Invesco DB Gold Fund 424B3 Prospectus supplement

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration Nos. 333-184947
333-184947-01
333-184947-02
333-184947-03
333-184947-04
333-184947-05
333-184947-06

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

POWERSHARES DB ENERGY FUND

POWERSHARES DB OIL FUND

POWERSHARES DB PRECIOUS METALS FUND

POWERSHARES DB GOLD FUND

POWERSHARES DB SILVER FUND

POWERSHARES DB BASE METALS FUND

SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 18, 2013 TO

PROSPECTUS DATED JANUARY 3, 2013

This Supplement updates certain information contained in the Prospectus dated January 3, 2013, as supplemented from time-to-time (the “Prospectus”) of PowerShares DB Multi-Sector Commodity Trust (the “Trust”), PowerShares DB Energy Fund, PowerShares DB Oil Fund, PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund, PowerShares DB Gold Fund, PowerShares DB Silver Fund and PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund (collectively, the “Funds”). All capitalized terms used in this Supplement have the same meaning as in the Prospectus.

Prospective investors in the Funds should review carefully the contents of both this Supplement and the Prospectus.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

All information in the Prospectus is restated pursuant to this Supplement, except as updated hereby.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission

has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Supplement is

truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS POOL NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC

Managing Owner

I.	Page 16 of the Prospectus is hereby deleted and replaced, in its entirety, with the following:

BREAKEVEN TABLE


	Dollar Amount and Percentage of Expenses Per Fund
	DBE⁹							DBO¹⁰							DBP¹⁰							DGL¹⁰							DBS¹⁰							DBB⁹
Expense¹	$				%			$				%			$				%			$				%			$				%			$				%
Management Fee²		$	0.19			0.75	%		$	0.19			0.75	%		$	0.19			0.75	%		$	0.19			0.75	%		$	0.19			0.75	%		$	0.19			0.75	%
Organization and Offering Expense Reimbursement³		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%
Brokerage Commissions and Fees⁴		$	0.01			0.03	%		$	0.01			0.04	%		$	0.01			0.04	%		$	0.01			0.04	%		$	0.01			0.04	%		$	0.01			0.03	%
Routine Operational, Administrative and Other Ordinary Expenses^5,6		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%		$	0.00			0.00	%
Interest Income⁷		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%		$	(0.01	)		(0.05	)%
12-Month Breakeven⁸		$	0.19			0.73	%		$	0.19			0.74	%		$	0.19			0.74	%		$	0.19			0.74	%		$	0.19			0.74	%		$	0.19			0.73	%

1.	The breakeven analysis assumes that the Shares have a constant month-end Fund net asset value and is based on $25.00 as the net asset value per Share. See “Charges” on page 97 for an explanation of the expenses included in the “Breakeven Table.”

2.	From the Management Fee, the Managing Owner will be responsible for paying the fees and expenses of the Administrator, ALPS Distributors and Invesco Distributors.

3.	The Managing Owner is responsible for paying the organization and offering expenses and the continuous offering costs of each Fund.

4.	The actual amount of brokerage commissions and trading fees to be incurred will vary based upon the trading frequency of each Fund and the specific futures contracts traded.

5.	The Managing Owner is responsible for paying all routine operational, administrative and other ordinary expenses of each Fund.

In connection with orders to create and redeem Baskets, Authorized Participants will pay a transaction fee in the amount of $500 per order. Because these transaction fees are de minimis in amount, are charged on a transaction-by-transaction basis (and not on a Basket-by-Basket basis), and are borne by the Authorized Participants, they have not been included in the Breakeven Table.

7.	Interest income currently is estimated to be earned at a rate of 0.05%, based upon the yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills as of May 31, 2013. Actual interest income could be higher or lower than the current yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills.

You may pay customary brokerage commissions in connection with purchases of the Shares. Because such brokerage commission rates will vary from investor to investor, such brokerage commissions have not been included in the Breakeven Table. Investors are encouraged to review the terms of their brokerage accounts for applicable charges.

Each of DBE and DBB are subject to (i) a Management Fee of 0.75% per annum and (ii) estimated brokerage commissions and fees of 0.03% per annum. DBE and DBB are each subject to fees and expenses in the aggregate amount of approximately 0.78% per annum. DBE and DBB will be successful only if each of their annual returns from the underlying futures contracts, including annual income from 3-month U.S. Treasury bills, exceeds approximately 0.78% per annum. Each of DBE and DBB is expected to earn 0.05% per annum, based upon the yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills as of May 31, 2013. Therefore, based upon the difference between the current yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills and the annual fees and expenses, each of DBE and DBB would be required to earn approximately 0.73% per annum, in order for an investor to break-even on an investment during the first twelve months of an investment. Actual interest income could be higher or lower than the current yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills.

10.

Each of DBO, DBP, DGL and DBS will be subject to (i) a Management Fee of 0.75% per annum and (ii) estimated brokerage commissions and fees of 0.04% per annum. DBO, DBP, DGL and DBS are each subject to fees and expenses in the aggregate amount of approximately 0.79% per annum. DBO, DBP, DGL and DBS will be successful only if each of their annual returns from the underlying futures contracts, including annual income from 3-month U.S. Treasury bills, exceeds approximately 0.79% per annum. Each of DBO, DBP, DGL and DBS is expected to earn 0.05% per annum, based upon the yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills as of May 31, 2013. Therefore, based upon the difference between the current yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills and the annual fees and expenses, each of DBO, DBP, DGL and DBS would be required to earn approximately 0.74% per annum, in order for an investor to break-even on an investment during the first twelve months of an investment. Actual interest income could be higher or lower than the current yield of 3-month U.S. Treasury bills.

All references throughout the Prospectus to the Interest Income and the 12-Month Breakeven amounts are hereby deleted and replaced with the revised information as provided in the above Breakeven Table.

II.

Pages 33 through 37 of the Prospectus are hereby deleted and replaced, in their entirety, with the following:

“PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB ENERGY FUND(TICKER: DBE), A SERIES OF

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Energy Fund

Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading: January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$977,045,652

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$196,235,052

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$27.25

Worst Monthly Drawdown: (28.36)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (66.18)% June 2008 – February 2009*


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	4.68	2.50	5.35	(8.46)	(6.19)	(1.17)
February	(3.75)	8.19	5.65	5.54	(5.93)	10.62
March	3.30	(1.99)	5.38	2.88	5.71	1.35
April	(4.43)	(0.43)	6.24	5.48	(1.34)	10.21
May	(2.12)	(14.35)	(7.66)	(14.15)	22.99	14.95
June		(1.25)	(3.55)	(0.73)	3.14	10.15
July		5.50	2.04	4.09	2.26	(12.21)
August		8.36	(3.94)	(7.48)	(3.50)	(6.72)
September		(1.35)	(11.72)	7.97	(0.96)	(11.32)
October		(3.68)	8.44	0.02	7.99	(28.36)
November		2.29	1.43	2.15	1.68	(14.60)
December		(0.36)	(2.81)	8.95	(0.39)	(13.74)**
Compound Rate of Return	(2.64)% (5 months)	1.34%	2.68%	3.42%	24.81%	(40.74)%

The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 – February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.44 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **.

The December 2008 return of (13.74)% includes the $0.44 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was (11.92)%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB OIL FUND(TICKER: DBO), A SERIES OF

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool:PowerShares DB Oil Fund

Type of Pool:Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading:January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$1,899,171,246

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$401,583,253

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$25.42

Worst Monthly Drawdown:(29.20)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown:(65.43)% June 2008 – February 2009*


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	5.73	0.46	3.69	(8.65)	(5.87)	(3.00)
February	(6.15)	8.47	2.60	7.48	(4.30)	10.99
March	4.96	(4.02)	7.67	4.76	7.88	0.30
April	(4.25)	1.14	6.25	4.46	(1.12)	12.33
May	(1.93)	(18.21)	(10.43)	(16.47)	26.94	12.65
June		(0.24)	(5.99)	(3.20)	1.94	11.73
July		1.99	(0.45)	4.98	3.09	(11.24)
August		8.31	(8.79)	(5.14)	(3.12)	(5.82)
September		(4.04)	(11.66)	6.70	(1.07)	(12.79)
October		(5.28)	14.58	(0.14)	8.27	(29.20)
November		2.67	8.17	1.66	2.94	(15.73)
December		2.28	(0.59)	9.39	(0.95)	(11.79)**
Compound Rate of Return	(2.19)% (5 months)	(9.00)%	1.28%	2.51%	35.65%	(41.42)%

The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 – February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.12 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **.

The December 2008 return of (11.79)% includes the $0.12 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was (11.27)%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information on page 36.

PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB PRECIOUS METALS FUND(TICKER: DBP), A SERIES

OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool:PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund

Type of Pool:Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading:January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$1,045,920,232

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$247,988,793

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$45.92

Worst Monthly Drawdown:(18.43)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown:(31.88)% February 2008 – October 2008


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	(0.09)	12.41	(7.08)	(1.83)	6.02	10.18
February	(6.12)	(0.58)	8.60	2.92	1.97	7.34
March	0.73%	(3.34)	4.38	0.68	(1.84)	(7.24)
April	(9.34)	(1.35)	13.10	5.93	(3.99)	(5.36)
May	(6.11)	(7.10)	(7.05)	2.01	12.91	2.30
June		1.92	(3.96)	2.27	(7.08)	3.99
July		0.44	9.87	(5.01)	2.61	(0.88)
August		5.99	10.31	5.95	1.17	(12.05)
September		6.06	(15.29)	6.14	7.00	2.59
October		(3.88)	7.85	5.46	1.73	(18.43)
November		0.12	0.08	4.66	13.44	11.56
December		(3.68)	(11.46)	3.91	(7.62)	6.94*
Compound Rate of Return	(19.58)% (5 months)	5.60%	4.34%	37.71%	26.57%	(3.88)%

The December 2008 return of 6.94% includes the $0.27 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was 7.91%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB GOLD FUND(TICKER: DGL), A SERIES OF

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool:PowerShares DB Gold Fund

Type of Pool:Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading:January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$919,465,487

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$179,578,850

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$47.26

Worst Monthly Drawdown:(18.06)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown:(26.80)% February 2008 – October 2008


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	(1.03)	10.87	(6.39)	(1.30)	4.85	9.67
February	(5.22)	(1.74)	5.58	3.15	1.48	5.14
March	0.97	(2.56)	1.98	(0.56)	(2.07)	(5.77)
April	(7.94)	(0.52)	8.05	5.89	(3.64)	(5.92)
May	(5.63)	(6.23)	(1.41)	2.79	9.53	2.54
June		2.52	(2.26)	2.45	(5.40)	4.17
July		0.31	8.32	(5.28)	2.69	(1.48)
August		4.54	12.25	5.56	(0.26)	(9.22)
September		5.12	(11.52)	4.63	5.75	5.49
October		(3.18)	6.32	3.60	3.01	(18.06)
November		(0.56)	1.28	1.98	13.39	13.29
December		(2.23)	(10.62)	2.45	(7.27)	6.66*
Compound Rate of Return	(17.72)% (5 months)	5.34%	8.63%	27.83%	22.03%	2.00%

The December 2008 return of 6.66% includes the $0.26 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was 7.52%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information on page 36.

PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB SILVER FUND(TICKER: DBS), A SERIES OF

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool:PowerShares DB Silver Fund

Type of Pool:Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading:January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$520,816,331

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$37,712,900

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$37.71

Worst Monthly Drawdown:(28.30)% September 2011

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown:(55.81)% April 2011 – May 2013


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	3.81%	19.37	(9.59)	(4.06)	11.40	12.83
February	(9.70)	4.11	19.91	1.91	4.16	16.53
March	(0.33)	(6.33)	12.35	6.15	(0.89)	(12.95)
April	(15.25)	(4.74)	28.28	6.20	(5.23)	(4.05)
May	(8.34)	(10.74)	(21.29)	(1.11)	26.80	1.67
June		(0.73)	(9.25)	1.38	(13.00)	3.41
July		1.05	15.23	(3.92)	2.46	1.68
August		12.54	4.06	7.65	6.73	(23.42)
September		10.10	(28.30)	12.36	11.63	(10.23)
October		(6.72)	14.33	12.61	(2.45)	(20.75)
November		2.85	(4.61)	14.77	13.71	4.72
December		(9.32)	(15.07)	9.63	(9.03)	8.74*
Compound Rate of Return	(27.41)% (5 months)	7.03%	(11.13)%	81.95%	48.10%	(27.16)%

The December 2008 return of 8.74% includes the $0.22 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was 9.92%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB BASE METALS FUND(TICKER: DBB), A SERIES OF

POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST

Name of Pool:PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund

Type of Pool:Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool

Inception of Trading:January 2007

Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of May 31, 2013:$1,328,359,300

Net Asset Value as of May 31, 2013:$322,256,077

Net Asset Value per Share as of May 31, 2013:$17.33

Worst Monthly Drawdown:(27.29)% October 2008

Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown:(60.29)% July 2007 – January 2009*


Monthly Rate of Return	2013(%)	2012(%)	2011(%)	2010(%)	2009(%)	2008(%)
January	1.41	11.27	0.62	(11.50)	(7.37)	8.82
February	(4.64)	1.97	3.18	4.12	3.71	12.16
March	(5.19)	(5.37)	(3.08)	8.17	12.99	(5.59)
April	(3.65)	0.30	(0.57)	(4.12)	6.48	(0.87)
May	2.54	(9.47)	(1.68)	(10.43)	6.30	(4.54)
June		(0.16)	(0.17)	(5.71)	3.07	3.92
July		(2.03)	4.35	11.17	13.82	(4.21)
August		0.17	(6.73)	(0.86)	7.55	(6.74)
September		10.74	(19.24)	9.18	(0.43)	(11.14)
October		(9.19)	7.81	3.32	5.97	(27.29)
November		6.90	(1.23)	(4.69)	6.81	(6.46)
December		(0.47)	(6.54)	13.14	7.98	(11.29)**
Compound Rate of Return	(9.41)% (5 months)	2.19%	(23.18)%	8.20%	88.64%	(45.73)%

The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from July 2007 – January 2009 includes the effect of the $0.96 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007, and the effect of the $0.28 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **.

The December 2008 return of (11.29)% includes the $0.28 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pool’s return for December 2008 was (9.21)%.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information on page 36.

Footnotes to Performance Information

1. “Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions” is the aggregate of all amounts ever contributed to the relevant pool, including investors who subsequently redeemed their investments.

2. “Net Asset Value” is the net asset value of the relevant pool as of May 31, 2013.

3. “Net Asset Value per Share” is the Net Asset Value of the relevant pool divided by the total number of Shares outstanding with respect to such pool as of May 31, 2013.

4. “Worst Monthly Drawdown” is the largest single month loss sustained since inception of trading. “Drawdown” as used in this section of the Prospectus means losses experienced by the relevant pool over the specified period and is calculated on a rate of return basis, i.e., dividing net performance by beginning equity. “Drawdown” is measured on the basis of monthly returns only, and does not reflect intra-month figures. “Month” is the month of the Worst Monthly Drawdown.

5. “Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown” is the largest percentage decline in the Net Asset Value per Share over the history of the relevant pool. This need not be a continuous decline, but can be a series of positive and negative returns where the negative returns are larger than the positive returns. “Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown” represents the greatest percentage decline from any month-end Net Asset Value per Share that occurs without such month-end Net Asset Value per Share being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the Net Asset Value per Share of a particular pool declined by $1 in each of January and February, increased by $1 in March and declined again by $2 in April, a “peak-to-valley drawdown” analysis conducted as of the end of April would consider that “drawdown” to be still continuing and to be $3 in amount, whereas if the Net Asset Value per Share had increased by $2 in March, the January-February drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at the $2 level.

6. “Compound Rate of Return” of the relevant pool is calculated by multiplying on a compound basis each of the monthly rates of return set forth in the respective charts above and not by adding or averaging such monthly rates of return. For periods of less than one year, the results are year-to-date.

7. The below table reflects both the name of the original Index that each Fund has tracked up to and including December 31, 2010, or Original Index, and the name of the Index that each Fund will track after December 31, 2010, or Renamed Index:


Fund	Index
	Original	Renamed	Dates
	Original	Renamed	Inception	Rename

PowerShares DB Energy Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Energy Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Excess Return™	7/06	10/10

PowerShares DB Oil Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Crude Oil Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return™	5/06	10/10

PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Precious Metals Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return™	7/06	10/10

PowerShares DB Gold Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold Index Excess Return™	5/06	10/10

PowerShares DB Silver Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Silver Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver Index Excess Return™	6/06	10/10

PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund	Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index–Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Excess Return™	DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return™	7/06	10/10

Each Fund’s Original Index is identical to the Renamed Index, except with respect to the following non-substantive changes: (i) name of Index and (ii) ticker symbol. The above Inception Dates remain identical. The Rename Date of October 2010 reflects the date on which each Original Index changed its name as reflected in the Renamed Index column above and each such change and became effective in January 3, 2011. Except as provided in the immediately preceding sentence, all prior underlying formulae, data (e.g., closing levels, measure of volatility, all other numerical statistics and measures) and all other characteristics (e.g., Base Date, Index Sponsor, Inception Date, rolling, etc.) with respect to each Original Index is identical to its corresponding Renamed Index.

DBLCI™ and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index™ are trade marks of the Index Sponsor and are the subject of Community Trade Mark Nos. 3055043 and 3054996. Trade Mark applications in the United States are pending with respect to both the Trust and aspects of each Index. The Fund and the Managing Owner have been licensed to use DBLCI™, Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index™ and DBIQ™.

[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]


III. Pages 47 through 95 of the Prospectus are hereby deleted and replaced, in their entirety, with the following:

Volatility of the Various Indexes

The following table¹ reflects various measures of volatility² of the history of each Index as calculated on an excess return basis:
Volatility Type	DBIQ-OY Energy ER™³	DBIQ-OY CL ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY Precious Metals ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY GC ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY SI ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals ER™⁵
Daily volatility over full history	24.48%	26.94%	16.65%	15.30%	26.78%	20.59%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility	22.80%	25.21%	15.51%	14.13%	24.95%	19.26%
Monthly return volatility	25.07%	26.55%	17.06%	15.57%	28.02%	21.73%
Average annual volatility	23.66%	25.91%	15.58%	14.39%	24.52%	18.61%

The following table reflects the daily volatility on an annual basis of each Index:

Year	DBIQ-OY Energy ER™³	DBIQ-OY CL ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY Precious Metals ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY GC ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY SI ER™⁴	DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals ER™⁵
1988	–	26.56%	11.17%	11.41%	10.73%	–
1989	–	28.11%	13.57%	13.14%	18.53%	–
1990	44.82%	40.56%	16.71%	17.67%	19.41%	–
1991	31.03%	29.57%	13.63%	12.63%	23.40%	–
1992	14.60%	16.66%	8.90%	8.32%	15.67%	–
1993	15.25%	17.70%	16.81%	14.44%	28.37%	–
1994	18.05%	20.13%	12.08%	9.60%	23.28%
1995	13.45%	17.07%	9.89%	6.62%	26.37%	–
1996	23.86%	31.02%	7.74%	6.17%	17.62%	–
1997	18.29%	21.51%	13.51%	12.60%	24.68%	11.99%
1998	23.80%	27.97%	14.60%	12.84%	29.22%	14.38%
1999	24.43%	27.10%	16.54%	17.35%	21.74%	14.07%
2000	28.21%	32.19%	14.01%	15.02%	14.41%	11.78%
2001	27.56%	29.77%	13.79%	14.44%	17.22%	12.57%
2002	24.63%	25.52%	13.51%	13.44%	17.43%	13.12%
2003	26.34%	26.59%	16.17%	16.66%	20.32%	13.86%
2004	28.71%	30.80%	19.48%	16.25%	35.48%	20.85%
2005	27.49%	26.55%	13.23%	12.38%	21.32%	18.18%
2006	22.01%	22.01%	25.97%	22.81%	41.21%	32.26%
2007	19.54%	21.17%	14.96%	13.91%	21.28%	20.35%
2008	36.57%	41.43%	27.33%	25.53%	43.01%	28.81%
2009	31.28%	33.56%	20.44%	18.40%	31.13%	29.14%
2010	18.84%	20.63%	15.22%	13.28%	26.40%	23.76%
2011	21.12%	25.20%	21.17%	17.47%	39.26%	20.67%
2012	16.54%	19.36%	15.35%	13.46%	25.27%	15.48%
2013¹	11.47%	14.93%	19.38%	18.19%	24.79%	15.06%
¹As of May 31, 2013. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. ²Volatility, for these purposes, means the following: Daily Volatility: The relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. Monthly Return Volatility: The relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the monthly change in price. Average Annual Volatility: The average of yearly volatilities for a given sample period. The yearly volatility is the relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price for each business day in the given year. ³As of June 4, 1990. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. ⁴As of December 2, 1988. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. ⁵As of September 3, 1997. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels.

ENERGY SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY ENERGY ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1990⁵	179.19	96.66	45.52%	45.52%
1991	147.42	107.20	-20.99%	14.98%
1992	137.39	110.88	9.57%	25.99%
1993	138.78	100.51	-20.19%	0.56%
1994	122.19	95.20	6.96%	7.56%
1995	119.82	102.02	11.00%	19.39%
1996	197.83	111.99	63.92%	95.71%
1997	204.30	159.71	-18.40%	59.71%
1998	160.51	97.65	-36.95%	0.70%
1999	178.20	92.77	72.80%	74.00%
2000	298.97	167.50	41.06%	145.44%
2001	278.42	192.42	-16.74%	104.36%
2002	298.19	194.55	41.97%	190.12%
2003	391.72	284.31	32.29%	283.81%
2004	715.99	383.42	54.72%	493.84%
2005	1037.13	582.46	55.14%	821.29%
2006	1074.96	812.65	-10.74%	722.36%
2007	1112.80	709.23	34.88%	1009.21%
2008	1772.65	559.38	-40.45%	560.50%
2009	862.18	518.29	25.76%	730.64%
2010	884.28	704.89	4.00%	763.88%
2011	1075.48	812.44	3.38%	793.06%
2012	1013.67	764.32	2.01%	811.04%
2013⁶	972.19	872.41	-2.28%	790.30%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND

NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1990⁵	183.60	97.33	51.88%	51.88%
1991	154.30	112.85	-16.53%	26.77%
1992	155.82	122.35	13.48%	43.86%
1993	160.01	118.31	-17.71%	18.38%
1994	147.06	112.95	11.67%	32.19%
1995	155.68	127.46	17.38%	55.17%
1996	270.11	146.19	72.56%	167.77%
1997	279.83	227.35	-14.08%	130.07%
1998	232.17	147.51	-33.81%	52.29%
1999	282.30	141.11	81.15%	175.87%
2000	496.29	265.84	49.64%	312.83%
2001	476.58	334.41	-13.77%	255.97%
2002	527.96	339.16	44.32%	413.72%
2003	700.53	505.36	33.65%	586.61%
2004	1293.70	686.54	56.88%	977.16%
2005	1917.92	1056.70	60.14%	1625.00%
2006	2070.40	1595.93	-6.33%	1515.87%
2007	2285.06	1397.07	41.00%	2178.45%
2008	3676.21	1165.04	-39.62%	1275.66%
2009	1798.15	1079.73	25.94%	1632.53%
2010	1845.15	1471.50	4.14%	1704.26%
2011	2247.01	1697.62	3.43%	1766.13%
2012	2118.34	1597.67	2.10%	1805.30%
2013⁶	2033.34	1824.93	-2.25%	1762.46%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CL⁷		HO⁷		LCO⁷		XB⁷		NG⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low
1990⁵	21.8%	21.9%	21.4%	22.6%	27.2%	22.2%	23.4%	22.4%	6.2%	10.9%
1991	21.8%	22.5%	22.8%	22.7%	23.8%	20.0%	21.5%	21.8%	10.1%	13.1%
1992	21.3%	22.3%	23.1%	23.1%	21.6%	21.5%	21.7%	22.2%	12.3%	10.8%
1993	21.6%	22.1%	21.5%	22.8%	21.1%	22.7%	21.4%	22.0%	14.4%	10.4%
1994	20.6%	21.7%	22.4%	22.5%	24.7%	21.9%	23.0%	21.8%	9.3%	12.1%
1995	22.9%	24.3%	21.2%	22.1%	23.1%	23.0%	23.1%	21.9%	9.7%	8.8%
1996	22.6%	22.6%	21.6%	21.1%	22.0%	22.5%	21.8%	22.9%	12.0%	10.9%
1997	23.2%	22.5%	21.6%	22.6%	22.2%	21.6%	21.4%	23.1%	11.4%	10.1%
1998	22.4%	22.7%	22.9%	23.4%	21.3%	21.1%	23.5%	22.5%	9.9%	10.4%
1999	22.7%	23.1%	21.9%	22.0%	23.0%	22.2%	23.3%	22.3%	9.1%	10.4%
2000	21.8%	22.9%	22.5%	22.2%	21.2%	22.8%	23.2%	23.2%	11.4%	8.9%
2001	23.5%	22.9%	22.0%	22.2%	21.4%	21.8%	22.5%	22.7%	10.5%	10.4%
2002	21.4%	23.2%	22.4%	22.5%	24.2%	22.6%	21.8%	23.2%	10.3%	8.5%
2003	22.7%	21.2%	22.6%	21.5%	22.3%	23.2%	22.3%	21.8%	10.2%	12.3%
2004	23.9%	22.6%	23.0%	22.2%	23.2%	21.8%	21.0%	22.9%	8.8%	10.5%
2005	20.6%	22.3%	23.5%	22.7%	21.8%	22.3%	24.9%	23.0%	9.1%	9.7%
2006	23.3%	22.8%	22.7%	22.7%	23.2%	22.9%	25.3%	22.8%	5.5%	8.7%
2007	22.6%	22.1%	22.8%	23.0%	22.5%	22.1%	23.0%	22.6%	9.1%	10.2%
2008	22.2%	21.8%	24.2%	21.3%	22.3%	22.8%	21.3%	21.7%	10.1%	12.4%
2009	24.5%	22.7%	19.4%	20.7%	23.9%	22.8%	27.5%	24.3%	4.7%	9.6%
2010	22.8%	22.3%	23.0%	23.0%	23.4%	23.0%	23.5%	23.1%	7.3%	8.6%
2011	21.9%	19.0%	23.3%	24.0%	23.3%	24.0%	23.3%	24.6%	8.3%	8.4%
2012	23.9%	22.8%	22.6%	23.1%	23.2%	22.7%	23.2%	23.0%	7.0%	8.3%
2013⁶	22.8%	22.4%	22.3%	21.7%	23.2%	22.0%	23.2%	22.6%	8.4%	11.3%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE,

SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CL⁷		HO⁷		LCO⁷		XB⁷		NG⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low	High	Low
1990⁵	21.8%	21.9%	21.4%	22.6%	27.2%	22.2%	23.4%	22.4%	6.2%	10.9%
1991	21.8%	22.5%	22.8%	22.7%	23.8%	20.0%	21.5%	21.8%	10.1%	13.1%
1992	21.3%	22.3%	23.2%	23.1%	21.6%	21.5%	21.5%	22.2%	12.5%	10.8%
1993	21.6%	22.1%	21.5%	22.8%	21.1%	22.7%	21.4%	22.0%	14.4%	10.4%
1994	20.6%	21.7%	22.4%	22.5%	24.7%	21.9%	23.0%	21.8%	9.3%	12.1%
1995	22.9%	22.9%	21.2%	22.4%	23.1%	23.1%	23.1%	23.3%	9.7%	8.4%
1996	22.6%	22.6%	21.6%	21.1%	22.0%	22.5%	21.8%	22.9%	12.0%	10.9%
1997	23.2%	22.0%	21.6%	22.8%	22.2%	21.1%	21.4%	23.7%	11.4%	10.3%
1998	22.4%	22.7%	22.9%	23.4%	21.3%	21.1%	23.5%	22.5%	9.9%	10.4%
1999	22.9%	23.1%	22.3%	22.0%	22.8%	22.2%	23.3%	22.3%	8.6%	10.4%
2000	21.8%	22.9%	22.5%	22.2%	21.2%	22.8%	23.2%	23.2%	11.4%	8.9%
2001	23.5%	22.9%	22.0%	22.2%	21.4%	21.8%	22.5%	22.7%	10.5%	10.4%
2002	21.4%	23.2%	22.4%	22.5%	24.2%	22.6%	21.8%	23.2%	10.3%	8.5%
2003	22.7%	21.2%	22.6%	21.5%	22.3%	23.2%	22.3%	21.8%	10.2%	12.3%
2004	23.9%	22.6%	23.0%	22.2%	23.2%	21.8%	21.0%	22.9%	8.8%	10.5%
2005	20.6%	22.3%	23.5%	22.7%	21.8%	22.3%	24.9%	23.0%	9.1%	9.7%
2006	23.3%	22.8%	22.7%	22.7%	23.2%	22.9%	25.3%	22.8%	5.5%	8.7%
2007	22.6%	22.1%	22.8%	23.0%	22.5%	22.1%	23.0%	22.6%	9.1%	10.2%
2008	22.2%	21.8%	24.2%	21.3%	22.4%	22.8%	21.3%	21.7%	10.0%	12.4%
2009	24.5%	22.7%	19.4%	20.7%	23.9%	22.8%	27.5%	24.3%	4.7%	9.6%
2010	22.8%	22.3%	23.0%	23.0%	23.4%	23.0%	23.5%	23.1%	7.3%	8.6%
2011	21.9%	19.0%	23.3%	24.0%	23.3%	24.0%	23.3%	24.6%	8.3%	8.4%
2012	23.9%	22.8%	22.6%	23.1%	23.2%	22.7%	23.2%	23.0%	7.0%	8.3%
2013⁶	22.8%	22.4%	22.3%	21.7%	23.2%	22.0%	23.2%	22.6%	8.4%	11.3%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND

NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from June 4, 1990 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		10.0%		13.6%		5.6%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		22.8%		22.8%		27.9%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.44		0.47		0.10
% of months with positive change¹⁴		55%		56%		54%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		5.9%		6.1%		7.3%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-5.0%		-4.8%		-6.5%

ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return¹⁰
1 year		7.0%		7.1%		2.5%
3 year		5.8%		5.9%		4.5%
5 year		-10.5%		-10.3%		-17.5%
7 year		-1.4%		-0.1%		-8.1%
10 year		10.9%		12.8%		0.3%
15 year		13.1%		15.8%		6.2%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

WHILE THE FUND’S OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006 (RENAMED OCTOBER 2010), CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE “HYPOTHETICAL.” HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.

NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUND’S PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD JUNE 1990 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER “THE RISKS YOU FACE” HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUND’S EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.

THE MANAGING OWNER COMMENCED OPERATIONS IN JANUARY 2006. AS MANAGING OWNER, THE MANAGING OWNER AND ITS TRADING PRINCIPALS HAVE BEEN MANAGING THE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS FOR THE FUNDS AND RELATED PRODUCTS AND MANAGING FUTURES TRADING ACCOUNTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE LIMITED ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY ENERGY ER, DBIQ-OY ENERGY TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US ENERGY TOTAL RETURN

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Energy ER, DBIQ-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are indices and do not reflect actual trading.

DBIQ-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY ENERGY TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US ENERGY TOTAL RETURN

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are indices and do not reflect actual trading.

DBIQ-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on June 4, 1990.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

The DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: CL (Light, Sweet Crude Oil), HO (Heating Oil), LCO (Brent Crude Oil), XB (RBOB Gasoline) and NG (Natural Gas) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index Total Return™.

10.	“Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return” is Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

“Average rolling 3 month daily volatility.” The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis.

13.

“Sharpe Ratio” compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variability — often referred to as the “standard deviation” — of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 2.91%.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable).

ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.

UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUER’S SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTY’S CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.

WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

CRUDE OIL SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY CL ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	112.02	97.53	12.02%	12.02%
1989	192.01	110.98	71.41%	92.01%
1990	294.82	160.13	24.79%	139.61%
1991	238.71	175.06	-15.63%	102.15%
1992	224.82	189.93	0.68%	103.52%
1993	217.01	152.46	-24.79%	53.08%
1994	173.31	142.13	5.59%	61.64%
1995	202.32	157.90	25.16%	102.32%
1996	414.35	185.87	104.80%	314.35%
1997	425.66	303.27	-26.65%	203.93%
1998	302.95	171.33	-40.94%	79.51%
1999	346.30	165.23	85.26%	232.56%
2000	551.67	325.69	31.04%	335.79%
2001	532.29	390.80	-3.95%	318.57%
2002	608.00	399.11	41.61%	492.76%
2003	847.48	574.29	39.55%	727.21%
2004	1632.10	824.87	63.83%	1255.23%
2005	2171.79	1319.88	42.95%	1837.28%
2006	2389.01	1856.67	-2.48%	1789.17%
2007	2523.38	1571.31	33.12%	2414.88%
2008	3955.92	1188.78	-41.61%	1368.33%
2009	2057.94	1147.41	36.08%	1898.07%
2010	2169.64	1673.17	3.20%	1962.00%
2011	2508.55	1642.90	1.97%	2002.66%
2012	2343.44	1685.62	-8.17%	1830.84%
2013⁶	2046.24	1796.69	-1.85%	1795.19%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE,

SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	112.73	97.60	12.73%	12.73%
1989	209.87	111.81	86.17%	109.87%
1990	341.64	182.36	34.76%	182.82%
1991	295.24	208.42	-10.88%	152.05%
1992	288.22	237.02	4.27%	162.81%
1993	281.69	202.92	-22.45%	103.80%
1994	235.88	190.71	10.24%	124.67%
1995	297.36	219.85	32.36%	197.36%
1996	641.10	274.37	115.60%	541.10%
1997	659.34	493.93	-22.77%	395.14%
1998	495.55	292.68	-37.99%	207.03%
1999	620.64	284.23	94.21%	496.27%
2000	1035.63	584.55	39.02%	728.92%
2001	1030.69	768.08	-0.53%	724.54%
2002	1217.32	786.82	43.96%	1087.00%
2003	1713.97	1154.40	40.99%	1573.50%
2004	3334.95	1670.29	66.12%	2679.95%
2005	4541.88	2707.94	47.56%	4002.06%
2006	5203.49	3969.14	2.34%	4097.88%
2007	5859.72	3499.36	39.16%	5741.98%
2008	9281.23	2799.96	-40.80%	3358.41%
2009	4853.73	2703.20	36.28%	4612.97%
2010	5119.70	3948.54	3.34%	4770.26%
2011	5927.09	3882.20	2.02%	4868.75%
2012	5538.20	3984.72	-8.09%	4466.53%
2013⁶	4839.85	4250.26	-1.82%	4383.52%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CL⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND

NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CL⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND

NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil TR⁹		Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		12.8%		16.8%		10.3%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		25.2%		25.2%		30.7%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.51		0.54		0.23
% of months with positive change¹⁴		56%		57%		56%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		6.4%		6.7%		7.9%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-5.3%		-5.2%		-7.0%

ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil TR⁹		Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index¹⁰
1 year		3.5%		3.6%		1.0%
3 year		1.7%		1.8%		-0.3%
5 year		-11.1%		-10.9%		-21.4%
7 year		-2.1%		-0.8%		-10.4%
10 year		11.4%		13.3%		0.3%
15 year		14.4%		17.1%		7.5%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

WHILE THE FUND’S OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006 (RENAMED OCTOBER 2010), CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE “HYPOTHETICAL.” HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY CL ER, DBIQ-OY CL TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN INDEX

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY CL ER, DBIQ-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBIQ-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY CL TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN INDEX

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBIQ-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

7.	The DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of CL (Light, Sweet Crude Oil) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ-OY CL ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ-OY CL TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Total Return™.

10.	“Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index” is Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

13.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable).

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

PRECIOUS METALS SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY PRECIOUS METALS ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.45	94.47	-5.10%	-5.10%
1989	95.07	78.33	-10.54%	-15.10%
1990	88.33	70.07	-12.51%	-25.72%
1991	75.34	62.42	-15.60%	-37.30%
1992	64.28	56.55	-9.44%	-43.22%
1993	71.31	55.38	18.49%	-32.72%
1994	68.95	61.70	-6.24%	-36.92%
1995	65.86	60.00	-4.13%	-39.53%
1996	65.24	54.89	-9.22%	-45.11%
1997	55.35	43.82	-17.28%	-54.59%
1998	48.63	40.62	-7.08%	-57.81%
1999	45.88	37.10	-1.70%	-58.53%
2000	44.35	36.32	-11.36%	-63.24%
2001	37.53	33.78	-2.66%	-64.22%
2002	42.57	35.33	18.95%	-57.43%
2003	50.84	39.24	19.06%	-49.32%
2004	57.55	46.00	6.35%	-46.10%
2005	64.36	50.94	16.97%	-36.95%
2006	89.86	63.88	21.19%	-23.60%
2007	93.76	72.62	20.64%	-7.82%
2008	111.75	70.48	-4.17%	-11.67%
2009	125.88	80.96	27.73%	12.83%
2010	156.43	106.48	38.64%	56.43%
2011	209.23	142.98	5.13%	64.46%
2012	193.25	160.55	6.30%	74.82%
2013⁶	178.48	139.48	-19.00%	41.61%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.52	95.05	-4.49%	-4.49%
1989	98.10	83.59	-2.82%	-7.18%
1990	97.35	81.17	-5.51%	-12.30%
1991	89.20	77.58	-10.84%	-21.81%
1992	80.34	72.71	-6.21%	-26.66%
1993	93.75	71.94	22.16%	-10.41%
1994	93.57	85.44	-2.11%	-12.31%
1995	93.31	84.23	1.38%	-11.10%
1996	96.38	84.72	-4.43%	-15.04%
1997	86.39	71.19	-12.91%	-26.00%
1998	80.52	68.46	-2.45%	-27.81%
1999	81.29	65.38	3.05%	-25.61%
2000	80.04	68.62	-5.96%	-30.05%
2001	73.58	65.10	0.81%	-29.48%
2002	85.28	69.70	20.93%	-14.72%
2003	102.89	78.85	20.29%	2.58%
2004	117.90	93.42	7.84%	10.62%
2005	136.03	104.80	20.74%	33.56%
2006	193.51	135.42	27.17%	69.85%
2007	216.92	161.55	26.12%	114.21%
2008	260.94	166.06	-2.83%	108.15%
2009	297.04	190.78	27.92%	166.26%
2010	369.64	251.28	38.83%	269.64%
2011	494.63	337.88	5.18%	288.80%
2012	456.90	379.70	6.39%	313.64%
2013⁶	422.32	330.11	-18.97%	235.17%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	GC⁷		SI⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low
1988⁵	80.0%	79.6%	20.0%	20.4%
1989	79.7%	80.9%	20.3%	19.1%
1990	81.2%	80.0%	18.8%	20.0%
1991	80.9%	80.5%	19.1%	19.5%
1992	78.8%	80.1%	21.2%	19.9%
1993	77.3%	80.3%	22.7%	19.7%
1994	76.6%	81.7%	23.4%	18.3%
1995	78.7%	82.3%	21.3%	17.7%
1996	79.9%	79.8%	20.1%	20.2%
1997	77.8%	77.0%	22.2%	23.0%
1998	75.9%	78.5%	24.1%	21.5%
1999	80.0%	77.2%	20.0%	22.8%
2000	80.1%	80.4%	19.9%	19.6%
2001	82.1%	81.0%	17.9%	19.0%
2002	80.7%	79.5%	19.3%	20.5%
2003	78.6%	80.4%	21.4%	19.6%
2004	79.7%	77.9%	20.3%	22.1%
2005	79.3%	81.2%	20.7%	18.8%
2006	76.1%	79.6%	23.9%	20.4%
2007	81.1%	80.1%	18.9%	19.9%
2008	78.4%	81.4%	21.6%	18.6%
2009	80.2%	80.9%	19.8%	19.1%
2010	78.2%	81.8%	21.8%	18.2%
2011	77.4%	79.3%	22.6%	20.7%
2012	78.9%	82.1%	21.1%	17.9%
2013⁶	79.7%	82.0%	20.3%	18.0%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	GC⁷		SI⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low
1988⁵	80.0%	79.6%	20.0%	20.4%
1989	79.5%	80.2%	20.5%	19.8%
1990	81.2%	79.8%	18.8%	20.2%
1991	80.9%	79.6%	19.1%	20.4%
1992	79.1%	80.1%	20.9%	19.9%
1993	77.1%	80.3%	22.9%	19.7%
1994	77.0%	81.7%	23.0%	18.3%
1995	77.8%	82.3%	22.2%	17.7%
1996	79.9%	80.1%	20.1%	19.9%
1997	77.8%	77.0%	22.2%	23.0%
1998	75.9%	78.5%	24.1%	21.5%
1999	80.0%	77.2%	20.0%	22.8%
2000	80.1%	80.2%	19.9%	19.8%
2001	82.1%	81.0%	17.9%	19.0%
2002	80.4%	79.5%	19.6%	20.5%
2003	78.6%	80.4%	21.4%	19.6%
2004	79.7%	77.9%	20.3%	22.1%
2005	79.3%	81.2%	20.7%	18.8%
2006	76.1%	79.6%	23.9%	20.4%
2007	81.1%	80.1%	18.9%	19.9%
2008	78.4%	81.4%	21.6%	18.6%
2009	80.2%	80.9%	19.8%	19.1%
2010	78.2%	81.8%	21.8%	18.2%
2011	77.4%	79.3%	22.6%	20.7%
2012	78.9%	81.5%	21.1%	18.5%
2013⁶	79.7%	82.0%	20.3%	18.0%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		1.4%		5.1%		5.2%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		15.5%		15.5%		15.1%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.12		0.09		0.13
% of months with positive change¹⁴		47.6%		51.7%		52.0%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		4.1%		4.1%		3.9%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-3.3%		-3.2%		-3.1%
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return¹⁰
1 year		-13.3%		-13.3%		-12.8%
3 year		4.4%		4.5%		4.0%
5 year		7.8%		8.0%		8.0%
7 year		8.7%		10.1%		10.2%
10 year		12.5%		14.3%		13.6%
15 year		8.1%		10.7%		10.8%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY PRECIOUS METALS ER, DBIQ-OY PRECIOUS METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Precious Metals ER, DBIQ-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBIQ-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY PRECIOUS METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBIQ-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

7.	The DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: GC (Gold) and SI (Silver) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ-OY Precious Metals ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ-OY Precious Metals TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Total Return™.

10.	“Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return” is Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

13.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable).

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

GOLD SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY GC ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.43	94.00	-5.59%	-5.59%
1989	94.66	79.15	-7.60%	-12.77%
1990	91.16	72.70	-9.12%	-20.72%
1991	80.68	66.43	-15.91%	-33.34%
1992	67.23	60.20	-9.29%	-39.53%
1993	73.24	59.14	14.87%	-30.54%
1994	70.04	64.50	-5.82%	-34.58%
1995	66.28	61.54	-4.98%	-37.84%
1996	66.44	57.01	-8.28%	-42.99%
1997	56.60	42.01	-25.00%	-57.24%
1998	46.03	39.77	-3.80%	-58.87%
1999	44.76	34.92	-3.54%	-60.32%
2000	43.19	34.95	-10.07%	-64.32%
2001	36.96	32.79	-2.15%	-65.08%
2002	43.15	34.85	23.03%	-57.04%
2003	50.90	39.63	18.18%	-49.24%
2004	54.99	45.62	3.76%	-47.33%
2005	61.77	49.36	14.51%	-39.68%
2006	82.59	61.37	16.20%	-29.91%
2007	87.24	66.67	23.43%	-13.49%
2008	102.34	70.49	1.73%	-11.99%
2009	120.07	80.47	22.77%	8.05%
2010	139.11	103.64	28.75%	39.11%
2011	183.97	128.88	9.42%	52.22%
2012	173.42	148.72	6.01%	61.38%
2013⁶	163.03	130.68	-17.18%	33.65%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.49	94.58	-4.99%	-4.99%
1989	99.14	83.75	0.37%	-4.64%
1990	100.47	82.41	-1.85%	-6.40%
1991	95.52	81.79	-11.18%	-16.86%
1992	84.33	77.40	-6.06%	-21.90%
1993	96.27	76.75	18.43%	-7.50%
1994	94.61	88.08	-1.68%	-9.06%
1995	93.77	88.12	0.48%	-8.62%
1996	98.16	88.05	-3.43%	-11.76%
1997	87.63	68.28	-21.03%	-30.32%
1998	76.21	67.02	0.99%	-29.62%
1999	79.30	61.54	1.12%	-28.84%
2000	77.95	65.87	-4.59%	-32.10%
2001	72.45	63.19	1.34%	-31.19%
2002	86.44	68.69	25.06%	-13.95%
2003	103.01	79.65	19.39%	2.74%
2004	112.66	92.65	5.21%	8.09%
2005	130.59	101.92	18.20%	27.77%
2006	177.84	130.09	21.94%	55.81%
2007	202.21	148.31	29.04%	101.05%
2008	238.99	166.08	3.15%	107.38%
2009	283.32	189.63	22.95%	154.97%
2010	328.71	244.58	28.92%	228.71%
2011	434.91	304.57	9.48%	259.86%
2012	410.02	351.68	6.10%	281.82%
2013⁶	385.77	309.28	-17.16%	216.31%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	GC⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	GC⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD GOLD INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold TR⁹		Gold Spot Fix pm¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		1.2%		4.8%		5.0%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		14.1%		14.1%		14.2%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.08		0.11		0.13
% of months with positive change¹⁴		47%		50%		53%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		3.9%		3.9%		3.7%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-3.0%		-2.9%		-3.1%
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold TR⁹		Gold Spot Fix pm¹⁰
1 year		-11.6%		-11.6%		-10.5%
3 year		3.8%		3.9%		4.9%
5 year		8.2%		8.4%		9.5%
7 year		8.9%		10.3%		11.4%
10 year		11.5%		13.3%		14.4%
15 year		7.9%		10.4%		10.9%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY GC ER, DBIQ-OY GC TR AND GOLD SPOT FIX PM

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY GC ER and DBIQ-OY GC TR are indices and do not reflect actual trading. Gold Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBIQ-OY GC TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY GC TR AND GOLD SPOT FIX PM

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ-OY GC TR is an index and does not reflect actual trading. Gold Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBIQ-OY GC TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

7.	The DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of GC (Gold) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ-OY GC ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ-OY GC TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Gold Index Total Return™.

10.

“Gold Spot Fix pm” is an internationally published benchmark for gold and is available through The London Bullion Market Association’s (the “LBMA”) website athttp://www.lbma.org.uk/statistics_historic.htm. The fixings are fully transparent and are therefore used to determine the accepted average price of gold. As a benchmark, many other financial instruments (such as cash-settled swaps and options) are priced off the fixing. The gold fixing started in 1919. The gold fixing is conducted twice a day by telephone, at approximately 10:30 am and 3:00 pm. The five Gold Fixing members are the Bank of Nova Scotia–ScotiaMocatta, Barclays Bank Plc, Deutsche Bank AG, HSBC Bank USA, NA and Société Générale.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

13.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable).

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

SILVER SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY SI ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.56	96.35	-3.14%	-3.14%
1989	98.80	74.81	-21.67%	-24.12%
1990	77.71	52.83	-26.21%	-44.01%
1991	58.55	46.28	-14.31%	-52.02%
1992	53.20	42.91	-10.01%	-56.83%
1993	62.57	41.28	33.57%	-42.33%
1994	64.94	49.92	-8.36%	-47.15%
1995	64.61	46.95	-0.55%	-47.45%
1996	58.86	45.10	-13.26%	-54.41%
1997	56.61	38.79	17.06%	-46.63%
1998	61.92	41.66	-17.16%	-55.79%
1999	49.84	42.50	5.74%	-53.26%
2000	47.98	39.06	-16.40%	-60.93%
2001	40.38	32.68	-6.36%	-63.41%
2002	41.20	34.04	4.25%	-61.86%
2003	46.80	34.43	22.10%	-53.43%
2004	63.99	43.08	13.63%	-47.08%
2005	68.75	50.02	27.66%	-32.44%
2006	110.77	67.36	40.22%	-5.27%
2007	109.82	82.34	9.77%	3.99%
2008	142.11	59.28	-27.27%	-24.37%
2009	128.69	70.03	48.53%	12.34%
2010	204.78	98.82	82.29%	104.78%
2011	319.49	176.44	-10.28%	83.72%
2012	244.65	172.62	7.68%	97.82%
2013⁶	212.37	145.08	-26.50%	45.40%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³		Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1988⁵	99.79	96.94	-2.52%		-2.52%
1989	100.47	80.40	-14.91%		-17.05%
1990	85.46	62.18	-20.31%		-33.89%
1991	70.97	55.14	-9.48%		-40.16%
1992	66.46	55.38	-6.80%		-44.23%
1993	82.27	53.55	37.71%	��	-23.20%
1994	87.23	69.13	-4.33%		-26.53%
1995	91.63	65.91	5.16%		-22.73%
1996	86.97	69.54	-8.67%		-29.44%
1997	92.17	61.74	23.25%		-13.03%
1998	101.42	70.42	-13.04%		-24.37%
1999	88.05	73.64	10.85%		-16.16%
2000	86.50	74.17	-11.31%		-25.64%
2001	77.17	64.30	-3.02%		-27.89%
2002	81.81	67.18	5.98%		-23.58%
2003	94.72	69.16	23.36%		-5.73%
2004	129.84	87.49	15.21%		8.61%
2005	145.33	102.71	31.78%		43.13%
2006	238.54	142.80	47.15%		110.61%
2007	254.17	188.78	14.75%		141.68%
2008	331.73	139.67	-26.26%		78.23%
2009	303.70	165.04	48.75%		165.11%
2010	483.90	233.22	82.53%		383.90%
2011	755.24	416.99	-10.24%		334.36%
2012	578.47	408.27	7.77%		368.09%
2013⁶	502.54	343.38	-26.48%		244.14%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	SI⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	SI⁷
	High¹	Low²
1988⁵	100%	100%
1989	100%	100%
1990	100%	100%
1991	100%	100%
1992	100%	100%
1993	100%	100%
1994	100%	100%
1995	100%	100%
1996	100%	100%
1997	100%	100%
1998	100%	100%
1999	100%	100%
2000	100%	100%
2001	100%	100%
2002	100%	100%
2003	100%	100%
2004	100%	100%
2005	100%	100%
2006	100%	100%
2007	100%	100%
2008	100%	100%
2009	100%	100%
2010	100%	100%
2011	100%	100%
2012	100%	100%
2013⁶	100%	100%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD SILVER INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver TR⁹		Silver Spot Fix pm¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		1.5%		5.2%		5.5%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		25.0%		25.0%		27.0%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.06		0.08		0.08
% of months with positive change¹⁴		48%		50%		49%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		6.7%		6.7%		6.9%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-5.4%		-5.3%		-5.2%
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver TR⁹		Silver Spot Fix pm¹⁰
1 year		-20.3%		-20.3%		-19.7%
3 year		5.8%		5.9%		6.8%
5 year		4.7%		4.9%		6.0%
7 year		6.5%		8.0%		8.0%
10 year		15.0%		16.9%		17.3%
15 year		8.0%		10.5%		10.6%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

WHILE THE FUND’S OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JUNE 2006 (RENAMED OCTOBER 2010), CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE “HYPOTHETICAL.” HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY SI ER, DBIQ-OY SI TR AND SILVER SPOT FIX PM

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY SI ER and DBIQ-OY SI TR are indices and do not reflect actual trading. Silver Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBIQ-OY SI TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY SI TR AND SILVER SPOT FIX PM

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ-OY SI TR is an index and does not reflect actual trading. Silver Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices.

DBIQ-OY SI TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

7.	The DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of SI (Silver) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ-OY SI ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ-OY SI TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Silver Index Total Return™.

10.

“Silver Spot Fix pm” is an internationally published benchmark for silver and is available through The London Bullion Market Association’s (the “LBMA”) website at http://www.lbma.org.uk/statistics_historic.htm. The fixings are fully transparent and are therefore used to determine the accepted average price of silver. As a benchmark, many other financial instruments (such as cash-settled swaps and options) are priced off the fixing. The silver fixing started in 1897. Three market making members of the LBMA conduct the Silver Fixing meeting under the chairmanship of The Bank of Nova Scotia–ScotiaMocatta by telephone at 12.00 noon each working day. The other two members of the Silver Fixing are Deutsche Bank AG and HSBC Bank USA, NA.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

13.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable).

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

INDUSTRIAL METALS SECTOR DATA

RELATING TO

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™

(DBIQ-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS ER™)

CLOSING LEVELS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1997⁵	100.17	82.95	-16.46%	-16.46%
1998	83.89	66.04	-20.69%	-33.75%
1999	80.73	63.87	21.85%	-19.27%
2000	82.74	73.17	-7.70%	-25.49%
2001	75.56	56.04	-19.70%	-40.17%
2002	64.83	55.75	-4.02%	-42.57%
2003	74.28	56.70	29.34%	-25.72%
2004	98.27	74.78	31.88%	-2.04%
2005	143.70	91.01	46.59%	43.60%
2006	275.22	144.73	80.98%	159.88%
2007	288.44	215.81	-14.86%	121.26%
2008	277.42	113.65	-45.29%	21.06%
2009	228.32	111.76	88.53%	128.23%
2010	248.13	173.48	8.72%	148.13%
2011	261.54	184.74	-22.19%	93.08%
2012	221.47	180.37	2.85%	98.58%
2013⁶	205.25	171.48	-8.86%	80.99%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	CLOSING LEVEL		CHANGES
	High¹	Low²	Annual Index Changes³	Index Changes Since Inception⁴
1997⁵	100.19	84.33	-15.05%	-15.05%
1998	85.63	70.50	-16.74%	-29.27%
1999	90.35	68.63	27.73%	-9.65%
2000	96.13	84.03	-2.07%	-11.53%
2001	90.14	68.73	-16.84%	-26.43%
2002	80.03	69.47	-2.42%	-28.21%
2003	93.81	71.10	30.67%	-6.19%
2004	125.83	94.46	33.72%	25.44%
2005	189.91	116.58	51.32%	89.82%
2006	380.41	191.40	89.91%	260.47%
2007	407.16	309.75	-10.99%	220.85%
2008	404.06	167.11	-44.52%	78.00%
2009	336.19	164.37	88.80%	236.06%
2010	365.85	255.58	8.87%	265.85%
2011	385.74	272.52	-22.15%	184.82%
2012	326.71	266.17	2.94%	193.18%
2013⁶	303.03	253.24	-8.83%	167.28%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™


	MAL⁷		MZN⁷		MCU⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low	High	Low
1997⁵	33.3%	34.4%	33.1%	34.4%	33.6%	31.2%
1998	34.0%	34.0%	34.8%	34.2%	31.1%	31.8%
1999	33.8%	32.7%	33.1%	37.0%	33.1%	30.3%
2000	33.9%	33.5%	33.1%	32.9%	32.9%	33.7%
2001	36.3%	38.1%	31.0%	29.3%	32.7%	32.6%
2002	32.8%	33.3%	32.2%	31.9%	34.9%	34.8%
2003	32.4%	32.7%	33.4%	33.4%	34.2%	33.8%
2004	32.7%	32.2%	34.6%	33.3%	32.7%	34.5%
2005	32.1%	32.5%	34.5%	34.7%	33.4%	32.8%
2006	33.9%	32.2%	33.4%	34.9%	32.7%	32.9%
2007	34.5%	34.9%	30.0%	31.5%	35.5%	33.5%
2008	35.1%	30.2%	30.0%	39.9%	34.9%	29.9%
2009	33.5%	26.6%	34.2%	40.1%	32.3%	33.3%
2010	32.6%	35.6%	31.6%	28.7%	35.7%	35.8%
2011	33.9%	36.2%	30.7%	29.6%	35.4%	34.2%
2012	32.7%	31.7%	32.8%	32.9%	34.4%	35.4%
2013⁶	33.8%	33.7%	33.3%	33.6%	32.8%	32.7%

THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX EXCESS RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™


	MAL⁷		MZN⁷		MCU⁷
	High¹	Low²	High	Low	High	Low
1997⁵	33.3%	34.4%	33.1%	34.4%	33.6%	31.2%
1998	34.0%	34.0%	34.8%	34.2%	31.1%	31.8%
1999	33.8%	32.7%	33.1%	37.0%	33.1%	30.3%
2000	33.5%	33.3%	32.8%	34.2%	33.7%	32.4%
2001	36.3%	38.1%	31.0%	29.3%	32.7%	32.6%
2002	32.8%	33.3%	32.2%	31.9%	34.9%	34.8%
2003	32.4%	32.7%	33.4%	33.4%	34.2%	33.8%
2004	32.7%	32.2%	34.6%	33.3%	32.7%	34.5%
2005	32.1%	32.5%	34.5%	34.7%	33.4%	32.8%
2006	33.9%	32.2%	33.4%	34.9%	32.7%	32.9%
2007	34.5%	40.9%	30.0%	29.0%	35.5%	30.1%
2008	35.1%	30.2%	30.0%	39.9%	34.9%	29.9%
2009	33.5%	26.6%	34.2%	40.1%	32.3%	33.3%
2010	32.6%	35.6%	31.6%	28.7%	35.7%	35.8%
2011	33.9%	36.2%	30.7%	29.6%	35.4%	34.2%
2012	32.7%	31.7%	32.8%	32.9%	34.4%	35.4%
2013⁶	33.8%	33.7%	33.3%	33.6%	32.8%	32.7%

THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE

DBIQ OPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS INDEX TOTAL RETURN™ OVER TIME.

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE

AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

All statistics based on data from September 3, 1997 to May 31, 2013.


VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES	DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return¹⁰
Annualized Changes to Index Level¹¹		3.8%		6.4%		4.9%
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility¹²		19.3%		19.3%		20.5%
Sharpe Ratio¹³		0.20		0.22		0.13
% of months with positive change¹⁴		50%		53%		54%
Average monthly positive change¹⁵		5.4%		5.3%		5.1%
Average monthly negative change¹⁶		-4.3%		-4.4%		-4.7%
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS¹⁷	DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals ER⁸		DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals TR⁹		Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return¹⁰
1 year		-4.2%		-4.1%		-4.7%
3 year		-2.7%		-2.6%		-2.9%
5 year		-5.5%		-5.3%		-6.9%
7 year		-3.9%		-2.6%		-3.7%

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS-ER, DBIQ-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS-TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals ER, DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading.

DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

COMPARISON OF DBIQ-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX

LOGO

NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUND’S FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

Each of DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

See accompanying Notes and Legends.

NOTES AND LEGENDS:

1.	“High” reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

2.	“Low” reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year.

3.	“Annual Index Changes” reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

4.	“Index Changes Since Inception” reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

5.	Closing levels as of inception on September 3, 1997.

6.	Closing levels as of May 31, 2013.

7.	The DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return™ and DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Total Return™ reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: MAL (Aluminum), MZN (Zinc) and MCU (Copper – Grade A) on an Optimum Yield^TM basis.

8.	“DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals ER™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Excess Return™.

9.	“DBIQ-OY Industrial Metals TR™” is DBIQ Optimum Yield Industrial Metals Index Total Return™.

10.	“Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return” is Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return.

11.	“Annualized Changes to Index Level” reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year.

12.

13.

14.	“% of months with positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

15.	“Average monthly positive change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

16.	“Average monthly negative change” during the period from inception to May 31, 2013.

17.	“Annualized Index Levels” reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7 years, as applicable).

ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEX’S METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.

IV.

The Experts section on page 101 is amended to include the following sentence after the second paragraph:

“Effective May 28, 2013, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP replaced KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the registrants.”

Invesco DB Gold Fund (DGL) 424B3Prospectus supplement