LOANS & ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSS | LOANS & ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES For the Company’s single family, commercial and multifamily loans, the allowance methodology takes into consideration the risk that the original borrower information may have adversely changed in two ways. First, in calculating the quantitative factor for the Company’s general loan loss allowance, the actual loss experience is tracked and stratified by original LTV and year of origination. As a result, the Company uses relatively higher loss rates across the LTV bands for loans originated and purchased in years 2005 through 2008 compared to the same LTV ranges for loans originated before 2005 or after 2008. Second, the Company uses a number of qualitative factors to reflect additional risk. One qualitative loss factor is real estate valuation risk which is applied to each LTV band primarily based upon the year the real estate loan was originated or purchased. Based upon price appreciation indices, multifamily property values in years 2005 through 2008 experienced significant declines. As a result, the Company applies a relatively higher qualitative loss factor rate across the LTV bands for loans originated and purchased in years 2005 through 2008 compared to the same LTV ranges for loans originated or purchased before 2005 or after 2008. For the Company’s home equity loans, the allowance methodology takes into consideration the risk that the original borrower information may have adversely changed in two ways. First, in calculating the quantitative factor for the Company’s general loan loss allowance, the actual loss experience is tracked and stratified by original combined LTV (“CLTV”) of the first and second liens. As a result, the Company allocates higher loss rates in proportion to the greater the CLTV. Second, the Company uses a number of qualitative factors to reflect additional risk. The Company does not have any individual purchased home equity loans in its portfolio and given the limited time frame under which the Company originated home equity loans, 2006-2009, no additional risk allocation is used. For the Company’s single family – warehouse lines, the allowance methodology takes into consideration the structure of these loans, as they remain in the portfolio for a short period (usually less than a month) and have higher credit protection allocated compared to traditional single family originations. A matrix was created to reflect most current operating levels of capital and line usage, which calculates a loss rating to assign to each originator. The Company will continue to monitor these loans and the allocated allowance as more historical information is obtained. For the Company’s factoring loans, the allowance methodology takes into consideration the credit quality of the insurance company or state securing the loan. The Company obtains credit ratings for these entities through agencies such as AM Best and allocates an allowance allocation based on these ratings. The Company will continue to monitor these loans and the allocated allowance as more historical information is obtained. For the Company’s C&I leveraged loans and bridge loans, the allowance methodology incorporates a loan level grading system and risk adjusters. Industry loss rates are applied to determine the loss allowance for each of these loans based upon their internal grading. The loss rate is then subject to risk adjustments increasing or decreasing the base loss rate depending upon the health of the borrower’s industry, the size of the company, or in the case of bridge loans, based upon the income generated by the property and the strength of the guarantor. For the Company’s recreational vehicle (“RV”) / auto loan portfolio, the allowance methodology takes into consideration potential adverse changes to the borrower’s financial condition since time of origination. The general loan loss reserves for RV / auto are stratified based upon borrower FICO scores. First, to account for potential deterioration of borrower’s credit history since time of origination, due to downturn in the economy or other factors, the Company refreshes the FICO scores used to drive the allowance on a semi-annual basis. The Company believes that current borrower credit history is a better predictor of potential loss than that was used at time of origination. Second, the Company uses a number of qualitative factors to reflect additional risk. The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio as of the dates indicated: At June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 Single family real estate secured: Mortgage $ 2,980,795 $ 1,918,626 Home equity 3,604 12,690 Warehouse and other 1 385,413 370,717 Multifamily real estate secured 1,185,531 978,511 Commercial real estate secured 61,403 24,061 Auto and RV secured 13,140 14,740 Factoring 122,200 118,945 Commercial & Industrial 248,584 152,619 Other 601 1,971 Total gross loans 5,001,271 3,592,880 Allowance for loan losses (28,327 ) (18,373 ) Unaccreted discounts and loan fees (44,326 ) (41,666 ) Total net loans $ 4,928,618 $ 3,532,841 _______________________________________ 1. The balance of single family warehouse loans was $122,003 at June 30, 2015 and $92,920 at June 30, 2014 . The remainder of the balance was attributable to single family lender finance loans. The following table summarizes activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated: At June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 2013 Balance—beginning of period $ 18,373 $ 14,182 $ 9,636 Provision for loan loss 11,200 5,350 7,550 Charged off (1,561 ) (1,591 ) (3,907 ) Recoveries 315 432 903 Balance—end of period $ 28,327 $ 18,373 $ 14,182 The following table summarizes the composition of the impaired loans: At June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 2013 Non-performing loans—90+ days past due plus other non-accrual loans $ 25,873 $ 16,390 $ 13,020 Troubled debt restructured loans—non-accrual 4,958 3,995 5,283 Troubled debt restructured loans—performing 217 2,379 3,538 Total impaired loans $ 31,048 $ 22,764 $ 21,841 At June 30, 2015 , the carrying value of impaired loans is net of write offs of $4,652 . At June 30, 2015 , $31,048 of impaired loans had no specific allowance allocations. The average carrying value of impaired loans was $29,967 and $20,850 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The interest income recognized during the periods of impairment is insignificant for those loans impaired at June 30, 2015 or 2014 . At June 30, 2015 and 2014 , there were no loans still accruing past due 90 days or more, unless the Company received principal and interest from the servicer despite the borrower’s delinquency. The Company considers the servicer’s recovery of such advances in evaluating whether such loans should continue to accrue. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors that we consider in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if repayment of the loan is expected from the sale of collateral. The Company has allocated $2 and $4 of the allowance to customers whose loans have been restructured and were determined to be TDRs as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The Company does not have any commitments to fund TDR loans at June 30, 2015 . At June 30, 2015 and 2014 , approximately 66.36% and 61.65% , respectively, of the Company’s real estate loans are collateralized by real property located in California and therefore exposed to economic conditions within this market region. In the ordinary course of business, the Company has granted related party loans collateralized by real property to principal officers, directors and their affiliates. There were no new related party loans granted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 . During the fiscal year 2014 , the Company originated two new related party loans in the amount of $1,585 and did not execute any interest rate modifications of existing loans. Total principal payments on related party loans were $325 and $296 during the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. At June 30, 2015 and 2014 , these loans amounted to $10,543 and $10,868 , respectively, and are included in loans held for investment. Interest earned on these loans was $111 and $141 during the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The Company’s loan portfolio consists of approximately 11.74% fixed interest rate loans and 88.26% adjustable interest rate loans as of June 30, 2015 . The Company’s adjustable rate loans are generally based upon indices using U.S. Treasuries, London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), and 11th District cost of funds. At June 30, 2015 and 2014 , purchased loans serviced by others were $132,976 or 2.66% and $150,786 or 4.20% respectively, of the loan portfolio. Allowance for Loan Loss . We are committed to maintaining the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered to be commensurate with estimated probable incurred credit losses in the portfolio. Although the adequacy of the allowance is reviewed quarterly, management performs an ongoing assessment of the risks inherent in the portfolio. While the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at June 30, 2015 , future additions to the allowance will be subject to continuing evaluation of estimated and known, as well as inherent, risks in the loan portfolio. Allowance for Credit Loss Disclosures . The assessment of the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses is based upon a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and nonaccrual loans, changes in the volume and mix of loans, collateral values and charge-off history. The allowance for loan loss for the RV and auto loan portfolio at June 30, 2015 was determined by classifying each outstanding loan according to the original FICO score and providing loss rates. The Company had $12,687 of RV and auto loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: FICO score greater than or equal to 770: $2,882 ; 715 – 769: $4,408 ; 700 – 714: $1,150 ; 660 – 699: $2,323 and less than 660: $1,924 . The Company provides general loan loss reserves for mortgage loans based upon the size and class of the mortgage loan and the LTV at date of origination. The allowance for each class is determined by dividing the outstanding unpaid balance for each loan by the LTV and applying a loss rate. At June 30, 2015 , the LTV groupings for each significant mortgage class were as follows: The Company had $2,957,736 of single family mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 60%: $1,606,203 ; 61% – 70%: $1,111,742 ; 71% – 80%: $239,584 and greater than 80%: $207 . The Company had $1,180,132 of multifamily mortgage portfolio loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 55%: $533,292 ; 56% – 65%: $367,910 ; 66% – 75%: $263,766 ; 76% – 80%: $15,164 and greater than 80%: $0 . Based on historical performance, the Company divides the LTV analysis into two classes, separating purchased loans from the loans underwritten directly by the Company since multifamily loans originated by the Company experience lower estimated loss rates. The Company originates and purchases mortgage loans with terms that may include repayments that are less than the repayments for fully amortizing loans, including interest only loans, option adjustable-rate mortgages, and other loan types that permit payments that may be smaller than interest accruals. The Companies lending guidelines for interest only loans are adjusted for the increased credit risk associated with these loans by requiring borrowers with such loans to borrow at LTVs that are lower than standard amortizing ARM loans and by calculating debt to income ratios for qualifying borrowers based upon a fully amortizing payment, not the interest only payment. The Company’s Credit Committee monitors and performs reviews of interest only loans. Adverse trends reflected in the Company’s delinquency statistics, grading and classification of interest only loans would be reported to management and the Board of Directors. As of June 30, 2015 , the Company had $700.3 million of interest only loans and $4.0 million of option adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Through June 30, 2015 , the net amount of deferred interest on these loan types was not material to the financial position or operating results of the Company. The Company provides general loan loss reserves for its RV and automobile loans based upon the borrower’s credit score at the time of origination and the Company’s loss experience to date. The Company obtains updated credit scores for its RV and auto borrowers approximately every six months . The updated credit score will result in a higher or lower general loan loss allowance depending on the change in borrowers’ FICO scores and the resulting shift in loan balances among the five FICO bands from which the Company measures and calculates its reserves. For the general loss reserve, the Company does not use individually updated credit scores or valuations for the real estate collateralizing its real estate loans, but does recalculate the LTV based upon principal payments made during each quarter. The Company had $59,275 of commercial real estate loan balances subject to general reserves as follows: LTV less than or equal to 50%: $22,111 ; 51% – 60%: $24,975 ; 61% – 70%: $12,189 ; 71% – 80%: $0 and greater than 80%: $0 . The Company’s commercial secured portfolio consists of business loans well-collateralized by residential real estate. The Company’s other portfolio consists of receivables factoring for businesses and consumers. The Company allocates its allowance for loan loss for these asset types based on qualitative factors which consider the value of the collateral and the financial position of the issuer of the receivables. The following tables summarize activity in the allowance for loan losses by segment for the periods indicated: June 30, 2015 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Balance at July 1, 2014 $ 7,959 $ 134 $ 1,259 $ 3,785 $ 1,035 $ 812 $ 279 $ 3,048 $ 62 $ 18,373 Provision for loan loss 6,305 (1 ) 620 922 224 288 13 2,834 (5 ) 11,200 Charge-offs (747 ) (43 ) — (344 ) (156 ) (271 ) — — — (1,561 ) Recoveries 147 32 — — — 124 — — 12 315 Balance at June 30, 2015 $ 13,664 $ 122 $ 1,879 $ 4,363 $ 1,103 $ 953 $ 292 $ 5,882 $ 69 $ 28,327 June 30, 2014 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Balance at July 1, 2013 $ 4,812 $ 183 $ 1,250 $ 3,186 $ 1,378 $ 1,536 $ 201 $ 1,623 $ 13 $ 14,182 Provision for loan loss 3,214 3 9 708 12 (142 ) 78 1,425 43 5,350 Charge-offs (125 ) (98 ) — (359 ) (355 ) (620 ) — — (34 ) (1,591 ) Recoveries 58 46 — 250 — 38 — — 40 432 Balance at June 30, 2014 $ 7,959 $ 134 $ 1,259 $ 3,785 $ 1,035 $ 812 $ 279 $ 3,048 $ 62 $ 18,373 June 30, 2013 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Balance at July 1, 2012 $ 4,030 $ 192 $ 108 $ 2,558 $ 398 $ 2,159 $ 86 $ 102 $ 3 $ 9,636 Provision for loan loss 1,469 229 1,142 858 1,958 131 115 1,521 127 7,550 Charge-offs (730 ) (257 ) — (420 ) (1,496 ) (867 ) — — (137 ) (3,907 ) Recoveries 43 19 — 190 518 113 — — 20 903 Balance at June 30, 2013 $ 4,812 $ 183 $ 1,250 $ 3,186 $ 1,378 $ 1,536 $ 201 $ 1,623 $ 13 $ 14,182 The following tables present our loans evaluated individually for impairment by portfolio class for the periods indicated: June 30, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Unpaid Principal Balance Adjustment Unpaid Book Balance Accrued Interest/Origination Fees Recorded Related With no related allowance recorded: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage In-house originated $ 7,000 $ 657 $ 6,343 $ 129 $ 6,472 $ — Purchased 6,318 2,083 4,235 157 4,392 — Multifamily real estate secured Purchased 2,569 921 1,648 — 1,648 — Commercial real estate secured Purchased 3,662 1,534 2,128 254 2,382 — Auto and RV secured In-house originated 1,097 815 282 13 295 — With an allowance recorded: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage In-house originated 10,142 — 10,142 — 10,142 214 Purchased 2,339 — 2,339 9 2,348 45 Home equity In-house originated 9 — 9 — 9 1 Multifamily real estate secured In-house originated 3,430 — 3,430 43 3,473 2 Purchased 321 — 321 20 341 3 Auto and RV secured In-house originated 171 — 171 4 175 8 Total $ 37,058 $ 6,010 $ 31,048 $ 629 $ 31,677 $ 273 As a % of total gross loans 0.74 % 0.12 % 0.62 % 0.01 % 0.63 % 0.01 % June 30, 2014 (Dollars in thousands) Unpaid Principal Balance Adjustment Unpaid Book Balance Accrued Interest/Origination Fees Recorded Related With no related allowance recorded: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage Purchased $ 7,413 $ 2,189 $ 5,224 $ 223 $ 5,447 $ — Home equity In-house originated 88 83 5 9 14 — Multifamily real estate secured Purchased 2,615 746 1,869 5 1,874 — Commercial real estate secured Purchased 3,670 1,297 2,373 133 2,506 — Auto and RV secured In-house originated 1,561 1,072 489 27 516 — With an allowance recorded: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage In-house originated 4,074 — 4,074 22 4,096 14 Purchased 4,087 — 4,087 53 4,140 19 Home equity In-house originated 163 — 163 — 163 1 Multifamily real estate secured In-house originated 2,307 — 2,307 22 2,329 3 Purchased 125 — 125 — 125 1 Commercial real estate secured Purchased 2,003 — 2,003 2 2,005 38 Auto and RV secured In-house originated 45 — 45 1 46 1 Total $ 28,151 $ 5,387 $ 22,764 $ 497 $ 23,261 $ 77 As a % of total gross loans 0.78 % 0.15 % 0.63 % 0.02 % 0.65 % — % The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment evaluation method: June 30, 2015 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 259 $ 1 $ — $ 5 $ — $ 8 $ — $ — $ — $ 273 Collectively evaluated for impairment 13,405 121 1,879 4,358 1,103 945 292 5,882 69 28,054 Total ending allowance balance $ 13,664 $ 122 $ 1,879 $ 4,363 $ 1,103 $ 953 $ 292 $ 5,882 $ 69 $ 28,327 Loans: Loans individually evaluated for impairment 1 $ 23,059 $ 9 $ — $ 5,399 $ 2,128 $ 453 $ — $ — $ — $ 31,048 Loans collectively evaluated for impairment 2,957,736 3,595 385,413 1,180,132 59,275 12,687 122,200 248,584 601 4,970,223 Principal loan balance 2,980,795 3,604 385,413 1,185,531 61,403 13,140 122,200 248,584 601 5,001,271 Unaccreted discounts and loan fees 10,438 11 (83 ) 3,348 96 149 (57,223 ) (1,062 ) — (44,326 ) Accrued interest receivable 10,530 5 306 4,862 145 73 477 1,159 — 17,557 Total recorded investment in loans $ 3,001,763 $ 3,620 $ 385,636 $ 1,193,741 $ 61,644 $ 13,362 $ 65,454 $ 248,681 $ 601 $ 4,974,502 1 Loans evaluated for impairment include TDRs that have been performing for more than six months. June 30, 2014 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Allowance for loan losses: Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 33 $ 1 $ — $ 4 $ 38 $ 1 $ — $ — $ — $ 77 Collectively evaluated for impairment 7,926 133 1,259 3,781 997 811 279 3,048 62 18,296 Total ending allowance balance $ 7,959 $ 134 $ 1,259 $ 3,785 $ 1,035 $ 812 $ 279 $ 3,048 $ 62 $ 18,373 Loans: Loans individually evaluated for impairment 1 $ 13,385 $ 168 $ — $ 4,301 $ 4,376 $ 534 $ — $ — $ — $ 22,764 Loans collectively evaluated for impairment 1,905,241 12,522 370,717 974,210 19,685 14,206 118,945 152,619 1,971 3,570,116 Principal loan balance 1,918,626 12,690 370,717 978,511 24,061 14,740 118,945 152,619 1,971 3,592,880 Unaccreted discounts and loan fees 7,138 (11 ) (2,055 ) 2,336 (37 ) 215 (48,546 ) (706 ) — (41,666 ) Accrued interest receivable 5,947 39 433 3,704 45 74 163 825 — 11,230 Total recorded investment in loans $ 1,931,711 $ 12,718 $ 369,095 $ 984,551 $ 24,069 $ 15,029 $ 70,562 $ 152,738 $ 1,971 $ 3,562,444 1 Loans evaluated for impairment include TDRs that have been performing for more than six months. Credit Quality Disclosure . Non-performing loans consisted of the following as of the dates indicated: At June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 Nonaccrual loans: Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage In-house originated $ 16,485 $ 4,073 Purchased 6,357 8,323 Home Equity In-house originated 9 168 Multifamily Real Estate Secured In-house originated 3,430 2,307 Purchased 1,969 1,995 Commercial Real Estate Secured Purchased 2,128 2,985 Total nonaccrual loans secured by real estate 30,378 19,851 Auto and RV Secured 453 534 Total nonperforming loans $ 30,831 $ 20,385 Nonperforming loans to total loans 0.62 % 0.57 % The increase in non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans is primarily the result of two single family residential loans that were placed on non-performing status during the second fiscal quarter of 2015 and remained non-performing through the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Approximately 16.08% of our non-performing loans at June 30, 2015 were considered TDRs, compared to 19.60% at June 30, 2014 . Borrowers who make timely payments after TDRs are considered non-performing for at least six months. Generally, after six months of timely payments, those TDRs are reclassified from the non-performing loan category to performing and any previously deferred interest income is recognized. Approximately 74.09% of the Bank’s non-performing loans are single family first mortgages already written down to 58.10% in aggregate, of the original appraisal value of the underlying properties. Generally these loans have experienced longer delays completing the foreclosure process due to the poor servicing practices of one of our seller servicers. The following tables provide the outstanding unpaid balance of loans that are performing and non-performing by portfolio class as of the dates indicated: June 30, 2015 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Performing $ 2,957,953 $ 3,595 $ 385,413 $ 1,180,132 $ 59,275 $ 12,687 $ 122,200 $ 248,584 $ 601 $ 4,970,440 Non-performing 22,842 9 — 5,399 2,128 453 — — — 30,831 Total $ 2,980,795 $ 3,604 $ 385,413 $ 1,185,531 $ 61,403 $ 13,140 $ 122,200 $ 248,584 $ 601 $ 5,001,271 June 30, 2014 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Performing $ 1,906,230 $ 12,522 $ 370,717 $ 974,209 $ 21,076 $ 14,206 $ 118,945 $ 152,619 $ 1,971 $ 3,572,495 Non-performing 12,396 168 — 4,302 2,985 534 — — — 20,385 Total $ 1,918,626 $ 12,690 $ 370,717 $ 978,511 $ 24,061 $ 14,740 $ 118,945 $ 152,619 $ 1,971 $ 3,592,880 The Company divides loan balances when determining general loan loss reserves between purchases and originations as follows: June 30, 2015 Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage Multifamily Real Estate Secured Commercial Real Estate Secured (Dollars in thousands) Origination Purchase Total Origination Purchase Total Origination Purchase Total Performing $ 2,869,119 $ 88,834 — $ 2,957,953 $ 1,048,266 $ 131,866 $ 1,180,132 $ 46,577 $ 12,698 $ 59,275 Non-performing 16,485 6,357 22,842 3,430 1,969 5,399 — 2,128 2,128 Total $ 2,885,604 $ 95,191 $ 2,980,795 $ 1,051,696 $ 133,835 $ 1,185,531 $ 46,577 $ 14,826 $ 61,403 June 30, 2014 Single Family Real Estate Secured: Mortgage Multifamily Real Estate Secured Commercial Real Estate Secured (Dollars in thousands) Origination Purchase Total Origination Purchase Total Origination Purchase Total Performing $ 1,797,526 $ 108,704 $ 1,906,230 $ 816,682 $ 157,527 $ 974,209 $ 6,164 $ 14,912 $ 21,076 Non-performing 4,073 8,323 12,396 2,307 1,995 4,302 — 2,985 2,985 Total $ 1,801,599 $ 117,027 $ 1,918,626 $ 818,989 $ 159,522 $ 978,511 $ 6,164 $ 17,897 $ 24,061 From time to time the Company modifies loan terms temporarily for borrowers who are experiencing financial stress. These loans are performing and accruing and will generally return to the original loan terms after the modification term expires. During the temporary period of modification, the company classifies these loans as performing TDRs that consisted of the following as of the dates indicated: June 30, 2015 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR $ 217 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 217 Non-performing loans 22,842 9 — 5,399 2,128 453 — — — 30,831 Total impaired loans $ 23,059 $ 9 $ — $ 5,399 $ 2,128 $ 453 $ — $ — $ — $ 31,048 Year Ended June 30, 2015 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Interest income recognized on performing TDRs $ 17 $ — $ — $ — $ 20 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 37 Average balances of performing TDRs $ 500 $ — $ — $ — $ 278 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 778 Average balances of impaired loans $ 21,106 $ 51 $ — $ 5,320 $ 3,028 $ 462 $ — $ — $ — $ 29,967 June 30, 2014 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR $ 989 $ — $ — $ — $ 1,390 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2,379 Non-performing loans 12,396 168 — 4,301 2,986 534 — — — 20,385 Total impaired loans $ 13,385 $ 168 $ — $ 4,301 $ 4,376 $ 534 $ — $ — $ — $ 22,764 Year Ended June 30, 2014 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Interest income recognized on performing TDRs $ 39 $ — $ — $ — $ 80 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 119 Average balances of performing TDRs $ 1,003 $ 32 $ — $ 542 $ 1,407 $ 456 $ — $ — $ — $ 3,440 Average balances of impaired loans $ 10,957 $ 60 $ — $ 5,021 $ 3,900 $ 898 $ 9 $ — $ 5 $ 20,850 June 30, 2013 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Performing loans temporarily modified as TDR $ 1,019 $ 20 $ — $ 1,623 $ — $ 876 $ — $ — $ — $ 3,538 Non-performing loans 11,353 37 — 2,882 3,559 472 — — — 18,303 Total impaired loans $ 12,372 $ 57 $ — $ 4,505 $ 3,559 $ 1,348 $ — $ — $ — $ 21,841 Year Ended June 30, 2013 Single Family (Dollars in thousands) Mortgage Home Warehouse & Other Multi- Commercial Auto and RV secured Factoring Commercial & Industrial Other Total Interest income recognized on performing TDRs $ 41 $ 1 $ — $ 121 $ — $ 73 $ — $ — $ — $ 236 Average balances of performing TDRs $ 1,461 $ 29 $ — $ 1,059 $ — $ 1,032 $ — $ — $ — $ 3,581 Average balances of impaired loans $ 13,272 $ 98 $ — $ 5,250 $ 2,878 $ 1,858 $ — $ — $ 11 $ 23,367 Interest recognized on performing loans temporarily modified as TDRs was $37 , $119 , and $236 for the years ended June 30, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 respectively. The average balances of performing TDRs and non-performing loans was $778 and $29,967 for the year ended June 30, 2015 , $3,440 and $20,850 for the year ended June 30, 2014 and $3,581 and $23,367 for the year ending June 30, 2013, respectively. The Company’s loan modifications included Single Family, Multifamily and Commercial loans of which included one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate or delinquent property taxes that were paid by the Bank and either repaid by the borrower over a one-year period or capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the loan. The Company’s loan modifications also included RV loans in which borrowers were able to make interest-only payments for a period of six months to one year which then reverted back to fully amortizing. The following tables present the loans modified as TDRs during the period indicated: Year Ended June 30, (Dollars in thousands) 2015 2014 2013 Single family real estate secured: Mortgage In-house originated $ 36 $ — $ — Purchased — 211 832 Multifamily real estate secured Purchased — — 1,342 Commercial real estate secured Purchased — — 1,455 Total TDR loans secured by real estate $ 36 $ 211 $ 3,629 Other — — — Total loans modified as TDRs $ 36 $ 211 $ 3,629 The following tables present loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the periods indicated: Year Ended June 30, 2015 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Troubled Debt Restructurings: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage In-house originated 1 $ 36 $ 36 Total 1 $ 36 $ 36 Year Ended June 30, 2014 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Troubled Debt Restructurings: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage Purchased 2 $ 211 $ 211 Total 2 $ 211 $ 211 Year Ended June 30, 2013 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Troubled Debt Restructurings: Single family real estate secured: Mortgage Purchased 3 $ 832 $ 832 Multifamily real estate secured Purchased 1 1,342 1,342 Commercial real estate secured Purchased 1 1,455 1,455 Total 5 $ 3,629 $ 3,629 The Company had no loans modified as TDRs within the previous twelve months for which there was a payment default for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 , respectively. The Company defines a payment default as 90 days past due. Credit Quality Indicators . The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings. Pass . Loans classified as pass are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the fair value, less cost to acquire and sell, of any underlying collateral in a timely manner. Special Mention . Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date. Substandard . Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful . Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The Company reviews and grades loans following a continuous loan review process, featuring coverage of all loan types and business lines at least quarterly. Continuous reviewing provides more effective risk monitoring because it immediately tests for potential impacts caused by changes in personnel, policy, products or underwriting standards. The following tables present |