QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this documentAs filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2003
Registration No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM F-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
MDP ACQUISITIONS PLC
MDCP ACQUISITIONS I
(Exact name of registrants as specified in their respective charters)
Ireland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | 2670 (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | | Not Applicable (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Arthur Cox Building Earlsfort Terrace Dublin 2 Ireland Telephone: +353 (1) 618-0000 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants' principal executive offices) |
National Registered Agents, Inc. 875 Avenue of the Americas Suite 501 New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (800) 767-1553 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) |
Copies to: |
Dennis M. Myers, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis 200 E. Randolph Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Telephone: (312) 861-2000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered
| | Amount to be Registered
| | Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit
| | Amount of Registration Fee
|
---|
|
95/8% Senior Notes due 2012 | | $205,000,000 | | 100% | | $16,585(1) |
|
Guarantee of 95/8% Senior Notes due 2012(2) | | — | | — | | (3) |
|
- (1)
- Calculated in accordance with Rule 457 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
- (2)
- MDCP Acquisitions I is a subsidiary of MDP Acquisitions plc and has guaranteed the 95/8% Senior Notes due 2012 being registered hereby.
- (3)
- Pursuant to Rule 457(n), no separate fee is payable with respect to the guarantees being registered hereby.
The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED APRIL 17, 2003
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. The prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities nor a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer and sale is not permitted.
PROSPECTUS
MDP Acquisitions plc
the indirect owner of
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/F-4/0001047469-03-013799/g900678.jpg)
Offer to Exchange
$205,000,000 95/8% Senior Notes due 2012
(CUSIP Nos. G59404AA4 and 58282PAA9)
for substantially identical securities that have been
registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933
Material Terms of Exchange Offer
- •
- MDP Acquisitions plc was formed to effect the acquisition of the business conducted by Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries. Substantially all of the financial information contained in this prospectus relates to the operations of JSG prior to its acquisition.
- •
- We sold the outstanding senior notes listed above on February 14, 2003 to initial purchasers who subsequently re-sold such securities to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. The net proceeds from such sale were used to partially fund the asset swap transaction with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation that was completed in March 2003.
- •
- The terms of the senior notes to be issued in the exchange offer described in this prospectus are substantially identical to the outstanding notes, except that the transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the outstanding notes will not apply to the exchange notes.
- •
- The exchange notes will be identical in all respects to, and will trade as a single series with, the publicly registered 95/8% senior notes due 2012 which will be issued in an exchange offer that will expire on May 9, 2003.
- •
- Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC, we believe that, subject to some exceptions, the exchange notes may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by you without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act.
- •
- The existing notes are currently listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. We currently intend to list the exchange notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
- •
- The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, , 2003, unless extended.
- •
- You may withdraw tenders of outstanding notes at any time prior to the expiration of the exchange offer.
- •
- You may tender your outstanding notes in integral multiples of $1,000.
- •
- We believe that the exchange of the notes will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
- •
- The exchange offer is subject to customary conditions, including that the exchange offer does not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC.
- •
- We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange offer.
For a discussion of certain factors that you should consider before participating in this exchange offer, see "Risk Factors" beginning on page 19 of this prospectus.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the notes to be distributed in the exchange offer, nor have any of these organizations determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
, 2003
Each broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such exchange notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging and delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection with resales of exchange notes received in exchange for notes where the notes were acquired by the broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the expiration date of the exchange offer (as defined herein), we will make this prospectus available to any broker-dealer in connection with any such resale. See "Plan of Distribution."
We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give any information or represent anything not contained in this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus does not offer to sell or solicit any offer to buy any notes in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is unlawful. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | Page
|
---|
Summary | | 1 |
Risk Factors | | 19 |
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements | | 32 |
Presentation of Our Financial Information | | 33 |
Exchange Rate Information | | 33 |
Market, Ranking and Other Data | | 34 |
The Transactions | | 35 |
Senior Notes Exchange Offer | | 39 |
Use of Proceeds | | 49 |
Capitalization | | 50 |
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements | | 51 |
Selected Historical Financial Data | | 63 |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | 67 |
Industry | | 87 |
Business | | 89 |
Management | | 105 |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | | 113 |
Security Ownership | | 117 |
Description of Certain Indebtedness | | 119 |
Description of the Senior Notes | | 128 |
Book-Entry, Settlement and Clearance | | 190 |
Taxation | | 195 |
Plan of Distribution | | 202 |
Service of Process and Enforcement of Civil Liabilities | | 203 |
Experts | | 203 |
Legal Matters | | 203 |
Where You Can Find Other Information | | 204 |
General Information | | 205 |
Index to Financial Statements | | F-1 |
SUMMARY
This following summary highlights material information about our company and this exchange offer. This summary does not contain all of the information that may be important to you in deciding whether to participate in the exchange offer. We encourage you to read this entire prospectus, including the financial data and the information described under the heading "Risk Factors" and the other documents we have referred to you.
In this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires:
- •
- "issuer" refers to MDP Acquisitions plc, a direct subsidiary of parent and indirect owner of JSG;
- •
- "parent" refers to MDCP Acquisitions Limited, an entity controlled by Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C. and its affiliates;
- •
- "guarantor" refers to MDCP Acquisition I, a direct subsidiary of issuer and guarantor of the senior notes;
- •
- "SSCC" refers to Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation;
- •
- "JSG" refers to Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries; and
- •
- "we," "us," and "our" and similar terms refer to the consolidated business of MDCP Acquisitions Limited and all of its consolidated subsidiaries and its predecessors, including JSG.
This summary has four major sections. The first section discusses our company, industry, competitive strengths, business strategy, recent developments, corporate structure and background information relating to the issuance of the outstanding notes. The second and third sections provide a summary of the terms of the exchange offer and the material terms of the exchange notes. The last section provides our summary historical and unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data and our recent operating results.
Our Company
We are the largest European-based integrated manufacturer of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products, with operations in Europe, Latin America and the United States and Canada. JSG, which was incorporated in Ireland in 1934 as the owner of a single converting plant, has grown to its current global position, owning, after giving effect to the exchange of assets with SSCC, 45 mills, most of which produce containerboard used to manufacture our corrugated containers, 194 converting plants, most of which convert containerboard into corrugated containers, 31 reclamation facilities, which provide some of the wastepaper requirements for our mills, and 31 other production facilities worldwide. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we generated net sales, net loss and EBITDA of €4,779 million, €30 million and €615 million, respectively, on a pro forma basis. Our European, Latin American and North American operations accounted for approximately 74%, 16% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 on a pro forma basis.
We command a leading share of the European corrugated container market and are one of Europe's largest producers of containerboard. In Latin America, we are the largest producer of corrugated containers and the second largest producer of containerboard. Through our North American operations, we are the second largest producer of corrugated containers in Canada. We are also a world leading producer of décor base paper, which is used as a laminate in furniture and flooring and is one of our fastest growing products.
Our containerboard mills and converting operations are highly integrated, as our corrugated container plants convert much of our containerboard production. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we produced approximately 3,000,000 metric tons of containerboard and a similar volume of corrugated containers. In addition, our mills produced over 1,000,000 metric tons of other grades of paperboard and paper, such as sack kraft, which is used to make industrial-grade paper sacks, and
1
boxboard, which is used for folding cartons, together with non-packaging grades, such as décor base paper, graphic board and printing and writing paper. Our conversion plants produced 265,000 metric tons of other paper-based packaging products, such as paper sacks and folding cartons.
We are highly leveraged as a result of the indebtedness we incurred in connection with the acquisition of JSG by MDCP Acquisitions I, a company newly formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to meet our debt service obligations, including those under the senior and subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis for the offering of additional senior notes, we would have had outstanding long term indebtedness of approximately €3,514 million (including the current portion of €4 million) and shareholders' equity of approximately €878 million. On the same pro forma basis, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2002 would have been 1.1x. Our substantial indebtedness could also require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to debt payments, limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in manufacture, production, distribution or marketing of our products, place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our competitors that are less leveraged than we are, increase our vulnerability to general and industry-specific adverse economic conditions and limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
Industry Overview
Corrugated containers are a safe and economical means of transporting consumer and industrial products. More goods are shipped in corrugated containers than in any other type of packaging. Containerboard, which is a generic term used to describe various types of paperboard such as linerboard and corrugating medium, is the principal raw material used to manufacture corrugated containers. Linerboard is used as the inner and outer facing (lining) of a corrugated container. The two main types of linerboard are kraftliner, which is produced using primarily virgin fiber, and testliner, which is produced using primarily recycled fiber. Corrugating medium is the wavy or fluted interior of the corrugated sheet. It is fluted and laminated to linerboard in corrugating plants to produce corrugated sheets. The sheets are subsequently printed, cut, folded and glued either in a corrugating plant or in a converting plant to produce corrugated containers.
Our industry is highly competitive, and no single company is dominant. Our competitors include large, vertically integrated paperboard and packaging products companies and numerous smaller companies. The industry is particularly sensitive to price fluctuations as well as other factors, including innovation, design, quality and service. To the extent that one or more of our competitors becomes more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our ability to attract and retain customers could be materially adversely affected, which could diminish our sales volumes and revenues.
Furthermore, the principal factor affecting the demand for our products, both globally and regionally, is the general level of economic growth and activity. Since the markets for paper-based packaging products in the developed world are generally mature, there is a close correlation between economic growth and demand for packaging products such as corrugated containers and their component materials, including containerboard. Accordingly, the demand for our products is adversely affected by an economic slowdown, particularly if such a slowdown affects the global economy rather than any one region. This occurred in 2000, 2001 and 2002.
Competitive Strengths
Leading Market Positions and Economies of Scale. We are the leading producer of kraftliner and the second largest producer of testliner in Europe and command a leading share of the European corrugated container market. In Latin America, we are the largest producer of corrugated containers and the second largest producer of containerboard. The scale and density of our production network
2
allows us to benefit from economies of scale in purchasing, production, distribution, marketing, research and development and the application of best practices.
Highly Integrated Producer. We have the ability to utilize substantially all of our containerboard mills' production internally because our converting plants' volume requirements for containerboard generally meet or exceed our mills' production. We believe integration provides us with earnings stability, largely because fluctuations in the earnings of our mills tend to be offset by changes in the earnings of our converting operations. Moreover, our high level of integration ensures consistent demand for our mills' containerboard production, which allows us to optimize capacity utilization, even during trough demand periods.
Cost Competitive and Well-Positioned Manufacturing Base. We believe that we incur among the lowest delivered cost to our customers as a result of our efficient, long-lived manufacturing base and the close proximity of our mills to customers and raw material sources.
Diversified Product Offerings, Geographic Markets and Customer Base. With leading positions in the production of kraftliner, testliner, corrugated containers and specialties, an operating presence in 20 countries and thousands of customers, our cash flows are broadly diversified across product offerings, geography and customer type.
Experienced Management with Substantial Equity Interest. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of approximately 20 years of experience with JSG. Our senior executives have invested approximately €61.0 million in equity of our parent. In addition, 214 other JSG managers have invested approximately €13.0 million in equity of parent.
Principal Shareholder with Proven Paper and Packaging Sector Expertise. Madison Dearborn is considered to be among the most active private equity investors in the U.S. in the paper and packaging industry, having previously made investments in Packaging Corporation of America, Riverwood International Corp., Buckeye Cellulose Corporation and Bay State Paper Holdings.
Business Strategy
Aggressively Reduce Debt. Our top priority is to reduce debt. To do so, we will maximize our cash flow available for debt reduction through transaction-related cost reductions, the continuation of our disciplined capital expenditure program and the divestiture of non-core operating and non-operating assets. Management and Madison Dearborn have identified transaction-related cash cost reductions in overhead and procurement which we believe will have a positive annualized effect on EBITDA of approximately €31.5 million, independent of management's ongoing operating cost reduction programs.
Pursue Continuous Operating Improvements. We are implementing a program designed to improve profits across JSG by reducing costs in areas such as raw materials, services, transportation and spare parts through the sharing of information, increased coordination and exchange of best practices within JSG. We annually undertake a focused review of fixed and variable costs, and we intend to maintain our well-positioned manufacturing base through benchmarking, improving asset utilization and realizing centralization savings.
Optimize Business Portfolio. Management plans to review its portfolio of businesses on an ongoing basis to identify opportunities to realize value by exiting businesses that are both not critical for JSG from a strategic perspective and are capable of being sold to third parties at attractive prices. In addition, we consider acquisitions a more capital-efficient and responsible method of expanding our operations. Therefore, we plan to pursue selected acquisitions if opportunities arise that meet both our stringent return on capital requirements and our business objectives of increasing integration and otherwise strengthening our competitive position.
3
Asset Swap Transaction
On March 31, 2003, certain subsidiaries of JSG completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets that previously comprised SSCC's European operations for JSG's 50% ownership interest in Smurfit MBI Canada and a cash payment of approximately €185 million. On February 14, 2003, we sold $205 million in aggregate principal amount of our 95/8% senior notes due 2012 to fund the cash consideration for this transaction.
In connection with the asset swap transaction, we acquired three paper mills (located in Hoya and Viersen, Germany and Cordoba, Spain), 20 corrugated container plants (11 located in Germany, three in Spain, four in Belgium, one in The Netherlands and one in France), one contract packaging plant in the Netherlands and five reclamation plants located in Germany. The primary products produced in these facilities include corrugated containers, containerboard and coated recycled boxboard. Production for these mills and sales volumes for the corrugated container facilities for 2000, 2001 and 2002 were:
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
Tons produced (metric tons in thousands): | | | | | | |
| Containerboard | | 367 | | 373 | | 393 |
| Coated boxboard | | 77 | | 71 | | 65 |
Corrugated containers sold | | 579 | | 589 | | 630 |
| |
| |
| |
|
For ease of reference, we refer to the asset swap transaction with SSCC described above as the SSCC Asset Swap and the sale of the notes used to finance the SSCC Asset Swap as the senior outstanding notes or outstanding notes.
Corporate Structure
Issuer owns guarantor and guarantor owns JSG. Issuer, a public limited company, was incorporated in Ireland on June 12, 2002 to act as a financing company in connection with the acquisition of JSG by Madison Dearborn and management. Prior to the acquisition of JSG, issuer had not engaged in any business. Issuer and guarantor are holding companies and do not directly conduct any business operations. Consequently, issuer and guarantor are dependent on dividends and other payments from JSG and its subsidiaries to make payments on the notes and, if required, the guarantees of the senior notes. You will not have any direct claim on the cash flows or assets of our subsidiaries, and our operating subsidiaries have no obligation to pay amounts due under the notes or the guarantees or to make funds available to issuer or guarantor for these payments. The ability of our subsidiaries to make dividends and other payments to issuer will depend on their cash flows and earnings which, in turn, will be affected by all of the factors discussed in the "Risk Factors" section. In addition, under Irish corporate law, our Irish subsidiaries may not pay dividends in excess of their distributable reserves—in general, the accumulated earnings of the relevant subsidiary.
The registered office of issuer is Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland, and its telephone number is +353 1 618 0000. JSG was originally incorporated in Ireland as a private company on January 15, 1934 and became a public company in 1964 and a public limited company in 1985. On November 18, 2002, JSG converted to a private limited company. JSG's principal executive offices are located at Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland and its telephone number is +353 1 202 7000.
4
The following chart illustrates our corporate structure and principal indebtedness after giving pro forma effect as at December 31, 2002 to the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes and the issuance of additional subordinated notes as interest payments on our 15.5% subordinated notes due 2013.
![GRAPH](https://capedge.com/proxy/F-4/0001047469-03-013799/g525357.jpg)
- (a)
- Guarantors under the senior credit facility. Parent and issuer have also provided a first priority security interest over all their tangible and intangible assets (other than the intercompany loan) to the lenders under the senior credit facility.
- (b)
- Borrowers under the senior credit facility.
- (c)
- In addition to our holding companies, certain of our operating subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior credit facility. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
- (d)
- Intercompany loan is equal to principal amount of senior notes and subordinated notes. Amounts due to issuer under this intercompany loan are subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness of guarantor under the senior credit facility pursuant to a priority agreement governing the rights of guarantor's creditors. The intercompany loan is subject to payment blockages and to restrictions on enforcement. For more information, see "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Intercompany Loan and Priority Agreements."
- (e)
- We had approximately €401 million of additional borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility and approximately €606 million of additional borrowing availability under our term loans as of December 31, 2002. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
- (f)
- As part of the acquisition of JSG, certain shareholders of JSG were able to elect to receive some or all of their consideration in the form of a loan note. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Loan Notes."
- (g)
- Includes indebtedness under our 6.75% notes due 2005, 7.50% debentures due 2025, certain local bank borrowing, capital lease obligations, Latin America funded debt and bank overdrafts. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Description
5
of Existing 6.75% Notes and 7.50% Debentures," "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Other Indebtedness" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements."
- (h)
- The guarantees are subordinated to all senior indebtedness of guarantor, including all amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility, and are not due unless certain conditions have been satisfied. See "Description of the Senior Notes."
Issuer sold on February 14, 2003 the senior outstanding notes to Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International as initial purchasers. The initial purchasers subsequently resold the senior outstanding notes outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in reliance on Regulation S and within the United States to qualified institutional buyers in reliance upon Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The net proceeds from the sale of the senior outstanding notes were used to partially finance the SSCC Asset Swap.
The JSG Acquisition
On October 7, 2002, MDCP Acquisitions I, a company newly formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding equity interests of JSG. In connection with the acquisition, JSG distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in SSCC and transferred certain non-operating assets and non-core operating assets to newly formed, wholly owned subsidiaries of parent, which we collectively refer to as the Newcos, in exchange for one or more intercompany notes. The Newcos borrowed €125 million under a bank credit facility, which is completely non-recourse to issuer. The Newcos then loaned the proceeds to parent, and parent used them to make a capital contribution to issuer.
The funding required to purchase all of the outstanding equity interests of JSG, to refinance certain existing indebtedness of JSG and to pay related fees and expenses was approximately €3,510 million. These cash costs were financed by the following transactions:
- •
- approximately €857 million of cash equity contributed by parent, which we refer to as the equity contribution. The equity contribution was comprised of the following:
- •
- the purchase by certain Madison Dearborn entities and certain other co-investors, including DBCP Europe GP (Jersey) Limited, JP Morgan Partners co-investors and Merrill Lynch Private Equity Partners co-investors, of 66,200,000 ordinary shares of parent for an aggregate subscription price of €66,200, or €0.001 per share, in cash, and by certain members of management, including Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, Gary W. McGann, Anthony P.J. Smurfit and Ian J. Curley, of 7,000,000 ordinary shares of parent for an aggregate subscription price of €70 million or €10 per share, in cash,
- •
- capital contributions of approximately €662 million in cash to parent on a pro rata basis by certain Madison Dearborn entities and certain other co-investors, including DBCP Europe GP (Jersey) Limited, JP Morgan Partners co-investors and Merrill Lynch Private Equity Partners co-investors, for no consideration, and
- •
- a capital contribution by parent of €125 million in cash, which funds were provided by the Newcos to parent in the form of an intercompany loan;
- •
- proceeds from the issuance and sale of 250,000 units, which we refer to as the units, consisting of €100 million and $150 million aggregate principal amount of 151/2% subordinated notes due 2013, which we refer to as the subordinated notes, and warrants to purchase parent's ordinary shares;
- •
- proceeds from the issuance and sale of €350 million aggregate principal amount of 101/8% senior notes due 2012 and $545 million aggregate principal amount of 95/8% senior notes due 2012, which we collectively refer to as the original senior notes and, together with the senior outstanding notes, the senior notes; and
6
- •
- borrowing by MDCP Acquisitions I under a new senior credit facility, which we refer to as the senior credit facility.
In addition, approximately €637 million of existing indebtedness of JSG was left outstanding. This indebtedness was comprised of amounts outstanding under its 6.75% notes due 2005 and 7.50% debentures due 2025 (after adjusting such amounts for related hedging obligations), certain local bank borrowing, capital lease obligations, Latin America funded debt and bank overdrafts.
For ease of reference, we collectively refer to the offer, the acquisition of JSG, the spin-off of the SSCC shares, the financing transactions described above and the transfer of assets to the Newcos as the transactions. In addition, we collectively refer to the senior notes and the subordinated notes as the notes.
In connection with the initial sale of the senior outstanding notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement. The pending exchange offer is being initiated to satisfy issuer's contractual obligations undertaken in such agreement. Following this section is a detailed summary of the terms of the exchange offer and the exchange notes.
7
SUMMARY OF EXCHANGE OFFER
Registration Rights Agreement | | Simultaneously with the initial sale of the senior outstanding notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement for the exchange offer. In the registration rights agreement, we agreed, among other things, to use our commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement with the SEC within 90 days of issuing the senior outstanding notes, to have such registration statement declared effective within 180 days of issuing the senior outstanding notes, and to complete the exchange offer within 30 business days of the effectiveness of the registration statement. The exchange offer is intended to satisfy your rights under the registration rights agreement. After the exchange offer is complete, you will no longer be entitled to any exchange or registration rights with respect to your outstanding notes. |
Senior Notes Exchange Offer | | We are offering to exchange the senior exchange notes for senior outstanding notes. The exchange notes have been registered under the Securities Act. All senior outstanding notes that are validly tendered and not validly withdrawn will be exchanged. We will issue senior exchange notes promptly after the expiration of the senior notes exchange offer. The senior outstanding notes may be tendered only in integral multiples of $1,000. |
Resales | | Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC set forth in no-action letters issued to unrelated parties, we believe that the senior exchange notes issued in the senior notes exchange offer may be offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by you without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the Securities Act, provided that: |
| | • | | the exchange notes are being acquired in the ordinary course of your business; |
| | • | | you are not participating, do not intend to participate, and have no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate, in the distribution of the exchange notes issued to you in an exchange offer; and |
| | • | | you are not an affiliate of ours. |
| | If any of these conditions are not satisfied and you transfer any exchange notes issued to you in the exchange offer without delivering a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act or without an exemption from registration of your exchange notes from these requirements, you may incur liability under the Securities Act. We will not assume, nor will we indemnify you against, any such liability. |
8
| | Each broker-dealer that is issued exchange notes in the exchange offer for its own account in exchange for outstanding notes that were acquired by that broker-dealer as a result of market-making or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale of the exchange notes. A broker-dealer may use this prospectus for an offer to resell, resale or other retransfer of the exchange notes issued to it in the exchange offer. |
Record Date | | We mailed this prospectus and the related exchange offer documents to registered holders of senior outstanding notes on 2003. |
Expiration Date | | The senior notes exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 2003, unless we decide to extend it. |
Conditions to the Exchange Offer | | The exchange offer is subject to customary conditions, including that the exchange offer does not violate applicable law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC. |
Procedures for Tendering Senior Outstanding Notes | | We issued the senior outstanding notes as global securities. When the senior outstanding notes were issued, we deposited the global senior notes with the custodian for the book-entry depositary. The book-entry depositary issued depositary interests in respect of each global note representing the senior outstanding notes to DTC and then recorded such interests in its books and records in the name of DTC's nominee. |
| | You may tender your senior outstanding notes through the book-entry transfer systems of DTC. To tender your senior outstanding notes by a means other than book-entry transfer, a letter of transmittal must be completed and signed according to the instructions contained in the letter. The applicable letter of transmittal and any other documents required by the letter of transmittal must be delivered to the exchange agent by mail, facsimile, hand delivery or overnight carrier. In addition, you must deliver the senior outstanding notes to the exchange agent or comply with the procedures for guaranteed delivery. See "Senior Notes Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering" for more information. |
| | Do not send letters of transmittal and certificates representing senior outstanding notes to us. Send these documents only to an exchange agent. See "Senior Notes Exchange Offer—Exchange Agents" for more information. |
9
Special Procedures for Beneficial Owners | | If you are the beneficial owner of book-entry interests and your name does not appear on a security position listing of DTC, as the holder of the book-entry interests or if you are a beneficial owner of outstanding notes that are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and you wish to tender the book-entry interest or outstanding notes in an exchange offer, you should contact the person in whose name your book-entry interests or outstanding notes are registered promptly and instruct that person to tender on your behalf. |
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures | | If you wish to tender your senior outstanding notes and you cannot get your required documents to the exchange agent on time, you may tender your senior outstanding notes by completing a notice of guaranteed delivery and complying with the guaranteed delivery procedures. |
Withdrawal Rights | | You may withdraw the tender of your senior outstanding notes at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 2003. |
Acceptance of Outstanding Notes and Delivery of Exchange Notes | | If you fulfill all conditions required for proper acceptance of outstanding notes, we will accept any and all outstanding notes that you properly tender in an exchange offer on or before 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. We will return any outstanding notes that we do not accept for exchange to you without expense as promptly as practicable after the expiration date. We will deliver the exchange notes as promptly as practicable after the expiration date and acceptance of the outstanding notes for exchange. See "Senior Notes Exchange Offer—Terms of Senior Notes Exchange Offer" for more information. |
Use of Proceeds; Fees and Expenses | | We will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of the exchange notes pursuant to the exchange offer. We will pay all of our expenses incident to the exchange offer. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations | | We believe that the exchange of outstanding notes will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
Exchange Agents | | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas is serving as the principal exchange agent in connection with the exchange offer. Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. is serving as the exchange agent in Luxembourg in connection with the exchange offer. |
10
SUMMARY OF TERMS OF EXCHANGE NOTES
The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the senior outstanding notes, except that the exchange notes will be registered under the Securities Act. As a result, the exchange notes will not bear legends restricting their transfer and will not contain the registration rights and liquidated damage provisions contained in the senior outstanding notes. The exchange notes represent the same debt as the senior outstanding notes. All of the senior outstanding notes and the corresponding exchange notes are governed by the same indenture. We use the term notes in this prospectus to collectively refer to the outstanding notes and the exchange notes.
Terms of
$205,000,000 95/8% Senior Exchange Notes due 2012
Issuer | | MDP Acquisitions plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland. |
Notes Offered | | $205 million in aggregate principal amount of Series B 95/8% Senior Notes due 2012, which we refer to as the senior exchange notes or exchange notes. The exchange notes will be identical in all respects to, and will trade as a single series with, the publicly registered 95/8% senior notes due 2012 which will be issued in an exchange offer that will expire on May 9, 2003. |
Maturity Date | | October 1, 2012. |
Interest | | Annual rate: 95/8% per year. |
| | Payment frequency: every six months on April 1 and October 1. |
| | First payment: April 1, 2003. |
| | Interest and certain other scheduled payments due on the senior exchange notes will be paid to issuer by guarantor pursuant to the terms of the intercompany loans. The intercompany loans are subordinated to all senior debt of guarantor. |
Ranking and Subordinated Guarantees | | The senior exchange notes are general, unsecured obligations of issuer and rank equally with or senior in right of payment to all current and future indebtedness of issuer. Each series of senior exchange notes ranks equally with the other and senior in right of payment to the subordinated notes. The senior exchange notes effectively rank junior to all of the existing and future indebtedness of issuer's subsidiaries, including those of guarantor and all borrowing under the senior credit facility, whether such debt is secured or unsecured. |
| | MDCP Acquisitions I is a guarantor of the senior exchange notes on a senior subordinated basis. The guarantees are senior subordinated obligations of the guarantor and rank behind all current and future senior indebtedness of the guarantor, including all borrowing under the senior credit facility. The guarantees also rank behind all liabilities of guarantor's subsidiaries. |
11
| | As of December 31, 2002, after giving pro forma effect to the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes, the senior exchange notes and the guarantees would have been effectively subordinated to approximately €2,409 million of indebtedness (and an additional €401 million would have been available for additional borrowing under the senior credit facility). |
| | Guarantor will be released from all of its obligations under the guarantee |
| | • | | in connection with the sale of guarantor |
| | | | • | | on an enforcement of the senior security by the senior agent under the senior credit facility or by any receiver or administrative receiver or |
| | | | • | | at the request of the senior agent after an event of default under the senior credit facility, or |
| | • | | if guarantor merges, consolidates or amalgamates with, or transfers all or substantially all of its property or assets to, another entity and the surviving entity enters into a guarantee of the senior notes in compliance with the indenture. |
| | Guarantor will also be released and discharged from its obligations in respect of a guarantee in the circumstances set forth in the section entitled "Description of the Senior Notes—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance." |
Optional Redemption | | On or after October 1, 2007, issuer may redeem all or part of the senior exchange notes at any time at the redemption prices described in the section "Description of the Senior Notes—Optional Redemption." |
| | At any time prior to October 1, 2005, issuer may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior exchange notes with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings, in each case, at the redemption prices described in the section "Description of the Senior Notes— Optional Redemption." |
| | In addition, prior to October 1, 2007, if issuer undergoes specific kinds of changes in control, issuer may also redeem all, but not part, of the senior exchange notes at the prices described in "Description of the Senior Notes—Optional Redemption." |
| | Issuer may also redeem all of the senior exchange notes, but not just a portion, at any time upon giving proper notice if changes in tax laws impose certain withholding taxes on amounts payable on the senior exchange notes. If issuer decides to do this, it must pay you a price equal to the principal amount of the senior exchange notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest and certain other amounts described in the section "Description of the Senior Notes—Redemption for Taxation Reasons." |
12
Change of Control | | If issuer experiences specific kinds of changes in control, issuer must offer to repurchase the senior exchange notes at 101% of their principal amounts, plus accrued and unpaid interest and certain other amounts, if any, to the date of redemption. See "Description of the Senior Notes—Repurchase at the Option of Holders." |
Basic Covenants of Indenture | | Issuer issued the exchange notes under an indenture among itself, the guarantor and a trustee, which we refer to as the senior notes indenture or the indenture. The senior notes indenture (among other things) limits issuer's ability and that of its restricted subsidiaries to: |
| | • | | pay dividends or make other distributions; |
| | • | | make other restricted payments and investments; |
| | • | | incur additional indebtedness and issue preference shares; |
| | • | | create liens; |
| | • | | incur restrictions on the ability of issuer's subsidiaries to pay dividends or other payments to them; |
| | • | | sell assets; |
| | • | | merge or consolidate with other entities; and |
| | • | | enter into transactions with affiliates. |
| | In addition, the senior notes indenture limits guarantor's ability to incur debt that is senior to its guarantees but junior to senior debt of guarantor. |
| | Each of the covenants is subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. See "Description of the Senior Notes." |
You should refer to the section entitled "Risk Factors" for an explanation of certain risks of participating in the exchange offer.
13
Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth our summary audited historical and unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data for the periods ended and at the dates indicated below. The periods prior to and including September 2, 2002 reflect data of JSG, issuer's predecessor for financial accounting purposes. The periods beginning September 3, 2002 reflect data of issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries after the acquisition of JSG. Because of the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities acquired as part of the transactions and the related impact to the financial data, the consolidated financial statements of JSG, issuer's predecessor for the periods prior to September 3, 2002, are not comparable to those of issuer subsequent to that date. We have derived the historical consolidated financial data as of and for the fiscal years 2000 and 2001 from JSG's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the historical consolidated financial data for the period from January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002 from the audited historical financial statements of JSG included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the historical financial data for the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 from the audited financial statements of issuer included elsewhere in this prospectus. The pro forma statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 2002 reflects the statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 2002 and adjusted to give pro forma effect to: (i) the transactions, which include the subsequent sale of certain non-operating and non-core operating assets to the Newcos, (ii) JSG's acquisition of Munksjö on March 28, 2002 and a smaller acquired business prior to the transactions, (iii) JSG's disposition of various businesses during 2002 prior to the transactions and (iv) the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes as if those transactions had been completed on January 1, 2002 and carried through to all periods presented. The pro forma balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 have been calculated by giving effect to item (iv) listed above as if such event had occurred on December 31, 2002. All other aspects of the transactions listed in items (i) through (iii) above are already calculated in issuer's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002.
For the pro forma financial statements and a more detailed discussion of pro forma adjustments, see "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements."
The effects of the SSCC Asset Swap have not been included in the pro forma financial information because such information is not required pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation S-X, which governs the form and content of pro forma financial statements.
The historical audited combined financial statements were prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP, which differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. These differences are described in note 37 to the audited historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
14
| | Predecessor
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Issuer
| | Pro Forma
| |
---|
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
| |
---|
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
| | September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002
| | Year Ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands, except ratios)
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | (audited)
| | (audited)
| | (unaudited)
| |
---|
Consolidated Statement of Income Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Irish GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | € | 4,565,244 | | € | 4,511,650 | | € | 3,134,080 | | € | 1,575,575 | | € | 4,778,572 | |
Cost of sales | | | 3,330,937 | | | 3,234,552 | | | 2,266,493 | | | 1,143,094 | | | 3,425,009 | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 5,734 | | | 8,820 | | | 5,794 | | | 10,090 | | | 38,589 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 1,228,573 | | | 1,241,636 | | | 861,793 | | | 422,391 | | | 1,314,974 | |
Net operating expenses | | | 866,103 | | | 883,964 | | | 656,419 | | | 287,453 | | | 970,880 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | 20,890 | | | 23,763 | | | 12,484 | | | 11,978 | | | 21,405 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | 341,580 | | | 333,909 | | | 192,890 | | | 122,960 | | | 322,689 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | 403,934 | | | 242,212 | | | 117,473 | | | 7,224 | | | 20,676 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | | (24,894 | ) | | (10,895 | ) | | (7,541 | ) | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | | 720,620 | | | 565,226 | | | 302,822 | | | 130,184 | | | 343,365 | |
Income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing | | | — | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | |
Share of associates' income on sale of operations | | | 3,105 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 20,511 | | | 23,053 | | | 10,286 | | | 5,230 | | | 14,298 | |
Interest expense | | | (120,370 | ) | | (108,621 | ) | | (65,881 | ) | | (92,718 | ) | | (312,651 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | (181,567 | ) | | (154,654 | ) | | (74,387 | ) | | (386 | ) | | (1,267 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | | 442,299 | | | 325,004 | | | 193,280 | | | 42,310 | | | 43,745 | |
Taxes on income, as reported | | | (169,001 | ) | | (120,417 | ) | | (77,889 | ) | | (31,395 | ) | | (47,470 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before equity minority interests | | | 273,298 | | | 204,587 | | | 115,391 | | | 10,915 | | | (3,725 | ) |
Equity minority interests | | | (30,816 | ) | | (37,022 | ) | | (19,969 | ) | | (9,061 | ) | | (26,757 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | € | 242,482 | | € | 167,565 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 1,854 | | € | (30,482 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Restated net income(1)(2) | | € | 225,932 | | € | 150,417 | | € | n/a | | € | n/a | | € | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Other Financial Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating activities | | € | 482,298 | | € | 584,492 | | € | 356,514 | | € | 260,923 | | | n/a | |
| Capital expenditure and financial investment | | | (116,327 | ) | | (136,627 | ) | | (121,206 | ) | | (90,307 | ) | | n/a | |
| Acquisitions and disposals | | | (109,067 | ) | | (42,431 | ) | | (297,064 | ) | | (2,516,819 | ) | | n/a | |
| Financing activities | | | (19,956 | ) | | (128,032 | ) | | 43,502 | | | 2,561,209 | | | n/a | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense | | | 234,851 | | | 238,764 | | | 172,354 | | | 92,661 | | | n/a | |
Capital expenditures | | | (147,629 | ) | | (177,213 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (91,139 | ) | | n/a | |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3) | | | 3.0 | x | | 3.3 | x | | 3.4 | x | | 1.4 | x | | 1.1 | x |
EBITDA(4) | | € | 576,431 | | € | 572,673 | | € | 385,684 | | € | 215,621 | | € | 614,870 | |
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash at bank and in hand | | € | 427,092 | | € | 440,109 | | € | n/a | | € | 184,331 | | | 374,331 | |
Working capital(5) | | | 395,614 | | | 534,879 | | | n/a | | | 415,548 | | | 605,548 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,138,827 | | | 2,088,019 | | | n/a | | | 2,214,254 | | | 2,214,254 | |
Total assets, as reported | | | 5,901,002 | | | 5,936,617 | | | n/a | | | 5,842,608 | | | 6,032,608 | |
Restated total assets(1)(2) | | | 5,844,744 | | | 5,867,569 | | | n/a | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
Long term debt and other long term liabilities | | | 1,337,515 | | | 1,404,432 | | | n/a | | | 3,027,384 | | | 3,217,384 | |
Shareholders' equity, as reported | | | 2,505,175 | | | 2,664,532 | | | n/a | | | 878,099 | | | 878,099 | |
Restated shareholders' equity(1)(2) | | | 2,386,730 | | | 2,525,191 | | | n/a | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA(4) | | € | 594,371 | | € | 589,382 | | € | 379,091 | | € | 213,175 | | | 592,439 | |
Net income | | | 245,670 | | | 151,921 | | | 95,973 | | | 10,267 | | | (21,518 | ) |
(Footnotes begin on following page)
15
(Footnotes for preceding page)
- (1)
- From January 1, 2002, we are adopting Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 19—"Deferred Tax" which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and the tax computation. FRS 19 applies to accounting periods ending on or after January 23, 2002. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and for the sole purposes of this summary historical consolidated financial data, previously reported figures have been restated. As a consequence of this change in policy, accounting for deferred taxation under Irish GAAP is more closely aligned to U.S. GAAP.
- (2)
- The summary historical financial data for the fiscal years 2000 and 2001 and for the period January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 were derived from JSG's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and for period September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 from issuer's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. As outlined in footnote (1) above, we have reflected the impact of FRS 19 in the financial data for these periods. The financial impact of the new standard is as follows:
| | Predecessor
| | Issuer
|
---|
| | Year ended December 31,
| |
| | September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002
|
---|
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
|
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
|
---|
| | (euro in thousands)
|
---|
Decrease in net income | | € | (16,550 | ) | € | (17,148 | ) | € | n/a | | € | n/a |
Decrease in total assets | | | (56,258 | ) | | (69,048 | ) | | n/a | | | n/a |
Decrease in shareholders' equity | | | (118,445 | ) | | (139,341 | ) | | n/a | | | n/a |
- (3)
- For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings are defined as earnings before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs and a portion of operating lease rental expense deemed to be representative of the interest factor.
- (4)
- EBITDA represents "operating income subsidiaries—continuing," plus "income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing," and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. EBITDA is included in this prospectus because it is a basis upon which issuer assesses its financial performance and debt service capabilities, and because certain covenants in issuer's (and subsidiaries') borrowing arrangements are tied to similar measures. You should not consider EBITDA in isolation from or as a substitute for cash flow from operations, net income, or other consolidated income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP or U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a company's profitability or liquidity. Issuer understands that while EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. For example, we calculate EBITDA without deducting income attributable to, or adding losses attributable to, equity minority interests.
16
Set forth below is a reconciliation of actual EBITDA to pro forma EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2002. See note (m) to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for additional details regarding these adjustments.
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands) (unaudited)
| |
---|
Actual EBITDA (Irish GAAP) | | | €601,305 | |
Pro forma adjustments: | | | | |
| Munksjö and other acquisition | | | 23,661 | |
| Disposal of businesses | | | (22,721 | ) |
| Sale to Newcos | | | 13,152 | |
| New compensation agreements | | | 441 | |
| Deferred gain amortization | | | (968 | ) |
| |
| |
Pro forma EBITDA (Irish GAAP) | | € | 614,870 | |
| |
| |
Set forth below are additional supplemental adjustments to eliminate the effect of non-recurring items and to adjust for certain other stand-alone considerations. These supplemental adjustments do not qualify as pro forma adjustments under the SEC's published rules (principally Article 11 of Regulation S-X) or guidance of its staff. See note (o) to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for additional details regarding these adjustments.
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands) (unaudited)
| |
---|
Supplemental adjustments: | | | |
| Non-recurring restructuring charge | | €21,405 | |
| Non-recurring income | | (8,841 | ) |
| Government grant amortization | | (3,427 | ) |
| |
| |
Total supplemental adjustments | | €9,137 | |
| |
| |
In addition to the foregoing, we have identified certain transaction-related cash cost expenses that we believe will not recur in future periods as a result of our cash cost reduction measures and operating improvements we are implementing as part of our business strategy. These cash expenses totaled €7,800 for the year ended December 31, 2001. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Impact of the Transactions—Potential Transaction-Related Cash Cost Savings" for more information.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to actual EBITDA:
| | Predecessor
| | Issuer
| |
---|
| | Year ended December 31,
| |
| | September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
| |
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
| |
---|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders | | € | 225,932 | | € | 150,417 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 1,854 | |
Equity minority interests | | | 30,816 | | | 37,022 | | | 19,969 | | | 9,061 | |
Taxes on income | | | 185,551 | | | 137,565 | | | 77,889 | | | 31,395 | |
Share of associates income | | | (200,578 | ) | | (76,663 | ) | | (35,545 | ) | | (6,838 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | 99,859 | | | 85,568 | | | 55,595 | | | 87,488 | |
Depreciation, amortization and depletion | | | 234,851 | | | 238,764 | | | 172,354 | | | 92,661 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EBITDA | | € | 576,431 | | € | 572,673 | | € | 385,684 | | € | 215,621 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
17
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Net income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders | | € | (30,482 | ) |
Equity minority interests | | | 26,757 | |
Taxes on income | | | 47,470 | |
Share of associates earnings | | | (19,409 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | 298,353 | |
Depreciation, amortization and depletion | | | 292,181 | |
| |
| |
Pro forma EBITDA | | € | 614,870 | |
| |
| |
- (5)
- Working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities.
- (6)
- Pro forma EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2002 reconciled from Irish GAAP to U.S. GAAP is summarized as follows:
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands) (unaudited)
| |
---|
Pro forma EBITDA (Irish GAAP) | | | €614,870 | |
Reconciling items: | | | | |
| Consolidation of the Newcos | | | (17,398 | ) |
| Stock compensation expense | | | (17,699 | ) |
| Pension expense | | | 9,141 | |
| Derivatives mark-to-market | | | 3,525 | |
| |
| |
Pro forma EBITDA (U.S. GAAP) | | € | 592,439 | |
| |
| |
- See
- note (n) to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
18
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following factors, in addition to the other information contained in this prospectus, when deciding whether to participate in the exchange offer.
Risks Associated with the Exchange Offer
Because there is no public market for the notes, you may not be able to resell your notes.
The exchange notes will be registered under the Securities Act, but will constitute a new issue of securities with no established trading market, and there can be no assurance as to:
- •
- the liquidity of any trading market that may develop;
- •
- the ability of holders to sell their exchange notes; or
- •
- the price at which the holders would be able to sell their exchange notes.
If a trading market were to develop, the exchange notes might trade at higher or lower prices than their principal amount or purchase price, depending on many factors, including prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities and our financial performance.
We understand that the initial purchasers presently intend to make a market in the notes. However, they are not obligated to do so, and any market-making activity with respect to the notes may be discontinued at any time without notice. In addition, any market-making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and may be limited during the exchange offer or the pendency of an applicable shelf registration statement. There can be no assurance that an active trading market will exist for the notes or that any trading market that does develop will be liquid. We currently intend to list the exchange notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange; however, we cannot assure you that a Luxembourg Stock Exchange listing will be obtained.
In addition, any outstanding note holder who tenders in the exchange offer for the purpose of participating in a distribution of the exchange notes may be deemed to have received restricted securities, and if so, will be required to comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction. For a description of these requirements, see "Senior Notes Exchange Offer."
Your outstanding notes will not be accepted for exchange if you fail to follow the procedures for the exchange offer and, as a result, your notes will continue to be subject to existing transfer restrictions and you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
We will not accept your notes for exchange if you do not follow the procedures for the exchange offer. We will issue exchange notes as part of the exchange offer only after a timely receipt of your outstanding notes, a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal and all other required documents. Therefore, if you want to tender your outstanding notes, please allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery. If we do not receive your notes, letter of transmittal and other required documents by the expiration date of the exchange offer, we will not accept your notes for exchange. We are under no duty to give notification of defects or irregularities with respect to the tenders of outstanding notes for exchange. If there are defects or irregularities with respect to your tender of outstanding notes, we will not accept your outstanding notes for exchange.
19
If you do not exchange your outstanding notes, your outstanding notes will continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions and you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
We did not register the outstanding notes nor do we intend to do so following the exchange offer. Outstanding notes that are not tendered will therefore continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions and may be transferred only in limited circumstances under the securities laws. If you do not exchange your outstanding notes, you will lose your right to have such outstanding notes registered under the federal securities laws. As a result, if you hold outstanding notes after the exchange offer, you may not be able to sell your outstanding notes.
Risks Relating to the Exchange Notes
Our substantial indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the notes.
We have significant debt service obligations as a result of completing the transactions and the SSCC Asset Swap. As of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis for the offering of the senior outstanding notes, we would have had outstanding long term indebtedness of approximately €3,514 million (including the current portion of €4 million) and shareholders' equity of approximately €878 million. On the same pro forma basis, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2002 would have been 1.1x. You should read the discussions under the headings "Capitalization" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements" for further information about our substantial indebtedness.
Our substantial debt could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:
- •
- make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the senior notes, the subordinated notes and our obligations under the senior credit facility;
- •
- require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, which would reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
- •
- limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the manufacture, production, distribution or marketing of our products, customer demand, competitive pressures, and the industries we serve;
- •
- place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our competitors that are less leveraged than we are;
- •
- increase our vulnerability to both general and industry-specific adverse economic conditions; and
- •
- limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
We are able to incur substantial additional debt in the future under the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures. The addition of further debt to our current debt levels could intensify the leverage-related risks that we now face. The senior notes indentures also permit us to incur additional debt which may be senior to the senior notes and the guarantees and which may be secured. The subordinated notes indentures also permit us to incur additional debt which may be senior to the subordinated notes and which may be secured.
In addition, the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures and the senior credit facility contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debts.
20
Our ability to make payments on the notes and refinance existing indebtedness depends on our ability to generate sufficient cash in the future.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the senior outstanding notes, and to fund planned capital and development expenditures or opportunities that may arise, such as acquisitions of other businesses, will depend on our ability to generate sufficient cash in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors that are beyond our control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowing will be available to us under our senior credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt, including the senior outstanding notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. If our future cash flows from operations and other capital resources are insufficient to pay our obligations as they mature or to fund our liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay our business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of our debt, including the senior outstanding notes. We cannot assure you that we would be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, the terms of our existing and future indebtedness, including the senior outstanding notes, may limit our ability to pursue any of these alternatives.
We are dependent on payments from our subsidiaries to fund payments to you on the notes, and our subsidiaries might not be able to make dividends or other payments to us in some circumstances.
Issuer and guarantor are holding companies and do not directly conduct any business operations. Consequently, issuer and guarantor will be dependent on dividends and other payments from JSG and its subsidiaries to make payments on the notes and, if required, the guarantees. You will not have any direct claim on the cash flows or assets of our subsidiaries, and our operating subsidiaries have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due under the notes or the guarantees of the senior notes or to make funds available to issuer or guarantor for these payments.
The ability of our subsidiaries to make dividends and other payments to issuer will depend on their cash flows and earnings which, in turn, will be affected by all of the factors discussed in these "Risk Factors." In addition, under Irish corporate law, our Irish subsidiaries may not pay dividends in excess of their distributable reserves—in general, the accumulated earnings of the relevant subsidiary. Furthermore, the senior credit facility prohibits guarantor and its subsidiaries from paying dividends and other distributions to issuer if, among other reasons, an event of default has occurred under the senior credit facility, and the priority agreement prohibits payments under the intercompany loan to issuer if, among other reasons, guarantor is in breach of its obligations to make payments on certain senior debt of guarantor and its subsidiaries (including debt under the senior credit facility) or during certain payment blockage periods. Although the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures limit the ability of our subsidiaries to enter into future consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends and make other payments to issuer, there are significant qualifications and exceptions to these limitations. These qualifications and exceptions include, among others and subject in each case to certain qualifications, (i) the entry into credit agreements not to exceed €2.525 billion, (ii) the incurrence of certain refinancing indebtedness, (iii) the incurrence of indebtedness to finance the purchase price or cost of construction or improvement of property, plan or equipment used in the business of issuer and its subsidiaries, including JSG, (iv) the incurrence of intercompany indebtedness, and (v) additional indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed €150.0 million. Consequently, the amounts that we receive from our subsidiaries may not be sufficient to enable us to service issuer's obligations under the notes.
21
Your rights to receive payments under the senior outstanding notes and the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes are subordinated to all liabilities of JSG and its subsidiaries. Further, the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes by guarantor are subordinated to all of guarantor's existing indebtedness and possibly all of its future borrowing, and such guarantees are subject to certain standstill terms and can be released in certain circumstances.
Generally, claims of creditors of a subsidiary, including trade creditors, will have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of the subsidiary over the claims of creditors of its parent company. The senior outstanding notes and the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes, therefore, will be structurally subordinated to the creditors of guarantor's operating subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the offering of senior outstanding notes, subsidiaries of guarantor would have had €1,778 million of outstanding indebtedness and trade payables, all of which would have ranked structurally senior to the senior outstanding notes and the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes.
Guarantor's guarantees of the senior outstanding notes rank behind all of guarantor's existing senior indebtedness and all of its future senior borrowing, except any future indebtedness that expressly provides that it ranks equal with, or subordinated in right of payment to, the guarantees. As a result, upon any distribution to guarantor's creditors in a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization or similar proceeding relating to guarantor or its property, the holders of guarantor's senior debt will be entitled to be paid in full in cash before any payment is made with respect to the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes.
The terms of the guarantees of the senior outstanding notes provide that, for so long as any amount due under the senior credit facility is outstanding, payment under such guarantees will not become due and holders of the senior outstanding notes will not be permitted to make any demand or otherwise take any action against guarantor until the earlier of (i) a payment default under the senior notes has occurred and is continuing and a period of not less than 179 days has elapsed, (ii) the debt under the senior credit facility has been accelerated because of an event of default thereunder or (iii) an insolvency event in respect of guarantor has occurred.
The guarantees of the senior outstanding notes will be released automatically in the event that (i) certain actions are taken to sell shares of guarantor pledged as security in connection with the senior credit facility in enforcing such security, (ii) after an event of default under the senior credit facility, the representative of the lenders thereunder requests the sale of guarantor's shares or (iii) a successor company enters into a replacement guarantee of the senior outstanding notes.
The intercompany loans are subordinated to all senior indebtedness of guarantor.
Issuer's only assets and sources of revenue are its indirect ownership of JSG and its rights under the intercompany loan reflecting the advance of proceeds of the original senior notes and subordinated notes from issuer to guarantor and the intercompany loan reflecting the advance of proceeds of the additional senior notes offering from issuer to guarantor, which we refer to collectively as the intercompany loans. The scheduled payments on the intercompany loans are adequate to make, when due, scheduled payments of principal and interest payments on the senior notes and the subordinated notes. However, the intercompany loans are subordinated in right of payment to all other indebtedness of guarantor. The priority agreements prohibit payments under the intercompany loans if guarantor or its subsidiaries breach their payment obligations under certain senior debt (including debt under the senior credit facility), or during certain payment blockage periods. In addition, issuer has agreed not to pursue its rights under the intercompany loans unless (i) a payment default has occurred under the senior notes or the subordinated notes and a period of 179 days has elapsed from the date of notification of the payment default under the senior notes or the subordinated notes, (ii) certain
22
insolvency events have occurred with respect to guarantor or (iii) the senior credit facility has been accelerated pursuant to an event of default thereunder.
As a consequence of these provisions, guarantor may be prohibited from making payments on the intercompany loans to service payments on the senior notes or the subordinated notes, and issuer may not recover any amount under the intercompany loans in an insolvency of guarantor prior to the payment in full in cash of all senior indebtedness of guarantor. Therefore, issuer may be unable to service its obligations in relation to the senior notes or the subordinated notes. For a more complete summary of the terms of the intercompany loans, please see "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Intercompany Loan and Priority Agreements."
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas currently acts as the trustee under the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest in a distress scenario of issuer and its subsidiaries and potential resignation of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the trustee under some or all of the series of notes.
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has been appointed as trustee under the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures. In the event of decline in the financial condition of the consolidated group and/or the industry and a downgrade of the ratings of the senior notes and the subordinated notes by the ratings agencies, the gap between the bond ratings on the senior notes and the subordinated notes would widen and, therefore, the interests of the holders of the senior notes and the holders of the subordinated notes would differ. In such an event, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas may have a potential conflict of interest in serving the interests of the holders of the senior notes and the holders of the subordinated notes and would likely resign as trustee of one of the series of notes.
Insolvency and examinership laws in Ireland could limit your ability to enforce your rights under the notes.
Each of parent, issuer, guarantor and JSG has its registered office in Ireland. As a result, there is a rebuttable presumption that each has its center of main interests in Ireland and consequently it is likely that any insolvency proceedings applicable to it would be governed by Irish law. Insolvency proceedings governed by Irish law could limit your ability to enforce your rights under the notes.
Irish insolvency laws generally recognize the priority of secured creditors over unsecured creditors. In addition, in the event of an insolvent winding-up of an Irish company, there are some unsecured claims which are given preference over other unsecured claims (such as claims under the notes). The claims which are given preference include, among others, amounts due to the Irish Revenue Commissioners, amounts due to employees and liabilities incurred by a liquidator or examiner in connection with a winding-up or during an examinership of an Irish company, and are in some cases subject to limits as to time or amount.
Under Irish insolvency laws, if a company goes into liquidation, a liquidator may apply to the court to have certain transactions unwound if they are deemed fraudulent preferences or have the effect of perpetrating a fraud on the company, its creditors or its shareholders. In addition, Ireland has a court protection procedure, known as "examination," to facilitate the survival of companies in financial difficulties. The procedure, which is similar to the Chapter 11 procedure in the United States, provides ailing companies with a period of protection from their creditors, both secured and unsecured, to facilitate a restructuring of the company. During examination, the rights of creditors are suspended so that no enforcement action or other legal proceedings can be commenced without the approval of the examiner or the relevant Irish court, as the case may be. Furthermore, the subject company cannot make any payment by way of satisfaction or discharge of the whole or a part of any liability incurred by it before the presentation of a petition except in certain strictly defined circumstances.
23
An examiner is given power, subject to certain limitations, to take whatever steps are necessary to prevent or rectify the effects of any act, omission, course of conduct, decision or contract in relation to a company which, in the examiner's opinion, is or is likely to be to the detriment of that company, or any interested party. For example, an examiner may repudiate a covenant restricting further borrowing and/or the creation of security where he is of the opinion that the enforcement of the negative pledge would be likely to prejudice the survival of the company as a whole or any part of its undertaking as a going concern.
If any of our Irish subsidiaries is placed in examinership, we may not be able to enforce our rights to recover any amounts owed by the subsidiary to us, and consequently we may be unable to make payments on the notes. In addition, if issuer is placed in examinership, you may be unable to enforce your rights under the indenture.
Fraudulent conveyance laws may adversely affect the validity and enforceability of the guarantees of the senior notes.
Guarantor guarantees the payment of the senior notes on a senior subordinated basis.
Although laws differ among various jurisdictions, in general, under fraudulent conveyance laws, a court could subordinate or void any guarantee if it found that:
- •
- the guarantee was incurred with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or shareholders of the company; or
- •
- the guarantor did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for the guarantee and the guarantor was any of the following:
- •
- insolvent or was rendered insolvent because of the guarantee;
- •
- engaged in a business or transaction for which its remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or
- •
- intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay at maturity; or
- •
- the guarantee was held not to be in the best interests or for the corporate benefit of the company.
The measure of insolvency for purposes of fraudulent transfer laws varies depending on the law applied. Generally, however, a guarantor would be considered insolvent if:
- •
- the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of all of its assets;
- •
- the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or
- •
- it could not pay its debts as they become due.
On the basis of historical financial information, recent operating history and other factors, we believe that at the time guarantor issued its guarantees, it was not insolvent, it did not have unreasonably small capital for the business in which it is engaged, and it had not incurred debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. In addition, the board of directors of guarantor passed a resolution confirming that the entry into the guarantees was in guarantor's best interest and for its corporate benefit. We can give no assurance, however, that a court would agree with our conclusions in this regard.
24
If a court voided any guarantee as a result of a fraudulent conveyance, or held it unenforceable for any other reason, you would cease to have any claim in respect of guarantor and would be a creditor solely of issuer.
You may be unable to recover in civil proceedings for U.S securities laws violations.
For a discussion of the risks that may affect your ability to effect service of process, enforce judgments or bring an action against issuer's or guarantor's directors and officers, because:
- •
- issuer and guarantor are companies organized and existing under the laws of Ireland;
- •
- a majority of their executive officers, and those of its subsidiaries, are non-residents of the United States; and
- •
- substantially all of their assets and those of their executive officers are located outside the United States,
please see the information set forth under the heading "Service of Process and Enforcement of Civil Liabilities."
Restrictions in our existing debt instruments may limit our ability to make payments on the senior outstanding notes or operate our business.
The senior credit facility, the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures contain covenants that limit the discretion of our management with respect to certain business matters. For example, these covenants significantly restrict our ability to:
- •
- pay dividends or make certain other payments, investments, loans and guarantees;
- •
- incur additional indebtedness;
- •
- create liens or other encumbrances; and
- •
- sell or otherwise dispose of assets and merge or consolidate with another entity.
In addition, the senior credit facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants. You should read the discussions under the headings "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility" for further information about these covenants. Events beyond our control can affect our ability to comply with these financial covenants. Our failure to comply with these obligations could cause an event of default under the senior credit facility. If an event of default occurs, our lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding and accrued and unpaid interest on the senior credit facility to be immediately due, and the lenders thereafter could foreclose upon the assets securing the senior credit facility. Such an acceleration would also constitute an event of default under the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures. If an event of default occurs, we cannot assure you that we would have sufficient assets to repay all of our obligations, including the senior outstanding notes and the related guarantees. We may incur other indebtedness in the future that may contain financial or other covenants more restrictive than those applicable to our new senior credit facility, the senior notes indentures or the subordinated notes indentures.
We may not be able to purchase the notes upon a change of control.
If a change of control occurs, as defined in the indenture, we will be required to make an offer for cash to repurchase all of the senior outstanding notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest, liquidated damages and additional amounts in respect of taxes, if any. If a change of control occurs, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds to pay the purchase price for any senior outstanding notes. A change of control would also trigger a mandatory prepayment of all amounts due under the senior credit facility. A change of control could
25
trigger mandatory prepayment or an event of default under other indebtedness, including the subordinated notes and indebtedness that we may incur in the future. If a change of control occurs at a time when we are prohibited from purchasing the senior outstanding notes under other debt agreements, we could seek the consent of our lenders to purchase the senior outstanding notes or could attempt to refinance the borrowing that prohibit our repurchase of the senior outstanding notes. If we do not obtain that consent or repay the borrowing, we would remain prohibited from purchasing the senior outstanding notes. In that case, our failure to repurchase any of the tendered notes would constitute an event of default under the indenture, which would likely cause a default under other indebtedness. In that event, we would be required to repay all senior debt, including debt under the senior credit facility, before we could repurchase the senior outstanding notes. You should read the discussions under the headings "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility," "Description of the Senior Notes—Events of Default and Remedies," and "Description of the Senior Notes—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control" for further information about these restrictions.
Increases in market interest rates will increase our debt service obligations.
A portion of our debt, including all of the debt we incur under the senior credit facility, bears interest at variable rates. An increase in the interest rates on our debt will reduce our funds available to repay the senior outstanding notes and our other debt and to finance our operations and future business opportunities and, as a result, will intensify the consequences of our leveraged capital structure. The senior credit facility requires that we hedge at least 50% of the floating rate interest cost on our financial indebtedness. As of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the offering of additional senior notes, €1,786 million of our total outstanding debt of €3,514 million bore interest at variable rates.
We may be required to withhold or deduct Irish taxes on interest payments or redeem the senior outstanding notes if we fail to list such notes on a recognized exchange before such interest payments are due.
Our interest payments to you under the senior outstanding notes may be subject to Irish withholding tax unless, among other requirements, such notes are then listed on a recognized stock exchange. We currently intend to list the notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. We cannot assure you, however, that a Luxembourg Stock Exchange listing will be obtained. Therefore, if we fail to list the notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange or any other recognized exchange, we may be required to pay additional amounts in order to ensure that the amounts received by you will be the same as though no deductions or withholding had been made. See "Description of the Senior Notes—Withholding Taxes."
Risks Relating to Our Business
We are exposed to changes in market conditions for our products, the cyclicality of the packaging industry and the resulting threat of overcapacity.
The principal factor affecting the demand for our products, both globally and regionally, is the general level of economic growth and activity. Since the markets for paper-based packaging products in the developed world are generally mature, there is a close correlation between economic growth and demand for packaging products such as corrugated containers and their component materials, including containerboard. Accordingly, the demand for our products is adversely affected by an economic slowdown, particularly if such a slowdown affects the global economy rather than any one region. This occurred in 2000, 2001 and 2002.
In addition, our operating results reflect the packaging industry's general cyclical pattern. This cyclicality arises, in part, from the capital intensity of facilities such as paper mills, which generally
26
results in continued production as long as prices are sufficient to cover marginal costs, the long lead time between the planning and completion of a new mill, the commodity-like nature of a majority of our products and substantial price competition. Consequently, the industry has from time to time experienced intermittent periods of substantial overcapacity. For example, a new testliner mill currently being constructed in Germany may result in some regional overcapacity when it begins operations. Periods of overcapacity combined with weak demand causes the industry to take downtime periodically to reduce inventory levels. In a period of weak corrugated container demand in Europe during the second half of 2001, our European containerboard mills took 200,000 metric tons of downtime, representing 8% of our annual capacity. We continue to take downtime, as necessary, to manage our inventories. In the event we take downtime at our mills but our competitors continue production at high levels, our sales volumes would be adversely affected without any significant offsetting benefit of improved prices in the market. Further, these adverse effects would be exacerbated in the event U.S. producers continue production and increase their level of containerboard exports to Europe.
Our industry is highly competitive and price fluctuations could diminish our sales volumes and revenues.
The paperboard and paper-based packaging products industries are highly competitive, and no single company is dominant. Our competitors include large, vertically integrated paperboard and packaging products companies and numerous smaller companies. The industries in which we compete are particularly sensitive to price fluctuations as well as other factors, including innovation, design, quality and service, with varying emphasis on these factors depending on the product line. To the extent that one or more of our competitors becomes more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our ability to attract and retain customers could be materially adversely affected, which could diminish our sales volumes and revenues.
Price fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs could adversely affect our ability to obtain the materials needed to manufacture our products and could adversely affect our manufacturing costs.
Wood fiber purchased from third parties and recycled wastepaper, particularly old corrugated containers or OCC, the principal raw materials used in the manufacture of our products, are purchased in highly competitive, price sensitive markets. These raw materials have historically exhibited price and demand cyclicality and extreme volatility. The price of OCC in Europe has peaked dramatically twice in recent years—in June 2000 and in June 2002. In each case, a relatively low level of supply was matched with a relatively high level of demand, principally caused by increased demand from Asia. In each case, the free-on-board price rose to over €150 per metric ton. Within a period of three months, supply and demand conditions leveled to return the price to around €100 per metric ton. In particular, the supply and price of such fiber depends on a variety of factors over which we have no control, including environmental and conservation regulations, natural disasters and weather. A decrease in the supply of such fiber has caused, and likely will continue to cause, higher fiber costs. In addition, the increase in demand for products manufactured, in whole or in part, from OCC has caused an occasional tightness in the supply of OCC. It may also cause a significant increase in the cost of such fiber used in the manufacture of recycled containerboard and related products. Recycled wastepaper supplies, primarily OCC, decreased during the second quarter of 2002, resulting in a price increase of approximately €60 to €80 per metric ton during such period. The strong OCC price increase which began at the end of the first quarter of 2002 adversely affected the profitability of our mills, prompting an increase in the paper prices charged by our mills. Although such price increases were implemented in the third quarter of 2002, they were insufficient to cover the OCC price increases. With OCC prices declining in the third quarter of 2002, paper price increases were eroded in part. Overall, however, OCC price decreases were greater than paper price decreases. Such costs are likely to continue to fluctuate based upon demand and supply characteristics.
27
The cost of producing our products is also sensitive to the price of energy. Energy prices, in particular oil and natural gas, have experienced significant volatility in recent years, with a corresponding effect on our production costs. In January 2001, natural gas prices reached a high of nearly $10.00 per million British thermal units, or mmBtu, compared to a historical 10-year average of $2.61 per mmBtu. Although natural gas prices normalized in the second half of 2001, energy prices may not remain at current rates and may rise to higher levels, in which case our production costs, competitive position and results of operations could be adversely affected thereby.
Our ability to improve our cash flow and profitability depends on a number of factors, including the successful implementation of our business strategy.
Our business strategy is to deleverage rapidly and strengthen our position as one of the world's leading providers of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products by implementing initiatives aimed at achieving cost savings and generating profitable growth. In order to realize the expected cost savings, we must successfully reduce debt and our overhead costs, improve our procurement process, realize certain operating efficiencies and rationalize our manufacturing capacity. We expect to incur up to approximately €10 million of one-time restructuring charges and expenses to achieve the expected cost-savings mainly during 2003. Our ability to generate growth will depend on our successful promotion of our products, our ability to develop new innovations and, ultimately, customer demand for and acceptance of our products. The success of our efforts to implement our strategy and accomplish these goals could be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, such as operating difficulties, increased operating costs, personnel turnover, competitors and customers, delays in implementing initiatives and general economic or industry conditions. In addition, implementing our strategy will require significant management resources and may divert or strain our management's ability to focus on other company objectives. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in achieving cost savings, generating growth or in increasing our cash flows or profitability. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our business strategy and achieving cost savings, we may be unable to fulfill our obligations under the notes.
We are exposed to currency rate fluctuations.
With the introduction of the euro in 12 of the present 15 European Union Member States, our exposure to exchange rate fluctuation arises mainly in relation to the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, sterling and the Swedish krona. With our interests in the United States and the use of the U.S. dollar as the functional currency of our Latin American operations, the U.S. dollar is the most important foreign currency in which we conduct our business.
Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar have a significant effect on our operations and on our reported results in euro. A weaker U.S. dollar will decrease and, conversely, a stronger U.S. dollar will increase, the euro figures reported in our consolidated financial statements with respect to our U.S. and Latin American operations. For example, borrowing in foreign currencies decreased by €128 million during the year ended December 31, 2002, principally as a result of the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar, which declined approximately 19% during the year relative to the value of the euro. Whereas borrowing in foreign currencies increased by €54 million during the year ended December 31, 2001, principally as a result of the relative weakness of the euro, which declined over 5% during the year relative to the value of the U.S. dollar. In addition, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar is important for the European industry because U.S. containerboard prices tend to influence the world market. Movements in the U.S. dollar exchange rate may also have an effect on trading since a strong U.S. dollar tends to make American exports less competitive.
28
We are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations.
We are subject to a wide range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in all the jurisdictions where we operate. These requirements are complex, constantly changing and have tended to become more stringent over time. In particular, we will be affected by the European Union's Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, or IPPC, program, which will require most of our European mills to obtain IPPC permits and undertake additional pollution control measures by 2007. Additionally, in the course of the next several years, site condition reports that establish the baseline condition of the underlying soil and groundwater will need to be prepared for each of our European mill sites in order to obtain the requisite IPPC permits. If the resulting soil and groundwater investigations result in the discovery of significant contamination, we may be forced to incur significant containment and clean-up expenses. Because these investigations have not yet been conducted, we are unable to accurately predict the costs necessary to remedy any contamination. In the event we incur unforeseen significant containment and clean-up expenses relating to these investigations, our operating results could be adversely affected. See "Business—Environmental Issues" for a more complete discussion of the environmental regulatory regimes applicable to our operations.
We may be adversely affected by the Kyoto Protocol, by which most industrialized nations agreed to reduce their emissions of carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gasses." Although the Kyoto Protocol has not yet become binding, European Union regulatory actions aiming to achieve the Kyoto Protocol's reduction targets may require us to increase the energy efficiency of our operations, which could particularly affect certain of our older European mills.
We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with these or other environmental health and safety requirements or that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with such requirements in the future. We can similarly provide no assurance that we will not experience an accident or otherwise become liable for contamination that may have occurred in the past (including such liability to buyers of properties or businesses that we have sold). Additionally, if environmental, health and safety laws and regulations change, or new information comes to our attention regarding our compliance with such laws and regulations, we may have to make additional expenditures or incur liabilities beyond what is currently anticipated, and such expenditures and liabilities could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
We are exposed to the risk of product substitution.
Our main product, corrugated containers, competes with other forms of packaging, principally reusable plastic containers. Within Europe, this competition has been felt mainly in the container market for fruit, vegetable, meat, poultry and dairy produce, collectively referred to as the short shelf-life sector. This sector is estimated to account for approximately 14% of the European corrugated market. Any significant substitution away from paper-based packaging products will adversely affect our profitability. Although we believe the substitution of reusable plastic containers in the short shelf-life sector has now reached its limit, we can provide no assurance that further substitution will not occur in this sector or in other sectors, nor can we provide any assurance that future packaging developments and trends will not drive further substitution.
The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to effectively sell existing products, develop and introduce new products, and integrate certain acquired businesses will depend on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and key employees. Our operations could be adversely affected if, for any reason, a number of these officers or key employees did not remain with us.
29
Terrorist attacks, war or other civil disturbances could lead to further economic instability and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The current global economic and political climate is one of uncertainty. Recent acts of terrorism throughout the world, the threat of additional terrorist attacks and the fear of a prolonged global conflict have exacerbated volatility in the financial markets and caused consumer, corporate and financial confidence to weaken, increasing the risk of a "self-reinforcing" economic downturn. Since September 11, 2001, many companies have experienced difficulties in achieving their revenue goals and have cancelled or delayed investments, expansions and recruitment. This and other economic and political uncertainty, such as the insolvency of several major global companies, the present situations in Iraq, North Korea, Argentina and Venezuela, also increase the difficulty of modeling market conditions, reducing the accuracy and reliability of management's internal forecasts. This downturn may have an adverse effect on some of our customers and may lead to a decline in demand for our products. If this were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The costs and difficulties of acquiring and integrating complementary businesses and technologies could impede our future growth and adversely affect our competitiveness.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to consider acquiring complementary businesses. Currently we do not have any commitments or agreements relating to any material acquisitions. Future acquisitions could result in the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations. Risks we could face with respect to acquisitions include:
- •
- greater than expected costs and management time and effort involved in identifying, completing and integrating acquisitions;
- •
- potential disruption of our ongoing business and difficulty in maintaining our standards, controls, information systems and procedures;
- •
- the inability to successfully integrate the services, products and personnel of any acquisition into our operations;
- •
- a need to incur debt, which may reduce our cash available for operations and other uses due to increased debt service obligations; and
- •
- realizing little, if any, return on our investment.
The controlling shareholders of our company may have interests in conflict with the interests of our noteholders.
Madison Dearborn owns a majority of the outstanding ordinary shares of parent. In addition, under the terms of management participation agreements, all of the management shareholders elected those individuals designated by Madison Dearborn to serve on the board of directors of parent and issuer and Madison Dearborn appointed a majority of the directors. As a result, Madison Dearborn has the ability to control the policies and operations of our company. Circumstances may occur in which the interests of Madison Dearborn, as the principal shareholder of our company, could be in conflict with your interests as a holder of our notes. In addition, our equity investors may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you as a holder of our notes.
30
We are engaged in a number of active litigation matters, the outcome of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, we were involved in certain civil and criminal proceedings in Spain arising out of a past acquisition. In November 1988, a subsidiary of JSG acquired Industrial Cartonera, S.A., or ICSA, a Spanish incorporated company, from a subsidiary of Torras Hostench S.A., or Torras. In early 1989, JSG acquired a 35% interest in another Spanish company called Industrias del Papel y de la Celulosa, S.A., or INPACSA, a former parent of ICSA. A number of individuals associated with Torras were charged by the public prosecutor in Madrid with diverting, for their own use, a substantial part of the purchase consideration paid by JSG for ICSA. The public prosecutor, on behalf of the minority shareholders of INPACSA, also claimed that certain transactions, including the transfer of ICSA by INPACSA which took place prior to JSG's acquisition of ICSA, caused damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA. In 1998, the public prosecutor also charged JSG's Chairman, Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, as the representative of JSG, in these proceedings with respect to the alleged damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA and Torras. A JSG subsidiary is also one of a number of parties against whom secondary civil liability had been claimed. JSG and Smurfit International B.V. have each indemnified Dr. Smurfit against loss or liability due to such proceedings. Bonds have been posted with the Spanish court in the amount of €47 million, which equals the amount of alleged damages, excluding interest. The maximum estimated current total exposure relating to the liabilities, including interest through December 31, 2002, is approximately €118 million, for which no reserve has been taken and which amount could accrue interest until payment of any final judgment. Preliminary proceedings commenced in March 2003 and on April 11, 2003, the court dismissed the proceedings against Dr. Smurfit, the JSG subsidiary and others. This decision may be appealed at the conclusion of the proceedings against the remaining defendants. We cannot assure you, however, that the consequences of any future adverse findings, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We are also the subject of litigation in the Dominican Republic arising from our acquisition in 1996 of a controlling interest in a small local corrugator owned by Industria Cartonera Dominicana. The lawsuits, alleging damages in excess of $300 million, are brought by a local competitor who is claiming loss of potential profits, as a consequence of our entry to the market. He is also alleging breach of contract. We believe these lawsuits are without merit and are defending them vigorously.
We have learned that Smurfit Communications, a publishing business owned by one of our subsidiaries, has, for a considerable period, overstated the circulation of some of its publications. It is not possible to quantify the exposure to advertisers in the publications, with whom negotiations are being conducted. It is hoped that compensation offered in the form of credits for future advertising, calculated by reference to advertising expenditure in recent years, will be accepted by customers. No legal proceedings have been instituted against Smurfit Communications by any advertiser in respect of the overstatements.
31
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms "believes," "estimates," "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "may," "will" or "should" or, in each case, their negative, or other variations or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts. They appear in a number of places throughout this prospectus and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth strategies and the industry in which we operate.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from those made in, or suggested by, the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. Important factors that could cause those differences include, but are not limited to:
- •
- our substantial leverage and our ability to meet our debt service obligations;
- •
- our ability to generate growth or profitable growth;
- •
- the availability and price of raw materials;
- •
- our ability to integrate our operations and acquisitions successfully, including our recent acquisition of certain European assets of SSCC;
- •
- our exposure to currency or interest rate fluctuations;
- •
- our ability to implement our business strategy successfully;
- •
- our ability to comply with existing or newly implemented environmental regimes in the countries in which we operate;
- •
- our liability for violations, known or unknown, under environmental laws;
- •
- increased competition from other companies in our industry and our ability to retain or increase our market shares;
- •
- our ability to maximize operating and organizational efficiencies; and
- •
- general local and global economic conditions.
We urge you to read the sections of this prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" and "Business" for a more complete discussion of the factors that could affect our future performance and the industry in which we operate. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events described in this prospectus may not occur.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or publicly revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements referred to above and contained elsewhere in this prospectus.
32
PRESENTATION OF OUR FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Unless otherwise indicated, financial information in this prospectus has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Ireland, or Irish GAAP. Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the most significant differences between Irish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The information for each of the financial years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 does not constitute full accounts as defined by the Companies (Amendment) Act 1986; however, full statutory accounts for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 will be filed with the Irish Registrar of Companies.
The information for the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 for issuer does not constitute full accounts as defined by the Companies (Amendment) Act 1986; however, full statutory accounts for the period from incorporation through December 31, 2002 will be filed with the Irish Registrar of Companies.
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
In this prospectus: (1) IR£ or Irish punt refers to the former currency of Ireland; (2) € or euro refers to the single currency of the participating Member States in the Third Stage of European Economic and Monetary Union of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, as amended from time to time; (3) $ or U.S. dollars refers to the lawful currency of the United States of America; and (4) £ or sterling refers to the lawful currency of the United Kingdom.
Ireland is a participant in the European Monetary Union. In accordance with the Maastricht Treaty, the euro was launched as the single European currency on January 1, 1999. Upon the launch of the euro, the exchange rate for the Irish punt was irrevocably fixed at IR£0.787564 = €1.00, and on January 1, 2002, the Irish punt was replaced by the euro. The following table shows for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2002, the period-end average, high and low Noon Buying Rate in the City of New York for cable transfers of euro as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York expressed as U.S. dollars per €1.00, which we refer to as the Noon Buying Rate.
| | U.S. Dollar/Euro Exchange Rates
|
---|
| | At and for the Year Ended December 31,
| |
|
---|
| | At and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
|
---|
| | 1999
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
Exchange rate at end of period | | 1.0070 | | 0.9388 | | 0.8901 | | 1.0485 | | 1.0900 |
Average exchange rate during period(1) | | 1.0588 | | 0.9207 | | 0.8909 | | 0.9495 | | 1.0806 |
Highest exchange rate during period | | 1.1812 | | 1.0335 | | 0.9535 | | 1.0485 | | 1.1062 |
Lowest exchange rate during period | | 1.0016 | | 0.8270 | | 0.8370 | | 0.8594 | | 1.0361 |
- (1)
- The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month during the applicable period.
| | At and for the Months Ended
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2003
|
---|
| | Jan.
| | Feb.
| | Mar.
| | Apr.
| | May
| | June
| | July
| | Aug.
| | Sept.
| | Oct.
| | Nov.
| | Dec.
| | Jan.
| | Feb.
| | Mar.
|
---|
Exchange rate at end of period | | 0.86 | | 0.87 | | 0.87 | | 0.90 | | 0.93 | | 0.99 | | 0.98 | | 0.98 | | 0.98 | | 0.99 | | 0.99 | | 1.05 | | 1.07 | | 1.08 | | 1.09 |
Average exchange rate during period | | 0.88 | | 0.87 | | 0.88 | | 0.89 | | 0.92 | | 0.96 | | 0.99 | | 0.98 | | 0.98 | | 0.98 | | 1.00 | | 1.02 | | 1.06 | | 1.08 | | 1.08 |
Highest exchange rate during period | | 0.90 | | 0.88 | | 0.88 | | 0.90 | | 0.94 | | 0.99 | | 1.02 | | 0.99 | | 1.00 | | 0.99 | | 1.01 | | 1.05 | | 1.09 | | 1.09 | | 1.11 |
Lowest exchange rate during period | | 0.86 | | 0.86 | | 0.87 | | 0.88 | | 0.90 | | 0.94 | | 0.97 | | 0.96 | | 0.97 | | 0.97 | | 0.99 | | 0.99 | | 1.04 | | 1.07 | | 1.05 |
On April 15, 2003, the Noon Buying Rate was €1.00=1.0801.
Our inclusion of these exchange rates is not meant to suggest that the euro amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or that such amounts could have been converted into U.S. dollars at such rate or any other rate. In connection with the preparation of the group profit and loss accounts and the group cash flow statement, management uses average monthly exchange rates. In connection with the preparation of the group balance sheet, management uses the closing exchange rate at the date of such balance sheet. For a discussion of the impact of the exchange fluctuations on our financial condition and results of operations, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview."
33
MARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATA
The data included in this prospectus regarding markets and ranking, including the size of certain markets and JSG's position and the position of JSG's competitors within these markets, are based on independent industry publications, reports from government agencies or other published industry sources and estimates based on JSG management's knowledge and experience in the markets in which it operates. The estimates have been based on information obtained from JSG's customers, distributors, suppliers, trade and business organizations and other contacts in the markets in which it operates. We believe these estimates to be accurate as of the date of this prospectus. However, this information may prove to be inaccurate because of the method by which some of the data were obtained or because this information cannot always be verified with complete certainty due to the limits on availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in a survey of market size. All references to market positions of JSG set forth herein are based on a comparison of volumes sold.
In connection with its due diligence evaluation of JSG, Madison Dearborn commissioned Jaakko Pöyry, a leading paper and packaging sector consultant, to prepare a report for its benefit. The report contains, among other things, an analysis of the containerboard, corrugated container and other paper-based packaging industries and JSG's competitiveness in those industries. Some of the data in that report have been included in this prospectus.
34
THE TRANSACTIONS
The JSG Acquisition
On July 5, 2002, MDCP Acquisitions I, a company newly formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C. and its affiliates, which we refer to as Madison Dearborn, commenced a public tender offer for all of the issued and to be issued share capital of Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited (formerly Jefferson Smurfit Group plc) and its consolidated subsidiaries, which we refer to as JSG. On September 3, 2002, MDCP Acquisitions I declared the offer unconditional in all respects after receiving valid acceptances in respect of approximately 91.4% of JSG's outstanding shares and, in connection therewith, began the compulsory share acquisition. MDCP Acquisitions I completed the compulsory share acquisition on October 7, 2002. On November 18, 2002, JSG converted to a private limited company.
At the time the offer was declared unconditional, JSG completed the spin-off and distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation. In connection with the acquisition, certain non-operating assets and non-core operating assets of JSG were or will be transferred to the Newcos in exchange for one or more intercompany notes. The Newcos borrowed €125 million under a bank credit facility, which is completely non-recourse to issuer. The Newcos then loaned the proceeds to MDCP Acquisitions Limited, which we refer to as parent, and parent used them to make a capital contribution to MDP Acquisitions plc, which we refer to as issuer. Parent is an entity controlled by Madison Dearborn. For more information, see "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Non-Recourse Newco Credit Facility."
The funding required to purchase all of the outstanding equity interests of JSG, to refinance certain existing indebtedness of JSG and to pay related fees and expenses of the transactions was approximately €3,510 million. These cash costs were financed by the following transactions:
- •
- the equity contribution of approximately €857 million in cash. The equity contribution was comprised of the following:
- •
- the purchase by certain Madison Dearborn entities, and certain other co-investors, including DBCP Europe GP (Jersey) Limited, JP Morgan Partners co-investors and Merrill Lynch Private Equity Partners co-investors, of 66,200,000 ordinary shares of parent for an aggregate subscription price of €66,200, or €0.001 per share, in cash, and by certain members of management, including Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, Gary W. McGann, Anthony P.J. Smurfit and Ian J. Curley, of 7,000,000 ordinary shares of parent for an aggregate subscription price of €70 million, or €10 per share, in cash,
- •
- capital contributions of approximately €662 million in cash to parent on a pro rata basis by certain Madison Dearborn entities and certain other co-investors, including DBCP Europe GP (Jersey) Limited, JP Morgan Partners co-investors and Merrill Lynch Private Equity Partners co-investors for no consideration, and
- •
- a capital contribution by parent of €125 million in cash, which funds were provided by the Newcos in the form of an intercompany loan;
- •
- proceeds from the issuance and sale of the units (comprised of the subordinated notes and the warrants);
- •
- proceeds from the issuance and sale of the original senior notes; and
- •
- borrowing by MDCP Acquisitions I under its senior credit facility.
The proceeds of the original senior notes offering and proceeds from the sale of the units were provided to MDCP Acquisitions I by issuer by way of an intercompany loan. This intercompany loan is subordinated to all existing future indebtedness of MDCP Acquisitions I under its senior credit facility and is subject to restrictions on enforcement. MDCP Acquisitions I also received gross proceeds of the
35
equity contributions to us. These amounts were used by MDCP Acquisitions I to fund the purchase of the outstanding equity interests of JSG, refinance certain existing indebtedness of JSG and pay related fees and expenses of the transactions.
In addition, we have outstanding approximately €637 million of existing indebtedness of JSG, which is comprised of amounts outstanding under its 6.75% notes due 2005 and 7.50% debentures due 2025 (after adjusting such amounts for related hedging obligations), certain local bank borrowing, capital lease obligations, Latin America funded debt and bank overdrafts.
Asset Swap Transaction
On March 31, 2003, certain subsidiaries of JSG completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets that previously comprised SSCC's European operations for JSG's 50% ownership interest in Smurfit MBI Canada and a cash payment of approximately €185 million. On February 14, 2003, we sold $205 million in aggregate principal amount of our 95/8% senior notes due 2012 to fund the cash consideration for this transaction.
In connection with the SSCC Asset Swap, we acquired three paper mills (located in Hoya and Viersen, Germany and Cordoba, Spain), 20 corrugated container plants (11 located in Germany, three in Spain, four in Belgium, one in The Netherlands and one in France), one contract packaging plant in the Netherlands and five reclamation plants located in Germany. The primary products produced in these facilities include corrugated containers, containerboard and coated recycled boxboard. Production for these mills and sales volumes for the corrugated container facilities for 2000, 2001 and 2002 were:
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
Tons produced (metric tons in thousands): | | | | | | |
| Containerboard | | 367 | | 373 | | 393 |
| Coated boxboard | | 77 | | 71 | | 65 |
Corrugated containers sold | | 579 | | 589 | | 630 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Corporate Structure
MDCP Acquisitions I, an Irish unlimited public company, is a subsidiary of issuer, an Irish public limited company, which in turn is a subsidiary of parent, an Irish limited company. Each of parent, issuer and guarantor are newly incorporated under the laws of Ireland and were set up specifically for the purpose of effecting the transactions. Since their incorporation, none of these entities has engaged in any business except in connection with the transactions. Parent converted from an Irish public limited company into an Irish limited company on September 19, 2002.
36
The following chart illustrates our corporate structure and principal indebtedness after giving pro forma effect as at December 31, 2002 to the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes and the issuance of additional subordinated notes as interest payments on the outstanding subordinated notes.
![GRAPHIC](https://capedge.com/proxy/F-4/0001047469-03-013799/g549757.jpg)
- (a)
- Guarantors under the senior credit facility. Parent and issuer also have provided a first priority security interest over all their tangible and intangible assets (other than the intercompany loan) to the lenders under the senior credit facility.
- (b)
- Borrowers under the senior credit facility.
- (c)
- In addition to our holding companies, certain of our operating subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior credit facility. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
- (d)
- Intercompany loan is equal to principal amount of senior notes and subordinated notes. Amounts due to issuer under this intercompany loan are subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness of guarantor under the senior credit facility pursuant to a priority agreement governing the rights of guarantor's creditors. The intercompany loan is subject to payment blockages and to restrictions on enforcement. For more information, see "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Intercompany Loan and Priority Agreement."
- (e)
- We had approximately €401 million of additional availability under our revolving credit facility and approximately €606 million of additional borrowing availability under our term loans as of December 31, 2002. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
- (f)
- As part of the acquisition of JSG, certain shareholders were able to elect to receive some or all of their consideration in the form of a loan note. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Loan Notes."
- (g)
- Includes indebtedness under our 6.75% notes due 2005, 7.50% debentures due 2025, certain local bank borrowing, capital lease obligations, Latin America funded debt and bank overdrafts. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Description of Existing 6.75% Notes and 7.50% Debentures" and "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements."
- (h)
- The guarantees are subordinated to all senior indebtedness of guarantor, including all amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility, and are not due unless certain conditions have been satisfied. See "Description of the Senior Notes."
37
Accounting Policies
JSG has prepared its historical financial statements in accordance with Irish GAAP, which differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. In particular, certain key line items in its historical balance sheets, profit and loss statements and cash flow statements would be different under U.S. GAAP than under Irish GAAP. For example, treatment of goodwill, deferred taxation and pension costs under Irish GAAP differ significantly from U.S. GAAP. JSG has historically provided, and we will continue to provide, a description of the principal differences between Irish GAAP and U.S. GAAP along with a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP in our financial statements.
In addition, the capitalization table and unaudited pro forma financial statements included in this prospectus have been prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP and therefore would be materially different if they were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For example, the Newcos to which certain assets were or will be sold as part of the transactions would be consolidated in issuer's financial statements under U.S. GAAP, causing pro forma debt of issuer to increase by €125 million and pro forma book equity of issuer to decrease by €125 million. Even though under U.S. GAAP issuer would consolidate the Newcos, neither issuer nor any of its subsidiaries has any repayment obligations relating to the €125 million of the Newco debt, which is recourse only to the assets of the Newcos. For more information on the differences between Irish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus.
38
SENIOR NOTES EXCHANGE OFFER
Purpose and Effect of the Senior Notes Exchange Offer
Issuer, guarantor for the senior notes and the initial purchasers entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the original issuance of the senior outstanding notes. The registration rights agreement provides that we will take the following actions, at our expense, for the benefit of the holders of the senior outstanding notes to which such agreement relates:
- •
- Within 90 days after the closing date on which the senior outstanding notes were issued, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to file an exchange offer registration statement for the senior outstanding notes, of which this prospectus is a part, relating to the senior notes exchange offer. The senior exchange notes will have terms substantially identical in all material respects to the senior outstanding notes except that the senior exchange notes will not contain transfer restrictions.
- •
- We will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act within 180 days after the date of the closing of the senior outstanding notes offering.
- •
- We will keep the senior notes exchange offer open for at least 20 business days, or longer if required by applicable law, after the date notice of the senior notes exchange offer is mailed to the holders.
- •
- We will use commercially reasonable efforts to complete the senior notes exchange offer within 30 business days after the date specified for the effectiveness of the registration statement.
We will be required to use all commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement covering resales of the senior outstanding notes if:
- •
- we are not permitted to effect the senior notes exchange offer due to applicable law or SEC policy,
- •
- any holder of unregistered senior notes notifies issuer prior to the 20th business day following consummation of the senior notes exchange offer that:
- •
- it is prohibited by law or SEC policy from participating in such exchange offer;
- •
- it may not resell the senior exchange notes acquired by it in the senior notes exchange offer to the public without delivering a prospectus and the prospectus contained in the senior notes exchange offer registration statement is not appropriate or available for such resales; or
- •
- it is a broker-dealer and owns senior notes acquired directly from issuer or an affiliate of issuer.
Issuer and guarantor of the senior notes will pay additional interest on the senior outstanding notes for the periods described below if:
- •
- issuer and guarantor of the senior outstanding notes do not file the registration statement required by the registration rights agreement within 90 days after the closing of the senior outstanding notes on February 14, 2003;
- •
- issuer and guarantor are unable to request and obtain effectiveness of the registration statement required by the registration rights agreement within 180 days after the closing of the senior outstanding notes on February 14, 2003;
39
- •
- issuer and guarantor do not complete the offer to exchange the senior outstanding notes for the senior exchange notes within 30 business days after the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective; or
- •
- the applicable shelf registration statement or the applicable exchange offer registration statement is declared effective but thereafter ceases to be effective or usable for its intended purpose without being succeeded within five business days by a post-effective amendment to such registration statement that cures such failure and that is itself declared effective immediately.
You will not have any remedy other than liquidated damages on the senior outstanding notes if issuer fails to meet the deadlines listed above, which we refer to as a registration default. When there is a registration default, issuer and guarantor of the senior outstanding notes will pay liquidated damages on the senior outstanding notes by a per year rate of 0.25% for the first 90-day period following such registration default. The amount of liquidated damages payable on the senior outstanding notes will increase by an additional per year rate of 0.25% for each subsequent 90-day period during which a registration default continues, up to a maximum amount of liquidated damages of 1.00% per year. If and when all registration defaults in respect of the senior outstanding notes have been cured, liquidated damages will cease to accrue.
If issuer and guarantor of the senior outstanding notes must pay liquidated damages, they will pay them to you in cash on the same dates that they make interest payments on the senior notes, until issuer and guarantor of the senior notes remedy all registration defaults.
Following the consummation of the senior notes exchange offer, holders of the senior outstanding notes who were eligible to participate in the senior notes exchange offer but who did not tender their senior outstanding notes will not have any further registration rights and their senior outstanding notes will continue to be subject to certain restrictions on transfer. Accordingly, the liquidity of the market for the senior outstanding notes could be adversely affected.
Terms of the Senior Notes Exchange Offer
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, we will accept any and all senior outstanding notes validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date of the senior notes exchange offer. We will issue $1,000 principal amount of senior exchange notes in exchange for each $1,000 principal amount of senior outstanding notes accepted in the senior notes exchange offer. Any holder may tender some or all of its senior outstanding notes pursuant to the senior notes exchange offer. However, senior outstanding notes may be tendered only in integral multiples of $1,000.
The form and terms of the senior exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the senior outstanding notes except that:
- (1)
- the senior exchange notes bear a series B designation and different ISIN, CUSIP and Common Code numbers, as the case may be, from the senior outstanding notes;
- (2)
- the senior exchange notes have been registered under the Securities Act and hence will not bear legends restricting their transfer; and
- (3)
- the holders of the senior exchange notes will not be entitled to certain rights under the registration rights agreement, including the provisions providing for an increase in the interest rate on the senior outstanding notes in certain circumstances relating to the timing of the senior notes exchange offer, all of which rights will terminate when such exchange offer is terminated.
40
The senior exchange notes will evidence the same debt as the senior outstanding notes and will be entitled to the benefits of the indenture. The senior notes exchange offer is not conditioned upon any minimum aggregate principal amount of senior outstanding notes being tendered for exchange, and neither exchange offer is not conditioned upon the subordinated notes exchange offer described below.
$205,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the senior outstanding notes are subject to the senior notes exchange offer. We have fixed close of business on , 2003 as the record date for the senior notes exchange offer for purposes of determining the persons to whom this prospectus and the letter of transmittal will be mailed initially.
Holders of senior outstanding notes do not have any appraisal or dissenters' rights under Irish law or the indenture relating to the senior outstanding notes in connection with the senior notes exchange offer. We intend to conduct the senior notes exchange offer in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
We will be deemed to have accepted validly tendered senior outstanding notes when, as and if we have given oral or written notice of our acceptance to the exchange agent. The exchange agent will act as agent for the tendering holders for the purposes of receiving the senior exchange notes from us.
If any tendered senior outstanding notes are not accepted for exchange because of an invalid tender, the occurrence of specified other events set forth in this prospectus or otherwise, the certificates for any unaccepted senior outstanding notes will be returned, without expense, to the tendering holder thereof as promptly as practicable after the expiration date of the senior notes exchange offer.
Holders who tender senior outstanding notes in the senior notes exchange offer will not be required to pay brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in the letter of transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the exchange of senior outstanding notes pursuant to the senior notes exchange offer. We will pay all charges and expenses, other than transfer taxes in certain circumstances, in connection with the senior notes exchange offer. See "—Fees and Expenses."
Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendments
The term "expiration date" will mean 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on , 2003, unless we, in our sole discretion, extend the senior notes exchange offer, in which case the term "expiration date" will mean the latest date and time to which the senior notes exchange offer is extended.
In order to extend the senior notes exchange offer, we will notify the exchange agent of any extension by oral or written notice and by mailing to the registered holders an announcement thereof or by means of a press release or other public announcement, each prior to 9:00 a.m., London time, on the next business day after the previously scheduled expiration date.
We reserve the right, in our sole discretion, (1) to delay accepting any senior outstanding notes, to extend the senior notes exchange offer or to terminate the senior notes exchange offer if any of the conditions set forth below under "—Conditions" have not been satisfied, by giving oral or written notice of any delay, extension or termination to the exchange agent or (2) to amend the terms of the senior notes exchange offer in any manner. Any delay in acceptance, extension, termination or amendment will be followed as promptly as practicable by oral or written notice thereof to the registered holders.
41
Interest on the Senior Exchange Notes
For each of the senior outstanding notes surrendered in an exchange offer, the holder who surrendered the note will receive a senior exchange note, having a principal amount equal to that of the surrendered note. Interest on each senior exchange note will accrue from the later of:
- •
- the last interest payment date on which interest was paid on the senior outstanding note surrendered; and
- •
- if no interest has been paid on the senior outstanding note, from the date on which the senior outstanding notes were issued.
If the senior note is surrendered for exchange on a date in a period that includes the record date for an interest payment date to occur on or after the date of the exchange will accrue from that interest payment date.
Interest on the senior exchange notes is payable semi-annually on each April 1 and October 1, commencing on April 1, 2003. For more information regarding the terms of the senior exchange notes, see "Description of the Senior Notes."
Procedures for Tendering
Only a holder of senior outstanding notes may tender the senior outstanding notes in the senior notes exchange offer.
In all cases, issuance of senior exchange notes for senior outstanding notes that are accepted for exchange pursuant to the senior notes exchange offer will be made only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
- •
- certificates for such senior outstanding notes or a timely confirmation (a "Book-Entry Confirmation") of a book-entry transfer of such senior outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account at DTC (a "book-entry transfer facility");
- •
- a duly executed letter of transmittal or a properly transmitted agent's message, as defined below, as applicable; and
- •
- all other required documents.
If any tendered outstanding senior notes are not accepted for any reason set forth in the terms and conditions of the senior notes exchange offer, if senior outstanding notes are submitted for a greater principal amount than the holder desires to exchange, such unaccepted or non-exchanged senior outstanding notes will be credited to an account maintained with DTC, as promptly as practicable after the expiration of the senior notes exchange offer.
If you hold senior outstanding notes through DTC and wish to accept the senior notes exchange offer, you must do so through DTC's Automated Tender Offer Program, or ATOP, pursuant to which you will agree to be bound by the terms of the applicable letter of transmittal. See "—Book-Entry Transfer." If you wish to tender such notes and cannot complete the procedures for book-entry transfer prior to the expiration date, you may tender such notes according to the guaranteed delivery procedures set forth below under "—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."
If you do not withdraw your senior outstanding notes before the expiration date, our acceptance will constitute an agreement between you and us that is in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein and in the applicable letter of transmittal, including the representations and warranties set forth in the applicable letter of transmittal.
All (i) acceptances of the senior notes exchange offer, either pursuant to the procedures for book-entry transfer or guaranteed delivery, and (ii) withdrawals of tendered senior outstanding notes must be made as set forth in this prospectus. The delivery of senior outstanding notes and delivery of
42
all other required documents is at the election and sole risk of the holder. As an alternative to delivery by mail, holders may wish to consider facsimile, overnight courier or hand delivery service. In all cases, sufficient time should be allowed to assure delivery of the letter of transmittal or agent's message to an exchange agent before the required time on the expiration date. No letter of transmittal or agent's message should be sent to issuer or any book-entry transfer facility. If applicable, holders should request their respective brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies or nominees to effect the above transactions for such holders. A holder that tenders senior outstanding notes by use of the guaranteed delivery procedures, however, must provide to an eligible institution (as defined below) the information required on page 2 of the notice of guaranteed delivery. See "—Guaranteed Delivery Procedures."
Any beneficial owner whose senior outstanding notes are registered in the name of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee and who wishes to tender should contact the registered holder promptly and instruct such registered holder to tender on such beneficial owner's behalf.
If a letter of transmittal is signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, such persons should so indicate when signing, and evidence satisfactory to us of their authority to so act must be submitted with such letter of transmittal.
All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including time of receipt), acceptance, and withdrawal of tendered senior outstanding notes will be determined by us in our sole discretion, subject to compliance with the applicable rules of the SEC, which determination will be final and binding. We reserve the absolute right to reject any and all senior outstanding notes not properly tendered or any senior outstanding notes the acceptance of which would, in the opinion of our counsel, be unlawful. We also reserve the right to waive any defects, irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular senior outstanding notes. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the senior notes exchange offer (including the instructions in the letters of transmittal) will be final and binding on all parties. Unless waived, any defects or irregularities in connection with tenders of senior outstanding notes must be cured within such time as we shall determine, in our sole discretion and subject to compliance with the applicable rules of the SEC. Although we intend to notify holders of defects or irregularities with respect to tenders of senior outstanding notes, neither we, the exchange agents nor any other person shall incur any liability for failure to give such notification. Tenders of senior outstanding notes will not be deemed to have been made until such defects or irregularities have been cured or waived. Any senior outstanding notes received by the exchange agent that are not properly tendered and as to which the defects or irregularities have not been cured or waived will be returned by the exchange agent to the tendering holder, unless otherwise provided in the letter of transmittal, as soon as practicable following the expiration date.
Book-Entry Transfer
The exchange agent will seek to establish accounts with respect to the senior outstanding notes at a book-entry transfer facility for purposes of the senior notes exchange offer within two business days after the date of this prospectus unless the exchange agent already has established an account with the book-entry transfer facility suitable for the senior notes exchange offer. If you are a financial institution that is a participant or an account holder in a book-entry transfer facility's system, you may make book-entry delivery of senior outstanding notes by causing the book-entry transfer facility to transfer such outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account at the book-entry transfer facility in accordance with the book-entry transfer facility's procedures for transfer.
DTC's ATOP program is the only method of processing the senior notes exchange offer through DTC. To accept the senior notes exchange offer through ATOP, participants in DTC must send electronic instructions to DTC through DTC's communication system. In addition, such tendering
43
participants should deliver a copy of the letter of transmittal to the exchange agent unless an agent's message is transmitted in lieu thereof. DTC is obligated to communicate those electronic instructions to the exchange agent through an agent's message. To tender senior outstanding dollar notes through ATOP, the electronic instructions sent to DTC and transmitted by DTC to the exchange agent must contain the character by which the participant acknowledges its receipt of and agrees to be bound by a letter of transmittal. Any instruction through ATOP is at your risk and such instruction will be deemed made only when actually received by the exchange agent.
In order for an acceptance of the senior notes exchange offer through ATOP to be valid, an agent's message must be transmitted to and received by the exchange agent prior to the expiration date, or the guaranteed delivery procedures described below must be complied with. Delivery of instructions to DTC does not constitute delivery to the exchange agent.
The term "agent's message" means a message transmitted by DTC to, and received by, an exchange agent. An agent's message forms a part of the Book-Entry Confirmation, which states that DTC has received an express acknowledgment from the participant or account holder, as the case may be, tendering the senior outstanding notes, which states that such participant or account holder, as applicable, has received the applicable letter of transmittal and agrees to bound by the terms of such letter of transmittal (or, in the case of an agent's message relating to a guaranteed delivery, that such participant or account holder, as the case may be, has received and agrees to be bound by the applicable notice of guaranteed delivery) and that we may enforce such agreement against such participant or account holder, as the case may be.
Guaranteed Delivery Procedures
If you desire to tender your senior outstanding notes and the procedure for book-entry transfer cannot be completed on a timely basis, a tender may be effected if:
- •
- the tender is made through a member of or participant in the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion Program, the New York Stock Exchange Medallion Signature Program, the Stock Exchange Medallion Program, or an "eligible guarantor institution" within the meaning of Rule 17Ad-15 under the Exchange Act (each, an "Eligible Institution");
- •
- prior to the expiration date, you submit the information required on page 2 of the notice of guaranteed delivery to an Eligible Institution and the Eligible Institution sends electronic instructions to DTC through ATOP (instead of sending a signed, hard copy of the notice of guaranteed delivery) setting forth your name and address and the amount of such notes, stating that the tender is being made thereby and guaranteeing that within three New York Stock Exchange trading days after the date of the electronic transmission of the notice of guaranteed delivery, a Book-Entry Confirmation including an agent's message, and other instructions required by the applicable letter of transmittal, will be electronically transmitted through ATOP to DTC by the Eligible Institution;
- •
- the applicable exchange agent receives such electronically transmitted notice of guaranteed delivery prior to the expiration date; and
- •
- a Book-Entry Confirmation, including an agent's message, and all other documents required by the applicable letter of transmittal, are received by the exchange agent within three NYSE trading days after the date of the electronic transmission of the notice of guaranteed delivery.
Acceptance of Senior Outstanding Notes for Exchange; Delivery of Senior Exchange Notes
Upon satisfaction or waiver of all of the conditions to the senior notes exchange offer, all senior outstanding notes properly tendered will be accepted, promptly after the expiration date, and the senior exchange notes will be issued promptly after acceptance of the senior outstanding notes. See
" —Conditions" below. For purposes of the exchange offer, senior outstanding notes shall be deemed
44
to have been accepted as validly tendered for exchange when, as and if we give oral (promptly confirmed in writing) or written notice thereof to the exchange agent.
In all cases, issuance of senior exchange notes pursuant to the senior notes exchange offer will be made only after timely receipt by an exchange agent of certificates for such senior outstanding notes or a timely Book-Entry Confirmation of such senior outstanding notes into the exchange agent's account at DTC, a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal, unless an agent's message is transmitted in lieu senior thereof, and all other required documents. If we do not accept any tendered senior outstanding notes for any reason set forth in the terms and conditions of the senior notes exchange offer or if you submit senior outstanding notes for a greater principal amount than you desire to exchange, such unaccepted or non-exchanged senior outstanding notes will be returned without expense to you as promptly as practicable after the senior notes exchange offer expires or terminates. In the case of senior outstanding notes tendered by the book-entry transfer procedures described above, the non-exchanged senior outstanding notes will be credited to an account maintained with DTC.
Withdrawal of Tenders
Tenders of senior outstanding notes may be withdrawn at any time prior to 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. Any senior outstanding notes so withdrawn will be deemed not to have been validly tendered for exchange for purposes of the senior notes exchange offer. Any senior outstanding notes which have been tendered for exchange but which are not exchanged for any reason will be returned to you without cost to you as soon as practicable after withdrawal, rejection of tender, or termination of the senior notes exchange offer. Properly withdrawn senior outstanding notes may be retendered by following one of the procedures described under "—Procedures for Tendering" at any time on or prior to the expiration date.
For a withdrawal of a tender of senior outstanding notes and held through DTC to be effective, an electronic ATOP transmission notice of withdrawal must be received by the exchange agent prior to 5:00 p.m., London time, 12:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration date. Any such notice of withdrawal must (i) specify the name of the person having deposited the senior outstanding notes to be withdrawn, (ii) identify the senior outstanding notes to be withdrawn, including the certificate number(s) and principal amount of the senior outstanding notes, or, in the case of senior outstanding notes transferred by book-entry transfer, the name and number of the account at DTC to be credited, (iii) be signed by the holder in the same manner as the original signature on the letter of transmittal by which the senior outstanding notes were tendered, including any required signature guarantees, or be accompanied by documents of transfer sufficient to register the transfer of the senior outstanding notes into the name of the person withdrawing the tender, and (iv) specify the name in which any senior outstanding notes are to be registered, if different from that of the person depositing the senior outstanding notes to be withdrawn. All questions as to the validity, form, and eligibility (including time of receipt) of such notices will be determined by us, whose determination shall be final and binding on all parties.
Conditions
Notwithstanding any other term of the senior notes exchange offer, we will not be required to accept for exchange, or exchange senior notes issued for, any senior outstanding notes, and we may terminate or amend the senior notes exchange offer as provided in this prospectus before the acceptance of the senior outstanding notes, if:
- (1)
- prior to the expiration of the senior notes exchange offer, any action or proceeding is instituted or threatened in any court or by or before any governmental agency with respect to the senior notes exchange offer which, in our sole judgment, might materially impair our ability to proceed with the senior notes exchange offer or any material adverse
45
If we reasonably determine that any of the conditions are not satisfied, we may (1) refuse to accept any senior outstanding notes and return all tendered senior outstanding notes, (2) extend the senior notes exchange offer and retain all senior outstanding notes tendered prior to the expiration of the senior notes exchange offer, subject, however, to the rights of holders to withdraw the senior outstanding notes (see "—Withdrawal of Tenders") or (3) waive the unsatisfied conditions with respect to the senior notes exchange offer and accept all properly tendered senior outstanding notes which have not been withdrawn.
Exchange Agents
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has been appointed as the principal exchange agent for the senior notes exchange offer. Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. has been appointed as the exchange agent in Luxembourg for the senior notes exchange offer. Questions and requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this prospectus or of the letters of transmittal and requests for Notice of Guaranteed Delivery should be directed to the exchange agents addressed as follows:
By Hand Delivery:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
c/o The Depository Trust Clearing Corporation
55 Water Street, 1st floor
Jeanette Park Entrance
New York, New York 10041
United States of America
By Mail:
DB Services Tennessee, Inc.
Reorganization Unit
P.O. Box 292737
Nashville, Tennessee 37229-2737
United States of America
By Overnight Mail or Courier:
DB Services Tennessee, Inc.
Corporate Trust & Agency Services
Reorganization Unit
648 Grassmere Park Road
Nashville, Tennessee 37211
United States of America
46
For Confirmation of Receipt Telephone:
+1 (615) 835-3572
For Information Telephone:
+1 (800) 735-7777
Facsimile Transmission:
+1 (615) 835-3701
Or:
By Overnight Courier, Registered or Certified Mail or Hand Delivery:
Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A.
2 Boulevard Konrad Adenauer
L-1511 Luxembourg
For Information Telephone:
+352 42 12 21
Facsimile Transmission:
+352 47 31 36
Delivery to an address other than set forth above will not constitute a valid delivery.
Fees and Expenses
We will bear the expenses of soliciting tenders. The principal solicitation is being made by mail; however, additional solicitation may be made by telegraph, telecopy, telephone or in person by our and our affiliates' officers and regular employees.
We have not retained any dealer-manager in connection with the senior notes exchange offer and will not make any payments to brokers, dealers or others soliciting acceptances of the senior notes exchange offer. We will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with these services.
We will pay the cash expenses to be incurred in connection with the senior notes exchange offer. Such expenses include fees and expenses of the exchange agents and trustee, accounting and legal fees and printing costs, among others.
Accounting Treatment
The senior exchange notes will be recorded at the same carrying value as the senior outstanding notes, as reflected in our accounting records on the date of exchange. Accordingly, we will not recognize any gain or loss for accounting purposes as a result of the senior notes exchange offer. The expenses of the senior notes exchange offer will be deferred and charged to expense over the remaining term of the senior exchange notes.
Consequences of Failure to Exchange
The senior outstanding notes that are not exchanged for senior exchange notes pursuant to the senior notes exchange offer will remain restricted securities. Accordingly, the senior outstanding notes may be resold only:
- (1)
- to us upon redemption thereof or otherwise;
47
- (2)
- so long as the senior outstanding notes are eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A, to a person inside the United States whom the seller reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer within the meaning of Rule 144A under the Securities Act in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A, in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act, or pursuant to another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, which other exemption is based upon an opinion of counsel reasonably acceptable to us;
- (3)
- outside the United States to a foreign person in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 904 under the Securities Act; or
- (4)
- pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, in each case in accordance with any applicable securities laws of any state of the United States.
Resale of the Senior Exchange Notes
With respect to resales of senior exchange notes, based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties, we believe that a holder or other person who receives senior exchange notes, whether or not the person is the holder, other than a person that is our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act, in exchange for senior outstanding notes in the ordinary course of business and who is not participating, does not intend to participate, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate, in the distribution of the senior exchange notes, will be allowed to resell the senior exchange notes to the public without further registration under the Securities Act and without delivering to the purchasers of the senior exchange notes a prospectus that satisfies the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act. However, if any holder acquires senior exchange notes in a senior notes exchange offer for the purpose of distributing or participating in a distribution of the senior exchange notes, the holder cannot rely on the position of the staff of the SEC expressed in the no-action letters or any similar interpretive letters, and must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction, unless an exemption from registration is otherwise available. Further, each broker-dealer that receives senior exchange notes for its own account in exchange for senior outstanding notes, where the senior outstanding notes were acquired by the broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of the senior exchange notes.
Notices
We currently intend to list the senior exchange notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. The senior exchange notes will be accepted for clearance through the accounts of DTC, and they will have new CUSIP, Common Code and ISIN numbers which will be transmitted to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. All documents prepared in connection with the senior notes exchange offer will be available at the office of the exchange agent in Luxembourg and all necessary actions and services in respect of the senior notes exchange offer may be done at the office of the exchange agent in Luxembourg. The exchange agent in Luxembourg appointed for these purposes is Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A.
All notices relating to the senior notes exchange offer will be published in accordance with the notice provisions of the indenture. See "Description of the Senior Notes—Notices." So long as the senior notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange shall require, notice of the results of the senior notes exchange offer will be given to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and will be published in a newspaper having a general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort), in each case as promptly as practicable, following the completion of the senior notes exchange offer.
48
USE OF PROCEEDS
The exchange offer is intended to satisfy certain of our obligations under the related registration rights agreement. We will not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of the exchange notes in the exchange offer. In consideration for issuing the exchange notes as contemplated by this prospectus, we will receive senior outstanding notes in a like principal amount. The form and terms of the exchange notes are the same as the form and terms of the senior outstanding notes, except that the exchange notes do not include certain transfer restrictions.
We provided the gross proceeds from the issuance of the senior outstanding notes to MDCP Acquisitions I by way of an intercompany loan. Such amounts were used to fund the cash consideration of the SSCC Asset Swap. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Intercompany Loan and Priority Agreements."
49
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2002: (i) the actual consolidated capitalization for issuer; and (ii) issuer's consolidated capitalization on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes. The table below should be read in conjunction with "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements" and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. Except as described in this prospectus, there has been no material change to our capitalization since December 31, 2002 other than changes in cash and cash equivalents as a result of the normal course of business.
| | At December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | Actual
| | Pro Forma
| |
---|
| | (Irish GAAP)(1)
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands)
| |
---|
Cash at bank and in hand | | €184,331 | | €374,331 | (2) |
| |
| |
| |
Long term debt (including current maturities): | | | | | |
| Bank loans, capitalized lease obligations and overdrafts | | 254,229 | | 254,229 | |
| New senior credit facility: | | | | | |
| | Revolving credit facility(3) | | 23,839 | | 23,839 | |
| | Tranche A Term loan | | 570,009 | | 570,009 | |
| | Tranche B Term loan | | 469,178 | | 469,178 | |
| | Tranche C Term loan | | 469,178 | | 469,178 | |
| U.S. public notes(4) | | 427,413 | | 427,413 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Total subsidiary debt | | 2,213,846 | | 2,213,846 | |
| Senior notes due 2012(5) | | 869,691 | | 1,064,691 | |
| |
| |
| |
| Total senior debt (cash pay interest) | | 3,083,537 | | 3,278,537 | |
| Subordinated notes due 2013(6) | | 235,640 | | 235,640 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total debt | | 3,319,177 | | 3,514,177 | |
Shareholders' equity(1),(7) | | 878,099 | | 878,099 | |
| |
| |
| |
Total capitalization | | €4,197,276 | | €4,392,276 | |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. A detailed discussion of those differences from an historical perspective is included in note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to the historical U.S. GAAP adjustments, certain of the pro forma adjustments would also be impacted. See note (m) to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Issuer's pro forma debt and shareholders' equity under U.S. GAAP would reflect the consolidation of the Newcos with issuer for financial reporting purposes. Neither issuer nor any of its subsidiaries have any repayment obligations relating to the €125,000 of the Newco debt, which is recourse only to the assets of the Newcos.
- (2)
- This number includes the net proceeds of the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes. While management used the net proceeds from the offering to finance the SSCC Asset Swap, the effects of such transaction are not included as a pro forma adjustment because such information is not required pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation S-X, which governs the form and content of pro forma financial statements.
- (3)
- At December 31, 2002, we had approximately $401,000 of unused borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
- (4)
- We have left outstanding the 6.75% senior notes due 2005 in an aggregate principal amount of $250,000 and 7.50% senior debentures due 2025 in an aggregate principal amount of $292,300. As of December 31, 2002, we had a currency swap in place relating to the 6.75% notes and 7.50% debentures. Under Irish GAAP, the fair value of currency swaps relating to such indebtedness (€89,703 as of December 31, 2002) is recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of such indebtedness. Amounts were converted into euro using an exchange rate of €1.00=$1.0487, which was the exchange rate as of December 31, 2002. The exchange rate on April 15, 2003 was €1.00=$1.0801.
- (5)
- The "Actual" column consists of €350,000 and $545,000, converted into euro using an exchange rate of €1.00=$1.0487, which was the exchange rate as of December 31, 2002. The "Pro Forma" column includes an additional $205,000 converted into euro at the December 31, 2002 exchange rate in order to give effect to the offering of senior outstanding notes. The exchange rate on April 15, 2003 was €1.00=$1.0801.
- (6)
- Consists of €100,000 and $150,000, converted into euro using an exchange rate of €1.00=$1.0487, which was the exchange rate as of December 31, 2002. The exchange rate on April 15, 2003 was €1.00=$1.0801. The initial carrying value of the subordinated notes is net of a €7,394 discount resulting from an allocation to the detachable warrants. Until maturity, we have the option of paying interest on the subordinated notes in cash or through the issuance of additional subordinated notes. We intend to pay interest in additional subordinated notes for the foreseeable future.
- (7)
- Includes €7,394 allocated to the warrants issued with the subordinated notes.
50
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived by the application of pro forma adjustments to JSG's and issuer's historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The pro forma adjustments give effect to the transactions, the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes and other events as explained further below. The pro forma and other adjustments are described in the accompanying notes, which should be read in conjunction with these unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements. Such adjustments are based on available information and certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The effects of the SSCC Asset Swap (other than the issuance and sale of the senior outstanding notes) have not been included in the pro forma financial information set forth below because such information is not required pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation S-X, which governs the form and content of the pro forma financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet gives pro forma effect to the issuance and sale of senior outstanding notes in February 2003 as if such event had occurred on December 31, 2002. All other aspects of the transactions are already reflected in the issuer's consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2002. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations give effect to (among other things) (i) the transactions, which include the subsequent sale of certain non-operating and non-core operating assets to the Newcos, (ii) the issuance and sale of the additional senior notes, (iii) JSG's acquisition of Munksjö on March 28, 2002 and a smaller business acquired prior to the transactions, and (iv) JSG's disposition of various businesses during 2002 prior to the transactions, as if those transactions had been completed on January 1, 2002 and carried through to the period presented.
The pro forma adjustments exclude the impacts, if any, resulting from the potential effect of new interest rate hedges on the senior credit facility or notes other than the effect incorporated into the assumed interest rates.
The initial allocation of the purchase price of JSG is preliminary, based on estimated fair values, and will be adjusted based on appraisals of tangible and intangible assets, pension valuations, and other information that is in the process of being obtained. The major adjustments expected to the values shown are in respect of the fair value of land and buildings, property, plant and equipment, post retirement health benefits and timberlands. The actuarial valuations of the various pension-type funds have been finalized and have resulted in an increase in deferred employee compensation of approximately €160 million (net of deferred tax of €50 million), a decrease in minority interests of approximately €17 million and an increase in goodwill. The fair value of timberlands resulted in the reduction in the carrying values of land and standing timber of €7 million and €23 million respectively. These adjustments have been reflected in the historical financial statements to December 31, 2002. The main outstanding item is the fair value of land and buildings and property, plant and equipment. At this time it is difficult for us to estimate the eventual outcome of the professional valuer's appraisals particularly as we operate at approximately 300 facilities. However we estimate that there will be an increase in fixed asset values of approximately €100 million which would reduce the goodwill and deferred tax provision shown in the financial statements. However there can be no assurance that the actual valuations will give the estimated result.
The unaudited pro forma financial statements are for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the transactions and other events been completed on the date or for the period presented, and does not purport to indicate consolidated balance sheet data or statement of income data as of any future date or for any future period. The unaudited pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the information contained in "Selected Historical Financial Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis
51
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unless otherwise indicated, the pro forma financial statements are presented by applying the SEC's rules with regard to pro forma financial information to historical financial statements prepared under Irish GAAP and using the euro as the functional currency. Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the most significant differences between Irish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements (included elsewhere in this prospectus) and notes (c) to the pro forma balance sheet and note (n) to the statements of operations.
52
MDP Acquisitions plc
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet(c)
December 31, 2002
(euro in thousands)
| |
| | Pro Forma Adjustments
| |
| |
---|
| | MDP Acquisitions plc Historical(a)
| | Senior notes offering(b)
| | Pro Forma MDP Acquisitions plc
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash | | € | 184,331 | | € | 190,000 | | € | 374,331 | |
| Accounts receivable and prepayments | | | 1,020,593 | | | — | | | 1,020,593 | |
| Inventories | | | 470,207 | | | — | | | 470,207 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current assets | | | 1,675,131 | | | 190,000 | | | 1,865,131 | |
Investments | | | 165,243 | | | — | | | 165,243 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,214,254 | | | — | | | 2,214,254 | |
Intangible assets | | | 1,543,545 | | | — | | | 1,543,545 | |
Other assets | | | 244,435 | | | — | | | 244,435 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | € | 5,842,608 | | € | 190,000 | | € | 6,032,608 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Liabilities, Minority Interests and Shareholders' Equity | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bank loans, overdrafts and other borrowing | | | 162,154 | | | — | | | 162,154 | |
| Current maturity of long term debt | | | 4,384 | | | — | | | 4,384 | |
| Accrued payables and accrued liabilities | | | 1,093,045 | | | — | | | 1,093,045 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,259,583 | | | — | | | 1,259,583 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long term debt | | | 3,152,639 | | | 195,000 | | | 3,347,639 | |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | (125,255 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | (130,255 | ) |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | 517,549 | | | — | | | 517,549 | |
Capital grants deferred | | | 12,043 | | | — | | | 12,043 | |
Minority interests (equity interests) | | | 147,950 | | | — | | | 147,950 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total long term liabilities and minority interests | | | 3,704,926 | | | 190,000 | | | 3,894,926 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Shareholders' equity | | | 878,099 | | | — | | | 878,099 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total liabilities, minority interests and shareholders' equity | | € | 5,842,608 | | € | 190,000 | | € | 6,032,608 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet
53
MDP Acquisitions plc
Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(euro in thousands)
- (a)
- As explained elsewhere in this prospectus, on September 3, 2002 issuer obtained control of JSG when it declared unconditional its tender offer for all of the issued and to be issued share capital of JSG. Accordingly, from that date on, issuer began consolidating JSG in its consolidated financial statements. Thus, included in issuer's historical balance sheet at December 31, 2002 are the initial effects of the JSG purchase accounting.
- (b)
- This pro forma adjustment consists of the net proceeds received upon the sale of the senior outstanding notes, which is derived by taking the gross proceeds of approximately €200,000 less transaction costs of approximately €10,000, yielding net proceeds of approximately €190,000. While management used the proceeds in connection with the asset swap transaction with SSCC as described elsewhere in this prospectus, the effects of the asset swap are not included as a pro forma adjustment because the acquisition/disposition effects of the asset swap are not expected to be significant.
- (c)
- Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. A detailed discussion of those differences from a historical perspective is included in note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to the historical U.S. GAAP adjustments, certain of the historical purchase accounting and related pro forma adjustments will be impacted, the most significant of which are summarized as follows:
- •
- Under U.S. GAAP, the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired would first be allocated to identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values, with the remainder being allocated to goodwill. The amount allocated to identifiable intangibles will be based on valuations/appraisals obtained after closing. Under Irish GAAP, the entire excess purchase price is allocated to goodwill.
- •
- Under Irish GAAP, no deferred income tax adjustments were recorded as part of the purchase accounting for the transactions. However, for U.S. GAAP purposes, there are deferred tax adjustments based on any book-to-tax temporary differences arising except for any relating to goodwill.
- •
- Debt issuance costs are classified as a reduction to the debt liability balances under Irish GAAP, but are classified as part of other assets for U.S. GAAP purposes.
54
The following table presents a reconciliation from Irish GAAP to U.S. GAAP for pro forma debt and shareholders' equity balances at December 31, 2002:
| | Gross Debt
| | Shareholders' Equity
| |
---|
Per Irish GAAP | | € | 3,514,177 | (1) | € | 878,099 | |
Reconciling items: | | | | | | | |
| Consolidate Newcos | | | 125,000 | (2) | | (125,000 | ) |
| Reclassify fair value of currency swaps | | | 89,703 | | | — | |
| Other reconciling items(3) | | | — | | | (61,414 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Per U.S. GAAP | | € | 3,728,880 | | € | 691,685 | |
| |
| |
| |
- Notes:
- (1)
- Excludes debt issuance costs of €130,255 that are netted against the face amount of the debt for Irish GAAP purposes. The balance is net of €89,703 in fair value of related currency swaps on the remaining notes and debentures and includes €4,257 of accrued interest.
- (2)
- Neither issuer nor any of its subsidiaries have any repayment or other obligations relating to the €125,000 of Newco debt, which is recourse only to the assets of the Newcos.
- (3)
- See note 37 to the historical financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
55
MDP Acquisitions plc
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations(n)
Year Ended December 31, 2002
(euro in thousands)
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Dispositions
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | JSG
| | Issuer
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| |
| |
| | Completed before JSG Acquisition(c)
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
| | September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002
| | JSG Acquisition(a)
| | Munksjö and other acquisitions(b)
| | Sale to Newcos(d)
| | Senior notes offering(e)
| | Pro Forma MDP Acquisitions plc
| |
---|
Net sales | | € | 3,134,080 | | € | 1,575,575 | | | — | | € | 165,347 | | € | (53,939 | ) | € | (42,491 | ) | — | | € | 4,778,572 | |
Cost of sales | | | 2,266,493 | | | 1,143,094 | | | — | (f) | | 105,240 | | | (40,476 | ) | | (49,342 | ) | — | | | 3,425,009 | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 5,794 | | | 10,090 | | | 22,705 | (g) | | — | | | — | | | — | | — | | | 38,589 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 861,793 | | | 422,391 | | | (22,705 | ) | | 60,107 | | | (13,463 | ) | | 6,851 | | — | | | 1,314,974 | |
Net operating expenses | | | 656,419 | | | 287,453 | | | 527 | (h),(i) | | 45,223 | | | (10,326 | ) | | (8,416 | ) | — | | | 970,880 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | 12,484 | | | 11,978 | | | — | | | — | | | (3,057 | ) | | — | | — | | | 21,405 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | 192,890 | | | 122,960 | | | (23,232 | ) | | 14,884 | | | (80 | ) | | 15,267 | | — | | | 322,689 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | 117,473 | | | 7,224 | | | (92,408 | )(j) | | (6,939 | ) | | — | | | (4,674 | ) | — | | | 20,676 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | | (7,541 | ) | | — | | | 7,541 | (j) | | — | | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | | 302,822 | | | 130,184 | | | (108,099 | ) | | 7,945 | | | (80 | ) | | 10,593 | | — | | | 343,365 | |
Income on sale of operations | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (20,440 | ) | | — | | — | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 10,286 | | | 5,230 | | | — | | | (1,218 | ) | | — | | | — | | — | | | 14,298 | |
Interest expense | | | (65,881 | ) | | (92,718 | ) | | (131,387 | )(k) | | (3,778 | ) | | 29 | | | 399 | | (19,315 | ) | | (312,651 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | (74,387 | ) | | (386 | ) | | 72,382 | (j) | | 1,124 | | | — | | | — | | — | | | (1,267 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | | 193,280 | | | 42,310 | | | (167,104 | ) | | 4,073 | | | (20,491 | ) | | 10,992 | | (19,315 | ) | | 43,745 | |
Taxes on income | | | (77,889 | ) | | (31,395 | ) | | 62,682 | (j),(l) | | (1,779 | ) | | 60 | | | 851 | | — | | | (47,470 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income (loss) before equity minority interests and preferred dividends | | | 115,391 | | | 10,915 | | | (104,422 | ) | | 2,294 | | | (20,431 | ) | | 11,843 | | (19,315 | ) | | (3,725 | ) |
Equity minority interests | | | (19,969 | ) | | (9,061 | ) | | 2,273 | (j) | | — | | | — | | | — | | — | | | (26,757 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders | | € | 95,422 | | € | 1,854 | | € | (102,149 | ) | € | 2,294 | | € | (20,431 | ) | € | 11,843 | | (19,315 | ) | € | (30,482 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations
56
MDP Acquisitions plc
Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
(euro in thousands)
- (a)
- These pro forma adjustments result from applying aspects of the transactions to the historical statements of income of JSG and issuer. These adjustments are described further in notes (f) through (l).
- (b)
- These pro forma adjustments reflect the historical operating results of Munksjö, a Swedish public company, and Corsuca, a small Venezuelan corrugated business, for the relevant pre-acquisition periods (i.e., prior to their results being consolidated in the historical consolidated statements of income).
JSG acquired 67% of Munksjö, the portion it did not already own, on March 28, 2002 and began consolidating Munksjö effective April 1, 2002. The Munksjö amounts were derived from Munksjö's consolidated annual financial statements for 2002. Munksjö reports results in its local currency (the Swedish krona) using Swedish GAAP. For pro forma purposes, the Munksjö amounts were translated into euro using average exchange rates. There were no significant differences between Swedish GAAP and Irish GAAP. As Munksjö was an associate prior to being acquired, these pro forma adjustments also remove JSG's share of Munksjö operating results recorded as part of the associates' income statement line items. In addition, because JSG financed the acquisition with available cash, JSG interest income relating to the funding was also eliminated.
In addition to Munksjö, JSG acquired Corsuca, a small Venezuelan corrugated business, in June 2002. The Corsuca amounts were derived from internal accounting records kept in U.S. dollars, and for pro forma purposes were translated into euro using average exchange rates.
It should be noted that neither the Munksjö nor Corsuca acquisition met the significance threshold of Rule 3-05 of SEC Regulation S-X, hence, separate pre-acquisition historical financial statements of Munksjö and Corsuca have not been included as part of this prospectus.
- (c)
- These pro forma adjustments eliminate the operating results of the following business units sold or otherwise disposed of by JSG from January 1 to September 2, 2002:
|
---|
American Lithograph (February 2002) |
U.K. Warrington (April 2002) |
U.S. Sequoia Voting (May 2002) |
- (d)
- These pro forma adjustments eliminate the historical operating results relating to certain non-operating and non-core operating assets of JSG sold by various subsidiaries of JSG to Newcos separately owned by the parent in connection with the transactions.
57
- (e)
- These pro forma adjustments represent the interest expense on the senior outstanding notes sold in February 2003 as follows:
| | Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
---|
($205,000 @ 9.625%) | | € | 18,815 |
Amortization of financing costs | | | 500 |
| |
|
| | € | 19,315 |
| |
|
- (f)
- To reflect additional depreciation resulting from purchase accounting, fair value adjustments made to property, plant and equipment. The adjustment was calculated using estimated remaining useful lives and, pending receipt of additional appraisal information, was preliminarily estimated to be minimal.
- (g)
- To reflect additional amortization resulting from the purchase accounting adjustment to intangible assets. The adjustment was estimated as follows:
| | Year Ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
New goodwill amortization (€1,543,545 over 40 years) | | € | 38,589 | |
Less historical amortization | | | (15,884 | ) |
| |
| |
Net adjustment | | € | 22,705 | |
| |
| |
- (h)
- To reflect new compensation agreements with senior management entered into in connection with the transactions. Included in this adjustment is the elimination of stock-based compensation expense (€441 for 2002) because the new stock-based compensation schemes are not expected to result in any stock compensation expense under Irish GAAP.
- (i)
- To eliminate amortization of the deferred gain relating to a machine sale to SSCC. Amount was €968 for 2002.
- (j)
- To eliminate the share of SSCC operating income, restructuring costs, net interest, income taxes, and minority interest.
58
- (k)
- To record interest expense and amortization of deferred financing costs on the debt incurred to finance the transactions, calculated as follows (assuming no repayments during periods):
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Revolving credit facility (€23,839 @ 5.69%) | | € | 1,356 | |
(Unused portion @ .75%) | | | 3,009 | |
Term loan A (€570,009 @ 6.04%) | | | 34,429 | |
Term loan B (€462,150 @ 6.54%) | | | 30,225 | |
Term loan C (€462,150 @ 7.04%) | | | 32,535 | |
Senior notes (€350,000 @ 10.125%) | | | 35,438 | |
Senior notes ($545,000 @ 9.625%) | | | 50,020 | |
6.75% notes due 2005 remaining (€213,007 @ 7.75%)(1) | | | 16,508 | |
7.50% debentures due 2025 remaining (€214,406 @ 7.10%)(1) | | | 15,223 | |
Capitalized leases remaining (€22,587 @ 5.45%) | | | 1,231 | |
Latin American funded debt (€17,000 @ 4.3%) | | | 731 | |
Subsidiary debt remaining (€155,000 @ 7.50%) | | | 11,625 | |
Other annual financing fees | | | 300 | |
| |
| |
Cash interest expense | | | 232,630 | |
Subordinated notes (€243,034 @ 15.5%)(2) | | | 40,034 | |
Amortization of discount on subordinated notes | | | 20,000 | |
Amortization of financing costs | | | 672 | |
Eliminate historical interest expense | | | (161,949 | ) |
| |
| |
Pro forma adjustment to interest expense | | € | 131,387 | |
| |
| |
| | | | |
- Notes
- (1)
- These amounts are net of €89,703 in fair value of related currency swaps. The assumed interest rates are based on an estimated effective rate.
- (2)
- Consists of €100,000 and $150,000, converted into euro using an exchange rate as of December 31, 2002, which was €1.00=$1.0487. The exchange rate on April 15, 2003 was €1.00=$1.0801. Represents 15.5% of the face amount compounded quarterly.
The amortization of the deferred financing costs was estimated using the straight-line method over an estimated average term of approximately 6.5 years. Actual amortization will be computed using the effective interest method based on an allocation to each individual debt instrument. The above interest amounts on the variable rate revolver and term loans are based on December 31, 2002 three-month LIBOR interest rates plus an applicable spread. Assuming a1/8 of one percent variance in these LIBOR rates, the aggregate effect on pro forma interest expense would be €2,120 for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (l)
- To record the income tax effect on all of the above adjustments, except for the non-deductible goodwill amortization adjustment.
- (m)
- "EBITDA" represents "operating income subsidiaries—continuing" plus "income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing," depreciation, depletion and amortization. EBITDA is included in this prospectus because it is a basis upon which issuer assesses its financial performance and debt service capabilities, and because certain covenants in issuer's (and subsidiaries') borrowing arrangements are tied to similar measures. You should not consider EBITDA in isolation from or as a substitute for cash flows from operations, net income, or other consolidated income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP or U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a company's profitability or liquidity. Issuer understands that
59
while EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. For example, we calculate EBITDA without deducting income attributable to, or adding losses attributable to, associates and minority interests.
| | Year ended December 31, 2002(6)
| |
---|
Actual EBITDA | | € | 601,305 | |
Pro forma adjustments: | | | | |
| Munksjö and other acquisition(1) | | | 23,661 | |
| Disposal of businesses(2) | | | (22,721 | ) |
| Sale to Newcos(3) | | | 13,152 | |
| New compensation agreements(4) | | | 441 | |
| Deferred gain amortization(5) | | | (968 | ) |
| |
| |
Pro forma EBITDA | | € | 614,870 | |
| |
| |
- Notes:
- (1)
- See note (b). The adjustment adds the EBITDA of these acquired businesses for the portion of the indicated period that they were not included in the consolidated historical results. Because Munksjö was acquired on March 28, 2002, its results are already included in JSG's and MDP Acquisition's consolidated results for three-fourths of that period—i.e., €65,047 of Munksjö EBITDA is included in JSG's and MDP Acquisition's historical EBITDA of €601,303 for the year ended December 31, 2002.
- (2)
- See note (c). This adjustment eliminates from historical balances the EBITDA of businesses disposed of during 2002. The change in the year ended December 31, 2002 is due to (i) net gains of €20,440 realized on the disposal of U.S. Sequoia Voting and American Lithograph and (ii) an improvement in the pre-sale operating results of Sequoia Voting in 2002 versus 2001.
- (3)
- See note (d). This adjustment eliminates from historical balances the EBITDA of non-operating assets and non-core operating assets that have been sold to the Newcos. A positive adjustment is due to the fact that the assets/operations had negative EBITDA during those periods. The change is mainly due to deterioration in the operating results of the newsprint business in California, which was sold to the Newcos. During 2002, that business had negative EBITDA of €9,531 prior to its sale to the Newcos.
- (4)
- See note (h).
- (5)
- See note (i).
- (6)
- Includes JSG through September 2 and MDP Acquisitions plc thereafter.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to actual EBITDA:
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders | | € | 97,276 | |
Equity minority interests | | | 29,030 | |
Taxes on income | | | 109,284 | |
Share of associates earnings | | | (42,383 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | 143,083 | |
Depreciation, amortization and depletion | | | 265,015 | |
| |
| |
Actual EBITDA | | | €601,305 | |
| |
| |
60
The following is a reconciliation of pro forma net income/loss to pro forma EBITDA:
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Net income/loss available to ordinary shareholders | | € | (30,482 | ) |
Equity minority interests | | | 26,757 | |
Taxes on income | | | 47,470 | |
Share of associates earnings | | | (19,409 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | 298,353 | |
Depreciation, amortization and depletion | | | 292,181 | |
| |
| |
Pro forma EBITDA | | € | 614,870 | |
| |
| |
- (n)
- Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. A detailed discussion of those differences from a historical perspective is included in note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to the historical U.S. GAAP adjustments, certain of the pro forma adjustments would also be impacted, the most significant of which are summarized as follows:
- •
- The Newcos to which certain assets are sold (see note (d)) would be consolidated in issuer's financial statements under U.S. GAAP, causing pro forma net income and EBITDA to decrease.
- •
- The Munksjö balances (see note (b)) would include U.S. GAAP adjustments for (i) pension expense, (ii) derivative instruments, (iii) intangible asset and goodwill amortization and (iv) income tax expense, among other items.
- •
- The operating results of businesses disposed of during 2002 (see note (c)) that are removed from the pro forma balances would include U.S. GAAP adjustments for (i) pension expense, (ii) intangible asset and goodwill amortization and (iii) income tax expense, among other items.
- •
- For U.S. GAAP purposes, the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired related to the transactions would first be allocated to identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values, with the remainder being allocated to goodwill. There would be no amortization of the goodwill and amortization of the intangibles generally would be based on their estimated economic lives.
- •
- The stock compensation expense eliminated for Irish GAAP purposes (see note (h)) would not be eliminated for U.S. GAAP purposes because the new plans would likely continue to result in U.S. GAAP expense. In addition, the historical expense under U.S. GAAP is different from Irish GAAP, as explained in note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
| | Pro Forma EBITDA
| |
---|
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Per Irish GAAP | | | €614,870 | |
Reconciling items: | | | | |
| Consolidation of the Newcos | | | (17,398 | ) |
| Stock compensation expense | | | (17,699 | ) |
| Pension expense | | | 9,141 | |
| Derivative mark-to-market | | | 3,525 | |
�� | |
| |
Per U.S. GAAP | | € | 592,439 | |
| |
| |
61
- (o)
- The following supplemental adjustments do not qualify as pro forma adjustments under the SEC's published rules (principally Article 11 of Regulation S-X) or guidance of its staff, but are included to eliminate the effect of non-recurring items and to adjust for certain other considerations.
| | Year ended December 31, 2002
| |
---|
Supplemental adjustments: | | | | |
| Non-recurring restructuring charge(1) | | € | 21,405 | |
| Non-recurring income(2) | | | (8,841 | ) |
| Government grant amortization(3) | | | (3,427 | ) |
| |
| |
Total supplemental adjustments | | € | 9,137 | |
| |
| |
- Notes:
- (1)
- Represents reorganization and restructuring costs classified as an "exceptional" expense in JSG's income statement. The above amount excludes €3,057 of the consolidated charge of €24,462 because it is incorporated into the disposal pro forma adjustment. The remaining €21,405 of restructuring charges for 2002, relate mainly to restructuring actions at JSG facilities in the United Kingdom and France. Management believes that this non-recurring restructuring expense is not relevant in analyzing recurring EBITDA.
- (2)
- Represents other income items classified within operating expenses in JSG's income statement. The above amount excludes €20,440 of net gains related to disposed businesses (U.S. Sequoia Voting and American Lithograph). The remaining non-recurring income items for 2002 consists of several one-time gains related to sales of properties, litigation settlements, changes in estimates, and other events. Management believes that this non-recurring income is not relevant in analyzing recurring EBITDA.
- (3)
- Represents income amortization related to capital grants on property, plant and equipment that JSG receives from various governments. The amount is netted within operating expenses, but not against intangible asset amortization expense.
For more information regarding these adjustments and other transaction-related cash cost expenses that we believe will not recur in future periods, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Impact of the Transactions—Potential Transaction-Related Cash Cost Savings."
62
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain of our historical financial data. The periods prior to and including September 2, 2002 reflect data of JSG, issuer's predecessor for financial accounting purposes. The periods beginning September 3, 2002 reflect data of issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries after the acquisition of JSG. Because of the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities acquired as part of the transactions and the related impact to the financial data, the consolidated financial statements of JSG, issuer's predecessor for the periods prior to September 3, 2002 are not comparable to those of issuer subsequent to that date. We have derived the selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 from JSG's audited financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical consolidated financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 have been derived from JSG's audited consolidated financial statements for such years, which are not included in this prospectus. We have derived the selected historical consolidated financial data for the period from January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002 from JSG's audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the selected historical consolidated financial data for the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 and as at December 31, 2002 from issuer's audited financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical financial data set forth below is not necessarily indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with the discussion under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the historical consolidated financial statements of JSG and issuer and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unless otherwise indicated, this historical financial data has been prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP. Irish GAAP differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. For a discussion of the most significant differences between Irish GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 37 to the historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
63
| | Predecessor
| | Issuer
| |
---|
| | Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
| | September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | 1998
| | 1999
| | 2000
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands, except ratios)
| |
| |
---|
Consolidated Statement of Income Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Irish GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net sales | | € | 3,666,850 | | € | 3,688,595 | | € | 4,565,244 | | € | 4,511,650 | | € | 3,134,080 | | € | 1,575,575 | |
Cost of sales | | | 2,645,977 | | | 2,728,050 | | | 3,336,671 | | | 3,243,372 | | | 2,272,287 | | | 1,153,185 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | | 67,754 | | | 23,235 | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 953,119 | | | 937,310 | | | 1,228,573 | | | 1,241,636 | | | 861,793 | | | 422,391 | |
Net operating expenses | | | 776,141 | | | 734,897 | | | 866,103 | | | 883,964 | | | 656,419 | | | 287,453 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | 24,425 | | | 43,174 | | | 20,890 | | | 23,763 | | | 12,484 | | | 11,978 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | 152,553 | | | 159,239 | | | 341,580 | | | 333,909 | | | 192,890 | | | 122,960 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | 134,599 | | | 222,285 | | | 403,934 | | | 242,212 | | | 117,473 | | | 7,224 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | | (101,004 | ) | | (19,621 | ) | | (24,894 | ) | | (10,895 | ) | | (7,541 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | € | 186,148 | | € | 361,903 | | € | 720,620 | | € | 565,226 | | € | 302,822 | | € | 130,184 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing | | | 200,890 | | | 34,529 | | | — | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | |
Share of associates' income on sale of operations | | | — | | | 148,060 | | | 3,105 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Interest income | | | 70,279 | | | 26,818 | | | 20,511 | | | 23,053 | | | 10,286 | | | 5,230 | |
Interest expense | | | (151,957 | ) | | (120,470 | ) | | (120,370 | ) | | (108,621 | ) | | (65,881 | ) | | (92,718 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | (88,209 | ) | | (187,528 | ) | | (181,567 | ) | | (154,654 | ) | | (74,387 | ) | | (386 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | | 217,151 | | | 263,312 | | | 442,299 | | | 325,004 | | | 193,280 | | | 42,310 | |
Taxes on income, as reported | | | (39,502 | ) | | (125,519 | ) | | (169,001 | ) | | (120,417 | ) | | (77,889 | ) | | (31,395 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before equity minority interests | | | 177,649 | | | 137,793 | | | 273,298 | | | 204,587 | | | 115,391 | | | 10,915 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Equity minority interests | | | (7,084 | ) | | (16,187 | ) | | (30,816 | ) | | (37,022 | ) | | (19,969 | ) | | (9,061 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | € | 170,565 | | € | 121,606 | | € | 242,482 | | € | 167,565 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 1,854 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Restated financial information applying FRS 19 retrospectively: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income, as reported | | | 170,565 | | | 121,606 | | | 242,482 | | | 167,565 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
Audited/unaudited deferred tax adjustment(1),(2) | | | (8,000 | ) | | (11,069 | ) | | (16,550 | ) | | (17,148 | ) | | n/a | | | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Audited/unaudited and restated net income | | € | 162,565 | | € | 110,537 | | € | 225,932 | | € | 150,417 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | € | 164,061 | | € | 116,732 | | € | 245,670 | | € | 151,921 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 10,267 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
64
Other Financial Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense | | | 207,119 | | | 217,904 | | | 234,851 | | | 238,764 | | | 172,354 | | | 92,661 | |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating activities | | € | 425,908 | | € | 392,417 | | € | 482,298 | | € | 584,492 | | € | 356,514 | | € | 260,923 | |
| Capital expenditure and financial investment | | | (209,862 | ) | | (125,356 | ) | | (116,327 | ) | | (136,627 | ) | | (121,206 | ) | | (90,307 | ) |
| Acquisitions and disposals | | | (312,392 | ) | | 60,681 | | | (109,067 | ) | | (42,431 | ) | | (297,064 | ) | | (2,516,819 | ) |
| Financing activities | | | 196,973 | | | (688,592 | ) | | (19,956 | ) | | (128,032 | ) | | 43,502 | | | 2,561,209 | |
Capital expenditures | | | (218,959 | ) | | (171,088 | ) | | (147,629 | ) | | (177,213 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (91,139 | ) |
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3) | | | 2.8 | x | | 1.9 | x | | 3.0 | x | | 3.3 | x | | 3.4 | x | | 1.4 | x |
EBITDA Data:(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
EBITDA | | € | 560,562 | | € | 411,672 | | € | 576,431 | | € | 572,673 | | € | 385,684 | | € | 215,621 | |
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Irish GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash at bank and in hand | | € | 887,892 | | € | 457,408 | | € | 427,092 | | € | 440,109 | | € | n/a | | € | 184,331 | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,004,026 | | | 2,085,678 | | | 2,138,827 | | | 2,088,019 | | | n/a | | | 2,214,254 | |
Total assets | | | 5,431,293 | | | 5,390,423 | | | 5,901,002 | | | 5,936,617 | | | n/a | | | 5,842,608 | |
Total long term debt and other long term liabilities | | | 1,758,609 | | | 1,205,363 | | | 1,337,515 | | | 1,404,432 | | | n/a | | | 3,027,384 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | 2,096,084 | | | 2,263,984 | | | 2,505,175 | | | 2,664,532 | | | n/a | | | 878,099 | |
Restated financial information applying FRS 19 retrospectively: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets, as reported | | € | 5,431,293 | | € | 5,390,423 | | € | 5,901,002 | | € | 5,936,617 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
Audited/unaudited deferred tax adjustment(1),(2) | | | (33,168 | ) | | (44,006 | ) | | (56,258 | ) | | (69,048 | ) | | n/a | | | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | |
Audited/unaudited and restated total assets | | € | 5,398,125 | | € | 5,346,417 | | € | 5,844,744 | | € | 5,867,569 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
Shareholders' equity, as reported | | | 2,096,084 | | | 2,263,984 | | | 2,505,175 | | | 2,664,532 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
Audited/unaudited deferred tax adjustment(1),(2) | | | (74,428 | ) | | (97,364 | ) | | (118,445 | ) | | (139,341 | ) | | n/a | | | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Audited/unaudited and restated shareholders' equity | | | 2,021,656 | | | 2,166,620 | | | 2,386,730 | | | 2,525,191 | | | n/a | | | n/a | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
U.S. GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | € | 5,698,219 | | € | 5,531,224 | | € | 5,975,685 | | € | 5,913,972 | | € | n/a | | € | 6,071,534 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | 2,266,535 | | | 2,398,395 | | | 2,607,526 | | | 2,685,847 | | | n/a | | | 691,685 | |
- (1)
- From January 1, 2002, we are adopting Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 19—"Deferred Tax" which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and the tax computation. FRS 19 applies to accounting periods ending on or after January 23, 2002. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and for the sole purposes of this summary historical consolidated financial data, previously reported figures have been restated. As a consequence of this change in policy, accounting for deferred taxation under Irish GAAP is more closely aligned to U.S. GAAP.
- (2)
- The summary historical financial data for the fiscal years 2000 and 2001 and for the period January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 was derived from JSG's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and for the period September 3, 2002 to December 31, 2002 was derived from issuer's audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. As outlined in note (1) above, we have
65
reflected the impact of FRS 19 in the financial data for these periods. The cumulative financial impact of the new standard as at January 1, 2000 and the financial impact on the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 has been audited. The financial impact on the individual years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 has not been audited.
- (3)
- For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings are defined as earnings before income taxes and extraordinary items, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs and a portion of operating lease rental expense deemed to be representative of the interest factor.
- (4)
- EBITDA represents "operating income subsidiaries—continuing" plus "income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing," depreciation, depletion and amortization. EBITDA is included in this prospectus because it is a basis upon which issuer assesses its financial performance and debt service capabilities, and because certain covenants in issuer's (and subsidiaries') borrowing arrangements are tied to similar measures. You should not consider EBITDA in isolation from or as a substitute for cash flows from operations, net income or other consolidated income or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP or U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a company's profitability or liquidity. Issuer understands that while EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, lenders and others in their evaluation of companies, EBITDA as used herein is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation. For example, we calculate EBITDA without deducting income attributable to, or adding losses attributable to, equity minority interests.
The following is a reconciliation of net income to actual EBITDA:
| | Predecessor
| | Issuer
| |
---|
| | Year ended December 31,
| |
| | September 3, 2002 to September 30, 2002
| |
---|
| | January 1, 2002 to September 2, 2002
| |
---|
| | 1998
| | 1999
| | 2000
| | 2001
| |
---|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders | | € | 162,565 | | € | 110,537 | | € | 225,932 | | € | 150,417 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 1,854 | |
Equity minority interests | | | 7,084 | | | 16,187 | | | 30,816 | | | 37,022 | | | 19,969 | | | 9,061 | |
Taxes on income | | | 47,502 | | | 136,588 | | | 185,551 | | | 137,565 | | | 77,889 | | | 31,395 | |
Share of associates income | | | 54,614 | | | (163,196 | ) | | (200,578 | ) | | (76,663 | ) | | (35,545 | ) | | (6,838 | ) |
Net interest expense | | | 81,678 | | | 93,652 | | | 99,859 | | | 85,568 | | | 55,595 | | | 87,488 | |
Depreciation, amortization and depletion | | | 207,119 | | | 217,904 | | | 234,851 | | | 238,764 | | | 172,354 | | | 92,661 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EBITDA | | € | 560,562 | | € | 411,672 | | € | 576,431 | | € | 572,673 | | € | 385,684 | | € | 215,621 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
66
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP. Our accounting policies are discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Irish GAAP differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. A description of the principal differences and reconciliations of net income for 2002, 2001 and 2000 and shareholders' equity at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are set forth in note 37 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Our financial statements in the future will vary in important respects from the consolidated historical financial statements of JSG contained in this prospectus. In particular, as a result of the JSG acquisition, there will be a significant increase in interest expense and a significant increase in amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets. For more information, see "—Impact of the Transactions—Comparability of Periods." Similarly, there will no longer be any contribution from our interest in SSCC, and we will no longer conduct significant operations in the United States and Canada after the transfer of our 50% ownership interest in Smurfit MBI of Canada for substantially all of SSCC's European operations. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements" for the pro forma effect of the transactions and certain other matters, including the Munksjö acquisition.
Certain information in the review set forth below and elsewhere in this prospectus includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See "Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors" for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus.
General
We are the largest European-based integrated manufacturer of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products. JSG, which was incorporated in Ireland in 1934 as the owner of a single converting plant, has grown to its current global position with thousands of customers and operations in 20 countries. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we generated net sales, net loss and EBITDA of €4,779 million, €30 million and €615 million, respectively, on a pro forma basis.
We organize and manage our operations on the basis of three regions: Europe, Latin America and the United States and Canada.
- •
- Europe. Our European operations are spread across the major economies of Western Europe. Within Europe, our operations are divided into two segments: packaging and specialties. Our packaging segment is comprised principally of our containerboard and corrugated container operations, and our specialties segment consists primarily of our production of décor base paper, greyboard and paper sacks. On March 28, 2002, we significantly increased our operating cash flows through the purchase of substantially all of the outstanding shares that we did not already own of Munksjö, formerly our Swedish associate. This acquisition expanded our European specialties business to include décor base paper, as well as expanded our corrugated container operations. Through the asset swap transaction with SSCC, we will further expand our European presence by acquiring three paper mills, 21 corrugated container plants and five reclamation plants. The primary products in these facilities include corrugated containers, containerboard and coated recycled boxboard.
- •
- Latin America. Our Latin American operations are located principally in Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Argentina. In 2002, Mexico accounted for approximately 32% of our Latin American EBITDA. Since our initial investments in the late 1980s, Latin America has
67
The table below sets forth our actual net sales generated by our subsidiary operations in each region in the last three years:
| | Year Ended December 31,
|
---|
Region
|
---|
| 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (euro in millions)
|
---|
Europe: | | | | | | | | | |
| Packaging | | € | 2,550 | | € | 2,523 | | € | 2,536 |
| Specialties | | | 499 | | | 489 | | | 868 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | Total | | | 3,049 | | | 3,012 | | | 3,404 |
Latin America | | | 783 | | | 834 | | | 749 |
United States and Canada | | | 733 | | | 666 | | | 557 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | Total | | € | 4,565 | | € | 4,512 | | € | 4,710 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Our European, Latin American and United States and Canada operations accounted for approximately 74%, 16% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 on a pro forma basis. We no longer conduct significant operations in North America.
We conduct our business primarily through wholly owned subsidiaries. Within JSG's operations, however, there are several subsidiaries in which JSG's ownership is less than 100% and in respect of which minority interests exist. For example, we own approximately 50%, 70% and 87% of the outstanding equity interests of our Canadian, Colombian and Venezuelan subsidiaries, respectively.
In addition to the activities of our subsidiaries, we conduct our operations through a number of associated companies in which we hold minority interests. We account for these associated companies under the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, we include in our operating results our proportionate share (based on our ownership percentage) of the net earnings or losses of such associates. Before the spin-off, our principal associated company was SSCC.
Overview
We generate sales principally through the production of paperboard and the conversion of paperboard into paper-based packaging products. Our paper mills sell containerboard and other grades of paperboard primarily to JSG-owned converting operations. We also sell containerboard and other grades of paperboard to third parties. In discussing our operations, we refer to our total sales, which include both internal and third party sales, because we believe it gives a better representation of the scope of our operations. We report net sales in our consolidated statements of income, which include only our sales to third parties.
Key factors that impact our operating results are changes in demand and industry capacity, our ability to recover paperboard price increases through increased prices to paper-based packaging customers, the cost of recycled wastepaper and certain currency exchange rate movements. Demand for our products, both globally and regionally, is generally driven by the general level of economic growth
68
and activity. Increased levels of economic growth and activity typically result in higher per capita use of packaging materials, both with respect to transportation of goods and consumer presentation. Because the markets for containerboard and packaging products in developed economies are generally mature, there is a close correlation between general economic growth and demand for packaging products such as corrugated containers and, therefore, for the component materials such as containerboard. In contrast, less-developed economies, including those in Latin America, generally have a lower rate of per capita consumption of packaging materials and containerboard, and thus, we believe, offer the potential opportunity for growth rates that exceed those of general economic growth in those economies.
Demand for containerboard and packaging products is also affected to a lesser degree by changes in their market prices. Significant increases in the price for containerboard and corrugated containers has, on some occasions, resulted in decreased demand as customers elect to purchase substitute products, such as returnable plastic containers, wood crates or shrink-wrap.
Historically, prices for containerboard and packaging products, including corrugated containers, have tended to be cyclical. This cyclicality has resulted from significant imbalances in the supply and demand for paper. On the one hand, paper production capacity cannot be readily adapted to reflect changing market conditions due to the capital intensity of paper production facilities and the long lead time between the planning and completion of a new paper mill. On the other hand, significant containerboard and corrugated container price cuts and inventory growth have resulted when capacity has exceeded demand. More recently, many leading paper manufacturers have reacted to reduced demand by taking downtime and by rationalizing high cost or inefficient capacity. This has resulted in a reduced level of capacity expansion with production decisions increasingly being based more on current rather than projected demand.
The profitability of our mills can be affected by the different characteristics of the markets for testliner and kraftliner. Because the primary raw material for the production of testliner is wastepaper, and wastepaper prices tend to fluctuate, our testliner mills can experience temporary increases and decreases in profits but earn a relatively stable margin over time. In contrast, the primary raw material for the production of kraftliner is wood, the cost of which is relatively more stable. As a result, our kraftliner mills can earn relatively strong margins during periods of high prices, but relatively lower margins when prices decline. Moreover, a majority of our kraftliner sales are made to third parties (in contrast to our testliner sales). Consequently, changes in the profitability of kraftliner have a more immediate impact on our operating results than testliner, which we primarily sell to our converting plants.
Our overall profitability is also affected not only by supply and demand for raw materials and our finished products, but also by the length of time it takes us to translate price increases in raw materials to prices we charge for third party sales of containerboard and paper-based packaging products. To the extent our containerboard is sold internally, our profitability will only be affected by the ability to recover any price increases from third party sales of paper-based packaging products. Price increases at the corrugated level tend to lag containerboard price movements, sometimes by months. As a result, during periods of rising containerboard prices, our profitability is generally adversely affected. Conversely, during periods of declining containerboard prices, our profitability is generally positively affected.
The principal determinant of the cost of our paperboard products is wastepaper, which is used extensively in the manufacture of our paperboard products. An important driver of recycled wastepaper prices is the balance of supply and demand for paper products in general. When the price of recycled wastepaper begins to rise, paper and containerboard manufacturers attempt to raise their prices to preserve profit margins, which generally narrow as a result of increased raw material costs. It generally takes approximately two months for the mills to pass along their price increases to the paper-based
69
packaging products manufacturers. In turn, the manufacturers of paper-based packaging products generally attempt to raise prices to recover containerboard cost increases. It generally takes approximately four months for these manufacturers to pass through their price increases. In a down cycle, as recycled wastepaper and containerboard prices fall, manufacturers of paper and paper-based packaging products attempt to maintain prices. From our experience, our mills are able to maintain prices for between two and three months while our paper-based packaging operations are able to maintain prices for between four and six months. As a result, the effect of price fluctuations on our mills and converting operations will vary depending on the relevant point in the industry cycle.
Given the wide geographic spread of our operations, we are exposed to currency rate fluctuations. With the introduction of the euro on January 1, 1999, however, our exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates within the European Union has been reduced, although the United Kingdom, Sweden and Denmark have not adopted the euro as their national currency. Nevertheless, since the results of our operations in the United States and those in Latin America are denominated in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar will continue to have a significant effect on our operations and on our reported results in euro. In particular, a weaker U.S. dollar will decrease and, conversely, a stronger U.S. dollar will increase, the euro figures we report in our financial statements with respect to our United States and Latin American operations. As a result, comparability of performance between financial periods can be significantly affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar against the euro.
Impact of the Transactions
Comparability of Periods
Our financial statements in the future will vary in important respects from JSG's consolidated historical financial statements contained in this prospectus. The acquisition of JSG was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. As a result, the aggregate purchase price for JSG's equity (including estimated transaction expenses) of approximately €2,504 million was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired in the acquisition results in a significant increase in our amortization and depreciation expense. In addition, due to the effects of the increased borrowing to finance the acquisition, our interest expense increases significantly in the periods following the acquisition. Moreover, our operating results will no longer be impacted by the operating results of SSCC as a result of the spin-off. In addition, our future operating results will reflect the completion of the SSCC Asset Swap. Period to period comparisons are also affected by the acquisition of Munksjö, our former Swedish associate, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, as described in "—Overview." See "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements."
Potential Transaction-Related Cash Cost Savings
As part of our business strategy, we have identified and are in the process of implementing certain transaction-related cash cost reductions in overhead and procurement. The following table sets forth certain cash expenses incurred by JSG in the year ended December 31, 2001, which we believe will not recur in future periods as a result of such cash cost reduction measures and operating improvements. See "Business—Business Strategy." Unless otherwise noted, amounts shown have not been adjusted to reflect additional expenses that we expect to incur in future periods, including additional professional fees, interest expense, depreciation and amortization and other expenses. In addition, while we believe the following cash expenses will not recur in future periods, there can be no
70
assurance that we will not incur other expenses similar to the cash expenses described below in future periods. The following calculations should not be viewed as indicative of future results.
Description
| | Year Ended December 31, 2001
|
---|
| | (euro in thousands)
|
---|
Purchasing improvements(1) | | € | 13,600 |
Reduction in senior management compensation(2) | | | 7,700 |
Reduction in sponsorships/contributions(3) | | | 3,000 |
Elimination of certain office operating expenses(4) | | | 2,700 |
Elimination of travel expenses(5) | | | 2,000 |
Elimination of public company costs(6) | | | 1,500 |
Reduction in insurance costs(7) | | | 1,000 |
| |
|
| Total estimated cash cost savings | | € | 31,500 |
| |
|
- (1)
- Reflects expected cash savings from the consolidation of purchasing functions across many of JSG's operations.
- (2)
- Represents the cash costs associated with JSG's Special Long-term Incentive Plan, which will be terminated in connection with the acquisition. Going forward, JSG's principal incentive compensation plan will be equity-based.
- (3)
- Reflects elimination of expected cash expenses associated with certain current sponsorships and contributions, which will be reduced in connection with the acquisition.
- (4)
- Reflects the elimination of cash costs associated with two of JSG's offices, which we expect to sell to one of the Newcos.
- (5)
- Reflects expected elimination of cash operating costs associated with JSG's interests in respect of an aircraft, which we expect to sell to one of the Newcos.
- (6)
- Reflects the elimination of cash costs incurred related to JSG's operating as a publicly traded corporation prior to the transactions.
- (7)
- Reflects expected cash savings from the termination of certain insurance policies.
The foregoing information includes forward-looking statements relating to potential transaction-related cash cost savings. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from those made in, or suggested by, the foregoing forward-looking statements. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business—Our ability to improve our cash flow and profitability depends on a number of factors, including the successful implementation of our business strategy."
71
Results of Operations
Issuer and certain of its affiliates were established solely for the purpose of effecting the acquisition of JSG. Because of the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities of JSG, issuer's predecessor for accounting purposes, and the related impact on cost of sales and expenses, the financial statements of JSG for periods prior to September 3, 2002 are not comparable to those of issuer subsequent to that date. The following tables sets forth each category of our consolidated income statement data and express such data as a percentage of net sales for: (i) JSG for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001: and (ii) JSG and issuer on a combined basis for the year ended December 31, 2002:
| | Predecessor
| | Combined(a)
| |
---|
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Consolidated Income Statement Data
| |
---|
| 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | (euro in thousands)
| |
---|
Net sales | | € | 4,565,244 | | 100.0 | % | € | 4,511,650 | | 100.0 | % | | €4,709,655 | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of sales | | | 3,336,671 | | 73.1 | | | 3,243,372 | | 71.9 | | | 3,425,472 | | 72.7 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | 0.0 | | | 26,642 | | 0.6 | | | — | | 0.0 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | 1,228,573 | | 26.9 | | | 1,241,636 | | 27.5 | | | 1,284,183 | | 27.3 | |
Net operating expenses | | | 866,103 | | 19.0 | | | 883,964 | | 19.6 | | | 943,872 | | 20.0 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | 20,890 | | 0.5 | | | 23,763 | | 0.5 | | | 24,462 | | 0.5 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | 341,580 | | 7.5 | | | 333,909 | | 7.4 | | | 315,849 | | 6.8 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | 403,934 | | 8.8 | | | 242,212 | | 5.4 | | | 124,697 | | 2.6 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | | (24,894 | ) | (0.5 | ) | | (10,895 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | (7,541 | ) | (0.2 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | € | 720,620 | | 15.8 | | € | 565,226 | | 12.5 | | € | 433,005 | | 9.2 | |
Profit on sales of operations subsidiaries—continuing | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | | | 20,440 | | 0.4 | |
Share of associates income on sale of operations | | | 3,105 | | 0.1 | | | — | | — | | | — | | — | |
Net interest | | | (99,859 | ) | (2.2 | ) | | (85,568 | ) | (1.9 | ) | | (143,083 | ) | (3.0 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | (181,567 | ) | (4.0 | ) | | (154,654 | ) | (3.4 | ) | | (74,772 | ) | (1.6 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | | 442,299 | | 9.7 | | | 325,004 | | 7.2 | | | 235,590 | | 5.0 | |
Taxes on income | | | (169,001 | ) | (3.7 | ) | | (120,417 | ) | (2.7 | ) | | (109,284 | ) | (2.3 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before equity minority interests | | | 273,298 | | 6.0 | | | 204,587 | | 4.5 | | | 126,306 | | 2.7 | |
Equity minority interests | | | (30,816 | ) | (0.7 | ) | | (37,022 | ) | (0.8 | ) | | (29,030 | ) | (0.6 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income available to ordinary shareholders | | € | 242,482 | | 5.3 | % | € | 167,565 | | 3.7 | % | € | 97,276 | | 2.1 | % |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (a)
- For comparison purposes, the financial results of JSG and its subsidiaries for the periods prior to its acquisition on September 3, 2002 have been combined with those of the issuer for periods following such acquisition.
Comparison of Combined Year Ended December 31, 2002 and JSG Year Ended December 31, 2001
Net Sales. Consolidated net sales from continuing operations of €4,207 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 decreased by approximately 7% compared to 2001 as a result of weak demand and difficult trading conditions. Although volumes were reasonably good, average prices were
72
lower and revenues declined accordingly. With the inclusion of Munksjö's post-acquisition sales of over €500 million, reported net sales amounted to €4,710 million, 4% higher than in 2001.
Net sales from our European operations of €3,404 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 increased by 13% by virtue of the inclusion of Munksjö's post-acquisition sales. Excluding Munksjö's contribution, net sales decreased by 3% reflecting weaker pricing rather than reduced volume. Average prices in Europe for containerboard and, to a lesser extent, corrugated containers weakened over the course of 2001. This decline continued into the first half of 2002, albeit at a more moderate rate. Although price increases were implemented in the third quarter of 2002, their impact on average price levels for the period was limited. Accordingly, average prices for containerboard and, to a lesser extent, corrugated containers were lower than in 2001. Corrugated container volumes were generally higher than in 2001 while containerboard volumes were at or above 2001 levels.
Reflecting a difficult economic environment, net sales from our Latin American operations of €749 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 represented a decrease of over 10% as compared to 2001. As in the case of Europe, weaker pricing was the dominant factor. Trading conditions were particularly difficult in Argentina while our Mexican operations were adversely affected by the economic downturn in the United States.
Net sales from our operations in the United States and Canada of €556 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 decreased by over 16% compared to 2001 reflecting in part a reduced scale following the disposal of our printing and voting equipment businesses in early 2002. Although corrugated container volumes in Canada were higher than in 2001, the benefit was offset by lower average prices while our U.S. newsprint mill faced a difficult market and significantly lower prices than in 2001. Beginning September 2002, the sales revenues of the newsprint mill are reported within the Newcos.
Income Before Interest Expense and Taxes. Reflecting higher consolidated third party sales in the combined year ended December 31, 2002, gross profit from subsidiaries of €1,284 million represented a 3% increase compared to 2001. Cost of sales sold increased also to 72.7%, representing a marginally higher percentage of net sales than in 2001. This resulted in part from the strong increase in waste fiber prices from the end of the first quarter, which adversely affected the profitability of our recycled mills prompting increases in paper prices. Although paper price increases were implemented in the third quarter of 2002, they were insufficient to cover the waste fiber cost increases. With waste fiber costs declining in the third quarter, further price increases did not occur in the final quarter of 2002.
Net operating expenses, primarily selling, general and administration costs, also increased in the combined year ended December 31, 2002, representing 20.0% of consolidated sales compared to 19.6% of consolidated sales in 2001. With sales revenues declining through price rather than volume, selling costs did not fall in line with revenue.
Our share of associates' operating income of €125 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 decreased by 49% as compared to 2001, reflecting reduced earnings from SSCC, partly as a result of its inclusion for only eight months in 2002 after completion of the spin-off. Lower average prices in 2002 for SSCC's principal products affected their operating income and, consequently, our reported share of their earnings. In addition, we continue to account for the amortization of goodwill under Irish GAAP, the absence of which charge under U.S. GAAP boosted SSCC's reported earnings. Under Irish GAAP, our share of SSCC goodwill amortization amounts to approximately €20 million for the period prior to the spin-off.
Total operating income before exceptional items of €465 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 represented a decrease of 26% as compared to 2001, reflecting the generally weaker operating conditions. The decline in profitability in Europe was offset by the inclusion of over
73
€47 million from Munksjö as a subsidiary, without which the overall decrease in operating income before exceptional items would have been 20%. Conversely, the decline in the profitability of our Latin American operations reflected partly the benefit in 2001 of non-recurring items. The profitability of our operations in the United States and Canada increased reflecting partly the disposal of the printing and voting equipment businesses, which generated large losses in 2001.
Exceptional items in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 included a net gain of over €20 million on the disposal of our U.S. printing and voting equipment businesses less reorganization and restructuring costs of €24 million, mainly in respect of our European operations. The resulting net loss of €4 million was augmented by a charge of €7 million in respect of our share of exceptional items arising in SSCC. Exceptional items in 2001 amounted to €61 million and comprised €50 million within our subsidiaries in respect of the impairment of fixed assets and reorganization and restructuring costs and €11 million in respect of our share of exceptional items arising in SSCC.
Interest Expense and Income Taxes. Group net interest, including approximately €50 million in respect of transaction related debt, amounted to €143 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 compared to €86 million in 2001. Excluding the transaction related interest, the increased charge reflected the impact of an increased level of debt following the acquisition of Munksjö at the end of March 2002, which more than offset the benefit of lower average interest rates. Our share of associates' net interest, which related principally to SSCC, was lower by €80 million in 2002 compared to 2001, the decrease reflecting the benefit of both lower debt levels and average interest rates and the presence of SSCC for only eight months of the year.
Reflecting the impact of the transaction as well as the lower level of profits in the combined year ended December 31, 2002, the overall tax charge of €109 million represented an average rate of 46.4% compared to 42.3% (as restated to reflect a full provision for deferred taxation) in 2001. The overall average rate for our subsidiaries was 47.0% compared to 40.9% in 2001. This apparently high rate of tax reflects the impact of non-deductible goodwill and the absence as yet of tax relief on much of the transaction related interest. The overall average rate for our associates, primarily SSCC, was 43.4% in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 47.0% (as restated) in 2001.
Comparison of JSG Years Ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000
We believe that our results in 2001 represented a good performance in a demanding operating environment.
Total sales. Total sales decreased from €5,928 million in 2000 to €5,861 million in 2001, an overall decline of approximately 1.0%. Net sales decreased from €4,565 million in 2000 to €4,512 million in 2001, or by approximately 1.2%, with the impact of currency changes and net acquisitions again partly offsetting the real decline. In Europe, we experienced a decline in net sales from €3,049 million in 2000 to €3,012 million in 2001, or approximately 1.2%, which was primarily due to lower volumes and prices in our packaging segment. In the United States and Canada, we experienced a decline in net sales from €733 million in 2000 to €666 million in 2001, or approximately 9.2%, primarily as a result of the weaker newsprint prices and the general downturn in the markets served by our print businesses. These declines in Europe and the United States and Canada more than offset improvements in net sales in Latin America from €783 million in 2000 to €834 million in 2001, or approximately 6.4%, reflecting a full year of results for certain businesses acquired in 2000.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales decreased from €3,337 million in 2000 to €3,243 million in 2001, or approximately 2.8%, as a result of lower volumes and lower raw material prices. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales decreased from 73.0% in 2000 to 72.0% in 2001, reflecting a decline in raw material costs.
74
Net operating expenses. Net operating expenses increased from €866 million in 2000 to €884 million in 2001, or approximately 2.1%, mainly as a result of the net impact of acquisitions. As a percentage of net sales, net operating expenses increased from 19.0% in 2000 to 19.6% in 2001, reflecting a decline in sales without a corresponding decline in fixed costs.
Group income before exceptional items, interest and taxes. Group income before exceptional items, interest and taxes increased from €362 million in 2000 to €384 million in 2001, an increase of approximately 6.1%, reflecting the performance of our subsidiary operations in Europe and Latin America.
Share of associates' operating income. Our share of associates' operating income decreased from €404 million in 2000 to €242 million in 2001, or approximately 40.1%, primarily because of a significantly lower contribution from SSCC as a result of the difficult trading conditions in the United States.
Income before exceptional items, interest and taxes. Income before exceptional items, interest and taxes decreased from €766 million in 2000 to €627 million in 2001, a decline of approximately 18.3%, primarily because of the factors discussed above.
Exceptional items. Exceptional items in 2001, consisting of both asset impairment and reorganization and restructuring costs, amounted to a loss of over €50 million. These costs, which arose in our European packaging businesses, reflect our continuing focus on restructuring our operations to enhance future profitability and follow on from similar charges in previous years. In 2000, exceptional costs relating to reorganization and restructuring, primarily in the United Kingdom, amounted to approximately €21 million.
Share of associates' exceptional items. In 2001, our share of associates' exceptional items amounted to a net loss of approximately €11 million and represented our share of restructuring and other costs incurred by SSCC. In 2000, we reported a net loss of €22 million in respect of our share of exceptional costs incurred by SSCC, as offset by a modest gain on the disposal of their newsprint operations in the United States and Canada.
Group net interest. Group net interest payable decreased from €99 million (an expense of €120 million less income of nearly €21 million) in 2000 to €86 million (an expense of €109 million less income of €23 million) in 2001, or approximately 14.3%. The reduced interest charge reflects lower average interest rates during 2001. This benefit was, however, partially offset by a stronger U.S. dollar, which increased the euro value of our U.S. dollar-denominated interest.
Share of associates' net interest. Our share of associates' net interest decreased from €182 million in 2000 to €155 million in 2001, or approximately 14.8%. The decline in interest charge relates predominantly to SSCC, where the benefit of lower average interest rates was complemented by reduced debt levels and the benefits of previous debt refinancing.
Income before taxes and equity minority interests. Income before taxes and equity minority interests decreased from €442 million in 2000 to €325 million in 2001, or approximately 26.5%. As a result of this reduced level of profitability, taxes on income decreased from €169 million in 2000 to €120 million in 2001, or approximately 28.7%. The charge in 2001 represented an overall tax rate of 37%, a reduction from the comparable 38% tax rate in 2000. As there is only limited tax relief available on the exceptional items, the tax rate on pre-exceptional profits was 33% in 2001 compared to 37% in 2000. This continued the downward trend that reflects our ongoing focus on tax management. Actions taken in 2001 helped reduce the distorting impact that unrelieved statutory tax losses had on the tax charge in 2000.
75
Income before equity minority interests decreased from €273 million in 2000 to €205 million in 2001, or approximately 25.1%. As a result of higher earnings from Smurfit MBI in Canada and from our Colombian operations, equity minority interests increased from €31 million in 2000 to €37 million in 2001, or approximately 20.1%.
Net income. Net income decreased from €242 million in 2000 to €168 million in 2001, a decline of over 30.0%.
Regional Review—2001 Compared to 2000
This regional review is based on net sales and income before exceptional items, interest and taxes.
Our operations in Europe generated total sales of €3,947 million and net sales of €3,049 million in 2000, compared to total sales and net sales of €3,880 million and €3,012 million, respectively, in 2001, representing a decline of approximately 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively. The decrease in sales revenue reflected the generally lower pricing environment, with the year-on-year decline being partly offset by the presence for a full year of operations of businesses acquired in 2000, including Neopac in Denmark. Excluding acquisitions and dispositions and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate movements, our net sales would have declined by approximately 2.0%.
Despite lower sales revenues, total income before exceptional items, interest and taxation for our European operations increased from €279 million in 2000 to €292 million in 2001, or approximately 4.7%. The underlying results varied, with the increase in our packaging operations being offset by reduced profits in our specialties operations and from our associates, primarily Munksjö, which is now our subsidiary.
Packaging. Total European sales by our packaging segment, which includes our containerboard mills and corrugated container operations, decreased from €3,423 million in 2000 to €3,364 million in 2001, or approximately 1.7%, while net sales decreased from €2,550 million in 2000 to €2,523 million in 2001, or approximately 1.0%. The year-on-year decline reflected a slight decline in overall volumes, when the impact of acquisitions is excluded, and modest price erosion, particularly in the second half of the year.
Our containerboard volumes in 2001 showed a modest year-on-year decline against 2000. Recycled containerboard volumes grew by 1.3% but kraftliner volumes declined 3.5% year-on-year. The decline in kraftliner volumes reflected downtime taken to manage inventories and the elimination of low-margin business.
In 2001, recycled containerboard prices declined, as did kraftliner prices, which declined modestly. OCC prices, which declined during 2001, contributed to the downward pressure on testliner prices.
The European containerboard industry continued to benefit from the decline of U.S. containerboard exports. Through the end of 2001, U.S. linerboard exports had decreased by approximately 50.0% since 1997 reflecting the strength of the U.S. dollar and the closure of over four million short tons of U.S. containerboard capacity. A strong U.S. dollar made U.S. tonnage less competitive in Europe. Although the U.S. dollar has recently weakened against the euro, we continue to see ourselves as a major beneficiary of this trend of reduced U.S. exports.
76
Our corrugated container volumes in Europe increased by 1.4% year-on-year. Excluding the effect of acquisitions, principally Neopac in Denmark, corrugated container volumes were unchanged year-on-year. We continued to restructure underperforming corrugated container facilities and reduced our exposure to unprofitable business, particularly in the United Kingdom. Corrugated container prices experienced moderate declines in the second half of 2001.
With corrugated container prices suffering moderate erosion only in the second half of 2001, the operations benefited from the general weakness of containerboard prices during the year. While lower average prices for OCC almost offset lower containerboard prices, the profitability of our mills was reduced. As a result of the lower average prices of OCC, our packaging segment generated increased profits despite lower sales revenue than in 2000.
Income before exceptional items, interest and tax increased from €221 million in 2000 to €244 million in 2001, or approximately 10.0%.
Specialties. Total sales by our specialties segment decreased from €524 million in 2000 to €516 million in 2001, or approximately 1.4%, while net sales decreased from €499 million in 2000 to €489 million in 2001, or approximately 2.0%, during that same period. The overall decline was primarily driven by the closure of two loss-making plants during 2001.
Several of our specialty businesses faced difficult market conditions during 2001. Both graphic board and sack volumes declined, but industry pricing remained relatively stable and accordingly the profitability of our specialties segment declined only modestly.
Income before exceptional items, interest and tax decreased from €26 million in 2000 to €24 million in 2001, or approximately 7.6%.
Associates. The profitability of our European associates decreased in 2001, principally because of the reduced contribution from our principal associate, Munksjö. Although Munksjö's paper and packaging operations performed relatively well during 2001, overall profitability was adversely affected by reduced earnings from market pulp through a combination of price erosion and reduced volumes as the Aspa mill was shut down to facilitate an expansion of its capacity. Our other associates performed well in 2001, generating increased earnings year-on-year.
In total, our share of income before exceptional items, interest and tax from our European associates decreased from €32 million in 2000 to approximately €25 million in 2001, a decrease of approximately 22.8%.
Our operations in Latin America generated total sales of €1,247 million and net sales of €783 million in 2000 compared to €1,315 million and €834 million, respectively, in 2001, or approximately 5.4% and 6.4%, respectively. The increase in sales arose mainly from the presence for a full year of the Argentinean operations acquired in 2000 and, to a lesser extent, exchange rate movements. Excluding acquisitions and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate movements, net sales decreased approximately €6 million from 2000 to 2001.
Mexico experienced a difficult operating environment in 2001 but produced record results as a result of certain nonrecurring gains. Corrugated container volumes increased year-on-year, despite a contraction in containerboard volumes. The Mexican economy remained heavily impacted by the slowing U.S. economy and the manufacturing sector was effectively in recession.
Colombian corrugated container volumes declined year-on-year, but were supported by moderately stronger pricing and an improved Colombian export sector. We acquired interests in two smaller corrugated facilities in Colombia during 2001.
Through the end of 2001, although volume decreased in Venezuela, we increased market share in Venezuela. This was achieved in difficult economic circumstances and against the backdrop of an
77
overvalued currency. Product pricing improved year-on-year. While there continued to be social unrest in Venezuela throughout 2001, we remain confident about our investments in this country in the expectation of a more balanced economic environment.
Throughout 2001 and mid-2002, Argentina has suffered from a severe economic recession coupled with political and social unrest. In early January 2002, Argentina abandoned its currency peg of one Argentine peso to one U.S. dollar and, on February 3, 2002, the Argentine government announced the full floating of the Argentine peso. We continue to prudently grow our businesses in Argentina and manage through an economy in a prolonged recession. Volumes improved significantly year-on-year, reflecting the impact of acquisitions in 2000. It is too early to predict the outcome of Argentina's difficulties, but we continue to take prudent steps to protect our asset base and business prospects, such as maintaining local currency borrowing.
Income before exceptional items, interest and tax increased from €94 million in 2000 to €127 million in 2001, or approximately 34.9%. Excluding the favorable impact of exchange rates and acquisitions, profitability increased by approximately 30.1%.
In our United States and Canada operations, our packaging segment included the corrugated container operations of our 50% owned Canadian subsidiary, Smurfit MBI, with our wholly owned U.S. operations. At December 31, 2001, our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries comprised the Pomona newsprint mill and the election printing and voting equipment operations. Under Associates, we reported our approximate 29.4% share of the earnings of SSCC.
Packaging. Sales for our United States and Canada packaging operations decreased from €733 million in 2000 to €666 million in 2001, or approximately 9.2%. While part of the decrease reflected the disposal of the reclamation operations, the main reason for this decline was the weak market conditions facing our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries.
Although Smurfit MBI's volumes were relatively unchanged year-on-year, it performed well in a difficult operating environment. While corrugated container prices were lower in 2001 than in 2000, the impact was more than offset by the benefit of lower containerboard prices.
It was a difficult year for our wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries. Newsprint volumes declined year-on-year at Pomona and energy costs, reflecting the West Coast energy crisis, increased by a factor of three. Newsprint pricing, stable during the first half of 2001, declined significantly in the second half of the year. Prior to their disposal in late 2001, our recycling plants were affected by reduced demand. Likewise, reduced demand affected our printing and voting operations. The results were consistent, however, with a slowing economy and a non-election year, and business started to improve during the fourth quarter.
Reflecting those market conditions, income before exceptional items, interest and tax generated by our packaging operations in the United States and Canada decreased from €31 million in 2000 to €13 million in 2001, or approximately 59.1%.
Associates. Our principal associate during this time period in the United States and Canada was SSCC, of which we owned approximately 29.4% at December 31, 2001. Our share of the earnings of associates decreased from €362 million in 2000 to €195 million in 2001, or approximately 46.2%, with the full impact of the decline in U.S. dollar earnings being offset by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the euro.
The demand for corrugated containers in the United States declined by approximately 6.0% in 2001, the steepest decline since 1975. This also marked the second year of consecutive decline, demand having fallen by approximately 1.0% in 2000. Reflecting significant levels of industry downtime, containerboard prices, although lower, remained comparatively resilient during 2001. SSCC's
78
containerboard mills took approximately 1.06 million short tons of market related downtime in 2001, compared to 714,000 short tons in 2000. We believe that industry-wide downtime in 2001 was over three million short tons, representing over 8.0% of U.S. annual capacity.
Reflecting the impact of higher energy prices in addition to lower prices and volumes, SSCC reported pre-tax profits of $191 million in 2001 compared to $434 million in 2000, a decrease of approximately 56.0%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historical Cash Flow
The following table sets forth summary cash flows for: (i) JSG for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000; and (ii) JSG and issuer on a combined basis for the year ended December 31, 2002. This table is in a simpler format than the FRS 1 cash flow included in the consolidated financial statements found elsewhere in this prospectus.
| | Predecessor
| | Combined(a)
| |
---|
| | Year Ended December 31,
| |
---|
Summary Cash Flows
| |
---|
| 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | (euro in millions)
| |
---|
| | (audited)
| |
---|
Profit before taxation—subsidiaries only | | € | 242 | | € | 248 | | € | 193 | |
Exceptional items | | | — | | | 15 | | | (20 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 225 | | | 236 | | | 262 | |
Working capital change | | | (81 | ) | | 19 | | | 21 | |
Non-cash interest expense | | | — | | | — | | | 10 | |
Capital expenditure | | | (152 | ) | | (192 | ) | | (209 | ) |
Sales of fixed assets | | | 24 | | | 27 | | | — | |
Tax paid | | | (55 | ) | | (114 | ) | | (130 | ) |
Associate and finance company dividends | | | 9 | | | 11 | | | 6 | |
Other | | | (9 | ) | | (3 | ) | | 13 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Free cash flow | | | 203 | | | 247 | | | 146 | |
Investments | | | (93 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (306 | ) |
Sale of businesses and investments | | | 10 | | | 12 | | | 27 | |
Share issue | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 11 | |
Transfer of cash to Newcos | | | — | | | — | | | (15 | ) |
Equity contribution | | | — | | | — | | | 864 | |
Payment to shareholders | | | — | | | — | | | (2,371 | ) |
Deferred debt issue costs | | | — | | | — | | | (130 | ) |
Transaction fees | | | — | | | — | | | (122 | ) |
Amounts transferred to parent/Newcos | | | — | | | — | | | (7 | ) |
Dividends | | | (87 | ) | | (95 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash inflow | | € | 34 | | € | 111 | | | €(1,967 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Reconciliation of change in net borrowing: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash inflow | | | 34 | | | 111 | | | (1,967 | ) |
Debt acquired | | | (40 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (150 | ) |
Non-cash interest accrued | | | — | | | — | | | (10 | ) |
Currency translation adjustments | | | (63 | ) | | (54 | ) | | 128 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Increase)/decrease in net borrowing | | € | (69 | ) | € | 54 | | € | (1,999 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (a)
- For comparison purposes, the financial results of JSG and its subsidiaries for the periods prior to its acquisition on September 3, 2002 have been combined with those of the issuer for periods following such acquisition.
79
Profits before taxation from subsidiaries for the combined year ended December 31, 2002 decreased to €193 million from €248 million in 2001, or approximately 22%, even after taking into account acquisitions, primarily as a result of decreased overall performance from certain of our operations. Profit before taxation from subsidiaries for 2001 amounted to €248 million, representing a small increase on €242 million in 2000. The increased level of cash generated by our subsidiaries resulted mainly from the increased overall performance in our European and Latin American operations. Profits from our wholly owned U.S. operations were considerably lower in 2001 than in 2000.
Depreciation and amortization for the combined year ended December 31, 2002 increased to €262 million from €236 million in 2001, or approximately 11%. The working capital inflow of €21 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to an outflow of €19 million in 2001 was largely a result of an increased focus on reducing working capital. The working capital inflow in 2001 was largely a function of lower inventory levels, but it also reflects lower activity compared to 2000. Increased capital expenditure, which was affected by the consolidation of Munksjö, was offset in part by a corresponding increase in depreciation. As in prior periods capital expenditures have been maintained at levels below depreciation giving us a net inflow of €53 million for the combined year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to €44 million for 2001. Capital expenditure was approximately 85% of depreciation in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 81% in 2001. Depreciation and amortization in 2001 amounted to €236 million, compared to €225 million in 2000. As in 2000, capital expenditure in 2001 has been maintained at a level below depreciation with the difference giving us a net inflow of approximately €44 million in 2001 compared to €73 million in 2000. Capital expenditure was approximately 81% of depreciation in 2001 compared to 68% in 2000.
Tax payments in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 increased to €130 million from €114 million in 2001, or approximately 14%, reflecting mainly an acceleration in tax payment dates in certain jurisdictions based on slightly larger profits in 2001 against 2000. Tax payments of €114 million in 2001 were €59 million higher than in 2000, reflecting the significantly higher profits generated across the company in 2000 compared with 1999.
As a result of the foregoing, cash flow provided by operating activities, or free cash flow, decreased by €101 million, from €247 million in 2001 to €146 million in the combined year ended December 31, 2002. Free cash flow of €247 million in 2001 was €44 million higher than the corresponding figure of €203 million in 2000. Dividends from associates were higher than in 2000 mainly due to increased dividend income from Munksjö.
Financing and investment cash movements in the combined year ended December 31, 2002 related principally to the acquisition of JSG. Otherwise, with the exception of the acquisition of Munksjö, the movements were relatively modest. Investments in the combined year ended December 31, 2002, primarily the acquisition of the remaining shares in Munksjö, amounted to €306 million compared to €55 million in 2001. The outflow for the purchase of the remaining Munksjö shares amounted to €274 million. Proceeds from the exercise of JSG options amounted to €11 million.
Financing and investment cash movements relating to the acquisition of JSG comprise the payment of €2,371 million to the former JSG shareholders and the payment of €252 million in debt issuance costs and fees and expenses to the end of 2002. In addition, it includes the effects of the transfer of cash to the Newcos of €15 million and the receipt of the equity contribution from parent of €864 million.
After investments and dividends, the overall cash deficit for the combined year ended December 31, 2002 was €1,967 million. Debt acquired of €150 million in relation to Munksjö, offset by currency translation adjustments of €128 million resulted in an overall increase in net borrowing of €1,999 million. The currency adjustments arose from the reduction in the euro value of our non-euro denominated net borrowing, principally as a result of the relative weakening of the U.S. dollar in 2002.
80
Investments in 2001 amounted to €55 million and included an investment of 25% in Leefung-Asco, a Hong Kong quoted company, the buy out of minority interests within the Nettingsdorfer Italian operations, and the buyback of shares in Colombia.
After investments and dividends in 2001, our cash surplus was €111 million. This surplus was offset by changes in currency exchange rates and debt acquired resulting in an overall decrease in net borrowing of €54 million in 2001.
The U.S. dollar is the most important foreign currency for us given the scale of our assets in the Americas. Borrowing denominated in foreign currencies in 2002 decreased by €128 million, principally as a result of the relative weakness of the U.S. dollar against the euro. The value of the U.S. dollar declined by over 19% in the year relative to the euro from an opening rate of approximately $0.88 to a closing rate of approximately $1.05 at December 31, 2002. Borrowing denominated in foreign currencies in 2001 increased by €54 million, principally as a result of the relative weakness of the euro against the U.S. dollar.
Note 31 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus provides a reconciliation of the cash flow to the movement in net debt, which is net borrowing plus finance leases.
After the Transactions
Since completion of the transactions, our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flow from operations and borrowing under our new €425 million revolving credit facility. Our primary uses of cash have been and will be for debt service and capital expenditures, each of which we have funded and expect to fund from these sources.
We incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the transactions. On a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the transactions as if they had occurred on December 31, 2002, we would have had approximately €3,319 million of indebtedness outstanding as compared to historical long-term indebtedness of JSG outstanding of approximately €1,320 million. Our significant debt service obligations could, under certain circumstances, have material adverse consequences to our securityholders, including holders of the notes. See "Risk Factors."
Our senior credit facility provides for three tranches of term loans in an aggregate amount of €2,100 million and a revolving credit facility with up to €425 million available. In order to partially fund the acquisition of JSG shares in the offer, refinance certain indebtedness of JSG and pay related fees and expenses, we borrowed a substantial portion of the amount available under the term loans. As of December 31, 2002, we had €401 million of borrowing available under the revolving credit facility to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. See "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Senior Credit Facility."
We used proceeds from the sale of the original senior notes and the units to fund the acquisition of JSG shares in the offer, refinance certain indebtedness of JSG and pay related fees and expenses. We used the proceeds from the sale of senior outstanding notes to fund the cash consideration portion of the SSCC Asset Swap. Until maturity, we have the option of paying interest on the subordinated notes in cash or through the issuance of additional subordinated notes. We intend to pay interest in additional subordinated notes for the foreseeable future.
The instruments governing our indebtedness, including the senior credit facility, the senior notes indentures and the subordinated notes indentures, contain financial and other covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments, consummate certain asset sales, incur liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, or merge or consolidate with any other person or sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. These limitations, together with our highly leveraged nature, could limit corporate and operating activities. See "Risk Factors." As of the date of
81
this prospectus, we are in compliance with the financial and other covenants of our indebtedness in all material respects.
From 1996 through 2001, the level of capital expenditures on aggregate were at or below annual depreciation levels. Management expects this trend to continue for at least the next three years. We made approximately €120 million in capital expenditures from July 2002 through year-end, €11 million of which we consider to be non-discretionary and €37 million of which will be used for maintenance. These expenditures were used primarily for cost reduction, business growth, maintenance and environmental and other regulatory compliance. We currently estimate that we will make approximately €226 million in capital expenditures in 2003 and approximately €240 million in capital expenditures in 2004.
In order to comply with increasingly stringent environmental requirements, we plan to incur capital expenditures to upgrade certain wastewater treatment facilities and to address air emissions, solid waste and noise at our mills. Our mills in Europe will also be affected by the European Union's IPPC program. The IPPC program requires member countries to ensure that industries employ Best Available Techniques, or BAT, for all environmental aspects of their operation, including wastewater discharges, air emissions, noise, energy use and environmental management. The resulting cost impact on us is uncertain because the BAT have not yet been finally established. Overall, we incurred approximately €12 million in fiscal year 2002 and currently plan to incur €14 million in fiscal year 2003 for environmental controls at our facilities worldwide, and we anticipate that our annual environmental capital expenditures will continue at this level, or will increase moderately, through 2007 to comply with IPPC and other environmental requirements. See "Business—Environmental Issues."
We are subject to several put arrangements and capital commitments in certain companies which are not wholly owned or in which we hold only a minority interest, namely Fustelpack S.p.A. in Italy, Industria Cartonera Dominicana in the Dominican Republic, Cajas de Carton Sultana S.A. de C.V. in Mexico, and Yen & Son Holdings PTE Limited in China. The owner of a 12% shareholding in Fustelpack S.p.A. (of which we own 69%) has the right every two years to put his shareholding to the other shareholders for a put price presently estimated to be approximately €1 million. The owner of almost 20% of Industria Cartonera Dominicana (of which we own 80%) has a put option on such shareholding, with the put price presently estimated to be approximately €1 million. In addition, we have an option expiring at the end of December 2003 to acquire the approximate 55% shareholding of Cajas de Carton Sultana S.A. de C.V. that we do not already own. The price for such option, which will be determined by an appraiser at the time it is exercised, is currently estimated at approximately €27 million. Smurfit International B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary, has agreed to provide to Yen & Son Holdings PTE Limited additional loans up to a maximum of $5 million over a period to be determined by the board of directors of Yen & Son Holdings PTE Limited. The price for such option will be determined by an appraiser at the time the option is exercised.
In addition, we are a party to various lawsuits and are subject to various contingent liabilities for which we have not taken a reserve. In the event we are found liable in any or all of such lawsuits, or the contingencies relating to such liabilities actually occur, our business and financial condition could be adversely affected. For more information, see "Risk Factors" and "Business—Legal Proceedings."
We believe that cash generated from operations and amounts available under the revolving credit facility will be adequate to meet our anticipated debt service requirements, capital expenditures and working capital needs for the foreseeable future, including approximately €55 million due in 2003 relating to the purchase of our Nettingsdorfer kraftliner mill. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash from operations or that future borrowing will be available under the senior credit facility or otherwise to us to service our indebtedness, including the senior credit facility, the senior notes and the subordinated notes, when required or to make anticipated capital expenditures. Our future operating performance and our ability to service or refinance the notes and to service, extend or refinance the senior credit facility will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. See "Risk Factors."
82
Contractual obligations table. The following represent our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the transactions.
| | Payments Due by Period
|
---|
Contractual Obligations
| | Total
| | Less than 1 year
| | 1 to 5 years
| | After 5 years
|
---|
| | (euro in millions)
|
---|
Long term debt | | € | 3,153 | | | 19 | | | 546 | | € | 2,588 |
Capital lease obligations | | | 23 | | | 4 | | | 6 | | | 13 |
Operating leases | | | 54 | | | 15 | | | 27 | | | 12 |
Other long-term obligations | | | 55 | | | 55 | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total contractual cash obligations | | € | 3,285 | | € | 93 | | € | 579 | | € | 2,613 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
We believe we have sufficient facilities available to meet our present working capital requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Certain accounting issues require management estimates and judgments for the preparation of financial statements. Our most significant policies requiring the use of estimates and judgments are listed below.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable on a case-by-case basis, and make adjustments to the bad debt reserve for expected losses. We consider such things as ability to pay, bankruptcy, credit ratings and payment history. For all other accounts, we estimate reserves for bad debts based on historical experience and past due status of the accounts. Our bad debt write-offs in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were €11 million, €10 million and €7 million, respectively.
Post Retirement Benefits
From September 3, 2002 (the date of acquisition), issuer has adopted FRS 17—"Retirement Benefits." FRS 17 applies to all types of benefits that an employer provides after employees have completed their service, including pensions and other post retirement benefits. The cost of the expected increase in the present value of scheme liabilities arising from employee service in the current or prior periods together with the difference between the increase in the present value of scheme liabilities arising from a closer benefit settlement date and the expected returns on the schemes assets at the start of the period is recognized in the income statement. Differences between the expected and the actual return on plan assets, together with the effect of changes in the current or prior assumptions underlying the liabilities are recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses. Scheme assets are valued at fair value and scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit method. Net scheme assets and liabilities, reduced by deferred tax amounts, are recorded on the balance sheet as a pension surplus or deficit as appropriate.
Prior to September 3, 2002, pension costs were recognized in income on a systematic basis so that the cost of providing retirement benefits to employees was evenly matched to the service lives of the employees concerned. Any excess or deficiency of the actuarial value of assets over the actuarial value of liabilities was amortized over the average remaining service lives of the relevant, then current employees. Any surplus or deficit within a scheme was not recognized on the balance sheet. The cost of providing post retirement health care benefits to employees was recognized on an actuarial basis. The effect of the adoption of FRS 17 on reported income from the date of acquisition is not material.
83
Income Tax Matters
At December 31, 2002, we had net operating loss carryforwards of €235 million which are available indefinitely. These loss carryforwards have a tax value of €53 million. Valuation allowances of €36 million have been established for a portion of these deferred tax assets. The realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable income. Based upon recent levels of taxable income, we expect that our deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, will be fully utilized.
We frequently face challenges from domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These challenges include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with our various filing positions, we record reserves for probable exposures. Based on our evaluation of our tax positions, we believe we have appropriately accrued for probable exposures. To the extent that we were to prevail in matters for which accruals have been established our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period may be materially impacted.
Prospective Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. It also provides accounting guidance for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The impact on our financial position and results of operations is not expected to be material.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145 "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 62, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 requires, in most cases, gains and losses on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations, rather than as extraordinary items. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 replaces EITF Issue No. 94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
Goodwill Accounting under U.S. GAAP
Effective January 1, 2002, JSG adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. We will perform the first of the required impairment tests as of January 1, 2002. We have not yet determined what the effects of these tests will be on our earnings and financial position. On an ongoing basis, we expect to perform impairment tests during the fourth quarter of each year.
Research and Development
We are committed to continuous innovation in our products and processes in order to reduce costs, improve operating efficiencies and increase profitability. Innovation is also an important factor in meeting our customers' needs. To meet this commitment, we have a major research and innovation center in Bordeaux, France. The research and development activities embrace all aspects of our business from the consumption of both recycled and virgin fibers by our mills and the manufacture of paper and containerboard to the conversion of containerboard into paper-based packaging products. In 2002, 2001 and 2000, JSG's research and development costs were approximately €4.9 million, €5.2 million, and €5.7 million, respectively.
84
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
JSG has not used special purpose vehicles or similar financing arrangements on a historical basis. In addition, JSG has not had off-balance sheet arrangements with any of our affiliates. As part of the transactions, the Newcos entered into the Newco credit facility, which is completely non-recourse to us. For more information, see "The Transactions—The JSG Acquisition" and "Description of Certain Indebtedness—Non-Recourse Newco Credit Facility."
Effect of Inflation
Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor, equipment and raw materials. We do not believe that inflation has had any material effect on our results of operations during fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Market Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates. Our senior credit facility is variable rate debt. Interest rate changes therefore generally do not affect the market value of such debt but do impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. As of December 31, 2002, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the February 2003 offering of additional senior notes, we had variable rate debt of approximately €1,786 million. Holding other variables constant, including levels of indebtedness, and assuming our 50% hedging policy, a one percentage point increase in interest rates would have had an estimated impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flow for the next year of approximately €9 million and €6 million, respectively. Under the terms of the senior credit facility, we have entered into one or more interest rate protection agreements establishing a fixed maximum interest rate with respect to some of the outstanding term loan borrowing under the senior credit facility. We are required to keep these agreements or their replacements in place for at least two years after the closing of the transactions.
Currency Sensitivity
The consolidated group operates in four principal currency areas: the euro, the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar and sterling. At the end of 2002, 27% of our net assets were denominated in currencies other than the euro, as compared to 51% at year-end 2001. In 2002, we reported a translation loss of €137 million on our foreign currency net assets, compared to a gain of €61 million in 2001. We believe that a strengthening of the euro exchange rate by 10% against other foreign currencies from December 31, 2002 would reduce the shareholders' equity at the end of 2002 by approximately €22 million (as compared to €123 million at end of 2001).
Commodity Pricing Risks
We are exposed to commodity price risks through our dependence on OCC, the principal raw material used in the manufacture of containerboard. The price of OCC is dependent on both demand and supply conditions. Demand conditions include the production of recycled containerboard in Europe and the demand for OCC for the production of recycled containerboard outside of Europe, principally in Asia. Supply conditions include the rate of recovery of OCC, itself dependant on historic pricing related to the cost of recovery, and have some slight seasonal variations.
Just over 1.05 metric tons of OCC are required to manufacture 1.0 metric tons of recycled containerboard. Consequently, an increase in the price of OCC of, for example, €20 per metric ton would increase the cost of production of recycled containerboard by €21 per metric ton. Historically, increases in the cost of OCC have led to a rapid rise in the price of recycled containerboard, with a lag of one to two months.
The price of OCC in Europe has peaked dramatically twice in recent years—in June 2000 and in June 2002. In each case, a relatively low level of supply was matched with a relatively high level of
85
demand, principally caused by increased demand from Asia. In each case, the free-on-board price rose to over €150 per metric ton. Within a period of three months, supply and demand conditions leveled to return the price to around €100 per metric ton.
The table below provides information about the European OCC price information per metric ton at and for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002.
Free-on-Board OCC Price per Metric Ton
|
---|
| | At and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
---|
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (euro)
|
---|
Price at the end of the period | | 120 | | 100 | | 119 |
Average price during period | | 143 | | 95 | | 124 |
Highest price during period | | 174 | | 100 | | 156 |
Lowest price during period | | 109 | | 87 | | 100 |
Qualitative Information about Market Risk
The operating parameters and policies of treasury management are established under formal board authority. The formal treasury policy covers the areas of funding, counterparty risk, foreign exchange, controls and derivatives. Risk arising on counterparty default is controlled within a framework of dealing with high quality institutions and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one bank or institution. We use financial instruments, including fixed and variable rate debt, to finance operations, for capital spending programs and for general corporate purposes. Additionally, financial instruments, including derivative instruments, are used to hedge exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risks. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes. We mitigate the risk that counterparties to derivatives will fail to perform by contracting with major financial institutions having high credit ratings and consider the likelihood of counterparty failure to be remote.
The successful management of our currency and interest rate exposure depends on a variety of factors, some of which are outside of our control. We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations due to our investing and funding activities and our operations in foreign currencies. We manage interest rate exposure to achieve an appropriate balance of fixed and variable rate funding. To achieve this objective, we enter into interest rate swaps, options and forward rate agreements. Interest rate swap agreements are used to change the interest payable or receivable on our underlying borrowing and cash from the variable to fixed rate or from fixed to variable rate. At December 31, 2002, the proportion of our total borrowing that was at fixed interest rates was 65% (as compared to 43% at December 31, 2001 and 41% at December 31, 2000).
The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 was €(1.1) million, €26.4 million and €(5.7) million, respectively. See note 20 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The weighted average interest rate on our total borrowing as of December 31, 2002 was 8.15% (as compared to 5.71% at December 31, 2001 and 7.24% at December 31, 2000). Our net interest expense of €143 million for 2002 (as compared to €86 million for 2001 and €100 million for 2000) was covered 2.4 times (as compared to 4.5 times in 2001 and 3.6 times in 2000) by our income before exceptional items, interest and taxes.
We manage our balance sheet having regard to the currency exposures arising from our assets being denominated in a wide range of currencies. To this end, where foreign currency assets are funded by borrowing, such borrowing is generally sourced in the currency of the related assets. We also hedge our currency exposure through the use of currency swaps, options and forward contracts.
86
INDUSTRY
Industry Overview
Corrugated containers are a safe and economical means of transporting consumer and industrial products. More goods are shipped in corrugated containers than in any other type of packaging. Containerboard, which is a generic term used to describe various types of paperboard such as linerboard and corrugating medium, is the principal raw material used to manufacture corrugated containers. Linerboard is used as the inner and outer facing (liner) of a corrugated container. The two main types of linerboard are kraftliner, which is produced using primarily virgin fiber, and testliner, which is produced using primarily recycled fiber. Corrugating medium is fluted and laminated to linerboard in either a corrugator plant or a converting plant to produce corrugated sheets. The sheets are then printed, cut, folded and glued in corrugator plants or converting plants to produce corrugated containers.
Recycled fiber is obtained principally from old corrugated case material, or OCC, acquired through open market purchases or from company-owned reclamation facilities. Virgin fiber is obtained in the form of wood chips or pulp wood acquired through open market purchases of wood fiber or from company-owned timberland. These fibers are chemically treated and then processed through paper machines, which consist of a paper-forming section, a press section (where water is removed by pressing the wet containerboard between rolls), and a drying section. The containerboard is then wound into rolls, which are shipped to company-owned converting plants or outside converters.
The dispersion of customers for corrugated containers and the high bulk, low density and low value of corrugated containers, which typically are delivered by truck, make shipping costs a relatively high percentage of total costs. As a result, corrugator plants usually serve markets within a 250-kilometer radius of the plant and employ a local sales force to serve the market area.
The principal factor affecting the demand for paper-based packaging products and paperboard, both globally and regionally, is the general level of economic growth and activity. The international market is affected by patterns of global and regional growth in demand for paper-based packaging products and paperboard and by the impact of exchange rate movements on trade flows. Increased levels of economic growth and activity generally result in higher per capita use of such products because of the resultant increased use for shipment of goods and in consumer product presentation.
The paper-based packaging products and paperboard markets in the developed world are generally mature. Accordingly, there is a correlation between economic growth and demand for packaging products such as corrugated containers and, therefore, for the component materials such as containerboard. The less developed economies, including those in Latin America, offer potential for increased per capita consumption of paper-based packaging products and their component products, and thus higher growth rates. On a per capita basis, growth in the relatively less mature Western European containerboard market continues to be higher than in the relatively mature North American market. We believe that the difference in the 2000 level of European per capita consumption (54kg) versus North American (95kg) suggests potential for further growth in the European containerboard market.
From 1990 through 2001, the Western European containerboard market, which tracks demand for corrugated containers, has exhibited stable year-over-year growth. Volumes increased from 1990 to 2001 at an average compound annual growth rate of 3.6%, which was nearly twice that of GDP growth over the same period. During that time period, there was only one year in which demand for containerboard declined. The fundamental drivers of this growth include the stable demand for consumer products, such as food and beverages, agricultural produce, and household goods and appliances, which account for 56% of all corrugated container end-use in Western Europe, and the growing trade of packaged products.
87
According to Jaakko Pöyry, Western European containerboard production and demand have historically been in good balance. Furthermore, due to the substantial amount of lead-time necessary to plan and build a new paper machine, future additions to containerboard capacity are highly visible. Based upon announced containerboard mill expansion projects, Jaakko Pöyry forecasts a continuation of the current industry equilibrium over the next two to three years as new capacity increases, both decided and planned, are expected to be met by increasing demand. The majority of the capacity increases planned over the next few years in Europe will increase recycled containerboard production capacity. Jaakko Pöyry projects Western European containerboard demand to grow at a 2.7% average compound annual growth rate from 2001 through 2005.
Containerboard pricing is driven primarily by price movements in OCC and wood pulp while corrugated container pricing is driven primarily by movements in containerboard pricing. Price increases at the corrugated level tend to lag behind containerboard price movements, sometimes by months. As a result, the greater the level of forward integration, the slower generally is the rate of change in net profits resulting from containerboard price movements.
Recycled waste paper, principally OCC, is the principal raw material used in the manufacture of our products. These recycled fiber prices can vary widely at times and are very dependent upon mill demand. While wood prices are relatively stable, fluctuations in Asian demand and reduced collections in the United States have been the principal factors driving the price of OCC.
Historically, the market for paper-based packaging products and paperboard has tended to be cyclical. Because of the capital intensity of the production facilities and the long lead time between the planning and completion of a new mill, capacity cannot readily be adapted to changing demand conditions. This has resulted in significant short-term imbalances when capacity has exceeded demand, leading to significant price cuts and inventory growth. More recently, the industry has reacted to reduced demand by taking downtime and by rationalizing high cost or inefficient capacity.
The result has been a moderation in the rate of actual and projected European capacity expansion and a period of relative price stability. In addition, exports from the United States, the world's largest producer of containerboard, had been tempered by the relative strength of the U.S. dollar, which made U.S. products less competitive in export markets. Even with the recent relative weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain European currencies, we have not seen a significant increase in imported U.S. products because of recent capacity reductions in the United States and we believe that this implies that it is increasingly probable that Europe will produce for Europe and the Americas for the Americas.
For example, in contrast to the overall containerboard market, Europe is a net importer of kraftliner. Demand for imported kraftliner is substantially met by North American exports and a limited supply from Eastern Europe. Kraftliner exports from the United States to Western Europe traditionally drove European kraftliner pricing. However, U.S. export volumes have dropped significantly in recent years (12% of Western European consumption in 2001 versus 23% of Western European consumption in 1998) as the strong U.S. dollar and high transportation costs made U.S. exports less competitive in the European market. Accordingly, significant capacity in the U.S. market was permanently rationalized, as it is less competitive in international markets.
88
BUSINESS
Our Company
We are the largest European-based integrated manufacturer of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products, with operations in Europe, Latin America and the United States and Canada. JSG, which was incorporated in Ireland in 1934 as the owner of a single converting plant, has grown to its current global position, owning, after giving effect to the exchange of assets with SSCC, 45 mills, most of which produce containerboard used to manufacture our corrugated containers, 194 converting plants, most of which convert containerboard into corrugated containers, 31 reclamation facilities, which provide some of the wastepaper requirements for our mills, and 31 other production facilities worldwide. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we generated net sales, net loss and EBITDA of €4,779 million, €30 million and €615 million, respectively, on a pro forma basis. Our European, Latin American and North American operations accounted for approximately 74%, 16% and 10%, respectively, of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 on a pro forma basis.
We command a leading share of the European corrugated container market and are one of Europe's largest producers of containerboard. In Latin America, we are the largest producer of corrugated containers and the second largest producer of containerboard. Through our North American operations, we are the second largest producer of corrugated containers in Canada. We are also a world leading producer of décor base paper, which is used as a laminate in furniture and flooring and is one of our fastest growing products.
Our containerboard mills and converting operations are highly integrated, as our corrugated container plants convert much of our containerboard production. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we produced approximately 3,000,000 metric tons of containerboard and a similar volume of corrugated containers. In addition, our mills produced over 1,000,000 metric tons of other grades of paperboard and paper, such as sack kraft, which is used to make industrial-grade paper sacks, and boxboard, which is used for folding cartons, together with non-packaging grades, such as décor base paper, graphic board and printing and writing paper. Our conversion plants produced 265,000 metric tons of other paper-based packaging products, such as paper sacks and folding cartons.
We have historically enjoyed strong operating cash flows due, in part, to the stable growth in demand for consumer products, such as food and beverages, agricultural produce and household goods and appliances, all of which are predominantly shipped in corrugated containers. In addition, our strong cash flows are a result of our leading market positions, economies of scale, high level of integration, cost competitive and well-positioned operations, diversified product offerings, geographic diversity, extensive customer base and experienced management.
Competitive Strengths
Leading Market Positions and Economies of Scale. The industry in which we operate remains fragmented, and few of our competitors have comparable scales of production. We are one of Europe's largest integrated producers of containerboard and corrugated containers. We are the leading producer of kraftliner and the second largest producer of testliner in Europe and command a leading share of the European corrugated container market. In Latin America, we are the largest producer of corrugated containers and the second largest producer of containerboard. The scale and density of our production network allows us to benefit from economies of scale in purchasing, production, distribution, marketing, research and development and the application of best practices. In addition, our extensive European presence allows us to provide better service to our pan-European customers. The financial barriers to entry into the containerboard segment and our long-standing customer relationships in the converting segment also help to protect our leading market positions.
89
Highly Integrated Producer. We are a highly integrated producer of containerboard and corrugated packaging products. We have the ability to utilize substantially all of our containerboard mills' production internally because our converting plants' volume requirements for containerboard generally meet or exceed our mills' production. We believe we can manage our operations to achieve more stable earnings than competitors that are not as integrated. Integration provides us with such stability, largely because fluctuations in the earnings of our mills tend to be offset by changes in the earnings of our converting operations. Moreover, our high level of integration ensures consistent demand for our mills' containerboard production, which allows us to optimize capacity utilization, even during trough demand periods. This integration also secures containerboard supply for our converting plants during peak demand periods. In addition, our vertical integration allows us to realize certain efficiencies throughout the production process by increasing control over the quality of the containerboard, its particular specifications and the timing of delivery to our converting facilities.
Cost Competitive and Well-Positioned Manufacturing Base. Our containerboard mill system benefits from a favorable cost position in the production and delivery of containerboard and thus has been consistently profitable. We believe that we incur among the lowest delivered cost to our customers as a result of our efficient, long-lived manufacturing base and the close proximity of our mills to customers and raw material sources. In addition, according to Jaakko Pöyry, we operate the two lowest delivered-cost European kraftliner mills.
Diversified Product Offerings, Geographic Markets and Customer Base. With leading positions in the production of kraftliner, testliner, corrugated containers and specialties, an operating presence in 20 countries and thousands of customers, our cash flows are broadly diversified across product offerings, geography and customer type. Our management believes that this diversification reduces our dependence on any single product, economy, market or customer and helps to offset the cyclical nature of the paper and packaging business.
Experienced Management with Substantial Equity Interest. We have an experienced senior management team with an average of approximately 20 years of experience with JSG. Following the transactions, we will be led by Dr. Michael Smurfit (Chairman), Gary McGann (Chief Executive Officer), Anthony Smurfit (Chief Operating Officer) and Ian Curley (Chief Financial Officer). These senior executives have invested approximately €61.0 million in equity of our parent. In addition, 214 other JSG managers have invested approximately €13.0 million in equity of parent. We believe that these equity stakes which, in combination with a significant option-based compensation program, collectively represent up to 20% of the fully diluted ownership of our parent, will provide a significant incentive to achieve financial targets.
Principal Shareholder with Proven Paper and Packaging Sector Expertise. Madison Dearborn is one of the world's largest and most experienced private equity investment firms. Madison Dearborn invests across a broad range of industries with a principal focus on basic industrial sectors, including the paper and packaging sector. Madison Dearborn is considered to be among the most active private equity investors in the U.S. in the paper and packaging industry, having previously made investments in Packaging Corporation of America, Riverwood International Corp., Buckeye Cellulose Corporation and Bay State Paper Holdings.
Business Strategy
Our primary strategic objectives are to deleverage rapidly and strengthen our position as one of the world's leading providers of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products. The key elements of our strategy are as follows:
Aggressively Reduce Debt. Our top priority is to reduce debt. To do so, we will maximize our cash flow available for debt reduction through transaction-related cost reductions, the continuation of our disciplined capital expenditure program and the divestiture of non-core operating and
90
non-operating assets. Management and Madison Dearborn have identified transaction-related cash cost reductions in overhead and procurement which we believe will have a positive annualized effect on EBITDA of approximately €31.5 million, independent of management's ongoing operating cost reduction programs. Over the last five years, our capital expenditures have remained below depreciation levels, reflecting our strategy of growing through the acquisition of well-invested assets instead of building new capacity. Going forward, we intend to continue leveraging our well-invested asset base through a disciplined capital expenditure program focused on return on invested capital in which annual expenditures remain below depreciation levels. Finally, we own a number of non-operating and non-core assets that can be sold at attractive prices in the short- and medium-term.
Pursue Continuous Operating Improvements. We intend to continue focusing on operating improvements, including leveraging our technical design and production tools, which we believe will reduce costs and improve the value we provide to our customers. We are implementing a program designed to improve profits across JSG by reducing costs in areas such as raw materials, services, transportation and spare parts through the sharing of information, increased coordination and exchange of best practices within JSG. We annually undertake a focused review of fixed and variable costs, and we intend to maintain our well-positioned manufacturing base through benchmarking, improving asset utilization and realizing centralization savings.
Optimize Business Portfolio. Management plans to review its portfolio of businesses on an ongoing basis to identify opportunities to realize value by exiting businesses that are both not critical for JSG from a strategic perspective and are capable of being sold to third parties at attractive prices. In addition, we believe we have historically been able to acquire strategic assets at well below their replacement cost, and we consider acquisitions a more capital-efficient and responsible method of expanding our operations. Therefore, we plan to pursue selected acquisitions if opportunities arise that meet both our stringent return on capital requirements and our business objectives of increasing integration and otherwise strengthening our competitive position.
History
JSG was originally incorporated in Ireland as a private company on January 15, 1934, becoming a public company on June 30, 1964. JSG was re-registered as a public limited company on February 1, 1985. On November 18, 2002, JSG converted to a private limited company.
We have grown from our original Irish base to become a major international manufacturer of containerboard, corrugated containers and other paper-based packaging products with operations in 20 countries. Initial expansion in Ireland in the 1960s and early 1970s was followed by a series of acquisitions in the United Kingdom, the United States, Latin America and, during the 1990s, in continental Europe. In 1998, we extended our operations to Canada with the acquisition of a 50% holding in Smurfit MBI, formerly MacMillan Bathurst, the remaining 50% being owned by our former associate, SSCC.
We continue to expand our geographic reach and to simplify our overall structure. Apart from the SSCC Asset Swap, some of our more recent material acquisitions and investments are as follows:
- •
- 100% of Neopac, our first Danish acquisition, in July 2000, for approximately €30 million;
- •
- the remaining 25% share of Nettingsdorfer, our Austrian kraftliner mill, in December 2000, for a non-interest bearing note of approximately €55 million in aggregate principal amount due in 2003;
- •
- 100% of Norcor, a corrugated facility in the United Kingdom, in February 2000, for approximately €35 million; and
91
- •
- an additional 67% share in Munksjö AB, our former Swedish associate, on March 28, 2002, for approximately €274 million and acquired debt of €150 million. We are presently in the process of acquiring the remaining share capital of Munksjö.
Operations
Our main focus is on the production of containerboard and its conversion into corrugated containers. We also produce boxboard, sack kraft paper, greyboard and non-packaging grades of paper, as well as converted products such as folding cartons and paper sacks.
Containerboard, boxboard, sack kraft paper and greyboard (comprised of graphic board and solid board packaging) are all forms of paperboard. Containerboard is a form of paperboard used primarily for the production of corrugated materials. Boxboard is used for the production of folding cartons. Sack kraft paper is used for the production of durable paper sacks. Greyboard is used for the production of, among other things, book covers.
We use OCC and, to a lesser extent, wood to produce our paperboard and paper. We then use the paperboard and paper that we produce as a source of raw materials for our converted product facilities, and we also sell some of our paperboard and paper to third parties. We outsource some paperboard and paper from third parties as raw materials for our converted product facilities, particularly where, for reasons of geographic proximity or price, it can be more efficiently outsourced.
OCC is the principal raw material used in our production of paperboard and is the essential component of testliner, one of the two types of containerboard we produce. Wood is the principal component used in the manufacture of the second type of containerboard we make, which is called kraftliner. Both testliner and kraftliner serve as the outer facing component of containerboard.
There is significant price volatility in the market for OCC. However, the market for wood is relatively stable. Accordingly, to the extent that we are able to source wood that we convert into virgin pulp at our own mills, we have a raw material source with greater price stability that helps protect margins. Our Latin American mills in Colombia and Venezuela primarily use wood from our nearby forestry operations and thereby benefit from the price stability of this raw material source.
We make a relatively higher margin on our production of kraftliner than we do on our production of testliner. Demand for kraftliner, however, is price sensitive relative to testliner, which moderates our ability to raise prices during an upturn in the industry cycle. We believe that the market demand for testliner in Europe and in Latin America will grow over time at a faster rate than the market demand for kraftliner, and we believe that we are well positioned in these markets to respond to this expected change in demand mix.
Our operations are managed on the basis of three regions: Europe, Latin America and the United States and Canada. After completion of the SSCC Asset Swap, we will no longer conduct significant operations in North America.
92
The table below shows a regional breakdown of our production volumes in 2002.
Product
| | Europe(1)
| | Latin America(2)
| | United States and Canada(3)
| | Total JSG
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Raw materials: | | | | | | | | |
Recycling | | 586 | | 244 | | — | | 830 |
Market pulp | | 116 | | — | | — | | 116 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total raw materials | | 702 | | 244 | | — | | 946 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Mill: | | | | | | | | |
Containerboard | | 2,358 | | 543 | | — | | 2,901 |
Sack kraft | | 114 | | 42 | | — | | 156 |
Boxboard | | — | | 150 | | — | | 150 |
Greyboard | | 284 | | — | | — | | 284 |
Other paperboard | | — | | 39 | | — | | 39 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total containerboard and other paperboard | | 2,756 | | 774 | | — | | 3,530 |
Newsprint(4) | | — | | — | | 101 | | 101 |
Other non-packaging paper(5) | | 228 | | 72 | | — | | 300 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total mill | | 2,984 | | 846 | | 101 | | 3,931 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Conversion: | | | | | | | | |
Corrugated containers | | 2,038 | | 573 | | 493 | | 3,104 |
Paper sacks | | 96 | | 20 | | — | | 116 |
Folding cartons | | 28 | | 47 | | — | | 75 |
Other(6) | | 73 | | 1 | | — | | 74 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total conversion | | 2,235 | | 641 | | 493 | | 3,369 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Munksjö's volumes are included from April 1, 2002.
- (2)
- Argentina, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Venezuela and Puerto Rico.
- (3)
- In 2001, we sold our two U.S. wastepaper reclamation plants and, in 2002, we sold our U.S. commercial printing business.
- (4)
- Our newsprint business is no longer part of our operations.
- (5)
- Other grades of non-packaging papers include printing and writing paper, tissue, décor base and other specialty papers.
- (6)
- Other converted products include solid board packaging (made from greyboard) as well as a limited volume of non-packaging products such as tissue and tube and core production. The tube and core production facilities were sold in late 2001. In Europe, other converted products include products in both our packaging and specialties segments (under "Paper-based packaging products").
Europe
Within Europe, our largest region, we have two production segments, packaging and specialties. In addition, we also derive profits from our two European associates, Papelera Navarra and Duropack.
Our European packaging segment is comprised principally of our containerboard mills and corrugated container plants. These operations are highly integrated, with the equivalent of approximately 95% of the containerboard produced being converted into corrugated containers in our plants. In addition, the packaging segment includes our production of sack kraft paper and printing and writing paper. Our specialties segment is principally comprised of our décor base paper and greyboard
93
production, as well as our paper sack, solid board packaging and folding carton operations in addition to our non-packaging activities.
Paperboard. The principal paperboard product in our packaging segment is containerboard. However, our mills produce other grades of paperboard for use in packaging products, such as sack kraft paper for use in the production of durable paper sacks.
The tables below show the production volumes of these operations in the last three years.
Containerboard, Other Paper and Paperboard
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Containerboard | | 2,365 | | 2,269 | | 2,358 |
Sack kraft | | 116 | | 117 | | 114 |
Other paperboard | | 93 | | 119 | | — |
Other non-packaging paper(1) | | 51 | | 46 | | 47 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total(2) | | 2,625 | | 2,551 | | 2,519 |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Other grades of non-packaging paper in our packaging segment consist of printing and writing paper.
- (2)
- Excludes greyboard production of approximately 45,000 metric tons per year for the three years presented at our Loenen mill in The Netherlands. These volumes were reported in JSG's specialties segment beginning in 2002.
OCC is the principal raw material for our paperboard mills. While we have our own reclamation operations in Ireland and the United Kingdom, we source most of our OCC requirements on the open market. In addition to our recycled paperboard mills, we have three mills in Europe for which wood pulp is the primary raw material. These are our two kraftliner mills, Facture in France and Nettingsdorfer in Austria, and our Spanish sack kraft mill, Smurfit Nervion. While Nettingsdorfer purchases its wood fiber requirements on the open market, we cooperate with the landowners to develop forest resources, primarily in the Aquitaine region of France, which facilitates the supply of wood fiber (which is relatively more price stable than other raw material sources) to Facture and Nervion.
Other than containerboard, our main grade of paperboard in this segment is sack kraft paper. Sack kraft paper is mainly made from wood pulp and is used in the production of multi-wall paper sacks. In 2002, we produced approximately 114,000 metric tons of sack kraft paper, predominantly at our Nervion mill in Spain. Almost 50% of the Nervion mill's output in 2002 was sold to our own conversion operations, which form part of our specialties segment.
Paper-based packaging products. The raw material for our paper-based packaging products is paperboard, primarily containerboard. Our conversion plants convert paperboard into corrugated containers and paper-based packaging products. The predominant product of our packaging segment is corrugated containers.
Paper-based Packaging Products
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Corrugated containers | | 1,980 | | 1,915 | | 2,038 |
Other(1) | | 47 | | 93 | | 53 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 2,027 | | 2,008 | | 2,091 |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Other converted products in our packaging segment include solid board packaging (made from greyboard).
94
Corrugated containers are sold to a broad range of manufacturers of consumable goods and are used to ship a range of diverse consumer products, such as food and beverages, agricultural produce, and household goods and electrical appliances. Corrugated products are also used for many other applications. We provide innovative packaging solutions with an emphasis on the value-added aspects of our corrugated containers in terms of design and presentation, including the use of multicolor graphics. Some of our value-added products and services include point-of-sale displays, "white top," a specialty grade of kraftliner on which graphics can be printed, and Innobook, a comprehensive product database which gives our customers the ability to customize their corrugated containers.
Our corrugated container plants are widely spread across the various regional and international markets that we serve. In Europe, our largest regional market, we are one of the largest integrated producers of corrugated containers, with an estimated 14% market share in 2002. We believe that we are the market leader in France, Ireland and Italy and one of the leading two or three producers in the United Kingdom, Spain and The Netherlands.
Our European specialties segment includes our principal greyboard mills together with our paper sack, folding carton operations and, following the acquisition of Munksjö in March 2002, décor base, tissue and other specialty non-packaging papers. In 2002, Munksjö produced over 240,000 metric tons of these specialty non-packaging papers. The table below shows our production volumes in the last three years with Munksjö included from April 1, 2002.
Paper and Paperboard
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Greyboard | | 297 | | 276 | | 284 |
Décor base, tissue and other speciality non-packaging papers | | — | | — | | 181 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 297 | | 276 | | 465 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Paper-based Packaging Products
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Paper sacks | | 99 | | 109 | | 96 |
Folding cartons | | 27 | | 21 | | 28 |
Other(1) | | 18 | | 18 | | 20 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 144 | | 148 | | 144 |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Munksjö's tissue production is the main component within other paper-based packaging products following the disposal of our British tube producing plants in late 2001.
Greyboard is a recycled board, the principal uses of which are bookbinding, puzzles, stationery, in which case it may be called graphic board, and packaging boxes, in which case it may be called solid board. We believe that we are currently the second largest producer in Europe of greyboard, primarily graphic board, with a total output in 2002 of over approximately 284,000 metric tons.
Multi-wall paper sacks are used in a wide range of industries including agriculture, food and cement. While the industrial products sector predominates, the use of these durable sacks is growing in the retail or take-home sector where paper sacks provide a convenient means of carrying such goods as pet food and "do-it-yourself" products. Our paper sack plants are based in the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Ireland, Italy and Sweden.
95
We produce folding cartons in Ireland, the United Kingdom and Italy, constituting a relatively small proportion of each country's market. Total folding carton production in 2002 amounted to 28,000 metric tons.
As of March 28, 2002, Munksjö, our former Swedish associate, became a subsidiary of JSG. Our equity stake in Munksjö is now approximately 99.6%. Munksjö's principal specialty grade is décor base paper, which is used as an outer layer on particle board and plywood in the manufacture of furniture, kitchen units, flooring, walls and other products. Munksjö produces décor base paper at five mills, four of which are located in Europe and one of which is located in the United States. Other specialty grades include electro technical paper (used for insulating high-voltage cables), sandpaper, thin paper (used as a protective layer between sheets of glass or steel) and tissue paper. These other grades are produced at Munksjö's Scandinavian mills. Munksjö also produces wood pulp at its Aspa mill in Sweden.
We have historically derived a significant portion of our earnings from our share of associates' earnings. Our two main European associates are Papelera Navarra of Spain and Duropack of Austria, both of which produce mainly containerboard and corrugated containers. Papelera Navarra also produces a specialty paper used in the manufacture of paper bags.
Latin America
In Latin America, we are the largest producer of corrugated containers and the second largest producer of containerboard. Our Latin American operations are located principally in Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Argentina.
The table below sets out our Latin American production volumes in the last three years.
Containerboard, Other Paper and Paperboard
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Containerboard | | 501 | | 525 | | 543 |
Sack kraft | | 37 | | 36 | | 42 |
Boxboard | | 179 | | 168 | | 150 |
Other paperboard | | 36 | | 30 | | 39 |
Other non-packaging paper(1) | | 70 | | 69 | | 72 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 823 | | 828 | | 846 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Paper-based Packaging Products
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Corrugated containers | | 500 | | 584 | | 573 |
Paper sacks | | 30 | | 29 | | 20 |
Folding cartons | | 63 | | 59 | | 47 |
Other | | 10 | | 1 | | 1 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 603 | | 673 | | 641 |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- In our Latin American operations, other non-packaging paper includes only printing and writing paper.
Our Latin American operations are highly integrated, from the reclamation of wastepaper and the production of wood pulp to the conversion into paper-based packaging products of a substantial portion of the paperboard produced by our mills. Our reclamation operations, located in Venezuela,
96
Puerto Rico, Colombia and Mexico, processed approximately 245,000 metric tons of OCC in 2002. The OCC we process in Venezuela and Puerto Rico is consumed entirely by our mills in Venezuela, largely satisfying their recycled fiber requirements. Likewise, the OCC we process in Colombia is consumed entirely by our mills in Colombia, largely satisfying Colombia's recycled fiber requirements. Our paperboard mills in Mexico purchase the major part of their recycled fiber requirements from third parties.
We also have forestry operations in Latin America. In Colombia and Venezuela, we own over 230,000 acres (95,000 hectares) and manage a further 10,000 acres (4,100 hectares). These plantations provide the local mills with a significant portion of their total wood fiber needs. Because wood has more stable pricing than both the pre-processed virgin pulp that we purchase from third parties and OCC, our mills that source from these plantations benefit from relatively greater margin protection. We generally procure the remaining portion of raw materials that is not provided by our own forestry resources through long-term contracts with third parties.
Mexico is the largest of the four main Latin American markets in which we operate. We believe we are the second largest manufacturer of paperboard and paper-based packaging products in Mexico. Additionally, we also believe that we are the leading producer in Colombia and Venezuela and one of the largest in Argentina.
United States and Canada
Our principal subsidiary operation is Smurfit MBI of Canada. Smurfit MBI, which is the second largest producer of corrugated containers in Canada with 12 corrugated plants. In connection with the SSCC Asset Swap, we transferred our 50% ownership interest in Smurfit MBI of Canada in exchange for certain of SSCC's European assets.
Our principal subsidiary operation in the United States on an historical basis was our 150,000 metric tons per year capacity recycled newsprint mill in Pomona, California. This newsprint business is no longer part of our operations as it has been transferred in connection with the Newco credit facility and is being held for sale. We sold two U.S. wastepaper reclamation plants in 2001 and our U.S. commercial and election printing business in early 2002.
The table below sets out the production volumes of our historical United States and Canada subsidiaries in the last three years. Smurfit MBI has been accounted for as a subsidiary since June 1999. We no longer have any ownership interest in Smurfit MBI.
Containerboard, Other Paper and Paperboard
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Newsprint | | 149 | | 135 | | 101 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 149 | | 135 | | 101 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Paper-based Packaging Products
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
| | (metric tons in thousands)
|
---|
Corrugated containers | | 497 | | 491 | | 493 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 497 | | 491 | | 493 |
| |
| |
| |
|
We currently own one mill in North America.
97
Marketing and Sales
We concentrate our marketing and sales activities in our regional and local business units in order to remain close to our customers, our competitors and local market developments. On a worldwide basis, we predominantly sell directly to the end-user rather than through agents. Our marketing strategy is to focus on the quality of products and the high caliber of service we offer to our customers. This strategy is geared towards maintaining margins for our products throughout the business cycle and enhancing profitability. Through continuous communication with customers, our goal is to improve the quality of service we provide.
The marketing strategy for our mills is to profitably maximize sales of products to converters located within an economically reasonable shipping distance from each mill. The strategy in the corrugated container and other converting plants focuses on both customized products tailored to fit customers' needs and high volume sales of commodity products. Most sales of converted products are made on the basis of contracts for specified volumes. These contracts are priced based on a number of factors such as country, currency, volume, weight and geographic area and most provide for periodic price adjustments. We are actively seeking to broaden the customer base for each of our markets rather than concentrate on only a few accounts for each plant.
No single customer accounts for more than 5% of our global sales.
Patents, Licenses and Research and Development
The paper and packaging industry is not characterized by proprietary products and, although we hold or are licensed to use certain patents, the successful continuation of any important part of our business is not dependent upon such patents.
Accordingly, the focus of research on papermaking is on providing the materials that will enable our converting operations and other packaging manufacturers to meet the challenges of a changing market place. In recent years, the focus in the corrugated container industry, for example, has been on more efficiently meeting the performance characteristics required of the corrugated container as a transport and storage medium. In addition to improved containerboard quality, research programs have provided improvements in printing processes. Furthermore, the need to meet the changing demands of customers' automated packaging lines requires us to stay abreast of innovations in industrial processes.
Competition
The markets in which we operate are international, highly competitive and comprised of many participants. While containerboard and many other paperboard and paper grades are marketed and sold internationally, the paper-based packaging industry tends to be more regionally or locally based. Many of the largest producers have multinational operations, but there are also many smaller regional and local operators. Some producers have fully integrated operations from forestry and waste fiber through to paper and paperboard and on to paper-based packaging while others focus more narrowly on certain intermediate or end products or in certain markets.
Although no single company is dominant, we do face significant competitors in each of our businesses and geographic markets in which we operate. Our competitors include other large vertically integrated companies as well as numerous smaller companies. The European and Latin American containerboard markets are more fragmented than the U.S. and Canadian markets. According to Jaakko Pöyry, in 2000 there were 151 containerboard producers in Western Europe, with the top five producers having a 42% share of the total capacity as compared to 53 containerboard suppliers in North America with the top five having a 57% share of total capacity. In Latin America, the top ten
98
containerboard producers accounted for approximately 57% of total capacity. Our principal competitors in each of the three geographic regions in which we operate are listed in the table below:
Europe
| | Latin America
| | United States and Canada
|
---|
DS Smith plc | | Cartonajes Estrella, S.A. de C.V. | | Georgia-Pacific Corporation |
Kappa Packaging B.V. | | Corporacion Durango, S.A. de C.V. | | International Paper Co. |
Sociedad Anónima Industrias Celulosa Aragonesa (SAICA) | | Klabin S.A. | | Norampac Temple-Inland Inc. |
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget (SCA) | | | | Weyerhaeuser Company |
The level of competition in a given product market may be affected by the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and the euro and other market factors including geographic location, general economic conditions and the operating efficiencies of competitors. Although price is an important factor because many of our products are characterized by commodity pricing, other factors affecting competition include product quality and performance, service and product innovation. In addition, our paper-based packaging products compete with various other packaging materials, including products made of plastic and wood.
The markets in which we operate are large relative to the production capacity of any one company, particularly with respect to paper and paperboard. Due to the high density and consequent easy transportability of paper and paperboard, the geographic market for kraftliner is worldwide. Because of cost constraints relating to transport, the geographic market for testliner is regional. The geographic market for converted products, such as corrugated containers, is somewhat limited by the low density and larger required transport space, which results in higher transportation costs for converted products.
Environmental Issues
We are subject to a wide range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These requirements are complex, frequently changing and tend to become more stringent over time. We are committed to environmental, health and safety excellence and devote substantial resources to tracking applicable requirements and monitoring compliance. We cannot assure you that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with all such requirements or that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with such requirements in the future.
Compliance with Environmental Regulatory Requirements
The most significant impact from environmental, health and safety regulatory requirements on our operations relates to our mills, which constitute 42 of our 284 facilities. Our manufacturing processes result in discharges to water and emissions to air, and they can produce elevated noise levels. At the same time, most of our mills are recycle mills, and do not handle black liquor (a by-product of certain pulping operations) or employ chlorine bleaching, which in each case can create additional environmental challenges. Nonetheless, we are affected by increasingly stringent environmental regulations in the countries where we operate.
In order to comply with these increasingly stringent environmental requirements, we plan to upgrade the wastewater treatment systems at many of our European and Latin American mills over the next three years. The most significant upgrades will be at our mills at Nettingsdorfer, Austria, and Facture, France, each of which are in the process of obtaining new environmental permits, and at the Hoya mill in Germany (to be acquired in the SSCC Asset Swap). We also have planned capital expenditures to address air emissions, solid waste and noise at other mills.
In addition, our mill in Nervion, Spain has a landfill which was used between 1975 and 1985 to store waste calcium carbonate prior to its application as a neutralizing agent to farming and forest lands. In 1985, the provincial government required us to cease the land application, and we stopped
99
using the landfill for storage and began disposing of the material offsite. In 1998, in response to complaints from the local municipality, we conducted a hydrogeological study to assess the potential impacts of the landfill on the Ibaizabal River. The study concluded that the material has not adversely affected the river, but it can affect the pH of storm water runoff. We installed a collecting drain around the material to collect and treat storm water. We are currently under no regulatory obligation to take further action. If we elect to remove the material at some future time or if a regulatory obligation to remove the material is imposed in the future, the cost would be approximately €5 million, which would be incurred over a period of five to ten years.
Our mills in Europe will also be affected by the European Union's Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, or IPPC, program. The IPPC program requires member countries to ensure that industries employ Best Available Technologies, or BAT, for all environmental aspects of their operations, including wastewater discharges, air emissions, noise, energy use and environmental management. Most of our European mills will be required to obtain permits imposing BAT by 2007. The resulting cost impact on us is uncertain because the BAT have not yet been finally established. Many of our mills are located in countries that already have stringent permitting requirements, and these mills may already be operating at or close to BAT. Other mills will likely require upgrades in order to comply with IPPC. Overall, we have incurred approximately €12 million in capital expenditures for environmental controls at our facilities worldwide in fiscal year 2002 and expect to incur approximately €14 million in fiscal year 2003. We anticipate that our annual environmental capital expenditures will continue at this level, or will increase moderately, through 2007 to comply with IPPC and other environmental requirements.
Our European operations are also subject to the European Union's Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste, which imposes mandatory targets for the recovery and recycling of packaging wastes. Member countries were required to comply with the Directive by 2001, but implementation to date has varied greatly from country to country. We do not expect the Directive to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, primarily because the targets imposed by the Directive are not significantly higher than the existing levels of recovery and recycling in most member countries.
Our European mills may also be subject to laws stemming from the Kyoto Protocol, by which the European Union agreed to reduce emissions of "greenhouse gasses" by 8%, as compared with 1990 emission levels, over the first commitment period (2008-2012). Participating countries must have made "demonstrable progress" in achieving this reduction commitment by 2005. The European pulp and paper industry has announced its concern that the Kyoto Protocol may adversely impact the competitiveness of the industry and has called on the European Union to consider industry-wide impacts as it decides how to implement the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol will not become binding until a sufficient number of industrialized nations have ratified it. Nonetheless, the European Union has begun regulatory actions necessary to achieve compliance with the Kyoto Protocol's emission reduction commitment. If ratified, the impact of the Kyoto Protocol will depend upon several factors, including: (1) how efficiently we use energy, as compared with our competitors; (2) how well the emissions trading regime will assist us in complying with the Kyoto Protocol; and (3) the extent to which we will be able to earn emissions credits for our forestry holdings as greenhouse gas "sinks." We believe our larger mills in Europe are already quite energy efficient. They make use of either combined heat and power systems or have on-site co-generation facilities. Nonetheless, our smaller European mills are less energy efficient and may present compliance challenges, depending upon how the emissions trading regime is implemented. Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. We maintain accounting reserves with regard to certain liability matters and believe that such reserves conform with acceptable accounting principles.
We presently are not involved in any environmental regulatory legal proceedings which are expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.
100
Environmental Contamination
We may also be held liable for releases of contaminants from our operations, or historical contamination that is discovered at our facilities or facilities that we have divested.
The IPPC program will require, as part of the permit process, that our European mills conduct "baseline" environmental investigations. While the purpose of the baseline investigations is not to force a facility to clean up historical contamination that is detected, several member countries intend to review the results of the investigations and, if significant contamination is detected, may issue orders to address the contamination. Thus, the baseline investigations may result in our having to address contamination that is currently undetected at some of our mills. The cost of the baseline investigations is not expected to be material. The cost of addressing the contamination, if necessary, will depend upon the extent of contamination detected and the required remedies, and therefore, cannot yet be predicted. We may also be required to address contamination at any mills we decide to close or have sold in the past.
In November 2001, black liquor was released from our mill in Nervion, Spain to the local municipal waste water treatment plant in Iurreta, Spain. As a result of the waste water treatment plant being unable to handle this additional load, the contamination reached the Ibaizabal River and caused a fish kill. An ecological group filed a complaint for an ecological crime. This resulted in preliminary assessments, which took place during December 2001 and February 2002. Three individuals, including the mill manager, have provided evidence. This matter is at a very preliminary phase, and we have not been formally named or charged in a proceeding.
Our Facture, France mill is the subject of litigation arising from ruptures of sewer pipe seals that resulted in contamination in 1997 and 1987. Remedial repairs have been estimated at €6.4 million, which will be shared between several companies. We do not expect our share of the repairs to be material.
After we ceased operations at our mill in Poix-Terron, France in 1999, we conducted an environmental investigation of the site as requested by the French authorities. We have established an accounting reserve for remediation of contamination at this site, which we believe to be adequate, and are proceeding with cleanup.
As part of our application for an IPPC permit for our mill in Townsend Hook, U.K., we conducted an environmental investigation in 2001. The investigation detected contamination in portions of the property. We submitted the results of the investigation to the governmental authorities in June 2002, and have not yet received a further directive. We may be required to conduct some soil and/or groundwater cleanup at the site, although we do not expect the associated costs to be material.
Raw Materials
OCC is the principal raw material used in our production of paperboard and is the essential component of testliner, one of the two types of containerboard we produce. Wood is the principal component used in the manufacture of the second type of containerboard we make, which is called kraftliner.
We source most of our OCC supply on the open market; however, at December 31, 2002, we had 26 reclamation plants located in Europe and Latin America, the primary focus of which is the sourcing of fiber for our mills.
We generally procure virgin fiber through long-term relationships with third parties. However, we also source some of our virgin fiber needs from our forestry operations which are located principally in Latin America. In Colombia and Venezuela, we own over 230,000 acres (95,000 hectares) and manage a further 10,000 acres (4,100 hectares). These plantations provide our local mills with a
101
significant portion of their total virgin fiber needs. Our two European kraftliner mills, Facture in France and Nettingsdorfer in Austria, as well as our Spanish sack kraft mill, Smurfit Nervion, use primarily virgin fiber in their production of paperboard.
Increases in the price of wastepaper and virgin fiber as raw materials could result from a variety of factors. The prices we pay for these raw materials tend to be cyclical, subject to significant volatility, and vary on a regional basis. The price of OCC in Europe has peaked dramatically twice in recent years—in June 2000 and in June 2002. In each case, a relatively low level of supply was matched with a relatively high level of demand, principally caused by increased demand from Asia. In each case, the free-on-board price rose to over €150 per metric ton. Within a period of three months, supply and demand conditions leveled to return the price to around €100 per metric ton. The prices we pay for raw materials used in the production of our converted materials made from testliner are similarly volatile.
We believe that our available sources of virgin fiber and OCC (including from our own reclamation activities) will be adequate to supply our raw material needs for the foreseeable future.
Property, Plants and Equipment
Our manufacturing facilities are spread across Europe, Latin America and North America. Our paper and paperboard mills are our main assets. We believe that our facilities are suitable and adequate for our business purposes for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2002, the net book value of our tangible fixed assets amounted to €2,214 million, of which €71 million related to capitalized leased assets.
The table below provides a regional summary of our facilities at December 31, 2002 after giving effect to the SSCC Asset Swap.
Facilities
| | Europe
| | Latin America
| | USA
| | Total JSG
|
---|
Reclamation | | 13 | | 18 | | — | | 31 |
Mills | | 34 | | 10 | | 1 | | 45 |
Corrugated containers | | 137 | | 24 | | — | | 161 |
Folding cartons | | 3 | | 3 | | — | | 6 |
Paper sacks | | 13 | | 3 | | — | | 16 |
Other conversion | | 10 | | 1 | | — | | 11 |
Other | | 29 | | 2 | | — | | 31 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total facilities | | 239 | | 61 | | 1 | | 301 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
At December 31, 2002, the annual productive capacity of our European associates' mills was approximately 185,000 metric tons in total. These figures for our associates are their total capacities rather than our proportionate share of their capacities.
102
Employees
We employed an average of 28,688 people on a full-time equivalent basis in 2002. The table below sets forth the average number of employees for the last three years by region and reporting segment.
Segment/Region
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
---|
Europe: | | | | | | |
| Packaging | | 13,913 | | 13,904 | | 14,619 |
| Specialties | | 3,155 | | 3,157 | | 4,578 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Total | | 17,068 | | 17,061 | | 19,197 |
Latin America | | 6,610 | | 6,659 | | 6,765 |
United States and Canada | | 3,011 | | 3,031 | | 2,726 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | 26,689 | | 26,751 | | 28,688 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Employee numbers in both our packaging and specialties segments in Europe remained stable between 2000 to 2001 but increased in 2002 as a result of the acquisition of Munksjö, with the greatest impact arising in the specialties segment.
There was little change in our employee numbers in Latin America between 2000 to 2001 but acquisitions in 2002 resulted in a modest increase in employee numbers.
Employee numbers in the United States and Canada remained stable between 2000 and 2001 but decreased in 2002 as a result of the disposal of our U.S. printing and voting equipment businesses and the transfer of our newsprint mill to the newcos.
Legal Proceedings
In addition to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, we were involved in certain civil and criminal proceedings in Spain arising out of a past acquisition. In November 1988, a subsidiary of JSG acquired ICSA, a Spanish incorporated company, from a subsidiary of Torras. In early 1989, JSG acquired a 35% interest in another Spanish company, INPACSA, a former parent of ICSA. A number of individuals associated with Torras were charged by the public prosecutor in Madrid with diverting, for their own use, a substantial part of the purchase consideration paid by JSG for ICSA. The public prosecutor, on behalf of the minority shareholders of INPACSA, also claimed that certain transactions, including the transfer of ICSA by INPACSA which took place prior to JSG's acquisition of ICSA, caused damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA. In 1998, the public prosecutor also charged JSG's Chairman, Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, as the representative of JSG, in these proceedings with respect to the alleged damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA and Torras. A JSG subsidiary is also one of a number of parties against whom secondary civil liability had been claimed. JSG and Smurfit International B.V. have each indemnified Dr. Smurfit against loss or liability due to such proceedings. Bonds have been posted with the Spanish court in the amount of €47 million, which equals the amount of alleged damages, excluding interest. The maximum estimated current total exposure relating to the liabilities, including interest through December 31, 2002, is approximately €118 million, for which no reserve has been taken and which amount could accrue interest until payment of any final judgment. Preliminary proceedings commenced in March 2003 and on April 11, 2003, the court dismissed the proceedings against Dr. Smurfit, the JSG subsidiary and others. This decision may be appealed at the conclusion of the proceedings against the remaining defendants. We cannot assure you, however, that the consequences of any future adverse findings, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We are also the subject of litigation in the Dominican Republic arising from the acquisition in 1996 of a controlling interest in a small local corrugator owned by Industria Cartonera Dominicana.
103
The lawsuits, alleging damages in excess of $300 million, are brought by a local competitor who is claiming loss of potential profits, as a consequence of our entry to the market. He is also alleging breach of contract. We believe these lawsuits are without merit and are defending them vigorously.
We have learned that Smurfit Communications, a publishing business owned by one of our subsidiaries, has for a considerable period, overstated the circulation of some of its publications. It is not possible to quantify the exposure to advertisers in the publications, with whom negotiations are being conducted. It is hoped that compensation offered in the form of credits for future advertising, calculated by reference to advertising expenditure in recent years, will be accepted by customers. No legal proceedings have been instituted against Smurfit Communications by any advertiser in respect of the overstatements.
We are also a party to various claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business, including with respect to environmental matters. For more information, see "—Environmental Issues." We believe such claims and legal actions, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Other Non-Core Assets
In 1989, JSG purchased the Kildare Hotel and Country Club, or the K-Club. In addition to golf course facilities that will play host to the Ryder Cup tournament in 2006, the K-Club is also comprised of four residential developments and a hotel. It is our intention to retain the K-Club for the foreseeable future and up to and including the Ryder Cup in 2006.
104
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
JSG is a wholly owned subsidiary of MDCP Acquisitions I, approximately 100% of which is owned by MDP Acquisitions plc, issuer of the notes offered hereby. MDP Acquisitions plc is owned approximately 100% by MDCP Acquisitions Limited, whose owners include Madison Dearborn, certain co-investors and certain management investors identified herein. Certain members of the board of directors of parent also serve as directors of issuer, as noted below. For more information, see "—Management Participation Agreements."
The directors and executive officers of MDCP Acquisitions Limited, and their ages and positions, are as follows:
Name
| | Age
| | Position
|
---|
Michael W.J. Smurfit | | 66 | | Chairman |
Gary W. McGann | | 52 | | Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Anthony P.J. Smurfit | | 39 | | Chief Operations Officer, Chief Executive—Smurfit Europe and Director |
Ian J. Curley | | 41 | | Chief Financial Officer and Director |
John A. Canning, Jr. | | 58 | | Non-executive Director |
Justin S. Huscher | | 49 | | Non-executive Director |
Christopher J. McGowan | | 31 | | Non-executive Director |
Samuel M. Mencoff | | 46 | | Non-executive Director |
Thomas S. Souleles | | 34 | | Non-executive Director |
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit serves as our Chairman. Dr. Smurfit retired as Chief Executive Officer of parent on November 1, 2002. He was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JSG in 1977 prior to which he was a Deputy Chairman and Joint Managing Director. He is currently Chairman of SSCC. In addition, Dr. Smurfit holds the position of Honorary Irish Consul to the Principality of Monaco.
Gary W. McGann serves as our Chief Executive Officer and as a director of issuer and parent. He became Chief Executive Officer in November 2002 upon the retirement of Dr. Smurfit. He was appointed President and Chief Operations Officer of the company on January 28, 2000. He joined JSG in 1998 as Chief Financial Officer. He had previously held a number of senior positions in both the private and public sectors over the last 20 years, including Chief Executive of Gilbeys of Ireland Limited and Aer Lingus Group.
Anthony P.J. Smurfit serves as our Chief Operations Officer, Chief Executive—Smurfit Europe, and as a director of parent. He has worked in various parts of JSG in Europe and the United States. Prior to taking up his position as Chief Executive of Smurfit Europe in October 1999 and Chief Operations Officer on November 1, 2002, he was Deputy Chief Executive of Smurfit Europe and previously Chief Executive Officer of Smurfit France. He is also a director of The Irish National Stud Company.
Ian J. Curley serves as our Chief Financial Officer and as a director of issuer and parent. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer of Smurfit Europe in 1997, prior to which he served as financial controller of Smurfit Continental Europe.
John A. Canning, Jr. serves as a director of parent. Mr. Canning has been employed principally by Madison Dearborn since 1993 and currently serves as its President. From 1969 to 1993, Mr. Canning worked in various positions with First Chicago Corporation, most recently as Executive Vice President of The First National Bank of Chicago and President of First Chicago Venture Capital. Mr. Canning is a member of the board of directors of the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, Inc., Norfolk Tides
105
Baseball Club, LaSalle National Bank, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Children's Inner City Educational Fund.
Justin S. Huscher serves as a director of parent. Mr. Huscher has been employed principally by Madison Dearborn since 1993 and currently serves as a Managing Director. From 1990 until 1993, Mr. Huscher served as Senior Investment Manager of First Chicago Venture Capital. Mr. Huscher is a member of the board of directors of Bay State Paper Holding Company and Packaging Corporation of America.
Christopher J. McGowan serves as a director of parent. Mr. McGowan has been employed principally by Madison Dearborn since 1999 and currently serves as a Vice President. Prior to joining Madison Dearborn, Mr. McGowan attended Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, where he received an M.B.A. Mr. McGowan is a member of the board of directors of AutoTradeCenter, Inc.
Samuel M. Mencoff serves as a director of issuer and parent. Mr. Mencoff has been employed principally by Madison Dearborn since 1993 and currently serves as a Managing Director. From 1987 until 1993, Mr. Mencoff served as Vice President of First Chicago Venture Capital. Mr. Mencoff is a member of the board of directors of Bay State Paper Holding Company, Packaging Corporation of America, Buckeye Technologies, Inc. and Riverwood Holdings, Inc.
Thomas S. Souleles serves as a director of issuer and parent. Mr. Souleles has been employed principally by Madison Dearborn since 1995 and currently serves as a Managing Director. Mr. Souleles is a member of the board of directors of Bay State Paper Holding Company and Packaging Corporation of America.
The mailing address for Dr. Michael Smurfit and Messrs. McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Curley is c/o Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited, Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland and the mailing address for Messrs. Canning, Huscher, McGowan, Mencoff and Souleles is c/o Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., Three First National Plaza, Suite 3800, Chicago, Illinois 60602, United States.
Except as described in this prospectus, there are no arrangements or understandings between any member of the board of directors or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which that person was elected or appointed to his position.
Parent's board of directors has the power to appoint officers. Each officer will hold office for the term determined by parent's board of directors and until such person's successor is chosen and qualified or until such person's death, resignation or removal. The Parent's board of directors has two committees: the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of Samuel Mencoff, Thomas Souleles and Christopher McGowan. The Compensation Committee is comprised of John Canning, Samuel Mencoff and Justin Huscher.
Family Relationships
Mr. Anthony Smurfit is the son of Dr. Michael Smurfit.
Compensation of Directors and Officers
None of parent's directors are entitled to receive any fees for serving as directors. All of the directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses related to their service as directors. The following
106
table summarizes compensation awarded or paid by JSG during 2001 and 2000 to the former directors of JSG who serve as directors and executive officers of parent.
| | Fees
| | Salary
| | Annual Bonus
| | Deferred Bonus
| | Other Benefits(1)
| | 2001 Total
| | 2000 Total
|
---|
| | (euro in thousands)
|
---|
Executive Officers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit(2) | | — | | 1,546 | | 1,397 | | — | | 31 | | 2,974 | | 4,601 |
Mr. Gary W. McGann(3) | | — | | 735 | | 735 | | 205 | | 10 | | 1,685 | | 1,054 |
Mr. Anthony P.J. Smurfit(4) | | 4 | | 410 | | 234 | | — | | 3 | | 651 | | 697 |
- (1)
- Relates principally to use of company cars, travel, accommodation and related costs.
- (2)
- For the periods indicated, Dr. Michael Smurfit served as Chief Executive Officer of JSG.
- (3)
- For the periods indicated, Mr. Gary McGann served as Chief Operations Officer of JSG.
- (4)
- For the periods indicated, Mr. Anthony Smurfit served as Chief Executive—Smurfit Europe.
For the year ended December 31, 2002, the aggregate compensation paid to officers of parent and its subsidiaries, including salaries, bonuses, other benefits and payments to pension plans, was approximately €8,215,000. Of this amount, approximately €1,345,000 was set aside or accrued to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for officer of parent and its subsidiaries and approximately €3,055,000 was paid or is payable to officers in the form of performance related benefits.
Participation in JSG Share Option Schemes and Other Employee Benefit Plans
The following table shows the aggregate number of options to purchase ordinary shares of JSG, the average exercise price of such options and share allocation awards as of December 31, 2001 for each of the individuals who serve as directors and executive officers of parent. All of JSG's existing equity incentive plans terminated in connection with the transactions. For more information regarding the effect of the completion of the offer on outstanding employee incentive awards, see "—Effects of the JSG Acquisition on Plan Awards."
Name
| | No. of Options(1)
| | Average Exercise Price
| | No. of Share Allocation Awards(2)
|
---|
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit | | — | | — | | 4,860,475 |
Mr. Gary W. McGann | | 1,400,000 | | 145.86c | | 2,024,593 |
Mr. Anthony P.J. Smurfit | | 235,000 | | 198.45c | | 540,195 |
Mr. Ian J. Curley | | 285,000 | | 221.71c | | 1,387,383 |
- (1)
- The amounts listed for Mr. McGann reflect stock appreciation rights that will vest upon the completion of the offer.
- (2)
- No additional consideration is payable to exercise such share allocation awards.
For information regarding the security ownership in our parent by our officers and directors, see "Security Ownership."
Management Employment Agreements
MDCP Acquisitions Limited and the management investors listed in the table below, which are referred to collectively as the management investors, have entered into certain letter agreements, dated as of July 4, 2002, regarding the terms of employment of the management investors, which are referred to collectively as the management employment agreements. The terms of each management employment agreement were established pursuant to arm's length negotiations between Madison
107
Dearborn and each management investor. A summary of the material terms of the management employment agreements is set forth below:
Pursuant to the terms of the management employment agreements, the senior management of parent consists of the following:
Name
| | Position with MDCP Acquisitions Limited
|
---|
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit | | Chairman |
Mr. Gary W. McGann | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Mr. Anthony P.J. Smurfit | | Chief Operations Officer and Chief Executive—Smurfit Europe |
Mr. Ian J. Curley | | Chief Financial Officer |
Under the terms of the management employment agreements, each management investor has been provided with a letter from parent, pursuant to which parent has agreed to procure his employment by JSG upon terms described below. Each letter sets forth the management investor's title and principal duties and responsibilities from November 1, 2002.
The payment date of Dr. Smurfit's Management Incentive Plan, or MIP, entitlement for 2002, which was agreed at €1,269,738, was December 20, 2002 as a result of his retirement as Chief Executive Officer.
Dr. Michael Smurfit has a six-year term as Chairman of parent and is entitled to a total benefit package of €2.75 million per annum, with a one year total benefits severance package in the case of termination by parent.
Pursuant to the terms of the management employment agreements, the employment terms applicable to each of Messrs. Gary McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Ian Curley will remain the same as those prevailing as of the date of the management employment agreements, subject only to salary increases previously agreed.
Each of Messrs. Gary McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Ian Curley covenants to parent that he will not exercise his contractual right to leave JSG upon its acquisition by parent and thereby trigger payment obligations from JSG thereunder. In consideration for this undertaking, parent will provide each such individual a "put" letter with terms identical to those currently applicable, except that:
- •
- a "Relevant Event" will be the sale of parent, except that a sale to the underwriters of an initial public offering and sales to Madison Dearborn both within 12 months after the consummation of the offer and the compulsory share acquisition will be excluded; and
- •
- the period within which he must exercise his rights upon a Relevant Event will be 12 months after the Relevant Event or, if his obligation to offer his services to purchasers upon a vesting of his unvested convertible equity is enforced, 12 months following the expiration of such period of employment.
In addition, the management employment agreements provide that in the event of termination of the employment of Messrs. McGann, Anthony Smurfit or Ian Curley by parent or JSG other than for just cause, such individual will be entitled to compensation equal to two times his prevailing annual remuneration/benefits package (including MIP, pension, etc.). Mr. Gary McGann will retain his existing notice period of 360 days but the notice period for Messrs. Anthony Smurfit and Ian Curley will be 90 days.
In consideration for the foregoing severance obligations, each of Messrs. Gary McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Ian Curley will enter into covenants with parent whereby each will agree that, provided the foregoing severance payments have been paid to them, they will not for a period of two years after their termination (i) compete with parent and its subsidiaries in a material part of its business, or (ii) solicit the employees, customers or suppliers of parent and its subsidiaries.
108
Pursuant to the terms of the management employment agreements, the existing MIP will continue, with adjustment from the completion of the offer and the compulsory share acquisition of the performance criteria to reflect that the present earnings per share criteria will no longer be appropriate given the changed capital structure of the business. A minimum payment of 60% of salary will be guaranteed under the MIP to each of Messrs. Gary McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Ian Curley for each of the years 2003 through 2006 and the remaining 40% will be dependent upon the achievement of appropriate objectives established by parent's board of directors or its compensation committee. The amount accrued under the MIP, in relation to Gary McGann and Ian Curley, for 2002 was paid on December 20, 2002.
The existing equity incentive plans in which the management investors previously participated were terminated as of the completion of the offer in accordance with their respective terms and cash and/or shares were paid and/or allocated to the management investors in respect of their respective entitlements at such time.
Management Equity Agreement
Purchase of Parent Equity. Under the Amended and Restated Management Equity Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2002, by and among parent and each of the executives that become party thereto, which we refer to as the management equity agreement, parent undertakes to sell to each executive that is a party to such agreement, certain of parent's ordinary shares, nominal value €0.001 per share, and certain of parent's class A convertible shares, nominal value €0.001 per share, which we refer to as class A convertible shares, class B convertible shares, nominal value €0.001 per share, which we refer to as class B convertible shares, and class C convertible shares, nominal value €0.001 per share, which we refer to as class C convertible shares, each of which is convertible into ordinary shares of parent. Following is a summary of the material terms of the management equity agreement.
Vesting. The class A convertible shares, class B convertible shares and class C convertible shares will be subject to vesting.
So long as the executive is and has continued to be employed by or served as an officer or director for parent and its subsidiaries, such executive's class A convertible shares will vest as follows:
Vesting Date
| | Cumulative Percentage of Class A Convertible Shares Vested
| |
---|
December 31, 2005 | | 33.3 | % |
December 31, 2006 | | 66.7 | % |
December 31, 2007 | | 100.0 | % |
None of an executive's class A convertible shares will become vested if such executive ceases to be employed by, or to serve as an officer or director for, parent or its subsidiaries prior to December 31, 2005. If an executive ceases to be employed by, or to serve as an officer or director for, parent or its subsidiaries on any date other than any vesting date set forth in the table above after December 31, 2005 but prior to December 31, 2007, the cumulative percentage of such executive's class A convertible shares to become vested will be determined on a pro rata basis according to the number of days elapsed from the immediately preceding vesting date. However, upon the sale of parent or certain public listing events, which we refer to as an acceleration event, all of an executive's class A convertible shares will become vested and will convert to an equal number of class D convertible shares of parent, nominal value €0.001 per share, which we refer to as class D convertible shares, unless at such time such executive is no longer employed by, or no longer serves as an officer or director for, parent and its subsidiaries.
On each vesting date set forth in the table above, 33.3% of the aggregate number of each executive's class B convertible shares will become vested if, and only if, the internal rate of return, or IRR, of MDCP IV Global Investments LP, MDCP III Global Investments LP, MDSE III Global
109
Investments LP and any affiliate of the foregoing entities that owns or holds ordinary shares of parent, which we refer to collectively as the MDCP co-investors, exceeds 25%. However, if the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of such vesting date is greater than 15% but less than 25%, the percentage of the aggregate class B convertible shares which will become vested as of such vesting date will be the percentage determined by multiplying 3.33 by the excess of (i) the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of the applicable vesting date over (ii) 15%. Further, if the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of the date of an acceleration event, which we refer to as the acceleration date, is greater than 15% but less than 25%, the percentage of class B convertible shares not previously eligible for vesting prior to the acceleration date that will vest as of such acceleration date will be the percentage determined by multiplying 10 by the excess of (i) the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of the applicable vesting date over (ii) 15%. Vesting with respect to the class B convertible shares will be cumulative such that if the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of an acceleration date or any subsequent applicable vesting date is greater than any preceding applicable vesting date, the percentage of each executive's entire holding of class B convertible shares vested will be recalculated to be equal to the percentage vested for such acceleration date or subsequent applicable vesting date. No class B convertible shares will vest for any executive as of any applicable vesting date or acceleration date if the executive holding such class B convertible shares is no longer employed by, or no longer serves as an officer or director for, parent and its subsidiaries as of such date.
On December 31, 2007, 100% of each executive's class C convertible shares will become vested if, and only if, the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of such date is equal to or greater than 30%. In the event that an acceleration event occurs prior to December 31, 2007, 100% of the class C convertible shares will become vested as of the acceleration date if, and only if, the IRR of the MDCP co-investors as of such acceleration date is equal to or greater than 30%. No class C convertible shares will vest for any executive as of December 31, 2007 or the acceleration date if the executive holding such class C convertible shares is no longer employed by, or no longer serves as an officer or director for, parent and its subsidiaries as of such date.
As a condition to accelerated vesting of an executive's class A convertible shares, class B convertible shares and class C convertible shares in connection with a sale of parent, such executive will, if requested by the purchaser of parent and for no additional consideration therefor, agree to continued employment for up to 12 months following such sale so long as such executive's compensation package and job description is substantially similar immediately following such sale.
Conversion. Each class A convertible share, class B convertible share and class C convertible share will automatically convert into one class D convertible share once it has fully vested. An executive may at any time and from time to time, upon payment in full in cash of the conversion price per share, convert all or any portion of such executive's class D convertible shares into ordinary shares of parent. The conversion price per share will equal the excess of the fair market value of an ordinary share of parent as of the date of sale of a convertible share over the subscription price for such convertible share (or, in the case of class D convertible shares, the subscription price for the convertible share from which it was converted). No convertible share issued under the management equity agreement will be convertible after the seventh anniversary of the date of issuance of such convertible share and with respect to any class D convertible share, the date of issuance for the class A convertible share, class B convertible share or class C convertible share from which such class D convertible share has been converted.
Redemption. In the event any executive ceases to be employed by, or to serve as an officer of or director for, parent or its subsidiaries, which we refer to as a termination, all of such executive's ordinary shares and convertible shares issued or issuable under the management equity agreement (except for ordinary shares purchased by such executive at the closing of the transactions contemplated by the management equity agreement on September 17, 2002) may be redeemed or purchased by, in order of priority, each of parent and the MDCP co-investors. In the case of any termination other than
110
for cause, the purchase price for each class A convertible share, class B convertible share and class C convertible share will be such executive's original cost for such share, and the purchase price for each class D convertible share and ordinary share will be the fair market value for such share. In the event of a termination for cause, the purchase price for each convertible share and ordinary share will be the lower of (i) the fair market value of such share and (ii) the original cost for such share. Such redeemed shares will be made available for sale by parent and the MDCP co-investors to any member of parent's management for the same purchase price and on the same terms as such shares were purchased by parent and the MDCP co-investors.
Restrictions on Transfer. The management equity agreement prohibits the executives from transferring any of their ordinary shares or convertible shares, subject to certain exceptions.
Participation and Preemptive Rights. The executives party to the management equity agreement are granted certain "tag-along" rights under the management equity agreement which entitle them to participate in certain sales by any MDCP co-investors. In addition, if parent proposes to issue any newly issued ordinary shares to the MDCP co-investors or any of their affiliates or co-investors, each executive will have the right to purchase on the same terms and conditions a pro rata portion of such new issuance.
Voting. So long as the MDCP co-investors, their affiliates and co-investors collectively hold a majority of the ordinary shares of parent, each executive holding ordinary shares will vote all of such executive's ordinary shares and take all other necessary stockholder actions as are requested by the holders of a majority of the shares held by such MDCP co-investors, their affiliates and co-investors, which we refer to as the co-investor majority, to cause the representatives to be elected as members of the board of directors of parent as directed by the co-investor majority.
Benefit Plans and Deferred Compensation Plans of Jefferson Smurfit Group
Prior to completion of the acquisition, JSG had in place several benefit plans and deferred compensation plans. Each of such arrangements, which are briefly described below, terminated upon completion of the acquisition.
The Jefferson Smurfit Group plc 1987 Option Scheme and the Jefferson Smurfit Group plc 1987 United Kingdom Option Scheme. These schemes, which expired in 1997 for the purpose of making new grants, allowed participating executives to receive grants of share options which would become exercisable based upon measures tied to the growth in company's earnings per share. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the total number of options outstanding under these schemes was 17,060,892 and 19,194,600, respectively.
The Jefferson Smurfit Group plc 1999 Performance Share Plan (the PSP). The PSP allowed participating executives to receive annual allocations that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation was made to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of not less than four years. At December 31, 2001, there were 34 participants in the PSP and the total number of allocations outstanding under this plan was 10,744,318. At December 31, 2000, the total number of allocations outstanding under this plan was 7,439,335.
The Jefferson Smurfit Group plc 1999 Executive Share Option Plan (the ESOP) and The Jefferson Smurfit Group plc 2000 United Kingdom Executive Approved Share Option Plan (the UK EASOP). The ESOP and the UK EASOP allowed participating executives to receive annual grants of share options. Options will became exercisable over a proportion of the shares subject to option to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of not less than four years. Options were granted to acquire shares at the market price at the time of grant, exercisable between five and ten years from the date of grant. The options generally took the form of options to subscribe for new shares of the company. At December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, the total number of
111
options outstanding under the ESOP and the UK EASOP was 35,869,860 and 24,747,932, respectively. No director or executive officer received options under either of the ESOP or the UK EASOP.
Special Long-Term Incentive Plans. Under the Special Long-Term Incentive Plans, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer each received an allocation that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation was made to the extent that certain pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of three years.
Deferred Bonus Plan. Mr. McGann was granted stock appreciation rights at various strike prices on his appointment to JSG as Chief Financial Officer in August 1998.
Effects of the JSG Acquisition on Plan Awards
The acquisition of JSG resulted in the exercisability of certain outstanding options issued under the schemes described above and the acceleration of share awards previously allocated to executive officers of the company under existing benefit plans. In aggregate, a total of 52,558,072 options and/or share awards were exercised in connection with the offer. Holders of options and share awards were paid an amount in cash equal to the difference between €2.15 and the exercise price of the option or share award, as applicable. In addition, holders of such options and share awards received shares of SSCC common stock at the same ratio as other holders of ordinary shares of JSG.
The table below sets forth for each executive officer of parent, after completion of the acquisition, the number of vested options and share allocation awards as of August 31, 2002, and the number of options and share allocation awards that were accelerated upon completion of the acquisition:
| |
| |
| | Number of Share Allocation Awards
|
---|
| | Number of Options
|
---|
Name
|
---|
| Vested
| | Accelerated
| | Vested
| | Accelerated
|
---|
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit | | — | | — | | — | | 4,050,395 |
Mr. Gary W. McGann | | — | | 1,400,000 | (1) | — | | 1,693,843 |
Mr. Anthony P.J. Smurfit | | 67,500 | | 167,500 | | — | | 350,767 |
Mr. Ian J. Curley | | 112,500 | | 172,500 | | — | | 1,177,921 |
- (1)
- Includes stock appreciation rights granted to Mr. McGann on his appointment to JSG as Chief Financial Officer in August 1998.
112
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Subscription and Shareholders Agreement
Parent, the MDCP co-investors and certain additional co-investors, which we refer to as the additional co-investors, have entered into a Subscription and Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2002, which we refer to as the shareholders agreement. The MDCP co-investors and the additional co-investors have purchased 66,200,000 ordinary shares of parent and agreed to certain arrangements regarding their participation in parent. Following is a summary of the material terms of the shareholders agreement.
Purchase Rights. In the event that at any time on or prior to the date for settlement of consideration in connection with the offer, which we refer to as the settlement date, any additional co-investor breaches any material obligation under the shareholders agreement or any agreement to which each of parent (or any of its subsidiaries) and such additional co-investor is a party, MDCP IV Global Investments LP, or MDCP IV, will have the right, in its sole discretion, to purchase all ordinary shares subscribed for under the shareholders agreement or otherwise owned by such additional co-investor by delivering to such additional co-investor an amount in cash per ordinary share, which we refer to as the per share price, equal to (i) the sum of the aggregate subscription price paid by the additional co-investor for ordinary shares plus all amounts contributed to or invested in parent by such additional co-investor, in each case on or prior to the settlement date, divided by (ii) the number of ordinary shares owned by such additional co-investor as of the settlement date.
Transfer Obligations. Each party to the shareholders agreement agrees that if requested by the holders of a majority of the shares held by the MDCP co-investors, which we refer to as the MDCP majority, in connection with the financing of the offer, such party shall transfer to any other person directed by the MDCP majority a number of ordinary shares as directed by the MDCP majority. The price per ordinary share paid to such party will not be less than the per share price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no party will be required to transfer a higher percentage of the ordinary shares owned by such party than the percentage of ordinary shares being transferred by the MDCP co-investors.
Covenants. Under the terms of the shareholders agreement and until the occurrence of an acceleration event, parent undertakes to deliver to each party and to each other holder of at least 15% of the ordinary shares (i) monthly and quarterly unaudited consolidated statements of income and cash flows of parent and its subsidiaries, (ii) annual consolidated statements of income and cash flows of parent and its subsidiaries, and (iii) an annual budget prepared on a monthly basis for parent and its subsidiaries.
Preemptive Rights. If parent proposes to issue any additional ordinary shares or equity securities or equity equivalents that are convertible or exercisable into ordinary shares to the MDCP co-investors or any of their respective affiliates, which we refer to as the new shares, each party will have the right to purchase all or part of a portion of the new shares equal to the product of (i) the total number of new shares proposed to be issued, multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of class D convertible shares and ordinary shares held by such shareholder as of the date of the shareholders agreement and the denominator of which is the total number of class D convertible shares and ordinary shares which are held by all shareholders immediately prior to the proposed issuance.
Restrictions on Transfer. The shareholders agreement prohibits any party from transferring any of its ordinary shares, subject to certain exceptions such as pursuant to applicable laws of descent in the case of individuals and, in the case of a party which is a company or partnership, among its affiliates.
Sale of Parent. If parent's board of directors and the MDCP majority approve a sale of parent, which we refer to as an approved sale, each party will vote for and consent to such approved sale and will take all necessary and desirable actions in connection with the consummation of the approved sale as requested by the board of directors, in each case subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions.
113
Participation Rights. The parties to the shareholders agreement are granted certain "tag-along" rights which entitle them to participate in certain sales by any MDCP co-investors or their permitted transferees.
Voting. So long as the MDCP co-investors and their respective permitted transferees collectively hold a majority of the ordinary shares, each party to the shareholders agreement will vote all of its equity securities and take all other necessary or desirable actions as are requested by the MDCP majority in order to cause the representatives to be elected as members of parent's board of directors as set forth in the corporate governance agreement and as otherwise directed by the MDCP majority. In addition, each party will at all times vote such party's equity securities on all matters presented to parent's shareholders as directed by the MDCP majority as long as such vote is not materially adversely discriminatory to such party in a manner different from the MDCP majority. The foregoing voting provisions terminate upon the occurrence of an acceleration event.
Registration Rights Agreement
As part of the transactions, each of the MDCP co-investors, the management investors and certain additional co-investors entered into the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement with parent, which we refer to as the registration rights agreement.
Demand Registrations. Under the registration rights agreement, the holders of a majority of the registrable securities held by the MDCP co-investors and their affiliates have the right at any time (i) prior to an initial public offering of parent's ordinary shares, to require parent to register any or all of such securities under the Securities Act on Form F-1 or any similar long-form registration statement, which we refer to as a long-form registration, at parent's expense and (ii) after an initial public offering of parent's ordinary shares, to require parent to register any or all of their securities under up to three long-form registrations and if available, an unlimited number of registrations on Forms F-2 and F-3 or similar short-form registrations, which we refer to as short-form registrations, at parent's expense. We refer to each of these types of registrations as demand registrations.
Parent is not required, however, to effect any long-form registration within 180 days after the effective date of a previous demand registration which was a long-form registration or a registration in which the holders of the registrable securities were given piggyback rights pursuant to the registration rights agreement. In addition, parent may postpone for up to 180 days the filing or the effectiveness of a registration statement for a demand registration if parent's board of directors determines that such demand registration would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on any proposal or plan by parent or any of its subsidiaries to engage in any material acquisition of assets or any material merger, tender offer, reorganization or similar transaction.
Piggyback Registrations. All holders of registrable securities are entitled to request the inclusion of such securities in any registration statement at parent's expense whenever parent proposes to register any offering of its equity securities (other than pursuant to a registration statement on Form F-4 or Form S-8 under the Securities Act) and the registration form to be used may be used for the registration of such registrable securities.
Corporate Governance Agreement
In connection with the transactions, each of the MDCP co-investors, the management investors and certain additional co-investors, which we collectively refer to as the investors, entered into an Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Agreement with parent, which we refer to as the corporate governance agreement.
Voting. Under the terms of the corporate governance agreement, each investor undertakes to vote all of such investor's ordinary shares and any other voting securities of parent and to take all other
114
reasonably necessary or desirable actions within such investor's control to ensure that, among other things:
- •
- the authorized number of directors on parent's board of directors is initially established at 9 directors;
- •
- four representatives designated by MDCP IV Global Investments LP, who we refer to as the MDCP IV directors, and one representative designated by MDCP III Global Investments LP, whom we refer to as the MDCP III director, be elected to the board of directors of parent;
- •
- each of the management investors is elected to the board of directors of parent;
- •
- at the election of the holders of a majority of the ordinary shares held by all MDCP co-investors, including any affiliates, which we refer to as the MDCP majority, the composition of the board of directors of all or any of parent's subsidiaries will be the same as, or as close to proportionally equivalent to that of, the board of directors of parent;
- •
- in the event that any MDCP IV director or MDCP III director ceases to serve as a member of the board of directors, such vacancy will be filled by a representative designated by MDCP IV Global Investments LP or MDCP III Global Investments LP, as the case may be;
- •
- each management investor will resign or be removed as a member of parent's board of directors, any board of directors of any subsidiary and any committees by a vote of a majority of ordinary shares then held by the investors as of any date after November 1, 2002 if such management investor is no longer employed by parent and its subsidiaries;
- •
- at the election of MDCP IV Global Investments LP, the authorized number of directors on parent's board of directors will be increased to no more than 13 directors, with such additional directors being appointed by MDCP IV Global Investments LP; and
- •
- in the event that any of the management investors is removed or resigns from the board of directors of parent, and board of directors of any subsidiary or any committee, MDCP IV Global Investments LP will be entitled to appoint any replacement director, subject to the right of any management investor to appoint a director, as described below.
Any management investor who, together with any affiliates or family members, owns (i) ordinary shares of parent with an aggregate investment cost of not less than €50 million prior to any public listing of the ordinary shares of parent or (ii) on or after a public listing of parent's ordinary shares, a number of ordinary shares having an aggregate value of not less than €50 million or a number of ordinary shares with an aggregate investment cost of not less than 50% of the aggregate investment cost of the ordinary shares held by such investor and such investor's affiliates and family members as of date for settlement of consideration after the offer was declared unconditional will have the collective right, together with any other management investors satisfying such requirements, to appoint one member of the board of directors of parent, whom we refer to as the purchased equity director. However, in the event that a purchased equity director becomes an employee of, serves as a director of or otherwise provides services for any person other than SSCC and its subsidiaries without the board of director's consent, such person will be removed from the board of directors of parent upon the written request of MDCP IV Global Investments LP.
Covenants. The corporate governance agreement contains certain covenants, which, among other things, limit parent's ability to enter into any affiliate transactions outside the ordinary course of business or to change any accounting policy of parent in a manner that would adversely affect the calculation of any management incentive target or performance.
Termination. The corporate governance agreement will terminate upon the earlier of a public listing of the ordinary shares of parent and a sale of parent to an independent third party pursuant to which such party acquires (i) capital stock of parent possessing the voting power to elect a majority of
115
parent's board of directors or (ii) all or substantially all of parent's assets. However, with respect to the right of any management investor to appoint a purchased equity director, such management investor's rights will not terminate until the earlier of a sale of parent of the type described above or the date on which such management investor no longer satisfies the ordinary share ownership requirements entitling such management investor to appoint a purchased equity director.
Transactions with SSCC
Spin-Off of SSCC Shares. Prior to the spin-off, Smurfit International B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of JSG, owned 71,638,462 shares, or approximately 29.3%, of SSCC's outstanding common stock. In connection with the spin-off by JSG to its shareholders of its SSCC common stock, Smurfit International sold its SSCC shares to JSG. The number of shares distributed in the spin-off were then delivered to SSCC and it instructed its transfer agent to cancel those shares and reissue the same number of shares of SSCC common stock in the names designated by JSG. The spin-off was approved by the JSG shareholders on July 29, 2002 and confirmed by the High Court of Ireland on August 27, 2002.
Transactions with SSCC. In the ordinary course of business, JSG sells products to and purchases products from, and may continue to sell products to and purchase products from, SSCC and its subsidiaries and affiliates on terms generally similar to those prevailing with unrelated parties. In addition, SSCC provides, and may continue to provide, JSG and certain of its affiliates with general management and elective management services under separate management services agreements.
In addition, prior to the completion of the SSCC Asset Swap, JSG and SSCC operated in Europe pursuant to a joint management arrangement that was permissible under the antitrust rules of the European Union in light of their former affiliate status. Until the European operations of JSG and SSCC were consolidated under a single owner it was possible that JSG and SSCC would be required to separately market their products in Europe.
Board Membership. Messrs. Howard E. Kilroy, Dermot F. Smurfit and Anthony P.J. Smurfit are directors of SSCC. Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit is SSCC's Chairman of the Board and serves on its board of directors. Each of these individuals will retire from the SSCC board of directors on May 8, 2003. Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, Dr. Dermot Smurfit, Mr. Anthony Smurfit and Mr. Kilroy are or were officers and/or directors of JSG.
For detailed financial information relating to transactions entered into with our associates, including SSCC, please see note 26 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Transactions with Directors and Executive Officers
No transaction material to us, on a consolidated basis, has been entered into in the last three years with any director, executive officer or member of their respective families or with any major shareholder. There are no loans outstanding between us or our subsidiaries and any director or executive officer or member of their respective families or with any major shareholder.
Transaction Fees
Madison Dearborn received a fee of approximately €38.0 million at the closing of the transactions plus out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the transactions. Madison Dearborn may be paid additional fees from time to time in the future for providing management, consulting or advisory services and related expenses.
116
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Issuer is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary (other than six shares held by nominees) of MDCP Acquisitions Limited, a limited company owned, in part, by the MDCP co-investors, the additional co-investors and the management investors.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the parent, as of February 28, 2003 by: (i) each person or entity known to us to own more than 5% of any class of parent's outstanding securities and (ii) each member of parent's board of directors, each of its named executive officers and all members of the board of directors and executive officers as a group. Approximately 73,200,000 ordinary shares of Parent are beneficially owned. To our knowledge, each of such securityholders has sole voting and investment power as to the ordinary shares shown unless otherwise noted. Beneficial ownership of the securities listed in the table has been determined in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act.
| | Beneficial Ownership(1)
| |
---|
| | Number of Ordinary Shares
| | Percentage of Ordinary Shares
| |
---|
Principal Securityholders: | | | | | |
MDCP Co-investors(2) c/o Walkers SPV Limited Walkers House Mary Street P.O. Box 908GT George Town Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands | | 46,682,056 | | 63.8 | % |
DBCP Europe GP (Jersey) Limited PO Box 87 22 Grenville Street St. Helier Jersey JE4 8PX | | 7,500,000 | | 10.3 | % |
Directors and Executive Officers: | | | | | |
John A. Canning, Jr.(3) | | — | | — | |
Justin S. Huscher(3) | | — | | — | |
Christopher J. McGowan(3) | | — | | — | |
Samuel M. Mencoff(3) | | — | | — | |
Thomas S. Souleles(3) | | — | | — | |
Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit(4),(5) | | 5,400,000 | | 7.4 | % |
Gary W. McGann(4) | | 150,000 | | 0.2 | % |
Anthony P.J. Smurfit(4) | | 400,000 | | 0.6 | % |
Ian J. Curley(4) | | 150,000 | | 0.2 | % |
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) | | 6,100,000 | | 8.3 | % |
(Footnotes begin on following page)
117
(Footnotes for preceding page)
- (1)
- "Beneficial ownership" generally means any person who, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or investment power with respect to a security. The MDCP co-investors, the additional co-investors and the management investors entered into the corporate governance agreement, which provides for, among other things, certain agreements of the parties as to the composition of parent's board of directors. The number of ordinary shares indicated in the table by each party does not include any ordinary shares held by other parties solely by virtue of the corporate governance agreement. For further information regarding the terms of the corporate governance agreement, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Corporate Governance Agreement."
- (2)
- Includes: (a) 39,020,270 ordinary shares beneficially owned by MDCP IV Global Investments LP, whose sole general partner is MDP IV Global GP, LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, whose sole general partner is MDP Global Investors Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (MDP Investors); (b) 7,495,357 ordinary shares beneficially owned by MDCP III Global Investments LP, whose sole general partner is MDP III Global GP, LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (MDP III Global), whose sole general partner is MDP Investors; and (c) 166,429 ordinary shares beneficially owned by MDSE III Global Investments LP, whose sole general partner is MDP III Global. MDP Investors is owned by 14 shareholders, each of whom are principals of Madison Dearborn, with all voting and investment decision-making determined on a majority-vote basis based on capital and with no individual shareholder owning more than 10% of the capital stock of MDP Global Investors Limited. An aggregate 26,517,944 shares owned beneficially by holders other than the MDCP Co- Investors are subject to a voting agreement pursuant to which such holders agree to vote on any matter submitted to shareholders for a vote in the same manner as a majority of the ordinary shares owned by MDCP Co-Investors are voted, unless such vote is adversely discriminatory to any such holder in a manner different than the MDCP Co-Investors.
- (3)
- The address of each of Messrs. Canning, Huscher, McGowan, Mencoff and Souleles is c/o Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., Three First National Plaza, 70 West Madison, Suite 3800, Chicago, Illinois 60602, United States of America.
- (4)
- The address of Dr. Michael Smurfit and Messrs. McGann, Anthony Smurfit and Curley is c/o Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited, Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland. Pursuant to the terms of the management equity agreement, these management investors have received class A convertible shares, class B convertible shares and class C convertible shares. The convertible shares will be non-voting and subject to certain vesting restrictions. Upon vesting, class A convertible shares, class B convertible shares and class C convertible shares convert into non-voting class D convertible shares. Holders of class D convertible shares may convert their class D convertible shares into ordinary shares of parent upon payment in full in cash of the conversion price per share. For further information with respect to the vesting and conversion of the convertible shares, see "Management—Management Equity Agreement."
- (5)
- An entity controlled by Dr. Smurfit purchased 5,000 units in the October 2002 units private placement. The units include warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 14,787.88 ordinary shares of parent. The warrants will become exercisable upon the first to occur of: (i) the time immediately prior to the occurrence of a change of control of parent; (ii) an underwritten initial public offering of equity securities of parent is consummated; (iii) equity securities of parent (other than the warrants) are listed on a U.S. national or non-U.S. recognized securities exchange or authorized for quotation on a U.S. national or non-U.S. recognized quotation system; or (iv) October 2, 2003.
118
DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESS
Senior Credit Facility
In connection with the transactions described herein, MDCP Acquisitions I as original borrower entered into the senior credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG London, as facility agent and security agent, Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International as joint arrangers and joint bookrunners, Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation and others as original lenders, parent, issuer and MDCP Acquisitions I as original guarantors, and a syndicate of financial institutions and institutional lenders. Set forth below is a summary of the material terms of the senior credit facility.
The senior credit facility originally provided for facilities of up to €2.525 billion as follows:
- •
- a seven-year term loan A facility of €1.05 billion;
- •
- an eight-year term loan B facility of €525 million;
- •
- a nine-year term loan C facility of €525 million; and
- •
- a seven-year revolving credit facility of up to €425 million.
The revolving credit facility is being used for the working capital and general corporate purposes of JSG. The term loan A facility and the revolving credit facility may be used for letters of credit and other documentary credits and ancillary facilities.
Interest and Fees. Advances under the various facilities bear the following interest rates:
- •
- advances under the term loan A facility and the revolving credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to the relevant interbank rate plus 2.25% (plus any mandatory costs); there is a margin ratchet arrangement which may result, in some circumstances, in the margin for these facilities being reduced;
- •
- advances under the term loan B facility bear interest at a rate equal to the relevant interbank rate plus 2.75% (plus any mandatory costs); and
- •
- advances under the term loan C facility bear interest at a rate equal to the relevant interbank rate plus 3.25% (plus any mandatory costs).
In each case, an amount may also be payable in respect of the lenders' costs of compliance with certain regulatory requirements. The relevant interbank rate for loans in euro is EURIBOR, the relevant interbank rate for loans in Swedish kronor is STIBOR and the relevant interbank rate for loans in any other currency is LIBOR.
A commitment fee calculated daily at an annual rate of 0.50% of the undrawn amount of the term loans is payable quarterly in arrears. A commitment fee calculated daily at an annual rate of 0.75% of the undrawn amount of the revolving credit facility is payable quarterly in arrears. Certain agency fees are payable to the facility agent and the security agent. Fees in respect of letters of credit or guarantees issued under the revolving credit facility reflect the interest rate margin applicable to advances under the term loan A facility and the revolving credit facility, and an additional utilization fee of 0.125% on the outstanding face amount of each documentary credit is payable.
Repayment. Amounts outstanding under the term loan A facility will be repaid in escalating semi-annual installments beginning in December 2003 and continuing through September 2009.
The term loan B facility and term loan C facility are repayable in one installment in September 2010 and September 2011, respectively. Each drawing under the revolving credit facility is repayable on the last day of its applicable interest period, subject to a final repayment date in September 2009 in respect of the revolving credit facility.
119
All outstanding amounts under the senior credit facility (including any ancillary facilities) must be prepaid and all revolving commitments will be reduced to zero, subject to certain exceptions and other conditions, on the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of parent and its subsidiaries (excluding Newcos) or on a change of control of parent, issuer or guarantor.
Certain mandatory prepayments are required in respect of the net proceeds of the first flotation, public offering or listing of any shares of parent or any holding company of parent or any member of parent and its subsidiaries (excluding Newcos), any additional asset sale proceeds from the Newcos and any disposal of any assets by any member of parent and its subsidiaries (excluding Newcos) above certain minimum levels.
Availability. Although term loans in an aggregate amount of €2,100 million are available under the senior credit facility, approximately €606 million was undrawn as at December 31, 2002. Availability of this remaining amount has been permanently reduced because certain amounts of our existing indebtedness were not refinanced within specific time periods. The revolving credit facility will be available for seven years.
Security and Guarantees. The indebtedness under the senior credit facility and related hedging arrangements is guaranteed and secured by a first priority security interest over all of the tangible and intangible assets of parent, issuer (other than the intercompany loan agreements) and MDCP Acquisitions I and over some or all of the assets of JSG and certain of its subsidiaries subject to certain exceptions. The senior credit facility permits JSG to secure its obligations under the Litigation Bonds (as defined in the "Description of the Senior Notes") using the same security being granted in support of the senior credit facility. These obligations will rank equally with outstanding obligations under the senior credit facility.
Certain Covenants. The senior credit facility requires us to meet certain financial tests, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum cash flow to debt service coverage ratio, and a maximum annual level of capital expenditures. In addition, the senior credit facility contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers, consolidations, prepayments of other indebtedness and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements.
Events of Default. The senior credit facility contains customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain other material indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, judgment defaults in excess of specified amounts, and failure of any guarantee or security document or any subordination provision supporting the senior credit facility to be in full force and effect.
Intercompany Loan and Priority Agreements
Intercompany Loans
In connection with the transactions and the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes, issuer, as lender, and guarantor, as borrower, entered into intercompany loan agreements, which we collectively refer to as the "intercompany loans." Pursuant to the terms of the intercompany loan relating to the transactions, issuer loaned to guarantor the gross proceeds issuer received from the offering of the original senior notes and the gross proceeds from the issuance of the units. Accordingly, the principal amount of this intercompany loan was €450 million and $695 million. Pursuant to the terms of the intercompany loan relating to the February 2003 offering of senior outstanding notes, issuer loaned an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the senior outstanding notes and contributed an amount equal to the remainder of the gross proceeds of such offering to guarantor.
120
Accordingly, the principal amount of this intercompany loan was $205 million. Under the intercompany loans, interest accrues on the outstanding principal amount in an amount equal to the interest payments due on the original senior notes and the interest payments due on the subordinated notes, on the one hand, and interest payments due on the senior outstanding notes, on the other hand, as they become due (and, in each case, in an amount equal to any substantially similar notes issued in accordance with the applicable registration rights agreements; references to the original senior notes, the senior outstanding notes (which are sometimes collectively referred to as the senior notes) and subordinated notes under this description of the intercompany loans and priority agreements below should be deemed to include references to any such exchange notes). Interest also accrues in an amount sufficient to make payments due on the senior notes and the subordinated notes in respect of certain tax gross-ups and liquidated damage provisions, in accordance with the terms of the senior notes and the subordinated notes. The intercompany loans also permit guarantor to pay amounts to issuer to enable issuer to pay expenses associated with registering new notes with the SEC to be offered in a registered exchange offer for the senior notes and the subordinated notes. The intercompany loans will be repaid five days in advance of the applicable "payment date." The "payment date" means (A)(i) with respect to the portion of the intercompany loans reflecting the subordinated notes, the final maturity date of the subordinated notes, and (ii) with respect to the portion of the intercompany loans reflecting the senior notes, the final maturity date of the senior notes or (B) the date on which the subordinated notes or the senior notes, as the case may be, fall due for payment upon acceleration or under any mandatory prepayment or repurchase provision in any case in accordance with their respective terms provided that either (i) the amounts due under the senior credit facility have then fallen due or have been declared to be due and payable on acceleration, (ii) 179 days have elapsed from the date on which notice was given to the senior agent of the occurrence of the event of default entitling the senior notes or the subordinated notes to be so accelerated or (iii) an order for the winding-up, administration, examination or dissolution of guarantor has been made or any liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy, judicial custodian, compulsory manager, receiver, administrative receiver, examiner, administrator or similar officer has been appointed in respect of guarantor.
All payments under the intercompany loans are subject to the provisions of the priority agreements which we collectively refer to as the "priority agreements." The priority agreements have been entered into in connection with the senior credit facility, and are effective until the date (which we refer to as the "senior discharge date") on which the agent under the senior credit facility is satisfied that all debt thereunder, under the related hedging agreements and under the Litigation Bonds (as defined in the "Description of the Senior Notes") (which we collectively refer to as the "senior obligations"), has been irrevocably paid and discharged and all commitments of the senior lenders and all obligations of related hedging banks in connection with the senior credit facility, have been terminated.
Priority Agreements
The priority agreements provide that prior to the senior discharge date, except as the requisite majority of creditors in respect of the senior obligations consent in writing, and except as specifically set out in such agreement, guarantor will not:
- •
- pay or make any distribution, in respect of or on account of, or purchase, defease, redeem or acquire any subordinated debt (as defined therein and which includes the intercompany loans) in cash or in kind;
- •
- demand or receive payment of, or any distribution in respect of or any account of or on, any subordinated debt in cash or in kind, or apply any money or property in or towards discharge of any subordinated debt;
121
- •
- discharge any subordinated debt by way of any right of set-off, combination of accounts or otherwise (subject to certain exceptions);
- •
- create or permit to subsist, or permit any of its subsidiaries to create or permit to subsist, any security interest over any of its assets to secure any subordinated debt;
- •
- give any financial support to any person in respect of the subordinated debt;
- •
- allow any subordinated debt to be evidenced by a negotiable instrument or subordinate any subordinated debt to any other indebtedness except as provided for in the priority agreements;
- •
- initiate or support any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, administration, examination or dissolution, proceedings involving an obligor (as defined therein (which includes guarantor)), except as permitted under the senior credit facility; or
- •
- take any other action whereby the ranking and/or subordination of the subordinated debt may be impaired.
In addition, each intercompany loan is subordinated in right of payment, to the extent set forth therein, to the prior payment in full in cash of all obligations of guarantor in respect of the senior obligations. The priority agreements provide that, upon any payment or distribution (including by exercise of any right of receipt, set-off, combination of accounts or other discharge) to creditors of guarantor (including issuer) in a liquidation, dissolution, winding-up, bankruptcy, administration, reorganization, receivership, administrative receivership or similar proceeding relating to guarantor or its property, or in an assignment for the benefit of creditors of guarantor or in any marshalling of guarantor's assets:
- •
- holders of guarantor's senior obligations will be entitled to receive irrevocable payment in full in cash of all liabilities due (and that become due thereafter) in respect of such senior obligations (including interest accruing after the commencement of any liquidation, dissolution, winding-up, bankruptcy, administration, reorganization, receivership, administrative receivership or similar proceeding at the rate specified in the applicable senior indebtedness) before issuer will be entitled to receive any payment with respect to the intercompany loans; and
- •
- until all liabilities with respect to such senior obligations are irrevocably paid in full in cash, any distribution to which issuer would be entitled but for the priority agreements will be made to the security agent for the senior lenders (as defined below), for application in accordance with the terms of the priority agreements.
No direct or indirect payment or distribution of any kind or character (including by exercise of any right of receipt, set-off, combination of accounts or other discharge) by guarantor pursuant to the terms of the intercompany loans shall be made, if at the time of such payment, there exists a default in the payment of all or any portion of any indebtedness under the senior credit facility (or, in the case of non-payment of any amounts not constituting principal, interest or fees, amounts in excess of €50,000) when due, which we refer to as a "senior payment default," and such default shall not have been cured or waived and any acceleration rescinded by or on behalf of the holder of such indebtedness.
Following the occurrence and during the continuation of any event of default with respect to the senior credit facility other than a senior payment default, which we refer to as a "senior non-payment default," upon the receipt by guarantor of written notice from the agent under the senior credit facility, which we refer to as a "payment blockage notice," no payment or distribution of any kind or character may be made by guarantor upon or in respect of the intercompany loans, for a period, which we refer to as a "payment blockage period," commencing on the date of such payment blockage notice and
122
ending on the earliest date on which a senior payment default does not exist and one of the following applies:
- (i)
- 179 days have elapsed since service of such payment blockage notice;
- (ii)
- the senior agent has confirmed in writing that such senior non-payment default has been cured or waived or has ceased to exist;
- (iii)
- the senior agent by written notice to guarantor cancels the payment blockage notice; or
- (iv)
- the senior discharge date occurs.
Unless the lenders under the senior credit facility or their agent or representative shall have accelerated the maturity of the senior credit facility and not rescinded such acceleration, after the end of the payment blockage period, guarantor may resume, and issuer may receive and retain in full, payments on the intercompany loans that would be permitted under the intercompany loans absent a senior non-payment default.
No senior non-payment default that existed on the date any payment blockage notice was given may be the basis for giving any subsequent payment blockage notice unless such senior non-payment default shall have been cured or waived or otherwise ceased to exist for a period of not less than 180 consecutive days. In addition, no subsequent payment blockage notice may be given until at least 360 days shall have elapsed since the issue of any immediately prior payment blockage notice, and then only to the extent that all scheduled payments with respect to the intercompany loans that have come due have been paid in full in cash or additional subordinated notes, as the case may be, as required by the terms of the applicable intercompany loan.
If payment of the principal of the senior notes or subordinated notes is accelerated pursuant to the relevant indenture, no payment on the applicable intercompany loan may be made until five business days after the trustee or issuer has given notice to the agent under the senior credit facility. Thereafter, guarantor may make the payments on the applicable intercompany loan only if the applicable intercompany loan and the priority agreement otherwise permit those payments at that time.
The priority agreements generally restrict issuer from taking any enforcement action with respect to the applicable intercompany loan without the consent of a majority of lenders under the senior credit facility and hedging banks in respect of hedging obligations. Notwithstanding such general restriction, issuer may take enforcement actions in relation to an intercompany loan in the following circumstances:
- (a)
- if any indebtedness under the senior credit facility has been declared to be due and payable or due and payable on demand (and demand has been made) by reason of an event of default under the senior credit facility;
- (b)
- (i) an order is made for the winding-up, dissolution, examination or administration of guarantor or (ii) a liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy, judicial custodian, compulsory manager, receiver, administrative receiver, examiner, administrator or similar officer is appointed in respect of guarantor; or
- (c)
- each of the following shall have occurred:
- (i)
- the non-payment of an amount when due under the senior notes or the subordinated notes (but in the case of any amount not constituting principal, interest or fees, in excess of €500,000);
- (ii)
- issuer or one of the trustees (under the senior notes or the subordinated notes) has notified the agent under the senior credit facility in writing of such default;
123
- (iii)
- a period of not less than 179 days has passed from the date of receipt of the agent under the senior credit facility of that notice; and
- (iv)
- at the end of such 179-day period, the default is continuing and has not yet been waived.
In the event that issuer receives or recovers any payment or distribution on or with respect to an intercompany loan at a time when such payment is prohibited by the applicable priority agreement, such payment will be held by issuer, in trust for the benefit of, and will be paid forthwith over and delivered, upon written request, to the security agent under the senior credit facility for application to the payment of all liabilities with respect to the senior obligations remaining unpaid to the extent necessary to pay such obligations in full in cash in accordance with their terms, after giving effect to any concurrent payment or distribution to or for the lenders and other obligees under the senior credit facility.
Description of Existing 6.75% Notes and 7.50% Debentures
General. Smurfit Capital Funding plc, a wholly owned subsidiary of JSG, issued the 6.75% notes due 2005, which we refer to as the 2005 notes, and 7.50% debentures due 2025, which we refer to as the 2025 debentures, in an aggregate principal amount of $250 million and $350 million, respectively, pursuant to an indenture dated as of November 15, 1995, among Smurfit Capital Funding plc, as issuer, JSG, as guarantor, certain subsidiary guarantors and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as Chemical Bank), as trustee. In this section, we refer to the 2005 notes and the 2025 debentures as the existing notes. We are not required to redeem or to make a change of control offer for the existing notes under the terms of the indenture as a result of the transactions. We intend to have the 2005 notes and the 2025 debentures remain outstanding. As of December 31, 2002, the 2005 notes had aggregate principal amount of $250 million and the 2025 debenture had aggregate principal amount of approximately $292 million. Under Irish GAAP, this was recorded as approximately €428 million, which reflects the carrying amount as a result of related currency swaps.
Maturity. The 2005 notes mature on November 20, 2005 and bear interest at the rate equal to 6.75% per annum. The 2025 debentures mature on November 20, 2025 and bear interest at the rate equal to 7.50% per annum.
Guarantees. The existing notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by (i) JSG, (ii) Smurfit International B.V., an indirect wholly owned Dutch subsidiary of JSG, and (iii) Packaging International Finance, an indirect wholly owned Irish subsidiary of JSG.
Security and Ranking. Originally, the existing notes and guarantees were unsecured obligations of Smurfit Capital Funding plc and the guarantors, respectively, and ranked equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Smurfit Capital Funding plc and the guarantors, respectively. Upon or following completion of the compulsory share acquisition, we granted to the lenders under our senior credit facility liens on substantially all of our assets to secure the borrowing made thereunder. Under the terms of the indenture relating to the existing notes, we were required at that time to secure the existing notes equally and ratably with such borrowings. As a result, our obligations under the existing notes will be secured on an equal and ratable basis by all of the collateral securing our senior credit facility for so long as such liens remain in place.
Redemption. The existing notes may be redeemed at our option in whole, but not in part, at any time at the principal amount plus accrued interest in the event of certain tax law changes requiring the payment of additional amounts.
We are not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the existing notes.
124
Merger, Sale or Consolidation. The indenture relating to the existing notes and guarantees provides that Smurfit Capital Funding plc, the subsidiary guarantors or JSG may consolidate with, or merge into, or transfer or lease their respective assets, substantially as an entirety, to any other person, provided that:
- •
- such successor person assumes Smurfit Capital Funding plc's obligations under the existing notes, such subsidiary guarantor's obligations on the relevant guarantees or JSG's obligations on the guarantees, as applicable;
- •
- after giving effect to the transaction, no event which, after notice or lapse of time, would become an event of default will have occurred and be continuing; and
- •
- certain other conditions are met, including payment of additional amounts, if any, resulting therefrom by any person succeeding Smurfit Capital Funding plc, the subsidiary guarantors or JSG.
Events of Default. The indenture relating to the existing notes and guarantees contains customary events of default, including payment defaults, covenant defaults, certain cross-defaults to other indebtedness, and certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization.
Covenants. The indenture relating to the existing notes and guarantees contains covenants for the benefit of the holders of the existing notes that, among other things, limit JSG's ability and that of any of its restricted subsidiaries to:
- •
- incur liens; and
- •
- enter into sale and leaseback transactions.
These limitations are, however, subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions.
Units Private Placement
As part of the transactions, we issued 100,000 euro units and 150,000 dollar units for an aggregate of approximately €252.7 million (at the September 23, 2002 exchange rate of €1.00 = $0.9822). Each euro unit consists of a €1,000 principal amount 15.5% subordinated note due 2013, which we refer to as the euro subordinated note, and a warrant to subscribe for ordinary shares of parent. Each dollar unit consists of a $1,000 principal amount 15.5% subordinated note due 2013, which we refer to as the dollar subordinated note, and, together with the euro subordinated notes, the subordinated notes, and a warrant to subscribe for ordinary shares of parent. For a description of the subordinated notes, see "Description of the Subordinated Notes."
The subordinated notes and the warrants were not separately transferable until the separability date, which was November 29, 2002. Separation will not occur automatically, but only at the request of a holder on or after the separability date. Consequently, to participate in the subordinated notes exchange offer, you will need to separate the relevant units.
Holders of the subordinated notes received warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 1.0% of the outstanding equity of parent, inclusive of the ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants, at the price of €0.001 per ordinary share, subject to certain anti-dilution protections. The warrants are separatable from the subordinated notes and will expire on October 1, 2013. In addition, the holders of warrants are entitled to certain registration rights.
Loan Notes
In connection with the offer, certain former shareholders of JSG elected to receive guaranteed unsecured loan notes, which we refer to as the loan notes, of guarantor in lieu of the cash tender offer price. For each €1 of cash consideration under the tender offer, such holders elected to receive one
125
loan note of €1. Such former shareholders elected to receive an aggregate principal amount of approximately €29 million in connection with the offer.
The loan notes were issued by guarantor in amounts and integral multiples of €1 and are unsecured, ranking equally with other unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of guarantor and are unconditionally guaranteed as to principal and interest by the lenders under our senior credit facility. The loan notes do not contain any restrictions on borrowings, disposals or charging of assets by guarantor.
Interest. The rate of interest on the loan notes for each interest period is a rate equal to six-month EURIBOR less 50 basis points, as determined on the first Irish business day of each interest period.
Mandatory Redemption. On December 31, 2002 and thereafter on any interest payment date falling prior to December 31, 2007, a holder of loan notes will be entitled to require guarantor to redeem the whole or any part (in amounts or integral multiples of €1 subject to a minimum of €100) of the principal amount outstanding from time to time of its holding of loan notes for cash at par, together with accrued interest to but excluding the date of redemption. On December 31, 2002, guarantor redeemed approximately €18 million of the loan notes. Any loan notes not previously redeemed or purchased will be redeemed in full at par on December 31, 2007 together with accrued interest to but excluding that date. A loan note shall become immediately redeemable at par together with accrued interest at the election of a holder of loan notes up to but excluding the date of redemption on the occurrence of specified events.
Optional Redemption/Repayment. If, at any time, the principal amount of all loan notes outstanding is equal to or less than €2 million, guarantor will have the right on giving the remaining holders of loan notes not less than 30 days' notice in writing expiring on any interest payment date to redeem all of the outstanding loan notes at par together with accrued interest to but excluding the date of redemption.
Other Indebtedness
In addition to the foregoing, we have approximately €49 million of indebtedness as of December 31, 2002 under various capital lease arrangements, certain funded debt arrangements in Latin America and overdraft facilities.
Non-recourse Newco Credit Facility
As part of the transactions, Madison Global Holdings Limited, as original borrower, and Arlonberg Limited and Madison Dearborn Partners (Netherlands) BV, or Newco BV, as original guarantors, entered into the Newco credit facility with Deutsche Bank AG London, Merrill Lynch International and others. Neither issuer nor any of its subsidiaries have any repayment obligations relating to the Newco credit facility, which is recourse only to the assets of the Newcos.
The Newco credit facility provides for a term loan of up to €125 million, which provides finance pending the receipt of proceeds from the sale of certain non-operating assets and non-core operating assets of JSG that were or will be transferred to the Newcos. The asset transfers were and will be made in exchange for intercompany notes which we refer to as the intercompany asset notes aggregating approximately €222.5 million to JSG and its subsidiaries. After amounts are drawn under the Newco credit facility, Newco BV loaned the €125 million of cash to parent. Parent, in turn, used the proceeds to make an equity capital contribution to issuer.
For purposes of Irish GAAP, amounts borrowed under the Newco credit facility are not consolidated in the financial statements of issuer. For purposes of U.S. GAAP, however, such amounts
126
would be consolidated in the financial statements of issuer, which would increase issuer's total debt and correspondingly decrease shareholders' book equity by €125 million. For more information, see note (c) to the pro forma balance sheet at December 31, 2002 in "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements."
The parties to the Newco credit facility, parent, certain investors in parent and certain other subsidiaries of parent are parties to a priority agreement, which we refer to as the Newco priority agreement. The Newco priority agreement provides that until the €125 million loan and related hedging obligations are irrevocably paid and discharged, and all commitments and obligations in connection with such loan and hedging obligations have been terminated (i) payments in respect of any subordinated debt of the Newcos and their subsidiaries (which includes the intercompany asset notes) are restricted, (ii) parent may not:
- •
- redeem, repurchase, defease, retire or repay any of its share capital;
- •
- declare, make or pay, or pay any interest on any unpaid amount of, any dividend, charge, fee or other distribution on or in respect of its share capital (subject to certain exceptions);
- •
- repay or distribute any share premium account;
- •
- pay, or allow any of its subsidiaries to pay, any management, advisory, consultancy or other fee to, or to the order of, any of its shareholders (or any of their affiliates) (subject to certain exceptions); or
- •
- lend or otherwise pay or transfer cash to, or allow any of its subsidiaries to lend or otherwise pay or transfer cash to any of its shareholders (or any of their affiliates)
and (iii) the investors in parent may not receive any payment, distribution, benefit or other consideration on account of any flotation or public offering of shares by parent or any of its subsidiaries, or listing of any such shares (with certain exceptions).
127
DESCRIPTION OF THE SENIOR NOTES
You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this description under the subheading "Certain Definitions." In this description, the word "Company" refers only to MDP Acquisitions plc and not to any of its subsidiaries.
The Company issued the Notes under an indenture (the "Indenture") among itself, the Subsidiary Guarantor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (the "Trustee") in a private transaction that is not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act. See "Notice to Investors." The terms of the Notes include those stated in the Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the "Trust Indenture Act").
Any Notes that remain outstanding after completion of the exchange offer, together with the Exchange Notes issued in the exchange offer, will be treated as a single class of securities under the Indenture.
The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Indenture and the Note Registration Rights Agreement. It does not restate those agreements in their entirety. We urge you to read the Indenture and the Note Registration Rights Agreement because they, and not this description, define your rights as holders of the Notes. Unless otherwise required by the context, references in this description to the "Notes" include the Notes issued to the initial purchasers in a private transaction that was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Notes, which have been registered under the Securities Act. Copies of the Indenture and the Note Registration Rights Agreement are available as set forth below under "—Additional Information." Certain defined terms used in this description but not defined below under "—Certain Definitions" have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture.
Brief Description of the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees of the Notes
The Notes
The Notes:
- •
- are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company;
- •
- will be senior to the Subordinated PIK Securities;
- •
- are unconditionally guaranteed by the Subsidiary Guarantor;
- •
- arepari passu in right of payment with any existing and future Senior Debt of the Company;
- •
- are effectively subordinated to Indebtedness of the Company's Subsidiaries, including Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement, the Existing Notes and the Existing Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness; and
- •
- will be represented by one or more bearer Notes in global form, but in certain circumstances may be represented by registered Notes in definitive form. See "Book-Entry, Settlement and Clearance."
The Subsidiary Guarantees
The Notes are guaranteed by the Subsidiary Guarantor, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The guarantees of the Notes are collectively referred to herein as the "Subsidiary Guarantees."
The Subsidiary Guarantees of the Notes:
- •
- are general unsecured obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor;
128
- •
- do not become due (and no demand may be made on the Subsidiary Guarantor) until the earliest to occur of the following: (x) certain events of bankruptcy with respect to the Subsidiary Guarantor, (y) a payment default under the Indenture that has been notified to the senior agent under the Senior Credit Agreement and that has been continuing for 179 days after such notice, and (z) the Indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Credit Agreement being declared prematurely due and payable or payable on demand (and demand has been made) by reason of the occurrence of an event of default, as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement;
- •
- are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor (including its Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement) and of its Subsidiaries; and
- •
- arepari passu in right of payment with any future senior subordinated Indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor.
Holding Company Status
The Company is a holding company with limited assets and operates its business through its subsidiaries. Any right of the Company and its creditors, including Holders, to participate in the assets of any of the Company's Subsidiaries upon any liquidation or administration of any such Subsidiary will be subject to the prior claims of the creditors of such Subsidiary, including, but not limited to, secured claims and claims under the Senior Credit Agreement and the Existing Notes. The claims of creditors of the Company, including the claims of Holders of Notes, will be effectively subordinated to all existing and future third-party indebtedness and liabilities, including trade payables, of the Company's Subsidiaries. Claims of Holders of the Notes on the Subsidiary Guarantee will be direct claims on the Subsidiary Guarantor. However, (i) each Subsidiary Guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor (including its Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement) and (ii) the Subsidiary Guarantor itself is a holding company, and any right of the Holders to participate in the assets of any of the Subsidiary Guarantor's Subsidiaries upon any liquidation or administration of any such Subsidiary will be subject to the prior claims of the creditors of such Subsidiary in substantially the same manner as the claims of the Holders against the Company is subject to the prior claims of the creditors of the Company's Subsidiaries, as described above. At September 30, 2002, the Company and its Subsidiaries would have had total liabilities of €5,179 million on a combined consolidatedpro forma basis after giving effect to the JSG Acquisition and the offering of Notes. The Company and its Subsidiaries may incur other indebtedness in the future, including secured indebtedness.
Principal, Maturity and Interest
The Indenture provides for the issuance by the Company of Notes, of which $205 million will be issued in this offering as "Additional Notes." The Company had previously issued $545 million principal amount of notes under the Indenture (the "Existing Senior Notes"). The Company may issue additional Notes (the "Additional Notes") under the Indenture, in each case from time to time after this offering. Any offering of Additional Notes is subject to the covenant described below under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock." The Notes and any Additional Notes subsequently issued under the Indenture would be treated as a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. For all purposes herein unless expressly stated otherwise, the term "Notes" shall include references to any Additional Notes.
The Company will issue Notes in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000. The Notes will mature on October 1, 2012.
Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 9.625%per annum. Interest on the Notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, commencing on April 1, 2003. In the case
129
of certificated Notes, the Company will make each interest payment to the Holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding March 15 and September 15; in the case of bearer global Notes, the Company will make each interest payment to the bearer thereof on the interest payment date. Rights of holders of beneficial interests to receive such payments will be subject to applicable procedures of the Book-Entry Depositary (defined below) and DTC.
Interest on the Notes will accrue from the date of the indenture or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months.
Book-Entry Terms
The Notes will initially be represented by two global securities in bearer form without interest coupons, which together will represent the aggregate principal amount of the Notes. The global notes will be deposited with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as book-entry depositary (the "Book-Entry Depositary") pursuant to the terms of Deposit and Custody Agreements (as defined in "Book-Entry, Settlement and Clearance"). The Book-Entry Depositary will issue a depositary interest in each global note, representing a 100% interest in the respective underlying global note to DTC by recording such interest in the Book-Entry Depositary's books and records in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Upon acceptance by DTC of depositary interests, DTC will record book-entry interests in such depositary interests ("Book-Entry Interests"). The Book-Entry Interests will not be held in definitive form. Instead, DTC will credit on its book-entry registration and transfer system the participants' accounts with the Book-Entry Interests owned by such participants. See "Book-Entry, Settlement and Clearance."
Methods of Receiving Payments on the Notes
Methods of receiving payments on global Notes are governed by provisions described under "Book-Entry, Settlement and Clearance—Book-Entry Procedures for the Global Notes" and "—Payments." In the case of certificated Notes, if a Holder of at least $1.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes has given wire transfer instructions to the Company, and, for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the paying agent in Luxembourg, the Company will pay all interest, premium, Liquidated Damages, if any, and Additional Amounts, if any, on that Holder's Notes in accordance with those instructions. In all other cases, the Company may elect to make payments of interest, premium, Liquidated Damages, if any, and Additional Amounts, if any, by check mailed to the Holders at their addresses set forth in the register of Holders. Payments on Notes will be made through the office or agency of a Paying Agent for the Notes (which, subject to the provisions in "—Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes," will be in the City and State of New York).
Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes
The Trustee will initially act as Paying Agent and Registrar for the Notes;provided that, for so long as any Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange so require, the Company shall have appointed a Person located in Luxembourg and reasonably acceptable to the Trustee as an additional paying agent and transfer agent for the Notes. In addition, the Company shall undertake under the Indenture that, if the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council meeting of 26-27 November 2000 are implemented, it will ensure that it maintains a paying agent in a European Union member state that will not be obliged to withhold or deduct tax pursuant to the Directive. The Company may change the Paying Agent or Registrar for the Notes without prior notice to the Holders of Notes, and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may act as Paying Agent or Registrar in respect of the Notes;provided, however, that if and for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the Company will publish notice of the change in the Paying Agent and Registrar in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort).
130
Transfer and Exchange
A Holder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the Indenture. The Registrar, the Trustee and any paying and transfer agent in Luxembourg may require a Holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents and the Company may require a Holder to pay any taxes and fees required by law or permitted by the Indenture. The Company is not required to transfer or exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, the Company is not required to transfer or exchange any Note for a period of 15 days before a selection of Notes to be redeemed. No service charge will be made for any registration of transfer or exchange of the Notes, but the Trustee and the paying and transfer agent in Luxembourg may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange.
The Holder of a Note will be treated as the owner of it for all purposes.
The Subsidiary Guarantees; Subordination Provisions of the Subsidiary Guarantee
The payment and performance in full when due of the Company's obligations under the Indenture and the Notes will be guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by the Subsidiary Guarantor subject to the subordination provisions and other terms summarized below. However, the Subsidiary Guarantor shall be released from all of its obligations under the Subordinated Guarantee (x) in connection with the sale of the Subsidiary Guarantor (i) on an enforcement of the senior security by the senior agent or by any receiver or administrative receiver or (ii) at the request of the senior agent after an event of default under the Senior Credit Agreement, or (y) if the Subsidiary Guarantor merges, consolidates or amalgamates with, or transfers all or substantially all of its property or assets to, another entity and the surviving entity enters into a guarantee of the Notes in compliance with the covenant under the caption, "—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets," below. The Subsidiary Guarantor will also be released and discharged from its obligations in respect of a Subordinated Guarantee in the circumstances set forth in the section entitled "—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance," below.
Subordination Provisions of Subordinated Guarantees
The Subordinated Guarantees will be subordinated in right of payment, to the extent set forth in the Indenture, to the prior irrevocable payment in full in cash of all Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor, including indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement. The Subordinated Guarantees will provide that, upon any payment or distribution (including by exercise of any right of receipt, set-off, combination of accounts or other discharge) to creditors of the Subsidiary Guarantor in a liquidation, dissolution, winding-up, bankruptcy, administration, reorganization, examination, receivership, administrative receivership or similar proceeding relating to the Subsidiary Guarantor or its property, or in an assignment for the benefit of creditors of the Subsidiary Guarantor or in any marshalling of the Subsidiary Guarantor's assets:
- (i)
- lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement and under the other Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor will be entitled to receive irrevocable payment in full in cash of all obligations due (and that become due thereafter) in respect of the Senior Credit Agreement and such Senior Debt (including interest accruing after the commencement of any liquidation, dissolution, winding-up, bankruptcy, administration, reorganization, receivership, administrative receivership or similar proceeding) before the Trustee or Holders of Notes will be entitled to receive any payment with respect to the Subordinated Guarantees (except that Holders may receive and retain payments made from any defeasance trust referred to in the section entitled "—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance" if such trust was established prior to the proceedings described above and not in breach of the Senior Credit Agreement); and
- (ii)
- until all Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement and the other Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor has been irrevocably paid in full in cash, any payment or distribution to
131
which the Trustee or Holders of Notes would be entitled but for the subordination provisions of the Subordinated Guarantees in the Indenture shall be made to the lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement and such other Senior Debt, as their respective interests may appear.
Notwithstanding that a failure by the Company to make any payment on the Notes when due would constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture and would enable the Trustee and the Holders of the Notes to accelerate the maturity of the Notes, the Subordinated Guarantees will provide that, prior to the repayment of all obligations under the Senior Credit Agreement, the obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor under its Subordinated Guarantee are not due (and no demand may be made on the Subsidiary Guarantor) until:
- (a)
- (i) an order is made for the winding-up, dissolution, examination, or administration of the Subsidiary Guarantor; or (ii) a liquidator, trustee in bankruptcy, judicial custodian, compulsory manager, receiver, administrative receiver, examiner, administrator or similar officer is appointed to the Subsidiary Guarantor; or
- (b)
- each of the following shall have occurred:
- (i)
- a default in payment of any amounts due under the Indenture or the Notes (or, in the case of any amount not constituting principal, interest or fees, amounts in excess of €500,000) has occurred;
- (ii)
- a Holder of Notes or the Trustee therefor has notified the agent for the lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement in writing of such default;
- (iii)
- a period of not less than 179 days has passed from the date of receipt by the agent for the lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement of that notice; and
- (iv)
- at the end of such 179-day period, the default is continuing and has not been waived; or
- (c)
- any Indebtedness outstanding under the Senior Credit Agreement has been declared to be prematurely due and payable or payable on demand (and demand has been made) by reason of an event of default, as defined in the Senior Credit Agreement.
Since the obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subordinated Guarantees will not be due until the occurrence of the events described above, the Trustee on behalf of holders of the Notes may not make a demand under or bring any enforcement action on the Subordinated Guarantees, including the commencement of insolvency proceedings with respect to the Subsidiary Guarantor, until such time.
Turnover
In the event that the Trustee or any Holder of Notes receives or recovers any payment or distribution on or with respect to the Subordinated Guarantee (other than payments made from any defeasance trust referred to in the section entitled "—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance") at a time when such payment is prohibited by the subordination provisions of the Indenture, such payment will be held by the Trustee or such Holder, in trust for the benefit of, and will be paid forthwith over and delivered, upon written request, to, the lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement as their interests may appear for application to the payment of all obligations with respect to Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement remaining unpaid to the extent necessary to pay such obligations in full in cash in accordance with their terms, after giving effect to any concurrent payment or distribution to or for such lenders. In the event that any such payment is received by the Trustee or a Holder, such Trustee or Holder shall, if it has knowledge that such payment was received at a time when it was so prohibited, give notice to the agent for the lenders under the Senior Credit Agreement.
132
Optional Redemption
At any time prior to October 1, 2005, the Company may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes issued under the Indenture at a redemption price of 109.625% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of one or more offerings of Capital Stock of the Company or a capital contribution to the Company's common equity made with the net cash proceeds of an offering of Capital Stock of the Company's direct or indirect parent other than, in each case, net cash proceeds received in connection with receipt of the Equity Balance);provided that:
- (1)
- at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes issued under the Indenture remain outstanding immediately after the occurrence of any such redemption (excluding Notes held by the Company and its Subsidiaries); and
- (2)
- the redemption must occur within 60 days of the date of the closing of such offering or the making of such capital contribution.
Prior to October 1, 2007, the Company may also redeem all the Notes, as a whole but not in part, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days' prior written notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, thereon, to, the date of redemption.
Except pursuant to the preceding paragraphs and except as described below under "—Redemption for Taxation Reasons," none of the Notes will be redeemable at the Company's option prior to October 1, 2007. Nothing in the Indenture prohibits the Company from acquiring the Notes by means other than a redemption, whether pursuant to an issuer tender offer or otherwise, assuming such acquisition does not otherwise violate the terms of the Indenture.
On or after October 1, 2007, the Company may redeem all or a part of the Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days' notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, and Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, thereon, to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on October 1 of the years indicated below:
Year
| | Price
|
---|
|
---|
2007 | | 104.813% |
2008 | | 103.208% |
2009 | | 101.604% |
2010 and thereafter | | 100.000% |
In the event that the Company effects an optional redemption of the Notes, the Company will inform the Luxembourg Stock Exchange of such optional redemption and confirm the aggregate principal amount of the Notes that will remain outstanding following such redemption.
At least 30 days but not more than 60 days before a redemption date, the Company shall, so long as the Notes are in global form, publish notice thereof in a leading newspaper having general circulation in New York (which is expected to beThe Wall Street Journal) (and, if and so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange shall so require, a newspaper having a general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort)) or in the case of certificated Notes, in addition to such publication, mail such notice to Holders by first-class mail, postage prepaid, at their respective addresses as they appear on the registration books of the Registrar.
133
Redemption for Taxation Reasons
The Issuer may, at its option, redeem the Notes in whole as to such series, but not in part, at any time upon giving not less than 30 nor more than 60 days' notice to the Holders of the Notes (which notice will be irrevocable) at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date fixed for redemption (a "Tax Redemption Date") (subject to the right of holders of record of certificated Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), all Additional Amounts (see "—Withholding Taxes"), if any, then due and which will become due on the Tax Redemption Date as a result of the redemption or otherwise, and Liquidated Damages thereon, if any, if a Payor (as defined below) determines that, as a result of:
- (1)
- any change in, or amendment to, the law or treaties (or any regulations or rulings promulgated thereunder) of a Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction (as defined below) affecting taxation or
- (2)
- any change in position regarding the application, administration or interpretation of such laws, treaties, regulations or rulings (including a holding, judgment or order by a court of competent jurisdiction), (each of the foregoing in clauses (1) and (2), a "Change in Tax Law"),
the Payor is, or on the next interest payment date in respect of the Notes would be, required to pay more thande minimis Additional Amounts, and the Payor cannot avoid such obligation by taking reasonable measures available to it. In the case of the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor, the Change in Tax Law must become effective on or after the date of the Indenture. In the case of a Successor Company or a successor of the Subsidiary Guarantor, the Change in Tax Law must become effective after the date that such entity first makes payment on the Notes. Notice of redemption for taxation reasons will be published in accordance with the procedures under "—Notices." Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such notice of redemption will be given earlier than 90 days prior to the earliest date on which the Payor would be obliged to make such payment or withholding if a payment in respect of such Notes were then due. Prior to the publication or mailing of any notice of redemption of Notes pursuant to the foregoing, the Payor will deliver to the Trustee an opinion of an independent tax counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee to the effect that the circumstances referred to above exist. The Trustee will accept such opinion as sufficient existence of the satisfaction of the conditions precedent described above, in which event it will be conclusive and binding on the holders of the Notes.
Mandatory Redemption
The Company is not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Notes.
Withholding Taxes
All payments made by the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor or a successor of either (a "Payor") on the Notes and under the Subsidiary Guarantees will be made without withholding or deduction for, or on account of, any present or future taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature ("Taxes") imposed or levied by or on behalf of (1) Luxembourg, the United States, Ireland or any political subdivision or governmental authority of any thereof or therein having power to tax, (2) any jurisdiction from or through which payment on the Notes is made, or any political subdivision or governmental authority thereof or therein having the power to tax, or (3) any other jurisdiction in which the Payor is organized or otherwise considered to be a resident for tax purposes, or any political subdivision or governmental authority thereof or therein having the power to tax (each of clause (1), (2) and (3), a "Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction") unless the withholding or deduction of such Taxes is then required by law. If any deduction or withholding for, or on account of, any Taxes of any
134
Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction will at any time be required from any payments made with respect to the Notes or under the Subsidiary Guarantees, including payments of principal, redemption price, interest, premium or Liquidated Damages, if any, the Payor will pay (together with such payments) such additional amounts (the "Additional Amounts") as may be necessary in order that the net amounts received in respect of such payments by the Holders of the Notes or the Trustee, as the case may be, after such withholding or deduction (including any such deduction or withholding from such Additional Amounts), equal the amounts which would have been received in respect of such payments on the Notes in the absence of such withholding or deduction;provided, however, that no such Additional Amounts will be payable with respect to:
- (1)
- any payments to a Holder or beneficial owner who is liable for such Taxes in respect of such Note by reason of the Holder's or beneficial owner's having any present or former connection with the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction (including being a citizen or resident or national of, or carrying on a business or maintaining a permanent establishment in, or being physically present in, the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction) other than by the mere holding of such Note or enforcement of rights thereunder or the receipt of payments in respect thereof;
- (2)
- any Taxes that are imposed or withheld where such withholding or imposition is by reason of the failure of the Holder or beneficial owner of the Note to comply with any reasonable and timely request by the Payor to provide information concerning the nationality, residence or identity of such Holder or beneficial owner or to make any declaration or similar claim or satisfy any certification, information or other reporting requirement relating to such matters, which is required or imposed by a statute, treaty, regulation, protocol, or administrative practice of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction as a precondition to exemption from all or part of such Taxes;
- (3)
- except in the case of the winding up of the Payor, any Note presented for payment (where presentation is required) in the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction (unless by reason of the Payor's actions, presentment could not have been made elsewhere and except to the extent that the Holder would have been entitled to Additional Amounts had the Notes been presented elsewhere);
- (4)
- any Note presented for payment (where presentation is required) more than 30 days after the relevant payment is first made available for payment to the Holder (except to the extent that the Holder would have been entitled to Additional Amounts had the Note been presented during such 30 day period);
- (5)
- any Taxes that are payable otherwise than by withholding from a payment of the principal of, premium, if any, interest or Liquidated Damages, if any, on the Notes;
- (6)
- any estate, inheritance, gift, sale, transfer, personal property or similar tax, assessment or other governmental charge;
- (7)
- a Tax imposed on a payment to an individual and required to be made pursuant to any European Union Directive (a "Directive") on the taxation of savings implementing the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council meeting of 26-27 November 2000 or any law implementing or complying with, or introduced in order to conform to, such Directive; or
- (8)
- a Tax imposed in connection with a Note presented for payment by or on behalf of a Holder or beneficial owner who would have been able to avoid such Tax by presenting the relevant Note to another paying agent in a member state of the European Union.
Such Additional Amounts will also not be payable where, had the beneficial owner of the Note been the Holder of the Note, it would not have been entitled to payment of Additional Amounts by reason of clauses (1) to (8) inclusive above.
135
The Payor will (i) make any required withholding or deduction and (ii) remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction in accordance with applicable law. The Payor will use all reasonable efforts to obtain certified copies of tax receipts evidencing the payment of any Taxes so deducted or withheld from each Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction imposing such Taxes and will provide such certified copies to each Holder. The Payor will attach to each certified copy a certificate stating (x) that the amount of withholding Taxes evidenced by the certified copy was paid in connection with payments in respect of the principal amount of Notes then outstanding and (y) the amount of such withholding Taxes paid per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes. Copies of such documentation will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at the office of the Trustee by the Holders of the Notes upon request and will be made available at the offices of the Paying Agent located in Luxembourg if the Notes are then listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Wherever in the Indenture or the Notes there are mentioned, in any context, (1) the payment of principal, (2) purchase prices in connection with a purchase of Notes, (3) interest or (4) any other amount payable on or with respect to any of the Notes, such reference shall be deemed to include payment of Additional Amounts as described under this heading to the extent that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be payable in respect thereof.
The Payor will pay any present or future stamp, court or documentary taxes, or any other excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies which arise in any jurisdiction from the execution, delivery or registration of any Notes or any other document or instrument referred to therein (other than a transfer of the Notes), or the receipt of any payments with respect to the Notes, excluding any such taxes, charges or similar levies imposed by any jurisdiction outside Luxembourg, Ireland, the United States or any jurisdiction in which a Paying Agent is located, other than those resulting from, or required to be paid in connection with, the enforcement of the Notes or any other such document or instrument following the occurrence of any Event of Default with respect to the Notes.
The foregoing obligations will survive any termination, defeasance or discharge of the Indenture.
Repurchase at the Option of Holders
Change of Control
If a Change of Control occurs, each Holder of Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof) of that Holder's Notes pursuant to an offer (the "Change of Control Offer") on the terms set forth in the Indenture. In the Change of Control Offer, the Company will offer a payment (the "Change of Control Payment") in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, Additional Amounts and Liquidated Damages, if any, thereon, to the date of purchase. Within 30 days following any Change of Control, the Company will mail a notice to each Holder and to the Trustee describing the transaction or transactions that constitute the Change of Control and offering to repurchase Notes on a date (the "Change of Control Payment Date") specified in such notice, which date shall be no earlier than 30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such notice is mailed, pursuant to the procedures required by the Indenture and described in such notice. The Company will comply with the requirements of Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the Notes as a result of a Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
On the Change of Control Payment Date, the Company will, to the extent lawful:
- (1)
- accept for payment all Notes or portions thereof properly tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;
136
- (2)
- deposit with the relevant Paying Agent an amount equal to the Change of Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions thereof so tendered; and
- (3)
- deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes so accepted together with an Officers' Certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of Notes or portions thereof being purchased by the Company.
The Paying Agent will promptly mail to each Holder of Notes so tendered the Change of Control Payment for such Notes and the Trustee, upon receipt of a Company order, will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book-entry) to each Holder a new Note equal in principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the Notes surrendered, if any;provided that each such new Note will be in a principal amount of $1,000, or an integral multiple thereof.
The Company will publicly announce the results of the Change of Control Offer on or as soon as practicable after the Change of Control Payment Date;provided, that if and for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the Company will publish such public announcement in Luxembourg in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort).
�� In the case of certificated Notes, if the Change of Control Payment Date is on or after an interest record date and on or before the related interest payment date, any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to the Person in whose name a Note is registered at the close of business on such record date, and no additional interest will be payable to holders who tender pursuant to the Change of Control Offer; in the case of global bearer Notes, the Company will pay accrued and unpaid interest to the Change of Control Payment Date to the Holder on such date.
The provisions described above that require the Company to make a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control will be applicable regardless of whether any other provisions of the Indenture are applicable. Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control, the Indenture does not contain provisions that permit the Holders of the Notes to require that the Company repurchase or redeem the Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction.
The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a Change of Control if a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Company and purchases all Notes validly tendered and not withdrawn under such Change of Control Offer.
The Company's ability to repurchase Notes pursuant to a Change of Control Offer may be limited by a number of factors. The occurrence of certain of the events that constitute a Change of Control may constitute a default under the Senior Credit Agreement. In addition, certain events that may constitute a change of control under the Senior Credit Agreement and cause a default may not constitute a Change of Control under the Indenture. The Priority Agreements and the Intercompany Loan Agreements effectively prohibit Subsidiaries of the Company from making funds available to the Company so that it can purchase the Notes upon a Change of Control so long as amounts are outstanding under the Senior Credit Agreement. In the event that a Change of Control occurs at a time when the Company's Subsidiaries are prohibited from making funds available to the Company so that the Company can purchase the Notes, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may seek the consent of its lenders to purchase the Notes or may attempt to refinance any borrowing that contains such prohibition. If such a consent or refinancing is not obtained, the Company's Subsidiaries will remain prohibited from making such funds available to the Company so that it can purchase the Notes. In such a case, failure to purchase tendered Notes would constitute an Event of Default under the Notes which would, in turn, constitute an event of default under the Senior Credit Agreement. In such circumstances, the subordination provisions in the Priority Agreements would likely restrict payment to Holders of the Notes. In addition, future Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries may also contain prohibitions of certain events that would constitute a Change of Control or require such
137
Indebtedness to be repurchased upon a Change of Control. The exercise by the Holders of their right to require the Company to repurchase the Notes could cause a default under such Indebtedness, even if the Change of Control itself does not, due to the financial effect of such repurchase on the Company. Finally, the Company's ability to pay cash to the Holders upon a repurchase may be limited by the Company's then existing financial resources. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available when necessary to make any required repurchases.
Even if sufficient funds were otherwise available, the terms of other Indebtedness may prohibit the Company's prepayment of Notes prior to their scheduled maturity. Consequently, if the Company is not able to prepay such Indebtedness or obtain requisite consents, the Company will be unable to fulfill its repurchase obligations if Holders of Notes exercise their repurchase rights following a Change of Control, thereby resulting in a default under the Indenture. A default under the Indenture may result in a cross-default under such other Indebtedness. In addition, because the Senior Credit Agreement is structurally senior to the Notes, the Company may not be able to make payments to Holders under the foregoing provisions.
The Change of Control provisions described above may deter certain mergers, tender offers and other takeover attempts involving the Company by increasing the capital required to effectuate such transactions. The definition of Change of Control includes a phrase relating to the direct or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of "all or substantially all" of the properties or assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole. Although there is a limited body of case law interpreting the phrase "substantially all," there is no precise established definition of the phrase under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a Holder of Notes to require the Company to repurchase such Notes as a result of a sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of less than all of the assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole to another Person or group may be uncertain.
Asset Sales
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, consummate an Asset Sale unless:
- (1)
- the Company (or the Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be) receives consideration at the time of such Asset Sale which, taken as a whole, is at least equal to the fair market value of the assets or Equity Interests issued or sold or otherwise disposed of;
- (2)
- such fair market value is determined by the Company's Board of Directors and evidenced by a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company set forth in an Officers' Certificate delivered to the Trustee; and
- (3)
- at least 75% of the consideration therefor received by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary is in the form of cash or Cash Equivalents or Marketable Securities. For purposes of this provision, each of the following shall be deemed to be cash:
- (a)
- any liabilities (as shown on the Company's or such Restricted Subsidiary's most recent balance sheet) of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary (other than contingent liabilities and liabilities that are by their terms subordinated to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees) that are assumed by the transferee of any such assets;
- (b)
- any securities, notes or other obligations received by the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary from such transferee that are converted, sold or exchanged by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary into cash or Cash Equivalents within 90 days of the related Asset Sale (to the extent of the cash received in that conversion); or
138
- (c)
- any Designated Noncash Consideration received by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in such Asset Sale having an aggregate fair market value, taken together with all other Designated Noncash Consideration received since the date of the Indenture pursuant to this clause (c) that is at that time outstanding, not to exceed 10% of Total Assets at the time of the receipt of such Designated Noncash Consideration (with the fair market value of each item of Designated Noncash Consideration being measured at the time received and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value).
Within 365 days after the receipt of any Net Proceeds from an Asset Sale, the Company may apply such Net Proceeds at its option:
- (1)
- to repay Senior Debt other than the Notes and, if such Senior Debt repaid is revolving credit Indebtedness, to correspondingly reduce commitments with respect thereto;
- (2)
- to invest in or to acquire other properties, assets (whether through the purchase of Capital Stock of any Persons owning such assets or otherwise) to replace the properties or assets that were the subject of the Asset Sale or that will be used in businesses of the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries, as the case may be, existing at the time such assets are sold; or
- (3)
- to make a capital expenditure or commit, or cause such Restricted Subsidiary to commit, to make a capital expenditure (such commitments to include amounts anticipated to be expended pursuant to the Company's capital investment plan as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company) within 24 months of such Asset Sale.
Pending the final application of any such Net Proceeds, the Company may temporarily reduce revolving credit borrowings or otherwise invest such Net Proceeds in any manner that is not prohibited by the Indenture.
Any Net Proceeds from Asset Sales that are not applied or invested as provided in the preceding two paragraphs will constitute "Excess Proceeds." On the 366th day after an Asset Sale, if the aggregate amount of Excess Proceeds exceeds €25.0 million, the Company will make an offer (an "Asset Sale Offer") to all Holders of Notes and all holders of other Indebtedness that ispari passu with the Notes containing provisions similar to those set forth in the Indenture with respect to offers to purchase or redeem with the proceeds of sales of assets to purchase the maximum principal amount of Notes and such otherpari passu Indebtedness that may be purchased out of the Excess Proceeds. The offer price in any Asset Sale Offer will be equal to 100% of principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, to the date of purchase, and will be payable in cash. If any Excess Proceeds remain after consummation of an Asset Sale Offer, the Company may use such Excess Proceeds for any purpose not otherwise prohibited by the Indenture. If the aggregate principal amount of Notes and such otherpari passu Indebtedness tendered into such Asset Sale Offer exceeds the amount of Excess Proceeds, the Trustee shall select the Notes and such otherpari passu Indebtedness to be purchased on apro rata basis based on the principal amount of such Notes and such otherpari passu Indebtedness tendered. Upon completion of each Asset Sale Offer, the amount of Excess Proceeds shall be reset at zero.
The Company will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-1 under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent such laws and regulations are applicable in connection with each repurchase of Notes pursuant to an Asset Sale Offer. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Asset Sales provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Asset Sale provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such conflict.
139
In the case of certificated Notes, if the date on which the Company purchases the principal amount of notes as required by the foregoing provisions is on or after an interest record date and on or before the related interest payment date, any accrued and unpaid interest will be paid to the Person in whose name a Note is registered at the close of business on such record date, and no additional interest will be payable to Holders who tender Notes pursuant to the Asset Sale Offer; in the case of global bearer Notes, the Company will pay accrued and unpaid interest to the date on which the Company purchases the principal amount of Notes to the Holder on such date.
The Senior Credit Agreement prohibits, and other agreements relating to Senior Debt of the Company may prohibit, the Company from purchasing any Notes and also provide that certain change of control or asset sale events with respect to the Company would constitute a default under these agreements. In the event a Change of Control or Asset Sale occurs at a time when the Company is prohibited from purchasing Notes, the Company could seek the consent of its lenders to the purchase of Notes or could attempt to refinance any borrowing that contain such prohibition. If the Company does not obtain such a consent or repay such borrowing, the Company will remain prohibited from purchasing Notes. In such case, the Company's failure to purchase tendered Notes would constitute an Event of Default under the Indenture which could, in turn, constitute a default under such agreements.
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, engage in any Asset Swaps, unless:
- (1)
- at the time of entering into such Asset Swap and immediately after giving effect to such Asset Swap, no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof;
- (2)
- the terms of such Asset Swap have been approved by a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company; and
- (3)
- the Company (or the Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be) receives consideration at the time of such Asset Swap which, taken as a whole, is at least equal to the fair market value of the assets disposed of in the Asset Swap.
Selection and Notice
If less than all of the Notes are to be redeemed at any time, the Trustee will select Notes for redemption relevant in compliance with the requirements of the principal national securities exchange, if any, on which the Notes are listed, and/or in compliance with the requirements of DTC, or if the Notes are not so listed or such exchange prescribes no method of selection and the Notes are not held through DTC, or DTC prescribes no method of selection, on apro rata basis, by lot or by such other method as the Trustee in its sole discretion shall deem fair and appropriate (and in such manner as complies with applicable legal and exchange requirements);provided,however, that no Note of $1,000 in the case of Notes in aggregate principal amount or less shall be redeemed in part.
140
At least 30 days but not more than 60 days before a redemption date, the Company shall, so long as the Notes are in global form, publish notice of redemption in a leading newspaper having general circulation in New York (which is expected to beThe Wall Street Journal) and, if and for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, publish such notice in Luxembourg in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort) or, in the case of certificated Notes, in addition to such publication, mail such notice to Holders by first-class mail, postage prepaid, at their respective addresses as they appear on the registration books of the Registrar.
If any Note is to be redeemed in part only, the notice of redemption that relates to that Note shall state the portion of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. In the case of a certificated Note, a new Note in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion of the original Note will be issued in the name of the Holder thereof upon cancellation of the original Note. In the case of a global bearer Note, an appropriate notation will be made on such Note to decrease the principal amount thereof to an amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof. Notes called for redemption become due on the date fixed for redemption. On and after the redemption date, interest ceases to accrue on Notes or portions of them called for redemption.
Further Issuances
We may from time to time, without notice to or the consent of the Holders of the Notes, create and issue further debt securities rankingpari passu with the Notes in all respects (or in all respects except for the payment of interest accruing prior to the issue date of the debt securities or except for the first payment of interest following the issue date of the debt securities). We may consolidate such further debt securities with the outstanding notes to form a single series.
Such additional debt securities may be issued with original issue discount ("OID") for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Purchasers of Notes after the date of any further issue may not be able to differentiate between debt securities sold as part of the further issue and previously issued Notes. In such case, if such debt securities were issued with OID, purchasers of Notes after such further issue may be required to accrue OID with respect to their Notes. This may affect the price of outstanding Notes following a further issue. Purchasers are advised to consult legal counsel with respect to the implications of any future decision by us to undertake a further issue of debt securities with OID.
Certain Covenants
Restricted Payments
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly:
- (1)
- declare or pay any dividend or make any other payment or distribution on account of the Company's or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries' Equity Interests (including, without limitation, any payment in connection with any merger or consolidation involving the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries) or to the direct or indirect holders of the Company's or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries' Equity Interests in their capacity as such (other than dividends or distributions payable (a) in Equity Interests (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Company or (b) to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company);
- (2)
- purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire or retire for value (including, without limitation, in connection with any merger or consolidation involving the Company) any Equity Interests of the Company or any direct or indirect parent of the Company;
141
- (3)
- make any payment on or with respect to, or purchase, redeem, defease or otherwise acquire or retire for value any Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor that is by its terms expressly subordinated to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees, as applicable, except a payment of interest or principal at the Stated Maturity thereof; or
- (4)
- make any Restricted Investment
(all such payments and other actions set forth in clauses (1) through (4) above being collectively referred to as "Restricted Payments"), unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such Restricted Payment:
- (1)
- no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof; and
- (2)
- the Company would, at the time of such Restricted Payment and after givingpro forma effect thereto as if such Restricted Payment had been made at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period, have been permitted to incur at least €1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described below under the caption "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock"; and
- (3)
- such Restricted Payment, together with the aggregate amount of all other Restricted Payments made by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries after the date of the Indenture (excluding Restricted Payments permitted by clauses (2), (3), (4), (6), (8) and (9) of the next succeeding paragraph), is less than the sum, without duplication, of:
- (a)
- 50% of the Consolidated Net Income of the Company for the period (taken as one accounting period) from the beginning of the first fiscal quarter commencing after the date of the Indenture to the end of the Company's most recently ended fiscal quarter for which internal financial statements are available at the time of such Restricted Payment (or, if such Consolidated Net Income for such period is a deficit, less 100% of such deficit), plus
- (b)
- 100% of the aggregate net cash proceeds received by the Company since the date of the Indenture (other than net cash proceeds received in connection with receipt of the Equity Balance) as a contribution to its common equity capital or from the issue or sale of Equity Interests of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock) or from the issue or sale of Disqualified Stock or debt securities of the Company that, in either case, have been converted into or exchanged for Equity Interests (other than Equity Interests (or Disqualified Stock or debt securities) sold to a Subsidiary of the Company or an employee stock ownership plan or similar trust or any other Person to the extent such sale to an employee stock ownership plan or similar trust or other Person is financed by loans from or guaranteed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary unless such loans have been repaid with cash on or prior to the date of determination), together with the net cash proceeds received by the Company upon such conversion or exchange, if any, less the amount of cash or other property distributed by the Company upon any such conversion or exchange, if any;provided, however, that any such net cash proceeds shall be excluded for purposes of incurring Indebtedness under clause (18) of the second paragraph of the covenant under "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" and for purposes of making Restricted Payments under clause (2) of the second paragraph hereof and shall not constitute an Excluded Contribution; plus
- (c)
- to the extent that any Restricted Investment that was made after the date of the Indenture is sold for cash or otherwise liquidated or repaid for cash, the lesser of
142
(i) the cash return of capital with respect to such Restricted Investment (less the cost of disposition, if any) and (ii) the initial amount of such Restricted Investment;provided, however, that no amount will be included under this clause (c) to the extent it is already included in Consolidated Net Income.
The preceding provisions will not prohibit:
- (1)
- the payment of any dividend within 60 days after the date of declaration thereof, if at said date of declaration such payment would have complied with the provisions of the Indenture;
- (2)
- the redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other acquisition of any subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor or of any Equity Interests of the Company in exchange for, or out of the net cash proceeds of the substantially concurrent sale (other than to a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company or to an employee stock ownership plan or similar trust or other Person to the extent such sale is financed by loans from or guaranteed by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary unless such loans have been repaid with cash on or prior to the date of determination) of, Equity Interests of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock);provided that the amount of any such net cash proceeds that are utilized for any such redemption, repurchase, retirement, defeasance or other acquisition shall be excluded for purposes of incurring Indebtedness under clause (18) of the second paragraph of the covenant under "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" and for purposes of making Restricted Payments under clause 3(b) of the preceding paragraph and shall not constitute an Excluded Contribution; andprovided,further, that amounts received in connection with the Equity Balance shall not be permitted for such redemptions, repurchases, retirements, defeasances or other acquisitions under this clause (2);
- (3)
- the defeasance, redemption, repurchase or other acquisition of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor with the net cash proceeds from an incurrence of subordinated Indebtedness of the Company that is Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness;
- (4)
- the payment of any dividend by a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to the holders of its common Equity Interests on apro ratabasis;
- (5)
- so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, the repurchase, redemption or other acquisition or retirement for value (or any dividend or distribution made to fund such repurchase, redemption or retirement for value) of any Equity Interests of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company or Parent held by any current or former officers, directors or employees of the Company (or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or of Parent) pursuant to any management equity subscription agreement, stock option agreement, stock plan or similar agreement other than any such agreement or plan with Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., or its Affiliates or Persons who are officers, directors, employees or consultants of Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., or its Affiliates (other than Persons who are officers, directors or employees of the Company);provided that the aggregate price paid for all such repurchased, redeemed, acquired or retired Equity Interests shall not exceed €5.0 million in any calendar year;provided further that (a) the Company may carry forward and make in a subsequent calendar year, in addition to the amounts permitted for such calendar year, the amount of such purchases, redemptions or other acquisitions or retirements for value permitted to have been made but not made in any preceding calendar year up to a maximum of €20.0 million in any calendar year pursuant to this clause (5), (b) that such amount in any calendar year may be increased by the cash proceeds of key man life insurance policies
143
received by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries after the date of the Indenture less any amount previously applied to the payment of Restricted Payments pursuant to this clause (5), and (c) that cancellation of the Indebtedness owing to the Company from employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with a repurchase of Equity Interests of the Company from such Persons shall be permitted under this clause (5) as if it were a repurchase, redemption, acquisition or retirement for value subject hereto;
- (6)
- repurchases of Equity Interests of the Company deemed to occur upon exercise of stock options to the extent Equity Interests represent a portion of the exercise price of such options;
- (7)
- cash payments, advances, loans or expense reimbursements made to Parent to permit Parent to pay (i) general operating expenses (other than management, consulting or similar fees payable to Affiliates of the Company), accounting, legal, corporate reporting and administrative expenses incurred in the ordinary course of its business in an amount not to exceed €2.0 million in the aggregate in any fiscal year, (ii) any taxes, duties or similar governmental fees of Parent to the extent such tax obligations are directly attributable to its ownership of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries and (iii) fees and expenses incurred in connection with the JSG Acquisition not to exceed €8.0 million;
- (8)
- the acquisition of, or payments made in respect of, any Equity Interests of JSG in connection with the Tender Offer (including Equity Interests acquired compulsorily under the procedures set out in Section 204 of the Irish Companies Act, 1963 and payments made in respect of outstanding options for Equity Interests of JSG);
- (9)
- Investments that are made with Excluded Contributions;provided that such Excluded Contribution shall not be used to make Restricted Payments pursuant to clause (3)(b) of the preceding paragraph or clause (2) of this paragraph nor shall it be used for purposes of incurring Indebtedness under clause (18) of the second paragraph of the covenant under "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock";
- (10)
- so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing (or results therefrom), repurchases of Subordinated PIK Securities, in connection with any change of control offer or asset sale offer required by the terms thereof, but only if:
- (a)
- in the case of a Change of Control, the Company has first complied with or simultaneously complies with its obligations under the provisions described under "Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control"; or
- (b)
- in the case of an Asset Disposition, the Company has complied with its obligations in accordance with the covenant under the heading, "Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales";
- (11)
- the acquisition or retirement of Disqualified Stock, either:
- (a)
- solely in exchange for shares of Disqualified Stock of the Company; or
- (b)
- through the application of net proceeds of a substantially concurrent sale of shares of Disqualified Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock issued or sold to a Subsidiary of the Company, or any management equity or an employee ownership plan or similar trust established by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for the benefit of its or their employees or other Person to the extent such sale is financed by loans to such Person from or guaranteed by the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor or any Restricted Subsidiary unless such loans have been
144
andprovided, further, that the net cash proceeds from such sale will be excluded from clause (3)(b) of the immediately preceding paragraph to the extent utilized to acquire any Capital Stock or subordinated Indebtedness of the Company; and
- (12)
- so long as no Default has occurred and is continuing or would be caused thereby, other Restricted Payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed €35.0 million since the date of the Indenture.
The amount of all Restricted Payments (other than cash) shall be the fair market value on the date of the Restricted Payment of the asset(s) or securities proposed to be transferred or issued to or by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, pursuant to the Restricted Payment. The fair market value of any assets or securities that are required to be valued by this covenant shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company whose resolution with respect thereto shall be conclusive. The determination by the Board of Directors of the Company must be based upon an opinion or appraisal issued by an accounting, appraisal or investment banking firm of international standing if the fair market value exceeds €40.0 million.
Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become directly or indirectly liable, contingently or otherwise, with respect to (collectively, "incur," and "incurrence" shall have a correlative meaning) any Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt); and the Company will not issue any Disqualified Stock and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to issue any shares of Preferred Stock;provided,however, that the Company may incur Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) or issue Disqualified Stock and any of the Company's Restricted Subsidiaries may incur Acquired Debt or Non-Public Indebtedness, if (i) the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio for the Company's most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such additional Indebtedness is incurred would have been at least 2.0 to l.0, determined on apro forma basis (including apro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom), as if the additional Indebtedness had been incurred or the Preferred Stock or Disqualified Stock had been issued, as the case may be, at the beginning of such four-quarter period and (ii) no Default or Event of Default will have occurred or be continuing or would occur as a consequence thereof.
145
The first paragraph of this covenant will not prohibit the incurrence of any of the following items of Indebtedness (collectively, "Permitted Debt"):
- (1)
- the incurrence by the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of Indebtedness under Credit Facilities and letters of credit under Credit Facilities in an aggregate principal amount at any one time outstanding under this clause (1) (with letters of credit being deemed to have a principal amount equal to the face amount) not to exceed €2.525 billion less the outstanding amount of Specified Existing Indebtedness (to the extent and for so long as such Specified Existing Indebtedness remains outstanding) and less the aggregate amount of all Net Proceeds of Asset Sales that have been applied by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries since the date of the Indenture to permanently repay Indebtedness under a Credit Facility pursuant to the covenant described above under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales";provided that the amount of Indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to Credit Facilities in accordance with this clause (1) shall be in addition to any Indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to Credit Facilities, in reliance on, and in accordance with, clauses (4) and (19) below or in the first paragraph of this covenant;
- (2)
- the incurrence by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries of the Existing Indebtedness;
- (3)
- the incurrence by the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor of Indebtedness represented by the Notes and the related Subsidiary Guarantees and the Exchange Notes and the related Subsidiary Guarantees to be issued pursuant to the Note Registration Rights Agreement;
- (4)
- the incurrence by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Indebtedness (including Capital Lease Obligations, mortgage financings or purchase money obligations) incurred for the purpose of financing all or any part of the purchase price or cost of construction or improvement of property, plant or equipment used in the business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, in an aggregate principal amount (which amount may, but need not be, incurred in whole or in part under Credit Facilities), including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred to refund, refinance, replace, amend, restate, modify or renew, in whole or in part, any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (4), not to exceed the greater of 3.50% of Total Assets as of the date of incurrence and €50.0 million at any time outstanding;
- (5)
- the incurrence by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to refund, refinance, replace, amend, restate, modify or renew, in whole or in part, Indebtedness (other than intercompany Indebtedness) that was permitted by the Indenture to be incurred under the first paragraph of this covenant or clauses (2) (other than Specified Existing Indebtedness), (3) or (19) of this paragraph;
- (6)
- the incurrence by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries of intercompany Indebtedness between or among the Company and/or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;provided,however, that each of the following shall be deemed, in each case, to constitute an incurrence of such Indebtedness by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary, as the case may be, that was not permitted by this clause (6):
- (a)
- any subsequent issuance or transfer of Equity Interests or any other event that results in any such Indebtedness being held by a Person other than the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof; and
- (b)
- any sale or other transfer of any such Indebtedness to a Person that is not either the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary thereof;
146
147
consultants of Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., and its Affiliates (other than officers, directors or employees of the Company)) for the purpose of permitting such persons to purchase Equity Interests of Parent, in an amount not to exceed €20 million at any one time outstanding;
- (14)
- the incurrence of Indebtedness under the Tender Offer Loan Notes;
- (15)
- the incurrence of Indebtedness by a Receivables Subsidiary in a Qualified Receivables Transaction that is not recourse to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (except for Standard Securitization Undertakings);provided that the aggregate principal amount of Indebtedness outstanding under this clause (15) and clause (1) above does not exceed €2.525 billion less Specified Existing Indebtedness (to the extent and for so long as such Specified Existing Indebtedness remains outstanding) and less the aggregate amount of all Net Proceeds of Asset Sales that have been applied by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries since the date of the Indenture to permanently repay Indebtedness under a Credit Facility pursuant to the covenant described above under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales";
- (16)
- the incurrence of Indebtedness by any one or more Restricted Subsidiaries of the Company of Other Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness not to exceed €50.0 million in the aggregate at any one time outstanding;
- (17)
- the incurrence of Indebtedness in the ordinary course of business by any bank or financial institution permitted under the Senior Credit Facility (each, an"Approved Bank") to facilitate the operation of bank accounts of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries maintained with such Approved Bank on a net balance basis where such balances arise in connection with ordinary banking arrangements to manage cash balances of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries as a group and not for the purpose of obtaining net external financing;
- (18)
- Indebtedness of the Company or Non-Public Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary incurred in connection with the acquisition of all of the Capital Stock or all or substantially all of the assets of a Permitted Business up to an amount equal to 100% of the net cash proceeds received by the Company (other than net cash proceeds received in connection with receipt of the Equity Balance) from the issuance or sale (other than to a Subsidiary) of its Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) or otherwise contributed to the capital of the Company (other than Capital Stock owned by any Person (including a holding company) to the extent the purchase of such Capital Stock is financed directly or indirectly (including, in the case of a holding company, by financing the purchase price of such holding company's Capital Stock) with the proceeds of loans or advances from the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary until such loans or advances are repaid in cash), in each case, subsequent to the date of the Indenture;provided, however, that any such net cash proceeds that are so received or contributed (i) shall be excluded for purposes of making Restricted Payments under clause 3(b) of the first paragraph and clause (2) of the second paragraph of the covenant under the caption "—Restricted Payments" and (ii) shall not constitute an Excluded Contribution; and
- (19)
- the incurrence by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of additional Indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount (or accreted value, as applicable) (which amount may, but need not be, incurred in whole or in part under the Credit Facilities) at any time outstanding, including all Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred under clause (5), above, to refund, refinance, replace, amend, restate, modify or renew, in whole or in part, any Indebtedness incurred pursuant to this clause (19), not to exceed €150.0 million.
148
Neither the Company nor any Restricted Subsidiary will incur any Indebtedness under the preceding paragraph if the proceeds thereof are used, directly or indirectly, to refinance any subordinated obligations of the Company unless such Indebtedness will be subordinated to the Notes to at least the same extent as such subordinated obligations. No Restricted Subsidiary may incur any Indebtedness if the proceeds are used to refinance Indebtedness of the Company (other than a refinancing of all the Notes). The Subsidiary Guarantor will not incur any Indebtedness if the proceeds thereof are used, directly or indirectly, to refinance any subordinated obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor unless such Indebtedness will be subordinated to the obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor under the Subsidiary Guarantees to at least the same extent as such subordinated obligations. The Subsidiary Guarantor will not incur any Indebtedness if the proceeds thereof are used, directly or indirectly, to refinance any senior subordinated Indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor unless such refinancing Indebtedness is either senior subordinated Indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor or subordinated Indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantor.
For purposes of determining compliance with this "Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" covenant, in the event that an item of proposed Indebtedness meets the criteria of more than one of the categories of Permitted Debt described in clauses (1) through (19) above, or is entitled to be incurred pursuant to the first paragraph of this covenant, the Company will be permitted to classify or later reclassify such item of Indebtedness in any manner that complies with this covenant;provided that Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement shall be incurred only in reliance on the exception provided by clause (1) of the definition of Permitted Debt. The amount of Indebtedness issued at a price that is less than the principal amount thereof will be equal to the amount of the liability in respect thereof determined in accordance with GAAP.
For purposes of determining compliance with any euro-denominated restriction on the incurrence of Indebtedness, the euro-equivalent principal amount of Indebtedness denominated in a non-euro currency shall be calculated based on the relevant currency exchange rate in effect on the date such Indebtedness was incurred, in the case of term Indebtedness, or first committed, in the case of revolving credit Indebtedness;provided that if such Indebtedness is incurred to refinance other Indebtedness denominated in a non-euro currency, and such refinancing would cause the applicable euro-denominated restriction to be exceeded if calculated at the relevant currency exchange rate in effect on the date of such refinancing, such euro-denominated restriction shall be deemed not to have been exceeded so long as the principal amount of such refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal amount of such Indebtedness being refinanced. The principal amount of any Indebtedness incurred to refinance other Indebtedness, if incurred in a different currency from the Indebtedness being refinanced, shall be calculated based on the currency exchange rate applicable to the currencies in which such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness is denominated that is in effect on the date of such refinancing.
No Subsidiary Guarantor Senior Subordinated Debt
The Subsidiary Guarantor will not incur, create, issue, assume, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any Indebtedness that is subordinate or junior in right of payment to the Senior Debt of the Subsidiary Guarantor and senior in any respect in right of payment to a Subsidiary Guarantee.
Liens
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any Lien of any kind on any asset now owned or hereafter acquired securing Indebtedness or trade payables (except Permitted Liens) unless contemporaneously with the incurrence of such Liens all payments due under the Indenture and the Notes are secured on an equal and ratable basis with the obligations so secured until such time as such obligations are no longer secured by a Lien.
149
Dividend and Other Payment Restrictions Affecting Subsidiaries
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, create or permit to exist or become effective any consensual encumbrance or restriction on the ability of any Restricted Subsidiary to:
- (1)
- pay dividends or make any other distributions on its Capital Stock to the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, or with respect to any other interest or participation in, or measured by, its profits, or pay any Indebtedness owed to the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (2)
- make loans or advances to the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; or
- (3)
- transfer any of its properties or assets to the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
However, the preceding restrictions will not apply to encumbrances or restrictions existing under or by reason of:
- (1)
- Existing Indebtedness as in effect on the date of the Indenture;
- (2)
- the Indenture, the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees;
- (3)
- applicable law, rules or regulations;
- (4)
- any instrument governing Indebtedness (including Acquired Debt) or Capital Stock of a Person acquired by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries as in effect at the time of such acquisition (except to the extent such Indebtedness was incurred in connection with or in contemplation of such acquisition), which encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any Person, or the properties or assets of any Person, other than the Person, or the property or assets of the Person, so acquired,provided that, in the case of Indebtedness, such Indebtedness was permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be incurred;
- (5)
- non-assignment provisions in leases, licenses or similar agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practices;
- (6)
- purchase money obligations for property acquired in the ordinary course of business that impose restrictions on the property so acquired of the nature described in clause (3) of the preceding paragraph;
- (7)
- any agreement for the sale or other disposition of a Restricted Subsidiary that restricts distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary pending its sale or other disposition;
- (8)
- Liens securing Indebtedness that limit the right of the debtor to dispose of the assets subject to such Lien;
- (9)
- provisions with respect to the disposition or distribution of assets or property in joint venture agreements, asset sale agreements, stock sale agreements and other similar agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business;
- (10)
- restrictions on cash or other deposits or net worth imposed by customers under contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business;
- (11)
- the Senior Credit Agreement as in effect on the date of the Indenture;
- (12)
- restrictions on the transfer of assets subject to any Lien permitted under the Indenture imposed by the holder of such Lien;
150
- (13)
- encumbrances or restrictions existing under or arising pursuant to Credit Facilities entered into in accordance with the Indenture;provided that the encumbrances or restrictions in such Credit Facilities are not materially more restrictive to the borrower than those applicable to the borrower under the Senior Credit Agreement as in effect on the date of the Indenture (other than encumbrances or restrictions in Credit Facilities entered into by a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company to finance some or all of the purchase price of a Restricted Subsidiary and which only apply to the Restricted Subsidiary so acquired and such Restricted Subsidiary's assets);
- (14)
- any Purchase Money Note or other Indebtedness or other contractual requirements of a Receivables Subsidiary in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction;provided that such restrictions apply only to such Receivables Subsidiary;
- (15)
- encumbrances or restrictions under Indebtedness incurred by the Restricted Subsidiaries owning the assets that comprise the Kildare Hotel and Country Club, which encumbrance or restriction is not applicable to any other Persons or the property or assets of any other Person;provided that such Indebtedness was permitted by the terms of the Indenture; and
- (16)
- any encumbrances or restrictions imposed by any amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings of the contracts, instruments or obligations referred to in clauses (1) through (15) above;provided that such amendments, modifications, restatements, renewals, increases, supplements, refundings, replacements or refinancings are, in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of the Company, not materially more restrictive with respect to such dividend and other payment restrictions than those contained in the dividends or other payment restrictions prior to such amendment, modification, restatement, renewal, increase, supplement, refunding, replacement or refinancing.
Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets
The Company may not, directly or indirectly: (1) consolidate or merge with or into another Person (whether or not the Company is the surviving corporation); or (2) sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole, in one or more related transactions, to another Person; unless:
- (1)
- either: (a) the Company is the surviving corporation; or (b) the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger (if other than the Company) or to which such sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance or other disposition shall have been made (the "Successor Company") is a corporation or limited liability company organized or existing under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia or any member of the European Union as of the date of the Indenture;
- (2)
- the Successor Company (if other than the Company) assumes all the obligations of the Company under the Notes, the Indenture, the Note Registration Rights Agreement and the Deposit and Custody Agreement pursuant to agreements reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee;
- (3)
- immediately after such transaction, no Default or Event of Default exists;
- (4)
- the Subsidiary Guarantor (unless it is the other party to the transactions above, in which case clause (1) shall apply) shall have by supplemental indenture confirmed that each Subsidiary Guarantee shall apply to the Subsidiary Guarantor's obligations in respect of the Indenture and the Notes and its obligations under the Note Registration Rights Agreement shall continue to be in effect;
- (5)
- the Company or the Successor Company (if other than the Company) will, on the date of such transaction after givingpro forma effect thereto and any related financing
151
transactions as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter period, be permitted to incur at least €1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test set forth in the first paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" or on the date of the transaction after givingpro forma effect thereto and any related financing transaction, as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable period, thepro forma Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of the Company or the Successor Company will exceed the actual Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of the Company on such date; and
- (6)
- the Company has delivered to the Trustee opinions of tax counsel reasonably acceptable to such Trustee stating that (A) any payment of principal, redemption price or purchase price of, interest, premium, if any, Additional Amounts, if any, and Liquidated Damages, if any, on the Notes by the Company or the Successor Company to a Holder of such Notes (or beneficial owner, if not a Holder) after the consolidation or merger, conveyance, transfer or lease of assets will be exempt from the Taxes defined under "—Withholding Taxes," above, and (B) no other taxes on income (including taxable capital gains) will be payable under the laws of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction by a Holder (or beneficial owner, if not a Holder) who is not and is not deemed to be a resident of the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction and does not carry on a trade in the Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction through a branch, agency or permanent establishment to which the Notes of that Holder or beneficial owner are attributable (or, as the case may be, does not carry on any business activities through a branch, agency or permanent establishment in such Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction) in respect of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of Notes, including the receipt of principal, interest, premium, if any, Additional Amounts, if any, or Liquidated Damages, if any, pursuant to such Notes.
In addition, the Company may not, directly or indirectly, lease all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in one or more related transactions, to any other Person. Notwithstanding the preceding clause (5), (x) any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company may consolidate or merge with or into or transfer all or part of its property and assets to the Company or a Wholly-Owned Restricted Subsidiary of the Company and (y) the Company may merge with an Affiliate owned 100% by Parent incorporated solely for the purpose of reincorporating the Company in another jurisdiction to realize tax or other benefits.
For purposes of this covenant, the sale, assignment, transfer, conveyance, disposition or lease of all or substantially all of the properties and assets of one or more Subsidiaries of the Company, which properties and assets, if held by the Company instead of such Subsidiaries, would constitute all or substantially all of the properties and assets of the Company on a consolidated basis, shall be deemed to be the transfer of all or substantially all of the properties and assets of the Company.
In the event of an occurrence of any of the events described above, the Company will inform the Luxembourg Stock Exchange of the occurrence of such event and provide a supplement to this Offering Memorandum setting forth reasonable details concerning the occurrence of such event.
If and for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the Company will publish notice of the occurrence of any of the events described above in Luxembourg in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort).
Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries
The Board of Directors of the Company may designate any Restricted Subsidiary to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary if that designation would not cause a Default. If a Restricted Subsidiary is
152
designated as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, the aggregate fair market value of all outstanding Investments owned by the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries in the Subsidiary so designated will be deemed to be an Investment made as of the time of such designation and will either reduce the amount available for Restricted Payments under the first paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption "—Restricted Payments" or reduce the amount available for future Investments under one or more clauses of the definition of Permitted Investments, as the Company shall determine. That designation will only be permitted if such Investment would be permitted at that time and if such Restricted Subsidiary otherwise meets the definition of an Unrestricted Subsidiary. The Board of Directors of the Company may redesignate any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary if the redesignation would not cause a Default.
Transactions with Affiliates
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, make any payment to, or sell, lease, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of its properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets from, or enter into or make or amend any transaction, contract, agreement, understanding, loan, advance or guarantee with, or for the benefit of, any Affiliate (each, an "Affiliate Transaction"), unless:
- (1)
- such Affiliate Transaction is on terms taken as a whole that are no less favorable in any material respect to the Company or the relevant Restricted Subsidiary than those that could have been obtained in a comparable transaction by the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary with a Person who is not an Affiliate; and
- (2)
- the Company delivers to the Trustee:
- (a)
- with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of €10.0 million, a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company set forth in an Officers' Certificate certifying that such Affiliate Transaction complies with this covenant and that such Affiliate Transaction has been approved by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company; and
- (b)
- with respect to any Affiliate Transaction or series of related Affiliate Transactions involving aggregate consideration in excess of €25.0 million, an opinion as to the fairness to the Holders of such Affiliate Transaction from a financial point of view issued by an accounting, appraisal, investment banking or advisory firm of international standing.
The following items shall not be deemed to be Affiliate Transactions and, therefore, will not be subject to the provisions of the first paragraph of this covenant:
- (1)
- any employment, consulting or similar agreement or other compensation arrangement entered into by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary excluding any such agreement or arrangement with Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., or its Affiliates or Persons who are officers, directors, employees or consultants of Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., or its Affiliates (other than Persons who are officers, directors or employees of the Company);
- (2)
- transactions between or among the Company and/or its Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (3)
- transactions with a Person that is an Affiliate of the Company solely because the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company owns an Equity Interest in such Person or solely because the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company has the
153
Sale and Leaseback Transactions
The Company will not, and will not permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to, enter into any sale and leaseback transaction;provided that the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may enter into a sale and leaseback transaction if:
- (1)
- either (a) the Company or that Restricted Subsidiary, as applicable, could have incurred Indebtedness in an amount equal to the Attributable Debt relating to such sale and leaseback transaction under the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio test in the first paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption "—Incurrence of Indebtedness and
154
Issuance of Preferred Stock" or (b) the Net Proceeds of such sale and leaseback transaction are applied to repay outstanding Senior Debt and, if such Senior Debt repaid is revolving credit Indebtedness, to correspondingly reduce commitments with respect thereto; and
- (2)
- the transfer of assets in that sale and leaseback transaction is permitted by, and the Company applies the Net Proceeds of such transaction in compliance with, the covenant described above under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales."
Business Activities
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, engage in any business other than Permitted Businesses, except to such extent as would not be material to the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole.
Limitation on Sale, Prepayment or Modification of the Intercompany Loan Agreements and the Priority Agreements
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary to, (1) amend, modify, supplement or waive any rights under the Intercompany Loan Agreements or the Priority Agreements in any manner that would adversely affect the rights of the Company or its creditors with respect to the Intercompany Loan Agreements or the Priority Agreements, (2) sell or otherwise dispose of or encumber the Intercompany Loan Agreements or (3) in the case of clauses (1) or (2), enter into any agreement that would have the same effect;provided that the Intercompany Loan Agreements and the Priority Agreements may be amended, modified, supplemented or waived to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency.
The Company will not, and will not permit any Restricted Subsidiary or any other Person that is an obligor with respect to the loans under the Intercompany Loan Agreements to prepay, repay, repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, reduce or retire the loan under the Intercompany Loan Agreements except (1) in accordance with their terms or (2) to accommodate or reflect a redemption or repurchase of outstanding Notes in a manner permitted by the Indenture.
On February 14, 2003, the Company, the Guarantor and the Trustee amended the Indenture so that the protections of this covenant would benefit Holders of the Notes offered pursuant to this Offering Memorandum.
Subsidiary Guarantor Remains Wholly Owned Subsidiary
Notwithstanding anything in the Indenture to the contrary, the Subsidiary Guarantor shall at all times remain a direct Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company for so long as the Subsidiary Guarantor remains a Subsidiary of the Company (excluding investor or director qualifying shares).
Reports
Notwithstanding that the Company may not be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, for so long as any Notes are outstanding, the Company will provide the Trustee and the Holders of the Notes with, (i) all annual and quarterly financial information that would be required to be filed on a Form 20-F and 10-Q (or any successor forms) as if the Company were required to file such forms and, with respect to the annual financial information, a report thereon by the Company's certified independent accountants and (ii) all information that would be required to be contained in current reports that would be required to be filed with the Commission on Form 8-K if the Company were required to file such reports;provided, however, that (A) quarterly financial information for the first and third fiscal quarters need not contain any reconciliation to
155
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States but must be prepared in accordance with GAAP, (B) such quarterly information shall be furnished within 60 days of the end of the fiscal quarter of the Company and may be provided in a report on a Form 6-K, (C) such annual information shall be furnished within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year of the Company and (D) such information that would be required to be contained in a report of Form 8-K may be provided in a report on Form 6-K but must be submitted promptly. In addition, whether or not required by the rules and regulations of the Commission, the Company will file a copy of all such information and reports with the Commission for public availability within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and regulations (unless the Commission will not accept such a filing) beginning after the completion of the exchange offer contemplated by the Note Registration Rights Agreement and the Company will make such information available to securities analysts and prospective investors upon request. The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will also furnish to the Holders of Notes, to prospective investors and to securities analysts, upon the requests of such Holders, prospective investors and securities analysts, any information required to be delivered pursuant to Rule 144A(d)(4) under the Securities Act so long as the Notes are not freely transferable under the Securities Act by Persons not "affiliates" under the Securities Act.
If the Company has designated any of its Subsidiaries that would be considered either individually or taken together as a Significant Subsidiary as Unrestricted Subsidiaries, then the quarterly and annual financial information required by the preceding paragraphs shall include a reasonably detailed presentation, either on the face of the financial statements or in the footnotes thereto, and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries separate from the financial condition and results of operations of the Unrestricted Subsidiaries of the Company.
For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the above information also will be made available in Luxembourg through the offices of the Paying Agent in Luxembourg.
Investment Company Act
Neither the Company nor the Subsidiary Guarantor will, nor will the Company permit any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or controlled Affiliates to, conduct its business in a fashion that would cause the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor to become subject to regulation under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). For purposes of establishing the Company's and the Subsidiary Guarantor's compliance with this provision, any exemption which is or would become available under Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act will be disregarded.
Events of Default and Remedies
Each of the following is an "Event of Default" under the Indenture:
- (1)
- default for 30 days in the payment when due of interest on, or Liquidated Damages or Additional Amounts with respect to, the Notes;
- (2)
- default in payment when due of the principal of, or premium, if any, on the Notes;
- (3)
- failure by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to comply with the provisions described under the captions "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales" or "—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets";
- (4)
- failure by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries for 30 days after notice by the Trustee or by the Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the Notes to comply with any of the other agreements in the Indenture;
156
- (5)
- default under any mortgage, indenture or instrument under which there is issued and outstanding any Indebtedness for money borrowed by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (or the payment of which is guaranteed by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries) whether such Indebtedness or guarantee now exists, or is created after the date of the Indenture, if that default:
- (a)
- is caused by a failure to pay principal at the final stated maturity of such Indebtedness (after giving effect to any applicable grace period provided in the Indebtedness) (a "Payment Default"); or
- (b)
- results in the acceleration of such Indebtedness prior to its express maturity,
and, in each case, the principal amount of any such Indebtedness, together with the principal amount of any other such Indebtedness under which there has been a Payment Default or the maturity of which has been so accelerated, aggregates €25.0 million or more;
- (6)
- failure by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to pay final nonappealable judgments aggregating in excess of €35.0 million, which judgments are not paid, discharged or stayed for a period of 90 days;
- (7)
- except as permitted by the Indenture, each Subsidiary Guarantee shall be held in any judicial proceeding to be unenforceable or invalid or shall cease for any reason to be in full force and effect or the Subsidiary Guarantor, or any Person acting on behalf of the Subsidiary Guarantor, shall deny or disaffirm its obligations under a Subsidiary Guarantee; and
- (8)
- certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Company or any of its Significant Subsidiaries.
In the case of an Event of Default arising from certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Company or a Significant Subsidiary, all outstanding Notes will become due and payable immediately without further action or notice. If any other Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee (upon request of Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the Notes then outstanding) shall by notice in writing to the Company or the Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may, by notice in writing to the Company and the Trustee, declare all such Notes to be due and payable and such notice shall specify the respective Event of Default and that such notice is a "notice of acceleration" (the "Acceleration Notice"), and the Notes shall become immediately due and payable. In the event of any Event of Default specified in clause (5), above, relating to Indebtedness under securities, such Event of Default and all consequences thereof (including, without limitation, any acceleration or resulting payment default) shall be annulled, waived and rescinded automatically and without any action by the Trustee or the Holders, if within 30 days after such Event of Default arose, (x) the Indebtedness or guarantee that is the basis for such Event of Default has been discharged, (y) the creditors on such Indebtedness have rescinded or waived the acceleration, notice or action, as the case may be, giving rise to such Event of Default or (z) if the default that is the basis for such Event of Default has been cured.
Holders of Notes may not enforce the Indenture or such Notes except as provided in the Indenture. Subject to certain limitations, Holders of a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may direct the Trustee in its exercise of any trust or power. The Trustee may withhold from Holders of the Notes notice of any continuing Default or Event of Default (except a Default or Event of Default relating to the payment of principal or interest or Liquidated Damages or Additional Amounts) if it determines that withholding notice is in their interest.
Subject to conditions specified in the Indenture, the Holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes by notice to the Trustee may on behalf of the Holders of all of such Notes waive
157
any existing Default or Event of Default and its consequences under the Indenture except a continuing Default or Event of Default in the payment of interest or Liquidated Damages or Additional Amounts on, or the principal of, and other monetary obligations on, the Notes.
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the duties of the Trustee, if an Event of Default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any of the Holders unless such Holders have offered to the Trustee reasonable indemnity or security against any loss, liability or expense. Except to enforce the right to receive payment of principal, premium, if any, interest when due, Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, no Holder may pursue any remedy with respect to the Indenture or the Notes, unless:
- (1)
- the Holder has previously given the Trustee notice that an Event of Default is continuing;
- (2)
- Holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Notes have requested such Trustee to pursue the remedy;
- (3)
- such holders have offered such Trustee reasonable security or indemnity against any loss, liability or expense;
- (4)
- such Trustee has not complied with such request within 60 days after the receipt of the request and the offer of security or indemnity; and
- (5)
- the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding Notes have not given the Trustee a direction that, in the opinion of such Trustee, is inconsistent with such request within such 60-day period.
In the case of any Event of Default occurring by reason of any willful action or inaction taken or not taken by or on behalf of the Company in bad faith with the intention of avoiding payment of the premium that the Company would have had to pay if the Company then had elected to redeem the Notes pursuant to the optional redemption provisions of the Indenture or was required to repurchase the Notes, an equivalent premium shall also become and be immediately due and payable to the extent permitted by law upon the acceleration of such Notes. If an Event of Default occurs prior to October 1, 2007, by reason of any willful action (or inaction) taken (or not taken) by or on behalf of the Company in bad faith with the intention of avoiding the prohibition on redemption of the Notes prior to October 1, 2007, then the premium specified in the Indenture shall also become immediately due and payable to the extent permitted by law upon the acceleration of the Notes.
The Company is required to deliver to the Trustee annually a statement regarding compliance with the Indenture. Upon becoming aware of any Default or Event of Default, the Company is required to deliver to the Trustee a statement specifying such Default or Event of Default.
No Personal Liability of Directors, Officers, Employees and Stockholders
No director, officer, employee, incorporator or stockholder of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor, as such, shall have any liability for any obligations of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor under the Notes, the Indenture or the Subsidiary Guarantees or for any claim based on, in respect of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation. Each Holder of Notes by accepting a Note waives and releases all such liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration for issuance of the Notes. The waiver may not be effective to waive liabilities under the United States federal or other applicable securities laws.
158
Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance
The Company may, at its option and at any time, elect to have all of its obligations discharged with respect to the outstanding Notes and all obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantor discharged with respect to the Subsidiary Guarantee ("Legal Defeasance") except for:
- (1)
- the rights of Holders of outstanding Notes to receive payments in respect of the principal of, or interest, premium, Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, on such Notes when such payments are due (including on a redemption date) from the trust referred to below;
- (2)
- the Company's obligations with respect to such Notes concerning issuing temporary Notes, registration of Notes, mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen Notes and the maintenance of an office or agency for payment and money for security payments held in trust;
- (3)
- the rights, powers, trusts, duties and immunities of the Trustee, and the Company's and the Subsidiary Guarantor's obligations in connection therewith; and
- (4)
- the Legal Defeasance provisions of the Indenture.
If the Company exercises its Legal Defeasance option, payment of the Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default.
In addition, the Company may, at its option and at any time, elect to have the obligations of the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor released with respect to certain covenants of Notes that are described in the Indenture ("Covenant Defeasance") and thereafter payment on such Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default relating to any omission to comply with those covenants. In the event Covenant Defeasance occurs, payment on such Notes may not be accelerated because of an Event of Default relating to certain events (not including non-payment, bankruptcy, receivership, rehabilitation and insolvency events) described under "—Events of Default and Remedies" with respect to such Notes.
In order to exercise either Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance:
- (1)
- the Company must irrevocably deposit with the Trustee, in trust, for the benefit of the Holders of the Notes, cash in dollars or U.S. Government Securities or a combination thereof in such amounts as will be sufficient, in the opinion of an internationally recognized firm of independent public accountants, to pay the principal of, interest, premium, Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, on the outstanding Notes on the stated maturity or on the applicable redemption date, as the case may be, and the Company must specify whether the Notes are being defeased to maturity or to a particular redemption date;
- (2)
- in the case of Legal Defeasance, the Company shall have delivered to the relevant Trustee (x) an Opinion of Counsel in the United States reasonably acceptable to such Trustee confirming that (A) the Company has received from, or there has been published by, the United States Internal Revenue Service a ruling or (B) since the date of the Indenture, there has been a change in the applicable United States federal income tax law, in either case to the effect that, and based thereon such Opinion of Counsel shall confirm that, the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of such Legal Defeasance and will be subject to United States federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred; and (y) an Opinion of Counsel in Ireland reasonably acceptable to such Trustee to the effect that (A) the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for Irish income tax purposes as a result of such Legal Defeasance
159
and will be subject to Irish income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Legal Defeasance had not occurred and (B) payments from the defeasance trust will be free and exempt from any and all withholding and other income taxes of whatever nature imposed or levied by or on behalf of Ireland or any political subdivision thereof or therein having the power to tax;
- (3)
- in the case of Covenant Defeasance, the Company shall have delivered to the Trustee (x) an Opinion of Counsel in the United States reasonably acceptable to such Trustee confirming that the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes as a result of such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to United States federal income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred; and (y) an Opinion of Counsel in Ireland reasonably acceptable to such Trustee to the effect that (A) the Holders of the outstanding Notes will not recognize income, gain or loss for Irish income tax purposes as a result of such Covenant Defeasance and will be subject to Irish income tax on the same amounts, in the same manner and at the same times as would have been the case if such Covenant Defeasance had not occurred and (B) payments from the defeasance trust will be free and exempt from any and all withholding and other income taxes of whatever nature imposed or levied by or on behalf of Ireland or any political subdivision thereof or therein having the power to tax;
- (4)
- no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing either: (a) on the date of such deposit (other than a Default or Event of Default resulting from the borrowing of funds to be applied to such deposit); or (b) insofar as Events of Default from bankruptcy or insolvency events are concerned, at any time in the period ending on the later of (A) the 91st day after the date of deposit or (B) the day immediately following the last day on which payment of or the deposit with respect to any such Note may be set aside as a preferential payment under applicable law;
- (5)
- such Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance will not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under any material agreement or instrument (other than the Indenture but in any event including the Senior Credit Agreement) to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound;
- (6)
- the Company must have delivered to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel in each applicable jurisdiction to the effect that, assuming no intervening bankruptcy of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor between the date of deposit and the 91st day following the deposit or, if longer, the day immediately following the last day on which the deposit may be set aside as a preferential payment under applicable law, and assuming that no Holder is an "insider" of the Company under applicable bankruptcy law, after such day following the deposit, the trust funds will not be subject to the effect of any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally;
- (7)
- the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate stating that the deposit was not made by the Company with the intent of preferring the Holders of such Notes over the other creditors of the Company with the intent of defeating, hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors of the Company or others; and
- (8)
- the Company must deliver to the Trustee an Officers' Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel, each stating that all conditions precedent relating to the Legal Defeasance or the Covenant Defeasance have been complied with.
160
Amendment, Supplement and Waiver
Except as provided in the next two succeeding paragraphs, the Indenture or the Notes may be amended or supplemented with the consent of the Holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the Notes then outstanding (including, without limitation, consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, Notes), and any existing Default or Event of Default or its consequences or compliance with any provision of the Indenture or the Notes may be waived with the consent of the Holders of a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes (including, without limitation, consents obtained in connection with a purchase of, or tender offer or exchange offer for, Notes).
Without the consent of each Holder affected, an amendment or waiver may not (with respect to any Notes held by a non-consenting Holder):
- (1)
- reduce the principal amount of Notes whose Holders must consent to an amendment, supplement or waiver;
- (2)
- reduce the principal of or change the fixed maturity of any Note or alter the provisions with respect to the redemption of such Notes (other than provisions relating to the covenants described above under the caption, "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders," in which case any amendment or waiver with respect thereto may be effected with the consent of Holders of 662/3% or greater principal amount of the Notes then outstanding);
- (3)
- reduce the rate of or change the time for payment of interest on any Note;
- (4)
- waive a Default or Event of Default in the payment of principal of, or interest, premium, Liquidated Damages or Additional Amounts, if any, on the Notes (except a rescission of acceleration of such Notes by the Holders of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of such Notes and a waiver of the payment default that resulted from such acceleration);
- (5)
- make any Note payable in money other than that stated in such Notes;
- (6)
- make any change in the provisions of the Indenture relating to waivers of past Defaults or the rights of Holders of such Notes to receive payments of principal of, interest, premium, Liquidated Damages or Additional Amounts, if any, on such Notes or the rights of any Holder to institute suit for the enforcement of any payment on or with respect to such Holder's Notes;
- (7)
- waive a redemption payment with respect to any Note;
- (8)
- make any change in the provisions of the Indenture described under "—Withholding Taxes" that adversely affects the rights of any Holder of such Notes or amends the terms of such Notes in a way that would result in a loss of an exemption from any of the Taxes described thereunder or an exemption from any obligation to withhold or deduct Taxes so described thereunder unless the Payor agrees to pay Additional Amounts, if any, in respect thereof;
- (9)
- release the Subsidiary Guarantor from any of its obligations under any Subsidiary Guarantee or the Indenture, except in accordance with the terms of the Indenture;
- (10)
- make any changes in the subordination provisions of the Intercompany Loan Agreements or the Priority Agreements that would adversely affect the Holders of Notes; or
- (11)
- make any change in the preceding amendment and waiver provisions.
After an amendment, supplement or waiver under the foregoing paragraph becomes effective, the Company shall, in the case of certificated Notes, mail to the Holders of the Notes a notice briefly describing the amendment, supplement or waiver. However, the failure to give such notice to all Holders of the Notes, or any defect therein, will not in any way impair or affect the validity of such amended or supplemented indenture or waiver. In addition, for so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the Company will publish notice of any amendment, supplement and waiver in Luxembourg in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort).
161
Notwithstanding the preceding, without the consent of any Holder of Notes, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Trustee may amend or supplement the Indenture or such Notes:
- (1)
- to cure any ambiguity, defect, error or inconsistency;
- (2)
- to provide for uncertificated Notes in addition to or in place of certificated Notes (provided that the uncertificated Notes are issued in registered form for purposes of Section 163(f) of the Code, or in a manner such that the uncertificated Notes are described in Section 163(f)(2)(B) of the Code);
- (3)
- to provide for the assumption of the Company's or the Subsidiary Guarantor's obligations to Holders of such Notes in the case of a merger or consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the Company's or the Subsidiary Guarantor's assets;
- (4)
- to make any change that would provide any additional rights or benefits to the Holders of such Notes or that does not adversely affect the legal rights under the Indenture of any such Holder; or
- (5)
- to comply with requirements of the Commission in order to effect or maintain the qualification of the Indenture under the Trust Indenture Act.
The Company will inform the Luxembourg Stock Exchange of any of the foregoing amendments, supplements and waivers and provide, if necessary, a supplement to this Offering Memorandum setting forth reasonable details in connection with any such amendments, supplements or waivers.
Satisfaction and Discharge
The Indenture will be discharged and will cease to be of further effect as to all Notes issued thereunder, when:
- (1)
- either:
- (a)
- all Notes that have been authenticated (except lost, stolen or destroyed Notes that have been replaced or paid and Notes for whose payment money has theretofore been deposited in trust and thereafter repaid to the Company) have been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation; or
- (b)
- all Notes that have not been delivered to the Trustee for cancellation have become due and payable by reason of the making of a notice of redemption or otherwise, and the Company has irrevocably deposited with the Trustee as trust funds in trust cash in dollars or non-callable U.S. Government Securities or a combination thereof in such amounts as will be sufficient without consideration of any reinvestment of interest, to pay and discharge the entire indebtedness on such Notes not delivered to the applicable Trustee for cancellation for principal, premium, Liquidated Damages and Additional Amounts, if any, and accrued interest to the date of maturity or redemption;provided, however, in the event a petition for relief under any Bankruptcy Law is filed with respect to the Company within 91 days after the deposit and the Trustee is required to return the moneys then on deposit with the Trustee to the Company, the obligations of the Company under this Indenture with respect to such Notes shall not be deemed terminated or discharged;
- (2)
- no Default or Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing on the date of such deposit or shall occur as a result of such deposit and such deposit will not result in a breach or violation of, or constitute a default under any other instrument to which the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor is a party or by which the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor is bound;
162
- (3)
- the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor has paid or caused to be paid all sums payable by it under the Indenture; and
- (4)
- the Company has delivered irrevocable instructions to the Trustee to apply the deposited money toward the payment of such Notes at maturity or the redemption date, as the case may be.
In addition, the Company must deliver an Officers' Certificate and an Opinion of Counsel to the Trustee stating that all conditions precedent to satisfaction and discharge have been satisfied.
Concerning the Trustee
If the Trustee becomes a creditor of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor, the Indenture limits its right to obtain payment of claims in certain cases, or to realize on certain property received in respect of any such claim as security or otherwise. The Trustee will be permitted to engage in other transactions; however, if it acquires any conflicting interest it must eliminate such conflict within 90 days, apply to the Commission for permission to continue or resign.
The Holders of a majority in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for exercising any remedy available to the Trustee, subject to certain exceptions. The Indenture provides that in case an Event of Default shall occur and be continuing that is actually known to a trust officer of the Trustee, the Trustee will be required, in the exercise of its power, to use the degree of care of a prudent person in the conduct of his or her own affairs. Subject to such provisions, the Trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the request of any Holder of Notes, unless the conditions enumerated in "—Events of Default and Remedies," above, are met. The Indenture contains provisions for the indemnification of the Trustee and the Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent in connection with their respective actions taken under the Indenture. The Trustee will have a lien prior to the Notes as to all property and funds held or collected by it under the Indenture to secure the obligations of the Company for compensation and reimbursement to the Trustee.
Additional Information
Anyone who receives this Offering Memorandum may obtain a copy of the Indenture and the Note Registration Rights Agreement without charge by writing to MDP Acquisitions plc, Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland, Attention: Chief Financial Officer. For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the foregoing information also will be made available in Luxembourg through the offices of the Paying Agent in Luxembourg.
Notices
Notices regarding the Notes will be published in a leading newspaper having a general circulation in New York (which is expected to beThe Wall Street Journal). In the case of certificated Notes, all notices to Holders of Notes will be validly given if mailed to them at their respective addresses in the register of the Holders of such Notes, if any, maintained by the Registrar. And, so long as any of the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of that stock exchange so require, notices will be published in a leading newspaper having general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort) or, if in the opinion of the Trustee such publication is not practicable, in an English language newspaper having general circulation in Europe. Each such notice shall be deemed to have been given on the date of such publication or, if published more than once on different dates, on the first date on which publication is made;provided that, if notices are mailed, such notice shall be deemed to have been given on the later of such publication and the seventh day after being so mailed. For so long as any Notes are represented by Global Notes, all
163
notices to Holders of the Notes will be delivered to DTC, which will give notice of such notice to the holders of the Book-Entry Interests. Any notice or communication mailed to a Holder shall be mailed to such Person by first-class mail or other equivalent means and shall be sufficiently given to him if so mailed within the time prescribed. Failure to mail a notice or communication to a Holder or any defect in it shall not affect its sufficiency with respect to other Holders. If a notice or communication is mailed in the manner provided above, it is duly given, whether or not the addressee receives it.
Prescription
Claims against the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor for the payment of principal, Additional Amounts or Liquidated Damages, if any, on the Notes will be prescribed ten years after the applicable due date for payment thereof. Claims against the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor for the payment of interest on the Notes will be prescribed five years after the applicable due date for payment of interest.
Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages
The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Note Registration Rights Agreement (as defined below). It does not restate the agreement in its entirety. We urge you to read the proposed form of the Note Registration Rights Agreement in its entirety because it, and not this description, defines your registration rights as Holders of these Notes. See "—Additional Information."
The Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the Initial Purchasers will enter into the Note Registration Rights Agreement (the "Note Registration Rights Agreement") on or prior to the closing of the offering of the Notes offered hereby. Pursuant to the Note Registration Rights Agreement, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will agree to use all commercially reasonable efforts to file with the Commission a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act permitting registration of the exchange notes (the "Exchange Notes" and each, an "Exchange Note") (such registration statement, an "Exchange Offer Registration Statement"). Upon the effectiveness of the Exchange Offer Registration Statement, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to offer (the "Exchange Offer") to the Holders of Transfer Restricted Securities pursuant to the Exchange Offer who are able to make certain representations the opportunity to exchange their Transfer Restricted Securities for Exchange Notes.
On November 25, 2002, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor filed a registration statement on Form F-4 with the Commission relating to the offer to holders of the Company's dollar-denominated Notes issued on September 30, 2002 to exchange such Notes for Exchange Notes which will be identical in all respects to the Exchange Notes registered pursuant to the Notes Registration Rights Agreement. The purpose of the offer to exchange both the Notes and the dollar-denominated Notes issued on September 30, 2002 for Exchange Notes is to create a single series of debt securities having a total outstanding principal amount that is greater than that of the Notes or the dollar-denominated Notes issued on September 30, 2002 as a separate series.
If:
- (1)
- the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor are not permitted to consummate the Exchange Offer in respect of the Notes because such Exchange Offer is not permitted by applicable law or Commission policy; or
- (2)
- any Holder of Transfer Restricted Securities notifies the Company prior to the 20th day following consummation of the Exchange Offer that:
- (a)
- it is prohibited by law or Commission policy from participating in such Exchange Offer; or
164
- (b)
- it may not resell the Exchange Notes acquired by it in the Exchange Offer to the public without delivering a prospectus and the prospectus contained in the Exchange Offer Registration Statement is not appropriate or available for such resales; or
- (c)
- it is a broker-dealer and owns Notes acquired directly from the Company or an affiliate of the Company,
the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to file with the Commission a shelf registration statement (a "Shelf Registration Statement") to cover resales of such Notes by the Holders thereof who satisfy certain conditions relating to the provision of information in connection with the Shelf Registration Statement.
The Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause the applicable registration statement to be declared effective as promptly as possible by the Commission.
For purposes of the preceding, "Transfer Restricted Securities" means each Note until:
- (1)
- the date on which such Note has been exchanged by a Person other than a broker-dealer for an Exchange Note in the Exchange Offer;
- (2)
- following the exchange by a broker-dealer in the Exchange Offer of a Note for an Exchange Note, the date on which such Exchange Note is sold to a purchaser who receives from such broker-dealer on or prior to the date of such sale a copy of the prospectus contained in the Exchange Offer Registration Statement;
- (3)
- the date on which such Note has been disposed of in accordance with a Shelf Registration Statement; or
- (4)
- the date on which such Note is distributed to the public pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The Note Registration Rights Agreement will provide that:
- (1)
- the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to file an Exchange Offer Registration Statement in respect of the Exchange Notes with the Commission on or prior to 90 days after the closing of this offering;
- (2)
- the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to have the Exchange Offer Registration Statement declared effective by the Commission on or prior to 180 days after the closing of this offering;
- (3)
- unless the Exchange Offer would not be permitted by applicable law or Commission policy, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will:
- (a)
- use all commercially reasonable efforts to commence the Exchange Offer; and
- (b)
- use all commercially reasonable efforts to issue on or prior to 30 business days, or longer if required by the federal securities laws, after the date on which the Exchange Offer Registration Statement was declared effective by the Commission, Exchange Notes in exchange for all Notes tendered prior thereto in the Exchange Offer; and
- (4)
- if obligated to file a Shelf Registration Statement, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will use all commercially reasonable efforts to file such Shelf Registration Statement with the Commission on or prior to 60 days after such filing obligation arises
165
If:
- (1)
- the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor fail to file any of the registration statements required by the Note Registration Rights Agreement on or before the date specified for such filing; or
- (2)
- any of such registration statements is not declared effective by the Commission on or prior to the date specified for such effectiveness (the "Effectiveness Target Date"); or
- (3)
- the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor fail to consummate the Exchange Offer in respect of the Notes within 30 business days of the Effectiveness Target Date with respect to the Exchange Offer Registration Statement; or
- (4)
- the Shelf Registration Statement or the Exchange Offer Registration Statement is declared effective but thereafter ceases to be effective or usable in connection with resales of Transfer Restricted Securities without being succeeded within five business days by a post-effective amendment to such Registration Statement that cures such failure and that is itself declared effective immediately (each such event referred to in clauses (1) through (4) above, a "Registration Default"),
then the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will pay liquidated damages ("Liquidated Damages") to each Holder of Notes with respect to the first 90-day period immediately following the occurrence of the first Registration Default in respect of the relevant series in an amount equal to aper annum rate of 0.25% on the principal amount of Notes held by such Holder.
The amount of the Liquidated Damages will increase by an additionalper annum rate of 0.25% with respect to each subsequent 90-day period until all Registration Defaults have been cured, up to a maximum amount of Liquidated Damages for all Registration Defaults of 1.00%per annum on the principal amount of Notes constituting Transfer Restricted Securities.
All accrued Liquidated Damages will be paid by the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor on each interest payment date to the Holder of a global Note or a certificated Note in the same manner and subject to the same procedures as are applicable to the payment of interest.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Subsidiary Guarantor will not be subject to any liability under the Note Registration Rights Agreement nor may any claims under such agreement be brought against the Subsidiary Guarantor if that would result in a default under the Senior Credit Agreement.
Immediately upon the cure of all Registration Defaults, the accrual of Liquidated Damages will cease in respect of such series.
Holders of Notes will be required to make certain representations to the Company (as described in the Note Registration Rights Agreement) in order to participate in the Exchange Offer and will be required to deliver certain information to be used in connection with a Shelf Registration Statement and to provide comments on a Shelf Registration Statement within the time periods set forth in the Note Registration Rights Agreement in order to have their Notes included in such Shelf Registration Statement and benefit from the provisions regarding Liquidated Damages set forth above. By acquiring Transfer Restricted Securities, a Holder will be deemed to have agreed to indemnify the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor against certain losses arising out of information furnished by such Holder in writing for inclusion in any Shelf Registration Statement. Holders of Notes will also be required to suspend their use of the prospectus included in any Shelf Registration Statement under certain circumstances upon receipt of written notice to that effect from the Company.
166
We intend to list the Exchange Notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. We cannot assure you, however, that a Luxembourg Stock Exchange listing will be obtained.
For so long as the Notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the Company will:
- (a)
- inform the Luxembourg Stock Exchange of the Exchange Offer prior to its commencement and provide details of the Exchange Offer after its completion;
- (b)
- publish notice of the Exchange Offer in Luxembourg in a daily newspaper with general circulation in Luxembourg (which is expected to be theLuxemburger Wort) in connection with the commencement of the Exchange Offer and the results of the Exchange Offer; and
- (c)
- make available in Luxembourg through the offices of the Paying Agent and/or an exchange agent appointed by the Company documents regarding the Exchange Offer.
Currency Indemnity and Calculation of Euro-denominated Restrictions
The dollar is the sole currency of account and payment for all sums payable by the Company under or in connection with the Notes, including damages. Any amount received or recovered in a currency other than dollar, whether as a result of, or the enforcement of, a judgment or order of a court of any jurisdiction, in the winding-up or dissolution of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor or otherwise, by any Holder of a Note, or by the Trustee in respect of any sum expressed to be due to it from the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor will only constitute a discharge to the Company to the extent of the dollar amount, which the recipient is able to purchase with the amount so received or recovered in that other currency on the date of that receipt or recovery (or, if it is not practicable to make that purchase on that date, on the first date on which it is practicable to do so).
If that dollar amount is less than the dollar amount expressed to be due to the recipient under any Note, the Trustee, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will indemnify them against any loss sustained by such recipient as a result. In any event, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will indemnify the recipient against the cost of making any such purchase. For the purposes of this currency indemnity provision, it will be sufficient for the Holder of a Note or the Trustee to certify in a satisfactory manner (indicating the sources of information used) that it would have suffered a loss had an actual purchase of dollar been made with the amount so received in that other currency on the date of receipt or recovery (or, if a purchase of dollar on such date had not been practicable, on the first date on which it would have been practicable, it being required that the need for a change of date be certified in the manner mentioned above). These indemnities constitute a separate and independent obligation from the Company's and the Subsidiary Guarantor's other obligations, will give rise to a separate and independent cause of action, will apply irrespective of any indulgence granted by any Holder of a Note or the Trustee and will continue in full force and effect despite any other judgment, order, claim or proof for a liquidated amount in respect of any sum due under any Note or to the Trustee.
Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, for purposes of determining compliance with any euro-denominated restriction herein, the euro-equivalent amount for purposes hereof that is denominated in a non-euro currency shall be calculated based on the relevant currency exchange rate in effect on the date such non-euro amount is incurred or made, as the case may be.
Enforceability of Judgments
Since a substantial portion of the assets of the Company are outside the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against the Company, including judgments with respect to the payment of principal, premium, interest, Liquidated Damages, Additional Amounts and any redemption
167
price and any purchase price with respect to the Notes, may not be collectable within the United States.
Consent to Jurisdiction and Service
In relation to any legal action or proceedings arising out of or in connection with the Indenture and the Notes, the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor will in the Indenture irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the federal and state courts in the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York, County and State of New York, United States of America.
Governing Law
Each of the Indenture and the Notes and the rights and duties of the parties thereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
Certain Definitions
Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indenture. Reference is made to the Indenture for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any other capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.
"Acquired Debt" means, with respect to any specified Person:
- (1)
- Indebtedness of any other Person existing at the time such other Person is merged with or into or became a Subsidiary of such specified Person, whether or not such Indebtedness is incurred in connection with, or in contemplation of, such other Person merging with or into, or becoming a Subsidiary of, such specified Person; and
- (2)
- Indebtedness secured by a Lien encumbering any asset acquired by such specified Person.
"Additional Amounts" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Withholding Taxes."
"Additional Notes" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Principal, Maturity and Interest."
"Affiliate" of any specified Person means any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, "control," as used with respect to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by agreement or otherwise;provided that beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the Voting Stock of a Person shall be deemed to be control. For purposes of this definition, the terms "controlling," "controlled by" and "under common control with" shall have correlative meanings.
"Applicable Premium" means, with respect to any Note on any redemption date, the greater of:
- (1)
- 1.0% of the principal amount of the Note; or
- (2)
- the excess of:
- (a)
- the present value at such redemption date of (i) the redemption price of the Note at October 1, 2007 (such redemption price being set forth in the table appearing above under the caption "—Optional Redemption") plus (ii) all required interest payments due on the Note through October 1, 2007 (excluding accrued but unpaid interest), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate as of such redemption date plus 50 basis points; over
- (b)
- the principal amount of the Note, if greater.
168
"Asset Sale" means:
- (1)
- the direct or indirect sale, lease, conveyance or other disposition or series of related sales, leases, conveyances or other dispositions that are part of a common plan, of any assets or rights, other than sales of inventory in the ordinary course of business;provided that the sale, conveyance or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole will be governed by the provisions of the Indenture described above under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control" and/or the provisions described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets" and not by the provisions of the Asset Sale covenant; and
- (2)
- the issuance of Equity Interests by any of the Company's Restricted Subsidiaries or the sale of Equity Interests in any of the Company's Subsidiaries (other than directors' qualifying shares).
Notwithstanding the preceding, the following items shall not be deemed to be Asset Sales:
- (1)
- any single transaction or series of related transactions that involves assets having a fair market value of less than €10.0 million;
- (2)
- a transfer of assets between or among the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (3)
- an issuance of Equity Interests by a Restricted Subsidiary to the Company or to another Restricted Subsidiary;
- (4)
- the sale, license or lease of equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other assets in the ordinary course of business;
- (5)
- the sale or other disposition of cash or Cash Equivalents or Marketable Securities in the ordinary course of business;
- (6)
- sales of accounts receivables and related assets of the type specified in the definition of "Qualified Receivables Transaction" to a Receivables Subsidiary for the fair market value thereof including cash or Cash Equivalents or Marketable Securities in an amount at least equal to 75% of the fair market value thereof as determined in accordance with GAAP;
- (7)
- a Restricted Payment or Permitted Investment that is permitted by the covenant described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payment";
- (8)
- the Transaction Asset Sales; and
- (9)
- an Asset Swap effected in compliance with the covenant described under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales."
"Asset Swap" means the concurrent purchase and sale or exchange of Permitted Business Assets between the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries and another Person that involves assets having a fair market value of at least €10.0 million;provided that any cash received must be applied in accordance with the covenant described under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales."
"Attributable Debt" in respect of a sale and leaseback transaction means, at the time of determination, the present value of the obligation of the lessee for net rental payments during the remaining term of the lease included in such sale and leaseback transaction including any period for which such lease has been extended or may, at the option of the lessor, be extended. Such present value shall be calculated using a discount rate equal to the rate of interest implicit in such transaction, determined in accordance with GAAP.
169
"Beneficial Owner" has the meaning assigned to such term in Rule 13d-3 and Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act, except that in calculating the beneficial ownership of any particular "person" (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), such "person" shall be deemed to have beneficial ownership of all securities that such "person" has the right to acquire by conversion or exercise of other securities, whether such right is currently exercisable or is exercisable only upon the occurrence of a subsequent condition. The terms "Beneficially Owns" and "Beneficially Owned" shall have a corresponding meaning.
"Board of Directors" means:
- (1)
- with respect to a corporation, the board of directors of the corporation;
- (2)
- with respect to a partnership, the board of directors of the general partner of the partnership; and
- (3)
- with respect to any other Person, the board or committee of such Person serving a similar function.
"Capital Lease Obligation" means, at the time any determination thereof is to be made, the amount of the liability in respect of a capital lease that would at that time be required to be capitalized on a balance sheet in accordance with GAAP.
"Book-Entry Depositary" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Book-Entry Terms."
"Book-Entry Interests" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Book-Entry Terms."
"Capital Stock" means:
- (1)
- in the case of a corporation, corporate stock;
- (2)
- in the case of a company, shares of such company;
- (3)
- in the case of an association or business entity, any and all shares, interests, participations, rights or other equivalents (however designated) of corporate stock;
- (4)
- in the case of a partnership or limited liability company, partnership or membership interests (whether general or limited); and
- (5)
- any other interest or participation that confers on a Person the right to receive a share of the profits and losses of, or distributions of assets of, the issuing Person;
provided that debt securities convertible into interests specified in (1) through (5) above shall not be deemed "Capital Stock."
"Cash Equivalents" means:
- (1)
- euros, United States dollars or any other currency that may be borrowed under the Senior Credit Agreement;
- (2)
- securities issued or directly and fully guaranteed or insured by the United States government or a member state of the European Communities on the date of the Indenture or any agency or instrumentality of either thereof (provided that the full faith and credit of the United States or such member state, as the case may be, is pledged in support thereof) having maturities of not more than one year from the date of acquisition;
- (3)
- certificates of deposit, overnight deposits and eurodollar time deposits with maturities of one year or less from the date of acquisition, bankers' acceptances with maturities not exceeding twelve months and overnight bank deposits, in each case, with any lender party
170
"Change in Tax Law" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Redemption for Taxation Reasons."
"Change of Control" means the occurrence of any of the following:
- (1)
- the direct or indirect sale, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger, consolidation or transfer of the Company Voting Stock), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries taken as a whole to any "person" (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) other than to a Principal or a Related Party of a Principal;
- (2)
- the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
- (3)
- the consummation of any transaction (including, without limitation, any merger or consolidation) the result of which is that any "person" (as defined above) other than the Principals and their Related Parties or a Permitted Group, becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Company, measured by voting power rather than number of shares; or
- (4)
- the first day on which a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company are not Continuing Directors.
"Change of Control Offer" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control."
"Change of Control Payment" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control."
"Change of Control Payment Date" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control."
"Code" means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"Commission" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or any successor entity thereof from time to time.
171
"Consolidated Cash Flow" means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the Consolidated Net Income of such Person for such period plus (to the extent deducted in calculating Consolidated Net Income):
- (1)
- provision for taxes based on income or profits of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, to the extent that such provision for taxes was deducted in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
- (2)
- consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, whether paid or accrued and whether or not capitalized (including, without limitation, amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount, non-cash interest payments, the interest component of any deferred payment obligations, the interest component of all payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, imputed interest with respect to Attributable Debt, commissions, discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of letters of credit or bankers' acceptance financings, interest paid under a guarantee of Indebtedness, Specified Dividends, Specified Employee Plan Contributions, and net of the effect of all payments made or received pursuant to Hedging Obligations), to the extent that any such expense or dividend was deducted in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
- (3)
- depletion, depreciation, amortization (including amortization of goodwill and other intangibles but excluding amortization of prepaid cash expenses that were paid in a prior period) and other non-cash items, including, without limitation, all non-cash charges arising from adjustments to the method of calculating pension liabilities (including relevant investment assumptions) which the Person is required by law to use (excluding any non-cash expense to the extent that it represents an accrual of or reserve for cash expenses in any future period or amortization of a prepaid cash expense that was paid in a prior period) of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period to the extent that such depreciation, amortization and other non-cash items were deducted in computing such Consolidated Net Income; plus
- (4)
- all non-recurring costs and expenses of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries incurred in connection with the JSG Acquisition, including but not limited to non-recurring costs and expenses incurred in the related financing transactions and operating changes implemented within 18 months of the completion of the JSG Acquisition; plus
- (5)
- to the extent not already eliminated, all items classified, in accordance with GAAP, as (i) extraordinary, (ii) exceptional or (iii) unusual and nonrecurring losses or charges (including, without limitation, severance, relocation and other restructuring costs); minus
- (6)
- to the extent not already eliminated, all items classified, in accordance with GAAP, as (i) extraordinary, (ii) exceptional or (iii) unusual or nonrecurring gains; minus
- (7)
- non-cash items increasing such Consolidated Net Income for such period, other than the accrual of revenue in the ordinary course of business and non-cash items increasing Consolidated Net Income to the extent that it represents the reversal of an accrual or reserve for cash expenses, in each case, on a consolidated basis and determined in accordance with GAAP.
Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, clauses (1) and (3) through (7) relating to amounts of a Restricted Subsidiary of a Person will be added to (or subtracted from) Consolidated Net Income to compute Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person only to the extent (and in the same proportion) that the net income (loss) of such Restricted Subsidiary was included in calculating the Consolidated Net Income of such Person and only to the extent that a corresponding amount would be permitted at the
172
date of determination to be dividended to the Company by such Restricted Subsidiary without prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained), and without direct or indirect restriction pursuant to the terms of its charter and all agreements, instruments, judgments, decrees, orders, statutes, rules and governmental regulations applicable to that Restricted Subsidiary or its stockholders.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the aggregate of the Net Income of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, on a consolidated basis, determined in accordance with GAAP;provided that:
- (1)
- the Net Income (if positive) of any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary or that is accounted for by the equity method of accounting shall be included only to the extent of the amount of dividends or distributions paid in cash to the specified Person or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary thereof;
- (2)
- the Net Income, if negative, of any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary or that is accounted for by the equity method of accounting shall be excluded;
- (3)
- the Net Income of any Restricted Subsidiary shall be excluded to the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or similar distributions by that Restricted Subsidiary of that Net Income is not at the date of determination permitted without any prior governmental approval (that has not been obtained), or, directly or indirectly, by operation of the terms of its charter or any agreement (other than restrictions in the Senior Credit Agreement and related agreements), instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or governmental regulation applicable to that Subsidiary or its stockholders (except to the extent of the amount of dividends or distributions that have actually been paid in the calculation period);
- (4)
- the Net Income of any Person acquired in a pooling of interests transaction for any period prior to the date of such acquisition shall be excluded;
- (5)
- the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles shall be excluded; and
- (6)
- for purposes of calculating Consolidated Cash Flow to determine the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, the Net Income of any Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries shall be calculated without deducting the income attributable to, or adding the losses attributable to, equity minority interests.
"Continuing Directors" means, as of any date of determination, any member of the Board of Directors of the Company who:
- (1)
- was a member of such Board of Directors on the date of the Indenture; or
- (2)
- was nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval of a majority of the Continuing Directors who were members of such Board at the time of such nomination or election.
"Credit Facilities" means one or more debt facilities or indentures (including, without limitation, under the Senior Credit Agreement) or commercial paper facilities, in each case with banks or other institutional lenders providing for loans or other extensions of credit, including revolving credit loans, term loans, receivables financing (including through the sale of receivables to such lenders or to special purpose entities formed to borrow from such lenders against such receivables), working capital loans, swing lines, ancillary facilities, advances or letters of credit, notes or debentures in each case, as amended, restated, modified, renewed, refunded, replaced, restructured or refinanced in whole or in part from time to time.
"Default" means any event that is, or with the passage of time or the giving of notice or both would be, an Event of Default.
173
"Deposit and Custody Agreement" means the Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated the date of the Indenture, between the Company, the Book-Entry Depositary and the custodian therefor in relation to the Notes.
"Designated Noncash Consideration" means any non-cash consideration received by the Company or one of its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with an Asset Sale that is designated as Designated Noncash Consideration pursuant to an Officers' Certificate executed by the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary. Such Officers' Certificate shall state the basis of such valuation, which shall be a report of an internationally recognized investment banking firm in the case of the receipt in one or a series of related transactions of Designated Noncash Consideration with a fair market value in excess of €25.0 million. A particular item of Designated Noncash Consideration shall no longer be considered to be outstanding when it has been sold for cash or redeemed or paid in full in the case of non-cash consideration in the form of promissory notes or equity.
"Directive" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Withholding Taxes."
"Disqualified Stock" means any Capital Stock that, by its terms (or by the terms of any security into which it is convertible, or for which it is exchangeable, in each case at the option of the holder thereof), or upon the happening of any event, matures or is mandatorily redeemable, pursuant to a sinking fund obligation or otherwise, or is convertible or exchangeable for Indebtedness or Disqualified Stock (excluding Capital Stock which is convertible or exchangeable solely at the option of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary) or is redeemable at the option of the holder thereof, in whole or in part, in each case on or prior to the date that is either (A) 91 days after the date on which the Notes mature or on which there are no Notes outstanding or (B) the day immediately following the last day on which payment of any Note may be set aside as a preferential payment under applicable law. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any Capital Stock that would constitute Disqualified Stock solely because the holders thereof have the right to require the Company to repurchase such Capital Stock upon the occurrence of a change of control or an asset sale shall not constitute Disqualified Stock if the terms of such Capital Stock provide that the Company may not repurchase or redeem any such Capital Stock pursuant to such provisions unless such repurchase or redemption complies with the covenant described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments" and with the covenant described under "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control" or "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales," above, as applicable.
"Equity Balance" means the issuance of Capital Stock of the Company or a capital contribution made to the Company's common equity in an aggregate amount of €125 million, constituting the difference between the €857 million aggregate amount of equity to be received from Parent consistent with the equity contribution (as defined in "Summary—The JSG Acquisition") and the amount received as of the date of the Indenture.
"Equity Interests" means Capital Stock and all warrants, options or other rights to acquire Capital Stock (but excluding any debt security that is convertible into, or exchangeable for, Capital Stock).
"Event of Default" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Events of Defaults and Remedies."
"Exchange Act" means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
"Exchange Note" and "Exchange Notes" have the meanings ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
"Exchange Offer" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
"Exchange Offer Registration Statement" and "Exchange Offer Registration Statements" have the meanings ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
174
"Excluded Contributions" means, except as expressly set forth herein, the net cash proceeds received by the Company after the date of the Indenture from (a) contributions to its common equity capital and (b) the sale (other than to a Subsidiary of the Company or to any management equity plan or stock option plan or any other management or employee ownership plan or similar trust established by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for the benefit of its or their employees or other Person to the extent such sale is financed by loans to such person from or guaranteed by the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor or any Restricted Subsidiary unless such loans have been repaid with cash on or prior to the date of determination) of Capital Stock (other than Disqualified Stock) of the Company, in each case that is designated within 60 days of the receipt of such net cash proceeds as an "Excluded Contribution" pursuant to an Officers' Certificateprovided that amounts received in connection with the Equity Balance shall in no event constitute an Excluded Contribution.
"Existing Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary that is organized outside Ireland under borrowings extended prior to the date of the Indenture to any such Restricted Subsidiary by Persons other than the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
"Existing Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries (other than Indebtedness under the Senior Credit Agreement) in existence on the date of the Indenture, including the Subordinated PIK Securities (even if the Subordinated PIK Securities are not issued until after the date of the Indenture) until such amounts are repaid.
"Existing Notes" means (i) the $250,000,000 6.75% Notes due 2005 issued by Smurfit Capital Funding plc and guaranteed by JSG and (ii) the $292,300,000 7.50% Debentures due 2025 issued by Smurfit Capital Funding plc and guaranteed by JSG.
"Fixed Charges" means, with respect to any specified Person for any period, the sum, without duplication, of consolidated interest expense of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period, whether paid or accrued and whether or not capitalized (including, without limitation, amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount, non-cash interest payments (other than Specified PIK Interest), the interest component of any deferred payment obligations, the interest component of all payments associated with Capital Lease Obligations, imputed interest with respect to Attributable Debt, commissions, discounts and other fees and charges incurred in respect of letter of credit or bankers' acceptance financings, interest paid under a guarantee of Indebtedness, and net of the effect of all payments made or received pursuant to Hedging Obligations) and Specified Dividends and Specified Employee Plan Contributions (excluding amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the JSG Acquisition).
"Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio" means with respect to any specified Person for any period, the ratio of the Consolidated Cash Flow of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period to the Fixed Charges of such Person and its Restricted Subsidiaries for such period. In the event that the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries incurs, assumes, Guarantees, repays, repurchases or redeems any Indebtedness (other than ordinary working capital borrowing) or issues, repurchases or redeems Disqualified Stock or a Subsidiary's Preferred Stock subsequent to the commencement of the period for which the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is being calculated and on or prior to the date on which the event for which the calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is made (the "Calculation Date"), then the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio shall be calculated givingpro forma effect to such incurrence, assumption, Guarantee, repayment, repurchase or redemption of Indebtedness, or such issuance, repurchase or redemption of Disqualified Stock or Preferred Stock, and the use of the proceeds therefrom as if the same had occurred at the beginning of the applicable four-quarter reference period. For purposes of this definition, the amount of Indebtedness under any revolving credit facility outstanding on the Calculation Date will be computed based on (i) the average daily balance of such Indebtedness during the applicable four-quarter period or such shorter period for which such facility was outstanding or (ii) if such facility was created after the end of such four fiscal
175
quarters, the average daily balance of such Indebtedness during the period from the date of creation of such facility to the Calculation Date;provided that in the case of a repayment, repurchase or redemption of Indebtedness incurred under any revolving credit facility,pro forma effect shall be given thereto only if and to the extent that such Indebtedness has been permanently repaid and the related commitment terminated. If any Indebtedness bears a floating rate of interest and is being givenpro forma effect, the interest expense on such Indebtedness will be calculated as if the rate in effect on the date of determination had been the applicable rate for the entire period (taking into account any Hedging Obligations and Other Hedging Agreements applicable to such Indebtedness if such Hedging Obligation has a remaining term in excess of 12 months).
In addition, for purposes of calculating the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:
- (1)
- acquisitions that have been made by the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, including through mergers or consolidations and including any related financing transactions, during the four-quarter reference period or subsequent to such reference period and on or prior to the Calculation Date shall be givenpro forma effect as if they had occurred on the first day of the four-quarter reference period and Consolidated Cash Flow for such reference period shall be calculated on apro forma basis in accordance with Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and including those cost savings that management reasonably expects to realize within six months of the consummation of the acquisition, but without giving effect to clause (4) of the proviso set forth in the definition of Consolidated Net Income;
- (2)
- the Consolidated Cash Flow attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the Calculation Date, shall be excluded; and the Consolidated Cash Flow (if positive or negative) directly attributable to assets that are the subject of an Asset Sale made during the four-quarter reference period or subsequent to such reference period and on or prior to the Calculation Date will be excluded;
- (3)
- the Fixed Charges attributable to discontinued operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP, and operations or businesses disposed of prior to the Calculation Date, shall be excluded, but only to the extent that the obligations giving rise to such Fixed Charges will not be obligations of the specified Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries following the Calculation Date; and
- (4)
- for any four-quarter reference period that includes any period of time prior to the consummation of the offering,pro forma effect shall be given for such period to the JSG Acquisition and the other adjustments that were added topro forma EBITDA to calculate Adjustedpro forma EBITDA calculated under GAAP as set forth in footnote (n) to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income under "Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements" all as calculated in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting officer of the Company, as if they had occurred on the first day of such four-quarter reference period.
"GAAP" means generally accepted accounting principles in Ireland as in effect as of the date of the Indenture;provided, however, that all reports and other financial information provided by the Company to the Holders, the Trustee and/or the Commission shall be prepared in accordance with Irish GAAP as in effect on the date of such report or other financial information. All ratios and computations based on GAAP contained in the Indenture will be computed in conformity with Irish GAAP.
"Guarantee" means a guarantee, contingent or otherwise, of all or any part of any Indebtedness (other than by endorsement of negotiable instruments for collection in the ordinary course of business),
176
including, without limitation, by way of a pledge of assets or through letters of credit or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof.
"Hedging Obligations" means, with respect to any specified Person, the obligations of such Person under:
- (1)
- interest rate swap agreements, interest rate cap agreements and interest rate collar agreements; and
- (2)
- other agreements or arrangements designed to protect such Person against fluctuations in interest rates.
"Holder" means, for so long as the Notes are represented by Global Notes, the bearer thereof which shall initially be the Book-Entry Depositary and, in the event that certificated Notes are issued, the Person in whose name the Notes are registered on the Registrar's books.
"Indebtedness" means, with respect to any specified Person, any indebtedness of such Person, whether or not contingent, in respect of:
- (1)
- borrowed money;
- (2)
- evidenced by bonds, notes, debentures or similar instruments or letters of credit (or reimbursement agreements in respect thereof);
- (3)
- banker's acceptances, letters of credit and similar instruments;
- (4)
- representing Capital Lease Obligations and Attributable Debt;
- (5)
- the deferred balance of the purchase price of any property which remains unpaid, except any such balance that constitutes an operating lease payment, accrued expense, trade payable or similar current liability;
- (6)
- all obligations of such Person with respect to the redemption, repayment or other repurchase of any Disqualified Stock or, with respect to any Subsidiary, any Preferred Stock (but excluding, in each case, any accrued dividends); or
- (7)
- any Hedging Obligations or Other Hedging Agreements,
if and to the extent any of the preceding items (other than letters of credit, Hedging Obligations and Other Hedging Agreements) would appear as a liability upon a balance sheet of the specified Person prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the term "Indebtedness" includes all Indebtedness of others secured by a Lien on any asset of the specified Person (whether or not such Indebtedness is assumed by the specified Person) and, to the extent not otherwise included, the Guarantee by the specified Person of any Indebtedness of any other Person.
The amount of any Indebtedness outstanding as of any date shall be:
- (1)
- the accreted value thereof, in the case of any Indebtedness issued with original issue discount; and
- (2)
- the principal amount thereof in the case of any other Indebtedness.
In addition, Indebtedness of any Person shall include Indebtedness described in the preceding paragraph that would not appear as a liability on the balance sheet of such Person if:
- (1)
- such Indebtedness is the obligation of a partnership or joint venture that is not a Restricted Subsidiary (a "Joint Venture");
- (2)
- such Person or a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person is a general partner of the Joint Venture (a "General Partner"); and
177
- (3)
- there is recourse, by contract or operation of law, with respect to the payment of such Indebtedness to property or assets of such Person or a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person; and then such Indebtedness shall be included in an amount not to exceed:
- (a)
- the lesser of (i) the net assets of the General Partner and (ii) the amount of such obligations to the extent that there is recourse, by contract or operation of law, to the property or assets of such Person or a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person; or
- (b)
- if less than the amount determined pursuant to clause (i) immediately above, the actual amount of such Indebtedness that is recourse to such Person or a Restricted Subsidiary of such Person, if the Indebtedness is evidenced by a writing and is for a determinable amount and the related interest expense shall be included in consolidated interest expense to the extent actually paid by the Company or its Restricted Subsidiaries.
"Initial Purchasers" means the several initial purchasers named as such in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2003, among the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantor and such initial purchasers.
"Intercompany Loan Agreements" means (i) that agreement, dated as of September 16, 2002, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, between the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor, providing for a loan from the Company to the Subsidiary Guarantor in the amount of the gross proceeds of the offering of the Notes issued on September 30, 2002 and the Subordinated PIK Securities, (ii) that agreement, dated as of February 14, 2003, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, between the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor for an advance of the aggregate principal of amount of the Notes offered pursuant to this Offering Memorandum and (iii) any other agreement that may be entered into from time to time, as may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, between the Company and the Subsidiary Guarantor for an advance of the aggregate principal amount of any Additional Notes issued and sold under the Indenture.
"Investments" means, with respect to any Person, all direct or indirect investments by such Person in other Persons (including Affiliates) in the forms of loans (including Guarantees or other obligations), advances or capital contributions (excluding commission, travel and similar advances to officers and employees made in the ordinary course of business), purchases or other acquisitions for consideration of Indebtedness, Equity Interests or other securities, together with all items that are or would be classified as investments on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP. If the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company sells or otherwise disposes of any Equity Interests of any direct or indirect Subsidiary of the Company such that, after giving effect to any such sale or disposition, such Person is no longer a Subsidiary of the Company, the Company shall be deemed to have made an Investment on the date of any such sale or disposition equal to the fair market value of the Equity Interests of such Subsidiary not sold or disposed of in an amount determined as provided in the final paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments." The acquisition by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of a Person that holds an Investment in a third Person shall be deemed to be an Investment by the Company or such Subsidiary in such third Person in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Investment held by the acquired Person in such third Person in an amount determined as provided in the final paragraph of the covenant described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments."
"JSG" means Jefferson Smurfit Group plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland, or any successor entity.
"JSG Acquisition" has the meaning ascribed thereto under the heading "Summary—The JSG Acquisition."
178
"Lien" means, with respect to any asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest or encumbrance of any kind in respect of such asset, whether or not filed, recorded or otherwise perfected under applicable law, including any conditional sale or other title retention agreement.
"Liquidated Damages" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
"Litigation Bonds" means the third-party bonds issued on behalf of JSG and/or one or more of its subsidiaries in a principal amount of approximately €47 million in connection with the currently pending litigation in Spain and the related counter-indemnities provided by Smurfit International B.V. and JSG in respect of the bonds.
"Marketable Securities" means publicly traded debt or equity securities that are listed for trading on a national securities exchange and that were issued by a corporation whose debt securities are rated in one of the three highest rating categories by either Standard & Poor's Rating Services or Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
"MDCP Acquisitions I " means MDCP Acquisitions I, a public unlimited liability company incorporated under the laws of Ireland.
"Net Income" means, with respect to any specified Person, the net income (loss) of such Person, determined in accordance with GAAP and before any reduction in respect of Preferred Stock dividends, excluding, however:
- (1)
- any gain (or loss), together with any related provision for taxes on such gain (or loss), realized in connection with: (a) any Asset Sale (which for these purposes shall include all transactions described in the second paragraph of the definition of "Asset Sale"); or (b) the disposition of any securities by such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries or the extinguishment of any Indebtedness of such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries; and
- (2)
- any extraordinary gain (or loss), together with any related provision for taxes on such extraordinary gain (or loss).
"Net Proceeds" means the aggregate cash proceeds received by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in respect of any Asset Sale (including, without limitation, any cash received upon the sale or other disposition of any non-cash consideration received in any Asset Sale) or sale and leaseback transaction, as the case may be, net of the direct costs relating to such Asset Sale or sale and leaseback transaction, including, without limitation, legal, accounting and investment banking fees, sales commissions, any relocation expenses incurred as a result thereof, all taxes of any kind paid or payable as a result thereof and reasonable reserves established to cover any indemnity obligations incurred in connection therewith, in each case, after taking into account any available tax credits or deductions and any tax sharing arrangements, and amounts required to be applied to the repayment of Indebtedness, other than Indebtedness under a Credit Facility, secured by a Lien on the asset or assets that were the subject of such Asset Sale and any reserve for adjustment in respect of the sale price of such asset or assets established in accordance with GAAP.
"Non-Public Indebtedness" means:
- (1)
- Indebtedness represented by promissory notes or similar evidence of Indebtedness under bank loans or similar financing agreements, including private placements to insurance companies, mezzanine lenders, strategic investors and private-equity sponsors; and
- (2)
- any other Indebtedness,provided that it (A) is not listed, quoted or tradeable on any exchange or market, including any market for securities eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, (B) is not issued or sold by means of any prospectus,
179
offering memorandum (but not an information memorandum of the type used in a bank syndication) or similar document typically used in connection with road show presentations, (C) is not marketed in an underwritten securities offering and (D) if placed with or through an agent, the agent does not place it with its high-yield bond accounts.
"Non-Recourse Debt" means Indebtedness:
- (1)
- as to which neither the Company nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (a) provides guarantee or credit support of any kind (including any undertaking, agreement or instrument that would constitute Indebtedness), (b) is directly or indirectly liable as a guarantor or otherwise or (c) constitutes the lender or is directly or indirectly liable;
- (2)
- no default with respect to which (including any rights that the holders thereof may have to take enforcement action against an Unrestricted Subsidiary) would permit upon notice, lapse of time or both any holder of any other Indebtedness (other than the Notes) of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries to declare a default on such other Indebtedness or cause the payment thereof to be accelerated or payable prior to its stated maturity; and
- (3)
- as to which the lenders have been notified in writing that they will not have any recourse to the stock or assets of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
"Note Registration Rights Agreement" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
"Obligations" means any principal, interest, penalties, fees, indemnifications, expenses, reimbursements, damages and other liabilities payable under the documentation governing any Indebtedness.
"Officer" means the Chairman of the Board, the President, any Vice President, the Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer or the Secretary of the Company.
"Officers' Certificate" means a certificate signed by two Officers of the Company.
"Opinion of Counsel" means a written opinion from legal counsel who is reasonably acceptable to the Trustee.
"Other Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness" means Indebtedness of a Restricted Subsidiary that is organized outside Ireland under borrowings extended after the date of the Indenture to any such Restricted Subsidiary by Persons other than the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
"Other Hedging Agreements" means any foreign exchange contracts, currency swap agreements, commodity agreements or other similar agreements or arrangements designed to protect against the fluctuations in currency or commodity values.
"Parent" means MDCP Acquisitions Limited, a private limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Ireland, and any successor thereto.
"Payor" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Withholding Taxes."
"Permitted Business" means the containerboard, paperboard and packaging products business and any business in which the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries are engaged in on the date of the Indenture or any business activity that is a reasonable extension, development or expansion thereof or ancillary to any of the foregoing.
"Permitted Business Assets" means assets used or useful in a Permitted Business, including a majority of the Voting Stock of a Permitted Business.
180
"Permitted Group" means any group of investors that is deemed to be a "person" (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) at any time prior to the initial public offering of ordinary shares of Parent, the Company or another direct or indirect holding company of JSG by virtue of the Subscription and Shareholders Agreement, as the same may be amended, modified or supplemented from time to time;provided that no single Person (other than the Principals and their Related Parties) Beneficially Owns (together with its Affiliates) more of the Voting Stock of the Company that is Beneficially Owned by such group of investors than is then collectively Beneficially Owned by the Principals and their Related Parties in the aggregate (excluding, for purposes of this definition, ordinary shares of an investor deemed to be Beneficially Owned by another investor solely as a result of such Subscription and Shareholders Agreement and their membership in the same group).
"Permitted Investments" means:
- (1)
- any Investment in the Company or in a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company;
- (2)
- any Investment in Cash Equivalents;
- (3)
- any Investment by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company in a Person, if as a result of such Investment:
- (a)
- such Person becomes a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company; or
- (b)
- such Person is merged, consolidated or amalgamated with or into, or transfers or conveys substantially all of its assets to, or is liquidated into, the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company;
- (4)
- any Investment made as a result of the receipt of non-cash consideration from an Asset Sale that was made pursuant to and in compliance with the covenant described above under the caption "—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales";
- (5)
- any Investment (other than Cash Equivalents) payment for which consisted solely of Capital Stock of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock);
- (6)
- Hedging Obligations and Other Hedging Agreements;
- (7)
- any Investment existing on the date of the Indenture and any Investments issued in connection with the Transaction Asset Sales;
- (8)
- any Investment in securities of trade creditors or customers received in compromise of obligations of such persons incurred in the ordinary course of business, including pursuant to any plan of reorganization or similar arrangement upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of such trade creditors or customers;
- (9)
- negotiable instruments held for deposit or collection in the ordinary course of business;
- (10)
- loans, guarantees of loans, advances or other extensions of credit to officers, directors, employees or consultants of the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company not to exceed €20 million in the aggregate outstanding at any time;
- (11)
- receivables owing to the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary created or acquired in the ordinary course of business and payable or dischargeable in accordance with customary trade terms;provided, however, that such trade terms may include such concessionary trade terms as the Company or any such Restricted Subsidiary deems reasonable under the circumstances;
- (12)
- payroll, travel and similar advances to cover matters that are expected at the time of such advances ultimately to be treated as expenses for accounting purposes and that are made in the ordinary course of business;
- (13)
- any Investment by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in a Receivables Subsidiary or any Investment by a Receivables Subsidiary in any other Person in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction;provided that each such Investment is in the form of a Purchase Money Note, an equity interest or interests in accounts receivables generated by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries;
- (14)
- Guarantees issued in accordance with the provisions under "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock";
181
- (15)
- Investments resulting from the acquisition of a Person that at the time of such acquisition held instruments constituting Investments that were not acquired in contemplation of the acquisition of such Person;
- (16)
- Investments in notes of Transaction Asset Purchasers made in connection with and as contemplated under the terms of the Transaction Asset Sales;
- (17)
- any Asset Swap made in accordance with the Asset Swaps provisions under "Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Asset Sales"; and
- (18)
- other Investments in any Person having an aggregate fair market value (measured on the date each such Investment was made and without giving effect to subsequent changes in value), when taken together with all other Investments made pursuant to this clause (18) that are at the time outstanding not to exceed the greater of €50.0 million or 5.0% of Total Assets;provided,however, that if an Investment pursuant to this clause (18) is made in any Person that is not a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company at the date of the making of the Investment and such Person becomes a restricted Subsidiary after such date, such Investment shall thereafter be deemed to have been made pursuant to clause (1), above, and shall cease to have been made pursuant to this clause (18).
"Permitted Liens" means:
- (1)
- Liens securing Indebtedness incurred under Credit Facilities that were permitted by the terms of the Indenture to be incurred;
- (2)
- Liens in favor of the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary;
- (3)
- Liens on property of a Person existing at the time such Person is merged with or into or consolidated with the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;provided that such Liens were in existence prior to the contemplation of such merger or consolidation and do not extend to any assets other than those of the Person merged into or consolidated with the Company or the Subsidiary;
- (4)
- Liens on property existing at the time of acquisition thereof by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company,provided that such Liens were in existence prior to the contemplation of such acquisition and do not extend to any assets other than those of the Person merged into or consolidated with the Company or the Subsidiary;
- (5)
- Liens to secure the performance of statutory obligations, surety or appeal bonds, performance bonds or other obligations of a like nature incurred in the ordinary course of business;
- (6)
- Liens to secure Indebtedness (including Capital Lease Obligations) permitted by clause (4) of the second paragraph of the covenant entitled "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" covering only the assets acquired with such Indebtedness;
- (7)
- Liens existing on the date of the Indenture together with any Liens securing Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness incurred under clause (5) of the second paragraph under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock" in order to refinance the Indebtedness secured by Liens existing on the date of the Indenture;provided that the Liens securing the Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness shall not extend to property other than that pledged under the Liens securing the Indebtedness being refinanced;
- (8)
- Liens on assets of Unrestricted Subsidiaries that secure Non-Recourse Debt of Unrestricted Subsidiaries;
182
- (9)
- Liens for taxes, assessments or governmental charges or claims that are not yet delinquent or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings promptly instituted and diligently concluded,provided that any reserve or other appropriate provision as shall be required in conformity with GAAP shall have been made therefor;
- (10)
- Liens securing Attributable Debt;
- (11)
- Liens on cash assets securing the Tender Offer Loan Notes;provided that such Liens do not, in the aggregate, extend to an amount of cash assets greater in value than the principal face amount of the Tender Offer Loan Notes so secured;
- (12)
- Liens on assets of a Receivables Subsidiary incurred in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction;
- (13)
- Liens securing Indebtedness incurred under the indentures relating to the Existing Notes;
- (14)
- Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company with respect to obligations that do not exceed €25.0 million at any one time outstanding;
- (15)
- Liens securing Hedging Obligations or Other Hedging Obligations entered into in the ordinary course of business;
- (16)
- Liens to secure Existing Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness or Other Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness permitted to be incurred pursuant to clause (16) of the second paragraph under "Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock"; and
- (17)
- Liens to secure the Litigation Bonds and any refinancing or replacement of the Litigation Bonds.
"Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness" means any Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries issued in exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to extend, refinance, renew, replace, defease or refund other Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (other than intercompany Indebtedness);provided that:
- (1)
- the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness does not exceed the principal amount (or accreted value, if applicable) of the Indebtedness so extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded (plus all accrued interest thereon, prepayment penalties, redemption or repurchase premiums, defeasance costs, fees and expenses and premiums incurred in connection therewith);
- (2)
- such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity date no earlier than the final maturity date of, and has a Weighted Average Life to Maturity equal to or greater than the Weighted Average Life to Maturity of, the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded;
- (3)
- if the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes, such Permitted Refinancing Indebtedness has a final maturity date no earlier than the final maturity date of, and is subordinated in right of payment to, the Notes on terms at least as favorable to the Holders of Notes as those contained in the documentation governing the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded; and
- (4)
- such Indebtedness is incurred either by the Company or by the Restricted Subsidiary who is the obligor on the Indebtedness being extended, refinanced, renewed, replaced, defeased or refunded.
183
"Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, limited liability company or government or other entity.
"Preferred Stock", as applied to the Capital Stock of any corporation, means Capital Stock of any class or classes (however designated) which is preferred as to the payment of dividends or as to the distribution of assets upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation or dissolution of such corporation over shares of Capital Stock of any other class of such corporation.
"Principals" means Madison Dearborn Partners, L.L.C., and its Affiliates.
"Priority Agreements" means (i) the Priority Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2002, (ii) the Priority Agreement dated as of February 14, 2003 and (iii) any other Priority Agreement executed in connection with the issuance and sale of Additional Notes under the Indenture, in each case, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, among the Senior Creditors (as defined therein), the Company, Parent, the Subsidiary Guarantor and the other parties thereto from time to time.
"Private Debt" means the (i) $462,000,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding of notes issued pursuant to the Note and Guarantee Agreement, dated September 24, 1993, by Smurfit International B.V. and Smurfit Packaging Corporation and guaranteed by JSG and (ii) £30,000,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding of notes issued pursuant to the Note and Guarantee Agreement, dated September 24, 1993, by Smurfit International B.V. and Smurfit Packaging Corporation and guaranteed by JSG.
"Purchase Money Note" means a promissory note evidencing a line of credit, which may be irrevocable, from, or evidencing other Indebtedness owed to, the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in connection with a Qualified Receivables Transaction, which note shall be repaid from cash available to the maker of such note, other than amounts required to be established as reserves pursuant to agreements, amounts paid to investors in respect of interest, principal and other amounts owing to such investors and amounts paid in connection with the purchase of newly generated receivables.
"Qualified Receivables Transaction" means any transaction or series of transactions that may be entered into by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries pursuant to which the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries may sell, convey or otherwise transfer to:
- (1)
- a Receivables Subsidiary (in the case of a transfer by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries); and
- (2)
- any other Person (in the case of a transfer by a Receivables Subsidiary),
or may grant a security interest in, any accounts receivable (whether now existing or arising in the future) of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, and any assets related thereto including, without limitation, all collateral securing such accounts receivable, all contracts and all guarantees or other obligations in respect of such accounts receivable, proceeds of such accounts receivable and other assets that are customarily transferred, or in respect of which security interests are customarily granted, in connection with asset securitization transactions involving accounts receivable.
"Receivables Subsidiary" means a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of the Company that engages in no activities other than in connection with the financing of accounts receivable and that is designated by the Board of Directors of the Company (as provided below) as a Receivables Subsidiary and:
- (1)
- has no Indebtedness or other Obligations (contingent or otherwise) that:
- (a)
- are guaranteed by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, other than contingent liabilities pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings;
184
- (b)
- are recourse to or obligate the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries in any way other than pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings; or
- (c)
- subjects any property or assets of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries, directly or indirectly, contingently or otherwise, to the satisfaction thereof, other than pursuant to Standard Securitization Undertakings;
- (2)
- has no contract, agreement, arrangement or undertaking (except in connection with a Purchase Money Note or Qualified Receivables Transaction) with the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries than on terms no less favorable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiaries than those that might be obtained at the time from Persons that are not Affiliates of the Company, other than fees payable in the ordinary course of business in connection with servicing accounts receivable; and
- (3)
- neither the Company nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries has any obligation to maintain or preserve the Receivables Subsidiary's financial condition or cause the Receivables Subsidiary to achieve certain levels of operating results.
Any such designation by the Board of Directors of the Company shall be evidenced to the relevant Trustee by filing with such Trustee a certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company giving effect to such designation and an Officers' Certificate certifying, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief after consulting with counsel, that such designation complied with the foregoing conditions.
"Related Party" means:
- (1)
- any controlling stockholder, 80% (or more) owned Subsidiary, or spouse or immediate family member (in the case of an individual) of any Principal; or
- (2)
- any trust, corporation, partnership or other entity, the beneficiaries, stockholders, partners, owners or Persons beneficially holding an 80% or more controlling interest of which consist of any one or more Principals and/or such other Persons referred to in the immediately preceding clause (1).
"Relevant Taxing Jurisdiction" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Withholding Taxes."
"Restricted Investment" means an Investment other than a Permitted Investment.
"Restricted Subsidiary" of a Person means any Subsidiary of the referent Person that is not an Unrestricted Subsidiary.
"Securities Act" means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
"Senior Credit Agreement" means (i) the Senior Facilities Agreement among MDCP Acquisitions I, Deutsche Bank AG London, as facility agent and the lenders parties thereto from time to time, as the same may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time and (ii) any renewal, extension, refunding, restructuring, replacement, or refinancing thereof (whether with the original facilities agent and lenders or another facilities agent or agents or other lenders and whether provided under the original Senior Facilities Agreement or any other agreement or indenture).
"Senior Debt," in respect of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor, as the case may be, means:
- (1)
- all Indebtedness outstanding under the Notes, all Credit Facilities (other than Credit Facilities of the Company relating to indentures and debentures), all Hedging Obligations and all Other Hedging Agreements (including guarantees thereof) with respect thereto of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor, as the case may be, whether outstanding on the date of the Indenture or thereafter incurred;
185
- (2)
- any other Indebtedness incurred by (i) the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary or (ii) the Subsidiary Guarantor or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Subsidiary Guarantor, as the case may be, unless the instrument under which such Indebtedness is incurred expressly provides that it is subordinated in right of payment to the Notes or the Subsidiary Guarantees, as the case may be; and
- (3)
- all Obligations with respect to the items listed in the preceding clauses (1) and (2) (including any interest accruing subsequent to the filing of a petition of bankruptcy at the rate provided for in the documentation with respect thereto, whether or not such interest is an allowed claim under applicable law).
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the preceding, Senior Debt will not include:
- (1)
- any liability for federal, state, local or other taxes owed or owing by the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor;
- (2)
- any Indebtedness of the Company or the Subsidiary Guarantor to any of its Subsidiaries;
- (3)
- any trade payables; or
- (4)
- the portion of any Indebtedness that is incurred in violation of the relevant Indenture (but only to the extent so incurred).
"Shelf Registration Statement" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Registration Rights; Liquidated Damages."
"Significant Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary that would be a "significant subsidiary" as defined in Article 1, Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X, promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Regulation is in effect on the date of the Indenture.
"Specified Dividends" of a Person means the product of (a) all dividends, whether paid or accrued and whether or not in cash, on any series of Preferred Stock of such Person or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries payable to a party other than the Company or a Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary (other than (i) dividends on Equity Interests payable solely in Equity Interests of the Company (other than Disqualified Stock) and (ii) dividends to the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company), times (b) a fraction, the numerator of which is one and the denominator of which is one minus the then current combined effective federal, state, provincial and local tax rate of such Person, expressed as a decimal, in each case, on a consolidated basis and in accordance with GAAP.
"Specified Employee Plan Contributions" means the cash contributions to any employee stock ownership plan or similar trust to the extent such contributions are used by such plan or trust to pay interest or fees to any Person (other than the Company) in connection with Indebtedness incurred by such plan or trust;provided, however, that there will be excluded therefrom any such interest expense of any Unrestricted Subsidiary to the extent the related Indebtedness is not Guaranteed or paid by the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary.
"Specified Existing Indebtedness" means the carrying value, as adjusted for any Hedging Obligations associated therewith in accordance with GAAP, of (i) the $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding of 6.75% Notes due 2005 issued by Smurfit Capital Funding plc and guaranteed by JSG, (ii) the $292,300,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.50% Debentures due 2025 issued by Smurfit Capital Funding plc and guaranteed by JSG, (iii) the Private Debt and (iv) the Existing Foreign Subsidiary Indebtedness, in each case, as converted into euros using the then applicable exchange rate.
"Specified PIK Interest" means any non-cash interest payable (and paid in non-cash) and amortization of any original issue discount on the Subordinated PIK Securities.
186
"Standard Securitization Undertakings" means representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities entered into by the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries that are reasonably customary in an accounts receivable transaction.
"Stated Maturity" means, with respect to any installment of interest or principal on any series of Indebtedness, the date on which such payment of interest or principal was scheduled to be paid in the original documentation governing such Indebtedness, and shall not include any contingent obligations to repay, redeem or repurchase any such interest or principal prior to the date originally scheduled for the payment thereof.
"Subordinated PIK Security" means the €100.0 million 151/2% Subordinated Notes due 2013 and the $150.0 million 151/2% Subordinated Notes due 2013, in each case, of the Company.
"Subsidiary" means, with respect to any specified Person:
- (1)
- any corporation, association or other business entity of which more than 50% of the total voting power of shares of Capital Stock entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or trustees thereof is at the time owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by such Person or one or more of the other Subsidiaries of that Person (or a combination thereof) and, in respect of the Company, Smurfit MBI; and
- (2)
- any partnership (a) the sole general partner or the managing general partner of which is such Person or a Subsidiary of such Person or (b) the only general partners of which are such Person or one or more Subsidiaries of such Person (or any combination thereof).
"Subsidiary Guarantees" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "Brief Description of the Notes and the Subsidiary Guarantees of the Notes—The Subsidiary Guarantees."
"Subsidiary Guarantor" means MDCP Acquisitions I.
"Subscription and Shareholders Agreement" means the Subscription and Shareholders Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2002, among certain investors in Parent.
"Successor Company" shall have the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Certain Covenants—Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets."
"Tax Redemption Date" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Redemption for Taxation Reasons."
"Taxes" has the meaning ascribed thereto under "—Withholding Taxes."
"Tender Offer" means the tender offer by MDCP Acquisitions I for the shares of JSG as contemplated by the Tender Offer Documentation.
"Tender Offer Documentation" means the Offer to Purchase, dated as of July 5, 2002, by MDCP Acquisitions I for the shares of JSG in connection with the Tender Offer, and any accompanying documentation sent or communicated to shareholders of JSG in connection therewith.
"Tender Offer Loan Notes" means the notes issued by MDCP Acquisitions I as consideration for the shares of JSG in connection with MDCP Acquisitions I's Tender Offer;provided that such loan notes are issued in accordance with Irish law, are not issued after the 14th day following the closing of the Tender Offer and are issued on terms consistent with those described in the Tender Offer Documentation (including, without limitation, with respect to rate of interest).
"Total Assets" means the total consolidated assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, as set forth on the Company's most recent consolidated balance sheet.
187
"Transaction Asset Purchaser" means each of Madison Dearborn Partners (Netherlands) B.V., Madison Global Holdings Limited and Arlonberg Limited (and collectively, the "Transaction Asset Purchasers").
"Transaction Asset Sales" means the disposition of assets by JSG and/or one or more of its Subsidiaries to the Transaction Asset Purchasers, as contemplated in the offering memorandum dated September 23, 2002 as part of the JSG Acquisition among the afore-mentioned Persons in exchange for notes issued by the Transaction Asset Purchasers.
"Treasury Rate" means, as of any redemption date, the yield to maturity as of such redemption date of United States Treasury securities with a constant maturity (as compiled and published in the most recent Federal Reserve Statistical Release H.15 (519) that has become publicly available at least two business days prior to the redemption date (or, if such Statistical Release is no longer published, any publicly available source of similar market data)) most nearly equal to the period from the redemption date to October 1, 2007;provided,however, that if the period from the redemption date to October 1, 2007 is less than one year, the weekly average yield on actually traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year shall be used.
"Unrestricted Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary of the Company and its direct and indirect Subsidiaries that is designated by the Board of Directors of the Company as an Unrestricted Subsidiary pursuant to a resolution of such Board of Directors, but only to the extent that such Subsidiary:
- (1)
- has no Indebtedness other than Non-Recourse Debt;
- (2)
- by such designation does not cause the Company to be unable to incur €1.00 of additional Indebtedness pursuant to the first paragraph of the covenant under "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock";
- (3)
- is not party to any agreement, contract, arrangement or understanding with the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary of the Company unless the terms of any such agreement, contract, arrangement or understanding are no less favorable to the Company or such Restricted Subsidiary than those that might be obtained at the time from Persons who are not Affiliates of the Company;
- (4)
- is a Person with respect to which neither the Company nor any of its Restricted Subsidiaries has any direct or indirect obligation (a) to subscribe for additional Equity Interests or (b) to maintain or preserve such Person's financial condition or to cause such Person to achieve any specified levels of operating results; and
- (5)
- has not guaranteed or otherwise directly or indirectly provided credit support for any Indebtedness of the Company or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries.
Any designation of a Subsidiary of the Company as an Unrestricted Subsidiary shall be evidenced to the Trustee by filing with the Trustee a certified copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company giving effect to such designation and an Officers' Certificate certifying that such designation complied with the preceding conditions and was permitted by the covenant described above under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Restricted Payments." If, at any time, any Unrestricted Subsidiary would fail to meet the preceding requirements as an Unrestricted Subsidiary, it shall thereafter cease to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary for purposes of the relevant Indenture and any Indebtedness of such Subsidiary shall be deemed to be incurred by a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company as of such date and, if such Indebtedness is not permitted to be incurred as of such date under the covenant described under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock," the Company shall be in default of such covenant. The Board of Directors of the Company may at any time designate any Unrestricted Subsidiary to be a Restricted Subsidiary;provided that such designation shall be deemed to be an incurrence of Indebtedness by a
188
Restricted Subsidiary of the Company of any outstanding Indebtedness of such Unrestricted Subsidiary and such designation shall only be permitted if (1) such Indebtedness is permitted under the covenant described under the caption "—Certain Covenants—Incurrence of Indebtedness and Issuance of Preferred Stock," calculated on apro forma basis as if such designation had occurred at the beginning of the four-quarter reference period; and (2) no Default or Event of Default would be in existence following such designation.
"U.S. Government Securities" shall mean securities that are (i) direct obligations of the United States of America for the payment of which its full faith and credit is pledged or (ii) obligations of a Person controlled or supervised by and acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States of America the payment of which is unconditionally guaranteed as a full faith and credit obligation by the United States of America, which, in either case under clauses (i) or (ii) are not callable or redeemable at the option of the issuer thereof, and shall also include a depository receipt issued by a bank or trust company as custodian with respect to any such U.S. Government Securities or a specific payment of interest on or principal of any such U.S. Government Security held by such custodian for the account of the holder of a depository receipt,provided that (except as required by law) such custodian is not authorized to make any deduction from the amount payable to the holder of such depository receipt from any amount received by the custodian in respect of the U.S. Government Security or the specific payment of interest on or principal of the U.S. Government Security evidenced by such depository receipt.
"Voting Stock" of any Person as of any date means the Capital Stock of such Person that is at the time entitled to vote in the election of the Board of Directors of such Person.
"Weighted Average Life to Maturity" means, when applied to any Indebtedness at any date, the number of years obtained by dividing:
- (1)
- the sum of the products obtained by multiplying (a) the amount of each then remaining installment, sinking fund, serial maturity or other required payments of principal, including payment at final maturity, in respect thereof, by (b) the number of years (calculated to the nearest one-twelfth) that will elapse between such date and the making of such payment; by
- (2)
- the then outstanding principal amount of such Indebtedness.
"Wholly Owned Restricted Subsidiary" of any specified Person means any Wholly Owned Subsidiary of such Person which at the time of determination is a Restricted Subsidiary.
"Wholly Owned Subsidiary" of any specified Person means a Subsidiary of such Person all of the outstanding Capital Stock or other ownership interests of which (other than directors' qualifying shares) shall at the time be owned by such Person and/or by one or more Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of such Person.
189
BOOK-ENTRY, SETTLEMENT AND CLEARANCE
General
The exchange notes are represented by global notes in bearer form without interest coupons, which we refer to as global notes.
The global notes were deposited with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as book-entry depositary. The global notes are then held for the book-entry depositary by a custodian that in each case has agreed that it will not transfer the global notes except among the book-entry depositary, its nominees, custodians and their respective successors located outside Ireland that are acceptable to issuer. The book-entry depositary maintains a book-entry system in which it recorded the registered owner of a depositary interest for each of the global notes in connection with which it issued a depositary interest in each global note, representing a 100% interest in the underlying global note, to The Depository Trust Company, or DTC, by recording such interest in the dollar book-entry depositary's books and records in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Upon acceptance by DTC of depositary interests, DTC will record book-entry interests in such depositary interests ("book-entry interests"). DTC will credit on its book-entry registration and transfer system the participants' accounts with the book-entry interests owned by such participants.
Book-entry interests may not be exchanged for notes in physical, definitive form except in the limited circumstances under "—Definitive Securities" described below. If any definitive notes are issued, they will only be issued in registered form.
Transfers
Transfers of book-entry interests between participants in DTC will be effected through DTC pursuant to customary procedures established by DTC and its respective participants. Transfers between participants in DTC will be effected under DTC's procedures and will be settled in same-day funds.
Cross-market transfers between DTC participants, on the one hand, and Euroclear or Clearstream participants, on the other hand, will be effected within DTC through the DTC participants that are acting as depositaries for Euroclear and Clearstream. To deliver or receive a book-entry interest in a global note held in a Euroclear or Clearstream account, an investor must send transfer instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, under the rules and procedures of that system and within the established deadlines of that system. If the transaction meets its settlement requirements, Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will send instructions to its DTC depositary to take action to effect final settlement by delivering or receiving book-entry interests in the relevant global notes in DTC, and making or receiving payment under normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear and Clearstream participants may not deliver instructions directly to the DTC depositaries that are acting for Euroclear or Clearstream.
Because of time zone differences, the securities account of a Euroclear or Clearstream participant that purchases an interest in a global note from a DTC participant will be credited on the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream immediately following the DTC settlement date. Cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream from the sale of a book-entry interest in a global note to a DTC participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream cash account as of the business day for Euroclear or Clearstream following the DTC settlement date.
DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have agreed to the above procedures to facilitate transfers of interests in the global notes among participants in those settlement systems. However, the settlement systems are not obligated to perform these procedures and may discontinue or change these procedures at any time. Issuer, the trustee and the exchange agents will have no responsibility for the performance
190
by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their participants or indirect participants of their obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
Information Concerning DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream
All book-entry interests will be subject to the operations and procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream. We provide the following summaries of those operations and procedures solely for the convenience of investors. The operations and procedures of each settlement system are controlled by that settlement system and may be changed at any time. Neither we nor the initial purchasers are responsible for those operations or procedures.
DTC has advised us that it is:
- •
- a limited purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law;
- •
- a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law;
- •
- a member of the Federal Reserve System;
- •
- a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code; and
- •
- a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
DTC was created to hold securities for its participants and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between its participants through electronic book-entry changes in the accounts of its participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical transfer and delivery of certificates. DTC's participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks and trust companies, clearing corporations and other organizations. Indirect access to DTC's system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies; these indirect participants clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a DTC participant, either directly or indirectly. Investors who are not DTC participants may beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only through DTC participants or indirect participants in DTC.
Euroclear and Clearstream have advised us as follows: Euroclear and Clearstream each hold securities for their account holders and facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions by electronic book-entry transfer between their respective account holders, thereby eliminating the need for physical movements of certificates and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities.
Euroclear and Clearstream each provide various services, including safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Euroclear and Clearstream each also deal with domestic securities markets in several countries through established depositary and custodial relationships. The respective systems of Euroclear and Clearstream have established an electronic bridge between their two systems across which their respective account holders may settle trades with each other.
Account holders in both Euroclear and Clearstream are worldwide financial institutions, including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, trust companies and clearing corporations. Indirect access of both Euroclear and Clearstream is available to other institutions that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with an account holder of either system.
An account holder's overall contractual relations with either Euroclear or Clearstream are governed by the respective rules and operating procedures of Euroclear or Clearstream and any applicable laws. Both Euroclear and Clearstream act under such rules and operating procedures only on behalf of their respective account holders, and have no record of, or relationship with, persons holding through their respective account holders.
191
Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream currently follow the foregoing procedures to facilitate transfers of book-entry interests among participants of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, they are under no obligation to do so, and such procedures may be discontinued or modified at any time. Issuer, the exchange agents and the trustee will have no responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective participants or indirect participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
The bearer of each global note will be considered the sole holder for all purposes under the indenture. Except as set forth below under "—Definitive Securities," participants or indirect participants will not be entitled to have securities or depositary interests representing such securities registered in their names, will not receive or be entitled to receive physical delivery of securities and will not be considered the owners or holders thereof under the indenture. As a result, holders of book-entry interests must rely on the procedures of the relevant book-entry depositary, participants of DTC, Euroclear and/or Clearstream must rely on the procedures of the applicable clearing system and indirect participants must rely on the procedures of DTC, Euroclear and/or Clearstream, as the case may be, and the procedures of indirect participants through which the person owns its interest in the book-entry interest to exercise any rights of a holder under the indenture.
The laws of some jurisdictions require that certain persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities that they own. Consequently, the ability to transfer book-entry interests to such persons will be limited to that extent. Because DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream can act only on behalf of their respective participants, which in turn act on behalf of indirect participants, the ability of a person having book-entry interests to pledge such interests to persons that do not participate in the DTC system, Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, or otherwise take actions in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing such interests.
Payments on Global Notes
Payments of any amounts owing in respect of the global notes will be made to the custodian for the book-entry depositary, as the holder thereof, which will receive these payments in each case for and on behalf of such book-entry depositary. These payments will fulfill all of issuer's obligations in respect of these payments and issuer will have no further responsibilities or liability in respect of payment. All these amounts will be payable through one or more paying agents outside Ireland appointed under one or more paying agency agreements to the custodian, as the holder of the global notes. Upon receipt of any of these amounts, the custodian or the book-entry depositary, as the case may be, will pay the amount so received to the nominee of DTC as the registered holder of a depositary interest representing the global notes and such payments will be credited to DTC participants' accounts that hold book-entry interests in the dollar global notes on the relevant payment date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records.
Issuer and the trustee and the paying and transfer agent in Luxembourg will have no responsibility or liability for the payment of amounts to owners of book-entry interests, for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of those interests by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream, or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records of DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream relating to those interests.
Payments by participants and indirect participants in DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream to the owners of book-entry interests will be governed by standing instructions and customary industry practice and will be the responsibility of those participants or indirect participants and DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream.
As of the date of this prospectus, the trustee for the notes is Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the paying agent and the transfer agent in respect of the notes is Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the principal exchange agent for the notes is Deutsche Bank Trust Company
192
Americas, and the paying agent, exchange agent, transfer agent and the registrar in Luxembourg is Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A.
Issuer may change the paying agent, exchange agent or registrar without prior notice to the holders of the notes, and issuer or any of its subsidiaries may act as paying agent, exchange agent or registrar. So long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, notice of a change of paying agent, exchange agent or registrar will be published in a newspaper having a general circulation in Luxembourg.
In all circumstances, issuer will ensure that:
- •
- a paying agent in respect of the senior notes is maintained in the City and State of New York;
- •
- for so long as the notes are listed on any securities exchange, any requirement of the exchange as to paying agents is satisfied; and
- •
- at all times there is a registrar, a paying agent, and a trustee.
So long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, issuer will maintain a paying agent and transfer agent in Luxembourg.
Definitive Notes
Owners of book-entry interests will receive definitive notes in registered form only if:
- •
- DTC notifies issuer at any time that it is unwilling or unable to continue as depositary for the global notes and a successor depositary is not appointed within 90 days;
- •
- issuer notifies the the relevant trustee that we elect to cause the issuance of definitive notes in registered form;
- •
- certain other events provided in the indenture should occur (including the occurrence and continuation of a default or an event of default under the terms of the indenture);
- •
- DTC ceases to be registered as a clearing agency under the Exchange Act, as amended, and a successor depositary is not appointed within 90 days;
- •
- the book-entry depositary is at any time unwilling or unable to continue as book-entry depositary and a successor book-entry depositary is not appointed by issuer within 90 days; or
- •
- in addition, if there is an event of default under the indenture, DTC reserves the right to exchange the relevant global notes for legended securities in definitive form and to distribute such definitive securities to its respective participants.
Depositary interests representing a global note may also be exchanged for definitive notes upon prior written notice given to the trustee by or on behalf of DTC in accordance with the indenture and the deposit and custody agreement. In all cases, definitive notes delivered in exchange for any depositary interests representing global notes will be registered in the names, and issued in any approved denominations, requested by or on behalf of DTC (in accordance with its customary procedures). In no event will definitive notes in bearer form be issued.
Exchanges of book-entry interests for definitive notes will be made in respect of the aggregate amount of notes outstanding at that time, at no expense to holders of book-entry interests. The indenture contains provisions relating to the maintenance by a registrar of a register reflecting ownership of definitive notes, if any, and other provisions customary for a registered debt security. Payment of principal and interest on each definitive note will be made to the holder appearing on the register at the close of business on the record date at the address shown for such holder on the register on the record date.
193
In the case of definitive notes, the holder of any definitive note may transfer that note by surrendering it at the offices or agencies of the issuer maintained for that purpose within the City and State of New York or, for so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the transfer agent maintained in Luxembourg. In the event of a partial transfer of a holding represented by one certificate, or partial redemption of a holding represented by one certificate, (1) a new certificate will be issued to the transferee in respect of the part transferred or redeemed and (2) a further new certificate in respect of the balance of the holding not transferred or redeemed will be issued to the transferor. After a holder has duly surrendered a definitive note for transfer, the trustee or the transfer agent in Luxembourg, will register the transfer and deliver a new definitive note (of a like amount to that of the definitive note so transferred) to the transferee at the offices of the trustee in the City and State of New York or, for so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, at the offices of the transfer agent in Luxembourg. Each new certificate to be issued will be available for delivery within 10 business days at the office of the trustee in the City and State of New York or, for so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, at the office of the paying and transfer agent in Luxembourg. Issuer will pay the costs of preparing, printing, packaging and delivering the definitive notes.
If definitive notes are issued and a holder of a definitive note claims that the note has been lost, destroyed or wrongfully taken or if that note is mutilated and is surrendered to the relevant trustee or the principal paying agent on its behalf, issuer will issue and the the trustee will authenticate a replacement note if requirements of the trustee and issuer are met. Such replacement note will be available for delivery at the office of the trustee in the City and State of New York, for so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, or at the office of the paying and transfer agent in Luxembourg. If required by the the trustee or issuer, a holder must post an indemnity bond sufficient in the judgment of the trustee and issuer to protect them or any paying agent or authenticating agent appointed under the relevant indenture from any loss which any of them may suffer if a note is replaced. Issuer and the trustee may charge for expenses in replacing a note.
Holders should be aware that, under current Irish tax law, upon the issuance to a holder of definitive notes, the holder may become subject to Irish income tax, currently at 20%, to be withheld on any payments of interest on the notes. For further details, see "Taxation—Irish Taxation." However, U.S. holders of definitive notes may be entitled to avoid such withholding by making a claim under the Ireland/U.S. Tax treaty or to receive a refund of withheld amounts from the Irish Revenue in some circumstances. In addition, holders of definitive notes may be entitled to receive Additional Amounts with respect to such withholding taxes. See "Description of the Senior Notes—Withholding Taxes."
194
TAXATION
The following is a description of the material U.S. tax consequences of participating in the exchange offer and of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the senior notes, and the material Irish tax consequences of participating in the exchange offer and of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the senior notes. The statements regarding U.S. and Irish tax laws and practices set out below, including the statements regarding U.S./Irish double taxation convention relating to income and capital gains, which we refer to as the Tax Treaty, assume that the senior notes were issued, and transfers thereof and payments thereon will be made, in accordance with the senior notes indenture.
For purposes of the Tax Treaty and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof, which we refer to as the Code, U.S. Holders of book-entry interests will be treated as owners of the notes underlying such book-entry interests and, except as noted below, the tax consequences of owning book-entry interests will be the same as those applicable to ownership of the senior notes.
Prospective purchasers of the senior notes are also advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S., Irish or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the senior notes, including the effect of any state, local, or foreign tax laws.
United States Taxation
The following discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of participating in the exchange offer and of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the senior notes represents the opinion of Kirkland and Ellis, U.S. tax counsel to issuer. This discussion deals only with investors that will hold senior notes as capital assets. The discussion does not cover all aspects of U.S. federal taxation that may be relevant to, or the actual tax effect that any of the matters described herein will have on, the acquisition, ownership or disposition of senior notes by particular investors, and does not address state, local, foreign or other tax laws. In particular, this discussion does not address all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to certain types of investors subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (such as banks, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, investors liable for the alternative minimum tax, individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or currencies, investors that will hold senior notes as part of a straddle or hedging, constructive sale, integrated or conversion transactions for U.S. federal tax purposes, a person that actually or constructively owns more than 10% of the voting stock of parent, traders in securities that have elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, or investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar).
As used herein, the term "U.S. Holder" generally means (i) a citizen or resident of the U.S. for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (ii) a corporation, partnership or limited liability company created or organized under the laws of the U.S. or any political subdivision thereof, (iii) a person or entity that is otherwise subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of income derived from the notes or (iv) a partnership to the extent the interest therein is owned by a person who is described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) of this paragraph. As used herein, the term "Non-U.S. Holder" means anyone that is not a U.S. Holder.
This discussion assumes that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the senior notes are treated as debt.
The discussion is based on the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect and all subject to change at any time, perhaps with retroactive effect.
195
If a partnership holds senior notes, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners in partnerships that hold senior notes should consult their tax advisors.
The discussion may not address your particular circumstances. You are thus urged to consult your tax advisors as to the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of the notes to you based on your particular circumstances.
Consequences to U.S. Holders
The exchange of senior outstanding notes for exchange senior notes (with substantially identical terms) in the exchange offer will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and a holder of exchange senior notes will have the same tax basis and holding period in such exchange senior notes that such holder had in the senior outstanding notes.
Payment of Interest. The senior notes were not issued with original issue discount. Accordingly, a U.S. Holder will be taxed on the interest on a senior note at ordinary income rates at the time at which such interest accrues or is received in accordance with such U.S. Holder's regular method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Disposition of Senior Notes. Upon the sale, exchange, retirement, or other disposition of a senior note, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale, exchange, retirement, or other disposition (less any portion attributable to accrued but unpaid interest or market discount (discussed below), both of which will be treated as ordinary income for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a senior note. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in a senior note generally will equal the cost of the senior note to such U.S. Holder, less any amortized bond premium and any principal payments received by such U.S. Holder plus any market discount previously included in income by the holder with respect the senior note.
A U.S. Holder's gain or loss realized upon the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a senior note will generally be treated as U.S. source gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a senior note, the U.S. Holder has held the senior note for more than one year. If a U.S. Holder is an individual and the senior note being sold, exchanged, or retired is a capital asset held for more than one year, the U.S. Holder may be eligible for reduced rates of taxation on any capital gain recognized. The ability to deduct capital losses is subject to limitations.
To the extent that the amount realized on a sale, exchange, retirement, or other disposition of a senior note represents accrued but unpaid interest, such amount must be taken into account as interest income, if it was not previously included in income, and exchange gain or loss may be realized as described above. See "—Payment of Interest." In the case of a U.S. Holder who acquired the senior notes with market discount (discussed below), any gain recognized upon the sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition of the senior notes generally will be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount that accrued during the period such U.S. Holder held such senior notes, unless the U.S. Holder previously had elected to include such accrued market discount in the U.S. Holder's income on a current basis. See "—Market Discount and Bond Premium."
Market Discount and Bond Premium
A U.S. Holder who purchases a senior note at a "market discount" that exceeds a statutorily definedde minimis amount will be subject to the "market discount" rules. In general, "market discount" is the excess of a debt instrument's stated redemption price at maturity over the holder's
196
basis in such debt instrument immediately after its acquisition. The stated redemption price at maturity of a debt instrument is the sum of all amounts payable with respect to the debt instrument, whether denominated as principal or interest (other than qualified stated interest payments). Qualified stated interest generally means stated interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or other property (other than additional debt instruments of the issuer) at least annually at a single fixed rate (or at certain qualifying variable rates).
Any gain on sale of a debt instrument attributable to a U.S. Holder's unrecognized accrued market discount is generally treated as ordinary income to the U.S. Holder. The amount of accrued market discount is calculated on a ratable basis or, at the election of the holder, on a constant yield to maturity basis. In addition, a U.S. Holder who acquires a debt instrument at a market discount may be required to defer a portion of any interest expense that otherwise may be deductible on any indebtedness incurred or maintained to purchase or carry the debt instrument until the U.S. Holder disposes of the debt instrument in a taxable transaction.
Instead of recognizing any market discount upon a disposition of a senior note (and being required to defer any applicable interest expense), a U.S. Holder may elect to include market discount in income currently as the discount accrues. Any current accruals of market discount with respect to senior notes pursuant to such election should be treated as interest on the senior notes (as discussed above). The current income inclusion election, once made, applies to all market discount obligations acquired by the electing U.S. Holder on or after the first day of the first taxable year in which the election applies, and may not be revoked without the consent of the IRS.
In the event that a senior note is purchased at a premium, i.e., for an amount in excess of the amount payable at maturity, a U.S. Holder generally may elect to offset payments of qualified stated interest on such senior note by an allocable portion of the premium (which will result in a corresponding reduction in such U.S. Holder's tax basis in the senior note). The portion of the premium allocable to each interest payment generally is calculated based on the U.S. Holder's yield to maturity for the senior note. If a U.S. Holder elects to amortize bond premium with respect to the senior note, such election will also apply to all other debt instruments held by such U.S. Holder during the year in which the election is made and to all debt instruments acquired after that year. The election may not be revoked without the consent of the IRS.
Foreign Tax Credit. Interest received (and market discount recognized) by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as foreign source income and will be cnsidered "passive" income or "financial services income, which is treated separately from other types of income in computing the foreign tax credit such U.S. Holder may take under U.S. federal income tax laws.
Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders
The exchange of senior outstanding notes for exchange senior notes (with substantially identical terms) in the exchange offer will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and a holder of exchange senior notes will have the same tax basis and holding period in such exchange senior notes that such holder had in the senior outstanding notes.
Interest and Market Discount on the Senior Notes. A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding with respect to the interest (or market discount) on a senior note. If, however, the interest (including market discount) on a senior note is effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder or, if a tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder, such holder, although exempt from U.S. withholding tax, will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such interest (and market discount) on a net income basis in a similar manner as if it were a U.S. Holder. Interest (and market discount) received by a Non-U.S. Holder on a senior note generally will be considered effectively connected with
197
a U.S. trade or business only if the Non-U.S. Holder is (i) an insurance company carrying on a U.S. business to which such interest (or market discount) is attributable, within the meaning of the Code, or (ii) has an office or other fixed place of business in the U.S. to which the interest (or market discount) is attributable and either (x) the interest (or market discount) is derived in the active conduct of a banking, financing, or similar business within the U.S. or (y) the interest (or market discount) is received by a corporation the principal business of which is trading in stock or securities for its own account. In addition, if such holder is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, subject to adjustments. For this purpose, interest (and market discount) on a senior note will be included in such foreign corporation's earnings and profits.
Disposition of Senior Notes. A Non-U.S. Holder will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain recognized on a sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of senior notes, provided that (i) the gain is not effectively connected with a trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder in the U.S. (or, if a tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder) and (ii) in the case of a foreign individual, the foreign person is not present in the U.S. for 183 days or more in the taxable year, and certain other conditions are met.
If an individual Non-U.S. Holder meets the effectively connected requirement described above, he will be taxed on his net gain (including any gain attributable to market discount) derived from the sale or other disposition under U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to a U.S. Holder.
If a Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign corporation meets the "effectively connected" requirement described above, it will be taxed on its gain (including any gain attributable to market discount) under U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to a U.S. Holder and, in addition, may be subject to the branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits within the meaning of the Code for the taxable year, as adjusted for certain items, unless it qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable income tax treaty.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, holders may be subject to information reporting requirements and backup withholding at a rate of 30% (for payments made in 2003) with respect to interest on the senior notes and proceeds received on the sale, exchange or redemption of the senior notes. The rate of backup withholding is scheduled to be reduced over time to 28% in 2006. The information reporting and backup withholding rules generally do not apply to payments to corporations, whether domestic or foreign.
An individual U.S. Holder generally will be subject to backup withholding on payments or proceeds received through a U.S. broker or nominee unless such U.S. Holder provides its taxpayer identification number to the payor on a properly executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 or if the Internal Revenue Service notifies the payor that backup withholding is required for such U.S. Holder.
A Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to backup withholding on payments or proceeds received through a U.S. broker or nominee unless such Non-U.S. Holder certifies its foreign status by providing a properly executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-8 BEN, W-8IMY, W-8ECI, or W-8EXP.
Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules will be creditable against the U.S. federal tax liability of a U.S. Holder upon furnishing the required information to the Internal Revenue Service.
198
Irish Taxation
The following is a summary of the material current Irish tax law and practice with regard to holders of the exchange notes (the "notes"). It does not purport to be a complete description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to subscribe for, buy, hold, sell, redeem, exchange or dispose of the notes and does not constitute tax or legal advice but is a summary of the material Irish tax considerations. The comments relate only to the position of persons who are the beneficial owners of the notes and all coupons and other rights thereon, that will hold notes as capital assets and may not apply to certain classes of persons such as dealers in securities. The comments are generally based upon Irish tax law and the practice of the Irish Revenue Commissioners as of the date hereof, which may be subject to change. Prospective noteholders are advised to consult their own tax advisers concerning the overall tax consequences of such ownership.
Withholding Tax
Withholding tax will not apply to interest payments (whether satisfied in cash or in kind) made by issuer to holders of the notes to the extent:
- (1)
- the notes are represented by a global note in bearer form and are quoted on a recognized stock exchange, which we refer to as "quoted eurobonds," and interest payments are made:
- (a)
- by a non-Irish paying agent; or
- (b)
- by or through an Irish paying agent and:
- (i)
- the notes are held in a recognized clearing system such as Euroclear or, Clearstream, Luxembourg, or DTC; or
- (ii)
- an appropriate form of declaration of non-residence is provided to the paying agent by or on behalf of the person who is the beneficial owner of the notes and entitled to the interest (or, where the provisions of Irish tax legislation deem the interest to be that of some other person, by that person); or
- (2)
- the interest is paid in the ordinary course of business of issuer and the holder is an "excluded company." An "excluded company" for these purposes is a company which is tax resident in a member state of the European Union, or in a territory with which Ireland has a double tax treaty, is not tax resident in Ireland, does not have an Irish branch or agency, with which the interest is connected and has provided confirmation of same to issuer on or before the interest is paid; or
- (3)
- the holder is resident in a jurisdiction which has concluded a double tax treaty with Ireland which provides that payment of interest may be paid without deduction or withholding in respect of taxes and the holder is entitled to the benefit of that exemption from withholding tax and has made all the requisite filings with the appropriate authorities to obtain relief under that treaty in advance of any interest payment.
In all other cases, interest payments (whether satisfied in cash or in kind) will be made net of withholding tax at the standard rate of income tax (which is currently 20%).
It is anticipated that provided the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and if they remain in global bearer form, they will qualify as "quoted eurobonds". It is also anticipated that the paying agent will be located outside Ireland. Accordingly, for so long as this is the case, the exemption under 1(a) above should apply to payments of interest on the notes.
199
Original issue discount, if any, payable on the notes will not be subject to Irish withholding tax irrespective of the place of residence or ordinary residence of the holder.
Encashment Tax
A collection or encashment agent in Ireland obtaining payment of interest whether in Ireland or elsewhere on a note or realizing in Ireland any interest on behalf of a holder of a note must withhold income tax at the standard rate (which is currently 20%) on making payments of such interest. This obligation does not arise where the person that is the beneficial owner of the note and entitled to the interest is not resident in Ireland and has made a declaration in the prescribed form and has provided that declaration to the collection or encashment agent, and the interest is not deemed, under the provisions of Irish tax legislation, to be that of some other person. Holders should note that appointment of an Irish collection or encashment agent may (subject to the above) bring them within the charge to Irish encashment tax.
Taxation of Interest arising on the notes
Interest on the notes whether paid gross or not, or in cash or in kind, may be chargeable to Irish income tax or corporation tax, as the case may be. In general, holders that are resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland for tax purposes will be chargeable to Irish corporation tax or income tax in respect of interest on the notes.
Holders that are not resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland for tax purposes will be exempt from Irish income tax in respect of interest on the notes where
- •
- the holder is an "excluded company" as described above;
- •
- the notes constitute "quoted eurobonds" and the interest is paid free of withholding tax in the circumstances described above, to a person who is tax resident in a member state of the European Union, or in a territory with which Ireland has a double taxation treaty and is not resident in Ireland, which we refer to as an "excluded person"; or
- •
- the holder is resident in a double tax treaty country and under the provisions of the relevant treaty with Ireland such person is exempt from Irish income tax on the interest, which we refer to as an "exempt double tax treaty resident."
Ireland operates a self-assessment system of tax and any person other than an "excluded company," "excluded person"or "exempt double tax treaty resident" in receipt of Irish source income comes within its scope, including a person who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland. However, to date it has been the practice of the Revenue Commissioners not to seek to collect the liability from such non-resident persons unless the recipient of the income has any other tax connection with Ireland such as a claim for repayment of Irish tax deducted at source, an Irish agency, branch, trustee or trade.
Generally, original issue discount payable by an Irish resident issuer is regarded as Irish source income and therefore, although paid gross, may be chargeable to Irish income tax or corporation tax as the case may be. Holders that are resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland for tax purposes may be chargeable to Irish corporation tax or income tax in respect of original issue discount, if any, payable on the notes depending on their circumstances.
As stated above, Ireland operates a self assessment system of tax, and any person in receipt of Irish source income comes within its scope, including technically, a person who is neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland. To date, it has been the practice of the Revenue Commissioners not to seek to collect the liability from such non-resident persons unless the recipient of the income has any other tax connection with Ireland such as a claim for repayment of Irish tax deducted at source, an Irish agency, branch, trustee or trade.
200
Anti Avoidance
Holders of the notes who are resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland for tax purposes ("Irish Holders") may be subject to Irish income tax or corporation tax, as the case may be, on their disposal. The nature of the tax charge will depend on the particular circumstances of the holder.
Irish Holders should have regard, where appropriate, to the provisions relating to the taxation of income deemed to arise on certain sales of securities and other provisions contained in the Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997 relating to the purchase and sale of securities. In particular, certain Irish Holders should note that if they dispose of their notes "cum" interest they may be subject to income tax on the interest which has accrued on the notes up to the date of sale in certain circumstances. Irish Holders who sell or transfer the right to receive interest (whether paid in cash or in kind) on the notes without selling or transferring the notes, may be liable to pay income tax on that interest, in the tax year in which the right to receive the interest is sold. In addition, certain Irish Holders who purchase the notes "cum" interest and who subsequently sell the notes "ex" interest may be disallowed loss relief for income tax purposes in certain circumstances.
EU Savings Tax Directive
On December 13, 2001 the Council of the European Union published a revised draft directive regarding the taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments from debt-claims. It is proposed that, subject to a number of important conditions being met, Member States will be required to provide to the tax authorities of another Member State, details of payments of interest (and other similar income) paid by a person within its jurisdiction to an individual resident in that other Member State. For the transitional period (see below) this will not apply to Belgium, Luxembourg and Austria as these Member States will instead operate a withholding system in relation to such payments. The directive is scheduled to be operative from January 1, 2004 with a transitional period for seven years from that date. Securities issued by Issuer (including the notes) on or after March 1, 2002 will be subject to the terms of the directive. The proposed directive is not yet final and may be subject to further amendment.
Capital Gains Tax
Holders resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland may be subject to Irish capital gains tax on any gain realized on the disposal (including redemptions) of the notes. Irish capital gains tax is chargeable (currently at the rate of 20%) on taxable capital gains, subject to any applicable indexation or loss relief.
Holders that are neither resident nor ordinarily resident in Ireland will not be subject to Irish capital gains tax on any gain realized on the disposal of the notes unless the notes either (i) are or were held for the purposes of a trade or business carried on by the holder in Ireland; or (ii) are not quoted on a stock exchange and derive (directly or indirectly) the greater part of their value from Irish land or exploration rights.
Exchange
On the basis that the exchange notes will evidence the same debt as the outstanding notes, and will have substantially identical terms (save for transfer restrictions) the acquisition of exchange notes in place of outstanding notes should not be regarded as an acquisition or disposal for Irish capital gains tax purposes. Persons who receive exchange notes in place of outstanding notes should be liable to Irish capital gains tax on a subsequent disposal of the exchange notes by reference to the original base cost and holding period of their outstanding notes.
Stamp Duty
No Irish stamp duty will be payable on the issue or subsequent transfer of the notes.
Capital Acquisitions Tax
A gift or inheritance consisting of the notes will generally be within the charge to Irish capital acquisitions tax (which subject to available exemptions and reliefs, is currently levied at 20%) if either (i) the disponer or the donee/successor in relation to the gift or inheritance is resident or ordinarily resident in Ireland (or in certain circumstances, if the disponer is domiciled in Ireland irrespective of his residence or that of the donee/successor) on the relevant date or (ii) if the notes are Irish situated property. Bearer instruments (such as the notes while in bearer form) would not usually be Irish situated property unless they are physically located in Ireland or there is a register of such notes maintained in Ireland. In the event that the notes cease to be represented by a global bearer note and are issued in definitive form, the notes would be Irish situate property if the principal registrar is maintained or required to be maintained in Ireland.
201
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
Each participating broker-dealer that receives exchange notes for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such exchange notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a participating broker-dealer in connection with resales of exchange notes received in exchange for senior outstanding notes where such senior outstanding notes were acquired as a result of market-making activities or other trading activities. We have agreed that for a period of 180 days after the expiration date, we will make this prospectus, as amended or supplemented, available to any participating broker-dealer for use in connection with any such resale.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sales of the exchange notes by participating broker-dealers. Exchange notes received by participating broker-dealers for their own account pursuant to the exchange offer may be sold from time to time in one or more transactions in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions, through the writing of options on the exchange notes or a combination of such methods of resale, at market prices prevailing at the time of resale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices or negotiated prices. Any such resale may be made directly to purchasers or to or through brokers or dealers who may receive compensation in the form of commissions or concessions from any such participating broker-dealer and/or the purchasers of any such exchange notes. Any participating broker-dealer that resells the exchange notes that were received by it for its own account pursuant to the exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates in a distribution of such exchange notes may be deemed to be an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act and any profit on any such resale of exchange notes and any commissions or concessions received by any such persons may be deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act. The letter of transmittal states that by acknowledging that it will deliver and by delivering a prospectus, a participating broker-dealer will not be deemed to admit that it is an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act.
For a period of 180 days after the effective date of this registration statement, we will promptly send additional copies of this prospectus and any amendment or supplement to this prospectus to any participating broker-dealer that requests such documents in a letter of transmittal.
The senior outstanding notes are currently listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. The senior outstanding notes have not been registered under the Securities Act and will be subject to restrictions on transferability to the extent that they are not exchanged for exchange notes by holders who are entitled to participate in this exchange offer. The holders of senior outstanding notes, other than any holder that is our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405 under the Securities Act, who are not eligible to participate in the exchange offer are entitled to certain registration rights, and we are required to file a shelf registration statement with respect to their notes.
The exchange notes will constitute a new issue of securities with no established trading market. We currently intend to list the exchange notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. In addition, such market making activity will be subject to the limits imposed by the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and may be limited during the exchange offer and the pendency of the shelf registration statements, as applicable. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that an active public or other market will develop for the exchange notes as to the liquidity of the trading market for the exchange notes. If a trading market does not develop or is not maintained, holders of the exchange notes may experience difficulty in reselling the exchange notes or may be unable to sell them at all. If a market for the exchange notes develops, any such market may be discontinued at any time.
202
SERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
Issuer, parent, guarantor and JSG are companies organized outside the United States. Guarantor is an unlimited company, issuer is a public limited company and parent is a limited company, each incorporated in Ireland. Many of the directors and executive officers of parent and issuer (and certain experts named in this prospectus) are not residents of the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of such persons and entities is located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or entities or to enforce against them judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions under the federal securities laws of the United States. We have been advised by William Fry, Irish counsel to issuer, that, subject to certain conditions and exceptions noted below, a final judgment obtained in the federal or state courts of New York predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States would be accepted and enforced by the courts of Ireland. The New York court must have had jurisdiction over the particular defendant according to Irish conflict of law rules (submission to jurisdiction by the defendant would satisfy those rules) and the New York judgment must be final and conclusive and the decree must be final and unalterable. The courts of Ireland may refuse to enforce a judgment of the courts sitting in New York for one of the following reasons: (1) the New York judgment is not for a definite sum of money; (2) the New York judgment was obtained by fraud; (3) the enforcement of the New York judgment in Ireland would be contrary to natural or constitutional justice; (4) the New York judgment is contrary to Irish public policy or involves certain laws of the State of New York which will not be enforced in Ireland; and (5) jurisdiction cannot be obtained by the Irish courts over the judgment debtors in the enforcement proceedings by personal service in Ireland or outside Ireland under Irish court rules. We have been advised that Irish courts would, provided the choice of law made was bona fide and was not contrary to public policy, give effect to the provisions of agreements governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York provided that Irish courts may not enforce foreign penal laws, foreign revenue laws, other public laws of a foreign state and foreign laws repugnant to Irish public policy. We have also been advised that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Ireland in original actions to enforce liabilities predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws. In enforcement proceedings brought in Ireland, a defendant may raise any counterclaim which could have been raised if the proceedings were originally brought in Ireland unless the subject of the counterclaim was in issue and decided in the proceedings in New York.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of JSG at December 31, 2001, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002, the financial statements of issuer as of December 31, 2002 and for the period from June 12, 2002 through December 31, 2002 and the financial statements of guarantor as of December 31, 2002 and for the period from June 14, 2002 through December 31, 2002 appearing in this prospectus and the registration statement have been audited by Ernst & Young, independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the exchange notes and the guarantees and other legal matters, including the tax-free nature of the exchange under U.S. law, will be passed upon on our behalf by Kirkland & Ellis (a partnership that includes professional corporations), Chicago, Illinois. Certain partners of Kirkland & Ellis are members of a limited liability company that is an investor in funds affiliated with Madison Dearborn. Kirkland & Ellis has from time to time represented, and may continue to represent, Madison Dearborn and certain of its affiliates in connection with certain legal matters.
203
WHERE YOU CAN FIND OTHER INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-4 (Reg. No. 333- ) with respect to the securities being offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information contained in the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules. You should refer to the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules, for further information about us and the securities being offered hereby. Statements we make in this prospectus about certain contracts or other documents are not necessarily complete. When we make such statements, we refer you to the copies of the contracts or documents that are filed as exhibits to the registration statement because those statements are qualified in all respects by reference to those exhibits. As described below, the registration statement, including exhibits and schedules, is on file at the offices of the SEC and may be inspected without charge.
Following the exchange offer, we will be required to file periodic reports and other information with the SEC under the Exchange Act. However, as we do not have a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from some of the Exchange Act reporting requirements. The reporting requirements that will not apply to us include the proxy solicitations rules of Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the short-swing insider profit disclosure rules of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
The indenture provides that we will, whether or not we have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act, provide the trustee and the holders of the notes (i) all annual and quarterly financial information that would be required to be filed on a Form 20-F and 10-Q (or any successor forms) as if issuer were required to file such forms and, with respect to the annual financial information, a report thereon by issuer's certified independent accountants and (ii) all information that would be required to be contained in current reports that would be required to be filed with the Commission on Form 8-K if the Company were required to file such reports. Provision of this information is subject to certain qualifications. See "Description of the Senior Notes—Certain Covenants—Reports" for more information. We will also furnish such other reports as we may determine or as the law requires.
For so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such exchange so require, the foregoing information also will be made available through the offices of the paying agent in Luxembourg.
Prior to completion of the transactions, JSG was subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act as a "foreign private issuer" and in accordance therewith was obligated to file reports and other information with the SEC relating to its business, financial condition and other matters. Such reports, the registration statement (including the attached exhibits) and any other statements and information should be available for inspection at the public reference room at the SEC's office located at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549, United States. Copies may be obtained by mail, upon payment of the SEC's customary charges, by writing to its principal office at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549, United States. Further information on the operations of the SEC's public reference room in Washington, D.C. can be obtained by calling the SEC at +1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers who file reports with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.
204
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Issuer is a public limited company and was incorporated in Ireland on June 12, 2002. The registered office of issuer is Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland. Issuer has been carrying on business since the date of its incorporation. Issuer is registered with the Companies Registration Office in Ireland and its company number is 357958. Issuer is governed by the laws of Ireland.
2. The nominal share capital of issuer was changed by shareholders' resolution on September 2, 2002 from €100,000, divided into 100,000 ordinary shares at €1.00 each, to €100,000 divided into 100,000,000 ordinary shares of €0.001 each, of which 40,000,000 shares have been issued fully paid up.
3. The directors of issuer, each of whose address is c/o MDP Acquisitions plc, Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Centre, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland, are:
| | Ian J. Curley Gary W. McGann Samuel M. Mencoff Thomas S. Souleles | | |
4. The objects of issuer, as set out more fully in its memorandum and articles of association are as follows:
To carry on the business of manufacturing, producing, selling, exporting, importing and dealing in and with all kinds of paper materials which may be manufactured or produced from any material or by any process and any and all by-products and compounds thereof and all articles, commodities, material or substances made of the foregoing may be utilised including cartons, boxes and every other kind of goods, wares and merchandise in the manufacture, production or processing of which paper and its components or compositions might be employed.
5. The Articles of Association of issuer contain the following provisions as to the remuneration of the directors:
- 5.1
- The remuneration of the directors shall from time to time be determined by an ordinary resolution of issuer and shall (unless any such resolution otherwise provides) be divisible among the directors as they may agree, or, failing agreement, equally, except that any director who shall hold office for part only of the period in respect of which such remuneration is payable shall be entitled to rank in such division for a proportion of the remuneration related to the period during which he has held office. The directors may also be paid all traveling, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending and returning from meetings of the directors or any committee of the directors or general meetings of issuer or in connection with the business of issuer.
- 5.2
- If any director shall be called upon to perform extra services which in the opinion of the directors are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a director, issuer may remunerate such director either by a fixed sum or by a percentage of profits or otherwise as may be determined by a resolution passed at a meeting of the directors and such remuneration may be either in addition to or in substitution for any other remuneration to which he may be entitled as a director.
- 5.3
- A shareholding qualification for directors may be fixed by issuer in general meeting and, unless and until so fixed, no qualifications shall be required. A director who is not a member of the company shall nevertheless be entitled to attend and speak at general meetings.
205
6. The company secretary of issuer is Bradwell Limited, Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Centre, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland.
7. Each of the directors of issuer is or may be deemed to be a promoter of issuer. No amount or benefit has been paid or given by issuer to any such director in the capacity of a promoter, nor is it intended that any amount or benefit will be paid or given by issuer to any such director in the capacity of a promoter.
8. Ernst & Young and William Fry have given and not withdrawn their respective consents to the issuance of this document with the inclusion therein of the references to them and, in the case of Ernst & Young, its report in the form and context in which they are included.
9. There has been no material adverse change in the financial position of issuer since June 12, 2002 and of guarantor since June 14, 2002, except as disclosed herein.
10. Neither issuer nor guarantor nor any of their subsidiaries is a party to or has knowledge of a threat of any litigation, administrative proceedings or arbitration that, in the judgment of issuer and guarantor, is material in the context of the offering except as disclosed herein.
11. The auditors of issuer and guarantor are Ernst & Young, independent auditors, of Ernst & Young Building, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, who have audited issuer's financial statements for the period from June 12, 2002 through December 31, 2002, guarantor's financial statements for the period from June 14, 2002 through December 31, 2002 and the consolidated financial statements of JSG for the two years ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002.
12. Issuer has appointed Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. as its paying agent in Luxembourg. Their address is 2 Boulevard Konrad Adenauer, L-1115 Luxembourg. Issuer reserves the right to vary such appointment. The paying agent in Luxembourg will act as intermediary between the holders of the notes and issuer and so long as the notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, issuer will maintain a paying agent in Luxembourg.
13. The issuance of the senior outstanding notes and the related exchange offer were authorized by resolutions of the board of directors of issuer on February 11, 2003 and the giving of the guarantee of the senior notes was authorized by resolutions of the directors of the guarantor on February 11, 2003.
14. Issuer currently intends to list the exchange notes on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. In connection with the listing, a legal notice relating to the issue of the notes and the articles of association of issuer will be deposited with the Chief Registrar of the District Court of Luxembourg(Greffier en Chef du Tribunal d'Arrondissement de et à Luxembourg), where you may then request to obtain copies.
15. As long as any notes are listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the rules of such stock exchange shall so require, copies of the articles of association of issuer, the indenture, and annual audited consolidated financial statements and quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements of JSG and annual audited consolidated financial statements and quarterly unaudited consolidated financial statements of issuer may be inspected during normal business hours on any business day (except for Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays) at the offices of the paying agent in Luxembourg. Consolidated financial statements for issuer and guarantor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 are included in this prospectus. Statutory accounts for issuer will be prepared. All of the foregoing documents will be obtainable free of charge at the office of our Luxembourg paying agent.
206
16. Euroclear and Clearstream and DTC, as applicable, have accepted the following securities for clearance with the following Common Codes, ISIN and CUSIP numbers:
| | Common Code
| | ISIN
| | CUSIP
|
---|
Outstanding senior notes | | | | | | |
Senior notes sold under Regulation S | | 015542209 | | USG59404AA40 | | G59404AA4 |
Senior notes sold under Rule 144A | | 015542152 | | US58282PAA93 | | 58282PAA9 |
Exchange senior notes | | | | | | |
17. MDCP Acquisitions I is a guarantor of the senior notes. Guarantor is an unlimited public company incorporated in Ireland on June 14, 2002. The registered office of guarantor is Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Centre, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland. Guarantor has been carrying on business since the date of its incorporation. Guarantor is registered with the companies registration office in Ireland and its company number is 358039. Guarantor is governed by the laws of Ireland.
18. The nominal share capital of guarantor is €100,000 divided into 100,000 ordinary shares of €1 each, of which 40,000 shares have been issued fully paid.
19. The articles of association of guarantor contain the following provisions as to the remuneration of the directors:
- 19.1.
- The ordinary remuneration of the directors shall be determined from time to time by an ordinary resolution of guarantor and shall be divisible (unless such resolution shall provide otherwise) among the directors as they may agree, or, failing agreement, equally, except that any director who shall hold office for part only of the period in respect of which such remuneration is payable shall be entitled only to rank in such division for a proportion of the remuneration related to the period during which he has held office.
- 19.2.
- Any director who holds any executive office (including for this purpose the office of chairman or deputy chairman) or who serves on any committee, or who otherwise performs services which in the opinion of the directors are outside the scope of the ordinary duties of a director, may be paid such extra remuneration by way of salary, commission or otherwise as the directors may determine.
20. The company secretary of guarantor is Bradwell Limited, Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Centre, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland.
21. The following contracts (not being contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business) have been entered into by issuer within the five years immediately preceding the date of this offering memorandum and are or may be material:
| | 21.1 | | Purchase Agreement, dated September 23, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the original senior notes. |
| | 21.2 | | Purchase Agreement, dated September 23, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDP Acquisitions Limited and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the units. |
| | 21.3 | | Purchase Agreement, dated February 11, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as initial purchasers, relating to the additional senior notes. |
| | | | |
207
| | 21.4 | | Euro Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the original euro senior notes. |
| | 21.5 | | Dollar Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the original dollar senior notes. |
| | 21.6 | | Dollar Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 14, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as initial purchasers, relating to the additional senior notes. |
| | 21.7 | | Euro Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, between MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG as the Euro Book-entry Depositary and the Euro Custodian, relating to the euro senior notes. |
| | 21.8 | | Dollar Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, between MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the Dollar Book-entry Depositary and the Dollar Custodian, relating to the dollar senior notes. |
| | 21.9 | | Euro Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the euro subordinated notes. |
| | 21.10 | | Dollar Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the dollar subordinated notes. |
| | 21.11 | | Euro Indenture, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG London, as Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, relating to the euro senior notes. |
| | 21.12 | | Dollar Indenture, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, relating to the dollar senior notes. |
| | 21.13 | | Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, relating to the dollar senior notes. |
| | 21.14 | | Euro Indenture, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG London, as Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, relating to the euro subordinated notes. |
| | 21.15 | | Dollar Indenture, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, relating to the dollar subordinated notes. |
| | | | |
208
| | 21.16 | | Euro Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG as the Euro Book-entry Depositary and the Euro Custodian, relating to the euro subordinated notes. |
| | 21.17 | | Dollar Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the Dollar Book-entry Depositary and the Dollar Custodian, relating to the dollar subordinated notes. |
| | 21.18 | | Senior Credit Facility dated as of September 12, 2002 by and among MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited), MDCP Acquisitions I, MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank AG London, Merrill Lynch International, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., AIB Capital Markets, plc, Bank of America N.A., The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, The Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland, Credit Lyonnais, Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, London Branch and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. |
| | 21.19 | | Bridge Facility dated September 10, 2002 by and among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank AG London, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. |
| | 21.20 | | Priority Agreement dated September 16, 2002, as amended September 27, 2002, among MDCP Acquisitions Limited, MDP Acquisitions plc and certain affiliated companies, Deutsche Bank AG London and certain other parties thereto. |
| | 21.21 | | Intercompany Loan Agreement, entered into on September 16, 2002, as amended September 27, 2002, between MDP Acquisitions plc and MDCP Acquisitions I. |
| | 21.22 | | Intercompany Loan Agreement, dated February 14, 2003, between MDP Acquisitions plc and MDCP Acquisitions I. |
| | 21.23 | | Priority Agreement, dated February 14, 2003, among MDCP Acquisitions Limited, MDP Acquisitions plc and certain affiliated companies, Deutsche Bank AG London and certain other parties thereto. |
22. The objects of guarantor, as set out more fully in the memorandum and articles of association of purchaser are as follows:
To carry on the business of manufacturing, producing, selling, exporting, importing and dealing in and with all kinds of paper materials which may be manufactured or produced from any material or by any process and any and all by-products and compounds thereof and all articles, commodities, material or substances made of the foregoing may be utilized including cartons, boxes and every other kind of goods, wares and merchandise in the manufacture, production or processing of which paper and its components or compositions might be employed.
23. The directors of guarantor, each of whose registered office is at Arthur Cox Building, Earlsfort Centre, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland, are:
John A. Canning, Jr. Ian J. Curley Justin S. Huscher Gary W. McGann Christopher J. McGowan | | Samuel M. Mencoff Thomas S. Souleles Anthony P.J. Smurfit Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit |
209
24. A listing of issuer's principal operating subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 is set out below:
Subsidiaries
| | Principal Activities
|
---|
Cartón de Colombia, S.A. Apartado Aereo 219, Cali, Colombia | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
Cartón de Venezuela, S.A. Apartado Aereo 609, Caracas, Venezuela | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
C.D. Haupt Papier- und Pappenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG Orpethaler Strasse 50, 34474 Diemelstadt-Wrexen, Germany | | Holding company for operations which manufacture greyboard, paperboard and packaging products |
Jefferson Smurfit Group Limited Beech Hill, Clonskeagh Dublin 4, Ireland | | Holding company for all operations |
MDCP Acquisitions I Arthur Cox Building Earlsfort Terrace Dublin 2, Ireland | | Holding company for all operations |
Munksjö AB Box 624, S-551 18 Jönköping, Sweden | | Holding company for operations in Sweden and other countries which manufacture paper-based packaging products and decór base paper |
Nettingsdorfer Papierfabrik AG & Co. KG A-4054 Nettingsdorf-Fabrik, Austria | | Manufacture of containerboard and holding company for Austrian and Italian operations which manufacture corrugated containers |
Smurfit S.A. Paque Saenz Peña 308—8th floor, Buenos Aires, Argentina | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
Smurfit Capital Funding plc Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland | | Finance company |
Smurfit Cartón y Papel de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Jaime Balmes, No. 11 Torre D, 7 Piso, Col. Los Morales Polanco 11510, Mexico D.F., Mexico | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
Smurfit International B.V. Fred Roeskestraat 123, 1076 EE Amsterdam, The Netherlands | | Principal international holding company |
| | |
210
Smurfit International France S.A. 2 rue Goethe, 75116 Paris, France | | Holding company for French operations whose principal activities are the manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
Smurfit Investments U.K. Limited 2 The Beacons, Beaconsfield Road, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 8EQ, England | | Holding company for UK operations whose principal activities are the manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
Smurfit Ireland Limited Beech Hill, Clonskeagh, Dublin 4, Ireland | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products and printing |
Smurfit MBI 2070 Hadwen Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2C9, Canada | | Manufacture of corrugated containers |
Smurfit Nervion, S.A. B Arriandi s/n, 48215 Iurreta, Vizcaya, Spain | | Manufacture of sack paper and holding company for Spanish, Portuguese and sack converting operations whose principal activities are the manufacture of paperboard, packaging and paper sack products |
Smurfit-SISA, S.p.A. Strada Serravalle 30, 15067 Novi Ligure (AL), Italy | | Manufacture of paperboard and packaging products |
A full list of subsidiaries will be annexed to the Annual Return of issuer which will be filed with the Irish Registrar of Companies.
211
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PREDECESSOR OPERATIONS AND ISSUER OF EXCHANGE SECURITIES
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and of MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2002 and for the period from June 12, 2002 through December 31, 2002:
| | Page
|
---|
Report of Independent Auditors | | F-2 |
Consolidated Statement of Income | | F-3 |
Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and Losses | | F-4 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet | | F-5 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity | | F-6 |
Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash Flows | | F-8 |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-9 |
PREDECESSOR OPERATIONS AND SUBSIDIARY GUARANTOR
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and of MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies as of December 31, 2002 and for the period from June 14, 2002 through December 31, 2002:
| | Page
|
---|
Report of Independent Auditors | | F-73 |
Consolidated Statement of Income | | F-74 |
Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and Losses | | F-75 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet | | F-76 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity | | F-77 |
Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash Flows | | F-79 |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | | F-80 |
F-1
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors
MDP Acquisitions plc
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MDP Acquisitions plc (successor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from June 12, 2002 to December 31, 2002. We have also audited the consolidated balance sheet of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the eight month and two day period ended September 2, 2002, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Irish auditing standards and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MDP Acquisitions plc (successor company) and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from June 12, 2002 to December 31, 2002, and the consolidated financial position of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the eight month and two day period ended September 2, 2002, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland which differ in certain respects from those followed in the United States (see Note 37 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for Deferred Taxation.
Ernst & Young
Dublin, Ireland.
April 8, 2003
F-2
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statement of Income
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Note
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net Sales | | 3 | | | 1,575,575 | | | 3,134,080 | | | 4,511,650 | | | 4,565,244 | |
| Cost of Sales | | | | | 1,153,184 | | | 2,272,287 | | | 3,243,372 | | | 3,336,671 | |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | — | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | | | 422,391 | | | 861,793 | | | 1,241,636 | | | 1,228,573 | |
Net operating expenses | | 4 | | | 287,453 | | | 656,419 | | | 883,964 | | | 866,103 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | 5 | | | 11,978 | | | 12,484 | | | 23,763 | | | 20,890 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | | | 122,960 | | | 192,890 | | | 333,909 | | | 341,580 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | | | 7,224 | | | 117,473 | | | 242,212 | | | 403,934 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | 5 | | | — | | | (7,541 | ) | | (10,895 | ) | | (24,894 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | | | | 130,184 | | | 302,822 | | | 565,226 | | | 720,620 | |
Income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing | | 5 | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | |
Share of associates income on sale of operations | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,105 | |
Interest income | | | | | 5,230 | | | 10,286 | | | 23,053 | | | 20,511 | |
Interest expense | | 7 | | | (92,718 | ) | | (65,881 | ) | | (108,621 | ) | | (120,370 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | | | (386 | ) | | (74,387 | ) | | (154,654 | ) | | (181,567 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | 8 | | | 42,310 | | | 193,280 | | | 325,004 | | | 442,299 | |
Taxes on income | | 9 | | | (31,395 | ) | | (77,889 | ) | | (137,565 | ) | | (185,551 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before equity minority interests | | | | | 10,915 | | | 115,391 | | | 187,439 | | | 256,748 | |
Equity minority interests | | | | | (9,061 | ) | | (19,969 | ) | | (37,022 | ) | | (30,816 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income available to ordinary shareholders(1) | | | | € | 1,854 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 150,417 | | € | 225,932 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- A summary of the significant adjustments to net income which would be required if accounting principles generally accepted in the United States had been applied instead of those generally accepted in Ireland is given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-3
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and Losses
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Income for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | (2,165 | ) | | 84,060 | | | 125,841 | | | 124,997 |
| Associates | | | 4,019 | | | 11,362 | | | 24,576 | | | 100,935 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 1,854 | | | 95,422 | | | 150,417 | | | 225,932 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Translation adjustments on foreign currency net investments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | 7,444 | | | (144,099 | ) | | 60,638 | | | 68,928 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Actuarial gain recognized in retirement benefit schemes | | | 4,407 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total recognized gains and losses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | 9,686 | | | (60,039 | ) | | 186,479 | | | 193,925 |
| Associates | | | 4,019 | | | 11,362 | | | 24,576 | | | 100,935 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 13,705 | | € | (48,677 | ) | € | 211,055 | | € | 294,860 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Note of Historical Cost Profits and Losses
The results disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Income are not materially different to the results based on an unmodified historical cost basis.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-4
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Balance Sheet
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Note
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
|
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | 11 | | | 184,331 | | | 440,109 |
Accounts receivable and prepayments | | 12 | | | 1,016,181 | | | 1,084,612 |
Amounts due by affiliates | | | | | 4,412 | | | — |
Amounts due by affiliates after more than one year | | | | | 244,435 | | | — |
Inventories | | 13 | | | 470,207 | | | 423,510 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total current assets | | | | | 1,919,566 | | | 1,948,231 |
| | | |
| |
|
Fixed assets | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | 14 | | | 165,243 | | | 1,674,802 |
Property, plant and equipment | | 15 | | | 2,214,254 | | | 2,088,019 |
Intangible assets | | 16 | | | 1,543,545 | | | 156,517 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total fixed assets | | | | | 3,923,042 | | | 3,919,338 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total assets | | | | € | 5,842,608 | | € | 5,867,569 |
| | | |
| |
|
Liabilities, minority interests and shareholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans, overdrafts and other borrowing | | 20 | | | 162,154 | | | 250,988 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 17 | | | 1,097,429 | | | 1,162,364 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total current liabilities | | | | | 1,259,583 | | | 1,413,352 |
Non current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Long term debt and other long term liabilities | | 19 | | | 3,027,384 | | | 1,404,432 |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | 21 | | | 377,183 | | | 337,014 |
Pension liabilities | | 25 | | | 140,366 | | | — |
Capital grants deferred | | | | | 12,043 | | | 12,290 |
Minority interests (equity interests) | | | | | 147,950 | | | 175,290 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total liabilities and minority interests | | | | | 4,964,509 | | | 3,342,378 |
| | | |
| |
|
Shareholders' equity(1) | | | | | | | | |
Share capital | | | | | 40 | | | 332,917 |
Share premium | | | | | — | | | 102,022 |
Other reserves | | | | | 871,798 | | | 308,256 |
Retained earnings | | | | | 6,261 | | | 1,781,996 |
| | | |
| |
|
Shareholders' equity | | | | | 878,099 | | | 2,525,191 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total liabilities, minority interests and shareholders' equity | | | | € | 5,842,608 | | € | 5,867,569 |
| | | |
| |
|
- (1)
- A summary of the significant adjustments to shareholders' equity which would be required if accounting principles generally accepted in the United States had been applied instead of those generally accepted in Ireland is given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-5
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Successor
Issuer was incorporated on June 12, 2002, with an authorized share capital of 100,000 shares of €1 each, of which 40,000 were issued. On September 2, 2002, the shares were redesignated as 100,000,000 ordinary shares of €0.001 each.
Predecessor
| | Number of ordinary shares
| | Ordinary shares of 30c each
| | Total share capital
|
---|
| | 000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Authorized | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2000 and 2001 | | 1,401,214 | | € | 420,364 | | € | 420,364 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Allotted, called up and fully paid | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | 1,107,525 | | | 332,258 | | | 332,258 |
Issued during the year | | 1,107 | | | 331 | | | 331 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | 1,108,632 | | | 332,589 | | | 332,589 |
Issued during the year | | 1,093 | | | 328 | | | 328 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2001 | | 1,109,725 | | € | 332,917 | | € | 332,917 |
| |
| |
| |
|
The options outstanding over ordinary shares at December 31, 2001 were 76,084,708 (2000: 63,820,228). During the year ended December 31, 2001, a total of 1,092,729 (2000: 1,106,668) ordinary shares with a nominal value of €328,000 were issued as a result of the exercise of options under the JSG share option schemes. The net proceeds arising from these issues, €2,011,000 (2000: €1,453,000) was used for normal business purposes.
The called up share capital of JSG included 25,000,000 shares (nominal value €7,500,000) held by a subsidiary which had not been cancelled. These shares did not rank for dividend as the related dividend entitlements had been waived.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-6
Successor
| | Share capital
| | Other reserves(1)
| | Retained earnings
| | Total shareholders' equity
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Shares issued | | | 40 | | | — | | | — | | | 40 |
Capital contribution | | | — | | | 864,354 | | | — | | | 864,354 |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | 1,854 | | | 1,854 |
Actuarial gain recognised in retirement benefit schemes | | | — | | | — | | | 4,407 | | | 4,407 |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | 7,444 | | | — | | | 7,444 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | € | 40 | | € | 871,798 | | € | 6,261 | | € | 878,099 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Other reserves of €864,354,000 are comprised of the following:
- An
- investment of €731,960,000 by Madison Dearborn Partners LLC and its affiliates, certain other co-investors and certain members of management by way of capital contributions; a capital contribution by parent of €125,000,000. Parent obtained the funds for this contribution by way of a loan from the newcos which they borrowed under a bank credit facility. The newcos borrowing is non recourse to issuer; the remaining €7,394,000 represents the value ascribed to the warrants to purchase shares in MDCP Acquisitions Ltd issued as part of the PIK units (see Note 20).
Predecessor
| | Share capital €000
| | Premium in excess of par value(1) €000
| | Other reserves(1) €000
| | Retained earnings €000
| | Total shareholders' equity(2) €000
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | | 332,258 | | | 99,217 | | | 185,540 | | | 1,646,969 | | | 2,263,984 | |
Shares issued | | | 331 | | | 1,122 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,453 | |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 242,482 | | | 242,482 | |
Dividends on ordinary shares (note 10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (75,204 | ) | | (75,204 | ) |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | — | | | 72,460 | | | — | | | 72,460 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | | 332,589 | | | 100,339 | | | 258,000 | | | 1,814,247 | | | 2,505,175 | (3) |
Shares issued | | | 328 | | | 1,683 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,011 | |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 167,565 | | | 167,565 | |
Dividends on ordinary shares (note 10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (79,021 | ) | | (79,021 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | — | | | 64,386 | | | — | | | 64,386 | |
Goodwill on disposals | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,416 | | | 4,416 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | € | 332,917 | | € | 102,022 | | € | 322,386 | | € | 1,907,207 | | € | 2,664,532 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
FRS 19 adoption (note 21) | | | — | | | — | | | (14,130 | ) | | (125,211 | ) | | (139,341 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 restated | | € | 332,917 | | € | 102,022 | | € | 308,256 | | € | 1,781,996 | | € | 2,525,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- The premium in excess of par value, revaluation reserve, capital conversion reserve fund, and capital redemption reserve fund and other reserves were not available for distribution.
- (2)
- Retained earnings and other reserves at December 31, 2001 included cumulative translation gains of €261,974,000 (2000: €197,588,000).
- (3)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year ended December 31, 2000, the closing balance for shareholders' equity would have been adjusted by €118,445,000 to €2,386,730,000.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-7
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash Flows
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Note
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net cash flow from operating activities | | 27 | | | 260,923 | | | 356,514 | | | 584,942 | | | 482,298 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Dividends received from associates | | | | | 1,552 | | | 4,060 | | | 11,118 | | | 8,718 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Returns on investments and servicing of finance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest received | | | | | 5,597 | | | 11,328 | | | 23,463 | | | 23,814 | |
Interest paid | | | | | (58,211 | ) | | (70,654 | ) | | (107,037 | ) | | (123,105 | ) |
Interest paid on finance leases | | | | | (605 | ) | | (1,151 | ) | | (1,728 | ) | | (2,454 | ) |
Dividends paid to minority interests | | | | | (5,259 | ) | | (8,222 | ) | | (18,584 | ) | | (16,924 | ) |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | | | (129,819 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (188,297 | ) | | (68,699 | ) | | (103,886 | ) | | (118,669 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Irish corporation tax paid | | | | | (315 | ) | | (9,625 | ) | | (7,786 | ) | | (13,482 | ) |
Overseas tax paid | | | | | (35,708 | ) | | (83,986 | ) | | (106,676 | ) | | (41,625 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (36,023 | ) | | (93,611 | ) | | (114,462 | ) | | (55,107 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Capital expenditure and financial investment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of tangible fixed assets | | | | | (91,139 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (177,213 | ) | | (147,629 | ) |
Less new finance leases | | | | | — | | | — | | | 7,537 | | | 713 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (91,139 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (169,676 | ) | | (146,916 | ) |
Capital grants received | | | | | 919 | | | 2,460 | | | 5,154 | | | 2,963 | |
Purchase of other investments | | | | | (1,600 | ) | | (4,963 | ) | | (6,303 | ) | | (3,008 | ) |
Retirement of fixed assets | | 30 | | | 1,513 | | | 917 | | | 34,198 | | | 30,634 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (90,307 | ) | | (121,206 | ) | | (136,627 | ) | | (116,327 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Acquisitions and disposals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of subsidiaries and minorities | | 33 | | | (2,495,618 | ) | | (320,640 | ) | | (13,697 | ) | | (103,998 | ) |
Business disposals | | | | | — | | | 25,207 | | | 4,406 | | | 2,650 | |
Advances to affiliates | | | | | (14,890 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Investments in and advances to associates | | | | | (6,311 | ) | | (1,631 | ) | | (33,140 | ) | | (7,719 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (2,516,819 | ) | | (297,064 | ) | | (42,431 | ) | | (109,067 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Equity dividends paid | | 29 | | | (255 | ) | | (50,662 | ) | | (76,570 | ) | | (70,007 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash (outflow)/inflow before use of liquid resources and financing | | | | | (2,569,226 | ) | | (270,668 | ) | | 122,084 | | | 21,839 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Management of liquid resources | | | | | (10,521 | ) | | 239,468 | | | (2,970 | ) | | 23,074 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Financing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issues of shares including minorities | | | | | 870,013 | | | 5,796 | | | 2,011 | | | 1,453 | |
Increase/(decrease) in term debt | | 31 | | | 1,699,908 | | | 42,651 | | | (120,636 | ) | | (11,029 | ) |
Advances (to)/from parent | | | | | (6,681 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Capital elements of finance leases repaid | | | | | (2,031 | ) | | (4,945 | ) | | (9,407 | ) | | (10,380 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | 2,561,209 | | | 43,502 | | | (128,032 | ) | | (19,956 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Decrease)/increase in cash | | | | € | (18,538 | ) | € | 12,302 | | € | (8,918 | ) | € | 24,957 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The significant differences between the cash flow statement prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland are given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-8
MDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1 Basis of preparation
MDP Acquisitions plc (issuer or registrant) was incorporated under Irish law on June 12, 2002 as a public limited company. MDCP Acquisitions I (purchaser or guarantor) was incorporated under Irish law on June 14, 2002 as an unlimited public company having a share capital. Purchaser acts as guarantor under the terms of the indentures relating to the issues of Senior Notes of issuer. Purchaser is a wholly owned subsidiary of issuer.
On July 5, 2002, purchaser commenced a public tender offer for all of the issued and to be issued share capital of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (JSG or predecessor). On September 3, 2002, purchaser declared this offer unconditional in all respects. Purchaser subsequently acquired all of the ordinary shares, completing the acquisition in October 2002.
At the time the offer was declared unconditional, JSG distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation ('SSCC'). In connection with the acquisition, certain non-operating assets and non-core operating assets of JSG were or will be transferred to newly formed, wholly owned subsidiaries of MDCP Acquisitions Ltd. (parent), which are collectively referred to as the 'newcos', in exchange for intercompany notes. On October 2, 2002, the newcos borrowed €125 million under a bank credit facility, which is non-recourse to issuer. The newcos then loaned the proceeds to parent, and parent used them to make a capital contribution to issuer. Issuer in turn made a capital contribution to purchaser.
In these financial statements, the term the "Group" is used to refer to issuer and its subsidiaries for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and predecessor and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the acquisition.
The acquisition of predecessor by issuer has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements using the acquisition method of accounting.
These financial statements have been prepared to show the performance of:
- •
- issuer and its subsidiaries for the period from June 12 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2002 and
- •
- predecessor for the period from January 1 to September 2, 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.
Prior to the acquisition on September 3, 2002, issuer and purchaser did not trade. Accordingly, issuer's consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the period from June 12, 2002 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2002 reflect the results of operations of the Group for the period from September 3 to December 31, 2002.
2 Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of accounting:
The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Ireland (Irish GAAP). They are prepared and presented in euro (€). In preparing these financial statements, certain items have been included in order to comply with accounting presentation and disclosure requirements applicable in the United States in respect of foreign registrants. An explanation of the significant differences between Irish and US GAAP as they
F-9
apply to the Group and a reconciliation to US GAAP are set out in Note 37. The financial statements do not constitute full accounts as defined by the Companies (Amendment) Act 1986.
(b) Group consolidation:
The financial statements comprise a consolidation of the financial statements of issuer or predecessor and their respective subsidiaries. Associates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Where accounting policies followed by subsidiaries and associates differ significantly from those adopted for the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, appropriate adjustments are made in order to achieve a consistent basis of accounting. The results of subsidiaries acquired or sold are consolidated and the Group's share of the results of associates are included for the periods from their effective date of acquisition or to their effective date of sale.
(c) Net sales and revenue recognition:
Net sales consist of sales to third parties after trade discounts and exclude sales taxes. Revenue is recognized at the time products are delivered or services rendered to external customers.
(d) Goodwill:
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of shares in subsidiaries over the fair value of their net assets acquired based on Group accounting policies. It is capitalized and amortized over a period of 40 years as the directors believe that the durability of the business can be demonstrated and the value of goodwill is capable of being continually reassessed. The carrying value of goodwill is subject to an impairment review at the end of the first full year following the year of acquisition and annually thereafter. This treatment differs in respect of goodwill arising on acquisitions made by predecessor prior to January 1, 1998, which was written off against reserves in the year of acquisition. In the event of a subsequent disposal any goodwill, previously charged directly against reserves, was written off in the income statement at the time of the related disposal.
(e) Depreciation:
Freehold and long leasehold land are not depreciated. Short leasehold land and buildings are depreciated over the remaining period of the lease, adjusted for estimated residual value. In the main, other tangible fixed assets are depreciated by equal annual installments over their estimated useful lives at the following rates:
Freehold and long leasehold buildings | | 1–5% | | Plant and machinery | | 3–33% |
Fixtures and fittings | | 10–25% | | Motor vehicles | | 20–25% |
(f) Timberlands:
The cost of acquiring, establishing and maintaining forestry plantations are classified as timberlands. Depletion of timberlands represents the charge to income relating to the timber extracted in the year.
F-10
(g) Leasing:
Assets acquired under finance leases are capitalized and included in tangible fixed assets and depreciated in accordance with Group depreciation policy. Payments under operating leases are expensed over the period of the lease.
(h) Inventory valuation:
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost includes direct costs plus applicable factory and other overheads. Net realizable value is the actual or estimated selling price less all applicable costs incurred or likely to be incurred in the realization of the selling price. Full provision is made for all damaged, deteriorated, obsolete and unusable materials.
(i) Debt instruments:
The finance costs of debt instruments, which is the difference between the net proceeds and the total amount payable under the instrument, are accounted for over the life of the instrument at a constant rate of interest on the outstanding balance. The proceeds of debt instruments, net of issue costs, are shown as liabilities on the balance sheet.
(j) Derivative instruments:
The Group uses forward currency contracts to reduce exposure to foreign exchange rates. The Group also uses interest rate swaps to adjust interest rate exposures. The Group considers its derivative instruments qualify for hedge accounting when certain criteria are met.
The criteria for forward foreign currency contracts are:
- •
- The instrument must be related to a foreign currency asset or liability that is probable and whose characteristics have been identified; and
- •
- It must reduce the risk of foreign currency exchange movements on our operations.
The rates under such contracts are used to record the hedged item. As a result, gains and losses are offset against the foreign exchange gains and losses on the related financial assets and liabilities, or where the instrument is used to hedge a committed, or probable, future transaction, are deferred until the transaction occurs.
The Group's criteria for interest rate swaps are:
- •
- The instrument must be related to an asset or a liability; and
- •
- It must change the character of the interest rate by converting a variable rate to a fixed rate or vice versa.
Interest differentials are recognized and included in interest payable or receivable as appropriate. Interest rate swaps are not revalued to fair value and are not shown on the Group balance sheet.
F-11
The Group enters currency swap agreements to reduce the impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations arising from unmatched foreign currency assets and liabilities. Related foreign currency assets and liabilities are accounted for in the currency of the underlying swap agreement and translated at the closing rate.
(k) Foreign Currencies:
Foreign currency transactions are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction or, if hedged forward, at the rate of exchange under the related forward currency contract. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rate or, if hedged forward, at the rate of exchange under the related forward currency contract. The resulting profits or losses are dealt with in the statement of income.
The balance sheets of subsidiaries are translated using the closing rate method. The income and cash flow statements are translated at average rates ruling for the relevant period. Resulting currency differences, together with those arising on hedging activities, are dealt with in reserves. The transactions of operations in hyper-inflationary economies are reported using a relatively stable currency as the functional currency. The translation gains and losses arising are recognized in the income statement.
(l) Post Retirement Benefits:
From September 3, 2002 (the date of acquisition), issuer has adopted FRS 17—'Retirement Benefits'. FRS 17 applies to all types of benefits that an employer provides after employees have completed their service, including pensions and other post retirement benefits. The expected increase in the present value of scheme liabilities arising from employee service in the current or prior periods is charged against operating income. The expected returns on the schemes assets and the increase during the period in the present value of the schemes liabilities arising from the passage of time are included in the statement of income. Differences between the expected and the actual return on plan assets, together with the effect of changes in the current or prior assumptions underlying the liabilities are recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses. Scheme assets are valued at fair value and scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit method. Net scheme assets and liabilities, reduced by deferred tax amounts, are recorded on the balance sheet as a pension surplus or deficit as appropriate.
Prior to September 3, 2002, pension costs were recognized in income on a systematic basis so that the cost of providing retirement benefits to employees was evenly matched to the service lives of the employees concerned. Any excess or deficiency of the actuarial value of assets over the actuarial value of liabilities was amortized over the average remaining service lives of the relevant, then current employees. Any surplus or deficit within a scheme was not recognized on the balance sheet. The cost of providing post retirement health care benefits to employees was recognized on an actuarial basis. The effect of the adoption of FRS 17 on reported income from the date of acquisition is not material.
(m) Deferred taxation:
Predecessor adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' effective from January 1, 2002. Under this standard full provision is made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains
F-12
and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in tax computations. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and reported figures for periods prior to January 1, 2002 have been restated.
(n) Research and development:
Research and development expenditure is written off as incurred.
(o) Use of estimates:
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3 Segmental Analyses
The Group is an integrated paper and board manufacturer and converter. The Group has identified reportable segments primarily on a geographic basis. In Europe, the Group has two reportable segments: (1) Packaging and (2) Specialities. The Packaging segment is highly integrated. It includes a system of mills and plants that produces a full line of containerboard that is converted into corrugated containers. The primary products of the Specialities segment include décor base paper (from April 1, 2002), graphicboard and paper sacks. Additionally, there are central costs which represent corporate governance costs, including executive costs, and costs of the Group's legal, company secretarial, pension administration, tax, treasury and controlling functions and other administrative costs.
Set out below are segmental analyses of sales, income—before interest, exceptional items and taxes, total assets, long lived assets, net operating assets, capital expenditure, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and investments in equity method investees. The analysis of income includes the Group's share of the income before exceptional items, interest and taxes of associates. A geographical analysis of employees can be found in Note 6 and of income taxes in Note 9.
Sales—third party (external net sales)
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 849,820 | | | 1,686,198 | | | 2,523,264 | | | 2,549,732 |
Specialities | | | 347,952 | | | 520,197 | | | 489,061 | | | 498,922 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,197,772 | | | 2,206,395 | | | 3,012,325 | | | 3,048,654 |
United States and Canada | | | 153,339 | | | 403,086 | | | 665,726 | | | 733,486 |
Latin America | | | 224,464 | | | 524,599 | | | 833,599 | | | 783,104 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,575,575 | | € | 3,134,080 | | € | 4,511,650 | | € | 4,565,244 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-13
Sales—Group and third party
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 1,129,725 | | | 2,246,357 | | | 3,364,145 | | | 3,422,830 |
Specialities | | | 367,860 | | | 550,243 | | | 516,265 | | | 523,857 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,497,585 | | | 2,796,600 | | | 3,880,410 | | | 3,946,687 |
United States and Canada | | | 153,339 | | | 403,086 | | | 665,726 | | | 733,486 |
Latin America | | | 350,831 | | | 828,750 | | | 1,314,834 | | | 1,247,374 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 2,001,755 | | € | 4,028,436 | | € | 5,860,970 | | € | 5,927,547 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Income before interest, exceptional items and taxes
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Packaging | | | 86,128 | | | 125,947 | | | 261,464 | | | 233,722 | |
Specialities | | | 22,457 | | | 34,985 | | | 22,157 | | | 25,710 | |
Associates | | | 5,608 | | | 18,120 | | | 28,594 | | | 37,573 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Europe | | | 114,193 | | | 179,052 | | | 312,215 | | | 297,005 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Packaging | | | 19,939 | | | 15,141 | | | 16,864 | | | 43,179 | |
Associates | | | — | | | 92,408 | | | 207,582 | | | 361,753 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
United States and Canada | | | 19,939 | | | 107,549 | | | 224,446 | | | 404,932 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Packaging | | | 18,129 | | | 61,638 | | | 127,453 | | | 97,874 | |
Associates | | | 791 | | | 3,726 | | | 5,476 | | | 4,206 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Latin America | | | 18,920 | | | 65,364 | | | 132,929 | | | 102,080 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Asia (Associates) | | | 826 | | | 3,218 | | | 560 | | | 402 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated centre costs | | | (11,716 | ) | | (32,336 | ) | | (43,624 | ) | | (38,015 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 142,162 | | € | 322,847 | | € | 626,526 | | € | 766,404 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-14
Total assets
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 2,068,710 | | | 2,025,337 | | | 2,222,552 |
Specialities | | | 867,302 | | | 484,032 | | | 466,137 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 2,936,012 | | | 2,509,369 | | | 2,688,689 |
United States and Canada | | | 185,682 | | | 1,705,075 | | | 1,631,162 |
Latin America | | | 763,161 | | | 953,249 | | | 918,525 |
Asia | | | 28,006 | | | 24,419 | | | 776 |
Group Centre | | | 137,355 | | | 518,940 | | | 458,814 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 4,050,216 | | | 5,711,052 | | | 5,697,966 |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,545 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,847 | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 5,842,608 | | € | 5,867,569 | | € | 5,844,744 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Long lived assets
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 1,159,530 | | | 1,111,787 | | | 1,183,182 |
Specialities | | | 491,696 | | | 181,248 | | | 179,893 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,651,226 | | | 1,293,035 | | | 1,363,075 |
United States and Canada | | | 81,465 | | | 186,436 | | | 189,807 |
Latin America | | | 476,259 | | | 575,899 | | | 552,594 |
Group Centre | | | 5,304 | | | 32,649 | | | 33,351 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 2,214,254 | | | 2,088,019 | | | 2,138,827 |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,545 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 3,757,799 | | € | 2,244,536 | | € | 2,285,605 |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-15
Net operating assets
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Packaging | | | 1,446,584 | | | 1,353,470 | | | 1,463,609 | |
Specialities | | | 620,241 | | | 345,566 | | | 333,596 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Europe | | | 2,066,825 | | | 1,699,036 | | | 1,797,205 | |
United States and Canada | | | 137,104 | | | 1,614,448 | | | 1,515,758 | |
Latin America | | | 621,147 | | | 803,749 | | | 734,670 | |
Asia | | | 26,053 | | | 23,772 | | | 766 | |
Group Centre | | | (15,573 | ) | | 60,364 | | | 67,645 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2,835,556 | | | 4,201,369 | | | 4,116,044 | |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,545 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,847 | | | — | | | — | |
Unallocated net liabilities | | | (3,749,849 | ) | | (1,832,695 | ) | | (1,876,092 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Group shareholders' equity | | € | 878,099 | | € | 2,525,191 | | € | 2,386,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
A reconciliation of net operating assets above to shareholders' equity is as follows:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Per segmental analysis of operating assets | | | 2,835,556 | | | 4,201,369 | | | 4,116,044 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,545 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,847 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated assets | | | 1,792,392 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (3,112,259 | ) | | (1,113,566 | ) | | (1,167,238 | ) |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | 125,255 | | | — | | | — | |
Corporation tax | | | (74,759 | ) | | (103,714 | ) | | (106,671 | ) |
Dividends proposed | | | — | | | (50,575 | ) | | (48,113 | ) |
Capital lease creditors | | | (22,587 | ) | | (23,597 | ) | | (24,972 | ) |
Deferred income | | | — | | | (28,939 | ) | | (32,827 | ) |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | (377,183 | ) | | (337,014 | ) | | (326,766 | ) |
Pension liabilities | | | (140,366 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Minority interests (equity interests) | | | (147,950 | ) | | (175,290 | ) | | (169,505 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated net liabilities | | | (3,749,849 | ) | | (1,832,695 | ) | | (1,876,092 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Shareholders' equity | | € | 878,099 | | € | 2,525,191 | | € | 2,386,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-16
Total assets comprise fixed assets and current assets. Long lived assets comprise property, plant and equipment and capitalized goodwill. Net operating assets comprise total assets less total liabilities but excluding all assets and liabilities of a financing nature.
Capital expenditure
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 56,967 | | | 53,329 | | | 73,398 | | | 75,364 |
Specialities | | | 15,462 | | | 25,461 | | | 40,104 | | | 31,015 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 72,429 | | | 78,790 | | | 113,502 | | | 106,379 |
United States and Canada | | | 4,804 | | | 7,343 | | | 11,831 | | | 20,110 |
Latin America | | | 13,640 | | | 33,403 | | | 51,506 | | | 19,562 |
Group Centre | | | 266 | | | 84 | | | 374 | | | 1,578 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 91,139 | | € | 119,620 | | € | 177,213 | | € | 147,629 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | 48,171 | | 99,748 | | 143,039 | | 143,681 |
Specialities | | 15,503 | | 24,039 | | 20,129 | | 19,346 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | 63,674 | | 123,787 | | 163,168 | | 163,027 |
United States and Canada | | 3,077 | | 10,213 | | 17,510 | | 17,508 |
Latin America | | 15,546 | | 32,158 | | 48,224 | | 41,274 |
Group Centre | | 274 | | 402 | | 1,042 | | 804 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Depreciation and depletion | | 82,571 | | 166,560 | | 229,944 | | 222,613 |
Goodwill amortization | | 10,090 | | 5,794 | | 8,820 | | 5,734 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | €92,661 | | €172,354 | | €238,764 | | €228,347 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-17
Investments in equity method investees
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Europe | | | 79,199 | | | 167,054 | | | 155,140 |
United States and Canada | | | 6,450 | | | 1,388,146 | | | 1,299,570 |
Latin America | | | 38,441 | | | 40,661 | | | 33,647 |
Asia | | | 26,949 | | | 25,246 | | | 1,318 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 151,039 | | € | 1,621,107 | | € | 1,489,675 |
| |
| |
| |
|
4 Net Operating Expenses
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Distribution costs | | | 94,905 | | | 188,221 | | | 244,874 | | | 243,588 | |
Administrative expenses | | | 194,352 | | | 469,816 | | | 641,972 | | | 625,598 | |
Other operating income | | | (1,804 | ) | | (1,618 | ) | | (2,882 | ) | | (3,083 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 287,453 | | € | 656,419 | | € | 883,964 | | € | 866,103 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
5 Exceptional Items
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Group | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment impairment provision | | | — | | | — | | | (26,642 | ) | | — | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | (11,978 | ) | | (12,484 | ) | | (23,763 | ) | | (20,890 | ) |
Income on sale of operations | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | (11,978 | ) | € | 7,956 | | € | (50,405 | ) | € | (20,890 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-18
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Associates | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Merger and restructuring costs | | — | | | (3,253 | ) | | (7,573 | ) | | (24,632 | ) |
Debt extinguishment costs | | — | | | (4,288 | ) | | (3,322 | ) | | (262 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | — | | € | (7,541 | ) | € | (10,895 | ) | € | (24,894 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income on sale of operations | | — | | | — | | | — | | € | 3,105 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Group
For the period January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 the Group has recorded costs of €12,484,000 representing reorganization and restructuring costs. The related tax relief of €1,891,000 is included in Taxes on income. In the same period the Group reported a gain of €20,440,000 in respect of the disposal of its US Printing and Voting equipment subsidiaries. The related tax charge of €4,300,000 is included in Taxes on income.
For the period September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 the Group has recorded costs of €11,978,000 representing reorganization and restructuring costs. The related tax relief of €1,930,000 is included in Taxes on income.
Associates
The merger and restructuring charges and debt extinguishment costs relate to SSCC. The related tax relief of €3,016,000 is included in Taxation—Share of associates.
6 Employees and Remuneration
The average number of persons employed by the Group by geographical area in the financial period was:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
Europe | | 19,842 | | 19,053 | | 17,061 | | 17,068 |
United States | | 2,620 | | 2,773 | | 3,031 | | 3,011 |
Latin America | | 6,871 | | 6,727 | | 6,659 | | 6,610 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | 29,333 | | 28,553 | | 26,751 | | 26,689 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Associates' employees | | 1,966 | | 43,533 | | 43,968 | | 44,667 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-19
The staff costs comprise:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Wages and salaries | | | 294,887 | | | 575,625 | | | 822,896 | | | 797,353 |
Social welfare | | | 57,894 | | | 106,281 | | | 142,138 | | | 138,465 |
Pensions | | | 24,686 | | | 43,285 | | | 62,507 | | | 67,033 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 377,467 | | € | 725,191 | | € | 1,027,541 | | € | 1,002,851 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Director's emoluments, including pension contributions for the period from September 3, 2002, through December 31, 2002 amounted to €1,877,000.
7 Interest Expense
Interest payable and similar charges:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
On bank loans and overdrafts | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| —repayable within 5 years, by installment | | | 9,513 | | | 8,376 | | | 10,990 | | | 9,115 |
| —repayable within 5 years, other than by installment | | | 9,350 | | | 10,239 | | | 22,949 | | | 24,557 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 18,863 | | | 18,615 | | | 33,939 | | | 33,672 |
On all other loans | | | 73,855 | | | 47,266 | | | 74,682 | | | 86,698 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 92,718 | | € | 65,881 | | € | 108,621 | | € | 120,370 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-20
8 Income Before Taxes
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Income before taxes is stated after charging: | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense | | 92,661 | | 172,353 | | 238,764 | | 228,348 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Auditors' remuneration (including expenses) | | 2,171 | | 1,448 | | 2,728 | | 2,630 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Operating lease rentals plant and machinery | | 2,200 | | 4,434 | | 11,506 | | 13,496 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Operating lease rentals other | | 1,910 | | 4,204 | | 4,973 | | 4,215 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Loss / (gain) on foreign currency borrowing less deposits | | 893 | | (2,813 | ) | 2,154 | | 1,469 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Research and development costs | | 1,486 | | 3,425 | | 5,240 | | 5,658 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Year 2000 and euro costs | | — | | — | | — | | 208 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
9 Taxation
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Current Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | 18,114 | | | 36,858 | | | 79,783 | | | 65,353 |
United States and Canada | | | 1,660 | | | 4,224 | | | 5,311 | | | 4,684 |
Latin America | | | 7,216 | | | 19,005 | | | 26,165 | | | 16,378 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 26,990 | | | 60,087 | | | 111,259 | | | 86,415 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Deferred Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | 1,482 | | | 1,291 | | | (12,268 | ) | | 5,570 |
United States and Canada | | | 337 | | | 667 | | | 1,916 | | | 1,357 |
Latin America | | | 1,233 | | | (1,188 | ) | | 631 | | | 4,166 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 3,052 | | | 770 | | | (9,721 | ) | | 11,093 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Taxes on income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Holding Company and subsidiaries | | | 30,042 | | | 60,857 | | | 101,538 | | | 97,508 |
Share of associates | | | 1,353 | | | 17,032 | | | 36,027 | | | 88,043 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 31,395 | | € | 77,889 | | € | 137,565 | | € | 185,551 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Deferred taxation arises as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital allowances | | | 345 | | | 1,791 | | | (6,996 | ) | | 9,085 |
Other | | | 2,707 | | | (1,021 | ) | | (2,725 | ) | | 2,008 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 3,052 | | € | 770 | | € | (9,721 | ) | € | 11,093 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Current taxation represents corporation tax or its equivalent on the taxable income in each jurisdiction and unrelieved overseas tax on dividends. For the periods January 1 through September 2,
F-21
2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively unrelieved overseas tax on dividends amounted to €488,827 and €108,686 (2001: €526,971; 2000: €178,000). For the periods January 1 through September 2, 2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively the amount of current taxation relating to Ireland was €4,667,000 and €1,100,000 (2001: €11,120,000; 2000: €10,449,000). For the periods January 1 through September 2, 2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively the amount of deferred taxation relating to Ireland was nil (2001: nil; 2000: nil).
From January 1, 2002, the Group adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax', which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in the tax computation. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and previously reported figures have been restated. €1,000,000 of the adjustment related to Ireland.
The Group has availed of a reduced taxation rate of 10% which applies to certain manufacturing and financial service operations in Ireland. The reduced rate is due to expire in 2005 for financial service operations and 2010 for manufacturing operations.
Income before tax is analyzed as follows:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Ireland | | | (26,043 | ) | | 17,422 | | | 61,309 | | | 49,065 | |
Foreign | | | 73,493 | | | 132,357 | | | 237,437 | | | 213,546 | |
Associates | | | 6,838 | | | 43,086 | | | 87,558 | | | 222,367 | |
Exceptional items (Note 5) | | | (11,978 | ) | | 415 | | | (61,300 | ) | | (42,679 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 42,310 | | € | 193,280 | | € | 325,004 | | € | 442,299 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Based on current capital investment plans, the Group expects to continue to be able to claim capital allowances in excess of depreciation in future years but at a slightly lower level than in the current year.
The total tax charge in future periods will be affected by any changes to the corporation tax rates in force in the countries in which the Group operates. The current tax charges will also be affected by changes in the excess of tax depreciation over book depreciation and the use of tax credits.
F-22
The following table relates the applicable Republic of Ireland statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate of the Group, obtained by computing the tax charge as a percentage of income before taxes and minority shareholders' interest:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
| | %
| |
---|
Corporation tax at Irish statutory rate | | 16.0 | | 16.0 | | 20.0 | | 24.0 | |
Adjusted for: | | | | | | | | | |
| Income subject to a higher rate of tax than the Irish statutory rate | | 36.6 | | 27.6 | | 23.8 | | 19.3 | |
| Income subject to a lower rate of tax than the Irish statutory rate | | — | | — | | (11.1 | ) | (8.7 | ) |
| Expenditure not deductible for tax purposes | | 30.9 | | 7.3 | | 11.3 | | 10.4 | |
| Utilisation of tax losses | | (6.5 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (1.2 | ) |
| Adjustments to tax charge in respect of previous periods | | 3.7 | | 0.5 | | (0.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) |
| Profits arising not subject to tax | | (6.5 | ) | (8.0 | ) | — | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 74.2 | | 40.3 | | 42.3 | | 42.0 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
10 Dividends
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Ordinary: | | | | | | | | |
Paid | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary interim (2001: 2.625c; 2000: 2.5c) | | — | | | 28,446 | | | 27,091 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Proposed | | | | | | | | |
Final dividend (2001: 4.662c; 2000: 4.44c) | | — | | | 50,575 | | | 48,113 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | — | | € | 79,021 | | € | 75,204 |
| |
| |
| |
|
11 Net Borrowing
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Cash at bank and in hand | | | 184,331 | | | 440,109 |
Total borrowing (Note 20) | | | 3,296,590 | | | 1,553,675 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 3,112,259 | | € | 1,113,566 |
| |
| |
|
F-23
12 Accounts Receivable and Prepayments
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Amounts falling due within one year: | | | | | | |
Trade receivables | | | 900,424 | | | 912,530 |
Less: Provision for bad and doubtful debts | | | 42,657 | | | 35,583 |
| |
| |
|
| | | 857,767 | | | 876,947 |
Amounts owed by associates | | | 10,140 | | | 11,703 |
Other receivables | | | 87,274 | | | 138,425 |
Prepayments and accrued income | | | 43,753 | | | 27,898 |
| |
| |
|
| | | 998,934 | | | 1,054,973 |
Amounts falling due after more than one year: | | | | | | |
Other receivables | | | 17,247 | | | 29,639 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,016,181 | | € | 1,084,612 |
| |
| |
|
13 Inventories
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Raw materials | | | 145,325 | | | 147,619 |
Work in progress | | | 34,892 | | | 24,943 |
Finished goods | | | 182,490 | | | 146,607 |
Other | | | 107,500 | | | 104,341 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 470,207 | | € | 423,510 |
| |
| |
|
14 Investments
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Associates (Note 14(i)) | | | 151,039 | | | 1,621,107 |
Other investments (Note 14(ii)) | | | 14,204 | | | 53,695 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 165,243 | | € | 1,674,802 |
| |
| |
|
F-24
Note 14(i): Associates
Successor
| | Share of net assets
| | Loans
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 142,058 | | | 8,792 | | | 150,850 | |
Additions | | | 6,279 | | | — | | | 6,279 | |
Retained earnings | | | 4,019 | | | — | | | 4,019 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (9,523 | ) | | — | | | (9,523 | ) |
Repayment | | | — | | | (1,368 | ) | | (1,368 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 91 | | | — | | | 91 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 1,079 | | | (388 | ) | | 691 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 144,003 | | € | 7,036 | | € | 151,039 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Share of net assets
| | Loans
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | | 1,336,914 | | | 8,459 | | | 1,345,373 | |
Additions | | | 7,718 | | | — | | | 7,718 | |
Retained earnings | | | 109,656 | | | — | | | 109,656 | |
Sales | | | (1,052 | ) | | — | | | (1,052 | ) |
Repayment | | | — | | | (3,980 | ) | | (3,980 | ) |
Reclassification on acquisition | | | (8,735 | ) | | — | | | (8,735 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 5,677 | | | — | | | 5,677 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 90,939 | | | 337 | | | 91,276 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 1,541,117 | | | 4,816 | | | 1,545,933 | (1) |
Additions | | | 28,429 | | | 4,707 | | | 33,136 | |
Retained earnings | | | 33,619 | | | — | | | 33,619 | |
Sales | | | (5,058 | ) | | — | | | (5,058 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 8,844 | | | — | | | 8,844 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 73,418 | | | 263 | | | 73,681 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | | 1,680,369 | | | 9,786 | | | 1,690,155 | |
FRS 19 adoption (Note 21) | | | (69,048 | ) | | — | | | (69,048 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 restated | | € | 1,611,321 | | € | 9,786 | | € | 1,621,107 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year end December 31, 2000, the closing balance of €1,545,933,000 would have been adjusted by €56,258,000 to €1,489,675,000.
F-25
Note 14(ii): Other investments
Successor
| | Listed* Cost
| | Unlisted Cost
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 6,717 | | | 74,940 | | | 81,657 | |
Additions | | | 753 | | | 583 | | | 1,336 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | — | | | (68,090 | ) | | (68,090 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (467 | ) | | 32 | | | (435 | ) |
Sales | | | (52 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (76 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (21 | ) | | — | | | (21 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (4 | ) | | (163 | ) | | (167 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 6,926 | | € | 7,278 | | € | 14,204 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 6,147 | | | 59,487 | | | 65,634 | |
Additions | | | 719 | | | 2,289 | | | 3,008 | |
Acquisitions | | | — | | | 131 | | | 131 | |
Reclassification | | | — | | | (7,238 | ) | | (7,238 | ) |
Sales | | | (692 | ) | | (1,252 | ) | | (1,944 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (88 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (150 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (1 | ) | | 142 | | | 141 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 6,085 | | | 53,497 | | | 59,582 | |
Additions | | | 702 | | | 5,601 | | | 6,303 | |
Reclassification | | | (2 | ) | | (8,562 | ) | | (8,564 | ) |
Sales | | | (50 | ) | | (3,708 | ) | | (3,758 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (14 | ) | | — | | | (14 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 5 | | | 141 | | | 146 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | € | 6,726 | | € | 46,969 | | € | 53,695 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- *
- Listed on a recognized stock exchange.
Other investments are stated at cost. The market value of the listed investments at December 31, 2002 was €7,028,000 (2001: €6,987,000; 2000: €7,066,000).
F-26
15 Property, Plant and Equipment
Successor
| | Land and Buildings
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Plant and Equipment
| |
| |
---|
| | Freehold
| | Leasehold
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cost or valuation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 897,687 | | | 33,821 | | | 3,058,488 | | | 3,989,996 | |
Additions | | | 12,374 | | | — | | | 76,420 | | | 88,794 | |
Retirements | | | (4,466 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (37,962 | ) | | (42,430 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 23,810 | | | — | | | (11,693 | ) | | 12,117 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (52,745 | ) | | — | | | (104,000 | ) | | (156,745 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (15,366 | ) | | (103 | ) | | (67,255 | ) | | (82,724 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | | 861,294 | | | 33,716 | | | 2,913,998 | | | 3,809,008 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 146,042 | | | 7,814 | | | 1,555,428 | | | 1,709,284 | |
Charged | | | 12,093 | | | 333 | | | 67,449 | | | 79,875 | |
Retirements | | | (1,989 | ) | | 3 | | | (34,054 | ) | | (36,040 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 687 | | | — | | | (5,116 | ) | | (4,429 | ) |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (11,173 | ) | | — | | | (36,906 | ) | | (48,079 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (3,743 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (40,161 | ) | | (43,909 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | | 141,917 | | | 8,145 | | | 1,506,640 | | | 1,656,702 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2002 | | € | 719,377 | | € | 25,571 | | € | 1,407,358 | | € | 2,152,306 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Timberlands
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 66,854 | |
Additions | | | 2,345 | |
Depletion | | | (2,696 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (4,555 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 61,948 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2002 | | € | 2,214,254 | |
| |
| |
F-27
Predecessor
| | Land and Buildings
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Plant and Equipment
| |
| |
---|
| | Freehold
| | Leasehold
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cost or valuation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 936,530 | | | 40,774 | | | 3,506,514 | | | 4,483,818 | |
Acquisitions | | | 42,610 | | | 632 | | | 66,361 | | | 109,603 | |
Additions | | | 26,320 | | | 156 | | | 121,153 | | | 147,629 | |
Retirements | | | (26,138 | ) | | (1,119 | ) | | (123,718 | ) | | (150,975 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (110,897 | ) | | (7,901 | ) | | (930,599 | ) | | (1,049,397 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 22,892 | | | 36 | | | 73,408 | | | 96,336 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 891,317 | | | 32,578 | | | 2,713,119 | | | 3,637,014 | |
Acquisitions | | | — | | | — | | | 3,410 | | | 3,410 | |
Additions | | | 17,934 | | | 5,106 | | | 144,075 | | | 167,115 | |
Retirements | | | (26,540 | ) | | (1,693 | ) | | (93,078 | ) | | (121,311 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (100,684 | ) | | (747 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (101,498 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 16,586 | | | 209 | | | 56,205 | | | 73,000 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | | 798,613 | | | 35,453 | | | 2,823,664 | | | 3,657,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 245,982 | | | 11,266 | | | 2,140,892 | | | 2,398,140 | |
Charged | | | 19,574 | | | 1,132 | | | 201,907 | | | 222,613 | |
Retirements | | | (2,205 | ) | | (712 | ) | | (95,596 | ) | | (98,513 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (134,510 | ) | | (3,107 | ) | | (933,284 | ) | | (1,070,901 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 4,220 | | | 41 | | | 42,587 | | | 46,848 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 133,061 | | | 8,620 | | | 1,356,506 | | | 1,498,187 | |
Charged | | | 19,737 | | | 1,099 | | | 201,781 | | | 222,617 | |
Retirements | | | (7,054 | ) | | (1,179 | ) | | (77,525 | ) | | (85,758 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (5,477 | ) | | (664 | ) | | (20,553 | ) | | (26,694 | ) |
Impairment writedown | | | — | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | 26,642 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 3,669 | | | 64 | | | 30,710 | | | 34,443 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | | 143,936 | | | 7,940 | | | 1,517,561 | | | 1,669,437 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2001 | | € | 654,677 | | € | 27,513 | | € | 1,306,103 | | € | 1,988,293 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2000 | | € | 758,256 | | € | 23,958 | | € | 1,356,613 | | € | 2,138,827 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-28
| | Timberlands
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 2000 | | | — | |
Additions | | | 10,098 | |
Reclassification | | | 92,633 | |
Depletion | | | (7,327 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 4,322 | |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | € | 99,726 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount at December 31, 2001 | | € | 2,088,019 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount at December 31, 2000 | | € | 2,138,827 | |
| |
| |
Land and buildings
Included in tangible assets is an amount for land of €243,964,000 (2001: €225,288,000; 2000: €307,937,000).
Capitalized leased property, plant and equipment
Included in the net book amount of tangible assets is an amount for capitalized leased assets of €70,981,000 (2001: €115,943,000; 2000: €125,720,000). The depreciation charge for capitalized leased assets for the periods January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 was €8,866,000 and €3,799,000 respectively and the related finance charges amounted to €1,186,000 and €570,000 respectively (2001: €14,530,000 and €1,728,000; 2000: €16,220,000 and €2,454,000 respectively).
Reclassifications
The reclassifications, in 2001, within both Cost and Depreciation relate principally to the reclassification of Timberlands. Historically, both the original cost and the related aggregate depreciation were recorded in Freehold Land and Buildings. The reclassifications in 2000 include the elimination from both Cost and Depreciation of approximately €1 billion in aggregate depreciation recorded when the assets were originally acquired. Other amounts relate mainly to the removal of fully depreciated assets no longer in use. These reclassifications have no impact on the net book value or the annual depreciation charge.
F-29
16 Intangible Assets
Successor
| | Goodwill
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Arising on Acquisition | | 1,558,994 | |
Amortization | | (10,090 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | (5,359 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | €1,543,545 | |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Goodwill
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | 96,447 | |
Acquisitions | | 53,976 | |
Amortization | | (5,734 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | 2,089 | |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | 146,778 | |
Acquisitions | | 19,573 | |
Amortization | | (8,820 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | (1,014 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | €156,517 | |
| |
| |
17 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Trade payables | | 608,959 | | 604,515 |
Amounts owed to associates—trading balances | | 2,314 | | 6,704 |
Taxation creditors (Note 18) | | 108,135 | | 169,782 |
Social welfare | | 41,413 | | 41,792 |
Accruals | | 211,150 | | 178,299 |
Capital payables | | 21,185 | | 19,406 |
Other payables | | 99,889 | | 85,727 |
Proposed dividend | | — | | 50,575 |
Capitalized lease obligations | | 4,384 | | 5,564 |
| |
| |
|
| | €1,097,429 | | €1,162,364 |
| |
| |
|
F-30
18 Taxation Creditors
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Current taxation | | 74,759 | | 103,714 |
Payroll taxes | | 27,053 | | 25,553 |
VAT and other sales taxes | | 6,323 | | 40,515 |
| |
| |
|
| | €108,135 | | €169,782 |
| |
| |
|
19 Long Term Debt and Other Long Term Liabilities
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Borrowing—due after more than one year (Note 20) | | 3,134,436 | | 1,302,687 |
Deferred income | | — | | 28,939 |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | (125,255 | ) | — |
Capitalized lease obligations | | 18,203 | | 18,033 |
Deferred acquistion consideration | | — | | 54,773 |
| |
| |
|
| | €3,027,384 | | €1,404,432 |
| |
| |
|
20 Borrowing
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Analysis of Net Debt | | | | | |
Senior credit facility: | | | | | |
| Revolving credit facility(1)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.25% | | 23,839 | | — | |
| Tranche A term loan(2a)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.25% | | 570,009 | | — | |
| Tranche B term loan(2b)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.75% | | 469,178 | | — | |
| Tranche C term loan(2c)—interest at relevant interbank rate +3.25% | | 469,178 | | — | |
Evergreen facilities(3) | | — | | 10,000 | |
Syndicate(4) | | — | | 192,307 | |
U.S. private placement(5) | | — | | 512,944 | |
U.K. private placement(6) | | — | | 49,302 | |
U.S. yankee bond(7) | | 428,086 | | 395,051 | |
Bank loans and overdrafts (net of cash) | | 15,279 | | (46,038 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Total subsidiary debt | | 1,975,569 | | 1,113,566 | |
Bond (including accrued interest)(8) | | 891,465 | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
Total senior debt | | 2,867,034 | | 1,113,566 | |
PIK units (including accrued interest)(9) | | 245,225 | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
Total net debt (excluding finance leases) | | €3,112,259 | | €1,113,566 | |
| |
| |
| |
F-31
- (1)
- Revolving credit facility of €425 million (available under the senior credit facility) to be repaid in full in 2009.
- (2a)
- Term loan A due to be repaid in certain installments up to 2009.
- (2b)
- Term loan B due to be repaid in full in 2010.
- (2c)
- Term loan C due to be repaid in full in 2011.
- (3)
- The drawings on the FRF 1 billion Evergreen facilities were refinanced and the facilities cancelled in October, 2002.
- (4)
- The drawings on the €800 million Syndicated loan were refinanced and the facility cancelled in October, 2002.
- (5)
- 6.97% senior series B notes due 2003 of €220 million, 7.1% senior series C notes due 2005 of USD 199 million and 7.28% senior series D notes due 2008 of USD 43 million. The notes were refinanced in October, 2002.
- (6)
- 9.71% senior series notes due 2004 of GBP 30 million. The notes were refinanced in October, 2002.
- (7)
- 6.75% senior notes due 2005 of USD 250 million and 7.50% senior debentures due 2025 of USD 292.3 million.
- (8)
- 10.125% senior notes due 2012 of €350 million and 9.625% senior notes due 2012 of USD 545 million.
- (9)
- 100,000 € units of 15.5% subordinated notes due 2013 and 150,000 USD units of 15.5% subordinated notes due 2013.
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | Bank Loans and Overdrafts
| | Other Borrowing
| | Total
| | Bank Loans and Overdrafts
| | Other Borrowing
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Analysis of borrowing by year of repayment | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Within one year | | 126,935 | | 35,219 | | 162,154 | | 239,362 | | 11,626 | | 250,988 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Between 1 and 2 years | | 72,724 | | 2,635 | | 75,359 | | 72,862 | | 245,773 | | 318,635 |
Between 2 and 3 years | | 77,475 | | 150,481 | | 227,956 | | 22,839 | | 55,285 | | 78,124 |
Between 3 and 4 years | | 101,019 | | 2,256 | | 103,275 | | 13,369 | | 298,016 | | 311,385 |
Between 4 and 5 years | | 127,239 | | 12,591 | | 139,830 | | 198,329 | | 2,747 | | 201,076 |
Thereafter | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By installment | | 253,198 | | 5,295 | | 258,493 | | 9,578 | | 6,549 | | 16,127 |
| Other than by installment | | 948,139 | | 1,381,384 | | 2,329,523 | | — | | 377,340 | | 377,340 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Due after more than one year | | 1,579,794 | | 1,554,642 | | 3,134,436 | | 316,977 | | 985,710 | | 1,302,687 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total borrowing | | €1,706,729 | | €1,589,861 | | €3,296,590 | | €556,339 | | €997,336 | | €1,553,675 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-32
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | Within One Year
| | After One Year
| | Within One Year
| | After One Year
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Analysis of borrowing | | | | | | | | |
Secured bank loans and overdrafts: | | | | | | | | |
Overseas loans | | 9,542 | | 44,998 | | 33,718 | | 24,911 |
Domestic loans | | 14,706 | | 1,479,602 | | — | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | 24,248 | | 1,524,600 | | 33,718 | | 24,911 |
Unsecured bank loans and overdrafts: | | | | | | | | |
Overseas loans | | 80,977 | | 41,139 | | 139,969 | | 206,034 |
Other bank loans | | 21,710 | | 14,055 | | 65,675 | | 86,032 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | 102,687 | | 55,194 | | 205,644 | | 292,066 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total bank loans and overdrafts | | 126,935 | | 1,579,794 | | 239,362 | | 316,977 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Secured other loans | | — | | 423,829 | | — | | — |
Unsecured other loans | | 35,219 | | 1,130,813 | | 11,626 | | 985,710 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total other loans | | 35,219 | | 1,554,642 | | 11,626 | | 985,710 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total borrowing | | €162,154 | | €3,134,436 | | €250,988 | | €1,302,687 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Included in secured other loans are the following long term obligations:
| | '000
|
---|
Guaranteed Senior Notes 6.75% due 2005 | | $ | 250,000 |
Guaranteed Debentures 7.50% due 2025 | | $ | 292,300 |
Included in unsecured other loans are the following long term obligations:
| | '000
|
---|
Senior Notes 10.125% due 2012 | | | €350,000 |
Senior Notes 9.625% due 2012 | | $ | 545,000 |
100,000 € units of 15.5% subordinated notes due 2013 | | | €100,000 |
150,000 $ units of 15.5% subordinated notes due 2013 | | $ | 150,000 |
In 2002, the Group refinanced US$220 million Guaranteed Senior Series B Notes 6.97% due in 2003, US$199 million Guaranteed Senior Series C Notes 7.10% due in 2005 and US$43 million Guaranteed Senior Series D Notes 7.28% due in 2008.
F-33
Committed facilities amounted to €3,597,165,000 (2001: €2,119,148,000) of which €3,145,750,000 (2001: €1,338,762,000) were utilized at December 31, 2002. The weighted average period until maturity of undrawn committed facilities is 6.1 years.
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
Maturity of Undrawn Committed Facilities
|
---|
| 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Within 1 year | | 848 | | 6,170 |
Between 1 and 2 years | | 48,056 | | 158,551 |
More than 2 years | | 402,511 | | 615,665 |
| |
| |
|
| | €451,415 | | €780,386 |
| |
| |
|
Financial instruments and risk management
The operating parameters and policies of treasury management are established under board authority. The formal treasury policy covers the areas of funding, counterparty risk, foreign exchange, controls and derivatives. Risk arising on counterparty default is controlled within a framework of dealing with high quality institutions that meet certain minimum criteria. The Group uses derivative instruments in its management of interest rate and currency risk. The Group does not enter into or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The Group's financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise borrowing, cash and liquid resources, and various items, such as trade debtors, trade creditors etc, that arise directly from its operations. The Group uses derivative financial instruments primarily to manage its exposure to market risks from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. The Group does not enter into or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The Group's policy is to centrally manage interest rate and currency exposure.
(a) Interest rate risk management
The Group manages interest rate exposure to achieve an appropriate balance of fixed and variable rate funding. To achieve this objective, the Group enters into interest rate swaps, options and forward rate agreements. Interest rate swap agreements are used to change the interest receivable or payable on the Group's underlying cash and borrowing from variable to fixed rates or from fixed to variable rates. At the year-end, 65% (2001: 43%) of the Group's borrowing was at fixed rates after taking account of interest rate swaps. The weighted average interest rate on borrowing outstanding at the year end was 8.15% (2001: 5.71%).
F-34
Outstanding interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:
| | Successor
| |
---|
Currency
| | Notional Principal (Millions)
| | Termination Dates
| | % Fixed Payable
| | % Variable Receivable
| | % Fixed Receivable
| | % Variable Payable
| |
---|
GBP | | 1 | | 2003 | | 7.46 | | Libor | (1) | — | | — | |
GBP | | 1 | | 2004 | | 7.87 | | Libor | | — | | — | |
EUR | | 10 | | 2003 | | 5.37 | | Euribor | (2) | — | | — | |
EUR | | 1,010 | | 2006 | | 3.3825-4.37 | | Euribor | | — | | — | |
SEK | | 94 | | 2006 | | — | | — | | 5.24 | | Stibor | (3) |
- (1)
- London Interbank Offered Rate
- (2)
- European Interbank Offered Rate
- (3)
- Stockholm Interbank Offered Rate
Outstanding interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2001 are summarized as follows:
| | Predecessor
|
---|
Currency
| | Notional Principal (Millions)
| | Termination Dates
| | % Fixed Payable
| | % Variable Receivable
| | % Fixed Receivable
| | % Variable Payable
|
---|
GBP | | 7 | | 2002-2004 | | 7.25-7.87 | | Libor | | — | | — |
USD | | 392 | | 2003 | | — | | — | | 5.89-6.00 | | Libor |
USD | | 242 | | 2003 | | 6.57-6.63 | | Libor | | — | | — |
EUR | | 3 | | 2002-2003 | | 3.29-5.59 | | Libor | | — | | — |
After taking into account the various interest rate swaps and currency swaps entered into by the Group, the interest rate profile of the Group's financial liabilities at December 31, 2002 was:
| | Successor
|
---|
| |
| |
| |
| | Fixed rate financial liabilities
|
---|
Currency
| | Total € Million
| | Floating rate financial liabilities € Million
| | Fixed rate financial liabilities € Million
| | Weighted average interest rate %
| | Weighted average period until maturity Years
|
---|
Euro | | 2,140 | | 663 | | 1,477 | | 5.80 | | 5.1 |
Sterling | | 177 | | 173 | | 4 | | 6.92 | | 1.9 |
US Dollar | | 760 | | 95 | | 665 | | 10.85 | | 9.9 |
Canadian Dollar | | 25 | | 25 | | — | | | | |
Swedish Krona | | 94 | | 94 | | — | | | | |
Other | | 123 | | 118 | | 5 | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Total | | €3,319 | | €1,168 | | €2,151 | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
F-35
(b) Foreign exchange risk management
The Group manages its balance sheet having regard to the currency exposures arising from its assets being denominated in a wide range of currencies. To this end, where foreign currency assets are funded by borrowing, such borrowing is generally sourced in the currency of the related assets. The Group also hedges a portion of its currency exposure through the use of currency swaps and forward contracts. At December 31, 2002, the Group had entered into €156 million (2001: €33 million) currency equivalent of forward contracts and €93 million equivalent of options contracts in respect of its day to day trading.
Outstanding currency swap agreements at December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:
Successor
|
---|
Currency Swapped (Millions)
| | Currency Received (Millions)
| | Maturity date
| | Interest rate paid
| | Interest rate received
|
---|
USD 195 | | EUR 200 | | 2007 | | Euribor + 318 | | Libor + 300 |
USD 247 | | EUR 210 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 462 | | 6.8238 |
USD 136 | | EUR 101 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 81 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 35 | | EUR 25 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 708 | | 7.55 |
USD 113 | | SEK 749 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 597 | | 7.55 |
USD 5 | | SEK 33 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 110 | | Libor + 93 |
Outstanding currency swap agreements at December 31 2001 are summarized as follows:
Predecessor
|
---|
Currency Swapped (Millions)
| | Currency Received (Millions)
| | Maturity date
| | Interest rate paid
| | Interest rate received
|
---|
USD 232 | | EUR 172 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 54/59 | | 6.8238 |
USD 50 | | EUR 37 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 106 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 15 | | EUR 11 | | 2005 | | 7.595 | | 6.8238 |
USD 85 | | EUR 63 | | 2005 | | 8.04 / 8.05 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 113 | | SEK 749 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 133/4 | | 7.55 |
USD 5 | | SEK 33 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 110 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 35 | | EUR 25 | | 2005 | | 8.015 | | 7.55 |
USD 39 | | EUR 34 | | 2003 | | 6.216 | | 5.95 |
USD 30 | | GBP 20 | | 2003 | | Libor | | 5.835 |
At December 31, 2002 the Group had also entered into currency swaps of €291 million equivalent (2001: €332 million) and forward contracts of €3 million equivalent as part of its short term liquidity management.
Excluding the Group's Latin American operations, there were no significant transactional currency exposures at December 31, 2002, that gave rise to net currency gains and losses recognized in the income statement. Such exposures comprise the monetary assets and liabilities of the Group that are not denominated in the operating (or "functional') currency of the operating unit involved. As at December 31, 2002, transactional currency exposures in the Group's Latin American operations amounted to €3 million (2001: €19 million).
F-36
(c) Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the material financial instruments of the Group are as follows:
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Cash, short term deposits and liquid investments | | 184,331 | | 184,331 | | 440,109 | | 440,109 | |
Accounts receivable and prepayments | | 998,934 | | 998,934 | | 1,054,973 | | 1,054,973 | |
Publicly traded investments | | 6,926 | | 7,028 | | 6,726 | | 6,987 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
Short term debt | | 162,154 | | 162,154 | | 250,988 | | 250,988 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 1,097,429 | | 1,097,429 | | 1,162,364 | | 1,162,364 | |
Medium and long term debt | | 3,134,436 | | 3,123,381 | | 1,302,687 | | 1,313,269 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swap agreements | | | | (1,105 | ) | | | 26,426 | |
Currency swap agreements | | | | 77,269 | | | | 223,866 | |
Foreign exchange contracts | | | | 22,080 | | | | (255 | ) |
Energy hedging contracts | | | | 7,069 | | | | (1,274 | ) |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Group in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash, short term deposits and liquid investments, debtors and creditors:
The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Listed investments:
These are valued based on quoted prices.
Short term debt and medium and long term debt:
The fair value of the Group's debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Group's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements and maturities.
Interest rate swap agreements:
The fair value of the Group's interest rate swap agreements is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis. In addition the fair value amount includes the interest rate component of currency swaps.
F-37
Currency swap agreements and foreign exchange contracts:
The fair value of these instruments is based on the estimated replacement cost of equivalent instruments at the balance sheet date.
Gains and losses on instruments used for hedging are not recognized until the exposure that is being hedged is itself recognized. Unrecognized gains and losses on instruments used for hedging, and the movement thereon, are as follows:
| | Gains
| | Losses
| | Total net gains/(losses)
|
---|
| | € Million
| | € Million
| | € Million
|
---|
Unrecognized gains and losses on hedges at December 31, 2001 | | 47 | | 21 | | 26 |
Gains and losses arising in previous years that were recognized in 2002 | | 18 | | 9 | | 9 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Gains and losses arising before December 31, 2001 that were not recognized in 2002 | | 29 | | 12 | | 17 |
Gains and losses arising in 2002 that were not recognized in 2002 | | 32 | | 21 | | 11 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Unrecognized gains and losses on hedges at December 31, 2002 | | €61 | | €33 | | €28 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Of which: | | | | | | |
Gains and losses expected to be recognized in 2003 | | 31 | | 12 | | 19 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Gains and losses expected to be recognized in 2004 or later | | 30 | | 21 | | 9 |
| |
| |
| |
|
(d) Credit Risk
Potential concentrations of credit risk to the Group consist principally of cash deposits, short term investments and trade debtors. The Group only deposits cash surpluses with quality credit rated banks and institutions that meet certain criteria and by policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one bank or institution. Trade debtors comprise a large, widespread customer base. The Group mitigates the risk that counterparties to derivatives will fail to perform by contracting with major financial institutions having high credit ratings and considers the likelihood of counterparty failure to be remote. At December 31, 2002, the Group did not consider there to be any significant concentration of credit risk.
F-38
21 Provisions for Liabilities and Charges
Successor
| | Deferred Income Taxes
| | Retirement and Other Deferred Benefits
| | Other Deferred Provisions
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | 159,691 | | 166,222 | | 46,896 | | 372,809 | |
Charge to income | | 3,052 | | 8,541 | | (7,659 | ) | 3,934 | |
Paid in year | | — | | (4,277 | ) | (2,061 | ) | (6,338 | ) |
Transfer to affiliates | | — | | — | | 64 | | 64 | |
Reclassification | | (1,283 | ) | 21,408 | | (5,408 | ) | 14,717 | |
Currency adjustment | | (2,564 | ) | (3,900 | ) | (1,539 | ) | (8,003 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | €158,896 | | €187,994 | | €30,293 | | €377,183 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Deferred Income Taxes
| | Retirement and Other Deferred Benefits
| | Other Deferred Provisions
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | 66,533 | | 142,670 | | 20,253 | | 229,456 | |
Charge to income | | 3,264 | | 18,468 | | 4,755 | | 26,487 | |
Paid in year | | — | | (16,488 | ) | (5,564 | ) | (22,052 | ) |
Acquistions | | 9,643 | | 327 | | 9,228 | | 19,198 | |
Reclassification | | 6,090 | | (1,269 | ) | 6,219 | | 11,040 | |
Currency adjustment | | 229 | | (21 | ) | 242 | | 450 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | 85,759 | (1) | 143,687 | | 35,133 | | 264,579 | |
Charge to income | | (17,827 | ) | 17,282 | | 2,386 | | 1,841 | |
Paid in year | | — | | (14,867 | ) | (4,373 | ) | (19,240 | ) |
Acquisitions | | — | | 30 | | (5 | ) | 25 | |
Reclassification | | (365 | ) | 14,845 | | 1,913 | | 16,393 | |
Currency adjustment | | 853 | | 1,296 | | 974 | | 3,123 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | €68,420 | | €162,273 | | €36,028 | | €266,721 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
FRS 19 adoption | | 70,293 | | — | | — | | 70,293 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| �� |
December 31, 2001 restated | | €138,713 | | €162,273 | | €36,028 | | €337,014 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Charge to income as above | | | (17,827 | ) | 3,264 |
FRS 19 adoption | | | 8,106 | | 7,829 |
| |
| |
|
Restated deferred taxation charge as per Note 9 | | € | (9,721 | ) | €11,093 |
| |
| |
|
F-39
| |
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Successor
| |
---|
| | Restated 2001
| |
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Deferred income taxes arises as follows: | | | | | | | |
Accelerated capital allowances | | 108,527 | | 101,921 | | 72,710 | |
Other timing differences | | 50,369 | | 36,792 | | 13,049 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | €158,896 | | €138,713 | | €85,759 | (1) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year end December 31, 2000, the closing balance for deferred income taxes would have been adjusted by €62,187,000 to €147,946,000.
From January 1, 2002, we adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and the tax computation. FRS 19 applies to accounting periods ending on or after January 23, 2002. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment.
The retirement and other deferred benefits mainly relate to pensions and similar arrangements and are substantially unfunded, which is in accordance with local custom in certain countries in which the Group operates. The benefits are based on employees' years of service and average final remuneration and are computed on an actuarial basis (see Note 25).
The Group also provides certain Post Retirement Healthcare benefits to certain employees in the United States and Canada. Provisions are accrued over the expected working lifetime of the relevant existing employees. Included in retirement and other deferred benefits at December 31, 2002 is €22,316,000 in respect of such obligations.
22 Contingent Liabilities
The Group has guaranteed certain of the bank overdrafts and loans of subsidiaries. The Group or subsidiaries have given guarantees in respect of the borrowing of certain associates amounting to €2,762,000.
In addition to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, we are involved in certain civil and criminal proceedings in Spain arising out of a past acquisition. In November 1988, a subsidiary of JSG acquired Industrial Cartonera, S.A., or ICSA, a Spanish incorporated company, from a subsidiary of Torras Hostench S.A., or Torras. In early 1989, JSG acquired a 35% interest in another Spanish company called Industrias del Papel y de la Celulosa, S.A., or INPACSA, a former parent of ICSA. A number of individuals associated with Torras were charged by the public prosecutor in Madrid with diverting, for their own use, a substantial part of the purchase consideration paid by JSG for ICSA. The public prosecutor, on behalf of the minority shareholders of INPACSA, also claimed that certain transactions, including the transfer of ICSA by INPACSA which took place prior to JSG's acquisition of ICSA, caused damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA. In 1998, the public prosecutor also charged JSG's Chairman, Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, as the representative of JSG, in these proceedings with respect to the alleged damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA and Torras. A JSG subsidiary is also one of a number of parties against whom secondary civil liability has been claimed.
F-40
JSG and Smurfit International B.V. have each indemnified Dr. Smurfit against loss or liability due to such proceedings. Bonds have been posted with the Spanish court in the amount of €47 million, which equals the amount of alleged damages, excluding interest. The maximum estimated current total exposure relating to the liabilities, including interest through December 31, 2002, is approximately €118 million, for which no reserve has been taken and which amount will accrue interest until payment of any final judgment. Preliminary proceedings commenced in late March 2003 and trial is expected to begin in Madrid in late April 2003. We are defending these actions vigorously and believe there is no basis for the involvement of the Chairman or any JSG subsidiary in these proceedings. We cannot assure you, however, that the consequences of any adverse findings, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We are also the subject of litigation in the Dominican Republic arising from our acquisition in 1996 of a controlling interest in a small local corrugator owned by Industria Cartonera Dominicana. The lawsuits, alleging damages in excess of $300 million, are brought by a local competitor who is claiming loss of potential profits, as a consequence of our entry to the market. He is also alleging breach of contract. We believe these lawsuits are without merit and are defending them vigorously.
23 Lease Obligations
Obligations under finance leases (net of finance charges):
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Payable within one year | | 4,384 | | 5,564 |
Payable in one to two years | | 3,648 | | 2,948 |
Payable in two to three years | | 3,697 | | 2,408 |
Payable in three to four years | | 3,292 | | 1,908 |
Payable in four to five years | | 2,854 | | 7,476 |
Payable thereafter | | 4,712 | | 3,293 |
| |
| |
|
| | €22,587 | | €23,597 |
| |
| |
|
Commitments under operating leases, payable in the coming year, relate to leases expiring in the following periods:
| | Land and Buildings
| | Other
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Within one year | | 1,162 | | 6,107 | | 7,269 |
Within two to five years inclusive | | 808 | | 3,568 | | 4,376 |
Over five years | | 2,297 | | 794 | | 3,091 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | €4,267 | | €10,469 | | €14,736 |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-41
The total commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2002 are as follows:
| | 2002
|
---|
| | €000
|
---|
Payable within one year | | 14,736 |
Payable in one to two years | | 10,149 |
Payable in two to three years | | 11,201 |
Payable in three to four years | | 3,140 |
Payable in four to five years | | 2,582 |
Payable thereafter | | 12,336 |
| |
|
| | €54,144 |
| |
|
24 Capital Commitments
The following capital commitments authorized by the directors had not been provided for in the Group financial statements:
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Contracted for | | | 27,107 | | | 20,204 |
Not contracted for | | | 33,532 | | | 32,276 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 60,639 | | € | 52,480 |
| |
| |
|
25 Employee Pension Plans and Similar Obligations
Successor
The Group has pension plans for its employees in many of the countries in which it operates. The major occupational pension plans are of the defined benefit type. From the date of acquisition, the Group's pension plans are accounted for in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 17—'Retirement Benefits'. FRS 17 applies to all types of benefits that an employer provides after employees have completed their service, including pensions and other post retirement benefits. The pension cost for the Group's major occupational pension plans has been determined using the projected unit credit method. The current agreed rates of contribution for future years are comparable to current levels.
Periodic actuarial valuations are performed on all of the major plans, by independantly professionally qualified actuaries, as follows: Ireland between July 1, 2000 and January 1, 2002; United Kingdom beween January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002; United States and Canada on December 31, 2002.
The Group also operates plans in the US and Canada, which provide certain employees with post retirement health care benefits. Actuarial valuations of both these plans were performed as at December 31, 2002 using the projected unit credit method. The principal assumption made by the
F-42
actuaries was that the per capita weighted average assumed rate of increase in covered benefits was:—US: 12%, reducing by 1% per annum until 2009 and Canada: 10.6%, reducing to 4.8% over 7 years until December 2009. The effect of a 1% increase in the health care trend rate would not materially increase the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002.
The main financial assumptions used to calculate scheme liabilities under FRS 17 are set out below:
Major Assumptions
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Rate of increase in salaries | | 1.25–4.00 | | 3.35–4.00 | | 3.45–7.00 |
Rate of increase to pensions in payment | | Nil–2.75 | | Nil–2.00 | | Nil–3.45 |
Discount rate for scheme liabilities | | 5.00–6.00 | | 6.50–6.75 | | 6.75–10.50 |
Inflation | | 1.25–3.00 | | 2.00–2.25 | | 3.45–4.50 |
The expected long term rates of return on the assets of the significant plans at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Equities | | 5.00–8.50 | | 9.20–10.50 | | 7.75 |
Bonds | | 4.61–5.75 | | 5.30–5.50 | | 7.00 |
Other | | 5.00–6.35 | | 3.50–8.70 | | N/A |
The market values of the assets of the significant schemes at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Equities | | | 252,291 | | | 71,428 | | | 11,342 | | | 335,061 | |
Bonds | | | 196,362 | | | 34,171 | | | 3,021 | | | 233,554 | |
Other | | | 92,848 | | | 11,438 | | | 11,567 | | | 115,853 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total market value | | | 541,501 | | | 117,037 | | | 25,930 | | | 684,468 | |
Present value of scheme liabilities | | | 680,397 | | | 181,932 | | | 19,846 | | | 882,175 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Deficit)/surplus in the plans | | | (138,896 | ) | | (64,895 | ) | | 6,084 | | | (197,707 | ) |
Deferred tax asset/(liability) | | | 35,636 | | | 23,713 | | | (2,008 | ) | | 57,341 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net pension (liability)/asset | | € | (103,260 | ) | € | (41,182 | ) | € | 4,076 | | € | (140,366 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-43
The following table sets out the components of the defined benefit cost for the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002:
Analysis of the amount charged in arriving at operating income
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
Current service cost | | | 11,011 | |
Past service cost | | | 1,533 | |
Expected return on pension scheme assets | | | (19,048 | ) |
Interest cost on pension scheme liabilities | | | 29,823 | |
| |
| |
Net loss | | € | 23,319 | |
| |
| |
The FRS 17 pension charge for the period of €23,319,000, has been included in arriving at operating income in order to maintain comparability with predecessor which accounted for pensions under SSAP 24—'Accounting for Pension Costs'. If the charge was disclosed in accordance with FRS 17 €10,775,000 would be classified as other financial income and operating income would be increased by €10,775,000.
F-44
Analysis of the amount recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets | | | 7,218 | |
Net experience gains/(losses) on scheme liabilities | | | 27,515 | |
Changes in financial assumptions underlying the scheme liabilities | | | (22,226 | ) |
| |
| |
Actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | € | 12,507 | |
| |
| |
Movement in deficit in the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002
| | €000
| |
---|
Deficit in scheme at acquisition date—September 3, 2002 | | | 210,214 | |
Movement in period: | | | | |
Current service cost | | | 11,011 | |
Past service cost | | | 1,533 | |
Contributions | | | (22,772 | ) |
Other finance income | | | 10,775 | |
Actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | | (12,507 | ) |
Currency | | | (547 | ) |
| |
| |
Deficit in scheme at December 31, 2002 | | € | 197,707 | |
| |
| |
History of amounts recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses
| | 2002
| |
---|
Difference between actual and expected return on pension scheme assets | | | | |
Amount | | € | 7,218,000 | |
Percentage of scheme assets | | | 1 | % |
Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities | | | | |
Amount | | € | 27,515,000 | |
Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | | | 3 | % |
Total actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | | | |
Amount | | € | 12,507,000 | |
Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | | | 1 | % |
In certain countries, in accordance with local practice, plans are financed internally and the provisions relating to such cases are included in pensions and other deferred compensation in accordance with the advice of independant actuaries. At December 31, 2002, these amounted to €169,330,000.
Predecessor
Prior to acquisition, the pension cost for JSG's major occupational pension plans had been determined in accordance with the advice of actuaries, mainly using the projected unit credit or attained age methods. Periodic actuarial valuations had been performed on all of the major plans. The most recent valuations were completed as follows: Ireland between July 1, 2000 and January 1, 2002; United Kingdom between January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002; U.S. and Canada on December 31, 2001.
F-45
The principal assumptions used in the calculation of the profit and loss expense under SSAP 24 of €43,285,000 for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 (year ended December 31, 2001: €62,507,000) was that the projected annual rate of investment return will exceed the projected annual rate of increase in pensionable earnings by between 2% to 4%. Under SSAP 24, surpluses or deficits on the pension plans arising from the actuarial valuations are spread over the expected weighted average service lives of the members of the relevant plan. The actuarial reports are available for inspection by the members of the relevant schemes only.
At December 31, 2001, the market value of the assets of the significant plans of €671,300,000 was in aggregate sufficient to cover approximately 92.1% of the benefits that had accrued to members after allowing for expected future increases in wages and salaries. The market value of the assets of the principal funds, as at December 31, 2001, are set out below.
Actuarial valuations of the post retirement health care benefit plans in the U.S. and Canada were performed as at December 31, 2001 using the projected unit credit method. The principal assumption made by the actuaries was that the per capita weighted average assumed rate of increase in covered benefits was:—US: 12%, reducing by 1% per annum until 2009 and Canada: 9.6%, reducing to 3.8% over 7 years until December 2008. The effect of a 1% increase in the health care trend rate would not materially increase the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation as at December 31, 2001.
In certain countries, in accordance with local practice, plans are financed internally and in such cases provisions are included in provisions for liabilities and charges in accordance with the advice of independent actuaries. At December 31, 2001 these amount to €162,273,000 (2000: €143,687,000).
The December 31, 2001 FRS 17 disclosures are set out below:
Major Assumptions
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Rate of increase in salaries | | 2.50–4.00 | | 3.00–4.00 | | 1.00–3.50 |
Rate of increase to pensions in payment | | Nil–2.50 | | Nil | | Nil |
Discount rate for scheme liabilities | | 5.75–6.50 | | 6.50–7.25 | | 5.50–7.00 |
Inflation | | 2.50–3.00 | | 2.75 | | 2.75–6.00 |
The expected long term rates of return on the assets of the significant plans at December 31, 2001 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Equities | | 8.00–8.50 | | 9.50 | | 10.00 |
Bonds | | 5.00–5.75 | | 6.25 | | 6.00 |
Other | | 4.00–7.00 | | 3.50–8.20 | | 4.75 |
F-46
The market values of the assets of the significant schemes at December 31, 2001 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Equities | | | 334,500 | | | 92,333 | | | 15,626 | | | 442,459 | |
Bonds | | | 192,824 | | | 40,672 | | | 13,893 | | | 247,389 | |
Other | | | 65,476 | | | 9,127 | | | 629 | | | 75,232 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total market value | | | 592,800 | | | 142,132 | | | 30,148 | | | 765,080 | |
Present value of scheme liabilities | | | 605,106 | | | 173,283 | | | 24,611 | | | 803,000 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Deficit)/surplus in the plans | | | (12,306 | ) | | (31,151 | ) | | 5,537 | | | (37,920 | ) |
Deferred tax asset/(liability) | | | 6,989 | | | 11,041 | | | (1,827 | ) | | 16,203 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net pension (liability)/asset | | € | (5,317 | ) | € | (20,110 | ) | € | 3,710 | | € | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
If FRS 17 had been adopted in the financial statements, JSG's shareholders' equity and retained earnings at December 31, 2001 would have been as follows:
| | Restated €000
| |
---|
Group shareholders' equity excluding net pension asset | | | 2,525,191 | |
Net pension (liability) | | | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
Group shareholders' equity | | € | 2,503,474 | |
| |
| |
Retained earnings excluding net pension asset | | | 1,781,996 | |
Net pension reserve | | | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
Retained earnings | | € | 1,760,279 | |
| |
| |
26 Related Party Transactions
Transactions with associates
We conduct certain transactions with associates in the normal course of business. A significant level of predecessor's transactions were conducted with SSCC.
The transactions with associates for each period are summarized as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Sale of goods | | 17,225 | | 67,403 | | 102,069 | | 84,023 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Purchase of goods | | 18,517 | | 179,986 | | 280,911 | | 279,616 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Receiving of services | | 1,573 | | 2,854 | | 668 | | 915 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Rendering of services | | 727 | | 1,445 | | 2,023 | | 1,905 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-47
Transactions with related parties
During the period, a number of transactions took place to transfer non operating and non core businesses and other assets and liabilities to the newcos, in exchange for promissory notes. The notes will generally not bear interest and will be subject to a subordination agreement pursuant to which no enforcement action may be taken, and no payment may be made, prior to the maturity or repayment of the €125 million credit facility. The notes are repayable from the proceeds of future assets sales and by repayment of intercompany balances due from MDCP Acquisitions Limited, the ultimate controlling party.
| | Successor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
|
---|
| | €000
|
---|
Transfer of businesses | | 104,892 |
| |
|
Transfer of tangible assets | | 17,500 |
| |
|
Transfer of financial assets | | 76,728 |
| |
|
Transfer of cash proceeds from business disposals | | 14,891 |
| |
|
Transfer of other assets | | 28,444 |
| |
|
27 Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Operating income | | | 122,960 | | | 192,890 | | | 333,909 | | | 341,580 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | — | | | 13,751 | | | — | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | (2,799 | ) | | 2,799 | | | 1,175 | | | — | |
Depreciation charge (net of government grants amortized) | | | 80,760 | | | 164,942 | | | 227,061 | | | 219,530 | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 10,090 | | | 5,794 | | | 8,820 | | | 5,734 | |
Finance lease interest paid | | | 605 | | | 1,151 | | | 1,728 | | | 2,454 | |
Decrease/(increase) in other payables and provisions | | | 4,993 | | | 5,510 | | | (1,814 | ) | | 4,213 | |
Decrease/(increase) in working capital (Note 28) | | | 35,975 | | | (13,060 | ) | | 3,830 | | | (85,705 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 8,339 | | | (3,512 | ) | | (3,518 | ) | | (5,508 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 260,923 | | € | 356,514 | | € | 584,942 | | € | 482,298 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-48
28 Movement in Working Capital
Successor
| | Inventories
| | Receivables
| | Payables*
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 508,433 | | | 1,140,679 | | | (1,113,171 | ) | | 535,941 | |
Disposed | | | (3,360 | ) | | (12,341 | ) | | 18,152 | | | 2,451 | |
Decrease in working capital | | | (23,064 | ) | | (76,401 | ) | | 63,490 | | | (35,975 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (11,802 | ) | | (35,756 | ) | | 13,243 | | | (34,315 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 470,207 | | € | 1,016,181 | | € | (1,018,286 | ) | € | 468,102 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Inventories
| | Receivables
| | Payables*
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 2001 | | | 423,510 | | | 1,084,612 | | | (1,002,516 | ) | | 505,606 | |
Acquisitions | | | 88,205 | | | 127,264 | | | (112,494 | ) | | 102,975 | |
Disposed | | | (6,572 | ) | | (13,436 | ) | | 19,940 | | | (68 | ) |
Increase in working capital | | | 21,542 | | | (26,184 | ) | | 17,702 | | | 13,060 | |
Currency adjustment | | | (18,252 | ) | | (31,577 | ) | | (35,803 | ) | | (85,632 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
September 2, 2002 | | € | 508,433 | | € | 1,140,679 | | € | (1,113,171 | ) | € | 535,941 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- *
- Amounts falling due within one year not including borrowing due within one year, corporation tax, dividends proposed and capitalized lease obligations.
29 Equity Dividends Paid
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002 €000
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002 €000
| | 2001 €000
| | 2000 €000
|
---|
Dividends to Group shareholders | | € | 255 | | € | 50,662 | | € | 76,570 | | € | 70,007 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
30 Retirement of Fixed Assets
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Property, plant and equipment | | | (401 | ) | | 786 | | | 26,589 | | | 23,550 |
Investments | | | 1,914 | | | 131 | | | 7,609 | | | 7,084 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,513 | | € | 917 | | € | 34,198 | | € | 30,634 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-49
31 Reconciliation of Net Cash Flow to Movement in Net Debt
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
(Decrease)/increase in cash | | | (18,538 | ) | | 12,302 | | | (8,918 | ) | | 24,957 | |
(Increase)/decrease in term debt | | | (1,699,908 | ) | | (42,651 | ) | | 120,636 | | | 11,029 | |
Increase/(decrease) in liquid resources | | | 10,521 | | | (239,468 | ) | | 2,970 | | | (23,074 | ) |
Capital elements of finance leases repaid | | | 2,031 | | | 4,945 | | | 9,407 | | | 10,380 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Change in net debt resulting from cash flows | | | (1,705,894 | ) | | (264,872 | ) | | 124,095 | | | 23,292 | |
New finance leases | | | — | | | — | | | (7,537 | ) | | (713 | ) |
Loans and finance leases acquired with subsidiaries | | | (1,432,276 | ) | | (124,709 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | (22,383 | ) |
Other non cash movements | | | (34,875 | ) | | 3,731 | | | (1,994 | ) | | (571 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 38,199 | | | 90,737 | | | (54,517 | ) | | (55,277 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Movement in net debt | | | (3,134,846 | ) | | (295,113 | ) | | 55,047 | | | (55,652 | ) |
Net debt at beginning of period | | | — | | | (1,137,163 | ) | | (1,192,210 | ) | | (1,136,558 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt at end of period | | € | (3,134,846 | ) | € | (1,432,276 | ) | € | (1,137,163 | ) | € | (1,192,210 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
32 Analysis of Net Debt
Successor
| | September 3 2002
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | — | | | (14,484 | ) | | 86,143 | | | — | | | (2,435 | ) | | 69,224 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | — | | | 10,521 | | | 106,791 | | | (367 | ) | | (1,838 | ) | | 115,107 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | — | | | (3,963 | ) | | 192,934 | | | (367 | ) | | (4,273 | ) | | 184,331 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | — | | | (4,054 | ) | | (57,820 | ) | | — | | | 10,496 | | | (51,378 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | — | | | 51,257 | | | (116,416 | ) | | (34,508 | ) | | (11,109 | ) | | (110,776 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | — | | | 47,203 | | | (174,236 | ) | | (34,508 | ) | | (613 | ) | | (162,154 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | — | | | (1,751,165 | ) | | (1,426,333 | ) | | — | | | 43,062 | | | (3,134,436 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | — | | | (1,707,925 | ) | | (1,407,635 | ) | | (34,875 | ) | | 38,176 | | | (3,112,259 | ) |
Finance leases | | — | | | 2,031 | | | (24,641 | ) | | — | | | 23 | | | (22,587 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | — | | € | (1,705,894 | ) | € | (1,432,276 | ) | € | (34,875 | ) | € | 38,199 | | € | (3,134,846 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-50
Predecessor
| | December 2001
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | September 2 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 87,756 | | | 961 | | | — | | | — | | | (2,574 | ) | | 86,143 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 352,353 | | | (239,468 | ) | | — | | | (1,041 | ) | | (5,053 | ) | | 106,791 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 440,109 | | | (238,507 | ) | | — | | | (1,041 | ) | | (7,627 | ) | | 192,934 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (76,419 | ) | | 11,341 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,258 | | | (57,820 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (174,569 | ) | | 24,994 | | | — | | | 4,772 | | | 28,387 | | | (116,416 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (250,988 | ) | | 36,335 | | | — | | | 4,772 | | | 35,645 | | | (174,236 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,302,687 | ) | | (67,645 | ) | | (118,477 | ) | | — | | | 62,476 | | | (1,426,333 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,113,566 | ) | | (269,817 | ) | | (118,477 | ) | | 3,731 | | | 90,494 | | | (1,407,635 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (23,597 | ) | | 4,945 | | | (6,232 | ) | | — | | | 243 | | | (24,641 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,137,163 | ) | € | (264,872 | ) | € | (124,709 | ) | € | 3,731 | | € | 90,737 | | € | (1,432,276 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-51
| | December 2000
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 79,932 | | | 6,131 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,693 | | | 87,756 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 347,160 | | | 2,970 | | | — | | | (410 | ) | | 2,633 | | | 352,353 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 427,092 | | | 9,101 | | | — | | | (410 | ) | | 4,326 | | | 440,109 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (57,580 | ) | | (15,049 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (3,790 | ) | | (76,419 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (305,006 | ) | | 162,612 | | | — | | | (1,584 | ) | | (30,591 | ) | | (174,569 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (362,586 | ) | | 147,563 | | | — | | | (1,584 | ) | | (34,381 | ) | | (250,988 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,231,744 | ) | | (41,976 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | — | | | (23,967 | ) | | (1,302,687 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,167,238 | ) | | 114,688 | | | (5,000 | ) | | (1,994 | ) | | (54,022 | ) | | (1,113,566 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (24,972 | ) | | 9,407 | | | — | | | (7,537 | ) | | (495 | ) | | (23,597 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,192,210 | ) | € | 124,095 | | € | (5,000 | ) | € | (9,531 | ) | € | (54,517 | ) | € | (1,137,163 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | December 1999
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 83,654 | | | (5,881 | ) | | — | | | — | | | 2,159 | | | 79,932 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 373,754 | | | (23,074 | ) | | — | | | (3,303 | ) | | (217 | ) | | 347,160 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 457,408 | | | (28,955 | ) | | — | | | (3,303 | ) | | 1,942 | | | 427,092 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (87,713 | ) | | 30,838 | | | — | | | — | | | (705 | ) | | (57,580 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (322,716 | ) | | 48,505 | | | — | | | 2,732 | | | (33,527 | ) | | (305,006 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (410,429 | ) | | 79,343 | | | — | | | 2,732 | | | (34,232 | ) | | (362,586 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,145,527 | ) | | (37,476 | ) | | (18,458 | ) | | — | | | (30,283 | ) | | (1,231,744 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,098,548 | ) | | 12,912 | | | (18,458 | ) | | (571 | ) | | (62,573 | ) | | (1,167,238 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (38,010 | ) | | 10,380 | | | (3,925 | ) | | (713 | ) | | 7,296 | | | (24,972 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,136,558 | ) | € | 23,292 | | € | (22,383 | ) | € | (1,284 | ) | € | (55,277 | ) | € | (1,192,210 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash comprises cash in hand and overnight deposits. The movement in liquid resources represents movement in all monetary assets (excluding cash, short term deposits and overnight borrowing) which are convertible into cash at, or close to, their carrying value in the balance sheet. These specifically comprise government gilts, commercial paper and deposits, with maturities of less than one year when
F-52
acquired. They are categorized as held-to-maturity because the Group has both the intent and the ability to hold these investments until maturity.
33 Acquisitions and Disposals
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net assets acquired (see below) | | | 936,624 | | | 319,630 | | | (4,042 | ) | | 92,197 | |
Reclassification from associates | | | — | | | (90,045 | ) | | — | | | (8,735 | ) |
Goodwill | | | 1,558,994 | | | 59,240 | | | 19,573 | | | 53,976 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 2,495,618 | | € | 288,825 | | € | 15,531 | | € | 137,438 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Satisfied by: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash payments | | | 2,495,618 | | | 288,825 | | | 15,531 | | | 137,438 | |
Cash acquired | | | — | | | (12,853 | ) | | (1,834 | ) | | (815 | ) |
Bank overdrafts acquired | | | — | | | 44,668 | | | — | | | 22,148 | |
Deferred acquisition consideration | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (54,773 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash outflows | | € | 2,495,618 | | € | 320,640 | | € | 13,697 | | € | 103,998 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Summary of net assets acquired:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net assets acquired: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,347,566 | | | 417,383 | | | 3,410 | | | 109,603 | |
| Investments | | | 232,507 | | | 2,030 | | | — | | | 131 | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Inventories | | | 508,433 | | | 88,205 | | | 254 | | | 19,271 | |
| Accounts receivable and prepayments | | | 1,140,679 | | | 127,264 | | | 1,066 | | | 46,337 | |
| Cash and investments held as current assets | | | 192,934 | | | 12,853 | | | 1,834 | | | (3,692 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | | 4,422,119 | | | 647,735 | | | 6,564 | | | 171,650 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (1,376,856 | ) | | (164,241 | ) | | (1,468 | ) | | (82,120 | ) |
Long term debt and other payables | | | (1,459,696 | ) | | (124,519 | ) | | (22,441 | ) | | (18,546 | ) |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | (520,301 | ) | | (39,241 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (19,198 | ) |
Fair value adjustment | | | 25,326 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Minority interests | | | (153,968 | ) | | (104 | ) | | 13,328 | | | 40,411 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net assets acquired at fair value to the Group | | € | 936,624 | | € | 319,630 | | € | (4,042 | ) | € | 92,197 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-53
In certain cases, in determining the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and the consideration, estimates are used. Any necessary adjustments are made in subsequent accounting periods.
Successor above represents the acquisition of JSG by MDCP Acquisitions I, effective September 3, 2002. The fair value exercise has not yet been completed.
The principal acquisitions made by Predecessor were as follows:—
In March 2002, the Group acquired the remaining 67% share in Munksjö AB for a consideration of approximately €274 million.
In December 2000, the Group acquired the remaining shares in Nettingsdorfer of Austria taking its shareholding from 75% to 100%. The consideration was approximately €55 million and is payable in July 2003.
In July 2000, the Group acquired Neopac A/S of Denmark from Svenska Cellulosa AB (SCA) of Sweden for a consideration of €30 million including acquired debt.
In February 2000, the Group acquired the remaining shares in Norwich Corrugated ("Norcor") taking its ownership from approximately 30% to 100%. The consideration was approximately €35 million.
34 Post Balance Sheet Events
On March 31, 2003, the Group completed the acquisition of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation's (SSCC's) European packaging assets. The Group completed the exchange of its 50% ownership of Smurfit MBI and consideration of approximately €185 million for SSCC's assets. Consideration for the transaction was financed by US$205 million of 9.625% senior notes due 2012 issued in February, 2003.
35 Parent Undertaking and Controlling Party
The immediate and ultimate controlling party and the parent undertaking of the smallest and largest group of which the company is a member, and for which group financial statements are prepared, is MDCP Acquisitions Ltd., a company incorporated in Ireland.
36 Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986
These financial statements do not comprise full accounts within the meaning of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986 of Ireland, in so far as such accounts have to comply in full with the disclosure and other requirements of the Act. Full accounts for predecessor for all years up to 2001 have received unqualified audit reports. Full accounts for predecessor for all periods up to and including December 31, 2001 have been filed with the Irish Registrar of Companies and full accounts for successor for the period to December 31, 2002 will be filed in due course.
F-54
37 Differences Between Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in Ireland and in the United States
The Group's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland ('Irish GAAP'), which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ('US GAAP'). The significant differences as they apply to the Group and the necessary adjustments are summarized below.
Goodwill
Irish GAAP, FRS 10, 'Goodwill and Intangible Assets,' requires goodwill to be capitalized as an intangible fixed asset and amortized in the statement of income over its estimated useful live. Under US GAAP, the Group adopted the accounting standard SFAS No. 142, 'Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets', which was published in June 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill will no longer be amortized, but will be tested for impairment on an annual basis and whenever indicators of impairment arise. The Group's identified indicators of impairment under SFAS No. 142 are the same as under SAB No. 100, 'Restructuring and Impairment Charges.' Goodwill will no longer be allocated to other long-lived assets for impairment testing in accordance with SFAS No. 121.
The goodwill impairment test, which is based on fair value, is to be performed on a reporting unit level using a two-step impairment test. A reporting unit is defined by SFAS No. 131 as an operating segment or one level lower. In the first step, the carrying value of the assets including goodwill and other intangibles less current liabilities of the reporting unit is compared with the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the long-term assets and net working capital exceeds their carrying value, goodwill is not deemed to be impaired and step two of the impairment test is not required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is lower than the carrying value of long-term assets and net working capital, step two needs to be performed to measure the amount of impairment. In step two, the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit needs to be determined, as if the reporting unit had been acquired on a stand-alone basis. The fair value of the reporting unit's assets and liabilities is compared with the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, no impairment charge is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, the difference needs to be recognized as impairment of goodwill in operating income.
The initial impairment test must be carried out on the date the new accounting rules are adopted. Impairment resulting from the transitional test must be recorded separately from operating results, as a 'cumulative effect arising from the adoption of new accounting principles.' JSG's transitional impairment test was performed as of January 1, 2002. The fair value of each reporting unit was determined based upon JSG's segment reporting. According to these calculations, the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value of their net assets. Therefore, the additional analysis was not required and there was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS No. 142.
The Group's annual impairment test will be performed during the fourth quarter of each year. The Group did not perform an annual impairment test as of December 31, 2002 as the purchase price allocation for the acquisition of JSG had not been completed by December 31, 2002. The Group has not identified any indicators of impairment as of December 31, 2002.
F-55
As required by SFAS No. 142 the following table identifies net income for the period from September 3, 2002, through December 31, 2002, the period ended September 2, 2002, and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, adjusted to exclude amortization of goodwill:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Reported net income under US GAAP | | | 10,267 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 |
SFAS No. 142 effect—Goodwill | | | — | | | — | | | 21,148 | | | 17,912 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Pro forma net income under US GAAP | | € | 10,267 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 173,069 | | € | 263,582 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Prior to January 1, 2002, under US GAAP, goodwill would be capitalized as an intangible fixed asset and amortized against income over its estimated economic life, not exceeding 40 years. Under Irish GAAP, prior to January 1, 1998, goodwill was immediately written off against shareholders equity. Predecessor did not reinstate goodwill previously written off to reserves, as this was not required under FRS 10. Consequently an adjustment was required under US GAAP to capitalize and amortize all goodwill previously written off to shareholders equity.
Revaluation
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention. Prior to January 1, 2000, the Group's policy was to periodically revalue certain properties. Under Irish GAAP, in accordance with the transitional arrangements in FRS 15, 'Tangible Fixed Assets', certain land and buildings continued to be included at their previously revalued amount. Under US GAAP, such revaluations would not be permitted and depreciation would be computed on the original historical cost. The effect of this difference on the charge for depreciation is not material.
Deferred taxation
Irish GAAP, FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in tax computations. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. This standard eliminates a number of the differences between accounting for deferred tax under Irish and US GAAP. However under SFAS 109—'Accounting for Income Taxes', deferred taxation would also be provided under US GAAP on the difference between the accounting and taxation bases of assets and liabilities of subsidiaries acquired. Deferred income taxes on the taxable US GAAP adjustments are included within the reconciliations.
From January 1, 2002, the Group adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax'. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and previously reported figures have been restated.
F-56
Pension costs
Under Irish GAAP, FRS 17—'Retirement Benefits' requires that scheme assets are valued at fair value and scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit method. Net scheme assets and liabilities, reduced by deferred tax amounts, are required to be shown on the face of the balance sheet as a pension surplus or deficit as appropriate. The Group has also adopted Urgent Issues Task Force abstract 35—'Death-in-service and incapacity benefits' ('UITF 35'). Under US GAAP the main differences with Irish GAAP arise in relation to the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and the treatment of death-in-service and incapacity benefits. Under US GAAP, net scheme assets and liabilities are required to be shown gross of deferred tax amounts.
Predecessor, under Irish GAAP, followed SSAP 24—'Accounting for Pension Costs', whereby the pension costs in respect of predecessor's defined benefit plans were assessed in accordance with the advice of independent actuaries using assumptions and methods which, taken as a whole, produced the actuaries' best estimates of the cost of providing the relevant pension benefits. For the purposes of the reconciliations of predecessor below, the provisions of SFAS 87—'Employers Accounting for Pensions' were adopted as of February 1, 1992 for the Group's principal plans. The Group did not implement SFAS 87 as of the effective date specified in the standard for foreign plans for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1988, due to the unavailability of actuarial data. A portion of the transitional asset at that date had been allocated to shareholders' equity based on a ratio of 3/15 being the number of years elapsed between the effective date in SFAS 87 over the remaining service lives at February 1, 1992 of employees expected to receive benefits.
Dividends
Under Irish GAAP, final dividends are provided for in the year in respect of which they are recommended by the board of directors for approval by the shareholders. Under US GAAP, dividends are provided for when declared.
Exceptional and extraordinary items
Under Irish GAAP, profits and losses associated with early debt extinguishment are included in income before taxation. For predecessor, these costs would have been treated as extraordinary items under US GAAP.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145—'Rescission of FASB Statements No.4, 44 and 62, Amendment of FASB No.13 and Technical Corrections'. SFAS 145 requires, in most cases, gains and losses on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations, rather than extraordinary items. The statement is effective for fiscal years after May 15, 2002.
Investment in SSCC
Prior to the acquisition of JSG on September 3, 2002, the Group's main investment in the US was in SSCC. At the time of the acquisition, JSG distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in SSCC. In the periods presented prior to the acquisition SSCC was an associate of which JSG owned between 33% and 29.3%. For the periods prior to the acquisition, Group
F-57
equity accounted for SSCC. For the periods after the acquisition, Group did not equity account for SSCC.
The reconciliation of net income below reflects the effects in each year presented of the differences between Irish GAAP and US GAAP of the Group's share of SSCC's results of operations. The reconciliation of shareholders' equity reflects the cumulative effects of the adjustments to income and the different basis of the Group's investment under US GAAP.
Hyper-inflationary economies
The Group accounts for the activities of its subsidiaries in Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, which have high rates of inflation, using the US dollar as the functional currency.
Under US GAAP for each of the periods presented, Mexico and Colombia would not be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Mexican Peso and Colombian Peso respectively would have been used as the functional currency. For the periods January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002, Venezuela would not be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Bolivar would have been used as the functional currency. For each of the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, Venezuela would be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Group's reporting currency, the euro, would be used as the functional currency rather than the US Dollar. The application of US GAAP has no material effect on the reported net income of these subsidiaries.
Stock based employee compensation expense
Predecessor operated variable option plans. As the options did not vest until certain targets were achieved, the number of shares which could be acquired by employees was not fully determinable until after the date of grant. In accordance with Urgent Issues Task Force abstract 17—'Employee Share Schemes' ('UITF 17'), under Irish GAAP predecessor's employee options did not result in charges against income except to the extent that the market value of the shares at the date of grant exceeded the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option.
Under US GAAP, following the measurement principles of APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ('APB 25'), compensation expense would be accrued and booked to income over the vesting period. The vesting period commences when it becomes probable that the underlying targets attaching to the options will be achieved and the number of shares will be known and ends with the date when the granting of the shares is not contingent upon the performance of additional services or other conditions. Compensation expense would be booked on a period by period basis to reflect the difference between the price an employee must pay to acquire the shares underlying the option and the market price of the shares at the end of each accounting period until the final vesting date.
SFAS 123—Accounting for Stock Based Compensation encourages, but does not require, compensation expense for employee stock options to be measured based on their fair value at the date of grant, determined using option valuation models. Successor and predecessor have elected to continue to account for stock based employee compensation in accordance with APB 25 and related interpretations and to provide the proforma information required by SFAS 123.
F-58
Treasury stock
A subsidiary of predecessor held 25,000,000 ordinary shares in JSG which cost €64,280,000. Under Irish GAAP, the cost of own shares is deducted from retained earnings. Under US GAAP, the cost of treasury stock that had not been retired would be separately disclosed in the balance sheet as a deduction from shareholders' equity.
Debt instruments issue costs
Under Irish GAAP debt issue costs are deducted from the proceeds of the relevant debt instruments. Under US GAAP such costs would be shown as deferred charges in the balance sheet. In both cases the amount of such costs are expensed at a constant rate of interest on the outstanding balance of the debt.
Accounting for associates
Irish GAAP requires separate disclosure of operating earnings, net interest, exceptional items and the taxation charge arising in associates. Under US GAAP earnings of associates, net of taxation would be shown as a single line item in arriving at net income.
Financial instruments
Under Irish GAAP all hedging instruments are matched with their underlying hedged item. Each instrument's gain or loss is brought into the, income statement and its fair value into the balance sheet at the same time as is the matched underlying asset, liability, income or cost.
Under FAS 133, all derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values. Changes in fair value are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders' equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 133, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the corresponding portions of the changes in the fair value of the hedged items, to the extent they are effective as hedges. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in net income.
The Group adopted SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, on January 1, 2001.
Impairment writedowns
Under Irish GAAP, impairment writedowns are included in accumulated depreciation. Under US GAAP they would be deducted from the cost of the assets identified as being impaired.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, 'Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets'. SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale consistent with the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121. While it supersedes
F-59
portions of APB Opinion 30, 'Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions', it retains the discontinued operations presentation, yet it broadens that presentation to include a component of an entity (rather than a segment of a business). However, discontinued operations are no longer recorded at net realizable value and future operating losses are no longer recognized before they occur. Under SFAS No. 144, it is no longer necessary to allocate goodwill to long-lived assets and then perform impairment testing. Furthermore, it has been stipulated that in situations where it is expected that certain flows of capital will be accumulated in areas subject to impairment testing, these can be calculated on the basis of a probability-weighted cash flow estimate. SFAS No. 144 also establishes criteria for determining when an asset should be treated as held for sale.
SFAS No. 144 was effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Accordingly, the Group adopted SFAS No. 144 as of January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Restructuring and integration costs
The rules for recognizing restructuring and integration costs in the statement of income are generally consistent between Irish and US GAAP. However, under Irish GAAP, on the acquisition of a business, costs in connection with restructuring would not be recorded in purchase accounting but would be expensed as incurred post acquisition. Under US GAAP, a purchase accounting liability would be recorded and goodwill would be increased.
Purchase price allocation
Under Irish GAAP the entire excess purchase price is allocated to goodwill. Under US GAAP, the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired would first be allocated to identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values, with the remainder being allocated to goodwill.
Leveraged buyout transactions
Under US GAAP, because of the application of the EITF issue 88-16, 'Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions', only partial purchase accounting applied to the acquisition. The approximate 8% rollover investment by senior management shareholders would be valued at their predecessor basis in JSG as opposed to the inherent new basis in successor. The primary effect of that adjustment would be to reduce goodwill and shareholders equity.
Composition of Issuer Group
As part of the JSG acquisition, certain assets were transferred to newcos, wholly owned subsidiaries of the parent. The newcos borrowed €125 million which was lent to parent to fund a €125 million capital contribution to issuer. Under US GAAP, the newcos would be consolidated in issuer's financial statements, causing debt of issuer to increase and equity of issuer to decrease. Even though issuer under US GAAP would consolidate the newcos, issuer has no repayment obligations relating to the newco debt, which is recourse only to the assets of the newcos.
F-60
The following is a summary of the significant adjustments to income and shareholders' equity which would be required if US GAAP were to be applied instead of Irish GAAP:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income reported in the consolidated statement of income | | | 1,854 | | | 95,422 | | | 150,417 | | | 225,932 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill amortization | | | 10,087 | | | 5,801 | | | (12,328 | ) | | (12,177 | ) |
| Cumulative goodwill amortization on businesses disposed | | | — | | | 183 | | | — | | | — | |
| Retirement benefits | | | 1,738 | | | 7,403 | | | 8,546 | | | 10,812 | |
| Share of earnings of associates—SSCC | | | — | | | 17,116 | | | 7,668 | | | (907 | ) |
| Deferred taxation | | | 773 | | | (15,717 | ) | | (4,570 | ) | | 14,882 | |
| Stock compensation expense | | | — | | | (17,699 | ) | | (5,277 | ) | | 7,128 | |
| Financial instruments—fair value | | | 61 | | | 3,464 | | | 12,522 | | | — | |
| Cumulative effect on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (5,057 | ) | | — | |
| Consolidation of companies sold to affiliates | | | (4,246 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 8,413 | | | 551 | | | 1,504 | | | 19,738 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 10,267 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 151,921 | | € | 245,670 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Arising from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | 10,267 | | | 98,544 | | | 158,971 | | | 241,709 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | | 10,267 | | | 98,544 | | | 158,971 | | | 241,709 | |
Extraordinary items (net of tax: September 2, 2002: €1,715,000; 2001: €1,329,000; 2000: (€280,000)) | | | — | | | (2,571 | ) | | (1,993 | ) | | 3,961 | |
Cumulative effect on prior year of change in accounting policy—adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (5,057 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 10,267 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 151,921 | | € | 245,670 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-61
Comprehensive Income
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | | 10,267 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial instruments—fair value | | | (4,534 | ) | | 12,202 | | | 4,138 | | | — | |
Cumulative effect on prior years adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (3,361 | ) | | — | |
Unrealised foreign currency translation adjustments | | | 16,900 | | | (193,666 | ) | | 28,906 | | | 31,323 | |
Net actuarial gain recognized in retirement benefit schemes | | | 3,773 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net minimum pension liability adjustment | | | — | | | (151,605 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Share of associates other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment | | | — | | | — | | | (33,174 | ) | | — | |
Deferred hedge loss | | | — | | | 1,605 | | | (3,613 | ) | | — | |
Unrealised losses and foreign currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | 2,889 | | | (1,642 | ) | | (2,552 | ) |
Net loss reclassified into earnings | | | — | | | 2,247 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive income | | € | 26,406 | | € | (230,355 | ) | € | 143,175 | | € | 274,441 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-62
Shareholders' equity
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Shareholders' equity as reported in the consolidated balance sheet | | | 878,099 | | | 2,525,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Goodwill—Gross | | | 59,846 | | | 493,119 | |
Aggregate amortization | | | 9,953 | | | (95,609 | ) |
Hyper-inflationary economies—property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | 17,519 | | | (392,192 | ) |
Aggregate depreciation | | | (7,372 | ) | | 193,042 | |
Hyper-inflationary economies—investments | | | 37 | | | (12,128 | ) |
Property revaluations | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | — | | | (10,579 | ) |
Aggregate depreciation | | | — | | | 2,611 | |
Retirement benefits | | | (16,146 | ) | | 67,270 | |
Proposed dividends | | | — | | | 50,575 | |
Investment in SSCC | | | — | | | (131,861 | ) |
Deferred taxation | | | (65,785 | ) | | (40,019 | ) |
Financial instruments—fair value | | | 19,435 | | | 16,660 | |
Cumulative effect on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | (8,418 | ) |
Minority share of US GAAP adjustments | | | (662 | ) | | 28,185 | |
Consolidate newcos | | | (125,000 | ) | | — | |
Rollover investment by JSG management | | | (77,084 | ) | | — | |
Shareholders' equity of companies sold to affiliates | | | (1,155 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | (186,414 | ) | | 160,656 | |
| |
| �� |
| |
Shareholders' equity as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 691,685 | | € | 2,685,847 | |
| |
| |
| |
F-63
Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income Amounts
Successor
| | Currency Translation Adjustments
| | Financial Instruments Gains/(losses)
| | Share of Associates Other Comprehensive Income
| | Net Actuarial Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Retirement Benefit Schemes
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
September 3, 2002 | | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — |
Movement from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 | | | 16,900 | | | (4,534 | ) | — | | | 3,773 | | | 16,139 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | € | 16,900 | | € | (4,534 | ) | — | | € | 3,773 | | € | 16,139 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Predecessor
| | Restated Currency Translation Adjustments
| | Financial Instruments Gains/(losses)
| | Share of Associates Other Comprehensive Income
| | Net Actuarial Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Retirement Benefit Schemes
| | Restated Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | | (2,793 | ) | | — | | | (1,596 | ) | — | | | (4,389 | ) |
Movement in the year | | | 31,323 | | | — | | | (2,552 | ) | — | | | 28,771 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | | 28,530 | | | — | | | (4,148 | ) | — | | | 24,382 | |
Cumulative effect of on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | (3,361 | ) | | — | | — | | | (3,361 | ) |
Movement in the year | | | 28,906 | | | 4,138 | | | (38,429 | ) | — | | | (5,385 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 | | € | 57,436 | | € | 777 | | € | (42,577 | ) | — | | € | 15,636 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash Flows
The consolidated statement of cash flows prepared under Irish GAAP presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP by SFAS 95—Statement of Cash Flows. This standard differs, however, with regard to the classification of items within the statements and as regards the definition of cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, cash would not include bank overdrafts. The movements on such bank overdrafts are required to be included in financing activities under SFAS 95. Under US GAAP only short term investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition are included in cash equivalents. Under Irish GAAP movements in short term investments are classified as management of liquid resources. Under Irish GAAP, cash flows are presented separately for operating activities, dividends received from associates, returns on investments and servicing of finance, taxation, capital expenditure and financial investment, acquisitions and disposals, equity dividends paid, management of liquid resources and financing. US GAAP, however, requires only three categories of cash flow activity to be reported: operating, investing and financing.
F-64
Cash flows from taxation and returns on investments and servicing of finance shown under Irish GAAP would be included as operating activities under US GAAP. Cash flows from capital expenditure, financial investment and aquisitions and disposals would be included as investing activities under US GAAP. The payment of dividends would be included as a financing activity under US GAAP. Under US GAAP, capitalized interest is treated as part of the cost of the asset to which it relates and is thus included as part of investing cash flows; under Irish GAAP all interest is treated as part of returns on investments and servicing of finance.
The categories of cash flow activity under US GAAP are summarized as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash inflow from operating activities | | | 173,234 | | | 206,485 | | | 396,295 | | | 334,163 | |
Cash (outflow) on investing activities | | | (2,596,026 | ) | | (211,558 | ) | | (252,341 | ) | | (97,651 | ) |
Cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities | | | 2,429,931 | | | (26,723 | ) | | (208,137 | ) | | (137,725 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Decrease/(increase) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,139 | | | (31,796 | ) | | (64,183 | ) | | 98,787 | |
Currency adjustment on cash and cash equivalents | | | (4,273 | ) | | (7,627 | ) | | 4,326 | | | 1,942 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 170,063 | | | 209,486 | | | 269,343 | | | 168,614 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | € | 172,929 | | € | 170,063 | | € | 209,486 | | € | 269,343 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-65
Deferred taxation—additional information required by SFAS 109
The analysis of the US GAAP deferred taxation liability required by SFAS 109 is as follows:
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor 2002
| | Predecessor 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Deferred taxation liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Excess of book value over tax value of fixed assets | | | 214,334 | | | 189,868 | |
Other timing differences | | | 85,447 | | | 92,766 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 299,781 | | | 282,634 | |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred taxation assets: | | | | | | | |
Net operating loss carry forwards | | | (53,387 | ) | | (71,546 | ) |
Valuation allowances | | | 36,234 | | | 54,829 | |
Retirement benefits | | | (61,047) | (1) | | — | |
Other timing differences | | | (54,241 | ) | | (87,185 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | | (132,441 | ) | | (103,902 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 167,340 | | € | 178,732 | |
| |
| |
| |
Split as follows: | | | | | | | |
Current | | | (9,894 | ) | | (256 | ) |
Non current | | | 177,234 | | | 178,988 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 167,340 | | € | 178,732 | |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Retirement benefits includes €57,341,000 in relation to deferred tax which has been recorded within 'Pension liabilities' (note 25).
Valuation allowances are set up for losses carried forward in those jurisdictions in which it is more likely than not that the losses carried forward will not be utilized to offset future taxable income or in which there is no deferred tax liability against which the related asset can be offset prior to expiry.
Share option schemes—additional information required by SFAS 123
Under the Group's 1987 Option Schemes, the 1999 Executive Share Option Plan and the 2000 United Kingdom Executive Approved Share Option Plan (the 'Schemes'), selected employees of the Company and its subsidiaries were granted non-qualified options to acquire ordinary shares of the Company. The share options were exercisable at a price equal to the market price, as defined, of the Company's ordinary shares at the time of grant. The options became exercisable upon the occurrence of certain trigger events, as defined, within 10 years from the date of grant. The options were to expire not later than 10 years from the date of grant.
The Group elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its share options because the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS 123 requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee share options. SFAS 123 requires pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share. This information has been
F-66
determined as if the Group had accounted for those employee share options issued subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that statement. Due to the recognition of option expense over the vesting period, the pro forma net income and earnings per share information required by SFAS 123 is not likely to be representative of the effects on the reported pro forma net income and earnings per share for future years. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
Predecessor | | | | | |
Expected option life (years) | | 5 | | 5 | |
Risk-free weighted average interest rate | | 4.4 | % | 5.3 | % |
Stock volatility | | 50.0 | % | 44.6 | % |
Dividend yield | | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | % |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected share price volatility. Because the Group's employees share options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee share options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period (see 'Stock based employee compensation expense' above for a description of the vesting period).
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002 €000
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002 €000
| | Restated 2001 €000
| | Restated 2000 €000
| |
---|
Net income attributable to common shareholders under US GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 10,267 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 | |
Add: Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects | | | — | | | 21,540 | | | 11,437 | | | 760 | |
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | | | — | | | (15,076 | ) | | (7,531 | ) | | (5,099 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Pro forma | | € | 10,267 | | € | 102,437 | | € | 155,827 | | € | 241,331 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The Group's 1999 Performance Share Plan allowed participating executives to receive annual allocations that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation
F-67
was made to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of not less than four years.
Under the Special Long Term Incentive Plans adopted in 2000, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, President & Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer each received an allocation that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation was made to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of three years.
During 2000, the Company introduced save as you earn share option schemes for eligible employees in both Ireland (the "Irish SAYE Scheme") and the UK (the "UK SAYE Scheme"). Under these schemes, employees could opt to save fixed amounts on a regular basis, over a three-year, five-year or seven-year period, subject to a maximum monthly saving of €320 (Irish SAYE Scheme) or Stg£250 (UK SAYE Scheme). The participants could use the amounts saved plus interest earned to acquire shares under options granted by the Company at the start of the savings period.
A summary of the Company's share options and related activity is as follows:
| | Shares under option
| | Restated Option Price Range
| | Restated Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
---|
Outstanding at December 31, 1999 | | 43,721,895 | | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.83 |
Granted | | 24,769,624 | | € | 0.00–€2.60 | | € | 1.34 |
Exercised | | (1,106,668 | ) | € | 1.25–€2.34 | | € | 1.30 |
Cancelled | | (3,564,623 | ) | € | 0.00–€2.60 | | € | 1.77 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 | | 63,820,228 | | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.66 |
Granted | | 17,342,570 | | € | 0.00–€2.21 | | € | 1.68 |
Exercised | | (1,092,779 | ) | € | 1.25–€2.29 | | € | 1.86 |
Cancelled | | (3,985,311 | ) | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.96 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 | | 76,084,708 | | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.64 |
Exercised | | (55,601,020 | ) | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.63 |
Cancelled | | (20,483,688 | ) | € | 0.00–€2.62 | | € | 1.66 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at September 2, 2002 | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
|
No options were granted in 2002.
The number of options exercisable at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was 7,722,892 and 4,759,600 respectively and the weighted average exercise price of these options was €1.94 and €1.91.
No options were outstanding at September 2, 2002.
Successor had no options outstanding at December 31, 2002.
F-68
Pension costs and termination indemnities—information required by SFAS 87 and SFAS 132
The components of the Group defined benefit net pension expense and termination indemnities for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 under SFAS 87 are estimated to be as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Service cost | | | 9,433 | | | 17,085 | | | 25,531 | | | 26,646 | |
Interest cost | | | 19,509 | | | 36,548 | | | 49,351 | | | 47,537 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (15,455 | ) | | (37,950 | ) | | (55,525 | ) | | (50,822 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation or asset | | | (84 | ) | | (674 | ) | | (1,047 | ) | | (1,084 | ) |
Recognized gains and losses | | | (2,053 | ) | | (308 | ) | | (563 | ) | | (2,374 | ) |
Prior service cost recognized | | | 1,226 | | | 607 | | | 879 | | | 662 | |
Gain due to settlement or curtailment | | | 64 | | | 516 | | | 3,934 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 12,640 | | € | 15,824 | | € | 22,560 | | € | 20,565 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-69
The Group's principal defined benefit schemes are in Ireland, the UK, the US and Canada. The estimated fund status of these schemes under SFAS 87 amended by SFAS 132 was as follows:
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of period | | | 885,688 | | | 725,004 | |
Service cost | | | 8,708 | | | 24,313 | |
Interest cost | | | 17,248 | | | 44,496 | |
Contributions by plan participants | | | 4,070 | | | 7,873 | |
Actuarial gains and losses | | | 6,419 | | | 20,141 | |
Benefits paid | | | (11,487 | ) | | (36,530 | ) |
Divestitures, curtailments or settlements | | | (344 | ) | | 3,891 | |
Plan amendments | | | 1,216 | | | 1,827 | |
Currency adjustments | | | (27,837 | ) | | 11,108 | |
| |
| |
| |
Benefit obligation at end of period | | | 883,681 | | | 802,123 | |
| |
| |
| |
Change in plan assets | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | | | 637,767 | | | 754,164 | |
Actual return on assets | | | 8,100 | | | (33,750 | ) |
Contributions by employer | | | 14,410 | | | 31,863 | |
Contributions by plan participants | | | 4,978 | | | 7,874 | |
Benefits paid | | | (11,757 | ) | | (36,400 | ) |
Divestitures | | | 5 | | | (43 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (9,181 | ) | | 10,540 | |
| |
| |
| |
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | | | 644,322 | | | 734,248 | |
| |
| |
| |
Funded status of the plans | | | (239,359 | ) | | (67,875 | ) |
Amounts available to be applied as an increase/(reduction) of future pension costs: | | | | | | | |
Unamortized prior service cost | | | — | | | 12,871 | |
Unrecognized transition net obligation or net asset | | | — | | | (2,796 | ) |
Unrecognized actuarial gains or losses | | | (2,832 | ) | | 114,718 | |
| |
| |
| |
(Accrued)/prepaid pension costs | | € | (242,191 | ) | € | 56,918 | |
| |
| |
| |
Plan assets in excess of / (less than) projected benefit obligations include overfunded plans at December 31, 2002 of nil (2001: €14,970,000) and underfunded plans at December 31, 2002 of €239,359,000 (2001: €82,845,000). The calculation of the US GAAP pension expense for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the projected benefit obligation at that date assumed a discount rate of approximately 5.9% (2001: 6.9%). The other main assumption was that the rate of increase in the compensation levels is expected to average 3.6% (2001: 4.2%; 2000: 3.8%) and that the long term return on plan assets is expected to average 7.1% (2001: 8.3%; 2000: 7.4%).
F-70
The assets of the plans are invested primarily in equities, fixed interest securities, insurance contracts and property.
The Group operates termination indemnity plans in certain countries as appropriate to local circumstances. In accordance with local practice, these are financed internally and the projected benefit obligations of these plans are provided for in the financial statements. The projected benefit obligations of these plans was €34,837,000 at December 31, 2002 (2001: €40,852,000). The calculation of the expense for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the projected benefit obligation at those dates assumed a weighted average discount rate of approximately 6.9% (2001: 10.9%). The other main assumptions used are the same as those used for the purposes of Irish GAAP. These include the assumption that the rate of increase in compensation levels is expected to average 2.7% (2001: 6.2%).
38 New Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, 'Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations'. SFAS No. 143 requires companies to record an appropriate charge in connection with the retirement or disposal of property and equipment in the period in which this took place, provided that the fair value can be reasonably determined. The costs incurred in the retirement or disposal of assets are netted against the carrying amount of the long-lived assets. Companies will calculate the changes over time in the amount of the anticipated expenses to be incurred for the retirement or disposal of an asset by discounting the amount calculated at the beginning of the period. The interest rate used in the calculation of this change corresponds to the risk-adjusted rate to be fixed in accordance with the company's credit rating the first time the expenses are recognized. The carrying amount of the related property and equipment increases by the amount calculated, which is then written down over the objects' remaining useful lives and recorded as operating expenses in the income statement. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Group believes that adopting SFAS No. 143 will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2002, the FASB published SFAS No. 146, 'Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities'. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes the preliminary provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, 'Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)'. This statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity must be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, the liability for an exit cost was recognized as the date of an entity's commitment to a concrete exit or disposal plan. The new standard holds that a company's commitment to a plan does not represent a direct obligation to another party that would be defined as a liability. SFAS 146 therefore rescinds the definitions and requirements for the accounting of exit costs contained in Issue 94-3 until a liability is actually incurred and stipulates that the amount of the liability be initially measured at the current fair value. However, this standard does not apply to expenses arising in connection with the retirement of activities in divisions acquired by way of a combination or covered by SFAS 144. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 146 to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results, operations or cash flows.
F-71
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ('FIN 45'), 'Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.' FIN 45 requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken by it in issuing the guarantee. It also expands the disclosure requirements in the financial statements of the guarantor with respect to its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. The Group is required to adopt the initial recognition and initial measurement accounting provisions of this interpretation on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Group does not anticipate the adoption to have a material effect on the Group's financial position or results, operations or cash flows.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, 'Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure', was issued. SFAS No. 148 supplements SFAS No. 123, 'Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation', and offers alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting of stock-based employee compensation recommended in SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148 also supplements the disclosure obligations contained in SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28 'Interim Financial Reporting'. The transition and disclosure obligations contained in SFAS 148 apply to fiscal years after December 15, 2002; earlier application is also permitted.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretations No. 46 ('FIN 46'), 'Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.' This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, 'Consolidated Financial Statements,' to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective February 1, 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and July 31, 2003 for variable interest entities created prior to February 1, 2003. The Group does not anticipate that the adoption of FIN 46 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
39 Comparative Figures
Certain figures for the prior years have been adjusted to conform with 2002 classifications and disclosure requirements.
F-72
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors
MDCP Acquisitions I
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MDCP Acquisitions I (successor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from June 14, 2002 to December 31, 2002. We have also audited the consolidated balance sheet of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the eight month and two day period ended September 2, 2002, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Irish auditing standards and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MDCP Acquisitions I (successor company) and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from June 14, 2002 to December 31, 2002, and the consolidated financial position of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the eight month and two day period ended September 2, 2002, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland which differ in certain respects from those followed in the United States (see Note 37 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (predecessor company) and subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for Deferred Taxation.
Ernst & Young
Dublin, Ireland.
April 8, 2003
F-73
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statement of Income
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Note
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net Sales | | 3 | | | 1,575,575 | | | 3,134,080 | | | 4,511,650 | | | 4,565,244 | |
| Cost of Sales | | | | | 1,153,184 | | | 2,272,287 | | | 3,243,372 | | | 3,336,671 | |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | — | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Gross profit | | | | | 422,391 | | | 861,793 | | | 1,241,636 | | | 1,228,573 | |
Net operating expenses | | 4 | | | 288,110 | | | 656,419 | | | 883,964 | | | 866,103 | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | 5 | | | 11,978 | | | 12,484 | | | 23,763 | | | 20,890 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Operating income subsidiaries—continuing | | | | | 122,303 | | | 192,890 | | | 333,909 | | | 341,580 | |
Share of associates' operating income | | | | | 7,224 | | | 117,473 | | | 242,212 | | | 403,934 | |
Share of associates' restructuring costs | | 5 | | | — | | | (7,541 | ) | | (10,895 | ) | | (24,894 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total operating income | | | | | 129,527 | | | 302,822 | | | 565,226 | | | 720,620 | |
Income on sale of operations subsidiaries—continuing | | 5 | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | |
Share of associates income on sale of operations | | 5 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,105 | |
Interest income | | | | | 5,230 | | | 10,286 | | | 23,053 | | | 20,511 | |
Interest expense | | 7 | | | (91,790 | ) | | (65,881 | ) | | (108,621 | ) | | (120,370 | ) |
Share of associates' net interest | | | | | (386 | ) | | (74,387 | ) | | (154,654 | ) | | (181,567 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before taxes and equity minority interests | | 8 | | | 42,581 | | | 193,280 | | | 325,004 | | | 442,299 | |
Taxes on income | | 9 | | | (31,395 | ) | | (77,889 | ) | | (137,565 | ) | | (185,551 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income before equity minority interests | | | | | 11,186 | | | 115,391 | | | 187,439 | | | 256,748 | |
Equity minority interests | | | | | (9,061 | ) | | (19,969 | ) | | (37,022 | ) | | (30,816 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income available to ordinary shareholders(1) | | | | € | 2,125 | | € | 95,422 | | € | 150,417 | | € | 225,932 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- A summary of the significant adjustments to net income which would be required if accounting principles generally accepted in the United States had been applied instead of those generally accepted in Ireland is given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-74
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and Losses
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Income for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | (1,894 | ) | | 84,060 | | | 125,841 | | | 124,997 |
| Associates | | | 4,019 | | | 11,362 | | | 24,576 | | | 100,935 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 2,125 | | | 95,422 | | | 150,417 | | | 225,932 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Translation adjustments on foreign currency net investments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | 7,444 | | | (144,099 | ) | | 60,638 | | | 68,928 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Actuarial gain recognized in retirement benefit schemes | | | 4,407 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total recognized gains and losses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Group | | | 9,957 | | | (60,039 | ) | | 186,479 | | | 193,925 |
| Associates | | | 4,019 | | | 11,362 | | | 24,576 | | | 100,935 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 13,976 | | € | (48,677 | ) | € | 211,055 | | € | 294,860 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Note of Historical Cost Profits and Losses
The results disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Income are not materially different to the results based on an unmodified historical cost basis.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-75
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Balance Sheet
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Note
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
|
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | 11 | | | 184,255 | | | 440,109 |
Accounts receivable and prepayments | | 12 | | | 1,016,181 | | | 1,084,612 |
Amounts due by affiliates | | | | | 4,412 | | | — |
Amounts due by affiliates after more than one year | | | | | 244,523 | | | — |
Inventories | | 13 | | | 470,207 | | | 423,510 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total current assets | | | | | 1,919,578 | | | 1,948,231 |
| | | |
| |
|
Fixed assets | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | 14 | | | 165,243 | | | 1,674,802 |
Property, plant and equipment | | 15 | | | 2,214,254 | | | 2,088,019 |
Intangible assets | | 16 | | | 1,543,531 | | | 156,517 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total fixed assets | | | | | 3,923,028 | | | 3,919,338 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total assets | | | | € | 5,842,606 | | € | 5,867,569 |
| | | |
| |
|
Liabilities, minority interests and shareholders' equity | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Bank loans, overdrafts and other borrowing | | 20 | | | 130,963 | | | 250,988 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 17 | | | 1,097,429 | | | 1,162,364 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total current liabilities | | | | | 1,228,392 | | | 1,413,352 |
Non current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Long term debt and other long term liabilities | | 19 | | | 1,921,885 | | | 1,404,432 |
Amounts due to affiliates | | | | | 1,143,811 | | | — |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | 21 | | | 377,183 | | | 337,014 |
Pension liabilities | | 25 | | | 140,366 | | | — |
Capital grants deferred | | | | | 12,043 | | | 12,290 |
Minority interests (equity interests) | | | | | 147,950 | | | 175,290 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total liabilities and minority interests | | | | | 4,971,630 | | | 3,342,378 |
| | | |
| |
|
Shareholders' equity(1) | | | | | | | | |
Share capital | | | | | 40 | | | 332,917 |
Share premium | | | | | — | | | 102,022 |
Other reserves | | | | | 864,404 | | | 308,256 |
Retained earnings | | | | | 6,532 | | | 1,781,996 |
| | | |
| |
|
Shareholders' equity | | | | | 870,976 | | | 2,525,191 |
| | | |
| |
|
Total liabilities, minority interests and shareholders' equity | | | | € | 5,842,606 | | € | 5,867,569 |
| | | |
| |
|
- (1)
- A summary of the significant adjustments to shareholders' equity which would be required if accounting principles generally accepted in the United States had been applied instead of those generally accepted in Ireland is given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-76
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Successor
Purchaser was incorporated on June 14, 2002, with an authorized share capital of 100,000 shares of €1 each, of which 40,000 were issued.
Predecessor
| | Number of ordinary shares
| | Ordinary shares of 30c each
| | Total share capital
|
---|
| | 000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Authorized | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2000 and 2001 | | 1,401,214 | | € | 420,364 | | € | 420,364 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Allotted, called up and fully paid | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | 1,107,525 | | | 332,258 | | | 332,258 |
Issued during the year | | 1,107 | | | 331 | | | 331 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | 1,108,632 | | | 332,589 | | | 332,589 |
Issued during the year | | 1,093 | | | 328 | | | 328 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2001 | | 1,109,725 | | € | 332,917 | | € | 332,917 |
| |
| |
| |
|
The options outstanding over ordinary shares at December 31, 2001 were 76,084,708 (2000: 63,820,228). During the year ended December 31, 2001, a total of 1,092,729 (2000: 1,106,668) ordinary shares with a nominal value of €328,000 were issued as a result of the exercise of options under the JSG share option schemes. The net proceeds arising from these issues, €2,011,000 (2000: €1,453,000) was used for normal business purposes.
The called up share capital of JSG included 25,000,000 shares (nominal value €7,500,000) held by a subsidiary which had not been cancelled. These shares did not rank for dividend as the related dividend entitlements had been waived.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-77
Successor
| | Share capital
| | Other reserves(1)
| | Retained earnings
| | Total shareholders' equity
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Shares issued | | | 40 | | | — | | | — | | | 40 |
Capital contribution | | | — | | | 856,960 | | | — | | | 856,960 |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | 2,125 | | | 2,125 |
Actuarial gain recognized in retirement benefit schemes | | | — | | | — | | | 4,407 | | | 4,407 |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | 7,444 | | | — | | | 7,444 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | € | 40 | | € | 864,404 | | € | 6,532 | | € | 870,976 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
- (1)
- Other reserves of €856,960,000 are comprised of investments by issuer by way of capital contributions.
Predecessor
| | Share capital
| | Premium in excess of par value(1)
| | Other reserves(1)
| | Retained earnings
| | Total shareholders' equity(2)
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | | 332,258 | | | 99,217 | | | 185,540 | | | 1,646,969 | | | 2,263,984 | |
Shares issued | | | 331 | | | 1,122 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,453 | |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 242,482 | | | 242,482 | |
Dividends on ordinary shares (note 10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (75,204 | ) | | (75,204 | ) |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | — | | | 72,460 | | | — | | | 72,460 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | | 332,589 | | | 100,339 | | | 258,000 | | | 1,814,247 | | | 2,505,175 | (3) |
Shares issued | | | 328 | | | 1,683 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,011 | |
Income available to ordinary shares | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 167,565 | | | 167,565 | |
Dividends on ordinary shares (note 10) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (79,021 | ) | | (79,021 | ) |
Currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | — | | | 64,386 | | | — | | | 64,386 | |
Goodwill on disposals | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,416 | | | 4,416 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | € | 332,917 | | € | 102,022 | | € | 322,386 | | € | 1,907,207 | | € | 2,664,532 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
FRS 19 adoption (note 21) | | | — | | | — | | | (14,130 | ) | | (125,211 | ) | | (139,341 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 restated | | | €332,917 | | € | 102,022 | | € | 308,256 | | € | 1,781,996 | | € | 2,525,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- The premium in excess of par value, revaluation reserve, capital conversion reserve fund, and capital redemption reserve fund and other reserves were not available for distribution.
- (2)
- Retained earnings and other reserves at December 31, 2001 included cumulative translation gains of €261,974,000 (2000: €197,588,000).
- (3)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year ended December 31, 2000, the closing balance for shareholders equity would have been adjusted by €118,445,000 to €2,386,730,000.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-78
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash Flows
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| |
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Note
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| |
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net cash flow from operating activities | | 27 | | | 260,266 | | | 356,514 | | | 584,942 | | | 482,298 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Dividends received from associates | | | | | 1,552 | | | 4,060 | | | 11,118 | | | 8,718 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Returns on investments and servicing of finance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest received | | | | | 5,597 | | | 11,328 | | | 23,463 | | | 23,814 | |
Interest paid | | | | | (57,052 | ) | | (70,654 | ) | | (107,037 | ) | | (123,105 | ) |
Interest paid on finance leases | | | | | (605 | ) | | (1,151 | ) | | (1,728 | ) | | (2,454 | ) |
Dividends paid to minority interests | | | | | (5,259 | ) | | (8,222 | ) | | (18,584 | ) | | (16,924 | ) |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | | | (129,819 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (187,138 | ) | | (68,699 | ) | | (103,886 | ) | | (118,669 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Irish corporation tax paid | | | | | (315 | ) | | (9,625 | ) | | (7,786 | ) | | (13,482 | ) |
Overseas tax paid | | | | | (35,708 | ) | | (83,986 | ) | | (106,676 | ) | | (41,625 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (36,023 | ) | | (93,611 | ) | | (114,462 | ) | | (55,107 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Capital expenditure and financial investment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of tangible fixed assets | | | | | (91,139 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (177,213 | ) | | (147,629 | ) |
Less new finance leases | | | | | — | | | — | | | 7,537 | | | 713 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (91,139 | ) | | (119,620 | ) | | (169,676 | ) | | (146,916 | ) |
Capital grants received | | | | | 919 | | | 2,460 | | | 5,154 | | | 2,963 | |
Purchase of other investments | | | | | (1,600 | ) | | (4,963 | ) | | (6,303 | ) | | (3,008 | ) |
Retirement of fixed assets | | 30 | | | 1,513 | | | 917 | | | 34,198 | | | 30,634 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (90,307 | ) | | (121,206 | ) | | (136,627 | ) | | (116,327 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Acquisitions and disposals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of subsidiaries and minorities | | 33 | | | (2,495,618 | ) | | (320,640 | ) | | (13,697 | ) | | (103,998 | ) |
Business disposals | | | | | — | | | 25,207 | | | 4,406 | | | 2,650 | |
Advances to affiliates | | | | | (14,890 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Investments in and advances to associates | | | | | (6,311 | ) | | (1,631 | ) | | (33,140 | ) | | (7,719 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | (2,516,819 | ) | | (297,064 | ) | | (42,431 | ) | | (109,067 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Equity dividends paid | | 29 | | | (255 | ) | | (50,662 | ) | | (76,570 | ) | | (70,007 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash (outflow)/inflow before use of liquid resources and financing | | | | | (2,568,724 | ) | | (270,668 | ) | | 122,084 | | | 21,839 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Management of liquid resources | | | | | (10,445 | ) | | 239,468 | | | (2,970 | ) | | 23,074 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Financing | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issues of shares including minorities | | | | | 862,619 | | | 5,796 | | | 2,011 | | | 1,453 | |
Increase/(decrease) in term debt | | 31 | | | 560,115 | | | 42,651 | | | (120,636 | ) | | (11,029 | ) |
Advances (to)/from parent | | | | | 1,139,928 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Capital elements of finance leases repaid | | | | | (2,031 | ) | | (4,945 | ) | | (9,407 | ) | | (10,380 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | 2,560,631 | | | 43,502 | | | (128,032 | ) | | (19,956 | ) |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Decrease)/increase in cash | | | | € | (18,538 | ) | € | 12,302 | | € | (8,918 | ) | € | 24,957 | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The significant differences between the cash flow statement prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and that prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland are given in Note 37.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part
of these Financial Statements.
F-79
MDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1 Basis of preparation
MDCP Acquisitions I (purchaser) was incorporated under Irish law on June 14, 2002 as an unlimited public company having a share capital. MDP Acquisitions plc (issuer) was incorporated under Irish law on June 12, 2002 as a public limited company. Purchaser is a wholly owned subsidiary of issuer. Purchaser acts as guarantor under the terms of the indentures relating to the issues of Senior Notes of issuer.
On July 5, 2002, purchaser commenced a public tender offer for all of the issued and to be issued share capital of Jefferson Smurfit Group plc (JSG or predecessor). On September 3, 2002, purchaser declared this offer unconditional in all respects. Purchaser subsequently acquired all of the ordinary shares, completing the acquisition in October 2002.
At the time the offer was declared unconditional, JSG distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation ('SSCC'). In connection with the acquisition, certain non-operating assets and non-core operating assets of JSG were or will be transferred to newly formed, wholly owned subsidiaries of MDCP Acquisitions Ltd. (parent), which are collectively referred to as the 'newcos', in exchange for intercompany notes. On October 2, 2002, the newcos borrowed €125 million under a bank credit facility, which is non-recourse to purchaser and issuer. The newcos then loaned the proceeds to parent, and parent used them to make a capital contribution to issuer. Issuer in turn made a capital contribution to purchaser.
In these financial statements, the term the "Group" is used to refer to purchaser and its subsidiaries for periods subsequent to the acquisition, and predecessor and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the acquisition.
The acquisition of predecessor by purchaser has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements using the acquisition method of accounting.
These financial statements have been prepared to show the performance of:
- •
- purchaser and its subsidiaries for the period from June 14 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2002 and
- •
- predecessor for the period from January 1 to September 2, 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.
Prior to the acquisition on September 3, 2002, purchaser did not trade. Accordingly, purchaser's consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the period from June 14, 2002 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2002 reflect the results of operations of the Group for the period from September 3 to December 31, 2002.
2 Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of accounting:
The financial statements are prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Ireland (Irish GAAP). They are prepared and presented in euro (€). In preparing these financial statements, certain items have been included in order to comply with accounting presentation and disclosure requirements applicable in the United States in respect of foreign registrants. An explanation of the significant differences between Irish and US GAAP as they apply to the Group and a reconciliation to US GAAP are set out in Note 37. The financial statements do not constitute full accounts as defined by the Companies (Amendment) Act 1986.
F-80
(b) Group consolidation:
The financial statements comprise a consolidation of the financial statements of purchaser or predecessor and their respective subsidiaries. Associates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
Where accounting policies followed by subsidiaries and associates differ significantly from those adopted for the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, appropriate adjustments are made in order to achieve a consistent basis of accounting. The results of subsidiaries acquired or sold are consolidated and the Group's share of the results of associates are included for the periods from their effective date of acquisition or to their effective date of sale.
(c) Net sales and revenue recognition:
Net sales consist of sales to third parties after trade discounts and exclude sales taxes. Revenue is recognized at the time products are delivered or services rendered to external customers.
(d) Goodwill:
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of shares in subsidiaries over the fair value of their net assets acquired based on Group accounting policies. It is capitalized and amortized over a period of 40 years as the directors believe that the durability of the business can be demonstrated and the value of goodwill is capable of being continually reassessed. The carrying value of goodwill is subject to an impairment review at the end of the first full year following the year of acquisition and annually thereafter. This treatment differs in respect of goodwill arising on acquisitions made by predecessor prior to January 1, 1998, which was written off against reserves in the year of acquisition. In the event of a subsequent disposal any goodwill, previously charged directly against reserves, was written off in the income statement at the time of the related disposal.
(e) Depreciation:
Freehold and long leasehold land are not depreciated. Short leasehold land and buildings are depreciated over the remaining period of the lease, adjusted for estimated residual value. In the main, other tangible fixed assets are depreciated by equal annual installments over their estimated useful lives at the following rates:
Freehold and long leasehold buildings | | 1–5% | | Plant and machinery | | 3–33% |
Fixtures and fittings | | 10–25% | | Motor vehicles | | 20–25% |
(f) Timberlands:
The cost of acquiring, establishing and maintaining forestry plantations are classified as timberlands. Depletion of timberlands represents the charge to income relating to the timber extracted in the year.
(g) Leasing:
Assets acquired under finance leases are capitalized and included in tangible fixed assets and depreciated in accordance with Group depreciation policy. Payments under operating leases are expensed over the period of the lease.
F-81
(h) Inventory valuation:
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost includes direct costs plus applicable factory and other overheads. Net realizable value is the actual or estimated selling price less all applicable costs incurred or likely to be incurred in the realization of the selling price. Full provision is made for all damaged, deteriorated, obsolete and unusable materials.
(i) Debt instruments:
The finance costs of debt instruments, which is the difference between the net proceeds and the total amount payable under the instrument, are accounted for over the life of the instrument at a constant rate of interest on the outstanding balance. The proceeds of debt instruments, net of issue costs, are shown as liabilities on the balance sheet.
(j) Derivative instruments:
The Group uses forward currency contracts to reduce exposure to foreign exchange rates. The Group also uses interest rate swaps to adjust interest rate exposures. The Group considers its derivative instruments qualify for hedge accounting when certain criteria are met.
The criteria for forward foreign currency contracts are:
- •
- The instrument must be related to a foreign currency asset or liability that is probable and whose characteristics have been identified; and
- •
- It must reduce the risk of foreign currency exchange movements on our operations.
The rates under such contracts are used to record the hedged item. As a result, gains and losses are offset against the foreign exchange gains and losses on the related financial assets and liabilities, or where the instrument is used to hedge a committed, or probable, future transaction, are deferred until the transaction occurs.
The Group's criteria for interest rate swaps are:
- •
- The instrument must be related to an asset or a liability; and
- •
- It must change the character of the interest rate by converting a variable rate to a fixed rate or vice versa.
Interest differentials are recognized and included in interest payable or receivable as appropriate. Interest rate swaps are not revalued to fair value and are not shown on the Group balance sheet.
The Group enters currency swap agreements to reduce the impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations arising from unmatched foreign currency assets and liabilities. Related foreign currency assets and liabilities are accounted for in the currency of the underlying swap agreement and translated at the closing rate.
F-82
(k) Foreign Currencies:
Foreign currency transactions are translated at the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction or, if hedged forward, at the rate of exchange under the related forward currency contract. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the closing rate or, if hedged forward, at the rate of exchange under the related forward currency contract. The resulting profits or losses are dealt with in the statement of income.
The balance sheets of subsidiaries are translated using the closing rate method. The income and cash flow statements are translated at average rates ruling for the relevant period. Resulting currency differences, together with those arising on hedging activities, are dealt with in reserves. The transactions of operations in hyper-inflationary economies are reported using a relatively stable currency as the functional currency. The translation gains and losses arising are recognized in the income statement.
(l) Post Retirement Benefits:
From September 3, 2002 (the date of acquisition), purchaser has adopted FRS 17—'Retirement Benefits'. FRS 17 applies to all types of benefits that an employer provides after employees have completed their service, including pensions and other post retirement benefits. The expected increase in the present value of scheme liabilities arising from employee service in the current or prior periods is charged against operating income. The expected returns on the schemes assets and the increase during the period in the present value of the schemes liabilities arising from the passage of time are included in the statement of income. Differences between the expected and the actual return on plan assets, together with the effect of changes in the current or prior assumptions underlying the liabilities are recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses. Scheme assets are valued at fair value and scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit method. Net scheme assets and liabilities, reduced by deferred tax amounts, are recorded on the balance sheet as a pension surplus or deficit as appropriate.
Prior to September 3, 2002, pension costs were recognized in income on a systematic basis so that the cost of providing retirement benefits to employees was evenly matched to the service lives of the employees concerned. Any excess or deficiency of the actuarial value of assets over the actuarial value of liabilities was amortized over the average remaining service lives of the relevant, then current employees. Any surplus or deficit within a scheme was not recognized on the balance sheet. The cost of providing post retirement health care benefits to employees was recognized on an actuarial basis. The effect of the adoption of FRS 17 on reported income from the date of acquisition is not material.
(m) Deferred taxation:
Predecessor adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' effective from January 1, 2002. Under this standard full provision is made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in tax computations. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and reported figures for periods prior to January 1, 2002 have been restated.
(n) Research and development:
Research and development expenditure is written off as incurred.
F-83
(o) Use of estimates:
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
3 Segmental Analyses
The Group is an integrated paper and board manufacturer and converter. The Group has identified reportable segments primarily on a geographic basis. In Europe, the Group has two reportable segments: (1) Packaging and (2) Specialities. The Packaging segment is highly integrated. It includes a system of mills and plants that produces a full line of containerboard that is converted into corrugated containers. The primary products of the Specialities segment include décor base paper (from April 1, 2002), graphicboard and paper sacks. Additionally, there are central costs which represent corporate governance costs, including executive costs, and costs of the Group's legal, company secretarial, pension administration, tax, treasury and controlling functions and other administrative costs.
Set out below are segmental analyses of sales, income—before interest, exceptional items and taxes, total assets, long lived assets, net operating assets, capital expenditure, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and investments in equity method investees. The analysis of income includes the Group's share of the income before exceptional items, interest and taxes of associates. A geographical analysis of employees can be found in Note 6 and of income taxes in Note 9.
Sales—third party (external net sales)
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 849,820 | | | 1,686,198 | | | 2,523,264 | | | 2,549,732 |
Specialities | | | 347,952 | | | 520,197 | | | 489,061 | | | 498,922 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,197,772 | | | 2,206,395 | | | 3,012,325 | | | 3,048,654 |
United States and Canada | | | 153,339 | | | 403,086 | | | 665,726 | | | 733,486 |
Latin America | | | 224,464 | | | 524,599 | | | 833,599 | | | 783,104 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,575,575 | | € | 3,134,080 | | € | 4,511,650 | | € | 4,565,244 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-84
Sales—Group and third party
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 1,129,725 | | | 2,246,357 | | | 3,364,145 | | | 3,422,830 |
Specialities | | | 367,860 | | | 550,243 | | | 516,265 | | | 523,857 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,497,585 | | | 2,796,600 | | | 3,880,410 | | | 3,946,687 |
United States and Canada | | | 153,339 | | | 403,086 | | | 665,726 | | | 733,486 |
Latin America | | | 350,831 | | | 828,750 | | | 1,314,834 | | | 1,247,374 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 2,001,755 | | € | 4,028,436 | | € | 5,860,970 | | € | 5,927,547 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Income before interest, exceptional items and taxes.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Packaging | | | 86,128 | | | 125,947 | | | 261,464 | | | 233,722 | |
Specialities | | | 22,457 | | | 34,985 | | | 22,157 | | | 25,710 | |
Associates | | | 5,608 | | | 18,120 | | | 28,594 | | | 37,573 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Europe | | | 114,193 | | | 179,052 | | | 312,215 | | | 297,005 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Packaging | | | 19,939 | | | 15,141 | | | 16,864 | | | 43,179 | |
Associates | | | — | | | 92,408 | | | 207,582 | | | 361,753 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
United States and Canada | | | 19,939 | | | 107,549 | | | 224,446 | | | 404,932 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Packaging | | | 18,129 | | | 61,638 | | | 127,453 | | | 97,874 | |
Associates | | | 791 | | | 3,726 | | | 5,476 | | | 4,206 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Latin America | | | 18,920 | | | 65,364 | | | 132,929 | | | 102,080 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Asia (Associates) | | | 826 | | | 3,218 | | | 560 | | | 402 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated centre costs | | | (12,373 | ) | | (32,336 | ) | | (43,624 | ) | | (38,015 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 141,505 | | € | 322,847 | | € | 626,526 | | € | 766,404 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-85
Total assets
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 2,068,710 | | | 2,025,337 | | | 2,222,552 |
Specialities | | | 867,302 | | | 484,032 | | | 466,137 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 2,936,012 | | | 2,509,369 | | | 2,688,689 |
United States and Canada | | | 185,682 | | | 1,705,075 | | | 1,631,162 |
Latin America | | | 763,161 | | | 953,249 | | | 918,525 |
Asia | | | 28,006 | | | 24,419 | | | 776 |
Group Centre | | | 137,279 | | | 518,940 | | | 458,814 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 4,050,140 | | | 5,711,052 | | | 5,697,966 |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,531 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,935 | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 5,842,606 | | € | 5,867,569 | | € | 5,844,744 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Long lived assets
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 1,159,530 | | | 1,111,787 | | | 1,183,182 |
Specialities | | | 491,696 | | | 181,248 | | | 179,893 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 1,651,226 | | | 1,293,035 | | | 1,363,075 |
United States and Canada | | | 81,465 | | | 186,436 | | | 189,807 |
Latin America | | | 476,259 | | | 575,899 | | | 552,594 |
Group Centre | | | 5,304 | | | 32,649 | | | 33,351 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 2,214,254 | | | 2,088,019 | | | 2,138,827 |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,531 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 3,757,785 | | € | 2,244,536 | | € | 2,285,605 |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-86
Net operating assets
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Packaging | | | 1,446,584 | | | 1,353,470 | | | 1,463,609 | |
Specialities | | | 620,241 | | | 345,566 | | | 333,596 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Europe | | | 2,066,825 | | | 1,699,036 | | | 1,797,205 | |
United States and Canada | | | 137,104 | | | 1,614,448 | | | 1,515,758 | |
Latin America | | | 621,147 | | | 803,749 | | | 734,670 | |
Asia | | | 26,053 | | | 23,772 | | | 766 | |
Group Centre | | | (15,573 | ) | | 60,364 | | | 67,645 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 2,835,556 | | | 4,201,369 | | | 4,116,044 | |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,531 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,935 | | | — | | | — | |
Unallocated net liabilities | | | (3,757,046 | ) | | (1,832,695 | ) | | (1,876,092 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Group shareholders' equity | | € | 870,976 | | € | 2,525,191 | | € | 2,386,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
A reconciliation of net operating assets above to shareholders' equity is as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Per segmental analysis of operating assets | | | 2,835,556 | | | 4,201,369 | | | 4,116,044 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Consolidated goodwill | | | 1,543,531 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | 248,935 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated assets | | | 1,792,466 | | | 156,517 | | | 146,778 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,975,645 | ) | | (1,113,566 | ) | | (1,167,238 | ) |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | 125,255 | | | — | | | — | |
Intra-Group indebtedness | | | (1,143,811 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Corporation tax | | | (74,759 | ) | | (103,714 | ) | | (106,671 | ) |
Dividends proposed | | | — | | | (50,575 | ) | | (48,113 | ) |
Capital lease creditors | | | (22,587 | ) | | (23,597 | ) | | (24,972 | ) |
Deferred income | | | — | | | (28,939 | ) | | (32,827 | ) |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | (377,183 | ) | | (337,014 | ) | | (326,766 | ) |
Pension liabilities | | | (140,366 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Minority interests (equity interests) | | | (147,950 | ) | | (175,290 | ) | | (169,505 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unallocated net liabilities | | | (3,757,046 | ) | | (1,832,695 | ) | | (1,876,092 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Shareholders' equity | | € | 870,976 | | € | 2,525,191 | | € | 2,386,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-87
Total assets comprise fixed assets and current assets. Long lived assets comprise property, plant and equipment and capitalized goodwill. Net operating assets comprise total assets less total liabilities but excluding all assets and liabilities of a financing nature.
Capital expenditure
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 56,967 | | | 53,329 | | | 73,398 | | | 75,364 |
Specialities | | | 15,462 | | | 25,461 | | | 40,104 | | | 31,015 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 72,429 | | | 78,790 | | | 113,502 | | | 106,379 |
United States and Canada | | | 4,804 | | | 7,343 | | | 11,831 | | | 20,110 |
Latin America | | | 13,640 | | | 33,403 | | | 51,506 | | | 19,562 |
Group Centre | | | 266 | | | 84 | | | 374 | | | 1,578 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 91,139 | | € | 119,620 | | € | 177,213 | | € | 147,629 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Packaging | | | 48,171 | | | 99,748 | | | 143,039 | | | 143,681 |
Specialities | | | 15,503 | | | 24,039 | | | 20,129 | | | 19,346 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Europe | | | 63,674 | | | 123,787 | | | 163,168 | | | 163,027 |
United States and Canada | | | 3,077 | | | 10,213 | | | 17,510 | | | 17,508 |
Latin America | | | 15,546 | | | 32,158 | | | 48,224 | | | 41,274 |
Group Centre | | | 274 | | | 402 | | | 1,042 | | | 804 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Depreciation and depletion | | | 82,571 | | | 166,560 | | | 229,944 | | | 222,613 |
Goodwill amortization | | | 10,090 | | | 5,794 | | | 8,820 | | | 5,734 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 92,661 | | € | 172,354 | | € | 238,764 | | € | 228,347 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-88
Investments in equity method investees
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Europe | | | 79,199 | | | 167,054 | | | 155,140 |
United States and Canada | | | 6,450 | | | 1,388,146 | | | 1,299,570 |
Latin America | | | 38,441 | | | 40,661 | | | 33,647 |
Asia | | | 26,949 | | | 25,246 | | | 1,318 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 151,039 | | € | 1,621,107 | | € | 1,489,675 |
| |
| |
| |
|
4 Net Operating Expenses
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Distribution costs | | | 94,905 | | | 188,221 | | | 244,874 | | | 243,588 | |
Administrative expenses | | | 194,352 | | | 469,816 | | | 641,972 | | | 625,598 | |
Other operating income | | | (1,147 | ) | | (1,618 | ) | | (2,882 | ) | | (3,083 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 288,110 | | € | 656,419 | | € | 883,964 | | € | 866,103 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
5 Exceptional Items
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Group | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment impairment provision | | | — | | | — | | | (26,642 | ) | | — | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | (11,978 | ) | | (12,484 | ) | | (23,763 | ) | | (20,890 | ) |
Income on sale of operations | | | — | | | 20,440 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | (11,978 | ) | € | 7,956 | | € | (50,405 | ) | € | (20,890 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-89
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Associates | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Merger and restructuring costs | | — | | | (3,253 | ) | | (7,573 | ) | | (24,632 | ) |
Debt extinguishment costs | | — | | | (4,288 | ) | | (3,322 | ) | | (262 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | — | | € | (7,541 | ) | € | (10,895 | ) | € | (24,894 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income on sale of operations | | — | | | — | | | — | | € | 3,105 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Group
For the period January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 the Group has recorded costs of €12,484,000 representing reorganization and restructuring costs. The related tax relief of €1,891,000 is included in Taxes on income. In the same period the Group reported a gain of €20,440,000 in respect of the disposal of its US Printing and Voting equipment subsidiaries. The related tax charge of €4,300,000 is included in Taxes on income.
For the period September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 the Group has recorded costs of €11,978,000 representing reorganization and restructuring costs. The related tax relief of €1,930,000 is included in Taxes on income.
Associates
The merger and restructuring charges and debt extinguishment costs relate to SSCC. The related tax relief of €3,016,000 is included in Taxation—Share of associates.
6 Employees and Remuneration
The average number of persons employed by the Group by geographical area in the financial period was:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
Europe | | 19,842 | | 19,053 | | 17,061 | | 17,068 |
United States | | 2,620 | | 2,773 | | 3,031 | | 3,011 |
Latin America | | 6,871 | | 6,727 | | 6,659 | | 6,610 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | 29,333 | | 28,553 | | 26,751 | | 26,689 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Associates' employees | | 1,966 | | 43,533 | | 43,968 | | 44,667 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-90
The staff costs comprise:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Wages and salaries | | | 294,887 | | | 575,625 | | | 822,896 | | | 797,353 |
Social welfare | | | 57,894 | | | 106,281 | | | 142,138 | | | 138,465 |
Pensions | | | 24,686 | | | 43,285 | | | 62,507 | | | 67,033 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 377,467 | | € | 725,191 | | € | 1,027,541 | | € | 1,002,851 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Director's emoluments, including pension contributions for the period from September 3, 2002, through December 31, 2002 amounted to €3,323,000.
7 Interest Expense
Interest payable and similar charges:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
On bank loans and overdrafts | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| —repayable within 5 years, by installment | | | 9,513 | | | 8,376 | | | 10,990 | | | 9,115 |
| —repayable within 5 years, other than by installment | | | 9,350 | | | 10,239 | | | 22,949 | | | 24,557 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 18,863 | | | 18,615 | | | 33,939 | | | 33,672 |
Payable to affiliates | | | 31,672 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
On all other loans | | | 41,255 | | | 47,266 | | | 74,682 | | | 86,698 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 91,790 | | € | 65,881 | | € | 108,621 | | € | 120,370 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-91
8 Income Before Taxes
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Income before taxes is stated after charging: | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense | | 92,661 | | 172,353 | | 238,764 | | 228,348 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Auditors' remuneration (including expenses) | | 2,151 | | 1,448 | | 2,728 | | 2,630 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Operating lease rentals plant and machinery | | 2,200 | | 4,434 | | 11,506 | | 13,496 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Operating lease rentals other | | 1,910 | | 4,204 | | 4,973 | | 4,215 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Loss / (gain) on foreign currency borrowing less deposits | | 893 | | (2,813 | ) | 2,154 | | 1,469 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Research and development costs | | 1,486 | | 3,425 | | 5,240 | | 5,658 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Year 2000 and euro costs | | — | | — | | — | | 208 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
9 Taxation
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Current Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | 18,114 | | | 36,858 | | | 79,783 | | | 65,353 |
United States and Canada | | | 1,660 | | | 4,224 | | | 5,311 | | | 4,684 |
Latin America | | | 7,216 | | | 19,005 | | | 26,165 | | | 16,378 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 26,990 | | | 60,087 | | | 111,259 | | | 86,415 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Deferred Taxation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | 1,482 | | | 1,291 | | | (12,268 | ) | | 5,570 |
United States and Canada | | | 337 | | | 667 | | | 1,916 | | | 1,357 |
Latin America | | | 1,233 | | | (1,188 | ) | | 631 | | | 4,166 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 3,052 | | | 770 | | | (9,721 | ) | | 11,093 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Taxes on income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Holding Company and subsidiaries | | | 30,042 | | | 60,857 | | | 101,538 | | | 97,508 |
Share of associates | | | 1,353 | | | 17,032 | | | 36,027 | | | 88,043 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 31,395 | | € | 77,889 | | € | 137,565 | | € | 185,551 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Deferred taxation arises as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital allowances | | | 345 | | | 1,791 | | | (6,996 | ) | | 9,085 |
Other | | | 2,707 | | | (1,021 | ) | | (2,725 | ) | | 2,008 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 3,052 | | € | 770 | | € | (9,721 | ) | € | 11,093 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Current taxation represents corporation tax or its equivalent on the taxable income in each jurisdiction and unrelieved overseas tax on dividends. For the periods January 1 through September 2, 2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively unrelieved overseas tax on dividends
F-92
amounted to €488,827 and €108,686 (2001: €526,971; 2000: €178,000). For the periods January 1 through September 2, 2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively the amount of current taxation relating to Ireland was €4,667,000 and €1,100,000 (2001: €11,120,000; 2000: €10,449,000). For the periods January 1 through September 2, 2002 and September 3 through December 31, 2002 respectively the amount of deferred taxation relating to Ireland was nil (2001: nil; 2000: nil).
From January 1, 2002, the Group adopted FRS19—`Deferred Tax', which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in the tax computation. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and previously reported figures have been restated. €1,000,000 of the adjustment related to Ireland.
The Group has availed of a reduced taxation rate of 10% which applies to certain manufacturing and financial service operations in Ireland. The reduced rate is due to expire in 2005 for financial service operations and 2010 for manufacturing operations.
Income before tax is analyzed as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Ireland | | | (25,772 | ) | | 17,422 | | | 61,309 | | | 49,065 | |
Foreign | | | 73,493 | | | 132,357 | | | 237,437 | | | 213,546 | |
Associates | | | 6,838 | | | 43,086 | | | 87,558 | | | 222,367 | |
Exceptional items (Note 5) | | | (11,978 | ) | | 415 | | | (61,300 | ) | | (42,679 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 42,581 | | € | 193,280 | | € | 325,004 | | € | 442,299 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Based on current capital investment plans, the Group expects to continue to be able to claim capital allowances in excess of depreciation in future years but at a slightly lower level than in the current year.
The total tax charge in future periods will be affected by any changes to the corporation tax rates in force in the countries in which the Group operates. The current tax charges will also be affected by changes in the excess of tax depreciation over book depreciation and the use of tax credits.
F-93
The following table relates the applicable Republic of Ireland statutory tax rate to the effective tax rate of the Group, obtained by computing the tax charge as a percentage of income before taxes and minority shareholders' interest:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
| | %
| |
---|
Corporation tax at Irish statutory rate | | 16.0 | | 16.0 | | 20.0 | | 24.0 | |
Adjusted for: | | | | | | | | | |
| Income subject to a higher rate of tax than the Irish statutory rate | | 36.3 | | 27.6 | | 23.8 | | 19.3 | |
| Income subject to a lower rate of tax than the Irish statutory rate | | — | | — | | (11.1 | ) | (8.7 | ) |
| Expenditure not deductible for tax purposes | | 30.7 | | 7.3 | | 11.3 | | 10.4 | |
| Utilisation of tax losses | | (6.5 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (1.2 | ) |
| Adjustments to tax charge in respect of previous periods | | 3.7 | | 0.5 | | (0.8 | ) | (1.8 | ) |
| Profits arising not subject to tax | | (6.5 | ) | (8.0 | ) | — | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 73.7 | | 40.3 | | 42.3 | | 42.0 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
10 Dividends
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Ordinary: | | | | | | | | |
Paid | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary interim (2001: 2.625c; 2000: 2.5c) | | — | | | 28,446 | | | 27,091 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Proposed | | | | | | | | |
Final dividend (2001: 4.662c; 2000: 4.44c) | | — | | | 50,575 | | | 48,113 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | — | | € | 79,021 | | € | 75,204 |
| |
| |
| |
|
11 Net Borrowing
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Cash at bank and in hand | | | 184,255 | | | 440,109 |
Total borrowing (Note 20) | | | 2,159,900 | | | 1,553,675 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,975,645 | | € | 1,113,566 |
| |
| |
|
F-94
12 Accounts Receivable and Prepayments
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Amounts falling due within one year: | | | | | | |
Trade receivables | | | 900,424 | | | 912,530 |
Less: Provision for bad and doubtful debts | | | 42,657 | | | 35,583 |
| |
| |
|
| | | 857,767 | | | 876,947 |
Amounts owed by associates | | | 10,140 | | | 11,703 |
Other receivables | | | 87,274 | | | 138,425 |
Prepayments and accrued income | | | 43,753 | | | 27,898 |
| |
| |
|
| | | 998,934 | | | 1,054,973 |
Amounts falling due after more than one year: | | | | | | |
Other receivables | | | 17,247 | | | 29,639 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,016,181 | | € | 1,084,612 |
| |
| |
|
13 Inventories
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Raw materials | | | 145,325 | | | 147,619 |
Work in progress | | | 34,892 | | | 24,943 |
Finished goods | | | 182,490 | | | 146,607 |
Other | | | 107,500 | | | 104,341 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 470,207 | | € | 423,510 |
| |
| |
|
14 Investments
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Associates (Note 14(i)) | | | 151,039 | | | 1,621,107 |
Other investments (Note 14(ii)) | | | 14,204 | | | 53,695 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 165,243 | | € | 1,674,802 |
| |
| |
|
F-95
Note 14(i): Associates
Successor
| | Share of net assets
| | Loans
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 142,058 | | | 8,792 | | | 150,850 | |
Additions | | | 6,279 | | | — | | | 6,279 | |
Retained earnings | | | 4,019 | | | — | | | 4,019 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (9,523 | ) | | — | | | (9,523 | ) |
Repayment | | | — | | | (1,368 | ) | | (1,368 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 91 | | | — | | | 91 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 1,079 | | | (388 | ) | | 691 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 144,003 | | € | 7,036 | | € | 151,039 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Share of net assets
| | Loans
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | | 1,336,914 | | | 8,459 | | | 1,345,373 | |
Additions | | | 7,718 | | | — | | | 7,718 | |
Retained earnings | | | 109,656 | | | — | | | 109,656 | |
Sales | | | (1,052 | ) | | — | | | (1,052 | ) |
Repayment | | | — | | | (3,980 | ) | | (3,980 | ) |
Reclassification on acquisition | | | (8,735 | ) | | — | | | (8,735 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 5,677 | | | — | | | 5,677 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 90,939 | | | 337 | | | 91,276 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 1,541,117 | | | 4,816 | | | 1,545,933 | (1) |
Additions | | | 28,429 | | | 4,707 | | | 33,136 | |
Retained earnings | | | 33,619 | | | — | | | 33,619 | |
Sales | | | (5,058 | ) | | — | | | (5,058 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 8,844 | | | — | | | 8,844 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 73,418 | | | 263 | | | 73,681 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | | 1,680,369 | | | 9,786 | | | 1,690,155 | |
FRS 19 adoption (Note 21) | | | (69,048 | ) | | — | | | (69,048 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 restated | | € | 1,611,321 | | € | 9,786 | | € | 1,621,107 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year end December 31, 2000, the closing balance of €1,545,933,000 would have been adjusted by €56,258,000 to €1,489,675,000.
F-96
Note 14 (ii): Other investments
Successor
| | Listed* Cost
| | Unlisted Cost
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 6,717 | | | 74,940 | | | 81,657 | |
Additions | | | 753 | | | 583 | | | 1,336 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | — | | | (68,090 | ) | | (68,090 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (467 | ) | | 32 | | | (435 | ) |
Sales | | | (52 | ) | | (24 | ) | | (76 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (21 | ) | | — | | | (21 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (4 | ) | | (163 | ) | | (167 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 6,926 | | € | 7,278 | | € | 14,204 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 6,147 | | | 59,487 | | | 65,634 | |
Additions | | | 719 | | | 2,289 | | | 3,008 | |
Acquisitions | | | — | | | 131 | | | 131 | |
Reclassification | | | — | | | (7,238 | ) | | (7,238 | ) |
Sales | | | (692 | ) | | (1,252 | ) | | (1,944 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (88 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (150 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (1 | ) | | 142 | | | 141 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 6,085 | | | 53,497 | | | 59,582 | |
Additions | | | 702 | | | 5,601 | | | 6,303 | |
Reclassification | | | (2 | ) | | (8,562 | ) | | (8,564 | ) |
Sales | | | (50 | ) | | (3,708 | ) | | (3,758 | ) |
Write off to statement of income | | | (14 | ) | | — | | | (14 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 5 | | | 141 | | | 146 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | € | 6,726 | | € | 46,969 | | € | 53,695 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- *
- Listed on a recognized stock exchange.
Other investments are stated at cost. The market value of the listed investments at December 31, 2002 was €7,028,000 (2001: €6,987,000; 2000: €7,066,000).
F-97
15 Property, Plant and Equipment
Successor
| | Land and Buildings
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Plant and Equipment
| |
| |
---|
| | Freehold
| | Leasehold
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cost or valuation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 897,687 | | | 33,821 | | | 3,058,488 | | | 3,989,996 | |
Additions | | | 12,374 | | | — | | | 76,420 | | | 88,794 | |
Retirements | | | (4,466 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (37,962 | ) | | (42,430 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 23,810 | | | — | | | (11,693 | ) | | 12,117 | |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (52,745 | ) | | — | | | (104,000 | ) | | (156,745 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (15,366 | ) | | (103 | ) | | (67,255 | ) | | (82,724 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | | 861,294 | | | 33,716 | | | 2,913,998 | | | 3,809,008 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 146,042 | | | 7,814 | | | 1,555,428 | | | 1,709,284 | |
Charged | | | 12,093 | | | 333 | | | 67,449 | | | 79,875 | |
Retirements | | | (1,989 | ) | | 3 | | | (34,054 | ) | | (36,040 | ) |
Reclassification | | | 687 | | | — | | | (5,116 | ) | | (4,429 | ) |
Transfer to affiliates | | | (11,173 | ) | | — | | | (36,906 | ) | | (48,079 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (3,743 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (40,161 | ) | | (43,909 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | | 141,917 | | | 8,145 | | | 1,506,640 | | | 1,656,702 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2002 | | € | 719,377 | | € | 25,571 | | € | 1,407,358 | | € | 2,152,306 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | Timberlands
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 66,854 | |
Additions | | | 2,345 | |
Depletion | | | (2,696 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (4,555 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 61,948 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2002 | | € | 2,214,254 | |
| |
| |
F-98
Predecessor
| | Land and Buildings
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Plant and Equipment
| |
| |
---|
| | Freehold
| | Leasehold
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cost or valuation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 936,530 | | | 40,774 | | | 3,506,514 | | | 4,483,818 | |
Acquisitions | | | 42,610 | | | 632 | | | 66,361 | | | 109,603 | |
Additions | | | 26,320 | | | 156 | | | 121,153 | | | 147,629 | |
Retirements | | | (26,138 | ) | | (1,119 | ) | | (123,718 | ) | | (150,975 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (110,897 | ) | | (7,901 | ) | | (930,599 | ) | | (1,049,397 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 22,892 | | | 36 | | | 73,408 | | | 96,336 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 891,317 | | | 32,578 | | | 2,713,119 | | | 3,637,014 | |
Acquisitions | | | — | | | — | | | 3,410 | | | 3,410 | |
Additions | | | 17,934 | | | 5,106 | | | 144,075 | | | 167,115 | |
Retirements | | | (26,540 | ) | | (1,693 | ) | | (93,078 | ) | | (121,311 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (100,684 | ) | | (747 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (101,498 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 16,586 | | | 209 | | | 56,205 | | | 73,000 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | | 798,613 | | | 35,453 | | | 2,823,664 | | | 3,657,730 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Depreciation | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 1999 | | | 245,982 | | | 11,266 | | | 2,140,892 | | | 2,398,140 | |
Charged | | | 19,574 | | | 1,132 | | | 201,907 | | | 222,613 | |
Retirements | | | (2,205 | ) | | (712 | ) | | (95,596 | ) | | (98,513 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (134,510 | ) | | (3,107 | ) | | (933,284 | ) | | (1,070,901 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 4,220 | | | 41 | | | 42,587 | | | 46,848 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 133,061 | | | 8,620 | | | 1,356,506 | | | 1,498,187 | |
Charged | | | 19,737 | | | 1,099 | | | 201,781 | | | 222,617 | |
Retirements | | | (7,054 | ) | | (1,179 | ) | | (77,525 | ) | | (85,758 | ) |
Reclassification | | | (5,477 | ) | | (664 | ) | | (20,553 | ) | | (26,694 | ) |
Impairment writedown | | | — | | | — | | | 26,642 | | | 26,642 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 3,669 | | | 64 | | | 30,710 | | | 34,443 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | | 143,936 | | | 7,940 | | | 1,517,561 | | | 1,669,437 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2001 | | € | 654,677 | | € | 27,513 | | € | 1,306,103 | | € | 1,988,293 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net book amount December 31, 2000 | | € | 758,256 | | € | 23,958 | | € | 1,356,613 | | € | 2,138,827 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-99
| | Timberlands
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 2000 | | | — | |
Additions | | | 10,098 | |
Reclassification | | | 92,633 | |
Depletion | | | (7,327 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 4,322 | |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | € | 99,726 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount at December 31, 2001 | | € | 2,088,019 | |
| |
| |
Net book amount at December 31, 2000 | | € | 2,138,827 | |
| |
| |
Land and buildings
Included in tangible assets is an amount for land of €243,964,000 (2001: €225,288,000; 2000: €307,937,000).
Capitalized leased property, plant and equipment
Included in the net book amount of tangible assets is an amount for capitalized leased assets of €70,981,000 (2001: €115,943,000; 2000: €125,720,000). The depreciation charge for capitalized leased assets for the periods January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 was €8,866,000 and €3,799,000 respectively and the related finance charges amounted to €1,186,000 and €570,000 respectively (2001: €14,530,000 and €1,728,000; 2000: €16,220,000 and €2,454,000 respectively).
Reclassifications
The reclassifications, in 2001, within both Cost and Depreciation relate principally to the reclassification of Timberlands. Historically, both the original cost and the related aggregate depreciation were recorded in Freehold Land and Buildings. The reclassifications in 2000 include the elimination from both Cost and Depreciation of approximately €1 billion in aggregate depreciation recorded when the assets were originally acquired. Other amounts relate mainly to the removal of fully depreciated assets no longer in use. These reclassifications have no impact on the net book value or the annual depreciation charge.
F-100
16 Intangible Assets
Successor
| | Goodwill
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Arising on Acquisition | | | 1,558,980 | |
Amortization | | | (10,090 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (5,359 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 1,543,531 | |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Goodwill
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | | 96,447 | |
Acquisitions | | | 53,976 | |
Amortization | | | (5,734 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 2,089 | |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 146,778 | |
Acquisitions | | | 19,573 | |
Amortization | | | (8,820 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (1,014 | ) |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 | | € | 156,517 | |
| |
| |
17 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Trade payables | | | 608,959 | | | 604,515 |
Amounts owed to associates—trading balances | | | 2,314 | | | 6,704 |
Taxation creditors (Note 18) | | | 108,135 | | | 169,782 |
Social welfare | | | 41,413 | | | 41,792 |
Accruals | | | 211,150 | | | 178,299 |
Capital payables | | | 21,185 | | | 19,406 |
Other payables | | | 99,889 | | | 85,727 |
Proposed dividend | | | — | | | 50,575 |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | 4,384 | | | 5,564 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,097,429 | | € | 1,162,364 |
| |
| |
|
F-101
18 Taxation Creditors
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Current taxation | | | 74,759 | | | 103,714 |
Payroll taxes | | | 27,053 | | | 25,553 |
VAT and other sales taxes | | | 6,323 | | | 40,515 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 108,135 | | € | 169,782 |
| |
| |
|
19 Long Term Debt and Other Long Term Liabilities
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Borrowing—due after more than one year (Note 20) | | | 2,028,937 | | | 1,302,687 |
Deferred income | | | — | | | 28,939 |
Deferred debt issuance costs | | | (125,255 | ) | | — |
Capitalized lease obligations | | | 18,203 | | | 18,033 |
Deferred acquistion consideration | | | — | | | 54,773 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,921,885 | | € | 1,404,432 |
| |
| |
|
F-102
20 Borrowing
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Analysis of Net Debt | | | | | | | |
Senior credit facility: | | | | | | | |
| Revolving credit facility(1)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.25% | | | 23,839 | | | — | |
| Tranche A term loan(2a)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.25% | | | 570,009 | | | — | |
| Tranche B term loan(2b)—interest at relevant interbank rate +2.75% | | | 469,178 | | | — | |
| Tranche C term loan(2c)—interest at relevant interbank rate +3.25% | | | 469,178 | | | — | |
Evergreen facilities(3) | | | — | | | 10,000 | |
Syndicate(4) | | | — | | | 192,307 | |
U.S. private placement(5) | | | — | | | 512,944 | |
U.K. private placement(6) | | | — | | | 49,302 | |
U.S. yankee bond(7) | | | 428,086 | | | 395,051 | |
Bank loans and overdrafts (net of cash) | | | 15,355 | | | (46,038 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
Total net debt (excluding finance leases) | | € | 1,975,645 | | € | 1,113,566 | |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Revolving credit facility of €425 million (available under the senior credit facility) to be repaid in full in 2009.
- (2a)
- Term loan A due to be repaid in certain installments up to 2009.
- (2b)
- Term loan B due to be repaid in full in 2010.
- (2c)
- Term loan C due to be repaid in full in 2011.
- (3)
- The drawings on the FRF 1 billion Evergreen facilities were refinanced and the facilities cancelled in October, 2002.
- (4)
- The drawings on the €800 million Syndicated loan were refinanced and the facility cancelled in October, 2002.
- (5)
- 6.97% senior series B notes due 2003 of €220 million, 7.1% senior series C notes due 2005 of USD 199 million and 7.28% senior series D notes due 2008 of USD 43 million. The notes were refinanced in October, 2002.
- (6)
- 9.71% senior series notes due 2004 of GBP 30 million. The notes were refinanced in October, 2002.
- (7)
- 6.75% senior notes due 2005 of USD 250 million and 7.50% senior debentures due 2025 of USD 292.3 million.
F-103
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | Bank Loans and Overdrafts
| | Other Borrowing
| | Total
| | Bank Loans and Overdrafts
| | Other Borrowing
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Analysis of borrowing by year of repayment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Within one year | | | 126,935 | | | 4,028 | | | 130,963 | | | 239,362 | | | 11,626 | | | 250,988 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Between 1 and 2 years | | | 72,724 | | | 2,635 | | | 75,359 | | | 72,862 | | | 245,773 | | | 318,635 |
Between 2 and 3 years | | | 77,475 | | | 150,481 | | | 227,956 | | | 22,839 | | | 55,285 | | | 78,124 |
Between 3 and 4 years | | | 101,019 | | | 2,256 | | | 103,275 | | | 13,369 | | | 298,016 | | | 311,385 |
Between 4 and 5 years | | | 127,239 | | | 12,591 | | | 139,830 | | | 198,329 | | | 2,747 | | | 201,076 |
Thereafter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| By installment | | | 253,198 | | | 5,295 | | | 258,493 | | | 9,578 | | | 6,549 | | | 16,127 |
| Other than by installment | | | 948,139 | | | 275,885 | | | 1,224,024 | | | — | | | 377,340 | | | 377,340 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Due after more than one year | | | 1,579,794 | | | 449,143 | | | 2,028,937 | | | 316,977 | | | 985,710 | | | 1,302,687 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total borrowing | | € | 1,706,729 | | € | 453,171 | | € | 2,159,900 | | € | 556,339 | | € | 997,336 | | € | 1,553,675 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-104
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | Within One Year
| | After One Year
| | Within One Year
| | After One Year
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Analysis of borrowing | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Secured bank loans and overdrafts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Overseas loans | | | 9,542 | | | 44,998 | | | 33,718 | | | 24,911 |
Domestic loans | | | 14,706 | | | 1,479,602 | | | — | | | — |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 24,248 | | | 1,524,600 | | | 33,718 | | | 24,911 |
Unsecured bank loans and overdrafts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Overseas loans | | | 80,977 | | | 41,139 | | | 139,969 | | | 206,034 |
Other bank loans | | | 21,710 | | | 14,055 | | | 65,675 | | | 86,032 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | 102,687 | | | 55,194 | | | 205,644 | | | 292,066 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total bank loans and overdrafts | | | 126,935 | | | 1,579,794 | | | 239,362 | | | 316,977 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Secured other loans | | | — | | | 423,829 | | | — | | | — |
Unsecured other loans | | | 4,028 | | | 25,314 | | | 11,626 | | | 985,710 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total other loans | | | 4,028 | | | 449,143 | | | 11,626 | | | 985,710 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total borrowing | | € | 130,963 | | € | 2,028,937 | | € | 250,988 | | € | 1,302,687 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Included in secured other loans are the following long term obligations:
| | '000
|
---|
Guaranteed Senior Notes 6.75% due 2005 | | $ | 250,000 |
Guaranteed Debentures 7.50% due 2025 | | $ | 292,300 |
In 2002, the Group refinanced US$220 million Guaranteed Senior Series B Notes 6.97% due in 2003, US$199 million Guaranteed Senior Series C Notes 7.10% due in 2005 and US$43 million Guaranteed Senior Series D Notes 7.28% due in 2008.
Committed facilities amounted to €2,491,665,000 (2001: €2,119,148,000) of which €2,040,250,000 (2001: €1,338,762,000) were utilized at December 31, 2002. The weighted average period until maturity of undrawn committed facilities is 6.1 years.
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
Maturity of Undrawn Commited Facilities
|
---|
| 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Within 1 year | | | 848 | | | 6,170 |
Between 1 and 2 years | | | 48,056 | | | 158,551 |
More than 2 years | | | 402,511 | | | 615,665 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 451,415 | | € | 780,386 |
| |
| |
|
F-105
Financial instruments and risk management
The operating parameters and policies of treasury management are established under board authority. The formal treasury policy covers the areas of funding, counterparty risk, foreign exchange, controls and derivatives. Risk arising on counterparty default is controlled within a framework of dealing with high quality institutions that meet certain minimum criteria. The Group uses derivative instruments in its management of interest rate and currency risk. The Group does not enter into or issue derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The Group's financial instruments, other than derivatives, comprise borrowing, cash and liquid resources, and various items, such as trade debtors, trade creditors etc, that arise directly from its operations. The Group uses derivative financial instruments primarily to manage its exposure to market risks from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. The Group does not enter into or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The Group's policy is to centrally manage interest rate and currency exposure.
(a) Interest rate risk management
The Group manages interest rate exposure to achieve an appropriate balance of fixed and variable rate funding. To achieve this objective, the Group enters into interest rate swaps, options and forward rate agreements. Interest rate swap agreements are used to change the interest receivable or payable on the Group's underlying cash and borrowing from variable to fixed rates or from fixed to variable rates. At the year-end, 48% (2001: 43%) of the Group's borrowing was at fixed rates after taking account of interest rate swaps. The weighted average interest rate on borrowing outstanding at the year end was 6.79% (2001: 5.71%).
Outstanding interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:
| | Successor
| |
---|
Currency
| | Notional Principal (Millions)
| | Termination Dates
| | % Fixed Payable
| | % Variable Receivable
| | % Fixed Receivable
| | % Variable Payable
| |
---|
GBP | | 1 | | 2003 | | 7.46 | | Libor | (1) | — | | — | |
GBP | | 1 | | 2004 | | 7.87 | | Libor | | — | | — | |
EUR | | 10 | | 2003 | | 5.37 | | Euribor | (2) | — | | — | |
EUR | | 1,010 | | 2006 | | 3.3825-4.37 | | Euribor | | — | | — | |
SEK | | 94 | | 2006 | | — | | — | | 5.24 | | Stibor | (3) |
- (1)
- London Interbank Offered Rate
- (2)
- European Interbank Offered Rate
- (3)
- Stockholm Interbank Offered Rate
F-106
Outstanding interest rate swap agreements at December 31, 2001 are summarized as follows:
| | Predecessor
|
---|
Currency
| | Notional Principal (Millions)
| | Termination Dates
| | % Fixed Payable
| | % Variable Receivable
| | % Fixed Receivable
| | % Variable Payable
|
---|
GBP | | 7 | | 2002-2004 | | 7.25-7.87 | | Libor | | — | | — |
USD | | 392 | | 2003 | | — | | — | | 5.89-6.00 | | Libor |
USD | | 242 | | 2003 | | 6.57-6.63 | | Libor | | — | | — |
EUR | | 3 | | 2002-2003 | | 3.29-5.59 | | Libor | | — | | — |
After taking into account the various interest rate swaps and currency swaps entered into by the Group, the interest rate profile of the Group's financial liabilities at December 31, 2002 was:
| | Successor
|
---|
| |
| |
| |
| | Fixed rate financial liabilities
|
---|
Currency
| | Total € Million
| | Floating rate financial liabilities € Million
| | Fixed rate financial liabilities € Million
| | Weighted average interest rate %
| | Weighted average period until maturity Years
|
---|
Euro | | 1,684 | | 650 | | 1,034 | | 3.47 | | 3.0 |
Sterling | | 177 | | 173 | | 4 | | 6.92 | | 1.9 |
US Dollar | | 79 | | 75 | | 3 | | | | |
Canadian Dollar | | 25 | | 25 | | — | | | | |
Swedish Krona | | 94 | | 94 | | — | | | | |
Other | | 123 | | 119 | | 5 | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
Total | | €2,182 | | €1,136 | | €1,046 | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
(b) Foreign exchange risk management
The Group manages its balance sheet having regard to the currency exposures arising from its assets being denominated in a wide range of currencies. To this end, where foreign currency assets are funded by borrowing, such borrowing is generally sourced in the currency of the related assets. The Group also hedges a portion of its currency exposure through the use of currency swaps and forward contracts. At December 31, 2002, the Group had entered into €156 million (2001: €33 million) currency equivalent of forward contracts and €93 million equivalent of options contracts in respect of its day to day trading.
F-107
Outstanding currency swap agreements at December 31, 2002 are summarized as follows:
Successor
|
---|
Currency Swapped (Millions)
| | Currency Received (Millions)
| | Maturity date
| | Interest rate paid
| | Interest rate received
|
---|
USD 195 | | EUR 200 | | 2007 | | Euribor + 318 | | Libor + 300 |
USD 247 | | EUR 210 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 462 | | 6.8238 |
USD 136 | | EUR 101 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 81 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 35 | | EUR 25 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 708 | | 7.55 |
USD 113 | | SEK 749 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 597 | | 7.55 |
USD 5 | | SEK 33 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 110 | | Libor + 93 |
Outstanding currency swap agreements at December 31 2001 are summarized as follows:
Predecessor
|
---|
Currency Swapped (Millions)
| | Currency Received (Millions)
| | Maturity date
| | Interest rate paid
| | Interest rate received
|
---|
USD 232 | | EUR 172 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 54/59 | | 6.8238 |
USD 50 | | EUR 37 | | 2005 | | Euribor + 106 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 15 | | EUR 11 | | 2005 | | 7.595 | | 6.8238 |
USD 85 | | EUR 63 | | 2005 | | 8.04 / 8.05 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 113 | | SEK 749 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 133/4 | | 7.55 |
USD 5 | | SEK 33 | | 2005 | | Stibor + 110 | | Libor + 93 |
USD 35 | | EUR 25 | | 2005 | | 8.015 | | 7.55 |
USD 39 | | EUR 34 | | 2003 | | 6.216 | | 5.95 |
USD 30 | | GBP 20 | | 2003 | | Libor | | 5.835 |
At December 31, 2002 the Group had also entered into currency swaps of €291 million equivalent (2001: €332 million) and forward contracts of €3 million equivalent as part of its short term liquidity management.
Excluding the Group's Latin American operations, there were no significant transactional currency exposures at December 31, 2002, that gave rise to net currency gains and losses recognized in the income statement. Such exposures comprise the monetary assets and liabilities of the Group that are not denominated in the operating (or 'functional') currency of the operating unit involved. As at December 31, 2002, transactional currency exposures in the Group's Latin American operations amounted to €3 million (2001: €19 million).
F-108
(c) Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the material financial instruments of the Group are as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Assets | | | | | | | | | |
Cash, short term deposits and liquid investments | | 184,255 | | 184,255 | | 440,109 | | 440,109 | |
Accounts receivable and prepayments | | 998,934 | | 998,934 | | 1,054,973 | | 1,054,973 | |
Publicly traded investments | | 6,926 | | 7,028 | | 6,726 | | 6,987 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
Short term debt | | 130,963 | | 130,963 | | 250,988 | | 250,988 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 1,097,429 | | 1,097,429 | | 1,162,364 | | 1,162,364 | |
Medium and long term debt | | 2,028,937 | | 2,051,117 | | 1,302,687 | | 1,313,269 | |
Derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate swap agreements | | | | (1,105 | ) | | | 26,426 | |
Currency swap agreements | | | | 77,269 | | | | 223,866 | |
Foreign exchange contracts | | | | 22,080 | | | | (255 | ) |
Energy hedging contracts | | | | 7,069 | | | | (1,274 | ) |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Group in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash, short term deposits and liquid investments, debtors and creditors:
The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.
Listed investments:
These are valued based on quoted prices.
Short term debt and medium and long term debt:
The fair value of the Group's debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Group's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements and maturities.
Interest rate swap agreements:
The fair value of the Group's interest rate swap agreements is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis. In addition the fair value amount includes the interest rate component of currency swaps.
F-109
Currency swap agreements and foreign exchange contracts:
The fair value of these instruments is based on the estimated replacement cost of equivalent instruments at the balance sheet date.
Gains and losses on instruments used for hedging are not recognized until the exposure that is being hedged is itself recognized. Unrecognized gains and losses on instruments used for hedging, and the movement thereon, are as follows:
| | Gains
| | Losses
| | Total net gains/(losses)
|
---|
| | € Million
| | € Million
| | € Million
|
---|
Unrecognized gains and losses on hedges at December 31, 2001 | | | 47 | | | 21 | | | 26 |
Gains and losses arising in previous years that were recognized in 2002 | | | 18 | | | 9 | | | 9 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Gains and losses arising before December 31, 2001 that were not recognized in 2002 | | | 29 | | | 12 | | | 17 |
Gains and losses arising in 2002 that were not recognized in 2002 | | | 32 | | | 21 | | | 11 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Unrecognized gains and losses on hedges at December 31, 2002 | | € | 61 | | € | 33 | | € | 28 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Of which: | | | | | | | | | |
Gains and losses expected to be recognized in 2003 | | | 31 | | | 12 | | | 19 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Gains and losses expected to be recognized in 2004 or later | | | 30 | | | 21 | | | 9 |
| |
| |
| |
|
(d) Credit Risk
Potential concentrations of credit risk to the Group consist principally of cash deposits, short term investments and trade debtors. The Group only deposits cash surpluses with quality credit rated banks and institutions that meet certain criteria and by policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one bank or institution. Trade debtors comprise a large, widespread customer base. The Group mitigates the risk that counterparties to derivatives will fail to perform by contracting with major financial institutions having high credit ratings and considers the likelihood of counterparty failure to be remote. At December 31, 2002, the Group did not consider there to be any significant concentration of credit risk.
F-110
21 Provisions for Liabilities and Charges
Successor
| | Deferred Income Taxes
| | Retirement and Other Deferred Benefits
| | Other Deferred Provisions
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 159,691 | | | 166,222 | | | 46,896 | | | 372,809 | |
Charge to income | | | 3,052 | | | 8,541 | | | (7,659 | ) | | 3,934 | |
Paid in year | | | — | | | (4,277 | ) | | (2,061 | ) | | (6,338 | ) |
Transfer to affiliates | | | — | | | — | | | 64 | | | 64 | |
Reclassification | | | (1,283 | ) | | 21,408 | | | (5,408 | ) | | 14,717 | |
Currency adjustment | | | (2,564 | ) | | (3,900 | ) | | (1,539 | ) | | (8,003 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 158,896 | | € | 187,994 | | € | 30,293 | | € | 377,183 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Deferred Income Taxes
| | Retirement and Other Deferred Benefits
| | Other Deferred Provisions
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 1999 | | | 66,533 | | | 142,670 | | | 20,253 | | | 229,456 | |
Charge to income | | | 3,264 | | | 18,468 | | | 4,755 | | | 26,487 | |
Paid in year | | | — | | | (16,488 | ) | | (5,564 | ) | | (22,052 | ) |
Acquistions | | | 9,643 | | | 327 | | | 9,228 | | | 19,198 | |
Reclassification | | | 6,090 | | | (1,269 | ) | | 6,219 | | | 11,040 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 229 | | | (21 | ) | | 242 | | | 450 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2000 | | | 85,759 | (1) | | 143,687 | | | 35,133 | | | 264,579 | |
Charge to income | | | (17,827 | ) | | 17,282 | | | 2,386 | | | 1,841 | |
Paid in year | | | — | | | (14,867 | ) | | (4,373 | ) | | (19,240 | ) |
Acquisitions | | | — | | | 30 | | | (5 | ) | | 25 | |
Reclassification | | | (365 | ) | | 14,845 | | | 1,913 | �� | | 16,393 | |
Currency adjustment | | | 853 | | | 1,296 | | | 974 | | | 3,123 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 as previously reported | | € | 68,420 | | € | 162,273 | | € | 36,028 | | € | 266,721 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
FRS 19 adoption | | | 70,293 | | | — | | | — | | | 70,293 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2001 restated | | € | 138,713 | | € | 162,273 | | € | 36,028 | | € | 337,014 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Charge to income as above | | | (17,827 | ) | | 3,264 |
FRS 19 adoption | | | 8,106 | | | 7,829 |
| |
| |
|
Restated deferred taxation charge as per Note 9 | | € | (9,721 | ) | € | 11,093 |
| |
| |
|
F-111
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Deferred income taxes arises as follows: | | | | | | | | | | |
Accelerated capital allowances | | | 108,527 | | | 101,921 | | | 72,710 | |
Other timing differences | | | 50,369 | | | 36,792 | | | 13,049 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 158,896 | | € | 138,713 | | € | 85,759 | (1) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- If FRS 19 had been adopted at the year end December 31, 2000, the closing balance for deferred income taxes would have been adjusted by €62,187,000 to €147,946,000.
From January 1, 2002, we adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' which requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and the tax computation. FRS 19 applies to accounting periods ending on or after January 23, 2002. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment.
The retirement and other deferred benefits mainly relate to pensions and similar arrangements and are substantially unfunded, which is in accordance with local custom in certain countries in which the Group operates. The benefits are based on employees' years of service and average final remuneration and are computed on an actuarial basis (see Note 25).
The Group also provides certain Post Retirement Healthcare benefits to certain employees in the United States and Canada. Provisions are accrued over the expected working lifetime of the relevant existing employees. Included in retirement and other deferred benefits at December 31, 2002 is €22,316,000 in respect of such obligations.
22 Contingent Liabilities
The Group has guaranteed certain of the bank overdrafts and loans of subsidiaries. The Group or subsidiaries have given guarantees in respect of the borrowing of certain associates amounting to €2,762,000.
In addition to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, we are involved in certain civil and criminal proceedings in Spain arising out of a past acquisition. In November 1988, a subsidiary of JSG acquired Industrial Cartonera, S.A., or ICSA, a Spanish incorporated company, from a subsidiary of Torras Hostench S.A., or Torras. In early 1989, JSG acquired a 35% interest in another Spanish company called Industrias del Papel y de la Celulosa, S.A., or INPACSA, a former parent of ICSA. A number of individuals associated with Torras were charged by the public prosecutor in Madrid with diverting, for their own use, a substantial part of the purchase consideration paid by JSG for ICSA. The public prosecutor, on behalf of the minority shareholders of INPACSA, also claimed that certain transactions, including the transfer of ICSA by INPACSA which took place prior to JSG's acquisition of ICSA, caused damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA. In 1998, the public prosecutor also charged JSG's Chairman, Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, as the representative of JSG, in these proceedings with respect to the alleged damage to the minority shareholders of INPACSA and Torras. A JSG subsidiary is also one of a number of parties against whom secondary civil liability has been claimed.
F-112
JSG and Smurfit International B.V. have each indemnified Dr. Smurfit against loss or liability due to such proceedings. Bonds have been posted with the Spanish court in the amount of €47 million, which equals the amount of alleged damages, excluding interest. The maximum estimated current total exposure relating to the liabilities, including interest through December 31, 2002, is approximately €118 million, for which no reserve has been taken and which amount will accrue interest until payment of any final judgment. Preliminary proceedings commenced in late March 2003 and trial is expected to begin in Madrid in late April 2003. We are defending these actions vigorously and believe there is no basis for the involvement of the Chairman or an JSG subsidiary in these proceedings. We cannot assure you, however, that the consequences of any adverse findings, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
We are also the subject of litigation in the Dominican Republic arising from our acquisition in 1996 of a controlling interest in a small local corrugator owned by Industria Cartonera Dominicana. The lawsuits, alleging damages in excess of $300 million, are brought by a local competitor who is claiming loss of potential profits, as a consequence of our entry to the market. He is also alleging breach of contract. We believe these lawsuits are without merit and are defending them vigorously.
23 Lease Obligations
Obligations under finance leases (net of finance charges):
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Payable within one year | | | 4,384 | | | 5,564 |
Payable in one to two years | | | 3,648 | | | 2,948 |
Payable in two to three years | | | 3,697 | | | 2,408 |
Payable in three to four years | | | 3,292 | | | 1,908 |
Payable in four to five years | | | 2,854 | | | 7,476 |
Payable thereafter | | | 4,712 | | | 3,293 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 22,587 | | € | 23,597 |
| |
| |
|
Commitments under operating leases, payable in the coming year, relate to leases expiring in the following periods:
| | Land and Buildings
| | Other
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Within one year | | | 1,162 | | | 6,107 | | | 7,269 |
Within two to five years inclusive | | | 808 | | | 3,568 | | | 4,376 |
Over five years | | | 2,297 | | | 794 | | | 3,091 |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 4,267 | | € | 10,469 | | € | 14,736 |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-113
The total commitments under non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2002 are as follows:
| | 2002
|
---|
| | €000
|
---|
Payable within one year | | 14,736 |
Payable in one to two years | | 10,149 |
Payable in two to three years | | 11,201 |
Payable in three to four years | | 3,140 |
Payable in four to five years | | 2,582 |
Payable thereafter | | 12,336 |
| |
|
| | €54,144 |
| |
|
24 Capital Commitments
The following capital commitments authorized by the directors had not been provided for in the Group financial statements:
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Contracted for | | | 27,107 | | | 20,204 |
Not contracted for | | | 33,532 | | | 32,276 |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 60,639 | | € | 52,480 |
| |
| |
|
25 Employee Pension Plans and Similar Obligations
Successor
The Group has pension plans for its employees in many of the countries in which it operates. The major occupational pension plans are of the defined benefit type. From the date of acquisition, the Group's pension plans are accounted for in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 17—`Retirement Benefits'. FRS 17 applies to all types of benefits that an employer provides after employees have completed their service, including pensions and other post retirement benefits. The pension cost for the Group's major occupational pension plans has been determined using the projected unit credit method. The current agreed rates of contribution for future years are comparable to current levels.
Periodic actuarial valuations are performed on all of the major plans, by independantly professionally qualified actuaries, as follows: Ireland between July 1, 2000 and January 1, 2002; United Kingdom beween January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002; United States and Canada on December 31, 2002.
The Group also operates plans in the US and Canada, which provide certain employees with post retirement health care benefits. Actuarial valuations of both these plans were performed as at December 31, 2002 using the projected unit credit method. The principal assumption made by the actuaries was that the per capita weighted average assumed rate of increase in covered benefits was:— US: 12%, reducing by 1% per annum until 2009 and Canada: 10.6%, reducing to 4.8% over 7 years
F-114
until December 2009. The effect of a 1% increase in the health care trend rate would not materially increase the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002.
The main financial assumptions used to calculate scheme liabilities under FRS 17 are set out below:
Major Assumptions
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Rate of increase in salaries | | 1.25–4.00 | | 3.35–4.00 | | 3.45–7.00 |
Rate of increase to pensions in payment | | Nil–2.75 | | Nil–2.00 | | Nil–3.45 |
Discount rate for scheme liabilities | | 5.00–6.00 | | 6.50–6.75 | | 6.75–10.50 |
Inflation | | 1.25–3.00 | | 2.00–2.25 | | 3.45–4.50 |
The expected long term rates of return on the assets of the significant plans at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Equities | | 5.00–8.50 | | 9.20–10.50 | | 7.75 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Bonds | | 4.61–5.75 | | 5.30–5.50 | | 7.00 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Other | | 5.00–6.35 | | 3.50–8.70 | | N/A |
| |
| |
| |
|
The market values of the assets of the significant schemes at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Equities | | | 252,291 | | | 71,428 | | | 11,342 | | | 335,061 | |
Bonds | | | 196,362 | | | 34,171 | | | 3,021 | | | 233,554 | |
Other | | | 92,848 | | | 11,438 | | | 11,567 | | | 115,853 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total market value | | | 541,501 | | | 117,037 | | | 25,930 | | | 684,468 | |
Present value of scheme liabilities | | | 680,397 | | | 181,932 | | | 19,846 | | | 882,175 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Deficit)/surplus in the plans | | | (138,896 | ) | | (64,895 | ) | | 6,084 | | | (197,707 | ) |
Deferred tax asset/(liability) | | | 35,636 | | | 23,713 | | | (2,008 | ) | | 57,341 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net pension (liability)/asset | | € | (103,260 | ) | € | (41,182 | ) | € | 4,076 | | € | (140,366 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-115
The following table sets out the components of the defined benefit cost for the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002:
Analysis of the amount charged in arriving at operating income
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
Current service cost | | | 11,011 | |
Past service cost | | | 1,533 | |
Expected return on pension scheme assets | | | (19,048 | ) |
Interest cost on pension scheme liabilities | | | 29,823 | |
| |
| |
Net loss | | € | 23,319 | |
| |
| |
The FRS 17 pension charge for the period of €23,319,000, has been included in arriving at operating income in order to maintain comparability with predecessor which accounted for pensions under SSAP 24—`Accounting for Pension Costs'. If the charge was disclosed in accordance with FRS 17 €10,775,000 would be classified as other financial income and operating income would be increased by €10,775,000.
F-116
Analysis of the amount recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses
| | 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| |
---|
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets | | | 7,218 | |
Net experience gains/(losses) on scheme liabilities | | | 27,515 | |
Changes in financial assumptions underlying the scheme liabilities | | | (22,226 | ) |
| |
| |
Actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | € | 12,507 | |
| |
| |
Movement in deficit in the period from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002
| | €000
| |
---|
Deficit in scheme at acquisition date—September 3, 2002 | | | 210,214 | |
Movement in period: | | | | |
Current service cost | | | 11,011 | |
Past service cost | | | 1,533 | |
Contributions | | | (22,772 | ) |
Other finance income | | | 10,775 | |
Actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | | (12,507 | ) |
Currency | | | (547 | ) |
| |
| |
Deficit in scheme at December 31, 2002 | | € | 197,707 | |
| |
| |
History of amounts recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses
| | 2002
| |
---|
Difference between actual and expected return on pension scheme assets | | | | |
Amount | | € | 7,218,000 | |
Percentage of scheme assets | | | 1 | % |
Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities | | | | |
Amount | | € | 27,515,000 | |
Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | | | 3 | % |
Total actuarial gain recognized in the statement of recognized gains and losses | | | | |
Amount | | € | 12,507,000 | |
Percentage of the present value of scheme liabilities | | | 1 | % |
In certain countries, in accordance with local practice, plans are financed internally and the provisions relating to such cases are included in pensions and other deferred compensation in accordance with the advice of independant actuaries. At December 31, 2002, these amounted to €169,330,000.
Predecessor
Prior to acquisition, the pension cost for JSG's major occupational pension plans had been determined in accordance with the advice of actuaries, mainly using the projected unit credit or attained age methods. Periodic actuarial valuations had been performed on all of the major plans. The most recent valuations were completed as follows: Ireland between July 1, 2000 and January 1, 2002; United Kingdom between January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2002; U.S. and Canada on December 31, 2001.
F-117
The principal assumptions used in the calculation of the profit and loss expense under SSAP 24 of €43,285,000 for the period from January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 (year ended December 31, 2001: €62,507,000) was that the projected annual rate of investment return will exceed the projected annual rate of increase in pensionable earnings by between 2% to 4%. Under SSAP 24, surpluses or deficits on the pension plans arising from the actuarial valuations are spread over the expected weighted average service lives of the members of the relevant plan. The actuarial reports are available for inspection by the members of the relevant schemes only.
At December 31, 2001, the market value of the assets of the significant plans of €671,300,000 was in aggregate sufficient to cover approximately 92.1% of the benefits that had accrued to members after allowing for expected future increases in wages and salaries. The market value of the assets of the principal funds, as at December 31, 2001, are set out below.
Actuarial valuations of the post retirement health care benefit plans in the U.S. and Canada were performed as at December 31, 2001 using the projected unit credit method. The principal assumption made by the actuaries was that the per capita weighted average assumed rate of increase in covered benefits was:— US: 12%, reducing by 1% per annum until 2009 and Canada: 9.6%, reducing to 3.8% over 7 years until December 2008. The effect of a 1% increase in the health care trend rate would not materially increase the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation as at December 31, 2001.
In certain countries, in accordance with local practice, plans are financed internally and in such cases provisions are included in provisions for liabilities and charges in accordance with the advice of independent actuaries. At December 31, 2001 these amount to €162,273,000 (2000: €143,687,000).
The December 31, 2001 FRS 17 disclosures are set out below:
Major Assumptions
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Rate of increase in salaries | | 2.50–4.00 | | 3.00–4.00 | | 1.00–3.50 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Rate of increase to pensions in payment | | Nil–2.50 | | Nil | | Nil |
| |
| |
| |
|
Discount rate for scheme liabilities | | 5.75–6.50 | | 6.50–7.25 | | 5.50–7.00 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Inflation | | 2.50–3.00 | | 2.75 | | 2.75–6.00 |
| |
| |
| |
|
The expected long term rates of return on the assets of the significant plans at December 31, 2001 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
|
---|
| | %
| | %
| | %
|
---|
Equities | | 8.00–8.50 | | 9.50 | | 10.00 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Bonds | | 5.00–5.75 | | 6.25 | | 6.00 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Other | | 4.00–7.00 | | 3.50–8.20 | | 4.75 |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-118
The market values of the assets of the significant schemes at December 31, 2001 were as follows:
| | Europe
| | US & Canada
| | Latin America
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Equities | | | 334,500 | | | 92,333 | | | 15,626 | | | 442,459 | |
Bonds | | | 192,824 | | | 40,672 | | | 13,893 | | | 247,389 | |
Other | | | 65,476 | | | 9,127 | | | 629 | | | 75,232 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total market value | | | 592,800 | | | 142,132 | | | 30,148 | | | 765,080 | |
Present value of scheme liabilities | | | 605,106 | | | 173,283 | | | 24,611 | | | 803,000 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(Deficit)/surplus in the plans | | | (12,306 | ) | | (31,151 | ) | | 5,537 | | | (37,920 | ) |
Deferred tax asset/(liability) | | | 6,989 | | | 11,041 | | | (1,827 | ) | | 16,203 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net pension (liability)/asset | | € | (5,317 | ) | € | (20,110 | ) | € | 3,710 | | € | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
If FRS 17 had been adopted in the financial statements, JSG's shareholders' equity and retained earnings at December 31, 2001 would have been as follows:
| | Restated €000
| |
---|
Group shareholders' equity excluding net pension asset | | | 2,525,191 | |
Net pension (liability) | | | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
Group shareholders' equity | | € | 2,503,474 | |
| |
| |
Retained earnings excluding net pension asset | | | 1,781,996 | |
Net pension reserve | | | (21,717 | ) |
| |
| |
Retained earnings | | € | 1,760,279 | |
| |
| |
26 Related Party Transactions
Transactions with associates
We conduct certain transactions with associates in the normal course of business. A significant level of predecessor's transactions were conducted with SSCC.
The transactions with associates for each period are summarized as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Sale of goods | | 17,225 | | 67,403 | | 102,069 | | 84,023 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Purchase of goods | | 18,517 | | 179,986 | | 280,911 | | 279,616 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Receiving of services | | 1,573 | | 2,854 | | 668 | | 915 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Rendering of services | | 727 | | 1,445 | | 2,023 | | 1,905 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-119
Transactions with related parties
During the period, a number of transactions took place to transfer non operating and non core businesses and other assets and liabilities to the newcos, in exchange for promissory notes. The notes will generally not bear interest and will be subject to a subordination agreement pursuant to which no enforcement action may be taken, and no payment may be made, prior to the maturity or repayment of the €125 million credit facility. The notes are repayable from the proceeds of future assets sales and by repayment of intercompany balances due from MDCP Acquisitions Limited, the ultimate controlling party.
A summary of the transactions follows:
| | Successor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
|
---|
| | €000
|
---|
Transfer of businesses | | 104,892 |
| |
|
Transfer of tangible assets | | 17,500 |
| |
|
Transfer of financial assets | | 76,728 |
| |
|
Transfer of cash proceeds from business disposals | | 14,891 |
| |
|
Transfer of other assets | | 28,444 |
| |
|
27 Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Operating income | | | 122,303 | | | 192,890 | | | 333,909 | | | 341,580 | |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment | | | — | | | — | | | 13,751 | | | — | |
Reorganization and restructuring costs | | | (2,799 | ) | | 2,799 | | | 1,175 | | | — | |
Depreciation charge (net of government grants amortized) | | | 80,760 | | | 164,942 | | | 227,061 | | | 219,530 | |
Goodwill amortization | | | 10,090 | | | 5,794 | | | 8,820 | | | 5,734 | |
Finance lease interest paid | | | 605 | | | 1,151 | | | 1,728 | | | 2,454 | |
Decrease/(increase) in other payables and provisions | | | 4,993 | | | 5,510 | | | (1,814 | ) | | 4,213 | |
Decrease/(increase) in working capital (Note 28) | | | 35,975 | | | (13,060 | ) | | 3,830 | | | (85,705 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 8,339 | | | (3,512 | ) | | (3,518 | ) | | (5,508 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 260,266 | | € | 356,514 | | € | 584,942 | | € | 482,298 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-120
28 Movement in Working Capital
Successor
| | Inventories
| | Receivables
| | Payables*
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
September 3, 2002 Acquired | | | 508,433 | | | 1,140,679 | | | (1,113,171 | ) | | 535,941 | |
Disposed | | | (3,360 | ) | | (12,341 | ) | | 18,152 | | | 2,451 | |
Decrease in working capital | | | (23,064 | ) | | (76,401 | ) | | 63,490 | | | (35,975 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (11,802 | ) | | (35,756 | ) | | 13,243 | | | (34,315 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2002 | | € | 470,207 | | € | 1,016,181 | | € | (1,018,286 | ) | € | 468,102 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Predecessor
| | Inventories
| | Receivables
| | Payables*
| | Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
December 31, 2001 | | | 423,510 | | | 1,084,612 | | | (1,002,516 | ) | | 505,606 | |
Acquisitions | | | 88,205 | | | 127,264 | | | (112,494 | ) | | 102,975 | |
Disposed | | | (6,572 | ) | | (13,436 | ) | | 19,940 | | | (68 | ) |
Increase in working capital | | | 21,542 | | | (26,184 | ) | | 17,702 | | | 13,060 | |
Currency adjustment | | | (18,252 | ) | | (31,577 | ) | | (35,803 | ) | | (85,632 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
September 2, 2002 | | € | 508,433 | | € | 1,140,679 | | € | (1,113,171 | ) | € | 535,941 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
- *
- Amounts falling due within one year not including borrowing due within one year, corporation tax, dividends proposed and capitalized lease obligations.
29 Equity Dividends Paid
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Dividends to Group shareholders | | € | 255 | | € | 50,662 | | € | 76,570 | | € | 70,007 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
30 Retirement of Fixed Assets
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Property, plant and equipment | | | (401 | ) | | 786 | | | 26,589 | | | 23,550 |
Investments | | | 1,914 | | | 131 | | | 7,609 | | | 7,084 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | € | 1,513 | | € | 917 | | € | 34,198 | | € | 30,634 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
F-121
31 Reconciliation of Net Cash Flow to Movement in Net Debt
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
(Decrease)/increase in cash | | | (18,538 | ) | | 12,302 | | | (8,918 | ) | | 24,957 | |
(Increase)/decrease in term debt | | | (560,115 | ) | | (42,651 | ) | | 120,636 | | | 11,029 | |
Increase/(decrease) in liquid resources | | | 10,445 | | | (239,468 | ) | | 2,970 | | | (23,074 | ) |
Capital elements of finance leases repaid | | | 2,031 | | | 4,945 | | | 9,407 | | | 10,380 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Change in net debt resulting from cash flows | | | (566,177 | ) | | (264,872 | ) | | 124,095 | | | 23,292 | |
New finance leases | | | — | | | — | | | (7,537 | ) | | (713 | ) |
Loans and finance leases acquired with subsidiaries | | | (1,432,276 | ) | | (124,709 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | (22,383 | ) |
Other non cash movements | | | (34,875 | ) | | 3,731 | | | (1,994 | ) | | (571 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | 35,096 | | | 90,737 | | | (54,517 | ) | | (55,277 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Movement in net debt | | | (1,998,232 | ) | | (295,113 | ) | | 55,047 | | | (55,652 | ) |
Net debt at beginning of period | | | — | | | (1,137,163 | ) | | (1,192,210 | ) | | (1,136,558 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt at end of period | | € | (1,998,232 | ) | € | (1,432,276 | ) | € | (1,137,163 | ) | € | (1,192,210 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
32 Analysis of Net Debt
| | Successor
| |
---|
| | September 3 2002
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | — | | | (14,484 | ) | | 86,143 | | | — | | | (2,435 | ) | | 69,224 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | — | | | 10,445 | | | 106,791 | | | (367 | ) | | (1,838 | ) | | 115,031 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | — | | | (4,039 | ) | | 192,934 | | | (367 | ) | | (4,273 | ) | | 184,255 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | — | | | (4,054 | ) | | (57,820 | ) | | — | | | 10,495 | | | (51,379 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | — | | | 83,653 | | | (116,416 | ) | | (34,508 | ) | | (12,313 | ) | | (79,584 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | — | | | 79,599 | | | (174,236 | ) | | (34,508 | ) | | (1,818 | ) | | (130,963 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | — | | | (643,768 | ) | | (1,426,333 | ) | | — | | | 41,164 | | | (2,028,937 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | — | | | (568,208 | ) | | (1,407,635 | ) | | (34,875 | ) | | 35,073 | | | (1,975,645 | ) |
Finance leases | | — | | | 2,031 | | | (24,641 | ) | | — | | | 23 | | | (22,587 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | — | | € | (566,177 | ) | € | (1,432,276 | ) | € | (34,875 | ) | € | 35,096 | | € | (1,998,232 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-122
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | December 2001
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | September 2 2002
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 87,756 | | | 961 | | | — | | | — | | | (2,574 | ) | | 86,143 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 352,353 | | | (239,468 | ) | | — | | | (1,041 | ) | | (5,053 | ) | | 106,791 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 440,109 | | | (238,507 | ) | | — | | | (1,041 | ) | | (7,627 | ) | | 192,934 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (76,419 | ) | | 11,341 | | | — | | | — | | | 7,258 | | | (57,820 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (174,569 | ) | | 24,994 | | | — | | | 4,772 | | | 28,387 | | | (116,416 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (250,988 | ) | | 36,335 | | | — | | | 4,772 | | | 35,645 | | | (174,236 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,302,687 | ) | | (67,645 | ) | | (118,477 | ) | | — | | | 62,476 | | | (1,426,333 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,113,566 | ) | | (269,817 | ) | | (118,477 | ) | | 3,731 | | | 90,494 | | | (1,407,635 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (23,597 | ) | | 4,945 | | | (6,232 | ) | | — | | | 243 | | | (24,641 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,137,163 | ) | € | (264,872 | ) | € | (124,709 | ) | € | 3,731 | | € | 90,737 | | € | (1,432,276 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-123
| | December 2000
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 79,932 | | | 6,131 | | | — | | | — | | | 1,693 | | | 87,756 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 347,160 | | | 2,970 | | | — | | | (410 | ) | | 2,633 | | | 352,353 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 427,092 | | | 9,101 | | | — | | | (410 | ) | | 4,326 | | | 440,109 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (57,580 | ) | | (15,049 | ) | | — | | | — | | | (3,790 | ) | | (76,419 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (305,006 | ) | | 162,612 | | | — | | | (1,584 | ) | | (30,591 | ) | | (174,569 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (362,586 | ) | | 147,563 | | | — | | | (1,584 | ) | | (34,381 | ) | | (250,988 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,231,744 | ) | | (41,976 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | | — | | | (23,967 | ) | | (1,302,687 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,167,238 | ) | | 114,688 | | | (5,000 | ) | | (1,994 | ) | | (54,022 | ) | | (1,113,566 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (24,972 | ) | | 9,407 | | | — | | | (7,537 | ) | | (495 | ) | | (23,597 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,192,210 | ) | € | 124,095 | | € | (5,000 | ) | € | (9,531 | ) | € | (54,517 | ) | € | (1,137,163 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | December 1999
| | Cash Flow
| | Acquisitions and Disposals
| | Non Cash
| | Currency
| | December 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash | | | 83,654 | | | (5,881 | ) | | — | | | — | | | 2,159 | | | 79,932 | |
Short term deposits and liquid resources | | | 373,754 | | | (23,074 | ) | | — | | | (3,303 | ) | | (217 | ) | | 347,160 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and investments | | | 457,408 | | | (28,955 | ) | | — | | | (3,303 | ) | | 1,942 | | | 427,092 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Bank overdrafts and demand loans | | | (87,713 | ) | | 30,838 | | | — | | | — | | | (705 | ) | | (57,580 | ) |
Loans repayable within one year | | | (322,716 | ) | | 48,505 | | | — | | | 2,732 | | | (33,527 | ) | | (305,006 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Short term borrowing | | | (410,429 | ) | | 79,343 | | | — | | | 2,732 | | | (34,232 | ) | | (362,586 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Long and medium term borrowing | | | (1,145,527 | ) | | (37,476 | ) | | (18,458 | ) | | — | | | (30,283 | ) | | (1,231,744 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net borrowing | | | (1,098,548 | ) | | 12,912 | | | (18,458 | ) | | (571 | ) | | (62,573 | ) | | (1,167,238 | ) |
Finance leases | | | (38,010 | ) | | 10,380 | | | (3,925 | ) | | (713 | ) | | 7,296 | | | (24,972 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net debt | | € | (1,136,558 | ) | € | 23,292 | | € | (22,383 | ) | € | (1,284 | ) | € | (55,277 | ) | € | (1,192,210 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash comprises cash in hand and overnight deposits. The movement in liquid resources represents movement in all monetary assets (excluding cash, short term deposits and overnight borrowing) which are convertible into cash at, or close to, their carrying value in the balance sheet. These specifically
F-124
comprise government gilts, commercial paper and deposits, with maturities of less than one year when acquired. They are categorized as held-to-maturity because the Group has both the intent and the ability to hold these investments until maturity.
33 Acquisitions and Disposals
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net assets acquired (see below) | | | 936,638 | | | 319,630 | | | (4,042 | ) | | 92,197 | |
Reclassification from associates | | | — | | | (90,045 | ) | | — | | | (8,735 | ) |
Goodwill | | | 1,558,980 | | | 59,240 | | | 19,573 | | | 53,976 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 2,495,618 | | € | 288,825 | | € | 15,531 | | € | 137,438 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Satisfied by: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash payments | | | 2,495,618 | | | 288,825 | | | 15,531 | | | 137,438 | |
Cash acquired | | | — | | | (12,853 | ) | | (1,834 | ) | | (815 | ) |
Bank overdrafts acquired | | | — | | | 44,668 | | | — | | | 22,148 | |
Deferred acquisition consideration | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (54,773 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net cash outflows | | € | 2,495,618 | | € | 320,640 | | € | 13,697 | | € | 103,998 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Summary of net assets acquired:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net assets acquired: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | | | 2,347,566 | | | 417,383 | | | 3,410 | | | 109,603 | |
| Investments | | | 232,507 | | | 2,030 | | | — | | | 131 | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Inventories | | | 508,433 | | | 88,205 | | | 254 | | | 19,271 | |
| Accounts receivable and prepayments | | | 1,140,679 | | | 127,264 | | | 1,066 | | | 46,337 | |
| Cash and investments held as current assets | | | 192,934 | | | 12,853 | | | 1,834 | | | (3,692 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total assets | | | 4,422,119 | | | 647,735 | | | 6,564 | | | 171,650 | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (1,376,842 | ) | | (164,241 | ) | | (1,468 | ) | | (82,120 | ) |
Long term debt and other payables | | | (1,459,696 | ) | | (124,519 | ) | | (22,441 | ) | | (18,546 | ) |
Provisions for liabilities and charges | | | (520,301 | ) | | (39,241 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (19,198 | ) |
Fair value adjustment | | | 25,326 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Minority interests | | | (153,968 | ) | | (104 | ) | | 13,328 | | | 40,411 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net assets acquired at fair value to the Group | | € | 936,638 | | € | 319,630 | | € | (4,042 | ) | € | 92,197 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-125
In certain cases, in determining the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and the consideration, estimates are used. Any necessary adjustments are made in subsequent accounting periods.
Successor above represents the acquisition of JSG by MDCP Acquisitions I, effective September 3, 2002. The fair value exercise has not yet been completed.
The principal acquisitions made by Predecessor were as follows:—
In March 2002, the Group acquired the remaining 67% share in Munksjö AB for a consideration of approximately €274 million.
In December 2000, the Group acquired the remaining shares in Nettingsdorfer of Austria taking its shareholding from 75% to 100%. The consideration was approximately €55 million and is payable in July 2003.
In July 2000, the Group acquired Neopac A/S of Denmark from Svenska Cellulosa AB (SCA) of Sweden for a consideration of € 30 million including acquired debt.
In February 2000, the Group acquired the remaining shares in Norwich Corrugated ("Norcor") taking its ownership from approximately 30% to 100%. The consideration was approximately € 35 million.
34 Post Balance Sheet Events
On March 31, 2003, the Group completed the acquisition of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation's (SSCC's) European packaging assets. The Group completed the exchange of its 50% ownership of Smurfit MBI and consideration of approximately €185 million for SSCC's assets. Consideration for the transaction was financed by US$205 million of 9.625% senior notes due 2012 issued in February, 2003.
35 Parent Undertaking and Controlling Party
The immediate controlling party and the parent undertaking of the smallest group of which the company is a member, and for which group financial statements are prepared, is MDP Acquisitions plc, a company incorporated in Ireland. The ultimate controlling party and the parent undertaking of the largest group of which the company is a member, and for which group financial statements are prepared, is MDCP Acquisitions Ltd., a company incorporated in Ireland.
36 Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986
These financial statements do not comprise full accounts within the meaning of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1986 of Ireland, in so far as such accounts have to comply in full with the disclosure and other requirements of the Act. Full accounts for predecessor for all years up to 2001 have received unqualified audit reports. Full accounts for predecessor for all periods up to and including December 31, 2001 have been filed with the Irish Registrar of Companies and full accounts for successor for the period to December 31, 2002 will be filed in due course.
F-126
37 Differences Between Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in Ireland and in the United States
The Group's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Ireland ('Irish GAAP'), which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ('US GAAP'). The significant differences as they apply to the Group and the necessary adjustments are summarized below.
Goodwill
Irish GAAP, FRS 10, 'Goodwill and Intangible Assets,' requires goodwill to be capitalized as an intangible fixed asset and amortized in the statement of income over its estimated useful live. Under US GAAP, the Group adopted the accounting standard SFAS No. 142, 'Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets', which was published in June 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill will no longer be amortized, but will be tested for impairment on an annual basis and whenever indicators of impairment arise. The Group's identified indicators of impairment under SFAS No. 142 are the same as under SAB No. 100, 'Restructuring and Impairment Charges.' Goodwill will no longer be allocated to other long-lived assets for impairment testing in accordance with SFAS No. 121.
The goodwill impairment test, which is based on fair value, is to be performed on a reporting unit level using a two-step impairment test. A reporting unit is defined by SFAS No. 131 as an operating segment or one level lower. In the first step, the carrying value of the assets including goodwill and other intangibles less current liabilities of the reporting unit is compared with the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the long-term assets and net working capital exceeds their carrying value, goodwill is not deemed to be impaired and step two of the impairment test is not required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is lower than the carrying value of long-term assets and net working capital, step two needs to be performed to measure the amount of impairment. In step two, the fair value of all assets and liabilities of the reporting unit needs to be determined, as if the reporting unit had been acquired on a stand-alone basis. The fair value of the reporting unit's assets and liabilities is compared with the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, no impairment charge is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, the difference needs to be recognized as impairment of goodwill in operating income.
The initial impairment test must be carried out on the date the new accounting rules are adopted. Impairment resulting from the transitional test must be recorded separately from operating results, as a 'cumulative effect arising from the adoption of new accounting principles.' JSG's transitional impairment test was performed as of January 1, 2002. The fair value of each reporting unit was determined based upon JSG's segment reporting. According to these calculations, the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the carrying value of their net assets. Therefore, the additional analysis was not required and there was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS No. 142.
The Group's annual impairment test will be performed during the fourth quarter of each year. The Group did not perform an annual impairment test as of December 31, 2002 as the purchase price allocation for the acquisition of JSG had not been completed by December 31, 2002. The Group has not identified any indicators of impairment as of December 31, 2002.
F-127
As required by SFAS No. 142 the following table identifies net income for the period from September 3, 2002, through December 31, 2002, the period ended September 2,2002, and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, adjusted to exclude amortization of goodwill:
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
|
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
Reported net income under US GAAP | | | 10,769 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 |
SFAS No. 142 effect—Goodwill | | | — | | | — | | | 21,148 | | | 17,912 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Pro forma net income under US GAAP | | € | 10,769 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 173,069 | | € | 263,582 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Prior to January 1, 2002, under US GAAP, goodwill would be capitalized as an intangible fixed asset and amortized against income over its estimated economic life, not exceeding 40 years. Under Irish GAAP, prior to January 1 1998, goodwill was immediately written off against shareholders equity. Predecessor did not reinstate goodwill previously written off to reserves, as this was not required under FRS 10. Consequently an adjustment was required under US GAAP to capitalize and amortize all goodwill previously written off to shareholders equity.
Revaluation
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention. Prior to January 1, 2000, the Group's policy was to periodically revalue certain properties. Under Irish GAAP, in accordance with the transitional arrangements in FRS 15, 'Tangible Fixed Assets', certain land and buildings continued to be included at their previously revalued amount. Under US GAAP, such revaluations would not be permitted and depreciation would be computed on the original historical cost. The effect of this difference on the charge for depreciation is not material.
Deferred taxation
Irish GAAP, FRS 19—'Deferred Tax' requires full provision to be made for deferred tax arising from timing differences between the recognition of gains and losses in the financial statements and their recognition in tax computations. In adopting FRS 19, we have chosen not to discount deferred tax assets and liabilities. This standard eliminates a number of the differences between accounting for deferred tax under Irish and US GAAP. However under SFAS 109—'Accounting for Income Taxes', deferred taxation would also be provided under US GAAP on the difference between the accounting and taxation bases of assets and liabilities of subsidiaries acquired. Deferred income taxes on the taxable US GAAP adjustments are included within the reconciliations.
From January 1, 2002, the Group adopted FRS 19—'Deferred Tax'. The cumulative effect of the change in policy has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment and previously reported figures have been restated.
F-128
Pension costs
Under Irish GAAP, FRS 17—'Retirement Benefits' requires that scheme assets are valued at fair value and scheme liabilities are measured using the projected unit method. Net scheme assets and liabilities, reduced by deferred tax amounts, are required to be shown on the face of the balance sheet as a pension surplus or deficit as appropriate. The Group has also adopted Urgent Issues Task Force abstract 35—'Death-in-service and incapacity benefits' ('UITF 35'). Under US GAAP the main differences with Irish GAAP arise in relation to the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and the treatment of death-in-service and incapacity benefits. Under US GAAP, net scheme assets and liabilities are required to be shown gross of deferred tax amounts.
Predecessor, under Irish GAAP, followed SSAP 24—'Accounting for Pension Costs', whereby the pension costs in respect of predecessor's defined benefit plans were assessed in accordance with the advice of independent actuaries using assumptions and methods which, taken as a whole, produced the actuaries' best estimates of the cost of providing the relevant pension benefits. For the purposes of the reconciliations of predecessor below, the provisions of SFAS 87—'Employers Accounting for Pensions' were adopted as of February 1, 1992 for the Group's principal plans. The Group did not implement SFAS 87 as of the effective date specified in the standard for foreign plans for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1988, due to the unavailability of actuarial data. A portion of the transitional asset at that date had been allocated to shareholders' equity based on a ratio of 3/15 being the number of years elapsed between the effective date in SFAS 87 over the remaining service lives at February 1, 1992 of employees expected to receive benefits.
Dividends
Under Irish GAAP, final dividends are provided for in the year in respect of which they are recommended by the board of directors for approval by the shareholders. Under US GAAP, dividends are provided for when declared.
Exceptional and extraordinary items
Under Irish GAAP, profits and losses associated with early debt extinguishment are included in income before taxation. For predecessor, these costs would have been treated as extraordinary items under US GAAP.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145—'Rescission of FASB Statements No.4, 44 and 62, Amendment of FASB No.13 and Technical Corrections'. SFAS 145 requires, in most cases, gains and losses on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations, rather than extraordinary items. The statement is effective for fiscal years after May 15, 2002.
F-129
Investment in SSCC
Prior to the acquisition of JSG on September 3, 2002, the Group's main investment in the US was in SSCC. At the time of the acquisition, JSG distributed to its shareholders by way of a share capital reduction its 29.3% interest in SSCC. In the periods presented prior to the acquisition SSCC was an associate of which JSG owned between 33% and 29.3%. For the periods prior to the acquisition, Group equity accounted for SSCC. For the periods after the acquisition, Group did not equity account for SSCC.
The reconciliation of net income below reflects the effects in each year presented of the differences between Irish GAAP and US GAAP of the Group's share of SSCC's results of operations. The reconciliation of shareholders' equity reflects the cumulative effects of the adjustments to income and the different basis of the Group's investment under US GAAP.
Hyper-inflationary economies
The Group accounts for the activities of its subsidiaries in Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela, which have high rates of inflation, using the US dollar as the functional currency.
Under US GAAP for each of the periods presented, Mexico and Colombia would not be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Mexican Peso and Colombian Peso respectively would have been used as the functional currency. For the periods January 1, 2002 through September 2, 2002 and September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002, Venezuela would not be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Bolivar would have been used as the functional currency. For each of the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, Venezuela would be regarded as hyper-inflationary and the Group's reporting currency, the euro, would be used as the functional currency rather than the US Dollar. The application of US GAAP has no material effect on the reported net income of these subsidiaries.
Stock based employee compensation expense
Predecessor operated variable option plans. As the options did not vest until certain targets were achieved, the number of shares which could be acquired by employees was not fully determinable until after the date of grant. In accordance with Urgent Issues Task Force abstract 17—'Employee Share Schemes' ('UITF 17'), under Irish GAAP predecessor's employee options did not result in charges against income except to the extent that the market value of the shares at the date of grant exceeded the amount the employee must pay to exercise the option.
Under US GAAP, following the measurement principles of APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ('APB 25'), compensation expense would be accrued and booked to income over the vesting period. The vesting period commences when it becomes probable that the underlying targets attaching to the options will be achieved and the number of shares will be known and ends with the date when the granting of the shares is not contingent upon the performance of additional services or other conditions. Compensation expense would be booked on a period by period basis to reflect the difference between the price an employee must pay to acquire the shares underlying the option and the market price of the shares at the end of each accounting period until the final vesting date.
F-130
SFAS 123—Accounting for Stock Based Compensation encourages, but does not require, compensation expense for employee stock options to be measured based on their fair value at the date of grant, determined using option valuation models. Successor and predecessor have elected to continue to account for stock based employee compensation in accordance with APB 25 and related interpretations and to provide the proforma information required by SFAS 123.
Treasury stock
A subsidiary of predecessor held 25,000,000 ordinary shares in JSG which cost €64,280,000. Under Irish GAAP, the cost of own shares is deducted from retained earnings. Under US GAAP, the cost of treasury stock that had not been retired would be separately disclosed in the balance sheet as a deduction from shareholders' equity.
Debt instruments issue costs
Under Irish GAAP debt issue costs are deducted from the proceeds of the relevant debt instruments. Under US GAAP such costs would be shown as deferred charges in the balance sheet. In both cases the amount of such costs are expensed at a constant rate of interest on the outstanding balance of the debt.
Accounting for associates
Irish GAAP requires separate disclosure of operating earnings, net interest, exceptional items and the taxation charge arising in associates. Under US GAAP earnings of associates, net of taxation would be shown as a single line item in arriving at net income.
Financial instruments
Under Irish GAAP all hedging instruments are matched with their underlying hedged item. Each instrument's gain or loss is brought into the income statement and its fair value into the balance sheet at the same time as is the matched underlying asset, liability, income or cost.
Under FAS 133, all derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values. Changes in fair value are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders' equity as a component of comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative qualifies for hedge accounting in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 133, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are recorded in income along with the corresponding portions of the changes in the fair value of the hedged items, to the extent they are effective as hedges. Changes in fair value of derivatives accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective as hedges, are recorded in other comprehensive income net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair values of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are reported in net income.
The Group adopted SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, on January 1, 2001.
F-131
Impairment writedowns
Under Irish GAAP, impairment writedowns are included in accumulated depreciation. Under US GAAP they would be deducted from the cost of the assets identified as being impaired.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, 'Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets'. SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale consistent with the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121. While it supersedes portions of APB Opinion 30, 'Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions', it retains the discontinued operations presentation, yet it broadens that presentation to include a component of an entity (rather than a segment of a business). However, discontinued operations are no longer recorded at net realizable value and future operating losses are no longer recognized before they occur. Under SFAS No. 144, it is no longer necessary to allocate goodwill to long-lived assets and then perform impairment testing. Furthermore, it has been stipulated that in situations where it is expected that certain flows of capital will be accumulated in areas subject to impairment testing, these can be calculated on the basis of a probability-weighted cash flow estimate. SFAS No. 144 also establishes criteria for determining when an asset should be treated as held for sale.
SFAS No. 144 was effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Accordingly, the Group adopted SFAS No. 144 as of January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Restructuring and integration costs
The rules for recognizing restructuring and integration costs in the statement of income are generally consistent between Irish and US GAAP. However, under Irish GAAP, on the acquisition of a business, costs in connection with restructuring would not be recorded in purchase accounting but would be expensed as incurred post acquisition. Under US GAAP, a purchase accounting liability would be recorded and goodwill would be increased.
Purchase price allocation
Under Irish GAAP the entire excess purchase price is allocated to goodwill. Under US GAAP, the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired would first be allocated to identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values, with the remainder being allocated to goodwill.
Leveraged buyout transactions
Under US GAAP, because of the application of the EITF issue 88-16, 'Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions', only partial purchase accounting applied to the acquisition. The approximate 8% rollover investment by senior management shareholders would be valued at their predecessor basis in JSG as opposed to the inherent new basis in successor. The primary effect of that adjustment would be to reduce goodwill and shareholders equity.
F-132
Composition of Purchaser Group
As part of the JSG acquisition, certain assets were transferred to newcos, wholly owned subsidiaries of the parent. The newcos borrowed €125 million which was lent to parent to fund a €125 million capital contribution to issuer. Issuer then made a €125 million capital contribution to purchaser. Under US GAAP, the newcos would be consolidated in purchaser's financial statements, causing debt of purchaser to increase and equity of purchaser to decrease. Even though purchaser under US GAAP would consolidate the newcos, purchaser has no repayment obligations relating to the newco debt, which is recourse only to the assets of the newcos.
F-133
The following is a summary of the significant adjustments to income and shareholders' equity which would be required if US GAAP were to be applied instead of Irish GAAP:
| | Successor
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| |
---|
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income reported in the consolidated statement of income | | | 2,356 | | | 95,422 | | | 150,417 | | | 225,932 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill amortization | | | 10,087 | | | 5,801 | | | (12,328 | ) | | (12,177 | ) |
| Cumulative goodwill amortization on businesses disposed | | | — | | | 183 | | | — | | | — | |
| Retirement benefits | | | 1,738 | | | 7,403 | | | 8,546 | | | 10,812 | |
| Share of earnings of associates—SSCC | | | — | | | 17,116 | | | 7,668 | | | (907 | ) |
| Deferred taxation | | | 773 | | | (15,717 | ) | | (4,570 | ) | | 14,882 | |
| Stock compensation expense | | | — | | | (17,699 | ) | | (5,277 | ) | | 7,128 | |
| Financial instruments—fair value | | | 61 | | | 3,464 | | | 12,522 | | | — | |
| Cumulative effect on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (5,057 | ) | | — | |
| Consolidation of companies sold to affiliates | | | (4,246 | ) | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 8,413 | | | 551 | | | 1,504 | | | 19,738 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 10,769 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 151,921 | | € | 245,670 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Arising from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | 10,769 | | | 98,544 | | | 158,971 | | | 241,709 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | | 10,769 | | | 98,544 | | | 158,971 | | | 241,709 | |
Extraordinary items (net of tax: September 2, 2002: €1,715,000; 2001: €1,329,000; 2000: (€280,000)) | | | — | | | (2,571 | ) | | (1,993 | ) | | 3,961 | |
Cumulative effect on prior year of change in accounting policy—adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (5,057 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Net income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 10,769 | | € | 95,973 | | € | 151,921 | | € | 245,670 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-134
Comprehensive Income
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | | 10,769 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 | |
Other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial instruments—fair value | | | (4,534 | ) | | 12,202 | | | 4,138 | | | — | |
Cumulative effect on prior years adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | — | | | (3,361 | ) | | — | |
Unrealised foreign currency translation adjustments | | | 16,900 | | | (193,666 | ) | | 28,906 | | | 31,323 | |
Net actuarial gain recognized in retirement benefit schemes | | | 3,773 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Net minimum pension liability adjustment | | | — | | | (151,605 | ) | | — | | | — | |
Share of associates other comprehensive income/(loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment | | | — | | | — | | | (33,174 | ) | | — | |
Deferred hedge loss | | | — | | | 1,605 | | | (3,613 | ) | | — | |
Unrealised losses and foreign currency translation adjustments | | | — | | | 2,889 | | | (1,642 | ) | | (2,552 | ) |
Net loss reclassified into earnings | | | — | | | 2,247 | | | — | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive income | | € | 26,908 | | € | (230,355 | ) | € | 143,175 | | € | 274,441 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-135
Shareholders' equity
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | 2002
| | Restated 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Shareholders' equity as reported in the consolidated balance sheet | | | 871,207 | | | 2,525,191 | |
| |
| |
| |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Goodwill—Gross | | | 59,846 | | | 493,119 | |
| —Aggregate amortization | | | 9,953 | | | (95,609 | ) |
Hyper-inflationary economies—property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | |
| —Cost | | | 17,519 | | | (392,192 | ) |
| —Aggregate depreciation | | | (7,372 | ) | | 193,042 | |
Hyper-inflationary economies—investments | | | 37 | | | (12,128 | ) |
Property revaluations | | | | | | | |
| —Cost | | | — | | | (10,579 | ) |
| —Aggregate depreciation | | | — | | | 2,611 | |
Retirement benefits | | | (16,146 | ) | | 67,270 | |
Proposed dividends | | | — | | | 50,575 | |
Investment in SSCC | | | — | | | (131,861 | ) |
Deferred taxation | | | (65,785 | ) | | (40,019 | ) |
Financial instruments—fair value | | | 19,435 | | | 16,660 | |
Cumulative effect on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | (8,418 | ) |
Minority share of US GAAP adjustments | | | (662 | ) | | 28,185 | |
Consolidate newcos | | | (125,000 | ) | | — | |
Rollover investment by JSG management | | | (77,084 | ) | | — | |
Shareholders' equity of companies sold to affiliates | | | (1,155 | ) | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | (186,414 | ) | | 160,656 | |
| |
| |
| |
Shareholders' equity as adjusted to accord with US GAAP | | € | 684,793 | | € | 2,685,847 | |
| |
| |
| |
F-136
Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income Amounts
Successor
| | Currency Translation Adjustments
| | Financial Instruments Gains/(losses)
| | Share of Associates Other Comprehensive Income
| | Net Actuarial Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Retirement Benefit Schemes
| | Total
|
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
|
---|
September 3, 2002 | | | — | | | — | | — | | | — | | | — |
Movement from September 3, 2002 through December 31, 2002 | | | 16,900 | | | (4,534 | ) | — | | | 3,773 | | | 16,139 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Balance at December 31, 2002 | | € | 16,900 | | € | (4,534 | ) | — | | € | 3,773 | | € | 16,139 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Predecessor
| | Restated Currency Translation Adjustments
| | Financial Instruments Gains/(losses)
| | Share of Associates Other Comprehensive Income
| | Net Actuarial Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Retirement Benefit Schemes
| | Restated Total
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Balance at December 31, 1999 | | | (2,793 | ) | | — | | | (1,596 | ) | — | | | (4,389 | ) |
Movement in the year | | | 31,323 | | | — | | | (2,552 | ) | — | | | 28,771 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2000 | | | 28,530 | | | — | | | (4,148 | ) | — | | | 24,382 | |
Cumulative effect of on prior years of adoption of SFAS 133 | | | — | | | (3,361 | ) | | — | | — | | | (3,361 | ) |
Movement in the year | | | 28,906 | | | 4,138 | | | (38,429 | ) | — | | | (5,385 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Balance at December 31, 2001 | | € | 57,436 | | € | 777 | | € | (42,577 | ) | — | | € | 15,636 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash Flows
The consolidated statement of cash flows prepared under Irish GAAP presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP by SFAS 95—Statement of Cash Flows. This standard differs, however, with regard to the classification of items within the statements and as regards the definition of cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, cash would not include bank overdrafts. The movements on such bank overdrafts are required to be included in financing activities under SFAS 95. Under US GAAP only short term investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition are included in cash equivalents. Under Irish GAAP movements in short term investments are classified as management of liquid resources. Under Irish GAAP, cash flows are presented separately for operating activities, dividends received from associates, returns on investments and servicing of finance, taxation, capital expenditure and financial investment, acquisitions and disposals, equity dividends paid, management of liquid resources and financing. US GAAP, however, requires only three categories of cash flow activity to be reported: operating, investing and financing.
Cash flows from taxation and returns on investments and servicing of finance shown under Irish GAAP would be included as operating activities under US GAAP. Cash flows from capital expenditure,
F-137
financial investment and aquisitions and disposals would be included as investing activities under US GAAP. The payment of dividends would be included as a financing activity under US GAAP. Under US GAAP, capitalized interest is treated as part of the cost of the asset to which it relates and is thus included as part of investing cash flows; under Irish GAAP all interest is treated as part of returns on investments and servicing of finance.
The categories of cash flow activity under US GAAP are summarized as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Cash inflow from operating activities | | | 173,736 | | | 206,485 | | | 396,295 | | | 334,163 | |
Cash (outflow) on investing activities | | | (2,598,294 | ) | | (211,558 | ) | | (252,341 | ) | | (97,651 | ) |
Cash inflow / (outflow) from financing activities | | | 2,431,620 | | | (26,723 | ) | | (208,137 | ) | | (137,725 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Decrease/(increase) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 7,062 | | | (31,796 | ) | | (64,183 | ) | | 98,787 | |
Currency adjustment on cash and cash equivalents | | | (4,273 | ) | | (7,627 | ) | | 4,326 | | | 1,942 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | | 170,063 | | | 209,486 | | | 269,343 | | | 168,614 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | | € | 172,852 | | € | 170,063 | | € | 209,486 | | € | 269,343 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-138
Deferred taxation—additional information required by SFAS 109
The analysis of the US GAAP deferred taxation liability required by SFAS 109 is as follows:
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor 2002
| | Predecessor 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Deferred taxation liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Excess of book value over tax value of fixed assets | | | 214,334 | | | 189,868 | |
Other timing differences | | | 85,447 | | | 92,766 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | 299,781 | | | 282,634 | |
| |
| |
| |
Deferred taxation assets: | | | | | | | |
Net operating loss carry forwards | | | (53,387 | ) | | (71,546 | ) |
Valuation allowances | | | 36,234 | | | 54,829 | |
Retirement benefits | | | (61,047 | )(1) | | — | |
Other timing differences | | | (54,241 | ) | | (87,185 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | | (132,441 | ) | | (103,902 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 167,340 | | € | 178,732 | |
| |
| |
| |
Split as follows: | | | | | | | |
Current | | | (9,894 | ) | | (256 | ) |
Non current | | | 177,234 | | | 178,988 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 167,340 | | € | 178,732 | |
| |
| |
| |
- (1)
- Retirement benefits includes €57,341,000 in relation to deferred tax which has been recorded within `Pension liabilities' (note 25).
Valuation allowances are set up for losses carried forward in those jurisdictions in which it is more likely than not that the losses carried forward will not be utilized to offset future taxable income or in which there is no deferred tax liability against which the related asset can be offset prior to expiry.
F-139
Share option schemes—additional information required by SFAS 123
Under the Group's 1987 Option Schemes, the 1999 Executive Share Option Plan and the 2000 United Kingdom Executive Approved Share Option Plan (the "Schemes"), selected employees of the Company and its subsidiaries were granted non-qualified options to acquire ordinary shares of the Company. The share options were exercisable at a price equal to the market price, as defined, of the Company's ordinary shares at the time of grant. The options became exercisable upon the occurrence of certain trigger events, as defined, within 10 years from the date of grant. The options were to expire not later than 10 years from the date of grant.
The Group elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its share options because the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS 123 requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee share options. SFAS 123 requires pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share. This information has been determined as if the Group had accounted for those employee share options issued subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that statement. Due to the recognition of option expense over the vesting period, the pro forma net income and earnings per share information required by SFAS 123 is not likely to be representative of the effects on the reported pro forma net income and earnings per share for future years. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
Predecessor | | | | | |
Expected option life (years) | | 5 | | 5 | |
| |
| |
| |
Risk-free weighted average interest rate | | 4.4 | % | 5.3 | % |
| |
| |
| |
Stock volatility | | 50.0 | % | 44.6 | % |
| |
| |
| |
Dividend yield | | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | % |
| |
| |
| |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected share price volatility. Because the Group's employees share options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee share options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting
F-140
period (see "Stock based employee compensation expense" above for a description of the vesting period).
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | Restated 2001
| | Restated 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Net income attributable to common sharholders under US GAAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | | 10,769 | | | 95,973 | | | 151,921 | | | 245,670 | |
Add: Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects | | | — | | | 21,540 | | | 11,437 | | | 760 | |
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects | | | — | | | (15,076 | ) | | (7,531 | ) | | (5,099 | ) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Pro forma | | € | 10,769 | | € | 102,437 | | € | 155,827 | | € | 241,331 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The Group's 1999 Performance Share Plan allowed participating executives to receive annual allocations that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation was made to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of not less than four years.
Under the Special Long Term Incentive Plans adopted in 2000, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, President & Chief Operations Officer and Chief Financial Officer each received an allocation that could result in the award of rights to acquire ordinary shares in the Company for a nominal consideration. Awards were granted over a proportion of the shares over which an allocation was made to the extent that pre-set performance targets were achieved over a performance period of three years.
During 2000, the Company introduced save as you earn share option schemes for eligible employees in both Ireland (the "Irish SAYE Scheme") and the UK (the "UK SAYE Scheme"). Under these schemes, employees could opt to save fixed amounts on a regular basis, over a three-year, five-year or seven-year period, subject to a maximum monthly saving of €320 (Irish SAYE Scheme) or Stg£250 (UK SAYE Scheme). The participants could use the amounts saved plus interest earned to acquire shares under options granted by the Company at the start of the savings period.
F-141
A summary of the Company's share options and related activity is as follows:
| | Shares under option
| | Restated Option Price Range
| | Restated Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
---|
Outstanding at December 31, 1999 | | 43,721,895 | | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.83 |
Granted | | 24,769,624 | | €0.00–€2.60 | | €1.34 |
Exercised | | (1,106,668 | ) | €1.25–€2.34 | | €1.30 |
Cancelled | | (3,564,623 | ) | €0.00–€2.60 | | €1.77 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 | | 63,820,228 | | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.66 |
Granted | | 17,342,570 | | €0.00–€2.21 | | €1.68 |
Exercised | | (1,092,779 | ) | €1.25–€2.29 | | €1.86 |
Cancelled | | (3,985,311 | ) | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.96 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 | | 76,084,708 | | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.64 |
Exercised | | (55,601,020 | ) | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.63 |
Cancelled | | (20,483,688 | ) | €0.00–€2.62 | | €1.66 |
| |
| |
| |
|
Outstanding at September 2, 2002 | | — | | — | | — |
| |
| |
| |
|
No options were granted in 2002.
The number of options exercisable at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was 7,722,892 and 4,759,600 respectively and the weighted average exercise price of these options was €1.94 and €1.91.
No options were outstanding at September 2, 2002.
Successor had no options outstanding at December 31, 2002.
F-142
Pension costs and termination indemnities—information required by SFAS 87 and SFAS 132
The components of the Group defined benefit net pension expense and termination indemnities for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 under SFAS 87 are estimated to be as follows:
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | Jan. 1, 2002 through Sept. 2, 2002
| | 2001
| | 2000
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Service cost | | | 9,433 | | | 17,085 | | | 25,531 | | | 26,646 | |
Interest cost | | | 19,509 | | | 36,548 | | | 49,351 | | | 47,537 | |
Expected return on plan assets | | | (15,455 | ) | | (37,950 | ) | | (55,525 | ) | | (50,822 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized transition obligation or asset | | | (84 | ) | | (674 | ) | | (1,047 | ) | | (1,084 | ) |
Recognized gains and losses | | | (2,053 | ) | | (308 | ) | | (563 | ) | | (2,374 | ) |
Prior service cost recognized | | | 1,226 | | | 607 | | | 879 | | | 662 | |
Gain due to settlement or curtailment | | | 64 | | | 516 | | | 3,934 | | | — | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | € | 12,640 | | € | 15,824 | | € | 22,560 | | € | 20,565 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
F-143
The Group's principal defined benefit schemes are in Ireland, the UK, the US and Canada. The estimated fund status of these schemes under SFAS 87 amended by SFAS 132 was as follows:
| |
| |
| |
---|
| | Successor
| | Predecessor
| |
---|
| | Sept. 3, 2002 through Dec. 31, 2002
| | 2001
| |
---|
| | €000
| | €000
| |
---|
Change in benefit obligation | | | | | | | |
Benefit obligation at beginning of period | | | 885,688 | | | 725,004 | |
Service cost | | | 8,708 | | | 24,313 | |
Interest cost | | | 17,248 | | | 44,496 | |
Contributions by plan participants | | | 4,070 | | | 7,873 | |
Actuarial gains and losses | | | 6,419 | | | 20,141 | |
Benefits paid | | | (11,487 | ) | | (36,530 | ) |
Divestitures, curtailments or settlements | | | (344 | ) | | 3,891 | |
Plan amendments | | | 1,216 | | | 1,827 | |
Currency adjustments | | | (27,837 | ) | | 11,108 | |
| |
| |
| |
Benefit obligation at end of period | | | 883,681 | | | 802,123 | |
| |
| |
| |
Change in plan assets | | | | | | | |
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period | | | 637,767 | | | 754,164 | |
Actual return on assets | | | 8,100 | | | (33,750 | ) |
Contributions by employer | | | 14,410 | | | 31,863 | |
Contributions by plan participants | | | 4,978 | | | 7,874 | |
Benefits paid | | | (11,757 | ) | | (36,400 | ) |
Divestitures | | | 5 | | | (43 | ) |
Currency adjustment | | | (9,181 | ) | | 10,540 | |
| |
| |
| |
Fair value of plan assets at end of period | | | 644,322 | | | 734,248 | |
| |
| |
| |
Funded status of the plans | | | (239,359 | ) | | (67,875 | ) |
Amounts available to be applied as an increase/(reduction) of future pension costs: | | | | | | | |
Unamortized prior service cost | | | — | | | 12,871 | |
Unrecognized transition net obligation or net asset | | | — | | | (2,796 | ) |
Unrecognized actuarial gains or losses | | | (2,832 | ) | | 114,718 | |
| |
| |
| |
(Accrued)/prepaid pension costs | | € | (242,191 | ) | € | 56,918 | |
| |
| |
| |
Plan assets in excess of / (less than) projected benefit obligations include overfunded plans at December 31, 2002 of nil (2001: €14,970,000) and underfunded plans at December 31, 2002 of €239,359,000 (2001: €82,845,000). The calculation of the US GAAP pension expense for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the projected benefit obligation at that date assumed a discount rate of approximately 5.9% (2001: 6.9%). The other main assumption was that the rate of increase in the compensation levels is expected to average 3.6% (2001: 4.2%; 2000: 3.8%) and that the long term return on plan assets is expected to average 7.1% (2001: 8.3%; 2000: 7.4%).
F-144
The assets of the plans are invested primarily in equities, fixed interest securities, insurance contracts and property.
The Group operates termination indemnity plans in certain countries as appropriate to local circumstances. In accordance with local practice, these are financed internally and the projected benefit obligations of these plans are provided for in the financial statements. The projected benefit obligations of these plans was €34,837,000 at December 31, 2002 (2001: €40,852,000). The calculation of the expense for the periods ended September 2, 2002 and December 31, 2002 and the projected benefit obligation at those dates assumed a weighted average discount rate of approximately 6.9% (2001: 10.9%). The other main assumptions used are the same as those used for the purposes of Irish GAAP. These include the assumption that the rate of increase in compensation levels is expected to average 2.7% (2001: 6.2%).
38 New Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, `Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations'. SFAS No. 143 requires companies to record an appropriate charge in connection with the retirement or disposal of property and equipment in the period in which this took place, provided that the fair value can be reasonably determined. The costs incurred in the retirement or disposal of assets are netted against the carrying amount of the long-lived assets. Companies will calculate the changes over time in the amount of the anticipated expenses to be incurred for the retirement or disposal of an asset by discounting the amount calculated at the beginning of the period. The interest rate used in the calculation of this change corresponds to the risk-adjusted rate to be fixed in accordance with the company's credit rating the first time the expenses are recognized. The carrying amount of the related property and equipment increases by the amount calculated, which is then written down over the objects' remaining useful lives and recorded as operating expenses in the income statement. SFAS No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Group believes that adopting SFAS No. 143 will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2002, the FASB published SFAS No. 146, `Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities'. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supersedes the preliminary provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, `Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)'. This statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity must be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, the liability for an exit cost was recognized as the date of an entity's commitment to a concrete exit or disposal plan. The new standard holds that a company's commitment to a plan does not represent a direct obligation to another party that would be defined as a liability. SFAS 146 therefore rescinds the definitions and requirements for the accounting of exit costs contained in Issue 94-3 until a liability is actually incurred and stipulates that the amount of the liability be initially measured at the current fair value. However, this standard does not apply to expenses arising in connection with the retirement of activities in divisions acquired by way of a combination or covered by SFAS 144. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 146 to have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results, operations or cash flows.
F-145
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (`FIN 45'), `Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.' FIN 45 requires a guarantor to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken by it in issuing the guarantee. It also expands the disclosure requirements in the financial statements of the guarantor with respect to its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. The Group is required to adopt the initial recognition and initial measurement accounting provisions of this interpretation on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Group does not anticipate the adoption to have a material effect on the Group's financial position or results, operations or cash flows.
In December 2002, SFAS No. 148, `Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure', was issued. SFAS No. 148 supplements SFAS No. 123, `Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation', and offers alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting of stock-based employee compensation recommended in SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148 also supplements the disclosure obligations contained in SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28 `Interim Financial Reporting'. The transition and disclosure obligations contained in SFAS 148 apply to fiscal years after December 15, 2002; earlier application is also permitted.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretations No. 46 (`FIN 46'), `Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.' This interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, `Consolidated Financial Statements,' to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective February 1, 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and July 31, 2003 for variable interest entities created prior to February 1, 2003. The Group does not anticipate that the adoption of FIN 46 to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
39 Comparative Figures
Certain figures for the prior years have been adjusted to conform with 2002 classifications and disclosure requirements.
F-146
MDP Acquisitions plc
the indirect owner of
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/F-4/0001047469-03-013799/g900678.jpg)
Offer to Exchange
$205,000,000 95/8% Senior Notes due 2012
(CUSIP Nos. G59404AA4 and 58282PAA9) for
substantially identical securities that have been registered
under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933
PROSPECTUS
, 2003
PART II: INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
Item 20: Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
The following is a summary of the statutes, charter and bylaw provisions or other arrangements under which the Registrants' directors and officers are insured or indemnified against liability in their capacities as such. All of the directors and officers of the Registrants are covered by insurance policies maintained and held in effect by JSG against certain liabilities for actions taken in their capacities as such, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Registrants Incorporated Under Irish Law
Each of MDP Acquisitions plc and MDCP Acquisitions I is incorporated under the laws of Ireland. The Articles of Association of issuer provides for the following with respect to indemnification.
Subject to the provisions of, and so far as may be admitted by the Companies Acts, 1963-2001, every director, managing director, chief executive, auditor, secretary or other officer of issuer shall be entitled to be indemnified by issuer against all costs, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him in the execution and discharge of his duties or proceedings, civil or criminal, which relate to anything done or omitted or alleged to have been done or omitted by him as an officer or employee of issuer and in which judgement is given in his favour (or the proceedings are otherwise dispose of without any finding or admission of any material breach of duty on his part) or in which he is acquitted or in connection with any application under any statute for relief from liability in respect of any such act or omission in which relief is granted to him by the Court.
The directors shall have power to purchase and maintain for any director or officer of issuer insurance against any such liability as referred to in Section 200 of the Companies Act 1963.
Item 21. Exhibits.
The attached Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 22. Undertakings.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
- (1)
- to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
- (i)
- To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
- (ii)
- To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement;
- (iii)
- To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in the Registration Statement.
- (2)
- That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
- (3)
- To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
II-1
- (4)
- To file a post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement to include any financial statements required by Item 8.A. of Form 20-F at the start of any delayed offering or throughout a continuous offering. Financial statements and information otherwise required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act need not be furnished,providedthat the registrant includes in the prospectus, by means of a post-effective amendment, financial statements required pursuant to this paragraph (a)(4) and other information necessary to ensure that all other information in the prospectus is at least as current as the date of those financial statements.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 20, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a directors, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as a part of this Registration Statement in reliance on Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be a part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(d) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(e) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in the registration statement when it became effective.
II-2
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, MDP Acquisitions plc has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form F-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Chicago, State of Illinois, on the 16th day of April, 2003.
| | MDP ACQUISITIONS PLC |
| | By: | | /s/ SAMUEL M. MENCOFF Samuel M. Mencoff Director |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Ian J. Curley, Gary W. McGann, Samuel M. Mencoff and Thomas S. Souleles, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement and any subsequent registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement and power of attorney have been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
| | Capacity
| | Date
|
---|
| | | | |
/s/ IAN J. CURLEY Ian J. Curley | | Director and Chief Financial Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ GARY W. MCGANN Gary W. McGann | | Director and Chief Executive Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ SAMUEL M. MENCOFF Samuel M. Mencoff | | Director and Authorized Representative in the United States | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ THOMAS S. SOULELES Thomas S. Souleles | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ GERARD A. FAGAN Gerard A. Fagan | | Principal Accounting Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
II-3
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, MDCP Acquisitions I has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form F-4 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Chicago, State of Illinois, on the 16th day of April, 2003.
| | MDCP ACQUISITIONS I |
| | By: | | /s/ SAMUEL M. MENCOFF Samuel M. Mencoff Director |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John A. Canning, Jr., Ian J. Curley, Justin S. Huscher, Gary W. McGann, Christopher J. McGowan, Samuel M. Mencoff, Thomas S. Souleles, Anthony P.J. Smurfit and Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Registration Statement and any subsequent registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their, or his or her substitutes or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement and power of attorney have been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
| | Capacity
| | Date
|
---|
| | | | |
/s/ JOHN A. CANNING, JR. John A. Canning, Jr. | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ IAN J. CURLEY Ian J. Curley | | Director and Chief Financial Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ JUSTIN S. HUSCHER Justin S. Huscher | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ GARY W. MCGANN Gary W. McGann | | Director and Chief Executive Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. MCGOWAN Christopher J. McGowan | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
II-4
/s/ SAMUEL M. MENCOFF Samuel M. Mencoff | | Director and Authorized Representative in the United States | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ THOMAS S. SOULELES Thomas S. Souleles | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ ANTHONY P.J. SMURFIT Anthony P.J. Smurfit | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ DR. MICHAEL W.J. SMURFIT Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit | | Director | | April 16, 2003 |
| | | | |
/s/ GERARD A. FAGAN Gerard A. Fagan | | Principal Accounting Officer | | April 16, 2003 |
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
| | Description
|
---|
1.1 | | Purchase Agreement, dated February 11, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as initial purchasers. |
3.1 | | Memorandum and Articles of Association of MDP Acquisitions plc.* |
3.2 | | Memorandum and Articles of Association of MDCP Acquisitions I.* |
4.1 | | Euro Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the euro senior notes issued on September 30, 2002.* |
4.2 | | Dollar Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the dollar senior notes issued on September 30, 2002.* |
4.3 | | Euro Indenture, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, relating to the euro senior notes issued on September 30, 2002.* |
4.4 | | Dollar Indenture, dated September 30, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, relating to the dollar senior notes issued on September 30, 2002 and February 14, 2003.* |
4.5 | | Euro Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, between MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG as the Euro Book-entry Depositary and the Euro Custodian, relating to the euro senior notes issued on September 30, 2002.* |
4.6 | | Dollar Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, between MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the Dollar Book-entry Depositary and the Dollar Custodian, relating to the dollar senior notes issued on September 30, 2002 and February 14, 2003.* |
4.7 | | Euro Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the euro subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
4.8 | | Dollar Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as representatives of the initial purchasers, relating to the dollar subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
4.9 | | Euro Indenture, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, and Deutsche Bank AG London, as Principal Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, related to the euro subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
| | |
II-6
4.10 | | Dollar Indenture, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Registrar and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A., as Paying Agent and Transfer Agent, relating to the dollar subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
4.11 | | Euro Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank AG London as the Euro Book-entry Depositary and the Euro Custodian, relating to the euro subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
4.12 | | Dollar Deposit and Custody Agreement, dated October 2, 2002, among MDP Acquisitions plc and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the Dollar Book-entry Depositary and the Dollar Custodian, relating to the dollar subordinated notes issued on October 2, 2002.* |
4.13 | | Indenture, dated November 15, 1995, among Smurfit Capital Funding Plc, as issuer, Jefferson Smurfit Group plc, as guarantor, Smurfit International B.V., as guarantor, Packaging International France, as guarantor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as Chemical Bank) as trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to the Form F-1 filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on November 2, 1995). |
4.14 | | Dollar Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee.* |
4.15 | | Euro Supplemental Indenture, dated February 14, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. |
4.16 | | Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 14, 2003, among MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I and Deutsche Bank AG London and Merrill Lynch International, as initial purchasers. |
5.1 | | Opinion of Kirkland & Ellis regarding the validity of the securities offered hereby. |
5.2 | | Opinion of William Fry. |
8.1 | | Opinion of Kirkland & Ellis regarding United States federal income tax considerations. |
10.1 | | Senior Credit Facility dated as of September 12, 2002 by and among MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited), MDCP Acquisitions I, MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank AG London, Merrill Lynch International, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., AIB Capital Markets, plc, Bank of America N.A., The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, The Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland, Credit Lyonnais, Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, London Branch and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(b)(1) to the Schedule TO/A filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on September 16, 2002). |
10.2 | | Bridge Facility dated September 10, 2002 by and among MDP Acquisitions plc, Deutsche Bank AG London, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(b)(2) to the Schedule TO/A filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on September 16, 2002). |
10.3 | | Priority Agreement dated September 16, 2002, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, among MDCP Acquisitions Limited, MDP Acquisitions plc and certain affiliated companies, Deutsche Bank AG London and certain other parties thereto.* |
| | |
II-7
10.4 | | Intercompany Loan Agreement, entered into on September 16, 2002, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, between MDP Acquisitions plc and MDCP Acquisitions I.* |
10.5 | | Amendment to Intercompany Loan Agreement dated September 27, 2002.* |
10.6 | | Amendment to Priority Agreement dated September 27, 2002.* |
10.7 | | Letter Agreement dated on or about July 4, 2002 between MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) and Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(d)(9) to the Schedule TO filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on July 5, 2002). |
10.8 | | Letter Agreement dated on or about July 4, 2002 between MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) and Gary McGann (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(d)(10) to the Schedule TO filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on July 5, 2002). |
10.9 | | Letter Agreement dated on or about July 4, 2002 between MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) and Anthony Smurfit (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(d)(11) to the Schedule TO filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on July 5, 2002). |
10.10 | | Letter Agreement dated on or about July 4, 2002 between MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) and Ian Curley (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99(d)(12) to the Schedule TO filed by Jefferson Smurfit Group plc on July 5, 2002). |
10.11 | | Amended and Restated Management Equity Agreement dated as of September 5, 2002 among MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) and each of Gary McGann, Anthony P.J. Smurfit, Ian J. Curley, and Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit.* |
10.12 | | Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 5, 2002 among MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited), each of the MDCP co-investors, and each of the other investors listed on the scheduled thereto.* |
10.13 | | Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Agreement dated as of September 5, 2002 among MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited), each of the MDCP co-investors, Dr. Michael W.J. Smurfit, Gary McGann, Anthony P.J. Smurfit, Ian J. Curley and each of the other investors listed on the schedule thereto.* |
10.14 | | Amended and Restated MDCP Acquisitions plc 2002 Management Equity Plan, adopted by the board of directors of MDCP Acquisitions plc (now known as MDCP Acquisitions Limited) on September 3, 2002.* |
10.15 | | Subscription and Shareholders Agreement, dated September 5, 2002, among MDCP Acquisitions plc and certain other parties thereto.* |
12.1 | | Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.* |
21.1 | | Subsidiaries of MDP Acquisitions plc.* |
23.1 | | Consent of Ernst & Young. |
23.2 | | Consents of Kirkland & Ellis (included in Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1). |
23.3 | | Consent of Jaakko Pöyry. |
23.4 | | Consent of William Fry. |
24.1 | | Power of Attorney (included in Part II to the Registration Statement). |
| | |
II-8
25.1 | | Statement of Eligibility of Trustee on Form T-1 under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas for the senior notes being registered hereby. |
99.1 | | Form of Letter of Transmittal for the senior notes.* |
99.2 | | Form of Instructions for the senior notes.* |
99.3 | | Form of Notice of Guaranteed Delivery for the senior notes.* |
99.4 | | Collateral Ranking Agreement, dated November 13, 2002, among MDCP Acquisitions Limited, MDP Acquisitions plc, MDCP Acquisitions I, certain subsidiaries of MDCP Acquisitions I, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as trustee, and Deutsche Bank AG London, as collateral agent.* |
- *
- Incorporated by reference from the Registrants' Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-101456).
II-9
QuickLinks
TABLE OF CONTENTSSUMMARYOur CompanyIndustry OverviewCompetitive StrengthsBusiness StrategyAsset Swap TransactionCorporate StructureThe JSG AcquisitionSUMMARY OF EXCHANGE OFFERSUMMARY OF TERMS OF EXCHANGE NOTESSummary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial DataRISK FACTORSCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSPRESENTATION OF OUR FINANCIAL INFORMATIONEXCHANGE RATE INFORMATIONMARKET, RANKING AND OTHER DATATHE TRANSACTIONSSENIOR NOTES EXCHANGE OFFERUSE OF PROCEEDSCAPITALIZATIONUNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTSMDP Acquisitions plc Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet(c) December 31, 2002 (euro in thousands)MDP Acquisitions plc Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (euro in thousands)MDP Acquisitions plc Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations(n) Year Ended December 31, 2002 (euro in thousands)MDP Acquisitions plc Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (euro in thousands)SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATAMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSINDUSTRYBUSINESSMANAGEMENTCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSSECURITY OWNERSHIPDESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN INDEBTEDNESSDESCRIPTION OF THE SENIOR NOTESBOOK-ENTRY, SETTLEMENT AND CLEARANCETAXATIONPLAN OF DISTRIBUTIONSERVICE OF PROCESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIESEXPERTSLEGAL MATTERSWHERE YOU CAN FIND OTHER INFORMATIONGENERAL INFORMATIONINDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Report of Independent AuditorsMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statement of IncomeMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and LossesNote of Historical Cost Profits and LossesMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Balance SheetMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' EquityMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash FlowsMDP Acquisitions plc and Subsidiary Companies Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Report of Independent AuditorsMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statement of IncomeMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statement of Total Recognized Gains and LossesNote of Historical Cost Profits and LossesMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Balance SheetMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' EquityMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Consolidated Financial Statements of Cash FlowsMDCP Acquisitions I and Subsidiary Companies Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsPART II: INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUSSIGNATUREPOWER OF ATTORNEYEXHIBIT INDEX