UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
Nortek, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | | | |
| Delaware | | 001-34697 | | 05-0314991 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (Commission file number) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | | | |
500 Exchange Street Providence, Rhode Island | | | | 02903-2699 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | | | (Zip Code) |
| | | | | |
| Kevin W. Donnelly | | (401) 751-1600 |
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report)
|
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
|
| |
| [X] | Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2013.
|
Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
Nortek, Inc. (“we”, “Company” or “Nortek”) has determined that certain products we manufactured, or contracted to manufacture, during the 2013 calendar-year reporting period (January 1 through December 31, 2013) contain “conflict minerals” (as defined in Section 13(p) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, and Rule 13p-1 and Form SD thereunder) that are necessary to the functionality or production of those products (“necessary conflict minerals”).
Based on our good-faith, reasonable country-of-origin inquiry, which overlaps to some extent with our due diligence measures as described in the attached Conflict Minerals Report (filed as Exhibit 1.02 to this Form SD), Nortek has reason to believe that some of its necessary conflict minerals may have originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (“Covered Countries”), and may not have been derived from recycled or scrap sources. Accordingly, as described more fully in the attached Conflict Minerals Report, we have exercised due diligence on the source and chain of custody of such necessary conflict minerals in accordance with the internationally recognized due diligence framework forth in the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, and the Supplements thereto for tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (“OECD Due Diligence Guidance”).
The following is a brief description of the steps taken by Nortek in conducting its good-faith, reasonable country-of-origin inquiry, which we believe has been reasonably designed to determine whether any of the necessary conflict minerals contained in our products originated in any of the Covered Countries and/or came from recycled or scrap sources.
In 2013, Nortek focused on the top tier of Nortek’s suppliers based on the highest expenditures incurred by the Company in 2013 for raw materials, components or finished products containing necessary conflict minerals, and selected a total of 44 “in-scope” suppliers by spend (Top Tier Suppliers) to survey. Using a survey template developed jointly by members of the Electronic Industry Citizen Coalition (EICC) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) under the auspices of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Nortek requested these Top Tier Suppliers provide relevant source information regarding products (including components) or materials purchased by Nortek that may contain necessary conflict minerals; i.e., 3TG content, country of origin, and smelting/refining facility. Upon receipt of supplier responses, we performed additional due diligence using key indicators and provisional red flags to ascertain the need for follow-up inquiries. In order to ensure consistency in our approach, we used the Company’s due diligence design framework developed to support our conflict minerals program to follow up with suppliers whose responses were incomplete or contained one or more red flags. Of the supplier responses that we deemed complete and trustworthy, we reviewed the smelters those suppliers listed against conflict-free smelter lists compiled by industry groups on the basis of the application of a third-party supply chain audit process, as explained more fully in the attached Conflict Minerals Report.
A summary of our 2013 survey results are as follows:
|
| | | | |
| Total Suppliers Surveyed | Responses Complete & Trustworthy | Incomplete Surveys requiring further follow up | Surveys with red flags; Planned for 2014 training | Non-Responsive |
| 44 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 10 |
In addition, globally Nortek initiated its communication with Top Tier suppliers to provide them with our policy on conflict minerals. Any direct supplier of commodities (including but not limited to 3TG) or components receives our conflict minerals flow-down requirement in new or renewed supplier agreements, or subsequent purchase order, which our direct suppliers must push down to their sub-suppliers via insertion in their agreements.
A copy of this Form SD, including the Conflict Minerals Report filed herewith as Exhibit 1.02, is publicly available on Nortek’s website at www.nortekinc.com under "SEC Filings" on the "Investors" portion of Nortek's website. The content of this website is included for informational purposes only, and is not incorporated by reference into this Form SD or the attached Conflict Minerals Report (Exhibit 1.02 to this Form SD).
Item 1.02 Exhibit
The Conflict Minerals Report required by Item 1.01 of Form SD is filed herewith as Exhibit 1.02 to this Form SD.
Section 2 - Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.02 - Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
|
| |
| |
NORTEK, INC. |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
| | /s/ Kevin W. Donnelly |
| | Kevin W. Donnelly |
| | Authorized Officer, Senior Vice President and |
| | General Counsel and Secretary |
Date: June 2, 2014
