The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
The Company has elected to use the calculated value method to account for options granted in the three month period ended March 31, 2007. As there was no significant active market for the Company’s common shares prior to the three month period ended March 31, 2007, the Company used historical volatility of the Dow Jones Small Cap Non-Durable Household Companies, which is representative of the Company’s size and industry. The Company has used the historical closing values of that index to estimate volatility which was calculated at 17%. The expected term considers the contractual term of the option as well as expectations for exercise and forfeiture behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the rates in effect on the grant date for U.S. Treasury instruments with maturities matching the relevant expected term of the award.
At March 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was $18,800 and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was $18,800. The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of our common stock for those awards that have an exercise price currently below the quoted price.
At March 31, 2007, all outstanding options were fully vested.
For services rendered in connection with its December 2006 IPO, the Company issued stock options on March 21, 2007 to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share vesting over the next three years and expiring December 19, 2016. These stock options were valued at approximately $6,300 using the Black-Scholes model and were unexercised as of March 31, 2007.
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The Company’s common stock equivalents include all common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants.
For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, the dilutive effect of 40,000 stock options are included in the diluted net income per share calculation. 1,207,500 stock options and 300,000 warrants are exluded from the calculation as they are antidilutive. For the three month period ended March 31, 2006, the Company had no common stock equivalents.
The Company has a $16 million line of credit with Compass Bank that originally expired May 5, 2007 but has been extended for 45 days to June 19, 2007. The interest on the first $6,000,000 of borrowings is fixed at 6.99% . Borrowings in excess of $6,000,000 have interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% . At March 31, 2007 that rate was 7.82% . The line of credit is due on demand and is secured by accounts receivable, inventories, and equipment. The line's
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONTINUED
NOTE E - LINE OF CREDIT (CONTINUED)
availability is based on a borrowing formula, which allows for borrowings equal to 85% of UPG’s eligible accounts receivable and a percentage of eligible inventory. In addition, UPG must maintain certain financial covenants including ratios on fixed charge coverage and minimum tangible net worth, as well as, maximum debt to tangible net worth and an interest coverage ratio. The advance formula referenced in the Security Agreement as the “Borrowing Base” is modified as follows: eighty-five percent (85.0%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable (as defined in the Security Agreement), plus fifty percent (50.0%) of the value of Borrower’s Eligible Inventory (as defined in the Security Agreement). Advances against Borrower’s Eligible Inventory shall not exceed the lesser of (a) $8,500,000 or (b) an amount equal to the product of (i) one and one-half (1.5), multiplied by (ii) eighty-five percent (85%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable at any one time outstanding. At March 31, 2007, $15,639,595 was outstanding under the line of credit and $38,480 remained available for borrowings under the line of credit based on the borrowing formula.
NOTE F – CONCENTRATIONS
A significant portion of UPG’s business is with one major customer, Brink’s Home Security, which represented approximately 42% and 53% of UPG’s revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At March 31, 2007, UPG had aggregate accounts receivable from this customer in the amount of $4,058,805. Through the date of this report, substantially this entire amount has been collected.
NOTE G – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, operating results, or cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that such legal proceedings will not have a material impact.
NOTE H – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The original due date of our line of credit was May 5, 2007. Compass Bank has extended the due date to June 19, 2007 in order to complete negotiations of the final terms.
Item 2. Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Form 10-Q. These statements include, without limitation, statements concerning our potential operations and results of operations. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in this Form 10-Q. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, without limitation, those factors discussed herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Results of Operations For Period Ending March 31, 2007 Compared to March 31, 2006
Revenues
For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, we had revenues of $23,500,000 compared to $20,700,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $2,800,000 or 13.5% . Revenues from Brinks Home Security and its authorized dealers in the quarter were $12,500,000 compared to $13,000,000 from the first quarter of 2006, a decrease of 4%. As most of our Brinks business is related to residential security systems, this decrease is primarily attributable to the overall slowdown in the residential construction industry. On the other hand, revenues from other customers increased from $7,700,000 in the first quarter of 2006 to $11,500,000 in the first quarter of 2007, an increase of 43%. We attribute this increase to existing and new accounts. We experienced price increases in certain battery and battery-related products as a result of increases in the cost of lead and copper. However, we were able to pass these increases along to our customers. We anticipate continued growth in revenue from the sales of battery, battery-powered product lines and new products. We also anticipate that sales to Brinks will grow in future periods due to Brinks growing inventory requirements in commercial markets.
Cost of Revenues
For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, our cost of revenues increased to $20,100,000 compared to $17,800,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $2,300,000 or 12.9% . Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was slightly lower at 85.4% compared to 85.9% for the similar period in 2006. We continue to monitor customer and vendor pricing due to raw material cost increases, which are expected to continue in the near future.
Operating Expenses
For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, our operating expenses, consisting of selling, general and administrative expenses as well as depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, increased approximately $460,000 or 21% to approximately $2,640,000 from $2,180,000 for the similar period in 2006. Of this increase, approximate amounts totaling $200,000 were attributable to salaries and other employee compensation expenses due to overall growth, $46,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation, $163,000 for legal, filing,
9
communication and other costs associated with being a reporting company, $80,000 in facility related costs, $59,000 in travel, trade shows and related costs, $22,000 in warehouse related expenses, $21,000 in additional bank fees and $12,000 in various insurance costs, offset primarily by reductions of $120,000 in management fees paid to our former parent for providing some of the services we are now paying for directly, and approximately $29,000 in various outside contractor services.
For the three month period ending March 31, 2007 we incurred approximately $50,000 in depreciation and amortization expense compared to $40,000 in the 2006 period.
Interest Expense and Income
Our interest expense totaled approximately $367,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to $182,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of approximately $185,000. The increase is due to the interest payable on notes having an aggregate principal amount of $5,850,000 held by our former parent, Zunicom, Inc., and increased borrowings under the line of credit at a higher interest rate. The average outstanding loan balance on the line of credit for the 2007 and 2006 periods was $13,700,000 and $10,900,000, respectively and the weighted average interest rates during the two periods was 7.82% and 7.13%, respectively.
Our interest income totaled approximately $173,000 in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $1,000 for the first quarter of 2006. This is due to the IPO funds being maintained in short term investments.
Liquidity
We had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $13,000,000 and $133,000 at March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to the proceeds from our initial public offering that was consummated in December 2006.
For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was approximately $938,000 compared to $2,300,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2006. The net cash used in operating activities is due primarily to approximate increases of $940,000 in our accounts receivable – trade, $315,000 in other receivables, $187,000 in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $44,000 in other assets, net reductions in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $435,000, $12,000 in deferred rent, offset by approximate decreases of $313,000 in inventories and $187,000 in our former parent receivable.
Cash used in investing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2007, was approximately $69,000 compared to $7,000 for the similar period in 2006. The cash used in 2007 and 2006 was related to the purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2007 was approximately $1,061,000 compared to $2,253,000 for the similar period in 2006. The net cash provided by financing activities for 2007 was primarily comprised of net borrowings on our line of credit of $1,066,000 offset by payments on lease obligations of approximately $5,000.
The Company has a $16 million line of credit with Compass Bank that originally expired May 5, 2007 but has been extended for 45 days to June 19, 2007. The interest on the first $6,000,000 of borrowings is fixed at 6.99% . Borrowings in excess of $6,000,000 have interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% . At March 31, 2007 that rate was 7.82% . The line of credit is due on demand and is secured by accounts receivable, inventories, and equipment. The line's availability is based on a borrowing formula, which allows for borrowings equal to 85% of UPG’s eligible accounts receivable and a percentage of eligible inventory. In addition, UPG must maintain certain financial covenants including ratios on fixed charge coverage and minimum tangible net worth, as well as, maximum debt to tangible net worth and an interest coverage ratio. The advance formula referenced in the Security Agreement as the “Borrowing Base” is modified as follows: eighty-five percent (85.0%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable (as defined in the Security Agreement), plus fifty percent (50.0%) of the value of Borrower’s Eligible Inventory (as defined in the Security Agreement). Advances against Borrower’s Eligible Inventory shall not exceed the lesser of (a) $8,500,000 or (b) an amount equal to the product of (i) one and one-half (1.5), multiplied by (ii) eighty-five percent (85%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable at any one time outstanding. At March 31, 2007, $15,639,595 was outstanding under the line of credit and $38,480 remained available for borrowings under the lie of credit based on the borrowing formula.
We believe that cash provided by operations and cash available under our line of credit, which is being renewed, will be sufficient to meet our operational needs over the next year.
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Foreign Currency Exchange
Our customers are primarily located in the U.S. However, many of our suppliers are located outside the U.S. and our financial results could be impacted by foreign currency exchange rates and market conditions abroad. However, the aggregate impact of any likely exchange rate fluctuations would be immaterial as most payments are made in U.S. dollars. We have not used derivative instruments to hedge our foreign exchange risks though we may choose to do so in the future.
Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely
10
affected by changes in these or other factors. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on us during three month period ended March 31, 2007 was not material.
Interest Rates
Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s line of credit. A portion of the outstanding borrowings on the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.5% . A change in the LIBOR would have a material effect on interest expense.
Item 4. Controls and procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Eveready Battery Company, Inc. (collectively “Eveready”) have initiated legal proceedings against us and over 20 other respondents relating to the manufacture, importation and sale of certain alkaline batteries alleged to infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,464,709. Eveready is seeking a general exclusion order with respect to future importation of these batteries. We have denied infringement and have been vigorously defending this action. The International Trade Commission ruled against Eveready and the matter was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On January 25, 2006, the Federal Circuit reversed the Commission’s holding of invalidity and has remanded for further proceedings based on its construction of Eveready’s patent. On February 23, 2007, the International Trade Commission again ruled that Everyready’s patent was invalid and terminated the investigation. Eveready has appealed that decision to the Federal Circuit and the parties are waiting for a ruling. For more information, see In re Certain Zero-Mercury-Added Alkaline Batteries, Parts Thereof and Products Containing Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-493, in the United States International Trade Commission.
In September of 2005, A.J. Gilson, a former sales representative, filed an action in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against Zunicom and us, claiming damages for breach of contract in the amount of $430,722 and all reasonable and necessary attorney fees. The plaintiff is alleging that we failed to pay him sales commissions to which he is entitled. We are defending ourselves and consider the claim without merit. We do not expect the final resolution of this claim to have a material adverse effect on our financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing of an unfavorable resolution against us, or the costs of settlement or litigation, our future results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of Part 1 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007 except as follows.
The risk factor immediately following, which was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, has been modified to provide additional disclosure related to changes since the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. See Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for an expanded description of other risks we face under “Other Risk Factors.”
The Company has experienced significant increases in raw material prices, particularly lead, and further changes in the prices of raw materials or in energy costs could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Lead is the primary material by weight used in the manufacture of batteries, representing approximately one-third of the Company’s cost of goods sold. Average lead prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) have risen dramatically.If the Company is unable to increase the prices of its products proportionate to the increase in raw material costs, the Company’s gross margins will decline. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to pass on these costs to its customers. Increases in the Company’s prices could also cause customer demand for the Company’s products to be reduced and net sales to decline. The rising cost of lead requires the Company to make significant investments in inventory and accounts receivable.
11
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Our initial public offering was declared effective on December 20, 2006. In the offering, we received net proceeds of approximately $12 million. We have used proceeds totaling approximately $310,000 implementing our new warehouse management system and $50,000 for new product development As of March 31, 2007 the remaining approximately $11.6 million in net proceeds were held in short-term investments in the form of cash in interest bearing accounts. We have made no direct or indirect payments to any directors or officers from the proceeds.
In Mach 2007, we granted options to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock to Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP, our corporate and securities laws counsel. The options have an exercise price of $7.00 per share and vest ratably over a three-year period beginning March 21, 2007. These options were not granted under our Stock Option Plan.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are furnished as part of this report or incorporated herein as indicated.
Exhibit No. | | | | Description |
3 | (i) | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (including Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation) (1) |
3 | (ii) | | Amended and Restated Bylaws (1) |
4.1 | | | Specimen stock certificate (1) |
4.2 | | | Form of representatives’ warrant (1) |
10.1 | (a) | | Form of 2006 Stock Option Plan (1) |
10.1 | (b) | | Form of Stock Option Agreement (1) |
10.1 | (c) | | Amended Option Plan Incorporated from S-8 (3) |
10.2 | | | Form of Randy Hardin Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.3 | | | Form of Ian Edmonds Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.4 | | | Form of Mimi Tan Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.5 | | | (a) Revolving Credit and Security Agreement with Compass Bank (1) |
| | | (b) Renewal and Modification Agreement, dated March 23, 2006 (1) |
| | | (c) Renewal and Modification Agreement, dated April 18, 2006 (1) |
| | | (d) First Amendment to Master Revolving Promissory Note (1) |
10.6 | | | Purchase Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, with Brinks Home Security (1) |
10.7 | | | Real Property Lease for 1720 Hayden Road, Carrollton, Texas (1) |
10.8 | | | Real Property Lease for 11605-B North Santa Fe, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (1) |
10.9 | | | Real Property Lease for Las Vegas, Nevada (1) |
10.10 | | | Agreement with Import Consultants (1) |
10.11 | (a) | | Form of Promissory Note in the amount of $2,850,000 payable to Zunicom (1) |
10.11 | (b) | | Form of Promissory Note in the amount of $3,000,000 payable to Zunicom (1) |
10.12 | | | Director-Nominee Consents |
| | | a) | Leslie Bernhard(1) |
| | | b) | Marvin I. Haas(1) |
| | | c) | Garland P. Asher(1) |
| | | d) | Robert M. Gutkowski(1) |
10.13 | | | Third Party Logistics & Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2006, with Brinks Home Security (1) |
14.1 | | | Code of Ethics* |
21.1 | | | Subsidiaries** |
31.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
31.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
* | Filed herewith. |
** | UPG does not have any significant subsidiaries. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit with the same number to UPG’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-137265) effective as of December 20, 2006. |
(2) | Management contract, compensation plan or arrangement. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration Number 333-_______) filed by us on May 8, 2007. |
12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, Thereunto duly authorized.
| | Universal Power Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
Date: May 15, 2007 | | /s/ Randy Hardin |
| | Randy Hardin |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: May 15, 2007 | | /s/ Julie Sansom-Reese |
| | Julie Sansom-Reese |
| | Chief Financial Officer |
| | (principal financial and accounting officer) |
13