay income tax in the form of payroll taxes, which employers are required to deduct from employees’ salaries or wages and pay directly to the tax authorities. In contrast, self-employed persons typically pay estimated taxes during the year before filing their annual income tax return. The income tax payable with respect to taxable income generated during the 2004 fiscal year is calculated on the basis of (i) a personal allowance in the amount of EUR 7,664 for single persons/EUR 15,329 for married couples that applies to all taxpayers, (ii) progressive tax brackets ranging from 16% to 45%, and (iii) a flat rate of 45% for net income in excess of EUR 52,151 for single persons/EUR 104,303 for married couples. In addition, a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% is imposed on the applicable income tax rate – with certain allowances – to finance the restructuring processes in the eastern
Länder. Capital income received by domestic taxpayers is subject to capital income withholding tax (Kapitalertragsteuer) at a rate of 30% for interest payments and 20% for dividend payments, subject to an allowance in the amount of EUR 1,421 (EUR 2,842 for married couples). The tax withheld is credited against the taxpayers’ income tax liability. For future changes in these tax rates see “— Tax Reform 2000”.
G-25
Back to Contents
Since January 2001, income generated by corporations is subject to corporate income tax at a flat rate of 25% (in 2003, however, the rate temporarily rose to 26.5% due to of the flooding in eastern Germany), reduced from 45% on retained earnings and 30% on distributed profits. The full imputation system previously used in connection with the taxation of dividends has been replaced by the so-called “half income system” in 2002 to make cross-border investment within the EU more attractive. Under the half income system, only half of the distributed profits of a corporation are included in the shareholders’ personal income for tax purposes. In turn, it is no longer necessary to credit the corporate tax paid by the company against the shareholders’ income tax liability. Starting with the 2002 tax year, capital gains from the sale of shareholdings from one corporation to another are generally tax-exempt. Private shareholders are able to sell their stakes in corporations after a minimum holding period of one year without having to pay taxes, unless they hold a substantial interest of 1% (10% prior to 2002). If the sale is subject to tax, i.e. when shares are sold within the one-year holding period or represent a substantial interest, the half-income system applies. The tax-free allowance for the sale or closure of a business is EUR 45,000 in 2004. Alternatively to the “one fifth rule”, a tax privilege for extraordinary income aimed at reducing the impact of progressive tax rates (called “one fifth rule” because it is computed by dividing the eligible extraordinary income by five and subsequently multiplying the resulting tax liability by five), entrepreneurs retiring from business can now opt for the so called “half-average tax rate” since the tax year 2001 (56% from 2004). Retiring entrepreneurs thus also have the option to have profits from the sale or closure of agricultural, business and professional undertakings and partnership shares taxed at this reduced tax rate. Various measures have been adopted to finance the foregoing tax relief, e.g. the declining-balance tax depreciation rate for movable assets was reduced from 30% to 20% and the depreciation rate for buildings owned for business purposes fell from 4% to 3%.
Value-added tax
Value-added tax (“VAT”) is imposed on the value added to most goods and services. The rate applicable to most goods and services is 16%. Certain items that are classified as basic necessities are subject to a 7% rate.
Environmental tax
On April 1, 1999, an environmental tax scheme was introduced in order to encourage energy conservation and at the same time lowering contributions to the public pension system, thereby allocating the burden of taxes and contributions more equally among labor, capital and natural resources.
Trade tax
Historically, the trade tax, which is levied at municipal level, comprised a tax on both the trade earnings and the trade capital of a business. The trade capital tax was abolished in 1998. By contrast, the trade earnings tax is still in effect. Its rate varies and depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the business subject to the trade tax as well as the municipality that levies the tax. A business’s trade earnings are calculated in accordance with specific rules and are not necessarily identical with that business’s earnings as calculated for other purposes. The trade tax is deductible as an operating expenditure and thus has an effect on personal as well as corporate income taxes. Unincorporated businesses, which already particularly benefit from the significant cuts in income tax rates in the wake of the Tax Reform 2000 (described below), thereby obtain an additional reduction of their tax burden. The trade tax will be credited against their income tax liability in a standardized form. The income tax applicable to unincorporated businesses will be reduced by an amount equal to 1.8 times the assessment basis for trade tax. As a result of the legislative mediation procedure, these provisions have been readjusted with respect to their precise objective in order to limit over-compensation. Ultimately, however, the majority of unincorporated companies will still be afforded full relief from trade tax through various available procedures.
Tax Reform 2000
In July 2000, the Tax Reduction Act (Steuersenkungsgesetz) and, in November/December 2000, the Supplementary Tax Reduction Act (Steuersenkungsergänzungsgesetz) were adopted as part of the so-called “Tax Reform 2000”, an ambitious tax reduction program that came into effect on January 1, 2001. The main beneficiaries of the Tax Reform 2000 are families, employees and small and medium-sized enterprises. Until 2005, the Tax Reform 2000 is expected to provide for a total annual relief in the amount of EUR 32 billion compared to the 1998 tax burden.
G-26
Back to Contents
The personal allowance for personal income tax payers was increased to EUR 7,664 for single persons and EUR 15,329 for married couples (from EUR 7,235 and EUR 14,471, respectively, since 2002) as from January 1, 2004. The minimum tax bracket was decreased to 16% (from 19.9% since 2002), while the maximum tax bracket was reduced to 45% (from 48.5% since 2002) from the same date. These measures are based on the second reduction stage of the Tax Reform 2000 which had originally been planned for 2002 but had ultimately been delayed for one year in light of the flooding, as well as a further tax relief within the scope of the third reduction stage, which was partly implemented one year earlier than scheduled under the Budget Support Act 2004 (Haushaltsbegleitgesetz 2004) in order to boost domestic growth. The maximum flat rate is applied only to taxable income in excess of EUR 52,151 for single persons and EUR 104,303 for married couples. The Tax Reform 2000 will be concluded on January 1, 2005 with the minimum tax bracket decreasing to 15% and the maximum tax bracket falling to 42%. These tax cuts are partly financed by reducing financial subsidies and tax privileges.
In addition to the Tax Reform 2000, the Bundestag adopted the Act for Development of Corporate Taxation (Gesetz zur Fortentwicklung des Unternehmenssteuerrechts), which took effect on January 1, 2002. This act contains a number of short-term measures particularly benefiting small and medium-sized enterprises. Most importantly, a reinvestment reserve makes it easier for small and medium-sized partnerships to restructure their equity, resulting in a total relief of EUR 650 million. Using this reinvestment reserve, partnerships can transfer profits from the sale of shares in corporations, up to a maximum of EUR 500,000, to new purchases of shares, but also to plant and depreciable movable assets. Additionally, the act contains provisions on the tax treatment of international transactions and the taxation of affiliated enterprises. Since 2004, loss carry-forwards for both companies and private individuals are limited. Losses up to an amount of EUR 1 million (EUR 2 million for married couples) can be carried forward in full, while losses exceeding this threshold can be carried forward only to 60%.
Pursuant to the Act to Promote Tax Honesty dated December 23, 2003, a tax amnesty will be granted to non-complying taxpayers if they make a declaration of unreported income and pay a flat tax rate on such income by March 31, 2005 at the latest. The act allows taxpayers to avoid sanctions for a limited period if they pay taxes due payable for earlier years at a flat rate. The fiscal authorities are also given better means of investigation in order to achieve greater justice in taxation in the future.
Current tax reform proposals
The Federal Government has presented draft legislation proposing a modification of the income tax treatment of contributions to and pension payments by the public pension scheme. The proposal sets forth a gradual transition to a taxation of pension payments, while contributions are tax exempt.
(Source: www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Steuern-und-Zoelle/Lexikon-Steuern-A-Z-.701.htm; www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Anlage22234/Tax-reform-2000-An-overview-Adobe-Acrobat-5.0.pdf; www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Anlage22909/BMF-Schreiben-vom-17.-Februar-2004-IV-C-1-S-2056-4/04.pdf; Bundesministrium der Finanzen, Monthly Report January .2004, pages 35-43 and 59-64; http://www.bundesregierung.de/dokumente/-,413.544169/Artikel/dokument.htm)
G-27
Back to Contents
The following table provides an overview of tax revenues of the Federal Government, Länder governments and municipalities divided by categories for the past five years.
TAX REVENUES OF THE FEDERAL, LÄNDER AND MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES(1)
| 2004(2) | | 2003 | | 2002 | | 2001 | | 2000 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Federal taxes(3) | 85,960 | | 86,616 | | 83,494 | | 79,277 | | 75,504 | |
Share of the Federal Government in(4): | | | | | | | | | | |
Wage tax and assessed income tax | 55,760 | | 58,505 | | 59,386 | | 60,094 | | 62,882 | |
Capital gains tax and corporate tax | 11,175 | | 8,638 | | 8,444 | | 10,230 | | 18,545 | |
Interest withholding tax | 3,003 | | 3,358 | | 3,730 | | 3,943 | | 3,227 | |
Value added and import-turnover tax | 71,405 | | 70,427 | | 71,043 | | 72,257 | | 73,264 | |
Trade tax | 1,280 | | 2,306 | | 1,754 | | 1,513 | | 1,327 | |
Total Federal taxes(5) | 188,883 | | 191,943 | | 192,051 | | 193,767 | | 198,790 | |
Länder taxes(6) | 20,043 | | 18,713 | | 18,576 | | 19,628 | | 18,444 | |
Share of the Länder governments in(4): | | | | | | | | | | |
Wage tax and assessed income tax | 55,760 | | 58,505 | | 59,386 | | 60,094 | | 62,882 | |
Capital gains tax and corporation tax | 11,175 | | 8,638 | | 8,444 | | 10,230 | | 18,545 | |
Interest withholding tax | 3,003 | | 3,358 | | 3,730 | | 3,943 | | 3,227 | |
Value added and import-turnover tax | 64,611 | | 63,725 | | 64,283 | | 63,794 | | 64,683 | |
Trade tax | 1,664 | | 2,697 | | 2,107 | | 1,894 | | 1,815 | |
Total Länder taxes(7) | 180,766 | | 177,577 | | 178,552 | | 178,691 | | 189,493 | |
Municipal authorities taxes(8) | 10,587 | | 10,326 | | 9,958 | | 9,866 | | 9,633 | |
Share of the municipalities in: | | | | | | | | | | |
Wage tax and assessed income tax | 20,499 | | 21,565 | | 21,977 | | 22,285 | | 23,074 | |
Value added and import-turnover tax(9) | 2,884 | | 2,844 | | 2,869 | | 2,885 | | 2,925 | |
Trade tax | 25,050 | | 24,139 | | 23,489 | | 24,533 | | 27,026 | |
Total municipal authorities taxes | 54,016 | | 51,788 | | 52,542 | | 54,059 | | 57,136 | |
Revenues of EU(10): | | | | | | | | | | |
Customs duties | 2,850 | | 2,877 | | 2,896 | | 3,191 | | 3,394 | |
Value added tax | 3,450 | | 5,209 | | 5,145 | | 8,509 | | 9,496 | |
Tax based on nominal GNP | 13,800 | | 12,840 | | 10,518 | | 8,031 | | 8,943 | |
Total tax revenues | 443,764 | | 442,233 | | 441,704 | | 446,247 | | 467,252 | |
| |
(1) | The information presented in this table concerning Federal tax receipts is not comparable to the information concerning tax receipts in the table “Federal Government Accounts” as the information was derived from different sources and is the result of different methods of data compilation. |
(2) | Estimated figures, based on the Federal Government’s growth rate forecast for nominal GDP of 2.3% in 2004. |
(3) | Including, among others, taxes on tobacco, distilled spirits and mineral fuels. |
(4) | Shared taxes are levied by the Federal Government (with the exception of the trade tax which is levied by the municipal authorities) and distributed among the Federal Government, the Länder governments and the municipalities according to specific distribution schedules. |
(5) | Net of Federal grants to certain Länder and of EU contributions. |
(6) | Includes, among others, taxes on property, motor vehicles and beer. |
(7) | Including Federal grants to certain Länder. |
(8) | Includes, among others, inheritance and gift tax, taxes on real property. |
(9) | Municipalities share in value added tax and import-turnover tax. |
(10) | Reflects revenue collections made by the Federal Government on behalf of others. |
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Finanzbericht 2004, Table 12, pages 280-281)
G-28
Back to Contents
Government Participations
At the end of 2003, the Federal Republic held direct participations in 98 public or private enterprises, and various special funds held participations in 20 (18 without double counting) enterprises. The aggregate nominal capital of the enterprises in which the Federal Republic or the special funds held direct participations amounted to EUR 19.8 billion as per December 31, 2002 compared to EUR 16.2 billion (DM 31.6 billion) as per December 31, 2001 (Calculated based on official figures provided in Deutsche Mark using the fixed conversion rate of DM 1.95583 = EUR 1).
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Beteiligungsbericht 2002, page 2; Beteiligungsbericht 2003, pages 1, 2)
The following table shows information on the Federal Republic’s significant participations (including those held through its “special funds”) as per October 2003.
Enterprises | Nominal Capital of Enterprise as per October 2003 | | Participation of the Federal Republic as per October 2003 | |
| (EUR in millions) | | (percent) | |
Significant majority participations: | | | | |
Deutsche Bahn AG | 2,150 | | 100.0 | |
Deutsche Post AG | 1,113 | | 50.0 | |
| | | plus 26 shares | |
Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau | 3,750 | | 80.0 | |
| | | | |
Significant minority participations exceeding 25% | | | | |
Deutsche Telekom AG | 10,746 | | 30.8 | |
Flughafen München GmbH | 307 | | 26.0 | |
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Beteiligungsbericht 2003, Chapters B and C, pages 8-110)G-29
Back to Contents
DEBT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
As per December 31, 2003, the Federal Government’s total debt, not including the debt of the Länder governments and the municipalities, amounted to EUR 767.7 billion, or 36.1% of the 2003 GDP at current prices, compared to EUR 725.4 billion, or 34.4% of the 2002 GDP at current prices as per December 31, 2002. Since July 1, 1999, the Federal Government has assumed joint liability for the debts of the following special funds: Sinking Fund for Vested Liabilities (Erblastentilgungsfonds) (for former GDR liabilities), the Federal Railway Fund (Bundeseisenbahnvermögen) and the Compensation Fund for Safeguarding the Use of Coal (Ausgleichsfonds Steinkohleneinsatz). The aforementioned special funds are allocated to the Federal Government as of July 1999.
(Source: Deutsche Bundesbank, Monthly Report March 2004, Tables VIII.10 and IX.1)
The Federal Government raises funds primarily through the issuance of bonds and notes. The Federal Government does not raise funds in foreign currencies. Starting January 1, 1999, the Federal Government has been raising all funds in euro. Bonds and notes issued by the Federal Republic are evidenced by book-entry and no certificates are issued.
In addition to its own direct debt obligations, the Federal Government had outstanding guarantees in an aggregate amount of EUR 229,122 million as per June 30, 2003. Of this amount, EUR 103,073 million was outstanding in the form of export credit insurance, which is handled by EULER HERMES on behalf and for the account of the Federal Government.
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Finanzbericht 2004, Overview 4, page 335)
For more detailed information regarding the Federal Government’s debt and guarantees, see “Tables and Supplementary Information”.
For information on the Federal Government’s liability as per December 31, 2003 for capital subscriptions to various international financial organizations, see the table entitled “III. Liabilities to International Financial Organizations“, below.
G-30
Back to Contents
TABLES AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. DIRECT DEBT OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT |
|
SUMMARY |
| Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
|
| |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Federal bonds | 477,346 | |
Five-year special Federal bonds | 156,500 | |
Federal Treasury notes | 93,000 | |
Federal savings bonds | 12,809 | |
Treasury discount paper | 35,834 | |
Federal Treasury financing paper | 1,239 | |
Borrowers’ note loans of which: | 38,410 | |
— from residents | 37,707 | |
— from non-residents | 703 | |
Old debt(1) of which: | 6,797 | |
Equalization claims | 6,398 | |
Other | 40 | |
Repurchased debt | 61,865 | |
Medium term notes of Treuhandanstalt | 343 | |
|
| |
Total | 760,453 | |
|
| |
(1) | Mainly equalization and covering claims of the Deutsche Bundesbank, other banks and insurance companies in connection with the currency reform of 1948. |
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Übersicht über den Stand der Schuld der Bundesrepublik Deutschland am 31. Dezember 2003, Bundesanzeiger Nr. 42 of March 2, 2004, page 3938)
G-31
Back to Contents
DEBT TABLES |
1. Federal Bonds(1) |
Title | | Interest Rate (% p.a.) | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003
| |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
6% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1986 (II) | | 6 | | 1986 | | 2016 | | 3,579 | |
5.625% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1986 | | 5.625 | | 1986 | | 2016 | | 511 | |
6.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1994 | | 6.25 | | 1994 | | 2024 | | 10,226 | |
6.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1994 | | 6.75 | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 5,113 | |
7.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1994 | | 7.5 | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 5,113 | |
Floating Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1994 | | float. | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 5,113 | |
6.25% Bonds of the Treuhandanstalt of 1994 | | 6.25 | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 4,090 | |
6.75% Bonds of the Treuhandanstalt of 1994 | | 6.75 | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 4,090 | |
7.5% Bonds of the Treuhandanstalt of 1994 | | 7.5 | | 1994 | | 2004 | | 5,113 | |
7.375% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1995 | | 7.375 | | 1995 | | 2005 | | 8,692 | |
6.875% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1995 | | 6.875 | | 1995 | | 2005 | | 10,226 | |
6.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1995 | | 6.5 | | 1995 | | 2005 | | 10,226 | |
6% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1996 (I) | | 6 | | 1996 | | 2006 | | 12,782 | |
6% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1996 (II) | | 6 | | 1996 | | 2006 | | 6,136 | |
6.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1996 | | 6.25 | | 1996 | | 2006 | | 7,158 | |
6% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1997 (I) | | 6 | | 1997 | | 2007 | | 15,339 | |
6% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1997 (II) | | 6 | | 1997 | | 2007 | | 15,339 | |
6.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1997 | | 6,5 | | 1997 | | 2027 | | 11,248 | |
5.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1998 | | 5.25 | | 1998 | | 2008 | | 15,339 | |
5.625% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1998 | | 5.625 | | 1998 | | 2028 | | 14,316 | |
4.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1998 (I) | | 4.75 | | 1998 | | 2008 | | 8,692 | |
4.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1998 (II) | | 4.75 | | 1998 | | 2028 | | 11,100 | |
4.125% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1998 | | 4.125 | | 1998 | | 2008 | | 13,805 | |
3.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1999 | | 3.75 | | 1999 | | 2009 | | 14,000 | |
4% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1999 | | 4 | | 1999 | | 2009 | | 11,000 | |
4.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1999 | | 4.5 | | 1999 | | 2009 | | 20,000 | |
5.375% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 1999 | | 5.375 | | 1999 | | 2010 | | 20,000 | |
6.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2000 | | 6.25 | | 2000 | | 2030 | | 9,000 | |
5.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2000 | | 5.5 | | 2000 | | 2031 | | 17,000 | |
5.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2000 (I) | | 5.25 | | 2000 | | 2010 | | 20,000 | |
5.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2000 (II) | | 5.25 | | 2000 | | 2011 | | 23,000 | |
5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2001 | | 5 | | 2001 | | 2011 | | 24,000 | |
5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2002 (I) | | 5 | | 2002 | | 2012 | | 25,000 | |
5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2002 (II) | | 5 | | 2002 | | 2012 | | 27,000 | |
4.5% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2003 | | 4.5 | | 2003 | | 2013 | | 24,000 | |
3.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2003 | | 3.75 | | 2003 | | 2013 | | 22,000 | |
4.25% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2003 | | 4.25 | | 2003 | | 2014 | | 8,000 | |
4.75% Bonds of the Federal Republic of 2003 | | 4.75 | | 2003 | | 2034 | | 10,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
Total Federal Bonds | | | | | | | | 477,346 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
(1) Federal Bonds are evidenced by book entry, and no certificates are issued. Maturities are 10 to 30 years. No redemption prior to maturity; including principal strips.
G-32
Back to Contents
2. Five-Year Special Federal Bonds(1) |
Title | | Interest Rate (% p.a.) | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003
| |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
3.25 % Bonds of 1999—Series 130 | | 3.25 | | 1999 | | 2004 | | 8,000 | |
3.25 % Bonds of 1999—Series 131 | | 3.25 | | 1999 | | 2004 | | 1,500 | |
4.125 % Bonds of 1999—Series 132 | | 4.125 | | 1999 | | 2004 | | 5,000 | |
4.250 % Bonds of 1999—Series 133 | | 4.250 | | 1999 | | 2004 | | 6,000 | |
4.250 % Bonds of 1999—Series 134 | | 4.250 | | 1999 | | 2005 | | 7,000 | |
5% Bonds of 2000—Series 135 | | 5 | | 2000 | | 2005 | | 6,000 | |
5% Bonds of 2000—Series 136 | | 5 | | 2000 | | 2005 | | 15,000 | |
5% Bonds of 2000—Series 137 | | 5 | | 2000 | | 2006 | | 14,000 | |
4.5% Bonds of 2001-Series 138 | | 4.5 | | 2001 | | 2006 | | 14,000 | |
4% Bonds of 2001-Series 139 | | 4 | | 2001 | | 2007 | | 18,000 | |
4.5% Bonds of 2002-Series 140 | | 4.5 | | 2002 | | 2007 | | 20,000 | |
4.250% Bonds of 2002-Series 141 | | 4.250 | | 2002 | | 2007 | | 14,000 | |
3% Bonds of 2003 -Series 142 | | 3 | | 2003 | | 2008 | | 14,000 | |
3.5% Bonds of 2003-Series 143 | | 3.5 | | 2003 | | 2008 | | 14,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
Total Five-Year Special Federal Bonds | | | | | | | | 156,500 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Five-Year Special Federal Bonds are evidenced by book entry, and no certificates are issued. Maturities are five years. No redemption prior to maturity. |
|
3. Federal Treasury Notes(1) |
Title | | Interest Rate (% p.a.) | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003
| |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
4.25% Notes of 2002 | | 4.25 | | 2002 | | 2004 | | 12,000 | |
4% Notes of 2002 | | 4 | | 2002 | | 2004 | | 12,000 | |
3.25% Notes of 2002 | | 3.25 | | 2002 | | 2004 | | 12,000 | |
3% Notes of 2002 | | 3 | | 2002 | | 2004 | | 14,000 | |
2,5% Notes of 2003 | | 2,5 | | 2003 | | 2005 | | 12,000 | |
2% Notes of 2003 | | 2 | | 2003 | | 2005 | | 12,000 | |
2.5% Notes of 2003 | | 2.5 | | 2003 | | 2005 | | 12,000 | |
2.75% Notes of 2003 | | 2.75 | | 2003 | | 2005 | | 7,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
Total Federal Treasury Notes | | | | | | | | 93,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
| |
(1) | Federal Treasury Notes are evidenced by book-entry, and no certificates are issued. Maturities are 2 years. No redemption prior to maturity. |
|
4. Federal Savings Bonds(1) |
| | Interest Rate | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
Federal Savings Bonds | | 1% to 7.25% | | 1997 to 2003 | | 2004 to 2010 | | 12,809 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
5. Treasury Discount Paper(2) |
| | Interest Rate(3) | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
Treasury Discount Paper | | 1.97% to 2.37% | | 2003 | | 2004 to 2005 | | 35,834 | |
G-33
Back to Contents
6. Federal Treasury Financing Paper(4) |
| | Interest Rate(3) | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
Federal Treasury Financing Paper | | 1.55% to 4% | | 2002 to 2003 | | 2004 to 2005 | | 1,239 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
7. Borrowers’ note loans(5) |
| | Interest Rate | | Year of Issue | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
Borrowers’ note loans | | 2% to 8.45% | | 1967 to 2003 | | 2004 to 2033 | | 38,410 | |
| |
(1) | Government Savings Bonds are evidenced by book entry and no certificates are issued. Maturities are six or seven years. The bonds are redeemable after one year from the issue date at the option of the holders thereof in installments of EUR 5,113 per holder and month. The terms of the Government Savings Bonds provide for interest rates that increase during the term of the bonds. In addition, the seven-year Government Savings Bonds provide for payment of compounded interest at maturity or upon redemption prior to maturity. |
(2) | Treasury Discount Papers are issued at a discount and repaid at par value on the maturity date. No interest payments are made during the term of the paper. It is issued in the form of one global bearer security. Maturities range from one year to two years. No redemption is permitted prior to maturity. |
(3) | Reflects annual interest rate paid to the holder by way of the initial issue discount. |
(4) | Treasury Financing Papers are issued at a discount and repaid at par value on the maturity date. No interest payments are made during the term of the paper. It is issued in the form of one global bearer security. Maturities range from one year to two years. No redemption is permitted prior to maturity. |
(5) | Borrowers’ note loans are an instrument of the German capital market where the lending entity, generally an institutional investor, receives a certificate evidencing its loan to the borrower and the term of such loans. The certificate generally authorizes at least three assignments. No redemption is permitted prior to maturity. |
8. Other Liabilities |
Title | | Interest Rate | | Year of Incurrence | | Maturity | | Principal Amount Outstanding as per December 31, 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | (EUR in millions) | |
Old debt(1) | | 0% to 8.9% | | Various | | Various | | 6,797 | |
Debt of Equalization of Burdens Fund | | | | | | | | | |
taken over by the Federal Government | | Various | | 1980 | | Various | | 0.31 | |
Other debt (2) | | Various | | Various | | Various | | 40.47 | |
| |
(1) | Includes mainly equalization and covering claims of the Deutsche Bundesbank, other banks and insurance companies in connection with the currency reform of 1948. |
(2) | Includes liabilities of the Federal Government to repay amounts received from the Investitionshilfeabgabe, a special duty levied on income, the proceeds of which were to be used to promote investments. |
(Source for Tables 1 through 3: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Übersicht über den Stand der Schuld der Bundesrepublik Deutschland am 31. Dezember 2003, Bundesanzeiger Nr. 42 of March 2, 2004, page 3938; internal documents of the Federal Ministry of Finance)
G-34
Back to Contents
II. GUARANTEES BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT |
Purpose of Guarantees | Principal Amount Outstanding as per June 30, | |
2002(1) |
| 2003(1) | |
| (EUR in millions) | |
Export finance loans (including rescheduled loans) | 102,614 | | 103,073 | |
Untied loans; direct foreign investments by German companies; | | | | |
Loans of the European Investment Bank to non-EU borrowers | 27,265 | | 27,869 | |
Loans in connection with EU agricultural policy measures | 6,136 | | 6,650 | |
Loans to domestic corporations and for projects in areas of | | | | |
Agriculture, fishing and housing construction | 51,120 | | 49,121 | |
Contributions to international financing institutions | 31,638 | | 40,255 | |
Co-financing of bilateral projects of German financial co-operation | 798 | | 779 | |
Successor agencies to Treuhandanstalt | 1,375 | | 1,375 | |
|
| |
| |
Total guarantees | 220,946 | | 229,122 | |
|
| |
| |
(1) | No year-end or quarterly figures are available. |
(Source: Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Finanzbericht 2003, page 335; Finanzbericht 2002, page 343)
G-35
Back to Contents
III. LIABILITIES TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
The Federal Republic is obligated to contribute to the capital subscriptions and, in some cases, to the additional financing requirements of certain international organizations in which it participates. Such contributions are in many cases stated initially in 1944 U.S. dollars. One 1944 U.S. dollar is equivalent to one Special Drawing Right (“SDR”), a unit of value established by an amendment in July 1969 to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund. From July 1, 1974 to December 31, 1980, the exchange rate between world currencies and the SDR was determined on the basis of a basket of 16 currencies, including the U.S. dollar, which accounted for approximately one-third of the value of the basket. From 1981 to 2000, the exchange rate between world currencies and the SDR was determined on the basis of a basket of five currencies, including the U.S. dollar. The currencies that determine the value of the SDR, the proportion of each of these currencies in the basket, and the financial instruments used in determining the interest rate on the SDR, are reviewed every five years. The adoption of the euro as the common currency for the initial 11 Member States of the European Union called for a change in the composition of the SDR basket. With effect from January 1, 2001, the SDR basket consists of four currencies: U.S. dollar, euro, Japanese yen and pound sterling. The currency weight of the U.S. dollar in the SDR basket initially was 45%, changing on a daily basis as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. On December 31, 2003, SDR 1 equalled EUR 1.17654
SUBSCRIPTIONS OR COMMITMENTS BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC
TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ORGANIZATIONS
AS PER DECEMBER 31, 2003
Name of Organization | Subscription or Commitment by the Federal Republic(1) | | Amount Paid In | |
| (U.S.$ millions) | |
International Monetary Fund(2) | 19,329.8 | | 19,329.8 | |
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development(3) | 8,734.0 | | 542.9 | |
International Development Association (IDA)(3)(6) | 14,070.0 | | 14,070.0 | |
International Finance Corporation (IFC)(3) | 128.9 | | 128.9 | |
European Investment Bank(4) | 18,631.6 | | 1,118.9 | |
African Development Bank(3) | 1,320.4 | | 121.9 | |
African Development Fund(3) | 1,881.4 | | 1,783.3 | |
Asian Development Bank(3) | 2,274.6 | | 159.3 | |
Asian Development Fund(3) | 1,640.1 | | 1,577.0 | |
Inter-American Development Bank(3) | 1,913.7 | | 82.3 | |
Inter-American Investment Corporation(3) | 13.3 | | 13.3 | |
Fund for Special Operations(3) | 239.6 | | 239.6 | |
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)(3) | 242.6 | | 231.0 | |
Caribbean Development Bank(3) | 50.2 | | 11.1 | |
Special Development Fund of the Caribbean Development | | | | |
Bank(3) | 51.0 | | 51.0 | |
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development | | | | |
(EBRD)(3)(5) | 2,145.9 | | 563.3 | |
Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB)(3)(5) | 692.7 | | 76.5 | |
| |
(1) | Subscriptions are in part committed in $, SDR, ECU or DM. SDR, ECU and DM commitments are converted to $ at year-end exchange rates, except that certain SDR commitments are converted at the fixed conversion rate of SDR 1 = $ 1.20635. |
(2) | Source: computation provided by Deutsche Bundesbank. Original figures expressed in SDR, converted to U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. |
(3) | Source: computation provided by Bundesministerium der Finanzen, Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung. |
(4) | Source: computation provided by European Investment Bank. |
(5) | Calculated using the noon buying rate for cable transfers in New York City payable in euro on December 31, 2003, which was EUR 1 per $ 1.2597. |
(6) | Source: Worldbank Annual Report 2003. The amount does not differentiate between amount subscribed and paid-in. It includes installments which were not yet due. |
G-36