UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
R | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 |
or |
£ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 000-50805
________________
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Maryland | 20-0138854 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
2800 Post Oak Boulevard | |
Suite 5000 | |
Houston, Texas | 77056-6118 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(888) 220-6121
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xNo o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated Filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso No x
As of May 6, 2011, 223.8 million shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | | |
| | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited): | | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss | | | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity | | | | |
| Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | | | |
| Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | | | | |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | | | |
| Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | | | | |
| Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Certification of CEO & CFO pursuant to Section 906 | | | | |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
| |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | |
(UNAUDITED) | |
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
ASSETS | |
Investment property, net | | $ | 2,208,416 | | | $ | 2,213,212 | |
Investments in unconsolidated entities | | | 369,456 | | | | 373,798 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 58,673 | | | | 64,592 | |
Restricted cash | | | 3,762 | | | | 3,852 | |
Distributions receivable | | | 2,470 | | | | 2,236 | |
Tenant and other receivables | | | 55,031 | | | | 53,469 | |
Intangible lease assets, net | | | 208,060 | | | | 220,981 | |
Deferred leasing costs, net | | | 110,440 | | | | 101,467 | |
Deferred financing costs, net | | | 6,912 | | | | 7,401 | |
Other assets | | | 110,360 | | | | 109,008 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 3,133,580 | | | $ | 3,150,016 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 76,591 | | | $ | 81,971 | |
Due to affiliates | | | 5,854 | | | | 6,171 | |
Intangible lease liabilities, net | | | 68,293 | | | | 72,465 | |
Other liabilities | | | 16,761 | | | | 17,661 | |
Interest rate swap contracts | | | 80,105 | | | | 85,301 | |
Participation interest liability | | | 77,217 | | | | 73,333 | |
Distributions payable | | | 28,966 | | | | 29,426 | |
Notes payable | | | 1,544,100 | | | | 1,521,544 | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,897,887 | | | | 1,887,872 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred shares, $.001 par value; 500,000 preferred shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 | | | - | | | | - | |
Common shares, $.001 par value; 1,500,000 common shares authorized as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010; 223,814 and 222,795 common shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively | | | 224 | | | | 223 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 1,572,406 | | | | 1,590,488 | |
Retained deficit | | | (351,043 | ) | | | (340,610 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 14,106 | | | | 12,043 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | 1,235,693 | | | | 1,262,144 | |
Noncontrolling interests | | | - | | | | - | |
Total equity | | | 1,235,693 | | | | 1,262,144 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 3,133,580 | | | $ | 3,150,016 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. | |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 | |
(UNAUDITED) | |
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | 73,794 | | | $ | 78,004 | |
Other revenue | | | 6,753 | | | | 7,077 | |
Total revenues | | | 80,547 | | | | 85,081 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | 22,339 | | | | 23,333 | |
Real property taxes | | | 11,505 | | | | 11,181 | |
Property management fees | | | 1,834 | | | | 1,890 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 25,680 | | | | 27,753 | |
Asset management and acquisition fees | | | 7,643 | | | | 7,655 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,610 | | | | 1,363 | |
Total expenses | | | 70,611 | | | | 73,175 | |
Income from continuing operations before other income (expenses), provision for income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net | | | 9,936 | | | | 11,906 | |
Other income (expenses): | | | | | | | | |
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net | | | 5,196 | | | | (5,854 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (22,527 | ) | | | (22,732 | ) |
Interest income | | | 69 | | | | 87 | |
Loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net | | | (7,326 | ) | | | (16,593 | ) |
Provision for income taxes | | | (130 | ) | | | (114 | ) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net | | | (1,826 | ) | | | (1,718 | ) |
Loss from continuing operations | | | (9,282 | ) | | | (18,425 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | | | - | | | | 5,487 | |
Net loss | | | (9,282 | ) | | | (12,938 | ) |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (1,151 | ) | | | (1,129 | ) |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (10,433 | ) | | $ | (14,067 | ) |
Basic and diluted loss per common share: | | | | | | | | |
Loss per common share | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | | | 223,814 | | | | 218,666 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,282 | ) | | $ | (12,938 | ) |
Other comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | 2,063 | | | | (12,864 | ) |
Net comprehensive loss | | | (7,219 | ) | | | (25,802 | ) |
Net comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | | (1,151 | ) | | | (1,129 | ) |
Net comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (8,370 | ) | | $ | (26,931 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. | |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 | |
(In thousands) | |
(UNAUDITED) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. | | | | | | | |
| | Common Shares | | | Amount | | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | | | Total | | | Noncontrolling Interests | |
BALANCE, January 1, 2011 | | | 222,795 | | | $ | 223 | | | $ | 1,590,488 | | | $ | (340,610 | ) | | $ | 12,043 | | | $ | 1,262,144 | | | $ | - | |
Issuance of common shares | | | 1,339 | | | | 1 | | | | 12,829 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 12,830 | | | | - | |
Redemption of common shares | | | (320 | ) | | | - | | | | (3,086 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,086 | ) | | | - | |
Distributions declared | | | - | | | | - | | | | (27,815 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (27,815 | ) | | | (1,151 | ) |
Other offering costs, net | | | - | | | | - | | | | (10 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (10 | ) | | | - | |
Net income (loss) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (10,433 | ) | | | - | | | | (10,433 | ) | | | 1,151 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,063 | | | | 2,063 | | | | - | |
BALANCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2011 | | | 223,814 | | | $ | 224 | | | $ | 1,572,406 | | | $ | (351,043 | ) | | $ | 14,106 | | | $ | 1,235,693 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Shares | | | Amount | | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | | Total | | | Noncontrolling Interests | |
BALANCE, January 1, 2010 | | | 217,237 | | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 1,661,006 | | | $ | (300,703 | ) | | $ | 48,408 | | | $ | 1,408,928 | | | $ | - | |
Issuance of common shares | | | 1,873 | | | | 2 | | | | 18,006 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 18,008 | | | | - | |
Redemption of common shares | | | (142 | ) | | | - | | | | (2,182 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2,182 | ) | | | - | |
Distributions declared | | | - | | | | - | | | | (32,650 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (32,650 | ) | | | (1,129 | ) |
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | | - | | | | - | | | | (118 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (118 | ) | | | - | |
Net income (loss) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (14,067 | ) | | | - | | | | (14,067 | ) | | | 1,129 | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,012 | ) | | | (3,012 | ) | | | - | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment included in income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (9,852 | ) | | | (9,852 | ) | | | - | |
BALANCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2010 | | | 218,968 | | | $ | 219 | | | $ | 1,644,062 | | | $ | (314,770 | ) | | $ | 35,544 | | | $ | 1,365,055 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. | |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 | |
(UNAUDITED) | |
| |
| | | | | | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | (In thousands) | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,282 | ) | | $ | (12,938 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 26,973 | | | | 28,488 | |
Gain on sale of investment property | | | - | | | | (4,225 | ) |
Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities | | | 1,826 | | | | 1,718 | |
Distributions received from unconsolidated entities | | | 830 | | | | - | |
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments, net | | | (5,196 | ) | | | 5,854 | |
Net change in operating accounts | | | (19,193 | ) | | | (21,304 | ) |
Net cash from operating activities | | | (4,042 | ) | | | (2,407 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Distributions received from unconsolidated entities in excess of equity in earnings | | | 2,195 | | | | 2,208 | |
Investments in property | | | (1,818 | ) | | | (1,361 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of land and improvements | | | - | | | | 35,025 | |
Change in restricted cash | | | 89 | | | | 2,550 | |
Net cash from investing activities | | | 466 | | | | 38,422 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Change in other liabilities | | | 254 | | | | 13 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | - | | | | 1,554 | |
Redemption of common shares | | | (2,929 | ) | | | (1,301 | ) |
Payments of selling commissions and dealer manager fees | | | - | | | | (166 | ) |
Payment of organizational and offering expenses | | | (19 | ) | | | - | |
Distributions paid to shareholders and noncontrolling interests | | | (16,596 | ) | | | (17,199 | ) |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | 17,500 | | | | 94,000 | |
Payments on notes payable | | | (553 | ) | | | (94,281 | ) |
Additions to deferred financing costs | | | (186 | ) | | | (1,352 | ) |
Net cash from financing activities | | | (2,529 | ) | | | (18,732 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | | 186 | | | | 13 | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (5,919 | ) | | | 17,296 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | | 64,592 | | | | 41,577 | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 58,673 | | | $ | 58,873 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. | |
HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial information has been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted according to such rules and regulations. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and eliminations, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly and in conformity with GAAP the financial position of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 have been included. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”), was formed on August 5, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of the state of Maryland for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning interests in real estate. Beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2004, the Company operated and intends to continue to operate in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT under which substantially all of the Company’s current and future business is and will be conducted through its majority-owned subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). Hines REIT is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is managed by Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”), pursuant to the advisory agreement between the Company and the Advisor.
Public Offerings
Hines REIT commenced its initial public offering on June 18, 2004, through which it raised $527.5 million. The Company commenced its second public offering (the “Second Offering”) on June 19, 2006, through which it raised $1.5 billion of gross proceeds.
The Company commenced its third public offering (the “Third Offering”) on July 1, 2008 pursuant to which it offered up to $3.5 billion in shares of common stock including $500.0 million in shares of common stock under its dividend reinvestment plan. In consideration of market conditions and other factors, the Company’s board of directors determined to cease sales of its shares to new investors pursuant to the Third Offering as of January 1, 2010. The Company’s board of directors determined to continue sales of its shares under its dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to the Third Offering. As of December 31, 2010, Hines REIT had raised $506.9 million in proceeds through the Third Offering. The Third Offering expired as of December 31, 2010. The Company commenced a new $150.0 million offering of shares of its common stock under its dividend reinvestment plan (the “DRP Offering”) on July 1, 2010. As of March 31, 2011, Hines REIT received gross offering proceeds of $42.0 million from the sale of 4.4 million shares through the DRP Offering. Based on market conditions and other considerations, the Company does not currently expect to commence any future offerings other than those related to shares issued under its dividend reinvestment plan. From April 1, 2011 through May 6, 2011, Hines REIT received gross offering proceeds of $12.3 million from the sale of 1.3 million shares through its dividend reinvestment plan.
Hines REIT contributes all net proceeds from its public offerings to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units in the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Hines REIT owned a 95.9% and 96.1%, respectively, general partner interest in the Operating Partnership.
Noncontrolling Interests
Hines 2005 VS I LP, an affiliate of Hines, owned a 0.5% interest in the Operating Partnership as of both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. In addition, another affiliate of Hines, HALP Associates Limited Partnership (“HALP”) owned a 3.6% and 3.4% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which is a profits interest (the “Participation Interest”). See Notes 9 and 13 for additional information regarding the Participation Interest.
Investment Property
As of March 31, 2011, the Company owned direct and indirect investments in 59 properties. These properties consisted of 44 U.S. office properties, one mixed-use office and retail complex in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, one industrial property in Brazil and a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states primarily in the southeastern United States (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio”).
The Company has made investments directly through entities wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership, or indirectly through other entities, such as through its investment in Hines US Core Office Fund LP (the “Core Fund”) in which it owns a 26.8% non-managing general partner interest. The Company also owns a 70% interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio indirectly through a joint venture with Weingarten Realty Investors and a 50% interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, indirectly through a joint venture with a Hines affiliate. The Company accounts for each of these investments using the equity method of accounting. See Note 5 for additional information regarding the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Described below are certain of the Company’s significant accounting policies. The disclosures regarding several of the policies have been condensed or omitted in accordance with interim reporting regulations specified by Form 10-Q. Please see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete listing of all of its significant accounting policies.
Use of Estimates
The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company evaluates its assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally, application of the Company’s accounting policies involves exercising judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this quarterly report include the accounts of Hines REIT, the Operating Partnership (over which Hines REIT exercises financial and operating control) and the Operating Partnership’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (see Note 5), as well as the noncontrolling interests. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
International Operations
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries operating in Toronto, Ontario and the Brazilian real is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiary operating in Brazil. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries have translated their financial statements into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts are translated using the average exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These translation gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Upon disposal of these subsidiaries the Company will remove the accumulated translation adjustment from equity and include it as part of the gain or loss on disposal in its consolidated statement of operations.
The Company’s international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency. In these instances, assets and liabilities are remeasured into the functional currency using the exchange rate in effect at the date of the transaction. These gains or losses are included in the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s subsidiaries also record gains or losses in the income statement when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency, is settled and the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the transaction was initiated.
Impairment of Investment Property
Real estate assets are reviewed for impairment each reporting period if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the individual property may not be recoverable. In such an event, a comparison will be made of the current and projected operating cash flows of each property on an undiscounted basis to the carrying amount of such property. Such carrying amount would be adjusted, if necessary, to estimated fair values to reflect impairment in the value of the asset. In estimating fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, contract sale prices, and discounted cash flow calculations which utilize inputs from a marketplace participant’s perspective.
No impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. If market conditions continue to deteriorate further or if management’s plans for certain properties change, impairment charges could be required in the future.
Impairment of Unconsolidated Entities
The Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities are reviewed for impairment, periodically, if events or circumstances change indicating a decline in the value of the investment is other than temporary. Based on the analysis of the facts and circumstances, no impairment was recorded for the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. However, if market conditions deteriorate in the future and result in lower valuations or reduced cash flows of the Company’s investments, impairment charges may be recorded in future periods.
Restricted Cash
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had restricted cash of $3.8 million and $3.9 million, respectively, related to escrow accounts required by certain of the Company’s mortgage agreements.
Tenant and Other Receivables
Receivable balances outstanding consist primarily of base rents, tenant reimbursements and receivables attributable to straight-line rent. An allowance for the uncollectible portion of tenant and other receivables is determined based upon an analysis of the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. Tenant and other receivables are shown at cost in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.6 million and $4.0 million, at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Deferred Leasing Costs
Direct leasing costs, primarily consisting of third-party leasing commissions and tenant inducements, are capitalized and amortized over the life of the related lease. Tenant inducement amortization is recorded as a reduction to rental revenue and the amortization of other direct leasing costs is recorded as a component of amortization expense. Direct leasing costs increased by $13.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011, due to leases executed at several of the Company’s properties which contained significant tenant inducements.
Tenant inducement amortization was $2.8 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition, the Company recorded $1.6 million and $1.0 million as amortization expense related to other direct leasing costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of direct costs incurred in obtaining debt financing including the financing fees paid to our Advisor (see Note 9 – Related Party Transactions). These costs are amortized into interest expense on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the terms of the obligations. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately $709,000 and $740,000, respectively, was amortized into interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Other Assets
Other assets included the following (in thousands):
| | | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
Prepaid insurance | | $ | 273 | | $ | 911 | |
Prepaid/deferred taxes | | | 3,009 | (1) | | 994 | |
Cash collateral for HSH mortgage facility | | | 106,291 | (2) | | 106,251 | (2) |
Other | | | 787 | | | 852 | |
Total | | $ | 110,360 | | $ | 109,008 | |
(1) | At March 31, 2011 prepaid/deferred taxes consist primarily of prepaid property taxes. |
| |
(2) | During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company made collateral payments totaling $106.1 million to HSH Nordbank in order to rebalance the collateral for the properties under the Company’s pooled mortgage facility. The increase in the cash collateral since that time is due to interest earned on these payments, which accrue to the Company and is reflected as an increase in the balance. |
Revenue Recognition
Rental payments are generally paid by the tenants prior to the beginning of each month. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, the Company recorded liabilities of $8.1 million, and $9.3 million related to prepaid rental payments which were included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company recognizes rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease including rent holidays, if any. Straight-line rent receivable was $49.7 million and $47.2 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Straight-line rent receivable consisted of the difference between the tenants’ rents calculated on a straight-line basis from the date of acquisition or lease commencement over the remaining terms of the related leases and the tenants’ actual rents due under the lease agreements and is included in tenant and other receivables in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Revenues associated with operating expense recoveries are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provisions. Revenues relating to lease termination fees are generally recognized at the time that a tenant’s right to occupy the space is terminated and when the Company has satisfied all obligations under the agreement.
Other revenues consist primarily of parking revenue and tenant reimbursements. Parking revenue represents amounts generated from contractual and transient parking and is recognized in accordance with contractual terms or as services are rendered. Other revenues relating to tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period that the expense is incurred.
Redemption of Common Stock
Financial instruments that represent a mandatory obligation of the Company to repurchase shares are required to be classified as liabilities and reported at settlement value. Management believes that shares tendered for redemption by the holder under the Company’s share redemption program do not represent a mandatory obligation until such redemptions are approved. At such time, the Company reclassifies such obligations from equity to an accrued liability based upon their respective settlement values. The Company has recorded liabilities of $3.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, related to shares tendered for redemption and approved by the board of directors, but which were not redeemed until the subsequent month. Such amounts have been included in redemption of common shares in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of equity. Effective November 30, 2009, the Company suspended its share redemption program except for redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder.
Per Share Data
Net income/loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net income/loss attributable to common shareholders for each period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during such period. Net income/loss per common share on a basic and diluted basis is the same because the Company has no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding.
3. Real Estate Investments
The following table provides summary information regarding the properties in which the Company owned interests as of March 31, 2011. All assets which are 100% owned by the Company are referred to as “directly-owned properties.” All other properties are owned indirectly through investments in the Core Fund, the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio and Distribution Park Rio.
Property | | City | | Date Acquired | | Leasable Square Feet | | Percent Leased | | Effective Ownership (1) |
Directly-owned Properties | | | | | | | | |
321 North Clark | | Chicago, Illinois | | 04/2006 | | 888,837 | | 75% | | 100% |
Citymark | | Dallas, Texas | | 08/2005 | | 219,117 | | 84% | | 100% |
4050/4055 Corporate Drive | | Dallas, Texas | | 05/2008 | | 643,429 | | 100% | | 100% |
JPMorgan Chase Tower | | Dallas, Texas | | 11/2007 | | 1,252,019 | | 88% | | 100% |
345 Inverness Drive | | Denver, Colorado | | 12/2008 | | 175,287 | | 78% | | 100% |
Arapahoe Business Park | | Denver, Colorado | | 12/2008 | | 309,450 | | 88% | | 100% |
Raytheon/DIRECTV Buildings | | El Segundo, California | | 03/2008 | | 550,579 | | 100% | | 100% |
2100 Powell | | Emeryville, California | | 12/2006 | | 344,433 | | 100% | | 100% |
Williams Tower | | Houston, Texas | | 05/2008 | | 1,479,764 | | 87% | | 100% |
2555 Grand | | Kansas City, Missouri | | 02/2008 | | 595,607 | | 100% | | 100% |
One Wilshire | | Los Angeles, California | | 08/2007 | | 661,553 | | 95% | | 100% |
3 Huntington Quadrangle | | Melville, New York | | 07/2007 | | 407,912 | | 52% | | 100% |
Airport Corporate Center | | Miami, Florida | | 01/2006 | | 1,018,428 | | 83% | | 100% |
Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio | | Minneapolis, Minnesota | | 09/2007 | | 767,859 | | 86% | | 100% |
3400 Data Drive | | Rancho Cordova, California | | 11/2006 | | 149,703 | | 100% | | 100% |
Daytona Buildings | | Redmond, Washington | | 12/2006 | | 251,313 | | 100% | | 100% |
Laguna Buildings | | Redmond, Washington | | 01/2007 | | 460,661 | | 85% | | 100% |
1515 S Street | | Sacramento, California | | 11/2005 | | 349,740 | | 99% | | 100% |
1900 and 2000 Alameda | | San Mateo, California | | 06/2005 | | 254,145 | | 91% | | 100% |
Seattle Design Center | | Seattle, Washington | | 06/2007 | | 390,684 | | 74% | | 100% |
5th and Bell | | Seattle, Washington | | 06/2007 | | 197,135 | | 91% | | 100% |
Atrium on Bay | | Toronto, Ontario | | 02/2007 | | 1,077,496 | | 98% | | 100% |
Total for Directly-Owned Properties | | | | | | 12,445,151 | | 89% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Indirectly-owned Properties | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Core Fund Properties | | | | | | | | |
One Atlantic Center | | Atlanta, Georgia | | 07/2006 | | 1,100,312 | | 90% | | 22% |
The Carillon Building | | Charlotte, North Carolina | | 07/2007 | | 472,222 | | 85% | | 22% |
Charlotte Plaza | | Charlotte, North Carolina | | 06/2007 | | 625,026 | | 89% | | 22% |
One North Wacker | | Chicago, Illinois | | 03/2008 | | 1,373,754 | | 94% | | 22% |
Three First National Plaza | | Chicago, Illinois | | 03/2005 | | 1,423,515 | | 92% | | 18% |
333 West Wacker | | Chicago, Illinois | | 04/2006 | | 855,056 | | 75% | | 18% |
One Shell Plaza | | Houston, Texas | | 05/2004 | | 1,230,395 | | 99% | | 11% |
Two Shell Plaza | | Houston, Texas | | 05/2004 | | 565,573 | | 97% | | 11% |
425 Lexington Avenue | | New York, New York | | 08/2003 | | 700,034 | | 100% | | 11% |
499 Park Avenue | | New York, New York | | 08/2003 | | 291,515 | | 94% | | 11% |
Renaissance Square | | Phoenix, Arizona | | 12/2007 | | 965,508 | | 83% | | 22% |
Riverfront Plaza | | Richmond, Virginia | | 11/2006 | | 951,616 | | 97% | | 22% |
Johnson Ranch Corporate Centre | | Roseville, California | | 05/2007 | | 179,990 | | 42% | | 18% |
Roseville Corporate Center | | Roseville, California | | 05/2007 | | 111,418 | | 51% | | 18% |
Summit at Douglas Ridge | | Roseville, California | | 05/2007 | | 185,128 | | 74% | | 18% |
Olympus Corporate Centre | | Roseville, California | | 05/2007 | | 193,178 | | 51% | | 18% |
Douglas Corporate Center | | Roseville, California | | 05/2007 | | 214,606 | | 84% | | 18% |
Wells Fargo Center | | Sacramento, California | | 05/2007 | | 502,365 | | 96% | | 18% |
525 B Street | | San Diego, California | | 08/2005 | | 449,180 | | 95% | | 22% |
The KPMG Building | | San Francisco, California | | 09/2004 | | 379,328 | | 88% | | 22% |
101 Second Street | | San Francisco, California | | 09/2004 | | 388,370 | | 83% | | 22% |
720 Olive Way | | Seattle, Washington | | 01/2006 | | 300,710 | | 84% | | 18% |
1200 19th Street | | Washington, D.C. | | 08/2003 | | 337,486 | | 83% | | 11% |
Warner Center | | Woodland Hills, California | | 10/2006 | | 808,274 | | 89% | | 18% |
Total for Core Fund Properties | | | | 14,604,559 | | 89% | | |
Property | | City | | Date Acquired | | Leasable Square Feet | | Percent Leased | | Effective Ownership (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Indirectly-owned Properties | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Grocery-Anchored Portfolio | | | | | | | | |
Cherokee Plaza | | Atlanta, Georgia | | 11/2008 | | 99,749 | | 100% | | 70% |
Bellaire Boulevard Center | | Bellaire, Texas | | 11/2008 | | 35,081 | | 100% | | 70% |
Thompson Bridge Commons | | Gainesville, Georgia | | 03/2009 | | 92,587 | | 93% | | 70% |
Champions Village | | Houston, Texas | | 11/2008 | | 384,581 | | 87% | | 70% |
King's Crossing | | Kingwood, Texas | | 11/2008 | | 126,397 | | 100% | | 70% |
Sandy Plains Exchange | | Marietta, Georgia | | 02/2009 | | 72,784 | | 95% | | 70% |
Commons at Dexter Lakes | | Memphis, Tennessee | | 11/2008 | | 228,496 | | 91% | | 70% |
Mendenhall Commons | | Memphis, Tennessee | | 11/2008 | | 79,871 | | 98% | | 70% |
University Palms Shopping Center | | Oviedo, Florida | | 11/2008 | | 99,172 | | 91% | | 70% |
Shoppes at Parkland | | Parkland, Florida | | 03/2009 | | 145,652 | | 96% | | 70% |
Oak Park Village | | San Antonio, Texas | | 11/2008 | | 64,287 | | 100% | | 70% |
Heritage Station | | Wake Forest, North Carolina | | 01/2009 | | 68,641 | | 98% | | 70% |
Total for Grocery-Anchored Portfolio | | | | 1,497,298 | | 93% | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Park Rio | | Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | | 07/2007 | | 693,115 | | 100% | | 50% |
Total for All Properties | | | | 29,240,123 | | 89% | (2) | |
_________
(1) | This percentage shows the effective ownership of the Operating Partnership in the properties listed. On March 31, 2011, Hines REIT owned a 95.9% interest in the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner. Affiliates of Hines owned the remaining 4.1% interest in the Operating Partnership. In addition, the Company owned an approximate 26.8% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund as of March 31, 2011. The Core Fund does not own 100% of these properties; its ownership interest in its properties ranges from 40.6% to 83.0%. |
| |
(2) | This amount represents the percentage leased assuming the Company owns a 100% interest in each of these properties. The percentage leased based on the Company’s effective ownership interest in each property is 89%. |
On December 23, 2010, the Company entered into a contract to sell Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex located in the Downtown North submarket of the central business district of Toronto, Canada. The contract sale price for Atrium on Bay is expected to be approximately $344.8 million CAD ($339.5 million USD, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 23, 2010), exclusive of transaction costs. The Company expects the closing of this sale to occur no later than June 30, 2011. However, the sale is dependent upon the buyer’s assumption of the Company’s existing mortgage loan as well as a number of other conditions. There is no guarantee that this sale will be consummated.
Investment Property, net
Investment property consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 | |
Buildings and improvements | | $ | 1,960,516 | | | $ | 1,953,741 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (189,325 | ) | | | (176,263 | ) |
Buildings and improvements, net | | | 1,771,191 | | | | 1,777,478 | |
Land | | | 437,225 | | | | 435,734 | |
Investment property, net | | $ | 2,208,416 | | | $ | 2,213,212 | |
Lease Intangibles |
| | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2011, the cost basis and accumulated amortization related to lease intangibles was as follows (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | |
| Lease Intangibles | |
| In-Place Leases | | Out-of-Market Lease Assets | | Out-of-Market Lease Liabilities | |
Cost | $ | | 356,062 | | $ | | 57,558 | | $ | | 130,277 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | (179,919 | ) | | | (25,641 | ) | | | (61,984 | ) |
Net | $ | | 176,143 | | $ | | 31,917 | | $ | | 68,293 | |
As of December 31, 2010, the cost basis and accumulated amortization related to lease intangibles was as follows (in thousands):
| Lease Intangibles | |
| In-Place Leases | | Out-of-Market Lease Assets | | Out-of-Market Lease Liabilities | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Less: accumulated amortization | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense of in-place leases was $11.6 million and $15.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and amortization of out-of-market leases, net, was an increase to rental revenue of $2.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
Anticipated amortization of in-place leases and out-of-market leases, net, including out-of-market ground leases for the period from April 1 through December 31, 2011 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 through 2015 is as follows (in thousands):
| | In-Place Leases | | | Out-of-Market Leases, Net | |
April 1 through December 31, 2011 | | $ | 30,760 | | | $ | (6,935 | ) |
2012 | | | 33,234 | | | | (8,737 | ) |
2013 | | | 27,141 | | | | (8,408 | ) |
2014 | | | 20,552 | | | | (5,258 | ) |
2015 | | | 18,380 | | | | (4,166 | ) |
Leases
In connection with its directly-owned properties, the Company has entered into non-cancelable lease agreements with tenants for space. As of March 31, 2011, the approximate fixed future minimum rentals for the period from April 1 through December 31, 2011 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 through 2015 and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
| | Fixed Future Minimum Rentals | |
April 1 through December 31, 2011 | | $ | 162,701 | |
2012 | | | 202,223 | |
2013 | | | 169,857 | |
2014 | | | 142,728 | |
2015 | | | 132,717 | |
Thereafter | | | 475,550 | |
Total | | $ | 1,285,776 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not earn more than 10% of its revenue from any individual tenant.
4. Discontinued Operations
On January 22, 2010, the Company sold Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil, which it acquired in December 2008. The sales price was $38.4 million (69.9 million BRL translated at a rate of R$1.818 per USD). On April 22, 2010, the Company sold Distribution Parks Elouveira and Vinhedo, two industrial properties located in Sao Paulo, Brazil, which it acquired in December 2008. The sales price was $102.5 million (181.0 million BRL translated at a rate of R$1.765 per USD). The results of operations of Distribution Parks Araucaria, Elouveira and Vinhedo and the gain realized on the disposition of Araucaria for are as follows:
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| 2011 | | 2010 | |
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,109 | |
Other revenue | | | - | | | | - | |
Total revenues | | | - | | | | 3,109 | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | - | | | | 67 | |
Real property taxes | | | - | | | | 265 | |
Property management fees | | | - | | | | 36 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | - | | | | 1,123 | |
Total expenses | | | - | | | | 1,491 | |
Income from discontinued operations before interest income, taxes and gain on sale | | | - | | | | 1,618 | |
Interest income | | | - | | | | 67 | |
Income taxes | | | - | | | | (423 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations before gain on sale | | | - | | | | 1,262 | |
Gain on sale of property | | | - | | | | 4,225 | |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | - | | | $ | 5,487 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The tables below show income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders allocated between continuing operations and discontinued operations: | |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations attributable | | | | | | | | |
to common shareholders | | $ | (10,433 | ) | | $ | (19,371 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations attributable | | | | | | | | |
to common shareholders | | | - | | | | 5,304 | |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | | $ | (10,433 | ) | | $ | (14,067 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable | | | | | | | | |
to common shareholders | | | | | | | | |
Loss from continuing operations | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | - | | | $ | 0.02 | |
5. Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
The table below presents the activity of the Company’s unconsolidated entities as of and for the periods presented (in thousands):
| | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| 2011 | | 2010 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | 373,798 | | | $ | 379,057 | |
Distributions declared | | | (3,259 | ) | | | (3,342 | ) |
Equity in losses | | | (1,826 | ) | | | (1,718 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate | | | 743 | | | | (677 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | 369,456 | | | $ | 373,320 | |
The Company has concluded its investment in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio qualifies as a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Grocery-Anchored Portfolio is financed with a $100 million secured note, which is solely guaranteed by the Company’s joint venture partner (the “JV Partner”). The JV Partner is the manager of the investment properties, which provides it with the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s financial performance. Based upon the loan guarantees and the JV Partner’s ability to direct the activities that significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE. The Company’s maximum loss exposure is expected to change in future periods as a result of income earned, distributions received and contributions made. During the period of its involvement with the VIE, the Company has not provided financial or other support to the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio, which it was not previously contractually required to provide. The table below includes the Company’s maximum loss exposure related to this investment as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is equal to the carrying value of its investment in the joint venture reflected in the balance sheet line item “Investments in unconsolidated entities” for each period. Amounts are in thousands:
Period | | Investment in Grocery-Anchored Portfolio (1) | | | Maximum Risk of Loss | |
March 31, 2011 | | $ | 64,592 | | | $ | 64,592 | |
December 31, 2010 | | $ | 66,123 | | | $ | 66,123 | |
(1) | Represents the carrying amount of the investment in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio, which includes the net effect of contributions made, distributions received and the Company’s share of equity in earnings. |
Investment in the Core Fund
Condensed consolidated financial information of the Core Fund is presented below:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Core Fund
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 |
| | (In thousands) |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 111,222 | | | $ | 131,353 |
Investment property, net | | | 3,250,998 | | | | 3,265,193 |
Other assets | | | 788,834 | | | | 725,498 |
Total Assets | | $ | 4,151,054 | | | $ | 4,122,044 |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Debt | | $ | 2,452,395 | | | $ | 2,463,920 |
Other liabilities | | | 316,637 | | | | 260,922 |
Redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | 450,838 | | | | 454,036 |
Partners' equity | | | 931,184 | | | | 943,166 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 4,151,054 | | | $ | 4,122,044 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Core Fund
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (In thousands) | |
Revenues, other income and interest income | | $ | 117,455 | | $ | 122,268 | |
Property operating expenses | | | (55,708) | | | (57,280) | |
Interest expense | | | (33,295) | | | (33,336) | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | (37,735) | | | (41,778) | |
Income tax expense | | | (107) | | | (90) | |
Income from discontinued operations | | | — | | | 993 | |
Loss allocated to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | | 777 | | | 1,228 | |
Net loss | | $ | (8,613) | | $ | (7,995) | |
Investment in Distribution Park Rio
Condensed consolidated financial information of Distribution Park Rio is presented below:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of Distribution Park Rio
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 |
| | (In thousands) |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 76 | | | $ | 55 |
Investment property, net | | | 64,730 | | | | 62,476 |
Other assets | | | 1,608 | | | | 2,505 |
Total Assets | | $ | 66,414 | | | $ | 65,036 |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 540 | | | $ | 378 |
Partners' equity | | | 65,874 | | | | 64,658 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 66,414 | | | $ | 65,036 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations of Distribution Park Rio
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (In thousands) |
Total revenues and interest income | | $ | 2,253 | | $ | 2,365 |
Total expenses | | | (1,107) | | | (962) |
Net income | | $ | 1,146 | | $ | 1,403 |
Investment in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
Condensed consolidated financial information of the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio is presented below:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of WRI HR Retail Venture I LLC
| | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 |
| | (In thousands) |
ASSETS | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 4,300 | | | $ | 2,454 |
Investment property, net | | | 167,193 | | | | 167,909 |
Other assets | | | 23,206 | | | | 27,701 |
Total Assets | | $ | 194,699 | | | $ | 198,064 |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | |
Debt | | $ | 127,060 | | | $ | 127,334 |
Other liabilities | | | 5,921 | | | | 7,335 |
Members' equity | | | 61,718 | | | | 63,395 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 194,699 | | | $ | 198,064 |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations of WRI HR Retail Venture I LLC
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (In thousands) |
Total revenues and interest income | | $ | 6,001 | | $ | 6,200 |
Total expenses | | | (5,490) | | | (5,701) |
Net income | | $ | 511 | | $ | 499 |
6. Debt Financing
The following table includes all of the Company’s outstanding notes payable balances as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands, except interest rates):
Description | Maturity Date | | Interest Rate | | | Principal Outstanding at March 31, 2011 | | | Principal Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
SECURED MORTGAGE DEBT | | | | | | | | | |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. — Airport Corporate Center | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company — 1515 S. Street | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capmark Finance, Inc. — Atrium on Bay | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Prudential Insurance Company of America — One Wilshire | | | | | | | | | | | | |
IXIS Real Estate Capital Inc. – Raytheon/ DIRECTV Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York State Teachers’ Retirement System – 2555 Grand | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York State Teachers’ Retirement System – Williams Tower | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Artesia Mortgage Capital Corporation – 345 Inverness Drive | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Artesia Mortgage Capital Corporation – Arapahoe Business Park I | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Artesia Mortgage Capital Corporation – Arapahoe Business Park II | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH POOLED MORTGAGE FACILITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — Citymark, 321 North Clark, 1900 and 2000 Alameda | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — 3400 Data Drive, Watergate Tower IV | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — Daytona and Laguna Buildings | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — 3 Huntington Quadrangle | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HSH Nordbank — Seattle Design Center/5th and Bell | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MET LIFE SECURED MORTGAGE FACILITY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Met Life — JPMorgan Chase Tower/ Minneapolis Office/Flex Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
KeyBank Revolving Credit Facility | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTES PAYABLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
__________
(1) | The Company entered into notes payable in connection with its acquisition of Atrium on Bay. The notes are denominated in Canadian dollars and translated into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate at the end of each period. |
| |
(2) | The Company entered into a new $45.0 million revolving line of credit with KeyBank pursuant to a Credit Agreement dated February 3, 2011 and a Promissory Note dated February 3, 2011. The facility matures August 3, 2011, subject to extension at the Company’s election for an additional six month period. Interest at the Company’s election, will be determined based on (i) the Prime Rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Rate or (iii) LIBOR plus a margin of at least 3.25%. | |
| | |
(3) | The Company assumed notes payable in connection with various acquisitions, which were recorded at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The difference between the fair value at acquisition and the principal outstanding is amortized over the term of the related note. | |
The following table summarizes required principal payments on the Company’s outstanding notes payable for the period from April 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2015 and for the period thereafter (in thousands):
| Principal Payments due by Period | |
| 2011 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2014 | | | 2015 | | | Thereafter | |
Notes Payable | $ | 66,945 | | | $ | 224,638 | | | $ | 457,480 | | | $ | 3,820 | | | $ | 22,833 | | | $ | 771,827 | |
The Company is not aware of any instances of noncompliance with financial covenants as of March 31, 2011.
7. Derivative Instruments
The Company has several interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank AG, New York Branch (“HSH Nordbank”). These swap transactions were entered into as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on the Company’s variable interest rate borrowings with HSH Nordbank. The Company has not designated any of its derivative instruments as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and changes in the fair value were recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 13 – Fair Value Disclosures for additional information regarding fair value measurements.
In addition, the Company entered into a foreign currency contract related to the disposition of Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil. The contract was entered into as an economic hedge against the variability of the foreign currency exchange rate related to the Company’s sales proceeds and was settled on February 24, 2010.
The tables below provide additional information regarding each of the Company’s derivative instruments (all amounts are in thousands):
| | Liability Derivatives Fair Value | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes: | | March 31, 2011 | | | December 31, 2010 |
Interest rate swap contracts | | $ | (80,105) | | | $ | (85,301) | |
Total derivatives | | $ | (80,105) | | | $ | (85,301) | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| 2011 | | 2010 | |
Gain (loss) on interest rate swap (1) | $ | 5,196 | | $ | (5,854 | ) |
Loss on foreign currency swap (2) | | — | | | (110 | ) |
Total | $ | 5,196 | | $ | (5,964 | ) |
(1) | Amounts represent the gain (loss) on interest rate swaps due to changes in fair value and are recorded in gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
| |
(2) | Amount represents the loss on the Company’s foreign currency swap described above. This amount is recorded in income from discontinued operations, net of taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
8. Distributions
With the authorization of its board of directors, the Company has declared distributions monthly and aggregated and paid such distributions quarterly. The Company intends to continue this distribution policy for so long as its board of directors decides this policy is in the best interests of its shareholders. Beginning July 1, 2010, the annual distribution rate was decreased from 6% to 5% (based on the Company’s most recent primary offering share price of $10.08 per share, assuming the current distribution rate is maintained for a twelve-month period). The Company has continued to declare distributions at an annual rate of 5% per share through June 30, 2011.
The table below outlines the Company’s total distributions declared to shareholders and noncontrolling interests for each of the quarters during 2011 and 2010, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash and those reinvested pursuant to the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan (all amounts are in thousands).
| | Shareholders | | Noncontrolling Interests |
Distributions for the Three Months Ended | | Cash Distributions | | Distributions Reinvested | | Total Declared | | Total Declared |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2011 | | $ | 15,491 | | $ | 12,324 | | $ | 27,815 | | $ | 1,151 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | | $ | 15,473 | | $ | 12,830 | | $ | 28,303 | | $ | 1,123 |
September 30, 2010 | | $ | 14,986 | | $ | 13,172 | | $ | 28,158 | | $ | 1,067 |
June 30, 2010 | | $ | 17,226 | | $ | 16,011 | | $ | 33,237 | | $ | 1,205 |
March 31, 2010 | | $ | 16,480 | | $ | 16,170 | | $ | 32,650 | | $ | 1,129 |
Total | | $ | 64,165 | | $ | 58,183 | | $ | 122,348 | | $ | 4,524 |
9. Related Party Transactions
The table below outlines fees and expense reimbursements incurred that are payable to Hines, the Advisor and Hines Real Estate Investments, Inc. (the “Dealer Manager”) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. All amounts are in thousands:
| | | Incurred | | | Unpaid as of |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | March 31, | | December 31, |
Type and Recipient | | 2011 | | 2010 | | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Participation Interest in the Operating Partnership – HALP Associates Limited Partnership | | $ | 3,884 | | $ | 3,877 | | | $ | 77,217 | | $ | 73,333 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Due to Affiliates | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling Commissions – the Dealer Manager | | $ | - | | $ | 89 | | | $ | - | | $ | - |
Dealer Manager Fee – the Dealer Manager | | | - | | | 29 | | | | - | | | - |
Issuer Costs - the Advisor | | | 10 | | | - | | | | - | | | 9 |
Asset Management Fee – the Advisor | | | 3,759 | | | 3,778 | | | | 3,759 | | | 3,759 |
Disposition Fee – the Advisor | | | - | | | 384 | | | | - | | | - |
Debt Financing Fee – the Advisor | | | - | | | 650 | | | | - | | | - |
Other - The Advisor (1) | | | 802 | | | 579 | | | | 445 | | | 785 |
Property Management Fee – Hines | | | 1,834 | | | 1,871 | | | | 164 | | | 12 |
Leasing Fee – Hines | | | 1,345 | | | 488 | | | | 1,037 | | | 958 |
Tenant Construction Management Fees – Hines | | | 9 | | | - | | | | 8 | | | 15 |
Expense Reimbursements – Hines (with respect to management and operation of the Company’s properties) | | | 4,427 | | | 4,315 | | | | 441 | | | 633 |
Due to Affiliates | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,854 | | $ | 6,171 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes amounts the Advisor paid on behalf of the Company such as general and administrative expenses. These amounts are generally reimbursed to the Advisor during the month following the period in which they are incurred. |
10. Changes in Assets and Liabilities | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The effect of the changes in asset and liability accounts on cash flows from operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows (in thousands): |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
| | | | | | |
Change in other assets | | $ | (1,332 | ) | | $ | (1,848 | ) |
Change in tenant and other receivables | | | (1,494 | ) | | | (1,501 | ) |
Change in deferred leasing costs | | | (13,542 | ) | | | (8,745 | ) |
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (5,199 | ) | | | (8,848 | ) |
Change in participation interest liability | | | 3,884 | | | | 3,877 | |
Change in other liabilities | | | (1,197 | ) | | | 328 | |
Change in due to affiliates | | | (313 | ) | | | (4,567 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities | | $ | (19,193 | ) | | $ | (21,304 | ) |
11. Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands): |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 21,249 | | | $ | 22,647 | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 216 | | | $ | 909 | |
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Activities | | | | | | | | |
Distributions declared and unpaid | | $ | 28,966 | | | $ | 33,779 | |
Distributions reinvested | | $ | 12,830 | | | $ | 16,692 | |
12. Commitments and Contingencies
On December 8, 2006, Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) signed a lease renewal for its space in Airport Corporate Center, an office property located in Miami, Florida. In connection with this renewal, the Company committed to fund $10.4 million of construction costs related to NCL’s expansion and refurbishment of its space, to be paid in future periods. As of March 31, 2011, $2.2 million of this commitment remained unfunded and was recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
On July 1, 2010, Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte”) signed a lease renewal for its space in JPMorgan Chase Tower, an office property located in Dallas, Texas. In connection with this renewal, the Company committed to fund $18.1 million of construction costs related to Deloitte’s expansion and refurbishment of its space, to be paid in future periods. As of March 31, 2011, $10.4 million of this commitment remained unfunded and is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
13. Fair Value Disclosures
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Derivative Instruments
The valuation of these instruments is determined based on assumptions that management believes market participants would use in pricing, using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate contracts have been determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
Although the Company has determined the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparty, HSH Nordbank. In adjusting the fair values of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds and guarantees. However, as of March 31, 2011, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuations of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined its derivative valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following tables set forth the Company’s interest rate swaps which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (in thousands):
| | | | | Basis of Fair Value Measurements |
Description | | Fair Value | | | | Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
March 31, 2011 | | $ | (80,105 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (80,105 | ) | | $ | — |
December 31, 2010 | | $ | (85,301 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (85,301 | ) | | $ | — |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Participation Interest
The Company records a liability related to the Participation Interest based on the estimated settlement value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets which is remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date. The fair value of the shares underlying the Participation Interest liability is determined based on the related redemption price in place as of each balance sheet date. Adjustments required to record this liability at fair value are included in asset management and acquisition fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Other Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2011, management estimated that the fair value of notes payable, which had a carrying value of $1.5 billion, was $1.5 billion. As of December 31, 2010, management estimated that the fair value of notes payable, which had a carrying value of approximately $1.5 billion, was $1.5 billion. The discount rates used approximate current lending rates for loans or groups of loans with similar maturities and credit quality, assumes the debt is outstanding through maturity and considers the debt’s collateral (if applicable). Management has utilized market information as available or present value techniques to estimate the amounts required to be disclosed. Since such amounts are estimates that are based on limited available market information for similar transactions, there can be no assurance that the disclosed values could be realized.
Other financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, distributions receivable, tenant and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses, other liabilities and distributions payable. The carrying value of these items reasonably approximates their fair value based on their highly-liquid nature and/or short-term maturities.
14. Reportable Segments
The Company’s investments in real estate are geographically diversified and management evaluates the operating performance of each at an individual property level. The Company has determined it has four reportable segments: 1) office properties, 2) a domestic industrial property, 3) domestic retail properties and 4) an international industrial property. The office properties segment consists of 21 office properties that the Company owns directly as well as 24 office properties that are owned indirectly through the Company’s investment in the Core Fund. The domestic industrial property segment consists of one directly-owned industrial property located in Dallas, Texas. The domestic retail segment consists of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers that are owned indirectly through the Company’s investment in a joint venture with Weingarten. The international industrial property segment consists of one industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, that is owned indirectly through the Company’s investment in a joint venture with a Hines affiliate.
The Company’s indirect investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting for investments. As such, the activities of these investments are reflected in investments in unconsolidated entities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The tables below provide additional information related to each of the Company’s segments (in thousands) and a reconciliation to the Company’s net income or loss, as applicable. "Corporate-Level Accounts" includes amounts incurred by the corporate-level entities which are not allocated to any of the reportable segments.
| | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| Office properties | | | | | $ | 79,412 | | $ | 83,983 |
| Domestic industrial property | | | | | | 1,135 | | | 1,098 |
Total revenue | | | | | $ | 80,547 | | $ | 85,081 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (1) | | | | | | | | |
| Office properties (1) | | | | | $ | 43,986 | | $ | 47,814 |
| Domestic industrial property (1) | | | | | | 883 | | | 863 |
Total segment net operating income | | | | $ | 44,869 | | $ | 48,677 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities | | | | | | | | |
| Equity in losses of domestic office properties | | | | | $ | (2,414) | | $ | (2,402) |
| Equity in earnings (losses) of domestic retail properties | | | | | | 1 | | | (5) |
| Equity in earnings of international industrial property | | | | | | 587 | | | 689 |
Total equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities | | | | | $ | (1,826) | | $ | (1,718) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | March 31, 2011 | | December 31, 2010 |
| Office properties | | | | | $ | 2,584,903 | | $ | 2,592,579 |
| Domestic industrial property | | | | | | 40,008 | | | 41,650 |
| Investment in unconsolidated entities - | | | | | | | | | |
| Office properties | | | | | | 272,020 | | | 275,372 |
| Domestic retail properties | | | | | | 64,592 | | | 66,123 |
| International industrial property | | | | | | 32,844 | | | 32,303 |
| Corporate-level accounts (2) | | | | | | 139,213 | | | 141,989 |
Total assets | | | | | $ | 3,133,580 | | $ | 3,150,016 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Reconciliation to net loss | | | | | | | | | |
| Total segment net operating income | | | | | $ | 44,869 | | $ | 48,677 |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | (25,680) | | | (27,753) |
| Asset management and acquisition fees | | | | | | (7,643) | | | (7,655) |
| General and administrative | | | | | | (1,610) | | | (1,363) |
| Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net | | | | | | 5,196 | | | (5,854) |
| Interest expense | | | | | | (22,527) | | | (22,732) |
| Interest income | | | | | | 69 | | | 87 |
| Provision for income taxes | | | | | | (130) | | | (114) |
| Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities, net | | | | | | (1,826) | | | (1,718) |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | | - | | | 5,487 |
Net loss | | | | | $ | (9,282) | | $ | (12,938) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Revenues less property operating expenses, real property taxes and property management fees. |
| |
(2) | This amount is primarily made of the Company's $106.3 million deposit to HSH Nordbank (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Other Assets for additional information) and cash at the corporate level. |
15. Subsequent Events
Declaration of Distributions
With the authorization of its board of directors, the Company declared distributions for the months of April, May and June 2011. These distributions will be calculated based on shareholders of record each day during each month in an amount equal to $0.00138082 per share, per day and will be paid on July 1, 2011 in cash or reinvested in stock for those participating in the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.
1515 S Street Mortgage Extension
In April 2011, the Company received an extension letter from the lender related to 1515 S Street’s mortgage. This extension letter extends the original maturity date from May 1, 2011 to August 1, 2011.
*****
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements include statements concerning future financial performance and distributions, future debt and financing levels, acquisitions and investment objectives, payments to Hines Advisors Limited Partnership (the “Advisor”), and its affiliates and other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto as well as all other statements that are not historical statements. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, the availability of future financing and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Any of the assumptions underlying forward-looking statements could be inaccurate. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, pay distributions to our shareholders and maintain the value of the real estate properties in which we hold an interest, may be significantly hindered.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented in certain forward-looking statements:
| • | The potential need to fund tenant improvements, lease-up costs or other capital expenditures, as well as increases in property operating expenses and costs of compliance with environmental matters or discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous or other undetected adverse conditions at our properties; |
| | |
| • | Risks associated with debt; |
| • | Competition for tenants, including competition with affiliates of Hines Interests Limited Partnership (“Hines”); |
| • | Risks associated with adverse changes in general economic or local market conditions, including terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, which may affect the markets in which we and our tenants operate; |
| • | Catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes and terrorist attacks; and our ability to secure adequate insurance at reasonable and appropriate rates; |
| | |
| • | Risks associated with the currency exchange rate related to our international investments; |
| • | Risks associated with our international investments, including the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and the uncertainty of such laws, the tax treatment of transaction structures, political and economic instability, foreign currency fluctuations, and inflation and governmental measures to curb inflation may adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions; |
| • | The failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could reduce the amount of cash we have available to pay distributions and make additional investments; |
| • | Changes in governmental, tax, real estate and zoning laws and regulations and the related costs of compliance and increases in our administrative operating expenses, including expenses associated with operating as a public company; |
| • | Risks relating to our investment in Hines US Core Office Fund LP (the “Core Fund”), such as its reliance on Hines for its operations and investments, and our potential liability for Core Fund obligations; |
| | |
| • | The lack of liquidity associated with our assets; |
| • | Our reliance on our Advisor, Hines and affiliates of Hines for our day-to-day operations and our Advisor’s ability to attract and retain high-quality personnel who can provide service at a level acceptable to us; |
| | |
| • | Risks associated with conflicts of interests that result from our relationship with our Advisor and Hines, as well as conflicts of interests certain of our officers and directors face relating to the positions they hold with other entities; and |
| | |
| • | Our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. |
These risks are more fully discussed in, and all forward-looking statements should be read in light of, all of the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Form 10-Q and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed in this Form 10-Q may increase with the passage of time. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Form 10-Q will be achieved. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to these risks and uncertainties. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement.
Executive Summary
Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (“Hines REIT” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”) and its subsidiary, Hines REIT Properties, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”) were formed in August 2003 for the purpose of investing in and owning interests in real estate. We have invested in real estate to satisfy our primary investment objectives including preserving invested capital, paying regular cash distributions and achieving modest capital appreciation of our assets over the long term. We have made investments directly through entities wholly owned by the Operating Partnership or indirectly through other entities such as through our investment in the Core Fund. As of March 31, 2011, we had direct and indirect interests in 59 properties. These properties consist of 44 office properties located throughout the United States, one mixed-use office and retail property in Toronto, Ontario, one industrial property in Dallas, Texas, one industrial property in Brazil and a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located primarily in five states in the Southeastern United States (the “Grocery-Anchored Portfolio”).
In order to provide capital for these investments, we raised over $2.5 billion through public offerings of our common stock since we commenced our initial public offering in June 2004. In consideration of market conditions and other factors, our board of directors determined to cease sales of our shares to new investors pursuant to the third public offering as of January 1, 2010. However, we have continued to sell shares under our dividend reinvestment plan. Based on market conditions and other considerations, we do not currently expect to commence any future offerings other than those related to shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan. The economic recession has had a significant negative impact on demand for all types of commercial space, and U.S. commercial real estate sales transaction volume in the last three years was down dramatically from the record high in 2007. This combination of real estate and capital markets factors has led to significant declines in commercial real estate values across all property types. Although investment transaction volume increased in 2010, the economic turmoil of the last few years has negatively impacted the values of real estate investments relative to their prior levels. We expect these conditions will negatively impact the estimated value of our shares upon our next valuation which is due to occur no later than June 30, 2011.
We pay distributions to our shareholders on a quarterly basis. Beginning July 1, 2010, the annual distribution rate was decreased from 6% to 5% (based on our most recent primary offering share price of $10.08 per share, assuming the current distribution rate is maintained for a twelve-month period). We have continued to declared distributions at an annual rate of 5% per share through June 30, 2011. However, in light of the current economic conditions, we expect that the level of distributions to our shareholders may decrease in future periods.
Our board of directors and our officers remain focused on carefully managing our cash position and maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity to meet our operating and capital needs in an environment where access to capital in the equity and debt markets remains constrained. To that end, in November 2009, our board of directors suspended our share redemption program until further notice, except with respect to redemption requests made in connection with the death or disability of a shareholder.
Critical Accounting Policies
Each of our critical accounting policies involves the use of estimates that require management to make assumptions that are subjective in nature. Management relies on its experience, collects historical and current market data, and analyzes these assumptions in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgments regarding assumptions as to future uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A disclosure of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2011.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our principal cash requirements are for property-level operating expenses, capital improvements and leasing costs, debt service, corporate-level general and administrative expenses, distributions and redemptions. We have four primary sources of capital for meeting our cash requirements:
| • | proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan; |
| • | debt financings, including secured or unsecured facilities; |
| • | proceeds from the sale of our properties; and |
| • | cash flow generated by our real estate investments and operations. |
We expect that our operating cash needs will primarily be met through cash flow generated by our properties and unconsolidated entities. Additionally, we are continually evaluating the hold period for each of our investments to determine the ideal time to sell assets in order to achieve attractive total returns and provide additional liquidity to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we received proceeds of $141.9 million from the sale of three industrial properties in Brazil and a land parcel in Houston, Texas.
Additionally, on December 23, 2010, we entered into a contract to sell Atrium on Bay, a mixed-use office and retail complex located in the Downtown North submarket of the central business district of Toronto, Canada. The contract sale price for Atrium on Bay is expected to be approximately $344.8 million CAD ($339.5 million USD, based on the exchange rate in effect on December 23, 2010), exclusive of transaction costs. We expect the closing of this sale to occur no later than June 30, 2011. However, the sale is dependent upon the buyer’s assumption of our existing mortgage loan as well as a number of other conditions. There is no guarantee that this sale will be consummated.
��
Our portfolio was 58% leveraged as of March 31, 2011, with 92% of our debt in the form of fixed-rate mortgage loans (some of which are effectively fixed through the use of interest rate swaps) which expire in more than one year. This leverage percentage is calculated using the estimated aggregate value of our real estate investments (including our pro rata share of real estate assets and related debt owned through our investments in other entities such as the Core Fund), cash and cash equivalents on hand as of that date and deposits related to our mortgages.
We have one mortgage loan with $45.0 million of outstanding principal which will mature in 2011. We are currently negotiating with lenders and expect to refinance this mortgage prior to its maturity. In April 2011, we received a letter from the lender which extends the original maturity date from May 1, 2011 to August 1, 2011. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to refinance this mortgage or that we will be able to do so at terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to refinance this mortgage, we will use cash flows from operating activities or proceeds from the sale of other real estate investments, if any, to pay off the outstanding mortgage. In addition, the KeyBank revolving line of credit matures August 3, 2011, subject to an extension at our election for an additional six month period. The outstanding balance of this facility on March 31, 2011, is $17.5 million. We will use cash flows from operating activities or proceeds from the sale of other real estate investments, if any, to pay off the outstanding balance upon maturity. As of March 31, 2011, we have mortgage loans expiring in 2012 and 2013 with outstanding principal balances of $224.6 million and $457.5 million, respectively. We expect to refinance these mortgages, but if we are unable to refinance or are required to make principal payments upon refinancing, we will use cash flows from operating activities or proceeds from the sale of other real estate investments. Additionally, we could be required to post additional collateral under our secured credit facility with HSH Nordbank in future periods. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cash Flows from Financing Activities - Debt Financings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our direct investments in real estate assets generate cash flow in the form of rental revenues, which are reduced by debt service, direct leasing costs and property-level operating expenses. Property-level operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and wages of property management personnel, utilities, cleaning, insurance, security and building maintenance costs, property management and leasing fees, and property taxes. Additionally, we incur corporate-level debt service, general and administrative expenses, asset management and acquisition fees. In general, cash flows from operating activities are lower in the first quarter of each year due to the payment of annual property taxes incurred by many of our properties. Net cash used by operating activities was $4.0 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities between 2011 and 2010 is due to adverse effects of the economic recession on commercial real estate fundamentals and our net operating income in addition to the sale of our Brazilian industrial properties during 2010.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities was approximately $466,000 and $38.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received proceeds of $35.0 million related to the sale of a Brazilian industrial property. We had no sales of properties during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Distributions
In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to pay regular cash distributions to our shareholders, which is one of our investment objectives, we have declared and expect to continue to declare distributions to shareholders (as authorized by our board of directors) as of daily record dates and aggregate and pay such distributions quarterly. Beginning July 1, 2010, the annual distribution rate was decreased from 6% to 5% (based on our most recent primary offering share price of $10.08 per share, assuming the current distribution rate is maintained for a twelve-month period). We have continued to declared distributions at an annual rate of 5% per share through June 30, 2011. In light of the current economic conditions, we expect that the level of distributions to our shareholders may decrease in future periods.
The table below outlines our total distributions declared to shareholders and noncontrolling interests for each of the quarters during 2011 and 2010, including the breakout between the distributions paid in cash and those reinvested pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan (all amounts are in thousands).
| | Shareholders | | Noncontrolling Interests |
Distributions for the Three Months Ended | | Cash Distributions | | Distributions Reinvested | | Total Declared | | Total Declared |
2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
March 31, 2011 | | $ | 15,491 | | $ | 12,324 | | $ | 27,815 | | $ | 1,151 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | | $ | 15,473 | | $ | 12,830 | | $ | 28,303 | | $ | 1,123 |
September 30, 2010 | | $ | 14,986 | | $ | 13,172 | | $ | 28,158 | | $ | 1,067 |
June 30, 2010 | | $ | 17,226 | | $ | 16,011 | | $ | 33,237 | | $ | 1,205 |
March 31, 2010 | | $ | 16,480 | | $ | 16,170 | | $ | 32,650 | | $ | 1,129 |
Total | | $ | 64,165 | | $ | 58,183 | | $ | 122,348 | | $ | 4,524 |
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we funded our cash distributions with distributions received from our unconsolidated investments, proceeds from the sales of our real estate investments and cash generated during prior periods, which included cash flows from operating activities and distributions received from our unconsolidated investments in excess of distributions.
Debt Financings
We use debt financing from time to time for property improvements, tenant improvements, leasing commissions and other working capital needs. Most of our debt is in the form of secured mortgage loans, which we entered into at the time each real estate asset was acquired.
On March 11, 2010, we refinanced Airport Corporate Center’s $77.9 million mortgage with Westdeutsche Immobilienbank AG and we made a principal payment of $12.9 million. The new mortgage loan is a $65.0 million, two-year, amortizing loan with a variable interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 5.50%. This mortgage was entered into by a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, but is guaranteed by Hines REIT.
We entered into a new $45.0 million revolving line of credit with KeyBank on February 3, 2011. This facility matures on August 3, 2011, subject to an extension at the Company’s election for an additional six month period. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received debt proceeds of $17.5 million related to borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We generally use proceeds from our revolving credit facility to fund general working capital needs.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received debt proceeds of $29.0 million and made payments of $16.0 million related to borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Results of Operations
| RESULTS OF OUR DIRECTLY-OWNED PROPERTIES |
We owned 22 properties directly that were 89% leased as of March 31, 2011 compared to 24 properties that were 91% leased as of March 31, 2010. The table below includes revenues and expenses of our directly-owned properties for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. Please note, the following analysis excludes the activity of three properties which were sold during 2010. All amounts in thousands, except for percentages:
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | Change | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | $ | | % | |
Total Revenue | | | | | | | | | | |
Property revenues | | $ | 80,547 | | $ | 85,081 | | $ | (4,534) | | | (5.3) | % |
Less: Property expenses (1) | | | 35,808 | | | 36,518 | | | (710) | | | (1.9) | % |
Total property revenues in excess of expenses | | $ | 44,739 | | $ | 48,563 | | $ | (3,824) | | | (7.9) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest and Depreciation/Amortization | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 25,680 | | $ | 27,753 | | $ | (2,073) | | | (7.5) | % |
Interest expense | | $ | 22,527 | | $ | 22,732 | | $ | (205) | | | (0.9) | % |
Interest income | | $ | 69 | | $ | 87 | | $ | (18) | | | (20.7) | % |
__________
(1) | Property expenses include property operating expenses, real property taxes, property management fees and income taxes. |
Revenues and expenses from the operation of our properties for the three months ended March 31, 2011 declined as compared to the same period in 2010. Property revenues also decreased during these periods primarily due to adverse effects of the economic recession on commercial real estate fundamentals. For example, decreases in tenant demand and leasing velocity have led to declining rental rates and increased tenant incentives on lease renewals. We have also experienced increases in tenant defaults and a reduction of out-of-market lease intangible amortization, both of which have negatively impacted our revenues between the periods.
Depreciation and amortization decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 due to fully amortized lease intangibles.
Discontinued Operations
On January 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil, which we acquired in December 2008. The sales price was $38.4 million (69.9 million BRL translated at a rate of R$1.818 per USD). On April 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Parks Elouveira and Vinhedo, two industrial properties located in Sao Paulo, Brazil, which we acquired in December 2008. The sales price was $102.5 million (181.0 million BRL translated at a rate of R$1.765 per USD on the date of the transaction). The results of operations of Distribution Parks Araucaria, Elouveira and Vinhedo and the gain realized on the disposition of Araucaria were as follows:
| | | | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Rental revenue | | $ | - | | $ | 3,109 |
Other revenue | | | - | | | - |
| Total revenues | | | - | | | 3,109 |
Expenses: | | | | | | |
Property operating expenses | | | - | | | 67 |
Real property taxes | | | - | | | 265 |
Property management fees | | | - | | | 36 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | - | | | 1,123 |
| Total expenses | | | - | | | 1,491 |
Income from discontinued operations before interest income, taxes and gain on sale | | | - | | | 1,618 |
Interest income | | | - | | | 67 |
Income taxes | | | - | | | (423) |
Income from discontinued operations before gain on sale | | | - | | | 1,262 |
Gain on sale of properties | | | - | | | 4,225 |
Income from discontinued operations | | $ | - | | $ | 5,487 |
| RESULTS FOR OUR INDIRECTLY-OWNED PROPERTIES |
Our Interest in the Core Fund
As of March 31, 2011, we owned a 26.8% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 24 properties that were 89% leased. As of March 31, 2010, we owned a 28.7% non-managing general partner interest in the Core Fund, which held interests in 25 properties that were 88% leased. Our equity in losses related to our investment in the Core Fund for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $2.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
Our Interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio
We own a 70% non-managing interest in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio, a portfolio of 12 grocery-anchored shopping centers located in five states primarily in the southeastern United States. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in the Grocery-Anchored Portfolio were insignificant for both the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Our Interest in Distribution Park Rio
We own a 50% non-managing interest in Distribution Park Rio, an industrial property located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Our equity in earnings related to our investment in Distribution Park Rio for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $587,000 and $689,000, respectively.
CORPORATE-LEVEL ACTIVITIES
Corporate-level activities include results related to derivative instruments, asset management and acquisition fees, general and administrative expenses as well as other expenses which are not directly related to our property operations.
Derivative Instruments
We have entered into several interest rate swap transactions with HSH Nordbank as economic hedges against the variability of future interest rates on our variable interest rate borrowings. We have not designated any of these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The interest rate swaps have been recorded at their estimated fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The gain or loss on derivative instruments recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is primarily the result of changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps during each period. In addition, we entered into a foreign currency swap in February 2010 in relation to our sale of Distribution Park Araucaria. We recognized a loss of approximately $110,000 related to this swap, which was recorded in income from discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. See “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information regarding certain risks related to our derivatives, such as the risk of counterparty non-performance.
Other Corporate-level Activities | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The tables below provide detail relating to our asset management and acquisition fees and general and administrative expenses. All amounts in thousands, except percentages: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | Change | |
| | 2011 | | 2010 | | $ | | % | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Asset management and acquisition fees | | $ | 7,643 | | $ | 7,655 | | $ | (12) | | | (0.2) | % |
General and administrative expenses | | $ | 1,610 | | $ | 1,363 | | $ | 247 | | | 18.1 | % |
We pay monthly asset management fees to our Advisor based on the amount of net equity capital invested in real estate investments and pay acquisition fees to our Advisor based on the purchase prices of our real estate investments.
General and administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees, insurance costs, costs and expenses associated with our board of directors and other administrative expenses.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, affiliates of Hines owned a 4.1% and 3.4% noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we allocated income of approximately $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, to these affiliates.
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP financial performance measure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) widely recognized by investors and analysts as one measure of operating performance of a real estate company. FFO excludes items such as real estate depreciation and amortization and gains and losses on the sale of real estate assets. Depreciation and amortization, as applied in accordance with GAAP, implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, it is management’s view, and we believe the view of many industry investors and analysts, that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies by using the historical cost accounting alone is insufficient. In addition, FFO excludes gains and losses from the sale of real estate, which we believe provides management and investors with a helpful additional measure of the historical performance of our real estate portfolio, as it allows for comparisons, year to year, that reflect the impact on operations from trends in items such as occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses and interest costs.
In addition to FFO, management uses modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) as defined by the Investment Program Association (“IPA”) as a non-GAAP supplemental financial performance measure to evaluate our operating performance. MFFO includes funds generated by the operations of our real estate investments and funds used in our corporate-level operations. MFFO is based on FFO, but includes certain additional adjustments which we believe are necessary due to changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that have been put into effect since the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO. These changes have prompted a significant increase in the magnitude of non-cash and non-operating items included in FFO, as defined. Such items include amortization of out-of-market lease intangible assets and liabilities and certain tenant incentives, the effects of straight-line rent revenue recognition, fair value adjustments to derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, non-cash impairment charges and certain other items as described in the footnotes below. Management uses MFFO to evaluate the financial performance of our investment portfolio. In addition, management uses MFFO to evaluate and establish our distribution policy and the sustainability thereof. Further, we believe MFFO is one of several measures that may be useful to investors in evaluating the potential performance of our portfolio.
FFO and MFFO should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) or to cash flows from operating activities, but rather should be reviewed in connection with these and other GAAP measurements. In addition, FFO and MFFO are not intended to be used as liquidity measures indicative of cash flow available to fund our cash needs. Please see the limitations listed below associated with the use of MFFO:
| • | MFFO excludes gains (losses) related to changes in estimated values of derivative instruments related to our interest rate swaps. Although we expect to hold these instruments to maturity, if we were to settle these instruments currently, it would have an impact on our operations. |
| | |
| • | Our FFO and MFFO as presented may not be comparable to amounts calculated by other REITs. |
| | |
| • | Our business is subject to volatility in the real estate markets and general economic conditions, and adverse changes in those conditions could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and MFFO. Accordingly, the predictive nature of MFFO is uncertain and past performance may not be indicative of future results. |
The following section presents our calculation of FFO and MFFO and provides additional information related to our operations (in thousands, except per share amounts).
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Net loss | | $ | (9,282 | ) | | $ | (12,938 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization (1) | | | 25,680 | | | | 28,876 | |
Gain on sale of investment property (2) | | | - | | | | (4,225 | ) |
Adjustments to equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities, net (3) | | | 8,863 | | | | 10,586 | |
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests (4) | | | (1,003 | ) | | | (748 | ) |
Funds from operations | | | 24,258 | | | | 21,551 | |
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments (5) | | | (5,196 | ) | | | 5,854 | |
Other components of revenues and expenses (6) | | | (2,173 | ) | | | (3,172 | ) |
Adjustments to equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities, net (3) | | | 87 | | | | 171 | |
Adjustments for noncontrolling interests (4) | | | 289 | | | | (95 | ) |
Modified Funds From Operations | | | 17,265 | | | | 24,309 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.06 | ) |
Funds From Operations Per Common Share | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.10 | |
Modified Funds From Operations Per Common Share | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.11 | |
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | | | 223,814 | | | | 218,666 | |
1) | | Represents the depreciation and amortization of various real estate assets. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such depreciation and amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of FFO. This amount includes $1.1 million of depreciation and amortization related to discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
2) | | Represents the gain on disposition of certain real estate investments. Although this gain is included in the calculation of net income (loss), we have excluded it from FFO because we believe doing so more appropriately presents the operating performance of our real estate investments on a comparative basis. |
3) | | Includes adjustments to equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities, net, similar to those described in Notes 1, 2 and 6 for our unconsolidated entities, which are necessary to convert our share of income (loss) from unconsolidated entities to FFO and MFFO. |
4) | | Includes income attributable to noncontrolling interests and all adjustments to eliminate the noncontrolling interests’ share of the adjustments to convert our net income (loss) to FFO and MFFO. |
5) | | Represents components of net income (loss) related to the estimated changes in the values of our interest rate swap derivatives. We have excluded these changes in value from our evaluation of our operating performance and MFFO because we expect to hold the underlying instruments to their maturity and accordingly the interim gains or losses will remain unrealized. |
6) | | Includes the following components of revenues and expenses that we do not consider in evaluating our operating performance and determining MFFO (in thousands): |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
2011 | | 2010 |
Straight-line rent adjustment (a) | | $ | (2,350) | | $ | (1,977) |
Amortization of lease incentives (b) | | | 2,815 | | | 1,788 |
Amortization of out-of-market leases (b) | | | (2,849) | | | (3,196) |
Other | | | 211 | | | 213 |
| | $ | (2,173) | | $ | (3,172) |
| | a | ) | Represents the adjustments to rental revenue as required by GAAP to recognize minimum lease payments on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms. We have excluded these adjustments from our evaluation of the operating performance of the Company and in determining MFFO because we believe that the rent that is billable during the current period is a more relevant measure of the Company’s operating performance for such period. |
| | b | ) | Represents the amortization of lease incentives and out-of-market leases. As stated in Note 1 above, historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, we believe that such amortization may be of limited relevance in evaluating current operating performance and, as such, these items are excluded from our determination of MFFO. |
Set forth below is additional information relating to certain items excluded from the analysis above which may be helpful in assessing our operating results:
· | Pursuant to the terms of the Grocery Anchored Portfolio joint venture agreement, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we received distributions of approximately $670,000 and $679,000 in excess of our pro-rata share of the joint venture’s MFFO, respectively. |
· | On January 22, 2010, we sold Distribution Park Araucaria, an industrial property located in Curitiba, Brazil, which we acquired in December 2008 for $33.0 million. Net proceeds from the sale after deducting transaction costs, fees and taxes were $34.6 million. |
· | Amortization of deferred financing costs was approximately $709,000 and $740,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and was deducted in determining MFFO. |
· | A portion of our acquisition and asset management fees are paid in equity through the Participation Interest. For both the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, this amount was $3.9 million. |
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with the Advisor, Dealer Manager and Hines or its affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and reimbursements to these entities, including acquisition fees, selling commissions, dealer manager fees, asset and property management fees, leasing fees, construction management fees, debt financing fees, re-development construction management fees, reimbursement of organizational and offering expenses, and reimbursement of certain operating costs, as described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and previously in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we paid the Advisor a disposition fee in connection with our dispositions of properties in Brazil. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Results for our Directly-Owned Properties - Discontinued Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Subsequent Events
Declaration of Distributions
With the authorization of our board of directors, we declared distributions for the months of April, May and June 2011. These distributions will be calculated based on shareholders of record each day during each month in an amount equal to $0.0138082 per share, per day and will be paid on July 1, 2011 in cash or reinvested in stock for those participating in our dividend reinvestment plan.
1515 S Street Mortgage Extension
In April 2011, we received an extension letter from the lender related to 1515 S Street’s mortgage. This extension letter extends the original maturity date from May 1, 2011 to August 1, 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks in pursuing our business plan are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $520.0 million of debt outstanding under our HSH Credit Facility, which is a variable-rate pooled mortgage facility. However, as a result of the interest rate swap agreements entered into with HSH Nordbank, these borrowings effectively bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 6.03%. We are exposed to credit risk of the counterparty to these interest rate swap agreements in the event of non-performance under the terms of the derivative contracts. In the event of non-performance by the counterparty, we would be subject to the variability of interest rates on the debt outstanding under the HSH Credit Facility to which our outstanding interest rate swaps relate. In addition, as of March 31, 2011 we have a variable interest rate mortgage in the amount of $64.3 million, which had an interest rate as of March 31, 2011 of 6.5%. If interest rates increased by 1%, we would incur an additional $643,000 in annual interest expense. Please see “Debt Financings” above for more information concerning our outstanding debt.
We currently have investments in Canada and Brazil and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements of foreign currencies, which may affect future costs and cash flows. For all currencies, we are currently a net receiver of the foreign currency (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we had no currency transactions which resulted in significant gains or losses being recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Discontinued Operations” for additional information. Generally, we have not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have obtained non-recourse mortgage financing at a fixed rate of interest in the local currency related to our property in Toronto, Canada. To the extent that currency fluctuations increase or decrease net operating income as translated to U.S. dollars, the change in debt service, as translated to U.S. dollars, will partially offset the effect of fluctuations in net operating income, and, to some extent, mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency rates. Based upon our equity ownership in our international subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011, holding everything else constant, a 10% immediate, simultaneous, unfavorable change in all of the foreign currency exchange rates to which we are exposed would decrease the net book value of our investments in our international subsidiaries by approximately $8.1 million and would decrease the quarterly net income of our international subsidiaries by approximately $416,000.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company or its subsidiaries may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes. As of May 13, 2011, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries was a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which are discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we did not sell or issue any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act.
All eligible requests for redemptions received by the Company were redeemed using proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan. The following table lists shares we redeemed under our share redemption program during the period covered by this report.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Total | | | |
| | | | | | | | Number of | | Maximum |
| | | | | | | | Shares | | Number of |
| | | | | | | | Purchased as | | Shares that |
| | | | | | | Part of | | May Yet be |
| | Total | | Average | | Publicly | | Purchased |
| | Number of | | Price | | Announced | | Under the |
| | Shares | | Paid per | | Plans or | | Plans or |
Period | | Purchased | | Share | | Programs | | Programs (2) |
January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2011 (1) | | | 320,159 | | $ | 9.15 | | | 320,159 | | | 1,339,263 |
Total | | | 320,159 | | | | | | 320,159 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) All shares were redeemed on January 3, 2011. |
(2) Our share redemption program is currently limited to requests made in connection with the death or disability of a stockholder. If we determine to redeem shares, we redeem shares on a quarterly basis and such redemptions will be limited to the lesser of the amount required to redeem 10% of the shares outstanding as of the same date in the prior calendar year or the amount of proceeds received from our dividend reinvestment plan in the quarter prior to the quarter in which the redemption request was received. This amount represents the number of shares available for redemption on April 1, 2011. For more information regarding our share redemption program, please see Item 5 of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved.
Item 5. Other Information.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits required by this item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. |
| | | | |
May 13, 2011 | | By: | /s/ CHARLES N. HAZEN | |
| | | Charles N. Hazen | |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
May 13, 2011 | | By: | s/ SHERRI W. SCHUGART | |
| | | Sherri W. Schugart | |
| | | Chief Financial Officer | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
EXHIBT INDEX
Exhibit No. | | | | | Description |
| 3.1 | | | | — | | Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on July 13, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein). |
| 3.2 | | | | — | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on August 3, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein). |
| 31.1 | * | | | — | | Certification. |
| 31.2 | * | | | — | | Certification. |
| 32.1 | * | | | — | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.” |
__________