Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number 000-50891
SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in the charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 20-0432760 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
222 South Riverside Plaza | ||
Chicago, Illinois (Address of principal executive office) | 60606 (Zip Code) |
(888) 782-4672
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filero
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso Noþ
Yeso Noþ
As of August 1, 2006, there were 14,680,688 shares of common stock (“Common Stock”), $0.01 par value, outstanding and 615,585 shares of non-voting Class B common stock (“Class B Common Stock”), $0.01 par value, outstanding.
SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC.
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
Certifications | 26 | |||||||
Certification | ||||||||
Certification | ||||||||
Certification | ||||||||
Certification | ||||||||
Amendment to Partner Agent Program Agreement | ||||||||
Amendment to Partner Agent Program Agreement | ||||||||
Amendment to Partner Agent Program Agreement |
2
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.
Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Assets | (unaudited) | |||||||
Fixed maturity investments, at fair value (amortized cost:$125,018 and $95,760) | $ | 121,751 | $ | 94,129 | ||||
Short-term investments, at amortized cost (which approximates fair value) | 10,114 | 8,862 | ||||||
Total investments | 131,865 | 102,991 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 7,311 | 5,329 | ||||||
Insurance receivables | 55,758 | 44,868 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses | 85,130 | 88,997 | ||||||
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | 1,059 | 3,492 | ||||||
Investment income accrued | 1,408 | 1,102 | ||||||
Equipment and capitalized software at cost (less accumulated depreciation of $2,539 and $1,488) | 6,925 | 5,566 | ||||||
Intangible assets | 10,745 | 10,745 | ||||||
Deferred acquisition costs | 15,256 | 11,279 | ||||||
Other assets | 1,902 | 2,794 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 317,359 | $ | 277,163 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves | $ | 123,948 | $ | 104,870 | ||||
Unearned insurance premiums | 72,391 | 58,595 | ||||||
Insured deposit funds | 11,934 | 7,159 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 5,214 | 5,724 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 213,487 | 176,348 | ||||||
Commitments (Note 4) | ||||||||
Stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
Common stock Class A at $.01 par value per share — authorized 30,000,000 and 30,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 14,680,688 shares | 147 | 147 | ||||||
Common stock Class B at $.01 par value per share — authorized 2,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 562,632 and 223,694 shares | 6 | 2 | ||||||
Paid-in capital — Class A | 127,801 | 127,256 | ||||||
Paid-in capital — Class B | 3,947 | 1,770 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (24,762 | ) | (26,729 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (3,267 | ) | (1,631 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 103,872 | 100,815 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 317,359 | $ | 277,163 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Earned insurance premiums | $ | 25,230 | $ | 3,032 | $ | 48,486 | $ | 3,502 | ||||||||
Net investment income | 1,432 | 1,043 | 2,576 | 1,836 | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenues | 26,659 | 4,072 | 51,060 | 5,337 | ||||||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expenses | 14,475 | 2,319 | 28,472 | 2,790 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs | 5,188 | 640 | 10,731 | 740 | ||||||||||||
Service company fees | — | 2,203 | — | 4,408 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 4,767 | 2,920 | 9,766 | 5,901 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 24,430 | 8,082 | 48,969 | 13,839 | ||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss) | 2,229 | (4,010 | ) | 2,091 | (8,502 | ) | ||||||||||
Federal income tax expense | (62 | ) | — | (124 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 2,167 | (4,010 | ) | 1,967 | (8,502 | ) | ||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains and losses for investments held, after tax | (798 | ) | 1,096 | (1,636 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 1,369 | $ | (2,914 | ) | $ | 331 | $ | (8,577 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per share available to common stockholders (in dollars) | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||||||
Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 15,176 | 14,754 | 15,096 | 14,731 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 15,176 | 14,754 | 15,096 | 14,731 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Common | Paid-in | Retained | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Comprehensive | Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class A | Class B | Class B | (Deficit) | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 147 | $ | 127,256 | $ | 2 | $ | 1,770 | $ | (26,729 | ) | $ | (1,631 | ) | $ | 100,815 | ||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | 1,967 | — | 1,967 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized investment losses, net of tax | — | — | — | — | — | (1,636 | ) | (1,636 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuance | — | — | 4 | 2,177 | — | — | 2,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation | — | 545 | — | — | — | — | 545 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | $ | 147 | $ | 127,801 | $ | 6 | $ | 3,947 | $ | (24,762 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | 103,872 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
Six Months | ||||||||
Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operations | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,967 | $ | (8,502 | ) | |||
Charges (credits) to reconcile net income to cash flows from operations: | ||||||||
Change in deferred income tax | 124 | — | ||||||
Net realized gains | 2 | 1 | ||||||
Amortization of bond discount | 214 | 109 | ||||||
Depreciation | 1,051 | 836 | ||||||
Net change in: | ||||||||
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense reserves | 3,867 | 11,655 | ||||||
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves | 19,078 | (9,548 | ) | |||||
Insurance premiums receivable | (10,890 | ) | (25,360 | ) | ||||
Unearned insurance premiums | 13,796 | 29,572 | ||||||
Deferred acquisition costs | (3,977 | ) | (5,297 | ) | ||||
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | 2,433 | (3,261 | ) | |||||
Insured deposit funds | 4,775 | — | ||||||
Other, net | 497 | 1,960 | ||||||
Total adjustments | 30,970 | 667 | ||||||
Net cash flows from (used for) operations | 32,937 | (7,835 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments | (1,252 | ) | 42,715 | |||||
Sales of fixed maturity investments | 3,876 | 6,259 | ||||||
Purchases of fixed maturity investments | (33,350 | ) | (46,480 | ) | ||||
Unsettled net investment purchases | — | (997 | ) | |||||
Purchase of equipment and capitalized software | (2,410 | ) | (2,128 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows (used for) provided by investing activities | (33,136 | ) | (631 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 2,181 | 500 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,181 | 500 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period | 1,982 | (7,966 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | 5,329 | 8,986 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | $ | 7,311 | $ | 1,020 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) include the accounts of Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc., or SUA or the Company, and its consolidated subsidiary, SUA Insurance Company. SUA completed an initial public offering, or IPO, of its common stock on November 23, 2004. Concurrent with the IPO, SUA completed the acquisition of Potomac Insurance Company of Illinois, or Potomac. For accounting purposes Potomac is considered an accounting predecessor. Potomac has subsequently been renamed SUA Insurance Company.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements, including certain financial statements footnotes, prepared in accordance with GAAP, is not required for interim reporting purposes and has been condensed or omitted. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in SUA’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
The interim financial data as of June 30, 2006, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 is unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s results for the interim periods. The results of operation for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statement line items to enhance the comparability of the results presented.
7
Table of Contents
Note 2. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) per share was determined by dividing the net loss by the applicable shares outstanding:
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
Net income (loss), as reported | $ | 2,167 | $ | (4,010 | ) | |||
Average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted) (in thousands) | 15,176 | 14,754 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per share (in dollars) (basic and diluted) | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.27 | ) |
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
Net income (loss), as reported | $ | 1,967 | $ | (8,502 | ) | |||
Average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted) (in thousands) | 15,096 | 14,731 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per share (in dollars) (basic and diluted) | $ | 0.13 | $ | (.58 | ) |
Note 3. Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had tax basis net operating loss carryforwards of $23,808 and $26,347, respectively. The Company also accumulated start-up and organization expenditures through December 31, 2004 of $2,364 that are deductible on a tax basis over a 60 month period commencing on November 23, 2004. The unamortized portion of these costs were $1,579 and $1,815 at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 the Company generated a GAAP and tax basis profit for the first time since inception in 2003. The company has not, however, paid any federal income tax since inception. As such, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against all potential tax assets, until such time as its operating results and future outlook produce sufficient taxable income to realize these tax assets.
The Company has recorded a tax provision in the quarter and expects a tax provision for the year equal to the current year increase in deferred tax liabilities associated with indefinite lived intangible assets. Because of the indefinite nature of these intangible assets for financial reporting purposes, these deferred tax liabilities do not represent a source of income to realize the Company’s deferred tax assets.
8
Table of Contents
Note 4. Commitments
On February 3, 2005, the Company entered into a lease agreement, or Lease, for its home office space that commenced on May 1, 2005 and terminates on April 30, 2020. On April 24, 2006, the Company amended the Lease to include additional premises effective September 1, 2006. The Company’s net lease obligations are $1,871 for years 1 through 5, $3,294 for years 6 through 10 and $3,753 for years 11 through 15. Included in the lease terms are scheduled rent escalations, improvement incentives and rent abatements all of which are recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term in relation to square footage occupied by the Company. To secure the lease agreement, the Company is required to hold an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $1,500.
The Company has the option to terminate the Lease at August 31, 2011 or at the end of the tenth year. Upon notice of termination, the Company is obligated to pay six months of the then current rent and the unamortized balance of abated rent, brokerage commissions, and construction allowance. If the Company opted to terminate as of August 31, 2011, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately $2,440 plus operating expenses, taxes, and brokerage commissions.
Note 5. Stock Options
The Board of Directors approved the Stock Option Plan, or Plan, during 2004. The Stock Option Plan authorizes the grant of options to certain personnel for up to 850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. All options granted have ten-year terms and vest ratably over either a three or four year period following the date of grant. The number of shares available for the granting of options under the Stock Option Plan as of June 30, 2006 was 97,534.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” or FAS 123R. FAS 123R replaces FAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” or FAS 123, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” or APB 25. The Company adopted FAS 123R at the beginning of the first quarter of 2006, applying the “modified prospective application,” which requires the Company to value stock options granted prior to its adoption of FAS 123R, which have not vested, under the fair value method and expense those amounts over the stock option’s remaining vesting period. Stock options granted subsequent to the adoption of FAS 123R are valued using the fair value method and expensed over the vesting period. In adopting the “modified prospective application,” the Company will not restate results for earlier periods. Under FAS 123R, the Company is required to select a valuation technique or option-pricing model that meets the criteria as stated in the standard. The Company has opted to use the binomial lattice option pricing model. In addition, FAS 123R requires the Company to reflect the tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense reflected in its financial statements as a financing cash flow rather than as an operating cash flow. The amount of financing cash flows recognized for such excess tax deductions were zero for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as no options were exercised during that period.
9
Table of Contents
Compensation expense recognized for stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 were $274 and $545, respectively. Had compensation expense for the Company’s stock-based compensation been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards made prior to 2006, under the Plan and consistent with FAS 123R, the Company’s net income per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2005 | |||||||
(dollars in thousands, | (dollars in thousands, | |||||||
except per share | except per share | |||||||
amounts) | amounts) | |||||||
Net income (loss) as reported | $ | (4,010 | ) | $ | (8,502 | ) | ||
Deduct: compensation expense | (244 | ) | (482 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) | $ | (4,254 | ) | $ | (8,984 | ) | ||
Basic loss per share: | ||||||||
As reported | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||
Diluted loss per share: | ||||||||
As reported | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) |
The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards at June 30, 2006 is approximately $1,632 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 1.6 years.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the binomial lattice option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants issued in the second quarter 2005:
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate | N/A | 3.67% – 4.33 | % | |||||
Expected life | N/A | 3.7 – 6.9 years | ||||||
Expected volatility | N/A | 45 | % | |||||
Expected dividend yield | N/A | 2% beginning after 5 years |
10
Table of Contents
The following table prerapents activity under the Stock Option Plan as of June 30, 2006:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | |||||||||||||
Exercise | Average | |||||||||||||
Price Per | Aggregate | Contractual | ||||||||||||
Number of | Share (in | Intrinsic | Remaining | |||||||||||
Option Plan Activity | Shares | dollars) | Value | Life | ||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2006 | 752,466 | $ | 9.30 | $ | 14,500 | 8.76 years | ||||||||
Options granted | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Options exercised | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Options forfeited | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | 752,466 | $ | 9.30 | $ | 11,500 | 8.51 years | ||||||||
Total options vested at June 30, 2006 | 232,501 | $ | 9.38 | $ | 0 | 8.44 years |
A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006 and changes during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Exercise Price | ||||||||
Shares | Per Share (in dollars) | |||||||
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 | 543,303 | $ | 9.22 | |||||
Options granted | 0 | N/A | ||||||
Options vested | (23,338 | ) | $ | 8.21 | ||||
Options forfeited | 0 | N/A | ||||||
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 | 519,965 | $ | 9.26 |
There were no options granted during the second quarter of 2006. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the second quarter of 2005 was $3.42. The fair value of options vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $75 and $124, respectively. There were no options exercised during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005.
Note 6. Unpaid Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense, or LAE, reserves are estimates of amounts needed to pay claims and related expenses in the future for insured events that have already occurred. The Company establishes estimates of amounts recoverable from its reinsurers in a manner consistent with the claims liability covered by the reinsurance contracts. The Company’s loss and LAE reserves represent management’s best estimate of reserves based on a composite of the results of the various actuarial methods, as well as consideration of known facts and trends.
At June 30, 2006, the Company reported gross loss and LAE reserves of $123,948, of which $78,820 represented the gross direct loss and LAE reserves of Potomac, which is fully
11
Table of Contents
reinsured by OneBeacon Insurance Company, or OneBeacon. At December 31, 2005, the Company reported gross loss and LAE reserves of $104,870, of which $86,736 represented the gross direct loss and LAE reserves of Potomac, which are fully reinsured by OneBeacon.
Potomac was a participant in the OneBeacon Amended and Restated Reinsurance Agreement. Under that agreement, Potomac ceded all of its insurance assets and liabilities into a pool, or Pool, and assumed a 0.5% share of the Pool’s assets and liabilities. On April 1, 2004, Potomac ceased its participation in the Pool and entered into reinsurance agreements whereby Potomac reinsured all of its business written with OneBeacon effective as of January 1, 2004. As a result, Potomac will not share in any favorable or unfavorable development of prior losses recorded by it or the Pool after January 1, 2004, unless OneBeacon fails to perform on its reinsurance obligation. The following table details our reserves as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
As of June 30, 2006 | As of December 31, 2005 | |||||||
Company direct reserves | $ | 45,128 | $ | 18,134 | ||||
Potomac direct reserves | 78,820 | 86,736 | ||||||
Gross reserves | 123,948 | 104,870 | ||||||
Ceded reserves | 85,130 | 88,997 | ||||||
Net reserves | $ | 38,818 | $ | 15,873 | ||||
Included in the reserves for the Company is tabular reserve discount for workers’ compensation and excess workers’ compensation pension claims of $654 as of June 30, 2006 and $187 as of December 31, 2005. The reserves are discounted on a tabular basis at four percent using the 2001 United States Actuarial Life Tables for Female and Male population.
Note 7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty of Income Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109,” or FIN 48. FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company believes that implementation of this new interpretation will have no material impact on our financial statements.
12
Table of Contents
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Those statements include, but may not be limited to, the discussions of our operating and growth strategy. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, those set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Business section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events and circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
We were formed on April 3, 2003 for the purpose of offering products in the specialty commercial property and casualty insurance market by using an innovative business model. Specialty insurance typically serves niche groups of insureds that require highly specialized knowledge of a business class to achieve underwriting profits. This segment has traditionally been underserved by most standard commercial property and casualty insurers, due to the complex business knowledge and the investment required to achieve attractive underwriting profits. Competition in this segment is based primarily on client service, availability of insurance capacity, specialized policy forms, efficient claims handling and other value-based considerations, rather than just price.
On November 23, 2004 we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, and concurrent private placements and completed the acquisition of Potomac Insurance Company of Illinois, or Potomac. After giving effect to the acquisition, we changed the name of Potomac to SUA Insurance Company.
Prior to our IPO, all activities consisted of start-up activities related to our IPO and costs to establish the infrastructure required to commence insurance operations.
On January 1, 2005 we commenced our insurance operations. However, due to the lead time necessary to quote and place business, we did not effectively begin writing policies until March 2005.
13
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Gross written premiums for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were $37.4 million, compared to gross written premiums of $25.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Our Partner Agent, Risk Transfer Holdings, Inc., or RTH, specializes in providing workers’ compensation coverage to professional employer organizations, or PEOs, which are organizations that provide small employers with human resource services, employee benefits and workers’ compensation insurance. Currently we are writing business in California, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas, Illinois and Nevada. RTH produced total gross written premiums of $22.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $17.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. While the recent rate decrease in California impacted this quarter’s premium, we continue to believe that California is an attractive market. We also continue to push into other markets including our recent entrance into Nevada.
American Team Managers, or ATM, specializes in general liability coverage for artisan contractors (electricians, plumbers and other trades) and general contractors and workers’ compensation for small to midsize businesses all within California. ATM also offers general liability, commercial auto and garage coverages for local and intermediate trucking in California. ATM produced total gross written premiums for the three months ended June 30, 2006 of $7.6 million, compared to $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. ATM’s premium growth continues, especially outside of workers’ compensation.
AEON Insurance Group, Inc., or AEON, our Partner Agent specializing in commercial auto, general liability, inland marine and property coverages for tow truck operators and vehicle repossessors, on a national basis, produced total gross written premiums of $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. AEON’s production grew quarter over quarter.
Specialty Risk Solutions, LLC, or SRS, specializes in providing general liability to the public entity segment including schools, municipalities and special districts. SRS signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in May 2005. There was no direct premium from SRS produced in the three months ended June 30, 2006 or the three months ended June 30, 2005. SRS selectively targets a limited number of accounts that renew primarily in the third quarter.
Appalachian Underwriters, Inc., or AUI, specializes in providing commercial general liability and commercial auto liability to residential and small commercial contractors in mid-south and central states. AUI signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in October 2005 and began writing business in December 2005. Total gross written premiums for the three months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $3.2 million.American Patriot Insurance Agency, Inc., or API, specializes in the small to medium roofing industry, providing commercial general liability and commercial auto liability both directly and through retail brokers. API signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in January 2006 and wrote $0.4 million of business in the three months ended June 30, 2006, its first quarter of operations.
14
Table of Contents
Total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 consisted of earned premium of $25.2 million and investment income of $1.4 million, compared to earned premium of $3.0 million and investment income of $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were $24.4 million, compared to $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 consisted of loss and loss adjustment expense of $14.5 million, amortization of deferred acquisition cost of $5.2 million and other operating expenses of $4.8 million.
By comparison, total expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 consisted of loss and loss adjustment expense of $2.3 million, amortization of deferred acquisition cost of $0.6 million, service company fees of $2.2 million and other operating expenses of $2.9 million. We did not incur any service company expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2006 because we terminated our service company contract effective December 31, 2005. We have assumed the responsibilities previously provided by our service company which expenses are included in other operating expenses. We remain committed to operating efficiently and increasing staff only as our business volume requires.
Other operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 included $1.4 million of salaries and benefit costs (excluding $1.0 million of salary and benefit costs classified as loss adjustment expenses and acquisition expenses), $0.8 million of professional and consulting fees, $0.6 million of depreciation and amortization and $1.9 million of other expenses. Also included in other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was compensation expense of $0.3 million associated with our stock option program. This represents a change in our accounting policies through the adoption of FAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” or FAS 123R, whereby we recognize compensation expense for stock options. Prior to the first quarter of 2006 we followed the accounting principles under the intrinsic value method of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” or APB 25.
By comparison, other operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2005 included $1.7 million of salaries and benefit costs (excluding $0.7 million of salary and benefit costs classified as loss adjustment expenses and acquisition expenses), $0.6 million of professional and consulting fees, $0.3 million of depreciation and amortization and $0.3 million of other expenses.
Tax expense of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 represents deferred tax credits associated with our acquisition of Potomac, which have an indefinite life and therefore cannot be offset with tax loss carryforwards.
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $2.2 million. This compares to a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2005 of $4.0 million.
15
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Gross written premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $68.2 million, compared to gross written premiums of $33.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
RTH produced total gross written premiums of $40.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
ATM produced total gross written premiums of $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
AEON produced total gross written premiums of $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
SRS signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in May 2005. There was no direct premium from SRS produced during this time period. SRS selectively targets a limited number of accounts that renew primarily in the third quarter.
AUI signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in October 2005 and began writing business in December 2005. Total gross written premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $5.0 million.
API signed a Partner Agent program agreement with us in January 2006 and wrote $0.4 million of business during the six months ended June 30, 2006, all of which was written during the three months ended June 30, 2006, its first quarter of operations.
Total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consisted of earned premium of $48.5 million and investment income of $2.6 million, compared to earned premium of $3.5 million and investment income of $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $49.0 million, compared to $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 consisted of loss and loss adjustment expense of $28.5 million, amortization of deferred acquisition cost of $10.7 million, and other operating expenses of $9.8 million. By comparison, total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 consisted of loss and loss adjustment expense of $2.8 million, amortization of deferred acquisition cost of $0.7 million, service company fees of $4.4 million and other operating expenses of $5.9 million. We did not incur any service company expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2006 because we terminated our service company contract effective December 31, 2005.
Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included $2.8 million of salaries and benefit costs (excluding $2.1 million of salary and benefit costs classified as loss adjustment expenses and acquisition expenses), $2.2 million of professional and consulting fees, $1.0 million of depreciation and amortization and $3.8 million of other expenses. Also included in other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was compensation expense of $0.5 million associated with our stock option program. By comparison, other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 included $2.8 million of salaries and benefit costs (excluding $1.1 million of salary and benefit costs classified as loss adjustment expenses and acquisition
16
Table of Contents
expenses), $1.2 million of professional and consulting fees, $0.8 million of depreciation and amortization and $1.1 million of other expenses. Year to date expenses include a reclassification of first quarter expenses of $0.4 million resulting in a decrease in acquisition expense from $5.9 million to $5.5 million and an increase in operating expense from $4.6 million to $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Tax expense of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 represents deferred tax credits associated with our acquisition of Potomac, which have an indefinite life and therefore cannot be offset with tax loss carryforwards.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $2.0 million. This compares to a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $8.5 million.
Our premiums in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 were primarily concentrated in California and Florida. Our gross written premiums by state as a percentage of total gross written premium for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 were as follows:
For the Three | For the Six | For the | ||||||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
California | 31.0 | % | 32.3 | % | 39.4 | % | ||||||
Florida | 49.2 | % | 41.3 | % | 42.6 | % | ||||||
Other States | 19.8 | % | 26.4 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Our business written for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was heavily weighted in workers’ compensation and our longer term goal is to have a more even balance between workers’ compensation, general liability and commercial auto. We are also continuing to explore the appointments of new Partner Agents to increase our volume and balance our book of business. Our gross written premium by line of business as a percentage of total gross written premium for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2005 were as follows:
For the Three | For the Six | For the | ||||||||||
Months Ended | Months Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||||||
Workers’ compensation | 62.9 | % | 65.2 | % | 68.8 | % | ||||||
Commercial automobile | 15.3 | % | 13.2 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||
General liability | 20.2 | % | 20.1 | % | 11.8 | % | ||||||
All other | 1.6 | % | 1.5 | % | 9.0 | % | ||||||
Total | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
17
Table of Contents
Our net loss and loss adjustment expense ratio continues to improve over prior periods. This reflects our adherence to conservative pricing and underwriting, as well as reflects a higher level of earned premium than in prior quarters. The table below provides key operating statistics and ratios:
For The | For The | For The | For The | |||||||||||||
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | June 30, 2005 | June 30, 2006 | June 30,2005 | |||||||||||||
Gross premiums written | $ | 37.4 | $ | 25.0 | $ | 68.2 | $ | 33.5 | ||||||||
Net premiums earned | $ | 25.2 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 48.5 | $ | 3.5 | ||||||||
Net loss and loss adjustment expense ratio | 57.4 | % | 76.5 | % | 58.7 | % | 79.7 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of amortization of deferred acquisition expense to earned premium | 20.6 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.1 | % | 21.1 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of all other expenses to gross written premium | 12.7 | % | 20.2 | % | 14.3 | % | 30.6 | % |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are organized as a holding company and, as such, have no direct operations of our own. Our assets consist primarily of investments in our subsidiary, through which we conduct substantially all of our insurance operations.
As a holding company, we will have continuing funding needs for general corporate expenses, the payment of principal and interest on future borrowings, if any, taxes and the payment of other obligations. Funds to meet these obligations are expected to come primarily from dividends and other statutorily permissible payments from our operating subsidiary. The ability of our operating subsidiary to make payments to us will be limited by the applicable laws and regulations of Illinois. There will be restrictions on the payment of dividends by our insurance subsidiary to us.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, net cash from operating activities was $32.9 million, principally consisting of premium and deposit collections exceeding losses and expenses paid out. These positive cash flows are a direct result of our continued premium growth. Cash used for investing activities was $33.1 million representing purchases of investments and additions to equipment and capitalized software. Further, we had cash flows from financing activities of $2.2 million from sales of Class B Common Stock to Partner Agents.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net cash used for operating activities was $7.8 million. As indicated in our discussion of Results of Operations, in our early stages of development, premium collections and investment income were insufficient to fund operating expenses. Further, cash used in investment activities was $0.6 million, principally representing purchases of investments and additions to equipment and capitalized software.
18
Table of Contents
Our investment portfolio consists of marketable fixed maturity and short-term investments. All fixed maturity investments are classified as available for sale and are reported at their estimated fair value based on quoted market prices. Realized gains and losses are credited or charged to income in the period in which they are realized. Changes in unrealized gains or losses are reported as a separate component of comprehensive income, and accumulated unrealized gains or losses are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.
The aggregate fair market value of our fixed maturity investments at June 30, 2006 was $121.8 million compared to amortized cost of $125.0 million. The aggregate fair market value of our fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2005 was $94.1 million compared to amortized cost of $95.8 million.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk can be described as the risk of change in fair value of a financial instrument due to changes in interest rates, creditworthiness, foreign exchange rates or other factors. We will seek to mitigate that risk by a number of actions, as described below.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates is concentrated in our investment portfolio. We monitor this exposure through periodic reviews of our consolidated asset and liability positions. We model and periodically review estimates of cash flows, as well as the impact of interest rate fluctuations relating to the investment portfolio and insurance reserves.
The table below summarizes the estimated effects of hypothetical increases and decreases in market interest rates on our investment portfolio:
Estimated | ||||||||||||||||
Assumed Change | Fair Value After | Increase | ||||||||||||||
Fair Value | in Relevant | Change in | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||
$ in thousands | at 6/30/06 | Interest Rate | Interest Rate | in Carrying Value | ||||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 131,865 | 100 bp decrease | $ | 135,050 | $ | 3,185 | |||||||||
50 bp decrease | $ | 133,485 | $ | 1,620 | ||||||||||||
50 bp increase | $ | 130,223 | $ | (1,642 | ) | |||||||||||
100 bp increase | $ | 128,571 | $ | (3,294 | ) |
Credit Risk
Our portfolio includes primarily fixed income securities and short-term investments, which are subject to credit risk. This risk is defined as default or the potential loss in market value resulting from adverse changes in the borrower’s ability to repay the debt. In our risk management strategy and investment policy, we earn competitive relative returns while investing in a diversified portfolio of securities of high credit quality issuers to limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.
19
Table of Contents
The portfolio of fixed maturities consists solely of high quality bonds at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The following table summarizes bond ratings at market or fair value.
6/30/2006 | 12/31/2005 | |||||||||||||||
Market Value | Percent of | Market Value | Percent of | |||||||||||||
(000) omitted | Portfolio | (000) omitted | Portfolio | |||||||||||||
US Govt & Other Bonds | $ | 66,325 | 54.5 | % | $ | 41,279 | 43.9 | % | ||||||||
AA Rated | $ | 17,171 | 14.1 | % | $ | 15,940 | 16.9 | % | ||||||||
A Rated | $ | 38,255 | 31.4 | % | $ | 36,910 | 39.2 | % | ||||||||
$ | 121,751 | 100.0 | % | $ | 94,129 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
We also have other receivable amounts subject to credit risk, including reinsurance recoverables from OneBeacon Insurance Company. To mitigate the risk of counterparties’ nonpayment of amounts due under these arrangements, we established business and financial standards for reinsurer approval, incorporating ratings by major rating agencies and considering then-current market information.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by SEC Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.There were no changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls.A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a
20
Table of Contents
company have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control and internal control over financial reporting systems are met.
21
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A: Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 2: Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 2, 2006, stockholders elected each of the director nominees to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified, with the following votes:
For | Withheld | |||||||
Courtney C. Smith | 12,296,420 | 18,985 | ||||||
Peter E. Jokiel | 12,202,957 | 112,448 | ||||||
Robert E. Dean | 12,296,420 | 18,985 | ||||||
Raymond A. Groth | 12,296,420 | 18,985 | ||||||
Paul A. Philp | 12,296,420 | 18,985 | ||||||
Robert H. Whitehead | 12,295,920 | 19,485 | ||||||
Russell E. Zimmermann | 12,295,920 | 19,485 |
At the same meeting, the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent auditors for the current year was approved and ratified, with the following votes:
For | Against | Abstention | ||||||
12,311,177 | 4,020 | 208 |
No other matters were voted on at the meeting.
Item 5: Other Information
None.
22
Table of Contents
Item 6: Exhibits
Exhibits:
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.1 | Amendment No. 2 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — American Patriot Insurance Agency, Inc. | |
99.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — AEON Insurance Group, Inc. | |
99.3 | Amendment No. 2 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — Risk Transfer Holdings, Inc. |
23
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS’ ALLIANCE, INC. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Dated: August 4, 2006 | By: | /s/ Courtney C. Smith | ||||
Name: Courtney C. Smith | ||||||
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal | ||||||
Executive Officer) | ||||||
Dated: August 4, 2006 | By: | /s/ Peter E. Jokiel | ||||
Name: Peter E. Jokiel | ||||||
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial | ||||||
Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
24
Table of Contents
Exhibits Index
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.1 | Amendment No. 2 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — American Patriot Insurance Agency | |
99.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — AEON Insurance Group, Inc | |
99.3 | Amendment No. 2 to the Specialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc. Partner Agent Program Agreement — Risk Transfer Holdings, Inc. |
25