UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒
Check the appropriate box:
| | |
| ☐ | | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| |
| ☐ | | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| |
| ☐ | | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| |
| ☒ | | Definitive Additional Materials |
| |
| ☐ | | Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 |
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
T.J. Rodgers
J. Daniel McCranie
Camillo Martino
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
| | | | |
| |
| ☒ | | No fee required. |
| |
| ☐ | | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
| | |
| | 1) | | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | 2) | | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | 3) | | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | 4) | | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | 5) | | Total fee paid: |
| |
| ☐ | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| |
| ☐ | | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| | |
| | 1) | | Amount Previously Paid: |
| | 2) | | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | 3) | | Filing Party: |
| | 4) | | Date Filed: |
| | |
| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | |  |
CYPRESSFIRST COMMENTS ON LATEST ADMISSIONS IN THIRD CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR DISCLOSURE
Executive Chairman Ray Bingham and Cypress Board Admit Bingham Discussed Cypress M&A Information with Chinese Government-backed Private Equity Firm
Cypress Disclosures Cynically Timed Less Than One Hour after Independent Proxy Advisory Firm Report
SAN JOSE, CA, May 30, 2017 — Camillo Martino and J. Daniel McCranie, nominees for election to the Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: CY) (“Cypress” or “the Company”) Board of Directors, and T.J. Rodgers, founder and former CEO of Cypress and the Company’s largest individual stockholder (collectively “CypressFirst”), today briefly commented on the latest admissions made by the Cypress Board in its May 30 Second Proxy Supplement.
T.J. Rodgers said, “In amid-day filing with five single-spaced pages of additional facts cynically released less than one hour after a report issued by a proxy advisory firm, the Cypress Board finally admitted that executive chairman Ray Bingham has discussed inside knowledge of Cypress’s M&A activities and prospects with his other employer, Chinese government-backed private equity firm Canyon Bridge. After two lawsuits attempting to secure the truth about Mr. Bingham’s conflict of interest, and two sets of prior misleading proxy disclosures, Cypress has waited until the last minute to even begin leveling with stockholders, who should have been well informed from the very beginning of the proxy contest. By waiting until after two of the proxy advisory firms had issued their reports, Cypress knowingly caused them to base their decisions on inadequate information. We sincerely hope that the Cypress stockholders will take a close look at the new Cypress disclosures—despite the inadequacy of even this third set of disclosures—before making their voting decisions.”
The following quotes can be found in the new May 30 Second Proxy Supplement:
Ray Bingham disclosed Cypress M&A status to Canyon Bridge.TheProxy Supplement states:“In August 2016, Mr. Bingham first met with Benjamin Bin Chow, the Managing Partner of Canyon Bridge, in connection with Mr. Bingham potentially serving in an advisory role for a private equity fund that would become Canyon Bridge. Also in August 2016, during the early stages of Mr. Bingham’s discussions with Canyon Bridge, Mr. Chow informed Mr. Bingham regarding a ‘rumor flying around in China about possible M&A plays surrounding the company [Cypress].’ Mr. Bingham said, ‘Nothing happening here.’”
Rodgers explained the significance of Mr. Bingham’s reply: “Months before Mr. Bingham notified any member of the Cypress Board or management team of his Canyon Bridge activities, he was providing confidential information on the status of Cypress’s M&A activities to an outside party that was seeking acquisition opportunities in the semiconductor industry and is a potential acquirer of Cypress itself.”
Ray Bingham discussed semiconductor acquisition targets with Canyon Bridge. The Proxy Supplement states:“[O]n November 4, 2016, an investment bank, at the investment bank’s request, presented to the Cypress Board regarding the continuing consolidation in the semiconductor industry and listed a number of companies that Cypress may want to acquire. The presentation also speculated that Canyon Bridge might be one of 30 companies that could have an interest in Cypress.”
“On November 15, 2016, Mr. Bingham messaged Mr. Chow and the other prospective Canyon Bridge principals regarding potential acquisition opportunities in the semiconductor space.”
Ray Bingham disclosed the identities of Cypress customers and acquisition targets to Canyon Bridge.TheProxy Supplement states:“[O]n November 22, 2016, Mr. Bingham informed Canyon Bridge that he would be visiting certain companies in China and Japan on behalf of Cypress. During his trip, Mr. Bingham talked with Cypress employees, met with Cypress customers, visited semiconductor companies of potential interest to Cypress and met with private equity investors. Before his trip, Mr. Bingham asked his colleagues at Canyon Bridge for their advice and opinions of the various companies and investors he would be meeting with.”
Rodgers continued, “This record clearly shows that on multiple occasions Mr. Bingham provided his Canyon Bridge partners with confidential information he learned as a Cypress director. Cypress stockholders should not tolerate an executive chairman who serves two masters and is leaking highly sensitive Cypress M&A information to a competitor that is seeking to acquire semiconductor companies.”
CypressFirst urges Cypress stockholders to put a stop to this conflict of interest by voting theGOLDproxy cardFOR the election of highly qualified candidates Dan McCranie and Camillo Martino.
More information about CypressFirst can be found atwww.CypressFirst.com.
Media Contacts
Abernathy MacGregor
Jeremy Jacobs / Sheila Ennis
212-371-5999 /415-926-7961
JRJ@abmac.com
SBE@abmac.com
Investor Contacts
MacKenzie Partners
Daniel Burch / Laurie Connell
212-929-5500
Dburch@mackenziepartners.com
ldennedy@mackenziepartners.com
* * * * *
2
