The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q are only predictions. Actual results could, and likely will, differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described under “Risk Factors” for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC and the other risks and uncertainties you can find in our press releases and other SEC filings. No guarantee about future results, performance or achievements can be made. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
During the third quarter of 2007, our net income rose 50.1% to $682,000 compared to $454,400 for the third quarter of 2006. The increase in net income was partially due to an $89,000 tax refund as a result of tax law changes which contributed to a lower effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007.
Revenues and net income have risen 17.2% and 52.7%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, reflecting the results of ongoing strength in our business and successful execution of our growth strategy. Based on our performance through the first three quarters of 2007, and provided we are able to effectively manage our volatile raw material costs, we expect to exceed our previous guidance of 10% growth in revenues and operating income for 2007.
In addition to targeted organic growth, acquisitions are a significant component of our expansion initiatives and growth plans. We continue to diligently evaluate markets and acquisition candidates that will facilitate reaching our strategic objectives. Our new logistics center located in Columbus, Georgia began operations during the third quarter. This center will allow us to better serve and develop our customer base in that region.
During the second quarter of 2007 we initiated our Sarbanes-Oxley 404 compliance plan and began incurring related costs during the third quarter of 2007. As of September 30, 2007 we had incurred approximately 60% of anticipated implementation costs and expect to substantially complete implementation of our compliance plan during the fourth quarter of 2007.
A more detailed analysis of our results of operations and financial condition follows:
Results of Operations For Period Ending September 30, 2007 Compared to September 30, 2006
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Revenues
For the three month period ended September 30, 2007, we had revenues of approximately $29,788,000 compared to $23,772,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $6,016,000 or 25.3%. Revenues from Brinks Home Security for the three month period were approximately $14,515,000 compared to $13,713,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of 5.8%. As most of our Brinks business is related to residential security systems, this modest increase partially reflects slower growth in the residential housing market. However, revenues from other customers for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased to approximately $15,273,000 in 2007 from $10,059,000 in 2006, or 51.8%. We attribute this increase to more focused marketing to existing and new accounts. In addition, we continued to experience price increases in certain battery and battery-related products as a result of increases in the cost of lead and copper which we were able to successfully pass along to our customers. We anticipate continued growth in revenue from the sales of battery, battery-powered product lines and new products. We also anticipate that sales to Brinks will grow in future periods due to Brinks growing commercial inventory requirements.
Cost of Revenues
For the three month period ended September 30, 2007, our cost of revenues increased to approximately $25,546,000 compared to $20,297,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $5,249,000 or 25.9%. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was slightly higher in the 2007 period at 85.8% compared to 85.4% for the similar 2006 period. We continue to monitor customer and vendor pricing due to raw material cost increases, which are expected to continue in the near future.
Operating Expenses
For the three month period ended September 30, 2007 our operating expenses, consisting of selling, general and administrative expenses as well as depreciation and amortization, increased approximately $668,000 or 26.4% to $3,198,000 from $2,530,000 for the similar period in 2006. Of this increase, approximate amounts totaling $38,000 were attributable to salaries and other employee compensation expenses due to overall growth, $258,000 for legal, filing, communication and other costs associated with being a reporting company, $24,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation, $331,000 attributable to Sarbanes-Oxley implementation and other consulting fees, $96,000 in facility related costs, $48,000 in travel, trade shows and related costs, $23,000 in warehouse related expenses, and $31,000 in additional bank fees, offset primarily by reductions of $120,000 in management fees and approximately $22,000 in various other corporate costs.
For the three month period ending September 30, 2007 we incurred approximately $51,000 in depreciation and amortization expense compared to $34,000 for the similar period in 2006.
Interest Expense and Income
Our interest expense totaled approximately $225,000 and $193,000 for the three month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, an increase of approximately $32,000. The increase is due to the interest payable on notes having an aggregate principal amount of $5,850,000 held by our former parent, Zunicom, Inc. The average outstanding loan balance on the line of credit was approximately $6,945,000 and $12,148,000, respectively for the three month periods ending September 30, 2007 and 2006. The weighted average interest rate during the periods was approximately 7.37% and 7.41%, respectively for 2007 and 2006.
Our interest income totaled approximately $56,000 and $9,000 for the three month periods ending September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is due to funds raised during our initial public offering being maintained in short term investments.
11
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
Revenues
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, we had revenues of approximately $79,731,000 compared to $68,017,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $11,714,000 or 17.2%. Revenues from Brinks Home Security for the nine month period were approximately $41,028,000 compared to $40,401,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of 1.6%. As most of our Brinks business is related to residential security systems, this modest increase is primarily attributable to the overall slowdown in the residential construction industry, thus slowing the demand for certain security products. However, revenues from other customers for the similar periods increased to approximately $38,703,000 in 2007 from $27,616,000 in 2006, or 40.2%. We attribute this increase to more focused marketing to existing and new accounts. In addition, we experienced price increases in certain battery and battery-related products as a result of increases in the cost of lead and copper which we were able to successfully pass along to our customers. We anticipate continued growth in revenue from the sales of battery, battery-powered product lines and new products. We also anticipate that sales to Brinks will grow in future periods due to Brinks growing commercial inventory requirements.
Cost of Revenues
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, our cost of revenues increased to approximately $67,903,000 compared to $58,343,000 for the similar period in 2006, an increase of $9,560,000 or 16.4%. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues was slightly lower at 85.2% compared to 85.8% for the similar period in 2006. We continue to monitor customer and vendor pricing due to raw material cost increases, which are expected to continue in the near future.
Operating Expenses
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 our operating expenses, consisting of selling, general and administrative expenses as well as depreciation and amortization, increased approximately $1,438,000 or 20.3% to approximately $8,534,000 from $7,096,000 for the similar period in 2006. Of this increase, approximate amounts totaling $322,000 were attributable to salaries and other employee compensation expenses due to overall growth, $71,000 for non-cash stock-based compensation, $378,000 attributable to Sarbanes-Oxley implementation and other consulting fees, $515,000 for legal, filing, communication and other costs associated with being a reporting company, $198,000 in facility related costs, $124,000 in travel, trade shows and related costs, $56,000 in warehouse related expenses, $70,000 in additional bank fees and $151,000 in various other corporate costs, offset primarily by reductions of $360,000 in management fees.
For the nine month period ending September 30, 2007 we incurred approximately $142,000 in depreciation and amortization expense compared to $115,000 for the similar period in 2006.
Interest Expense and Income
Our interest expense totaled approximately $958,000 and $596,000 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, an increase of approximately $362,000. The increase is due primarily to the interest payable on notes having an aggregate principal amount of $5,850,000 held by our former parent, Zunicom, Inc. The average outstanding loan balance on the line of credit was approximately $12,400,000 and $10,400,000, respectively, for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2007 and 2006. The weighted average interest rate during the periods was approximately 7.65% and 7.15%, respectively for 2007 and 2006.
Our interest income totaled approximately $396,000 and $18,000 for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase is due to funds raised during our initial public offering being maintained in short term investments.
Liquidity
As of September 30, 2007, working capital increased to $21.7 million, up from $21.0 million at December 31, 2006.
For the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was approximately $2,089,664 compared to $1,407,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. The net cash used in
12
operating activities is due primarily to approximate increases of $3,555,000 in our accounts receivable – trade, $249,000 in other receivables, $3,507,000 in inventories, $215,000 in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $61,000 in other assets and $32,000 in deferred rent, offset by approximate net increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $3,237,000, and a decrease of $187,000 in our former parent receivable.
Cash used in investing activities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007, was approximately $869,000 compared to $84,000 for the similar period in 2006. Most of the increase in 2007 is related to implementation of our new warehouse system which is approximately 80% complete. The cash used in 2006 was related to the purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $9,347,000 compared to cash provided by of approximately $1,455,000 for the similar period in 2006. The net cash used in financing activities for 2007 was primarily due to reducing our outstanding line of credit by applying approximately $11,200,000 in remaining funds raised during our December 2006 initial public offering, payments on capital lease obligations of approximately $16,000 offset by new borrowings under our line of credit of approximately $1,869,000.
The Company has a $30 million line of credit with Compass Bank which matures on July 5, 2012. The facility bears interest at LIBOR Index Rate plus a sliding range from 1.25% to 2.50% based on quarterly covenant performance. At September 30, 2007 that rate was 7.5%. The line of credit is due on demand and is secured by accounts receivable, inventories, and equipment. The line's availability is based on a borrowing formula, which allows for borrowings equal to 85% of UPG’s eligible accounts receivable and a percentage of eligible inventory. In addition, UPG must maintain certain financial covenants including ratios on funded debt to EBITDA, as well as a fixed charge ratio. The advance formula referenced in the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) as the “Borrowing Base” is eighty-five percent (85.0%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable plus fifty percent (50.0%) of the value of Borrower’s Eligible Inventory (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Advances against Borrower’s Eligible Inventory shall not exceed the lesser of (a) $30,000,000 or (b) an amount equal to the product of (i) one and one-half (1.5), multiplied by (ii) eighty-five percent (85%) of the outstanding value of Borrower’s Eligible Accounts Receivable at any one time outstanding. At September 30, 2007, $5,242,484 was outstanding under the line of credit and approximately $14,360,000 remained available for borrowings under the line of credit based on the borrowing formula.
We believe that cash provided by operations and cash available under our line of credit will be sufficient to meet our operational needs over the next year.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange
While our customers are located primarily in the U.S., many of our suppliers are located outside the U.S. Accordingly, our financial results could be impacted by foreign currency exchange rates and market conditions abroad. However, the aggregate impact of any likely exchange rate fluctuations would be immaterial as most payments are made in U.S. dollars. We have not used derivative instruments to hedge our foreign exchange risks though we may choose to do so in the future.
Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to: differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely affected by changes in these or other factors. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on us during three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 was not material.
Interest Rates
Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our line of credit. A portion of the outstanding borrowings on the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR Index rate plus up to 2.5%. A change in the LIBOR rate would have a material effect on interest expense.
13
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
At the end of 2007, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require our management to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and at the end of 2008, our independent registered public accountants will be required to audit management’s assessment. We are in the process of performing the system and process documentation, evaluation and testing required for management to make this assessment and for its independent registered public accountants to provide their attestation report. We have not completed this process or its assessment, and this process will require significant amounts of management time and resources. In the course of evaluation and testing, management may identify deficiencies that will need to be addressed and remediated.
Other than certain improvements primarily related to documentation and segregation of duties, resulting from implementation of our Sarbanes-Oxley plan, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Energizer Holdings, Inc. and Eveready Battery Company, Inc. (collectively “Eveready”) have initiated legal proceedings against us and over 20 other respondents relating to the manufacture, importation and sale of certain alkaline batteries alleged to infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,464,709. Eveready is seeking a general exclusion order with respect to future importation of these batteries. We have denied infringement and have been vigorously defending this action. The International Trade Commission ruled against Eveready and Eveready then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On January 25, 2006, in the Federal Circuit reversed the Commission’s holding of invalidity and remanded for further proceedings based on its construction of Eveready’s patent. On February 23, 2007, the International Trade Commission again ruled that Everyready’s patent was invalid and terminated the investigation. Eveready has appealed that decision to the Federal Circuit. For more information, see In re Certain Zero-Mercury-Added Alkaline Batteries, Parts Thereof and Products Containing Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-493, in the United States International Trade Commission.
In A.J. Gilson v. Universal Power Group, Inc., Cause No. 05-09448-H, in the 160th Judicial Court of Dallas County, Texas plaintiff, a former independent sales representative for Universal Power Group, brought an action asserting claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel and quantum meruit, alleging that Universal failed to pay him commissions owed in the amount of $430,722. We denied plaintiff's allegations. Trial was conducted in this case on July 30-August 1, 2007, and a final judgement was entered against the plaintiff October 12, 2007 dismissing the plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. As of the date of this report no appeal has been filed.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of Part 1 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007 except as follows.
The risk factor immediately following, which was disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, has been modified to provide additional disclosure related to changes since we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. See Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 for an expanded description of other risks we face under “Other Risk Factors.”
14
We have experienced significant increases in raw material prices, particularly lead, and further changes in the prices of raw materials or in energy costs could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Lead is the primary material by weight used in the manufacture of batteries, representing approximately one-third of our cost of sealed lead acid batteries. Average lead prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) have risen dramatically. If we are unable to increase the prices of our products proportionate to the increase in raw material costs, our gross margins will decline. We cannot assure you that we will be able to pass on these costs to its customers. Increases in our prices could also cause customer demand for our products to be reduced and net sales to decline. The rising cost of lead requires us to make significant investments in inventory and accounts receivable.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Our initial public offering (IPO) was declared effective on December 20, 2006. In the offering, we received net proceeds of approximately $12 million. We have used proceeds totaling approximately $701,000 implementing our new warehouse management system, $31,000 in start up of our Columbus, Georgia logistics center and $93,000 for new product development. As of September 30, 2007 the remaining approximately $11.2 million in net proceeds were applied to temporarily reduce our outstanding line of credit pending acquisition opportunities or other designated IPO uses. We have made no direct or indirect payments to any directors or officers from the proceeds.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are furnished as part of this report or incorporated herein as indicated.
Exhibit No. | | Description |
3(i) | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (including Amended and Restated Articles of |
| | Incorporation) (1) |
3(ii) | | Amended and Restated Bylaws (1) |
4.1 | | Specimen stock certificate (1) |
4.2 | | Form of representatives’ warrant (1) |
10.1(a) | | Form of 2006 Stock Option Plan (1) |
10.1(b) | | Form of Stock Option Agreement (1) |
10.1(c) | | Amended Option Plan Incorporated from S-8 (3) |
10.2 | | Form of Randy Hardin Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.3 | | Form of Ian Edmonds Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.4 | | Form of Mimi Tan Employment Agreement (1)(2) |
10.5 | | (a) Revolving Credit and Security Agreement with Compass Bank (1) |
| | (b) Renewal and Modification Agreement, dated March 23, 2006 (1) |
| | (c) Renewal and Modification Agreement, dated April 18, 2006 (1) |
| | (d) First Amendment to Master Revolving Promissory Note, dated April 18, 2006 (1) |
10.6 | | Purchase Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, with Brinks Home Security (1) |
10.7 | | Real Property Lease for 1720 Hayden Road, Carrollton, Texas (1) |
10.8 | | Real Property Lease for 11605-B North Santa Fe, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (1) |
10.9 | | Real Property Lease for Las Vegas, Nevada (1) |
10.10 | | Agreement with Import Consultants (1) |
10.11(a) | | Form of Promissory Note in the amount of $2,850,000 payable to Zunicom, Inc. (1) |
10.11(b) | | Form of Promissory Note in the amount of $3,000,000 payable to Zunicom, Inc. (1) |
10.12 | | Director-Nominee Consents |
| | a) | Leslie Bernhard(1) |
| | b) | Marvin I. Haas(1) |
| | c) | Garland P. Asher(1) |
| | d) | Robert M. Gutkowski(1) |
10.13 | | Third Party Logistics & Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2006, with Brinks Home |
| | Security (1) |
21.1 | | Subsidiaries** |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to |
| | Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to |
| | Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
15
|
* | Filed herewith. |
** | UPG does not have any significant subsidiaries. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit with the same number to UPG’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 |
| (SEC File No. 333-137265) effective as of December 20, 2006. |
(2) | Management contract, compensation plan or arrangement. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC Registration Number 333-137265) |
| filed by us on May 8, 2007. |
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Universal Power Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2007 | /s/Randy Hardin |
| Randy Hardin |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: November 9, 2007 | /s/Roger Tannery |
| Roger Tannery |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| (principal financial and accounting officer) |
17