UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
¨ | Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-51669
STERLING MINING COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
IDAHO | | 82-0300575 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
2201 N. Government Way, Ste. E, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
(208) 666-4070
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) (check one)
Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer x Non-Accelerated Filer ¨ Smaller Reporting Company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 39,439,974 shares of common stock as of August 6, 2008.
STERLING MINING COMPANY
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
-2-
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements |
STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30 2008 | | | December 31 2007 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 826,780 | | | $ | 6,145,385 | |
Marketable securities | | | 524,163 | | | | 1,284,711 | |
Accounts receivable | | | 712,951 | | | | 570,650 | |
Inventories | | | 1,772,947 | | | | 1,364,941 | |
Prepaid expenses and deposits | | | 1,557,939 | | | | 874,630 | |
Other current assets | | | 97,255 | | | | 257,536 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 5,492,035 | | | | 10,497,853 | |
| | | | | | | | |
INVESTMENTS | | | | | | | | |
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries | | | 4,509,252 | | | | 4,407,343 | |
Long-term investments and other investments | | | 219,313 | | | | 1,283,628 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total investments | | | 4,728,565 | | | | 5,690,971 | |
| | | | | | | | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | 28,324,041 | | | | 25,025,694 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion | | | (1,529,935 | ) | | | (536,494 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total property and equipment | | | 26,794,106 | | | | 24,489,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Prepaid long-term leases | | | 863,678 | | | | 905,192 | |
Other assets | | | 277,053 | | | | 275,039 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 38,155,437 | | | $ | 41,858,255 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 4,625,379 | | | $ | 2,042,238 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 964,436 | | | | 1,472,656 | |
Notes payable-current portion | | | 3,477,862 | | | | 477,862 | |
Capital lease liability-current portion | | | 1,171,241 | | | | 850,957 | |
Unearned revenue | | | 120,176 | | | | 459,535 | |
Debenture payable | | | 100,000 | | | | — | |
Other current liabilities | | | 235,358 | | | | 40,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 10,694,452 | | | | 5,343,973 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Notes payable | | | 30,292 | | | | 41,901 | |
Debentures payable | | | — | | | | 100,000 | |
Capital lease liability | | | 1,970,633 | | | | 1,476,987 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total long-term liabilities | | | 2,000,925 | | | | 1,618,888 | |
| | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $0.05 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized, 39,439,974 and 38,698,828 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | | | 1,971,999 | | | | 1,934,941 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 73,617,436 | | | | 71,479,310 | |
Common stock issuable | | | 158,500 | | | | — | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (49,339,311 | ) | | | (38,681,700 | ) |
Accumulated comprehensive income | | | (948,564 | ) | | | 162,843 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 25,460,060 | | | | 34,895,394 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | $ | 38,155,437 | | | $ | 41,858,255 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying condensed notes to interim financial statements.
-3-
STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30 2008 | | | Three Months Ended June 30 2007 | | | Six Months Ended June 30 2008 | | | Six Months Ended June 30 2007 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ | 3,011,055 | | | $ | 213,616 | | | $ | 4,328,853 | | | $ | 403,603 | |
Lease and contract income | | | 59,769 | | | | 640,535 | | | | 121,703 | | | | 641,885 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 3,070,824 | | | $ | 854,151 | | | $ | 4,450,556 | | | $ | 1,045,488 | |
COSTS AND EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Production costs applicable to sales | | | 2,270,980 | | | | 265,208 | | | | 3,252,432 | | | | 513,369 | |
Exploration | | | 716,490 | | | | 642,663 | | | | 1,475,777 | | | | 940,046 | |
Mine rehabilitation | | | 2,899,770 | | | | 1,751,972 | | | | 6,615,188 | | | | 2,996,321 | |
General and administrative | | | 1,079,158 | | | | 1,731,038 | | | | 3,206,921 | | | | 2,677,810 | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization | | | 710,659 | | | | 46,358 | | | | 993,441 | | | | 60,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 7,677,057 | | | | 4,437,239 | | | | 15,543,759 | | | | 7,188,153 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS | | | (4,606,233 | ) | | | (3,583,088 | ) | | | (11,093,203 | ) | | | (6,142,665 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain (loss) on investments | | | 365,223 | | | | 39,643 | | | | 1,010,734 | | | | 276,988 | |
Interest and dividends | | | (1,961 | ) | | | 17,553 | | | | 36,775 | | | | 53,640 | |
Interest (expense) | | | (322,664 | ) | | | (18,566 | ) | | | (325,001 | ) | | | (35,151 | ) |
Gain (loss) on exchange | | | (393,945 | ) | | | 6,394 | | | | (326,798 | ) | | | (73,628 | ) |
Other income | | | (11,966 | ) | | | — | | | | 5,034 | | | | (746 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense) | | | (365,313 | ) | | | 45,024 | | | | 400,744 | | | | 221,103 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | (4,971,546 | ) | | | (3,538,064 | ) | | | (10,692,459 | ) | | | (5,921,562 | ) |
INCOME TAXES | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | | | (4,971,546 | ) | | | (3,538,064 | ) | | | (10,692,459 | ) | | | (5,921,562 | ) |
GAIN (LOSS) FROM EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS | | | — | | | | (1,062 | ) | | | 34,846 | | | | 554 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | | | (4,971,546 | ) | | | (3,539,126 | ) | | | (10,657,613 | ) | | | (5,921,008 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments | | | (1,116,107 | ) | | | (516,587 | ) | | | (1,111,407 | ) | | | (375,520 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | (6,087,653 | ) | | $ | (4,055,713 | ) | | $ | (11,769,020 | ) | | $ | (6,296,528 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and fully diluted loss per Share | | $ | (0.13 | ) | | $ | (0.12 | ) | | $ | (0.27 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | | 38,698,828 | | | | 29,890,900 | | | | 38,943,834 | | | | 29,578,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying condensed notes to interim financial statements.
-4-
STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | (unaudited) | | | (unaudited) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (10,657,613 | ) | | $ | (5,921,008 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | | 993,441 | | | | 60,607 | |
Stock issued for services and leases | | | — | | | | 431,130 | |
Stock option expense | | | 398,193 | | | | — | |
(Gain) loss on investments | | | (1,010,734 | ) | | | (276,988 | ) |
(Gain) loss on investment in equity method subsidiaries | | | (34,846 | ) | | | (554 | ) |
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange | | | 326,798 | | | | — | |
Payments for lease expenses with stock | | | 158,500 | | | | 25,346 | |
(Increase) decrease in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (142,301 | ) | | | 8,972 | |
Inventories | | | (408,006 | ) | | | (116,056 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | | | (641,795 | ) | | | (354,213 | ) |
Other current assets | | | 158,267 | | | | (69,660 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 2,583,141 | | | | 977,382 | |
Accrued expenses | | | (508,220 | ) | | | 217,193 | |
Unearned revenue | | | (339,359 | ) | | | — | |
Other current liabilities | | | 190,616 | | | | (157,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash used by operating activities | | | (8,933,918 | ) | | | (5,175,094 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of investments | | | (210,433 | ) | | | (644,696 | ) |
Proceeds from investments | | | 1,910,497 | | | | 484,555 | |
Investment in property, plant and equipment | | | (2,132,386 | ) | | | (8,876,127 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | | | (432,322 | ) | | | (9,036,268 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales of common stock net of costs | | | 1,776,991 | | | | 11,339,443 | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants | | | — | | | | 18,750 | |
Proceeds from notes payable | | | 2,988,391 | | | | — | |
Payment of notes & leases payable | | | (717,747 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities: | | | 4,047,635 | | | | 11,358,193 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | �� | (5,318,605 | ) | | | (2,853,169 | ) |
Cash beginning of period | | | 6,145,385 | | | | 3,054,582 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | 826,780 | | | $ | 201,413 | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES: | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Interest paid | | $ | 276,701 | | | $ | 35,151 | |
| | | | | | | | |
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock issued for leases | | $ | — | | | $ | 156,500 | |
Common stock issuable issued for land | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,362,500 | |
Acquisition of capital lease equipment | | $ | 1,529,354 | | | $ | — | |
See accompanying condensed notes to interim financial statements.
-5-
STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, JUNE 30, 2008
Sterling Mining Company (“Sterling” or the “Company”) is engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, developing, and mining mineral properties, primarily those containing silver and associated base and precious metals The Company’s operating mines are the Sunshine Mine in Idaho and the San Acacio-Barones (“Barones”) silver project in Mexico. The Company has exploration projects in Idaho, Montana, and Mexico. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho on February 3, 1903. The Company is headquartered at 2201 N. Government Way, Ste. E, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814.
Note 1: Basis of Presentation of Financial Statements
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, consolidated statements of cash flows and notes to interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sterling Mining Company and its consolidated subsidiary. Management has made all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes as set forth in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The results of operations for the periods presented may not be indicative of those which may be expected for a full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted as permitted by GAAP.
Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to GAAP and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.
Accounting Method
The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with GAAP.
Accounts Receivable
The Company carries its accounts receivable at net realizable value. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its accounts receivable and determines if an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary, based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit conditions.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations and conditional asset retirement obligations in according with SFAS 143, FIN 47 and U.S. GAAP.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Compensated Absences
Employees of the Company may be paid vacation, sick, and personal days off. The Company accrued $40,725 in 2007 for compensated absences expense. The Company did not accrue any additional expense during the first or second quarter of 2008 because management has deemed that any additional liability arising from these provisions in the future would be immaterial.
Concentration of Risk
The Company maintains its domestic cash in several commercial banks in Coeur d’Alene and Wallace, Idaho. Accounts are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $100,000. The Company also maintains cash in a Mexican bank. The Mexican accounts, one denominated in dollars and one denominated in pesos, are considered to be uninsured.
Derivative Instruments
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (hereinafter “SFAS No. 133”) as amended by SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB No. 133”, and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” These statements establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an Amendment of FASB Standards No. 133 and 140.”
-6-
If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized as income in the period of change.
Historically, the Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks.
The Company issued one convertible debenture in 2007 which did not give rise to derivative instruments.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighing them by the amount of time that they were outstanding. Diluted net loss is the same basis net loss per share, as the inclusion of common stock equivalents would be antidilutive.
Equity Method
The Company applies the equity method to account for investments for which it has significant influence upon the investee, according to APB Opinion 18 and subsequent pronouncements.
During 2007 the Company acquired significant influence in Merger Mines Corporation and began accounting for its investment in Merger Mines Corporation using the equity method. The value of the Company’s investment in Merger Mines Corporation increased to approximately $1.5 million as of June 30, 2008. Sterling owns 44% of the voting shares of common stock issued and outstanding by Merger.
During 2006 the Company acquired significant influence in Chester Mining Company and began accounting for its investment in Chester Mining Company using the equity method. Sterling owns 48% of the voting shares of common stock issued and outstanding by Chester. The value of the Company’s investment in Chester Mining Company increased to approximately $3.0 million as of June 30, 2008.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
At least annually, management reviews the reserves used to estimate the quantities and grades of ore at the Company’s mines which management believes can be recovered and sold economically. Management’s calculations of proven and probable ore reserves are based on in-house engineering and geological assessments using current operating costs, metals prices and, when applicable, third-party audits of the Company’s reserves.
Exploration Costs
In accordance with GAAP, the Company expenses exploration costs as incurred.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). The provisions of SFAS 157 are applicable to all of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a new framework for measuring fair value and expands related disclosures. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS 157 are described below.
| | |
Level 1: | | Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. The Company’s Level 1 assets include cash equivalents, primarily securities in active markets and institutional money market funds, whose carrying value represents fair value because of their short-term maturities of the investments held by these funds. |
Level 2: | | Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. The Company’s Level 2 assets represent securities that are traded in active markets but are restricted shares, and small cap mining stocks that are not traded in active markets. |
-7-
| | |
Level 3: | | Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data. The Company’s Level 3 assets represent options and warrants in small cap mining stocks. Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method and consideration for the risk of loss of value. |
Foreign Currency Transactions
The Company created a Mexican subsidiary during 2004 for the purpose of exploration and exploitation of silver bearing minerals in Mexico. The Company translates into United States dollars the assets and liabilities of its Mexico subsidiary according to GAAP. The Company translates into United States dollars the revenues, expenses, gains and losses of its Mexican subsidiary at the transaction date and records them according to GAAP. Management has concluded that for the purposes of financial reporting, the functional currency of the Mexican subsidiary is the United States dollar. Consequently, management uses the temporal method of foreign currency translation.
Inventories
Metals inventories are carried at the lower of current market value or average unit cost. Production costs include the cost of direct labor and materials, depreciation, amortization, and overhead costs relating to mining and processing activities. Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or fair market value. The inventories balance at June 30, 2008 and 2007 represented supplies inventory and, minerals inventory in Idaho and Mexico and silver coins and other inventory in Idaho.
Mineral Development Costs
The Company will capitalize property acquisition costs for undeveloped mineral interests that have significant potential to develop an economic ore body. The Company will amortize the capital costs based on proven and probable ore reserves if an economic ore body is developed. If an economic ore body is not discovered, previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the property does not contain an economic ore body. Costs to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and will be amortized on a unit of production basis over proven and probable reserves. Gains and losses on the sales or retirement of assets are recorded as other income or expense.
Prepaid Expenses
The Company’s current prepaid expenses primarily consist of prepaid insurance premiums, pre-payment to the utility company, and prepaid lease payments which are paid for up to a year in advance. Prepaid lease payments for periods beyond one year are considered other non-current assets. Non-current assets are primarily comprised of the Sunshine Mine lease and the 20 year Barones lease which was prepaid in 2004 and is being amortized over the 20 year lease term.
Minority Interest
The Company owns 99% of its Mexico subsidiary, Sterling Mining de Mexico S.A. de C.V. The 1% minority in the subsidiary is owned by an individual. A minority interest is not shown on the balance sheet because there is a negative value to the capital account of the minority interest holder. Additionally, the minority holder is not expected to make additional capital contributions.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiary after elimination of inter-company accounts and transactions. The majority-owned subsidiary of the Company is named above.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. The Company accounts for equipment under capital lease agreements according to FAS 13 “Accounting for Leases” and subsequent pronouncements.
Provision for Taxes
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, no obligations remain and collectability is considered probable. The passing of title to the customer is based on terms of sales contracts. Revenues from leases are recognized when realized and earned according to the lease provisions and receipt of the lease payments. The Company recognizes revenue from coin sales when title passes, which is typically when cash is received in exchange for the coins. When the Mexican subsidiary sells precipitate, revenue is recognized when payment is reported by the refining plant. Advance payments in Mexico are recorded as deferred revenue.
-8-
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains on items for which the fair value option has been elected are to be reported in earnings. SFAS 159 will become effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Management has not determined yet the effect that adoption of SFAS 159 may have on our results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (“SFAS 160”), Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (“SFAS 141R”), Business Combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, goodwill acquired in the business combination, or a gain from a bargain purchase. SFAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008
Note 3: Marketable Securities and Investments
The Company’s investment portfolio consists primarily of small-cap mining stocks, options and warrants.
The Company’s investments in securities are classified as either trading, held to maturity, or available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not own any securities classified as trading or held to maturity, but did own securities classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities consist of equity securities not classified as trading securities or as securities to be held to maturity.
Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported as a net amount in a separate component of other comprehensive income. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the average cost method and are included in earnings. The Company determines the gain or loss on investment securities held as available-for-sale, based upon the accumulated cost basis of specific investment accounts. Certain “other investments” are in companies with very limited volume and stable trading prices. Thus, fair market values tend to shift only fractionally.
On the Company’s balance sheet, short-term available for sale securities are classified as “marketable securities.” Long-term available-for-sale securities and other investments are classified as “investments.”
Options and warrants are recorded at fair market value, calculated using a conventional Black Scholes pricing model. Assumptions made in estimating the fair value include the risk-free interest rate, volatility and expected life. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the average volatility ranged from 47% to 121%. Expected life used was the number of days to expiration. The risk-free interest rate used was the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-free rate most closely corresponding to the option or warrant lifetime. Management used risk free rates between 2.42% and 4.74% for the periods presented. The Company has adjusted its methodology in valuing options and warrants held as investments. If the exercise price of the option or warrant was greater than the market price on June 30 then the value of the option or warrant was written to zero ($0) because there would be no market for those financial instruments in the market place.
The changes in marketable securities, long-term investments, and investments-other during the three months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | | Fair Value at March 31, 2008 | | Plus Purchases | | Less Sales at Cost | | | Plus (Less) Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | (Less) Impairments | | Fair Value at June 30, 2008 | | Fair Value at December 31, 2007 |
Investments Long-Term | | $ | 788,393 | | $ | 5,597 | | $ | (146,520 | ) | | $ | (428,157 | ) | | $ | — | | $ | 219,313 | | $ | 989,328 |
Investments Other | | | 207,321 | | | — | | | — | | | | (207,321 | ) | | | — | | | — | | | 294,299 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments | | | 995,714 | | | 5,597 | | | (146,520 | ) | | | (635,478 | ) | | | — | | | 219,313 | | | 1,283,627 |
Marketable Securities | | | 1,505,567 | | | 226,411 | | | (727,186 | ) | | | (480,629 | ) | | | — | | | 524,163 | | | 1,284,712 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 2,501,281 | | $ | 232,008 | | $ | (873,706 | ) | | $ | (1,116,107 | ) | | $ | — | | $ | 743,476 | | $ | 2,568,339 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | |
At June 30, 2008, the total basis of marketable securities and investments was $1,692,040. Total accumulated unrealized losses were $948,564 and the total fair market value was $743,476.
At December 31, 2007, the total basis of marketable securities and investments was $2,405,496. Total accumulated unrealized gains were $162,843 and the total fair market value was $2,568,339.
-9-
Note 4: Income Tax
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.
At June 30, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets, calculated at an expected rate of 34%, of approximately $11,150,000, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at June 30, 2008.
The Company’s deferred tax assets are estimated as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2008 | | | December 31, 2007 | |
Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 32,790,000 | | | $ | 22,256,000 | |
Deferred tax asset | | $ | 11,150,000 | | | $ | 7,567,000 | |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance | | | (11,150,000 | ) | | | (7,567,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
At June 30, 2008, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $32,790,000, which expire in the years 2018 through 2027.
The change in the allowance account from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008 was approximately $3,583,000.
Note 5: Inventories
The Company uses the first-in-first-out method of inventory valuation.
Inventories in the United States consist of silver concentrate, metal inventory, supply inventory, and silver coins and other inventory for sale. Inventories in Mexico consist primarily of silver concentrate and precipitate. Other components of inventory are copper, reagents, gravel and work in process.
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the concentrate and precipitate in Mexico was either on-site, in transit, or at the refinery. The concentrate, from the Sunshine Mine, was either on-site or in transit.
Note 6: Property Plant and Equipment
During the first half of the year the Company acquired nine pieces of underground mining equipment under a capital lease agreement.
The Company conducts a major part of its operation with leased equipment. These equipment leases, which are for two to five years each, expiring from 2009 to 2013, are classified as capital leases. Each lease contains the option for the Company, after the initial lease term, to purchase the property at approximately 15% of the purchase price.
The rental payments under most leases are based on the remaining balance, after an initial down payment of 40%. The first and last month payments are due at the beginning of the lease term and do not reduce the balance used to calculate the minimum lease payment, resulting in implicit interest rates of approximately 20%.
The following is an analysis of the leased property under capital leases by major classes:
| | | | |
Property: | | Asset Balances at June 30, 2008 | |
Mining Equipment | | $ | 124,989 | |
Underground Diesel Equipment | | | 5,883,966 | |
Less: Accumulated amortization | | | (467,456 | ) |
| | | | |
| | $ | 5,541,499 | |
| | | | |
The following is a schedule by years of future minimum lease payments under capital leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of June 30, 2008:
| | | | |
Year ending June 30: | | | |
2008 | | $ | 1,572,492 | |
2009 | | | 1,620,915 | |
2010 | | | 1,283,221 | |
2011 | | | 323,527 | |
2012 | | | 10,027 | |
2013 | | | 2,506 | |
| | | | |
Total minimum lease payments required | | | 4,812,688 | |
Less: Amount representing interest | | | (1,411,539 | ) |
| | | | |
Present value of minimum lease payments | | $ | 3,401,149 | |
| | | | |
-10-
Note 7: Commitments and Contingencies
Mineral Leases
The Company has secured leases of several mineral properties. Each of the leases is subject to lease payments as shown in the table below:
Mineral Leases
| | | | | |
| | Production Royalties Payable (1) | | 2008 Annual Lease Fees |
Barones Concession(2) | | Yes | | $ | — |
Chester Claim Group(3) | | Yes | | | 7,200 |
J.E. Prospect | | Yes | | | 12,500 |
Jestec | | Yes | | | 15,000 |
Merger Mines Claim Group | | Yes | | | 2,500 |
Metropolitan Mines Claim Group | | Yes | | | 12,000 |
Mineral Mountain Claim Group | | Yes | | | 3,600 |
Montana Revett Claim Group(4) | | Yes | | | — |
San Acacio Concession(5) | | Yes | | | 150,000 |
Sunshine Mine and Infrastructure, ARI Lease | | Yes | | | 120,000 |
Timberline Resources(6) | | Yes | | | 20,000 |
Rock Creek-Idaho(7) | | Yes | | | 6,000 |
Jimenez de Teul(8) | | Yes | | | 150,000 |
Alhambra(9) | | Yes | | | 3,000 |
Copper(10) | | Yes | | | 1,500 |
(1) | All leases are subject to production royalties. |
(2) | $375,000 in cash and $100,000 in the Company’s common stock were prepaid in 2004 to apply to the life of the Barones lease of 240 months. There are no annual lease fees. |
(3) | The Chester Claim Group lease also requires an annual payment of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. |
(4) | Montana Revett Claim Group annual lease fee of $20,000 commenced on June 1, 2007. |
(5) | San Acacio production royalties are not payable to lessor, but are payable to third parties. |
(6) | Timberline annual lease fee of $20,000 began on June 1, 2007. |
(7) | The lease includes a $50,000 per year work commitment and payments of $500 a month, which can be credited against the 25% net profits royalty. |
(8) | The lease includes a $100,000 work commitment in 2008 and additional work commitments of $100,000 for each of the next three years. |
(9) | The lease includes annual payments $3,000 per year until such time as Net Profit Royalties are payable. |
(10) | The lease includes annual payments $1,500 per year until such time as Net Profit Royalties are payable. |
Other Leases
The Company has entered into a lease for office space near the Sunshine Mine site at $2,259 per month through September 2008. The Company has entered into a lease for office space in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho for $1,843 from December 2007 through November 2008.
The Company’s future obligations under mineral and office space operating lease agreements are as follows:
| | | |
Year Ending: | | |
December 31, 2008 | | $ | 445,712 |
December 31, 2009 | | | 490,324 |
December 31, 2010 | | | 390,324 |
December 31, 2011 | | | 390,324 |
December 31, 2012 | | | 390,324 |
| | | |
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 2,107,008 |
| | | |
-11-
Compliance with Environmental Regulations
The Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations designed to protect the quality of the water and air, and threatened or endangered species, in the vicinity of many of its mining operations. These regulations include “permitting” or pre-operating approval requirements designed to ensure the environmental integrity of a proposed mining facility, operating requirements to mitigate the effects of discharges into the environment during mining operations, and reclamation or post-operation requirements designed to remediate the lands affected by a mining facility. The Company is investigating the necessary environmental requirements and any bonding necessary to comply with the regulations.
Other Taxes
Estimated property tax liabilities at June 30, 2008 are shown below:
| | | |
Tax Year: | | |
2007 | | $ | 40,886 |
2008 | | | 70,240 |
| | | |
Balance, June 30, 2008 | | $ | 111,126 |
| | | |
Note 8: Notes Payable
On May 26, 2008 the Company entered into a short-term note with a private party for $500,000 that requires interim monthly payments of interest and principal with the final payment due August 31, 2008. This note has an annual interest rate of 12%. On May 29, the Company entered into a short-term note with a private party for $100,000 that is due on December 1, 2008. This note has an annual interest rate of 14.0%. On June 18 the Company entered into a short-term note with a group of lenders for $2,400,000 that is due October 15, 2008. This note has an annual interest rate of 24% and is secured by certain patented mining claims and properties, and all of the Company’s accounts, equipment, inventory, leases (excluding the Sunshine Mine lease), and other personal property, subject to existing security interests. Net proceeds from the June 18 note, after fees and interest, were $2,021,740. The Company had three existing notes payable as follows: $400,000 to Western Continental for a land purchase, $50,000 to Diversified Machine Technology (DMT) for a land purchase and $58,154 to Microsoft Corporation for the purchase of computer hardware and software. The notes payable current portion on the balance sheet is $3,477,862 representing the current portion of the Microsoft note, the payable to Western Continental, and the payable to DMT. Notes payable long-term on the balance sheet is $30,292, the long-term portion of the Microsoft note.
The notes payable have the following terms: The Western Continental note has a 7.25% interest rate, monthly interest payments of $2,417, with payment of the principal due in full on November 6, 2008. The DMT note has a maturity date of October 6, 2008, when the principal is due in full. No payment is due until the maturity date. The Microsoft note has monthly payments $2,803. Interest and principal are scheduled to be paid in full on July 1, 2010. Each note is collateralized by the asset acquired.
Notes Payable, current and long-term at June 30, 2008 are as follows:
| | | |
Notes Payable | | |
Current | | | |
DMT | | $ | 50,000 |
Western Continental | | | 400,000 |
Microsoft | | | 27,862 |
May 26 Note | | | 500,000 |
May 29 Note | | | 100,000 |
June 18 Note | | | 2,400,000 |
| | | |
Sub-total | | $ | 3,477,862 |
Long-term | | | |
Microsoft | | | 30,292 |
| | | |
Total | | $ | 3,508,154 |
| | | |
Note 9: Common Stock, Options and Warrants
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company completed a private placement offering that raised total proceeds of $1,780,794, proceeds net of financing costs $1,776,991. In the private placement, the Company sold to nine investors 741,164 shares of common stock, 370,581 Series A Warrants and 370,581 Series B Warrants. The Series A Warrants are exercisable for a term of 18 Months from May 5, 2008, at and exercise price of $3.40 per share. The Series B Warrants are exercisable for a term of 36 months from May 5, 2008, at an exercise price of $4.10 per share.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted 1,289,000 options under the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan with an exercise price of $1.45 per share with vesting at various dates through 2012. These options were granted to eleven persons who were directors, officers and employees of the Company. The fair value of each option is estimated on the issue date using the Black-Scholes Option Price Calculation. The following assumptions were made in estimating the fair value: risk free interest of 3.1% to 3.5%; volatility of 66% to 74%; dividend rate of 0%; and expected life of 3 years. The total value of options awarded during the three months was calculated at $514,757. Expense was recorded of $319,361 for the options which were earned during the three months ended June 30, 2008. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company issued no shares, options, or warrants.
-12-
Options issued to officers in 2007 partially vested in the second quarter of 2008. The Company recognized $158,500 of common stock issuable for an annual mineral lease payment of 50,000 shares.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, stock options of 25,000 were exercised for cash proceeds of $18,750 and 810,000 stock options were granted. Options granted were reduced from 960,000 to 810,000 due to the correction of a mathematical error and an amendment to the employment agreement of Mr. Ray DeMotte. The exercise price of the options remains at $4.00.
Note 10: Loss per Common Share
The Company is authorized to issue 80,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.05 par value per share, of which 39,439,974 shares were issued at June 30, 2008. The number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2008 is 38,943,834.
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Although there were common stock equivalents outstanding June 30, 2008, they were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because they would have been considered anti-dilutive.
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had issued and outstanding 12,342,250 warrants, 2,099,999 options, and convertible debt that could be converted to 80,000 shares of common stock and earnings would be fully diluted by 14,522,249 shares.
Note 11: Business Segments
The Company began reporting two business segments during 2004. One segment is the exploration and development segment in the United States of America. The Company engages in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in the U.S.A. in this segment.
The Company’s other segment, acquired in 2004, is the Mexico exploration segment. That segment includes the Company’s 99% owned subsidiary Sterling Mining De Mexico, S.A. De C.V. The Mexico segment engages in the acquisition, exploration and operation of mineral properties in Mexico. The Company’s objective in each segment is to place those properties that can be operated at a profit into production.
The following table presents information about reportable segments for the three months ended and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30 | | | Six Months Ended June 30 | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 1,914,123 | | | $ | 224,935 | | | $ | 2,288,236 | | | $ | 232,917 | |
Mexico | | | 1,156,701 | | | | 629,216 | | | | 2,162,320 | | | | 812,571 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 3,070,824 | | | $ | 854,151 | | | $ | 4,450,556 | | | $ | 1,045,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | (4,620,491 | ) | | $ | (3,432,625 | ) | | $ | 11,267,009 | | | $ | (5,803,437 | ) |
Mexico | | | 14,258 | | | | (150,463 | ) | | | 173,806 | | | | (339,228 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 4,606,233 | | | $ | (3,583,088 | ) | | $ | (11,093,203 | ) | | $ | (6,142,665 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | (4,590,537 | ) | | $ | (3,394,476 | ) | | $ | (10,502,455 | ) | | $ | (5,506,542 | ) |
Mexico | | | (381,009 | ) | | | (144,650 | ) | | | (155,158 | ) | | | (414,466 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | (4,971,546 | ) | | $ | (3,539,126 | ) | | $ | (10,657,613 | ) | | $ | (5,921,008 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identifiable Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | Same as | | | | Same as | | | $ | 36,374,880 | | | $ | 22,881,200 | |
Mexico | | | 6 mo. | | | | 6 mo. | | | | 1,780,557 | | | | 1,790,397 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | Column | | | | Column | | | $ | 38,155,437 | | | $ | 24,671,597 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital Expenditures: (Net) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 480,605 | | | $ | 3,498,256 | | | $ | 3,226,474 | | | $ | 5,534,763 | |
Mexico | | | 28,460 | | | | 184,459 | | | | 71,873 | | | | 403,864 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 509,065 | | | $ | 3,682,715 | | | $ | 3,298,347 | | | $ | 5,938,627 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
-13-
Note 12: Significant Customers
Sterling Mining de Mexico, the Mexican subsidiary, has sold its concentrate and precipitate to two refineries in the past. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, sales were to Met-Mex Penoles refinery and to one buyer. Concentrate from the Sunshine Mine was sold to one customer during the first quarter. During the second quarter the Company entered into a contract with Ocean Partners, a concentrate broker, to sell the silver concentrates from the Sunshine Mine. This agreement is for 200 metric tons of concentrate.
Note 13: Subsequent Events
On July 21, 2008, the Company and Minco Silver Corporation (“Minco Silver”) signed a letter of intent whereby Minco Silver agreed to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Sterling (the “Transaction”), subject to certain terms and conditions. In the Sterling Mining Company and Minco Silver Corporation letter of agreement, the Company was extended a $15 million line of credit bearing 10% interest per annum. On July 31, $5.0 million was advanced to the Company. The line is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company.
The management committee will operate under a management agreement that enables the committee to approve Sterling expenses and payments, the 2008 work plan for Sterling properties, and employment of managers for Sterling operations.
The Transaction is subject to completion of confirmatory due diligence, definitive documentation, regulatory approvals, and obtaining shareholder approval at a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders. The Letter of Intent includes a commitment by Sterling to not solicit alternative transactions to the Transaction. A break-up fee of $2.75 million is payable to Minco Silver under certain conditions. The Transaction is expected to close by December, 2008.
On July 31, 2008 the Company used a portion of the initial advance under the line of credit obtained form Minco Silver to make a payment of principal of $1.0 million to the group of lenders that issued the $2.4 million short term note payable to the Company on June 18.
The Company is not presently in operational control of the Barones silver project in Mexico as the result of the misappropriation of the assets and operations by a former manager. Consequently, Sterling Mining is not receiving cash from operation of the Barones Silver Project, which will have a material adverse effect on results of operations in the third quarter of 2008 and subsequent periods, and Sterling Mining’s ownership of the Barones silver project may be impaired, which could result in a write-down of the carrying value of that asset.
The Company borrowed $280,000 from Roger VanVoorhees on July 17, 2008. The note carries an interest rate of 14% and is due and payable December 17, 2008. Roger VanVoorhees is a member of the Company’s board of directors.
Item 2: | Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations |
Statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk”, are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our forward-looking statements include our current expectations and projections about future results, performance, results of litigation, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “feel,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.
These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Sterling Mining Company or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
The results of the Company’s operations are significantly affected by the market prices of silver which may fluctuate widely and are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, interest rates, expectations regarding inflation, currency values, governmental decisions regarding the disposal of precious metals stockpiles, global and regional political and economic conditions, and other factors.
The average prices of silver (London Final) and gold (London Final) for the second three months of 2008 were $17.18 and $896.29 per ounce, respectively. The market prices of silver and gold on July 29, 2008 were $17.42 per ounce and $923.50 per ounce, respectively.
The Company’s operating mines are the Sunshine Mine in Idaho and the San Acacio-Barones silver project in Mexico. The Company has exploration projects in Idaho, Montana, and Mexico. As a result of the work completed in the first quarter of 2008, the Company expects increasing production quarterly in 2008 and increasing concentrate grades.
-14-
Operating Highlights and Statistics
Sunshine Mine
At the Sunshine Mine a total of 14,085 tons of ore was mined during the second quarter of 2008 from 2700 level West Chance and 3100 level Sunshine stopes. At the end of the quarter mine production increased to approximately 370 tons per day. There were five stopes in production and two additional stopes under development for July production. Development activities continued in both production areas to access new stopes as well as advance the decline to connect to the 3400 level in the Sunshine vein area for ventilation, secondary escapeway, and to access two developed stopes below 3400 level. The mine sandfill system returned to operation with the completion of renovation and installation of new components. The mine “leaky feeder” radio communication system was completed down the Jewell shaft and to mining areas on 2700 and 3100 levels. Installation of the mine’s rockburst monitoring system began, targeting operation in the third quarter.
During the quarter the mill processed 9,058 wet tons of ore resulting in 135,777 ounces of silver reporting to concentrates. Mill recovery averaged 95.2% during the period. The No. 1 ball mill was brought on line during June; however, the No. 2 ball mill electric motor failed in June and was sent out for repairs. A second shift in the mill was added in July.
The diamond drill contractor completed 2,400 feet of underground diamond drilling during the quarter. The contractor drilled a total of 10,470 feet for the year from locations in the Sterling Tunnel. Sterling drill crews completed 2,086 feet of upper country drilling and 817 feet in the West Chance area of the lower mine. Sterling crews drilled a total of 3,623 feet for the second quarter and 5,404 feet for the first half of the year. Third quarter Sterling drilling will focus on definition drilling in the West Chance area.
A contingency plan was put into place that would allow pumping without the new Jewell Shaft dewatering pump. A dam was built on 3100 and outfitted with pumps to lift water to the 2700 level dam and pump station. The mine water level has been lowered to 3400 level.
The majority of diesel equipment is now underground in the 2700 West Chance and 3100 Sunshine areas. The mine converted fuel to biodiesel in order to comply with new federal emissions standards.
The Company hired 31 employees at the Sunshine Mine during the second quarter bringing the total number of employees to 164. The mine is anticipating that the workforce will number 189 by the end of 2008.
Sterling Mining de Mexico
In Mexico production for the second quarter of 2008 exceeded first quarter production primarily due to the high grade of mill feed and the continued operation of the crusher. During the second quarter of 2008, Sterling Mining de Mexico produced 62,571 ounces of silver of which 21,655 ounces were produced as precipitate at the Barones project and 40,916 ounces were produced as concentrate at the El Arca facility. Second quarter production was primarily in April and May. June production was curtailed by a loss of access to the San Acacio As disclosed under “Item 5. Other Information,” below, Sterling Mining is not presently in operational control of the Barones silver project in Mexico as the result of the misappropriation of the assets and operations by a former manager. Consequently, Sterling Mining is not receiving cash from operation of the Barones Silver Project, which will have a material adverse effect on results of operations in the third quarter of 2008 and subsequent periods, and Sterling Mining’s ownership of the Barones silver project may be impaired, which could result in a write-down of the carrying value of that asset.
During the second quarter of 2008, Sterling Mining Company continued assessing its exploration properties in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. The Company intends to enter into joint ventures with other junior exploration companies on several of its projects, while advancing other projects by itself.
Operating Statistics from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information by mine for the periods ending June 30, 2008 and 2007:
Sterling Mining Company production statistics for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | US | | | Mexico | | | US(1) | | Mexico | |
| | Sunshine Mine | | | Barones | | | El Arca | | | Sunshine Mine | | Barones | | | El Arca | |
Tons processed | | 9,058 | | | 14,677 | | | 20,282 | | | — | | 26,648 | | | — | |
Recovery /Ag oz. | | 95.2 | % | | 33.8 | % | | 41.4 | % | | — | | 18.3 | % | | — | |
Silver ounces produced | | 135,777 | | | 21,655 | | | 40,916 | | | — | | 12,502 | | | — | |
|
Sterling Mining Company production statistics for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 | |
| | |
| | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | US | | | Mexico | | | US(1) | | Mexico | |
| | Sunshine Mine | | | Barones | | | El Arca | | | Sunshine Mine | | Barones | | | El Arca | |
Tons processed | | 15,502 | | | 28,635 | | | 25,072 | | | — | | 55,315 | | | 4,191 | |
Recovery /Ag oz. | | 94.5 | % | | 37.4 | % | | 47.4 | % | | — | | 15.9 | % | | 41.0 | % |
Silver ounces produced | | 179,240 | | | 53,722 | | | 58,529 | | | — | | 21,802 | | | 9,456 | |
(1) | The Sunshine Mine began initial production in December 2007. |
-15-
Comparative Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007:
Revenues
Revenues from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2008 consisted of sales of silver and gold in the United States and Mexico and coin sales in the USA. The Company reported revenues of $3,070,824 in the second quarter of 2008 and $854,151 in the second quarter of 2007. Revenues in the second quarter in Mexico were $1,156,700 in 2008 and $629,216 in 2007. Revenues in the second quarter in the USA were $1,914,123 in 2008 and $224,935 in 2007. Revenue increases in both segments were due to increases in silver production. Revenues from continuing operations during the first six months of 2008 and 2007 were $4,450,556 and $1,045,488 respectively. Revenues from operation in the USA were $2,288,235 and $232,917 the increase in sales is due to mining operations starting at the Sunshine Mine. In Mexico revenues for the first six months were $2,162,320 in 2008 and $812,571, the increase in revenue at Mexico was due to increased production at our Barones and El Arca facilities.
Costs and Expenses
The Company reported cost of revenues of $2,270,980 in the second quarter of 2008 and $265,208 in the second quarter of 2007. “Cost of sales and other production costs” in Mexico were $418,504 in the second quarter of 2008 and $262,435 the second quarter of 2007. The Cost of Revenues for silver and coin sales in the U.S. was $1,852,476 in the second quarter of 2008 and $2,773 in the second quarter of 2007. The increase in cost of revenues in Mexico is due to increased production at the Barones Silver Plant and at the El Arca mill. Cost of revenues in the United States increased because the Sunshine Mine was producing concentrate in the second quarter of 2008 and there was no production in the second quarter of 2007.
The Company’s cost of revenues for the six months ending in June, 2008 were 3,252,432 and in 2007 were 513,369. Cost of production in the USA was $2,151,612 and $10,359 in 2008 and 2007 respectively. The cost of production for Mexico for 2008 and 2007 respectively were $1,100,820 and $503,010. The increase in costs was due to the cost of mining operations at the Sunshine Mine in the US and the operating costs of running the operations at the Barones plant and El Arca.
Total operating expenses for the second quarter were $7,677,057 in 2008 and $4,437,239 in 2007. The operating expenses for the fist six months of 2008 were $15,543,759 and in 2007 were $7,188,153. Both the quarter and year to date expense increases were due to the increased operations in both USA and Mexico.
Other Income and Expenses
Other income and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was expense of $365,313 and income of $45,024, respectively. The largest component of expense in the second quarter of 2008 was foreign exchange loss and interest expense.
Other income and expense for the six months ended June 30 resulted in a net gain of $400,744 in 2008 and a net gain of $221,103 in 2007. The largest component of the gain in 2008 was the gain on sale of investments.
Taxes
Sterling Mining Company has a substantial net operating loss for U.S. income tax purposes. Sterling Mining de Mexico has a net tax asset of IVA tax refundable in Mexico of approximately $97,225.
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
As a result of the above, the Company’s net loss from continuing operations amounted to approximately $4.9 million and $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 respectively. The largest component of the loss in the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 was mine rehabilitation expense of $2.9 million and $1.8 million respectively.
Mine rehabilitation expenses increased by approximately $1.1 million due to increased activity at the Sunshine Mine. General and administrative expenses, including professional services, decreased by approximately $0.7 million due to a decrease in legal expenses and consultants.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s cash balance at June 30, 2008 was approximately $0.8 million and marketable securities were $0.5 million.
The Company used $9.0 million cash for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The primary use of cash for operating activities was rehabilitation of the Sunshine Mine. The Company received $1.7 million from the sale of investments which was offset by the acquisition of capital equipment of $2.1 million, netting $.4 million use of cash from investing activities.
On May 5, 2008, the Company completed a private placement offering that raised total proceeds of $1,780,794, proceeds net of financing costs $1,776,991. In the private placement, the Company sold to nine investors 741,164 shares of common stock, 370,581 Series A Warrants and 370,581 Series B Warrants. The Series A Warrants are exercisable for a term of 18 months from May 5, 2008, at an exercise price of $3.40 per share. The Series B Warrants are exercisable for a term of 36 months from May 5, 2008, at an exercise price of $4.10 per share. The Company also raised $2,998,391 through the issuance of debt in connection with several loans, including a bridge term loan, which was offset by the payment of $717,747 on the payment of for leases and notes. The Company was provided approximately $4 million in cash from financing activities.
-16-
On July 21, 2008, in the Sterling Mining Company and Minco Silver Corporation letter of agreement, the Company was extended a $15 million line of credit bearing 10% interest per annum. On July 31, $5.0 million was advanced to the Company. The line is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company.
The net result is the Company reported a net decrease in cash approximately $5.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The Company expects that recurring overhead will level off. Total operating cash expenses now average approximately $2.8 million per month. The Company expects its July 21 Letter of Intent with Minco Silver to result in a business combination which will be adequate to meet the cash needs of the corporation for the foreseeable future due to the credit facility of $15 million.
The capital requirements of the Company’s Mexican operations and any exploration projects the Company may select for advancement will be dependent on the profits and cash flow from the Sunshine Mine and our Mexican operations as-well-as the results of economic and technical studies of the projects.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The Company does not have any contingent liabilities to report. A presentation of the Company’s Contractual Obligations and Commitments is shown below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Payments due by period |
| | Total | | Less than 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 3-5 Years | | After 5 Years |
Note Payable | | $ | 3,508,154 | | $ | 3,477,862 | | $ | 30,292 | | $ | — | | $ | — |
Debentures Payable | | | 100,000 | | | 100,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Capital Lease Liabilities | | | 4,812,688 | | | 1,572,492 | | | 3,227,663 | | | 12,533 | | | — |
Operating Leases: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
J.E. Prospect | | $ | 65,000 | | $ | 12,500 | | $ | 12,500 | | $ | 20,000 | | $ | 20,000 |
Jestec | | | 115,000 | | | — | | | 15,000 | | | 50,000 | | | 50,000 |
American Reclamation | | | 420,000 | | | 60,000 | | | 120,000 | | | 120,000 | | | 120,000 |
Chester Mining Co | | | 28,800 | | | 7,200 | | | 7,200 | | | 7,200 | | | 7,200 |
Mineral Mountain | | | 14,400 | | | 3,600 | | | 3,600 | | | 3,600 | | | 3,600 |
Merger Mines | | | 15,000 | | | 2,500 | | | 2,500 | | | 5,000 | | | 5,000 |
Timberline Resources | | | 80,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | | | 20,000 |
Metropolitan Mines | | | 42,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 12,000 | | | 12,000 | | | 12,000 |
Rock Creek Mining | | | 21,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 6,000 | | | 6,000 |
San Acacio | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Jimenez de Teul | | | 150,000 | | | 150,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Cuatro Cienegas | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Alhambra | | | 12,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 3,000 | | | 3,000 |
Copper | | | 6,000 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total Leases | | $ | 969,200 | | $ | 269,300 | | $ | 203,300 | | $ | 248,300 | | $ | 248,300 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Obligations | | $ | 9,386,442 | | $ | 5,416,054 | | $ | 3,461,255 | | $ | 260,833 | | $ | 248,300 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company has determined from the significant accounting policies as disclosed in our financial statements, that the following disclosures are critical accounting policies.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are essential to the financial disclosure process in determining the reserves of ore bearing rock and the future liabilities for remediation and reclamation from mining activities. The Company used recognized outside consultants to determine the essential characteristics of the important determinants concerning the Company’s future actions in moving exploration stage properties through development into production. The estimates that the Company will develop are based upon the experience of these outside consultants and the Company’s experienced personnel. As the Company proceeds with the re-opening of the Sunshine Mine, all estimates will be reviewed on a timely basis to allow for the reporting of current and valid financial information. Management believes that all of the estimates currently being relied upon are valid and appropriate concerning the value of assets and liabilities. In the past, given the very limited operations of the Company, management has been fairly accurate as to the use of estimates and the timing of any changes.
Mineral Exploration and Development Costs
The Company has been engaged in exploration since its inception.
-17-
In accordance with GAAP, the Company expenses exploration costs as incurred. Significant property acquisition costs for undeveloped mineral interests that have significant potential to develop an economic ore body are capitalized. The Company will amortize the capital costs based on proven and probable ore reserves if an economic ore body is developed. If an economic ore body is not discovered previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the property does not contain an economic ore body. Costs to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines are capitalized and will be amortized on units of production basis over proven and probable reserves. Gains and losses on the sales or retirement of assets are recorded as other income or expense.
The Company expects to have reserves in the future on any development it deems commercially viable. The essential nature of any reserves acquired or discovered will be estimates based upon ore body information presented to and reviewed by professionals. The enterprise of exploration and mining are subject to substantial uncertainties in development and operations. The Company continues to recruit a team of operational professionals, with the highest standards for reporting always being in the forethought of management.
Any estimates arising out of our exploration, development and operational activities will be expected to be reviewed under current internal policies. Our current environment has had only a short period of active operations and management believes that all exploration, development and operating policies are being accurately maintained. Our future operations will be heavily dependent on the market values of precious metals and our estimated costs of production. As these determinants change we would expect analysis by management of both short-term and long-term conditions, which could have a negative impact on the Company’s choices concerning development and operations of its existing and future acquired properties.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. The Company accounts for equipment under capital lease agreements according to FAS 13 “Accounting for Leases” and subsequent pronouncements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, no obligations remain and collectability is considered probable. The passing of title to the customer is based on terms of sales contracts. Revenues from leases are recognized when realized and earned according to the lease provisions and receipt of the lease payments. The Company recognizes revenue from coin sales when title passes, which is typically when cash is received in exchange for the coins. When the Mexican subsidiary sells precipitate, revenue is recognized when payment is reported by the refining plant. Advance payments in Mexico are recorded as deferred revenue.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains on items for which the fair value option has been elected are to be reported in earnings. SFAS 159 will become effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Management has not determined yet the effect that adoption of SFAS 159 may have on our results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (“SFAS 160”), Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (“SFAS 141R”), Business Combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, goodwill acquired in the business combination, or a gain from a bargain purchase. SFAS 141R is effective for financial statements issued for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange, interest rates, and commodity prices. The Company’s operations in Mexico could potentially be affected by a change in the exchange rate of Mexican pesos into American dollars.
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability, preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with GAAP. An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Based on that evaluation, and in light of the previously identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2007, related to ineffective oversight of |
-18-
| financial reporting; lack of appropriate accounting policies, procedures and personnel; procedures for accounting for investments; journal entry documentation and procedures; and management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting described in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2008. |
(b) | Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. Other than the following changes described below, there have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. |
To remedy the effects of unfilled key financial reporting positions as described in the material weaknesses relating to lack of appropriate accounting policies, procedures and personnel, the Company hired a corporate controller to oversee the financial reporting effective April 15, 2008.
The Company implemented procedures in April that require all journal entries to be reviewed and signed by an accounting manager.
The Company has contracted with an independent consultant firm to assist the Company in compliance with applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
-19-
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
We initially reported in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that in September 2005, James D. Christianson and several small entities whom Christianson represents filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against several parties, including two directors of the Company. The United States District Court in Idaho dismissed securities litigation brought by J.D. Christianson and related parties against Sterling and several directors. The Court had previously dismissed significant parts of the case. On May 22, 2008, after reviewing amended claims submitted by Christianson, this case was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by Sterling Mining, except where such statements are made in connection with an initial public offering. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, which address activities, actions, goals, prospects, or new developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as expansion and growth of our operations and other such matters are forward-looking statements. Any one or a combination of factors could materially affect our operations and financial condition. Forward-looking statements made by us are based on knowledge of our business and the environment in which we operate as of the date of this report. Because of the factors discussed in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in subsequent reports on Form 10-Q under the Item 1A “Risk Factors,” actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements.
As disclosed under “Item 5. Other Information,” below, Sterling Mining is not presently in operational control of the San Acacio-Barones silver project in Mexico as the result of the misappropriation of the assets and operations by a former manager. Consequently, Sterling Mining is not receiving cash from operation of the Barones Silver Project, which will have a material adverse effect on results of operations in the third quarter of 2008 and subsequent periods, and Sterling Mining’s ownership of the Barones silver project may be impaired, which could result in a write-down of the carrying value of that asset.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
The Company has cancelled the annual stockholders’ meeting and proxy solicitation for the election of Directors due to the provisions of the Letter of Intent with Minco Silver, Inc.
Until July 2008, Sterling Mining operated the Barones silver project in Mexico through Sterling Mining México S.A. de C.V. (“Sterling Mexico”) and a manager employed by Sterling Mexico who was granted power of attorney to act as necessary to preserve and develop the mining concessions, recover material from the mine site and operate the mill. In June 2008, Sterling Mining discovered that the manager took steps to misappropriate Sterling Mexico’s Barones properties to his own benefit by declaring a default under the mining concessions that were originally acquired from the manager, firing Sterling Mexico employees and then hiring those employees himself, and paying out Sterling Mexico cash and distributing Sterling Mexico personal property to himself and the employees, all in an effort to convert the Barones properties and milling operation to the personal property of the manager.
On July 18, 2008, an Ordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders (the “July 18 Meeting”) of Sterling Mexico was convened in the City of Guadalupe, Zacatecas, in which it was resolved to change the administration of Sterling Mexico from a Board of Directors to a Sole Administrator and a Manager. Also, at the July 18 Meeting, the manager who has attempted to misappropriate the property of Sterling Mexico was terminated and all powers of attorney previously granted were revoked. The new administrator is J. Kenney Berscht and the new manager is James N. Meek.
Sterling Mexico has demanded of the former manager an accounting of all of the assets, revenue and expenses of Sterling Mexico and the return of all such property and payment of any revenue due to Sterling Mexico. The former manager has until August 18, 2008, to respond. If no response is made or is the response is not acceptable to Sterling Mexico, we expect that we will institute through Sterling Mexico legal proceedings against the former manager alleging theft and conversion of the property of Sterling Mexico and seeking the return of all property and payment of damages resulting from the former manager’s wrongful conduct.
-20-
Unaudited revenue for the first six months of 2008 from the Barones silver project was $2,162,320, and the net loss for Sterling Mexico during the period was $112,033. The misappropriation of our assets and operations in Mexico by the former manager will likely result in realizing little or no revenue from the Barones silver project while Sterling Mexico pursues recovery of its property and its claims against the former manager, while incurring legal fees and other costs to recover such property. Accordingly, these events in Mexico will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the third quarter of 2008 and continuing thereafter until the matter is resolved. Although we believe that we are in the right and will ultimately recover the misappropriated property, there is always a risk in any litigation that Sterling Mexico pursues that a court will make a judgment adverse to our interests, which would impair the value of the Barones silver project carried on our unaudited balance sheet as of June 30, 2008, in the amount of $1,560,000.
| | |
Exhibit | | Description |
| |
31.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
| |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
| |
32.1 | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
| |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
-21-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | |
| | | | STERLING MINING COMPANY |
| | | |
Date: August 8, 2008 | | | | By: | | /s/ J. Kenney Berscht |
| | | | | | J. Kenney Berscht |
| | | | | | Principal Executive Officer |
| | | |
Date: August 8, 2008 | | | | By: | | /s/ James N. Meek |
| | | | | | James N. Meek, |
| | | | | | Chief Financial Officer |
-22-