CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 190,875 | | | $ | 203,816 | |
Receivables, net | | | 176,205 | | | | 200,373 | |
Inventories | | | 66,389 | | | | 65,485 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 23,916 | | | | 20,926 | |
Total current assets | | | 457,385 | | | | 490,600 | |
Property, net | | | 514,829 | | | | 507,270 | |
Capitalized software costs, net | | | 52,251 | | | | 51,454 | |
Intangible assets, net | | | 18,395 | | | | 19,780 | |
Goodwill | | | 2,661 | | | | 2,661 | |
Other assets | | | 128,698 | | | | 118,628 | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,174,219 | | | $ | 1,190,393 | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 77,972 | | | $ | 82,939 | |
Short-term debt | | | 6,434 | | | | 8,252 | |
Accrued liabilities | | | 150,573 | | | | 157,534 | |
Due to affiliates | | | - | | | | 1,507 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 234,979 | | | | 250,232 | |
Long-term debt | | | 577,842 | | | | 578,298 | |
Other long-term liabilities | | | 13,768 | | | | 18,005 | |
| | | 826,589 | | | | 846,535 | |
Commitments and contingencies | | | | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Hughes Communications, Inc. ("HCI") stockholders' equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized and no | | | | | | | | |
shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 | | | - | | | | - | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 64,000,000 shares authorized; | | | | | | | | |
21,604,120 shares and 21,514,963 shares issued and outstanding | | | | | | | | |
as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively | | | 22 | | | | 22 | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 726,251 | | | | 724,558 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (362,546 | ) | | | (357,850 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (25,507 | ) | | | (28,583 | ) |
Total HCI stockholders' equity | | | 338,220 | | | | 338,147 | |
| | | 9,410 | | | | 5,711 | |
Total equity | | | 347,630 | | | | 343,858 | |
Total liabilities and equity | | $ | 1,174,219 | | | $ | 1,190,393 | |
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | |
Services revenues | | $ | 162,365 | | | $ | 148,897 | |
Hardware sales | | | 77,850 | | | | 88,263 | |
Total revenues | | | 240,215 | | | | 237,160 | |
Operating costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | |
Cost of services | | | 106,670 | | | | 94,217 | |
Cost of hardware products sold | | | 74,205 | | | | 76,798 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 44,241 | | | | 49,155 | |
Research and development | | | 5,351 | | | | 6,076 | |
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 1,385 | | | | 1,608 | |
Total operating costs and expenses | | | 231,852 | | | | 227,854 | |
Operating income | | | 8,363 | | | | 9,306 | |
Other income (expense): | | | | | | | | |
Interest expense | | | (13,836 | ) | | | (9,308 | ) |
Interest income | | | 320 | | | | 1,463 | |
Other income, net | | | - | | | | 31 | |
Income (loss) before income tax (expense) benefit and equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | | | (5,153 | ) | | | 1,492 | |
Income tax (expense) benefit | | | 655 | | | | (640 | ) |
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | | | 170 | | | | (151 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | (4,328 | ) | | | 701 | |
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | (368 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Net income (loss) attributable to HCI stockholders | | $ | (4,696 | ) | | $ | 656 | |
Earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.03 | |
Diluted | | $ | (0.22 | ) | | $ | 0.03 | |
Shares used in computation of per share data: | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 21,358,667 | | | | 18,867,630 | |
Diluted | | | 21,358,667 | | | | 19,275,233 | |
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | HCI Shareholders' Equity | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Additional | | | | | | Other | | | | | | | |
| | Common | | | Paid-In | | | Accumulated | | | Comprehensive | | | Noncontrolling | | | | |
| | Stock | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Loss | | | Interest | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 724,558 | | | $ | (357,850 | ) | | $ | (28,583 | ) | | $ | 5,711 | | | $ | 343,858 | |
Consolidation of Hughes Systique Corporation | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,331 | | | | 3,331 | |
Shared-based compensation | | | - | | | | 1,783 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,783 | |
Buyback of Electronic System Products, Inc. shares | | | - | | | | (90 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (90 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | (4,696 | ) | | | | | | | 368 | | | | (4,328 | ) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,407 | ) | | | | | | | (1,407 | ) |
Reclassification of realized loss on hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (854 | ) | | | | | | | (854 | ) |
Unrealized gain on hedging instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,337 | | | | | | | | 5,337 | |
Balance at March 31, 2009 | | $ | 22 | | | $ | 726,251 | | | $ | (362,546 | ) | | $ | (25,507 | ) | | $ | 9,410 | | | $ | 347,630 | |
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4,328 | ) | | $ | 701 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 21,893 | | | | 10,710 | |
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | | 378 | | | | 343 | |
Equity plan compensation expense | | | 1,783 | | | | 1,071 | |
Equity in (earnings) losses from unconsolidated affiliates | | | (170 | ) | | | 151 | |
| | | (9 | ) | | | (3 | ) |
Change in other operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: | | | | | | | | |
Receivables, net | | | 12,150 | | | | 23,857 | |
Inventories | | | (1,089 | ) | | | (10,194 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 1,573 | | | | (3,927 | ) |
Accounts payable | | | (6,837 | ) | | | 905 | |
Accrued liabilities and other | | | (7,985 | ) | | | (6,197 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 17,359 | | | | 17,417 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Change in restricted cash | | | 174 | | | | 7 | |
Purchases of marketable securities | | | - | | | | (2,071 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities | | | - | | | | 1,005 | |
Expenditures for property | | | (26,625 | ) | | | (22,948 | ) |
Expenditures for capitalized software | | | (4,391 | ) | | | (3,382 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property | | | 56 | | | | 25 | |
Acquisition of Helius, Inc., net of cash received | | | - | | | | (10,812 | ) |
Cash acquired, consolidation of Hughes Systique Corporation | | | 828 | | | | - | |
Investment in Hughes Systique Corporation | | | - | | | | (1,500 | ) |
Hughes Systique Corporation note receivables | | | - | | | | (500 | ) |
Other, net | | | (90 | ) | | | - | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (30,048 | ) | | | (40,176 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in notes and loans payable | | | (509 | ) | | | 689 | |
Long-term debt borrowings | | | 933 | | | | 1,654 | |
Repayment of long-term debt | | | (2,069 | ) | | | (4,620 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (1,645 | ) | | | (2,277 | ) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,393 | | | | 1,080 | |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | | (12,941 | ) | | | (23,956 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period | | | 203,816 | | | | 134,092 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period | | $ | 190,875 | | | $ | 110,136 | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 2,653 | | | $ | 2,832 | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 726 | | | $ | 952 | |
Supplemental non-cash disclosures related to: | | | | | | | | |
Investment in Hughes Telematics, Inc. | | $ | 13,000 | | | | | |
Consolidation of Hughes Systique Corporation | | $ | 5,252 | | | | | |
See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsHUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: | Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Hughes Communications, Inc. (“HCI” and, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company” or “we”) was formed as a Delaware corporation on June 23, 2005. The Company is a publicly-traded company and its stock trades on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations System—Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “HUGH.” The Company operates its business primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS”), a telecommunications company.
We provide equipment and services to the broadband communications marketplace. We have extensive technical expertise in satellite, wire line and wireless communications which we utilize in a number of product and service offerings. In particular, we offer a spectrum of broadband equipment and services to the managed services market comprised of enterprises with a requirement to connect a large number of geographically dispersed locations with reliable, scalable, and cost-effective applications, such as credit card verification, inventory tracking and control, and broadcast video. Our broadband network services and systems are provided to the international and domestic enterprise markets, and our satellite Internet access is provided to North American consumers, which we refer to as the Consumer market. In addition, we provide networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite, telematics and wireless backhaul systems. These services are generally provided on a contract or project basis and may involve the use of proprietary products engineered by us.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with: (i) generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information; (ii) the instructions to Form 10-Q; and (iii) the guidance of Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for financial statements required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). They include the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, including its domestic and foreign subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned or for which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. Entities in which the Company holds at least 20% ownership or in which there are other indicators of significant influence are generally accounted for by the equity method, whereby the Company records its proportionate share of the entities’ results of operations. Entities in which the Company holds less than 20% ownership and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are generally carried at cost. As permitted under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, certain notes and other financial information normally required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted. Management believes the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the periods presented herein. Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 may not be indicative of our future results. These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
All intercompany balances and transactions with subsidiaries and other consolidated entities have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be affected by changes in those estimates.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
New Accounting Pronouncements
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional guidance: 1) for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and 2) on how to identify whether a transaction is distressed or forced. This FSP is effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP is intended to bring greater consistency to the timing of impairment recognition and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP is effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” related to fair value disclosures for any financial instruments that are not currently reflected on the balance sheet at fair value. Prior to issuing this FSP, fair values for these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. The FSP now requires these disclosures on a quarterly basis, providing qualitative and quantitative information about fair value estimates for all those financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value. This FSP is effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of SFAS No. 133.” This Statement, among other things, requires entities to provide more transparent disclosure for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Company’s disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” The objective of SFAS No. 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. This Statement applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but affects only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and provided additional required disclosures relating to our noncontrolling interest pursuant to SFAS No. 160.
Note 2: | Acquisition of Helius, Inc. |
In February 2008, we completed the acquisition of Helius, Inc. pursuant to the merger agreement we entered into on December 21, 2007 (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we paid $10.5 million, after certain adjustments, at the closing of the acquisition. Immediately after the acquisition, Helius, Inc. was converted to a limited liability company, Helius, LLC (“Helius”). As part of the Merger Agreement, we have a remaining contractual obligation for contingent consideration of up to $20.0 million (the “Contingent Payment”). If Helius achieves certain post-closing
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
performance goals (the “Performance Goals”) as set forth in the Merger Agreement, we are obligated to pay the Contingent Payment in April 2010 as additional purchase price. Since it is not certain that Helius will achieve the Performance Goals, we have not recognized the liability on the Contingent Payment according to SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” However, if it becomes probable that Helius will achieve the Performance Goals pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we will recognize the Contingent Payment as additional goodwill.
The excess of the total acquisition costs of $10.8 million over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired from Helius has been reflected as goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 141. We believe that the goodwill resulting from the Helius acquisition reflects the expected synergies that will generate long-term revenue growth, expansion of customer services and improvement of customer retention rates as we combine Helius’ customer base and skills as a recognized leader in the internet protocol television solutions business with our extensive broadband networking experience and customer base. Due to the nature of Helius’ business activities, its customer base and other similarities with our North America Enterprise business, Helius operates within our North America Broadband segment. Helius’ results of operations have been included in our consolidated statement of operations since February 2008.
The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | Amount | |
Cash consideration | | $ | 10,500 | |
Direct acquisition costs | | | 305 | |
Total acquisition costs | | $ | 10,805 | |
The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):
| | Amount | |
Current assets | | $ | 1,054 | |
Property | | | 658 | |
Intangible assets | | | 7,600 | |
Goodwill | | | 2,661 | |
Total assets | | | 11,973 | |
Current liabilities | | | (1,168 | ) |
Total liabilities | | | (1,168 | ) |
Net assets acquired | | $ | 10,805 | |
Based on the valuation of Helius’ intangible assets, using an income approach, the fair values of the intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
| | Amount | |
Customer relationships | | $ | 4,260 | |
Patented technology | | | 2,870 | |
Trademarks | | | 470 | |
Total | | $ | 7,600 | |
The weighted average amortization period for the intangible assets is approximately 7.6 years. The total amount of goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Pro forma financial statements are not presented as Helius’s results of operations were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 3: | Hughes Systique Corporation |
Hughes Systique Corporation (“Hughes Systique”) is a communications consulting and software company. We have contracts with Hughes Systique for software development services. The founders of Hughes Systique include Pradman Kaul, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President and certain former employees of HNS, including Pradeep Kaul, who is the CEO and President of Hughes Systique, HNS’ former Executive Vice President and the brother of our CEO and President. The Company acquired equity investments in Hughes Systique Series A preferred shares (“HSC Preferred Shares”) of $3.0 million and $1.5 million in October 2005 and January 2008, respectively.
In February 2008, the Company and Nextwave Broadband Inc. (“Nextwave”), another significant shareholder of Hughes Systique, agreed to make available to Hughes Systique a term loan facility (the “Loan”) of up to $3.0 million. Under the Loan, each loan request must be at least $1.0 million, and the Loan was to be funded equally by the Company and Nextwave. The Loan has a fixed interest rate of 6%, and it is convertible into common shares of Hughes Systique upon non-payment or an event of default. Hughes Systique has the option to pay the interest annually or to convert the interest to principal as a “payment in kind.” In February 2008, the Company and Nextwave each funded $0.5 million as part of a $1.0 million loan drawdown. In late March 2009, Hughes Systique requested and the Company funded the remaining $1.0 million of its original $1.5 million loan commitment. As a result, the Company is not obligated to provide any further financial support to Hughes Systique under the Loan.
On March 11, 2009, Hughes Systique entered into a termination and settlement agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with Nextwave Wireless LLC and Nextwave Broadband Inc., collectively referred to as Nextwave. The Termination Agreement provided for the following: 1) Hughes Systique relieved Nextwave of its obligation to fund its remaining commitment under the Loan; 2) Nextwave waived Hughes Systique’s obligation to repay amounts previously funded, together with accrued interest; 3) Hughes Systique waived Nextwave’s obligations for the purchase of services under existing agreements and Nextwave’s obligation to repay outstanding accounts receivable of approximately $0.8 million. Additionally, Nextwave’s ownership in HSC Preferred Shares, which represented approximately 31.79% of Hughes Systique’s equity, was converted to a reduced level of ownership, representing a 5% interest in Hughes Systique’s common stock. The effect of these transactions has increased, on an undiluted basis, our ownership in Hughes Systique to approximately 45.23% and the ownership of our CEO and President and his brother in Hughes Systique to approximately 25.61%. In addition, pursuant to FIN 46(R), these transactions caused a reconsideration event on March 11, 2009, resulting in the Company becoming the “primary beneficiary” of Hughes Systique. As a result, the Company is required to consolidate Hughes Systique’s assets and liabilities and results of operations for periods beginning on or after March 12, 2009. The basis of Hughes Systique’s assets and liabilities were adjusted to their preliminary estimated fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” Management’s estimated fair value of Hughes Systique is preliminary and subject to refinement. The determination of Hughes Systique’s fair value is expected to be completed in the second half of 2009.
Based on the preliminary valuation, the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of Hughes Systique’s assets and liabilities at March 12, 2009. The Company is in the process of determining the fair value of certain assets, thus the allocation of the assets is subject to refinement (in thousands):
| | Amount | |
Current assets | | $ | 5,249 | |
Property | | | 717 | |
Other assets | | | 3,686 | |
Current liabilities | | | (2,808 | ) |
Long term liabilities | | | (763 | ) |
| | | 6,081 | |
Noncontrolling interest | | | (3,331 | ) |
| | $ | 2,750 | |
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the revenue and net loss of the Hughes Systique included in our results of operations since March 12, 2009 was $0.3 million and 0.2 million, respectively. Pro forma financial statements are not presented as Hughes Systique’s results of operations were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Receivables, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Trade receivables | | $ | 151,543 | | | $ | 177,798 | |
Contracts in process | | | 31,757 | | | | 30,412 | |
Other receivables | | | 2,265 | | | | 1,714 | |
Total receivables | | | 185,565 | | | | 209,924 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (9,360 | ) | | | (9,551 | ) |
Total receivables, net | | $ | 176,205 | | | $ | 200,373 | |
Trade receivables included $1.1 million and $6.8 million of amounts due from affiliates at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Advances and progress billings offset against contracts in process amounted to $9.4 million and $13.9 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Production materials and supplies | | $ | 11,273 | | | $ | 10,268 | |
Work in process | | | 15,288 | | | | 12,445 | |
Finished goods | | | 39,828 | | | | 42,772 | |
Total inventories | | $ | 66,389 | | | $ | 65,485 | |
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market, principally using standard costs adjusted to reflect actual based on variance analyses performed throughout the year. Inventories are adjusted to net realizable value using management’s best estimates of future use. In making its assessment of future use or recovery, management considers the aging and composition of inventory balances, the effects of technological and/or design changes, forecasted future product demand based on firm or near-firm customer orders and alternative means of disposition of excess or obsolete items.HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Property, net consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
| | Estimated Useful Lives | | | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | (years) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Land and improvements | | | 10 | | | $ | 5,863 | | | $ | 5,871 | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | | 2 - 30 | | | | 28,379 | | | | 28,090 | |
Satellite related assets | | | 15 | | | | 380,394 | | | | 380,394 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 1 - 7 | | | | 168,099 | | | | 134,544 | |
VSAT operating lease hardware | | | 2 - 5 | | | | 42,607 | | | | 42,741 | |
Furniture and fixtures | | | 5 - 7 | | | | 1,299 | | | | 1,092 | |
Construction in progress | | | | | | | 16,263 | | | | 25,180 | |
Total property | | | | | | | 642,904 | | | | 617,912 | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | | | | | (128,075 | ) | | | (110,642 | ) |
Total property, net | | | | | | $ | 514,829 | | | $ | 507,270 | |
Satellite related assets consist primarily of SPACEWAYTM 3 (“SPACEWAY 3”), a next generation broadband satellite system with a unique architecture for broadband data communications. In April 2008, we placed SPACEWAY 3 into service and began to depreciate its related costs on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of 15 years. Satellite related assets include the costs associated with the construction and launch of the satellite, insurance premiums for the satellite launch and the in-orbit testing period, interest incurred during the construction of the satellite, and other costs directly related to the satellite.
We capitalized interest related to the construction of SPACEWAY 3 of $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and none for the same period in 2009 as we placed the satellite into service in April 2008.
Note 7: | Intangible Assets, Net |
Intangible assets, net consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
| | | Estimated Useful Lives (years) | | | Cost Basis | | | Accumulated Amortization | | | Net Basis | |
March 31, 2009: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog and customer relationships | | | 4 - 8 | | | $ | 22,092 | | | $ | (13,589 | ) | | $ | 8,503 | |
Patented technology and trademarks | | | 2 - 10 | | | | 16,393 | | | | (6,501 | ) | | | 9,892 | |
Total intangible assets, net | | | | | | $ | 38,485 | | | $ | (20,090 | ) | | $ | 18,395 | |
December 31, 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Backlog and customer relationships | | | 4 - 8 | | | $ | 22,092 | | | $ | (12,694 | ) | | $ | 9,398 | |
Patented technology and trademarks | | | 2 - 10 | | | | 16,393 | | | | (6,011 | ) | | | 10,382 | |
Total intangible assets, net | | | | | | $ | 38,485 | | | $ | (18,705 | ) | | $ | 19,780 | |
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
We amortize the recorded values of our intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $1.4 million and $1.6 million of amortization expense, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense at March 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
| | Amount | |
Remaining nine months ending December 31, 2009 | | $ | 4,156 | |
Year ending December 31, | | | | |
2010 | | | 2,920 | |
2011 | | | 2,902 | |
2012 | | | 2,902 | |
2013 | | | 2,902 | |
2014 | | | 1,270 | |
Thereafter | | | 1,343 | |
Total estimated future amortization expense | | $ | 18,395 | |
Note 8: | Short-Term and Long-Term Debt |
Short-term and current portion of long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | Interest Rates | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
VSAT hardware financing | | | 1.00% - 15.00% | | | $ | 4,047 | | | $ | 4,864 | |
Revolving bank borrowings | | | 8.25% - 18.00% | | | | 1,980 | | | | 2,432 | |
Capital lease and other | | | 6.00% - 13.75% | | | | 407 | | | | 956 | |
Total short term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | | | | | | $ | 6,434 | | | $ | 8,252 | |
As of March 31, 2009, HNS had $2.0 million of outstanding revolving bank borrowings, which were obtained by HNS’ subsidiary in India under revolving lines of credit with several local banks and which had a weighted average variable interest rate of 12.45%. There is no requirement for compensating balances for these borrowings. The total amount available for borrowing by the Indian and European subsidiaries under the revolving lines of credit was $1.3 million as of March 31, 2009.
Long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
| | | | | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | Interest Rates | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Senior notes | | | 9.50% | | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | |
Term loans | | | 7.62% | | | | 115,000 | | | | 115,000 | |
VSAT hardware financing | | | 2.00% - 15.00% | | | | 7,496 | | | | 8,038 | |
Capital lease and other | | | 6.00% | | | | 5,346 | | | | 5,260 | |
Total long-term debt | | | | | | $ | 577,842 | | | $ | 578,298 | |
HNS’ $450 million senior notes (the “Senior Notes”) have a fixed interest rate of 9.50% per annum and mature on April 15, 2014. Interest on the Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, interest accrued on the Senior Notes was $19.7 million.
HNS has a secured $50 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), which matures on April 22, 2011. The interest rate associated with the Revolving Credit Facility, is based on, at the Company’s option, the ABR rate plus
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1.50% per annum or Adjusted LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2009, the Revolving Credit Facility had total outstanding letters of credit of $3.6 million and an available borrowing capacity of $46.4 million.
In February 2007, HNS borrowed $115 million from a syndicate of banks (the “Term Loan Facility”), which matures on April 15, 2014. The interest on the Term Loan Facility is paid quarterly at Adjusted LIBOR (as defined in the Term Loan Facility and existing Revolving Credit Facility) plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, HNS entered into a swap agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum (the “Swap Agreement”). As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, interest accrued based on the Swap Agreement and the Term Loan Facility was $0.8 million.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes, the agreement governing the amended Revolving Credit Facility and the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility require HNS to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants: (i) in the case of the indenture, for so long as any Senior Notes are outstanding; (ii) in the case of the amended Revolving Credit Facility, so long as the amended Revolving Credit Facility is in effect, and (iii) in the case of the Term Loan Facility, for so long as the Term Loan Facility remains outstanding. Negative covenants contained in these agreements include limitations on the ability of HNS and/or certain of its subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; issue redeemable stock and subsidiary preferred stock; incur liens; pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; make loans and investments; enter into agreements that restrict distributions from HNS’ subsidiaries; sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person; and enter into new lines of business. In addition to these negative covenants, the amended Revolving Credit Facility, the indenture governing the Senior Notes and/or the agreement governing the Term Loan Facility contain affirmative covenants that require us to: (i) preserve our businesses and properties; (ii) maintain insurance over our assets; (iii) pay and discharge all material taxes when due; and (iv) furnish the lenders’ administrative agent our financial statements for each fiscal quarter and fiscal year, certificates from a financial officer certifying that no Event of Default or Default has occurred during the fiscal period being reported, litigation and other notices, compliance with laws, maintenance of records and other such customary covenants. HNS and its subsidiaries comprise a substantial portion of the Company’s net assets and results of operations since January 1, 2006. Because of the negative covenants above, there are certain restrictions on the net assets of HNS. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, HNS’ net assets were $228.3 million and $229.8 million, respectively. Management believes that HNS was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of March 31, 2009.
We entered into a capital lease with 95 West Co., Inc. (“95 West Co.”) and its parent, Miraxis License Holdings, LLC (“MLH”), which are our related parties as discussed in Note 14 —Transactions with Related Parties. Pursuant to the capital lease agreement, 95 West Co. and MLH agreed to provide a series of coordination agreements allowing HNS to operate SPACEWAY 3 at the 95° west longitude orbital slot where 95 West Co. and MLH have higher priority rights. As of March 31, 2009, the remaining debt balance under the capital lease was $5.8 million, which was included in Capital lease and other in the short-term and long-term debt tables above. The remaining payments under the capital lease are subject to conditions in the agreement including our ability to operate SPACEWAY 3, and are as follows: $0.75 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010 and $1.0 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2011 through 2016.
Note 9: | Financial Instruments |
Interest Rate Swap
The interest on the Term Loan Facility was at Adjusted LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk associated with the Term Loan Facility, the Company entered into the Swap Agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum. As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. The Company accounts for the Swap Agreement as a cash flow hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $4.5 million and an unrealized loss of $5.3 million, respectively, in other comprehensive income (loss) associated with the fair market valuation of the interest rate swap. The net interest paymentsHUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
based on the Swap Agreement and the Term Loan Facility are paid quarterly and estimated to be approximately $8.8 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2013 and $3.3 million for the year ending December 31, 2014. For each of the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $2.2 million interest expense on the Term Loan Facility.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The principal market, as prescribed by SFAS No. 157, is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability. If there is no principal market, the most advantageous market is used. This is the market in which the reporting entity would sell the asset or transfer the liability with the price that maximizes the amount that would be received for the asset or minimizes the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value should be based on assumptions market participants would make in pricing the asset or liability. Where available, fair value is based on observable quoted market prices or derived from observable market data. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are used (i.e. Black-Scholes or a binomial model).
Effective January 1, 2008, financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet were categorized based on the priority of the inputs used in the valuation technique to measure fair value. SFAS No. 157 established a three level fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.
Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.
As of March 31, 2009, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, net, other assets, accounts payable, and debt, except for the Senior Notes and the interest rate swap on the Term Loan Facility as described below, approximated their respective fair values. The carrying value and the fair value of our Senior Notes were $450.0 million and $414.0 million, respectively, at March 31, 2009.
Our Term Loan Facility originally had a variable interest rate based on observable interest rates plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate the variable interest rate risk, we entered into the Swap Agreement to swap the Adjusted LIBOR for a fixed interest rate of 5.12% per annum. As a result, the Term Loan Facility has a fixed interest rate of 7.62% per annum. The Company adjusts the value of the interest rate swap on a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate swap was a $12.9 million liability, included in Other long-term liabilities in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and was within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted fair value measurement for non-financial assets and liabilities. We had no non-financial assets or liabilities that were adjusted to fair value during the period ended March 31, 2009.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
On February 21, 2006, SkyTerra Communications, Inc. (“SkyTerra”) distributed (the “Distribution”) all of our outstanding shares of common stock to the common, non-voting common and preferred stockholders and Series 1-A and 2-A warrant holders of SkyTerra, which separated SkyTerra into two publicly traded companies. For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the Company’s results through the date of the Distribution were included in the consolidated returns filed by SkyTerra. Prior to the Distribution, SkyTerra had unused net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $227.2 million expiring in 2008 through 2025, and capital loss carryforwards of approximately $93.3 million expiring in 2006 through 2010. Following the issuance of a private letter ruling by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to whether an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code occurred during a period from 1999 through 2004, SkyTerra expects that its carryforwards will not be subject to such limitation and, therefore, will be available to offset future taxable income unless subject to other limitations. Following the Distribution, a portion of the SkyTerra NOL and capital loss carryforwards belong to the Company. The Company estimates that its share of the NOL carryforwards was approximately $128.5 million and its share of the capital loss carryforwards was approximately $3.3 million at the Distribution date.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company estimates that its remaining NOL carry-forwards are approximately $210.3 million and will expire, if unused, between the years 2012 and 2029 and its capital loss carry-forwards of approximately $12.0 million will expire, if unused, between 2010 and 2012.
Prior to the year ended December 31, 2005, due to SkyTerra’s operating losses and the uncertainty surrounding the ability of SkyTerra to realize its deferred tax assets, a full valuation allowance had been established related to the NOLs and capital loss carryforwards. As the Distribution did not qualify as a tax-free spin-off, SkyTerra generated significant taxable income in 2006 for federal and state income tax purposes. As the Company is the accounting successor to SkyTerra, the taxes associated with the Distribution were included in the Company’s results. In addition, due to the tax sharing agreement between SkyTerra and the Company (the “Tax Sharing Agreement”), the Company is responsible for all tax liabilities associated with the Distribution. According to SkyTerra’s 2006 income tax returns, the existing NOL and capital loss carry-forwards were sufficient to offset any income taxes payable on the gain from the Distribution, other than alternative minimum taxes (“AMT”) of $1.1 million.
In accordance with the Tax Sharing Agreement, the Company is currently entitled to the amount paid to Skyterra in excess of Skyterra’s AMT liability and will be entitled to the remaining $1.1 million reimbursement from SkyTerra at such time as SkyTerra realizes the benefit of the alternative minimum tax credit. This estimated reimbursement has been reflected on the Company’s books as a long-term receivable from SkyTerra. Because of the Company’s U.S. federal NOL carryforward position and full valuation allowance against the Company’s net deferred tax assets, our income tax expense represents taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries and state taxes. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a net income tax benefit of $0.7 million, which is attributable to an income tax benefit generated by our Indian subsidiary as a result of being engaged in telecommunications infrastructure development. Indian tax law provides for a deduction of 100% of profits and gains derived from qualifying infrastructure businesses for ten consecutive assessment years. Our income tax expense was $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s German and U.K. subsidiaries utilized $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of their NOL carry-forwards. Since they have not met the “more likely than not” criteria of SFAS No. 109, they maintain a full valuation allowance on their deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2009. Upon the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R) on January 1, 2009, any benefit realized from the reversal of the U.K. and German valuation allowance associated with the utilization of their respective deferred tax assets will be recorded as a reduction to income tax expense.
At the adoption of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, the Company identified $8.7 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions in prior periods. Through March 31, 2009, the Company has identified an additional $1.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits. If recognized, the total unrecognized tax benefits would impact the Company’s effective tax rate.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in operating expenses and penalties in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2009, because of its NOL carryforward position, the Company has not recorded any liability for the payment of interest or penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. Following is a description of the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions:
United States - Federal | | 1994 and forward |
United States - Various States | | 1994 and forward |
United Kingdom | | 2005 and forward |
Germany | | 2004 and forward |
Italy | | 2004 and forward |
India | | 1995 and forward |
Brazil | | 2003 and forward |
Note 12: | Employee Share-Based Payments |
2006 Equity and Incentive Plan
In January 2006, we adopted and our Board of Directors approved the 2006 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of equity-based awards, including restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock options, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based awards, as well as cash bonuses and long-term cash awards to directors, officers, employees, advisors and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries who are selected by our Compensation Committee for participation in the Plan. The Company recorded compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards, issued to members of our Board of Directors, our executives, a contractor and HNS’ employees, and restricted stock units, issued only to our international employees, after adjustment for forfeitures, of $0.8 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had $6.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, which is recognized over a weighted average life of 2.15 years.
Summaries of non-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units are as follows:
Restricted Stock Awards
| | Shares | | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 | | | 160,765 | | | $ | 45.51 | |
Issued | | | 90,000 | | | $ | 11.13 | |
Forfeited | | | (700 | ) | | $ | 45.02 | |
Vested | | | (10,349 | ) | | $ | 26.68 | |
Non-vested at March 31, 2009 | | | 239,716 | | | $ | 33.42 | |
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $11.13 per share and $48.58 per share, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $0.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively.HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Restricted Stock Units
| | Shares | | | Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |
Non-vested at December 31, 2008 | | | 8,350 | | | $ | 46.12 | |
Issued | | | 4,000 | | | $ | 8.82 | |
Non-vested at March 31, 2009 | | | 12,350 | | | $ | 34.04 | |
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $8.82 per unit. None of the restricted stock units vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009. None of the restricted stock units were granted or vested during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Stock Option Program
On April 24, 2008, the Company’s Compensation Committee made awards of stock options under the Plan (the “Stock Option Program”), which consisted of the issuance of non-qualified stock options to employees of HCI and its subsidiaries. A total of 700,000 options (the “Option Pool”) have been authorized under the Stock Option Program for option awards during the period of April 24, 2008 to December 31, 2009. The grant and exercise price of the stock options was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Any options forfeited or cancelled before exercise will be deposited back into the Option Pool and will become available for award under the Stock Option Program. In accordance with the terms of the Stock Option Program, the Compensation Committee delegated to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President of the Company the authority to award options, at his discretion, to the current and future employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. Each grant has a 10 year life and vests 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and 25% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model based on the assumptions noted in the table below.
Since the Company recently became a public registrant in February 2006 and does not have sufficient history to measure expected volatility using its own stock price history and does not have the history to compute the expected term of the stock options, the Company utilized an average volatility based on a group of companies identified as its peers until such time that the Company has adequate stock history of its own. The Company estimated the expected term of the stock, which is closely aligned with the identified peer group, based upon the current anticipated corporate growth, the currently identified market value of the stock price at issuance and the vesting schedule of the stock options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the published U.S. Treasury Yield Curve as of the grant date for the period of 5 years which most closely correlates to the expected term of the option award. Dividend yield is zero as the Company has not, nor does it currently plan to, issue dividends to its shareholders.
The key assumptions for the option awards are as follows:
| | | | Three Months Ended |
| | | | March 31, 2009 |
Volatility range | | | | 47.60% — 55.00% |
Weighted-average volatility | | | | 47.67% |
Expected term | | | | 5 years |
Risk-free interest rate range | | | | 1.50% — 3.15% |
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate | | | | 3.14% |
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
| | Option Shares | | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 | | | 552,400 | | | $ | 53.67 | | | | 9.32 | | | $ | - | |
Forfeited or expired | | | (500 | ) | | $ | 54.00 | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 | | | 551,900 | | | $ | 53.67 | | | | 9.07 | | | $ | - | |
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2009 | | | 496,710 | | | $ | 53.67 | | | | 9.07 | | | $ | - | |
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | | | | | | |
The compensation expense related to stock option awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period beginning on the date of grant. The Company recorded $0.8 million of compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and $9.3 million remained unrecognized at March 31, 2009 for non-vested stock options, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.07 years. No stock options vested during the current quarter.
HNS’ Bonus Unit Plan
In July 2005, HNS adopted an incentive bonus unit plan (the “Bonus Unit Plan”), pursuant to which HNS’ bonus units were granted to certain employees of the Company. The bonus units provide for time vesting over five years and are subject to a participant’s continued employment with HNS. Pursuant to the Bonus Unit Plan, if participants in the Bonus Unit Plan are employed by HNS at the time of the predetermined exchange dates, they are entitled to exchange their vested bonus units for shares of our common stock. The first exchange occurred on July 15, 2008, when approximately 1.9 million bonus units were exchanged for 192,399 shares of our common stock. The number of our common stock shares to be issued upon each exchange is calculated based upon the fair market value of the vested bonus unit divided by the average closing trading price of our common stock for the 20 business days immediately preceding the date of the exchange. The fair value of the bonus units on the grant date was approximately $1.2 million, after adjustment for a 13% estimated forfeiture rate, based on the estimated increase in the fair market value of HNS’ net equity at the time of the grant.
On September 19, 2008, HNS issued 310,000 bonus units to certain of its employees pursuant to the terms of the Bonus Unit Plan. The fair value of the new issuance of bonus units was determined using a forward pricing model. The total estimated compensation expense for the new issuance of bonus units is $1.7 million, after adjustment for a 10% estimated forfeiture rate. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R), the Company amortizes the compensation expense of the Bonus Unit Plan over the vesting period beginning on the date of grant. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized $0.2 million of compensation expense. The Company recognized minimal compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008. There were no bonus units issued or forfeited during the first quarter of 2009. As of March 31, 2009, there were 2.5 million non-vested bonus units outstanding.
HNS Class B Membership Interests
Class B membership interests in HNS were issued to certain members of our senior management, two of HNS’ former senior management and a member of our Board of Directors and HNS’ Board of Managers. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, HNS determined that the Class B membership interests had nominal value at the date of grant, and minimal compensation expense was recorded for each of the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. There were no Class B membership interests issued or forfeited during the first quarter of 2009. As of March 31, 2009, there were 3,656 outstanding Class B membership interests.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 13: | Long-Term Cash Incentive Retention Program |
In connection with the April 22, 2005 transaction between DIRECTV Group (“DIRECTV”) and SkyTerra, HNS established the Long-Term Cash Incentive Retention Program (the “Retention Plan”), a one-time employee retention program, which was designed to retain a select group of employees chosen by HNS’ senior management. The Retention Plan provides that participants will receive a cash payout equal to each participant’s individual target bonus amount if (i) the individual remains employed by HNS on the vesting date of April 22, 2009 and (ii) HNS successfully attains its earnings goal for 2008.
In accordance with the Retention Plan, HNS established the earnings goal in March 2008, which was equivalent to HNS’ planned 2008 Adjusted EBITDA, defined as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization further adjusted to exclude certain adjustments consistent with the definition used in calculating HNS’ covenant compliance under its credit agreements and the indenture governing the Senior Notes. HNS successfully attained 100% of its Adjusted EBITDA goal for 2008. As of March 31, 2009, the Company accrued the maximum payout under the Retention Plan of $14.1 million, which was paid to participants on April 24, 2009.
Note 14: | Transactions with Related Parties |
In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into transactions with related parties to purchase and/or sell telecommunications services, equipment, and inventory. Related parties include all entities that are controlled by Apollo Management, L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Apollo”), our controlling stockholder.
Smart & Final, Inc. (“Smart & Final”)
As of March 31, 2009, Apollo owned, directly or indirectly, 95% of Smart & Final. We provide broadband products and services to Smart & Final.
Hughes Systique
HNS has contracted with Hughes Systique for software development services. In addition to our 45.23% ownership in Hughes Systique, our CEO and President and his brother, who is the CEO and President of Hughes Systique, in the aggregate, owned approximately 25.61%, on an undiluted basis, of Hughes Systique’s outstanding shares as of March 31, 2009. Furthermore, our CEO and President and Jeffrey A. Leddy, a member of our Board of Directors and HNS’ Board of Managers, serve on the board of directors of Hughes Systique. As a result of the Termination Agreement, we are required to consolidate Hughes Systique’s results of operations in our operating results. For a description of additional transactions entered into between the Company and Hughes Systique, see Note 3—Hughes Systique Corporation.
Intelsat Holdings Limited (“Intelsat”)
The Company and its subsidiaries lease satellite transponder capacity from Intelsat. In addition, our Italian subsidiary, Hughes Network Systems, S.r.L., entered into a cooperation agreement with Intelsat, Telespazio and Telecom Italia. Under this agreement, the parties are cooperating to provide broadband satellite services for Italian businesses operating in Eastern Europe and North Africa. Effective February 4, 2008, Apollo divested its entire ownership interest in Intelsat, and as a result, Intelsat is no longer a related party.
Agreement with 95 West Co., Inc.
In July 2006, HNS entered into an agreement with 95 West Co. and its parent, MLH, pursuant to which 95 West Co. and MLH agreed to provide a series of coordination agreements which allow HNS to operate SPACEWAY 3 at an orbital position where such parties have higher-priority rights. Jeffery A. Leddy, a member of our Board of Directors and HNS’ Board of Managers, is the managing director of 95 West Co. and MLH and also owns a small interest in each. Andrew Africk, another member of our Board of Directors and HNS’ Board of Managers, is also a director of MLH. As part of theHUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
agreement, HNS agreed to pay $9.3 million, in annual installments of $0.3 million in 2006, $0.75 million in each year between 2007 and 2010 and $1.0 million in each year between 2011 and 2016 for the use of the orbital position, subject to conditions in the agreement including HNS’ ability to operate SPACEWAY 3. As of March 31, 2009, the remaining debt balance under the capital lease was $5.8 million, which was included in Capital lease and other in the short-term and long-term debt tables included in Note 8.
Agreement with Hughes Telematics, Inc.
In July 2006, HNS granted a limited license to Hughes Telematics, Inc. (“HTI”) allowing HTI to use the HUGHES trademark. The license is limited in that HTI may use the HUGHES trademark only in connection with its business of automotive telematics and only in combination with the TELEMATICS name. As partial consideration for the license, the agreement provides that HNS will be HTI’s preferred engineering services provider. The license is royalty-free, except that HTI has agreed to pay a royalty to HNS in the event HTI no longer has a commercial or affiliated relationship with HNS. As contemplated by the license terms, HNS has commenced providing development services and equipment to HTI.
In October 2007, HNS entered into an agreement with HTI and a customer of HTI, whereby HNS agreed to assume the rights and performance obligations of HTI in the event that HTI fails to perform its obligations due to a fundamental cause such as bankruptcy or the cessation of its telematics business. In connection with that agreement, HNS and HTI have entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which HTI has agreed to take certain actions to enable HNS to assume HTI’s obligations in the event that such action is required. However, as a result of the Merger, as defined and described below, HNS’ obligations to HTI and its customer expired when HTI became a public company with an initial market capitalization value greater than $350.0 million.
In January 2008, HNS entered into an agreement with HTI, pursuant to which HNS is developing an automotive telematics system for HTI, comprising the telematics system hub and the Telematics Control Unit (“TCU”), which will serve as the user appliance in the telematics system. The agreement also provides that, subject to certain specified performance conditions, HNS will serve as the exclusive manufacturer and supplier of TCU’s for HTI.
On March 12, 2009, we invested $13.0 million in the convertible preferred stock of Hughes Telematics, Inc. (“HTI Preferred Stock”) as part of a $50.0 million private placement of HTI Preferred Stock. In connection with the merger of HTI with Polaris Acquisition Corp. (the “Merger”), which occurred on March 31, 2009, wherein HTI became a publicly traded company, our outstanding HTI Preferred Stock converted into HTI common stock, subject to a six-month lock-up. As a result of the Merger, our investment represents approximately 5.4% of HTI’s outstanding common stock, before giving effect to the “earn-out” discussed below. In connection with the Merger, we also received certain additional common shares of HTI that are subject to achievement of certain “earn-out” targets by HTI over five years. If the full earn-out is achieved, our investment could represent approximately 3.8% of HTI’s outstanding, unrestricted common stock. In addition to the risk and valuation fluctuations associated with the “earn-out” target, the carrying value of the investment in HTI may be subject to fair value adjustments in future reporting periods.
HTI is controlled by an affiliate of Apollo. Jeffrey A. Leddy, a member of HNS’ Board of Managers and our Board of Directors, is the CEO and a director of HTI and owns approximately 0.5% of HTI’s equity as of March 31, 2009. In addition, Andrew Africk, another member of HNS’ Board of Managers and our Board of Directors, is a director of HTI and a senior partner of Apollo.
Other
Certain members of our Board of Directors and officers serve on the board of directors of some of our affiliates. In some cases, such directors and officers have received stock-based compensation from such affiliates for their service. In those cases, the amount of stock-based compensation received by the directors and officers is comparable to stock-based compensation awarded to other non-executive members of the affiliates’ board of directors.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Related Party Transactions
Sales and purchase transactions with related parties are as follows (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Sales: | | | | | | |
HTI | | $ | 7,068 | | | $ | 6,107 | |
Smart & Final | | | 152 | | | | 207 | |
Total sales | | $ | 7,220 | | | $ | 6,314 | |
Purchases: | | | | | | | | |
Hughes Systique(1) | | $ | 1,591 | | | $ | 2,031 | |
Intelsat(2) | | | - | | | | 10,074 | |
Total purchases | | $ | 1,591 | | | $ | 12,105 | |
(1) For the period after March 11, 2009, Hughes Systique's results of operations are consolidated with the Company's operating results. | |
(2) Subsequent to February 4, 2008, Intelsat is no longer a related party. | | | | | | | |
Assets and liabilities resulting from transactions with related parties are as follows (in thousands):
| | March 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Due from related parties: | | | | | | |
HTI | | $ | 1,077 | | | $ | 6,734 | |
Smart & Final | | | 44 | | | | 30 | |
Total due from related parties | | $ | 1,121 | | | $ | 6,764 | |
Due to related party: | | | | | | | | |
Hughes Systique(1) | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,507 | |
Total due to related party | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,507 | |
(1) For the period after March 11, 2009, Hughes Systique's results of operations are consolidated with the Company's operating results. | |
We have four reportable segments, which we operate and manage as strategic business units and organize by products and services. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on operating earnings of the respective segments. Our business segments include: (i) the North America Broadband segment; (ii) the International Broadband segment; (iii) the Telecom Systems segment; and (iv) the Corporate and Other segment. The North America Broadband segment consists of the Consumer group, which delivers broadband internet service to consumer customers, and the Enterprise group, which provides satellite, wire line and wireless communication networks and services to enterprises. The International Broadband segment consists of the Enterprise group, which includes our international service companies. The international Enterprise group provides satellite, wire line and wireless communication networks and services to enterprise customers worldwide. The Telecom Systems segment consists of the Mobile Satellite Systems group, the Telematics group, and the Terrestrial Microwave group. The Mobile Satellite Systems group provides turnkey satellite ground segment systems to mobile system operators. The Telematics group provides development services and equipment to HTI and certain of its customers. The Terrestrial Microwave group provides point-to-multipoint microwave radio network systems that enable mobile operators to connect their cell sites and fixed operators to provide wireless broadband services. The Corporate and Other segment includes various minor investments held by the Company, including Hughes Systique, our corporate offices and assets not specifically related to another business segment.
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
There are no intersegment transactions. Selected financial information for our operating segments is as follows (in thousands):
| | North America Broadband | | | International Broadband | | | Telecom Systems | | | Corporate and Other | | | Consolidated | |
As of or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 165,608 | | | $ | 44,884 | | | $ | 29,262 | | | $ | 461 | | | $ | 240,215 | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 1,750 | | | $ | 1,231 | | | $ | 5,489 | | | $ | (107 | ) | | $ | 8,363 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 18,185 | | | $ | 2,708 | | | $ | 967 | | | $ | 33 | | | $ | 21,893 | |
Assets | | $ | 641,150 | | | $ | 174,992 | | | $ | 59,684 | | | $ | 298,393 | | | $ | 1,174,219 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 24,844 | | | $ | 3,324 | | | $ | 457 | | | $ | 2,391 | | | $ | 31,016 | |
As of or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 156,790 | | | $ | 44,596 | | | $ | 35,634 | | | $ | 140 | | | $ | 237,160 | |
Operating income (loss) | | $ | 5,022 | | | $ | 433 | | | $ | 4,589 | | | $ | (738 | ) | | $ | 9,306 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 7,677 | | | $ | 2,143 | | | $ | 890 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,710 | |
Assets | | $ | 624,023 | | | $ | 202,899 | | | $ | 66,308 | | | $ | 220,792 | | | $ | 1,114,022 | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | 20,146 | | | $ | 3,173 | | | $ | 567 | | | $ | 2,444 | | | $ | 26,330 | |
Comprehensive loss is as follows (in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended | |
| | March 31, | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (4,328 | ) | | $ | 701 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (1,407 | ) | | | 187 | |
Reclassification of realized gain (loss) on hedging instruments | | | (854 | ) | | | 19 | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging instruments | | | 5,337 | | | | (5,236 | ) |
Unrealized gains on securities | | | - | | | | 79 | |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 3,076 | | | | (4,951 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | | | (1,252 | ) | | | (4,250 | ) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest | | | (368 | ) | | | (45 | ) |
Comprehensive loss attributable to HCI | | $ | (1,620 | ) | | $ | (4,295 | ) |
Note 17: | Commitments and Contingencies |
Litigation
The Company is periodically involved in litigation in the ordinary course of its business involving claims regarding intellectual property infringement, product liability, property damage, personal injury, contracts, employment and worker’s compensation. We do not believe that there are any such pending or threatened legal proceedings, including ordinary litigation incidental to the conduct of our business and the ownership of our properties that, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
On June 28, 2007, HNS initiated an arbitration proceeding against Sea Launch Limited Partnership and Sea Launch
Company, LLC (collectively, “Sea Launch”) with the American Arbitration Association seeking a refund of $44.4 million in payments made to Sea Launch under a Launch Services Agreement (“LSA”). This dispute stems from the material failure of a Sea Launch rocket that occurred on January 30, 2007. Sea Launch was scheduled to launch HNS’ SPACEWAY 3 in May 2007; however, following the January 30, 2007 rocket failure, there was substantial uncertainty about when Sea Launch would return to flight. As a result, HNS made alternative arrangements with another launch services provider to launch SPACEWAY 3 in August 2007. In accordance with the LSA, HNS sent a notice of termination to Sea Launch and was entitled to a refund of the $44.4 million in payments made to Sea Launch in anticipation of the SPACEWAY 3 launch. Sea Launch refused to refund HNS’ payments and alleged that HNS breached the LSA by entering into a contract with another launch services provider and that the January 30, 2007 explosion of a Sea Launch rocket constituted an “excusable delay” under the LSA. HNS’ arbitration filing was based on breach of contract. HNS believed that Sea Launch’s purported justifications for refusing to refund the $44.4 million were without merit and that HNS was contractually entitled to a full refund of its payments under the express terms of the LSA.
In October 2008, Hughes Telecommunicaçoes do Brasil Ltda. (“HTB”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HNS, received a tax assessment of approximately $4.4 million from the State of São Paulo Treasury Department. The tax assessment alleges that HTB failed to pay certain import taxes to the State of São Paulo. The Company does not believe the assessment is valid and plans to dispute the State of São Paulo’s claims and to defend itself vigorously against these allegations. Therefore, the Company has not recorded a liability. It is the opinion of management that such litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is contingently liable under standby letters of credit and bonds in the aggregate amount of $18.7 million that were undrawn at March 31, 2009. Of this amount, $3.6 million were issued under the Revolving Credit Facility; $1.6 million were secured by restricted cash; $0.9 million related to insurance bonds; and $12.6 million were secured by letters of credit issued under credit arrangements available to our Indian and Brazilian subsidiaries. Certain letters of credit issued by our Indian subsidiaries are secured by those entities’ assets. As of March 31, 2009, these obligations were scheduled to expire as follows: $9.3 million in 2009; $5.5 million in 2010; $1.4 million in 2011; and $2.5 million in 2012 and thereafter.
On March 19, 2009, the Company offered participants in the Stock Option Program the opportunity to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) all or a portion of their eligible outstanding stock options for new stock options, on a one-for-one basis, through an exchange offer, which expired on April 16, 2009. Each new option (the “New Option”) has an exercise price of $14.47, which was the closing price of our common stock on April 15, 2009, and a new vesting schedule to reflect the new grant date of April 16, 2009.
As a result of the Exchange Offer, which was completed on April 16, 2009, 546,900 outstanding stock options (representing 100% participation) were exchanged, and the estimated fair value of the New Options of $2.3 million was computed using the Black-Scholes option valuation model based on the new grant date. The compensation expense related to the New Options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the four-year vesting period beginning on the date of grant.
On August 8, 2007, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, as amended on November 15, 2007, to register shares of our common stock, preferred stock, and warrants and debt securities and non-convertible debt securities of HNS and HNS Finance Corp., a finance subsidiary which is HNS’s wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Co-Issuer”), as co issuers. In connection with any future issuance of debt securities of HNS and the Co-Issuer, we will, and one or more of our other subsidiaries may, on a joint and several basis, offer full and unconditional guarantees of the obligations of HNS and the Co-Issuer under such debt securities. The registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on November 19, 2007.
In lieu of providing separate unaudited financial statements of HNS, the Co-Issuers and HNS’ guarantor subsidiaries, condensed financial statements prepared in accordance with Rule 3-10 and Rule 5-04 of Regulation S-X are presented below. The column marked “Parent” represents the Company’s results. The column marked “Subsidiary Issuer” represents the results of HNS. The column marked “Guarantor Subsidiaries” includes the results of HNS’ guarantor subsidiaries and the Co-Issuer, which is a co-issuer of HNS’ Senior Notes and which had no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows for the periods presented. The column marked “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries” includes the results of non-guarantor subsidiaries of the Company and HNS. Eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis for the periods presented are included in the column so labeled. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning the Co-Issuer and HNS’ Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because management has determined that they are not material to investors.
The following represents the supplemental condensed financial statements of the Company, HNS, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-guarantor Subsidiaries. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.