Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2011
or
¨ | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number:001-02301
NSTAR Electric Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts | 04-1278810 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
800 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts | 02199 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(617) 424-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s class of common stock was 100 shares, par value $1 per share, as of August 5, 2011.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format.
Table of Contents
NSTAR Electric Company
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
Page No. | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 - 4 | ||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements (unaudited) | |||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 - 8 | ||||||
9 | ||||||
10 - 18 | ||||||
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 18 - 31 | ||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 31 | ||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 31 | ||||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 31 | ||||
Item 5. | Other Information | 32 | ||||
Item 6. | Exhibits | 33 | ||||
Signature | 34 | |||||
Exhibit 31.1 | Section 302 CEO Certification | |||||
Exhibit 31.2 | Section 302 CFO Certification | |||||
Exhibit 32.1 | Section 906 CEO Certification | |||||
Exhibit 32.2 | Section 906 CFO Certification |
Important Information
NSTAR Electric files its Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K reports, and other information with the SEC. You may access materials free of charge on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov or on NSTAR’s website atwww.nstar.com: Select “Investor Relations,” “Financial Information,” then select “SEC filings” from the drop-down list. Copies of NSTAR Electric’s SEC filings may also be obtained free of charge by writing to NSTAR’s Investor Relations Department at the address on the cover of this Form 10-Q or by calling 781-441-8338.
As a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR, NSTAR Electric is subject to the NSTAR Board of Trustees Guidelines on Significant Corporate Governance Issues, a Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive Officer, General Counsel, and Senior Financial Officers pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for Trustees (Directors), Officers and Employees (“Code of Conduct”). NSTAR intends to disclose any amendment to, and any waiver from, a provision of the Code of Ethics that applies to the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer or any other executive officer and that relates to any element of the Code of Ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, in a press release, on the NSTAR website or on Form 8-K, within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver. NSTAR’s Corporate Governance documents, including charters, guidelines and codes, and any amendments to such charters, guidelines and codes that are applicable to NSTAR’s executive officers, senior financial officers or directors can be accessed free of charge on NSTAR’s website at:www.nstar.com: Select “Investor Relations” and “Company Information.”
The certifications of NSTAR Electric’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are attached to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1, and 32.2.
1
Table of Contents
The following is a glossary of abbreviated names or acronyms frequently used throughout this report.
NSTAR Companies | ||
NSTAR | NSTAR (Holding Company) or NSTAR and its subsidiaries (as the context requires) | |
NSTAR Electric | NSTAR Electric Company | |
NSTAR Gas | NSTAR Gas Company | |
NSTAR Electric & Gas | NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation | |
HEEC | Harbor Electric Energy Company | |
Regulatory and Other Authorities | ||
DOE | U.S. Department of Energy | |
DPU | Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities | |
DPUC | Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control | |
FERC | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission | |
IRS | U.S. Internal Revenue Service | |
ISO-NE | ISO (Independent System Operator) - New England, Inc | |
MPUC | Maine Public Utilities Commission | |
NHPUC | New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission | |
NRC | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |
OCC | Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel | |
PCAOB | Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) | |
SEC | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
Other | ||
AFUDC | Allowance for Funds Used During Construction | |
ASC | Financial Accounting Standards Board (U.S.) Accounting Standards Codification | |
CAP | IRS Compliance Assurance Process | |
CPSL | Capital Projects Scheduling List | |
CY | Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company | |
EERF | Energy Efficiency Reconciling Factor | |
GAAP | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America | |
GCA | Massachusetts Green Communities Act | |
kW | Kilowatt (equal to one thousand watts) | |
kWh | Kilowatthour (the basic unit of electric energy equal to one kilowatt of power supplied for one hour) | |
MD&A | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
MW | Megawatts | |
MWh | Megawatthour (equal to one million watthours) | |
MY | Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company | |
NU | Northeast Utilities | |
PAM | Pension and PBOP Rate Adjustment Mechanism | |
PBOP | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions | |
ROE | Return on Equity | |
SIP | Simplified Incentive Plan | |
SQI | Service Quality Indicators | |
YA | Yankee Atomic Electric Company |
2
Table of Contents
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements may also be contained in other filings with the SEC, in press releases, and oral statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements contain words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. These statements are based on the current expectations, estimates or projections of management and are not guarantees of future performance. Some or all of these forward-looking statements may not turn out to be what NSTAR Electric expected. Actual results could differ materially from these statements. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the outcomes stated in such forward-looking statements and estimates will be achieved.
Examples of some important factors that could cause our actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
• | adverse financial market conditions including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital |
• | adverse economic conditions |
• | changes to prevailing local, state and federal governmental policies and regulatory actions (including those of the DPU, other state regulatory agencies, and the FERC) with respect to allowed rates of return, rate structure, continued recovery of regulatory assets and energy costs, financings, municipalization, and operation and construction of facilities |
• | acquisition and disposition of assets |
• | changes in tax laws and policies |
• | changes in, and compliance with, environmental and safety laws and policies |
• | new governmental regulations or changes to existing regulations that impose additional operating requirements or liabilities |
• | changes in available information and circumstances regarding legal issues and the resulting impact on our estimated litigation costs |
• | weather conditions that directly influence the demand for electricity |
• | impact of continued cost control processes on operating results |
• | ability to maintain current credit ratings |
• | impact of uninsured losses |
• | impact of adverse union contract negotiations |
• | damage from major storms and other natural events and disasters |
• | impact of conservation measures and self-generation by our customers |
• | changes in financial accounting and reporting standards |
• | changes in hazardous waste site conditions and the cleanup technology |
• | prices and availability of operating supplies |
• | failures in operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could disrupt business activities, result in the disclosure of confidential information and adversely affect financial reporting and/or the Company’s reputation |
• | catastrophic events that could result from terrorism, cyber attacks, or attempts to disrupt the Company’s business, or the businesses of third parties, that may impact operations in unpredictable ways and adversely affect financial results and liquidity |
• | impact of service quality performance measures; and |
3
Table of Contents
• | impact of the expected timing and likelihood of completion of the pending merger with Northeast Utilities, any of which could be adversely affected by, among other things, (i) the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any required governmental and regulatory approvals of the pending merger; (ii) litigation brought in connection with the pending merger; (iii) the ability to maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers, as well as the ability to successfully integrate the businesses; and (iv) the risk that the credit ratings of the combined company or its subsidiaries may be different from what the companies expect. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this filing and NSTAR Electric undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult all further disclosures NSTAR Electric makes in its filings to the SEC. Other factors in addition to those listed here could also adversely affect NSTAR Electric. This Quarterly Report also describes material contingencies and critical accounting policies and estimates in the accompanying Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,”in Part II, Item 1A,“Risk Factors” and in the accompanying Part 1, Item 1,Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and NSTAR Electric encourages a review of these items.
4
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues | $ | 570,944 | $ | 579,719 | $ | 1,168,838 | $ | 1,162,237 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased power and transmission | 243,974 | 268,218 | 523,312 | 552,164 | ||||||||||||
Operations and maintenance | 83,714 | 78,022 | 176,545 | 163,115 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 68,639 | 67,097 | 137,160 | 147,749 | ||||||||||||
Energy efficiency and renewable energy programs | 32,865 | 21,991 | 72,956 | 39,658 | ||||||||||||
Property and other taxes | 26,379 | 24,334 | 55,401 | 50,567 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 455,571 | 459,662 | 965,374 | 953,253 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Operating income | 115,373 | 120,057 | 203,464 | 208,984 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Interest charges (income): | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 22,620 | 23,882 | 45,257 | 45,469 | ||||||||||||
Transition property securitization | 1,982 | 2,851 | 4,337 | 6,614 | ||||||||||||
Interest income and other, net | (8,559 | ) | (11,334 | ) | (15,976 | ) | (17,621 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest charges | 16,043 | 15,399 | 33,618 | 34,462 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Other income (deductions): | ||||||||||||||||
Other income | 1,104 | 399 | 2,122 | 1,198 | ||||||||||||
Other deductions | (309 | ) | (420 | ) | (875 | ) | (819 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total other income (deductions) | 795 | (21 | ) | 1,247 | 379 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 100,125 | 104,637 | 171,093 | 174,901 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes | 39,471 | 41,936 | 67,546 | 69,488 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net income | $ | 60,654 | $ | 62,701 | $ | 103,547 | $ | 105,413 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data is not relevant because NSTAR Electric Company’s common stock is wholly owned by NSTAR.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Retained Earnings
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period | $ | 1,150,904 | $ | 1,039,008 | $ | 1,158,501 | $ | 1,100,086 | ||||||||
Net income | 60,654 | 62,701 | 103,547 | 105,413 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Subtotal | 1,211,558 | 1,101,709 | 1,262,048 | 1,205,499 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Deduct dividends declared: | ||||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends declared to Holding Company | 63,300 | 28,300 | 113,300 | 131,600 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends declared | 490 | 490 | 980 | 980 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Subtotal | 63,790 | 28,790 | 114,280 | 132,580 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Balance at the end of the period | $ | 1,147,768 | $ | 1,072,919 | $ | 1,147,768 | $ | 1,072,919 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 9,521 | $ | 8,964 | ||||
Restricted cash | — | 17,007 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $27,885 and $29,033, respectively | 241,363 | 227,115 | ||||||
Accrued unbilled revenues | 52,942 | 42,528 | ||||||
Regulatory assets | 313,035 | 354,572 | ||||||
Inventory, at average cost | 22,927 | 18,254 | ||||||
Refundable income taxes | — | 128,340 | ||||||
Other | 746 | 33,735 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current assets | 640,534 | 830,515 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Utility plant: | ||||||||
Electric plant in service, at original cost | 5,563,463 | 5,468,560 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation | 1,406,868 | 1,351,537 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net electric plant-in-service | 4,156,595 | 4,117,023 | ||||||
Construction work in progress | 131,751 | 87,678 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net utility plant | 4,288,346 | 4,204,701 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Other investments: | ||||||||
Equity and other investments | 4,583 | 4,755 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 3,373 | 3,373 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total other investments | 7,956 | 8,128 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred debits: | ||||||||
Regulatory assets | 1,595,587 | 1,653,888 | ||||||
Other deferred debits | 31,702 | 39,706 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total deferred debits | 1,627,289 | 1,693,594 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total assets | $ | 6,564,125 | $ | 6,736,938 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
NSTAR Electric Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Liabilities and Capitalization | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 16,512 | $ | 687 | ||||
Transition property securitization | 49,754 | 46,955 | ||||||
Notes payable | 163,000 | 227,500 | ||||||
Power contract obligations | 45,129 | 72,553 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 153,887 | 205,467 | ||||||
Payable to affiliates, net | 79,676 | 110,304 | ||||||
Income taxes | 102,988 | 63,622 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 18,846 | 18,587 | ||||||
Other | 58,847 | 58,470 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total current liabilities | 688,639 | 804,145 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities: | ||||||||
Accumulated deferred income taxes | 1,236,726 | 1,219,810 | ||||||
Power contract obligations | 125,961 | 143,224 | ||||||
Pension liability | 261,811 | 254,014 | ||||||
Regulatory liability - cost of removal | 231,749 | 226,738 | ||||||
Payable to affiliates | 67,683 | 66,702 | ||||||
Other deferred credits | 84,326 | 84,320 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total deferred credits | 2,008,256 | 1,994,808 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Capitalization: | ||||||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 1,599,537 | 1,616,011 | ||||||
Transition property securitization | 84,312 | 127,860 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total long-term debt | 1,683,849 | 1,743,871 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cumulative non-mandatory redeemable preferred stock | 43,000 | 43,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Common equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $1 per share (100 shares issued and outstanding) | — | — | ||||||
Premium on common stock | 992,613 | 992,613 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 1,147,768 | 1,158,501 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total common equity | 2,140,381 | 2,151,114 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total capitalization | 3,867,230 | 3,937,985 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Total liabilities and capitalization | $ | 6,564,125 | $ | 6,736,938 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 103,547 | $ | 105,413 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 137,160 | 147,749 | ||||||
Debt amortization | 2,396 | 2,402 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 3,413 | (8,197 | ) | |||||
Net changes in: | ||||||||
Refundable income taxes | 128,340 | — | ||||||
Current assets and liabilities | (32,303 | ) | (81,761 | ) | ||||
Regulatory assets | 52,438 | 49,531 | ||||||
Long-term power contract obligations | (43,320 | ) | (64,064 | ) | ||||
Deferred debits and credits, net | 13,581 | (5,640 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 365,252 | 145,433 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Investing activities: | ||||||||
Plant expenditures (including AFUDC) | (161,625 | ) | (136,168 | ) | ||||
Decrease in restricted cash | 17,007 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of properties | 188 | — | ||||||
Net change in other investment activities | 89 | 3,971 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (144,341 | ) | (132,197 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Financing activities: | ||||||||
Transition property securitization redemptions | (40,749 | ) | (47,588 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt issuances | — | 300,000 | ||||||
Discount on issuance of long-term debt | — | (4,806 | ) | |||||
Debt issuance costs | — | (2,777 | ) | |||||
Long-term debt redemptions | (825 | ) | (125,826 | ) | ||||
Net change in notes payable | (64,500 | ) | 2,000 | |||||
Dividends paid | (114,280 | ) | (132,580 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (220,354 | ) | (11,577 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 557 | 1,659 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 8,964 | 7,457 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | $ | 9,521 | $ | 9,116 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 49,857 | $ | 46,573 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | (117,262 | ) | $ | 101,875 | |||
Non-cash investing activity: | ||||||||
Plant additions included in accounts payable | $ | 18,777 | $ | 10,048 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in NSTAR Electric’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note A. Business Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
1. About NSTAR Electric
NSTAR Electric Company (NSTAR Electric or the Company) is a regulated public utility incorporated in 1886 under Massachusetts law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR. NSTAR Electric serves approximately 1.1 million electric distribution customers in the City of Boston and 80 surrounding communities. NSTAR is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries in the energy delivery business serving approximately 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts, including NSTAR Electric’s customers and approximately 300,000 natural gas distribution customers of NSTAR Gas in 51 communities. NSTAR has a service company that provides management and support services to substantially all NSTAR subsidiaries - NSTAR Electric & Gas.
Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR Electric, provides distribution service and ongoing support to its only customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric’s three wholly-owned consolidated special-purpose subsidiaries are BEC Funding LLC, BEC Funding II LLC, and CEC Funding LLC, all established to facilitate the sales of electric rate reduction certificates at a public offering. The certificates of all special-purpose subsidiaries are secured by a portion of the transition charge assessed on NSTAR Electric’s retail customers as permitted by the 1997 Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Act and authorized by the DPU. The activities of BEC Funding LLC were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
2. Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
On October 16, 2010, upon unanimous approval from their respective Boards of Trustees, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities (NU) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The transaction will be a merger of equals in a stock-for-stock transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at closing, NSTAR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NU. On March 4, 2011, shareholders of each company approved the merger and adopted the merger agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, NSTAR shareholders will receive 1.312 NU common shares for each NSTAR common share that they own. Following completion of the merger, it is anticipated that NU shareholders will own approximately 56 percent of the post-transaction company and former NSTAR shareholders will own approximately 44 percent of the post-transaction company.
The post-transaction company will provide electric and gas energy delivery services through six regulated electric and gas utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire serving nearly 3.5 million electric and gas customers. Completion of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. NSTAR anticipates that the regulatory approvals can be obtained to permit the merger to close in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Regulatory Approvals on Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
Federal
On January 4, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Communications Commission, and on February 10, 2011, the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired. On July 6, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). A filing was made with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on December 9, 2010 seeking NRC consent to the transfer of NSTAR’s indirect control of ownership interest in three decommissioned nuclear plants to NU. NRC consent is currently pending.
10
Table of Contents
Massachusetts
On November 24, 2010, NSTAR and NU filed a joint petition requesting the DPU’s approval of their proposed merger. On March 10, 2011, the DPU issued an order that modified the standard of review to be applied in the review of mergers involving Massachusetts utilities from a “no net harm” standard to a “net benefits” standard, meaning that the companies must demonstrate that the pending transaction provides benefits that outweigh the costs. Applicable state law provides that mergers of Massachusetts utilities and their respective holding companies must be “consistent with the public interest.” The order states that the DPU has flexibility in applying the factors applicable to the standard of review. NSTAR and NU filed supplemental testimony with the DPU on April 8, 2011 indicating the merger could provide post-transaction net savings of approximately $784 million in the first ten years following the closing of the merger and provide environmental benefits with respect to Massachusetts emissions reductions, global warming policies, and furthering the goals of Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act.
The DPU held public evidentiary hearings during July 2011. On July 15, 2011, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources filed a motion for an indefinite stay in the proceedings. On July 21, 2011, NSTAR and NU filed a response objecting to this motion. The DPU released a briefing schedule in which final briefs are due on September 19, 2011. NSTAR and NU expect a ruling from the DPU in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Connecticut
On June 1, 2011, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) issued a decision stating that it lacks jurisdiction to consider the NSTAR merger with NU. On June 30, 2011, the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel filed a Petition for Administrative Appeal in Connecticut Superior Court requesting that the Superior Court remand the decision back to the DPUC with instructions to reopen the docket and review the merger transaction. NSTAR cannot determine the outcome or timing of this action.
New Hampshire
On April 5, 2011, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) issued an order finding that it does not have statutory authority to approve or reject the merger.
Maine
On May 11, 2011, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued an order approving the merger contingent upon approval by the FERC. The FERC approval was received on July 6, 2011.
3. Basis of Consolidation and Accounting
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial information presented as of June 30, 2011 and for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 has been prepared from NSTAR Electric’s books and records without audit by an independent registered public accounting firm. However, NSTAR Electric’s independent registered public accounting firm has performed a review of these interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the PCAOB. The review report is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q. Financial information as of December 31, 2010 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of NSTAR Electric, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. In the opinion of NSTAR Electric’s management, all adjustments (which are of a normal recurring nature) necessary for a fair statement of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
NSTAR Electric follows accounting policies prescribed by the FERC and the DPU. In addition, NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries are subject to the accounting and reporting requirements of the SEC. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. NSTAR
11
Table of Contents
Electric is subject to the application of ASC 980,Regulated Operations, that considers the effects of regulation resulting from differences in the timing of recognition of certain revenues and expenses from those of other businesses and industries. The distribution and transmission businesses are subject to rate-regulation that is based on cost recovery and meets the criteria for application of ASC 980.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not indicative of the results that may be expected for an entire year. The demand for electricity is affected by weather conditions, economic conditions, and consumer conservation behavior. Electric energy sales and revenues are typically higher in the winter and summer months than in the spring and fall months.
4. Pension and Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions (PBOP) Plans
NSTAR Electric’s net periodic Pension Plan and PBOP Plan benefit costs for the second quarter are based on the latest available participant census data. An annual actuarial valuation was completed during the second quarter, and recognized costs were adjusted based on the actual final study results.
NSTAR Electric’s Pension Plan and PBOP Plan assets are affected by fluctuations in the financial markets. Fluctuations in the fair value of the Pension Plan and PBOP Plan assets impact the funded status, accounting costs, and cash funding requirements of these Plans. The earnings impact of increased Pension and PBOP costs is mitigated by NSTAR Electric’s DPU-approved Pension and PBOP rate adjustment mechanism (PAM). Under the PAM, NSTAR Electric recovers its pension and PBOP expense through a reconciling rate mechanism. The PAM removes the volatility in earnings that could result from fluctuations in market conditions and plan experience.
Pension
NSTAR Electric sponsors the NSTAR Pension Plan (the Plan) that covers substantially all employees. As its sponsor, NSTAR Electric allocates the costs of the Plan to NSTAR Electric & Gas. NSTAR Electric & Gas charges all of its benefit costs to the NSTAR operating companies, including NSTAR Electric, on the proportion of total direct labor charged to its operating companies. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, NSTAR contributed $50 million to the Plan. In addition, $6 million was contributed in July 2011. NSTAR currently anticipates making additional contributions of approximately $19 million to the Plan during the remainder of 2011. The actual level of funding may differ from this estimate.
Components of net periodic pension benefit cost were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 6.1 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 13.0 | $ | 11.8 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 15.3 | 15.5 | 30.5 | 30.9 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on Plan assets | (18.4 | ) | (15.8 | ) | (35.7 | ) | (31.4 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized actuarial loss | 12.5 | 12.7 | 24.3 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Net periodic pension benefit cost | $ | 15.3 | $ | 18.0 | $ | 31.7 | $ | 36.1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Table of Contents
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
NSTAR also provides health care and other benefits to retired employees who meet certain age and years of service eligibility requirements. Under certain circumstances, eligible retirees are required to contribute to the costs of postretirement benefits.
To fund these postretirement benefits, NSTAR, on behalf of NSTAR Electric and other NSTAR subsidiaries, makes contributions to various VEBA trusts that were established pursuant to section 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code.
NSTAR Electric participates in the Plan trusts with other NSTAR subsidiaries. Plan assets are available to provide benefits for all Plan participants who are former employees of NSTAR Electric and other subsidiaries of NSTAR. During the six-months ended June 30, 2011, NSTAR contributed $14.9 million to this plan. In addition, $2.5 million was contributed in July 2011. NSTAR currently anticipates contributing approximately $12.6 million for the remainder of 2011 toward these benefits. NSTAR Electric will fund approximately $12.1 million, $2 million, and $10.2 million of these amounts, respectively.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost allocated to NSTAR Electric for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 was $5.1 million and $12.8 million, as compared to $8.6 million and $16.6 million in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.
5. Interest Income and Other, net
Major components of interest income and other, net were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Interest on regulatory deferrals | $ | 8,090 | $ | 5,565 | $ | 16,031 | $ | 12,281 | ||||||||
Income tax items | (2,311 | ) | 6,326 | (1,939 | ) | 6,698 | ||||||||||
Other interest income (expense) | 2,774 | (634 | ) | 1,947 | (1,513 | ) | ||||||||||
Short-term debt | (61 | ) | (148 | ) | (215 | ) | (283 | ) | ||||||||
AFUDC | 67 | 225 | 152 | 438 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total interest income and other, net | $ | 8,559 | $ | 11,334 | $ | 15,976 | $ | 17,621 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Variable Interest Entities
NSTAR Electric has certain long-term purchase power agreements with energy facilities where it purchases substantially all of the output from a specified facility for a specified period. NSTAR Electric has evaluated these agreements under the variable interest accounting guidance and has determined that these agreements represent variable interests. NSTAR Electric is not considered the primary beneficiary of these entities and does not consolidate the entities because it does not control the activities most relevant to the operating results of these entities and does not hold any equity interests in the entities. NSTAR Electric’s exposure to risks and financial support commitments with respect to these entities is limited to the purchase of the power generated at the prices defined under the contractual agreements. NSTAR Electric’s involvement with these variable interest entities has no material impact on NSTAR Electric’s financial position, financial performance, or cash flows.
7. Subsequent Events
Management has reviewed subsequent events through the date of this filing and concluded that no material subsequent events have occurred that are not accounted for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosed in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
13
Table of Contents
Note B. Derivative Instruments
Energy Contracts
NSTAR Electric has determined that it is not required to account for the majority of its electricity supply contracts as derivatives because they qualify for, and NSTAR Electric has elected, the normal purchases and sales exception. As a result, these agreements are not reflected on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. NSTAR Electric has one long-term renewable energy contract that does not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception and is valued at an estimated $1 million and $2.4 million liability as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. NSTAR Electric has measured the difference between the cost of this contract and projected market energy costs over the life of the contract, and recorded a long-term derivative liability and a corresponding long-term regulatory asset for the value of this contract. Changes in the value of the contract have no impact on earnings. The fair value of the renewable energy contract deemed to be a derivative was as follows:
(in thousands) | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Renewable Energy Contract – Non-hedging instrument | ||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Account: | ||||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities: Power contract obligations | $ | 1,033 | $ | 2,400 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total liability for non-hedging derivative instrument | $ | 1,033 | $ | 2,400 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Note C. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
NSTAR Electric is part of a consolidated tax group. As such, income tax payments are either due to or from NSTAR (Holding Company).
The following table reconciles the statutory Federal income tax rate to the annual estimated effective income tax rate for 2011 and the actual effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010:
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Statutory Federal tax rate | 35 | % | 35 | % | ||||
State income tax, net of Federal income tax benefit | 4 | 4 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Effective tax rate | 39 | % | 39 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
Receipt of Federal Tax Refund for 2001-2007 Tax Years
On April 21, 2011, NSTAR Electric received a $166.8 million refund comprised of an overpayment of tax and accrued interest thereon, relating to the 2001-2007 tax years. The approved settlement and receipt of the refund resolves all outstanding tax matters for these years.
Open Tax Years
The 2008 and 2009 Federal income tax returns have been examined under the IRS Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) with no adjustments. The 2010 Federal income tax return is being reviewed under CAP. This program accelerates the examination of the return in an attempt to resolve issues before the tax return is filed. The outcome and the timing of any potential audit adjustments are uncertain.
Uncertain Tax Positions
NSTAR Electric did not have a reserve for uncertain tax positions at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
14
Table of Contents
Interest on Tax Positions
The total amounts of accrued interest receivable (payable) related to tax matters included in“Other current assets” or “Accrued interest” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
(in millions) | June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||
Accrued tax interest (payable) receivable | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 32.7 |
Note D. Fair Value Measurements
NSTAR Electric follows a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to determine fair value and requires the Company to classify assets and liabilities carried at fair value based on the observability of these inputs. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include active exchange-traded equity securities.
Level 2 – Quoted prices available in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable, and inputs derived principally from market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs from objective sources. These inputs may be based on entity-specific inputs. Level 3 inputs include all inputs that do not meet the requirements of Level 1 or Level 2.
The renewable energy contract was valued based on the difference between the contracted price and the estimated fair value of remaining contracted supply to be purchased. Inputs used to develop the estimate included on-line regional generation and forecasted demand.
The following represents the fair value hierarchy of NSTAR Electric’s financial liability that was recognized at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Recurring Fair Value Measures:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Renewable Energy Contract(a) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Renewable Energy Contract(a) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | - | Included in “Deferred credits and other liabilities: Power contract obligations” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
15
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, net accounts receivable, other current assets, certain current liabilities, and notes payable as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these securities.
The fair values of long-term indebtedness (excluding notes payable, including current maturities) are based on the quoted market prices of similar issues. Carrying amounts and fair values as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Long-term indebtedness (including current maturities) | $ | 1,750,115 | $ | 1,900,220 | $ | 1,791,513 | $ | 1,936,680 |
Note E. Indebtedness
On August 1, 2011, NSTAR Electric redeemed $15 million of Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency Bonds, 5.75%, due February 2014, at par.
Note F. Commitments and Contingencies
1. Service Quality Indicators
SQI are established performance benchmarks for certain identified measures of service quality relating to customer service and billing performance, safety and reliability and DPU Consumer Division statistics performance for all Massachusetts utilities. NSTAR Electric is required to report annually to the DPU concerning its performance as to each measure and is subject to maximum penalties of up to two and one-half percent of total transmission and distribution revenues should performance fail to meet the applicable benchmarks.
NSTAR Electric monitors its service quality continuously, and if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and is estimable, a liability is accrued. Any settlement or rate order that would result in a different liability level from what has been accrued would be adjusted in the period that the DPU issues an order determining the amount of any such liability.
NSTAR Electric’s service quality performance levels for 2010 were not in a penalty situation and the final performance report was filed with the DPU on March 1, 2011.
2. Environmental Matters
NSTAR Electric faces possible liabilities as a result of involvement in several multi-party disposal sites, state-regulated sites or third party claims associated with contamination remediation. NSTAR Electric generally expects to have only a small percentage of the total potential liability for the majority of these sites. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, NSTAR Electric had liabilities of $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for these environmental sites. This estimated recorded liability is based on an evaluation of all currently available facts with respect to these sites.
Estimates related to environmental remediation costs are reviewed and adjusted as further investigation and assignment of responsibility occurs and as either additional sites are identified or NSTAR Electric’s responsibilities for such sites evolve or are resolved. NSTAR Electric’s ultimate liability for future environmental remediation costs may vary from these estimates. Based on NSTAR Electric’s current assessment of its environmental responsibilities, existing legal requirements, and regulatory policies, NSTAR Electric does not believe that these environmental remediation costs will have a material adverse effect on NSTAR Electric’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
16
Table of Contents
3. Regulatory Proceedings
DPU Safety and Reliability Programs (CPSL)
As part of the Rate Settlement Agreement, NSTAR Electric is allowed to recover incremental costs related to the double pole inspection, replacement/restoration and transfer program and the underground electric safety program, which includes stray-voltage remediation and manhole inspections, repairs, and upgrades. Recovery of these Capital Program Scheduling List (CPSL) billed costs is subject to DPU review and approval. From 2006 through 2010, NSTAR Electric incurred and billed cumulative incremental revenue requirements of approximately $67 million. During 2011, approximately $7 million has been incurred through June 30. These amounts include incremental operations and maintenance and revenue requirements on capital investments.
On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order on NSTAR Electric’s 2006 CPSL costs recovery filing. The expected recovery amount did not vary materially from the revenue previously recognized. On October 8, 2010, NSTAR Electric submitted a Compliance Filing with the DPU reconciling the recoverable CPSL Program revenue requirement for each year 2006 through 2009 with the revenues already collected to determine the proposed adjustment effective on January 1, 2011. The DPU allowed the proposed rates to go into effect on that date, subject to reconciliation of program costs. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing of subsequent DPU orders related to this filing. Should an adverse DPU decision be issued, it could have a material adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s result of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Basic Service Bad Debt Adder
On July 1, 2005, in response to a generic DPU order that required electric utilities in Massachusetts to recover the energy-related portion of bad debt costs in their Basic Service rates, NSTAR Electric increased its Basic Service rates and reduced its distribution rates for those bad debt costs. In furtherance of this generic DPU order, NSTAR Electric included a bad debt cost recovery mechanism as a component of its Rate Settlement Agreement. This recovery mechanism (bad debt adder) allows NSTAR Electric to recover its Basic Service bad debt costs on a fully reconciling basis. These rates were implemented, effective January 1, 2006, as part of NSTAR Electric’s Rate Settlement Agreement.
On February 7, 2007, NSTAR Electric filed its 2006 Basic Service reconciliation with the DPU proposing an adjustment related to the increase of its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. This proposed rate adjustment was anticipated to be implemented effective July 1, 2007. On June 28, 2007, the DPU issued an order approving the implementation of a revised Basic Service rate. However, the DPU instructed NSTAR Electric to reduce distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. Such action would result in a further reduction to distribution rates from the adjustment NSTAR Electric made when it implemented the Settlement Agreement. This adjustment to NSTAR Electric’s distribution rates would eliminate the fully reconciling nature of the Basic Service bad debt adder.
NSTAR Electric has not implemented the directives of the June 28, 2007 DPU order. Implementation of this order would require NSTAR Electric to write-off a previously recorded regulatory asset related to its Basic Service bad debt costs. NSTAR Electric filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the DPU’s order on July 18, 2007. On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order and reaffirmed that NSTAR Electric should reduce its distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. On June 18, 2010, NSTAR Electric filed an appeal of the DPU’s order with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). A decision by the SJC is expected in late 2011 or early 2012. As of June 30, 2011, the potential pre-tax impact to earnings of eliminating the bad debt adder would be approximately $22 million. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing of this appeals process. NSTAR Electric continues to believe that its position is appropriate and that it is probable upon appeal that it will ultimately prevail.
17
Table of Contents
Other
In the fourth quarter of each year, NSTAR Electric files proposed distribution rate adjustments for effect on the following January 1. These rate adjustments include a SIP rate factor and several other fully reconciling cost recovery items. Consistent with previous filings, the 2010 filings include a combination of actual and forecasted data for 2010 that NSTAR Electric will update during 2011 with year-end data to allow a final investigation and reconciliation. There are several case years that remain outstanding at the DPU. These cases are pending decisions at the DPU and NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing or the ultimate outcome of these filings.
4. Yankee Companies Spent Fuel Litigation
In October 2006, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims issued a judgment in a spent nuclear fuel litigation in the amounts of $34.2 million, $32.9 million, and $75.8 million for CY, YA, and MY, respectively. This judgment in favor of the Yankee Companies relates to the alleged failure of the Department of Energy (DOE) to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel for years prior to 2001 for CY and YA, and prior to 2002 for MY (DOE Phase I Damages). NSTAR Electric’s portion of the Phase I judgments amounts to $4.8 million, $4.6 million, and $3 million, respectively. The DOE appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that affirmed in part and reversed in part the awards of the earlier Phase I judgments. The Court of Federal Claims issued a decision on remand on September 7, 2010, which determined that the net damage awards are to be amended against the DOE in the amounts of $39.7 million, $21.2 million, and $81.7 million for CY, YA, and MY, respectively. NSTAR Electric’s portion of the appealed judgments amounts to $5.6 million, $3 million, and $3.3 million, respectively. The DOE filed notice of its appeal of the decision on remand to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on November 8, 2010, and the Yankee Companies filed their notice of cross-appeal on a limited issue on November 19, 2010. The DOE’s brief on appeal was filed February 4, 2011. A final decision on this appeal could be received by March 2012.
On July 1, 2009, the Yankee Companies filed for additional damages related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel for the years from January 2002 through December 2008 for CY and YA, and from January 2003 through December 2008 for MY (DOE Phase II Damages). This phase of the spent nuclear fuel litigation specifies damages in the amounts of $135.4 million, $86.1 million, and $43 million for CY, YA, and MY, respectively. Claim amounts applicable to NSTAR Electric are $19 million, $12 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.
NSTAR Electric cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these pending decisions for trial, appeal or the potential subsequent complaints. However, should the Yankee Companies ultimately prevail, NSTAR Electric’s share of the proceeds received would be refunded to its customers.
5. Legal Matters
In the normal course of its business, NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries are involved in certain legal matters, including civil litigation. Management is unable to fully determine a range of potential court-ordered damages, settlement amounts, and related litigation costs (“legal liabilities”) that would be in excess of amounts accrued and amounts covered by insurance. Based on the information currently available, NSTAR Electric does not believe that it is probable that any such legal liabilities will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position. However, it is reasonably possible that additional legal liabilities that may result from changes in circumstances could have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
The accompanying MD&A focuses on factors that had a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of NSTAR Electric during the periods presented and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, and with the MD&A in NSTAR Electric’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
18
Table of Contents
Business Overview
NSTAR Electric Company is a regulated public utility incorporated in 1886 under Massachusetts law and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NSTAR. NSTAR Electric serves approximately 1.1 million electric distribution customers in the City of Boston and 80 surrounding communities. NSTAR is a holding company engaged through its subsidiaries in the energy delivery business serving approximately 1.4 million customers in Massachusetts, including NSTAR Electric’s customers and approximately 300,000 natural gas distribution customers of NSTAR Gas in 51 communities. NSTAR has a service company that provides management and support services to substantially all NSTAR subsidiaries - NSTAR Electric & Gas.
Harbor Electric Energy Company (HEEC), a wholly owned-subsidiary of NSTAR Electric, provides distribution service and ongoing support to its only customer, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority’s wastewater treatment facility located on Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. NSTAR Electric’s three wholly-owned consolidated special-purpose subsidiaries are BEC Funding LLC (BEC Funding), BEC Funding II, LLC (BEC Funding II) and CEC Funding, LLC (CEC Funding), all established to facilitate the sales of electric rate reduction certificates at a public offering. The certificates of all special-purpose subsidiaries are secured by a portion of the transition charge assessed on NSTAR Electric’s retail customers as permitted by the 1997 Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Act and authorized by the DPU. These certificates are non-recourse to NSTAR Electric. NSTAR Electric has no variable interest entities. The activities of BEC Funding LLC were substantially completed as of March 31, 2010 and the Company was dissolved on April 14, 2010.
NSTAR Electric derives its operating revenues primarily from the sale of energy, distribution, transmission, and energy efficiency services to customers. However, NSTAR Electric’s earnings are impacted by fluctuations in unit sales of electric kWh, which have an effect on the level of distribution and transmission revenues recognized. In accordance with the regulatory rate structure in which NSTAR Electric operates, its recovery of energy and certain energy-related costs are fully reconciled with the level of energy revenues currently recorded and, therefore, do not have an impact on earnings. As a result of this rate structure, any variability in the cost of energy supply purchased will have an impact on purchased power and transmission expenses, but will not affect the Company’s net income as the Company recognizes a corresponding change in revenues.
Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
On October 16, 2010, upon unanimous approval from their respective Boards of Trustees, NSTAR and Northeast Utilities (NU) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The transaction will be a merger of equals in a stock-for-stock transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at closing, NSTAR will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of NU. On March 4, 2011, shareholders of each company approved the merger and adopted the merger agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, NSTAR shareholders will receive 1.312 NU common shares for each NSTAR common share that they own. Following completion of the merger, it is anticipated that NU shareholders will own approximately 56 percent of the post-transaction company and former NSTAR shareholders will own approximately 44 percent of the post-transaction company.
The post-transaction company will provide electric and gas energy delivery services through six regulated electric and gas utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire serving nearly 3.5 million electric and gas customers. Completion of the merger is subject to various customary conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals. NSTAR anticipates that the regulatory approvals can be obtained to permit the merger to close in the fourth quarter of 2011.
19
Table of Contents
Regulatory Approvals on Pending Merger with Northeast Utilities
Federal
On January 4, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Communications Commission, and on February 10, 2011, the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period expired. On July 6, 2011, NSTAR and NU received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). A filing was made with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on December 9, 2010 seeking NRC consent to the transfer of NSTAR’s indirect control of ownership interest in three decommissioned nuclear plants to NU. NRC consent is currently pending.
Massachusetts
On November 24, 2010, NSTAR and NU filed a joint petition requesting the DPU’s approval of their proposed merger. On March 10, 2011, the DPU issued an order that modified the standard of review to be applied in the review of mergers involving Massachusetts utilities from a “no net harm” standard to a “net benefits” standard, meaning that the companies must demonstrate that the pending transaction provides benefits that outweigh the costs. Applicable state law provides that mergers of Massachusetts utilities and their respective holding companies must be “consistent with the public interest.” The order states that the DPU has flexibility in applying the factors applicable to the standard of review. NSTAR and NU filed supplemental testimony with the DPU on April 8, 2011 indicating the merger could provide post-transaction net savings of approximately $784 million in the first ten years following the closing of the merger and provide environmental benefits with respect to Massachusetts emissions reductions, global warming policies, and furthering the goals of Massachusetts’ Green Communities Act.
The DPU held public evidentiary hearings during July 2011. On July 15, 2011, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources filed a motion for an indefinite stay in the proceedings. On July 21, 2011, NSTAR and NU filed a response objecting to this motion. The DPU released a briefing schedule in which final briefs are due on September 19, 2011. NSTAR and NU expect a ruling from the DPU in the fourth quarter of 2011.
Connecticut
On June 1, 2011, the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) issued a decision stating that it lacks jurisdiction to consider the NSTAR merger with NU. On June 30, 2011, the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel filed a Petition for Administrative Appeal in Connecticut Superior Court requesting that the Superior Court remand the decision back to the DPUC with instructions to reopen the docket and review the merger transaction. NSTAR cannot determine the outcome or timing of this action.
New Hampshire
On April 5, 2011, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (NHPUC) issued an order finding that it does not have statutory authority to approve or reject the merger.
Maine
On May 11, 2011, the Maine Public Utilities Commission issued an order approving the merger contingent upon approval by the FERC. The FERC approval was received on July 6, 2011.
Earnings
NSTAR Electric’s earnings are impacted by its customers’ requirements for energy in the form of unit sales of electricity, which have an effect on the level of retail distribution and transmission revenues recognized. In accordance with the regulatory rate structure in which NSTAR Electric operates, its recovery of energy costs are fully reconciled with the level of energy revenues currently recorded and, therefore, do not have an impact on earnings.
20
Table of Contents
Net income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 was $60.7 million and $103.5 million, as compared to $62.7 million and $105.4 million for the same periods in 2010, as further explained below.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
For a complete discussion of critical accounting policies, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 7 of NSTAR Electric’s 2010 Form 10-K. There have been no substantive changes to those policies and estimates.
Rate and Regulatory Proceedings
Rate Structure
a. Rate Settlement Agreement
NSTAR Electric is operating under a DPU-approved Rate Settlement Agreement (Rate Settlement Agreement) that expires December 31, 2012. From 2007 through 2012, the Rate Settlement Agreement establishes for NSTAR Electric, among other things, annual inflation-adjusted distribution rates including a productivity offset, that are generally offset by an equal and corresponding adjustment to transition rates. The rates as of January 1 were as follows:
January 1, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Annual inflation-adjusted distribution rate – SIP (decrease) increase | (0.19 | )% | 1.32 | % | 1.74 | % | 2.68 | % |
b. Regulated Electric Distribution Rates
Retail electric delivery rates are established by the DPU and are comprised of:
• | a distribution charge, which includes a fixed customer charge and a demand and/or energy charge (to collect the costs of building and expanding the infrastructure to deliver power to its destination, as well as ongoing operating costs and certain DPU-approved safety and reliability programs costs), a Pension and PBOP Rate Adjustment Mechanism (PAM) to recover incremental pension and pension benefit costs, a reconciling rate adjustment mechanism to recover costs associated with the residential assistance adjustment clause, a net-metering reconciliation surcharge to collect the lost revenues and credits associated with net-metering facilities installed by customers, and an Energy Efficiency Reconciling Factor (EERF) to recover energy efficiency expenditures in addition to those charges recovered in the energy conservation charge; |
• | a basic service chargerepresents the collection of energy costs, including costs related to charge-offs of uncollected energy costs, through DPU-approved rate mechanisms. Electric distribution companies in Massachusetts are required to obtain and resell power to retail customers through Basic Service for those who choose not to buy energy from a competitive energy supplier. Basic Service rates are reset every six months (every three months for large commercial and industrial customers). The price of Basic Service is intended to reflect the average competitive market price for electric power; |
21
Table of Contents
• | a transition charge represents the collection of costs to be collected primarily from previously held investments in generating plants and costs related to existing above-market power contracts, and contract costs related to long-term power contracts buy-outs; |
• | a transmission charge represents the collection of annual costs of moving the electricity over high voltage lines from generating plants to substations located within NSTAR Electric’s service area including costs allocated to NSTAR Electric by ISO-NE to maintain the wholesale electric market; |
• | an energy conservation chargerepresents a legislatively-mandated charge to collect costs for energy efficiency programs; and |
• | a renewable energy charge represents a legislatively-mandated charge to collect the costs to support the development and promotion of renewable energy projects. |
c. Regulatory Matters
DPU Safety and Reliability Programs (CPSL)
As part of the Rate Settlement Agreement, NSTAR Electric is allowed to recover incremental costs related to the double pole inspection, replacement/restoration and transfer program and the underground electric safety program, which includes stray-voltage remediation and manhole inspections, repairs, and upgrades. Recovery of these Capital Program Scheduling List (CPSL) billed costs is subject to DPU review and approval. From 2006 through 2010, NSTAR Electric incurred and billed cumulative incremental revenue requirements of approximately $67 million. During 2011, approximately $7 million has been incurred through June 30. These amounts include incremental operations and maintenance and revenue requirements on capital investments.
On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order on NSTAR Electric’s 2006 CPSL costs recovery filing. The expected recovery amount did not vary materially from the revenue previously recognized. On October 8, 2010, NSTAR Electric submitted a Compliance Filing with the DPU reconciling the recoverable CPSL Program revenue requirement for each year 2006 through 2009 with the revenues already collected to determine the proposed adjustment effective on January 1, 2011. The DPU allowed the proposed rates to go into effect on that date, subject to reconciliation of program costs. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing of subsequent DPU orders related to this filing. Should an adverse DPU decision be issued, it could have a material adverse impact on NSTAR Electric’s result of operations, financial position, and cash flows.
Basic Service Bad Debt Adder
On July 1, 2005, in response to a generic DPU order that required electric utilities in Massachusetts to recover the energy-related portion of bad debt costs in their Basic Service rates, NSTAR Electric increased its Basic Service rates and reduced its distribution rates for those bad debt costs. In furtherance of this generic DPU order, NSTAR Electric included a bad debt cost recovery mechanism as a component of its Rate Settlement Agreement. This recovery mechanism (bad debt adder) allows NSTAR Electric to recover its Basic Service bad debt costs on a fully reconciling basis. These rates were implemented, effective January 1, 2006, as part of NSTAR Electric’s Rate Settlement Agreement.
On February 7, 2007, NSTAR Electric filed its 2006 Basic Service reconciliation with the DPU proposing an adjustment related to the increase of its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. This proposed rate adjustment was anticipated to be implemented effective July 1, 2007. On June 28, 2007, the DPU issued an order approving the implementation of a revised Basic Service rate. However, the DPU instructed NSTAR Electric to reduce distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. Such action would result in a further reduction to distribution rates from the adjustment NSTAR Electric made when it implemented the Settlement Agreement. This adjustment to NSTAR Electric’s distribution rates would eliminate the fully reconciling nature of the Basic Service bad debt adder.
22
Table of Contents
NSTAR Electric has not implemented the directives of the June 28, 2007 DPU order. Implementation of this order would require NSTAR Electric to write-off a previously recorded regulatory asset related to its Basic Service bad debt costs. NSTAR Electric filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the DPU’s order on July 18, 2007. On May 28, 2010, the DPU issued an order and reaffirmed that NSTAR Electric should reduce its distribution rates by the increase in its Basic Service bad debt charge-offs. On June 18, 2010, NSTAR Electric filed an appeal of the DPU’s order with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC). A decision by the SJC is expected in late 2011 or early 2012. As of March 31, 2011, the potential pre-tax impact to earnings of eliminating the bad debt adder would be approximately $22 million. NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing of this appeals process. NSTAR Electric continues to believe that its position is appropriate and that it is probable upon appeal that it will ultimately prevail.
Other
In the fourth quarter of each year, NSTAR Electric files proposed distribution rate adjustments for effect on the following January 1. These rate adjustments include a SIP rate factor and several other fully reconciling cost recovery items. Consistent with previous filings, the 2010 filings include a combination of actual and forecasted data for 2010 that NSTAR Electric will update during 2011 with year-end data to allow a final investigation and reconciliation. There are several case years that remain outstanding at the DPU. These cases are pending decisions at the DPU and NSTAR Electric cannot predict the timing or the ultimate outcome of these filings.
FERC Transmission ROE
NSTAR Electric earns an 11.14% ROE on local transmission facility investments. The ROE on NSTAR Electric’s regional transmission facilities is 11.64%. Additional incentive adders are available and are decided on a case-by-case basis according to FERC’s national transmission incentive rules. The FERC may grant a variety of financial incentives, including ROE basis point incentive adders for qualified investments made in new regional transmission facilities. This 100 basis point adder, when combined with the FERC’s approved ROEs described above, results in a 12.64% ROE for qualified regional investments. The incentive is intended to promote and accelerate investment in transmission projects that can significantly reduce congestion costs and enhance reliability in the region.
Other
a. Energy Efficiency Plan
NSTAR Electric administers demand-side management energy efficiency programs. The Massachusetts Green Communities Act (GCA) directs electric distribution companies to develop three-year energy efficiency plans. The first three-year plan covering the period 2010 through 2012 was approved by the DPU and is expected to lead to a significant expansion of energy efficiency activity in Massachusetts. Like the historical programs, the new three-year plan includes financial incentives based on energy efficiency program performance. In addition, the DPU has stated that it will permit distribution companies that do not as yet have rate decoupling mechanisms in place to implement lost base revenue rate adjustment mechanisms that will partially offset reduced distribution rate revenues as a result of successful energy efficiency programs.
NSTAR Electric incurred Energy Efficiency program expenses of $32.9 million during the second quarter of 2011. These program expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 for NSTAR Electric were $73 million inclusive of program administrator incentives. NSTAR Electric anticipates that its 2011 Energy Efficiency Plan will amount to approximately $184.3 million in spending, inclusive of program administrator incentives.
23
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following section of MD&A compares the results of operations for each of the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Executive Summary of Quarterly Results
Net income was $60.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $62.7 million for the same period in 2010. Major factors on an after-tax basis that contributed to the $2 million, or 3.2%, decrease in earnings include:
• | Lower electric distribution revenues due to a 1.8% decrease in sales due to cooler weather and customer conservation ($2.5 million) |
• | Higher depreciation and property taxes ($2 million) |
• | Higher operations and maintenance expenses ($4.2 million) |
These decreases in earnings factors were partially offset by:
• | Higher transmission revenues ($1.4 million) |
• | The absence in 2011 of the cumulative impact of a true-up adjustment resulting from a DPU order in May 2010 related to NSTAR Electric’s transition revenues for the years 2006-2009 ($3 million) |
• | Higher Energy Efficiency revenues ($0.5 million) |
Significant cash flow events during the quarter include the following:
• | Cash flows from operating activities provided approximately $317.4 million, an increase of $264.5 million as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase primarily reflects receipt of a tax refund and the associated interest totaling $166.8 million. Other favorable impacts include the timing of energy supply payments and customer collections related to these energy costs and lower estimated tax payments due to bonus depreciation benefits |
• | NSTAR Electric invested approximately $88.8 million in capital projects to improve system reliability and capacity |
• | NSTAR Electric paid $63.8 million in common share dividends to NSTAR and retired approximately $19.4 million in securitized debt. |
Energy sales
The following is a summary of retail electric energy sales for the periods indicated:
Retail Electric Sales - MWh | Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | ||||||||||
Residential | 1,504,260 | 1,508,700 | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial, Industrial, and Other | 3,524,043 | 3,610,897 | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total retail sales | 5,028,303 | 5,119,597 | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
NSTAR Electric’s energy sales in the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased 1.8% compared to 2010 primarily due to unfavorable weather conditions resulting from a cooler spring during 2011 as compared to 2010. Cooling degree-days in the Boston area for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were down 25.5% from the same period in 2010.
24
Table of Contents
Weather and, to a lesser extent, fluctuations in fuel costs, conservation measures, and economic conditions affect sales to NSTAR Electric’s residential and small commercial customers. Economic conditions, fluctuations in fuel costs, and conservation measures affect NSTAR Electric’s large commercial and industrial customers. In terms of customer sector characteristics, industrial sales are less sensitive to weather than residential and commercial sales, which are influenced by temperature variations. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for a more detailed discussion.
Weather conditions
NSTAR Electric forecasts its electric sales based on normal weather conditions. Actual results may vary from those projected due to actual weather conditions, energy conservation, and other factors.
The demand for electricity is affected by weather. Weather impacts electric sales primarily during the summer in NSTAR Electric’s service area. Customer heating or cooling usage may not directly correlate with historical levels or with the level of degree-days that occur (as further discussed below), particularly when weather patterns experienced are consistently colder or warmer. Also, NSTAR Electric’s business is sensitive to variations in daily weather, is highly influenced by New England’s seasonal weather variations, and is susceptible to damage from major storms and other natural events and disasters that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide energy.
Degree-days measure changes in daily mean temperature levels. A degree-day is a unit measuring how many degrees the outdoor daily mean temperature falls below (in the case of heating) or rises above (in the case of cooling) a base of 65 degrees. As shown in the table below, weather conditions during the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 measured by heating and cooling degree-days, respectively, were 45.7% higher/colder relating to heating degree-days and 25.5% lower/cooler related to cooling degree-days for 2011 as compared to 2010. Conversely, weather conditions were warmer than the 30-year average by 6.5% and 9.7% for heating and cooling degree-days, respectively, during the second quarter of 2011. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for a more detailed discussion.
Heating Degree-Days (Boston, MA) | ||||
Three months ended June 30, 2011 | 733 | |||
Three months ended June 30, 2010 | 503 | |||
Normal 30-Year Average | 784 | |||
Cooling Degree-Days (Boston, MA) | ||||
Three months ended June 30, 2011 | 193 | |||
Three months ended June 30, 2010 | 259 | |||
Normal 30-Year Average | 176 |
Operating revenues
Operating revenues for the second quarter of 2011 decreased $8.8 million, or 1.5%, from the same period in 2010 as follows:
(in millions) | Three Months Ended June 30, | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||
Operating revenues | 2011 | 2010 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Retail distribution and transmission | $ | 283.0 | $ | 285.3 | $ | (2.3 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |||||||
Energy, transition, and other | 287.9 | 294.4 | (6.5 | ) | (2.2 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | $ | 570.9 | $ | 579.7 | $ | (8.8 | ) | (1.5 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Table of Contents
NSTAR Electric’s largest earnings sources are the revenues derived from distribution and transmission rates approved by the DPU and the FERC. Electric retail distribution revenues primarily represent charges to customers for recovery of the Company’s capital investment, including a return component, and operation and maintenance costs related to its electric distribution infrastructure. The transmission revenue component represents charges to customers for the recovery of similar costs to move the electricity over high voltage lines from the generator to the Company’s distribution substations.
The decrease of $2.3 million, or 0.8%, in retail distribution and transmission revenues is primarily due to lower sales due to customer conservation and cooler weather, partially offset by higher PAM-related recoveries.
Energy, transition, and other revenues primarily represent charges to customers for the recovery of costs incurred by the Company in order to acquire the energy supply on behalf of its customers and a transition charge for recovery of the Company’s prior investments in generating plants and the costs related to long-term power contracts. The energy revenues relate to customers being provided energy supply under Basic Service. These revenues are fully reconciled to the costs incurred and have no impact on NSTAR Electric’s consolidated net income. Energy, transition, and other revenues also reflect revenues related to the Company’s ability to effectively reduce stranded costs (incentive entitlements), rental revenue from electric property, and annual cost reconciliation true-up adjustments. The $6.5 million, or 2.2% decrease in energy, transition, and other revenues is primarily attributable to lower Basic Service rates in effect due to lower energy costs. Uncollected transition costs as a result of the reductions in transition rates are deferred and collected through future rates with a carrying charge.
Operating expenses
Purchased power and transmission expense was $244 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $268.2 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $24.2 million, or 9%. The decrease in expense reflects lower Basic Service and other energy costs of $27.1 million. These decreases were partially offset by higher transmission costs of $2.9 million due to an increase in regional network support costs. NSTAR Electric adjusts its rates to collect the costs related to energy supply from customers on a fully reconciling basis. Due to this rate adjustment mechanism, changes in the amount of energy supply expense have no impact on consolidated net income.
Operations and maintenance expensewas $83.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $78 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $5.7 million, or 7.3%. One significant component contributing to this increase in expense is higher pension and PBOP related PAM amortization costs ($2.5 million). Fluctuations in PAM amortization do not have an earnings impact as these costs are fully recovered from customers. Also contributing to the higher expense were storm-related expenses ($1 million), and higher labor and labor-related costs ($1.2 million). Partially offsetting these factors was lower bad debt expense ($1.1 million).
Depreciation and amortization expense was $68.6 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $67.1 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $1.5 million, or 2.2%. The increase primarily reflects higher depreciable distribution and transmission plant-in-service, offset by lower amortization costs related to the pay-down of securitized debt.
Energy efficiency and renewable energy programs expensewas $32.9 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $22 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $10.9 million, or 49.5%. These costs are in accordance with the new three-year plan program guidelines established by the DPU and are collected from customers on a fully reconciling basis plus a performance incentive. NSTAR Electric anticipates a further increase in Energy Efficiency spending during 2011 and in future years driven by requirements of the GCA. Those spending increases are funded partially through proceeds from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and through NSTAR Electric’s participation in the Forward Capacity Market.
26
Table of Contents
Property and other taxes expense was $26.4 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $24.3 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $2.1 million, or 8.6%, reflecting higher overall property investments and higher tax rates.
Interest charges (income):
Long-term debt and transition property securitization certificate interest charges were $24.6 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $26.7 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 7.9%. The decrease in interest charges reflects scheduled principal pay downs of transition property securitization debt and the retirement of NSTAR Electric’s $125 million, 7.80% Debentures in May 2010.
Interest income and other, net were $8.6 million of net interest income in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $11.3 million of net interest income in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $2.7 million, or 23.9%, due to decreased interest income on tax issues of $8.6 million, partially offset by higher interest income of $2.5 million from regulatory deferrals and $3.2 million in interest income from legal matters.
Other income (deductions):
Other income was approximately $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $0.4 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $0.7 million. The increase relates primarily to higher cash surrender values of insurance policies and higher equity investment earnings.
Other deductionswere $0.3 million in the second quarter 2011 compared to $0.4 million in the same period 2010, a decrease of $0.1 million.
Income tax expense:
Income tax expense was $39.5 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $41.9 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 5.7% primarily reflecting lower pre-tax operating income in 2011.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Executive Summary of Quarterly Results
Net income was $103.5 million for the first half of 2011 compared to $105.4 million for the same period in 2010. Major factors on an after-tax basis that contributed to the $1.9 million, or 1.8%, decrease in earnings during the first half of 2011 include:
• | Higher depreciation and property taxes ($5.1 million) |
• | Higher operations and maintenance expenses ($9.8 million) |
These decreases in earnings factors were partially offset by:
• | Higher electric distribution revenues due to a 0.7% increase in sales offset by the annual inflation rate adjustment ($2 million) |
• | Higher transmission revenues ($3.2 million) |
• | The absence in 2011 of the cumulative impact of a true-up adjustment resulting from a DPU order in May 2010 related to NSTAR Electric’s transition revenues for the years 2006-2009 ($3 million) |
• | Higher interest income on regulatory deferrals ($2.3 million) |
27
Table of Contents
Significant cash flow events during the first half of 2011 include the following:
• | Cash flows from operating activities provided approximately $365.3 million, an increase of $219.9 million as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase primarily reflects receipt of a tax refund and the associated interest totaling $166.8 million. Other favorable impacts include the timing of energy supply payments and customer collections related to these energy costs and lower estimated tax payments due to bonus depreciation benefits |
• | NSTAR Electric invested approximately $161.6 million in capital projects to improve system reliability and capacity |
• | NSTAR Electric paid $114.3 million in common share dividends to NSTAR and retired approximately $40.7 million in securitized debt. |
Energy sales
The following is a summary of retail electric energy sales for the periods indicated:
Retail Electric Sales - MWh | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | ||||||||||
Residential | 3,246,072 | 3,183,921 | 2.0 | |||||||||
Commercial, Industrial, and Other | 7,136,404 | 7,128,167 | 0.1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Total retail sales | 10,382,476 | 10,312,088 | 0.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
NSTAR Electric’s energy sales in the first half of 2011 increased 0.7% compared to 2010 primarily due to favorable weather conditions in the first quarter of 2011 resulting from a colder winter as compared to 2010, but offset by a cooler second quarter of 2011. Heating degree-days in the Boston area for the first half of 2011 were up 16.6% from the same period in 2010.
Weather and, to a lesser extent, fluctuations in fuel costs, conservation measures, and economic conditions affect sales to NSTAR Electric’s residential and small commercial customers. Economic conditions, fluctuations in fuel costs, and conservation measures affect NSTAR Electric’s large commercial and industrial customers. In terms of customer sector characteristics, industrial sales are less sensitive to weather than residential and commercial sales, which are influenced by temperature variations. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for a more detailed discussion.
Weather conditions
The demand for electricity is affected by weather. Weather impacts electric sales primarily during the summer in NSTAR Electric’s service area. Customer heating or cooling usage may not directly correlate with historical levels or with the level of degree-days that occur (as further discussed below), particularly when weather patterns experienced are consistently colder or warmer. Also, NSTAR Electric’s business is sensitive to variations in daily weather, is highly influenced by New England’s seasonal weather variations, and is susceptible to damage from major storms and other natural events and disasters that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide energy.
As shown in the table below, weather conditions during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 measured by heating degree-days and cooling degree-days, respectively, were 16.6% higher/colder relating to heating degree-days and 25.5% lower/cooler related to cooling degree-days for 2011 as compared to 2010. During the first half of 2011, weather conditions compared to the normal 30-year average were 0.2% lower/warmer and 9.7% higher/warmer for heating and cooling degree-days, respectively. Refer to the“Operating Revenues” section below for a more detailed discussion.
28
Table of Contents
Heating Degree-Days (Boston MA) | ||||
Six months ended June 30, 2011 | 3,646 | |||
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | 3,127 | |||
Normal 30-Year Average | 3,654 | |||
Cooling Degree-Days (Boston, MA) | ||||
Six months ended June 30, 2011 | 193 | |||
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | 259 | |||
Normal 30-Year Average | 176 |
Operating revenues
Operating revenues for the first half of 2011 increased $6.6 million, or 0.6%, from the same period in 2010 as follows:
(in millions) | Six Months Ended June 30, | Increase (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||
Operating revenues | 2011 | 2010 | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
Retail distribution and transmission | $ | 552.9 | $ | 540.7 | $ | 12.2 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
Energy, transition, and other | 615.9 | 621.5 | (5.6 | ) | (0.9 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Total operating revenues | $ | 1,168.8 | $ | 1,162.2 | $ | 6.6 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSTAR Electric’s largest earnings sources are the revenues derived from distribution and transmission rates approved by the DPU and the FERC. Electric retail distribution revenues primarily represent charges to customers for recovery of the Company’s capital investment, including a return component, and operation and maintenance costs related to its electric distribution infrastructure. The transmission revenue component represents charges to customers for the recovery of similar costs to move the electricity over high voltage lines from the generator to the Company’s distribution substations.
The increase of $12.2 million, or 2.3%, in retail distribution and transmission revenues primarily reflects:
• | Increased transmission revenues primarily due to the recovery of a higher transmission investment base, including higher depreciation and property taxes and recovery of higher regional network service and other costs ($4.8 million) |
• | Increased distribution revenues due to increased sales of 0.7% due to the impact of weather conditions, partially offset by a negative annual inflation rate adjustment ($3.3 million) |
• | Increased PAM-related recovery revenues due to increased amortization of previously deferred costs ($4.7 million) |
Energy, transition, and other revenues primarily represent charges to customers for the recovery of costs incurred by the Company in order to acquire the energy supply on behalf of its customers and a transition charge for recovery of the Company’s prior investments in generating plants and the costs related to long-term power contracts. The energy revenues relate to customers being provided energy supply under Basic Service. These revenues are fully reconciled to the costs incurred and have no impact on NSTAR Electric’s consolidated net income. Energy, transition, and other revenues also reflect revenues related to the Company’s ability to effectively reduce stranded costs (incentive entitlements), rental revenue from electric property, and annual cost reconciliation true-up adjustments. The $5.6 million, or 0.9% decrease in energy, transition, and other revenues is primarily attributable to lower Basic Service rates in effect due to lower energy costs. Uncollected transition costs as a result of the reductions in transition rates are deferred and collected through future rates with a carrying charge.
29
Table of Contents
Operating expenses
Purchased power and transmission expense was $523.3 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $552.2 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $28.9 million, or 5.2%. The decrease in expense reflects lower Basic Service and other energy costs of $38.5 million. These decreases were partially offset by higher transmission costs of $9.6 million due to an increase in regional network support costs. NSTAR Electric adjusts its rates to collect the costs related to energy supply from customers on a fully reconciling basis. Due to this rate adjustment mechanism, changes in the amount of energy supply expense have no impact on consolidated net income.
Operations and maintenance expensewas $176.5 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $163.1 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $13.4 million, or 8.2%. One significant component contributing to this increase in expense is higher pension and PBOP related PAM amortization costs ($5.2 million). Fluctuations in PAM amortization do not have an earnings impact as these costs are fully recovered from customers. Also contributing to the higher expense were storm-related expenses ($1.9 million), higher maintenance costs ($2.2 million) and higher labor and labor-related costs ($3.9 million).
Depreciation and amortization expense was $137.2 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $147.7 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $10.5 million, or 7.1%. The decrease primarily reflects the lower amortization costs related to the pay-down of securitized debt, offset by higher depreciable distribution and transmission plant-in-service.
Energy efficiency and renewable energy programs expensewas $73 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $39.7 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $33.3 million, or 83.9%. These costs are in accordance with the new three-year plan program guidelines established by the DPU and are collected from customers on a fully reconciling basis plus a performance incentive. NSTAR Electric anticipates a further increase in Energy Efficiency spending during 2011 and in future years driven by requirements of the GCA. Those spending increases are funded partially through proceeds from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and through NSTAR Electric’s participation in the Forward Capacity Market.
Property and other taxes expense was $55.4 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $50.6 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $4.8 million, or 9.5%, reflecting higher overall property investments and higher tax rates.
Interest charges (income):
Long-term debt and transition property securitization certificate interest charges were $49.6 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $52.1 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $2.5 million, or 4.8%. The decrease in interest charges reflects scheduled principal pay downs of transition property securitization debt and the retirement of NSTAR Electric’s $125 million, 7.80% Debentures in May 2010. These reductions in interest expense were partially offset by higher expense for NSTAR Electric’s $300 million 5.50% Debentures issued in March 2010.
Interest income and other, net were $16 million of net interest income in the first half of 2011 compared to $17.6 million of net interest income in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 9.1%, due to decreased interest income on tax issues of $8.6 million, partially offset by higher interest income of $3.8 million from regulatory deferrals and $3.2 million in interest income from legal matters.
Other income (deductions):
Other income was approximately $2.1 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $1.2 million in the same period of 2010, an increase of $0.9 million. The increase relates primarily to higher cash surrender values of insurance policies and higher equity investment earnings.
30
Table of Contents
Other deductionswere $0.9 million in the first half 2011 compared to $0.8 million in the same period 2010, an increase of $0.1 million.
Income tax expense:
Income tax expense was $67.5 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $69.5 million in the same period of 2010, a decrease of $2 million, or 2.9%, primarily reflecting lower pre-tax operating income in 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
NSTAR Electric’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, NSTAR Electric carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of NSTAR Electric’s management, including NSTAR Electric’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of NSTAR Electric’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that NSTAR Electric’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective (1) to timely alert them to material information relating to NSTAR Electric’s information required to be disclosed by NSTAR Electric in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) to ensure that appropriate information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
There have been no changes in NSTAR Electric’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during NSTAR Electric’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NSTAR Electric’s internal control over financial reporting.
In the normal course of its business, NSTAR Electric and its subsidiaries are involved in certain legal matters, including civil litigation. Management is unable to fully determine a range of potential court-ordered damages, settlement amounts, and related litigation costs (“legal liabilities”) that would be in excess of amounts accrued and amounts covered by insurance. Based on the information currently available, NSTAR Electric does not believe that it is probable that any such legal liability will have a material impact on its consolidated financial position. However, it is reasonably possible that additional legal liabilities that may result from changes in circumstances could have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Investors or prospective investors should carefully consider the risk factors that were previously disclosed in NSTAR Electric’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
31
Table of Contents
Item 5. | Other Information |
The following is furnished for informational purposes.
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements:
Twelve months ended June 30, 2011: | ||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | 6.30 | |||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements | 6.04 |
32
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
a) | Exhibits: |
Exhibit | 4 | - | Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures | |||
- | Management agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of any agreement or instrument of NSTAR Electric defining the rights of holders of any non-registered debt whose authorization does not exceed 10% of total assets. | |||||
Exhibits filed herewith: | ||||||
Exhibit | 12 | - | Statement re Computation of Ratios | |||
12.1 | - | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||
12.2 | - | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2011 | ||||
Exhibit | 15 | - | Letter re Unaudited Interim Financial Information | |||
15.1 | - | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Awareness Letter | ||||
Exhibit | 31 | - | Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certifications | |||
31.1 | - | Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
31.2 | - | Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
Exhibit | 32 | - | Section 1350 Certifications | |||
32.1 | - | Certification Statement of Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
32.2 | - | Certification Statement of Chief Financial Officer of NSTAR Electric pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||||
Exhibit | 99 | - | Additional Exhibits | |||
99.1 | - | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm * | ||||
* | Rule 436(c) of the 1933 Act provides that a report on unaudited interim financial information shall not be considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the 1933 Act. Therefore, the accountant is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the 1933 Act. | |||||
Exhibit | 101.INS | - | XBRL Instance Document | |||
Exhibit | 101.SCH | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |||
Exhibit | 101.CAL | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |||
Exhibit | 101.LAB | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |||
Exhibit | 101.PRE | - | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
33
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NSTAR Electric Company | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Date: August 9, 2011 | By: | /s/ R. J. WEAFER, JR. | ||||
Robert J. Weafer, Jr. | ||||||
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
34