Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 10K 2019 Annual report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM

10-K

(Mark One)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number:

001-33277

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		04-3508648
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Four Tower Bridge 200 Barr Harbor Drive, Suite 200 West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania		19428
(Address of principal executive offices at December 31, 2018)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(267)824-2827

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value Per Share	MDGL	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No

☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes

☐

☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes

☒

☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation

S-T

(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes

☒

☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a

non-accelerated

filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☒	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
			Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule

12b-2

of the Exchange Act). Yes

☐

No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by

non-affiliates

of the registrant based upon the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on June 28, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, was $884,202,105. For purposes of this calculation, directors and executive officers of the registrant have been deemed affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 21, 2020 the registrant had 15,429,154 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information required by Part III, Items

10-14

of this Form

10-K

is incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form

10-K,

provided that if such Proxy Statement is not filed within such period, such information will be included in an amendment to this Form

10-K

to be filed within such

120-day

period.

Table of Contents


		Page
PART I
Item 1.	Business		3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		25
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		49
Item 2.	Properties		49
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		49
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		49
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		50
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		52
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		53
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		61
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		61
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		61
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		61
Item 9B.	Other Information		62
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		63
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		63
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		63
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence		63
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		63
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		64
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary		66
	Signatures		67

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form

10-K

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements are subject to considerable risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts, “projects,” “forecasts,” “goal,” “continue,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “would,” or other forms of these words or similar words or expressions or the negative expression thereof. In particular, forward-looking statements contained in or incorporated by reference to this Annual Report relate to, among other things,

•

Anticipated or estimated future results, including the risks and uncertainties associated with our future operating performance and financial position,

•

Our possible or assumed future results of operations and expenses, business strategies and plans, capital needs and financing plans, market trends, competitive position, industry environment and potential growth opportunities,

•

Our clinical trials, research and development activities, and the timing and results associated with the future development of our lead product candidate,

MGL-3196

(resmetirom),

•

Our primary and secondary study endpoints for resmetirom, the potential for achieving such endpoints and projections, including those regarding potential future NASH resolution, safety, fibrosis treatment, cardiovascular effects and lipid treatment with resmetirom,

•

Optimal dosing levels for resmetirom and projections regarding potential NASH or NAFLD patient benefits with resmetirom,

•

Market demand for and acceptance of our products,

•

Research, development and commercialization of new products,

•

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals, including, but not limited to, potential regulatory delays or rejections,

•

Risks associated with meeting the objectives of clinical studies, including, but not limited to our ability to achieve enrollment objectives concerning patient number (including an adequate safety database) and/or timing for our studies, any delays or failures in enrollment, the occurrence of adverse safety events, and the risks of successfully conducting trials that are substantially larger than our past trials,

•

Risks related to our ability to accomplish our business development objectives and realize the anticipated benefit of any such transactions, and

•

Assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

We caution you that the foregoing list may not include all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report.

Forward-looking statements represent our management’s current beliefs and assumptions based on information currently available. Forward-looking statements involve numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss these risks and uncertainties in greater detail in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in

Table of Contents

Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report, as well as in our other filings with the SEC. You should read this Annual Report, and the other documents that we file or have filed with the SEC, with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from the results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual future results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.

Except as required by applicable law or the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Table of Contents

Item 1.

Business

References in this Annual Report on Form

10-K

to Madrigal, the Company, we, our and us refer to Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. “Madrigal” is a registered trademark of Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. Other trademarks or service marks appearing in this report may be trademarks or service marks of other owners.

Executive Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company pursuing novel therapeutics that target a specific thyroid hormone receptor pathway in the liver, which is a key regulatory mechanism common to a spectrum of cardio-metabolic and fatty liver diseases with high unmet medical need. Our lead product candidate,

MGL-3196

(resmetirom), is a proprietary,

first-in-class,

orally administered, small molecule, liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor-ß

(THR-

ß) selective agonist being developed as a once-daily oral pill that can potentially be used to treat a number of disease states including

non-alcoholic

steatohepatitis, or NASH. A

36-week,

Phase 2 clinical trial has been completed and the

12-week

primary and secondary endpoints were achieved in the main study, results were reported in December 2017, and positive topline

36-week

results were reported at the conclusion of the Phase 2 clinical trial in May 2018. There was an extension study in a subset of the patients that completed the main

36-week

study, which was completed in 2019.

On March 28, 2019 the Company announced that it had initiated the MAESTRO-NASH Phase 3 trial with its once daily, oral thyroid hormone receptor beta selective agonist, resmetirom. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study is currently being conducted at more than 150 sites in the United States and the rest of the world. Patients with liver biopsy confirmed NASH with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis are be randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single oral daily dose of placebo, resmetirom 80 mg or resmetirom 100 mg. A second liver biopsy at Week 52 in the first 900 patients will be the basis of filing for subpart

H-accelerated

approval; the primary endpoint will be the percent of patients treated with either dose of resmetirom as compared with placebo who achieve NASH resolution on the Week 52 liver biopsy, defined as the absence of hepatocyte ballooning (score=0), and minimal lobular inflammation (score

0-1),

associated with at least a 2 point reduction in NAS, and no worsening of fibrosis stage. Two key secondary endpoints are reduction in

LDL-cholesterol

and a

1-point

or more improvement in fibrosis stage on the week 52 biopsy with no worsening of NASH. Patients will continue in the study for a total of approximately 54 months and will be evaluated for a composite clinical outcome including cirrhosis on liver biopsy, or a liver related event such a hepatic decompensation. The total anticipated enrollment is approximately 2,000 patients and will include up to 15% high risk F1 fibrosis stage NASH patients whose efficacy responses will be evaluated as exploratory endpoints.

On December 10, 2019 the Company announced it had opened for enrollment

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1,

52-week,

double-blind, placebo controlled Phase 3 clinical study in 700 patients with biopsy-confirmed or presumed NASH recruited from sites in the U.S. Key endpoints are safety, including safety biomarkers, LDL cholesterol, lipid biomarkers, and fibrosis biomarkers. Except for serial liver biopsies, the study protocol is similar to the MAESTRO-NASH study with resmetirom doses of 80 mg or 100 mg or placebo and includes key secondary lipid,

MRI-PDFF

and NASH biomarker endpoints. In addition,

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

includes an open label arm in which up to 100 patients will be dosed with 100 mg resmetirom. The MAESTRO

-NAFLD-1

study will help support the adequacy of the safety database at the time of NDA submission for subpart H approval for treatment of NASH in patients with F2 or F3 fibrosis (MAESTRO-NASH, NASH resolution surrogate endpoint).

The Company has also completed a Phase 2 clinical trial in 116 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), and we reported the results in February 2018. In addition to the NASH and HeFH Phase 2 clinical trials, resmetirom has also been studied in eight completed Phase 1 trials in a total of 219 healthy volunteers. Resmetirom appeared to be safe and was well-tolerated in these trials, which included a single ascending dose trial, a multiple ascending dose trial, two drug interaction trials with statins, a multiple dose mass

Table of Contents

balance study, a single dose relative bioavailability study of tablet formulations versus capsule formulation, and a multiple dose drug interaction and food effect study. Further, we have initiated a Phase 1 trial to study patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment (including patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment) and NASH patients.

The following chart summarizes the status of our product candidate development programs for resmetirom and

MGL-3745,

a preclinical compound which has similar thyroid receptor selectivity to resmetirom and is thus a potential backup compound for resmetirom:

Key Developments

Initiation of MAESTRO-NASH Phase 3 clinical trial

On March 28, 2019 the Company announced that it had initiated a Phase 3 trial in NASH with its once daily, oral thyroid hormone receptor beta selective agonist,

MGL-3196

(resmetirom). This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will be conducted at more than 150 sites in the United States and the rest of the world. Patients with liver biopsy confirmed NASH with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single oral daily dose of placebo, resmetirom 80 mg or resmetirom 100 mg. A second liver biopsy at week 52 in the first 900 patients will be the basis of filing for subpart

H-accelerated

approval; the primary endpoint will be the percent of patients treated with either dose of resmetirom as compared with placebo who achieve NASH resolution on the week 52 liver biopsy, defined as the absence of hepatocyte ballooning (score=0), and minimal lobular inflammation (score

0-1),

associated with at least a 2 point reduction in NAS, and no worsening of fibrosis stage. Two key secondary endpoints are reduction in

LDL-cholesterol

and a

1-point

Initiation of

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

Phase 3 clinical trial

On December 10, 2019 the Company announced it had opened for enrollment

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1,

52-week,

double-blind, placebo controlled Phase 3 clinical study in 700 patients with biopsy-confirmed or

Table of Contents

presumed NASH recruited from sites in the U.S. Key endpoints are safety, including safety biomarkers, LDL cholesterol, lipid biomarkers, and fibrosis biomarkers. Except for serial liver biopsies, the study protocol is similar to the MAESTRO-NASH study with resmetirom doses of 80 mg or 100 mg or placebo and includes key secondary lipid,

MRI-PDFF

and NASH biomarker endpoints. In addition,

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

includes an open label arm in which up to 100 patients will be dosed with 100 mg resmetirom. The MAESTRO

-NAFLD-1

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) Phase 2 Clinical Trial in NASH

The Company successfully completed a Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH in 2018. In this clinical trial, resmetirom demonstrated statistical significance in the primary endpoint (p<0.0001), the relative reduction of liver fat compared with baseline on magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction, or

MRI-PDFF,

12-weeks

which was reported in December 2017, and statistically significant results in multiple

36-week

endpoints, including key secondary endpoints, reduction and resolution of NASH on liver biopsy as set forth in the table below, which was reported in May 2018. This clinical trial was published in the Lancet in November, 2019.


	MGL-3196		MGL-3196 MRI-PDFF Responders(1)		Placebo
Number of patients with baseline and end-of-study liver biopsies(2)		73		46		34
> 2 Point Decrease in NAS		56%		70%		32	%
		p=0.02		p=0.001
NASH Resolution		27%		39%		6	%
		p=0.02		p=0.001

(1)	resmetirom MRI-PDFF Responders = resmetirom treated patients with >=30% relative fat reduction on Week 12 MRI-PDFF

(2)	does not include one end-of-study liver biopsy that was inadequate

Resmetirom treated patients with greater than or equal to 30% fat reduction on

MRI-PDFF

12-weeks

demonstrated a higher percentage of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score, or NAS, reduction and NASH resolution. In patients with NASH resolution, 35% of resmetirom treated patients and no placebo patients had a baseline NAS greater than or equal to five. In resmetirom patients with NASH resolution, fibrosis also resolved in 50% of such patients and was decreased statistically significantly relative to all placebo patients.

Further,

36-week

results from our Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH showed:

•

Sustained, highly statistically significant (p<0.0001) reduction in liver fat compared with placebo on

36-week

MRI-PDFF

and mean relative fat reduction of 37% with resmetirom treated patients in contrast with 8.5% with placebo patients;

•

Sustained, statistically significant reductions (p<0.0001) in resmetirom compared to placebo treated patients in

low-density

lipoprotein cholesterol

(LDL-C)

and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) of more than 20%, triglycerides (TG) of 36% and lipoprotein(a) of 37%;

•

Statistically significant reductions in liver enzymes (ALT, AST and GGT) relative to placebo (all p=0.002) and a 40% reduction in ALT in patients with elevated baseline levels (p=0.01);

•

Statistically significant reductions in fibrosis biomarkers in

MGL-3196

treated patients as compared with placebo patients;

•

On liver biopsy, fibrosis was reduced by at least one point in 23% of placebo patients and 29% of resmetirom treated patients;

Table of Contents

•

Very good all subject tolerability: mostly mild and a few moderate adverse events, or AEs, which were balanced between drug treated patients and placebo patients; and

•

An increase in incidence of a transient mild diarrhea at beginning of study, often a single episode, in resmetirom treated patients compared with placebo patients.

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) Phase 2 Clinical Trial in HeFH

In February 2018, we announced

top-line

results from our Phase 2 clinical trial in HeFH. In this trial, patients treated with resmetirom (placebo corrected) achieved highly significant (p< 0.0001)

LDL-C

lowering of 18.8%, and 21%

LDL-C

lowering in those patients receiving an optimal dose of resmetirom.

LDL-C

lowering was 28.5% in patients treated with resmetirom as compared to placebo in a prespecified group of patients who did not tolerate high intensity statin doses. Highly significant (p<0.0001) and numerically similar results were observed with ApoB. Highly significant (p<0.0001) TG

(25-31%),

apolipoprotein CIII (22.7%), and Lp(a) lowering

(26-33%)

were observed in all patients treated with resmetirom and certain prespecified subgroups, irrespective of statin treatment.

Resmetirom has been well-tolerated with mostly mild AEs and some moderate AEs, the numbers of which are balanced between placebo and drug-treatment groups. Fewer than seven percent of patients did not complete the study, and patients who discontinued for AEs, all mild to moderate, were balanced between drug-treated and placebo patients. There were two serious AEs in the study, both considered unrelated to treatment, one in a placebo and one in a drug-treated patient.

Lead Product

Candidate—MGL-3196

(resmetirom)

We believe that resmetirom may be the first

THR-agonist

product candidate in development for NASH that selectively targets the THR-ß pathway. Active thyroid hormone, known as T3, interacts with two nuclear receptors, THR-

, which is the predominant receptor expressed in most human tissues, including heart and bone, and THR-ß, which has more restricted tissue expression, and is the predominant receptor responsible for metabolic actions in the liver, including both cholesterol- and

TG-lowering.

Selective activation of the THR-ß receptor in liver tissue is believed to favorably affect cholesterol and lipoprotein levels via multiple mechanisms, which may be complementary to those of other lipid-lowering therapies such as statin drugs. We believe that these characteristics of THR-ß activation by resmetirom will in turn lead to clinically meaningful reductions in

LDL-C,

and plasma and liver TGs.

We believe that resmetirom is the first selective small molecule THR-ß agonist compound. Resmetirom, along with

MGL-3745,

a potential backup compound to resmetirom, was discovered at

Hoffmann-La

Roche, or Roche, in Nutley, New Jersey, by utilizing a novel functional assay that, unlike a simple receptor binding assay, assessed the functional activity of compounds which interacted with thyroid hormone receptors. In a published study by Madrigal and Roche in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry using this functional assay, resmetirom was shown to be highly selective for the THR-ß receptor, with almost no effect on THR-

, unlike other compounds purported in published studies to be ß -selective based on binding affinity, but which were shown to equally activate THR-

and THR-ß in the novel functional assay.

We believe that the ß-selectivity and liver-targeting properties of resmetirom are critically important for resmetirom’s beneficial metabolic actions in the liver, and enable avoidance of safety issues associated with THR-

activation by thyroid hormone and/or less selective THR agonists in tissues such as heart and bone. In a variety of preclinical animal model studies, resmetirom showed enhanced safety relative to T3 or other thyroid agonists. In animal models, resmetirom demonstrated cholesterol lowering, liver TG lowering, and reduction of markers of NASH-related liver inflammation and fibrosis at drug levels similar to those that lowered

LDL-C

in human clinical trials, providing data to support the advancement of resmetirom into NASH and FH clinical trials. In chronic animal toxicology studies in dogs and rats, no effects on bone or cartilage histology were seen at any resmetirom dose in either species.

Table of Contents

Resmetirom did not increase liver enzymes in Phase 1 studies and there were no bone and cartilage histologic findings in chronic animal toxicology studies.

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) Clinical and

Non-Clinical

Development Program

To date, we have completed a series of Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies, Phase

2-enabling

preclinical good laboratory practice, or GLP, toxicology studies, and drug manufacturing studies to support further clinical development, including active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, manufacturing and drug product development studies, drug metabolism studies, acute, subchronic and chronic animal toxicology studies, and other safety pharmacology and toxicology studies.

We have completed Phase 1 studies with resmetirom in a total of 219 subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of resmetirom. Our Phase 1 studies included randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single and

14-day

multiple-dose escalation studies, drug-interaction studies with statins, with the antidiabetic agent pioglitazone, and with the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel. In addition, a study using radiolabeled resmetirom, a study of a tablet versus capsule formulation of resmetirom, and a multiple dose drug interaction and food effect study have also been completed. In Phase 1 studies, resmetirom appeared safe and was well-tolerated up to 200 mg once daily. The results of these studies suggest that resmetirom is suitable for once-daily oral dosing. Currently there is an ongoing Phase 1 hepatic impairment study to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of resmetirom in patients with hepatic impairment.

In a Phase 1 multiple ascending dose study in healthy subjects, the effects of resmetirom on lipid parameters were assessed as initial markers of pharmacodynamic activity (Atherosclerosis

230:373-380,

2013). As illustrated in the figure below, daily doses of resmetirom ranging from 50 to 200 mg showed highly statistically significant reductions relative to placebo of up to 30% for

LDL-C

(range,

p=.05-<0.0001),

28% for

non-high-

density lipoprotein cholesterol, or

non-HDL-C

(range, p

=0.027-p<0.0001)

and 24% for ApoB (range, p

=0.008-0.0004),

and statistical trends of up to 60% reduction in TG (range, p

=0.13-0.016).

The near maximal lipid effects were observed at a resmetirom dose of 80 mg once-daily. Resmetirom was well-tolerated at all doses, with no dose-related adverse events or liver enzyme, electrocardiography, or vital-sign changes. At the highest dose of resmetirom (200 mg), there was a reversible reduction of 20% in the level of a precursor hormone to T3, free T4, which was significantly different from placebo (p < 0.0001) that may be explained by increased liver metabolism of free T4. There was no change in thyrotropin, a pituitary hormone that regulates the level and production of thyroid hormone by the thyroid gland or T3, or other evidence of central thyroid axis dysfunction at any dose of resmetirom.

Table of Contents

Change in Lipids After 14 Days

Change from Baseline (CFB) by mean % CFB calculated for each individual subject 24 h after 14th dose; baseline value obtained just prior to first dose; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; Chol, total cholesterol;

LDL-C,

LDL cholesterol directly measured;

Non-HDL-C,

non-HDL

cholesterol; TG, triglycerides (median %CFB).

In a Phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial, 116 patients

with HeFH

who were not at their

LDL-C

goal were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either resmetirom or placebo, in addition to their current cholesterol lowering regimen, which included approximately 75% taking high intensity statins (20/40 mg rosuvastatin or 80 mg atorvastatin), and about

two-thirds

of patients also taking ezetimibe. Compared to placebo, resmetirom treated patients achieved highly significant (p< 0.0001)

LDL-C

lowering of 18.8%, and 21%

LDL-C

lowering in those on an optimal dose of resmetirom.

LDL-C

lowering was 28.5% in resmetirom treated compared to placebo in a prespecified group of patients who did not tolerate high intensity statin doses. Highly significant (p<0.0001) and numerically similar results were observed with ApoB. Highly significant reductions (p<0.0001) in TG

(25-31%),

ApoCIII (22.7%) and Lp(a)

(26-33%)

were observed in all resmetirom treated patients and prespecified subgroups, irrespective of statin treatment.

In the NASH Phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial, 125 patients 18 years of age and older with liver biopsy-confirmed NASH were randomized at approximately 25 clinical sites in the United States. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo (N=41) or resmetirom (N=84). The starting dose in resmetirom-treated patients was 80 mg once a day. The study employed an adaptive dosing design whereby, in a blinded fashion, the dose could be adjusted by small amounts (i.e. 20 mg up or down) or remain at 80 mg in each resmetirom-treated patient based on a pharmacokinetic analysis of drug level performed in each patient at 2 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was the reduction of liver fat at 12 weeks compared with baseline (relative change), assessed by

MRI-PDFF,

with efficacy confirmed at the end of the trial (36 weeks) by repeat

MRI-PDFF

and conventional liver biopsy to examine histological evidence for the resolution of NASH. Other secondary endpoints included changes in clinically relevant biomarkers at 12 and 36 weeks, improvement in fibrosis by at least one stage with no worsening of steatohepatitis, and safety and tolerability.

Resmetirom demonstrated statistical significance (p<0.0001) in the primary endpoint, the relative reduction of liver fat on

MRI-PDFF

at 12 weeks. At 36 weeks, statistically significant results were demonstrated in

Table of Contents

multiple histology endpoints including key secondary endpoints related to the reduction and resolution of NASH (see Table on page 3). At 36 weeks, resmetirom treated patients demonstrated sustained, statistically significant (p<0.0001) reductions compared to placebo treated patients in

LDL-C

and ApoB of more than 20%, TGs of 36% and Lp(a) of 37%. In addition, resmetirom demonstrated statistically significant reductions in liver enzymes (ALT, AST and GGT) relative to placebo (all p=0.002).

Our Strategy

Our goal is to become a leading biopharmaceutical company developing and commercializing innovative liver-directed, ß-selective thyroid hormone receptor agonists for the treatment of cardio-metabolic and liver disease, fibrosis and inflammation. A key element is building a multi-therapy NASH focused company. To achieve our goal, we plan to:

•

Complete clinical development and seek regulatory approval of MGL-3196 (resmetirom) in NASH.

We successfully completed a Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH in 2018. NASH is a disease driven by the growing epidemic of obesity, with a significant unmet need for approved therapies that are effective and well tolerated. We believe resmetirom is an excellent candidate for the chronic treatment of NASH due to its safety profile and

first-in-class

pleiotrophic actions in liver cells and potential to reduce cardiovascular risk in NASH patients.

•

Establish commercial capabilities to market MGL-3196 (resmetirom) as a leading treatment for NASH.

If approved, we may choose either to establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize resmetirom, or to collaborate with one or more third parties to accomplish these tasks. Patients with NASH are primarily managed by a concentrated group of liver specialists in the United States and Europe. We believe this will enable us to launch resmetirom in NASH in a cost-effective, targeted manner.

•

Grow our pipeline through additional indications for MGL-3196 (resmetirom) potentially including orphan indications.

We believe that resmetirom has the potential to be an effective treatment for other disease indications that are rare diseases or may be designated rare diseases and we may pursue orphan drug designation where possible.

Table of Contents

Target Indications

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Overview and Market Opportunity

NASH is a serious inflammatory form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or NAFLD. NAFLD has become the most common liver disease in the United States and other developed countries and is characterized by an accumulation of fat in the liver with no other apparent causes. The rising worldwide prevalence of obesity-related disorders has contributed to a rapid increase in the global prevalence of NASH and NAFLD. In the United States, NAFLD is estimated to affect approximately 27% to 34% of the population, or an estimated 86 million to 108 million people, and approximately 10% to 20% of those will progress from NAFLD to NASH. Current estimates place NASH prevalence at approximately 9 million to 15 million people in the United States, or three percent to five percent of the population, with similar prevalence in Europe and Asia. The prevalence of NASH is also increasing in developing regions due to the adoption of a more sedentary lifestyle and a diet consisting of processed foods with high fat and fructose content.

In addition to the accumulation of fat in the liver, NASH is characterized by inflammation and cellular damage with or without fibrosis, the first stage of liver scarring, which may ultimately progress to cirrhosis. NASH is a severe condition that can lead to fibrosis and eventually progress to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, esophageal varices, ascites, liver cancer and liver failure. NASH is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, or CVD, and the most common cause of death in NASH patients is CVD. Progression to cirrhosis and other late-stage complications can occur within five to ten years after an initial NASH diagnosis. NASH patients with

type-2

diabetes have a heightened risk of NASH disease progression. Once the disease advances beyond NASH to such life-threatening conditions as liver cancer and liver failure, then liver transplantation is the only treatment alternative.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention projects the prevalence of obesity to increase from 34% of the United States population to 42% of the United States population by 2030. Driven by this epidemic of obesity, NASH is projected to become the leading cause of liver transplants by 2020. Given the extremely limited availability of organ donors and high transplant costs, NASH patients who require transplantation will place a significant economic burden on the healthcare system. As such, there is a significant unmet medical need for well-tolerated oral treatments for NASH. Because there are currently no therapeutic products approved for the treatment of NASH, the market size is difficult to estimate. However, based on our analysis of multiple market assessments, we estimate that the addressable NASH population is several million patients worldwide, and that NASH could become a multi-billion dollar market able to support multiple approved drug products.

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) in NASH

We are developing resmetirom for NASH. Based on the scientific literature in human and animal studies, we believe that NASH livers in humans frequently have a deficiency in THR-ß activity that leads to features of NASH, including fatty liver, inflammation and fibrosis, and that treatment with resmetirom will replace this hormone deficiency and be an effective NASH treatment. We believe that resmetirom is an excellent candidate for the chronic treatment of NASH because of its safety and tolerability profile observed to date in healthy subjects, its effects in reducing cardiovascular risk factors such as

LDL-C

and TGs in early-stage clinical trials, and its multiple beneficial effects in animal models of NASH. CVD is the most common cause of death in patients with NASH. We have completed multiple studies in animal models of metabolic diseases, dyslipidemia and NASH in which resmetirom demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in liver TGs, insulin resistance, liver enzymes (which may be elevated in NASH), and markers of inflammation and fibrosis. We believe that resmetirom will treat the underlying lipotoxicity that drives the inflammation and liver cell damage observed in NASH patients, and after the underlying lipotoxicity is treated, NASH-related liver fibrosis will resolve as the liver regenerates.

Table of Contents

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) NASH Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Studies

In October 2016, we initiated a Phase 2 proof of concept clinical trial in patients with liver biopsy documented NASH, including those with

type-2

diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension. In the study we randomized 125 NASH patients 2:1, resmetirom or placebo QD in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of once-daily resmetirom versus placebo in patients with NASH, including those with

type-2

diabetes. Patients continued treatment through 36 weeks. The study was conducted in the United States. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of resmetirom as measured by the reduction of liver fat at 12 weeks, and the secondary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of resmetirom as measured by a reduction of NASH, which was assessed by liver biopsy, at 36 weeks. Other secondary and exploratory endpoints included safety and tolerability, and effects on serum biomarkers at 12 and 36 weeks, lipid parameters, and biomarker measures of insulin sensitivity. We reached our

top-line

analysis of the primary endpoint in December 2017, and we reached our

top-line

analysis of the secondary endpoint (NASH assessment on liver biopsy) in May 2018. There was an extension study in a subset of the patients that completed the main

36-week

study which was completed in 2019.

In September 2013, the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the FDA conducted a joint workshop focused on trial designs and endpoints in drug and diagnostic development for liver disease secondary to NAFLD, including NASH. In December 2014, the journal Hepatology accepted for publication a manuscript summarizing the workshop output, including potentially acceptable surrogate endpoints for clinical studies supporting the approval of agents for NASH and liver fibrosis. We believe that our Phase 2 NASH study design incorporated surrogate secondary endpoints consistent with the current FDA requirements for demonstration of efficacy in registrational trials. Following completion of our Phase 2 clinical trial of resmetirom in NASH patients, we held an end of Phase 2 meeting with the FDA, received positive feedback.

In March 2019 the Company announced that it had initiated a Phase 3 trial in NASH with its once daily, oral thyroid hormone receptor beta selective agonist,

MGL-3196

H-accelerated

0-1),

associated with at least a 2 point reduction in NAS, and no worsening of fibrosis stage. Two key secondary endpoints are reduction in

LDL-cholesterol

and a

1-point

In December 2019 the Company announced it had opened for enrollment

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1,

52-week,

MRI-PDFF

and NASH biomarker endpoints. In addition,

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

includes an open label arm in which up to 100 patients will be dosed with 100 mg resmetirom. The MAESTRO

-NAFLD-1

Madrigal has agreement on liver biopsy endpoints with the FDA, and long term liver related benefit endpoints for the treatment of NASH. Given that NASH is an evolving field, and FDA evaluates risk versus

Table of Contents

benefit prior to approval, Phase 3 data will be carefully reviewed by FDA. However, currently there are ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials of compounds to treat NASH by other companies in which it is contemplated that accelerated approval of the compounds under FDA subpart H, which provides for accelerated approval of certain new drug products that have been studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and that provide meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments, would be based on the surrogate endpoint of histological evidence of NASH resolution without the worsening of fibrosis. It is expected that these trials would continue after approval to confirm the long term clinical benefit of NASH resolution based on a reduction in patients progressing to cirrhosis and other liver related events.

Dyslipidemia in NASH patients

Overview and Market Opportunity

Patients with NASH, and its more prevalent precursor, NAFLD, are at heightened cardiovascular risk. Patients suffering from these conditions die more frequently from cardiovascular events than from their liver disease. Multiple factors contribute to this risk, including elevated levels of

LDL-C

and other atherogenic lipoproteins. Excess liver fat itself is also a significant cardiovascular risk factor. Patients with NASH and NAFLD, however, may not undergo a biopsy to confirm a NASH diagnosis until they reach the more advanced stages of fibrosis (F2 - F4). A significant segment of this large group of patients also suffer from diabetes and metabolic syndrome, and have lipid levels that are above target despite treatment with established therapies. These patients may benefit from therapy to lower their lipid levels in addition to excess liver fat, in order to reduce their cardiovascular risk.

We believe our studies to date in patients with NASH and patients with HeFH, have demonstrated the pleiotropic activity of resmetirom and the potential of the drug to reduce an array of atherogenic lipoproteins, including

LDL-C,

ApoB, TG, ApoCIII, and Lp(a). As a result, we intend to also focus our development of resmetirom on patients with NASH who have elevated lipid levels, because it is unlikely that liver biopsy will be required to diagnose NASH, there is a potential for resmetirom to address patients across the entire NASH spectrum including patients with earlier stages of NASH and NASH-fibrosis..

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH)

FH is a genetic disorder characterized by aggressive and early onset CVD. In people with FH, genetic mutations make the liver incapable of metabolizing or removing excess

LDL-C,

causing very high

LDL-C

levels in the blood. There are two forms of FH: HoFH, a less common condition where mutation is inherited from both parents, and HeFH, a more common condition where mutation is inherited from just one parent. The vast majority of the cholesterol circulating in a person’s body is produced by the liver. Cholesterol is a necessary component in the structure and function of human cells. Individuals with FH are unable to recycle this natural supply of cholesterol that their bodies are constantly producing. Therefore, the cholesterol levels of an individual with FH are exceedingly high. Over time, the elevated blood cholesterol can lead to blockages in the arteries of the heart and/or brain. The longer a person experiences high

LDL-C,

the more likely he or she will be to experience a cardiovascular event (

i.e.

, heart attack or stroke).

In preclinical animal studies resmetirom lowered

LDL-C

in a variety of species as a monotherapy and also when dosed in combination with statins. Resmetirom also showed the potential to lower Lp(a), a severely atherogenic particle that is frequently elevated in patients with FH. A previous THR agonist, eprotirome, demonstrated clinical proof of concept for the THR target in Phase 3 FH clinical trials by significantly lowering

LDL-C

and Lp(a) in patients with HeFH who were on standard treatments such as statins and ezetimibe. The development of eprotirome ceased during the Phase 3 FH trial due to liver toxicity observed in the trial as well as eprotirome-induced cartilage damage seen in chronic toxicology studies in dogs. Because of its high level of THR-ß selectivity, its liver-targeting properties, and its absence of findings in chronic animal toxicology studies, we believe that resmetirom will avoid the toxicity issues of previous THR agonist compounds and may be a beneficial treatment for FH patients.

Table of Contents

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) FH Phase 2 Clinical Plan

In February 2017, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial of resmetirom for the treatment of HeFH. In the study we randomized HeFH patients 2:1, resmetirom or placebo QD in double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Patients continued treatment through 12 weeks. The study was conducted in Europe. In this 12 week clinical trial, the primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of resmetirom as measured by the percent reduction in

LDL-C

as compared with placebo. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability, and evaluated the efficacy of resmetirom to reduce a variety of lipid parameters, including

non-HDL-C,

ApoB, TGs, Lp(a), apoA/B, and lipoprotein particles. In February 2018, we announced positive results from the 12 week Phase 2 clinical trial of resmetirom for the treatment of HeFH. Resmetirom treated patients achieved highly significant reductions in

LDL-C,

ApoB, TG, ApoCIII, and Lp(a) in all patients and prespecified subgroups.

Collaborations

VIA Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or VIA, entered into a research, development and commercialization agreement, or the Roche Agreement, with Roche, on December 18, 2008. We subsequently assumed all of VIA’s rights in, to and under, and all of VIA’s obligations under, the Roche Agreement pursuant to an asset purchase agreement, dated September 14, 2011. Pursuant to the terms of the Roche Agreement, we, as

successor-in-interest

to VIA, assumed control of all development and commercialization of

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) and will hold exclusive worldwide rights for all potential indications. Under the Roche Agreement, Roche exclusively licensed certain patent rights and

know-how

relating to resmetirom in exchange for consideration consisting of an upfront payment, milestone payments, the remainder of which total $8 million and are tied to regulatory approval in the United States and Europe of resmetirom or any derivative product, and single-digit royalty payments based on net sales of resmetirom and any derivative products, subject to certain reductions. In 2011, we commenced Phase 1 clinical trials and subsequently paid Roche a related milestone payment. In October 2016, we commenced a Phase 2 study in NASH and subsequently paid Roche a related milestone payment. In 2019, we commenced a Phase 3 study in NASH and subsequently paid Roche a $2 million related milestone payment. Except as described above, we have not achieved any additional product development or regulatory milestones under the Roche Agreement and have generated no net sales of products developed from resmetirom.

Pursuant to the Roche Agreement, we must use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct clinical and commercial development programs for products containing resmetirom. If we determine that it is not reasonable to continue clinical trials or other development of resmetirom, we may elect to cease further development and Roche may terminate the license. If we determine not to pursue the development or commercialization of resmetirom in certain jurisdictions, including the United States, Roche may terminate the license for such territories. The Roche Agreement will expire, unless earlier terminated pursuant to other provisions of the agreement, on the last to occur of (i) the expiration of the last valid claim of a licensed patent covering the manufacture, use or sale of products containing resmetirom, or (ii) ten years after the first sale of a product containing resmetirom.

Competition

The development and commercialization of new drugs is highly competitive. We will face competition with respect to all product candidates we may develop or commercialize in the future from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies worldwide. The key factors affecting the success of any approved product will be its efficacy, safety profile, drug interactions, method of administration, pricing, reimbursement and level of promotional activity relative to those of competing drugs.

•

Our potential competitors may have substantially greater financial, technical, and personnel resources than us. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater commercial infrastructures. Our ability to compete successfully will depend largely on our ability to leverage our collective experience in drug discovery, development and commercialization to:

•

discover and develop medicines that are differentiated from other products in the market,

Table of Contents

•

obtain patent and/or proprietary protection for our products and technologies;

•

obtain required regulatory approvals;

•

obtain a commercial partner;

•

commercialize our drugs, if approved; and

•

attract and retain high-quality research, development and commercial personnel.

There are currently no therapeutic products approved for the treatment of NASH. There are several commercially available products that are currently used

off-label

for NASH, such as vitamin E, an antioxidant, insulin sensitizers, such as pioglitazone, anti-hyperlipidemic agents, such as gemfibrozil, pentoxifylline, ursodiol and others. In addition, there are numerous drugs in development for the treatment of NASH. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. submitted a NDA in September 2019 and MAA in December 2019 for obeticholic acid for the treatment of patients with fibrosis due to NASH. We are aware of several companies that have product candidates in clinical development for the treatment of NASH, including Gilead Sciences, Inc., Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Allergan plc / Tobira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Galmed Medical Research Ltd., Genfit Corp., Cirius Therapeutics, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Takeda, Inventiva, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi S.A., NGM Biopharmaceutical, Viking Therapeutics, Akero Therapeutics, and MedImmune LLC, and there are other companies with candidates in earlier stages of development. Given resmetirom’s actions on the underlying biological pathways across the spectrum of early to late stages of NASH, its CV beneficial effects, and its complementary mechanism to other therapies, we believe that resmetirom has the potential to be used alone or in combination with some of these potential NASH products.

There are several marketed products, both generic and proprietary, available for the treatment of HoFH and HeFH. We believe that resmetirom has the potential to be used in combination with several of these products. Available marketed products include: various statins, Merck’s ezetimibe, Aegerion’s lomitapide, Ionis’ mipomersen, Amgen’s evolocumab and Sanofi/Regeneron’s alirocumab. In addition, there are multiple drugs in development for the treatment of FH, including Gemphire’s gemcabene, Merck’s anacetrapib, Esperion’s

ETC-1002,

and drugs at an earlier stage of development. Given resmetirom’s pleoitropic lipid-lowering actions, its complementary mechanism to statins and other lipid-lowering drugs, and its potential for lowering Lp(a), we believe that resmetirom has the potential to be used in combination with the standard of care to treat patients with HoFH and HeFH.

Sales and Marketing

Because we are focused on discovery and development of our product candidates, we currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities in order to commercialize any approved product candidates. If our product candidates are approved, we intend either to establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize our products, or to outsource this function to a third party.

Manufacturing

We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish, any manufacturing facilities. We currently rely, and expect to rely, on third-party contract manufacturers, or CMOs, for the manufacture of any product candidates that we may develop for larger-scale preclinical and clinical testing, as well as for commercial quantities of any drug candidates that are approved.

Research and Development

Table of Contents

expenses were $72.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, and $24.4 million for year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to the advancement of clinical programs to Phase 3 studies, further API manufacturing studies and the continuation of preclinical studies. We expect research and development expenses to increase over time as we advance our clinical and preclinical development programs for resmetirom.

Intellectual Property

We will be able to protect our technology and products from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent we are covered by valid and enforceable patents or such knowledge is effectively maintained as trade secrets. Patents and other proprietary rights are thus an essential element of our business. We also rely on trade secrets,

know-how,

continuing technological innovation and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position.

Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for our current and future product candidates, technology and

know-how,

to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others, and to prevent others from infringing our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing United States and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, and maintaining the confidentiality of inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business.

We own or

co-own:

three United States and 15 foreign issued patents and allowed patent applications; and one United States and 36 foreign pending patent applications, each of which relates to

composition-of-matter

of resmetirom, including certain dosage forms, and its use in the treatment of key disease indications. Our current patent portfolio covers the United States and certain other jurisdictions worldwide. In addition, pursuant to the Roche Agreement, Roche granted us an exclusive license to certain United States and foreign patents and patent applications owned by Roche and Roche

know-how

relating to resmetirom. The Roche Agreement imposes various diligence, milestone payment, royalty payment, insurance, indemnification, and other obligations on us.

Issued United States patents directed to resmetirom, including certain dosage forms, have statutory expiration dates between 2026 and 2033, excluding any patent term extensions that might be available following the grant of marketing authorizations. Issued patents outside of the United States directed to resmetirom, including certain dosage forms, have statutory expiration dates between 2026 and 2033. We have pending patent applications for resmetirom that, if issued, would be expected to expire in the United States and in countries outside of the United States between 2033 and 2039, excluding any patent term adjustment that might be available following the grant of the patent and any patent term extensions that might be available following the grant of marketing authorizations.

Our trademarks are protected under the common law and/or by registration in the United States and other countries. We seek to protect our proprietary processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements and invention assignment agreements with our personnel, including consultants and commercial partners. These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information.

Orphan Drug Designation

Some potential target disease indications for resmetirom are rare diseases or may be designated rare diseases and we plan to pursue orphan drug designation where possible. If granted, each such designation might provide for regulatory exclusivity for seven years in the United States and ten years in the EU from the date of product approval for individual indications.

Table of Contents

Government Regulation

Government Regulation and Product Approval

Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, approval, labeling, packaging, storage, record-keeping, promotion, advertising, distribution, marketing and export and import of products such as those we are developing. A new drug must be approved by the FDA through the new drug application, or NDA, process before it may be legally marketed in the United States, and must be approved by foreign regulatory authorities via various procedures before it can be marketed in the applicable country. The animal and other

non-clinical

data and the results of human clinical trials performed under an Investigational New Drug application, or IND, and under similar foreign applications will become part of the NDA.

United States Drug Development Process

In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local, and foreign statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable United States requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include, among other things, the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, a clinical hold, warning letters and other types of enforcement-related letters, requesting product recalls, product seizures, changes to the conditions surrounding marketing approval such as labeling changes or changes to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigations Strategies, or REMS, program, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, debarment, restitution, disgorgement of profits, or civil or criminal investigations and penalties. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us. The process required by the FDA before a drug or biologic may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

•

completion of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies according to GLP or other applicable regulations;

•

submission to the FDA of an IND which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;

•

performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials according to Good Clinical Practices, or GCP, to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug for its intended use;

•

submission to the FDA of an NDA;

•

completion of registration batches and validation of the manufacturing process to show ability to consistently produce quality batches of product;

•

satisfactory completion of a FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the drug is produced to assess compliance with current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the drug’s identity, strength, quality and purity; and

•

FDA review and approval of the NDA.

Once a pharmaceutical candidate is identified for development, it enters the preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluations of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies, to assess the safety and quality of the product. Animal studies must be performed in compliance with FDA’s GLP regulations and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal Welfare Act. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, to the FDA as part of the IND. The sponsor will also include a protocol detailing, among other things, the objectives of

Table of Contents

the first phase of the clinical trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated, if the first phase lends itself to an efficacy evaluation. Some preclinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted. The IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA, within the

30-day

time period, places the clinical trial on a clinical hold or a partial clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. Clinical holds also may be imposed by the FDA at any time before or during studies due to safety concerns or

non-compliance,

or other reasons.

All clinical trials must be conducted under the supervision of one or more qualified investigators in accordance with good clinical practice regulations. They must be conducted under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria and the safety and effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. Each protocol must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND, and progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually. In addition, timely safety reports must be submitted to the FDA and the investigators for serious and unexpected adverse events or animal test results that suggest a significant risk to human subjects. An institutional review board, or IRB, at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve each protocol before a clinical trial commences at that institution and must also approve the information regarding the trial and the consent form that must be provided to each trial subject or his or her legal representative, monitor the study until completed and otherwise comply with IRB regulations. Foreign studies conducted under an IND must meet the same requirements that apply to studies being conducted in the U.S. Data from a foreign study not conducted under an IND may be submitted in support of an NDA if the study was conducted in accordance with GCP and the FDA is able to validate the data.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

•

Phase 1:

The product candidate is initially introduced into healthy human subjects and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. In the case of some products for severe or life-threatening diseases, such as cancer, especially when the product may be too inherently toxic to ethically administer to healthy volunteers, the initial human testing is often conducted in patients with the target diseases.

•

Phase 2:

This phase involves studies in a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.

•

Phase 3:

This phase involves trials undertaken to further evaluate dosage, clinical efficacy and safety in an expanded patient population at geographically dispersed clinical study sites. These studies are intended to establish the overall risk-benefit ratio of the product candidate and provide, if appropriate, an adequate basis for product approval and product labeling.

The FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 testing may not be completed successfully within any specified period, if at all. Further, success in either preclinical studies or early-stage clinical trials does not assure success in later-stage clinical trials. Sponsors of all controlled clinical trials, except for Phase 1 trials, are required to submit certain clinical trial information for inclusion in the public clinical trial registry and results data bank maintained by the National Institutes of Health, which are publicly available at http://clinicaltrials.gov.

During the development of a new drug, sponsors are given opportunities to meet with the FDA at certain points. These points may be prior to submission of an IND, at the end of Phase 2, and before an NDA is submitted. Meetings at other times may be requested. These meetings can provide an opportunity for the sponsor to share information about the data gathered to date, for the FDA to provide advice, and for the sponsor and FDA

Table of Contents

to reach agreement on the next phase of development. Sponsors typically use the end of Phase 2 meeting to discuss their Phase 2 clinical results and present their plans for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial that they believe will support approval of the new drug.

Concurrent with clinical trials, companies usually complete additional animal studies and must also develop additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the drug and finalize a process for manufacturing the product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and, among other things, the manufacturer must develop methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final drug. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

United States Review and Approval Processes

The results of product development, preclinical studies and clinical trials, along with descriptions of the manufacturing process, analytical tests conducted on the chemistry of the drug, proposed labeling, and other relevant information are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product. The submission of an NDA is subject to the payment of user fees; a waiver of such fees may be obtained under certain limited circumstances. The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs submitted to ensure that they are sufficiently complete for substantive review before it accepts them for filing. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the NDA must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application also is subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an

in-depth

substantive review. The FDA may refer the NDA to an advisory committee for review, evaluation and recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. The approval process is lengthy and often difficult, and the FDA may refuse to approve an NDA if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied or may require additional clinical or other data and information. Even if such data and information are submitted, the FDA may ultimately decide that the NDA does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. Data obtained from clinical trials are not always conclusive, and the FDA may interpret data differently than we interpret the same data. The FDA may issue a complete response letter, which generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require additional clinical or other data or impose other conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA, or an approval letter following satisfactory completion of all aspects of the review process. The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether a product is safe and effective for its intended use and whether its manufacturing is cGMP-compliant to assure and preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity. Before approving an NDA, the FDA will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. In addition, the FDA often will conduct a bioresearch monitoring inspection of the clinical trial sites involved in conducting pivotal studies to ensure data integrity and compliance with applicable GCP requirements.

NDAs receive either standard or priority review. A drug representing a significant improvement in treatment, prevention or diagnosis of disease may receive priority review. Priority review for an NDA for a new molecular entity will be six months from the date that the NDA is filed. The FDA has ten months in which to complete its initial review of a standard new molecular entity NDA. The FDA does not always meet its goal dates and in certain circumstances the goal date may be extended. In addition, products studied for their safety and effectiveness in treating serious or life-threatening illnesses and which provide meaningful therapeutic benefit over existing treatments, may receive accelerated approval. In that situation, the product may be approved on the basis of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials establishing that the drug product has an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit or on the basis of an effect on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit. As a condition of approval, the FDA may require that a

Table of Contents

sponsor of a drug receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials. Priority review and accelerated approval do not change the standards for approval, but may expedite the approval process.

If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be significantly limited to specific diseases, dosages or patient populations, or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial value of the product. In addition, the FDA may require a sponsor to conduct Phase 4 testing which involves clinical trials designed to further assess a drug’s safety and effectiveness after NDA approval, and may require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of approved products which have been commercialized.

The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act, or FDASIA, which was enacted in 2012, made permanent the Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, which requires a sponsor to conduct pediatric studies for most drugs and biologics, for a new active ingredient, new indication, new dosage form, new dosing regimen or new route of administration. Under PREA, original NDAs and supplements thereto must contain a pediatric assessment unless the sponsor has received a deferral or waiver. The required assessment must assess the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations and support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The sponsor or FDA may request a deferral of pediatric studies for some or all of the pediatric subpopulations. A deferral may be granted for several reasons, including a finding that the drug or biologic is ready for approval for use in adults before pediatric studies are complete or that additional safety or effectiveness data needs to be collected before the pediatric studies begin. After April 2013, the FDA must send a

non-compliance

letter to any sponsor that fails to submit the required assessment, keep a deferral current or fails to submit a request for approval of a pediatric formulation.

Patent Term Restoration and Marketing Exclusivity

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of FDA approval of our product candidates, some of our United States patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent restoration term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, patent term restoration cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. The patent term restoration period is generally

one-half

the time between the effective date of an IND, and the submission date of an NDA, plus the time between the submission date of an NDA and the approval of that application, except that the period is reduced by any time during which the applicant failed to exercise due diligence. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension, and the extension must be applied for prior to expiration of the patent and within 60 days of approval. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, in consultation with the FDA, reviews and approves the application for any patent term extension or restoration.

Pediatric exclusivity is another type of marketing exclusivity available in the United States. The FDASIA made permanent the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, or BPCA, which provides for an additional six months of marketing exclusivity if a sponsor conducts clinical trials in children in response to a written request from the FDA, or a Written Request. If the Written Request does not include studies in neonates, the FDA is required to include its rationale for not requesting those studies. The FDA may request studies on approved or unapproved indications in separate Written Requests. The issuance of a Written Request does not require the sponsor to undertake the described studies.

Orphan Drug Designation

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to a drug or biological product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more than 200,000 individuals in the United States and for which

Table of Contents

there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the United States a drug for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States for that drug. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process. If a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same indication, except in very limited circumstances, for seven years. Orphan drug exclusivity, however, also could block the approval of one of our product candidates for seven years if a competitor obtains approval of the same drug as defined by the FDA or if our product candidate is determined to be contained within the competitor’s product for the same indication or disease.

The FDA also administers a clinical research grants program, whereby researchers may compete for funding to conduct clinical trials to support the approval of drugs, biologics, medical devices, and medical foods for rare diseases and conditions. A product does not have to be designated as an orphan drug to be eligible for the grant program. An application for an orphan grant should propose one discrete clinical study to facilitate FDA approval of the product for a rare disease or condition. The study may address an unapproved new product or an unapproved new use for a product already on the market.

Fast Track Designation and Accelerated Approval

The FDA is required to facilitate the development, and expedite the review, of drugs that are intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition for which there is no effective treatment and which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. Under the fast track program, the sponsor of a new drug candidate may request that the FDA designate the drug candidate for a specific indication as a fast track drug concurrent with, or after, the filing of the IND for the drug candidate. The FDA must determine if the drug candidate qualifies for fast track designation within 60 days of receipt of the sponsor’s request.

Under the fast track program, the FDA may designate a drug for fast-track status if it is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening illness and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need. Similarly, the agency may designate a drug for accelerated approval if it treats a serious condition and generally provides meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than IMM, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit, taking into account the severity, rarity, or prevalence of the condition and the availability or lack of alternative treatments.

In clinical trials, a surrogate endpoint is a measurement of laboratory or clinical signs of a disease or condition that substitutes for a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. A drug candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, will allow the FDA to withdraw the drug from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for drug candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.

In FDASIA, Congress encouraged the FDA to utilize innovative and flexible approaches to the assessment of products under accelerated approval. The law required the FDA to issue related draft guidance within a year after the law’s enactment and also promulgate confirming regulatory changes. In May 2014, the FDA published a Guidance for Industry entitled, “Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions-Drugs and Biologics” which provides guidance on FDA programs that are intended to facilitate and expedite development and review of new

Table of Contents

drugs as well as threshold criteria generally applicable to concluding that a drug is a candidate for these expedited development and review programs. In addition to the Fast Track, accelerated approval and priority review programs discussed above, the FDA also provided guidance on a new program for Breakthrough Therapy designation. A request for Breakthrough Therapy designation should be submitted concurrently with, or as an amendment to an IND. The FDA has already granted this designation to over 30 new drugs and has approved several.

Post-Approval Requirements

Once an approval is granted, products are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA. The FDA may withdraw the approval if, among other things, compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if safety or efficacy problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market. If new safety issues are identified following approval, the FDA may require the NDA sponsor to take certain measures, such as revising the approved labeling to reflect the new safety information, conducting post-market studies or clinical trials to assess the new safety information, and/or implementing or changing a REMS Program to mitigate newly-identified risks. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further FDA review and approval. Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMP and other laws and regulations. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the production of clinical and commercial quantities of our product candidates. Future inspections by the FDA and other regulatory agencies may identify compliance issues at the facilities of our contract manufacturers that may disrupt production or distribution, or require substantial resources to correct.

Any drug products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting of adverse experiences with the drug, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information, drug sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements, and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements. The FDA strictly regulates labeling, advertising, promotion and other types of information on products that are placed on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label.

From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced and passed in Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the approval, manufacturing and marketing of products regulated by the FDA. In addition to new legislation, FDA regulations and guidance are often revised or interpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether further legislative changes will be enacted, or FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations changed or what the impact of such changes, if any, may be.

Foreign Regulation

In addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales and distribution of its products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries or economic areas, such as the

28-member

European Union, before we may commence clinical trials or market products in those countries or areas. The approval process and requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from place to place, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.

Under EU regulatory systems, a company may submit marketing authorization applications either under a centralized or decentralized procedure. The centralized procedure, which is compulsory for medicinal products

Table of Contents

produced by biotechnology or those medicinal products containing new active substances for specific indications such as the treatment of AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, viral diseases and designated orphan medicines, and optional for other medicines which are highly innovative. Under the centralized procedure, a marketing application is submitted to the EMA where it will be evaluated by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use and a favorable opinion typically results in the grant by the European Commission of a single marketing authorization that is valid for all EU member states within 67 days of receipt of the opinion. The initial marketing authorization is valid for five years, but once renewed is usually valid for an unlimited period. The decentralized procedure provides for approval by one or more “concerned” member states based on an assessment of an application performed by one member state, known as the “reference” member state. Under the decentralized approval procedure, an applicant submits an application, or dossier, and related materials to the reference member state and concerned member states. The reference member state prepares a draft assessment and drafts of the related materials within 120 days after receipt of a valid application. Within 90 days of receiving the reference member state’s assessment report, each concerned member state must decide whether to approve the assessment report and related materials. If a member state does not recognize the marketing authorization, the disputed points are eventually referred to the European Commission, whose decision is binding on all member states.

When conducting clinical trials in the EU, we must adhere to the provisions of the EU Clinical Trials Directive and the laws and regulations of the EU Member States implementing them. These provisions require, among other things, that the prior authorization of an Ethics Committee and the submission and approval of a clinical trial authorization application be obtained in each Member State before commencing a clinical trial in that Member State.

As in the United States, it may be possible in foreign countries to obtain a period of market and/or data exclusivity that would have the effect of postponing the entry into the marketplace of a competitor’s generic product. For example, in the EU, if any of our products receive marketing approval in the European Economic Area, or EEA, which is comprised of the 28 member states of the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, we expect that we will benefit from eight years of data exclusivity and an additional two years of marketing exclusivity. An additional

one-year

extension of marketing exclusivity is possible if during the data exclusivity period we obtain an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications that is deemed to bring a significant clinical benefit compared to existing therapies. The data exclusivity period begins on the date of the product’s first marketing authorization in the EU and prevents biosimilars from relying on the holder of the marketing authorization for the reference biological medicine’s pharmacological, toxicological and clinical data for a period of eight years. After eight years, a biosimilar product application may be submitted and the sponsoring companies may rely on the marketing authorization holder’s data. However, a biosimilar medicine cannot launch until 2 years later (or a total of ten years after the first marketing authorization in the EU of the innovator product), or 3 years later (or a total of eleven years after the first marketing authorization in the EU of the innovator product) if the marketing authorization holder obtains marketing authorization for a new indication with significant clinical benefit within the eight year data exclusivity period.

As in the United States, a sponsor may apply for designation of a product as an orphan drug for the treatment of a specific indication in the EU before the application for marketing authorization is made. Orphan drugs in Europe enjoy economic and marketing benefits, including up to ten years of market exclusivity for the approved indication unless another applicant can show that its product is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the orphan-designated product.

Reimbursement

Significant uncertainty exists regarding the coverage and reimbursement status of products approved by the FDA and other government authorities. In the United States, sales of any products for which we may receive regulatory approval for commercial sale will depend in significant part on the availability and adequacy of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors include government authorities,

Table of Contents

managed care providers, private health insurers and other organizations. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list which might not include all of the

FDA-approved

products for a particular indication. Moreover, a payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development.

Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for, examining the medical necessity of, and assessing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. In order to obtain coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, we may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of any products, in addition to the costs required to obtain regulatory approvals. Our drug candidates may not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. If third-party payors do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit.

The U.S. government and state legislatures have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs. For example, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, or collectively, ACA, contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs reimbursed by Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to federal health care programs. Adoption of government controls and measures, and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceuticals.

The marketability of any products for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement. In addition, an increasing emphasis on cost containment measures in the United States has increased and we expect will continue to increase the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the EU provides options for its member states to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A member state may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products. Historically, products launched in the EU do not follow price structures of the United States and generally tend to be significantly lower

Employees

As of February 21, 2020, we had twenty nine full-time employees, including twenty three engaged in research, development, and regulatory activities, and six in executive, general and administrative functions, and multiple part-time consultants.

Table of Contents

General Information

We were incorporated in Delaware in September 2011. Our principal executive offices are located at 200 Barr Harbor Drive, Suite 200, West Conshohocken, PA 19428. Our Internet website address is www.madrigalpharma.com. No portion of our website is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form

10-K.

We advise you to read this Annual Report on Form

10-K

in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the SEC in connection with our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, our quarterly reports on Form

10-Q

and any current reports on Form

8-K

that we may file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports after the date of this annual report directly from us or from the SEC at its website at www.sec.gov. We make our periodic and current reports available on our internet website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

Table of Contents

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in or incorporated by reference into this report, before making an investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we do not currently believe are important to an investor may also harm our business. If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions described in the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or our results of operations could be seriously harmed. If that happens, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose part or all of the value of any of our shares held by you.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have limited operating history, we have incurred significant operating losses since inception and we expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future. We may never become profitable or, if achieved, be able to sustain profitability.

We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future as we continue our clinical trial and development programs for

MGL-3196

(resmetirom) and other future product candidates. As of December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $223.2 million. Losses have principally resulted from costs incurred in our preclinical and clinical trials, research and development programs and from our general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2019, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of approximately $439.0 million. In the future, we intend to continue to conduct research and development, clinical testing, regulatory compliance and, if resmetirom or other future product candidates are approved, sales and marketing activities that, together with anticipated general and administrative expenses, will likely result in us incurring further significant losses for the foreseeable future.

We currently generate no revenue from product sales, and we may never be able to commercialize resmetirom or other future product candidates. We do not currently have the required approvals to market resmetirom or any other future product candidates, and we may never receive them. We may not be profitable even if we or any of our future development partners succeed in commercializing any of our product candidates. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing and commercializing our product candidates, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all.

Our business depends on the success of

MGL-3196

(resmetirom), which is still in clinical development and has not completed a pivotal trial. If we are unable to obtain regulatory approval for and successfully commercialize resmetirom, or we experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

To date, the sole focus of our product development has been resmetirom, a liver-directed selective thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist for potential use in

non-alcoholic

steatohepatitis, or NASH, and familial hypercholesterolemia, or FH. Successful continued development and ultimate regulatory approval of resmetirom for NASH or dyslipidemia is critical to the future success of our business. We have invested, and will continue to invest, a significant portion of our time and financial resources in the clinical development of resmetirom. We will need to raise sufficient funds to successfully complete our clinical development program for resmetirom in NASH and dyslipidemia. The future regulatory and commercial success of resmetirom is subject to a number of risks, including the following:

•

we may not have sufficient financial and other resources to complete the necessary clinical trials for resmetirom, including, but not limited to, our planned registrational clinical trials to obtain drug approval;

•

the mechanism of action of resmetirom is complex and we do not know the degree to which it will translate into a therapeutic benefit, if any, in NASH, dyslipidemia or any other indication, and we do not know the degree to which the complex mechanism of action may contribute to long term safety

Table of Contents

issues or adverse events, if any, when resmetirom is taken for prolonged periods such as in the treatment of NASH, dyslipidemia or any other indication;

•

we may not be able to obtain adequate evidence from clinical trials of efficacy and safety for resmetirom in NASH, dyslipidemia or any other indication;

•

we do not know the degree to which resmetirom will be accepted as a therapy by physicians, patients and payors, even if approved;

•

in our clinical programs for resmetirom, we may experience variability in patients, adjustments to clinical trial procedures and the need for additional clinical trial sites, which could delay our clinical trial progress;

•

the results of our clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical or clinical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory bodies for marketing approval;

•

patients in our clinical trials may die or suffer other adverse effects for reasons that may or may not be related to resmetirom, which could delay or prevent further clinical development;

•

the standards implemented by clinical or regulatory agencies may change at any time;

•

we cannot be certain what efficacy endpoints foreign clinical or regulatory agencies may require in a Phase 3 clinical trial of NASH or dyslipidemia or for approval of our product candidates; we also cannot be certain if we will be able to gain accelerated approval of any of our product candidates based on surrogate endpoints;

•

foreign clinical or regulatory agencies will likely require efficacy endpoints for Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of NASH or dyslipidemia that differ from the endpoints of our current Phase 2 trials and the results of our Phase 3 clinical trials may not be as favorable as the results we have observed to date in our current trials;

•

other differences in the design of our planned Phase 3 clinical trials of the treatment of NASH, including the use of a new tablet formulation of resmetirom and the inclusion of patients with more advanced NASH, could cause the results of our Phase 3 trials to be less favorable than the results we observed in our Phase 2 trials in NASH;

•

if we obtain accelerated approval of a product candidate based on a surrogate endpoint, we will likely be required to conduct a post-approval clinical outcomes trial to confirm the clinical benefit of the product candidate and if the post-approval trial is not successful we may not be able to continue marketing the product;

•

we cannot be certain of the number and type of clinical trials and

non-clinical

studies that FDA or other regulatory agencies will require in order to approve resmetirom or NASH or dyslipidemia;

•

if approved for NASH, resmetirom will likely compete with the

off-label

use of currently marketed products and other therapies in development that may reach approval for NASH prior to resmetirom;

•

if approved for dyslipidemia, resmetirom will likely compete with currently approved and marketed products and other therapies in development that may reach approval for dyslipidemia prior to resmetirom; and

•

we may not be able to obtain, maintain or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights.

Of the large number of drugs in development in the pharmaceutical industry, only a small percentage results in the submission of a new drug application, or NDA, to the FDA and even fewer are approved for commercialization. Furthermore, even if we do receive regulatory approval to market resmetirom, any such approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses or patient populations for which we may market the products. Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the requisite financing to continue to fund our development programs, we may be unable to successfully develop or commercialize resmetirom. If we or any of our future

Table of Contents

development partners are unable to develop, or obtain regulatory approval for, or, if approved, successfully commercialize resmetirom, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to continue our business.

Clinical trials are very expensive, time-consuming and difficult to design and implement and involve uncertain outcomes. Furthermore, the results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials are not always predictive of future results. Any product candidate that we advance into clinical trials, including resmetirom, may not have favorable results in later clinical trials or receive regulatory approval.

Drug development has inherent risk. We will be required to demonstrate through adequate and well-controlled clinical trials that our product candidates are safe and effective, with a favorable benefit-risk profile, for use in our target indications before we can seek regulatory approvals for its commercial sale. Clinical studies are expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. Delay or failure can occur at any stage of development, including after commencement of any of our clinical trials. In addition, success in early clinical trials does not mean that later clinical trials will be successful, because later-stage clinical trials may be conducted in broader patient populations and involve different study designs. For instance, our Phase 1 results and our Phase 2 primary endpoint results in NASH may not be predictive of any future Phase 2 results or of results in any Phase 3 clinical trial in NASH. Furthermore, our future trials will need to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy in significantly larger patient populations for approval by regulatory authorities. Companies frequently suffer significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, even after earlier clinical trials have shown promising results, and we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. In addition, only a small percentage of drugs under development result in the submission of an NDA to the FDA and even fewer are approved for commercialization.

We cannot be certain that any of our ongoing or future clinical trials will be successful, and any safety concerns observed in any one of our clinical trials in our targeted indications could limit the prospects for regulatory approval of our product candidates in those and other indications.

Because resmetirom has not yet received regulatory approval for any indication, it is difficult to predict the time and cost of development and our ability to successfully complete clinical development and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for commercialization.

Resmetirom has not yet received regulatory approval for the treatment of NASH, dyslipidemia or any other indication, and unexpected problems may arise that could cause us to delay, suspend or terminate our development efforts in any or all indications. Further, resmetirom has not yet demonstrated efficacy in patients with NASH or dyslipidemia, and the long-term safety consequences of a liver-directed thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist are not known. Regulatory approval of new product candidates such as resmetirom can be more expensive and take longer than approval for candidates for the treatment of more well-understood diseases with previously approved products.

If clinical trials or regulatory approval processes for our product candidates are prolonged, delayed or suspended, we may be unable to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis, which would require us to incur additional costs and delay our receipt of any revenue from potential product sales.

We cannot predict whether we will encounter problems with any of our completed, ongoing or planned clinical trials that will cause us or any regulatory authority to delay, suspend, or terminate those clinical trials or delay the analysis of data derived from them. A number of events, including any of the following, could delay or impede completely the completion of our ongoing and planned clinical trials and negatively affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and to market and sell, a particular product candidate:

•

conditions imposed on us by the FDA or other regulatory authorities regarding the scope or design of our clinical trials;

Table of Contents

•

insufficient supply of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct and complete our clinical trials;

•

slow enrollment and retention rate of subjects in our clinical trials; and

•

serious and unexpected drug-related side effects related to the product candidate being tested.

Commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed by the imposition of additional conditions on our clinical trials by the FDA or any other applicable foreign regulatory authority or the requirement of additional supportive studies by the FDA or such foreign regulatory authority.

We do not know whether our clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured, will enroll an adequate number of patients on time, or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Delays in the initiation, enrollment or completion of our clinical trials will result in increased development costs for our product candidates, and our financial resources may be insufficient to fund any incremental costs. In addition, if our clinical trials are delayed, our competitors may be able to bring products to market before we do and the commercial viability of our product candidates could be limited.

If we inadvertently fail to comply with foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and marketing approval for drugs, we could be prevented from selling our drug candidates in foreign markets, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing, and reimbursement for marketing our drug candidates outside the United States vary greatly from country to country and may require additional testing. We expect that our future clinical development of our drug candidates will involve a number of clinical trials in foreign jurisdictions, particularly in Europe. We have no experience in obtaining foreign regulatory approvals. The time required to obtain approvals outside the United States may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not guarantee approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or by the FDA. Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements or obtain required approvals could impair our ability to develop foreign markets for our drug candidates and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical trials for our product candidates. If we encounter difficulties enrolling patients in our clinical trials, our clinical development activities could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. We may not be able to initiate, continue, or complete clinical trials required by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies for resmetirom if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these clinical trials. We expect our Phase 3 clinical trials of resmetirom will require that we enroll significantly more patients than were enrolled in our Phase 2 trials. Patient enrollment, a significant factor in the timing to conduct and complete clinical trials, is affected by many factors, including the size and nature of the patient population, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, competing clinical trials, and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages and disadvantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating. For instance, we are aware that other companies conducting clinical trials in NASH patients have had delays in recruiting patients for their trials. In the proposed clinical trials, patient willingness to undergo a liver biopsy in our NASH trials, and identification of patients willing to participate in our dyslipidemia trials, are also risk factors. Potential patients for resmetirom may not be adequately diagnosed or identified with the diseases which we are targeting or may not meet the entry criteria for our studies.

Table of Contents

The FDA typically requires sponsors of lipid-lowering product candidates to conduct drug-drug interaction studies with statins because statins may have increased safety risks when administered together with other drug therapies that affect their pharmacokinetic profile. We have completed two Phase 1 clinical drug interaction studies of resmetirom and statins in 39 normal healthy volunteers, which showed resmetirom to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated. We have completed a Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH including patients taking low dose statins. We have also completed a Phase 2 clinical trial in HeFH including patients taking high dose statins. In general, drug interactions between resmetirom and statins and any other drug that might result in adverse events could delay development in later clinical trials.

We will be required to identify and enroll a sufficient number of patients for each of our planned clinical trials of resmetirom for NASH and dyslipidemia indications, respectively. We also may encounter difficulties in identifying and enrolling NASH patients and dyslipidemia patients with a stage of disease appropriate for our future clinical trials. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials if we are unable to locate a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in the clinical trials required by the FDA or other foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, the process of finding and diagnosing patients may prove costly. Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for any of our clinical trials would result in significant delays or may require us to abandon one or more clinical trials.

Any product candidate in our current or future clinical trials may cause unacceptable adverse events or side effects or have other properties that may delay or prevent its regulatory approval or commercialization or limit its commercial potential.

Unacceptable adverse events or undesirable side effects caused by any of our product candidates in current or future clinical trials could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications and markets. This in turn could prevent us from completing development of or commercializing the affected product candidate and generating revenue from its sale. If any of our product candidates cause unacceptable adverse events in clinical trials, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize such product candidate.

Occurrence of serious treatment-related side effects could impede subject recruitment and clinical trial enrollment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial, require us to halt the clinical trial, and prevent receipt of regulatory approval from the FDA. They could also adversely affect physician or patient acceptance of our product candidates or result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

Our product candidates will remain subject to ongoing regulatory review even if they receive marketing approval, and if we fail to comply with continuing regulations, we could lose these approvals and the sale of any approved commercial products could be suspended.

Even if we receive regulatory approval to market a particular product candidate, the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, and record keeping related to the product will remain subject to extensive regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP, regulations and GCPs, for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our ability to commercialize such products. In addition, any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. The FDA may also require a REMS Program as a condition of approval of our product candidates, which could include requirements for a medication guide, physician communication plans or additional elements to ensure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other risk minimization tools.

Table of Contents

If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements of the FDA and other applicable domestic and foreign regulatory authorities, or previously unknown problems with any approved product, manufacturer, or manufacturing process are discovered, we could be subject to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including:

•

restrictions on the products, manufacturers, or manufacturing processes;

•

warning letters or untitled letters;

•

civil or criminal penalties;

•

fines;

•

injunctions;

•

product seizures or detentions;

•

pressure to initiate voluntary product recalls;

•

suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals; and

•

refusal to approve pending applications for marketing approval of new products or supplements to approved applications.

If any of these events occurs, our ability to sell such products may be impaired, and we may incur substantial additional expense to comply with regulatory requirements, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing industry, and our product candidates may become obsolete.

We are engaged in a rapidly evolving field. Competition from other pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and research and academic institutions is intense and likely to increase. Many of those companies and institutions have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than us. Those companies and institutions also have substantially greater experience in developing products, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approval and in manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products. Our competitors may succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we do. Competitors have developed or are in the process of developing technologies that are, or in the future may be, the basis for competitive products. Some of these competitive products may have an entirely different approach or means of accomplishing the desired therapeutic effect than products being developed by us. Our competitors may succeed in developing products that are more effective and/or cost competitive than those we are developing, or that would render our product candidates less competitive or even obsolete. In addition, one or more of our competitors may achieve product commercialization or patent protection earlier than we may, which could materially adversely affect our business.

If the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities approve generic products that compete with any of our or any of our partners’ product candidates, the sales of our product candidates would be adversely affected.

Once an NDA or marketing authorization application outside the United States is approved, the product covered thereby becomes a “listed drug” that can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an abbreviated new drug application in the United States. Agency regulations and other applicable regulations and policies provide incentives to manufacturers to create modified,

non-infringing

versions of a drug to facilitate the approval of an abbreviated new drug application or other application for generic substitutes in the United States and in nearly every pharmaceutical market around the world. These manufacturers might only be required to conduct a relatively inexpensive study to show that their product has the same active ingredient(s), dosage form, strength, route of administration and conditions of use, or labeling, as our product and that the

Table of Contents

generic product is bioequivalent to our product, meaning it is absorbed in the body at the same rate and to the same extent as our product. These generic equivalents, which must meet the same quality standards as branded pharmaceuticals, would be significantly less costly than our product to bring to market, and companies that produce generic equivalents are generally able to offer their products at lower prices. Thus, after the introduction of a generic competitor, a significant percentage of the sales of any branded product are typically lost to the generic product. Accordingly, competition from generic equivalents to our product or any of our partners’ future products, if any, would materially adversely affect our future revenue, profitability and cash flows and substantially limit our ability to obtain a return on the investments we have made and expect to make in our or any of our partners’ product candidates, including resmetirom.

Competition that our or any of our partners’ products may face from generic versions of our products could materially and adversely impact our future revenue, profitability and cash flows and substantially limit our ability to obtain a return on the investments we have made in those product candidates.

If physicians and patients do not accept our future products or if the market for indications for which any product candidate is approved is smaller than expected, we may be unable to generate significant revenue, if any.

Even if any of our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, they may not gain market acceptance among physicians, patients, and third-party payers. Efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payers on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may not be successful. If any of our product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenue or any profits from operations. Physicians may decide not to recommend its treatments for a variety of reasons including:

•

timing of market introduction of competitive products;

•

demonstration of clinical safety and efficacy compared to other products;

•

cost-effectiveness;

•

limited or no coverage by third-party payers;

•

convenience and ease of administration;

•

prevalence and severity of adverse side effects;

•

restrictions in the label of the drug;

•

other potential advantages of alternative treatment methods; and

•

ineffective marketing and distribution support of its products.

If any of our product candidates are approved, but fail to achieve market acceptance or such market is smaller than anticipated, we may not be able to generate significant revenue and our business would suffer.

As we evolve from a company that is primarily involved in clinical development to a company that is also involved in commercialization, we may encounter difficulties in expanding our operations successfully.

As we advance our product candidates through clinical trials, we will need to expand our development, regulatory, manufacturing, and marketing and sales capabilities and may need to further contract with third parties to provide these capabilities. As our operations expand, we likely will need to manage additional relationships with such third parties, as well as additional collaborators, distributors, marketers and suppliers.

Maintaining third party relationships for these purposes will impose significant added responsibilities on members of our management and other personnel. We must be able to effectively manage our development

Table of Contents

efforts, recruit and train sales and marketing personnel, effectively manage our participation in the clinical trials in which our product candidates are involved and improve our managerial, development, operational and finance systems, all of which may impose a strain on our administrative and operational infrastructure.

If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing or distribution services, any product revenues that we receive, or the profitability of these product revenues to us, are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any products that we develop without the involvement of these third parties. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our products or in doing so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our products.

The uncertainty associated with pharmaceutical reimbursement and related matters may adversely affect our business.

Market acceptance and sales of any one or more of our product candidates will depend on reimbursement policies and may be affected by future healthcare reform measures in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions. Government authorities and third-party payers, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which drugs they will cover and establish payment levels. We cannot be certain that reimbursement will be available for any of our product candidates. Also, we cannot be certain that reimbursement policies will not reduce the demand for, or the price paid for, our products. If reimbursement is not available or is available on a limited basis, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidates that we develop.

In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, also called the Medicare Modernization Act, or MMA, changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation established Medicare Part D, which expanded Medicare coverage for outpatient prescription drug purchases by the elderly but provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. The MMA also introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on average sales prices for physician-administered drugs. The United States and several foreign jurisdictions are considering, or have already enacted, a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in ways that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. Among policy makers and payers in the United States and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access to healthcare. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any products that we develop due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative proposals.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or ACA, became law in the United States. The goal of ACA is to reduce the cost of healthcare and substantially change the way healthcare is financed by both government and private insurers. While we cannot predict what impact on federal reimbursement policies this legislation will have in general or on our business specifically, the ACA may result in downward pressure on pharmaceutical reimbursement, which could negatively affect market acceptance of, and the price we may charge for, any products we develop that receives regulatory approval. We also cannot predict the impact of ACA on us as many of the ACA reforms require the promulgation of detailed regulations implementing the statutory provisions, which have not yet been fully implemented.

Table of Contents

If any product liability lawsuits are successfully brought against us or any of our collaborative partners, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our product candidates.

We face an inherent risk of product liability lawsuits related to the testing of our product candidates in seriously ill patients and will face an even greater risk if product candidates are approved by regulatory authorities and introduced commercially. Product liability claims may be brought against us or our partners by participants enrolled in our clinical trials, patients, healthcare providers or others using, administering or selling any of our future approved products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against any such claims, we may incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

•

decreased demand for any of our future approved products;

•

injury to our reputation;

•

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

•

termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

•

significant litigation costs;

•

substantial monetary awards to or costly settlements with patients or other claimants;

•

product recalls or a change in the indications for which products may be used;

•

loss of revenue;

•

diversion of management and scientific resources from our business operations; and

•

the inability to commercialize our product candidates.

If any of our product candidates are approved for commercial sale, we will be highly dependent upon consumer perceptions of us and the safety and quality of our products. We could be adversely affected if we are subject to negative publicity. We could also be adversely affected if any of our products or any similar products distributed by other companies prove to be, or are asserted to be, harmful to patients. Also, because of our dependence upon consumer perceptions, any adverse publicity associated with illness or other adverse effects resulting from patients’ use or misuse of our products or any similar products distributed by other companies could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We do not currently hold product liability insurance coverage. Prior to commercialization of our product candidates, we will need to purchase insurance coverage. As a result, we may be unable to maintain or obtain sufficient insurance at a reasonable cost to protect us against losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business. These liabilities could prevent or interfere with our product development and commercialization efforts. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us, particularly if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could decrease our cash resources and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our employees, contractors, vendors and partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our employees, contractors, vendors or partners. Misconduct by these parties could include failures to comply with FDA regulations, to provide accurate information to the FDA, to comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, to report financial information or data timely, completely or accurately, or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Third-party misconduct could

Table of Contents

also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, but it is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us resulting from this misconduct and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

We enter into various contracts in the normal course of our business in which we indemnify the other party to the contract. In the event we have to perform under these indemnification provisions, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the normal course of business, we periodically enter into academic, commercial, service, collaboration, licensing, consulting and other agreements that contain indemnification provisions. With respect to our academic and other research agreements, we typically indemnify the institution and related parties from losses arising from claims relating to the products, processes or services made, used, sold or performed pursuant to the agreements for which we have secured licenses, and from claims arising from our or our potential sublicensees’ exercise of rights under the agreements. With respect to our commercial agreements, we indemnify our vendors from any third-party product liability claims that could result from the production, use or consumption of the product, as well as for alleged infringements of any patent or other intellectual property right by a third party.

Should our obligation under an indemnification provision exceed applicable insurance coverage or if we are denied insurance coverage, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Similarly, if we are relying on a collaborator to indemnify us and the collaborator is denied insurance coverage or the indemnification obligation exceeds the applicable insurance coverage, and if the collaborator does not have other assets available to indemnify us, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If we fail to develop and commercialize other product candidates, we may be unable to grow our business.

Although the development and commercialization of resmetirom is our primary focus, as part of our longer-term growth strategy, we plan to evaluate the development and commercialization of other therapies related to thyroid hormone, orphan and other diseases. We will evaluate internal opportunities from our compound libraries, and also may choose to

in-license

or acquire other product candidates as well as commercial products to treat patients suffering from thyroid hormone, orphan or other disorders with high unmet medical needs and limited treatment options. These other product candidates may require additional, time-consuming development efforts prior to commercial sale, including preclinical studies, clinical trials and approval by the FDA and/or applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to the risks of failure that are inherent in pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that the product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, we cannot assure you that any such products that are approved will be manufactured or produced economically, be successfully commercialized, be widely accepted in the marketplace, or be more effective than other commercially available alternatives.

If we lose key management personnel, or if we fail to recruit additional highly skilled personnel, our ability to identify, develop and commercialize products will be impaired.

We are highly dependent on principal members of our management team, including our Chief Executive Officer, Paul A. Friedman, M.D., and our President, Research and Development, and Chief Medical Officer , Rebecca Taub, M.D. These executives each have significant pharmaceutical industry experience. The loss of any member of our management team or scientific staff, including Drs. Friedman and Taub, would impair our ability

Table of Contents

to identify, develop and market new products. Our management and other employees may voluntarily terminate their employment with us at any time. The loss of the services of these or other key personnel, or the inability to attract and retain additional qualified personnel, could result in delays to development or approval, loss of sales and diversion of management resources. In addition, we depend on our ability to attract and retain other highly skilled personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and the process of hiring and integrating such qualified personnel is often lengthy. We may be unable to recruit such personnel on a timely basis, if at all, which would negatively impact our development and commercialization programs.

Additionally, we do not currently maintain “key person” life insurance on the lives of our executives or any of our employees. This lack of insurance means that we may not receive adequate compensation for the loss of the services of these individuals.

We currently have no marketing, sales or distribution infrastructure with respect to our product candidates. If we are unable to develop our sales, marketing and distribution capabilities on our own or through collaborations with marketing partners, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.

We currently have no marketing, sales or distribution capabilities and have limited sales or marketing experience within our organization. If our product candidate, resmetirom, is approved, we intend either to establish a sales and marketing organization with technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities to commercialize resmetirom, or to outsource this function to a third party. Either of these options would be expensive and time-consuming. Some or all of these costs may be incurred in advance of any approval of resmetirom. In addition, we may not be able to hire a sales force in the United States that is sufficient in size or has adequate expertise in the medical markets that we intend to target. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely affect the commercialization of resmetirom and other future product candidates.

With respect to our existing and future product candidates, we may choose to collaborate with third parties that have direct sales forces and established distribution systems, either to augment our own sales force and distribution systems or as an alternative to our own sales force and distribution systems. To the extent that we enter into

co-promotion

or other licensing arrangements, our product revenue may be lower than if we directly marketed or sold any approved products. In addition, any revenue we receive will depend in whole or in part upon the efforts of these third parties, which may not be successful and are generally not within our control. If we are unable to enter into these arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any approved products. If we are not successful in commercializing any approved products, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more third parties, our future product revenue will suffer and we may incur significant additional losses.

Even if we obtain FDA approval of resmetirom or any other future product candidate, we may never obtain approval or commercialize our products outside of the United States, which would limit our ability to realize their full market potential.

In order to market any products outside of the United States, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding clinical trial design, safety and efficacy. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not mean that regulatory approval will be obtained in any other country. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Seeking foreign regulatory approvals could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and may require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, which would be costly and time consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in those countries. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. In addition, our failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have negative effects on the process for regulatory approval in other

Table of Contents

countries. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we or our partners fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our products will be harmed.

If we do not obtain protection under the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and similar foreign legislation by extending the term of patents covering each of our product candidates, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and conditions of FDA marketing approval of our product candidates, one or more of our United States patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent term extension of up to five years for a patent covering an approved product as compensation for effective patent term lost during product development and the FDA regulatory review process. However, we may not receive an extension if we fail to apply within applicable deadlines, fail to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise fail to satisfy applicable requirements. Moreover, the length of the extension could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is less than we request, the period during which we can enforce our patent rights for that product may not extend beyond the current patent expiration dates and our competitors may obtain approval to market competing products sooner. As a result, our revenue could be potentially materially reduced. Further, if this occurs, our competitors may take advantage of our investment in development and trials by referencing our clinical and preclinical data and launch their product earlier than might otherwise be the case.

We may fail to obtain orphan drug designations from the FDA for our product candidates, as applicable, and even if we obtain such designations, we may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for market exclusivity.

Our strategy includes filing for orphan drug designation where available for our product candidates. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to a drug or biologic intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is defined as one occurring in a patient population of fewer than 200,000 in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug or biologic will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and

user-fee

waivers. In addition, if a product that has orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA, to market the same drug or biologic for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity.

We have not obtained orphan designation for any product candidates to date, although we believe some of the potential indications of our product candidates could qualify for orphan drug designation and the related benefits if approved for such indications and we may file for orphan drug designation with respect to such indications. Even if we obtain such designations, we may not be the first to obtain regulatory approval of a product candidate for the orphan-designated indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated indication or may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if we are unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the orphan-designated disease or condition. Further, even if we obtain orphan drug designation exclusivity for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs with different active moieties may be approved for the same condition, and only the first applicant to receive approval will receive the benefits of marketing exclusivity.

Table of Contents

Even after an orphan-designated product is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve a later drug with the same active moiety for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior if it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug, nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. In addition, while we may seek orphan drug designation for our product candidates, we may never receive such designations. Failure to obtain an orphan drug designation for our product candidates may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we or our partners market products in a manner that violates fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws, or if we or our partners violate government price reporting laws, we or our partners may be subject to administrative civil and/or criminal penalties.

Although we do not currently have any products on the market, if we obtain FDA approval for our product candidates, and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our operations may be directly, or indirectly through our prescribers, customers and third-party payors, subject to various U.S. federal and state healthcare laws and regulations. These laws include, among others, the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the U.S. federal civil and criminal false claims laws. At such time, if ever, as we or any of our partners market any of our future approved products, it is possible that some of our business activities and/or our partners could be subject to challenge under one or more of these laws.

Federal false claims, false statements and civil monetary penalties laws prohibit, among others, any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to get a false claim paid. The federal healthcare program Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce, or in return for, purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers, on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers, on the other. Although there are several statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchasing or recommending may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.

In addition, we and/or our partners may be subject to patient data privacy and security regulation, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, and their respective implementing regulations, which impose specified requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information.

Most states also have statutes or regulations similar to these federal laws, which may apply to items such as pharmaceutical products and services reimbursed by private insurers. We and/or our partners may be subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions for violations of any of these federal and state laws. Pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for a variety of promotional and marketing activities, such as: providing free trips, free goods, sham consulting fees and grants and other monetary benefits to prescribers; reporting to pricing services inflated average wholesale prices that were then used by federal programs to set reimbursement rates; engaging in

off-label

promotion; and submitting inflated best price information to the Medicaid Rebate Program to reduce liability for Medicaid rebates.

Ensuring that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations, agency guidance or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations.

Table of Contents

If the third parties on which we rely for the conduct of our clinical trials and results do not perform our clinical trial activities in accordance with good clinical practices and related regulatory requirements, we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates.

We use third-party service providers to conduct and/or oversee the clinical trials of our product candidates and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We rely heavily on these parties for successful execution of our clinical trials. Nonetheless, we are responsible for confirming that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with FDA requirements and our general investigational plan and protocol.

The FDA requires us and our third-party service providers to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices, or GCP, for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate, and that the trial participants are adequately protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule or may not conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory or GCP requirements or the respective trial plans and protocols. In addition, third parties may not be able to repeat their past successes in clinical trials. The failure of these third parties to carry out their obligations could delay or prevent the development, approval and commercialization of our product candidates or result in enforcement action against us.

If our relationship with these third-party providers terminates, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative providers or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional third-party providers involves substantial cost and requires management time and focus, and could delay development and commercialization of our product candidates. Though we intend to carefully manage our relationships with our third-party providers, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a negative impact on our business and financial condition.

We have relied on, and expect to continue to rely on, third-party manufacturers to produce our product candidates.

We do not own or operate manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or commercial quantities of our product candidates, and we lack the resources and the capabilities to do so. As a result, we currently rely, and expect to rely for the foreseeable future, on third-party manufacturers to supply our product candidates. Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured our product candidates or products ourselves. For example, if we do not maintain our key manufacturing relationships, we may fail to find replacement manufacturers or develop our own manufacturing capabilities, which could delay or impair our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our products and substantially increase our costs or deplete profit margins, if any. If we do find replacement manufacturers, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them on terms and conditions favorable to us and there could be a substantial delay before new facilities could be qualified and registered with the FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities.

The FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities require manufacturers to register manufacturing facilities. The FDA and corresponding foreign regulators also inspect these facilities to confirm compliance with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs. Contract manufacturers may face manufacturing or quality control problems causing drug substance production and shipment delays or a situation where the contractor may not be able to maintain compliance with the applicable cGMP requirements. Any failure to comply with cGMP requirements or other FDA, European Medicines Agency, or EMA, and comparable foreign regulatory requirements could adversely affect our clinical research activities and our ability to develop our product candidates and market our products following approval.

Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to develop our product candidates and commercialize any products that receive regulatory approval on a timely basis.

Table of Contents

Our internal computer systems, or those of our third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material disruption of our development programs and have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our internal computer systems and those of our current or future third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. Attacks on information technology systems are increasing in their frequency, levels of persistence, sophistication and intensity, and they are being conducted by increasingly sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. In addition to extracting sensitive information, such attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware, ransomware,

denial-of-service

attacks, social engineering and other means to affect service reliability and threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information. The prevalent use of mobile devices also increases the risk of data security incidents. While we have not experienced any material system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations or the operations of third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors and consultants, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and significant reputational, financial, legal, regulatory, business or operational harm. For example, the loss of clinical trial data for our product candidates could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss of or damage to our data or applications or other data or applications relating to our technology or product candidates, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liabilities and the further development of our product candidates could be delayed. In addition, our liability insurance may not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to security breaches, cyberattacks and other related breaches.

Any failure or perceived failure by us or any third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants to comply with our privacy, confidentiality, data security or similar obligations to third parties, or any data security incidents or other security breaches that result in the unauthorized access, release or transfer of sensitive information, including personally identifiable information, may result in governmental investigations, enforcement actions, regulatory fines, litigation or public statements against us, could cause third parties to lose trust in us or could result in claims by third parties asserting that we have breached our privacy, confidentiality, data security or similar obligations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, data security incidents and other security breaches can be difficult to detect, and any delay in identifying them may lead to increased harm. While we have implemented data security measures intended to protect our information technology systems and infrastructure, there can be no assurance that such measures will successfully prevent service interruptions or data security incidents.

The Coronavirus, and/or similar outbreaks, could have a material, adverse impact on us.

An outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a new coronavirus named “2019-nCoV” (the “Coronavirus”), which was first detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, has resulted in tens of thousands of infections in China and continues to spread, including to the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the Coronavirus outbreak a “public health emergency of international concern.” If the Coronavirus worsens in China or if the Chinese government’s efforts to contain the Coronavirus continue to restrict the movement of goods and people in China, our business activities originating from China, including our manufacturing and supply chain related activities could be adversely affected. In addition, if the Coronavirus continues to spread outside of China, our business in general could be adversely affected. If either of the foregoing were to occur in the future, it could materially, adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Our Intellectual Property

Our rights to develop and commercialize our product candidates are subject in part to the terms and conditions of a license to resmetirom granted to us by Roche.

We entered into a Research, Development and Commercialization Agreement, or the Roche Agreement, with

Hoffmann-La

Roche, or Roche, on December 18, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the Roche Agreement, we assumed control of all development and commercialization of resmetirom and hold exclusive worldwide rights for all potential indications. Under the Roche Agreement, Roche exclusively licensed certain patent rights and

know-how

relating to resmetirom in exchange for consideration consisting of an upfront payment, milestone payments tied to the achievement of product development and regulatory milestones, and royalty payments based on net sales of products containing resmetirom or another licensed product, subject to certain reductions. We must use commercially reasonable efforts to conduct clinical and commercial development programs for products containing resmetirom. If we determine that it is not reasonable to continue clinical trials or other development of resmetirom, we may elect to cease further development and Roche may terminate the license. If we determine not to pursue the development or commercialization of resmetirom in certain jurisdictions, including the United States, Roche may terminate the license for such territories. The Roche Agreement will expire, unless earlier terminated pursuant to other provisions thereof, on the last to occur of (i) the expiration of the last valid claim of a licensed patent covering the manufacture, use or sale of products containing resmetirom, or (ii) ten years after the first sale of a product containing resmetirom.

Under the Roche Agreement, Roche controls prosecution of the licensed patent rights, although we have a right to comment.

We do not have, nor have we had, any material disputes with Roche regarding the Roche Agreement. However, if there is any future dispute between us and Roche regarding the parties’ rights under the Roche Agreement, our ability to develop and commercialize resmetirom, or any other product candidate covered by the Roche Agreement, may be materially harmed. Any uncured, material breach under the Roche Agreement could result in our loss of exclusive rights to resmetirom and may lead to a complete termination of the Roche Agreement and force us to cease product development efforts for resmetirom.

We may fail to comply with any of our obligations under agreements pursuant to which we license rights or technology, which could result in the loss of rights or technology that are material to our business.

We may enter into license agreements from time to time. Licensing of intellectual property is important to our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues. Disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including but not limited to:

•

the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

•

the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;

•

the sublicensing of patent and other rights;

•

our diligence obligations under the license agreement and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;

•

the ownership of inventions and

know-how

resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by us and our licensors and collaborators; and

•

the priority of invention of patented technology.

If disputes over intellectual property and other rights that we have licensed or acquired from third parties prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates.

Table of Contents

Our success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary technologies.

Our success depends on our ability to protect our intellectual property and our proprietary technologies. Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection and trade secret protection for our product candidates, proprietary technologies, and their uses, as well as our ability to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others.

We can provide no assurance that our patent applications or those of our licensors will result in additional patents being issued or that issued patents will afford sufficient protection against competitors with similar technologies, nor can we provide any assurance that the patents issued will not be infringed, designed around or invalidated by third parties. Even issued patents may later be found unenforceable or may be modified or revoked in proceedings instituted by third parties before various patent offices or in courts. The degree of future protection for our proprietary rights is uncertain. Only limited protection may be available and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. This failure to properly protect the intellectual property rights relating to our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Composition-of-matter

patents on the biological or chemical active pharmaceutical ingredients are generally considered to offer the strongest protection of intellectual property and provide the broadest scope of patent protection for pharmaceutical products, as such patents provide protection without regard to any method of use or any method of manufacturing. While we have licensed rights to issued

composition-of-matter

patents in the United States and other jurisdictions for resmetirom, we cannot be certain that the claims in issued

composition-of-matter

patents will not be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged. We cannot be certain that the claims in owned and licensed patent applications covering our product candidates will be considered patentable by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, and valid by courts in the United States or by the patent offices and courts in foreign jurisdictions. Even if we owned and licensed patent applications covering our product candidates, the patents may not be enforced against competitors. For example, a formulation patent will not be enforced against those making and marketing a product that has the same active pharmaceutical ingredient in a different formulation that is not claimed in the formulation patent.

Method-of-use

patents protect the use of a product for the specified method or for treatment of a particular indication. This type of patent may not be enforced against competitors making and marketing a product that has the same active pharmaceutical ingredient but is used for a method not claimed in the patent. Moreover, even if competitors do not actively promote their product for our targeted indications, physicians may prescribe these products

“off-label.”

Although

off-label

prescriptions may infringe or contribute to the infringement of

method-of-use

patents, the practice is common and such infringement is difficult to prevent or prosecute.

Our licensed

composition-of-matter

patent licensed from Roche for resmetirom is expected to expire in the United States in 2026. Our

co-owned

patents and pending patent applications that cover our particular solid form, dosage, method of manufacturing, and uses of resmetirom to treat various indications are expected to expire in 2033. While patent term adjustments or patent term extensions could result in later expiration dates for each of these patents, there can be no assurances that we will receive any patent adjustments or patent term extensions. The patent application process and patent maintenance and enforcement are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we or any of our future development partners will be successful in protecting our product candidates by obtaining and defending patents. These risks and uncertainties include the following:

•

the USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions during the patent process and after a patent has issued. There are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, competitors might be able to enter the market earlier than would otherwise have been the case;

•

patent applications may not result in any patents being issued;

Table of Contents

•

patents may be challenged, invalidated, modified, revoked, circumvented, found to be unenforceable or otherwise may not provide any competitive advantage;

•

we and our licensor(s) may not have been the first to make the inventions covered by pending patent applications or issued patents;

•

we and our licensor(s) may not have been the first to file patent applications for our product candidates or the compositions developed, or for their uses;

•

others may independently develop identical, similar or alternative products or compositions and uses thereof;

•

we and our licensor(s)’ disclosures in patent applications may not be sufficient to meet the statutory requirements for patentability;

•

others may design around our owned and licensed patent claims to produce competitive products which fall outside of the scope of the patents;

•

others may identify prior art or other bases which could invalidate our or licensor(s)’ patents;

•

our competitors might conduct research and development activities in the United States and other countries that provide a safe harbor from patent infringement claims for certain research and development activities, as well as in countries where us and our licensor(s) do not have patent rights, and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in major commercial markets;

•

there may be significant pressure on the United States government and international governmental bodies to limit the scope of patent protection both inside and outside the United States for disease treatments that prove successful, as a matter of public policy regarding worldwide health concerns; and

•

countries other than the United States may have patent laws less favorable to patentees than those upheld by United States courts, allowing foreign competitors a better opportunity to create, develop and market competing product candidates.

In addition, we rely on the protection of our trade secrets and proprietary

know-how.

Although we have taken steps to protect our trade secrets and unpatented

know-how,

including entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties, and confidential information and inventions agreements with employees, consultants and advisors, we cannot provide any assurances that any of these parties would not breach the agreements to disclose any proprietary information, including trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Further, third parties may still obtain this information by other means, such as breaches of our physical or computer security systems. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. Moreover, third parties may come upon this or similar information lawfully and independently. We would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. Further, intellectual property rights have limitations and do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive position. If any of these events occurs or if we otherwise lose protection for our trade secrets or proprietary

know-how,

our business may be harmed.

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.

On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. In particular, under the Leahy-Smith Act, the United States transitioned in March 2013 to a “first inventor to file” system in which the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent. Third parties are allowed to

Table of Contents

submit prior art before the issuance of a patent by the USPTO, and a patent may become subject to post-grant proceedings including opposition, derivation, reexamination,

inter partes

review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope or enforceability of, or invalidate, our patent rights, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

Claims by third parties that we infringe their proprietary rights may result in liability for damages or prevent or delay our developmental and commercialization efforts.

The biotechnology industry has been characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing product candidates. As the biotechnology industry expands and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties. Because patent applications are maintained in secrecy until the application is published, we may be unaware of third party patents that may be infringed by commercialization of resmetirom or our other product candidates. Moreover, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently-pending patent applications that may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. In addition, identification of third party patent rights that may be relevant to our technology is difficult because patent searching is imperfect due to differences in terminology among patents, incomplete databases and the difficulty in assessing the meaning of patent claims. Any claims of patent infringement asserted by third parties would be time consuming and could likely:

•

result in costly litigation;

•

divert the time and attention of our technical personnel and management;

•

cause development delays;

•

prevent us from commercializing resmetirom for NASH or dyslipidemia or our other product candidates until the asserted patent expires or is held finally invalid or not infringed in a court of law;

•

require us to develop

non-infringing

technology, which may not be possible on a cost-effective basis; or

•

require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements.

Although no third party has asserted a claim of patent infringement against us as of the filing date of this report, others may hold proprietary rights that could prevent resmetirom or our other product candidates from being marketed. Any patent-related legal action against us claiming damages and seeking to enjoin commercial activities relating to our product candidate or processes could subject us to potential liability for damages and require us to obtain a license to continue to manufacture or market resmetirom or our other product candidates. We cannot predict whether we would prevail in any such actions or that any license required under any of these patents would be made available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, we cannot be sure that we could redesign our product candidate or processes to avoid infringement, if necessary. Accordingly, an adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding, or the failure to obtain necessary licenses, could prevent us from developing and commercializing resmetirom or our other product candidates, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Moreover, we may be subject to a third party preissuance submission of prior art to the USPTO or in addition to interference proceedings, may become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination,

inter partes

review, post-grant review or other post-grant proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our

Table of Contents

patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time consuming, and unsuccessful. Further, our issued patents could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court.

If we or any of our future development partners were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent directed at one of our product candidates, or one of our future product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness,

non-enablement

or insufficient written description. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO or made a misleading statement during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar claims before the USPTO, even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on such product candidate. Such a loss of patent protection would have a material adverse impact on our business

Interference proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or declared by the USPTO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors. An unfavorable outcome could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms. Our defense of litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees. In addition, the uncertainties associated with litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our clinical trials, continue our research programs, license necessary technology from third parties, or enter into development partnerships that would help us bring our product candidates to market.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

We may not be successful in obtaining or maintaining necessary rights to our product candidates through acquisitions and

in-licenses.

We currently have rights to the intellectual property, through licenses from third parties and under patents that we own or

co-own,

to develop our product candidates. Because our programs may require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business may depend in part on our ability to acquire,

in-license,

or use these proprietary rights. For example, our product candidates may require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and the rights to these formulations may be held by others. We may be unable to acquire or

in-license

any compositions, methods of use, processes, or other third party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify as necessary for our product candidates. The licensing and acquisition of third party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to license or acquire third party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources, and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a

Table of Contents

competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire third party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment.

We may collaborate with U.S. and foreign academic institutions and industry collaborators to accelerate our preclinical or clinical research. Typically, these institutions provide us with an option to negotiate a license to any of the institution’s rights in technology resulting from the collaboration. Regardless of such option, we may be unable to negotiate a license within the specified timeframe or under terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to do so, the institution may offer the intellectual property rights to other parties, potentially blocking our ability to pursue our program.

If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of that program and our business and financial condition could suffer.

Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.

Because we rely on third parties to research and develop and to manufacture our product candidates, we must, at times, share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, third party contractors and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our trade secrets. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Any of these could impair our competitive position.

In addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our advisors, employees, third party contractors and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets, although our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. For example, any academic institution that we may collaborate with in the future will usually expect to be granted rights to publish data arising out of such collaboration, provided that we are notified in advance and given the opportunity to delay publication for a limited time period in order for us to secure patent protection of intellectual property rights arising from the collaboration, in addition to the opportunity to remove confidential or trade secret information from any such publication. In the future we may also conduct joint research and development programs that may require us to share trade secrets under the terms of our research and development or similar agreements. Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of our agreements with third parties, independent development or publication of information by any of our third party collaborators. A competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition among potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. At times, competitors may adopt trade names or trademarks similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition, there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations of our registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names. Over the long term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, then we may not

Table of Contents

be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected. Our efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade secrets, domain names, copyrights or other intellectual property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

While we have licensed from Roche issued

composition-of-matter

patents directed at resmetirom in the United States and other countries, filing, prosecuting and defending patents on resmetirom in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing their inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with resmetirom, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Capital

If we fail to obtain the capital necessary to fund all of our planned operations, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize resmetirom and other future product candidates.

Although we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our current operations through at least the next 12 months, we may require additional working capital in order to complete the remaining clinical development for resmetirom and our other product candidates through potential regulatory approval and through potential commercialization of these product candidates. We expect our spending levels to increase in connection with our clinical trials of resmetirom as well as other corporate activities. The amount and timing of any expenditure needed to implement our development and commercialization programs will depend on numerous factors, including:

•

the type, number, scope, progress, expansion costs, results of and timing of our future clinical trials or the need for additional clinical trials of resmetirom for NASH and dyslipidemia or any of our other product candidates which we are pursuing or may choose to pursue in the future;

•

the costs of obtaining, maintaining and enforcing our patents and other intellectual property rights;

•

the costs and timing of obtaining regulatory approval for resmetirom for NASH and dyslipidemia and any of our other product candidates;

Table of Contents

•

the costs and timing of obtaining or maintaining manufacturing for resmetirom for NASH and dyslipidemia and any of our other product candidates, including commercial manufacturing if any product candidate is approved;

•

the costs and timing of establishing sales, marketing and reimbursement capabilities and enhanced internal controls over financial reporting;

•

the terms and timing of establishing and maintaining collaborations, license agreements and other partnerships;

•

costs associated with any new product candidates that we may develop,

in-license

or acquire;

•

the effect of competing technological and market developments; and

•

the costs associated with operating as a public company.

Some of these factors are outside of our control. Our existing capital resources may not be sufficient to enable us to fund the completion of all planned clinical trials and commercialization objectives for our product candidates. As a result, we may need to raise substantial additional funds in the future.

We have not sold any products, and we do not expect to sell or derive revenue from any product sales for the foreseeable future. We may seek additional funding through future debt and equity financings, as well as potential additional collaborations or strategic partnerships with other companies or through

non-dilutive

financings. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders. In addition, the issuance of additional shares by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline.

If we are unable to obtain additional funding on a timely basis, we may be unable to complete planned clinical trials for resmetirom for NASH and dyslipidemia and any of our other product candidates, and we may be required to significantly curtail some or all of our activities. We also could be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise that may require us to relinquish rights to our product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us.

Our ability to use net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain

built-in

losses to reduce future tax payments may be limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

Our net operating losses have been fully offset by a valuation allowance due to uncertainties surrounding our ability to realize these tax benefits. Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three year period), the corporation’s ability to use its

pre-change

net operating loss carryforwards and other

pre-change

tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. We have not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code, or similar state provisions, has previously occurred. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our

pre-change

net operating loss carryforwards to offset U.S. federal taxable income may become subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us and may be substantial.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be, volatile.

Historically, the market price of our common stock has fluctuated over a wide range, and it is likely that the price of our common stock will continue to be volatile in the future. The market price of our common stock could be impacted due to a variety of factors, including, in addition to global and industry-wide events:

•

the losses we may incur;

Table of Contents

•

developments in patent or other proprietary rights owned or licensed by us, our collaborative partners or our competitors;

•

public concern as to the safety and efficacy of products developed by us or others; and

•

litigation.

In addition, due to one or more of the foregoing factors in one or more future quarters, our results of operations may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that event, the market price of our common stock could materially decline.

A small number of our stockholders own a substantial amount of our outstanding common stock and may be deemed to have substantial control over us; therefore, your ability to influence corporate matters may be limited.

Certain stockholders affiliated and associated with our officers and directors collectively own approximately 33.3% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2019 and acting together, may have the ability to substantially affect matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a strategic transaction, even if such a transaction would benefit other stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws may delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change of control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions include a classified board of directors. In addition, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits, with some exceptions, stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us. Although we believe these provisions together provide for an opportunity to receive higher bids by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, they would apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

Future sales and issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase common stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.

We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution. We may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in more than one transaction, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights superior to our existing stockholders.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public markets or significant short sales of our common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital.

As of December 31, 2019, there were: 1,969,797 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock outstanding, all of which were readily convertible into a like number of shares of our common stock at the option of the holders (the “Common Shares Underlying Our Preferred Stock”); an additional 1,461,987 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options (the “Common Shares Underlying Our Stock

Table of Contents

Options”); and 4,177,854 shares of our common stock (the “Bay City Capital Holdings”) held by our largest stockholder, Bay City Capital LLC (“Bay City”). The Bay City Capital Holdings represent approximately 27% of our outstanding common as of December 31, 2019, and are capable of being sold directly (by Bay City) or indirectly (following any future distribution of Bay City Capital Holdings by Bay City to its partners), and any material sale of such shares could significantly reduce the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise adequate capital. The Common Shares Underlying Our Preferred Stock (assuming the full conversion of all currently outstanding preferred shares), the Common Shares Underlying Our Stock Options (assuming the complete exercise of all outstanding stock options) and the Bay City Capital Holdings represent 40.3% of our common stock on an as converted basis. Sales of a substantial number of any of such shares of our common stock or other equity-related securities in the public markets, could depress the market price of our common stock. If there are significant sales or short sales of our stock, the price decline that could result from this activity may cause the share price to decline further, which, in turn, may cause long holders of the common stock to sell their shares, thereby contributing to sales of common stock in the market. Such sales also may impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional shares in the future at a time and price that our management deems acceptable, if at all.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, and accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the future. As a result, the only return to stockholders will be appreciation in the price of our common stock, which may never occur. Investors seeking cash dividends should not invest in our common stock.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.

Properties

We lease our approximately 10,500 square-foot corporate headquarters facility located in West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. We believe our facility is adequate for our current needs. Our lease expires in January 2022. We plan to acquire additional space as our business continues to grow. We continue to evaluate our facility requirements and believe that appropriate space will be available to accommodate our future needs.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities.

Market Information

The term “Private Madrigal” refers to Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. prior to the consummation of the Merger.

Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq stock market under the symbol “MDGL” since July 25, 2016, the trading date following the consummation of our merger with Private Madrigal. Prior to July 25, 2016, our common stock was traded on the Nasdaq stock market under the symbol “SNTA.”

Holders

As of February 20, 2020, there were approximately 28 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares are held of record by banks, brokers, financial institutions and other nominees. In addition, we had two holders of record who owned shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.

Stock Performance Graph

The graph set forth below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019, with the cumulative total return of (a) the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index and (b) the Nasdaq Composite Index, over the same period. This graph assumes the investment of $100 on January 1, 2015 in our common stock, the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index and assumes the reinvestment of dividends, if any. The vertical line on July 21, 2016 notes the date of the Merger.

Table of Contents

The comparisons shown in the graph below are based upon historical data. We caution that the stock price performance shown in the graph below is not necessarily indicative of, nor is it intended to forecast, the potential future performance of our common stock.

The above Stock Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it by reference into a filing.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information about our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Table of Contents

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form

10-K.

The statements of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been derived from our audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form

10-K.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and financial statements and related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form

10-K.


	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Total revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		72,324			25,389			24,390			15,933			2,427
General and administrative		22,648			15,293			7,672			9,290			806

Total operating expenses		94,972			40,682			32,062			25,223			3,233

Loss from operations		(94,972	)		(40,682	)		(32,062	)		(25,223	)		(3,233	)
Interest income (expense), net		11,024			7,671			558			(1,165	)		(3,612	)
Other income		—			200			350			—			—

Net loss	$	(83,948	)	$	(32,811	)	$	(31,154	)	$	(26,388	)	$	(6,845	)

Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(5.45	)	$	(2.22	)	$	(2.54	)	$	(5.07	)	$	(40.03	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		15,394,659			14,796,712			12,244,939			5,204,644			171,012


	As of December 31,
	2019			2018			2017			2016			2015
							(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	439,045		$	483,718		$	191,527		$	40,500		$	306
Total assets		442,056			485,428			192,313			41,210			364
Total liabilities		25,491			8,444			10,054			4,800			49,277
Accumulated deficit		(223,220	)		(139,272	)		(106,461	)		(75,307	)		(48,920	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	416,565		$	476,984		$	182,259		$	36,410		$	(48,913	)

Table of Contents

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A and disclosures under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” within this Annual Report on Form

10-K,

the audited financial statements and accompanying notes, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form

10-K,

and this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read together. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur for the full fiscal year or any other future period. The term “Synta” refers to Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. prior to the consummation of the Merger described herein. Unless otherwise indicated, references to the terms “Madrigal,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Private Madrigal prior to the consummation of the Merger described herein and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly known as Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.) upon the consummation of the Merger described herein.

About Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Our Focus.

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapeutic candidates for the treatment of cardiovascular, metabolic, and liver diseases. Our lead product candidate, resmetirom (resmetirom), is a proprietary, liver-directed, selective thyroid hormone receptor-ß, or

THR-

ß, agonist being developed as a once-daily oral pill that can potentially be used to treat a number of disease states with high unmet medical need, including

non-alcoholic

steatohepatitis, or NASH.

Our Patient Market Opportunity.

NASH is a serious inflammatory form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or NAFLD. NAFLD has become the most common liver disease in the United States and other developed countries and is characterized by an accumulation of fat in the liver with no other apparent causes. NASH can progress to cirrhosis or liver failure, require liver transplantation and can also result in liver cancer. Progression of NASH to end stage liver disease will soon surpass all other causes of liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Importantly, beyond these critical conditions, NASH and NAFLD patients additionally suffer heightened cardiovascular risk and, in fact, die more frequently from cardiovascular events than from liver disease. NASH and NAFLD have grown as a consequence of rising worldwide obesity-related disorders. In the United States alone, NAFLD is estimated to affect approximately 27% to 34% of the population, or an estimated 86 million to 108 million people, and approximately 10% to 20% of this population is projected to progress from NAFLD to NASH. Current estimates place NASH prevalence at approximately 9 million to 15 million people in the United States, or three percent to five percent of the population, with similar prevalence in Europe and Asia.

Our Completed Studies.

For NASH, we enrolled 125 patients in a Phase 2 clinical trial with resmetirom. We achieved the

12-week

primary endpoint for this Phase 2 clinical trial and reported the results in December 2017, and we reported positive topline

36-week

results at the conclusion of the Phase 2 clinical trial in May 2018. We have completed treatment in a

36-week,

open-label extension study in 31 participating NASH patients from our Phase 2 clinical trial, which includes 14 patients who received placebo in the main study. We also completed a 116 patient Phase 2 clinical trial and announced results in February 2018 for the use of resmetirom in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or HeFH. In addition to the NASH and HeFH Phase 2 clinical trials, resmetirom has also been studied in eight completed Phase 1 trials in a total of 219 subjects. Resmetirom appeared to be safe and was well-tolerated in these trials, which included a single ascending dose trial, a multiple ascending dose trial, two drug interaction trials with statins, a multiple dose mass balance study, a single dose relative bioavailability study of tablet formulation versus capsule formulation, a multiple dose drug interaction study, and a multiple dose drug interaction with food effect study.

Our Ongoing and Planned Studies.

On March 28, 2019, the Company announced that it had initiated MAESTRO-NASH, a Phase 3 trial in NASH with its once daily, oral thyroid hormone receptor beta selective agonist, resmetirom. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will be conducted at more than 150 sites in the United States and the rest of the world. Patients with liver biopsy confirmed NASH with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis will

Table of Contents

be randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single oral daily dose of placebo, resmetirom 80 mg or resmetirom 100 mg. A second liver biopsy at week 52 in the first 900 patients will be the basis of filing for subpart

H-accelerated

0-1),

associated with at least a

2-point

reduction in NAS, and no worsening of fibrosis stage. Two key secondary endpoints are reduction in

LDL-cholesterol

and a

1-point

or more improvement in fibrosis stage on the week 52 biopsy with no worsening of NASH. Patients will continue in the study for a total of approximately 54 months, and will be evaluated for a composite clinical outcome including cirrhosis on liver biopsy, or a liver related event such a hepatic decompensation. The total anticipated enrollment is approximately 2,000 patients, and will include up to 15% high risk F1 fibrosis stage NASH patients whose efficacy responses will be evaluated as exploratory endpoints.

On December 10, 2019 the Company announced it had opened for enrollment

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1,

52-week,

MRI-PDFF

and NASH biomarker endpoints. In addition,

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

includes an open label arm in which up to 100 patients will be dosed with 100 mg resmetirom. The MAESTRO

-NAFLD-1

Recent Developments

Initiation of MAESTRO-NASH Phase 3 clinical trial

In March of 2019 we initiated a Phase 3 trial in NASH, described in detail above under “About Madrigal; Our Ongoing and Planned Studies.” In the second quarter, the Phase 3 NASH trial triggered a $2 million milestone payment under our Research, Development and Commercialization Agreement with

Hoffmann-La

Roche (“Roche”).

FDA grants Fast Track designation for resmetirom in NASH

In October 2019, FDA granted Fast Track designation to resmetirom for NASH.

Initiation of

MAESTRO-NAFLD-1

Phase 3 clinical trial

In December 2019 we initiated a Phase 3 trial in presumed NASH, described in detail above under “About Madrigal; Our Ongoing and Planned Studies.”

Other Key Developments

Clinical Trials

In October 2016, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial in NASH ([NCT02912260] at www.ClinicalTrials.gov). The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase 2 study enrolled 125 patients 18 years of age and older with biopsy-confirmed NASH. Patients were randomized to receive either placebo or resmetirom, twice as many receiving resmetirom as placebo. Efficacy was confirmed at the end of the trial (36 weeks) by repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging—Proton Density Fat Fraction, or

MRI-PDFF,

and conventional liver biopsy to examine histological evidence for the resolution of NASH. Recent published data show a high correlation of reduction of liver fat measured by

MRI-PDFF

to NASH scoring on liver biopsy. Other secondary endpoints included changes in clinically relevant biomarkers at 12 and 36 weeks, improvement in fibrosis by at least one

Table of Contents

stage with no worsening of steatohepatitis, and safety and tolerability. We reached our

top-line

analysis of the primary endpoint in December 2017, and we reached our

top-line

analysis of multiple

36-week

endpoints, including key secondary endpoints, reduction and resolution of NASH on liver biopsy, in May 2018.

In February 2017, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial in HeFH ([NCT03038022] at www.ClinicalTrials.gov). The

12-week,

randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center Phase 2 clinical trial enrolled 116 patients with HeFH in several European countries. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either resmetirom or placebo, in addition to their current drug regimen (including high dose statins and/or ezetimibe). The primary endpoint of the study was reduction of LDL cholesterol, with secondary endpoints including reductions in TGs, Lp(a), and ApoB, as well as safety. Lp(a) is a severely atherogenic lipid particle, commonly elevated in familial hypercholesterolemia patients, the levels of which are not adequately reduced by existing lipid lowering therapies. THR-ß agonism is one of the few therapeutic approaches that can substantially lower Lp(a). In February 2018, we announced positive results from the 12 week Phase 2 clinical trial in HeFH.

Reverse Merger

On July 22, 2016, Synta completed its business combination with Private Madrigal in accordance with the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of April 13, 2016, or the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Synta formed a wholly-owned subsidiary that merged with and into Private Madrigal, with Private Madrigal surviving the merger and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Synta, or the Merger. In connection with, and prior to the consummation of, the Merger, Synta effected a

1-for-35

reverse stock split of its common stock, or the Reverse Stock Split, and, following the Merger, changed its name to “Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.” All shares and per share amounts have been retrospectively adjusted to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split, except as otherwise disclosed. Following the consummation of the Merger, our business became the business conducted by Private Madrigal prior to the consummation of the Merger.

Basis of Presentation

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses primarily consist of costs associated with our research activities, including the preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates. We expense our research and development expenses as incurred. We contract with clinical research organizations to manage our clinical trials under agreed upon budgets for each study, with oversight by our clinical program managers. We account for nonrefundable advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities as expenses when the service has been performed or when the goods have been received. Manufacturing expense includes costs associated with drug formulation development and clinical drug production. We do not track employee and facility related research and development costs by project, as we typically use our employee and infrastructure resources across multiple research and development programs. We believe that the allocation of such costs would be arbitrary and not be meaningful.

Our research and development expenses consist primarily of:

•

salaries and related expense, including stock-based compensation;

•

external expenses paid to clinical trial sites, contract research organizations, laboratories, database software and consultants that conduct clinical trials;

•

expenses related to development and the production of nonclinical and clinical trial supplies, including fees paid to contract manufacturers;

•

expenses related to preclinical studies;

Table of Contents

•

expenses related to compliance with drug development regulatory requirements; and

•

other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for depreciation of equipment and other supplies.

We expect to continue to incur substantial expenses related to our development activities for the foreseeable future as we conduct our clinical studies programs, manufacturing and toxicology studies. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials, additional drug manufacturing requirements, and later stage toxicology studies such as carcinogenicity studies. Our research and development expenses have increased year over year in each of 2017, 2018, and 2019 and we expect that our research and development expenses will increase substantially in the future. The process of conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approval is costly and time consuming. The probability of success for each product candidate is affected by numerous factors, including preclinical data, clinical data, competition, manufacturing capability and commercial viability. Accordingly, we may never succeed in achieving marketing approval for any of our product candidates

Completion dates and costs for our clinical development programs as well as our research program can vary significantly for each current and future product candidate and are difficult to predict. As a result, we cannot estimate with any degree of certainty the costs we will incur in connection with the development of our product candidates at this point in time. We expect that we will make determinations as to which programs and product candidates to pursue and how much funding to direct to each program and product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the scientific success of early research programs, results of ongoing and future clinical trials, our ability to enter into collaborative agreements with respect to programs or potential product candidates, as well as ongoing assessments as to each current or future product candidate’s commercial potential.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expenses for employees, management costs, costs associated with obtaining and maintaining our patent portfolio, professional fees for accounting, auditing, consulting and legal services, and allocated overhead expenses.

We expect that our general and administrative expenses may increase in the future as we expand our operating activities, maintain and expand our patent portfolio and incur additional costs associated with being a public company and maintaining compliance with exchange listing and SEC requirements. We expect these potential increases will likely include management costs, legal fees, accounting fees, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance premiums and expenses associated with investor relations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to accrued research and development expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs are comprised of costs incurred in performing research and development activities, including internal costs (including stock-

Table of Contents

based compensation), costs for consultants, milestone payments under licensing agreements, and other costs associated with the Company’s preclinical and clinical programs. In particular, the Company has conducted safety studies in animals, optimized and implemented the manufacturing of our drug, and conducted Phase

1-3

clinical trials, all of which are considered research and development expenditures. Management uses significant judgment in estimating the amount of research and development costs recognized in each reporting period. Management analyzes and estimates the progress of its preclinical studies and clinical trials, completion of milestones events per underlying agreements, invoices received and contracted costs when estimating the research and development costs to accrue in each reporting period. Actual results could differ from the Company’s estimates. The Company’s historical estimates for research and development costs have not been materially different from the actual costs.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of stock options granted to employees, officers and directors. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the grant date fair value as management believes it is the most appropriate valuation method for its option grants. The Black-Scholes model requires inputs for risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and expected lives of the options. The expected lives for options granted represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses the simplified method for determining the expected lives of options. Expected volatility is based upon an industry estimate or blended rate including the Company’s historical trading activity. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical data. This analysis is

re-evaluated

at least annually and the forfeiture rate is adjusted as necessary.

Certain of the employee stock options granted by the Company are structured to qualify as incentive stock options (ISOs). Under current tax regulations, the Company does not receive a tax deduction for the issuance, exercise or disposition of ISOs if the employee meets certain holding requirements. If the employee does not meet the holding requirements, a disqualifying disposition occurs, at which time the Company may receive a tax deduction. The Company does not record tax benefits related to ISOs unless and until a disqualifying disposition is reported. In the event of a disqualifying disposition, the entire tax benefit is recorded as a reduction of income tax expense. The Company has not recognized any income tax benefit for its share-based compensation arrangements due to the fact that the Company does not believe it is more likely than not it will realize the related deferred tax assets.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

Revenue

We did not generate any revenue during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Operating Expenses

The following table provides comparative results of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):


	Year ended December 31,						Increase / (Decrease)
	2019			2018			$			%
	2019			2018			$			%
Research and Development Expenses	$	72,324		$	25,389			46,935			185	%
General and Administrative Expenses		22,648			15,293			7,355			48	%
Interest (Income)		(11,024	)		(7,671	)		3,353			44	%
Other (Income)		—			(200	)		(200	)		(100	%)

	$	83,948		$	32,811			51,137			156	%

Table of Contents

Research and Development Expense

Our research and development expenses were $72.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Research and development expenses increased by $46.9 million in the 2019 period due primarily to the additional activities related to the initiation of the Phase 3 clinical trial in NASH, including a payment due related to a milestone achieved under our agreement with Roche, an increase in head count, and an increase in

non-cash

stock compensation from stock option awards. We expect our research and development expenses to increase over the next several years as we advance our clinical and preclinical development programs for resmetirom and as we increase our research and development efforts in connection therewith.

General and Administrative Expense

Our general and administrative expenses were $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. General and administrative expenses increased by $7.4 million in the 2019 period due primarily to an increase in

non-cash

stock compensation from stock option awards. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase over the next several years as we advance our clinical and preclinical development programs for resmetirom and continue operating as a public company, both of which will likely result in an increase in our headcount, consulting services, and certain overhead needed to support those efforts.

Interest Income

Our interest income was $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in interest income was due primarily to a higher average principal balance in our investment account in 2019.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Revenue

We did not generate any revenue during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Operating Expenses

The following table provides comparative results of our operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):


	Year ended December 31,						Increase / (Decrease)
	2018			2017			$			%
Research and Development Expenses	$	25,389		$	24,390			999			4	%
General and Administrative Expenses		15,293			7,672			7,621			99	%
Interest (Income)		(7,671	)		(558	)		7,113			1275	%
Other (Income)		(200	)		(350	)		(150	)		(43	%)

	$	32,811		$	31,154			1,657			5	%

Research and Development Expense

Our research and development expenses were $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $24.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. Research and development expenses increased by $1.0 million in the 2018 period due primarily to an increase in

non-cash

stock compensation from stock option awards partially offset by a decrease related to our Phase 2 clinical trials due to the completion of treatment in 2018. We expect our research and development expenses to increase over the next several years as we advance our clinical and preclinical development programs for resmetirom and as we increase our research and development efforts in connection therewith.

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense

Our general and administrative expenses were $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. General and administrative expenses increased by $7.6 million in the 2018 period due primarily to an increase in

non-cash

Interest Income

Our interest income was $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase in interest income was due primarily to a higher average principal balance in our investment account in 2018 and increased interest rates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, we have incurred significant net losses and we have funded our operations primarily through the issuance of convertible debt, the issuance of shares of our common stock and shares of our preferred stock, and the proceeds from the Merger. Our most significant use of capital pertains to salaries and benefits for our employees, including clinical, scientific, operational, financial and management personnel, and external research and development expenses, such as clinical trials and preclinical activity related to our product candidates.

As of December 31, 2019, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaling $439.0 million compared to $483.7 million as of December 31, 2018, with the decrease attributable to the funding of operations. Our cash and investment balances are held in a variety of interest bearing instruments, including obligations of U.S. government agencies, U.S. Treasury debt securities, corporate debt securities and money market funds. Cash in excess of immediate requirements is invested in accordance with our investment policy with a view toward capital preservation and liquidity.

We anticipate continuing to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future. While our rate of cash usage will likely increase in the future, in particular to support our product development and clinical trial efforts, we believe our available cash resources as of December 31, 2019 will be sufficient to fund our operations past one year from the issuance of the financial statements contained herein. Future capital requirements will be substantial and will depend on many factors. To meet future capital requirements, we will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations through equity or debt financing. We regularly consider fundraising opportunities and may decide, from time to time, to raise capital based on various factors, including market conditions and our plans of operation. Additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, or if the terms of potential funding sources are unfavorable, our business and our ability to develop our product candidates would be harmed. Furthermore, any sales of additional equity securities may result in dilution to our stockholders, and any debt financing may include covenants that restrict our business.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our net cash flow activity (in thousands):


	Year ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(41,624	)	$	(25,507	)	$	(22,317	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		30,707			(380,076	)		(22,006	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		235			314,335			173,805

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(10,682	)	$	(91,248	)	$	129,482

Table of Contents

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $41.6 million, $25.5 million, and $22.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The use of cash in these periods resulted primarily from our losses from operations, as adjusted for

non-cash

charges for stock-based compensation, and changes in our working capital accounts. Net cash used in the year ended December 31, 2019 increased from prior years predominately due to escalated clinical trial related activity.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $30.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and consisted primarily of $650.2 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities, partially offset by $619.3 million of purchases of marketable securities for our investment portfolio.

Net cash used in investing activities was $380.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 and consisted primarily of $614.4 million of purchases of marketable securities for our investment portfolio, partially offset by $234.3 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $22.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and consisted primarily of $70.2 million of purchases of marketable securities for our investment portfolio, partially offset by $48.3 million from sales and maturities of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and consisted primarily of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $314.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 and consisted primarily of sales of our common stock in the June 2018 Registered Offering and the exercise of stock options.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $173.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and consisted primarily of net proceeds from sales of our common stock under the October 2015 Sales Agreement, sales of our common stock and our preferred stock in the June 2017 Offering, and sales of our common stock in the December 2017 Registered Offering.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

As of December 31, 2019, we had contractual obligations and commercial commitments as follows (in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1 - 3 Years		4 - 5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Operating Leases		765		363		402		—		—

Total Contractual Obligations		765		363		402		—		—

Operating leases relates to our corporate headquarters facility located in West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.

The Company has entered into customary contractual arrangements in support of the Phase 3 clinical trials.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance

Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation

S-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We regularly review our investments and monitor the financial markets. We invest in high-quality financial instruments, primarily money market funds, U.S. government and agency securities, government-sponsored bond obligations and certain other corporate debt securities, with the effective duration of the portfolio less than twelve months and no security with an effective duration in excess of twenty-four months, which we believe are subject to limited credit risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Due to the short-term duration of our investment portfolio and the low risk profile of our investments, we believe that an immediate 10% change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio. We do not believe that we have any material exposure to interest rate risk or changes in credit ratings arising from our investments.

Capital Market Risk

We currently have no product revenues and depend on funds raised through other sources. One source of funding is through future debt or equity offerings. Our ability to raise funds in this manner depends upon, among other things, capital market forces affecting our stock price.

Inflation Risk

Inflation has not had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 or 2017.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The information required by this Item 8 is referred to in Item 15, listed in the Index to Financial Statements as a part of this Annual Report on Form

10-K,

and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules

13a-15(e)

and

15d-15(e)

under the Exchange Act) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Table of Contents

Under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2019.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules

13a-15(f)

and

15d-15(f)

under the Exchange Act) for our company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. This process includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on its assessment under that framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as stated in its report, which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.

Other Information.

None.

Table of Contents

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form

10-K

because we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the 2020 Proxy Statement, no later than April 30, 2020, and certain information to be included in the 2020 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this item concerning our directors, executive officers, Section 16 compliance and corporate governance matters is incorporated by reference in our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference in our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by this item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference in our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference in our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this item regarding principal accounting fees and services is incorporated by reference in our 2020 Proxy Statement.

Table of Contents

PART IV


Item 15.		EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Item 15(a)		The following documents are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Item 15(a)(1) and (2)		The Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information required to be presented in them is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or related notes.

Item 15(a)(3)		We have filed, or incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference, the exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index.

Item 15(b)		See Item 15(a)(3) above.

Item 15(c)		See Item 15(a)(2) above.

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Filed
Herewith

Incorporated by

Reference herein

from Form or

Schedule

Filing Date

SEC File /

Registration

Number

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated April 13, 2016, by and among Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp., the Registrant and Saffron Merger Sub, Inc.

DEFA14A; Form

8-K

(Exhibit 2.1)

4/14/2016

001-33277

3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.

Form

10-K

(Exhibit 3.1)

3/31/2017

001-33277

3.2

Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 3.1)

6/21/2017

001-33277

3.3

Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended April 13, 2016.

DEFA14A; Form

8-K

(Exhibit 3.1)

4/14/2016

001-33277

4.1

Description of Securities of the Registrant

Equity Agreements

10.1

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 20, 2017, by and among the Registrant and the investors party thereto, including the Registration Rights Agreement attached as Exhibit B thereto.

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 10.1)

6/21/2017

001-33277

Agreements with Respect to Collaborations, Licenses, Research and Development

10.2

Research, Development and Commercialization Agreement, dated December 18, 2008, by and between Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and the Registrant.

Form

10-Q

(Exhibit 10.5)

11/14/2016

001-33277

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Filed
Herewith

Incorporated by

Reference herein

from Form or

Schedule

Filing Date

SEC File /

Registration

Number

Equity Compensation Plans

10.3*

Amended 2015 Stock Plan

Definitive Proxy Statement(Annex A)

5/15/2019

001-33277

10.4*

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Amended 2015 Stock Plan.

Form

10-K

(Exhibit 10.10)

3/31/2017

001-33277

10.5*

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under Amended 2015 Stock Plan.

Form

10-K

(Exhibit 10.11)

3/31/2017

001-33277

10.7*

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors under Amended 2015 Stock Plan.

Form

10-K

(Exhibit 10.12)

3/31/2017

001-33277

10.8*

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Amended 2015 Stock Plan.

Form

10-Q

(Exhibit 10.1)

5/10/2016

001-33277

Agreements with Executive Officers and Directors

10.9*

Letter Agreement, dated November 24, 2014, between Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. and Marc R. Schneebaum

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 10.3)

12/4/2014

001-33277

10.11*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and certain directors and executive officers.

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 10.4)

12/4/2014

001-33277

10.12*

Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (outside of the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Plan), dated December 8, 2014, between the Registrant and Marc Schneebaum.

Form

10-K

(Exhibit 10.46)

3/12/2015

001-33277

10.13*

Letter Agreement, dated April 13, 2016, by and between the Company and Paul A. Friedman, M.D.

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 10.3)

7/22/2016

001-33277

10.14*

Letter Agreement, dated April 13, 2016, by and between the Company and Rebecca Taub, M.D.

Form

8-K

(Exhibit 10.4)

7/22/2016

001-33277

21.1

List of Subsidiaries.

23.1

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Filed
Herewith

Incorporated by

Reference herein

from Form or

Schedule

Filing Date

SEC File /

Registration

Number

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**

Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

104

Inline XBRL for the cover page of this Annual Report on Form

10-K,

included in the Exhibit 101 Inline XBRL Document Set.

*	Indicates a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompany this Annual Report on Form

10-K

are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form

10-K,

regardless of any general incorporation language contained in any filing.

†	Confidential portions of these documents have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

Item 16.

Form

10-K

Summary.

None.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

Date: February 26, 2020	By:	/s/ PAUL A. FRIEDMAN, M.D.
		Paul A. Friedman, M.D.
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Paul A. Friedman, M.D., Marc R. Schneebaum and Brian J. Lynch, and each or either of them, acting individually, as his or her true and lawful

attorney-in-fact

and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC, granting unto said

attorney-in-fact

and agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said

attorney-in-fact

and agent, or any of them, or their or his or her substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done or by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ PAUL A. FRIEDMAN, M.D. Paul A. Friedman, M.D.	Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	February 26, 2020

/s/ MARC R. SCHNEEBAUM Marc R. Schneebaum	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)	February 26, 2020

/s/ REBECCA TAUB, M.D. Rebecca Taub, M.D.	Director	February 26, 2020

/s/ FRED B. CRAVES, PH.D. Fred B. Craves, Ph.D.	Director	February 26, 2020

/s/ KENNETH M. BATE Kenneth M. Bate	Director	February 26, 2020

/s/ KEITH R. GOLLUST Keith R. Gollust	Director	February 26, 2020

Table of Contents


Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ DAVID MILLIGAN, PH.D. David Milligan, Ph.D.	Director	February 26, 2020

/s/ RICHARD S. LEVY, M.D. Richard S. Levy, M.D.	Director	February 26, 2020

/s/ JAMES M. DALY James M. Daly	Director	February 26, 2020

Table of Contents

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss		F-7
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		F-8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-10

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive loss, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in

F-2

Table of Contents

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Research and Development Costs

As described in Notes 2 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, management uses significant judgment in estimating the amount of research and development costs recognized in each reporting period. Management analyzes and estimates the progress of its preclinical studies and clinical trials, completion of milestone events per underlying agreements, invoices received and contracted costs when estimating the research and development costs to accrue in each reporting period. Total research and development costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2019 were $72.3 million and research and development costs accrued were $13.8 million as of December 31, 2019.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to research and development costs is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when estimating the costs incurred for services performed by vendors that have not yet been invoiced in estimating the research and development costs to accrue in the reporting period. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the audit evidence obtained relating to estimates of costs accrued.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls over management’s process relating to accruing research and development costs, including controls over estimating the costs incurred for services performed by vendors that have not yet been invoiced. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for estimating the research and development costs to accrue in the reporting period, evaluating the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in management’s estimate by testing for consistency with a sample of contracts and invoices, testing the number of patients screened for and enrolled in the trial, testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation of the accrual for research and development costs incurred, and evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used in the estimate. Evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions used in the estimate involved assessing management’s ability to reasonably estimate costs incurred that have not been invoiced by (i) performing a

F-3

Table of Contents

comparison of the estimated accrual to average procedure rates per contracts applied to the number of patients screened for and enrolled in the trial, and by (ii) performing a comparison of the estimated accrual to actual costs incurred on similar completed preclinical studies and clinical trials.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 26, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

F-4

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	December 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,697		$	57,379
Marketable securities		392,348			426,339
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,152			1,483

Total current assets		440,197			485,201
Property and equipment, net		1,184			227
Right-of-use asset		675			—

Total assets	$	442,056		$	485,428

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,178		$	2,487
Accrued expenses		23,637			5,957
Lease liability		315			—

Total current liabilities		25,130			8,444
Long term liabilities:
Lease liability		361			—

Total long term liabilities		361			—

Total liabilities		25,491			8,444

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share authorized: 5,000,000 shares at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; 1,969,797 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share authorized: 200,000,000 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; 15,429,154 and 15,409,023 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		2			2
Additional paid-in-capital		639,567			616,573
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)		216			(319	)
Accumulated deficit		(223,220	)		(139,272	)

Total stockholders’ equity		416,565			476,984

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	442,056		$	485,428

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
Revenues:
Total revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		72,324			25,389			24,390
General and administrative		22,648			15,293			7,672

Total operating expenses		94,972			40,682			32,062

Loss from operations		(94,972	)		(40,682	)		(32,062	)
Interest income		11,024			7,671			558
Other income		—			200			350

Net loss	$	(83,948	)	$	(32,811	)	$	(31,154	)

Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(5.45	)	$	(2.22	)	$	(2.54	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		15,394,659			14,796,712			12,244,939

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Year Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			201 7
Net Loss	$	(83,948	)	$	(32,811	)	$	(31,154	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities		535			(288	)		(56	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(83,413	)	$	(33,099	)	$	(31,210	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-7

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Preferred stock				Common stock				Additional paid-in Capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Accumulated deficit			Total stockholders’ equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Additional paid-in Capital		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			Accumulated deficit			Total stockholders’ equity
Balance at December 31, 2016		—	$	—		11,951,866	$	1	$	111,691	$	25		$	(75,307	)	$	36,410
Issuance of common and preferred shares in equity offerings, net of transaction costs		1,969,797		—		2,275,768		—		173,805		—			—			173,805
Compensation expense related to stock options for services		—		—		—		—		3,254		—			—			3,254
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		—		—		—		—		—		(56	)		—			(56	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(31,154	)		(31,154	)

Balance at December 31, 2017		1,969,797	$	—		14,227,634	$	1	$	288,750	$	(31	)	$	(106,461	)	$	182,259
Issuance of common shares in equity offering, excluding to related parties, net of transaction costs		—		—		1,079,580		1		311,824		—			—			311,825
Sale of common shares to related parties and exercise of common stock options, net of transaction costs		—		—		101,809		—		2,510		—			—			2,510
Compensation expense related to stock options for services		—		—		—		—		13,489		—			—			13,489
Unrealized loss on marketable securities		—		—		—		—		—		(288	)		—			(288	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(32,811	)		(32,811	)

Balance at December 31, 2018		1,969,797	$	—		15,409,023	$	2	$	616,573	$	(319	)	$	(139,272	)	$	476,984
Sale of common shares to related parties and exercise of common stock options, net of transaction costs		—		—		20,131		—		235		—			—			235
Compensation expense related to stock options for services		—		—		—		—		22,759		—			—			22,759
Unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—		—		—		—		535			—			535
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(83,948	)		(83,948	)

Balance at December 31, 2019		1,969,797	$	—		15,429,154	$	2	$	639,567	$	216		$	(223,220	)	$	416,565

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-8

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Years Ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(83,948	)	$	(32,811	)	$	(31,154	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense		22,759			13,489			3,254
Depreciation and amortization expense		112			96			77
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		332			(998	)		502
Accounts payable		(1,309	)		558			917
Accrued expense		16,783			(2,168	)		4,087
Accrued interest, net of interest received on maturity of investments		3,647			(3,673	)		—

Net cash used in operating activities		(41,624	)		(25,507	)		(22,317	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of marketable securities		(619,303	)		(614,358	)		(70,211	)
Sales and maturities of marketable securities		650,182			234,304			48,330
Purchases of property and equipment, net of disposals		(172	)		(22	)		(125	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		30,707			(380,076	)		(22,006	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuances of stock, excluding related parties, net of transaction costs		—			311,825			173,805
Proceeds from the sale of related party stock and exercise of common stock options, net of transaction costs		235			2,510			—

Net cash provided by financing activities		235			314,335			173,805

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(10,682	)		(91,248	)		129,482
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		57,379			148,627			19,145

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	46,697		$	57,379		$	148,627

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Obtaining a right-of-use asset in exchange for a lease liability	$	900		$	—		$	—
Purchases of property and equipment in accounts payable or accrued expense at period end		897			—			250

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-9

Table of Contents

MADRIGAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization, Business and Basis of Presentation

Organization and Business

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company” or “Madrigal”) is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company developing novel, high-quality, small-molecule drugs addressing major unmet needs in cardiovascular, metabolic, and liver diseases. The Company’s lead compound,

MGL-3196

(resmetirom), is being advanced for

non-alcoholic

steatohepatitis (“NASH”), a liver disease that commonly affects people with metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes, and

non-alcoholic

fatty liver disease (“NAFLD”). The Company initiated a Phase 2 study of resmetirom in NASH in October 2016. In February 2017, the Company initiated a Phase 2 study of resmetirom in patients with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (“HeFH”). Both Phase 2 studies were fully enrolled in 2017, the HeFH study was completed in February 2018, and the NASH study was completed in May 2018. The Company initiated two Phase 3 studies of resmetirom in NASH in 2019.

Madrigal was originally incorporated as a private company (“Private Madrigal”) on August 19, 2011 and operations commenced in September 2011. On July 22, 2016, Private Madrigal completed a reverse merger (the “Merger”) into Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. (“Synta”). Upon the consummation of the Merger, the historical financial statements of Private Madrigal became the Company’s historical financial statements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principle of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank accounts, the balance of which, at times, exceeds Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits.

The primary objective of the Company’s investment activities is to preserve its capital for the purpose of funding operations and the Company does not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company’s cash is deposited in highly rated financial institutions in the United States. The Company invests in money market funds and high-grade, commercial paper and corporate bonds, which management believes are subject to minimal credit and market risk.

Marketable Securities

Marketable securities consist of investments in high-grade corporate obligations, and government and government agency obligations that are classified as

available-for-sale.

Since these securities are available to fund current operations they are classified as current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

F-10

Table of Contents

The Company adjusts the cost of

available-for-sale

debt securities for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The Company includes such amortization and accretion as a component of interest income, net. Realized gains and losses and declines in value, if any, that the Company judges to be other-than-temporary on

available-for-sale

securities are reported as a component of interest income. To determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists, the Company considers whether it intends to sell the debt security and, if the Company does not intend to sell the debt security, it considers available evidence to assess whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company determined it did not have any securities that were other-than-temporarily impaired.

Marketable securities are stated at fair value, including accrued interest, with their unrealized gains and losses included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The fair value of these securities is based on quoted prices and observable inputs on a recurring basis. Realized gains and losses are determined on the specific identification method. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not have any realized gains or losses on marketable securities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash equivalents, and marketable securities, approximate their fair values. The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments reflects the amounts that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy has the following three levels:

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2—observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3—unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company measures the fair value of its marketable securities by taking into consideration valuations obtained from third-party pricing sources. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market based approaches, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, to estimate fair value. These inputs include reported trades of and broker-dealer quotes on the same or similar securities, issuer credit spreads, benchmark securities and other observable inputs.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s financial assets valued based on Level 1 inputs consisted of cash and cash equivalents in a money market fund and its financial assets valued based on Level 2 inputs consisted of high-grade corporate bonds and commercial paper. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not have any transfers of financials assets between Levels 1 and 2. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not have any financial liabilities that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on the balance sheet.

Research and Development Costs

F-11

Table of Contents

tock

1-3

Patents

Costs to secure and defend patents are expensed as incurred and are classified as general and administrative expense in the Company’s statements of operations. Patent expenses were approximately $408 thousand, $226 thousand and $176 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

re-evaluated

at least annually and the forfeiture rate is adjusted as necessary.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the Company’s financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company currently maintains a 100% valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from

non-owner

sources. Changes in unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities represent the only difference between the Company’s net loss and comprehensive loss.

F-12

Table of Contents

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share

Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding restricted stock that has been issued but is not yet vested. Diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted average dilutive potential common shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. However, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share as the inclusion of weighted average shares of unvested restricted common stock and common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options would be anti-dilutive.

The following table summarizes outstanding securities not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:


	As of December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Common stock options		1,461,987		1,132,618		976,777
Unvested restricted common stock		—		52,063		104,127
Preferred stock		1,969,797		1,969,797		1,969,797

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU

2016-02,

“Leases,” which, together with amendments comprising ASC 842, requires lessees to identify arrangements that should be accounted for as leases and generally recognized, for operating and finance leases with terms exceeding twelve months, a

right-of-use

asset (or “ROU”) and lease liability on the balance sheet. For public business entities, ASU

2016-02

is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. The Company adopted ASU

2016-02

effective January 1, 2019.

Based on the modified retrospective transition approach, there

was no significant retrospective impact from the adoption. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We have elected the package of practical expedients, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We have elected the short-term lease exception and we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities for qualifying leases (leases with a term of less than 12 months from lease commencement). In 2019, the Company accounted for a new lease under the guidance (see Note 8).

3. Liquidity and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to risks common to development stage companies in the

Bio-Pharmaceutical

industry including, but not limited to, uncertainty of product development and commercialization, dependence on key personnel, uncertainty of market acceptance of products and product reimbursement, product liability, uncertain protection of proprietary technology, potential inability to raise additional financing necessary for development and commercialization, and compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other government regulations.

The Company has incurred losses since inception, including approximately $83.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, resulting in an accumulated deficit of approximately $223.2 million and $139.3 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Management expects to incur losses for the foreseeable future. To date, the Company has funded its operations primarily through the issuance of convertible debt, the proceeds from the Merger on July 22, 2016, and proceeds from sales of the Company’s common and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (see Note 6).

The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31, 2019 will be sufficient to fund operations past one year from the issuance of these financial statements. To meet its future

F-13

Table of Contents

capital needs, the Company intends to raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, collaborations, partnerships or other strategic transactions. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete any such transactions on acceptable terms or otherwise. The inability of the Company to obtain sufficient funds on acceptable terms when needed could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company has the ability to delay certain research activities and related clinical expenses if necessary due to liquidity concerns until a date in which those concerns are relieved.

4. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

A summary of cash, cash equivalents and

available-for-sale

marketable securities held by the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2019
	Cost		Unrealized gains		Unrealized losses			Fair value
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash (Level 1)	$	1,772	$	—	$	—		$	1,772
Money market funds (Level 1)		44,925		—		—			44,925
Corporate debt securities due within 3 months of date of purchase (Level 2)		—		—		—			—

Total cash and cash equivalents		46,697		—		—			46,697

Marketable securities:
Corporate debt securities due within 1 year of date of purchase (Level 2)		309,365		220		(40	)		309,545
Corporate debt securities due within 1 to 2 years of date of purchase (Level 2)		82,767		39		(3	)		82,803

Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	438,829	$	259	$	(43	)	$	439,045


	December 31, 2018
	Cost		Unrealized gains		Unrealized losses			Fair value
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash (Level 1)	$	2,004	$	—	$	—		$	2,004
Money market funds (Level 1)		43,401		—		—			43,401
Corporate debt securities due within 3 months of date of purchase (Level 2)		11,974		—		—			11,974

Total cash and cash equivalents		57,379		—		—			57,379

Marketable securities:
Corporate debt securities due within 1 year of date of purchase (Level 2)		426,658		14		(333	)		426,339

Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	484,037	$	14	$	(333	)	$	483,718

F-14

Table of Contents

5. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	December 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
C ontract research costs	$	13,775	$	571
Compensation and benefits		2,779		1,797
Professional fees		1,177		1,062
Other		5,906		2,527

	$	23,637	$	5,957

6. Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Common Stock

Each common stockholder is entitled to 1 vote for each share of common stock held. The common stock will vote together with all other classes and series of stock of the Company as a single class on all actions to be taken by the Company’s stockholders. Each share of common stock is entitled to receive dividends, as and when declared by the Company’s board of directors.

The Company has never declared cash dividends on its common stock and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.

Preferred Stock

The Series A Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.0001 per share and is convertible into shares of the common stock at a

1-to-one

ratio, subject to adjustment as provided in the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, that the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 21, 2017 (the “Series A Certificate”). The terms of the Series A Preferred Stock are set forth in the Series A Certificate. Each share of the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of Common Stock following notice that may be given at the holder’s option. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or

winding-up

of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, after the satisfaction in full of the debts of the Company and the payment of any liquidation preference owed to the holders of shares of capital stock of the Company ranking prior to the Series A Preferred Stock upon liquidation, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall participate pari passu with the holders of the Common Stock (on an

as-if-converted-to

-Common-Stock

basis) in the net assets of the Company. Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock will generally have 0 voting rights, except as required by law. Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive dividends before shares of any other class or series of capital stock of the Company (other than dividends in the form of the Common Stock) equal to the dividend payable on each share of the Common Stock, on an

as-converted

basis.

June 2018 Registered Offering of Common Stock

In June 2018, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein (the “June 2018 Underwriters”), relating to an underwritten public offering (the “June 2018 Offering”) of 1,079,580 shares of the Company’s common stock, including 95,973 shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the June 2018 Underwriters pursuant to a

30-day

option to purchase such additional shares granted therein, at a public offering price of $305.00 per share. The June 2018 Offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $329.3 million, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $311.8 million, after deducting the June 2018 Underwriters’ discount and other offering costs. The June 2018 Offering closed on June 11, 2018.

F-15

Table of Contents

December 2017 Registered Offering of Common Stock

In December 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein (the “Underwriters”), relating to an underwritten public offering (the “December 2017 Offering”) of 1,731,929 shares of the Company’s common stock, including 225,904 shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the Underwriters pursuant to a

30-day

option to purchase such additional shares granted therein, at a public offering price of $83.00 per share. The December 2017 Offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $143.8 million, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $135.7 million, after deducting the Underwriters’ discount and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The December 2017 Offering closed on December 21, 2017.

June 2017 Private Placement Offering and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

In June 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement)” with a group of institutional accredited investors, who were existing,

non-controlling

stockholders of the Company, pursuant to which the Company sold securities to the Investors in a private placement transaction (the “June 2017 Offering”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold 328,300 shares of its common stock at a price of $15.23 per share, and 1,969,797 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) at a price of $15.23 per share. The June 2017 Offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $35.0 million, and net proceeds to the Company of approximately $34.9 million. The June 2017 Offering closed on June 23, 2017.

At-The-Market

Issuance Sales Agreement

In October 2015, the Company entered into an

at-the-market

issuance sales agreement (the “October 2015 Sales Agreement”), with Cowen and Company, LLC (“Cowen”), pursuant to which the Company could issue and sell shares of its common stock. In 2017

215,539 shares were sold for an aggregate of approximately $3.5 million in gross proceeds, and $3.4 million in net proceeds. NaN shares were sold in 2019 and 2018.

7. Stock-based Compensation

The 2015 Stock Plan, as amended, is our primary plan through which equity based grants are awarded. We ceased making new awards under the 2006 Stock Plan upon adoption of the 2015 Stock Plan. The 2015 Stock Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options,

non-statutory

stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based compensation awards to employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company. The administration of the 2015 Stock Plan is under the general supervision of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The terms of stock options awarded under the 2015 Stock Plan, in general, are determined by the Compensation Committee, provided the exercise price per share generally shall not be set at less than the fair market value of a share of the common stock on the date of grant and the term shall not be greater than ten years from the date the option is granted. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had options outstanding to purchase 1,461,987 shares of its common stock, which includes options outstanding under its 2006 Stock Plan. As of December 31, 2019, 1,351,345 shares were available for future issuance.

F-16

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019:


	Shares			Weighted average exercise price		Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)		Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2019		1,132,618		$	48.52
Options granted		378,500			118.70
Options exercised		(20,131	)		11.67
Options cancelled		(29,000	)		175.78

Outstanding at December 31, 2019		1,461,987		$	64.67		7.37	$	68,604

Exercisable at December 31, 2019		943,399		$	40.38		6.94	$	63,995

The total cash received by the Company as a result of stock option exercises was $0.2 million, $2.1 million and $0.0 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $2.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2019. The weighted-average grant date fair values, based on the Black-Scholes option model, of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $91.19, $137.49 and $13.30, respectively.

Restricted Common Stock

The Company’s share-based compensation plan provides for awards of restricted shares of common stock to employees, officers, directors and consultants to the Company. Restricted stock awards are subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates during the prescribed retention period. Restricted shares vest over the service period.

The following table summarizes restricted share activity during the year ended December 31, 2019:


	Shares			Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at January 1, 2019		52,063		$	9.45
Vested		(52,063	)		9.45

Outstanding at December 31, 2019		—		$	—

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was as follows (in thousands):


	Years Ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award:
Stock options	$	22,487	$	12,997	$	2,662
Restricted stock		272		492		592

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	22,759	$	13,489	$	3,254

Effect of stock-based compensation expense by line item:
Research and development	$	8,277	$	3,707	$	883
General and administrative		14,482		9,782		2,371

Total stock-based compensation expense included in net loss	$	22,759	$	13,489	$	3,254

F-17

Table of Contents

Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense on stock options as of December 31, 2019 was $32.1 million with a weighted average remaining period of 2.7 years.

8. Leases

In 2019, the Company entered into an operating lease for office space. As described within Note 2, we adopted ASU

2016-02,

“Leases,” on January 1, 2019 requiring, among other changes, operating and finance leases with terms exceeding twelve months to be recognized as

a right-of-use asset (or “

ROU

”)

and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. The lease term is determined to be the

non-cancelable

period including any lessee renewal options that are considered reasonably certain of exercise. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company used judgment to determine an appropriate incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term in a similar economic environment.

Future minimum payments under the Company’s operating leases related to the ROU asset and lease liability as of December 31, 2019 was as follows (in thousand):


	Operating Leases
2020	$	363
2021		371
2022		31
Thereafter		—

Total minimum payments	$	765
Less: imputed interest		89

Present value of lease liabilities	$	676

As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining operating lease term was 2.0 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liabilities was 5.5%.

Cash paid related to the lease liability was $297 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Operating lease costs during the year ended December 31, 2019

was $386 thousand. Rent expense during the year ended December 31

2018 and 2017 was $239 thousand and $134

thousand

, respectively.

Short term and variable leases costs were immaterial during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has a Research, Development and Commercialization Agreement with

Hoffmann-La

Roche (“Roche”) which grants the Company a sole and exclusive license to develop, use, sell, offer for sale and import any Licensed Product as defined by the agreement.

The agreement requires future milestone payments to Roche. In 2019, the Company commenced a Phase 3 study in

Non-Alcoholic

Steatohepatitis (NASH), which triggered a $2 million milestone payment under the agreement. Remaining milestones under the agreement total $8 million and are earned by achieving specified objectives related to future regulatory approval in the United States and Europe of a product developed from resmetirom. A single-digit royalty payment range is based on net sales of products developed from resmetirom, subject to certain reductions. Except as described above, the Company has not achieved any additional product development or regulatory milestones and had 0 Licensed Product sales for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

The Company has entered into customary contractual arrangements and letters of intent in preparation for and in support of the Phase 3 clinical trials.

F-18

Table of Contents

10. Income Taxes

At December 31, 2019, the Company had federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $64.2 million available to reduce future taxable income,

which

$40.4 million will

expire between 203

and 2037. The Company also has state operating loss carryforwards of approximately $52.9 million, available to reduce future taxable income, which expire between 2031

nd 203

. The Company has unused federal research and development carryforwards of approximately $5.9 million which will begin to expire in 203

The Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) limits the amounts of NOL carryforwards that a Company may use in any one year in the event of certain cumulative changes in ownership over a three-year period as described in Section 382 of the IRC. Such change in ownership could limit the Company’s utilization of the NOL, and could be triggered by subsequent sales of securities by the Company or stockholders. The deferred tax asset related to the NOL reflected on the financial statements could be affected by this limitation. Although a formal analysis has not been completed, the Company has determined that an ownership change likely occurred for Madrigal during the year ended December 31, 2017. The net operating losses are expected to be subject to an annual limitation; however, none of these NOLs is expected to expire before becoming available to reduce future taxable income.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. As there is no assurance of future taxable income, a full valuation allowance has been established to offset the deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance increased $26.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Changes in the deferred tax asset will be recorded as an income tax benefit or expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Entities are also required to evaluate, measure, recognize and disclose any uncertain income tax provisions taken on their income tax returns. The Company has analyzed its tax positions and has concluded that as of December 31, 2019 there were 0 uncertain positions. The 2013 through 2018 tax returns are open to review by the IRS and state taxing authorities. Interest and penalties, if any, as they relate to income taxes assessed, are included in the income tax provision. There was 0 income tax related interest and penalties included in the income tax provision for 2019.

Temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):


	For the years ended December 31,
	2019		2018		2017
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Unrealized gains on investments	$	62	$	—	$	—
Total deferred tax liabilities	$	62	$	—	$	—
Deferred Tax Assets
Charitable contributions	$	15	$	13	$	4
Accrued expenses		759		498		421
Intangibles		983		477		579
Stock compensation		10,943		4,395		605
Property, plant & equipment		13		9		—
Unrealized loss on investment		—		92		9
Net operating losses		17,635		14,851		9,229
Capitalized R&D		29,364		15,108		8,671

F-19

Table of Contents


	For the years ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
R&D credit	$	6,141		$	3,505		$	1,901

Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		65,853			38,948			21,419
Valuation allowance		(65,791	)		(38,948	)		(21,419	)

Total deferred tax assets		62			—			—

Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—		$	—

Differences between the effective income tax rate and the US statutory rate were as follows (in thousands):


	For the years ended December 31,
	2019			2018			2017
Tax benefit at U.S. federal statutory rate	$	(17,629	)	$	(6,890	)	$	(10,592	)
Stock based compensation		(47	)		(3,415	)		138
Effect of tax reform, change in federal tax rate		—			—			9,260
Other n ondeductible e xpenses		14			—			1
State income taxes benefit before valuation allowance, net of federal benefit		(6,613	)		(5,460	)		(704	)
Increase in domestic valuation allowance		26,843			17,529			2,880
Research and development credit		(2,636	)		(1,604	)		(825	)
Other adjustments		68			(160	)		(158	)

Income tax expense (benefit)	$	—		$	—		$	—

11. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

The following tables present a summary of quarterly results of operations for 2019 and 2018 (in thousands, except shares and per share data):


	Three months ended
	March 31, 2019			June 30, 2019			September 30, 2019			December 31, 2019
	March 31, 2019			June 30, 2019			September 30, 2019			December 31, 2019
Revenues:
Total revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		12,373			15,594			19,447			24,910
General and administrative		5,746			7,110			4,748			5,044

Total operating expenses		18,119			22,704			24,195			29,954

Loss from operations		(18,119	)		(22,704	)		(24,195	)		(29,954	)
Interest income		3,039			3,005			2,766			2,214
Other income		—			—			—			—

Net loss	$	(15,080	)	$	(19,699	)	$	(21,429	)	$	(27,740	)

Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.98	)	$	(1.28	)	$	(1.39	)	$	(1.80	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		15,364,465			15,368,986			15,415,096			15,429,154

F-20

Table of Contents


	Three months ended
	March 31, 2018			June 30, 2018			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2018
	March 31, 2018			June 30, 2018			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2018
Revenues:
Total revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		5,198			5,109			6,211			8,871
General and administrative		1,871			2,717			5,122			5,583

Total operating expenses		7,069			7,826			11,333			14,454

Loss from operations		(7,069	)		(7,826	)		(11,333	)		(14,454	)
Interest income		705			1,166			2,821			2,979
Other income		—			200			—			—

Net loss	$	(6,364	)	$	(6,460	)	$	(8,512	)	$	(11,475	)

Net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.45	)	$	(0.45	)	$	(0.56	)	$	(0.75	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		14,127,868			14,383,720			15,307,872			15,348,358

F-21

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. freshman Avg

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals (MDGL) 10-K2019 FY Annual report

Content analysis