Cit 10Q 2014 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

|X|

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

| |

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 001-31369

CIT GROUP INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)				65-1051192 (IRS Employer Identification Number)

11 West 42nd Street New York, New York (Address of Registrant’s principal executive offices)				10036 (Zip Code)

(212) 461-5200 (Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes |X| No |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes |X| No |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ‘large accelerated filer,’ ‘accelerated filer’ and ‘smaller reporting company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One): Large accelerated filer |X| Accelerated filer |_| Non-accelerated filer |_| Smaller reporting company |_|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes |X| No |_|

As of October 31, 2014 there were 182,977,211 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

CONTENTS


Part One—Financial Information:
ITEM 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
	and
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	41
ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	91

Part Two—Other Information:
ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	92
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	92
ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	92
ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	93
ITEM 6.	Exhibits	93
Signatures		99

Table of Contents 1

Table of Contents

Part One—Financial Information

ITEM 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)(dollars in millions – except share data)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Assets
Cash and due from banks, including restricted balances of $198.1 and $178.1 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013⁽¹⁾, respectively	$	892.2		$	680.1
Interest bearing deposits, including restricted balances of $881.2 and $785.5 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013⁽¹⁾, respectively		5,322.0			5,364.6
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		650.0			–
Investment securities		792.4			2,630.7
Assets held for sale⁽¹⁾		1,102.7			1,003.4
Loans (see Note 7 for amounts pledged)		19,785.8			18,629.2
Allowance for loan losses		(357.7	)		(356.1	)
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses⁽¹⁾		19,428.1			18,273.1
Operating lease equipment, net (see Note 7 for amounts pledged)⁽¹⁾		15,183.8			13,035.4
Unsecured counterparty receivable		580.1			301.6
Goodwill		557.3			334.6
Other assets, including $120.8 and $50.3 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, at fair value		1,972.4			1,694.1
Assets of discontinued operation⁽¹⁾		–			3,821.4
Total Assets	$	46,481.0		$	47,139.0
Liabilities
Deposits	$	14,483.2		$	12,526.5
Credit balances of factoring clients		1,433.2			1,336.1
Other liabilities, including $60.0 and $111.0 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, at fair value		2,637.2			2,664.3
Long-term borrowings, including $3,245.9 and $2,510.4 contractually due within twelve months at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		18,923.4			18,484.5
Liabilities of discontinued operation⁽¹⁾		–			3,277.6
Total Liabilities		37,477.0			38,289.0
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 600,000,000 authorized
Issued: 203,112,990 and 202,182,395 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		2.0			2.0
Outstanding: 183,422,634 and 197,403,751 at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively
Paid-in capital		8,593.6			8,555.4
Retained earnings		1,392.5			581.0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(82.1	)		(73.6	)
Treasury stock: 19,690,356 and 4,778,644 shares at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 at cost, respectively		(900.8	)		(226.0	)
Total Common Stockholders’ Equity		9,005.2			8,838.8
Noncontrolling minority interests		(1.2	)		11.2
Total Equity		9,004.0			8,850.0
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	46,481.0		$	47,139.0

⁽¹⁾

The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) that are consolidated by the Company. The difference between VIE total assets and total liabilities represents the Company’s interests in those entities, which were eliminated in consolidation. The assets of the consolidated VIEs will be used to settle the liabilities of those entities and, except for the Company’s interest in the VIEs, are not available to the creditors of CIT or any affiliates of CIT.


Assets
Cash and interest bearing deposits, restricted	$	635.9	$	516.4
Assets held for sale		1.6		96.7
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses		3,840.0		3,109.7
Operating lease equipment, net		4,018.5		4,569.9
Other		7.7		11.9
Assets of discontinued operation		–		3,438.2
Total Assets	$	8,503.7	$	11,742.8
Liabilities
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (classified as long-term borrowings)	$	5,383.0	$	5,156.4
Liabilities of discontinued operation		–		3,265.6
Total Liabilities	$	5,383.0	$	8,422.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)(dollars in millions – except share data)

	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	299.9		$	299.6		$	894.7		$	927.7
Other interest and dividends		8.4			6.8			25.6			20.3
Interest income		308.3			306.4			920.3			948.0
Interest expense
Interest on long-term borrowings		(216.0	)		(212.4	)		(642.1	)		(662.0	)
Interest on deposits		(59.2	)		(44.3	)		(167.2	)		(131.4	)
Interest expense		(275.2	)		(256.7	)		(809.3	)		(793.4	)
Net interest revenue		33.1			49.7			111.0			154.6
Provision for credit losses		(38.2	)		(16.4	)		(85.1	)		(50.5	)
Net interest revenue, after credit provision		(5.1	)		33.3			25.9			104.1
Non-interest income
Rental income on operating leases		535.0			472.9			1,546.5			1,433.6
Other income		24.2			104.5			189.0			253.7
Total non-interest income		559.2			577.4			1,735.5			1,687.3
Total revenue, net of interest expense and credit provision		554.1			610.7			1,761.4			1,791.4
Other expenses
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(156.4	)		(134.2	)		(462.5	)		(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.1	)
Operating expenses		(234.5	)		(228.8	)		(693.0	)		(685.8	)
Loss on debt extinguishment		–			–			(0.4	)		–
Total other expenses		(437.4	)		(404.4	)		(1,303.0	)		(1,211.0	)
Income from continuing operations before benefit (provision) for income taxes		116.7			206.3			458.4			580.4
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		401.2			(13.2	)		369.6			(55.3	)
Income from continuing operations, before attribution of noncontrolling interests		517.9			193.1			828.0			525.1
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, after tax		(2.5	)		(0.2	)		(2.5	)		(3.7	)
Income from continuing operations		515.4			192.9			825.5			521.4
Discontinued Operation
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes		(0.5	)		6.7			(229.3	)		24.4
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		–			–			282.8			–
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes		(0.5	)		6.7			53.5			24.4
Net Income	$	514.9		$	199.6		$	879.0		$	545.8
Basic income per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	2.78		$	0.96		$	4.34		$	2.59
Income from discontinued operation		–			0.03			0.28			0.12
Basic income per share	$	2.78		$	0.99		$	4.62		$	2.71
Diluted income per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	2.76		$	0.96		$	4.31		$	2.58
Income from discontinued operation		–			0.03			0.28			0.12
Diluted income per share	$	2.76		$	0.99		$	4.59		$	2.70
Average number of common shares (thousands)
Basic		185,190			200,811			190,465			201,089
Diluted		186,289			202,329			191,433			202,139
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.15		$	–		$	0.35		$	–

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 3

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Unaudited)(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Income from continuing operations, before attribution of noncontrolling interests	$	517.9		$	193.1		$	828.0		$	525.1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(6.3	)		(1.7	)		(13.6	)		(9.0	)
Changes in fair values of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges		0.3			–			0.2			–
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities		(0.4	)		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		(1.7	)
Changes in benefit plans net gain (loss) and prior service (cost)/credit		1.8			(0.4	)		5.0			0.4
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(4.6	)		(2.5	)		(8.5	)		(10.3	)
Comprehensive income before noncontrolling interests and discontinued operation		513.3			190.6			819.5			514.8
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2.5	)		(0.2	)		(2.5	)		(3.7	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes		(0.5	)		6.7			53.5			24.4
Comprehensive income	$	510.3		$	197.1		$	870.5		$	535.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)(dollars in millions)

	Common Stock		Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock			Noncontrolling Minority Interests			Total Equity
December 31, 2013	$	2.0	$	8,555.4	$	581.0		$	(73.6	)	$	(226.0	)	$	11.2		$	8,850.0
Net income						879.0									2.5			881.5
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax									(8.5	)								(8.5	)
Dividends paid						(67.5	)											(67.5	)
Amortization of restricted stock, stock option and performance shares expenses and shares withheld to cover taxes upon vesting				37.1								(16.8	)					20.3
Repurchase of common stock												(658.0	)					(658.0	)
Employee stock purchase plan				1.1														1.1
Distribution of earnings and capital															(14.9	)		(14.9	)
September 30, 2014	$	2.0	$	8,593.6	$	1,392.5		$	(82.1	)	$	(900.8	)	$	(1.2	)	$	9,004.0

December 31, 2012	$	2.0	$	8,501.8	$	(74.6	)	$	(77.7	)	$	(16.7	)	$	4.7		$	8,339.5
Net income (loss)						545.8									3.7			549.5
Other comprehensive income, net of tax									(10.3	)								(10.3	)
Amortization of restricted stock and stock option expenses				40.5								(15.2	)					25.3
Repurchase of common stock												(51.4	)					(51.4	)
Employee stock purchase plan				0.8														0.8
Distribution of earnings and capital															0.3			0.3
September 30, 2013	$	2.0	$	8,543.1	$	471.2		$	(88.0	)	$	(83.3	)	$	8.7		$	8,853.7

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 5

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)(dollars in millions)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Cash Flows From Operations
Net income	$	879.0		$	545.8
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operations:
Provision for credit losses		85.1			50.5
Net depreciation, amortization and (accretion)		754.3			521.3
Net gains on equipment, receivable and investment sales		(290.7	)		(115.6	)
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes		(395.5	)		38.7
(Increase) decrease in finance receivables held for sale		(144.7	)		139.8
Decrease (increase) in other assets		124.4			(89.9	)
(Decrease) increase in accrued liabilities and payables		(78.0	)		182.1
Net cash flows provided by operations		933.9			1,272.7
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Loans originated and purchased		(11,532.5	)		(13,083.0	)
Principal collections of loans		9,850.8			10,797.6
Purchases of investment securities		(8,474.8	)		(14,264.3	)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities		9,688.5			12,857.6
Proceeds from asset and receivable sales		2,585.6			1,465.0
Purchases of assets to be leased and other equipment		(2,431.7	)		(1,275.4	)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term factoring receivables		(112.2	)		22.0
Acquisitions, net of cash received		(448.2	)		–
Change in restricted cash		(21.2	)		80.4
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(895.7	)		(3,400.1	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from the issuance of term debt		2,866.0			1,171.5
Repayments of term debt		(4,116.5	)		(1,902.5	)
Net increase in deposits		1,957.1			2,125.1
Collection of security deposits and maintenance funds		390.2			416.1
Use of security deposits and maintenance funds		(355.7	)		(398.0	)
Repurchase of common stock		(658.0	)		(51.4	)
Dividends paid		(67.5	)		–
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		15.6			1,360.8
Increase (decrease) in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents		53.8			(766.6	)
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		5,081.1			5,636.2
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,134.9		$	4,869.6
Supplementary Cash Flow Disclosure
Interest paid	$	(850.8	)	$	(786.6	)
Federal, foreign, state and local income taxes paid, net	$	(19.0	)	$	(59.8	)
Supplementary Non Cash Flow Disclosure
Transfer of assets from held for investment to held for sale	$	1,329.6		$	1,372.9
Transfer of assets from held for sale to held for investment	$	52.2		$	30.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

CIT Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively “CIT” or the “Company”), has provided financial solutions to its clients since its formation in 1908. The Company provides financing, leasing and advisory services principally to middle market companies in a wide variety of industries primarily in North America, and equipment financing and leasing solutions to the transportation industry worldwide. CIT became a bank holding company (“BHC”) in December 2008 and a financial holding company (“FHC”) in July 2013. CIT is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. CIT Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, is a state-chartered bank located in Salt Lake City, Utah, and is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (“UDFI”). The Company operates primarily in North America, with locations in Europe and Asia.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include financial information related to CIT Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its majority owned subsidiaries, including the Bank, and those variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company is the primary beneficiary. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not included in the consolidated financial statements.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q for interim financial information and accordingly, do not include all information and note disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The financial statements in this Form 10-Q have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.), but in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of CIT’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our current Form 10-K on file.

The consolidated financial statements include the effects of adopting Fresh Start Accounting (“FSA”) upon emergence from bankruptcy on December 10, 2009, as required by GAAP, based on a convenience date of December 31, 2009. Accretion and amortization of certain FSA adjustments are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows.

The accounting and financial reporting policies of CIT Group Inc. conform to GAAP and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Some of the more significant estimates include: allowance for loan losses, loan impairment, fair value determination, lease residual values, liabilities for uncertain tax positions, realizability of deferred tax assets and goodwill assets. Additionally where applicable, the policies conform to accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities.

Acquisitions

On January 31, 2014, CIT acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Paris-based Nacco, an independent full service railcar lessor in Europe and on August 1, 2014, CIT Bank acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Capital Direct Group and its subsidiaries (“Direct Capital”), a U.S. based lender providing equipment leasing and financing to small and mid-sized businesses operating across a range of industries. SeeNote 16 — Goodwill for further discussion.

Discontinued Operation

On April 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of its student lending business. As a result, the student lending business is reported as a discontinued operation. The business had been included in the Non-Strategic Portfolios segment and consisted of a portfolio of U.S. Government-guaranteed student loans. The portfolio was in run-off and had been transferred to assets held for sale (“AHFS”) at the end of 2013. SeeNote 2 — Discontinued Operation.

Revisions

The Company discovered and corrected in the first quarter of 2014 an immaterial error impacting the classification of railcar maintenance expenses. Management determined that railcar maintenance expenses, which previously reduced “Rental income on operating leases”, should be reflected as a separate line item in the “Other expenses” section of the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations (i.e., gross presentation). These classification errors had no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet or Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in any period. Prior periods have been conformed to the current presentation.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity

On April 10, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-08,Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The final guidance raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 7

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

new disclosures of both discontinued operations and certain other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The ASU is aimed at reducing the frequency of disposals reported as discontinued operations by focusing on strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. In another change from current GAAP, the guidance permits companies to have continuing cash flows and significant continuing involvement with the disposed component.

The ASU eliminates most of the scope exceptions in current GAAP. Under the revised standard, a discontinued operation is (1) a component of an entity or group of components that has been disposed of by sale, disposed of other than by sale or is classified as held for sale that represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results or (2) an acquired business or nonprofit activity that is classified as held for sale on the date of the acquisition. The guidance does not change the presentation requirements for discontinued operations in the statement where net income is presented. Although it permits significant continuing involvement, the standard does not address how companies should present continuing involvement with a discontinued operation prior to the disposal. Also, the ASU requires the reclassification of assets and liabilities of a discontinued operation in the statement of financial position for all prior periods presented.

The standard expands the disclosures for discontinued operations and requires new disclosures related to individually material disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation, an entity’s continuing involvement with a discontinued operation following the disposal date, and retained equity method investments in a discontinued operation.

For public entities, the guidance is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014 and interim periods within that year. The ASU is applied prospectively. However, all entities may early adopt the guidance for new disposals (or new classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. CIT did not early adopt the ASU as it pertains to the student lending business, which was classified as held for sale since December 2013 and reported as a discontinued operation as of June 30, 2014.

Revenue Recognition

The FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customer, which will supersede virtually all of the revenue recognition guidance in US GAAP.

The core principle of the five-step model is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers control of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, many companies will have to make more estimates and use more judgment than they do under current GAAP. The five-step analysis of transactions, to determine when and how revenue is recognized, includes:

Identify the contract with the customer.

Identify the performance obligations in the contract.

Determine the transaction price.

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations.

Recognize revenue when or as each performance obligation is satisfied.

Companies can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. Under the modified approach, financial statements will be prepared for the year of adoption using the new standard, but prior periods will not be adjusted. Instead, companies will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the effective date for contracts that still require performance by the company and disclose all line items in the year of adoption as if they were prepared under today’s revenue guidance.

The FASB has set an effective date of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 for public entities. However, public companies that choose full retrospective application will need to apply the standard to amounts they report for 2015 and 2016 on the face of their 2017 financial statements. CIT is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU.

Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period

The FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12,Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, in June 2014.

The ASU directs that a performance target that affects vesting and can be achieved after the requisite service period is a performance condition. That is, compensation cost would be recognized over the required service period if it is probable that the performance condition would be achieved. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period would reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and would be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest.

The ASU does not require additional disclosures. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this ASU as of the beginning of the earliest annual

8 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost.

The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. CIT is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU and is reviewing existing awards for applicability.

Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The FASB issued ASU 2014-15,Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, in August 2014. This ASU describes how entities should assess their ability to meet their obligations and sets disclosure requirements about how this information should be communicated. The standard will be used along with existing auditing standards, and provides the following key guidance:

Entities must perform a going concern assessment by evaluating their ability to meet their obligations for a look-forward period of one year from the financial statement issuance date (or date the financial statements are available to be issued).

Disclosures are required if it is probable an entity will be unable to meet its obligations within the look-forward period. Incremental substantial doubt disclosure is required if the probability is not mitigated by management’s plans.

Pursuant to the ASU, substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists if it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date the annual or interim financial statements are issued or available to be issued (assessment date).

The new standard applies to all entities for the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. Company management is responsible for assessing going concern uncertainties at each annual and interim reporting period thereafter. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on CIT’s financial statements or disclosures.

NOTE 2 — DISCONTINUED OPERATION

On April 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of its student lending business, along with certain secured debt and servicing rights. As a result, the student lending business is reported as a discontinued operation for all periods presented. The business was in run-off and $3.4 billion in portfolio assets were classified as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2013.

The operating results and the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operation, which was formerly included in the Non-Strategic Portfolios segment, are presented separately in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Summarized financial information for the discontinued business is shown below. Prior period balances have been adjusted to present the operations of the student lending business as a discontinued operation.

In connection with the classification of the student lending business as a discontinued operation, certain indirect operating expenses that previously had been allocated to the business, have instead been allocated to Corporate and Other as part of continuing operations and are not included in the summary of discontinued operation presented in the table below. The total incremental pretax amounts of indirect overhead expense that were previously allocated to the student lending business and remain in continuing operations were approximately $2.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and $1.7 million and $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Interest expense allocated to discontinued operation corresponds to debt of approximately $3.2 billion, net of $224 million of FSA. The debt included $0.8 billion that was repaid using a portion of the cash proceeds. Salaries and general operating expenses included in discontinued operation consists of direct expenses of the student lending business that are separate from ongoing CIT operations and will not continue subsequent to disposal.

Income from the discontinued operation was $53.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, reflecting the benefit of proceeds received in excess of the net carrying value of assets and liabilities sold. The interest expense primarily reflects the acceleration of FSA accretion of $224 million on the extinguishment of the debt, while the gain on sale mostly reflects the excess of purchase price over net assets, and amounts received for the sale of servicing rights.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 9

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operation(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Assets:
Assets held for sale	$	–	$	3,374.5
Cash		–		94.5
Other assets		–		352.4
Total assets	$	–	$	3,821.4
Liabilities:
Long-term borrowings (secured)	$	–	$	3,265.6
Other liabilities		–		12.0
Total Liabilities	$	–	$	3,277.6

Operating Results of Discontinued Operation(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Total interest income	$	–		$	31.7		$	27.0		$	99.1
Total interest expense		–			(21.3	)		(248.2	)		(58.0	)
Other income		–			0.3			(2.1	)		0.6
Operating expenses		–			(3.4	)		(3.5	)		(11.4	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operation before provision for income taxes		–			7.3			(226.8	)		30.3
Provision for income taxes		(0.5	)		(0.6	)		(2.5	)		(5.9	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes		(0.5	)		6.7			(229.3	)		24.4
Gain on sale of discontinued operation		–			–			282.8			–
Income (loss) from discontinued operation, net of taxes	$	(0.5	)	$	6.7		$	53.5		$	24.4

The individual assets and liabilities of the discontinued Student Lending operation are combined in the captions “Assets of discontinued operation” and “Liabilities of discontinued operation” in the consolidated Balance Sheet.

NOTE 3 — LOANS

Finance receivables consist of the following:

Finance Receivables by Product(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Loans	$	14,377.5	$	13,814.3
Direct financing leases and leveraged leases		5,408.3		4,814.9
Finance receivables		19,785.8		18,629.2
Finance receivables held for sale		931.9		794.3
Finance and held for sale receivables⁽¹⁾	$	20,717.7	$	19,423.5

⁽¹⁾

Assets held for sale on the Balance Sheet includes finance receivables and operating lease equipment. As discussed in subsequent tables, since the Company manages the credit risk and collections of finance receivables held for sale consistently with its finance receivables held for investment, the aggregate amount is presented in this table.

10 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table presents finance receivables by segment, based on obligor location:

Finance Receivables(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Domestic		Foreign		Total		Domestic		Foreign		Total
Transportation & International Finance	$	851.5	$	2,836.2	$	3,687.7	$	666.6	$	2,827.8	$	3,494.4
North American Commercial Finance		14,705.2		1,392.8		16,098.0		13,196.7		1,496.4		14,693.1
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		0.1		0.1		117.9		323.8		441.7
Total	$	15,556.7	$	4,229.1	$	19,785.8	$	13,981.2	$	4,648.0	$	18,629.2

The following table presents selected components of the net investment in finance receivables:

Components of Net Investment in Finance Receivables(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Unearned income	$	(897.9	)	$	(942.0	)
Unamortized (discounts)		(25.2	)		(47.9	)
Net unamortized deferred costs and (fees)		58.9			49.7

Certain of the following tables present credit-related information at the “class” level in accordance with ASC 310-10-50,Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Finance Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. A class is generally a disaggregation of a portfolio segment. In determining the classes, CIT considered the finance receivable characteristics and methods it applies in monitoring and assessing credit risk and performance.

Credit Quality Information

The following table summarizes finance receivables by the risk ratings that bank regulatory agencies utilize to classify credit exposure and which are consistent with indicators the Company monitors. Customer risk ratings are reviewed on a regular basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information affecting the borrowers’ ability to fulfill their obligations.

The definitions of these ratings are as follows:

Pass – finance receivables in this category do not meet the criteria for classification in one of the categories below.

Special mention – a special mention asset exhibits potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects.

Classified – a classified asset ranges from: (1) assets that exhibit a well-defined weakness and are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower, and are characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected to (2) assets with weaknesses that make collection or liquidation in full unlikely on the basis of current facts, conditions, and values. Assets in this classification can be accruing or on non-accrual depending on the evaluation of these factors.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 11

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Finance and Held for Sale Receivables — by Risk Rating(dollars in millions)

	Transportation & International Finance				North American Commercial Finance
Grade:	Transportation Finance		International Finance		Corporate Finance		Equipment Finance		Real Estate Finance		Commercial Services		Subtotal		Non-Strategic Portfolios		Total
September 30, 2014
Pass	$	2,566.8	$	1,210.3	$	6,407.6	$	4,117.0	$	1,675.1	$	1,978.5	$	17,955.3	$	404.4	$	18,359.7
Special mention		11.4		115.8		592.0		281.3		76.6		318.2		1,395.3		49.1		1,444.4
Classified – accruing		45.7		50.3		185.4		239.0		–		178.6		699.0		13.5		712.5
Classified – non-accrual		0.1		41.7		52.9		73.4		–		7.8		175.9		25.2		201.1
Total	$	2,624.0	$	1,418.1	$	7,237.9	$	4,710.7	$	1,751.7	$	2,483.1	$	20,225.5	$	492.2	$	20,717.7
December 31, 2013
Pass	$	1,627.4	$	1,530.3	$	5,783.1	$	3,355.2	$	1,554.8	$	1,804.6	$	15,655.4	$	685.5	$	16,340.9
Special mention		28.6		145.8		769.5		363.5		–		314.7		1,622.1		350.1		1,972.2
Classified – accruing		97.2		36.2		233.6		266.0		–		138.9		771.9		97.8		869.7
Classified – non-accrual		14.3		21.0		83.8		59.4		–		4.2		182.7		58.0		240.7
Total	$	1,767.5	$	1,733.3	$	6,870.0	$	4,044.1	$	1,554.8	$	2,262.4	$	18,232.1	$	1,191.4	$	19,423.5

Past Due and Non-accrual Loans

The table that follows presents portfolio delinquency status, regardless of accrual/non-accrual classification:

Finance and Held for Sale Receivables — Delinquency Status(dollars in millions)

	30–59 Days Past Due		60–89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater		Total Past Due 30 Days or Greater		Current		Total Finance Receivables
September 30, 2014
Transportation Finance	$	0.1	$	1.0	$	2.0	$	3.1	$	2,620.9	$	2,624.0
International Finance		21.3		6.3		32.7		60.3		1,357.8		1,418.1
Corporate Finance		0.1		7.8		11.4		19.3		7,218.6		7,237.9
Equipment Finance		64.1		25.4		16.6		106.1		4,604.6		4,710.7
Real Estate Finance		–		–		–		–		1,751.7		1,751.7
Commercial Services		35.1		1.9		2.3		39.3		2,443.8		2,483.1
Sub-total		120.7		42.4		65.0		228.1		19,997.4		20,225.5
Non-Strategic Portfolios		7.9		6.1		9.8		23.8		468.4		492.2
Total	$	128.6	$	48.5	$	74.8	$	251.9	$	20,465.8	$	20,717.7
December 31, 2013
Transportation Finance	$	18.3	$	0.9	$	0.5	$	19.7	$	1,747.8	$	1,767.5
International Finance		30.6		11.6		12.6		54.8		1,678.5		1,733.3
Corporate Finance		–		–		17.8		17.8		6,852.2		6,870.0
Equipment Finance		116.6		30.0		18.6		165.2		3,878.9		4,044.1
Real Estate Finance		–		–		–		–		1,554.8		1,554.8
Commercial Services		47.9		2.4		1.0		51.3		2,211.1		2,262.4
Sub-total		213.4		44.9		50.5		308.8		17,923.3		18,232.1
Non-Strategic Portfolios		29.7		7.9		16.2		53.8		1,137.6		1,191.4
Total	$	243.1	$	52.8	$	66.7	$	362.6	$	19,060.9	$	19,423.5

12 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table sets forth non-accrual loans and assets received in satisfaction of loans (repossessed assets). Non-accrual loans include loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be impaired (generally loans with balances greater than $500,000), as well as other, smaller balance loans placed on non-accrual due to delinquency (generally 90 days or more).

Finance Receivables on Non-accrual Status(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Held for Investment		Held for Sale		Total		Held for Investment		Held for Sale		Total
Transportation Finance	$	0.1	$	–	$	0.1	$	14.3	$	–	$	14.3
International Finance		41.7		–		41.7		21.0		–		21.0
Corporate Finance		52.9		–		52.9		83.5		0.3		83.8
Equipment Finance		73.4		–		73.4		59.4		–		59.4
Commercial Services		7.8		–		7.8		4.2		–		4.2
Sub-total		175.9		–		175.9		182.4		0.3		182.7
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		25.2		25.2		17.6		40.4		58.0
Total	$	175.9	$	25.2	$	201.1	$	200.0	$	40.7	$	240.7
Repossessed assets						0.7						7.0
Total non-performing assets					$	201.8					$	247.7
Total Accruing loans past due 90 days or more					$	13.0					$	9.9

Payments received on non-accrual financing receivables are generally applied first against outstanding principal, though in certain instances where the remaining recorded investment is deemed fully collectible, interest income is recognized on a cash basis.

Impaired Loans

The Company’s policy is to review for impairment finance receivables greater than $500,000 that are on non-accrual status. Consumer loans and small-ticket loan and lease receivables that have not been modified in a troubled debt restructuring, as well as short-term factoring receivables, are included (if appropriate) in the reported non-accrual balances above, but are excluded from the impaired finance receivables disclosure below as charge-offs are typically determined and recorded for such loans when they are more than 90 – 150 days past due.

The following table contains information about impaired finance receivables and the related allowance for loan losses, exclusive of finance receivables that were identified as impaired at the Convenience Date for which the Company is applying the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality), which are disclosed further below in this note.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 13

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Impaired Loans(dollars in millions)

							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	September 30, 2014						2014		2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Average Recorded Investment
With no related allowance recorded:
Transportation Finance	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	2.7
International Finance		14.5		22.3		–		10.0		6.9
Corporate Finance		130.0		137.3		–		130.9		157.0
Equipment Finance		5.0		6.4		–		5.8		7.3
Commercial Services		5.8		5.8		–		7.6		10.3
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		–		–		4.2		27.5
With an allowance recorded:
Transportation Finance		–		–		–		11.2		11.9
International Finance		8.6		8.6		2.7		2.8		–
Corporate Finance		41.3		42.8		20.4		47.0		87.0
Equipment Finance		2.8		2.8		1.2		1.0		–
Commercial Services		7.8		7.8		1.2		3.5		4.7
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		–		–		–		1.3
Total Impaired Loans⁽¹⁾		215.8		233.8		25.5		224.0		316.6
Total Loans Impaired at Convenience Date⁽²⁾		1.2		16.0		0.5		32.7		83.9
Total	$	217.0	$	249.8	$	26.0	$	256.7	$	400.5

	December 31, 2013						Year Ended December 31, 2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
With no related allowance recorded:
Transportation Finance	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	2.2
International Finance		6.9		24.5		–		6.9
Corporate Finance		136.1		150.1		–		152.8
Equipment Finance		5.8		7.9		–		7.0
Commercial Services		9.1		9.1		–		10.0
Non-Strategic Portfolios		10.2		12.5		–		24.0
With an allowance recorded:
Transportation Finance		14.3		14.3		0.6		12.4
Corporate Finance		50.6		51.7		28.8		79.7
Commercial Services		4.2		4.2		1.0		4.6
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		–		–		1.0
Total Impaired Loans⁽¹⁾		237.2		274.3		30.4		300.6
Total Loans Impaired at Convenience date⁽²⁾		54.1		95.8		1.0		77.9
Total	$	291.3	$	370.1	$	31.4	$	378.5

⁽¹⁾

Interest income recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 while the loans were impaired was $8.1 million and $13.8 million, respectively, of which $0.7 million and $2.5 million was interest recognized using the cash-basis method of accounting. Interest income recorded for the year ended December 31, 2013 while the loans were impaired was $17.7 million, of which $3.5 million was interest recognized using the cash-basis method of accounting.

⁽²⁾

Details of finance receivables that were identified as impaired at the Convenience Date are presented under Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.

14 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Impairment occurs when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CIT will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the agreement. The Company has established review and monitoring procedures designed to identify, as early as possible, customers that are experiencing financial difficulty. Credit risk is captured and analyzed based on the Company’s internal probability of obligor default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) ratings. A PD rating is determined by evaluating borrower credit-worthiness, including analyzing credit history, financial condition, cash flow adequacy, financial performance and management quality. An LGD rating is predicated on transaction structure, collateral valuation and related guarantees or recourse. Further, related considerations in determining probability of collection include the following:

Instances where the primary source of payment is no longer sufficient to repay the loan in accordance with terms of the loan document;

Lack of current financial data related to the borrower or guarantor;

Delinquency status of the loan;

Borrowers experiencing problems, such as operating losses, marginal working capital, inadequate cash flow, excessive financial leverage or business interruptions;

Loans secured by collateral that is not readily marketable or that has experienced or is susceptible to deterioration in realizable value; and

Loans to borrowers in industries or countries experiencing severe economic instability.

Impairment is measured as the shortfall between estimated value and recorded investment in the finance receivable. A specific allowance or charge-off is recorded for the shortfall. In instances where the estimated value exceeds the recorded investment, no specific allowance is recorded. The estimated value is determined using fair value of collateral and other cash flows if the finance receivable is collateralized, the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the contract’s effective interest rate, or market price. In instances when the Company measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, the change in present value is reported in the provision for credit losses.

The following summarizes key elements of the Company’s policy regarding the determination of collateral fair value in the measurement of impairment:

“Orderly liquidation value” is the basis for collateral valuation;

Appraisals are updated annually or more often as market conditions warrant; and

Appraisal values are discounted in the determination of impairment if the:

appraisal does not reflect current market conditions; or

collateral consists of inventory, accounts receivable, or other forms of collateral that may become difficult to locate, collect or subject to pilferage in a liquidation.

Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality

For purposes of this presentation, the Company is applying the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality) to finance receivables that were identified as impaired under FSA at the Convenience Date. At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the carrying amounts approximated $1 million and $54 million, respectively, and the outstanding balance approximated $16 million and $96 million, respectively. The outstanding balance represents the sum of contractual principal, interest and fees earned at the reporting date, calculated as pre-FSA net investment plus inception to date charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses on these loans was $0.5 million at September 30, 2014 and $1.0 million at December 31, 2013. SeeNote 4 — Allowance for Loan Losses.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company periodically modifies the terms of finance receivables in response to borrowers’ difficulties. Modifications that include a financial concession to the borrower are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs).

CIT uses a consistent methodology across all loans to determine if a modification is with a borrower that has been determined to be in financial difficulty and was granted a concession. Specifically, the Company’s policies on TDR identification include the following examples of indicators used to determine whether the borrower is in financial difficulty:

Borrower is in default with CIT or other material creditor

Borrower has declared bankruptcy

Growing doubt about the borrower’s ability to continue as a going concern

Borrower has (or is expected to have) insufficient cash flow to service debt

Borrower is de-listing securities

Borrower’s inability to obtain funds from other sources

Breach of financial covenants by the borrower.

If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, then CIT utilizes the following criteria to determine whether a concession has been granted to the borrower:

Assets used to satisfy debt are less than CIT’s recorded investment in the receivable

Modification of terms – interest rate changed to below market rate

Maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 15

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The borrower does not otherwise have access to funding for debt with similar risk characteristics in the market at the restructured rate and terms

Capitalization of interest

Increase in interest reserves

Conversion of credit to Payment-In-Kind (PIK)

Delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more

Partial forgiveness of the balance.

Modified loans that meet the definition of a TDR are subject to the Company’s standard impaired loan policy, namely that non-accrual loans in excess of $500,000 are individually reviewed for impairment, while non-accrual loans less than $500,000 are considered as part of homogenous pools and are included in the determination of the non-specific allowance.

The recorded investment of TDRs at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $150.9 million and $220.9 million, of which 18% and 33%, respectively were on non-accrual. North American Commercial Finance receivables accounted for 99% of the total TDRs at September 30, 2014 and 80% at December 31, 2013, and there were $0.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, of commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs.

Recorded investment related to modifications qualifying as TDRs that occurred during the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and $11.4 million and $24.6 million for the nine month periods. The recorded investment of TDRs that experience a payment default (payment default is one missed payment) at the time of default, during the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification totaled $0.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.8 million for the nine month periods. The September 30, 2014 defaults related to Equipment Financing and essentially all of the September 30, 2013 defaults related primarily to North America Commercial Finance and Non-Strategic Portfolios.

The financial impact of the various modification strategies that the Company employs in response to borrower difficulties is described below. While the discussion focuses on the third quarter of 2014 amounts, the overall nature and impact of modification programs were comparable in the prior year.

The nature of modifications qualifying as TDR’s based upon recorded investment at September 30, 2014 was comprised of payment deferrals for 92% and covenant relief and/or other for 8%. December 31, 2013 TDR recorded investment was comprised of payment deferrals for 88%, covenant relief and/or other for 11%, and interest rate reductions and debt forgiveness for 1%;

Payment deferrals, the Company’s most common type of modification program, result in lower net present value of cash flows, if not accompanied by additional interest or fees, and increased provision for credit losses to the extent applicable. The financial impact of these modifications is not significant given the moderate length of deferral periods;

Interest rate reductions result in lower amounts of interest being charged to the customer, but are a relatively small part of the Company’s restructuring programs. Additionally, in some instances, modifications improve the Company’s economic return through increased interest rates and fees, but are reported as TDRs due to assessments regarding the borrowers’ ability to independently obtain similar funding in the market and assessments of the relationship between modified rates and terms and comparable market rates and terms. The weighted average change in interest rates for all TDRs occurring during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 was immaterial;

Debt forgiveness, or the reduction in amount owed by borrower, results in incremental provision for credit losses, in the form of higher charge-offs. While these types of modifications have the greatest individual impact on the allowance, the amounts of principal forgiveness for TDRs occurring during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 were not significant, as debt forgiveness is a relatively small component of the Company’s modification programs; and

The other elements of the Company’s modification programs do not have a significant impact on financial results given their relative size, or do not have a direct financial impact, as in the case of covenant changes.

16 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 4 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses:

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Finance Receivables (dollars in millions)

	Quarter Ended September 30, 2014															Quarter Ended September 30, 2013
	Transportation & International Finance			North American Commercial Finance			Non- Strategic Portfolios			Corporate and Other			Total			Transportation & International Finance			North American Commercial Finance			Non- Strategic Portfolios			Corporate and Other			Total
Beginning balance	$	39.7		$	301.3		$	–		$	–		$	341.0		$	41.6		$	307.5		$	18.1		$	–		$	367.2
Provision for credit losses		9.1			29.7			(0.7	)		0.1			38.2			6.0			8.3			2.2			(0.1	)		16.4
Other⁽¹⁾		1.6			(3.8	)		–			(0.1	)		(2.3	)		0.8			(1.6	)		0.3			0.1			(0.4	)
Gross charge-offs⁽²⁾		(4.5	)		(20.7	)		–			–			(25.2	)		(7.5	)		(16.4	)		(12.7	)		–			(36.6	)
Recoveries		0.6			4.7			0.7			–			6.0			2.5			5.7			1.3			–			9.5
Allowance balance – end of period	$	46.5		$	311.2		$	–		$	–		$	357.7		$	43.4		$	303.5		$	9.2		$	–		$	356.1

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014															Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Beginning balance	$	46.7		$	303.8		$	5.6		$	–		$	356.1		$	44.3		$	293.7		$	41.3		$	–		$	379.3
Provision for credit losses		29.8			55.5			(0.4	)		0.2			85.1			4.1			38.0			8.6			(0.2	)		50.5
Other⁽¹⁾		–			(7.3	)		–			(0.2	)		(7.5	)		0.2			(7.4	)		(1.0	)		0.2			(8.0	)
Gross charge-offs⁽²⁾		(34.7	)		(56.5	)		(7.5	)		–			(98.7	)		(13.0	)		(47.9	)		(48.1	)		–			(109.0	)
Recoveries		4.7			15.7			2.3			–			22.7			7.8			27.1			8.4			–			43.3
Allowance balance – end of period	$	46.5		$	311.2		$	–		$	–		$	357.7		$	43.4		$	303.5		$	9.2		$	–		$	356.1

	September 30, 2014															September 30, 2013
Allowance balance:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	2.7		$	22.8		$	–		$	–		��$	25.5		$	–		$	33.9		$	–		$	–		$	33.9
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		43.8			287.9			–			–			331.7			43.4			268.6			9.2			–			321.2
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality⁽³⁾		–			0.5			–			–			0.5			–			1.0			–			–			1.0
Allowance balance – end of period	$	46.5		$	311.2		$	–		$	–		$	357.7		$	43.4		$	303.5		$	9.2		$	–		$	356.1
Other reserves⁽¹⁾	$	0.3		$	33.3		$	–		$	0.1		$	33.7		$	0.1		$	29.0		$	–		$	–		$	29.1
Finance receivables:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	23.1		$	192.7		$	–		$	–		$	215.8		$	11.0		$	232.9		$	13.5		$	–		$	257.4
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		3,664.6			15,904.1			0.1			–			19,568.8			3,228.4			14,158.7			661.8			–			18,048.9
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality⁽³⁾		–			1.2			–			–			1.2			0.1			62.6			2.0			–			64.7
Ending balance	$	3,687.7		$	16,098.0		$	0.1		$	–		$	19,785.8		$	3,239.5		$	14,454.2		$	677.3		$	–		$	18,371.0
Percent of loans to total loans		18.6	%		81.4	%		–			–			100.0	%		17.6	%		78.7	%		3.7	%		–			100.0	%

⁽¹⁾

“Other reserves” represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit and for deferred purchase agreements, all of which is recorded in Other liabilities. “Other” also includes changes relating to sales and foreign currency translations.

⁽²⁾

Gross charge-offs include $1 million and $10 million charged directly to the Allowance for loan losses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, related primarily to North American Commercial Finance. Gross charge-offs include $6 million and $17 million charged directly to the Allowance for the loan losses for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, related to North American Commercial Finance and Non-Strategic Portfolios.

⁽³⁾

Represents loans considered impaired in FSA and are accounted for under the guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality).

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 17

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 5 — SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER RESALE AGREEMENTS

During the third quarter, the Company entered into $650 million of securities purchased under resale agreements. Securities purchased under agreements to resell (reverse repos) generally do not constitute a sale or purchase of the underlying securities for accounting purposes and, therefore are treated as collateralized financing transactions. These agreements are recorded at the amounts at which the securities were acquired. SeeNote 9 — Fair Value for discussion of fair value. The Company’s reverse repos are short-term securities that mature within 91 days and are secured by the underlying collateral, which, along with the cash investment, are maintained by a third-party.

CIT’s policy is to obtain collateral with a market value in excess of the principal amount under resale agreements. To ensure that the market value of the underlying collateral remains sufficient, the collateral is valued on a daily basis. Collateral typically consists of government-agency securities, corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities.

These securities financing agreements give rise to minimal credit risk as a result of the collateral provisions, therefore no allowance is considered necessary. In the event of counterparty default, the financing agreement provides the Company with the right to liquidate the collateral held. Interest earned on these financing agreements is included in ‘Other interest and dividends’ in the statement of operations.

NOTE 6 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Investments include debt and equity securities. The Company’s debt securities primarily include U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government Agency securities, and supranational and foreign government securities. Equity securities include common stock and warrants.

Investment Securities (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Debt securities available-for-sale	$	342.0	$	1,487.8
Equity securities available-for-sale		14.0		13.7
Debt securities held-to-maturity⁽¹⁾		345.0		1,042.3
Non-marketable equity investments⁽²⁾		91.4		86.9
Total investment securities	$	792.4	$	2,630.7

⁽¹⁾

Recorded at amortized cost less impairment on securities that have credit-related impairment.

⁽²⁾

Non-marketable equity investments include $25.8 million and $23.6 million in limited partnerships at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, accounted for under the equity method. The remaining investments are carried at cost and include qualified Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) investments, equity fund holdings and shares issued by customers during loan work out situations or as part of an original loan investment.

Debt securities and equity securities classified as available-for-sale (“AFS”) are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of applicable income taxes. Debt securities classified as AFS typically mature in 91 days or less.

Debt securities classified as held-to-maturity (“HTM”) represent securities that the Company has both the ability and intent to hold until maturity, and are carried at amortized cost.

Non-marketable equity investments include ownership interests greater than 3% in limited partnership investments that are accounted for under the equity method. Equity method investments are recorded at cost, adjusted to reflect the Company’s portion of income, loss or dividends of the investee. All other non-marketable equity investments are carried at cost and periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”).

The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is OTTI. For debt securities classified as HTM that are considered to have OTTI that the Company does not intend to sell and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell before recovery, the OTTI is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in other income in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in OCI. OTTI on debt securities and equity securities classified as AFS and non-marketable equity investments are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period determined.

Realized investment gains totaled $5.6 million and $1.0 million for the quarters and $14.7 million and $4.9 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and exclude losses from OTTI. OTTI impairments on equity securities recognized in earnings were not material for the quarters and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Impairment amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) were not material at September 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

In addition, the Company maintained $5.3 billion of interest bearing deposits at September 30, 2014 and $5.4 billion at December 31, 2013, that are cash equivalents and are classified separately on the balance sheet.

18 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table presents interest and dividends on interest bearing deposits, investments and reverse repurchase agreements:

Interest and Dividend Income (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Interest income – interest bearing deposits	$	4.4	$	4.0	$	13.5	$	11.8
Interest income – investments / reverse repos		3.6		2.1		10.0		5.8
Dividends – investments		0.4		0.7		2.1		2.7
Total interest and dividends	$	8.4	$	6.8	$	25.6	$	20.3

Securities Available-for-Sale

The following table presents amortized cost and fair value of securities AFS at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Securities Available for Sale — Amortized Cost and Fair Value (dollars in millions)

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2014
Debt securities AFS
U.S. government agency obligations	$	329.3	$	–	$	–		$	329.3
Supranational and foreign government securities		12.7		–		–			12.7
Total debt securities AFS		342.0		–		–			342.0
Equity securities AFS		14.0		0.4		(0.4	)		14.0
Total securities AFS	$	356.0	$	0.4	$	(0.4	)	$	356.0
December 31, 2013
Debt securities AFS
U.S. Treasury securities	$	649.1	$	–	$	–		$	649.1
U.S. government agency obligations		711.9		–		–			711.9
Supranational and foreign government securities		126.8		–		–			126.8
Total debt securities AFS		1,487.8		–		–			1,487.8
Equity securities AFS		13.5		0.4		(0.2	)		13.7
Total securities AFS	$	1,501.3	$	0.4	$	(0.2	)	$	1,501.5

Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

The carrying value and fair value of debt securities HTM at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity — Carrying Value and Fair Value (dollars in millions)

	Carrying Value		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2014
Mortgage-backed securities – U.S. government owned and sponsored agencies	$	147.7	$	1.8	$	(3.5	)	$	146.0
State and municipal		48.1		–		(2.0	)		46.1
Foreign government		37.3		0.1		–			37.4
Corporate – foreign		111.9		8.8		–			120.7
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	345.0	$	10.7	$	(5.5	)	$	350.2
December 31, 2013
U.S. government agency obligations	$	735.5	$	0.1	$	–		$	735.6
Mortgage-backed securities – U.S. government owned and sponsored agencies		96.3		1.7		(5.8	)		92.2
State and municipal		57.4		–		(6.5	)		50.9
Foreign government		38.3		–		–			38.3
Corporate – foreign		114.8		9.0		–			123.8
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	1,042.3	$	10.8	$	(12.3	)	$	1,040.8

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 19

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of debt securities HTM by contractual maturity dates:

Debt Securities Held-To-Maturity — Carrying Value and Fair Value Maturities (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
U.S. government agency obligations
Total – Due within 1 year	$	–	$	–	$	735.5	$	735.6
Mortgage-backed securities – U.S. government owned and sponsored agencies
Due after 5 but within 10 years	$	1.4	$	1.3	$	–	$	–
Due after 10 years⁽¹⁾		146.3		144.7		96.3		92.2
Total		147.7		146.0		96.3		92.2
State and municipal
Due within 1 year		1.2		1.2		0.7		0.7
Due after 1 but within 5 years		2.9		3.0		4.4		4.4
Due after 5 but within 10 years		–		–		0.7		0.7
Due after 10 years⁽¹⁾		44.0		41.9		51.6		45.1
Total		48.1		46.1		57.4		50.9
Foreign government
Due within 1 year		23.1		23.1		29.8		29.8
Due after 1 but within 5 years		14.2		14.3		8.5		8.5
Total		37.3		37.4		38.3		38.3
Corporate – Foreign
Due within 1 year		0.8		0.8		0.8		0.8
Due after 1 but within 5 years		45.7		52.0		48.6		56.1
After 5 but within 10 years		65.4		67.9		65.4		66.9
Total		111.9		120.7		114.8		123.8
Total debt securities held-to-maturity	$	345.0	$	350.2	$	1,042.3	$	1,040.8

⁽¹⁾

Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to exercise of call or prepayment rights.

NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

The following table presents outstanding long-term borrowings:

Long-term Borrowings (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	CIT Group Inc.		Subsidiaries		Total		Total
Senior Unsecured Notes⁽¹⁾	$	12,232.2	$	0.1	$	12,232.3	$	12,531.6
Secured Borrowings		–		6,691.1		6,691.1		5,952.9
Total Long-term Borrowings	$	12,232.2	$	6,691.2	$	18,923.4	$	18,484.5

⁽¹⁾

Senior Unsecured Notes at September 30, 2014 were comprised of $8,243.4 million Unsecured Notes, $3,950.0 million Series C Notes and $38.9 million other unsecured debt.

Revolving Credit Facility

There were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The amount available to draw upon at September 30, 2014 was approximately $1.4 billion, with the remaining amount of approximately $0.1 billion being utilized for issuance of letters of credit.

20 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The Revolving Credit Facility may be drawn and prepaid at the option of CIT. The unutilized portion of any commitment under the Revolving Credit Facility may be reduced permanently or terminated by CIT at any time without penalty.

The Revolving Credit Facility is unsecured and is guaranteed by eight of the Company’s domestic operating subsidiaries. The facility was amended in January 2014 to modify the covenant requiring a minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio and the criteria for calculating the ratio. The amended covenant requires a minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio ranging from 1.25:1.0 to the current requirement of 1.5:1.0 depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt rating.

The Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a $6 billion minimum consolidated net worth covenant of the Company, tested quarterly, and also limits the Company’s ability to create liens, merge or consolidate, sell, transfer, lease or dispose of all or substantially all of its assets, grant a negative pledge or make certain restricted payments during the occurrence and continuance of an event of default.

Senior Unsecured Notes

Senior unsecured notes include notes issued under the “shelf” registration filed in March 2012, and Series C Unsecured Notes. The notes filed under the shelf registration rank equal in right of payment with the Series C Unsecured Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility.

The following tables present the principal amounts of Senior Unsecured Notes issued under the Company’s shelf registration and Series C Unsecured Notes by maturity date.

Senior Unsecured Notes (dollars in millions)

Maturity Date			Date of Issuance	Par Value
February 2015*	4.750	%	February 2012		1,500.0
May 2017	5.000	%	May 2012		1,250.0
August 2017	4.250	%	August 2012		1,750.0
March 2018	5.250	%	March 2012		1,500.0
April 2018*	6.625	%	March 2011		700.0
February 2019*	5.500	%	February 2012		1,750.0
February 2019	3.875	%	February 2014		1,000.0
May 2020	5.375	%	May 2012		750.0
August 2022	5.000	%	August 2012		1,250.0
August 2023	5.000	%	August 2013		750.0
Weighted average and total	4.99	%		$	12,200.0

Series C Unsecured Notes

The Indentures for the Senior Unsecured Notes and Series C Unsecured Notes limit the Company’s ability to create liens, merge or consolidate, or sell, transfer, lease or dispose of all or substantially all of its assets. Upon a Change of Control Triggering Event as defined in the Indentures for the Senior Unsecured Notes and Series C Unsecured Notes, holders of the Senior Unsecured Notes and Series C Unsecured Notes will have the right to require the Company, as applicable, to repurchase all or a portion of the Senior Unsecured Notes and Series C Unsecured Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of such repurchase.

Other debt of $38.9 million includes senior unsecured notes issued prior to CIT’s reorganization.

Secured Borrowings

Set forth below are borrowings and pledged assets primarily owned by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIE”). Creditors of these entities received ownership and/or security interests in the assets. The assets of the consolidated VIEs will be used to settle the liabilities of those entities and, except for the Company’s interest in the VIEs, are not available to the creditors or any affiliates of CIT.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 21

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Secured Borrowings and Pledged Assets Summary⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾ (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Secured Borrowing		Pledged Assets		Secured Borrowing		Pledged Assets
Rail⁽³⁾	$	1,218.4	$	1,760.1	$	931.0	$	1,163.1
Aerospace⁽³⁾		2,475.5		3,775.8		2,366.1		4,126.7
International Finance		596.3		746.5		583.5		748.1
Subtotal – Transportation & International Finance		4,290.2		6,282.4		3,880.6		6,037.9
Corporate Finance		129.7		151.5		320.2		447.4
Real Estate Finance		160.0		204.4		–		–
Commercial Services		334.7		1,786.9		334.7		1,453.2
Equipment Finance		1,776.5		2,306.5		1,227.3		1,499.7
Subtotal – North American Commercial Finance		2,400.9		4,449.3		1,882.2		3,400.3
Small Business Loan – Non-Strategic Portfolios		–		–		190.1		220.1
Total	$	6,691.1	$	10,731.7	$	5,952.9	$	9,658.3

⁽¹⁾

As part of our liquidity management strategy, the Company pledges assets to secure financing transactions (which include securitizations), and for other purposes as required or permitted by law while CIT Bank also pledges assets to secure borrowings from the FHLB and FRB.

⁽²⁾

At September 30, 2014, we had pledged assets (including collateral for the FRB discount window not in the table above) of $12.3 billion, which included $6.3 billion of loans (including amounts held for sale), $4.8 billion of operating lease equipment, $1.0 billion of cash and $0.2 billion of investment securities.

⁽³⁾

At September 30, 2014, the GSI TRS related borrowings and pledged assets, respectively, of $1,238.5 million and $1,699.7 million were included in Transportation & International Finance. The GSI TRS is described in Note 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments.

The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Seattle and may borrow under a line of credit that is secured by collateral pledged to FHLB Seattle. CIT Bank has $160 million outstanding under the line and $204 million of commercial real estate assets were pledged as collateral at September 30, 2014. A subsidiary of the Bank is a member of the FHLB Des Moines and may borrow under lines of credit that are secured by a blanket lien on the subsidiary’s assets and collateral pledged to FHLB Des Moines. At September 30, 2014, $148 million of collateral was pledged and $130 million of advances were outstanding with FHLB Des Moines.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company utilizes VIEs in the ordinary course of business to support its own and its customers’ financing needs. Each VIE is a separate legal entity and maintains its own books and records.

The most significant types of VIEs that CIT utilizes are ‘on balance sheet’ secured financings of pools of leases and loans originated by the Company where the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company originates pools of assets and sells these to special purpose entities, which, in turn, issue debt instruments backed by the asset pools or sells individual interests in the assets to investors. CIT retains the servicing rights and participates in certain cash flows. These VIEs are typically organized as trusts or limited liability companies, and are intended to be bankruptcy remote, from a legal standpoint.

The main risks inherent in these secured borrowing structures are deterioration in the credit performance of the vehicle’s underlying asset portfolio and risk associated with the servicing of the underlying assets.

Lenders typically have recourse to the assets in the VIEs and may benefit from other credit enhancements, such as: (1) a reserve or cash collateral account that requires the Company to deposit cash in an account, which will first be used to cover any defaulted obligor payments, (2) over-collateralization in the form of excess assets in the VIE, or (3) subordination, whereby the Company retains a subordinate position in the secured borrowing which would absorb losses due to defaulted obligor payments before the senior certificate holders. The VIE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the debt issued by the VIEs to match the underlying assets or to limit or change the risk of the VIE.

With respect to events or circumstances that could expose CIT to a loss, as these are accounted for as on balance sheet, the Company records an allowance for loan losses for the credit risks associated with the underlying leases and loans. The VIE has an obligation to pay the debt in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements.

Generally, third-party investors in the obligations of the consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have recourse to the Company beyond certain specific provisions that are customary for secured

22 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

financing transactions, such as asset repurchase obligations for breaches of representations and warranties. In addition, the assets are generally restricted to pay only such liabilities.

NOTE 8 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

As part of managing economic risk and exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk, the Company primarily enters into derivative transactions in over-the-counter markets with other financial institutions. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) includes measures to broaden the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation by requiring clearing and exchange trading of certain derivatives, and imposing margin, reporting and registration requirements for certain market participants. Since the Company does not meet the definition of a Swap Dealer or Major Swap Participant under the Act, the new reporting and clearing obligations, which became effective April 10, 2013, apply to a limited number of derivative transactions executed with its lending customers in order to manage their interest rate risk.

SeeNote 1 — “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our December 31, 2013 Form 10-K for further description of the Company’s derivative transaction policies.

The following table presents fair values and notional values of derivative financial instruments:

Fair and Notional Values of Derivative Financial Instruments⁽¹⁾ (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014							December 31, 2013
Qualifying Hedges	Notional Amount		Asset Fair Value		Liability Fair Value			Notional Amount		Asset Fair Value		Liability Fair Value
Cross currency swaps – net investment hedges	$	–	$	–	$	–		$	47.1	$	1.1	$	–
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges		–		–		–			3.8		–		(0.3	)
Foreign currency forward contracts – net investment hedges		1,410.9		46.6		(7.6	)		1,436.8		11.8		(23.8	)
Total Qualifying Hedges		1,410.9		46.6		(7.6	)		1,487.7		12.9		(24.1	)
Non-Qualifying Hedges
Cross currency swaps		–		–		–			131.8		6.3		–
Interest rate swaps		1,733.3		10.0		(19.0	)		1,386.0		5.7		(25.4	)
Written options		2,527.8		–		(2.7	)		566.0		–		(1.0	)
Purchased options		1,359.3		0.7		–			816.8		1.2		–
Foreign currency forward contracts		1,945.4		63.5		(17.3	)		1,979.9		23.4		(50.8	)
TRS		1,077.6		–		(13.4	)		485.2		–		(9.7	)
Equity Warrants		1.0		–		–			1.0		0.8		–
Total Non-qualifying Hedges		8,644.4		74.2		(52.4	)		5,366.7		37.4		(86.9	)
Total Hedges	$	10,055.3	$	120.8	$	(60.0	)	$	6,854.4	$	50.3	$	(111.0	)

⁽¹⁾

Presented on a gross basis.

Total Return Swaps

Two financing facilities between two wholly-owned subsidiaries of CIT and Goldman Sachs International (“GSI”) are structured as total return swaps (“TRS”), under which amounts available for advances are accounted for as derivatives. Pursuant to applicable accounting guidance, only the unutilized portion of the TRS is accounted for as a derivative and recorded at its estimated fair value. The size of the CIT Financial Ltd. (“CFL”) facility is $1.5 billion and the CIT TRS Funding B.V. (“BV”) facility is $625 million.

The aggregate “notional amounts” of the total return swaps of $1,077.6 million at September 30, 2014 and $485.2 million at December 31, 2013 represent the aggregate unused portions under the CFL and BV facilities and constitute derivative financial instruments. These notional amounts are calculated as the maximum aggregate facility commitment amounts, currently $2,125.0 million, less the aggregate actual adjusted qualifying borrowing base outstanding of $1,047.4 million at September 30, 2014 and $1,639.8 million at December 31, 2013 under the CFL and BV Facilities. The notional amounts of the derivatives will increase as the adjusted qualifying borrowing base decreases due to repayment of the underlying asset-backed securities (ABS) to investors. If CIT funds additional ABS under the CFL or BV Facilities, the aggregate adjusted qualifying borrowing base of the total return swaps will increase and the notional amount of the derivatives will decrease accordingly.

In April 2014, the Company sold its student loan assets and extinguished the debt of $787 million, which was secured by these loans. This debt secured reference obligations under the TRS. The extinguishment of the debt was the primary cause of the increase of the notional amount related to the TRS to $1,077.6 million.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 23

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Valuation of the derivatives related to the GSI facilities is based on several factors using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology, including:

CIT’s funding costs for similar financings based on current market conditions;

Forecasted usage of the facilities through the final maturity date in 2028; and

Forecasted amortization, including prepayment assumptions, due to principal payments on the underlying ABS, which impacts the amount of the unutilized portion.

Based on the Company’s valuation, the liability related to the GSI facilities was $13.4 million at September 30, 2014, compared to zero at June 30, 2014 and $9.7 million at December 31, 2013. The change in value of $13.4 million was recognized as a reduction to Other Income in the third quarter, while the nine month amount was a reduction of $3.7 million.

Impact of Collateral and Netting Arrangements on the Total Derivative Portfolio

The following tables present a summary, at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, of the gross amounts of recognized financial assets and liabilities; the amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheet; the net amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheet; the amounts subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement that were not included in the offset amount above, and the amount of cash collateral received or pledged. Substantially all of the derivative transactions are under an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreement.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities (dollars in millions)

									Gross Amounts not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)			Gross Amount Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Net Amount Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Derivative Financial Instruments⁽¹⁾			Cash Collateral Pledged/(Received)⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾			Net Amount
September 30, 2014
Derivative assets	$	120.8		$	–	$	120.8		$	(25.9	)	$	(79.4	)	$	15.5
Derivative liabilities		(60.0	)		–		(60.0	)		25.9			2.8			(31.3	)
December 31, 2013
Derivative assets	$	50.3		$	–	$	50.3		$	(33.4	)	$	(5.0	)	$	11.9
Derivative liabilities		(111.0	)		–		(111.0	)		33.4			41.0			(36.6	)

⁽¹⁾

The Company’s derivative transactions are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlements of certain payments as well as offsetting of all contracts (“Derivative Financial Instruments”) with a given counterparty in the event of bankruptcy or default of one of the two parties to the transaction. We believe our ISDA agreements meet the definition of a master netting arrangement or similar agreement for purposes of the above disclosure. In conjunction with the ISDA agreements, the Company has entered into collateral arrangements with its counterparties which provide for the exchange of cash depending on the change in the market valuation of the derivative contracts outstanding. Such collateral is available to be applied in settlement of the net balances upon an event of default by one of the counterparties.

⁽²⁾

Collateral pledged or received is included in Other assets or Other liabilities, respectively.

24 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table presents the impact of derivatives on the statements of operations:

Derivative Instrument Gains and Losses (dollars in millions)

		Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Derivative Instruments	Gain/(Loss) Recognized	2014			2013			2014			2013
Qualifying Hedges
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges	Other income	$	–		$	–		$	–		$	0.7
Total Qualifying Hedges			–			–			–			0.7
Non Qualifying Hedges
Cross currency swaps	Other income		–			(2.7	)		4.1			7.3
Interest rate swaps	Other income		2.1			3.3			5.9			15.0
Interest rate options	Other income		(2.2	)		(0.2	)		(2.4	)		–
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income		80.7			(60.9	)		67.2			(15.5	)
Equity warrants	Other income		(0.3	)		0.1			(0.8	)		0.3
TRS	Other income		(13.4	)		–			(3.7	)		(2.2	)
Total Non-qualifying Hedges			66.9			(60.4	)		70.3			4.9
Total derivatives-income statement impact		$	66.9		$	(60.4	)	$	70.3		$	5.6

The following table presents the changes in AOCI relating to derivatives:

Changes in AOCI Relating to Derivatives (dollars in millions)

Contract Type	Derivatives – effective portion reclassified from AOCI to income			Hedge ineffectiveness recorded directly in income		Total income statement impact			Derivatives – effective portion recorded in OCI			Total change in OCI for period
Quarter Ended September 30, 2014
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges	$	–		$	–	$	–		$	0.2		$	0.2
Foreign currency forward contracts – net investment hedges		(6.7	)		–		(6.7	)		82.0			88.7
Cross currency swaps – net investment hedges		–			–		–			–			–
Total	$	(6.7	)	$	–	$	(6.7	)	$	82.2		$	88.9
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges	$	–		$	–	$	–		$	–		$	–
Foreign currency forward contracts – net investment hedges		0.1			–		0.1			(40.5	)		(40.6	)
Cross currency swaps – net investment hedges		–			–		–			(2.9	)		(2.9	)
Total	$	0.1		$	–	$	0.1	��	$	(43.4	)	$	(43.5	)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges	$	–		$	–	$	–		$	0.2		$	0.2
Foreign currency forward contracts – net investment hedges		(12.8	)		–		(12.8	)		63.5			76.3
Cross currency swaps – net investment hedges		–			–		–			1.1			1.1
Total	$	(12.8	)	$	–	$	(12.8	)	$	64.8		$	77.6
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Foreign currency forward contracts – cash flow hedges	$	0.7		$	–	$	0.7		$	0.7		$	–
Foreign currency forward contracts – net investment hedges		(7.7	)		–		(7.7	)		3.5			11.2
Cross currency swaps – net investment hedges		(0.1	)		–		(0.1	)		5.8			5.9
Total	$	(7.1	)	$	–	$	(7.1	)	$	10.0		$	17.1

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 25

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Company is required to report fair value measurements for specified classes of assets and liabilities. SeeNote 1 — “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our December 31, 2013 Form 10-K for further description of the Company’s fair value measurement policy.

The Company characterizes inputs in the determination of fair value according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities where the measurement objective specifically requires the use of fair value are set forth in the tables below:

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis (dollars in millions)

September 30, 2014	Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Debt Securities AFS	$	342.0		$	12.7	$	329.3		$	–
Equity Securities AFS		14.0			14.0		–			–
Trading assets at fair value – derivatives		74.2			–		74.2			–
Derivative counterparty assets at fair value		46.6			–		46.6			–
Total Assets	$	476.8		$	26.7	$	450.1		$	–
Liabilities
Trading liabilities at fair value – derivatives	$	(52.4	)	$	–	$	(39.0	)	$	(13.4	)
Derivative counterparty liabilities at fair value		(7.6	)		–		(7.6	)		–
Total Liabilities	$	(60.0	)	$	–	$	(46.6	)	$	(13.4	)
December 31, 2013
Assets
Debt Securities AFS	$	1,487.8		$	675.9	$	811.9		$	–
Equity Securities AFS		13.7			13.7		–			–
Trading assets at fair value – derivatives		37.4			–		37.4			–
Derivative counterparty assets at fair value		12.9			–		12.9			–
Total	$	1,551.8		$	689.6	$	862.2		$	–
Liabilities
Trading liabilities at fair value – derivatives	$	(86.9	)	$	–	$	(77.2	)	$	(9.7	)
Derivative counterparty liabilities at fair value		(24.1	)		–		(24.1	)		–
Total	$	(111.0	)	$	–	$	(101.3	)	$	(9.7	)

26 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table presents financial instruments for which a non-recurring change in fair value has been recorded:

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis (dollars in millions)

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Gains and (Losses)
Assets
September 30, 2014
Assets held for sale	$	782.8	$	–	$	–	$	782.8	$	(61.7	)
Impaired loans		45.8		–		–		45.8		(7.1	)
Total	$	828.6	$	–	$	–	$	828.6	$	(68.8	)
December 31, 2013
Assets held for sale	$	731.1	$	–	$	–	$	731.1	$	(59.4	)
Impaired loans		18.5		–		–		18.5		(1.6	)
Total	$	749.6	$	–	$	–	$	749.6	$	(61.0	)

Loans are transferred from held for investment (“HFI”) to Assets held for sale (“HFS”) at the lower of cost or fair value. At the time of transfer, a write-down of the loan is recorded as a charge-off, if applicable. Once classified as HFS, the amount by which the carrying value exceeds fair value is recorded as a valuation allowance.

Impaired finance receivables of $500,000 or greater that are placed on non-accrual status are subject to periodic individual review in conjunction with the Company’s ongoing problem loan management (PLM) function. Impairment occurs when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CIT will be unable to collect all amounts due according to contractual terms of the agreement. Impairment is measured as the shortfall between estimated value and recorded investment in the finance receivable, with the estimated value determined using fair value of collateral and other cash flows if the finance receivable is collateralized, or the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the contract’s effective interest rate.

Level 3 Gains and Losses

The tables below set forth a summary of changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

Changes in Fair Value of Level 3 Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis (dollars in millions)

	Total			Derivatives
December 31, 2013	$	(9.7	)	$	(9.7	)
Gains or losses realized/unrealized
Included in Other Income		(3.7	)		(3.7	)
September 30, 2014	$	(13.4	)	$	(13.4	)
December 31, 2012	$	(5.8	)	$	(5.8	)
Gains or losses realized/unrealized
Included in Other Income		(2.2	)		(2.2	)
September 30, 2013	$	(8.0	)	$	(8.0	)

Level 3 liabilities at September 30, 2014 and 2013 represent the valuation of the derivatives related to the GSI facilities.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 27

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying and estimated fair values of financial instruments presented below exclude leases and certain other assets and liabilities, for which disclosure is not required.

Estimated Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value			Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value
Assets
Trading assets at fair value – derivatives	$	74.2		$	74.2		$	37.4		$	37.4
Derivative counterparty assets at fair value		46.6			46.6			12.9			12.9
Assets held for sale (excluding leases)		467.9			482.5			415.2			416.4
Loans (excluding leases)		13,223.6			13,102.4			12,619.4			12,681.6
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		650.0			650.0			–			–
Investment securities		792.4			797.6			2,630.7			2,629.2
Other assets subject to fair value disclosure and unsecured counterparty receivables⁽¹⁾		880.3			880.3			586.5			586.5
Liabilities
Deposits⁽²⁾		(14,533.6	)		(14,698.3	)		(12,565.0	)		(12,751.9	)
Trading liabilities at fair value – derivatives		(52.4	)		(52.4	)		(86.9	)		(86.9	)
Derivative counterparty liabilities at fair value		(7.6	)		(7.6	)		(24.1	)		(24.1	)
Long-term borrowings⁽²⁾		(19,052.5	)		(19,459.8	)		(18,693.1	)		(19,340.8	)
Other liabilities subject to fair value disclosure⁽³⁾		(1,941.6	)		(1,941.6	)		(1,919.1	)		(1,919.1	)

⁽¹⁾

Other assets subject to fair value disclosure primarily include accrued interest receivable and miscellaneous receivables. These assets have carrying values that approximate fair value generally due to the short-term nature and are classified as level 3. The unsecured counterparty receivables primarily consist of amounts owed to CIT from GSI for debt discount, return of collateral posted to GSI and settlements resulting from market value changes to asset-backed securities underlying the GSI Facilities

⁽²⁾

Deposits and long-term borrowings include accrued interest, which is included in “Other liabilities” in the Balance Sheet.

⁽³⁾

Other liabilities subject to fair value disclosure include accounts payable, accrued liabilities, customer security and maintenance deposits and miscellaneous liabilities. The fair value of these approximate carrying value and are classified as level 3.

Assumptions Used to Value Financial Instruments

Derivatives – The estimated fair values of derivatives were calculated internally using observable market data and represent the net amount receivable or payable to terminate, taking into account current market rates, which represent Level 2 inputs, except for the TRS derivative that utilized Level 3 inputs. SeeNote 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments for notional principal amounts and fair values.

Assets held for sale – Assets held for sale are recorded at lower of cost or fair value on the balance sheet. Most of the assets are subject to a binding contract, current letter of intent or other third-party valuation, which are Level 3 inputs. For the remaining assets, the fair value is generally determined using internally generated valuations or discounted cash flow analysis, which are considered Level 3 inputs. Commercial loans are generally valued individually, while small-ticket commercial loans are valued on an aggregate portfolio basis.

Loans – Since there is no liquid secondary market for most loans in the Company’s portfolio, the fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses which use Level 3 inputs. In addition to the characteristics of the underlying contracts, key inputs to the analysis include interest rates, prepayment rates, and credit spreads. For the commercial loan portfolio, the market based credit spread inputs are derived from instruments with comparable credit risk characteristics obtained from independent third party vendors. As these Level 3 unobservable inputs are specific to individual loans / collateral types, management does not believe that sensitivity analysis of individual inputs is meaningful, but rather that sensitivity is more meaningfully assessed through the evaluation of aggregate carrying values of the loans. The fair value of loans at September 30, 2014 was $13.1 billion, which is 99.1% of carrying value.

28 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Impaired Loans – The value of impaired loans is estimated using the fair value of collateral (on an orderly liquidation basis) if the loan is collateralized, or the present value of expected cash flows utilizing the current market rate for such loan. As these Level 3 unobservable inputs are specific to individual loans / collateral types, management does not believe that sensitivity analysis of individual inputs is meaningful, but rather that sensitivity is more meaningfully assessed through the evaluation of aggregate carrying values of impaired loans relative to contractual amounts owed (unpaid principal balance or “UPB”) from customers. As of September 30, 2014, the UPB related to impaired loans, including loans for which the Company is applying the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality), totaled $249.8 million. Including related allowances, these loans are carried at $191.0 million, or 77% of UPB. Of these amounts, $171.8 million and $155.3 million of UPB and carrying value, respectively, relate to loans with no specific allowance. The difference between UPB and carrying value reflects cumulative charge-offs on accounts remaining in process of collection, FSA discounts and allowances. SeeNote 3 — Loans for more information.

Securities purchased under agreements to resell – The estimated fair values of securities purchased under agreements to resell were calculated internally based on discounted cash flows that utilize observable market rates for the applicable maturity and which represent Level 2 inputs.

Investment Securities – Debt and equity securities classified as AFS are carried at fair value, as determined either by Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. Debt securities classified as AFS included investments in U.S. Treasury and federal government agency securities and were valued using Level 2 inputs, primarily quoted prices for similar securities. Certain equity securities classified as AFS were valued using Level 1 inputs, primarily quoted prices in active markets, while other equity securities used Level 2 inputs, due to being less frequently traded or having limited quoted market prices. Debt securities classified as HTM are securities that the Company has both the ability and the intent to hold until maturity and are carried at amortized cost and periodically assessed for OTTI, with the cost basis reduced when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. Non-marketable equity investments are generally recorded under the cost or equity method of accounting and are periodically assessed for OTTI, with the net asset values reduced when impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary. For investments in limited equity partnership interests, we use the net asset value provided by the fund manager as an appropriate measure of fair value.

Deposits – The fair value of deposits was estimated based upon a present value discounted cash flow analysis. Discount rates used in the present value calculation are based on the Company’s average current deposit rates for similar terms, which are Level 3 inputs.

Long-term borrowings – Unsecured borrowings of approximately $12.3 billion par value at September 30, 2014, were valued based on quoted market prices, which are Level 1 inputs. Approximately $1.9 billion par value of the secured borrowings at September 30, 2014 utilized market inputs to estimate fair value, which are Level 2 inputs. Where market estimates were not available for approximately $4.8 billion par value at September 30, 2014, fair values were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis with a discount rate approximating current market rates for issuances by CIT of similar term debt, which are Level 3 inputs.

NOTE 10 — REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Company and the Bank are each subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require that the Company and the Bank each maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets, subject to any agreement with regulators to maintain higher capital levels.

The calculation of the Company’s regulatory capital ratios are subject to review and consultation with the FRB, which may result in refinements to amounts reported at September 30, 2014.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 29

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital Components (dollars in millions)

	CIT						CIT Bank
Tier 1 Capital	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Total stockholders’ equity	$	9,005.2		$	8,838.8		$	2,682.6		$	2,596.6
Effect of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive loss excluded from Tier 1 Capital and qualifying noncontrolling interest		17.8			24.2			–			–
Adjusted total equity		9,023.0			8,863.0			2,682.6			2,596.6
Less: Goodwill⁽¹⁾		(557.3	)		(338.3	)		(159.5	)		–
Disallowed deferred tax assets		(333.9	)		(26.6	)		–			–
Disallowed intangible assets⁽¹⁾		(33.5	)		(20.3	)		(18.7	)		–
Investment in certain unconsolidated subsidiaries		(30.6	)		(32.3	)		–			–
Other Tier 1 components⁽²⁾		(6.0	)		(6.0	)		–			–
Tier 1 Capital		8,061.7			8,439.5			2,504.4			2,596.6
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying allowance for credit losses and other reserves⁽³⁾		391.3			383.9			240.7			193.6
Less: Investment in certain unconsolidated subsidiaries		(30.6	)		(32.3	)		–			–
Other Tier 2 components⁽⁴⁾		–			0.1			–			–
Total qualifying capital	$	8,422.4		$	8,791.2		$	2,745.1		$	2,790.2
Risk-weighted assets	$	56,212.0		$	50,571.2		$	19,220.2		$	15,451.9
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Actual		15.0	%		17.4	%		14.3	%		18.1	%
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes to be well capitalized		10.0	%		10.0	%		10.0	%		10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Actual		14.3	%		16.7	%		13.0	%		16.8	%
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes to be well capitalized		6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio:
Actual		18.1	%		18.1	%		13.2	%		16.9	%
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes		4.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%		5.0	%

⁽¹⁾

Goodwill and disallowed intangible assets adjustments also reflect the portion included within assets held for sale.

⁽²⁾

Includes the Tier 1 capital charge for nonfinancial equity investments and the Tier 1 capital deduction for net unrealized losses on available-for-sale marketable securities (net of tax).

⁽³⁾

“Other reserves” represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and deferred purchase agreements, all of which are recorded in Other Liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾

Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income tax benefit in the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $401.2 million and $369.6 million, respectively. This compares to income tax provision of $13.2 million in the year-ago third quarter and $55.3 million in the year-ago nine months period. Included in the discrete tax benefit of $400.6 million and $394.6 million for the current quarter and year to date, respectively, was a $375 million reduction to the U.S. net federal deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and approximately $30 million tax benefit related to an adjustment to the U.S. federal and state valuation allowances due to the acquisition of Direct Capital, offset partially by other miscellaneous net tax expense items. Included in the year-ago nine months period income tax provision was approximately $12 million of net discrete tax expense that primarily related to the establishment of valuation allowances against certain international net deferred tax assets due to our international platform rationalizations, partially offset by incremental tax benefits associated with favorable settlements of prior year international tax audits. Excluding discrete items, the income tax provisions primarily reflected income tax expense on the earnings of certain international operations and state income tax expense in the U.S.

The change in the effective tax rate each period is impacted by a number of factors, including the relative mix of domestic and foreign earnings, adjustments to the valuation

30 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

allowances, and discrete items. The actual year-end 2014 effective tax rate may vary from the currently projected tax rate due to changes in these factors.

As of December 31, 2013, CIT had cumulative U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forwards (NOLs) of $5.2 billion, of which $2.6 billion was related to pre-emergence losses. These NOLs will expire between 2027 and 2033. The Company generated a modest amount of domestic taxable income year-to-date, which marginally decreased the U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forwards and its respective valuation allowance. Pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company is generally subject to a $230 million annual limitation on the use of its $2.6 billion of pre-emergence NOLs, of which approximately $685 million is no longer subject to the limitation. NOLs arising in post-emergence years are not subject to this limitation absent an ownership change as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for U.S. tax purposes.

As noted in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K and most recently in our June 30, 2014 Form 10-Q, the Company has not previously recognized any tax benefit on its prior year U.S. federal and U.S. state net operating losses (“NOLs”) and certain prior year foreign NOLs due to uncertainties related to its ability to realize its net deferred tax assets in the future. Due to these uncertainties, combined with the three years of cumulative losses by certain domestic and foreign reporting entities, the Company had concluded that it did not meet the criteria to recognize its net deferred tax assets, inclusive of the deferred tax assets related to the NOLs in these entities. Accordingly, the Company maintained a valuation allowance of $1.5 billion against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013. Of the $1.5 billion valuation allowance, approximately $1.3 billion related to domestic reporting entities ($0.9 billion U.S. federal and $0.4 billion U.S. state) and $211 million related to foreign reporting entities.

The determination of whether or not to maintain the valuation allowances on certain reporting entities’ net deferred tax assets requires significant judgment and an analysis of all positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that these future benefits will be realized. ASC 740-10-30-18 states that “future realization of the tax benefit of an existing deductible temporary difference or NOL carry-forward ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback and carry-forward periods available under the tax law.” As such, the Company has considered the following potential sources of taxable income in its assessment of a reporting entity’s ability to recognize its net deferred tax asset:

Taxable income in carryback years,

Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences (deferred tax liabilities),

Prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, and

Future taxable income forecasts.

During the third quarter, management concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income within the applicable carry-forward periods to realize $375 million of its $930 million U.S. net federal deferred tax assets. This conclusion was reached after weighing all of the evidence and determining that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence. No discrete reduction to the valuation allowance related to the U.S net state deferred tax assets or the capital loss carry-forwards was recorded in the quarter. In the U.S., the Company files a U.S. consolidated federal tax return, combined unitary state tax returns, and separate state tax returns in various jurisdictions. Thus, the tax reporting entity for U.S. federal tax purposes and U.S. state combined filing purposes is the “U.S. Affiliated Group”, while the reporting entities for the separate state income tax returns are select individual affiliated group members. The positive evidence supporting this conclusion is as follows:

The U.S. Affiliated Group transitioned into a 3-year (12 quarter) cumulative normalized income position this quarter, resulting in the Company’s ability to significantly increase the reliance on future taxable income forecasts.

Management’s long-term forecast of future U.S. taxable income supports partial utilization of the U.S. federal NOLs prior to their expiration.

The federal NOLs will not expire until 2027 through 2033.

The forecast of future taxable income for the Company reflects a long-term view of growth and returns that management believes is more likely than not of being realized.

For the U.S. state valuation allowance, the Company analyzed the state net operating loss carry-forwards for each reporting entity to determine the amounts that are expected to expire unused. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the existing valuation allowance was still required on the U.S. state deferred tax assets on net operating loss carry-forwards. Accordingly, no discrete adjustment was made to the U.S. State valuation allowance this quarter. The negative evidence supporting this conclusion is as follows:

Separate State filing entities remained in a three year cumulative loss.

State NOLs expiration periods vary in time and availability.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 31

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

positions mentioned in the “Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions” section below, against our U.S. federal and state NOLs and capital loss carry-forwards at the end of the year. The Company currently believes these NOLs will expire unused without the implementation of effective tax planning strategies or other events.

The ability to recognize the remaining valuation allowances against the U.S. federal and state NOLs, and capital loss carry-forwards net deferred tax assets will be evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if there are any significant events that would affect our ability to utilize these deferred tax assets. If events are identified that affect our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, the analysis will be updated to determine if any adjustments to the valuation allowances are required. Such events may include acquisitions that support the Company’s long-term business strategies while also enabling it to accelerate the utilization of its net operating losses, as evidenced by the acquisition of Direct Capital Corporation and the announced definitive agreement and plan of merger to acquire IMB Holdco LLC, the parent company of OneWest Bank N.A. (“OneWest Bank”).

The impact of the OneWest Bank transaction on the utilization of the Company’s NOLs cannot be considered in the Company’s forecast of future taxable income until the acquisition is consummated. The acquisition is expected to accelerate the utilization of the Company’s NOLs and therefore management anticipates it will reverse the remaining U.S. federal valuation allowance after consummation of the acquisition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the acquisition on the U.S. state NOLs and expects the acquisition to utilize some portion of these amounts which would cause a partial reduction to the U.S. state valuation allowance.

In the evaluation process related to the net deferred tax assets of the Company’s foreign reporting entities, uncertainties surrounding the international business plans, the recent international platform rationalizations, and the “cumulative losses in recent years” have made it challenging to reliably project future taxable income. The primary inputs for the forecast of future taxable income will continue to be identified as the business plans for the international operations evolve, and potential tax planning strategies are identified. Thus, as of this reporting period, the negative evidence continues to outweigh the positive evidence, and the Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance on these entities’ net deferred tax assets.

Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company’s potential liability for uncertain tax positions totaled $325.6 million at September 30, 2014 and $320.1 million at December 31, 2013. Management estimates that this liability may be reduced by up to $280 million within the next twelve months. Approximately $10 million of the reduction would impact the total income tax provision. The remaining $270 million reduction may impact the total income tax provision or could result in an increase to the Company’s deferred tax asset with an offsetting increase to its valuation allowance depending on the Company’s determination of the need for a valuation allowance. The Company’s accrued liability for interest and penalties totaled $13.9 million at September 30, 2014 and $13.3 million at December 31, 2013. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

NOTE 12 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table details the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014								December 31, 2013
	Gross Unrealized			Income Taxes		Net Unrealized			Gross Unrealized			Income Taxes			Net Unrealized
Foreign currency translation adjustments	$	(63.0	)	$	–	$	(63.0	)	$	(49.4	)	$	–		$	(49.4	)
Changes in benefit plan net gain (loss) and prior service (cost)/credit		(19.3	)		0.2		(19.1	)		(24.3	)		0.2			(24.1	)
Changes in fair values of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges		–			–		–			(0.2	)		–			(0.2	)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available for sale securities		–			–		–			0.2			(0.1	)		0.1
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(82.3	)	$	0.2	$	(82.1	)	$	(73.7	)	$	0.1		$	(73.6	)

32 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

The following table details the changes in the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income by Component(dollars in millions)

	Foreign currency translation adjustments			Changes in benefit plan net gain (loss) and prior service (cost) credit			Changes in fair values of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges			Unrealized net gains (losses) on available for sale securities			Total AOCI
Balance as of December 31, 2013	$	(49.4	)	$	(24.1	)	$	(0.2	)	$	0.1		$	(73.6	)
AOCI activity before reclassifications		(20.9	)		–			0.2			(0.6	)		(21.3	)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI		7.3			5.0			–			0.5			12.8
Net current period AOCI		(13.6	)		5.0			0.2			(0.1	)		(8.5	)
Balance as of September 30, 2014	$	(63.0	)	$	(19.1	)	$	–		$	–		$	(82.1	)
Balance as of December 31, 2012	$	(36.6	)	$	(43.1	)	$	(0.1	)	$	2.1		$	(77.7	)
AOCI activity before reclassifications		(16.5	)		0.7			0.7			(2.1	)		(17.2	)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI		7.5			(0.3	)		(0.7	)		0.4			6.9
Net current period AOCI		(9.0	)		0.4			–			(1.7	)		(10.3	)
Balance as of September 30, 2013	$	(45.6	)	$	(42.7	)	$	(0.1	)	$	0.4		$	(88.0	)

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The amounts included in the Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) are net of income taxes. The change in income taxes associated with changes in benefit plans net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit were not significant for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. The change in income taxes associated with net unrealized gains on available for sale securities was $0.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and $0.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. The change in income taxes associated with net unrealized gains on available for sale securities was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. There were no income taxes associated with foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in fair values of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.

The changes in benefit plans net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit reclassification adjustments impacting net income was $1.7 million and $0.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and $5.0 million and $(0.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively. Foreign currency translation reclassification adjustments impacting net income were $4.9 million and $(0.1) million for the quarters ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and were $7.3 million and $7.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, respectively. Reclassification adjustments impacting net income for unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities was $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and was insignificant and $0.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Reclassification adjustments impacting net income related to changes in fair value of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges was insignificant for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and was insignificant for the prior year quarter and $(0.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The Company has operations in Canada and other countries. The functional currency for foreign operations is generally the local currency. The value of assets and liabilities of these operations is translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. The resulting foreign currency translation gains and losses, as well as offsetting gains and losses on hedges of net investments in foreign operations, are reflected in AOCI. Transaction gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded in Other Income.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 33

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended September 30,															Nine Months Ended September 30,																Affected Income Statement
	2014							2013								2014							2013									line item
	Gross Amount		Tax			Net Amount		Gross Amount			Tax		Net Amount			Gross Amount		Tax			Net Amount		Gross Amount			Tax			Net Amount
Foreign currency translation adjustments gains (losses)	$	4.9	$	–		$	4.9	$	(0.1	)	$	–	$	(0.1	)	$	7.3	$	–		$	7.3	$	7.5		$	–		$	7.5			Operating Expenses
Changes in benefit plan net gain/(loss) and prior service (cost)/credit gains (losses)		1.7		–			1.7		0.1			–		0.1			5.0		–			5.0		(0.3	)		–			(0.3	)		Other Income
Changes in fair value of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges gains (losses)		–		–			–		–			–		–			–		–			–		(0.7	)		–			(0.7	)		Other Income
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available for sale securities		0.5		(0.2	)		0.3		–			–		–			0.8		(0.3	)		0.5		0.7			(0.3	)		0.4			Other Income
Total Reclassifications out of AOCI	$	7.1	$	(0.2	)	$	6.9	$	–		$	–	$	–		$	13.1	$	(0.3	)	$	12.8	$	7.2		$	(0.3	)	$	6.9

NOTE 13 — COMMITMENTS

Commitments (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014
	Due to Expire						December 31, 2013
	Within One Year		After One Year		Total Outstanding		Total Outstanding
Financing Commitments
Financing and leasing assets	$	1,033.0	$	3,896.9	$	4,929.9	$	4,325.8
Letters of credit
Standby letters of credit		24.8		349.3		374.1		302.3
Other letters of credit		27.4		–		27.4		35.9
Guarantees
Deferred purchase agreements		1,920.2		–		1,920.2		1,771.6
Guarantees, acceptances and other recourse obligations		3.2		–		3.2		3.9
Purchase and Funding Commitments
Aerospace manufacturer purchase commitments		779.6		8,812.7		9,592.3		8,744.5
Rail and other manufacturer purchase commitments		695.1		380.7		1,075.8		1,054.0

Financing Commitments

Financing commitments, referred to as loan commitments or lines of credit, reflect CIT’s agreements to lend to its customers, subject to the customers’ compliance with contractual obligations. Included in the above are commitments that have been extended to and accepted by customers, clients or agents, but on which the criteria for funding have not been completed of $789 million at September 30, 2014 and $548 million at December 31, 2013. Financing commitments also include credit line agreements to Commercial Services clients that are cancellable by us only after a notice period. The notice period is typically 90 days or less. The amount available under these credit lines, net of the amount of receivables assigned to us, is $236 million at September 30, 2014. As financing commitments may not be fully drawn, may expire unused, may be reduced or cancelled at the customer’s request, or may require the customer to be in compliance with certain conditions, total commitment amounts do not necessarily reflect actual future cash flow requirements.

The table above includes approximately $1.1 billion of undrawn financing commitments at September 30, 2014 and $0.9 billion at December 31, 2013 where CIT does not have the contractual obligation to lend as the customer is not in compliance with contractual obligations.

At September 30, 2014, substantially all undrawn financing commitments were senior facilities. Most of the Company’s undrawn and available financing commitments are in the Corporate Finance division.

The table above excludes uncommitted revolving credit facilities extended by Commercial Services to its clients for

34 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

working capital purposes. In connection with these facilities, Commercial Services has the sole discretion throughout the duration of these facilities to determine the amount of credit that may be made available to its clients at any time and whether to honor any specific advance requests made by its clients under these credit facilities.

Letters of Credit

In the normal course of meeting the needs of clients, CIT sometimes enters into agreements to provide financing and letters of credit. Standby letters of credit obligate the issuer of the letter of credit to pay the beneficiary if a client on whose behalf the letter of credit was issued does not meet its obligation. These financial instruments generate fees and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To minimize potential credit risk, CIT generally requires collateral and in some cases additional forms of credit support from the client. Most of the Company’s letters of credit are in the Corporate Finance division.

Deferred Purchase Agreements

A Deferred Purchase Agreement (“DPA”) is provided in conjunction with Commercial Services factoring, whereby CIT provides a client with credit protection for trade receivables without purchasing the receivables. The trade receivable terms are generally sixty days or less. If the client’s customer is unable to pay an undisputed receivable solely as the result of credit risk, then CIT purchases the receivable from the client. The outstanding amount in the table above is the maximum potential exposure that CIT would be required to pay under all DPAs. This maximum amount would only occur if all receivables subject to DPAs default in the manner described above, thereby requiring CIT to purchase all such receivables from the DPA clients.

The table above includes $1,836 million of DPA credit protection at September 30, 2014, related to receivables which have been presented to us for credit protection after shipment of goods has occurred and the customer has been invoiced. The table also includes $84 million available under DPA credit line agreements, net of amount of DPA credit protection provided at September 30, 2014. The DPA credit line agreements specify a contractually committed amount of DPA credit protection and are cancellable by us only after a notice period. The notice period is typically 90 days or less.

The methodology used to determine the DPA liability is similar to the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses associated with the finance receivables, which reflects embedded losses based on various factors, including expected losses reflecting the Company’s internal customer and facility credit ratings. The liability recorded in Other Liabilities related to the DPAs totaled $6.7 million and $6.0 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Purchase Commitments

CIT’s equipment purchase commitments relate primarily to purchases of commercial aircraft and rail equipment. Commitments to purchase new commercial aircraft are predominantly with Airbus Industries (“Airbus”), The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and Embraer S.A. (“Embraer”). Aerospace equipment purchases are contracted for specific models, using baseline aircraft specifications at fixed prices, which reflect discounts from list prices prevailing at the time of commitment. The delivery price of an aircraft may change depending on final specifications. Equipment purchases are recorded at the delivery date. The estimated commitment amounts in the preceding table are based on contracted purchase prices reduced for pre-delivery payments to date and exclude buyer furnished equipment selected by the lessee. Pursuant to existing contractual commitments, at September 30, 2014, 137 aircraft remain to be purchased from Airbus, Boeing and Embraer. Aircraft deliveries are scheduled periodically through 2020. Commitments exclude unexercised options to order additional aircraft. In July 2014, the Company signed memorandums of understanding with Airbus for the purchase of 20 commercial aircraft. These are not included in the above table.

The Company’s rail business entered into commitments to purchase railcars from multiple manufacturers. Pursuant to these contractual commitments, at September 30, 2014, approximately 7,500 railcars remain to be purchased with deliveries through 2016. Rail equipment purchase commitments are at fixed prices subject to price increases for certain materials. Other purchase commitments primarily relate to Equipment Finance.

Purchase commitments also include $0.2 billion of equipment to be purchased in 2014 pursuant to sale and lease-back agreements with airlines.

NOTE 14 — CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 35

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

pending, taken together, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, but may be material to the Company’s operating results or cash flows for any particular period, depending in part on its operating results for that period. The actual results of resolving such matters may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved.

For certain Litigation matters in which the Company is involved, the Company is able to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses in excess of established reserves and insurance. For other matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible, such an estimate cannot be determined. For Litigation where losses are reasonably possible, management currently estimates the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses as up to $90 million in excess of established reserves and insurance related to those matters, if any. This estimate represents reasonably possible losses (in excess of established reserves and insurance) over the life of such Litigation, which may span a currently indeterminable number of years, and is based on information currently available as of September 30, 2014. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from this estimate.

Those Litigation matters for which an estimate is not reasonably possible or as to which a loss does not appear to be reasonably possible, based on current information, are not included within this estimated range and, therefore, this estimated range does not represent the Company’s maximum loss exposure.

The foregoing statements about CIT’s Litigation are based on the Company’s judgments, assumptions, and estimates and are necessarily subjective and uncertain. Several of the Company’s Litigation matters are described below.

LAC-MÉGANTIC, QUEBEC DERAILMENT

On July 6, 2013, a freight train including five locomotives and seventy-two tank cars carrying crude oil derailed in the town of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec. Nine of the tank cars were owned by The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. (“CIT/EF”) (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) and leased to Western Petroleum Company (“WPC”), a subsidiary of World Fuel Services Corp. (“WFS”). Two of the locomotives are owned by CIT/EF and were leased to Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Ltd. (“MMA”), the railroad operating the freight train at the time of the derailment, a subsidiary of Rail World, Inc.

The derailment was followed by explosions and fire, which resulted in the deaths of over forty people and an unknown number of injuries, the destruction of more than thirty buildings in Lac-Mégantic, and the release of crude oil on land and into the Chaudiègere River. The extent of the property and environmental damage has not yet been determined. Twenty lawsuits have been filed in Illinois by representatives of the deceased in connection with the derailment. The Company is named as a defendant in seven of the Illinois lawsuits, together with 13 other defendants, including WPC, MMA (who has since been dismissed without prejudice as a result of its chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on August 7, 2013), and the lessors of the other locomotives and tank cars. Liability could be joint and several among some or all of the defendants. All but two of these cases have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Illinois and transferred to the U.S. District Court in Maine. The Company has been named as an additional defendant in a pending class action in the Superior Court of Quebec, Canada. Other cases may be filed in U.S. and Canadian courts. The plaintiffs in the pending U.S. and Canadian actions assert claims of negligence and strict liability based upon alleged design defect against the Company in connection with the CIT/EF tank cars. The Company has rights of indemnification and defense against its lessees, WPC and MMA (a debtor in bankruptcy), and also has rights as an additional insured under liability coverage maintained by the lessees. On July 28, 2014, the Company commenced a lawsuit against WPC in the U.S. District Court in the District of Minnesota to enforce its rights of indemnification and defense. In addition to its indemnification and insurance rights against its lessees, the Company and its subsidiaries maintain contingent and general liability insurance for claims of this nature, and the Company and its insurers are working cooperatively with respect to these claims.

The Lac-Mégantic derailment triggered a number of regulatory investigations and actions. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada issued its final report on the cause(s) of the derailment in September 2014. In addition, Quebec’s Environment Ministry has issued an order to WFS, WPC, MMA, and Canadian Pacific Railway (which allegedly subcontracted with MMA) to pay for the full cost of environmental clean-up and damage assessment related to the derailment.

As the Company is unable to predict the outcome of the foregoing legal proceedings or whether and the extent to which additional lawsuits or claims will be brought against the Company or its subsidiaries, the total damages have not been quantified, there are a large number of parties named as defendants, and the extent to which resulting liability will be assessed against other parties and their financial ability to bear such responsibilities is unknown, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the amount or range of loss that may be incurred in connection with the derailment. The Company is vigorously defending the claims that have been asserted, including pursuing its rights under indemnification agreements and insurance policies. MMA’s U.S. bankruptcy trustee together with its Canadian bankruptcy monitor are engaged in negotiations in pursuit of a global or close to global settlement with the various parties, including CIT.

36 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

BRAZILIAN TAX MATTERS

Banco Commercial Investment Trust do Brasil S.A. (“Banco CIT”), CIT’s Brazilian bank subsidiary, is pursuing a number of tax appeals relating to disputed local tax assessments on leasing services and importation of equipment. The disputes primarily involve questions of whether the correct taxing authorities were paid and whether the proper tax rate was applied.

ISS Tax Appeals

Notices of infraction were received relating to the payment of Imposto sobre Serviços (“ISS”), charged by municipalities in connection with services. The Brazilian municipalities of Itu and Cascavel claim that Banco CIT should have paid them ISS tax on leasing services for tax years 2006 – 2011. Instead, Banco CIT paid the ISS tax to Barueri, the municipality in which it is domiciled in São Paulo, Brazil. The disputed issue is whether the ISS tax should be paid to the municipality in which the leasing company is located or the municipality in which the services were rendered or the customer is located. One of the pending ISS tax matters was resolved in favor of Banco CIT in April 2014. The amounts claimed by the taxing authorities of Itu and Cascavel collectively for open tax assessments and penalties are approximately 454,000 Reais (approximately $186,000). Favorable legal precedent in a similar tax appeal has been issued by Brazil’s highest court resolving the conflict between municipalities.

ICMS Tax Appeals

Notices of infraction were received relating to the payment of Imposto sobre Circulaco de Mercadorias e Servicos (“ICMS”) taxes charged by states in connection with the importation of equipment. The state of São Paulo claims that Banco CIT should have paid it ICMS tax for tax years 2006 – 2009 because Banco CIT, the purchaser, is located in São Paulo. Instead, Banco CIT paid ICMS tax to the states of Espirito Santo, Espirito Santa Caterina, and Alagoas, where the imported equipment arrived. A recent regulation issued by São Paulo in December 2013 reaffirms a 2009 agreement by São Paulo to conditionally recognize ICMS tax payments made to Espirito Santo. One of the pending notices of infraction against Banco CIT related to taxes paid to Espirito Santo was extinguished in May 2014. Another assessment related to taxes paid to Espirito Santo in the amount of 63.6 million Reais ($26.0 million) was upheld in a ruling issued by the administrative court in May 2014. That ruling has been appealed. Petitions seeking recognition of the taxes paid to Espirito Santo have been filed with respect to the pending notices of infraction. Petitions were filed in a general amnesty program regarding all but one of the assessments related to taxes paid to Santa Caterina and Alagoas. Those petitions have resulted in the extinguishment of all but one of the Santa Caterina and Alagoas assessments. The amounts claimed by São Paulo collectively for open tax assessments and penalties are approximately 68.5 million Reais (approximately $28.0 million) for goods imported into the state of Espirito Santo from 2006 – 2009 and the state of Alagoas in 2008.

A notice of infraction was received relating to São Paulo’s challenge of the ICMS tax rate paid by Banco CIT for tax years 2004 – 2007. São Paulo alleges that Banco CIT paid a lower rate of ICMS tax on imported equipment than was required (8.8% instead of 18%). Banco CIT challenged the notice of infraction and was partially successful based upon the type of equipment imported. Banco CIT has commenced a judicial proceeding challenging the unfavorable portion of the administrative ruling. The amount claimed by São Paulo for tax assessments and penalties is approximately 4 million Reais (approximately $1.6 million).

The current potential aggregate exposure in taxes, fines and interest for the ISS and the ICMS tax matters is approximately 73 million Reais (approximately $29.8 million).

NOTE 15 — BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

Management’s Policy in Identifying Reportable Segments

CIT’s reportable segments are comprised of business units that are aggregated into segments primarily based upon industry categories, geography, target markets and customers served, and, to a lesser extent, the core competencies relating to product origination, distribution methods, operations and servicing and the nature of their regulatory environment. This segment reporting is consistent with the presentation of financial information to management.

Types of Products and Services

In December 2013, the Company announced organization changes that became effective January 1, 2014. Management changed its operating segments to (i) realign and simplify its businesses and organizational structure, (ii) streamline and consolidate certain business processes to achieve greater operating efficiencies, and (iii) leverage CIT’s operational capabilities for the benefit of its clients and customers. Effective January 1, 2014, CIT manages its business and reports financial results in three operating segments: (1) Transportation & International Finance (“TIF”); (2) North American Commercial Finance (“NACF”); and (3) Non-Strategic Portfolios (“NSP”).

The change in segment reporting does not affect CIT’s historical consolidated results of operations. The discussions below reflect the new reporting segments; all prior period comparisons have been conformed and are consistent with the presentation of financial information to management.

TIF offers secured lending and leasing products to midsize and larger companies across the aerospace, rail and maritime industries, as well as international finance, which includes corporate lending and equipment financing businesses in China and the U.K. Revenues generated by TIF include rents collected on leased assets, interest on loans, fees, and gains from assets sold.

NACF offers secured lending as well as other financial products and services predominately to small and midsize companies in the U.S. and Canada. These include secured revolving lines of credit and term loans, leases, accounts

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 37

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

receivable credit protection, accounts receivable collection, import and export financing, factoring, debtor-in-possession and turnaround financing and receivable advisory services. Revenues generated by NACF include interest earned on loans, rents collected on leased assets, fees and other revenue from leasing activities and capital markets transactions, and commissions earned on factoring and related activities.

NSP consists of portfolios that were determined to be subscale or no longer part of our long-term strategy. NSP at September 30, 2014 is primarily comprised of international portfolios, including certain portfolios in Latin America and Europe.

Segment Income Statement and Assets

In the table that follows, Corporate and Other includes certain non-allocated items such as unallocated interest expense, primarily related to corporate liquidity costs (Interest Expense), mark-to-market adjustments on non-qualifying derivatives (Other Income) and restructuring charges for severance and facilities exit activities (Operating Expenses).

Business Segments (dollars in millions)

	Transportation & International Finance			North American Commercial Finance			Non-Strategic Portfolios			Corporate & Other			Total CIT
Quarter Ended September 30, 2014
Interest income	$	68.8		$	215.8		$	20.4		$	3.3		$	308.3
Interest expense		(165.3	)		(74.2	)		(18.6	)		(17.1	)		(275.2	)
Provision for credit losses		(9.1	)		(29.7	)		0.7			(0.1	)		(38.2	)
Rental income on operating leases		501.4			24.7			8.9			–			535.0
Other income		18.8			71.1			(47.1	)		(18.6	)		24.2
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(132.8	)		(20.1	)		(3.5	)		–			(156.4	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		–			–			–			(46.5	)
Operating expenses		(73.8	)		(125.9	)		(16.9	)		(17.9	)		(234.5	)
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes	$	161.5		$	61.7		$	(56.1	)	$	(50.4	)	$	116.7
Quarter Ended September 30, 2013
Interest income	$	66.1		$	199.6		$	37.0		$	3.7		$	306.4
Interest expense		(146.4	)		(66.9	)		(29.9	)		(13.5	)		(256.7	)
Provision for credit losses		(6.0	)		(8.3	)		(2.2	)		0.1			(16.4	)
Rental income on operating leases		415.5			27.2			30.2			–			472.9
Other income		31.4			71.5			(1.1	)		2.7			104.5
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(106.1	)		(19.8	)		(8.3	)		–			(134.2	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(41.4	)		–			–			–			(41.4	)
Operating expenses		(62.5	)		(119.7	)		(36.2	)		(10.4	)		(228.8	)
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes	$	150.6		$	83.6		$	(10.5	)	$	(17.4	)	$	206.3
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
Interest income	$	217.7		$	618.0		$	74.4		$	10.2		$	920.3
Interest expense		(481.1	)		(211.2	)		(66.5	)		(50.5	)		(809.3	)
Provision for credit losses		(29.8	)		(55.5	)		0.4			(0.2	)		(85.1	)
Rental income on operating leases		1,446.1			72.6			27.8			–			1,546.5
Other income		36.4			202.6			(38.8	)		(11.2	)		189.0
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(386.1	)		(62.0	)		(14.4	)		–			(462.5	)
Maintenance and other operating lease costs		(147.1	)		–			–			–			(147.1	)
Operating expenses		(228.8	)		(367.6	)		(56.6	)		(40.0	)		(693.0	)
Loss on debt extinguishments		–			–			–			(0.4	)		(0.4	)
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes	$	427.3		$	196.9		$	(73.7	)	$	(92.1	)	$	458.4
Select Period End Balances
Loans	$	3,687.7		$	16,098.0		$	0.1		$	–		$	19,785.8
Credit balances of factoring clients		–			(1,433.2	)		–			–			(1,433.2	)
Assets held for sale		464.7			85.3			552.7			–			1,102.7
Operating lease equipment, net		14,931.2			252.6			–			–			15,183.8

38 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Business Segments (dollars in millions) (continued)

	Transportation & International Finance			North American Commercial Finance			Non-Strategic Portfolios			Corporate & Other			Total CIT
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Interest income	$	185.3		$	628.9		$	123.7		$	10.1		$	948.0
Interest expense		(434.4	)		(217.1	)		(99.5	)		(42.4	)		(793.4	)
Provision for credit losses		(4.1	)		(38.0	)		(8.6	)		0.2			(50.5	)
Rental income on operating leases		1,256.7			76.8			100.1			–			1,433.6
Other income		75.1			200.0			(27.0	)		5.6			253.7
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(320.3	)		(54.7	)		(26.1	)		–			(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease costs		(124.0	)		–			(0.1	)		–			(124.1	)
Operating expenses		(187.4	)		(366.2	)		(108.9	)		(23.3	)		(685.8	)
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit for income taxes	$	446.9		$	229.7		$	(46.4	)	$	(49.8	)	$	580.4
Select Period End Balances
Loans	$	3,239.5		$	14,454.2		$	677.3		$	–		$	18,371.0
Credit balances of factoring clients		–			(1,278.4	)		–			–			(1,278.4	)
Assets held for sale		82.4			32.2			1,007.6			–			1,122.2
Operating lease equipment, net		12,303.5			228.4			45.2			–			12,577.1

NOTE 16 — GOODWILL

The following table summarizes goodwill assets by segment:

Goodwill (dollars in millions)

	Transportation & International Finance		North American Commercial Finance		Total
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	183.1	$	151.5	$	334.6
Acquisitions, other⁽¹⁾		63.2		159.5		222.7
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	246.3	$	311.0	$	557.3

⁽¹⁾

Includes foreign exchange translation.

Goodwill balances as of December 31, 2013 represented the excess of reorganization equity value over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets, net of liabilities. Effective January 1, 2014, this goodwill was reallocated to the Company’s new TIF and NACF reporting units based on the respective reporting unit’s estimated fair value of equity. The Company evaluated goodwill for impairment immediately before and after the reallocation of goodwill to the reporting units and identified no impairment.

On January 31, 2014, CIT acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Paris-based Nacco, an independent full service railcar lessor in Europe. The Nacco acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method. The purchase price was approximately $250 million and the acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date resulting in approximately $70 million of goodwill. The assets acquired included approximately $650 million of leasing assets along with existing secured debt.

On August 1, 2014, CIT Bank acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Capital Direct Group and its subsidiaries (“Direct Capital”), a U.S. based lender providing equipment leasing and financing to small and mid-sized businesses operating across a range of industries. The Direct Capital acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method. The purchase price was approximately $230 million and the acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date resulting in approximately $160 million of goodwill. The assets acquired included finance receivables of approximately $540 million, along with existing secured debt of $487 million. In addition, intangible assets of approximately $20 million were recorded relating mainly to the valuation of existing customer relationships and trade names.

Once goodwill has been assigned, it no longer retains its association with a particular event or acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to support the value of the goodwill.

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements 39

Table of Contents

CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 17 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Agreement to form Joint Ventures

The Company announced in October 2014 that it has agreed to form TC-CIT Aviation Ireland and TC-CIT Aviation U.S. (together TC-CIT Aviation), joint ventures between CIT Aerospace, a global leader in aircraft finance, and Century Tokyo Leasing Corporation (“CTL”), a comprehensive financial services company in Japan with a global presence. Under the terms of the agreements, TC-CIT Aviation will acquire commercial aircraft that will be leased to airlines around the globe. Initially, CIT Aerospace expects to sell 14 commercial aircraft to TC-CIT Aviation in transactions with an aggregate value of approximately $0.6 billion and will be responsible for arranging future aircraft acquisitions, negotiating leases, servicing the aircraft and administering the entities. CIT will also make and maintain a minority equity investment in TC-CIT Aviation. CTL will make and maintain a majority equity interest in the joint venture and will be a lender to the newly-established companies.

Agreements to Sell Portfolios

In October 2014, the Company entered into separate agreements to sell (1) a TIF international loan portfolio (AHFS of $325 million) and (2) certain NSP operations in Europe (AHFS of $100 million). The Company expects minimal gain or loss from these sales.

40 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

and

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

OVERVIEW

CIT Group Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, “CIT” or the “Company”) has provided financial solutions to its clients since its formation in 1908. We provide financing, leasing and advisory services principally to middle market companies in a wide variety of industries primarily in North America, and equipment financing and leasing solutions to the transportation industry worldwide. We had $36 billion of financing and leasing assets at September 30, 2014. CIT became a bank holding company (“BHC”) in December 2008 and a financial holding company in July 2013.

CIT is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”) under the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. CIT Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, is a state chartered bank located in Salt Lake City, Utah, that offers commercial financing and leasing products as well as a suite of savings options and is subject to regulation by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (“UDFI”).

On July 22, 2014, CIT announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger to acquire IMB Holdco LLC, the parent company of OneWest Bank N.A. for $3.4 billion in cash and stock. IMB Holdco is regulated by the FRB and OneWest is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Department of the Treasury. The transaction is subject to certain customary closing conditions and regulatory approval by the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Following the closing, based on current definitions and requirements at the time of the announcement, CIT will become subject to the enhanced regulatory mandates applicable to bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, commonly referred to as systemically important financial institutions, or SIFIs, including but not limited to submitting an annual capital plan, undergoing an annual supervisory stress test and two company-run stress tests, submitting a resolution plan, implementation of an enhanced compliance program under the Volcker Rule, and payment of additional FRB assessments. The date on which CIT becomes subject to each SIFI requirement will vary depending on the terms of the individual regulation.

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” contain financial terms that are relevant to our business. You can find a glossary of key financial terms that we use in Part IItem 1. Business Overview in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Form 10-K”), and any new terms used are defined within this Form 10-Q.

Management uses certain non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. See“Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for a reconciliation of these to comparable financial measures based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Segment Changes

As discussed in our 2014 first quarter Form 10-Q, we announced organization changes that became effective January 1, 2014. Management changed our operating segments to (i) realign and simplify its businesses and organizational structure, (ii) streamline and consolidate certain business processes to achieve greater operating efficiencies, and (iii) leverage CIT’s operational capabilities for the benefit of its clients and customers. Effective January 1, 2014, CIT manages its business and reports financial results in three operating segments: (1) Transportation & International Finance (“TIF”); (2) North American Commercial Finance (“NACF”); and (3) Non-Strategic Portfolios (“NSP”). These are discussed further in“Results By Business Segments”.

Discontinued Operation

On April 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of the $3.3 billion student lending business along with certain secured debt and servicing rights. Income from discontinued operation (net of taxes) was $54 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which included a $283 million gain on sale, partially offset by the $229 million loss on discontinued operation. The gain on sale reflected proceeds received in excess of the net carrying value of assets and liabilities sold and amounts received for the sale of servicing rights, while the loss on discontinued operation was driven primarily by the acceleration of fresh start accounting (FSA) accretion of $224 million on extinguishment of the debt.

The business had previously been included in the NSP segment. Approximately $3.2 billion of debt was extinguished, including $0.8 billion that was repaid using a

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 41

Table of Contents

portion of the cash proceeds. The student lending business consisted of a portfolio of U.S. Government-guaranteed student loans that was in run-off and had been transferred to assets held for sale (“AHFS”) at the end of 2013. The Company had ceased offering private student loans in 2007 and government-guaranteed student loans in 2008. All prior period data has been adjusted to reflect the student lending business as a discontinued operation.

Unless specifically noted, the discussions throughout the following sections reflect CIT results on a continuing operations basis.

2014 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

We grew commercial financing and leasing assets through solid new business activity and strategic acquisitions, and credit quality remained at cyclical lows.

Net income of $515 million, $2.76 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2014, was up from $200 million, $0.99 per diluted share, for the year-ago quarter and $247 million, $1.29 per diluted share, in the prior quarter. Income from continuing operations (after taxes) for the third quarter was $515 million, $2.76 per diluted share, up from $193 million, $0.96 per diluted share, for the year-ago quarter and $195 million, $1.02 per diluted share, in the prior quarter. Net income for the three month period ended September 30, 2014 included a $375 million, $2.01 per diluted share, income tax benefit associated with the partial reversal of a valuation allowance related to the U.S. federal deferred tax asset. In addition to the benefit from the U.S. Federal tax valuation allowance reversal, the tax provision benefited by approximately $30 million related to the acquisition of Direct Capital. Net income also reflected $48 million of after tax impairment charges in NSP related to the progress we made exiting certain portfolios, $9 million of restructuring charges, as well as higher provision for credit losses and a negative mark-to-market on our TRS facility.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $879 million, $4.59 per diluted share, up from $546 million, $2.70 per diluted share, for the 2013 period. Income from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $826 million, $4.31 per diluted share, up from $521 million, $2.58 per diluted share for the 2013 period. Net income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 also included the $375 million, $1.96 per diluted share, income tax benefit associated with the previously mentioned partial reversal of the tax related valuation allowance.

Income from continuing operations, before income taxes totaled $117 million for the third quarter of 2014, down from $206 million for the year-ago quarter and $219 million for the prior quarter. Third quarter pre-tax results were dampened by impairment charges on AHFS, mostly related to international assets in the NSP segment, and an increase in credit provision. The prior quarter income from continuing operations reflected benefits from higher loan prepayments, lower credit costs as well as the restructuring of an aircraft securitization in our TRS facility that positively impacted interest expense and other income. Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $458 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, down from $580 million for the 2013 period.

Net finance revenue⁽¹⁾(“NFR”) was $365 million up from $347 million in the year-ago quarter and $361 million in the prior quarter, reflecting higher asset levels. Average earning assets were $34.3 billion in the current quarter, up from $30.4 billion in the year-ago quarter and $33.2 billion in the prior quarter. NFR as a percentage of average earning assets (“net finance margin”) was 4.26%, down from 4.56% in the year-ago quarter and 4.35% in the prior quarter (4.26% excluding the impact of debt redemptions⁽²⁾). NFM remained at the high-end of our near-term outlook benefitting from lower funding costs, which was offset by portfolio re-pricing. The reduction from the year-ago quarter primarily reflects portfolio re-pricing, the sale of higher-yielding Dell Europe assets, and declines in net FSA accretion, partially offset by lower funding costs. NFR was $1,048 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, down slightly from the 2013 period.

While other financial institutions may use net interest margin (“NIM”) to measure earnings on interest bearing assets, defined as interest income less interest expense, we discuss NFR, which includes net operating lease revenue (operating lease rental revenue, depreciation expense and maintenance and other operating lease expenses), due to the significant impact of operating lease equipment on revenue and expense. Net operating lease revenue was up modestly from the year-ago quarter, as increased revenue earned on higher average assets and consistently high aircraft and railcar utilization rates offset higher depreciation expense and maintenance and other operating lease expenses and pressure on revenues from lower remarketing rates. Compared to the prior quarter, the modest increase in net operating lease revenue reflected higher revenues and slightly lower maintenance and other operating lease expenses.

Provision for credit losses was $38 million, up from $16 million in the year-ago quarter and $10 million in the prior quarter, reflecting higher non-specific reserves, primarily due to asset growth, and higher reserves on a small number of accounts. The provision for credit losses was $85 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, up from $51 million for the 2013 period.

Other income of $24 million decreased from $105 million in the year-ago quarter and from $94 million in the prior quarter. The current quarter includes total impairment charges of $54 million on AHFS, mostly on NSP international equipment finance portfolios, as well as a negative mark-to-market of $13 million on the TRS derivative, while the prior quarter included benefits from the acceleration of counterparty receivable accretion of $9 million related to the aircraft securitization restructuring and a positive mark-to-market of $11 million on the TRS derivative. Other income was $189 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, down from $254 million for the 2013 period, primarily from lower gains on asset sales.

⁽¹⁾

Net finance revenue and average earning assets are non-GAAP measures; see “Non-GAAP Financial Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

⁽²⁾

Debt redemption impacts include accelerated FSA net discount/(premium) accretion and accelerated original issue discount. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

42 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Operating expenses were $235 million, up from $229 million in the year-ago quarter and $225 million in the prior quarter. Excluding restructuring costs⁽³⁾, operating expenses were $225 million, essentially unchanged from $226 million in the year-ago quarter and up from $219 million in the prior quarter. The increase in operating expenses from the prior quarter is primarily due to the acquisition of Direct Capital and other integration costs, offset by the benefit from the sale of our Small Business Lending portfolio last quarter. The change from the year-ago quarter also reflected costs resulting from the acquisition of Nacco in the first quarter of 2014, offset by lower tax-related expenses and benefits from our cost reduction initiatives. Operating expenses were $693 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, up from $686 million for the 2013 period. Headcount at September 30, 2014 was approximately 3,330, which includes the addition of 250 Direct Capital employees, down from 3,380 a year ago and up from 3,170 at June 30, 2014.

Provision for income taxes was a benefit of $401 million in the current quarter reflecting a $375 million partial reversal of the U.S. Federal deferred tax asset valuation allowance, a $30 million benefit related to the acquisition of Direct Capital and net expenses on state and international earnings. Income tax expense was $13 million in the year-ago quarter and $18 million in the prior quarter, primarily reflecting the recognition of income tax expense on international earnings and state tax expense. The benefit for income taxes was $370 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a provision of $55 million for the 2013 period. The decline was mainly due to the reversal of the valuation allowance and the tax benefit from the Direct Capital acquisition.

Total assets from continuing operations⁽⁴⁾ at September 30, 2014 were $46.5 billion, up from $44.2 billion at June 30, 2014, and $42.3 billion at September 30, 2013. Financing and leasing assets in North American Commercial Finance and Transportation & International Finance increased to $35.5 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion (4%) from June 30, 2014 and $5.2 billion (17%) from a year ago. The sequential quarter increase was driven by solid origination volumes and the acquisition of Direct Capital, which added $0.54 billion of financing and leasing assets. The increase from the year-ago quarter also included the acquisition of Nacco in the first quarter of 2014, which added approximately $0.65 billion of financing and leasing assets. The Non-Strategic Portfolios declined by approximately $0.1 billion from June 30, 2014, and by $1.2 billion from a year ago, to $0.6 billion, reflecting portfolio run off and asset sales including the completion of the sale of the Small Business Lending portfolio in June 2014. Total loans of $19.8 billion increased $1.2 billion from June 30, 2014 and by $1.4 billion from a year ago, reflecting new loan originations and the purchase of Direct Capital, partially offset by asset sales. Operating lease equipment increased $0.4 billion from June 30, 2014 and $2.6 billion from a year ago to $15.2 billion, reflecting the Nacco acquisition and other equipment purchases. Cash and securities of $7.7 billion were up $0.4 billion from June 30, 2014 and down $0.7 billion from September 30, 2013.

Credit metrics remained at or near cycle lows. Non-accrual loans were $201 million, or 1.02% of finance receivables, at September 30, 2014, compared to $190 million (1.02%) at June 30, 2014 and $258 million (1.41%) at September 30, 2013. The increase from the prior quarter was primarily in international portfolios, partially offset by a reduction in the aerospace portfolio. Net charge-offs were $19 million, or 0.39% of average finance receivables (AFR), versus $27 million (0.59%) in the year-ago quarter and $21 million (0.45%) in the prior quarter.

2014 PRIORITIES

Our priorities continue to be focused on achieving our profitability targets by growing earning assets and managing expenses, growing CIT Bank assets and deposits, and returning capital to our shareholders. Enhancing internal control functions and maintaining constructive relationships with our regulators also remain a priority.

Grow Earning Assets

We plan to grow earning assets, organically and through acquisitions, by focusing on existing products and markets as well as newer initiatives.

Financing and leasing assets (“FLA”) totaled $36.1 billion, up from $34.7 billion at June 30, 2014 and $32.1 billion at September 30, 2013. TIF and NACF comprise the vast majority of the assets and totaled $35.5 billion, up $1.5 billion sequentially, driven by solid origination volumes in both segments and $0.54 billion of financing and leasing assets from an acquisition in NACF, and increased $5.2 billion from a year ago, which also included an acquisition in TIF in the 2014 first quarter. NSP makes up the remaining balance of FLA and is expected to decline as portfolios are sold or otherwise liquidated.

Achieve Profit Targets

The 2014 third quarter and nine months pre-tax return on AEA were 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. While the consolidated CIT returns were below our near-term outlook of approximately 2.00%, the returns for both the quarter and year-to-date excluding NSP were in excess of the target.

NFM for the third quarter, 4.26%, remained at the high end of our near term outlook range of 3.75%-4.25%, benefiting from lower funding costs, which was offset by portfolio re-pricing.

Excluding the impairments on the non-strategic portfolios, Other Income for the quarter was at the low end of our near-term outlook range of 0.75%-1.00%, consistent with the current middle market deal environment.

Operating expenses were $235 million, including restructuring charges of $9 million. Excluding restructuring charges, operating expenses were 2.63% of AEA, above the near-term outlook range of 2.00%-2.50, but improved by about 30 basis points from a year ago, reflecting progress on several initiatives.

⁽³⁾

Operating expenses excluding restructuring costs is a non-GAAP measure. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

⁽⁴⁾

Total assets from continuing operations is a non-GAAP measure. See “Non-GAAP Measurements” for reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 43

Table of Contents

We continue to make progress reducing NSP, and have exited all the sub-scale countries in Asia, and several in Latin America and Europe, as well as our Small Business Lending (“SBL”) portfolio. Our primary focus is now on exiting Brazil, Mexico and smaller portfolios in Europe. In October we entered into separate agreements to sell a TIF international loan portfolio (AHFS of $325 million), and certain NSP operations in Europe (AHFS of $100 million). In addition, we are in the advance stages of negotiating the sale of our NSP Mexico and Brazil portfolios. Upon completion of these exits, we expect to eliminate approximately $10 million from our quarterly expenses.

Expand Bank Assets and Funding

CIT Bank funds most of our U.S. lending and leasing volume and continues to expand on-line deposit offerings.

Total assets were $20.3 billion at September 30, 2014, up from $18.3 billion at June 30, 2014, reflecting new business volume and the August 1, 2014 acquisition of Direct Capital, a provider of financing to small and mid-sized businesses. CIT Bank funded $2.2 billion of new business volume in the current quarter, up 34% from the year-ago quarter and up 8% sequentially.

Deposits at quarter-end were $14.4 billion, up from $13.9 billion at June 30, 2014. The weighted average rate on outstanding deposits was 1.57% at September 30, 2014.

On July 22, 2014, CIT announced that it entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger with IMB Holdco LLC, the parent company of OneWest Bank N.A. (“OneWest Bank”), for $3.4 billion in cash and stock. At September 30, 2014, OneWest Bank had 73 branches in Southern California, with nearly $22 billion of assets and over $14 billion of deposits.

Continue to Return Capital

We continue to prudently deploy our capital, as well as return capital to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends, which totaled approximately $135 million in the third quarter, while maintaining strong capital ratios.

During the third quarter, we repurchased over 2.2 million of our shares for an aggregate purchase price of $106 million, bringing the total repurchases for 2014 to over 14.5 million shares at an average price of $45.20, or an aggregate of approximately $658 million.

On July 22, 2014, CIT announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to an additional $500 million of common stock through June 30, 2015. Approximately $450 million of the authorized repurchase capacity remains at September 30, 2014.

On October 14, 2014, the Board approved CIT’s quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share, payable on November 26, 2014 to shareholders of record on November 12, 2014.

NET FINANCE REVENUE

The following tables present management’s view of consolidated NFR and NFM:

Net Finance Revenue⁽¹⁾ and Net Finance Margin (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Interest income	$	308.3		$	309.8		$	306.4		$	920.3		$	948.0
Rental income on operating leases		535.0			519.6			472.9			1,546.5			1,433.6
Finance revenue		843.3			829.4			779.3			2,466.8			2,381.6
Interest expense		(275.2	)		(262.2	)		(256.7	)		(809.3	)		(793.4	)
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(156.4	)		(157.3	)		(134.2	)		(462.5	)		(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(49.0	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.1	)
Net finance revenue	$	365.2		$	360.9		$	347.0		$	1,047.9		$	1,063.0
Average Earning Assets⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾ (“AEA”)	$	34,295.3		$	33,186.7		$	30,418.2		$	33,128.3		$	29,931.2
As a % of AEA:
Interest income		3.60	%		3.74	%		4.03	%		3.70	%		4.22	%
Rental income on operating leases		6.24	%		6.26	%		6.22	%		6.23	%		6.39	%
Finance revenue		9.84	%		10.00	%		10.25	%		9.93	%		10.61	%
Interest expense		(3.21	)%		(3.16	)%		(3.38	)%		(3.26	)%		(3.53	)%
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(1.82	)%		(1.90	)%		(1.77	)%		(1.86	)%		(1.79	)%
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(0.55	)%		(0.59	)%		(0.54	)%		(0.59	)%		(0.55	)%
Net finance margin		4.26	%		4.35	%		4.56	%		4.22	%		4.74	%

⁽¹⁾

NFR and AEA are non-GAAP measures; see reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

⁽²⁾

AEA balances are less than comparable balances displayed in this document in ‘Select Data’ (Quarterly Average Balances) due to the exclusion of deposits with banks and other investments and the inclusion of credit balances of factoring clients.

44 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

NFR and NFM are key metrics used by management to measure the profitability of our lending and leasing assets. NFR includes interest and yield-related fee income on our loans and capital leases, rental income on our operating lease equipment and interest and dividend income on cash, investments and reverse repo securities, reduced by funding costs, depreciation from our operating lease equipment, and maintenance and other operating lease expenses. Since our asset composition includes a high level of operating lease equipment (44% of AEA for the quarter ended September 30, 2014), NFM is a more appropriate metric for CIT than net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other financial institutions), as NIM does not fully reflect the earnings of our portfolio, because it includes the impact of debt costs on all our assets, but excludes the net operating lease revenue (rental income less depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses).

NFR increased from the year-ago quarter and prior quarter, as higher earning assets offset compression on portfolio yields across many of our businesses. The prior quarter also included a net benefit of $7 million related to accelerated FSA discount and original issue discount (“OID”) related to certain secured debt restructuring transactions.

Adjusted NFR ($) and Net Finance Margin (NFM) (%)(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended
	September 30, 2014				June 30, 2014					September 30, 2013
NFR / NFM	$	365.2	4.26	%	$	360.9		4.35	%	$	347.0	4.56	%
Accelerated FSA net discount/(premium) on debt extinguishments and repurchases		–	–			34.7		0.42	%		–	–
Accelerated OID on debt extinguishments related to the GSI facility		–	–			(42.0	)	(0.51	)%		–	–
Adjusted NFR / NFM	$	365.2	4.26	%	$	353.6		4.26	%	$	347.0	4.56	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014					2013
NFR / NFM	$	1,047.9		4.22	%	$	1,063.0	4.74	%
Accelerated FSA net discount/(premium) on debt extinguishments and repurchases		34.7		0.14	%		24.8	0.11	%
Accelerated OID on debt extinguishments related to the GSI facility		(42.0	)	(0.17	)%		–	–
Adjusted NFR / NFM	$	1,040.6		4.19	%	$	1,087.8	4.85	%

The accelerated debt FSA accretion and accelerated OID on debt extinguishment related to the GSI facility (“accelerated OID accretion”), when discussed in combination, is referred to as “accelerated debt FSA and OID accretion”.

Adjusted NFM was flat sequentially, and declined from the year-ago quarter and nine-months ended September 30, 2013 as margin compression and sales offset lower debt costs:

Finance revenue, though up in 2014 on increased earning assets, reflected portfolio repricing, decline in benefits from FSA and the sale of higher-yielding Dell Europe portfolio (within NSP), which benefited 2013 yields primarily from suspended depreciation on operating leases.

Continued benefit from lower debt cost. Weighted average coupon rate of outstanding deposits and long-term borrowings of 3.16% at September 30, 2014 was down from 3.37% at September 30, 2013, as the portion of our funding derived from deposits increased to 43% from 40% at September 30, 2013.

NFM reflects the mentioned impacts to finance revenue and lower debt costs, and had a diminished benefit from suspended depreciation on operating lease equipment held for sale, as depreciation is not recorded while this equipment is held for sale (detailed further below).

Interest expense increased from the 2013 periods, primarily due to higher deposit balances, commensurate with asset growth. Sequentially, the increase also reflects higher debt balances associated with the Direct Capital acquisition, while the 2014 second quarter had a net benefit of $7 million of debt FSA and OID accretion. At September 30, 2014, the remaining FSA discount on long-term borrowings and deposits of approximately $7 million is not significant.

The weighted average coupon rate of outstanding deposits and long-term borrowings was 3.16% at September 30, 2014, down from 3.20% at June 30, 2014 and 3.37% at September 30, 2013, benefiting from a continued high proportion of deposit funding and an increase in proportion to secured debt. Deposits represented 43% of the total deposits and long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014, while unsecured debt was 37% and secured debt was 20%. These proportions will fluctuate in the future depending upon our capital markets activities.

The weighted average coupon rate of long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 4.32%, down from 4.44% at June 30, 2014 and 4.57% at September 30, 2013. Long-term

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 45

Table of Contents

borrowings consist of unsecured and secured debt. The weighted average coupon rate of unsecured long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 4.99%, unchanged from June 30, 2014 and down from 5.11% at September 30, 2013. The weighted average coupon rate of secured long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 3.11%, down from 3.17% at June 30, 2014 and 3.35% at September 30, 2013.

Deposits have increased, both in dollars and proportion of total CIT funding. The weighted average rate of total CIT deposits was 1.64%, unchanged from June 30, 2014 and up from 1.54% at September 30, 2014. Deposits and long-term borrowings are also discussed inFunding and Liquidity. SeeSelect Data and Average Balances section for more information on Long-term borrowing rates.

The following table depicts select yields and margin related data for our segments, plus select divisions within TIF and NACF.

Select Segment and Division Margin Metrics(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Transportation & International Finance
AEA	$	18,724.2		$	18,066.2		$	15,417.8		$	17,985.7		$	15,255.8
Gross yield		12.18	%		12.34	%		12.49	%		12.33	%		12.60	%
NFM		4.82	%		4.91	%		4.87	%		4.81	%		4.92	%
Adjusted NFM		4.82	%		4.75	%		4.87	%		4.76	%		5.05	%
AEA
Aerospace	$	10,728.8		$	10,260.7		$	9,146.4		$	10,264.9		$	9,292.0
Rail	$	5,783.4		$	5,578.0		$	4,339.9		$	5,503.5		$	4,269.3
Maritime Finance	$	702.9		$	576.2		$	350.0		$	589.5		$	276.0
International Finance	$	1,509.1		$	1,651.3		$	1,581.5		$	1,627.8		$	1,418.5
Gross yield
Aerospace		11.81	%		12.18	%		12.25	%		12.16	%		12.29	%
Rail		14.59	%		14.44	%		14.77	%		14.52	%		14.70	%
Maritime Finance		5.00	%		5.58	%		5.97	%		5.11	%		7.02	%
International Finance		9.00	%		8.59	%		9.13	%		8.69	%		9.47	%
North American Commercial Finance
AEA	$	14,953.4		$	14,132.4		$	13,156.0		$	14,203.9		$	12,746.4
Gross yield		6.43	%		6.62	%		6.90	%		6.48	%		7.38	%
NFM		3.91	%		4.13	%		4.26	%		3.92	%		4.54	%
Adjusted NFM		3.91	%		4.13	%		4.26	%		3.92	%		4.63	%
AEA
Real Estate Finance	$	1,727.3		$	1,668.5		$	1,291.3		$	1,660.2		$	1,031.0
Corporate Finance	$	7,298.8		$	7,220.8		$	6,767.7		$	7,165.3		$	6,647.4
Equipment Finance	$	4,907.9		$	4,269.2		$	4,141.7		$	4,400.2		$	4,041.6
Commercial Services	$	1,019.4		$	973.9		$	955.3		$	978.2		$	1,026.4
Gross yield
Real Estate Finance		4.30	%		4.10	%		4.22	%		4.14	%		4.25	%
Corporate Finance		5.25	%		5.71	%		5.38	%		5.33	%		5.95	%
Equipment Finance		9.06	%		9.52	%		10.53	%		9.51	%		11.01	%
Commercial Services		5.92	%		4.99	%		5.50	%		5.27	%		5.50	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios
AEA	$	617.7		$	988.1		$	1,844.4		$	938.7		$	1,929.0
Gross yield		18.97	%		14.17	%		14.57	%		14.52	%		15.47	%
NFM		4.66	%		2.55	%		6.29	%		3.03	%		6.78	%
Adjusted NFM		4.66	%		2.55	%		6.29	%		3.03	%		6.84	%

Compared to the 2013 quarter and nine month periods, gross yields (interest income plus rental income on operating leases as a % of AEA) and NFM in TIF were down, reflecting lower rental rates. Quarterly comparisons also reflect lower loan prepayment benefits. NACF gross yields and NFM reflect continued pressures on certain units of the business. NSP contains run-off portfolios, which can cause volatility in the gross yield due to the low AEA. The NSP year-to-date gross yield is down, generally reflecting sales of higher yielding portfolios.

46 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the details on net operating lease revenue⁽⁵⁾. We changed the presentation of net operating lease revenue in the first quarter of 2014 and have revised the 2013 periods for the new presentation. A new line item reflects maintenance and other operating lease expenses associated with our operating lease equipment. Previously, maintenance costs reduced rental income, while other operating lease expenses were included with depreciation. Total net operating lease revenue did not change with the new presentation.

Net Operating Lease Revenue as a % of Average Operating Leases(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended
	September 30, 2014					June 30, 2014					September 30, 2013
Rental income on operating leases	$	535.0		14.28	%	$	519.6		14.33	%	$	472.9		15.28	%
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(156.4	)	(4.17	)%		(157.3	)	(4.34	)%		(134.2	)	(4.33	)%
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)	(1.24	)%		(49.0	)	(1.35	)%		(41.4	)	(1.34	)%
Net operating lease revenue	$	332.1		8.87	%	$	313.3		8.64	%	$	297.3		9.61	%
Average Operating Lease Equipment (“AOL”)	$	14,984.6				$	14,505.9				$	12,383.9

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014					2013
Rental income on operating leases	$	1,546.5		14.31	%	$	1,433.6		15.47	%
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(462.5	)	(4.28	)%		(401.1	)	(4.33	)%
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(147.1	)	(1.36	)%		(124.1	)	(1.34	)%
Net operating lease revenue	$	936.9		8.67	%	$	908.4		9.80	%
Average Operating Lease Equipment (“AOL”)	$	14,410.9				$	12,357.8

Net operating lease revenue was primarily generated from the commercial aircraft and rail portfolios. Net operating lease revenue increased, as the benefit of increased assets from the growing aerospace and rail portfolios offset lower rental rates, and also when compared to the 2013 periods, higher depreciation expense and increased maintenance and other operating lease expenses. Rental income increased from the year-ago periods as did depreciation expense, reflecting the growing portfolio. Depreciation expense also includes amounts related to equipment impairments, of which the 2014 second quarter included a modest charge. The increase from 2013 in maintenance and other operating lease expenses reflects the growing rail portfolio. On average, lease renewal rates in the rail portfolio were re-pricing slightly higher, while the commercial aircraft portfolio has been re-pricing slightly lower, putting pressure on overall rental revenue, compared to the 2013 periods. These factors are also reflected in the net operating lease revenue as a percent of AOL. The sequential trends reflects higher AOL and slightly lower maintenance and operating lease expenses. The 2014 first quarter European rail acquisition also impacted net yields, as the acquired portfolio’s net yields were lower.

Utilization and asset levels remained strong in 2014. All but two of our commercial aircraft were leased or under a commitment. Including commitments, rail fleet utilization was 99% at September 30, 2014, up from the prior quarter and September 30, 2013.

All new aircraft deliveries scheduled for the next twelve months are placed. We expect delivery of approximately 4,800 railcars from our order book over the next twelve months, essentially all of which are placed.

Depreciation on operating lease equipment increased from the prior-year quarter, reflecting higher asset balances and lower suspended depreciation and was down slightly from the prior quarter, as lower impairments and suspended depreciation offset the impact of asset growth. The declines in depreciation as a % of AOL mostly reflects the continued growth of the aero and rail portfolios, which have longer-lived assets. Net operating lease revenue includes rental income on operating lease equipment classified as AHFS, but there is no related depreciation expense. Once a long-lived asset is classified as AHFS, depreciation expense is no longer recognized, but the asset is evaluated periodically for impairment with any such charge recorded in other income. (See“Non-interest Income — Impairment on assets held for sale” for discussion of impairment charges). As such, the year-ago quarter benefited from suspended depreciation, primarily in NSP as a result of certain operating lease equipment being recorded as AHFS. The amount of suspended depreciation on operating lease equipment in AHFS totaled $6 million for the third quarter of 2014, $19 million for the year-ago quarter and $4 million for the prior quarter. Year-to-date, the amount of suspended depreciation totaled $13 million, down from $69 million in 2013. The decreases from 2013 primarily reflect the sale of the Dell Europe portfolio in the second half of 2013.

Operating lease equipment in AHFS totaled $171 million at September 30, 2014, $223 million at June 30, 2014, and $237 million at September 30, 2013.

See“Non-interest Income — Impairment on assets held for sale”, “Expenses — Depreciation on operating lease equipment” and“Concentrations — Operating Leases” for additional information.

⁽⁵⁾

Net operating lease revenue and average operating lease equipment are non-GAAP measures; see reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial information.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 47

Table of Contents

CREDIT METRICS

Credit metrics remain at or near cyclical lows, and given current levels, sequential quarterly movements in non-accrual loans and charge-offs are subject to volatility as individual larger accounts migrate in and out of non-accrual status or get resolved.

Net charge-offs were $19 million, or 0.39% of average finance receivables (AFR), versus $27 million (0.59%) in the year-ago quarter and $21 million (0.45%) in the prior quarter. Net charge-offs included $11 million, $12 million and $12 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale for the quarters ended September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, and September 30, 2013, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 net charge-offs were $76 million (0.53%), versus $66 million (0.48%) in the comparable year ago period. Year to date, net charge-offs include $36 million in 2014 and $35 million in 2013 related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale. Recoveries have continued to decline, totaling $6 million in the quarter as compared to $10 million a year ago and $8 million in the prior quarter. Recoveries for the nine month period ended September 30, 2014 of $23 million are down substantially from $43 million in the comparable year ago period, driven by the lower levels of charge-offs in recent periods.

Non-accrual loans totaled $201 million (1.02% of Finance receivables) at September 30 2014, down from $258 million (1.41%) at September 30, 2013 and $241 million (1.29%) at December 31, 2013. The decrease reflects the sale of the Small Business Lending unit, repayments, charge-offs, and returns to accrual status where appropriate.

The provision for credit losses was $38 million for the quarter, up from $16 million in the year-ago quarter and $10 million in the prior quarter, reflecting higher non-specific reserves, primarily due to asset growth, and higher reserves on a small number of accounts.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.81% at September 30, 2014, compared to 1.83% at June 30, 2014 and 1.91% at December 31, 2013. The allowance for loan losses is intended to provide for losses inherent in the portfolio based on estimates of the ultimate outcome of collection efforts, realization of collateral values, and other pertinent factors, such as estimation risk related to performance in prospective periods. We may make adjustments to the allowance depending on general economic conditions and specific industry weakness or trends in our portfolio credit metrics, including non-accrual loans, charge-off levels, and realization rates on collateral.

Our allowance for loan losses includes: (1) specific reserves for impaired loans, (2) non-specific reserves for losses inherent in non-impaired loans utilizing the Company’s internal probability of default/loss given default ratings system, generally with a two year loss emergence period assumption, to determine estimated loss levels, and (3) a qualitative adjustment to the non-specific reserve for economic risks, industry and geographic concentrations, and other factors not adequately captured in our methodology. Our policy is to recognize losses through charge-offs when there is a high likelihood of loss after considering the borrower’s financial condition, underlying collateral and guarantees, and the finalization of collection activities.

For all presentation periods, qualitative adjustments largely related to instances where management believed that the Company’s current risk ratings in selected portfolios did not yet fully reflect the corresponding inherent risk. The qualitative adjustments did not exceed 10% of the total allowance for any of such periods and are recorded by class and included in the allowance for loan losses.

48 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The following table presents detail on our allowance for loan losses, including charge-offs and recoveries and provides summarized components of the provision and allowance:

Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Credit Losses(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Allowance – beginning of period	$	341.0		$	352.6		$	367.2		$	356.1		$	379.3
Provision for credit losses⁽¹⁾		38.2			10.2			16.4			85.1			50.5
Other⁽¹⁾		(2.3	)		(0.6	)		(0.4	)		(7.5	)		(8.0	)
Net additions		35.9			9.6			16.0			77.6			42.5
Gross charge-offs⁽²⁾		(25.2	)		(29.1	)		(36.6	)		(98.7	)		(109.0	)
Recoveries		6.0			7.9			9.5			22.7			43.3
Net Charge-offs		(19.2	)		(21.2	)		(27.1	)		(76.0	)		(65.7	)
Allowance – end of period	$	357.7		$	341.0		$	356.1		$	357.7		$	356.1
Loans
Transportation & International Finance	$	3,687.7		$	3,228.3		$	3,239.5
North American Commercial Finance		16,098.0			15,376.1			14,454.2
Non-Strategic Portfolios		0.1			–			677.3
Total loans	$	19,785.8		$	18,604.4		$	18,371.0
Allowance
Transportation & International Finance	$	46.5		$	39.7		$	43.4
North American Commercial Finance		311.2			301.3			303.5
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–			–			9.2
Total allowance	$	357.7		$	341.0		$	356.1

Provision for Credit Losses(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended								Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014		2014			2013			2014			2013
Specific allowance – impaired loans	$	3.3	$	(3.5	)	$	(9.0	)	$	(4.9	)	$	(11.3	)
Non-specific allowance		15.7		(7.5	)		(1.7	)		14.0			(3.9	)
Net charge-offs		19.2		21.2			27.1			76.0			65.7
Total	$	38.2	$	10.2		$	16.4		$	85.1		$	50.5

Allowance for Loan Losses(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Specific allowance – impaired loans	$	25.5		$	30.4
Non-specific allowance		332.2			325.7
Total	$	357.7		$	356.1
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans		1.81	%		1.91	%

⁽¹⁾

Includes amounts related to reserves on unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and for deferred purchase agreements, which are reflected in other liabilities, as well as foreign currency translation adjustments. These related other liabilities totaled $33 million, $28 million and $29 million at September 30, 2014, December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively.

⁽²⁾

Gross charge-offs included $11 million, $12 million and $12 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale for the quarters ended September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, and September 30, 2013, respectively. Year to date, gross charge-offs include $36 million in 2014 and $35 million in 2013 related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 49

Table of Contents

The allowance rate reflects the relatively benign credit environment. The allowance in NACF increased, reflecting portfolio growth and higher reserves on certain accounts. NSP currently carries no reserves, as the portfolio almost entirely consists of AHFS. The decline in specific allowance is consistent with reduced non-accrual inflows and balances.

Segment Finance Receivables and Allowance for Loan Losses (dollars in millions)

	Finance Receivables		Allowance for Loan Losses			Net Carrying Value
September 30, 2014
Transportation & International Finance	$	3,687.7	$	(46.5	)	$	3,641.2
North American Commercial Finance		16,098.0		(311.2	)		15,786.8
Non-Strategic Portfolios		0.1		–			0.1
Total	$	19,785.8	$	(357.7	)	$	19,428.1
December 31, 2013
Transportation & International Finance	$	3,494.4	$	(46.7	)	$	3,447.7
North American Commercial Finance		14,693.1		(303.8	)		14,389.3
Non-Strategic Portfolios		441.7		(5.6	)		436.1
Total	$	18,629.2	$	(356.1	)	$	18,273.1

50 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The following table presents charge-offs, by class. SeeResults by Business Segment for additional information.

Charge-offs as a Percentage of Average Finance Receivables by Class (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended															Nine Months Ended September 30,
	September 30, 2014					June 30, 2014					September 30, 2013					2014				2013
Gross Charge-offs
Transportation Finance	$	0.7		0.12	%	$	–		–		$	–		–		$	0.7	0.04	%	$	–		–
International Finance		3.8		1.39	%		15.9		4.23	%		7.5		1.90	%		34.0	3.14	%		13.0		1.23	%
Transportation & International Finance⁽¹⁾		4.5		0.52	%		15.9		1.79	%		7.5		0.93	%		34.7	1.31	%		13.0		0.58	%
Corporate Finance		12.0		0.66	%		4.0		0.22	%		8.3		0.49	%		26.4	0.50	%		21.0		0.42	%
Equipment Finance		8.0		0.69	%		8.3		0.83	%		7.4		0.75	%		25.5	0.83	%		24.7		0.85	%
Commercial Services		0.7		0.11	%		0.9		0.15	%		0.7		0.13	%		4.6	0.26	%		2.2		0.13	%
North American Commercial Finance⁽²⁾		20.7		0.52	%		13.2		0.35	%		16.4		0.46	%		56.5	0.50	%		47.9		0.46	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios⁽³⁾		–		–			–		–			12.7		5.53	%		7.5	5.04	%		48.1		4.96	%
Total	$	25.2		0.52	%	$	29.1		0.62	%	$	36.6		0.80	%	$	98.7	0.69	%	$	109.0		0.80	%
Recoveries
Transportation Finance	$	–		–		$	0.2		0.05	%	$	1.0		0.25	%	$	0.2	0.01	%	$	1.1		0.09	%
International Finance		0.6		0.25	%		2.6		0.69	%		1.5		0.37	%		4.5	0.42	%		6.7		0.64	%
Transportation & International Finance		0.6		0.08	%		2.8		0.31	%		2.5		0.30	%		4.7	0.18	%		7.8		0.35	%
Corporate Finance		–		–			0.4		0.02	%		0.1		–			0.5	0.02	%		1.6		0.03	%
Equipment Finance		4.4		0.38	%		3.5		0.36	%		4.2		0.42	%		13.1	0.43	%		20.3		0.70	%
Commercial Services		0.3		0.04	%		0.5		0.07	%		1.4		0.25	%		2.1	0.11	%		5.2		0.30	%
North American Commercial Finance		4.7		0.12	%		4.4		0.12	%		5.7		0.16	%		15.7	0.14	%		27.1		0.26	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios		0.7		NM			0.7		3.16	%		1.3		0.58	%		2.3	1.48	%		8.4		0.86	%
Total	$	6.0		0.13	%	$	7.9		0.17	%	$	9.5		0.21	%	$	22.7	0.16	%	$	43.3		0.32	%
Net Charge-offs
Transportation Finance	$	0.7		0.12	%	$	(0.2	)	(0.05	)%	$	(1.0	)	(0.25	)%	$	0.5	0.03	%	$	(1.1	)	(0.09	)%
International Finance		3.2		1.14	%		13.3		3.54	%		6.0		1.53	%		29.5	2.72	%		6.3		0.59	%
Transportation & International Finance⁽¹⁾		3.9		0.44	%		13.1		1.48	%		5.0		0.63	%		30.0	1.13	%		5.2		0.23	%
Corporate Finance		12.0		0.66	%		3.6		0.20	%		8.2		0.49	%		25.9	0.48	%		19.4		0.39	%
Equipment Finance		3.6		0.31	%		4.8		0.47	%		3.2		0.33	%		12.4	0.40	%		4.4		0.15	%
Commercial Services		0.4		0.07	%		0.4		0.08	%		(0.7	)	(0.12	)%		2.5	0.15	%		(3.0	)	(0.17	)%
North American Commercial Finance⁽²⁾		16.0		0.40	%		8.8		0.23	%		10.7		0.30	%		40.8	0.36	%		20.8		0.20	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios⁽³⁾		(0.7	)	NM			(0.7	)	(3.16	)%		11.4		4.95	%		5.2	3.56	%		39.7		4.10	%
Total	$	19.2		0.39	%	$	21.2		0.45	%	$	27.1		0.59	%	$	76.0	0.53	%	$	65.7		0.48	%

⁽¹⁾

TIF charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30 and nine months ended September 30, 2014, included approximately $9 million and $12 million, respectively, related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale (none for the quarter ended September 30, 2014). The prior-year quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $1 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale.

⁽²⁾

NACF charge-offs for the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2014, included approximately $11 million and $3 million, respectively, ($17 million year to date) related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale. The respective amounts for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $3 million and $5 million.

⁽³⁾

NSP charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, included $7 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale (none for the quarters ended June 30 and September 30, 2014). Charge-offs for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $8 million and $29 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale.

NM — Not meaningful as the AFR for this segment is insignificant.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 51

Table of Contents

Charge-offs remain at relatively low levels absent the amount related to assets transferred to AHFS. Recoveries are down in amount from prior periods and are expected to continue to decline as the low level of more recent charge-offs afford fewer opportunities for recoveries. Additionally, charge-offs associated with AHFS do not generate future recoveries as the loans are generally sold before recoveries can be realized.

The tables below present information on non-performing loans, which includes non-performing loans related to AHFS for each period:

Non-accrual and Accruing Past Due Loans (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Non-accrual loans
U.S.	$	117.1	$	176.3
Foreign		84.0		64.4
Non-accrual loans	$	201.1	$	240.7
Troubled Debt Restructurings
U.S.	$	146.4	$	218.0
Foreign		4.5		2.9
Restructured loans	$	150.9	$	220.9
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	13.0	$	9.9

Non-accrual Loans as a Percentage of Finance Receivables by Class (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Transportation Finance	$	0.1	–		$	14.3	0.81	%
International Finance		41.7	3.92	%		21.0	1.22	%
Transportation & International Finance		41.8	1.13	%		35.3	1.01	%
Corporate Finance		52.9	0.74	%		83.8	1.23	%
Equipment Finance		73.4	1.56	%		59.4	1.47	%
Commercial Services		7.8	0.31	%		4.2	0.19	%
North American Commercial Finance		134.1	0.83	%		147.4	1.00	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios		25.2	⁽¹	⁾		58.0	13.14	%
Total	$	201.1	1.02	%	$	240.7	1.29	%

⁽¹⁾

Non-accrual loans include loans held for sale. The September 2014 NSP amount reflected non-accrual loans held for sale; there were no portfolio loans, therefore no % is displayed.

Non-accrual loans declined from year-end, both in amount and as a percentage of finance receivables. The improvements reflect the sale of the Small Business Lending unit in NSP, as well as low levels of new non-accruals.

Approximately 53% of our non-accrual accounts were paying currently at September 30, 2014, and our impaired loan carrying value (including specific reserves and charge-offs) to estimated outstanding contractual balances approximated 87%. For this purpose, impaired loans are comprised principally of non-accrual loans over $500,000 and TDRs.

Total delinquency (30 days or more) improved to 1.27% of finance receivables compared to 1.75% at June 30, 2014, primarily due to an improvement in non-credit (administrative) delinquencies in the Equipment Finance portfolio.

Foregone Interest on Non-accrual Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings (dollars in millions)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
	U.S.			Foreign			Total			U.S.			Foreign			Total
Interest revenue that would have been earned at original terms	$	26.9		$	10.6		$	37.5		$	41.9		$	9.3		$	51.2
Less: Interest recorded		(9.4	)		(3.1	)		(12.5	)		(14.2	)		(2.5	)		(16.7	)
Foregone interest revenue	$	17.5		$	7.5		$	25.0		$	27.7		$	6.8		$	34.5

52 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The Company periodically modifies the terms of loans/finance receivables in response to borrowers’ difficulties. Modifications that include a financial concession to the borrower, which otherwise would not have been considered, are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). For those accounts that were modified but were not considered to be TDRs, it was determined that no concessions had been granted by CIT to the borrower. Borrower compliance with the modified terms is the primary measurement that we use to determine the success of these programs.

The tables that follow reflect loan carrying values as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 of accounts that have been modified.

Troubled Debt Restructurings and Modifications (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
			% Compliant				% Compliant
Troubled Debt Restructurings⁽¹⁾
Deferral of principal and/or interest	$	138.6	100	%	$	194.6	99	%
Debt forgiveness	��	–	–		2.4		77	%
Covenant relief and other		12.3	85	%	23.9		74	%
Total TDRs	$	150.9	99	%	$	220.9	96	%
Percent non-accrual		18%			33%

			% Compliant				% Compliant
Modifications⁽¹⁾
Extended maturity	$	0.1	100	%	$	14.9	37	%
Covenant relief		94.4	100	%	50.6		100	%
Interest rate increase/additional collateral		10.7	100	%	21.8		100	%
Other		23.2	100	%	62.6		87	%
Total Modifications	$	128.4			$	149.9	91	%
Percent non-accrual		17%			23%

⁽¹⁾

Table depicts the predominant element of each modification, which may contain several of the characteristics listed.

SeeNote 3 — Loans for additional information regarding TDRs and other credit quality information.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Non-interest Income(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Rental income on operating leases	$	535.0		$	519.6		$	472.9		$	1,546.5		$	1,433.6
Other Income:
Factoring commissions	$	31.1		$	28.3		$	32.3		$	88.0		$	91.3
Fee revenues		23.6			21.8			25.3			67.0			73.1
Gains on sales of leasing equipment		22.0			16.0			30.7			46.4			86.8
Gains on loan and portfolio sales		9.8			4.5			23.5			17.8			24.5
Gains on investments		5.3			5.6			1.0			14.4			4.6
Recoveries of loans charged off pre-emergence and loans charged off prior to transfer to held for sale		3.6			5.0			6.3			13.8			16.8
Counterparty receivable accretion		–			8.7			0.9			10.7			5.7
Gains (losses) on derivatives and foreign currency exchange		(22.8	)		8.3			0.9			(21.6	)		2.7
Impairment on assets held for sale		(54.1	)		(14.3	)		(44.6	)		(69.5	)		(89.3	)
Other revenues		5.7			9.8			28.2			22.0			37.5
Total other income		24.2			93.7			104.5			189.0			253.7
Total non-interest income	$	559.2		$	613.3		$	577.4		$	1,735.5		$	1,687.3

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 53

Table of Contents

Non-interest Income includes Rental Income on Operating Leases and Other Income.

Rental income on operating leases from equipment we lease is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term. Rental income is discussed in“Net Finance Revenues” and“Results by Business Segment”. See also“Concentrations — Operating Leases” for additional information on operating leases.

Other income decreased from the prior quarter and the year-ago quarter reflecting the following:

Factoring commissions were down from the year-ago quarter and year-to-date periods as changes in underlying portfolio mix offset increased factoring volume. The 10% commission increase from the prior quarter was largely driven by an increase in volume. Factoring volume was $6.7 billion, up 2% from the year-ago quarter, and up 7% sequentially reflecting normal seasonality.

Fee revenues include capital markets-related fees, agent and advisory fees, fees on lines of credit and letters of credit, and servicing fees for the loans we sell but retain servicing. Fee revenues are mainly driven by our NACF segment. The improvement from the prior quarter reflects higher capital markets fees, partially offset by the decline in SBL fees. The NSP segment SBL portfolio was sold in June 2014 and there are no SBL servicing fee revenues in the current quarter. SBL fee revenues were approximately $2 million in the prior quarter and $3 million for the year-ago quarter.

Gains on sales of leasing equipment resulted from $212 million of equipment sales in the third quarter of 2014, $125 million in the prior quarter and $409 million in the year-ago quarter. Gains as a percentage of equipment sold decreased from last quarter and increased from the year-ago quarter and will vary based on the type and age of equipment sold. The carrying amount of equipment sold for the current quarter 2014 included $130 million in TIF (which generated 77% of the gains), $79 million in NACF and $3 million in NSP. The carrying amount of equipment sold for the prior quarter consisted of approximately $35 million in TIF (which generated 51% of the gains), $82 million in NACF and $8 million in NSP. The carrying amount of equipment sold for the year-ago quarter consisted of approximately $325 million in TIF (which generated 78% of the gains in the quarter), $69 million in NACF and $15 million in NSP. Gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 resulted from the sales of $593 million and $1,052 million of equipment, respectively.

Gains on loan and portfolio sales in the third quarter of 2014 reflected $224 million of sales, with $157 million in NACF, $64 million in TIF and $3 million in NSP. The prior quarter sales totaled $439 million of sales, which included $300 million in NSP, primarily as a result of the SBL sale (gains on which were minimal), $93 million in NACF, and $46 million in TIF. The year-ago quarter sales were $293 million, which consisted of $191 million in NSP, $52 million in TIF and $50 million in NACF. NSP gains were $21 million in the year ago quarter reflecting the sale of the first tranche of the Dell Europe portfolio. Gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 resulted from the sales of $811 million and $413 million, respectively.

Gains on investments reflected sales of equity investments, primarily in NACF.

Recoveries of loans charged off pre-emergence and loans charged off prior to transfer to held for sale reflects repayments or other workout resolutions on loans charged off prior to emergence from bankruptcy and loans charged off prior to classification as held for sale. These recoveries are recorded as other income, unlike recoveries on loans charged off after our restructuring, which are recorded as a reduction to the provision for loan losses.

Counterparty receivable accretion relates to the FSA accretion of a fair value discount on the receivable from Goldman Sachs International (“GSI”) related to the GSI Facilities, which are total return swaps (as discussed in Funding and Liquidity andNote 7 — Long-term Borrowings andNote 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments). The discount is accreted into income over the expected term of the payout of the associated receivables. The prior quarter includes acceleration of accretion of the remaining balance of FSA discount on the counterparty receivable, reflecting the restructuring of two aircraft securitization facilities. There was no remaining FSA discount on the counterparty receivable since June 30, 2014.

Gains (losses) on derivatives and foreign currency exchange in the current quarter include losses of $13 million related to the valuation of the derivatives within the GSI facility, as compared to gains of $11 million last quarter and no gain or loss in the year-ago quarter. Activity also includes the impact of transactional foreign currency movements, which resulted in losses of $85 million in the third quarter of 2014, as the US dollar strengthened against other currency exposures and gains of $41 million and $61 million in the prior and year-ago quarters, respectively. The impact of these transactional foreign currency movements were partially offset by gains of $80 million in the current quarter and losses of $44 million and $60 million in the prior and year-ago quarters, respectively, on derivatives that economically hedge foreign currency movements and other exposures. There was a $4 million loss from realization of cumulative translation adjustment (CTA) in the current quarter related to NSP exits, and no significant CTA gains or losses in the prior or year-ago quarters. While the realization of CTA has an impact on earnings, there is no impact to Equity. For additional information on the impact of derivatives on the income statement, please refer toNote 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments.

Impairment on assets held for sale in the current quarter includes $49 million for NSP international equipment finance portfolios identified as subscale platforms during our international rationalization and $5 million from TIF, which largely related to commercial aircraft operating lease equipment held for sale. The prior quarter reflects $4 million from NSP and $10 million from TIF, with $5 million related to commercial aircraft operating leases and the remainder related to the transfer of an international portfolio to AHFS. The prior year quarter included $37 million of NSP charges and $8 million related to commercial aerospace. The prior year quarter NSP charges

54 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

included $18 million related to Dell Europe portfolio operating lease equipment, for which there was a similar offsetting benefit in depreciation expense, $3 million for NSP loans, and the remaining impairment charges related mostly to the international platform rationalization. When a long-lived asset is classified as held for sale, depreciation expense is suspended and the asset is evaluated periodically for impairment, with any such charge recorded in other income. (SeeExpenses for related discussion ofDepreciation on operating lease equipment.)

Other revenues include items that are more episodic in nature, such as proceeds received in excess of carrying value on non-accrual accounts held for sale, which were repaid or had another workout resolution, and insurance proceeds in excess of carrying value on damaged leased equipment, and also includes income from joint ventures. The prior year quarter included a $13 million gain on the sale of a workout related claim in TIF plus approximately $6 million of revenues related to the Dell Europe portfolio.

EXPENSES

Other Expenses(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Depreciation on operating lease equipment	$	(156.4	)	$	(157.3	)	$	(134.2	)	$	(462.5	)	$	(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(49.0	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.1	)
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits	$	(130.3	)	$	(125.7	)	$	(133.0	)	$	(394.9	) ��	$	(405.6	)
Technology		(19.9	)		(20.8	)		(22.3	)		(61.8	)		(62.2	)
Professional fees		(22.0	)		(16.9	)		(19.5	)		(56.9	)		(50.0	)
Net occupancy expense		(9.1	)		(8.5	)		(9.0	)		(26.5	)		(27.0	)
Provision for severance and facilities exiting activities		(9.2	)		(5.6	)		(3.2	)		(24.7	)		(18.4	)
Advertising and marketing		(7.5	)		(8.3	)		(3.7	)		(23.7	)		(17.7	)
Other expenses		(36.5	)		(39.2	)		(38.1	)		(104.5	)		(104.9	)
Total operating expenses		(234.5	)		(225.0	)		(228.8	)		(693.0	)		(685.8	)
Loss on debt extinguishments		–			(0.4	)		–			(0.4	)		–
Total other expenses	$	(437.4	)	$	(431.7	)	$	(404.4	)	$	(1,303.0	)	$	(1,211.0	)
Headcount		3,330			3,170			3,380

Depreciation on operating lease equipment is recognized on owned equipment over the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation expense is primarily driven by the TIF operating lease equipment portfolio, which includes long-lived assets such as aircraft and railcars. To a lesser extent, depreciation expense includes amounts on smaller ticket equipment, such as office equipment. Impairments recorded on equipment held in portfolio are reported as depreciation expense. AHFS also impacts the balance (as depreciation expense is suspended on operating lease equipment once it is transferred to AHFS). Depreciation expense is discussed further in“Net Finance Revenues,” as it is a component of our asset margin. See“Non-interest Income” for impairment charges on operating lease equipment classified as held for sale.

Maintenance and other operating lease expenses relate to the TIF operating lease portfolio. Prior to 2014 these maintenance expenses were included as a reduction to rental income on operating leases, while other operating lease expenses were recorded as an increase to depreciation expense on operating lease equipment. The majority of the maintenance expenses are railcar fleet related. CIT Rail provides railcars primarily pursuant to full-service lease contracts under which CIT Rail as lessor is responsible for railcar maintenance and repair. Under our aircraft leases, the lessee is generally responsible for normal maintenance and repairs, airframe and engine overhauls, compliance with airworthiness directives, and compliance with return conditions of aircraft on lease. As a result, aircraft operating lease expenses primarily relate to transition costs incurred in connection with re-leasing an aircraft.

The increase in maintenance and other operating lease expenses from the prior year reflects the growing rail portfolio and aerospace remarketing expenses resulting from the elevated levels of aircraft re-leasing activity in 2014.

Operating expenses increased from the prior quarters, reflecting integration costs and additional employees related to the Direct Capital acquisition, and in addition from the year-ago quarter on increased provision for severance and facilities exiting activities. Operating expenses include Bank deposit-raising costs, which totaled $14 million in the current and prior quarter of 2014, compared to $8 million for the year-ago quarter. These are reflected across various expense categories, but mostly within advertising and marketing and in other expenses, reflecting deposit insurance costs. Year-to-date, the deposit-raising costs were $42 million for 2014 and $25 million in 2013. Operating expenses reflect the following changes:

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 55

Table of Contents

Compensation and benefits increased sequentially primarily due to increased costs related to the Direct Capital acquisition and decreased from the 2013 periods as we made progress on various expense initiatives. Headcount at September 30, 2014 was up from the prior quarter due to the addition of approximately 250 Direct Capital employees.

Professional fees include legal and other professional fees such as tax, audit, and consulting services and increased from prior periods reflecting costs associated with the acquisitions in the current quarter and in the first quarter of 2014.

Provision for severance and facilities exiting activities reflects employee termination charges and other costs associated with various organization efficiency initiatives.

Advertising and marketing expenses include CIT Bank advertising and marketing costs associated with raising deposits, which totaled $5 million in the current and prior quarter and $3 million in the prior year quarter. Year-to-date, CIT Bank advertising and marketing costs totaled $17 million in 2014 and $12 million in 2013.

Other expenses include items such as travel and entertainment, insurance, FDIC costs, office equipment and supply costs and taxes (other than income taxes).

We continue to make progress reducing NSP, and have exited all the sub-scale countries in Asia, and several in Latin America and Europe, as well as our SBL portfolio. Our primary focus is now on exiting Brazil, Mexico and smaller portfolios in Europe. In October we entered into separate agreements to sell a TIF international loan portfolio (AHFS of $325 million), and certain NSP operations in Europe (AHFS of $100 million). In addition, we are in the advance stages of negotiating the sale of our NSP Mexico and Brazil portfolios. Upon completion of these exits, we expect to eliminate approximately $10 million from our quarterly expenses.

FRESH START ACCOUNTING

Upon emergence from bankruptcy in 2009, CIT applied Fresh Start Accounting (FSA) in accordance with GAAP. FSA had a significant impact on our operating results in prior years but the impact has significantly lessened. NFR includes the accretion of the FSA adjustments to the loans, leases and debt, as well as to depreciation and, to a lesser extent rental income related to operating lease equipment.

The most significant remaining discount at September 30, 2014, related to operating lease equipment ($1.3 billion related to rail operating lease equipment and $0.8 billion to aircraft operating lease equipment). The discount on the operating lease equipment was, in effect, an impairment of the operating lease equipment upon emergence from bankruptcy, as the assets were recorded at their fair value, which was less than their carrying value. The recording of the FSA adjustment reduced the asset balances subject to depreciation and thus decreases depreciation expense over the remaining useful life of the operating lease equipment or until it is sold.

At September 30, 2014 the remaining FSA balance was $3 million on loans and $7 million on borrowings and deposits.

INCOME TAXES

Income Tax Data (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Provision (benefit) for income taxes, before discrete items	$	(0.6	)	$	15.4		$	17.4		$	25.0		$	43.1
Discrete items		(400.6	)		2.7			(4.2	)		(394.6	)		12.2
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	(401.2	)	$	18.1		$	13.2		$	(369.6	)	$	55.3
Effective tax rate		(344.1	)%		8.3	%		6.4	%		(80.6	) %		9.5	%

56 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

income tax provision was approximately $12 million of net discrete tax expense that primarily related to the establishment of valuation allowances against certain international net deferred tax assets due to our international platform rationalizations, partially offset by incremental tax benefits associated with favorable settlements of prior year international tax audits. Excluding discrete items, the income tax provisions primarily reflected income tax expense on the earnings of certain international operations and state income tax expense in the U.S.

The change in the effective tax rate each period is impacted by a number of factors, including the relative mix of domestic and foreign earnings, adjustments to the valuation allowances, and discrete items. The actual year-end 2014 effective tax rate may vary from the currently projected tax rate due to changes in these factors.

Taxable income in carryback years,

Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences (deferred tax liabilities),

Prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, and

Future taxable income forecasts.

During the third quarter, management concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income within the applicable carry-forward periods to realize $375 million of its $930 million U.S. net federal deferred tax assets. This conclusion was reached after weighing all of the evidence and determining that the positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence. No discrete reduction to the valuation allowance related to the U.S. net state deferred tax assets or the capital loss carry-forwards was recorded in the quarter. In the U.S., the Company files a U.S. consolidated federal tax return, combined unitary state tax returns, and separate state tax returns in various jurisdictions. Thus, the tax reporting entity for U.S. federal tax purposes and U.S. state combined filing purposes is the “U.S. Affiliated Group” while the reporting entities for the separate state income tax returns are select individual affiliated group members. The positive evidence supporting this conclusion is as follows:

Management’s long-term forecast of future U.S. taxable income supports partial utilization of the U.S. federal NOLs prior to their expiration.

The federal NOLs will not expire until 2027 through 2033.

The forecast of future taxable income for the Company reflects a long-term view of growth and returns that management believes is more likely than not of being realized.

For the U.S. state valuation allowance, the Company analyzed the state net operating loss carry-forwards for each reporting entity to determine the amounts that are expected to expire unused. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the existing valuation allowance was still required on the U.S. state deferred tax assets on net operating loss carry-forwards. Accordingly, no discrete adjustment was made to the U.S. state valuation allowance this quarter. The negative evidence supporting this conclusion is as follows:

Separate State filing entities remained in a three year cumulative loss.

State NOLs expiration periods vary in time and availability.

Additionally, during the current year, the Company expects there will be other reductions of the U.S. federal and state valuation allowances in the normal course as the Company recognizes U.S. taxable income. This taxable income will reduce the deferred tax asset on NOLs, and, when combined with the increase in net deferred tax liabilities, which are mainly related to accelerated tax depreciation on the operating lease portfolios, will result in a reduction of the valuation allowances. However, the Company expects it will retain approximately $700 million of valuation allowances, exclusive of any resolutions of uncertain tax positions mentioned inNote 11 – Income Taxes, against our U.S. federal and state NOLs and capital loss carry-forwards at the end of the year. The Company currently believes these NOLs will expire unused without the implementation of effective tax planning strategies or other events.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 57

Table of Contents

The ability to recognize the remaining valuation allowances against the U.S. federal and state NOLs, and capital loss carry-forwards net deferred tax assets will be evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if there are any significant events that would affect our ability to utilize these deferred tax assets. If events are identified that affect our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, the analysis will be updated to determine if any adjustments to the valuation allowances are required. Such events may include acquisitions that support the Company’s long-term business strategies while also enabling it to accelerate the utilization of its net operating losses, as evidenced by the acquisition of Direct Capital Corporation and the announced definitive agreement and plan of merger to acquire IMB Holdco, LLC, the parent company of OneWest Bank N.A. (“OneWest Bank”).

The impact of the OneWest transaction on the utilization of the Company’s NOLs cannot be considered in the Company’s forecast of future taxable income until the acquisition is consummated. The acquisition is expected to accelerate the utilization of the Company’s NOLs and therefore management anticipates it will reverse the remaining U.S. federal valuation allowance after consummation of the acquisition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the acquisition on the U.S. state NOLs and expects the acquisition to utilize some portion of these amounts which would cause a partial reduction to the U.S. state valuation allowance.

The income tax provision before discrete items for the remainder of 2014 is expected to remain similar to prior quarters, in the range of $10-$15 million. Beginning in 2015, income tax expense will be reported on earnings at the global effective tax rate, currently expected to be approximately 30-35%. However, there will be a minimal impact on cash taxes paid until the related NOL carry-forward is fully utilized. In addition, while GAAP equity increased as a result of the valuation allowance reversal and recognition of the net deferred tax asset, there was minimal benefit on regulatory capital.

SeeNote 11 – Income Taxes for additional information, including deferred tax assets.

RESULTS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

As discussed in our 2014 first quarter Form 10-Q, we announced organization changes that became effective January 1, 2014. Management changed our operating segments to (i) realign and simplify its businesses and organizational structure, (ii) streamline and consolidate certain business processes to achieve greater operating efficiencies, and (iii) leverage CIT’s operational capabilities for the benefit of its clients and customers. Effective January 1, 2014, CIT manages its business and reports financial results in three operating segments: (1) TIF; (2) NACF; and (3) NSP. The change in segment reporting does not affect CIT’s historical consolidated results of operations.

On April 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of the student lending business. The business had previously been included in the NSP segment.

The discussions below reflect the new reporting segments and reflect the student lending business as a discontinued operation. All prior period comparisons have been conformed and are consistent with the presentation of financial information to management.

SeeNote 15 — Business Segment Information for additional details.

Transportation & International Finance

TIF includes several divisions: aerospace (commercial aircraft and business aircraft), rail, and maritime finance, as well as international finance, which includes corporate lending and equipment financing businesses in China and the U.K. Revenues generated by TIF include rents collected on leased assets, interest on loans, fees, and gains from assets sold.

Aerospace—Commercial Air provides leasing and financing solutions — including operating leases, capital leases, loans and structuring and advisory services — for commercial airlines worldwide. We own and finance a fleet of more than 300 commercial aircraft and have about 100 customers in approximately 50 countries.

Aerospace—Business Air provides financing solutions to business jet operators. Serving clients around the globe, we provide financing that is tailored to our clients’ unique business requirements. Products include term loans, leases, predelivery financing, fractional share financing and vendor/manufacturer financing.

Rail offers customized leasing and financing solutions and a highly efficient, diversified fleet of railcar assets to freight shippers and carriers throughout North America and Europe. We expanded our operations to Europe through a 2014 acquisition. See“Concentrations — Leased Railcars” section.

58 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Maritime Finance offers senior secured loans, sale-leasebacks and bareboat charters to owners and operators of oceangoing cargo vessels, including tankers, bulkers, container ships, car carriers, and offshore vessels and drilling rigs.

International Finance offers corporate lending and advisory services as well as equipment financing and leasing to small and middle market businesses in China and the U.K.

Transportation & International Finance – Financial Data and Metrics(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Earnings Summary
Interest income	$	68.8		$	72.2		$	66.1		$	217.7		$	185.3
Interest expense		(165.3	)		(155.1	)		(146.4	)		(481.1	)		(434.4	)
Provision for credit losses		(9.1	)		(8.3	)		(6.0	)		(29.8	)		(4.1	)
Rental income on operating leases		501.4			485.1			415.5			1,446.1			1,256.7
Other income		18.8			10.4			31.4			36.4			75.1
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(132.8	)		(131.6	)		(106.1	)		(386.1	)		(320.3	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(49.0	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.0	)
Operating expenses		(73.8	)		(75.5	)		(62.5	)		(228.8	)		(187.4	)
Income before benefit (provision) for income taxes	$	161.5		$	148.2		$	150.6		$	427.3		$	446.9
Select Average Balances
Average finance receivables (AFR)	$	3,432.7		$	3,547.0		$	3,199.2		$	3,535.8		$	2,984.8
Average operating leases (AOL)	$	14,712.7		$	14,234.7		$	12,098.4		$	14,138.2		$	12,090.5
Average earning assets (AEA)	$	18,724.2		$	18,066.2		$	15,417.8		$	17,985.7		$	15,255.8
Statistical Data
Net finance margin (NFM) – net finance revenue (interest and rental income, net of interest and depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) as a % of AEA		4.82	%		4.91	%		4.87	%		4.81	%		4.92	%
Operating lease margin (rental income less depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) as a % of AOL		8.76	%		8.56	%		8.86	%		8.61	%		8.96	%
New business volume	$	1,326.8		$	1,404.7		$	982.0		$	3,786.1		$	2,312.3

Pre-tax earnings for the quarter were up slightly from the year-ago quarter and sequentially. The quarter reflected solid earning asset growth of nearly 4% and continued strong asset utilization. Pre-tax earnings last quarter included a $5 million impairment upon the transfer to AHFS of an international loan portfolio of approximately $0.5 billion and a net benefit to interest expense of $7 million due to the refinancing of secured debt within the TRS. In October 2014, we agreed to sell the international loan portfolio, which is expected to close in the 2014 fourth quarter. Pre-tax earnings for the year-to-date period were down mostly due to higher operating expenses, in part reflecting the first quarter European rail acquisition, and lower gains on asset sales, partially offset by higher net finance revenue.

Financing and leasing assets grew to $19.1 billion at September 30, 2014, up sequentially from $18.4 billion and from $15.6 billion a year ago. The sequential increase reflected growth in all Transportation divisions, with Aerospace accounting for approximately 70% of the growth. The $3.5 billion, or 22% increase from September 2013 included growth of $1.8 billion in Aerospace, $1.4 billion in Rail, including the European rail acquisition in the 2014 first quarter, and $0.5 billion in Maritime. We entered the European rail leasing market with the January 31, 2014 acquisition of Nacco, an independent full service railcar lessor in Europe, which included more than 9,500 railcars, consisting of tank cars, flat cars, gondolas and hopper cars.

New business volume remained strong and asset utilization remained high. New business volume outpaced the year-ago quarter, while down modestly from the prior quarter and consisted of $0.6 billion of operating lease equipment, including the delivery of 7 aircraft and approximately 1,500 railcars and the funding of $0.7 billion of finance receivables.

Other highlights included:

Net finance revenue was $226 million, up from $188 million in the year-ago quarter primarily due to asset growth, and from $222 million sequentially, which included a debt refinancing benefit. Year-to-date, NFR was $650 million, up from $563 million in 2013. NFM was down from the year-ago periods as lower yields offset lower funding costs. See <I>Net Finance Revenue</I> for table on segment gross yields.

Net operating lease revenue (rental income on operating leases less depreciation on operating lease equipment and maintenance and other operating lease expenses), which is a component of NFR, was $322 million, up from $268 million from the year-ago quarter and $305 million in the prior quarter. Increased rent from growth in the Aerospace and Rail portfolios and combined strong utilization offset an increase in depreciation, and maintenance and operating lease expense compared to the year-ago quarter. Net

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 59

Table of Contents

		operating lease revenue was $913 million year-to-date in 2014, up from $812 million in 2013. The declines from 2013 in the net operating lease margin (as a % of average operating lease equipment) reflected pressure on renewal rents on certain aircraft, higher maintenance costs and operating lease expenses and higher depreciation rates. We entered 2014 with approximately 50 aircraft to remarket due to lease expirations, a level that was higher than in recent years, and have made solid progress placing these aircraft. Lease commitments have been renewed or entered into for approximately 90% of those aircraft. Most of these have been renewed with the existing carrier, which lowers the remarketing costs.

n		At September 30, 2014, TIF had 285 commercial aircraft, and approximately 119,000 railcars and 390 locomotives on operating lease.

Utilization remained strong with all but two commercial aircraft and 99% of rail equipment on lease or under a commitment at September 30, 2014.

At September 30, 2014, we had 137 aircraft on order from manufacturers (down from 147 at December 31, 2013), with deliveries scheduled through 2020. In July, CIT placed an order with Boeing for the purchase of 10 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft, with deliveries beginning in 2018. In addition to the order book, CIT also signed memorandums of understanding with Airbus for the purchase of 15 A330-900neo (new engine option) aircraft and five A321-200ceo (current engine option) aircraft, which will be included in the order book count upon contract execution. Deliveries of the A330-900neo are scheduled to begin in 2018 and deliveries of the A321-200ceo are scheduled to begin in 2015.

We had future purchase commitments for approximately 7,500 railcars, with scheduled deliveries through 2016.

All aircraft scheduled for delivery in the next 12 months and approximately 80% of all railcars on order, have lease commitments. SeeItem 1. Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13 — Commitments.

Other income primarily includes gains on equipment and receivable sales, partially offset by impairment charges. For the third quarter of 2014, gains totaled $18 million on $194 million of equipment and receivable sales, compared to $24 million of gains on $377 million of sales in the year-ago quarter and $11 million of gains on $81 million of sales last quarter. Year-to-date, gains totaled $34 million on $473 million of sales in 2014 and $66 million of gains on $851 million of sales in 2013. Gains can vary significantly quarter to quarter, depending on various factors, including types of equipment sold. Impairment charges totaled $5 million in the third quarter of 2014, primarily reflecting aircraft equipment held for sale, compared to $8 million in the year-ago quarter and $10 million last quarter. Year-to-date, impairment charges were $16 million in 2014 and $10 million in 2013.

Provision for credit losses was up slightly from the year-ago quarter and the prior quarter. The year-to-date increase over 2013 reflects fluctuations in the international portfolio charge-offs. Net charge-offs were $4 million (0.44% of average finance receivables) in the third quarter of 2014, down from the year-ago quarter and the prior quarter. TIF charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014, included approximately $9 million and $12 million, respectively, related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale (none for the quarter ended September 30, 2014). The prior-year third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $1 million related to the transfer of receivables to assets held for sale. Net charge-offs year-to-date were $30 million (1.13%) in 2014, compared to $5 million (0.23%) in 2013. Essentially all of the charge-offs for both years were concentrated in the International portfolio. Non-accrual loans were $42 million (1.13% of finance receivables) at September 30, 2014, essentially flat with June 30, 2014 and up from $23 million (0.70%) at September 30, 2013.

Operating expenses were $74 million and $229 million for the quarter and year-to-date 2014, up from the 2013 periods reflecting the European rail acquisition and our continued investment in growth initiatives.

North American Commercial Finance

The NACF segment is comprised of four divisions: Corporate Finance, Equipment Finance, Real Estate Finance and Commercial Services. Revenue is generated from interest earned on loans, rents on leases, fees and other revenue from lending activities and capital markets transactions, and commissions earned on factoring and related activities.

Corporate Finance provides a range of financing options and offers advisory services to small and medium size companies. Its core products include both loan and fee-based products. Loans offered are primarily senior secured loans collateralized by accounts receivable, inventory, machinery & equipment and/or intangibles that are often used for working capital, plant expansion, acquisitions or recapitalizations. These loans include revolving lines of credit and term loans and, depending on the nature and quality of the collateral, may be referred to as asset-based loans or cash flow loans. We provide financing to customers in a wide range of industries, including Commercial & Industrial, Communications, Media & Entertainment, Energy and Healthcare.

Equipment Finance provides leasing and equipment loan solutions to small businesses and middle market companies in a wide range of industries. We provide financing solutions for our borrowers and lessees, and assist manufacturers and distributors in growing sales, profitability and customer loyalty by providing customized, value-added finance solutions to their commercial clients. We offer both capital and operating leases.

Real Estate Finance provides senior secured commercial real estate loans to developers and other commercial real estate professionals. We focus on stable, cash flowing properties and originate construction loans to highly experienced and well capitalized developers.

60 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Commercial Services provides factoring, receivable management products, and secured financing to businesses (our clients, generally manufacturers or importers of goods) that operate in several industries, including apparel, textile, furniture, home furnishings and consumer electronics. Factoring entails the assumption of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable arising from the sale of goods by our clients to their customers (generally retailers) that have been factored (i.e. sold or assigned to the factor). Although primarily U.S.-based, Commercial Services also conducts business with clients and their customers internationally.

North American Commercial Finance – Financial Data and Metrics (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Earnings Summary
Interest income	$	215.8		$	208.8		$	199.6		$	618.0		$	628.9
Interest expense		(74.2	)		(68.1	)		(66.9	)		(211.2	)		(217.1	)
Provision for credit losses		(29.7	)		(2.6	)		(8.3	)		(55.5	)		(38.0	)
Rental income on operating leases		24.7			25.1			27.2			72.6			76.8
Other income		71.1			69.7			71.5			202.6			200.0
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(20.1	)		(20.0	)		(19.8	)		(62.0	)		(54.7	)
Operating expenses		(125.9	)		(120.2	)		(119.7	)		(367.6	)		(366.2	)
Income before benefit (provision) for income taxes	$	61.7		$	92.7		$	83.6		$	196.9		$	229.7
Select Average Balances
Average finance receivables (AFR)	$	16,009.3		$	15,181.0		$	14,274.3		$	15,221.6		$	13,860.6
Average earning assets (AEA)	$	14,953.4		$	14,132.4		$	13,156.0		$	14,203.9		$	12,746.4
Statistical Data
Net finance margin – net finance revenue (interest and rental income, net of interest and depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) as a % of AEA		3.91	%		4.13	%		4.26	%		3.92	%		4.54	%
New business volume	$	1,608.0		$	1,600.1		$	1,423.8		$	4,581.0		$	4,466.2
Factoring volume	$	6,746.7		$	6,282.8		$	6,600.8		$	19,300.6		$	18,910.9

AEA is lower than AFR as it is reduced by the average credit balances for factoring clients.

Pre-tax earnings were down from both the year-ago and prior quarters, primarily due to higher credit costs. Year-to-date, pre-tax earnings declined due to higher credit costs and lower yields in certain portfolios, which offset the benefit from higher earning assets.

Financing and leasing assets grew 5% sequentially, to $16.4 billion, primarily reflecting the acquisition of approximately $540 million of financing and leasing assets in Direct Capital that are reflected in the Equipment Finance division. The 12% growth from a year ago also reflected strong growth in our Real Estate Finance and Corporate Finance divisions. Funded new business volume for the quarter was up 13% from the year-ago quarter, and flat with the prior quarter. The increase in new business volume from the prior quarters reflected increases in Real Estate Finance and Equipment Finance, partially offset by a decline in Corporate Finance.

CIT Bank originated the vast majority of the U.S. funded volume in each of the presented quarters. At September 30, 2014, over 75% of financing and leasing assets were in CIT Bank.

Other highlights included:

Net finance revenue was $146 million, up from $140 million in the year-ago quarter reflecting higher earning assets, and unchanged from the prior quarter. Net finance margin (NFM) was 3.91%, down from the year-ago quarter primarily due to lower portfolio yields in Equipment Finance and Corporate Finance. The sequential quarter decline is largely due to benefits from higher prepayments in the prior quarter. The year-to-date decline in NFM from 2013 reflects the reduction of prepayment benefits, lower portfolio yields across all businesses, and a declining benefit from net FSA accretion.

Other income was essentially flat compared to the year-ago quarter and prior quarter, as well as on a year-to-date basis, and primarily consisted of the following items:

Factoring commissions were $31 million, down slightly from the year-ago quarter as changes in underlying portfolio mix offset increased factoring volume, and up from $28 million in the prior quarter, largely driven by an increase in volume. Factoring volume was up 2% from the year-ago quarter, and up 7% sequentially reflecting normal seasonality.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 61

Table of Contents

n		Fee revenue was $22 million, up from $20 million in the year-ago quarter, and $18 million in the prior quarter. Fee revenue is mainly driven by syndication fees, arranger fees, agent fees and fees from issuing letters of credit and on unused lines of credit. Year-to-date period, fee revenue totaled $57 million, down slightly from 2013.

n		Gains on equipment, receivables and investments sales totaled $15 million, up from $7 million in the year-ago quarter and $13 million in the prior quarter. Equipment and receivables sold totaled $236 million, up from $118 million in the year-ago quarter and $175 million in the prior quarter. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, gains totaled $38 million (on $549 million of equipment and receivables sold), up from $23 million (on $355 million of equipment and receivables sold) during the comparable period in 2013.

Credit metrics remained at or near cycle lows. Non-accrual loans were $134 million (0.83% of finance receivables), essentially unchanged from June 30, 2014 and down from $167 million (1.16%) a year ago. The current quarter provision for credit losses primarily reflects reserve build due to growth and higher reserves on a small number of accounts. Net charge-offs were $16 million (0.40% of average finance receivables), compared to $11 million (0.30%) in the year-ago quarter and $9 million (0.23%) last quarter. Net charge-offs for the current quarter included $11 million related to the transfer of receivables to AHFS, compared to $3 million in each of the year-ago and prior quarters. For the year-to-date periods, net charge-offs were $41 million (0.36%) in 2014 and included $17 million related to the transfer of receivables to AHFS compared to $21 million (0.20%) in 2013, which included $5 million related to the transfer of receivables to AHFS.

Operating expenses were up from the year-ago quarter due to operating costs related to Direct Capital. The nine month period largely reflected the benefits of operating efficiencies gained compared to 2013, offset by the additional costs related to Direct Capital.

Non-Strategic Portfolios

NSP consists of portfolios that we no longer consider strategic. Included in NSP at September 30, 2014 are several international equipment finance portfolios, including Brazil, Mexico and smaller portfolios in Europe that we identified as subscale platforms during our international rationalization. On April 25, 2014, we completed the sale of the student lending business. Upon sale, the business was classified as a discontinued operation, and all prior period data has been adjusted.

Non-Strategic Portfolios – Financial Data and Metrics (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Earnings Summary
Interest income	$	20.4		$	25.6		$	37.0		$	74.4		$	123.7
Interest expense		(18.6	)		(23.0	)		(29.9	)		(66.5	)		(99.5	)
Provision for credit losses		0.7			0.7			(2.2	)		0.4			(8.6	)
Rental income on operating leases		8.9			9.4			30.2			27.8			100.1
Other income		(47.1	)		3.9			(1.1	)		(38.8	)		(27.0	)
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(3.5	)		(5.7	)		(8.3	)		(14.4	)		(26.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		–			–			–			–			(0.1	)
Operating expenses		(16.9	)		(20.5	)		(36.2	)		(56.6	)		(108.9	)
Loss before benefit (provision) for income taxes	$	(56.1	)	$	(9.6	)	$	(10.5	)	$	(73.7	)	$	(46.4	)
Select Average Balances
Average finance receivables (AFR)	$	0.1		$	83.9		$	921.4		$	196.5		$	1,293.5
Average earning assets (AEA)	$	617.7		$	988.1		$	1,844.4		$	938.7		$	1,929.0
Statistical Data
Net finance revenue as a % of AEA		4.66	%		2.55	%		6.29	%		3.03	%		6.78	%
New business volume	$	64.7		$	64.1		$	169.6		$	180.6		$	614.9

Pre-tax losses for the 2014 third quarter were elevated due to impairments on AHFS. Impairment charges on international equipment finance portfolios identified as subscale platforms during our international rationalization totaled $49 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2014. HFS impairment charges were $54 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $37 million and $80 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013. The 2014 third quarter and year-to-date also reflected declining operating expenses offset by lower net revenues from lower assets levels compared to the 2013 periods.

Financing and leasing assets at September 30, 2014 totaled $0.6 billion in AHFS, primarily related to international small ticket platforms identified as subscale platforms during our international rationalization. The financing and leasing assets were down approximately $0.1 billion from June 30, 2014, primarily due to impairment charges, runoff and currency exchange.

62 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

We have exited all the sub-scale countries in Asia, and several in Latin America and Europe, as well as our SBL portfolio, and continue to market the remaining non-strategic portfolios in Europe and Latin America. In October we entered into an agreement to sell certain operations in Europe (AHFS of $100 million). In addition, we are in the advance stages of negotiating the sale of our Mexico and Brazil portfolios.

Corporate and Other

Certain items are not allocated to operating segments and are included in Corporate and Other, including unallocated interest expense, primarily related to corporate liquidity costs (Interest Expense), mark-to-market adjustments on non-qualifying derivatives (Other Income), restructuring charges for severance and facilities exit activities and certain legal costs and unallocated expenses (Operating Expenses).

Corporate and Other – Financial Data (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Earnings Summary
Interest income	$	3.3		$	3.2		$	3.7		$	10.2		$	10.1
Interest expense		(17.1	)		(16.0	)		(13.5	)		(50.5	)		(42.4	)
Provision for credit losses		(0.1	)		–			0.1			(0.2	)		0.2
Other income		(18.6	)		9.7			2.7			(11.2	)		5.6
Operating expenses, including loss on debt extinguishments		(17.9	)		(9.2	)		(10.4	)		(40.4	)		(23.3	)
Loss before benefit (provision) for income taxes	$	(50.4	)	$	(12.3	)	$	(17.4	)	$	(92.1	)	$	(49.8	)

Interest income consists of interest and dividend income, primarily from deposits held at other depository institutions and other investment securities.

Other income primarily reflects gains and (losses) on derivatives, including the GSI facilities, which drove the balances in the current and prior quarters, and foreign currency exchange. The GSI derivative has a negative mark-to-market of $13 million in the current quarter and an $11 million positive mark-to-market in the prior quarter.

Operating expenses reflects salary and general and administrative expenses in excess of amounts allocated to the business segments, litigation-related costs and provision for severance and facilities exiting activities. Restructuring charges totaled $9 million in the third quarter of 2014, compared to $3 million in the year-ago quarter and $6 million in the prior quarter. Year-to-date, restructuring charges totaled $25 million, up from $18 million in 2013.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 63

Table of Contents

FINANCING AND LEASING ASSETS

The following table presents our financing and leasing assets by segment and divisions within these segments.

Financing and Leasing Asset Composition (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Transportation & International Finance
*Segment Total*
Loans	$	3,687.7	$	3,494.4	5.5	%
Operating lease equipment, net		14,931.2		12,778.5	16.8	%
Assets held for sale		464.7		158.5	193.2	%
Financing and leasing assets		19,083.6		16,431.4	16.1	%
*Aerospace*
Loans		1,664.4		1,247.7	33.4	%
Operating lease equipment, net		9,216.6		8,267.9	11.5	%
Assets held for sale		109.9		148.8	(26.1	)%
Financing and leasing assets		10,990.9		9,664.4	13.7	%
*Rail*
Loans		120.1		107.2	12.0	%
Operating lease equipment, net		5,708.7		4,503.9	26.8	%
Assets held for sale		0.4		3.3	(87.9	)%
Financing and leasing assets		5,829.2		4,614.4	26.3	%
*Maritime Finance*
Loans		839.5		412.6	103.5	%
Financing and leasing assets		839.5		412.6	103.5	%
*International Finance*
Loans		1,063.7		1,726.9	(38.4	)%
Operating lease equipment, net		5.9		6.7	(11.9	)%
Assets held for sale		354.4		6.4	>100	%
Financing and leasing assets		1,424.0		1,740.0	(18.2	)%
North American Commercial Finance
*Segment Total*
Loans		16,098.0		14,693.1	9.6	%
Operating lease equipment, net		252.6		240.5	5.0	%
Assets held for sale		85.3		38.2	123.3	%
Financing and leasing assets		16,435.9		14,971.8	9.8	%
*Real Estate Finance*
Loans		1,751.7		1,554.8	12.7	%
Financing and leasing assets		1,751.7		1,554.8	12.7	%
*Corporate Finance*
Loans		7,152.5		6,831.8	4.7	%
Operating lease equipment, net		8.5		6.2	37.1	%
Assets held for sale		85.3		38.2	123.3	%
Financing and leasing assets		7,246.3		6,876.2	5.4	%
*Equipment Finance*
Loans		4,710.7		4,044.1	16.5	%
Operating lease equipment, net		244.1		234.3	4.2	%
Financing and leasing assets		4,954.8		4,278.4	15.8	%
*Commercial Services*
Loans and factoring receivables		2,483.1		2,262.4	9.8	%
Financing and leasing assets		2,483.1		2,262.4	9.8	%
Non-Strategic Portfolios
Loans		0.1		441.7	(100	)%
Operating lease equipment, net		–		16.4	(100	)%
Assets held for sale		552.7		806.7	(31.5	)%
Financing and leasing assets		552.8		1,264.8	(56.3	)%
Consolidated Totals:
Loans	$	19,785.8	$	18,629.2	6.2	%
Operating lease equipment, net		15,183.8		13,035.4	16.5	%
Assets held for sale		1,102.7		1,003.4	9.9	%
Total financing and leasing assets	$	36,072.3	$	32,668.0	10.4	%

64 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Growth in TIF was driven by Aerospace, Rail and Maritime Finance. The higher TIF financing and leasing assets reflects solid new business volume, which included the delivery of 29 commercial aircraft and approximately 5,400 railcars, the funding of $1.6 billion of loans, and was supplemented by the acquisition of a European railcar lessor of approximately $650 million of assets (operating lease equipment). NACF growth was led by Equipment Finance, which included the acquisition of Direct Capital that increased loans by approximately $540 million in the third quarter, Real Estate Finance, which had double-digit growth year-to-date, and Corporate Finance, which had strong activity in the commercial and industrial and energy industries. The decline in NSP primarily reflected sales in the first half of the year, and impairment charges and foreign currency fluctuations during the third quarter.

AHFS in TIF were mainly comprised of loans in the international portfolio and aircraft and related equipment in the aerospace division. Most of the remaining AHFS at September 30, 2014 were in NSP and included various equipment financing portfolios, primarily in Latin America.

Financing and leasing asset trends are also discussed in the respective segment descriptions in“Results by Business Segment”.

The following table presents the changes to our financing and leasing assets:

Financing and Leasing Assets Roll forward (dollars in millions)

	Transportation & International Finance			North American Commercial Finance			Non-Strategic Portfolios			Total
Balance at June 30, 2014	$	18,412.9		$	15,650.0		$	658.7		$	34,721.6
New business volume		1,326.8			1,608.0			64.7			2,999.5
Portfolio / business acquisitions		–			536.6			–			536.6
Loan and portfolio sales		(64.2	)		(157.2	)		(2.9	)		(224.3	)
Equipment sales		(129.5	)		(79.0	)		(3.3	)		(211.8	)
Depreciation		(132.8	)		(20.1	)		(3.5	)		(156.4	)
Gross charge-offs		(4.5	)		(20.7	)		–			(25.2	)
Collections, impairments and other		(325.1	)		(1,081.7	)		(160.9	)		(1,567.7	)
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	19,083.6		$	16,435.9		$	552.8		$	36,072.3
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	16,431.4		$	14,971.8		$	1,264.8		$	32,668.0
New business volume		3,786.1			4,581.0			180.6			8,547.7
Portfolio / business acquisitions		649.2			536.6			–			1,185.8
Loan and portfolio sales		(124.3	)		(319.9	)		(366.4	)		(810.6	)
Equipment sales		(349.0	)		(229.4	)		(14.6	)		(593.0	)
Depreciation		(386.1	)		(62.0	)		(14.4	)		(462.5	)
Gross charge-offs		(34.7	)		(56.5	)		(7.5	)		(98.7	)
Collections, impairments and other		(889.0	)		(2,985.7	)		(489.7	)		(4,364.4	)
Balance at September 30, 2014	$	19,083.6		$	16,435.9		$	552.8		$	36,072.3

The following tables present our segment volumes and loan and equipment sales:

Total Business Volumes(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2014		2014		2013		2014		2013
Transportation & International Finance	$	1,326.8	$	1,404.7	$	982.0	$	3,786.1	$	2,312.3
North American Commercial Finance		1,608.0		1,600.1		1,423.8		4,581.0		4,466.2
Non-Strategic Portfolios		64.7		64.1		169.6		180.6		614.9
Total	$	2,999.5	$	3,068.9	$	2,575.4	$	8,547.7	$	7,393.4
Factored Volume	$	6,746.7	$	6,282.8	$	6,600.8	$	19,300.6	$	18,910.9

Funded new business volume increased nearly 16% from the year-ago quarter and on a year-to-date basis, as increases in TIF and NACF activity offset the decline in the run-off portfolios in NSP.

Factoring volume was up from the year-ago quarter, and increased from the prior quarter, reflecting seasonal trends.

Business volumes are discussed in the respective segment descriptions in“Results by Business Segment”.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 65

Table of Contents

Loan and Portfolio Sales (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2014		2014		2013		2014		2013
Transportation & International Finance	$	64.2	$	45.9	$	52.3	$	124.3	$	52.3
North American Commercial Finance		157.2		92.9		49.7		319.9		133.4
Non-Strategic Portfolios		2.9		299.9		191.2		366.4		227.7
Total	$	224.3	$	438.7	$	293.2	$	810.6	$	413.4

The prior quarter sales in NSP primarily consisted of small business portfolio loans, along with some international portfolios.

Equipment Sales (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		June 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2014		2014		2013		2014		2013
Transportation & International Finance	$	129.5	$	35.2	$	324.6	$	349.0	$	799.1
North American Commercial Finance		79.0		82.0		68.6		229.4		221.5
Non-Strategic Portfolios		3.3		7.5		15.3		14.6		31.0
Total	$	211.8	$	124.7	$	408.5	$	593.0	$	1,051.6

Asset sales in TIF primarily reflect aerospace and rail assets. Asset and loan and portfolio sales are discussed in Non-interest Income section, along with the related gains and losses.

CONCENTRATIONS

Ten Largest Accounts

Our ten largest financing and leasing asset accounts in the aggregate represented 11.1% of our total financing and leasing assets at September 30, 2014 (the largest account was 2.0%). The largest accounts represent aerospace and rail assets.

The ten largest financing and leasing asset accounts were 9.8% at December 31, 2013.

Geographic Concentrations

The following table represents the financing and leasing assets by obligor geography:

Financing and Leasing Assets by Obligor – Geographic Region (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Northeast	$	6,361.9	17.6	%	$	5,933.1	18.2	%
Southwest		3,984.9	11.1	%		3,606.9	11.1	%
Midwest		3,894.0	10.8	%		3,762.5	11.5	%
Southeast		3,683.2	10.2	%		2,690.2	8.2	%
West		3,428.6	9.5	%		3,238.6	9.9	%
Total U.S.		21,352.6	59.2	%		19,231.3	58.9	%
Asia / Pacific		4,473.6	12.4	%		4,017.9	12.3	%
Europe		3,811.5	10.6	%		3,692.4	11.3	%
Canada		2,646.8	7.3	%		2,287.0	7.0	%
Latin America		1,733.3	4.8	%		1,743.1	5.3	%
All other countries		2,054.5	5.7	%		1,696.3	5.2	%
Total	$	36,072.3	100.0	%	$	32,668.0	100.0	%

66 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes both state concentrations greater than 5.0% and international country concentrations in excess of 1.0% of our financing and leasing assets:

Financing and Leasing Assets by Obligor – State and Country (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
State
Texas	$	3,327.8	9.2	%	$	3,022.4	9.3	%
New York		2,404.7	6.7	%		2,323.3	7.1	%
All other states		15,620.1	43.3	%		13,885.6	42.5	%
Total U.S.	$	21,352.6	59.2	%	$	19,231.3	58.9	%
Country
Canada	$	2,646.8	7.3	%	$	2,287.0	7.0	%
England		1,112.3	3.1	%		1,166.5	3.6	%
Australia		1,040.7	2.9	%		974.4	3.0	%
China		938.4	2.6	%		969.1	2.9	%
Mexico		699.6	1.9	%		819.9	2.5	%
Brazil		634.7	1.8	%		710.3	2.2	%
Philippines		440.6	1.2	%		255.9	0.8	%
France		425.9	1.2	%		294.7	0.9	%
South Korea		415.8	1.1	%		459.9	1.4	%
Russia		384.0	1.1	%		355.9	1.1	%
Spain		381.6	1.1	%		450.7	1.4	%
Indonesia		349.1	1.0	%		285.9	0.9	%
All other countries		5,250.2	14.5	%		4,406.5	13.4	%
Total International	$	14,719.7	40.8	%	$	13,436.7	41.1	%

Industry Concentrations

The following table represents financing and leasing assets by industry of obligor:

Financing and Leasing Assets by Obligor – Industry (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
Commercial airlines (including regional airlines)⁽¹⁾	$	10,296.1	28.5	%	$	8,972.4	27.5	%
Manufacturing⁽²⁾		6,101.0	16.9	%		5,542.1	17.0	%
Retail⁽³⁾		3,187.9	8.8	%		3,063.1	9.4	%
Transportation⁽⁴⁾		2,784.9	7.8	%		2,404.2	7.4	%
Service industries		2,732.6	7.6	%		3,144.3	9.6	%
Energy and utilities		1,456.9	4.0	%		1,256.7	3.8	%
Real Estate		1,410.8	3.9	%		1,351.4	4.1	%
Oil and gas extraction / services		1,340.0	3.8	%		1,018.7	3.1	%
Healthcare		1,310.2	3.6	%		1,393.1	4.3	%
Finance and insurance		942.8	2.6	%		760.1	2.3	%
Other (no industry greater than 2%)		4,509.1	12.5	%		3,761.9	11.5	%
Total	$	36,072.3	100.0	%	$	32,668.0	100.0	%

⁽¹⁾

Includes the Commercial Aerospace Portfolio and additional financing and leasing assets that are not commercial aircraft.

⁽²⁾

At September 30, 2014, includes manufacturers of chemicals, including pharmaceuticals (3.6%), petroleum and coal, including refining (3.1%), and food (1.8%).

⁽³⁾

At September 30, 2014, includes retailers of apparel (4.2%) and general merchandise (1.5%).

⁽⁴⁾

At September 30, 2014, included rail (3.9%), maritime (1.7%) and trucking and shipping (1.6%).

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 67

Table of Contents

Commercial Aerospace

The following tables present details on our commercial and regional aerospace portfolio concentrations, which we call our Commercial Aerospace portfolio. The net investment in regional aerospace financing and leasing assets was $49.5 million and $52.1 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and was substantially comprised of loans and capital leases.

Commercial Aerospace Portfolio (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Net Investment		Number		Net Investment		Number
By Product:
Operating lease⁽¹⁾	$	9,293.7		285	$	8,379.3		270
Loan⁽²⁾		582.3		50		505.3		39
Capital lease		315.2		20		31.7		8
Total	$	10,191.2		355	$	8,916.3		317

The information presented below by region, manufacturer, and body type, is based on our operating lease aircraft portfolio, which comprises 91% of our total commercial aerospace portfolio and substantially all of our owned fleet of leased aircraft at September 30, 2014.

Commercial Aerospace Operating Lease Portfolio⁽¹⁾ (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Net Investment		Number		Net Investment		Number
By Region:
Asia / Pacific	$	3,407.5		85	$	3,065.1		81
Europe		2,327.6		88		2,408.8		91
U.S. and Canada		1,942.5		59		1,276.5		43
Latin America		1,017.0		38		940.3		38
Africa / Middle East		599.1		15		688.6		17
Total	$	9,293.7		285	$	8,379.3		270
By Manufacturer:
Airbus	$	6,184.0		168	$	5,899.1		167
Boeing		2,559.9		98		2,038.7		87
Embraer		521.8		19		441.5		16
Other		28.0		–		–		–
Total	$	9,293.7		285	$	8,379.3		270
By Body Type⁽³⁾:
Narrow body	$	6,662.9		241	$	6,080.6		230
Intermediate		2,601.6		43		2,297.3		39
Regional and other		29.2		1		1.4		1
Total	$	9,293.7		285	$	8,379.3		270
Number of customers				100				98
Weighted average age of fleet (years)				5				5

⁽¹⁾

Includes operating lease equipment held for sale.

⁽²⁾

Plane count excludes aircraft in which our net investment consists of syndicated financings against multiple aircraft. The net investment associated with such financings was $40 million at September 30, 2014 and $45 million at December 31, 2013.

⁽³⁾

Narrow body are single aisle design and consist primarily of Boeing 737 and 757 series, Airbus A320 series, and Embraer E170 and E190 aircraft. Intermediate body are smaller twin aisle design and consist primarily of Boeing 767 series and Airbus A330 series aircraft. Regional and Other includes aircraft and related equipment, such as engines.

Our top five commercial aerospace outstanding exposures totaled $2,602.2 million at September 30, 2014. The largest individual outstanding exposure, which was to a U.S. carrier, totaled $722.0 million at September 30, 2014. SeeNote 13 — Commitments for additional information regarding commitments to purchase additional aircraft.

68 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Leased Railcars

TIF’s Rail business has a fleet of approximately 119,000 railcars, including approximately 30,000 tank cars, of which approximately 19,000 are used in the transport of crude oil, ethanol and other flammable liquids (collectively, “Flammable Liquids”) in North America. TIF’s fleet of tank cars in Flammable Liquids service is comprised of legacy tank cars used to transport Flammable Liquids, and tank cars meeting the CPC-1232 design standards, which standards were voluntarily adopted by the rail industry in 2011 and include design enhancements intended to improve tank car safety. Of the approximately 19,000 tank cars in our North American fleet currently in Flammable Liquids service, approximately 10,500 were manufactured prior to adoption of the CPC-1232 standard and may be subject to higher costs to retrofit.

Following several highly-publicized derailments of tank cars since mid-2013, U.S. and Canadian government agencies and industry groups agreed to implement a number of operational changes, including requiring multiple crew members on all trains carrying hazardous materials, prohibiting unattended trains on main lines, increasing track inspections, reducing speeds in populated areas, redirecting trains around high-risk areas, and mandating the testing and classification of crude oil prior to shipment. In addition, in April, 2014, Transport Canada (“TC”) issued an order prohibiting the use of certain older tank cars in dangerous goods service in Canada effective immediately. We do not expect these operational changes and restrictions will have a material impact on our business or financial results.

On June 27, 2014, TC announced proposed amendments under the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, the Railway Safety Management System Regulations, and the Transportation Information Regulations that will, among other safety requirements for railways, formalize new DOT-111 tank car standards. On July 23, 2014, the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“NPRM”) on Enhanced Tank Car Standards and Operational Controls for High Hazard Flammable Trains seeking public comment on tank cars standards, braking systems, speed restrictions, rail routing and notifications to state emergency responders. The NPRM also requested comment on retrofit standards and schedule for existing tank cars in high-hazard flammable trains.

The NPRM is complex and will require extensive review. In addition, the PHMSA proposed three different options for new tank car standards in the NPRM and raised questions to which public comment and discussion is requested. Until PHMSA and TC release their proposed rules, we will be unable to assess how any final regulations may impact CIT and what changes may be required with respect to our tank cars in Flammable Liquids service, including the scope and cost to CIT of any retrofit program and the timing of required implementation of any retrofitting requirements. Since the average age of our affected fleet is relatively young, we expect to retrofit most, if not all, of our cars pursuant to the regulations and to amortize and recover the cost over the remaining asset life.

OTHER ASSETS / OTHER LIABILITIES

The following tables present components of other assets and other liabilities.

Other Assets (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Deposits on commercial aerospace equipment	$	693.0	$	831.3
Deferred federal and state tax assets		352.6		40.0
Deferred costs, including debt related costs		153.4		158.5
Furniture and fixtures		127.8		85.3
Fair value of derivative financial instruments		120.8		50.3
Tax receivables, other than income taxes		114.3		132.2
Other⁽¹⁾		410.5		396.5
Total other assets	$	1,972.4	$	1,694.1

⁽¹⁾

Other includes items such as: accrued interest/dividends, fixed assets, prepaid expenses, investments in and receivables from non-consolidated entities, and other miscellaneous assets, none of which are individually in excess of $100 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 69

Table of Contents

Other Liabilities (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Equipment maintenance deposits	$	941.2	$	904.2
Accrued expenses and accounts payable		437.4		478.1
Security and other deposits		299.5		227.4
Current taxes payable and deferred taxes		264.4		179.8
Accrued interest payable		179.5		247.1
Valuation adjustment relating to aerospace commitments		117.9		137.5
Other⁽¹⁾		397.3		490.2
Total other liabilities	$	2,637.2	$	2,664.3

⁽¹⁾

Other consist of other taxes, property tax liabilities and other miscellaneous liabilities; none of which are individually in excess of $100 million.

RISK MANAGEMENT

CIT is subject to a variety of risks that may arise through the Company’s business activities, including the following principal forms of risk:

Credit risk, which is the risk of loss (including the incurrence of additional expenses) when a borrower does not meet its financial obligations to the Company. Credit risk may arise from lending, leasing, and/or counterparty activities.

Asset risk, which is the equipment valuation and residual risk of lease equipment owned by the Company that arises from fluctuations in the supply and demand for the underlying leased equipment. The Company is exposed to the risk that, at the end of the lease term, the value of the asset will be lower than expected, resulting in either reduced future lease income over the remaining life of the asset or a lower sale value.

Market risk, which includes interest rate and foreign currency risk. Interest rate risk refers to the impact that fluctuations in interest rates will have on the Company’s NFR and on the market value of the Company’s assets, liabilities and derivatives. Foreign exchange risk refers to the economic impact that fluctuations in exchange rates between currencies will have on the Company’s non-dollar denominated assets and liabilities.

Liquidity risk, which is the risk that the Company has an inability to maintain adequate cash resources and funding capacity to meet its obligations, including under liquidity stress scenarios.

Legal, regulatory and compliance risk, which is the risk that the Company is not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, which may result in fines, regulatory criticism or business restrictions, or damage to the Company’s reputation. Following the closing of the OneWest transaction, based on current definitions and requirements at the time of the announcement, CIT will become subject to the enhanced regulatory mandates applicable to bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, commonly referred to as systemically important financial institutions, or SIFIs, including but not limited to submitting an annual capital plan, undergoing an annual supervisory stress test and two company-run stress tests, submitting a resolution plan, implementation of an enhanced compliance program under the Volcker Rule, and payment of additional FRB assessments. The date on which CIT becomes subject to each SIFI requirement will vary depending on the terms of the individual regulation.

Operational risk, which is the risk of financial loss, damage to the Company’s reputation, or other adverse impacts resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, people or external events.

In order to effectively manage risk, the Company has established a governance and oversight structure that includes defining the Company’s risk appetite, setting limits, underwriting standards and target performance metrics that are aligned with the risk appetite, and establishing credit approval authorities. The Company ensures effective risk governance and oversight through the establishment and enforcement of policies and procedures, risk governance committees, management information systems, models and analytics, staffing and training to ensure appropriate expertise, and the identification, monitoring and reporting of risks so that they are proactively managed.

Our policies and procedures relating to Risk Management are detailed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk arises from lending, leasing, investments, deposit taking and funding, as assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts as interest rates change. We evaluate and monitor interest rate risk through two primary metrics.

Net Interest Income Sensitivity (“NII Sensitivity”), which measures the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on net finance revenue; and

70 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”), which measures the net economic value of equity impact by assessing the market value of assets, liabilities and derivatives.

Interest rate risk and sensitivity is influenced primarily by the composition of the balance sheet, driven by the type of products offered (fixed/floating rate loans and deposits), investments, funding and hedging activities. Our assets are primarily comprised of commercial loans, operating leases, cash and investments. We use a variety of funding sources, including retail and brokered CDs, savings accounts, secured and unsecured debt, and equity. Our leasing products are level/fixed payment transactions, whereas the interest rate on a majority of our commercial loan portfolio is based off of a floating rate index such as short-term Libor or Prime. Our investment portfolio, reverse repos and interest bearing deposits (cash) have short duration and reprice frequently. With respect to liabilities, CDs and unsecured debt are fixed rate, secured debt is a mix of fixed and floating rate, and the rates on savings accounts are established based on the market environment and competition. The composition of our assets and liabilities results in a slight net asset-sensitive position at the shorter end of the curve, mostly to moves in LIBOR, whereby our assets will reprice faster than our liabilities.

Deposits continued to grow as a percent of total funding. CIT Bank sources deposits primarily through direct-to-consumer (via the internet) and brokered channels. At September 30, 2014, the Bank had over $14 billion in deposits, more than half of which were obtained through our direct channel while approximately 38% were sourced through brokers with the remainder from institutional and other sources. Fixed rate, term deposits represented over 61% of our deposit portfolio. The deposit rates we offer can be influenced by market conditions and competitive factors. Changes in interest rates can affect our pricing and potentially impact our ability to gather and retain deposits. Rates offered by competitors also can influence our rates and our ability to attract and hold deposits. The majority of the Bank’s deposits are fixed-rate. In a rising rate environment, the Bank may need to increase rates to renew maturing deposits and attract new deposits. Rates on our savings account deposits may fluctuate due to pricing competition and may also move with short-term interest rates, on a lagging basis. In general, retail deposits represent a low-cost source of funds and are less sensitive to interest rate changes than many non-deposit funding sources. Our ability to gather brokered deposits may be more sensitive to rate changes than other types of deposits. We manage this risk by limiting maturity concentration and emphasizing new issuance in long-dated maturities of up to ten years. We regularly stress test the effect of deposit rate changes on our margins and seek to achieve optimal alignment between assets and liabilities from an interest rate risk management perspective.

The table below summarizes the results of simulation modeling produced by our asset/liability management system. The results reflect the percentage change in the EVE and NII Sensitivity over the next twelve months assuming an immediate 100 basis point parallel increase or decrease in interest rates. NII sensitivity is based on a static balance sheet projection.

Change to NII Sensitivity and EVE

	September 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	+100 bps			–100 bps			+100 bps			–100 bps
NII Sensitivity		6.3	%		(1.0	)%		6.1	%		(0.9	)%
EVE		1.8	%		(1.6	)%		1.8	%		(2.0	)%

A primary driver of the change in NII Sensitivity was the sale in April 2014 of the student lending business, which had, as of December 31, 2013, a portfolio of $3.4 billion of government-guaranteed student loans and associated $3.3 billion of floating rate debt that was extinguished upon sale. The December 31, 2013 amounts reflect the simulation results on our portfolio at that time, which included the student lending business.

As detailed in the above table, NII sensitivity is positive to an increase in interest rates. This is primarily driven by our cash and investment securities position, and commercial floating rate loan portfolio, which reprice frequently. On a net basis, we have more floating/repricing assets than liabilities in the near term. As a result, our current portfolio is more sensitive to moves in short-term interest rates in the near term. Therefore, our Net Finance Revenue (NFR) may increase if short-term interest rates rise, or decrease if short-term interest rates decline. Market implied forward rates over the subsequent future twelve months are used to determine a base interest rate scenario for the net interest income projection for the base case. This base projection is compared with those calculated under varying interest rate scenarios such as 100 bps parallel rate shift to arrive at NII Sensitivity.

EVE complements net interest income simulation and sensitivity analysis as it estimates risk exposures beyond a twelve month horizon. EVE modeling measures the extent to which the economic value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments may change in response to fluctuations in interest rates. EVE is calculated by subjecting the balance sheet to different rate shocks, measuring the net value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, and comparing those amounts with the base case of an unchanged interest rate environment. The duration of our liabilities is greater than that of our assets, in that we have more fixed rate liabilities than assets in the longer term, causing EVE to increase under increasing rates and decrease under decreasing rates. The methodology with which the operating lease assets are assessed in the results table above reflects the existing contractual rental cash flows and the

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 71

Table of Contents

expected residual value at the end of the existing contract term. The simulation modeling for both NII Sensitivity and EVE assumes we take no action in response to the changes in interest rates.

A wide variety of potential interest rate scenarios are simulated within our asset/liability management system. All interest sensitive assets and liabilities are evaluated using discounted cash flow analysis. Rates are shocked up and down via a set of scenarios that include both parallel and non-parallel interest rate movements. Scenarios are also run to capture our sensitivity to changes in the shape of the yield curve. Furthermore, we evaluate the sensitivity of these results to a number of key assumptions, such as credit quality, spreads, and prepayments. Various holding periods of the operating lease assets are also considered. These range from the current existing lease term to longer terms which assume lease renewals consistent with management’s expected holding period of a particular asset. NII Sensitivity and EVE limits have been set and are monitored for certain of the key scenarios. We manage the exposure to changes in NII Sensitivity and EVE in accordance with our risk appetite and within Board approved policy limits.

We use results of our various interest rate risk analyses to formulate asset and liability management (“ALM”) strategies in order to achieve the desired risk profile, while managing our objectives for capital adequacy and liquidity risk exposures. Specifically, we manage our interest rate risk position through certain pricing strategies for loans and deposits, our investment strategy, issuing term debt with floating or fixed interest rates, and using derivatives such as interest rate swaps, which modify the interest rate characteristics of certain assets or liabilities.

These measurements provide an estimate of our interest rate sensitivity, however, they do not account for potential changes in credit quality, size, and prepayment characteristics of our balance sheet. They also do not account for other business developments that could affect net income, or for management actions that could affect net income or that could be taken to change our risk profile. Accordingly, we can give no assurance that actual results would not differ materially from the estimated outcomes of our simulations. Further, such simulations do not represent our current view of expected future interest rate movements.

FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

CIT actively manages and monitors its funding and liquidity sources against relevant limits and targets. These sources satisfy funding and other operating obligations, while also providing protection against unforeseen stress events like unanticipated funding obligations, such as customer line draws, or disruptions to capital markets or other funding sources. In addition to its unrestricted cash, short-term investments and portfolio cash inflows, liquidity sources include:

a $1.5 billion multi-year committed revolving credit facility, of which $1.4 billion was available at September 30, 2014; and

committed securitization facilities and secured bank lines aggregating $4.9 billion, of which $2.4 billion was available at September 30, 2014, provided that eligible assets are available that can be funded through these facilities.

Asset liquidity is further enhanced by our ability to sell or syndicate portfolio assets in secondary markets, which also enables us to manage credit exposure, and to pledge assets to access secured borrowing facilities through the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”) and FRB.

Cash and investment securities totaled $7.2 billion at September 30, 2014, and were comprised of $6.2 billion of cash, $0.7 billion of securities purchased under resale agreements (“reverse repurchase agreements”) and $0.3 billion of other short-term investment securities, compared to $6.8 billion at June 30, 2014 and $7.3 billion at September 30, 2013. Cash and investment securities at September 30, 2014 consisted of $2.0 billion related to the bank holding company and $3.2 billion at CIT Bank with the remainder comprised of cash at operating subsidiaries and in restricted balances.

During the third quarter, CIT entered into $650 million of reverse repurchase agreements in an effort to improve returns on excess liquidity. These are short-term securities that mature within 91 days, have a weighted average yield of over 50 bps and are secured by the underlying collateral, which is maintained at a third-party custodian. Interest earned on these securities is included in ‘Other interest and dividends’ in the statement of operations.

Reverse repurchase agreements are subject to counterparty credit risk, market risk and operational risk. These risks are reduced but not eliminated through various risk management tools, including the use of collateral and initial margins, daily marking to market, position limits with counterparties and concentration limits for specific securities. SeeNote 5 — Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements for further details.

Short-term investment securities at September 30, 2014 consisted of Government Agency bonds that were classified as AFS and had maturity dates of 90 days or less.

72 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The weighted average coupon rates on outstanding deposits and long-term borrowings was 3.16% at September 30, 2014 compared to 3.20% at June 30, 2014 and 3.37% at September 30, 2013. The following table reflects our funding mix:

Funding Mix (dollars in millions)


Deposits	43	%	40	%
Secured	20	%	19	%
Unsecured	37	%	41	%

The percentage of secured funding at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 reflects debt related to the student lending business being reported in discontinued operation (i.e. not part of the funding mix at December 2013), and extinguishment of this debt in April 2014. In the second quarter, the Company restructured two aircraft securitization facilities, which resulted in the extinguishment of $300 million in secured debt, however, in the third quarter, management issued a $640 million aerospace securitization and drew down $540 million on an existing CIT Bank conduit facility. Also in the third quarter, total debt of $487 million was acquired with Direct Capital.

Deposits

We continued to grow deposits during 2014 to fund our bank lending and leasing activities. Deposits totaled $14.5 billion at September 30, 2014, up from $12.5 billion at December 31, 2013 and $11.8 billion at September 30, 2013. The weighted average interest rate on deposits was 1.64% at September 30, 2014, 1.65% at December 31, 2013 and 1.54% at September 30, 2013.

The following table details our deposits by type:

Deposits (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Online deposits	$	7,991.6	$	6,117.5
Brokered CDs / sweeps		5,494.1		5,365.4
Other⁽¹⁾		997.5		1,043.6
Total	$	14,483.2	$	12,526.5

⁽¹⁾

Other primarily includes a deposit sweep arrangement related to Healthcare Savings Accounts and deposits at our Brazil bank.

Long-term Borrowings – Unsecured

Revolving Credit Facility

The Revolving Credit Facility has a total commitment amount of $1.5 billion and the maturity date of the commitment is January 27, 2017. The total commitment amount consists of a $1.15 billion revolving loan tranche and a $350 million revolving loan tranche that can also be utilized for issuance of letters of credit. The applicable margin charged under the facility is 2.50% for LIBOR-based loans and 1.50% for Base Rate loans. Improvement in CIT’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings to either BB by S&P or Ba2 by Moody’s would result in a reduction in the applicable margin to 2.25% for LIBOR-based loans and to 1.25% for Base Rate loans. A downgrade in CIT’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings to B+ by S&P and B1 by Moody’s would result in an increase in the applicable margin to 2.75% for LIBOR-based loans and to 1.75% for Base Rate loans. In the event of a one notch downgrade by only one of the agencies, no change to the margin charged under the facility would occur.

The Revolving Credit Facility is unsecured and is guaranteed by eight of the Company’s domestic operating subsidiaries. The facility was amended to modify the covenant requiring a minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio and the criteria for calculating the ratio. The amended covenant requires a minimum guarantor asset coverage ratio ranging from 1.25:1.0 to the current requirement of 1.5:1.0 depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt rating. At September 30, 2014, the last reported asset coverage ratio was 2.70x.

Senior Unsecured Notes and Series C Unsecured Notes

At September 30, 2014, we had outstanding $12.2 billion of unsecured notes, down slightly from $12.5 billion at December 31, 2013. On February 19, 2014, CIT issued, at par value, $1 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2019 that bear interest at a per annum rate of 3.875%. On April 1, 2014, we repaid $1.3 billion of maturing 5.25% unsecured notes.

SeeNote 7 — Long-term Borrowings for further detail.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 73

Table of Contents

Long-term Borrowings – Secured

Secured borrowings totaled $6.7 billion at September 30, 2014 and $6.0 billion at December 31, 2013, which are secured by $10.7 billion and $9.7 billion of pledged assets at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Though up modestly from year end, the balance is up from $5.3 billion at June 30, 2014, primarily reflecting a $640 million aerospace securitization, $540 million draw down on an existing CIT Bank conduit facility and total debt of $487 million acquired with the Direct Capital acquisition.

Direct Capital debt included secured debt in 6 separate facilities representing $581 million in total commitments at the acquisition date. The outstanding balance for these acquired facilities totaled $486 million at the acquisition date consisting of four revolving facilities ($293 million), and two term asset-backed securitization facilities ($193 million).

The September 30, 2014 borrowings include $1.9 billion in CIT Bank, which were secured by $2.4 billion of assets, up from $1.0 billion of pledged assets and $0.8 billion of secured debt at December 31, 2013. Non-bank secured borrowings were $4.8 billion and $5.1 billion at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and were secured by assets of $8.4 billion and $8.6 billion, respectively.

As part of our liquidity management strategy, we may pledge assets to secure financing transactions (which include securitizations), to secure borrowings from the FHLB or for other purposes as required or permitted by law. Our secured financing transactions do not meet accounting requirements for sale treatment and are recorded as secured borrowings, with the assets remaining on-balance sheet for GAAP. The debt associated with these transactions is collateralized by receivables, leases and/or equipment. Certain related cash balances are restricted.

During the 2014 first quarter, CIT renewed a CAD 250 million committed multi-year conduit facility that allows the Canadian Equipment Finance business to fund both existing assets and new originations at attractive terms. In the second quarter, CIT Bank renewed and extended to 2016 an existing $1 billion committed multi-year equipment finance conduit facility.

The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Seattle and may borrow under a line of credit that is secured by collateral pledged to FHLB Seattle. CIT Bank has $160 million outstanding under the line and $204 million of commercial real estate assets were pledged as collateral at September 30, 2014. A subsidiary of the Bank is a member of FHLB Des Moines and may borrow under lines of credit that are secured by a blanket lien on the subsidiary’s assets and collateral pledged to FHLB Des Moines. At September 30, 2014, $148 million of collateral was pledged and $130 million of advances were outstanding with FHLB Des Moines.

SeeNote 7 — Long-Term Borrowings for a table displaying our secured financings and pledged assets.

GSI Facilities

At September 30, 2014, a total of $1,699.7 million of pledged assets and $1,238.5 million of secured debt issued to investors were outstanding under the GSI Facilities. Both amounts are up substantially from June 30, 2014, primarily due to the addition of the aerospace securitization. After adjustment to the amount of actual qualifying borrowing base under terms of the GSI Facilities, this secured debt provided for usage of $1,047.4 million of the maximum notional amount of the GSI Facilities. The remaining $1,077.6 million of the maximum notional amount represents the unused portion of the GSI Facilities and constitutes the notional amount of derivative financial instruments. An unsecured counterparty receivable of $580.1 million is owed to CIT from GSI for debt discount, return of collateral posted to GSI and settlements resulting from market value changes to asset- backed securities underlying the structures at September 30, 2014. The counterparty receivable was up from $301.6 million at December 31, 2013 as the proportionate amount of the balance was allocated to discontinued operation, i.e. the former student lending business. Upon sale of the secured assets and repayment of the secured debt, the full capacity of the facility from a presentation perspective, reverted back to the continuing operations.

Interest expense related to the GSI Facilities is affected by the following:

A fixed facility fee of 2.85% per annum times the maximum facility commitment amount,

A variable amount based on one-month or three-month USD LIBOR times the “utilized amount” (effectively the “adjusted qualifying borrowing base”) of the total return swap, and

A reduction in interest expense due to the recognition of the payment of any OID from GSI on the various asset-backed securities.

SeeNote 8 — Derivative Financial Instruments for further information.

74 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Debt Ratings

Debt ratings can influence the cost and availability of short-and long-term funding, the terms and conditions on which such funding may be available, the collateral requirements, if any, for borrowings and certain derivative instruments, the acceptability of our letters of credit, and the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Company. A decrease, or potential decrease, in credit ratings could impact access to the capital markets and/or increase the cost of debt, and thereby adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and financial condition.

Our debt ratings at September 30, 2014 as rated by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and Dominion Bond Rating Service (“DBRS”) are presented in the following table and were unchanged from December 31, 2013.

Debt Ratings as of September 30, 2014

	S&P Ratings Services	Moody’s Investors Service	DBRS
Issuer / Counterparty Credit Rating	BB-	Ba3	BB
Revolving Credit Facility Rating	BB-	Ba3	BBB (Low)
Series C Notes / Senior Unsecured Debt Rating	BB-	Ba3	BB
Outlook	Positive	Stable	Positive

After the July 22, 2014 announcement of our definitive agreement to acquire OneWest Bank, Moody’s affirmed its Ba3 corporate family rating and placed our Ba3 senior unsecured rating on review for possible downgrade; S&P affirmed its BB- rating and retained its positive outlook; and DBRS placed its BB rating under review with positive implications.

Rating agencies indicate that they base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, level and quality of earnings, and the current legislative and regulatory environment, including implied government support. In addition, rating agencies themselves have been subject to scrutiny arising from the financial crisis and could make or be required to make substantial changes to their ratings policies and practices, particularly in response to legislative and regulatory changes, including as a result of provisions in Dodd-Frank. Potential changes in the legislative and regulatory environment and the timing of those changes could impact our ratings, which as noted above could impact our liquidity and financial condition.

A debt rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and the ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Tax Implications of Cash in Foreign Subsidiaries

Cash and short term investments held by foreign subsidiaries, including cash available to the BHC and restricted cash, totaled $1.9 billion at September 30, 2014, up slightly from $1.8 billion at December 31, 2013.

Other than in a limited number of jurisdictions, Management does not intend to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings.

Contractual Payments and Commitments

The following tables summarize significant contractual payments and contractual commitment expirations at September 30, 2014. Certain amounts in the payments table are not the same as the respective balance sheet totals, because this table is based on contractual amounts and excludes FSA discounts, in order to better reflect projected contractual payments. Likewise, actual cash flows could vary materially from those depicted in the payments table as further explained in the table footnotes.

Payments for the Twelve Months Ended September 30⁽¹⁾ (dollars in millions)

	Total		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019+
Secured borrowings⁽²⁾	$	6,680.1	$	1,745.8	$	1,239.9	$	954.7	$	602.3	$	2,137.4
Senior unsecured borrowings		12,251.5		1,500.1		–		3,000.0		2,200.0		5,551.4
Total Long-term borrowings		18,931.6		3,245.9		1,239.9		3,954.7		2,802.3		7,688.8
Deposits		14,484.7		6,693.7		1,721.4		2,172.4		839.9		3,057.3
Credit balances of factoring clients		1,433.2		1,433.2		–		–		–		–
Lease rental expense		170.2		30.9		29.0		25.1		23.1		62.1
Total contractual payments	$	35,019.7	$	11,403.7	$	2,990.3	$	6,152.2	$	3,665.3	$	10,808.2

⁽¹⁾

Projected payments of debt interest expense and obligations relating to postretirement programs are excluded.

⁽²⁾

Includes non-recourse secured borrowings, which are generally repaid in conjunction with the pledged receivable maturities.

The unsecured $1.5 billion principal balance with a coupon rate of 4.75% comes due in February 2015.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 75

Table of Contents

Commitment Expiration by Twelve Month Periods Ended September 30 (dollars in millions)

	Total		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019+
Financing commitments	$	4,929.9	$	1,033.0	$	731.6	$	918.4	$	939.9	$	1,307,0
Aerospace equipment purchase commitments⁽¹⁾		9,592.3		779.6		618.9		850.3		1,716.7		5,626.8
Rail and other equipment purchase commitments		1,075.8		695.1		362.0		18.7		–		–
Letters of credit		401.5		52.2		35.3		57.6		79.5		176.9
Deferred purchase agreements		1,920.2		1,920.2		–		–		–		–
Guarantees, acceptances and other recourse obligations		3.2		3.2		–		–		–		–
Liabilities for unrecognized tax obligations⁽²⁾		325.6		280.0		45.6		–		–		–
Total contractual commitments	$	18,248.5	$	4,763.3	$	1,793.4	$	1,845.0	$	2,736.1	$	7,110.7

⁽¹⁾

Aerospace commitments are net of amounts on deposit with manufacturers. The Company had announced it has entered into memorandums of understanding for 20 Airbus commercial aircraft in July 2014, which are not included in the above table as the contract has not been finalized.

⁽²⁾

The balance cannot be estimated past 2016; therefore the remaining balance is reflected in 2016.

Financing commitments increased from $4.3 billion at December 31, 2013 to $4.9 billion at September 30, 2014. These include commitments that have been extended to and accepted by customers or agents, but on which the criteria for funding have not been completed of $789 million at September 30, 2014 and $548 million at December 31, 2013. Also included are credit line agreements to Commercial Services clients that are cancellable by us only after a notice period. The notice period is typically 90 days or less. The amount available under these credit lines, net of amount of receivables assigned to us, were $236 million at September 30, 2014 and $157 million at December 31, 2013.

At September 30, 2014, substantially all our undrawn financing commitments were senior facilities, with approximately 80% secured by equipment or other assets and the remainder comprised of cash flow or enterprise value facilities. Most of our undrawn and available financing commitments are in Corporate Finance. The top ten undrawn commitments totaled $377 million at September 30, 2014.

The table above includes approximately $1.1 billion of undrawn financing commitments at September 30, 2014 and $0.9 billion at December 31, 2013 that were not in compliance with contractual obligations, and therefore CIT does not have the contractual obligation to lend.

CAPITAL

Capital Management

CIT manages capital to ensure it is adequate to support and grow the businesses and return capital to its shareholders. CIT’s capital management is discussed in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Return of Capital

In January 2014, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $307 million of common stock through December 31, 2014, which included the amount that was not used from the 2013 share repurchase. In April 2014, the Board of Directors authorized an additional share repurchase of up to $300 million of common stock through December 31, 2014. On July 22, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an additional repurchase of up to $500 million of common stock through June 30, 2015. Approximately $450 million of the authorized repurchases remained at September 30, 2014.

During the 2014 first quarter, we repurchased over 2.9 million shares at an average price of $46.66 per share, totaling nearly $136 million. During the second quarter, we repurchased over 9.4 million shares at an average price of $44.24 per share, totaling $416 million. During the third quarter we repurchased over 2.2 million of our shares at an average price of $47.31 per share, totaling nearly $106 million, bringing the total repurchases for 2014 to over 14.5 million shares at an average price of $45.20, or an aggregate of approximately $658 million. The repurchases were effected via open market purchases and through plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

76 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Our 2014 common stock dividends are as follows:

2014 Dividends

Declaration Date	Payment Date	Per Share Dividend
January	February 28, 2014	$	0.10
April	May 30, 2014	$	0.10
July	August 29, 2014	$	0.15
October	November 26, 2014	$	0.15

Capital Composition and Ratios

The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. The regulatory capital guidelines currently applicable to the Company are based on the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel I). We compute capital ratios in accordance with Federal Reserve capital guidelines for assessing adequacy of capital. To be well capitalized, a BHC generally must maintain Tier 1 and Total Capital Ratios of at least 6% and 10%, respectively. The Federal Reserve Board also has established minimum guidelines. The minimum ratios are: Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 4.0%, Total Capital Ratio of 8.0% and Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 4.0%. In order to be considered a “well capitalized” depository institution under FDIC guidelines, the Bank must maintain a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10%, and a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of at least 5%.

Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital Components (dollars in millions)

Tier 1 Capital	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Common stockholders’ equity	$	9,005.2		$	8,838.8
Effect of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive loss excluded from Tier 1 Capital and qualifying noncontrolling interests		17.8			24.2
Adjusted total equity		9,023.0			8,863.0
Less: Goodwill		(557.3	)		(338.3	)
Disallowed deferred tax assets		(333.9	)		(26.6	)
Disallowed intangible assets		(33.5	)		(20.3	)
Investment in certain subsidiaries		(30.6	)		(32.3	)
Other Tier 1 components⁽¹⁾		(6.0	)		(6.0	)
Tier 1 Capital		8,061.7			8,439.5
Tier 2 Capital
Qualifying reserve for credit losses and other reserves⁽²⁾		391.3			383.9
Less: Investment in certain subsidiaries		(30.6	)		(32.3	)
Other Tier 2 components⁽³⁾		–			0.1
Total qualifying capital	$	8,422.4		$	8,791.2
Risk-weighted assets	$	56,212.0		$	50,571.2
BHC Ratios
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		14.3	%		16.7	%
Total Capital Ratio		15.0	%		17.4	%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		18.1	%		18.1	%
CIT Bank Ratios
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		13.0	%		16.8	%
Total Capital Ratio		14.3	%		18.1	%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio		13.2	%		16.9	%

⁽¹⁾

Includes the Tier 1 capital charge for nonfinancial equity investments and the Tier 1 capital deduction for net unrealized losses on available-for-sale marketable securities (net of tax).

⁽²⁾

⁽³⁾

Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pre-tax gains on available for sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 77

Table of Contents

The change in common stockholders’ equity from December 31, 2013 is primarily driven by Net Income of $879 million, including the benefit of the reversal of the valuation allowance on the U.S. Federal deferred tax asset of $375 million, less the impact of share repurchases, $658 million, and dividends paid, $68 million.

In addition to the changes in common stockholders’ equity, Regulatory Capital is also affected by certain adjustments. During the year the primary changes to these balances included:

In the third quarter, we recorded a partial reversal ($375 million) of our U.S. Federal deferred tax asset valuation allowance. This reversal benefited net income and stockholders’ equity but had minimal impact on our regulatory capital ratios as the majority of the deferred tax asset balance is disallowed for regulatory capital purposes.

The increase in goodwill and intangible assets of $236 million, due to the acquisitions of Direct Capital in the third quarter and Nacco in the first quarter, also reduced the amount of regulatory capital.

For a BHC, capital adequacy is based upon risk-weighted asset ratios calculated in accordance with quantitative measures established by the Federal Reserve. Under the Basel 1 guidelines, certain commitments and off-balance sheet transactions are assigned asset equivalent balances, and together with on-balance sheet assets, are divided into risk categories, each of which is assigned a risk weighting ranging from 0% (for example U.S. Treasury Bonds) to 100% (for example commercial loans). For a BHC, capital adequacy is based upon risk-weighted asset ratios calculated in accordance with quantitative measures established by the Federal Reserve. Under the Basel 1 guidelines, certain commitments and off-balance sheet transactions are assigned asset equivalent balances, and together with on-balance sheet assets, are divided into risk categories, each of which is assigned a risk weighting ranging from 0% (for example U.S. Treasury Bonds) to 100% (for example commercial loans).

The reconciliation of balance sheet assets to risk-weighted assets is presented below:

Risk-Weighted Assets (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Balance sheet assets	$	46,481.0		$	47,139.0
Risk weighting adjustments to balance sheet assets		(6,989.0	)		(10,328.1	)
Off balance sheet items		16,720.0			13,760.3
Risk-weighted assets	$	56,212.0		$	50,571.2

The decline in the balance sheet assets and the risk weighting adjustments primarily reflects the sale of the student loan assets during the 2014 second quarter. The off balance sheet items for the current period primarily reflects commitments to purchase aircraft and railcars ($12.5 billion, which includes 20 Airbus aircraft under July 2014 memorandums of understanding), unused lines of credit ($1.8 billion credit equivalent, largely related to Corporate Finance division) and deferred purchase agreements ($1.9 billion related to Commercial Services division).

Future Regulatory Capital Guidelines

On April 15, 2014, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”) released the final standard of its “Supervisory Framework for Measuring and Controlling Large Exposures” (“SFLE”), which will take effect on January 1, 2019, and replace the BCBS 1991 standard on measuring and controlling large exposures. SFLE includes a general limit on all of a bank’s exposures to a single counterparty of 25% of a bank’s Tier 1 Capital. This limit also applies to identified groups of connected counterparties, which are interdependent and likely to fail simultaneously. A tighter limit of 15% of Tier 1 Capital will apply to exposures between banks that have been designated as global systemically important banks (GSIBs).

We described in detail in the “Regulation” section of Item 1 Business Overview in our 2013 Form 10-K details regarding Basel III and other regulatory matters. A brief summary follows:

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a final rule (“Basel III Final Rule”) implementing revised risk-based capital and leverage requirements for banking organizations proposed under Basel III. CIT, as well as the Bank, will be subject to the Basel III Final Rule as of January 1, 2015.

78 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Among other matters, the Basel III Final Rule: (i) introduces a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specifies that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements; (iii) mandates that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital; and (iv) expands the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital as compared to existing regulations. For most banking organizations, the most common form of Additional Tier 1 capital is non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes, which will be subject to the Basel III Final Rule specific requirements. CIT does not currently have either of these forms of capital outstanding.

The Basel III Final Rule also introduces a new “capital conservation buffer”, composed entirely of CET1, on top of these minimum risk-weighted asset ratios apart from the Tier 1 leverage ratio. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 will begin on January 1, 2015 and will be phased-in over a 4-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

Per the Basel III final rule, CIT will be required to maintain risk-based capital ratios at January 1, 2019 as follows:

	Minimum Capital Requirements – January 1, 2019
	Tier 1 Common Equity			Tier 1 Capital			Total Capital			Leverage Ratio
Stated minimum Ratio		4.5	%		6.0	%		8.0	%		4.0	%
Capital conservation buffer		2.5	%		2.5	%		2.5	%		NA
Effective minimum ratio		7.0	%		8.5	%		10.5	%		4.0	%

With respect to the Bank, the Basel III Final Rule revises the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regulations adopted pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, by: (i) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each PCA category (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (as compared to the current 6%); and (iii) eliminating the current provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3% leverage ratio and still be adequately capitalized. The Basel III Final Rule does not change the total risk-based capital requirement for any PCA category.

At September 30, 2014, CIT’s and the Bank’s capital ratios, as displayed in a prior table, and capital composition exceed the post-transition minimum capital requirements at January 2019. CIT’s capital stock is substantially all Tier 1 Common equity and generally does not include non-qualifying capital instruments subject to transitional deductions. CIT and the Bank are subject to a minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio of 4% and 5%, respectively. We continue to believe that, as of September 30, 2014, CIT and the Bank would meet all capital requirements under the Basel III Final Rule, including the capital conservation buffer, on a fully phased-in basis as if such requirements were currently effective. As non-advanced approaches banking organizations, CIT and the Bank will not be subject to the Countercyclical Buffer or the supplementary leverage ratio.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 79

Table of Contents

Tangible Book Value and Tangible Book Value per Share

Tangible book value represents common equity less goodwill and other intangible assets. A reconciliation of CIT’s total common stockholders’ equity to tangible book value, a non-GAAP measure, follows:

Tangible Book Value and per Share Amounts (dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Total common stockholders’ equity	$	9,005.2		$	8,838.8
Less: Goodwill		(557.3	)		(334.6	)
Intangible assets		(33.5	)		(20.3	)
Tangible book value	$	8,414.4		$	8,483.9
Book value per share	$	49.10		$	44.78

Tangible book value per share	$	45.87		$	42.98

Book value was up as the year-to-date earnings exceeds the impact of share repurchases, the value of which reduces book value while held in treasury. Tangible book value (“TBV”) was down slightly and reflected the reduction for the goodwill recorded with the Direct Capital and Nacco acquisitions. Book value per share increased reflecting the decline in outstanding shares and higher common equity. TBV per share increased, as the decline in outstanding shares offset the slight decrease in TBV.

CIT BANK

The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, that is subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC and the UDFI and is our principal bank subsidiary. The Bank originates and funds lending and leasing activity in the U.S. for CIT’s segments. Asset growth during 2014 reflected solid lending and leasing volume and its third quarter acquisition of Direct Capital, which added approximately $540 million of loans and $487 million of debt. Deposits grew in support of the increased organic business. The Bank’s capital and leverage ratios are included in the tables that follow and while remaining well above required levels, they are down reflecting growth activities, including the impact of goodwill and intangible assets associated with the Direct Capital acquisition.

As detailed in the following Consolidated Balance Sheet table, total assets increased to $20.3 billion, up $4.2 billion from December 31, 2013, related primarily to growth in financing and leasing assets. Cash and deposits with banks was $3.2 billion, up from December 31, 2013, reflecting increased deposits.

Commercial loans totaled $14.7 billion, up from $12.0 billion at December 31, 2013. The increase reflects solid new business activity during 2014 and the addition of $540 million from the third quarter acquisition of Direct Capital. The Bank funded $2.2 billion of new business volume during the third quarter of 2014, up 34% from the year-ago quarter and 8% sequentially. Most of the 2014 third quarter volume, $1.5 billion, related to NACF. Increases in Equipment Finance and Real Estate Finance divisions offset lower Corporate Finance activity. The remaining amount funded aerospace, maritime and rail transactions in TIF. Year-to-date, volume is up 18%. The Bank also expanded its portfolio of operating lease equipment, which totaled nearly $2.0 billion at September 30, 2014 and was comprised primarily of railcars and some aircraft.

CIT Bank deposits were $14.4 billion at September 30, 2014, up from $12.5 billion at December 31, 2013. The weighted average interest rate was 1.57% at September 30, 2014, up slightly from December 31, 2013.

80 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The following presents condensed financial information for CIT Bank.

Condensed Balance Sheets (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS:
Cash and deposits with banks	$	3,216.6		$	2,528.6
Investment securities		276.7			234.6
Assets held for sale		81.4			104.5
Commercial loans		14,671.3			12,032.6
Allowance for loan losses		(253.7	)		(212.9	)
Operating lease equipment, net		1,962.1			1,248.9
Goodwill		159.5			–
Other assets		214.4			195.0
Total Assets	$	20,328.3		$	16,131.3
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY:
Deposits	$	14,432.5		$	12,496.2
Long-term borrowings		1,867.6			854.6
Other borrowings		1,000.0			–
Other liabilities		345.6			183.9
Total Liabilities		17,645.7			13,534.7
Total Equity		2,682.6			2,596.6
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	20,328.3		$	16,131.3
Capital Ratios
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		13.0	%		16.8	%
Total Capital Ratio		14.3	%		18.1	%
Tier 1 Leverage ratio		13.2	%		16.9	%
Financing and Leasing Assets by Segment
North American Commercial Finance	$	12,575.0		$	10,701.1
Transportation & International Finance		4,139.8			2,606.8
Non-Strategic Portfolios		–			78.1
Total	$	16,714.8		$	13,386.0

Condensed Statements of Operations (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Interest income	$	184.5		$	169.8		$	142.9		$	512.1		$	401.5
Interest expense		(65.1	)		(55.1	)		(42.6	)		(171.6	)		(124.7	)
Net interest revenue		119.4			114.7			100.3			340.5			276.8
Provision for credit losses		(33.6	)		(14.6	)		(29.7	)		(73.0	)		(67.8	)
Net interest revenue, after credit provision		85.8			100.1			70.6			267.5			209.0
Rental income on operating leases		61.6			53.9			29.1			161.3			75.0
Other income		23.6			23.0			32.8			73.6			90.0
Total net revenue, net of interest expense and credit provision		171.0			177.0			132.5			502.4			374.0
Operating expenses (including maintenance and other operating lease expenses)		(119.5	)		(82.5	)		(78.9	)		(287.4	)		(223.6	)
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(24.4	)		(22.7	)		(12.0	)		(65.3	)		(29.8	)
Income before provision for income taxes		27.1			71.8			41.6			149.7			120.6
Provision for income taxes		(10.6	)		(30.4	)		(16.5	)		(58.8	)		(49.5	)
Net income	$	16.5		$	41.4		$	25.1		$	90.9		$	71.1

New business volume – funded	$	2,207.4		$	2,049.3		$	1,651.5		$	5,917.1		$	5,006.3

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 81

Table of Contents

The Bank’s 2014 results benefited from higher earning assets. The Bank’s provision for credit losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 reflects higher reserve build, including higher non-specific reserves, primarily due to asset growth including new business through Direct Capital, while credit metrics remain at or near cyclical lows. For the quarter ended September 30, 2014, net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables were 0.30%, compared to 0.19% in the year-ago quarter and 0.21% last quarter.

Other income in 2014 was down from the 2013 periods, reflecting lower fee revenue. Operating expenses increased from the 2013 periods, reflecting the continued growth of both asset and deposits in the Bank, higher corporate expense allocations, the addition of 250 employees in the current quarter associated with the Direct Capital acquisition, and a charge related to the branch initiative.

Net Finance Revenue(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Interest income	$	184.5		$	169.8		$	142.9		$	512.1		$	401.5
Rental income on operating leases		61.6			53.9			29.1			161.3			75.0
Finance revenue		246.1			223.7			172.0			673.4			476.5
Interest expense		(65.1	)		(55.1	)		(42.6	)		(171.6	)		(124.7	)
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(24.4	)		(22.7	)		(12.0	)		(65.3	)		(29.8	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses*		(2.3	)		(1.8	)		(0.5	)		(5.9	)		(1.3	)
Net finance revenue	$	154.3		$	144.1		$	116.9		$	430.6		$	320.7

Average Earning Assets (“AEA”)	$	16,224.0		$	14,792.4		$	11,598.1		$	14,881.3		$	10,549.7
As a % of AEA:
Interest income		4.55	%		4.59	%		4.93	%		4.59	%		5.07	%
Rental income on operating leases		1.52	%		1.46	%		1.00	%		1.45	%		0.95	%
Finance revenue		6.07	%		6.05	%		5.93	%		6.04	%		6.02	%
Interest expense		(1.61	)%		(1.49	)%		(1.47	)%		(1.54	)%		(1.58	)%
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(0.60	)%		(0.61	)%		(0.41	)%		(0.59	)%		(0.38	)%
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses*		(0.06	)%		(0.05	)%		(0.02	)%		(0.05	)%		(0.02	)%
Net finance revenue		3.80	%		3.90	%		4.03	%		3.86	%		4.04	%

Amounts included in CIT Bank operating expenses.

NFR and NFM are key metrics used by management to measure the profitability of our lending and leasing assets. NFR includes interest and fee income on our loans and capital leases, interest and dividend income on cash and investments, rental revenue from our leased equipment, depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses, as well as funding costs. Since our asset composition includes an increasing level of operating lease equipment (12% of AEA for the quarter ended September 30, 2014), NFM is a more appropriate metric for the Bank than net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other banks), as NIM does not fully reflect the earnings of our portfolio because it includes the impact of debt costs on all our assets but excludes the net revenue (rental income less depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) from operating leases.

NFR and AEA increased on asset growth. NFM is down from the prior periods reflecting some pressure on loan yields, while higher funding costs impacted the current quarter reflecting the added debt. During 2014, the Bank grew its operating lease portfolio, by adding aircraft and railcars which contributed net operating lease revenue of $35 million, up from $17 million in the year-ago quarter and $29 million in the prior quarter. Year-to-date, net operating lease revenue totaled $90 million, up from $44 million in 2013.

82 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

SELECT DATA AND AVERAGE BALANCES

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial information regarding our results of operations, balance sheets and certain ratios.

Select Data (dollars in millions)

	At or for the Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Select Statement of Operations Data
Net interest revenue	$	33.1		$	47.6		$	49.7		$	111.0		$	154.6
Provision for credit losses		(38.2	)		(10.2	)		(16.4	)		(85.1	)		(50.5	)
Total non-interest income		559.2			613.3			577.4			1,735.5			1,687.3
Total other expenses		437.4			431.7			404.4			1,303.0			1,211.0
Income from continuing operations		515.4			195.2			192.9			825.5			521.4
Net income		514.9			246.9			199.6			879.0			545.8
Per Common Share Data
Diluted income per common share from continuing operations	$	2.76		$	1.02		$	0.96		$	4.31		$	2.58
Diluted income per common share	$	2.76		$	1.29		$	0.99		$	4.59		$	2.70
Book value per common share	$	49.10		$	46.42		$	44.16
Tangible book value per common share	$	45.87		$	44.16		$	42.36
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.15		$	0.10		$	–		$	0.35		$	–
Performance Ratios
Return on average common stockholders’ equity		23.6	%		9.0	%		8.8	%		12.6	%		8.1	%
Net finance revenue as a percentage of average earning assets		4.26	%		4.35	%		4.56	%		4.22	%		4.74	%
Return on average total assets		4.54	%		1.75	%		1.86	%		2.46	%		1.70	%
Total ending equity to total ending assets		19.4	%		19.5	%		19.2	%
Balance Sheet Data
Loans including receivables pledged	$	19,785.8			18,604.4			18,371.0
Allowance for loan losses		(357.7	)		(341.0	)		(356.1	)
Operating lease equipment, net		15,183.8			14,788.3			12,577.1
Goodwill		557.3			403.1			338.3
Total cash and short-term investments		6,543.5			6,771.9			7,296.1
Assets of discontinued operation		–			1.0			3,888.3
Total assets		46,481.0			44,152.7			46,224.0
Deposits		14,483.2			13,939.0			11,806.1
Total long-term borrowings		18,923.4			17,545.5			18,041.2
Liabilities of discontinued operation		–			0.9			3,362.9
Total common stockholders’ equity		9,005.2			8,617.6			8,845.0
Credit Quality
Non-accrual loans as a percentage of finance receivables		1.02	%		1.02	%		1.41	%
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average finance receivables		0.39	%		0.45	%		0.59	%		0.53	%		0.48	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of finance receivables		1.81	%		1.83	%		1.94	%
Financial Ratios
Tier 1 Capital Ratio		14.3	%		16.0	%		16.7	%
Total Capital Ratio		15.0	%		16.7	%		17.4	%

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 83

Table of Contents

Quarterly Average Balances⁽¹⁾ and Associated Income (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014								June 30, 2014								September 30, 2013
	Average Balance			Revenue / Expense		Average Rate (%)			Average Balance			Revenue / Expense		Average Rate (%)			Average Balance			Revenue / Expense		Average Rate (%)
Interest bearing deposits	$	5,517.4		$	4.4		0.32	%	$	4,620.9		$	4.5		0.39	%	$	5,188.7		$	4.0		0.31	%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell⁽⁶⁾		275.0			0.4		0.58	%		–			–		–			–			–		–
Investments		860.9			3.6		1.67	%		2,035.8			3.9		0.77	%		2,041.3			2.8		0.55	%
Loans (including held for sale)⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
U.S.⁽²⁾		17,002.0			229.2		5.85	%		16,339.2			226.9		6.03	%		14,943.2			209.6		6.13	%
Non-U.S.		3,186.7			70.7		8.87	%		3,510.0			74.5		8.49	%		4,189.3			90.0		8.59	%
Total loans⁽²⁾		20,188.7			299.9		6.36	%		19,849.2			301.4		6.50	%		19,132.5			299.6		6.71	%
Total interest earning assets / interest income⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		26,842.0			308.3		4.83	%		26,505.9			309.8		4.92	%		26,362.5			306.4		4.88	%
Operating lease equipment, net (including held for sale)⁽⁴⁾
U.S.⁽⁴⁾		7,959.1			176.2		8.86	%		7,741.5			172.5		8.91	%		6,497.9			148.2		9.12	%
Non-U.S.⁽⁴⁾		7,219.3			155.9		8.64	%		6,921.8			140.8		8.14	%		6,155.1			149.1		9.69	%
Total operating lease equipment, net⁽⁴⁾		15,178.4			332.1		8.75	%		14,663.3			313.3		8.55	%		12,653.0			297.3		9.40	%
Total earning assets⁽²⁾		42,020.4		$	640.4		6.29	%		41,169.2		$	623.1		6.25	%		39,015.5		$	603.7		6.40	%
Non-interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		968.1								1,213.1								672.8
Allowance for loan losses		(345.3	)							(350.4	)							(363.4	)
All other non-interest earning assets		2,768.3								2,546.5								2,216.9
Assets of discontinued operation		0.2								931.2								3,940.1
Total Average Assets	$	45,411.7							$	45,509.6							$	45,481.9
Borrowings
Deposits	$	14,223.6		$	59.2		1.66	%	$	13,608.5		$	56.1		1.65	%	$	11,501.4		$	44.3		1.54	%
Long-term borrowings⁽⁵⁾		18,430.3			216.0		4.69	%		18,226.2			206.1		4.52	%		17,808.3			212.4		4.77	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		32,653.9		$	275.2		3.37	%		31,834.7		$	262.2		3.29	%		29,309.7			256.7		3.50	%
Credit balances of factoring clients		1,327.1								1,301.7								1,264.8
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		2,674.4								2,863.2								2,699.6
Liabilities of discontinued operation		0.2								793.9								3,418.1
Noncontrolling interests		9.9								8.4								9.8
Stockholders’ equity		8,746.2								8,707.7								8,779.9
Total Average Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	45,411.7							$	45,509.6							$	45,481.9
Net revenue spread							2.92	%							2.96	%							2.90	%
Impact of non-interest bearing sources							0.67	%							0.66	%							0.78	%
Net revenue/yield on earning assets⁽²⁾				$	365.2		3.59	%				$	360.9		3.62	%				$	347.0		3.68	%

⁽¹⁾

The average balances presented are derived based on month end balances during the year. Tax exempt income was not significant in any of the periods presented. Average rates are impacted by FSA accretion and amortization.

⁽²⁾

The rate presented is calculated net of average credit balances for factoring clients.

⁽³⁾

Non-accrual loans and related income are included in the respective categories.

⁽⁴⁾

Operating lease rental income is a significant source of revenue; therefore, we have presented the rental revenues net of depreciation and net of Maintenance and other operating lease expenses.

⁽⁵⁾

Interest and average rates include FSA accretion, including amounts accelerated due to redemptions or extinguishments, and accelerated original issue discount on debt extinguishment related to the GSI facility.

⁽⁶⁾

The weighted average rate for the Securities purchased under agreements to resell is approximately 0.50% for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 based on interest income and average balances in whole dollars.

84 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Year to Date Average Balances⁽¹⁾ and Associated Income (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014								September 30, 2013
	Average Balance			Revenue / Expense		Average Rate (%)			Average Balance			Revenue / Expense		Average Rate (%)
Interest bearing deposits	$	5,138.7		$	13.5		0.35	%	$	5,478.3		$	11.8		0.29	%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		110.0			0.4		0.48	%		–			–		–
Investments		1,850.8			11.7		0.84	%		1,766.1			8.5		0.64	%
Loans (including held for sale)⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
U.S.⁽²⁾		16,430.3			670.5		5.91	%		14,384.9			644.8		6.53	%
Non-U.S.		3,471.3			224.2		8.61	%		4,182.7			282.9		9.02	%
Total loans⁽²⁾		19,901.6			894.7		6.42	%		18,567.6			927.7		7.13	%
Total interest earning assets / interest income⁽²⁾⁽³⁾		27,001.1			920.3		4.78	%		25,812.0			948.0		5.14	%
Operating lease equipment, net (including held for sale)⁽⁴⁾
U.S.⁽⁴⁾		7,678.0			504.9		8.77	%		6,443.1			452.4		9.36	%
Non-U.S.⁽⁴⁾		6,895.0			432.0		8.35	%		6,253.7			456.0		9.72	%
Total operating lease equipment, net⁽⁴⁾		14,573.0			936.9		8.57	%		12,696.8			908.4		9.54	%
Total earning assets⁽²⁾		41,574.1		$	1,857.2		6.15	%		38,508.8		$	1,856.4		6.64	%
Non-interest earning assets
Cash and due from banks		974.5								466.4
Allowance for loan losses		(352.0	)							(371.7	)
All other non-interest earning assets		2,577.2								2,200.5
Assets of discontinued operation		1,517.3								4,059.6
Total Average Assets	$	46,291.1							$	44,863.6
Borrowings
Deposits	$	13,544.9		$	167.2		1.65	%	$	10,897.0		$	131.4		1.61	%
Long-term borrowings⁽⁵⁾		18,566.0			642.1		4.61	%		17,967.5			662.0		4.91	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		32,110.9		$	809.3		3.36	%		28,864.5		$	793.4		3.66	%
Credit balances of factoring clients		1,311.0								1,225.4
Other non-interest bearing liabilities		2,799.5								2,639.6
Liabilities of discontinued operation		1,296.4								3,519.4
Noncontrolling interests		10.0								8.7
Stockholders’ equity		8,763.3								8,606.0
Total Average Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	46,291.1							$	44,863.6
Net revenue spread							2.79	%							2.98	%
Impact of non-interest bearing sources							0.68	%							0.82	%
Net revenue/yield on earning assets⁽²⁾				$	1,047.9		3.47	%				$	1,063.0		3.80	%

⁽¹⁾

The average balances presented are derived based on month end balances during the year. Tax exempt income was not significant in any of the years presented. Average rates are impacted by FSA accretion and amortization.

⁽²⁾

The rate presented is calculated net of average credit balances for factoring clients.

⁽³⁾

Non-accrual loans and related income are included in the respective categories.

⁽⁴⁾

Operating lease rental income is a significant source of revenue; therefore, we have presented the rental revenues net of depreciation and net of Maintenance and other operating lease expenses.

⁽⁵⁾

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 85

Table of Contents

Interest income on interest bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell and investment securities was not significant in any of the quarters presented. Average quarterly interest bearing deposits was up for the September 30, 2014 quarter, while year-to-date, the average was down reflecting the investment of cash in investment securities to earn a higher yield. Investments are typically a combination of high quality debt, primarily U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government Agency securities, and supranational and foreign government securities that typically mature in 91 days or less. Investments were down sequentially, reflecting maturities, and the subsequent usage of the proceeds to repay maturing debt. The sequential quarterly increase in average rate for investments reflects a reduction in lower-yielding investments, such as U.S. Treasuries.

Average rates on loans and operating lease equipment decreased from the year-ago quarter and year-to-date, as compression on portfolio yields across many of our businesses, sales of higher-yielding portfolios last year, suspended depreciation in the prior year, lower yield-related fees and lower FSA accretion offset the higher level of earning assets.

The weighted average coupon rate of outstanding deposits and long-term borrowings was 3.16% at September 30, 2014, down from 3.20% at June 30, 2014 and 3.37% at September 30, 2013, benefiting from a continued high proportion of deposit funding and an increase in proportion of secured debt. Deposits represented 43% of the total deposits and long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014, while unsecured debt was 37% and secured debt was 20%. These proportions will fluctuate in the future depending upon our capital markets activities.

The weighted average coupon rate of long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 4.32%, down from 4.44% at June 30, 2014 and 4.57% at September 30, 2013. Long-term borrowings consist of unsecured and secured debt. The weighted average coupon rate of unsecured long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 4.99%, unchanged from June 30, 2014 and down from 5.11% at September 30, 2013. The weighted average coupon rate of secured long-term borrowings at September 30, 2014 was 3.11%, down from 3.17% at June 30, 2014 and 3.35% at September 30, 2013.

86 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

The average long-term borrowings balances presented below were derived based on daily balances and the average rates are based on a 30 days per month day count convention. The average rates include FSA accretion, including amounts accelerated due to redemptions or extinguishments and prepayment costs.

Average Daily Long-term Borrowings Balances and Rates (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended
	September 30, 2014							June 30, 2014							September 30, 2013
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
Revolving Credit Facility⁽¹⁾	$	–	$	3.3		–		$	–	$	3.2		–		$	–	$	3.9		–
Senior Unsecured Notes		12,232.1		156.0		5.10	%		12,231.9		156.3		5.11	%		12,283.8		160.6		5.23	%
Secured borrowings		6,400.5		56.7		3.54	%		5,686.2		46.6		3.28	%		5,618.3		47.9		3.41	%
Long-term Borrowings	$	18,632.6	$	216.0		4.64	%	$	17,918.1	$	206.1		4.60	%	$	17,902.1	$	212.4		4.75	%

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2014							September 30, 2013
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate
Revolving Credit Facility⁽¹⁾	$	–	$	10.8		–		$	–	$	11.9		–
Senior Unsecured Notes		12,487.5		481.0		5.14	%		11,965.4		496.0		5.53	%
Secured borrowings		6,049.0		150.3		3.31	%		6,015.1		154.1		3.42	%
Long-term Borrowings	$	18,536.5	$	642.1		4.62	%	$	17,980.5	$	662.0		4.91	%

⁽¹⁾

Interest expense and average rate includes Facility commitment fees and amortization of Facility deal costs.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We consider accounting estimates relating to the following to be critical in applying our accounting policies:

Allowance for Loan Losses

Loan Impairment

Fair Value Determination

Lease Residual Values

Liabilities for Uncertain Tax Positions

Realizability of Deferred Tax Assets

Goodwill Assets

Except as discussed in “Income Taxes” and inNote 11 — Income Taxes of Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements relating to the partial reversal of the U.S. federal deferred tax asset valuation allowance, there have been no significant changes to the methodologies and processes used in developing estimates relating to these items from those described in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INTERNAL CONTROLS

The Internal Controls Working Group (“ICWG”), which reports to the Disclosure Committee, is responsible for monitoring and improving internal controls over external financial reporting. The ICWG is chaired by the Controller and is comprised of senior executives in Finance and the Chief Auditor. SeeItem 4. Controls and Procedures for more information.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 87

Table of Contents

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASUREMENTS

The SEC adopted regulations that apply to any public disclosure or release of material information that includes a non-GAAP financial measure. The accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Due to the nature of our financing and leasing assets, which include a higher proportion of operating lease equipment than most BHCs, and the impact of FSA following our 2009 restructuring, certain financial measures commonly used by other BHCs are not as meaningful for our Company. Therefore, management uses certain non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our performance. We intend our non-GAAP financial measures to provide additional information and insight regarding operating results and financial position of the business and in certain cases to provide financial information that is presented to rating agencies and other users of financial information. These measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP and may be different from or inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. See footnotes below the tables for additional explanation of non-GAAP measurements.

Total Net Revenues⁽¹⁾ and Net Operating Lease Revenues⁽²⁾(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Total Net Revenue
Interest income	$	308.3		$	309.8		$	306.4		$	920.3		$	948.0
Rental income on operating leases		535.0			519.6			472.9			1,546.5			1,433.6
Finance revenue		843.3			829.4			779.3			2,466.8			2,381.6
Interest expense		(275.2	)		(262.2	)		(256.7	)		(809.3	)		(793.4	)
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(156.4	)		(157.3	)		(134.2	)		(462.5	)		(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(49.0	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.1	)
Net finance revenue (NFR)		365.2			360.9			347.0			1,047.9			1,063.0
Other income		24.2			93.7			104.5			189.0			253.7
Total net revenues	$	389.4		$	454.6		$	451.5		$	1,236.9		$	1,316.7
Net Operating Lease Revenue
Rental income on operating leases	$	535.0		$	519.6		$	472.9		$	1,546.5		$	1,433.6
Depreciation on operating lease equipment		(156.4	)		(157.3	)		(134.2	)		(462.5	)		(401.1	)
Maintenance and other operating lease expenses		(46.5	)		(49.0	)		(41.4	)		(147.1	)		(124.1	)
Net operating lease revenue	$	332.1		$	313.3		$	297.3		$	936.9		$	908.4

Adjusted NFR ($) and NFM (%) (dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended
	September 30, 2014				June 30, 2014					September 30, 2013
NFR / NFM	$	365.2	4.26	%	$	360.9		4.35	%	$	347.0	4.56	%
Accelerated FSA net discount/(premium) on debt extinguishments and repurchases		–	–			34.7		0.42	%		–	–
Accelerated OID on debt extinguishments related to the GSI facility		–	–			(42.0	)	(0.51	)%		–	–
Adjusted NFR / NFM	$	365.2	4.26	%	$	353.6		4.26	%	$	347.0	4.56	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014					2013
NFR / NFM	$	1,047.9		4.22	%	$	1,063.0	4.74	%
Accelerated FSA net discount/(premium) on debt extinguishments and repurchases		34.7		0.14	%		24.8	0.11	%
Accelerated OID on debt extinguishments related to the GSI facility		(42.0	)	(0.17	)%		–	–
Adjusted NFR / NFM	$	1,040.6		4.19	%	$	1,087.8	4.85	%

88 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses Excluding Restructuring Costs⁽³⁾(dollars in millions)

	Quarters Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,			June 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating expenses	$	(234.5	)	$	(225.0	)	$	(228.8	)	$	(693.0	)	$	(685.8	)
Provision for severance and facilities exiting activities		9.2			5.6			3.2			24.7			18.4
Operating expenses excluding restructuring costs	$	(225.3	)	$	(219.4	)	$	(225.6	)	$	(668.3	)	$	(667.4	)

Earning Assets⁽⁴⁾(dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			September 30, 2013
Loans	$	19,785.8		$	18,629.2		$	18,371.0
Operating lease equipment, net		15,183.8			13,035.4			12,577.1
Assets held for sale		1,102.7			1,003.4			1,122.2
Credit balances of factoring clients		(1,433.2	)		(1,336.1	)		(1,278.4	)
Total earning assets	$	34,639.1		$	31,331.9		$	30,791.9

Continuing Operations Total Assets⁽⁵⁾ (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			September 30, 2013
Total Assets	$	46,481.0	$	44,152.7		$	47,139.0		$46,224.0
Assets of discontinued operation		–		(1.0	)		(3,821.4	)	(3,888.3	)
Continuing operations total assets	$	46,481.0	$	44,151.7		$	43,317.6		$42,335.7

Tangible Book Value⁽⁶⁾ (dollars in millions)

	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			September 30, 2013
Total common stockholders’ equity	$	9,005.2		$	8,838.8		$	8,845.0
Less: Goodwill		(557.3	)		(334.6	)		(338.3	)
Intangible assets		(33.5	)		(20.3	)		(22.4	)
Tangible book value	$	8,414.4		$	8,483.9		$	8,484.3

⁽¹⁾

Total net revenues is a non-GAAP measure that represents the combination of net finance revenue and other income and is an aggregation of all sources of revenue for the Company. Total net revenues is used by management to monitor business performance. Given our asset composition includes a high level of operating lease equipment, NFM is a more appropriate metric than net interest margin (“NIM”) (a common metric used by other bank holding companies), as NIM does not fully reflect the earnings of our portfolio because it includes the impact of debt costs of all our assets but excludes the net revenue (rental revenue less depreciation and maintenance and other operating lease expenses) from operating leases.

⁽²⁾

Net operating lease revenue is a non-GAAP measure that represents the combination of rental income on operating leases less depreciation on operating lease equipment and maintenance and other operating lease expenses. Net operating lease revenues is used by management to monitor portfolio performance.

⁽³⁾

Operating expenses excluding restructuring costs is a non-GAAP measure used by management to compare period over period expenses.

⁽⁴⁾

Earning assets is a non-GAAP measure and are utilized in certain revenue and earnings ratios. Earning assets are net of credit balances of factoring clients. This net amount represents the amounts we fund.

⁽⁵⁾

Continuing operations total assets is a non-GAAP measure, which management uses for analytical purposes to compare balance sheet assets on a consistent basis.

⁽⁶⁾

Tangible book value is a non-GAAP measure, which represents an adjusted common shareholders’ equity balance that has been reduced by goodwill and intangible assets. Tangible book value is used to compute a per common share amount, which is used to evaluate our use of equity.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis andItem 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 89

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “expect,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “target” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, webcasts, phone calls and conference calls, concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are included, for example, in the discussions about:

our liquidity risk and capital management, including our capital plan, leverage, capital ratios, and credit ratings, our liquidity plan, and our plans and the potential transactions designed to enhance our liquidity and capital, and for a return of capital,

our plans to change our funding mix and to access new sources of funding to broaden our use of deposit taking capabilities,

our credit risk management and credit quality,

our asset/liability risk management,

our funding, borrowing costs and net finance revenue,

our operational risks, including success of systems enhancements and expansion of risk management and control functions,

our mix of portfolio asset classes, including growth initiatives, new business initiatives, new products, acquisitions and divestitures, new business and customer retention,

legal risks, including related to the enforceability of our agreements and to changes in laws and regulations,

our growth rates,

our commitments to extend credit or purchase equipment, and

how we may be affected by legal proceedings.

All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievements. Also, forward-looking statements are based upon management’s estimates of fair values and of future costs, using currently available information.

Therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in those statements. Factors, in addition to those disclosed in“Risk Factors”, that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

capital markets liquidity,

risks of and/or actual economic slowdown, downturn or recession,

industry cycles and trends,

uncertainties associated with risk management, including credit, prepayment, asset/liability, interest rate and currency risks,

adequacy of reserves for credit losses,

risks inherent in changes in market interest rates and quality spreads,

funding opportunities, deposit taking capabilities and borrowing costs,

conditions and/or changes in funding markets and our access to such markets, including secured and unsecured term debt and the asset-backed securitization markets,

risks of implementing new processes, procedures, and systems,

risks associated with the value and recoverability of leased equipment and lease residual values,

risks of achieving the projected revenue growth from new business initiatives or the projected expense reductions from efficiency improvements,

application of fair value accounting in volatile markets,

application of goodwill accounting in a recessionary economy,

changes in laws or regulations governing our business and operations, or affecting our assets, including our operating lease equipment

changes in competitive factors,

demographic trends,

customer retention rates,

future acquisitions and dispositions of businesses or asset portfolios, and

regulatory changes and/or developments.

Any or all of our forward-looking statements here or in other publications may turn out to be wrong, and there are no guarantees about our performance. We do not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement for any reason.

90 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of September 30, 2014. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 91

Part Two—Other Information

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

CIT is currently involved, and from time to time in the future may be involved, in a number of judicial, regulatory, and arbitration proceedings relating to matters that arise in connection with the conduct of its business (collectively, “Litigation”), certain of which Litigation matters are described inNote 14 – Contingencies ofItem 1. Consolidated Financial Statements. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of Litigation matters, particularly when such matters are in their early stages or where the claimants seek indeterminate damages, CIT cannot state with confidence what the eventual outcome of the pending Litigation will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss, fines, or penalties related to each pending matter may be, if any. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, CIT establishes reserves for Litigation when those matters present loss contingencies as to which it is both probable that a loss will occur and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on currently available information, CIT believes that the results of Litigation that is currently pending, taken together, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, but may be material to the Company’s operating results or cash flows for any particular period, depending in part on its operating results for that period. The actual results of resolving such matters may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved.

For more information about pending legal proceedings, including an estimate of certain reasonably possible losses in excess of reserved amounts, seeNote 14 – Contingencies ofItem 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

For a discussion of certain risk factors affecting CIT, seePart I, Item 1A: Risk Factors, of CIT’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and Forward-Looking Statements of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information related to purchases by the Company of its common shares.

		Average Price Paid per Share			Total Dollar Amount Purchased Under the Program		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program
					(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)
2013⁽¹⁾				4,006,941	$	193.4	$	–
First Quarter Purchases⁽²⁾				2,905,348	$	135.6
Second Quarter Purchases⁽²⁾				9,409,798	$	416.3
Third Quarter Purchases⁽²⁾⁽³⁾:
July 1–31, 2014	–	$	–	–	$	–
August 1–31, 2014	717,716	$	47.89	717,716		34.4
September 1–30, 2014	1,520,431	$	47.04	1,520,431		71.5
	2,238,147	$	47.31	2,238,147	$	105.9
September 30, 2014⁽³⁾				14,553,293	$	657.8	$	449.2

⁽¹⁾

Shares repurchases were subject to a $200 million total that expired on December 31, 2013.

⁽²⁾

Shares repurchases are subject to a $607 million total that expires on December 31, 2014.

⁽³⁾

Remaining share repurchases are subject to a $500 million total that expires on June 30, 2015.

92 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

Management will determine the timing and amount of any share repurchases under the share repurchase authorizations based on market conditions and other considerations. The repurchases may be effected in the open market through derivative, accelerated repurchase and other negotiated transactions, and through plans designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The repurchased common stock is held as treasury shares and may be used for the issuance of shares under CIT’s employee stock plans.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits


2.1				Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among CIT Group Inc., IMB Holdco LLC, Carbon Merger Sub LLC and JCF III HoldCo I L.P., dated as of July 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014).

3.1				Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated December 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed December 9, 2009).

3.2				Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended through July 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed July 16, 2014).

4.1				Indenture dated as of January 20, 2006 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) for the issuance of senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form S-3 filed January 20, 2006).

4.2				First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 13, 2007 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) for the issuance of senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007).

4.3				Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 2009, between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) relating to senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2009).

4.4				Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 16, 2009 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) relating to senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed October 19, 2009).

Item 6. Exhibits 93

Table of Contents

4.5				Framework Agreement, dated July 11, 2008, among ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as arranger, Madeleine Leasing Limited, as initial borrower, CIT Aerospace International, as initial head lessee, and CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, as amended by the Deed of Amendment, dated July 19, 2010, among The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. (f/k/a ABN AMRO Bank N.V.), as arranger, Madeleine Leasing Limited, as initial borrower, CIT Aerospace International, as initial head lessee, and CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, as supplemented by Letter Agreement No. 1 of 2010, dated July 19, 2010, among The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., as arranger, CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, and CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, as amended and supplemented by the Accession Deed, dated July 21, 2010, among The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., as arranger, Madeleine Leasing Limited, as original borrower, and Jessica Leasing Limited, as acceding party, as supplemented by Letter Agreement No. 2 of 2010, dated July 29, 2010, among The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., as arranger, CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, and CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.6				Form of All Parties Agreement among CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, Madeleine Leasing Limited, as borrower and lessor, CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, various financial institutions, as original ECA lenders, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Paris Branch, as French national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Niederlassung Deutschland, as German national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as British national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, and CIT Aerospace International, as servicing agent, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.7				Form of ECA Loan Agreement among Madeleine Leasing Limited, as borrower, various financial institutions, as original ECA lenders, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Paris Branch, as French national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Niederlassung Deutschland, as German national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as British national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, and CIT Aerospace International, as servicing agent, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.8				Form of Aircraft Head Lease between Madeleine Leasing Limited, as lessor, and CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.9				Form of Proceeds and Intercreditor Deed among Madeleine Leasing Limited, as borrower and lessor, various financial institutions, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Paris Branch, as French national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Niederlassung Deutschland, as German national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as British national agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.10				Form of All Parties Agreement among CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, Jessica Leasing Limited, as borrower and lessor, CIT Group Inc., as guarantor, various financial institutions, as original ECA lenders, Citibank International plc, as French national agent, Citibank International plc, as German national agent, Citibank International plc, as British national agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, CIT Aerospace International, as servicing agent, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2010 fiscal year (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

94 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

4.11				Form of ECA Loan Agreement among Jessica Leasing Limited, as borrower, various financial institutions, as original ECA lenders, Citibank International plc, as French national agent, Citibank International plc, as German national agent, Citibank International plc, as British national agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2010 fiscal year (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.12				Form of Aircraft Head Lease between Jessica Leasing Limited, as lessor, and CIT Aerospace International, as head lessee, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2010 fiscal year (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.13				Form of Proceeds and Intercreditor Deed among Jessica Leasing Limited, as borrower and lessor, various financial institutions, as original ECA lenders, Citibank International plc, as French national agent, Citibank International plc, as German national agent, Citibank International plc, as British national agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as ECA facility agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V., London Branch, as security trustee, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, relating to certain Export Credit Agency sponsored secured financings of aircraft and related assets during the 2010 fiscal year (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to Form 10-K filed March 10, 2011).

4.14				Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2011, between CIT Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed June 30, 2011).

4.15				First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 30, 2011, between CIT Group Inc., the Guarantors named therein, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (including the Form of 5.250% Note due 2014 and the Form of 6.625% Note due 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed June 30, 2011).

4.16				Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 7, 2012, between CIT Group Inc., the Guarantors named therein, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (including the Form of Notes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Form 8-K dated February 13, 2012).

4.17				Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2012, among CIT Group Inc., the Guarantors named therein, and JP Morgan Securities LLC, as representative for the initial purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K dated February 13, 2012).

4.18				Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014 among CIT Group Inc., certain subsidiaries of CIT Group Inc., as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto from time to time and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed January 28, 2014).

4.19				Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2012, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed March 16, 2012).

4.20				First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 15, 2012, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (including the Form of 5.25% Senior Unsecured Note due 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K filed March 16, 2012).

4.21				Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 4, 2012, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (including the Form of 5.000% Senior Unsecured Note due 2017 and the Form of 5.375% Senior Unsecured Note due 2020) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K filed May 4, 2012).

Item 6. Exhibits 95

Table of Contents

4.22				Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2012, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (including the Form of 4.25% Senior Unsecured Note due 2017 and the Form of 5.00% Senior Unsecured Note due 2022) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed August 3, 2012).

4.23				Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 1, 2013, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (including the Form of 5.00% Senior Unsecured Note due 2023) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed August 1, 2013).

4.24				Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 19, 2014, among CIT Group Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as paying agent, security registrar and authenticating agent (including the Form of 3.875% Senior Unsecured Note due 2019) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed February 19, 2014).

10.1*				Amended and Restated CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective December 10, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-8 filed January 11, 2010).

10.2*				CIT Group Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

10.3*				CIT Group Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

10.4*				New Executive Retirement Plan of CIT Group Inc. (As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008).

10.5*				Letter Agreement, effective February 8, 2010, between CIT Group Inc. and John A. Thain (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2010).

10.6*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Three Year Stock Salary Award Agreement, dated February 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2010).

10.7*				Letter Agreement, dated June 2, 2010, between CIT Group Inc. and Scott T. Parker (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K filed July 6, 2010).

10.8*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Retention Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.9*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement (One Year Vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.10*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement (Three Year Vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.11*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Three Year Vesting) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.12*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Director Award Agreement (Initial Grant) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.13*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Director Award Agreement (Annual Grant) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2010).

10.14*				Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and C. Jeffrey Knittel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009).

10.15*				Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and C. Jeffrey Knittel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009).

96 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

10.16*				Letter Agreement, dated April 21, 2010, between CIT Group Inc. and Nelson J. Chai (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011).

10.17*				Letter Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, between CIT Group Inc. and Lisa K. Polsky (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011).

10.18*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (with Good Reason) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011).

10.19*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (without Good Reason) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011).

10.20**				Airbus A320 NEO Family Aircraft Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2011, between Airbus S.A.S. and C.I.T. Leasing Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of Form 10-Q/A filed February 1, 2012).

10.21**				Amended and Restated Confirmation, dated June 28, 2012, between CIT TRS Funding B.V. and Goldman Sachs International, and Credit Support Annex and ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule, each dated October 26, 2011, between CIT TRS Funding B.V. and Goldman Sachs International, evidencing a $625 billion securities based financing facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2012).

10.22**				Third Amended and Restated Confirmation, dated June 28, 2012, between CIT Financial Ltd. and Goldman Sachs International, and Amended and Restated ISDA Master Agreement Schedule, dated October 26, 2011 between CIT Financial Ltd. and Goldman Sachs International, evidencing a $1.5 billion securities based financing facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2012).

10.23**				ISDA Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex, each dated June 6, 2008, between CIT Financial Ltd. and Goldman Sachs International related to a $1.5 billion securities based financing facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2008).

10.24*				Letter Agreement, dated February 24, 2012, between CIT Group Inc. and Andrew T. Brandman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Form 8-K filed April 12, 2012).

10.25				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (with Good Reason) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2012).

10.26				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (without Good Reason) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2012).

10.27*				Assignment and Extension of Employment Agreement, dated February 6, 2013, by and among CIT Group Inc., C. Jeffrey Knittel and C.I.T. Leasing Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2013).

10.28*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Form 10-K filed March 1, 2013).

10.29*				Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Executives with Employment Agreements) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-K filed March 1, 2013).

10.30*				CIT Employee Severance Plan (Effective as of November 6, 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 in Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2013).

10.31				Stockholders Agreement, by and among CIT Group Inc. and the parties listed on the signature pages thereto, dated as of July 21, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014).

10.32*				Retention Letter Agreement, dated July 21, 2014, between CIT Group Inc. and Nelson Chai and Attached Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed July 25, 2014).

10.33*				Extension to Term of Employment Agreement, dated January 2, 2014, between CIT Group Inc. and C. Jeffrey Knittel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2014).

12.1				CIT Group Inc. and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

Item 6. Exhibits 97

Table of Contents

31.1				Certification of John A. Thain pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Commission, as promulgated pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2				Certification of Scott T. Parker pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Commission, as promulgated pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1***				Certification of John A. Thain pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2***				Certification of Scott T. Parker pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS				XBRL Instance Document (Includes the following financial information included in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

101.SCH				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF				XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

*		Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**		Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an application for granting confidential treatment pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
***		This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.

98 CIT GROUP INC

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

November 7, 2014				CIT GROUP INC.

				/s/ Scott T. Parker
				Scott T. Parker
				Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

				/s/ E. Carol Hayles
				E. Carol Hayles
				Executive Vice President and Controller

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. sophomore Avg

Cit (CIT) 10-Q2014 Q3 Quarterly report

Content analysis