UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
| (Mark One) | |
| þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2012 |
| or | |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to ________ |
Commission File Number 000-53390
Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Nevada | 20-2543857 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| 294 Grove Lane East Wayzata, Minnesota | 55391 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(952) 473-9950
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
| (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. | |
| Yesþ Noo |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) | |
| Yesþ Noo |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. | |
Large accelerated filero | Accelerated filero |
|
|
Non-accelerated filero | Smaller reporting companyþ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). | |
| Yeso Noþ |
As of May 14, 2012, the registrant had 40,040,796 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Explanatory Note
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A amends the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q originally filed by Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc. on May 15, 2012, (the “Original Filing”). This Amendment is being filed to (i) incorporate certain disclosures as a result of correspondence received from the Staff of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. In accordance with Rule 12b-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Amendment includes the complete text of each item as amended. Except as described above, the Original Filing has not been materially amended, updated or otherwise modified. This Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Filing or update those disclosures regarding events that occurred subsequent to the end of the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012. All other information remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the original time of filing.
|
|
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this quarterly report and in our audited condensed consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contained in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 23, 2012, as amended.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements included in this quarterly report that are not historical facts (including any statements regarding plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions), including, without limitation, the information set forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue,” or other similar words.
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of the filing of this report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements include, among other things, those set forth in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2012.
All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this report.
Overview
We are principally focused on developing and owning transloading facilities, marketing and transporting crude oil and related products within the Williston Basin oil fields. We compete through our joint ventures by providing our customers with value-added benefits, including a full-service transloading facility, competitive pricing and an optimal geographic location that is centrally located in Mountrail County, North Dakota, which continues to experience the most drilling activity in the Williston Basin. Currently, we have a transloading entity and a marketing entity, each of which is organized in the form of a limited liability company of which we hold a 50% membership interest.
Our Company owns a transloading facility located in New Town, North Dakota. In November 2009, we entered into an operating lease agreement with Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC, the transloading joint venture in which our wholly owned subsidiary owns a 50% ownership interest. Under the lease, our Company receives monthly lease payments from the transloading joint venture through December 31, 2013. The agreement includes provisions that allow us to collect additional rents if we incur certain additional costs related to the equipment and transloading facility. The transloading joint venture generates income primarily from a per-barrel fee charged when crude oil is transloaded into a tank railcar located on the transloading facility that it leases from our Company. Currently, crude oil is transloaded from semi-trailer trucks owned and operated by third parties into tank railcars through a mobile transloader. Using this method, our site has the capacity to transload approximately 50,000 barrels per day.
1
DPTS Marketing, LLC, the marketing joint venture in which our wholly owned subisdiary owns a 50% ownership interest, purchases barrels of crude oil from well operators at the wellhead and from first purchasers delivering to our crude by rail facility. We then coordinate the transportation of the purchased crude oil to a purchaser at a location determined by the purchaser. Potential purchasers include; storage facilities, blending facilities, distributors and refineries. The following reflects a step-by-step process on how the marketing business operates:
|
|
|
| 1. | The marketing joint venture enters into a purchase and sale agreement with a producer or first purchaser. |
|
|
|
| 2. | During the contracted month the marketing joint venture sends a third party trucking company to pick up the barrels from certain wellhead locations specified by the producer, or receives the barrels delivered in New Town. |
|
|
|
| 3. | As specified in the purchase and sale agreement, title to the oil transfers from the producer (seller) to DPTS Marketing (purchaser) at the time it passes through the truck’s flange at the well or at our crude by rail site. |
|
|
|
| 4. | The oil is transported by truck to our transloading facility where it is transferred from the truck to a railcar. |
|
|
|
| 5. | Canadian Pacific then picks up the oil at our transloading facility in New Town, North Dakota and delivers it to several locations using arrangements with other class 1 and short line railroads; where DPTS Marketing sells the oil to its final customer. |
Current Business Drivers
As reported by the USGS, the North Dakota Industrial Commission currently predicts that the Bakken’s production will increase for many years. A common date for a production plateau is between the years of 2022 to 2024.
The prices at which crude oil trade in the open market have experienced significant volatility, and will likely continue to fluctuate in the foreseeable future due to a variety of influences including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
| • | domestic and foreign demand for crude oil by both refineries and end users; |
| • | the introduction of alternative forms of fuel to replace or compete with crude oil; |
| • | domestic and foreign reserves and supply of crude oil; |
| • | competitive measures implemented by our competitors and domestic and foreign governmental bodies; |
| • | political climates in nations that traditionally produce and export significant quantities of crude oil (including military and other conflicts in the Middle East and surrounding geographic region) and regulations and tariffs imposed by exporting and importing nations; |
| • | weather conditions; and |
| • | domestic and foreign economic volatility and stability. |
Lack of capacity within the trunk pipelines is driving competition within the transloading and storage industry. This competition is expected to become increasingly intense as the demand to transport crude oil in North Dakota has risen in recent years.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Our Company experienced a net loss of $15.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to a net loss of $670,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The net loss was mainly driven by the expense related to the period change in fair value of the embedded derivative resulting from the additional payment provision in our outstanding promissory notes that mature in 2013. The increase was recorded as interest expense. An “embedded derivative” is the derivative portion of a single financial instrument or contract that combines a derivative and a non-derivative in its structure. In this case, the currently outstanding promissory notes include an additional payment provision that could modify the cash flows of the promissory notes due to the change in our share price, therefore making the additional payment provision an embedded derivative. The original fair value of the embedded derivative is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt because the additional payment provision properly qualifies as a contingent payment, and when comparing the fair value of the new promissory notes and the old promissory notes, the fair value of the embedded derivative needs to be included in the fair value of the new promissory notes when calculating the loss on extinguishment of debt. General and administrative expense decreased by approximately $871,000 compared to the first quarter of 2011, primarily reflecting increased expenses relating to share based compensation to consultants during the three months ended March 31, 2011. Income from our wholly owned subsidiaries’ investments in the transloading and marketing joint ventures increased to $1.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively, as compared to $780,000 from the transloading joint venture during the same period in 2011. The marketing joint venture was not operational during the first quarter of 2011. We also recognized rental income of $80,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to $77,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
2
We estimate that the embedded derivative related to the additional payment due under the outstanding promissory notes had a fair value of approximately $32.8 million as of March 31, 2012, representing a $27.3 million increase during the first quarter of 2012. Our predecessor entity, Dakota Plains, Inc., engaged an independent valuation firm to assess the fair value of the embedded derivative in connection with the preparation of its year-end financial statements, which resulted in an estimated fair value of $5,540,000 as of December 31, 2011 (the valuation utilized an assumed stock price of approximately $4.00, which was the share price of Dakota Plains, Inc. last private equity raise). This increase was due to a substantial appreciation in fair value of our common stock during the same period and has been recorded as interest expense in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before (i) interest expense, (ii) income taxes, (iii) depreciation and amortization, and (iv) non-cash expenses relating to share based payments recognized under ASC Topic 718. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was $2.4 million, compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $796,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily related to the Company’s investment in DPTS Marketing, LLC which was not operational in the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
| |||||
|
| 2012 |
| 2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Loss |
| $ | (15,869,875 | ) | $ | (670,258 | ) |
Add Back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Benefit |
|
| (9,475,400 | ) |
| (433,000 | ) |
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
| 41,217 |
|
| 38,482 |
|
Share Based Compensation - Employees and Directors |
|
| 81,638 |
|
| 18,503 |
|
Share Based Compensation - Consultants |
|
| — |
|
| 1,550,000 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
| 27,580,244 |
|
| 291,899 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 2,357,824 |
| $ | 795,626 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by the SEC and is derived from net income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe presenting Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors to gain an overall understanding of our current financial performance. Specifically, we believe the non-GAAP financial measure included herein provides useful information to both management and investors by excluding certain expenses that our management believes are not indicative of our operating results. In addition, the non-GAAP financial measure is used by our management for budgeting and forecasting as well as subsequently measuring our performance, and we believe that it provides investors with a financial measure that most closely aligns to our internal measurement processes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our short and long-term future cash needs will involve supporting the loading, marketing and transporting of crude oil and related products from and into the Williston Basin fields. We plan on expanding our existing transloading facility to meet the logistical and storage needs of future transloading arrangements. This will include, but is not limited to, the possible implementation of a central gathering system, which will feed into a storage facility. We also continue to evaluate the possible acquisition or start-up of a trucking business to transport crude oil to our transloading facility.
Cash Flows
Our cash flows depend, to a large degree, on the level of spending by oil and gas companies on development and production activities. Sustained increases or decreases in the price of natural gas or oil could have a material impact on these activities, and could also materially affect our cash flows. Certain sources and uses of cash, such as the level of discretionary capital expenditures, purchases and sales of investments, issuances and repurchases of debt and of our common shares are within our control and are adjusted as necessary based on market conditions.
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities totaled $663,000 and $65,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, respectively, or an increase of cash used of $598,000. The primary reason for the increase in cash used in operating activities was the increase in cash general and administrative expenses of $616,000 and cash paid for interest expense of $236,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2012. These increases in cash used for operating activities was partially offset as a result of a change in working capital related to an increase in prepaid expenses of $123,000 and a net increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $380,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
3
Cash Flows Provided by Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $980,000 and $256,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, respectively, or an increase of $723,000. The increase related to additional cash received from our investment in Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $0 compared to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. In January 2011, the Company received $3.5 million in proceeds from the issuance of senior promissory notes. In March 2011, the Company received $3.2 million from the issuance of common stock. In January 2011, the Company paid cash dividends of $1.9 million.
As previously disclosed, in November 2011, our predecessor entity, Dakota Plains, Inc., combined certain outstanding promissory notes by issuing $9.0 million aggregate principal amount of 12.0% promissory notes due March 1, 2013. All accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding promissory notes is due and payable in arrears on the last day of each fiscal quarter. We may prepay amounts due under the promissory notes in whole or in part without penalty or premium at any time.
Pursuant to the Exchange and Loan Agreements executed in connection with the issuance of the new promissory notes, our Company, at its discretion on or before November 1, 2012, may require certain holders of the promissory notes to lend to us, in a single draw, up to an aggregate of $5.5 million in proportion to the principal amount of such holders’ existing promissory notes. The supplemental notes, if issued, would bear 18% simple annual interest and would mature one year after the date of issuance. If supplemental notes are issued, each holder of the supplemental notes will also receive a warrant to purchase at the strike price (volume weighted average closing price of our common stock over the twenty trading days after the supplemental notes are issued) a number of shares of our common stock equal to the quotient of the 50% of the principal amount of the supplemental note divided by $1.00. The warrant would be exercisable at any time during the period that is ten years after the date the supplemental notes are issued at a per share exercise price equal to the volume-weighted average closing price of our common stock over the twenty trading days after the date the supplemental notes are issued.
Under the terms of the outstanding promissory notes, an additional payment, which may be paid in shares or in the form of a subordinated promissory note, at the election of each holder, was triggered by the merger of Dakota Plains, Inc. with and into our Company, which occurred on March 23, 2012. Because the average closing price of our common stock over the twenty trading days immediately following that merger (the “Initial Trading Price”) exceeded $2.50, each note holder is entitled to receive from us an amount equal to the remainder, to the extent positive, of (x) the unpaid principal amount of their promissory note multiplied by the Initial Trading Price and divided by $2.50 minus (y) the unpaid principal amount of the promissory note. The holders of the promissory notes may elect to receive the additional payment either (i) a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the additional payment divided by $4.00, or (ii) a subordinated promissory note having a principal amount equal to the additional payment, bearing no interest for three calendar months after issuance and 12% simple annual interest thereafter, due and payable on the one-year anniversary of the issue date of such promissory note. We currently estimate that the embedded derivative represented by the additional payment provision in the outstanding promissory notes has a fair value equal to approximately $32.8 million.
Due to the joint venture partners’ mutually agreed upon suspension of regular distributions by the transloading joint venture in order to retain cash for certain capital expenditures (discussed below) and our expectation that the marketing joint venture will not provide a priority cash distribution during 2012 (discussed below), we do not expect to receive significant cash distributions from our investments in the existing joint ventures for at least the remainder of fiscal 2012. In light of the scheduled maturity of our $9.0 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes in March 2013 and the potential maturity of up to $32.8 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes issuable pursuant to the additional payment provision in the outstanding promissory notes as early as April 2013, we expect to have significant cash requirements in the next twelve months. We anticipate that we will need to obtain additional financing to meet these obligations. We may from time to time seek, replace, or renegotiate the terms of our outstanding debt through privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. These transactions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. Our ability to obtain additional financing will depend upon a number of factors, including our future performance and financial results and general economic and capital market conditions. While we are determined to continue to preserve value and to ensure the long-term success of our Company, we cannot be certain that we will be able to raise additional financing on terms acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain new financing, if and when necessary, our financial results and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
4
Transloading Joint Venture Distributions
The transloading joint venture distributes a cash payment on a monthly basis using a calculation that considers the month’s ending cash balance less third party expenses, both current and due over the next 30 days. The ending amount is the priority cash available. Any joint venture member transaction payments due are then deducted from the priority cash available. The ending balance, which is the priority cash remaining, is then multiplied by 50%, which is the required distribution amount. The distribution amount is then evenly distributed between Dakota Plains Transloading, LLC and PTS. Dakota Plains Transloading, LLC received a regular cash distribution from the transloading joint venture in January 2012. However, beginning in February 2012, Dakota Plains Transloading, LLC has temporarily suspended regular distributions to conserve capital to fund the purchase of seven additional transloaders for use at our New Town, North Dakota transloading facility and the construction and installation of a storage tank capable of storing up to 90,000 barrels of crude oil. The storage tank was ordered on April 16, 2012 and its construction and installation is expected to be completed in February 2013.
Subsequent to the end of the first quarter, the transloading joint venture agreed to proceed with the previously engaged engineering firm’s storage facility design and executed a letter of intent pursuant to which the manufacturer has begun construction of the storage tank. We anticipate that the construction of a permanent storage facility will result in aggregate capital expenditures of approximately $7.0 million, which is expected to be funded exclusively through cash generated by the operations of Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC.
On January 31, 2012, our contract with a customer that provided a significant portion of the income generated from the transloading joint venture expired. For the month of January, this customer was responsible for approximately 12,000 barrels of oil transloaded on a daily basis at our facility. In February and March, our marketing joint venture was our exclusive transloading customer and transloaded approximately 15,000 barrels of oil per day and 18,000 barrels of oil per day, respectively.
Marketing Joint Venture Distributions
The marketing joint venture determines if there will be a cash distribution on a quarterly basis. The distribution is based on the cash balance at quarter end, less the member preferred initial contribution equaling of $20 million and the cash necessary to fund, the trading activities incurred during the current quarter as well as the following, quarter’s forecasted operating expenses and trading activities. The net balance will be the priority cash available and will be distributed at 50% of the balance, evenly between the members. The marketing joint venture has made no cash distributions since its inception in April 2011.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
|
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
Unless otherwise indicated, all documents incorporated herein by reference to a document filed with the SEC purusant to the Exchange Act are located under SEC file number 000-53390.
|
|
|
| 2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 22, 2012, by and among MCT Holding Corporation, Dakota Plains, Inc. and DP Acquisition Corporation(1) |
|
|
|
| 2.2 | Plan of Merger of Dakota Plains, Inc. with and into MCT Holding Corporation(2) |
|
|
|
| 2.3 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 23, 2012, by and among MCT Holding Corporation, MCT Distribution Corporation and Lindsey Hailstone(3) |
|
|
|
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, effective March 23, 2012(4) |
|
|
|
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective March 23, 2012(5) |
|
|
|
| 4.1 | Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective March 23, 2012(6) |
|
|
|
| 10.1 | Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(7) |
|
|
|
| 10.2 | Form of Incentive Stock Option under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(8) |
|
|
|
| 10.3 | Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(9) |
|
|
|
| 10.4 | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan(10) |
|
|
|
| 10.5 | Form of Warrant with Executive Officers(11) |
5
|
|
|
| 10.6 | Form of Warrant(12) |
|
|
|
| 10.7 | Employment Agreement with Gabriel G. Claypool, dated March 22, 2012(13) |
|
|
|
| 10.8 | Employment Agreement with Timothy R. Brady, dated March 22, 2012(14) |
|
|
|
| 10.9 | Employment Agreement with Nicholas Q. Dillon, dated March 22, 2012(15) |
|
|
|
| 10.10 | Form of Exchange and Loan Agreement dated November 1, 2011(16) |
|
|
|
| 10.11 | Form of Exchange and Loan Agreement (Standby Credit Arrangement) dated November 1, 2011(17) |
|
|
|
| 10.12 | Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement dated November 9, 2009(18) |
|
|
|
| 10.13 | DPTS Marketing LLC Member Control Agreement dated April 29, 2011(19) |
|
|
|
| 10.14 | Amendment to DPTS Marketing LLC Member Control Agreement dated August 17, 2011(20) |
|
|
|
| 10.15 | Lease Agreement dated November 4, 2009(21) |
|
|
|
| 10.16 | Supplemental Agreement to Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement and Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Lease Agreement dated July 22, 2010(22) |
|
|
|
| 10.17 | Amendment to Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement dated April 29, 2011(23) |
|
|
|
| 10.18 | Amendment to Lease Agreement dated August 18, 2011(24) |
|
|
|
| 10.19 | Indemnification Agreement(25) |
|
|
|
| 10.20 | Employment Agreement with Robert C. Henry, dated April 9, 2012(26) |
|
|
|
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
| 32 | Section 1350 Certifications* |
|
|
|
| 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document* |
|
|
|
| 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema* |
|
|
|
| 101.CAL | XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase* |
|
|
|
| 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase* |
|
|
|
| 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase* |
|
|
|
| 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase* |
* Previously Filed.
|
|
|
| ||
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(9) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(12) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(13) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(14) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(15) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(16) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(17) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(18) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(19) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(20) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(21) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(22) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(23) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(24) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(25) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012. | |
(26) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 13, 2012. | |
6
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Date: | July 27, 2012 | DAKOTA PLAINS HOLDINGS, INC. | |
| /s/ Timothy R. Brady | |||
| Timothy R. Brady | |||
| Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
7
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
| Description |
| Manner of Filing |
|
| |||
3.1 |
| Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, effective March 23, 2012 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
3.2 |
| Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective March 23, 2012 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.1 |
| Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.2 |
| Form of Incentive Stock Option under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.3 |
| Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.4 |
| Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.5 |
| Form of Warrant with Executive Officers |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.6 |
| Form of Warrant |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.7 |
| Employment Agreement with Gabriel G. Claypool, dated March 22, 2012 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.8 |
| Employment Agreement with Timothy R. Brady, dated March 22, 2012 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.9 |
| Employment Agreement with Nicholas Q. Dillon, dated March 22, 2012 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.10 |
| Form of Exchange and Loan Agreement dated November 1, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.11 |
| Form of Exchange and Loan Agreement (Standby Credit Arrangement) dated November 1, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.12 |
| Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement dated November 9, 2009 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.13 |
| DPTS Marketing LLC Member Control Agreement dated April 29, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.14 |
| Amendment to DPTS Marketing LLC Member Control Agreement dated August 17, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.15 |
| Lease Agreement dated November 4, 2009 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.16 |
| Supplemental Agreement to Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement and Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Lease Agreement dated July 22, 2010 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.17 |
| Amendment to Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions, LLC Member Control Agreement dated April 29, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.18 |
| Amendment to Lease Agreement dated August 18, 2011 |
| Incorporated by Reference |
10.19 |
| Indemnification Agreement |
| Incorporated by Reference |
31.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
| Filed Electronically |
31.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
| Filed Electronically |
32 |
| Section 1350 Certifications |
| Previously Filed |
101.INS |
| XBRL Instance Document |
| Previously Filed |
101.SCH |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
| Previously Filed |
101.CAL |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
| Previously Filed |
101.DEF |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| Previously Filed |
101.LAB |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
| Previously Filed |
101.PRE |
| XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
| Previously Filed |
8
