UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34963
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-3717839 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
75 State Street, Boston, MA 02109
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(617) 423-3644
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of July 17, 2013 was 105,018,375.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item Number | Page |
i
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.
On our internet site, http://www.lpl.com, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our proxy statements, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Hard copies of all such filings are available free of charge by request via email (investor.relations@lpl.com), telephone (617) 897-4574, or mail (LPL Financial Investor Relations at 75 State Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02109). The information contained or incorporated on our website is not a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
When we use the terms “LPLFH” “we” “us” “our” the “firm” and the "Company," we mean LPL Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context otherwise indicates.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in Item 2 - “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding the Company's future financial and operating results, growth, business strategy, plans, liquidity, ability and plans to repurchase shares and pay dividends in the future, including statements regarding projected costs, projected savings, projected expenses and anticipated improvements to the Company's operating model, services, and technology as a result of the Service Value Commitment, as well as any other statements that are not related to present facts or current conditions or that are not purely historical, constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company's historical performance and its plans, estimates and expectations as of July 31, 2013. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees that the future results, plans, intentions or expectations expressed or implied by the Company will be achieved. Matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, legislative, regulatory, competitive and other factors, which may cause actual financial or operating results, levels of activity, or the timing of events, to be materially different than those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include: changes in general economic and financial market conditions, including retail investor sentiment; fluctuations in the value of assets under custody; effects of competition in the financial services industry; changes in the number of the Company's financial advisors and institutions, and their ability to market effectively financial products and services; changes in interest rates and fees payable by banks participating in the Company's cash sweep program, including the Company's success in negotiating agreements with current or additional counterparties; the Company's success in integrating the operations of acquired businesses; execution of the Company's plans related to the Service Value Commitment, including the Company's ability to successfully transform and transition business processes to third party service providers; the Company's success in negotiating and developing commercial arrangements with third party service providers that will enable the Company to realize the service improvements and efficiencies expected to result from the Service Value Commitment; the performance of third party service providers to which business processes are transitioned from the Company; the Company's ability to control operating risks, information technology systems risks and sourcing risks; the effect of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory actions, including disciplinary actions imposed by self-regulatory organizations; and the other factors set forth in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, the Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this quarterly report, even if its estimates change, and you should not rely on statements contained herein as representing the Company's views as of any date subsequent to the date of this quarterly report.
ii
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||
Commission | $ | 508,399 | $ | 447,243 | $ | 993,971 | $ | 910,896 | ||||||||
Advisory | 298,094 | 268,192 | 579,320 | 519,173 | ||||||||||||
Asset-based | 107,505 | 102,784 | 211,271 | 200,025 | ||||||||||||
Transaction and other | 88,631 | 78,894 | 178,009 | 153,466 | ||||||||||||
Interest income, net of interest expense | 4,426 | 4,800 | 8,834 | 9,510 | ||||||||||||
Other | 11,865 | 5,930 | 22,311 | 16,546 | ||||||||||||
Total net revenues | 1,018,920 | 907,843 | 1,993,716 | 1,809,616 | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||
Commission and advisory | 701,687 | 620,582 | 1,361,240 | 1,237,974 | ||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 98,227 | 93,034 | 197,007 | 182,046 | ||||||||||||
Promotional | 24,804 | 26,122 | 48,469 | 42,953 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,245 | 17,412 | 40,019 | 34,587 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 16,283 | 14,007 | 33,081 | 28,504 | ||||||||||||
Professional services | 14,123 | 18,199 | 28,633 | 31,320 | ||||||||||||
Brokerage, clearing and exchange | 11,428 | 9,554 | 21,598 | 19,069 | ||||||||||||
Communications and data processing | 10,892 | 9,797 | 20,384 | 18,696 | ||||||||||||
Regulatory fees and other | 7,686 | 6,891 | 15,105 | 14,437 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 7,332 | 2,057 | 13,369 | 3,751 | ||||||||||||
Other | 10,682 | 9,441 | 16,569 | 16,113 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 923,389 | 827,096 | 1,795,474 | 1,629,450 | ||||||||||||
Non-operating interest expense | 12,667 | 13,439 | 24,827 | 29,471 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 7,962 | — | 7,962 | 16,524 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 944,018 | 840,535 | 1,828,263 | 1,675,445 | ||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | 74,902 | 67,308 | 165,453 | 134,171 | ||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | 29,811 | 27,806 | 65,645 | 53,490 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | ||||||||
EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 11): | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.73 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.72 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustment for items reclassified to earnings, net of tax expense of $273 and $527 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively | — | 441 | — | 850 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | — | 441 | — | 850 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,943 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 81,531 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 584,871 | $ | 466,261 | ||||
Cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations | 440,118 | 577,433 | ||||||
Receivables from: | ||||||||
Clients, net of allowance of $521 at June 30, 2013 and $587 at December 31, 2012 | 306,164 | 369,814 | ||||||
Product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations | 170,061 | 152,950 | ||||||
Others, net of allowance of $5,979 at June 30, 2013 and $6,675 at December 31, 2012 | 248,143 | 241,324 | ||||||
Securities owned: | ||||||||
Trading — at fair value | 9,049 | 8,088 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity | 8,669 | 10,202 | ||||||
Securities borrowed | 7,556 | 9,448 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | — | 5,215 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $281,832 at June 30, 2013 and $324,684 at December 31, 2012 | 138,881 | 130,847 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $5,604 at June 30, 2013 and $4,903 at December 31, 2012 | 18,427 | 21,254 | ||||||
Goodwill | 1,371,523 | 1,371,523 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $246,823 at June 30, 2013 and $237,681 at December 31, 2012 | 483,984 | 503,528 | ||||||
Other assets | 136,188 | 120,637 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,923,634 | $ | 3,988,524 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
LIABILITIES: | ||||||||
Drafts payable | $ | 155,513 | $ | 203,132 | ||||
Payables to clients | 487,798 | 749,505 | ||||||
Payables to broker-dealers and clearing organizations | 23,384 | 53,031 | ||||||
Accrued commission and advisory expenses payable | 130,395 | 128,459 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 224,211 | 216,138 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 2,928 | — | ||||||
Unearned revenue | 65,500 | 61,808 | ||||||
Securities sold, but not yet purchased — at fair value | 232 | 366 | ||||||
Senior secured credit facilities | 1,540,515 | 1,317,825 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes — net | 106,658 | 118,240 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 2,737,134 | 2,848,504 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | ||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 600,000,000 shares authorized; 116,513,596 shares issued at June 30, 2013 and 115,713,741 shares issued at December 31, 2012 | 116 | 116 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,260,977 | 1,228,075 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost — 10,994,785 shares at June 30, 2013 and 9,421,800 shares at December 31, 2012 | (345,388 | ) | (287,998 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 270,795 | 199,827 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,186,500 | 1,140,020 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,923,634 | $ | 3,988,524 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Retained Earnings | Total Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — December 31, 2011 | 110,532 | $ | 110 | $ | 1,137,723 | 2,618 | $ | (89,037 | ) | $ | (850 | ) | $ | 296,802 | $ | 1,344,748 | |||||||||||||
Net income and other comprehensive income, net of tax expense | 850 | 80,681 | 81,531 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock to settle restricted stock units | 2,823 | 3 | (3 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | 1,705 | (55,894 | ) | (55,894 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on common stock | (222,557 | ) | (222,557 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other | 1,952 | 2 | 11,097 | 11,099 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 22 | 12,072 | 12,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | 48,404 | 48,404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — June 30, 2012 | 115,329 | $ | 115 | $ | 1,209,293 | 4,323 | $ | (144,931 | ) | $ | — | $ | 154,926 | $ | 1,219,403 | ||||||||||||||
BALANCE — December 31, 2012 | 115,714 | $ | 116 | $ | 1,228,075 | 9,422 | $ | (287,998 | ) | $ | — | $ | 199,827 | $ | 1,140,020 | ||||||||||||||
Net income and other comprehensive income, net of tax expense | 99,808 | 99,808 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | 1,584 | (57,770 | ) | (57,770 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on common stock | (28,763 | ) | (28,763 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other | 800 | 17,996 | (11 | ) | 380 | (77 | ) | 18,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 12,693 | 12,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | 2,213 | 2,213 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE — June 30, 2013 | 116,514 | $ | 116 | $ | 1,260,977 | 10,995 | $ | (345,388 | ) | $ | — | $ | 270,795 | $ | 1,186,500 |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Noncash items: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 40,019 | 34,587 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 2,219 | 2,349 | ||||||
Share-based compensation | 12,693 | 12,072 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation | (2,213 | ) | (48,404 | ) | ||||
Provision for bad debts | 575 | 488 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision | (11,582 | ) | (6,241 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 7,962 | 16,524 | ||||||
Net changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration obligations | 1,203 | 709 | ||||||
Other | 1,252 | 1,519 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations | 137,315 | 60,968 | ||||||
Receivables from clients | 63,716 | 8,405 | ||||||
Receivables from product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations | (17,111 | ) | 11,844 | |||||
Receivables from others | (8,127 | ) | (10,806 | ) | ||||
Securities owned | (1,089 | ) | (574 | ) | ||||
Securities borrowed | 1,892 | (2,238 | ) | |||||
Other assets | (12,101 | ) | (41,215 | ) | ||||
Drafts payable | (47,619 | ) | (37,645 | ) | ||||
Payables to clients | (261,707 | ) | (51,859 | ) | ||||
Payables to broker-dealers and clearing organizations | (29,647 | ) | 898 | |||||
Accrued commission and advisory expenses payable | 1,936 | (11,747 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2,348 | (3,874 | ) | |||||
Income taxes receivable/payable | 10,356 | 40,592 | ||||||
Unearned revenue | 3,692 | (759 | ) | |||||
Securities sold, but not yet purchased | (134 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (4,344 | ) | $ | 56,113 | |||
Continued on following page | ||||||||
5
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | (32,161 | ) | $ | (18,793 | ) | ||
Purchase of securities classified as held-to-maturity | (2,495 | ) | (2,015 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturity of securities classified as held-to-maturity | 4,000 | 3,000 | ||||||
Deposits of restricted cash | (1,500 | ) | (9,964 | ) | ||||
Release of restricted cash | — | 6,800 | ||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — | (38,766 | ) | |||||
Purchases of minority interest investments | (1,000 | ) | — | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (33,156 | ) | (59,738 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Repayment of senior secured credit facilities | (861,160 | ) | (1,343,393 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from senior secured credit facilities | 1,078,957 | 1,330,681 | ||||||
Payment of debt issuance costs | (2,461 | ) | (4,431 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock | (50,975 | ) | (55,894 | ) | ||||
Dividends on common stock | (28,763 | ) | (222,557 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation | 2,213 | 48,404 | ||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises and other | 18,299 | 11,099 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 156,110 | (236,091 | ) | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 118,610 | (239,716 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period | 466,261 | 720,772 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period | $ | 584,871 | $ | 481,056 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 24,779 | $ | 29,570 | ||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 66,466 | $ | 17,765 | ||||
NONCASH DISCLOSURES: | ||||||||
Fixed assets acquired under build-to-suit lease | $ | — | $ | 5,599 | ||||
Gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax expense | $ | — | $ | 850 | ||||
Discount on proceeds from senior secured credit facilities recorded as debt issuance costs | $ | 4,893 | $ | 19,319 | ||||
Pending settlement of treasury stock purchases | $ | 6,795 | $ | — |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Organization and Description of the Company
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (“LPLFH”), a Delaware holding corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) provides an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to independent financial advisors and financial advisors at financial institutions (collectively “advisors”) in the United States of America. Through its custody and clearing platform, using both proprietary and third-party technology, the Company provides access to diversified financial products and services enabling its advisors to offer independent financial advice and brokerage services to retail investors (their “clients”).
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation — Quarterly Reporting — The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Company’s results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other interim period. Certain reclassifications were made to previously reported amounts in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to make them consistent with the current period presentation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of income, comprehensive income and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes for the year ended December 31, 2012, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. The Company has evaluated subsequent events up to and including the date these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.
Consolidation — These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LPLFH and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity investments in which the Company exercises significant influence but does not exercise control and is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method.
Comprehensive Income — The Company presents its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income separately and immediately following its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company’s comprehensive income is composed of net income and the effective portion of the gains on financial derivatives in cash flow hedge relationships, net of related tax effects.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those related to revenue and related expense recognition, asset impairment, valuation of accounts receivable, valuation of financial instruments, contingent consideration obligations, contingencies and litigation, valuation and recognition of share-based payments, dividends and income taxes. These accounting policies are stated in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and the differences may be material to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Reportable Segment — The Company’s internal reporting is organized into three service channels; Independent Advisor Services, Institution Services and Custom Clearing Services. These service channels qualify as individual operating segments, but are aggregated and viewed as one single reportable segment due to their similar economic characteristics, products and services, production and distribution process, regulatory environment and quantitative thresholds.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are carried at fair value or at amounts that, because of their short-term nature, approximate current fair value, with the exception of its
7
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
indebtedness. The Company carries its indebtedness at amortized cost. The Company measures the implied fair value of its debt instruments using trading levels obtained from a third-party service provider. Accordingly, the debt instruments would qualify as Level 2 fair value measurements. See Note 4 for additional detail regarding the Company’s fair value measurements. As of June 30, 2013, the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s indebtedness was approximately $1,540.5 million and $1,534.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, the carrying amount and fair value was approximately $1,317.8 million and $1,320.4 million, respectively.
Contingent Consideration — The Company may be required to pay future consideration to the former shareholders of acquired companies, depending upon the terms of the applicable purchase agreement, that is contingent upon the achievement of certain financial or operating targets. The fair value of the contingent consideration is determined using financial forecasts and other estimates, which assess the probability and timing of the financial targets being reached, and measuring the associated cash payments at their present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration on the acquisition date is included in the purchase price of the acquired company. At each reporting date, or whenever there are significant changes in underlying key assumptions, a review of these assumptions is performed and the contingent consideration liability is updated to its estimated fair value. If there are no significant changes in the assumptions, the quarterly determination of the fair value of contingent consideration reflects the implied interest for the passage of time. Changes in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration obligations may result from changes in the terms of the contingent payments, changes in discount periods and rates, changes in assumptions with respect to the timing and likelihood of achieving the applicable targets and other related developments. Actual progress toward achieving the financial targets for the remaining measurement periods may be different than the Company's expectations of future performance. The change in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration has been classified as other expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Company's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, that are of significance, or potential significance, to the Company.
3. Restructuring
Service Value Commitment
On February 5, 2013, the Company committed to an expansion of its Service Value Commitment, an ongoing effort to position the Company for sustainable long-term growth by improving the service experience of its advisors and delivering efficiencies in its operating model. The Company has assessed its information technology delivery, governance, organization and strategy and committed to undertake a course of action (the “Program”) to reposition its labor force and invest in technology, human capital, marketing and other key areas to enable future growth. The Program is expected to be completed in 2015.
The Company estimates total charges in connection with the Program to be approximately $65.0 million. These expenditures are comprised of outsourcing and other related costs, technology transformation costs, employee severance obligations and other related costs and non-cash charges for impairment of certain fixed assets related to internally developed software.
8
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the balance of accrued expenses and the changes in the accrued amounts for the Program as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Accrued Balance at December 31, 2012 | Costs Incurred(1) | Payments | Non-cash | Accrued Balance at June 30, 2013 | Total Expected Restructuring Costs(2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Outsourcing and other related costs | $ | — | $ | 6,495 | $ | (5,786 | ) | $ | — | $ | 709 | $ | 26,000 | ||||||||||
Technology transformation costs | — | 3,200 | (2,946 | ) | — | 254 | 23,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Employee severance obligations and other related costs | — | 1,555 | (787 | ) | — | 768 | 15,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset impairments (Note 4) | — | 842 | — | (842 | ) | — | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | 12,092 | $ | (9,519 | ) | $ | (842 | ) | $ | 1,731 | $ | 65,000 |
________________________________
(1) | At June 30, 2013, costs incurred represent the total cumulative costs incurred under the Program to date. |
(2) | At June 30, 2013, total expected restructuring costs exclude approximately $25.0 million of internally developed software and computer and networking equipment related to the Program that is expected to be capitalized with a useful life ranging from three to seven years, and with expense being recorded as depreciation and amortization within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $11.4 million has been spent on technology infrastructure of which approximately $8.2 million has been capitalized, with the remainder included in costs incurred. |
4. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized within a three-level fair value hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
• | Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between fair value measurement classifications during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
The Company’s fair value measurements are evaluated within the fair value hierarchy, based on the nature of inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date. At June 30, 2013, the Company had the following financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Cash Equivalents — The Company’s cash equivalents include money market funds, which are short term in nature with readily determinable values derived from active markets.
Securities Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased — The Company's trading securities consist of house account model portfolios for the purpose of benchmarking the performance of its fee based advisory platforms and temporary positions resulting from the processing of client transactions. Examples of these securities include money market funds, U.S. treasury obligations, mutual funds, certificates of deposit and traded equity and debt securities.
The Company uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of its trading securities. Prices received from the pricing services are validated using various methods including comparison to prices received from additional pricing services, comparison to available quoted market prices and review of other relevant market data including implied yields of major categories of securities. In general, these
9
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
quoted prices are derived from active markets for identical assets or liabilities. When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities are not available, the quoted prices are based on similar assets and liabilities or inputs other than the quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. For certificates of deposit and treasury securities, the Company utilizes market-based inputs including observable market interest rates that correspond to the remaining maturities or the next interest reset dates. At June 30, 2013, the Company did not adjust prices received from the independent third-party pricing services.
Other Assets — The Company’s other assets include deferred compensation plan assets that are invested in money market and other mutual funds which are actively traded and valued based on quoted market prices, and certain non-traded real estate investment trusts with quoted prices for identical or similar securities and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities — The contingent consideration liabilities, which are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, result from the Company's acquisitions of National Retirement Partners, Inc. ("NRP"), Concord Capital Partners ("Concord") and Veritat Advisors, Inc. ("Veritat").
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||
At June 30, 2013: | |||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents | $ | 333,495 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 333,495 | |||||||
Securities owned — trading: | |||||||||||||||
Money market funds | 409 | — | — | 409 | |||||||||||
Mutual funds | 6,229 | — | — | 6,229 | |||||||||||
Equity securities | 118 | — | — | 118 | |||||||||||
Debt securities | — | 787 | — | 787 | |||||||||||
U.S. treasury obligations | 1,506 | — | — | 1,506 | |||||||||||
Total securities owned — trading | 8,262 | 787 | — | 9,049 | |||||||||||
Other assets | 39,398 | 1,091 | — | 40,489 | |||||||||||
Total assets at fair value | $ | 381,155 | $ | 1,878 | $ | — | $ | 383,033 | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold, but not yet purchased: | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9 | |||||||
Equity securities | 130 | — | — | 130 | |||||||||||
Debt securities | — | 48 | — | 48 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 45 | — | 45 | |||||||||||
Total securities sold, but not yet purchased | 139 | 93 | — | 232 | |||||||||||
Contingent consideration obligations | — | — | 37,090 | 37,090 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 139 | $ | 93 | $ | 37,090 | $ | 37,322 |
Certain assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value measurement in certain circumstances, for example, when evidence of impairment exists. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $0.8 million for certain fixed assets related to internally developed software that were determined to have no estimated fair value (See Note 3). The Company has determined that the impairment qualifies as a non-recurring Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy.
10
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2012: | |||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents | $ | 177,393 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 177,393 | |||||||
Securities owned — trading: | |||||||||||||||
Money market funds | 302 | — | — | 302 | |||||||||||
Mutual funds | 5,737 | — | — | 5,737 | |||||||||||
Equity securities | 414 | — | — | 414 | |||||||||||
Debt securities | — | 235 | — | 235 | |||||||||||
U.S. treasury obligations | 1,400 | — | — | 1,400 | |||||||||||
Total securities owned — trading | 7,853 | 235 | — | 8,088 | |||||||||||
Other assets | 28,624 | — | — | 28,624 | |||||||||||
Total assets at fair value | $ | 213,870 | $ | 235 | $ | — | $ | 214,105 | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold, but not yet purchased: | |||||||||||||||
Mutual funds | $ | 38 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 38 | |||||||
Equity securities | 247 | — | — | 247 | |||||||||||
Debt securities | — | 55 | — | 55 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | — | 26 | — | 26 | |||||||||||
Total securities sold, but not yet purchased | 285 | 81 | — | 366 | |||||||||||
Contingent consideration obligations | — | — | 35,887 | 35,887 | |||||||||||
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 285 | $ | 81 | $ | 35,887 | $ | 36,253 |
Changes in Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The table below provides information on the valuation technique, significant unobservable inputs and the ranges utilized by the Company in measuring fair value on a recurring basis of the significant Level 3 liabilities as of June 30, 2013 (dollars in millions):
Fair Value | Valuation Technique | Unobservable Input | Range | |||||||
Contingent consideration obligations | $ | 37.1 | Probability weighted discounted cash flow | Discount rate | 3% - 13% |
The Company determines the fair value for its contingent consideration obligations using an income approach whereby the Company assesses the probability and timing of the achievement of the applicable milestones, which are based on contractually negotiated financial or operating targets that vary by acquisition transaction, such as revenues, gross margin, EBITDA and assets under custody. The contingent payments are estimated using a probability weighted, multi-scenario analysis of expected future performance of the acquired businesses. The Company then discounts these expected payment amounts to calculate the fair value as of the valuation date. The Company's management evaluates the underlying projections and other related factors used in determining fair value each period and makes updates when there have been significant changes in management's expectations.
The principal significant unobservable input used in the valuations of the Company's contingent consideration obligations is a risk-adjusted discount rate. Whereas management's underlying projections adjust for market penetration and adoption rates, the discount rate is risk-adjusted for key factors such as advisor attrition, advisor recruitment, expenses and overhead costs, average client assets, revenue generation of client assets and credit
11
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
risk. An increase in the discount rate will result in a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration. Conversely, a decrease in the discount rate will result in an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration.
The contingent consideration obligation related to the acquisition of NRP is based on the achievement of certain revenue-based targets for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Performance Measurement Period"), in aggregate for those advisors joining LPL Financial LLC ("LPL Financial") subsequent to the NRP acquisition for whom retirement plans comprise a significant part of their business. During the first six months of 2013, as a result of greater than expected recruitment of new advisors who serve retirement plans, which is expected to continue throughout the Performance Measurement Period, the Company revised its revenue estimates and made certain changes in the probability assumptions with respect to the likelihood of achieving the revenue targets. These revisions, combined with implied interest, resulted in a $4.7 million increase in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation related to NRP during the six months ended June 30, 2013 which is recorded in other expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.
The contingent consideration obligation related to the acquisition of Concord is based on the achievement of targeted levels of gross margin attributed to Concord for the year ending December 31, 2013. Gross margin is calculated as net revenues less production expenses and accordingly, the Company considers gross margin to be a non-GAAP measure. Net revenue includes revenues attributed to Concord's business activities and assets under administration on Concord's software platform. Production expenses include all expenses directly incurred to generate net revenues, including commission and advisory expense and brokerage, clearing and exchange expense. During the first quarter of 2013, the Company revised its estimates of the amount and timing of projected 2013 gross margin and adjusted its assumptions regarding the likelihood of payment. The revisions resulted in a $3.8 million decrease in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation related to Concord during the six months ended June 30, 2013 which is recorded in other expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. The maximum amount of contingent consideration is $15.0 million.
The contingent consideration obligation related to the acquisition of Veritat is based on the achievement of targeted levels of assets under management and earnings, as well as, the retention of key employees. The majority of the contingent consideration is based on a sliding scale of the financial targets of assets under management and earnings. Financial forecasts are used by management that include assumptions about growth in assets under management, earnings, employee retention and discount rates in order to assist with determining the progress toward these targets. The financial targets are sensitive to advisor recruitment, market fluctuations and the ability of advisors to grow their business. The Company maintained its original estimate for the contingent consideration obligation related to Veritat and therefore recorded implied interest of $0.3 million in other expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the contingent consideration for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Fair value at December 31, 2012 | $ | 35,887 | |
Net changes in estimated fair value of contingent consideration obligations | 1,203 | ||
Fair value at June 30, 2013 | $ | 37,090 |
5. Held-to-Maturity Securities
The Company holds certain investments in securities including U.S. government notes, which are recorded at amortized cost because the Company has both the intent and the ability to hold these investments to maturity. Interest income is accrued as earned. Premiums and discounts are amortized using a method that approximates the effective yield method over the term of the security and are recorded as an adjustment to the investment yield. The Company discloses the fair value of its securities held-to-maturity using quoted prices in active markets, which is a Level 1 fair value measurement.
12
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The amortized cost, gross unrealized loss or gain and fair value of securities held-to-maturity were as follows (in thousands):
Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized (Loss) Gain | Fair Value | |||||||||
At June 30, 2013: | |||||||||||
U.S. government notes | $ | 8,669 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 8,628 | ||||
At December 31, 2012: | |||||||||||
U.S. government notes | $ | 10,202 | $ | 6 | $ | 10,208 |
At June 30, 2013, the securities held-to-maturity were scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):
Within one year | After one but within five years | After five but within ten years | Total | ||||||||||||
U.S. government notes — at amortized cost | $ | 5,424 | $ | 2,745 | $ | 500 | $ | 8,669 | |||||||
U.S. government notes — at fair value | $ | 5,425 | $ | 2,722 | $ | 481 | $ | 8,628 |
6. Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Weighted Average Life Remaining (in years) | Gross Carrying Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
At June 30, 2013: | |||||||||||||
Definite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||
Advisor and financial institution relationships | 12.3 | $ | 439,762 | $ | (159,263 | ) | $ | 280,499 | |||||
Product sponsor relationships | 12.5 | 230,916 | (82,490 | ) | 148,426 | ||||||||
Client relationships | 10.6 | 19,110 | (4,930 | ) | 14,180 | ||||||||
Trade names | 8.8 | 1,200 | (140 | ) | 1,060 | ||||||||
Total definite-lived intangible assets | $ | 690,988 | $ | (246,823 | ) | $ | 444,165 | ||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||
Trademark and trade name | 39,819 | ||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 483,984 | |||||||||||
At December 31, 2012: | |||||||||||||
Definite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||
Advisor and financial institution relationships | 12.8 | $ | 450,164 | $ | (157,470 | ) | $ | 292,694 | |||||
Product sponsor relationships | 13.0 | 230,916 | (76,230 | ) | 154,686 | ||||||||
Client relationships | 11.1 | 19,110 | (3,901 | ) | 15,209 | ||||||||
Trade names | 9.3 | 1,200 | (80 | ) | 1,120 | ||||||||
Total definite-lived intangible assets | $ | 701,390 | $ | (237,681 | ) | $ | 463,709 | ||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||
Trademark and trade name | 39,819 | ||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 503,528 |
13
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Total amortization expense of intangible assets was $9.8 million and $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $19.5 million and $19.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 through 2017 and thereafter is estimated as follows (in thousands):
2013 — remainder | $ | 19,462 | |
2014 | 38,680 | ||
2015 | 37,775 | ||
2016 | 37,619 | ||
2017 | 36,752 | ||
Thereafter | 273,877 | ||
Total | $ | 444,165 |
7. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate differs from the federal corporate tax rate of 35.0%, primarily as a result of state taxes, settlement contingencies and expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes. These items resulted in effective tax rates of 39.8% and 41.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 39.7% and 39.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
8. Indebtedness
Senior Secured Credit Facilities — On May 13, 2013, the Company entered into the First Amendment and Incremental Assumption Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) with its wholly owned subsidiary, LPL Holdings, Inc., the other Credit Parties signatory thereto, the Several Lenders parties thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and other parties thereto. The Amended Credit Agreement supplements and amends the Company's Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012 (“Previous Credit Agreement”).
The Previous Credit Agreement had established a Term Loan A with an initial principal amount of $735.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 ("Term Loan A"), a Term Loan B with an initial principal amount of $615.0 million maturing on March 29, 2019 ("Prior Term Loan B") and a revolving credit facility with borrowing capacity of $250.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 ("Revolving Credit Facility").
Quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan A were scheduled to be 5.0% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 and 10.0% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (“Mandatory Amortization”), with the remaining principal due upon maturity.
Pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company amended Prior Term Loan B to increase its borrowing to an aggregate principal amount of $1,083.9 million (“Amended Term Loan B”). On May 13, 2013, the Company used the proceeds of Amended Term Loan B to (i) refinance the remaining outstanding balance of $608.9 million on Prior Term Loan B and (ii) repay a portion of the outstanding balance on Term Loan A in an aggregate principal amount of $238.9 million (“Term Loan A Repayment”). The remaining loan proceeds are available for working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. The maturity date of Amended Term Loan B is March 29, 2019. The amount and maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility was not changed in the Amended Credit Agreement.
The Term Loan A Repayment prepaid the Mandatory Amortization. Quarterly repayments of the principal for Amended Term Loan B will total 1.0% per year with the remaining principal due upon maturity. Any outstanding principal under the Revolving Credit Facility will be due upon maturity.
In connection with the execution of the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company incurred $7.4 million in costs that are capitalized as debt issuance costs in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. This refinancing resulted in the prepayment of all outstanding principal borrowings on Prior Term Loan B.
14
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company accelerated the recognition of $8.0 million of unamortized costs attributable to Prior Term Loan B related to the Previous Credit Agreement. This accelerated recognition has been recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
The Amended Credit Agreement subjects the Company to certain financial and non-financial covenants. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in compliance with such covenants.
As of June 30, 2013, the Revolving Credit Facility was being used to support the issuance of $21.4 million of irrevocable letters of credit for the construction of the Company's future San Diego office building and other items. The remaining $228.6 million was undrawn at June 30, 2013.
Borrowings under Term Loan A and Amended Term Loan B bear interest at a base rate equal to either one, two, three, six, nine or twelve-month LIBOR (the "Eurodollar Rate") plus the applicable margin, or an alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus the applicable margin. The ABR is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, (b) the effective federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%, (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% and (d) solely in the case of Amended Term Loan B, 1.75%. The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under its Amended Credit Agreement at any time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR loans and with the exception of certain repricing transactions in respect of Amended Term Loan B consummated before November 13, 2013, which will be subject to a premium of 1.0% of the principal amount of Amended Term Loan B subject to such repricing transaction.
Borrowings under Prior Term Loan B bore interest at a base rate equal to either the Eurodollar Rate plus the applicable margin or an ABR plus the applicable margin. The ABR was equal to the greatest of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, (b) the effective federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%, (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% and (d) 2.00%.
The applicable margin for borrowings with respect to both Term Loan A and Amended Term Loan B is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings. The LIBOR rate with respect to Amended Term Loan B shall in no event be less than 0.75%. The applicable margin for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings with a commitment fee of 0.50%.
The applicable margin for borrowings under the Previous Credit Agreement with respect to Prior Term Loan B was 2.00% for base rate borrowings and 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings. The LIBOR rate with respect to Prior Term Loan B had a floor of 1.00%.
The Previous Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012, allowed the Company to repay all outstanding principal borrowings under the Company's Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2010 ("Original Credit Agreement"). Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2012, the Company accelerated the recognition of $16.5 million of debt issuance costs related to borrowings under the Original Credit Agreement, which has been recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.
15
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company’s outstanding borrowings were as follows (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Balance | Interest Rate | Balance | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||
Senior secured term loans: | |||||||||||||||||
Term Loan A | 3/29/2017 | $ | 459,375 | 2.70 | % | (1) | $ | 707,438 | 2.71 | % | (3) | ||||||
Prior Term Loan B | 3/29/2019 | — | — | % | 610,387 | 4.00 | % | (4) | |||||||||
Amended Term Loan B | 3/29/2019 | 1,081,140 | 3.25 | % | (2) | — | — | % | |||||||||
Total borrowings | 1,540,515 | 1,317,825 | |||||||||||||||
Less current borrowings (maturities within 12 months) | 10,839 | 42,900 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings — net of current portion | $ | 1,529,676 | $ | 1,274,925 |
____________
(1) | As of June 30, 2013, the variable interest rate for Term Loan A is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.20%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
(2) | As of June 30, 2013, the variable interest rate for Amended Term Loan B is based on fifty percent of the outstanding loan balance with interest calculated at the greater of the three-month LIBOR of 0.28% or 0.75%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%; and fifty percent of the outstanding loan balance with interest calculated at the greater of the six-month LIBOR of 0.42% or 0.75%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
(3) | As of December 31, 2012, the variable interest rate for Term Loan A is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.21%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
(4) | As of December 31, 2012, the variable interest rate for Prior Term Loan B is based on the greater of the one-month LIBOR of 0.21% or 1.00%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 3.00%. |
Bank Loans Payable — The Company maintains three uncommitted lines of credit. Two of the lines have unspecified limits, which are primarily dependent on the Company’s ability to provide sufficient collateral. The other line had a $200.0 million and $150.0 million limit at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and allows for both collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. Both lines were utilized in 2013 and 2012; however, there were no balances outstanding at June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
The following summarizes borrowing activity in the revolving and uncommitted line of credit facilities (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Average balance outstanding | $ | 1,424 | $ | 289 | $ | 6,915 | $ | 211 | |||||||
Weighted-average interest rate | 1.83 | % | 1.70 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.56 | % |
16
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The minimum calendar year payments and maturities of the senior secured borrowings as of June 30, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
2013 — remainder | $ | 5,419 | |
2014 | 10,838 | ||
2015 | 10,838 | ||
2016 | 10,838 | ||
2017 | 470,214 | ||
Thereafter | 1,032,368 | ||
Total | $ | 1,540,515 |
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases — The Company leases certain office space and equipment under various operating leases. These leases are generally subject to scheduled base rent and maintenance cost increases, which are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the leases. Total rental expense for all operating leases was approximately $5.0 million and $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $10.0 million and $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Service Contracts — The Company is party to certain long-term contracts for systems and services that enable back office trade processing and clearing for its product and service offerings.
Future minimum payments under leases, lease commitments, service contracts and other contractual obligations with remaining terms greater than one year as of June 30, 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
2013 — remainder | $ | 9,634 | |
2014 | 37,869 | ||
2015 | 36,618 | ||
2016 | 35,818 | ||
2017 | 28,737 | ||
Thereafter | 261,098 | ||
Total(1)(2) | $ | 409,774 |
_________________
(1) | In June 2013, LPL Financial entered into a long-term contractual obligation with a third-party service provider to enhance the quality, speed and cost of processes that support the Company by outsourcing certain functions. The table above includes the minimum payments due over the duration of the contract. The contractual obligation may be canceled, subject to a termination penalty that is approximately equal to the initial annual minimum payment. The termination penalty steps down ratably through the passage of time. Minimum payments have not been reduced by this termination penalty. |
(2) | Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rental income of $4.4 million due in the future under noncancellable subleases. |
Guarantees — The Company occasionally enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require it to indemnify certain parties against third-party claims. The terms of these obligations vary and, because a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated, the Company has determined that it is not possible to make an estimate of the amount that it could be obligated to pay under such contracts.
The Company’s subsidiary, LPL Financial, provides guarantees to securities clearing houses and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require a member to guarantee the performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing houses and exchanges, all other members would be required to meet any shortfall. The Company’s liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and may exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the potential requirement for the Company to make payments under these agreements is remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.
Loan Commitments — From time to time, LPL Financial makes loans to its advisors which may be forgivable, primarily to newly recruited advisors to assist in the transition process. Due to timing differences, LPL
17
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Financial may make commitments to issue such loans prior to actually funding them. These commitments are generally contingent upon certain events occurring, including but not limited to the advisor joining LPL Financial. LPL Financial had no significant unfunded commitments at June 30, 2013.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in legal proceedings from time to time arising out of its business operations, including arbitrations and lawsuits involving private claimants, and subpoenas, investigations and other actions by government authorities and self-regulatory organizations. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, the Company cannot predict with certainty what the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters will be. The Company recognizes a liability with regard to a legal proceeding when it believes it is probable a liability has occurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If some amount within a range of loss appears at the time to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the Company accrues that amount. When no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, however, the Company accrues the minimum amount in the range. The Company maintains insurance coverage, including general liability, errors and omissions, excess entity errors and omissions and fidelity bond insurance. The Company records legal reserves and related insurance recoveries on a gross basis.
Defense costs with regard to legal proceedings are expensed as incurred and classified as professional services within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. When there is indemnification or insurance, the Company may engage in defense or settlement and subsequently seek reimbursement for such matters.
Litigation — Claims involving client complaints or disclosures about risks related to purchased securities or other financial products are typically arbitrated pursuant to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's ("FINRA") procedures for arbitration rather than litigated in court. In an arbitration, neutral third parties review evidence in the form of documents and testimony, listen to arguments and render a decision on the disputed matter. Through arbitration, the opportunity for appeal is foregone in virtually all matters as the decisions are final and binding.
The Company maintains insurance coverage for client claims. With respect to these matters, the estimated losses on the majority of pending matters are less than the applicable deductibles of the insurance policies. The Company believes, based on the information available at this time, after consultation with counsel, consideration of insurance, if any, and indemnifications provided by the third-party indemnitors, if any, that the outcomes of matters with estimated losses in excess of applicable deductibles will not have a material impact on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, financial condition or cash flows.
Regulatory — In July 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (the “Notice”) asserting that the Company is subject to a penalty with respect to an alleged untimely deposit of withholding taxes related to the exercise of certain non-qualified stock options in connection with the Company's initial public offering in 2010. In 2012, the Company recorded an estimate of probable loss within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. During the first quarter of 2013, the IRS issued a Summary of Employment Tax Examination (the "Summary") and the Company remitted payment which approximated amounts previously accrued in accordance with the Summary. The Company is awaiting final consent of resolution from the IRS. The Company believes the outcome of this matter will not have a material impact beyond the amounts recorded to its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, financial condition or cash flows.
In June of 2013, the Company reached an agreement with its principal regulator to resolve a matter related to email surveillance and production. During the first quarter of 2013, the Company recorded an estimate of a probable loss within professional services and accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and financial condition, respectively. The outcome of this matter did not differ materially from the amount recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, financial condition or cash flows as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Other Commitments — As of June 30, 2013, the Company had received collateral primarily in connection with client margin loans with a market value of approximately $331.0 million, which it can sell, re-pledge or loan. Of this amount, approximately $24.8 million was pledged with client-owned securities to the Options Clearing
18
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Corporation ("OCC") as collateral to secure client obligations related to options positions. Additionally, approximately $132.9 million are held at banks in connection with unutilized secured margin lines of credit; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $173.3 million has not been re-pledged, loaned or sold, and as of June 30, 2013 there are no restrictions that materially limit the Company's ability to re-pledge, loan or sell the remaining $306.2 million of client collateral. In May 2013, the Company ended its participation in the National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC") Stock Borrow Program and all pledged collateral was returned to the Company.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had received collateral primarily in connection with client margin loans with a market value of approximately $375.8 million, which it can sell, re-pledge or loan. Of this amount, approximately $41.5 million has been pledged or loaned as of December 31, 2012; $22.2 million was pledged with client-owned securities to the OCC as collateral to secure client obligations related to options positions, and $19.3 million was loaned to the NSCC through participation in its Stock Borrow Program. Additionally, approximately $40.3 million are held at banks in connection with unutilized secured margin lines of credit; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $294.0 million had not been re-pledged, loaned or sold, and as of December 31, 2012 there are no restrictions that materially limited the Company's ability to re-pledge, loan or sell the remaining $334.3 million of client collateral.
Trading securities on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition includes $0.9 million pledged to clearing organizations at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
LPL Financial provides brokerage, clearing and custody services on a fully disclosed basis; offers its investment advisory programs and platforms; and provides technology and additional processing and related services to the advisors of the broker-dealer subsidiary of a large global insurance company and their clients under a multi-year agreement. Termination fees may be payable by a terminating or breaching party depending on the specific cause of termination.
10. Stockholders' Equity
Stock Plan Summary
On November 17, 2010, the Company adopted a 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"), which provides for the granting of stock options, warrants, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The 2010 Plan serves as the successor to the 2005 Stock Option Plan for Incentive Stock Options, the 2005 Stock Option Plan for Non-qualified Stock Options, the 2008 Advisor and Institution Incentive Plan, the 2008 Stock Option Plan and the Director Restricted Stock Plan (the "Predecessor Plans"). Upon adoption of the 2010 Plan, awards were no longer made under the Predecessor Plans. To the extent not already exercised, awards previously granted under the Predecessor Plans remain outstanding. Stock options granted under the 2010 Plan are either incentive stock options, or non-qualified stock options, as defined in the 2010 Plan. The Company has issued new shares under the 2010 Plan and is also permitted to reissue treasury shares.
Under the 2010 Plan, the Company may grant up to 12.1 million new shares in addition to the shares available for grant under the Predecessor Plans. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had approximately 6.7 million of authorized unissued shares reserved for issuance upon exercise and conversion of outstanding awards.
Stock Options and Warrants
The Company grants stock options to certain employees, advisors, officers and non-employee directors. The Company has also granted warrants to certain financial institutions. Stock options and warrants generally vest in equal increments over a three- to five-year period and expire on the tenth anniversary following the date of grant.
The Company recognizes share-based compensation for stock options awarded to employees, officers and directors based on the grant date fair value over the requisite service period of the award, which generally equals the vesting period. The Company recognized share-based compensation related to the vesting of these awards of $3.8 million and $4.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $7.3 million and $8.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is included in compensation and benefits on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2013, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted to employees, officers and directors was $37.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.41 years.
19
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company recognizes share-based compensation for stock options and warrants awarded to its advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period. The Company recognized share-based compensation of $2.4 million and $0.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $4.3 million and $2.8 million for during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the vesting of stock options and warrants awarded to its advisors and financial institutions, which is classified within commission and advisory expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2013, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted to advisors and financial institutions was $17.7 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.39 years.
Restricted Stock
The Company recognizes share-based compensation for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to its employees, officers and directors by measuring such awards at their grant date fair value. Share-based compensation is recognized ratably over the requisite service period, which generally equals the vesting period. The Company recognized $0.6 million and $0.2 million of share-based compensation related to the vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $1.0 million and $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which is included in compensation and benefits on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2013, total unrecognized compensation cost for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees, officers and directors was $5.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 1.68 years.
2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
On November 19, 2008, the Company established an unfunded, unsecured deferred compensation plan to permit employees and former employees who held non-qualified stock options issued under the 2005 Stock Option Plan for Incentive Stock Options and 2005 Stock Option Plan for Non-qualified Stock Options that were set to expire in 2009 and 2010, to receive stock units under the Deferred Compensation Plan. On February 22, 2012, the Company distributed 1,673,556 shares, net of shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax requirements, pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions to participants were made in the form of whole shares of common stock equal to the number of stock units allocated to the participant's account, with fractional shares paid out in cash. Participants authorized the Company to withhold shares from their distribution of common stock to satisfy their withholding tax obligations. Accordingly on February 22, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,149,896 shares and paid $37.5 million of cash consideration related to tax withholdings. The repurchase of shares was executed under the share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors on August 16, 2011.
Share Repurchases
The Board of Directors has approved several share repurchase programs pursuant to which the Company may repurchase its issued and outstanding shares of common stock from time to time. Repurchased shares are included in treasury stock on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Purchases may be effected in open market or privately negotiated transactions, including transactions with affiliates, with the timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased generally determined at the discretion of the Company's management.
On May 29, 2013, a new share repurchase plan was approved for the repurchase up to $200.0 million in addition to the remaining capacity available under previous plans was approved. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, 1,428,576 shares were repurchased at a weighted average price of $36.99 per share for a total cost of $52.8 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, 1,583,865 shares were repurchased at a weighted average price of $36.47 per share for a total cost of $57.8 million. The share repurchases in 2013 have been made pursuant to a repurchase plan authorized in September of 2012. At June 30, 2013 the Company had $29.2 million available for repurchases under its September 2012 plan and $200.0 million available under the May 2013 plan.
20
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Dividends
The payment, timing and amount of any dividends permitted under our credit facilities are subject to approval by our Board of Directors, including both timing and amount. Cash dividends per share of common stock and total cash dividends paid during each quarter were as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
Dividend per Share | Total Cash Dividend | Dividend per Share | Total Cash Dividend | ||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 0.135 | $ | 14.4 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Second quarter | 0.135 | 14.4 | 2.00 | 222.6 |
11. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to the computation of basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued. The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | |||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding | 106,414 | 110,820 | 106,381 | 109,888 | |||||||||||
Dilutive common share equivalents | 1,281 | 2,014 | 1,084 | 2,791 | |||||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding | 107,695 | 112,834 | 107,465 | 112,679 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 0.73 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.72 |
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes stock options, warrants and restricted stock units that are anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, stock options, warrants and restricted stock units representing common share equivalents of 3,864,493 shares and 3,796,356 shares, respectively, were anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, stock options, warrants and restricted stock units representing common share equivalents of 4,689,047 shares and 3,558,814 shares, respectively, were anti-dilutive.
12. Related Party Transactions
One of the Company’s significant stockholders owns a minority interest in Artisan Partners Limited Partnership (“Artisan”), which pays fees in exchange for product distribution and record-keeping services. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company earned $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in fees from Artisan. Additionally, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Artisan owed the Company $1.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively, which is included in receivables from product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
American Beacon Advisor, Inc. (“American Beacon”), a company majority-owned by one of the Company’s significant stockholders, pays fees in exchange for product distribution and record-keeping services. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company earned $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in fees from American Beacon.
21
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
One of the Company's significant stockholders owns a minority interest in XOJET, Inc. ("XOJET"), which provides chartered aircraft services. The Company paid $0.5 million to XOJET during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Aplifi, Inc. ("Aplifi"), a privately held technology company in which the Company holds an equity interest, provides software licensing for annuity order entry and compliance. The Company paid $0.8 million and $0.5 million to Aplifi for such services during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Certain entities affiliated with SunGard Data Systems Inc. ("SunGard"), a company minority-owned by one of the Company's significant stockholders, provide data center recovery services. The Company paid $0.2 million to SunGard during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
One of the Company's stockholders, TPG Capital ("TPG") provided the Company with consulting services. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company paid $0.2 million to TPG.
13. Net Capital and Regulatory Requirements
The Company operates in a highly regulated industry. Applicable laws and regulations restrict permissible activities and investments and require compliance with various financial and customer-related regulations. The consequences of noncompliance can include substantial monetary and non-monetary sanctions. In addition, the Company is also subject to comprehensive examinations and supervision by various governmental and self-regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies generally have broad discretion to prescribe greater limitations on the operations of a regulated entity for the protection of investors or public interest. Furthermore, where the agencies determine that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply with applicable law, or are otherwise inconsistent with the laws and regulations or with the supervisory policies, greater restrictions may be imposed.
The Company’s registered broker-dealer, LPL Financial, is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act), which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined. Net capital and the related net capital requirement may fluctuate on a daily basis. LPL Financial is a clearing broker-dealer and had net capital of $181.1 million with a minimum net capital requirement of $6.0 million and net capital in excess of the minimum requirement of $175.1 million as of June 30, 2013.
The Company's subsidiary, The Private Trust Company N.A. ("PTC"), operates in a highly regulated industry and is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have substantial monetary and non-monetary impacts to PTC's operations.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, LPL Financial and PTC met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
14. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
LPL Financial’s client securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, LPL Financial extends credit to the advisor's client, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the client’s account. As clients write options contracts or sell securities short, LPL Financial may incur losses if the clients do not fulfill their obligations and the collateral in the clients’ accounts is not sufficient to fully cover losses that clients may incur from these strategies. To control this risk, LPL Financial monitors margin levels daily and clients are required to deposit additional collateral, or reduce positions, when necessary.
LPL Financial is obligated to settle transactions with brokers and other financial institutions even if its advisors' clients fail to meet their obligation to LPL Financial. Clients are required to complete their transactions on the settlement date, generally three business days after the trade date. If clients do not fulfill their contractual obligations, LPL Financial may incur losses. In addition, the Company occasionally enters into certain types of contracts to fulfill its sale of when, as, and if issued securities. When, as, and if issued securities have been authorized but are contingent upon the actual issuance of the security. LPL Financial has established procedures to reduce this risk by generally requiring that clients deposit cash and/or securities into their account prior to placing an order.
22
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
LPL Financial may at times hold equity securities on both a long and short basis that are recorded on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at market value. While long inventory positions represent LPL Financial’s ownership of securities, short inventory positions represent obligations of LPL Financial to deliver specified securities at a contracted price, which may differ from market prices prevailing at the time of completion of the transaction. Accordingly, both long and short inventory positions may result in losses or gains to LPL Financial as market values of securities fluctuate. To mitigate the risk of losses, long and short positions are marked-to-market daily and are continuously monitored by LPL Financial.
15. Subsequent Event
On July 30, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per share on the Company's outstanding common stock to be paid on August 30, 2013 to all stockholders of record on August 15, 2013.
******
23
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We are the nation's largest independent broker-dealer, a top custodian for registered investment advisors ("RIAs"), and a leading independent consultant to retirement plans. We provide an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to more than 13,400 independent financial advisors and financial advisors at approximately 700 financial institutions (our "advisors") across the country, enabling them to provide their retail investors (their "clients") with objective, conflict-free financial advice. We also support approximately 4,600 financial advisors who are affiliated and licensed with insurance companies with customized clearing, advisory platforms and technology solutions.
In addition, through our subsidiary companies, we support a diverse client base. Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is a leading provider of consulting services and solutions to RIAs, banks and trust companies servicing high net worth clients, while The Private Trust Company N.A. manages trusts and family assets for high net worth clients in all 50 states.
Our singular focus is to provide our advisors with the front-, middle- and back-office support they need to serve the large and growing market for independent investment advice. We believe we are the only company that offers advisors the unique combination of an integrated technology platform, comprehensive self-clearing services and open-architecture access to leading financial products, all delivered in an environment unencumbered by conflicts from product manufacturing, underwriting or market making.
For over 20 years, we have served the independent advisor market. We currently support the largest independent advisor base and we believe we have the fourth largest overall advisor base in the United States based on the information available as of the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was issued. Through our advisors, we are also one of the largest distributors of financial products in the United States. Our scale is a substantial competitive advantage and enables us to more effectively attract and retain advisors. Our unique business model allows us to invest in more resources for our advisors, increasing their revenues and creating a virtuous cycle of growth. We have approximately 3,000 employees with primary offices in Boston, Charlotte and San Diego.
Our Sources of Revenue
Our revenues are derived primarily from fees and commissions from products and advisory services offered by our advisors to their clients, a substantial portion of which we pay out to our advisors, as well as fees we receive from our advisors for the use of our technology, custody, clearing, trust and reporting platforms. We also generate asset-based revenues through the distribution of financial products for a broad range of product manufacturers. Under our self-clearing platform, we custody the majority of client assets invested in these financial products, which includes providing statements, transaction processing and ongoing account management. In return for these services, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks and other financial product manufacturers pay us fees based on asset levels or number of accounts managed. We also earn interest from margin loans made to our advisors’ clients.
We track recurring revenue, a characterization of net revenue and a statistical measure, which we define to include our revenues from asset-based fees, advisory fees, trailing commissions, cash sweep programs and certain other fees that are based upon accounts and advisors. Because certain recurring revenues are associated with asset balances, they will fluctuate depending on the market value of the asset balances and current interest rates. These asset balances, specifically related to advisory fee revenues and asset-based revenues, have approximately a 60% correlation to market fluctuations. Accordingly, recurring revenue can be negatively impacted by adverse external market conditions. However, recurring revenue is meaningful to us despite these fluctuations because it is not based on transaction volumes or other activity-based revenues, which are more difficult to predict, particularly in declining or volatile markets.
24
The table below summarizes the sources of our revenue, the primary drivers of each revenue source and the percentage of each revenue source that represents recurring revenue, a characterization of revenue and a statistical measure:
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | |||||
Sources of Revenue | Primary Drivers | Total (millions) | % of Total Net Revenue | % Recurring | |
Advisor-driven revenue with ~85%-90% payout ratio | Commission | - Transactions - Brokerage asset levels | $994 | 50% | 40% |
Advisory | - Asset levels in custodied advisory programs | $579 | 29% | 99% | |
Attachment revenue retained by us | Asset-Based - Cash Sweep Fees - Sponsorship Fees - Record Keeping | - Cash balances - Interest rates - Client asset levels - Number of accounts | $211 | 11% | 99% |
Transaction and Other - Transactions - Client (Investor) Accounts - Advisor Seat and Technology | - Client activity - Number of clients - Number of advisors - Number of accounts - Premium technology subscribers | $178 | 9% | 64% | |
Interest and Other Revenue | - Margin accounts - Alternative investment transactions | $32 | 1% | 35% | |
Total Net Revenue | $1,994 | 100% | 66% | ||
Total Recurring Revenue | 66% |
• | Commission and Advisory Revenues. Commission and advisory revenues both represent advisor-generated revenue, generally 85-90% of which is paid to advisors. |
Commission Revenues. We generate two types of commission revenues: front-end sales commissions that occur at the point of sale and trailing commissions. Transaction-based commission revenues primarily represent gross commissions generated by our advisors, primarily from commissions earned on the sale of various financial products such as mutual funds, variable and fixed annuities, alternative investments, general securities, fixed income, insurance, group annuities and options and commodities. The levels of transaction-based commissions can vary from period to period based on the overall economic environment, number of trading days in the reporting period and investment activity of our advisors' clients. We earn trailing commission revenues (a commission that is paid over time, such as 12(b)-1 fees) on mutual funds and variable annuities held by clients of our advisors. Trailing commissions are recurring in nature and are earned based on the current market value of investment holdings in trail-eligible assets.
Advisory Revenues. Advisory revenues represent fees charged on our corporate RIA platform provided through LPL Financial LLC ("LPL Financial") to clients of our advisors based on the value of advisory assets. Advisory fees are typically billed to clients quarterly, in advance, and are recognized as revenue ratably during the quarter. The value of the assets in the advisory account on the billing date determines the amount billed, and accordingly, the revenues earned in the following three month period. The majority of our accounts are billed using values as of the last business day of each calendar quarter. Generally, the advisory revenues collected on our corporate RIA platform range from 0.5% to 3.0% of the underlying assets.
25
In addition, we support independent RIAs who conduct their advisory business through separate entities by establishing their own RIA ("Independent RIAs") pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, rather than through LPL Financial. The assets held under these investment advisory accounts custodied with LPL Financial are included in our advisory and brokerage assets, net new advisory assets and advisory assets under custody metrics. The advisory revenue generated by an Independent RIA is earned by the Independent RIA, and accordingly is not included in our advisory revenue. However, we charge administrative fees to Independent RIAs including custody and clearing fees, based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts. The administrative fees collected on our Independent RIA platform vary, and can reach a maximum of 0.6% of the underlying assets.
Furthermore, we support certain financial advisors at broker-dealers affiliated with insurance companies through our customized advisory platforms and charge fees to these advisors based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts.
• | Asset-Based Revenues. Asset-based revenues are comprised of fees from cash sweep programs, our sponsorship programs with financial product manufacturers, and omnibus processing and networking services. Pursuant to contractual arrangements, uninvested cash balances in our advisors’ client accounts are swept into either insured deposit accounts at various banks or third-party money market funds, for which we receive fees, including administrative and record-keeping fees based on account type and the invested balances. In addition, we receive fees from certain financial product manufacturers in connection with sponsorship programs that support our marketing and sales-force education and training efforts. Our omnibus processing and networking revenues represent fees paid to us in exchange for administrative and record-keeping services that we provide to clients of our advisors. Omnibus processing revenues are paid to us by mutual fund product sponsors and based upon the value of custodied assets in advisory accounts and the number of brokerage accounts in which the related mutual fund positions are held. Networking revenues on brokerage assets are correlated to the number of positions we administer and are paid to us by mutual fund and annuity product manufacturers. |
• | Transaction and Other Revenues. Revenues earned from transactions and other services provided primarily consist of transaction fees and ticket charges, subscription fees, Individual Retirement Account ("IRA") custodian fees, contract and license fees, conference fees and other client account fees. We charge fees to our advisors and their clients for executing certain transactions in brokerage and fee-based advisory accounts. We earn subscription fees for various services provided to our advisors and on IRA custodial services that we provide for their client accounts. We charge monthly administrative fees to our advisors and fees to advisors who subscribe to our reporting services. We charge fees to financial product manufacturers for participating in our training and marketing conferences. In addition, we host certain advisor conferences that serve as training, sales and marketing events, for which we charge an attendance fee. |
• | Other Revenue. Other revenue includes marketing re-allowance fees from certain financial product manufacturers, primarily those who offer alternative investments, mark-to-market gains or losses on assets held by us for the advisors' non-qualified deferred compensation plan and our model portfolios, revenues from our retirement partner program, as well as interest income from client margin accounts and cash equivalents, net of operating interest expense and other items. |
Our Operating Expenses
• | Production Expenses. Production expenses are comprised of the following: base payout amounts that are earned by and paid out to advisors based on commission and advisory revenues earned on each client's account (collectively, commission and advisory revenues earned are referred to as gross dealer concessions, or "GDC"); production bonuses earned by advisors based on the levels of commission and advisory revenues they produce; the recognition of share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period; a mark-to-market gain or loss on amounts designated by advisors as deferred commissions in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan at each interim reporting period; and brokerage, clearing and exchange fees. Our production payout ratio is calculated as production expenses excluding brokerage, clearing and exchange fees, divided by GDC. |
26
We characterize components of production payout, which consists of all production expenses except brokerage, clearing and exchange fees, as either GDC sensitive or non-GDC sensitive. Base payout amounts and production bonuses earned by and paid to advisors are characterized as GDC sensitive because they are variable and highly correlated to the level of our commission and advisory revenues in a particular reporting period. Payout characterized as non-GDC sensitive includes share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period, and mark-to-market gains or losses on amounts designated by advisors as deferred commissions in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Non-GDC sensitive payout is correlated to market movement as well as to the value of our stock. We believe that discussion of production payout, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our production expenses, provides useful information to investors regarding our payouts to advisors.
The following table illustrates production expenses and production payout as components of our payout ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2013:
Base payout rate | 83.97 | % |
Production based bonuses | 2.10 | % |
GDC sensitive payout | 86.07 | % |
Non-GDC sensitive payout | 0.45 | % |
Total Payout Ratio | 86.52 | % |
________________________________
See "Results of Operations" for the comparative 2012 period's analysis of production payout ratio.
• | Compensation and Benefits Expense. Compensation and benefits expense includes salaries and wages and related employee benefits and taxes for our employees (including share-based compensation), as well as compensation for temporary employees and consultants. |
• | General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include promotional fees, occupancy and equipment, communications and data processing, regulatory fees, professional services and other expenses. General and administrative expenses also include expenses for our hosting of certain advisor conferences that serve as training, sales and marketing events. |
• | Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense represents the benefits received for using long-lived assets. Those assets consist of significant intangible assets established through our acquisitions, as well as fixed assets which include internally developed software, hardware, leasehold improvements and other equipment. |
• | Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges primarily represent expenses incurred as a result of our expansion of our Service Value Commitment announced in 2013 (See Note 3 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). Restructuring charges also include costs arising from our 2011 consolidation of UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. ("UVEST") and our 2009 consolidation of Mutual Service Corporation, Associated Financial Group, Inc., Associated Securities Corp., Associated Planners Investment Advisory, Inc. and Waterstone Financial Group, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as the “Affiliated Entities”). |
27
How We Evaluate Our Business
We focus on several business and key financial metrics in evaluating the success of our business relationships and our resulting financial position and operating performance. Our key metrics as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
As of June 30, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change | ||||||||
Business Metrics (unaudited) | ||||||||||
Advisors | 13,409 | 13,185 | 1.7 | % | ||||||
Advisory and brokerage assets (in billions)(1) | $ | 396.7 | $ | 353.0 | 12.4 | % | ||||
Advisory assets under custody (in billions)(2)(3) | $ | 132.4 | $ | 111.4 | 18.9 | % | ||||
Net new advisory assets (in billions)(4) | $ | 6.7 | $ | 5.3 | 26.4 | % | ||||
Insured cash account balances (in billions)(3) | $ | 16.9 | $ | 14.6 | 15.8 | % | ||||
Money market account balances (in billions)(3) | $ | 8.7 | $ | 8.5 | 2.4 | % |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Financial Metrics (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue growth from prior period | 12.2 | % | 1.5 | % | 10.2 | % | 2.4 | % | |||||||
Recurring revenue as a % of net revenue(5) | 65.6 | % | 65.3 | % | 65.5 | % | 64.2 | % | |||||||
Net income (in millions) | $ | 45.1 | $ | 39.5 | $ | 99.8 | $ | 80.7 | |||||||
Earnings per share (diluted) | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.72 | |||||||
Non-GAAP Measures: | |||||||||||||||
Gross margin (in millions)(6) | $ | 305.8 | $ | 277.7 | $ | 610.9 | $ | 552.6 | |||||||
Gross margin as a % of net revenue(6) | 30.0 | % | 30.6 | % | 30.6 | % | 30.5 | % | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) | $ | 131.0 | $ | 111.6 | $ | 267.0 | $ | 236.5 | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net revenue | 12.9 | % | 12.3 | % | 13.4 | % | 13.1 | % | |||||||
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of gross margin(6) | 42.9 | % | 40.2 | % | 43.7 | % | 42.8 | % | |||||||
Adjusted Earnings (in millions) | $ | 65.9 | $ | 55.0 | $ | 134.0 | $ | 118.2 | |||||||
Adjusted Earnings per share (diluted) | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.05 |
____________
(1) | Advisory and brokerage assets are comprised of assets that are custodied, networked and non-networked and reflect market movement in addition to new assets, inclusive of new business development and net of attrition. Such totals do not include the market value of certain other client assets as of June 30, 2013, comprised of $52.1 billion held in retirement plans supported by advisors licensed with LPL Financial, $10.4 billion of trust assets supported by Concord Capital Partners ("Concord") and $65.8 billion of assets supported by Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. Data regarding certain of these assets was not available at June 30, 2012. In addition, reported retirement plan assets represent assets that are custodied with 27 third-party providers of retirement plan administrative services who provide reporting feeds. We estimate the total assets in retirement plans served to be between $75.0 billion and $90.0 billion. If we receive reporting feeds in the future from providers for whom we do not currently receive feeds, we intend to include and identify such additional assets. |
(2) | Advisory assets under custody are comprised of advisory assets under management in our corporate RIA platform, and Independent RIA assets in advisory accounts custodied by us. See "Results of Operations" for a tabular presentation of advisory assets under custody. |
(3) | Advisory assets under custody, insured cash account balances and money market account balances are components of advisory and brokerage assets. |
(4) | Represents net new advisory assets consisting of funds from new accounts and additional funds deposited into existing advisory accounts that are custodied in our fee-based advisory platforms. Net new advisory assets for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were $3.7 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. |
28
(5) | Recurring revenue, which is a characterization of net revenue and a statistical measure, is derived from sources such as advisory revenues, asset-based revenues, trailing commission revenues, revenues related to our cash sweep programs, interest earned on margin accounts and technology and service revenues, and is not meant as a substitute for net revenues. |
(6) | Gross margin is calculated as net revenues less production expenses. Production expenses consist of the following expense categories from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income: (i) commission and advisory and (ii) brokerage, clearing and exchange. All other expense categories, including depreciation and amortization, are considered general and administrative in nature. As our gross margin amounts do not include any depreciation and amortization expense, we consider our gross margin amounts to be non-GAAP measures that may not be comparable to those of others in our industry. |
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income plus interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization), further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash charges and other adjustments set forth below. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we consider it an important measure of our performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a useful financial metric in assessing our operating performance from period to period because it excludes certain items that we believe are not representative of our core business, such as certain material non-cash items and other adjustments.
We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our reported GAAP results, provides useful information to investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations due to the following exclusions:
• | because non-cash equity grants made to employees, officers and non-employee directors at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time, the related share-based compensation expense is not a key measure of our current operating performance and |
• | because costs associated with acquisitions and the resulting integrations, debt refinancing and restructuring and conversions costs can vary from period to period and transaction to transaction, expenses associated with these activities are not considered a key measure of our operating performance. |
We use Adjusted EBITDA:
• | as a measure of operating performance; |
• | for planning purposes, including the preparation of budgets and forecasts; |
• | to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; |
• | to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies; |
• | in communications with our board of directors concerning our financial performance and |
• | as a factor in determining employee and executive bonuses. |
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and does not purport to be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income, operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect all cash expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
29
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt and |
• | Adjusted EBITDA can differ significantly from company to company depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which companies operate and capital investments, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in our business. We compensate for its limitations by relying primarily on the GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental information.
Set forth below is a reconciliation from our net income to Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | |||||||
Interest expense | 12,667 | 13,439 | 24,827 | 29,471 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 29,811 | 27,806 | 65,645 | 53,490 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(1) | 9,768 | 9,948 | 19,544 | 19,780 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets | 10,477 | 7,464 | 20,475 | 14,807 | |||||||||||
EBITDA | 107,814 | 98,159 | 230,299 | 198,229 | |||||||||||
EBITDA Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 4,486 | 5,176 | 8,448 | 9,336 | |||||||||||
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 3,282 | 5,056 | 3,726 | 6,914 | |||||||||||
Restructuring and conversion costs(4) | 7,322 | 2,164 | 13,585 | 4,174 | |||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs(5) | 7,968 | 109 | 7,968 | 16,652 | |||||||||||
Equity issuance and related offering costs(6) | — | 446 | — | 446 | |||||||||||
Other(7) | 173 | 469 | 2,939 | 783 | |||||||||||
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 23,231 | 13,420 | 36,666 | 38,305 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 131,045 | $ | 111,579 | $ | 266,965 | $ | 236,534 |
____________
(1) | Represents amortization of intangible assets as a result of our purchase accounting adjustments from our merger transaction in 2005 and our various acquisitions. |
(2) | Represents share-based compensation expense for equity awards granted to employees, officers and directors. Such awards are measured based on the grant-date fair value and recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period. |
(3) | Represents acquisition and integration costs resulting from various acquisitions, including changes in the estimated fair value of future payments, or contingent consideration, required to be made to former shareholders of certain acquired entities. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately $2.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively, was recognized as a charge against earnings due to a net increase in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration. |
(4) | Represents organizational restructuring charges, conversion and other related costs resulting from the expansion of the Service Value Commitment, the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities. As of June 30, 2013, we have recognized approximately 19% of costs related to the expansion of the Service Value Commitment, which is expected to be completed in 2015. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 91% and 99% of costs related to the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities, respectively, have been recognized. The remaining costs for the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities largely consist of the amortization of transition payments that have been made in connection with these two consolidations for |
30
the retention of advisors and financial institutions that are expected to be recognized into earnings by December 2014.
(5) | Represents expenses incurred resulting from the early extinguishment and repayment of amounts outstanding on our prior senior secured credit facilities, including the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs that had no economic benefit, as well as various other charges incurred in connection with the repayment under prior senior secured credit facilities and the establishment of new senior secured credit facilities. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 include a write off of $8.0 million related to the May 2013 refinancing and amendment of our previous credit agreement. Results for the six months ended June 30, 2012 include a write off of $16.5 million related to the March 2012 refinancing and replacement of our original credit agreement. |
(6) | Represents equity issuance and offering costs incurred in the first and second quarters of 2012, related to the closing of a secondary offering in the second quarter of 2012. |
(7) | Generally, represents certain excise and other taxes. Results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 include $2.7 million of severance and termination benefits related to a change in management structure that have been excluded from the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA. |
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share
Adjusted Earnings represents net income before: (a) share-based compensation expense, (b) amortization of intangible assets and software resulting from our merger transaction in 2005 and our various acquisitions, a component of depreciation and amortization, (c) acquisition and integration related expenses, (d) restructuring and conversion costs, (e) debt extinguishment costs and (f) other. Reconciling items are tax effected using the income tax rates in effect for the applicable period, adjusted for any potentially non-deductible amounts.
Adjusted Earnings per share represents Adjusted Earnings divided by weighted average outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis.
We prepared Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share to eliminate the effects of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance.
We believe that Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our reported GAAP results provide useful information to investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations for the following reasons:
• | because non-cash equity grants made to employees, officers and non-employee directors at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing, the related share-based compensation expense is not a key measure of our current operating performance; |
• | because costs associated with acquisitions and related integrations, debt refinancing and restructuring and conversions can vary from period to period and transaction to transaction, expenses associated with these activities are not considered a key measure of our operating performance and |
• | because amortization expenses can vary substantially from company to company and from period to period depending upon each company’s financing and accounting methods, the fair value and average expected life of acquired intangible assets and the method by which assets were acquired, the amortization of intangible assets obtained in acquisitions is not considered a key measure in comparing our operating performance. |
Since 2010, we have used Adjusted Earnings for internal management reporting and evaluation purposes. We also believe Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because securities analysts use them as supplemental measures to evaluate the overall performance of companies, and our investor and analyst presentations, which are generally available to investors through our website, include references to Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share.
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are not measures of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or earnings per share or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our profitability or liquidity.
31
Although Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are frequently used by securities analysts and others in their evaluation of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share in isolation, or as substitutes for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. In particular you should consider:
• | Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
• | Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs and |
• | Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with using Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-GAAP measures Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | |||||||
After-Tax: | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA Adjustments(1) | |||||||||||||||
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 3,200 | 3,806 | 6,102 | 6,973 | |||||||||||
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 2,025 | 3,561 | 946 | 4,707 | |||||||||||
Restructuring and conversion costs | 4,518 | 1,335 | 8,382 | 2,575 | |||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs | 4,916 | 67 | 4,916 | 10,274 | |||||||||||
Equity issuance and related offering costs | — | 275 | — | 275 | |||||||||||
Other | 106 | 289 | 1,813 | 483 | |||||||||||
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 14,765 | 9,333 | 22,159 | 25,287 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets(1) | 6,027 | 6,138 | 12,059 | 12,204 | |||||||||||
Adjusted Earnings | $ | 65,883 | $ | 54,973 | $ | 134,026 | $ | 118,172 | |||||||
Adjusted Earnings per share(4) | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.05 | |||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted | 107,695 | 112,834 | 107,465 | 112,679 |
____________
(1) | Generally, EBITDA Adjustments and amortization of purchased intangible assets have been tax effected using a federal rate of 35.0% and the applicable effective state rate which was 3.30%, net of the federal tax benefit, for the periods presented, except as noted in footnotes 2 and 3 of this table. |
(2) | Represents the after-tax expense of non-qualified stock options for which we receive a tax deduction upon exercise, restricted stock awards for which we receive a tax deduction upon vesting, shares awarded to employees under the ESPP for which we receive a tax deduction, and the full expense impact of incentive stock options granted to employees that have vested and qualify for preferential tax treatment and conversely, for which we do not receive a tax deduction. Share-based compensation expense for vesting of incentive stock options was $1.1 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $2.3 million and $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
(3) | Represents the after-tax expense of acquisition and related costs for which we receive a tax deduction. In addition, the results for the six months ended June 30, 2013 reflect a $3.8 million reduction of expense |
32
related to the estimated fair value of contingent consideration for the stock acquisition of Concord, that is not deductible for tax purposes.
(4) | Represents Adjusted Earnings, a non-GAAP measure, divided by weighted average number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis. Set forth is a reconciliation of earnings per share on a fully diluted basis, as calculated in accordance with GAAP to Adjusted Earnings per share: |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.72 | |||||||
After-Tax: | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA Adjustments per share | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.22 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets per share | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.11 | |||||||||||
Adjusted Earnings per share | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.05 |
Service Value Commitment
On February 5, 2013, we committed to an expansion of our Service Value Commitment, an ongoing effort to position us for sustainable long-term growth by improving the service experience of our advisors and delivering efficiencies in our operating model. We have assessed our information technology delivery, governance, organization and strategy and committed to undertake a course of action (the “Program”) to reposition our labor force and invest in technology, human capital, marketing and other key areas to enable future growth.
The Program is expected to be completed in 2015, and we estimate total charges of $65.0 million for technology transformation costs, outsourcing and other related costs, employee severance obligations and other related costs, and non-cash charges for impairment of certain fixed assets related to internally developed software. We incurred $12.1 million million of expense in the first half of 2013 primarily for services provided by outside consultants, and we remain on track to incur approximately $40.0 million for the entire year. By 2015, we expect annual pre-tax run-rate savings of approximately $30.0 million to $35.0 million. See Note 3 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.
During the second quarter of 2013, we entered into a master services agreement pursuant to which a third party service provider will provide certain outsourced back office functions. We expect the transition of certain initial functions to be completed prior to year-end.
Acquisitions, Integrations and Divestitures
From time to time we undertake acquisitions and/or divestitures based on opportunities in the competitive landscape. These activities are part of our overall growth strategy, but can distort comparability when reviewing revenue and expense trends for periods presented. The following describes significant acquisition and integration activities that have impacted our 2012 and 2013 results.
Acquisition of National Retirement Partners, Inc.
On February 9, 2011, we acquired certain assets of National Retirement Partners, Inc. (“NRP”). As part of the acquisition, 206 advisors previously registered with NRP transferred their securities and advisory licenses and registrations to LPL Financial. We may be required to pay future consideration to former shareholders of NRP that is contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue-based milestones in the third year following the acquisition. We estimated the fair value of the remaining contingent consideration at the close of the transaction and we re-measure contingent consideration at fair value at each interim reporting period with changes recognized in earnings (See Note 4 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements).
Acquisition of Concord Capital Partners
On June 22, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Concord. Concord provides technology and open architecture investment management solutions for trust departments of financial institutions. We may be required to pay future consideration that is based on the achievement of certain gross margin-based milestones for the year ending December 31, 2013. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration at
33
the close of the transaction and re-measure contingent consideration at fair value at each interim reporting period with changes recognized in earnings (See Note 4 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). The maximum amount of contingent consideration is $15.0 million.
Acquisition of Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc.
On April 23, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Fortigent, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm, Fortigent Reporting Company, LLC and Fortigent Strategies Company, LLC (together, "Fortigent"). Fortigent is a leading provider of solutions and consulting services to RIAs, banks and trust companies servicing high net worth clients. This strategic acquisition further enhanced our capabilities and offered an extension of our existing services for wealth management advisors. As of June 30, 2013, $4.6 million remained in an escrow account to be paid to former shareholders of Fortigent in accordance with the terms of the stock purchase agreement.
Acquisition of Veritat Advisors, Inc.
On July 10, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Veritat Advisors, Inc. ("Veritat"). Veritat was a registered investment advisory firm that developed and utilized a proprietary online financial planning platform designed to support advisors who serve the mass market. This strategic acquisition will enhance our technological capabilities and increase the flexibility of our offering for mass market clients through NestWise LLC. We may be required to pay future consideration to the former shareholders of Veritat that is contingent upon the achievement of certain financial targets and retention of key employees.
Economic Overview and Impact of Financial Market Events
After increasing steadily in the first quarter of 2013, the equity markets in the United States increased in a more choppy manner during the second quarter. The S&P 500 index closed the quarter at 1,606, up 2.4% from its close on March 31, 2013. However, during the quarter, the S&P 500 Index reached its peak of 1,669 on May 21, 2013, retreated by 3.8% over a five week period before recovering to close at 1,606. Over the first six months of 2013, the S&P 500 index has increased by 12.6%, compared to an increase of 8.3% over the first six months of 2012. Overall while equity market levels improved, lingering economic concerns remain about spending cuts, U.S. and global growth rates, a persistent high unemployment level, and sovereign debt concerns in certain countries in the European Union.
In response to continuing economic concerns, central banks, including the Federal Reserve, have continued to maintain interest rates at historically low levels. The average Federal Funds Effective rate was 0.12% in the second quarter of 2013, a decrease from the average of 0.14% and 0.15% in the first quarter of 2013 and second quarter of 2012, respectively. The low interest rate environment continued to pressure our revenues from our cash sweep programs and continued to diminish investor demand for fixed income securities and fixed annuities. The decrease in investor demand for fixed income securities was also in part due to the steepening of the yield curve impacting fixed income prices and an increase in the attractiveness of equities.
During the second quarter, investor concern over the sustainability of economic growth and the timing of reductions in levels of liquidity provided by central banks to maintain the low interest rates caused increased volatility in the equity markets. In the second quarter, the S&P 500 experienced daily fluctuations in the index of more than 1% on approximately 25% of the trading days. In contrast, in the first quarter, daily fluctuations in the S&P 500 index of more than 1% only occurred on 12% of the trading days. While concerns over the end of the Federal Reserve's provision of liquidity through quantitative easing did not impact short-term interest rates, during the second quarter, intermediate to longer-term interest rates increased during the quarter. For example, the yield on the 10-year maturity United States Treasury bond increased from 1.85% at March 31, 2013 to 2.49% at June 30, 2013.
34
Results of Operations
The following discussion presents an analysis of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Where appropriate, we have identified specific events and changes that affect comparability or trends, and where possible and practical, have quantified the impact of such items.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change | 2013 | 2012 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commission | $ | 508,399 | $ | 447,243 | 13.7 | % | $ | 993,971 | $ | 910,896 | 9.1 | % | |||||||||
Advisory | 298,094 | 268,192 | 11.1 | % | 579,320 | 519,173 | 11.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Asset-based | 107,505 | 102,784 | 4.6 | % | 211,271 | 200,025 | 5.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Transaction and other | 88,631 | 78,894 | 12.3 | % | 178,009 | 153,466 | 16.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Other | 16,291 | 10,730 | 51.8 | % | 31,145 | 26,056 | 19.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Net revenues | 1,018,920 | 907,843 | 12.2 | % | 1,993,716 | 1,809,616 | 10.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production | 713,115 | 630,136 | 13.2 | % | 1,382,838 | 1,257,043 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 98,227 | 93,034 | 5.6 | % | 197,007 | 182,046 | 8.2 | % | |||||||||||||
General and administrative | 84,470 | 84,457 | — | % | 162,241 | 152,023 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 20,245 | 17,412 | 16.3 | % | 40,019 | 34,587 | 15.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 7,332 | 2,057 | * | 13,369 | 3,751 | * | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 923,389 | 827,096 | 11.6 | % | 1,795,474 | 1,629,450 | 10.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Non-operating interest expense | 12,667 | 13,439 | (5.7 | )% | 24,827 | 29,471 | (15.8 | )% | |||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt | 7,962 | — | * | 7,962 | 16,524 | (51.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 944,018 | 840,535 | 12.3 | % | 1,828,263 | 1,675,445 | 9.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 74,902 | 67,308 | 11.3 | % | 165,453 | 134,171 | 23.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 29,811 | 27,806 | 7.2 | % | 65,645 | 53,490 | 22.7 | % | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 45,091 | $ | 39,502 | 14.1 | % | $ | 99,808 | $ | 80,681 | 23.7 | % |
____________
* Not Meaningful
35
Revenues
Commission Revenues
The following table sets forth our commission revenue, by product category, included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | % Total | 2012 | % Total | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||
Variable annuities | $ | 206,081 | 40.5 | % | $ | 190,427 | 42.6 | % | $ | 15,654 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||
Mutual funds | 146,395 | 28.8 | % | 122,128 | 27.3 | % | 24,267 | 19.9 | % | |||||||||||
Alternative investments | 46,397 | 9.1 | % | 33,189 | 7.4 | % | 13,208 | 39.8 | % | |||||||||||
Equities | 29,104 | 5.7 | % | 23,207 | 5.2 | % | 5,897 | 25.4 | % | |||||||||||
Fixed annuities | 23,178 | 4.5 | % | 27,062 | 6.0 | % | (3,884 | ) | (14.4 | )% | ||||||||||
Fixed income | 22,314 | 4.4 | % | 19,982 | 4.5 | % | 2,332 | 11.7 | % | |||||||||||
Insurance | 21,515 | 4.2 | % | 18,647 | 4.2 | % | 2,868 | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||
Group variable annuities(1) | 13,073 | 2.7 | % | 12,283 | 2.7 | % | 790 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||
Other | 342 | 0.1 | % | 318 | 0.1 | % | 24 | 7.5 | % | |||||||||||
Total commission revenue | $ | 508,399 | 100.0 | % | $ | 447,243 | 100.0 | % | $ | 61,156 | 13.7 | % |
(1) | For the three months ended June 30, 2013, commission revenues associated with group annuities are presented as a separate component of overall commission revenues. Previously, such revenues were presented within commission revenues associated with variable annuities. Accordingly, the corresponding amounts for the three months ended June 30, 2012 have been reclassified above to make them consistent with the current period presentation. |
Commission revenue increased by $61.2 million, or 13.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012 due primarily to an increase in sales-based activity for mutual funds and alternative investments and increases in trail revenues for mutual funds and variable annuities. Additionally, commission revenues from equities, insurance and fixed income, primarily driven by unit investment trusts, also contributed to the overall growth in commission revenue. Such overall growth reflects market-wide growth, increased investor engagement that has driven advisor productivity and the overall growth in our advisor count over the past twelve months.
The increase in commission revenues associated with alternative investments reflects investors' preferences for diversification, as income-producing alternative strategies continue to grow in popularity and investors continue to seek opportunities to earn return outside of the traditional equity and fixed income markets. The continued low interest rate environment, which has reduced investor demand for fixed annuities, is reflected in the decline in commission revenues for fixed annuities products.
36
The following table sets forth our commission revenue, by product category, included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | % Total | 2012 | % Total | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||
Variable annuities | $ | 408,523 | 41.1 | % | $ | 380,864 | 41.8 | % | $ | 27,659 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Mutual funds | 287,298 | 28.9 | % | 244,806 | 26.9 | % | 42,492 | 17.4 | % | |||||||||||
Alternative investments | 86,808 | 8.7 | % | 71,595 | 7.9 | % | 15,213 | 21.2 | % | |||||||||||
Equities | 56,460 | 5.7 | % | 49,363 | 5.4 | % | 7,097 | 14.4 | % | |||||||||||
Fixed income | 44,462 | 4.5 | % | 42,480 | 4.7 | % | 1,982 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||||
Insurance | 41,868 | 4.2 | % | 39,592 | 4.2 | % | 2,276 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||||
Fixed annuities | 41,772 | 4.2 | % | 55,819 | 6.1 | % | (14,047 | ) | (25.2 | )% | ||||||||||
Group variable annuities(1) | 26,210 | 2.7 | % | 25,891 | 2.9 | % | 319 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||
Other | 570 | 0.1 | % | 486 | 0.1 | % | 84 | 17.3 | % | |||||||||||
Total commission revenue | $ | 993,971 | 100.0 | % | $ | 910,896 | 100.0 | % | $ | 83,075 | 9.1 | % |
(1) | For the six months ended June 30, 2013, commission revenues associated with group annuities are presented as a separate component of overall commission revenues. Previously, such revenues were presented within commission revenues associated with variable annuities. Accordingly, the corresponding amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2012 have been reclassified to make them consistent with the current period presentation. |
Commission revenue increased by $83.1 million, or 9.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. We attribute this increase to the same factors that impacted our quarterly performance for most product categories, which are described above.
Advisory Revenues
The following table summarizes the activity within our advisory assets under custody for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in billions):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Balance - Beginning of period | $ | 130.2 | $ | 110.8 | $ | 122.1 | $ | 101.6 | |||||||
Net new advisory assets | 3.7 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 5.3 | |||||||||||
Market impact and other | (1.5 | ) | (2.2 | ) | 3.6 | 4.5 | |||||||||
Balance - End of period | $ | 132.4 | $ | 111.4 | $ | 132.4 | $ | 111.4 |
Net new advisory assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have a limited impact on advisory fee revenue for those respective periods. Rather, net new advisory assets for those respective periods will be a driver of advisory fee revenue in future periods. Net new advisory assets increased $3.7 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2013 resulting from the continued shift by our existing advisors from brokerage towards more advisory business.
Advisory revenues increased by $29.9 million, or 11.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, which is in line with the underlying relevant asset growth. Advisory revenue for a particular quarter is predominately driven by the prior quarter-end advisory assets under management. At March 31, 2013, advisory assets under management were $106.1 billion, a 9.7% increase over the balance at March 31, 2012, driven by strong net new asset flows and market appreciation. The Independent RIA model has continued to grow rapidly as advisors seek the freedom to run their business in a manner which best enables them to meet their clients' needs. This continued shift of advisors to the Independent RIA platform has caused the rate of revenue growth of advisory assets under management to lag behind the rate of growth of advisory assets under custody. Advisory fee revenues do not include fees charged by Independent RIA advisors for which there also is no
37
corresponding payout. However, there are administrative fees charged to Independent RIA advisors including custody and clearing fees, based on the value of assets.
Advisory fees increased by $60.1 million, or 11.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012. This growth is attributable to the same net new advisory asset flows and shift of advisors toward more advisory business that has impacted our quarterly performance, and to a positive market impact for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
The following table summarizes the composition of our advisory assets under custody as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in billions):
As of June 30, | ||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | % Change | ||||||||
Advisory assets under management | $ | 106.4 | $ | 95.7 | 11.2 | % | ||||
Independent RIA assets in advisory accounts custodied by LPL Financial | 26.0 | 15.7 | 65.6 | % | ||||||
Total advisory assets under custody | $ | 132.4 | $ | 111.4 | 18.9 | % |
Growth of the Independent RIA assets in advisory accounts custodied by LPL Financial has outpaced the growth in advisory assets under management. This growth is consistent with the industry trend as more advisors shift their business toward the Independent RIA model.
Asset-Based Revenues
Asset-based revenues increased by $4.7 million, or 4.6%, to $107.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. Revenues for record-keeping services, which are largely based on the underlying asset values, increased due to the impact of the higher average market indices on the value of such underlying assets and net new sales of eligible assets. The average S&P 500 index for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was 1,610, an increase of 19.2% over the average in the prior year period. Asset-based revenues also include revenues from our cash sweep programs, which decreased by $3.1 million, or 9.1%, to $31.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 from $34.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in our cash sweep revenues is result of a decline in the average effective rate for federal funds of 3 basis points from 0.15% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 0.12% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, which was partially offset by an increase of 4.9% in average assets in our cash sweep programs, which were $23.7 billion and $22.6 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Asset-based fees increased by $11.2 million, or 5.6%, to $211.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. Revenues for record-keeping services and from product sponsors, which are each largely based on the underlying asset values, increased due to the impact of the higher average market indices on the value of such underlying assets and net new sales of eligible assets. The average S&P 500 index for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 1,563, an increase of 15.9% over the average in the prior year period. Asset-based fees also include revenues from our cash sweep programs, which decreased by $6.0 million, or 8.7%, to $62.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $68.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease resulted from a re-pricing of certain contracts that underlie our cash sweep programs, partially offset by an increase of 6.4% in average assets in our cash sweep programs, which were $23.4 billion and $22.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as retail investors increased their percentage of cash assets in response to the volatility in the financial markets.
Transaction and Other Revenues
Transaction and other revenues increased by $9.7 million, or 12.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. Transaction and other revenues increased due to higher trade volumes in certain advisory accounts and a 2.1% increase in the average number of advisors. These increases were partially offset by decreased conference revenues of $1.6 million due to a shift in the timing of a conference in the first quarter of 2013 that occurred in the second quarter of 2012.
Transaction and other revenues increased by $24.5 million, or 16.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. Transaction and other revenues increased due to higher trade volumes in certain advisory accounts and a 2.8% increase in the average number of advisors. Additionally, our April 2012 acquisition of
38
Fortigent contributed an incremental $4.3 million in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012.
Other Revenue
Other revenue increased $5.6 million, or 51.8%, to $16.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The primary contributor to this increase for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were alternative investment marketing allowances received from product sponsor programs, which increased by $3.1 million compared to the same period in 2012, based primarily on increased sales of alternative investments. Other revenue includes gains or losses on assets held for the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Gains were $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to losses of $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The gains or losses on assets held for the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan are offset by corresponding production expenses as noted below.
Other revenue increased $5.1 million, or 19.5%, to $31.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012. The primary contributor to this increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were alternative investment marketing allowances received from product sponsor programs, which increased by $3.1 million compared to the same period in 2012, based primarily on increased sales of alternative investments. Other revenue includes gains or losses on assets held for the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Gains were $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared $0.3 million for the same period in 2012. The gains or losses on assets held for the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan are offset by corresponding increases in production expenses as noted below.
Expenses
Production Expenses
The following table shows our production payout ratio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | Change | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | Change | ||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Base payout rate | 84.06 | % | 84.27 | % | (21 bps) | 83.97 | % | 84.26 | % | (29 bps) | |||||
Production based bonuses | 2.47 | % | 2.57 | % | (10 bps) | 2.10 | % | 2.08 | % | 2 bps | |||||
GDC sensitive payout | 86.53 | % | 86.84 | % | (31 bps) | 86.07 | % | 86.34 | % | (27 bps) | |||||
Non-GDC sensitive payout | 0.47 | % | (0.10 | )% | 57 bps | 0.45 | % | 0.23 | % | 22 bps | |||||
Total Payout Ratio | 87.00 | % | 86.74 | % | 26 bps | 86.52 | % | 86.57 | % | (5 bps) |
Production expenses increased by $83.0 million, or 13.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. The increase largely correlates with our commission and advisory revenues, which increased by 12.7% during the same period. Our production payout was 87.00% for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 86.74% for the prior year period. This increase of 26 basis points in our total payout ratio arose from increases in the non-GDC sensitive payout components which were partially offset by lower rates for base payout and production-based bonuses. The decrease in the base payout rate is due in part to growth of our advisory platform, which on average has a lower base payout rate than our brokerage platform. The decrease in our production based bonuses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same year ago period reflects the realization of benefits from the price change that went into effect in 2012. The increase in non-GDC sensitive payout is attributable to increased advisor stock-based compensation for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 correlating to an increase in the price of our stock at June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012, and incremental production expenses related to the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan as noted above.
Production expenses increased by $125.8 million, or 10.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. The increase correlates with our commission and advisory revenues, which increased by 10.0% during the same period. Our production payout was 86.52% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 86.57% for the prior year period. The base payout rate decreased by 29 basis points in part due to the growth of our advisory platform, which on average has a lower base rate than our brokerage platform. Our
39
production based bonuses increased by 2 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared with the same year ago period, which is attributable to our advisors' trend of attaining higher payout tiers earlier in the year, partially offset by pricing changes implemented during 2012. The increase in non-GDC sensitive payout is attributable to increased advisor stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012 correlating to market movement in our stock and production expenses related to the advisor non-qualified deferred compensation plan as noted above.
Compensation and Benefits Expense
Compensation and benefits increased by $5.2 million, or 5.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher staffing levels necessary to support increased levels of advisor and client activities. Our average number of full-time employees increased 4.5% from 2,886 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 3,015 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
Compensation and benefits increased by $15.0 million, or 8.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. Our average number of full-time employees increased 6.0% from 2,805 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 2,972 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to higher staffing levels to support increased levels of advisor and client activities and our 2012 acquisition of Fortigent.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $84.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, a $2.2 million charge was incurred due to a change in the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations. The increase was offset by decreased conference expenses due to a shift in the timing of a conference in the first quarter of 2013 that occurred in the second quarter of 2012.
General and administrative expenses increased by $10.2 million, or 6.7%, to $162.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. The primary drivers behind the increase for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012, were business development and promotional expenses, a $1.5 million increase in expenses for hosting certain of our advisor conferences, a $2.1 million increase in expenses related to our acquisition of Fortigent in April 2012 and a $2.2 million charge due to a change in the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, depreciation and amortization increased by $2.8 million, or 16.3%, and $5.4 million, or 15.7%, respectively, compared to the respective period of 2012. The amortization of internally developed software and depreciation of equipment and leasehold improvements in our new office facility in Boston contributed to these increases.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges represent expenses incurred as a result of our expansion of our Service Value Commitment, our 2011 consolidation of UVEST and our 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities.
Restructuring charges were $7.3 million and $13.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. These charges relate primarily to consulting fees paid to support our technology transformation and to develop our detailed outsourcing plans, as well as employee severance obligations and other related costs and non-cash charges for impairment incurred through our expansion of our Service Value Commitment. Refer to Note 3 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding this matter.
Restructuring charges were $2.1 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. These charges relate primarily to technology costs and other expenditures incurred for the conversion and transfer of advisors and their client accounts from UVEST to LPL Financial.
Interest Expense
Interest expense represents non-operating interest expense for our senior secured credit facilities.
Interest expense decreased $0.8 million, or 5.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012. The maturity of an interest rate swap agreement on June 30, 2012 for a notional value of
40
$65.0 million reduced interest expense by $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.
Interest expense decreased $4.6 million, or 15.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 2012. The reduction in interest expense for 2013 is due primarily to a reduction in the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings as a result of the debt refinancing in March 2012. Additionally, the maturity of an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $65.0 million on June 30, 2012, reduced interest expense by $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012. The increase in debt resulting from our debt refinancing in May 2013 did not materially increase interest expense in the 2013 period.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
Losses from the extinguishment of debt totaled $8.0 million and $16.5 million for the six months ending June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In May 2013, we refinanced and amended our credit agreement and effectively increased our borrowing by approximately $236.1 million, with net proceeds used primarily for working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. Accordingly, we wrote off $8.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs that had no future economic benefit related to our prior credit agreement. Refer to Note 8 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding this matter.
In March 2012, we refinanced and replaced the debt outstanding under our original credit agreement primarily to extend the maturities of our borrowings. In connection with this refinancing, we wrote off $16.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs that had no future economic benefit related to the previous credit agreement. Refer to Note 8 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding this matter.
Provision for Income Taxes
We estimate our full-year effective income tax rate at the end of each interim reporting period. This estimate is used in providing for income taxes on a year-to-date basis and may change in subsequent interim periods. The tax rate in any quarter can be affected positively and negatively by adjustments that are required to be reported in the quarter in which resolution of the item occurs. The effective income tax rates reflect the impact of state taxes, settlement contingencies and expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded income tax expense of $29.8 million, compared with $27.8 million in the prior year period. Our effective income tax rate was 39.8% and 41.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective income tax rate was higher in the second quarter of 2012 due to the timing of non-deductible expenses between the first and second quarters of 2012 and a decrease in pre-tax income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded income tax expense of $65.6 million, compared with $53.5 million in the prior year period. Our effective income tax rate was 39.7% and 39.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Senior management establishes our liquidity and capital policies. These policies include senior management’s review of short- and long-term cash flow forecasts, review of monthly capital expenditures and daily monitoring of liquidity for our subsidiaries. Decisions on the allocation of capital are based upon, among other things, projected profitability and cash flow, risks of the business, regulatory capital requirements and future liquidity needs for strategic activities. Our Treasury Department assists in evaluating, monitoring and controlling the business activities that impact our financial condition, liquidity and capital structure and maintains relationships with various lenders. The objectives of these policies are to support the executive business strategies while ensuring ongoing and sufficient liquidity.
41
A summary of changes in our cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is provided below (in thousands):
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in): | |||||||
Operating activities | $ | (4,344 | ) | $ | 56,113 | ||
Investing activities | (33,156 | ) | (59,738 | ) | |||
Financing activities | 156,110 | (236,091 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 118,610 | (239,716 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period | 466,261 | 720,772 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period | $ | 584,871 | $ | 481,056 |
Cash requirements and liquidity needs are primarily funded through our cash flow from operations and our capacity for additional borrowing.
Net cash provided by or used in operating activities includes net income adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, restructuring related charges, share-based compensation, amortization of debt issuance costs, deferred income tax provision and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Operating assets and liabilities include balances related to settlement and funding of client transactions, receivables from product sponsors and accrued commissions and advisory expenses due to our advisors. Operating assets and liabilities that arise from the settlement and funding of transactions by our advisors’ clients are the principal cause of changes to our net cash from operating activities and can fluctuate significantly from day to day and period to period depending on overall trends and clients' behaviors.
Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 totaled $4.3 million. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $56.1 million. The change in cash flows between periods primarily reflects the impact of client trading and settlement activity, which represented a net use of funds of $155.2 million in 2013 compared to a net use of funds of $7.6 million in 2012. The increased use of cash in client trading and settlement activities was offset in part by higher levels of net income which was $99.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $80.7 million for the same period in the prior year, and depreciation and amortization which was $40.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $34.6 million for the same period in the prior year. Additionally, $8.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs were written off as a charge to earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2013 stemming from our May 2013 debt refinancing, compared to $16.5 million for the same period in the prior year related to our March 2012 debt refinancing.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled $33.2 million and $59.7 million, respectively. The net cash used in 2013 primarily consists of $32.2 million in capital expenditures. The net cash used in 2012 included $18.8 million in capital expenditures and $38.8 million for the acquisition of Fortigent.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $156.1 million. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $236.1 million. Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2013 include $1,079.0 million in proceeds from our new senior secured credit facilities and $18.3 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $861.2 million to pay down term loans under our senior secured credit facilities, $51.0 million for repurchases of common stock and $28.8 million of regular cash dividends paid. Cash flows used in financing activities in 2012 include $222.6 million of special cash dividends paid and $55.9 million for repurchases of common stock, partially offset by $48.4 million from excess tax benefits arising from share-based compensation.
We believe that based on current levels of operations and anticipated growth, cash flow from operations, together with other available sources of funds, which includes three uncommitted lines of credit available and the revolving credit facility established through our credit agreement, will be adequate to satisfy our working capital needs, the payment of all of our obligations and the funding of anticipated capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. In addition, we have certain capital requirements due to our registered broker-dealer entity and bank trust subsidiaries and we have met all capital adequacy requirements for these entities and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We regularly evaluate our existing indebtedness, including refinancing thereof, based on
42
a number of factors, including our capital requirements, future prospects, contractual restrictions, the availability of refinancing on attractive terms and general market conditions.
Share Repurchases
The Board of Directors has approved several share repurchase programs pursuant to which we may repurchase issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. Purchases may be effected in open market or privately negotiated transactions, including transactions with our affiliates, with the timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased generally determined at our discretion within the constraints of our credit agreement and general operating needs.
On May 29, 2013, a new share repurchase plan to repurchase up to $200.0 million in addition to the remaining capacity available under previous plans was approved. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, 1,428,576 shares were repurchased under our September 2012 repurchase plan at a weighted average price of $36.99 per share for a total cost of $52.8 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, 1,583,865 shares were repurchased under our September 2012 repurchase plan at a weighted average price of $36.47 per share for a total cost of $57.8 million. At June 30, 2013 we had $29.2 million available for repurchases under our September 2012 plan and $200.0 million available under our May 2013 plan.
Issuance Under 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
On February 22, 2012, we distributed 1,673,556 shares, net of shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax requirements of the participants, pursuant to the terms of our 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions to participants were made in the form of whole shares of common stock equal to the number of stock units allocated to the participant's account and fractional shares were paid out in cash. Participants authorized us to withhold shares from their distribution of common stock to satisfy their withholding tax obligations. On February 22, 2012 we repurchased 1,149,896 shares and made the related withholding tax payment of approximately $37.5 million.
In calculating earnings per share and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method, we were required to allocate a portion of our earnings to employees that held stock units that contained non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents under our 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. After the distribution of shares under the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, the two-class method was no longer applicable. This distribution of shares did not have a material impact on earnings per share or diluted earnings per share. However, the distribution increased the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 by approximately 850,000 shares.
Dividends
The payment, timing and amount of any dividends permitted under our credit facilities are subject to approval by our Board of Directors. Cash dividends per share of common stock and total cash dividends paid during each quarter were as follows (in millions, except per share data):
2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||
Dividend per Share | Total Cash Dividend | Dividend per Share | Total Cash Dividend | ||||||||||||
First quarter | $ | 0.135 | $ | 14.4 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Second quarter | $ | 0.135 | $ | 14.4 | $ | 2.00 | $ | 222.6 |
On July 30, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.19 per share on our outstanding common stock to be paid on August 30, 2013 to all stockholders of record on August 15, 2013.
Regulatory
In July 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (the “Notice”) asserting we are subject to a penalty with respect to an alleged untimely deposit of withholding taxes related to the exercise of certain non-qualified stock options in connection with our initial public offering in 2010. In 2012, we recorded an estimate of probable loss within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. During the first quarter of 2013, the IRS issued a Summary of Employment Tax Examination (the "Summary") and we remitted payment which approximated amounts previously accrued in accordance with the Summary. We are awaiting final consent of resolution from the IRS. We believe the
43
outcome of this matter will not have a material impact beyond the amounts recorded to our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, financial condition or cash flows.
In the second quarter of 2013, we reached an agreement with our principal regulator to resolve a matter related to email surveillance and production. During the first quarter of 2013, we recorded an estimate of a probable loss within professional services and accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and financial condition, respectively. The outcome of this matter did not differ materially from the amount recorded in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, financial condition or cash flows as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
Operating Capital Requirements
Our primary requirement for working capital relates to funds we loan to our advisors’ clients for trading conducted on margin and funds we are required to maintain at clearing organizations to support these clients’ trading activities. We have several sources of funds that enable us to meet increases in working capital requirements that relate to increases in client margin activities and balances. These sources include cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations, and proceeds from re-pledging or selling client securities in margin accounts. When a client purchases securities on margin or uses securities as collateral to borrow from us on margin, we are permitted, pursuant to the applicable securities industry regulations, to re-pledge, loan or sell securities which collateralize those margin accounts. As of June 30, 2013, we had received collateral in connection primarily with client margin loans with a fair value of approximately $331.0 million, which can be re-pledged, loaned or sold. Of this amount, approximately $24.8 million has been pledged to the Options Clearing Corporation ("OCC") as collateral to secure certain client obligations related to options positions. Additionally, approximately $132.9 million are held at banks in connection with uncommitted lines of credit, which were unutilized at June 30, 2013; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $173.3 million has not been re-pledged, loaned or sold. There are no restrictions that materially limit our ability to re-pledge, loan or sell the remaining $306.2 million of client collateral. In May 2013, we ended our participation in the National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC") Stock Borrow Program and all pledged collateral was returned to us.
Our other working capital needs are primarily related to regulatory capital requirements at our broker-dealer and bank trust subsidiaries and software development, which we have satisfied in the past from internally generated cash flows.
Notwithstanding the self-funding nature of our operations, we may sometimes be required to fund timing differences arising from the delayed receipt of client funds associated with the settlement of client transactions in securities markets. These timing differences are funded either with internally generated cash flow or, if needed, with funds drawn on our uncommitted lines of credit at our broker-dealer subsidiary LPL Financial, and/or under our revolving credit facility.
Our registered broker-dealer, LPL Financial, is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. LPL Financial computes net capital requirements under the alternative method, which requires firms to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, equal to the greater of $250,000 or 2.0% of aggregate debit balances arising from client transactions.
LPL Financial is also subject to the National Futures Association's ("NFA") financial requirements and is required to maintain net capital that is in excess of or equal to the greatest of NFA's minimum financial requirements. Currently, the highest NFA requirement is the minimum net capital calculated pursuant to the SEC's Uniform Net Capital Rule.
In addition to the minimum net capital requirements, the SEC and FINRA have established "early warning" capital requirements for broker-dealers that, when exceeded, limit certain activities of the broker-dealer. Early warning requirements provide advance warning that a firm's net capital is dropping toward its minimum requirement, allowing time for initiation of corrective action. For LPL Financial, an early warning level is reached if its ratio of aggregate customer debit balances falls below 5.0% of net capital. At June 30, 2013, LPL Financial's net capital was $181.1 million and its early warning requirement was $14.9 million. LPL Financial typically maintains net capital in excess of the early warning level to maintain its ability to grow its business, demonstrate the stability of its operations and provide a safeguard in the event of sustained levels of market volatility, as experienced by the securities industry in 2008. At June 30, 2013, LPL Financial's excess net capital was $175.1 million.
LPL Financial's ability to pay dividends greater than 10% of its excess net capital during any 35 day rolling period requires approval from FINRA. In addition, payment of dividends is restricted if LPL Financial's net capital would be less than 5.0% of aggregate customer debit balances.
44
Prior to July 16, 2012, UVEST was also a registered broker-dealer and computed net capital requirements under the aggregate indebtedness method, which requires firms to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, of not less than 6.67% of aggregate indebtedness. In connection with the consolidation of UVEST with LPL Financial, UVEST's registration with FINRA was withdrawn effective July 16, 2012 and is no longer subject to net capital filing requirements.
Our subsidiary, The Private Trust Company N.A. ("PTC"), is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure by any of our subsidiaries to meet their respective minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity Assessment
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and reduce our total debt will depend upon our future performance, which, in turn, will be subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our operating results, cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for repayment of our indebtedness in the future. Some risks that could materially adversely affect our ability to meet our debt service obligations include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and economic activity in the financial markets. The performance of our business is correlated with the economy and financial markets, and a slowdown in the economy or financial markets could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of sufficient cash flows and capital resources, we could face substantial liquidity constraints and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. However, our senior secured credit agreement will restrict our ability to dispose of assets and our use of proceeds from any such dispositions. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions, and even if we could consummate such dispositions, we may not be able to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them and, in any event, any such proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.
Indebtedness
On May 13, 2013, we entered into the First Amendment and Incremental Assumption Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) with our wholly owned subsidiary, LPL Holdings, Inc., the other Credit Parties signatory thereto, the several Lenders parties thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, and other parties thereto. The Amended Credit Agreement supplements and amends the Company's Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012 (“Previous Credit Agreement”).
Pursuant to the Previous Credit Agreement, the Company established a Term Loan A of $735.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 ("Term Loan A"), a Term Loan B of $615.0 million maturing on March 29, 2019 ("Prior Term Loan B") and a revolving credit facility with borrowing capacity of $250.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 ("Revolving Credit Facility").
Pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company amended Prior Term Loan B to increase its borrowings to an aggregate principal amount of $1,083.9 million (“Amended Term Loan B”). On May 13, 2013, we used the proceeds of Amended Term Loan B to (i) refinance the remaining outstanding balance of $608.9 million on Prior Term Loan B and (ii) repay a portion of the outstanding balance on Term Loan A in an aggregate principal amount of $238.9 million (“Term Loan A Repayment”). The remaining loan proceeds are available for working capital requirements and other general corporate purposes. The maturity date of Amended Term Loan B is March 29, 2019. The amount and maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility was not changed in the Amended Credit Agreement.
In connection with the execution of the Amended Credit Agreement, we incurred $7.4 million in costs that are capitalized as debt issuance costs in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Because this refinancing resulted in the repayment of all outstanding principal borrowings on Prior Term Loan B, we accelerated the recognition of $8.0 million of unamortized costs attributable to Prior Term Loan B related to the Previous Credit Agreement. This accelerated recognition has been recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.
45
In addition, we maintain three uncommitted lines of credit at LPL Financial. Two of the lines have unspecified limits, and are primarily dependent on our ability to provide sufficient collateral. The other line had a $200.0 million and $150.0 million limit at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and allows for both collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. The lines were utilized in 2013 and 2012; however, there were no balances outstanding at June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.
We also were party to an interest rate swap agreement, in a notional amount of $65.0 million, to mitigate interest rate risk by hedging the variability of a portion of our floating-rate senior secured term loan. This agreement expired on June 30, 2012. While our term loan is unhedged as of June 30, 2013, the risk of variability on our floating interest rate is partially mitigated by the client margin loans, which carry floating interest rates, as well as fees received from the cash sweep programs. At June 30, 2013, our receivables from our advisors’ clients for margin loan activity were approximately $236.4 million, and the balance of deposits in the cash sweep programs was $25.6 billion.
Interest Rate and Fees
Borrowings under Term Loan A and Amended Term Loan B bear interest at a base rate equal to either one, two, three, six, nine or twelve-month LIBOR (the "Eurodollar Rate") plus the applicable margin, or an alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus the applicable margin. The ABR is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, (b) the effective federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%, (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% and (d) solely in the case of Amended Term Loan B, 1.75%.
The applicable margin for borrowings with respect to Term Loan A, Amended Term Loan B and the Revolving Credit Facility is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings. The applicable margin on our term loans and Revolving Credit Facility could change depending on our total leverage ratio.
The applicable borrowing rates for Term Loan A were not affected by the refinancing on May 13, 2013. Borrowings under Prior Term Loan B bore interest at rates similar to the Amended Term Loan B except that the applicable margin for borrowings under the Previous Credit Agreement was 2.00% for base rate borrowings and 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings and the LIBOR rate with respect to Prior Term Loan B was subject to a floor of 1.00%.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the Amended Credit Agreement, we are required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder. The commitment fee rate at June 30, 2013 was 0.50% for our Revolving Credit Facility, but is subject to change depending on our leverage ratio. Prior to the closing of the Previous Credit Agreement on March 29, 2012, the commitment fee was 0.75% on our previous revolving credit facility. We must also pay customary letter of credit fees.
Prepayments
The Amended Credit Agreement (other than the Revolving Credit Facility) requires us to prepay outstanding amounts under our senior secured term loan facility subject to certain exceptions, with:
• | 50% (percentage will be reduced to 0% if our total leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00 or less) of our annual excess cash flow (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) adjusted for, among other things, changes in our net working capital (as of June 30, 2013 our total leverage ratio was 2.50); |
• | 100% of the net cash proceeds of all non-ordinary course asset sales or other dispositions of property (including insurance recoveries), if we do not reinvest or commit to reinvest those proceeds in assets to be used in our business or to make certain other permitted investments within 15 months as long as such reinvestment is completed within 180 days and |
• | 100% of the net cash proceeds of any incurrence of debt, other than proceeds from debt permitted under the Amended Credit Agreement. |
Mandatory prepayments in respect of the incurrence of any debt can be applied by us to scheduled installments of principal of Term Loan A and Amended Term Loan B in any order at our direction. Any other mandatory prepayments described above will be applied to scheduled installments of principal of Term Loan A and Amended Term Loan B in direct order. We may voluntarily repay outstanding term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement at any time without premium or penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans, and with the exception of certain repricing transactions in respect to Amended Term Loan B consummated before November 13, 2013, which will be subject to a premium of 1.0% of the principal amount of Amended Term Loan B subject to such repricing transaction.
46
Amortization
Under the Previous Credit Agreement, we were required to make quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan A totaling 5.0% for the twelve months ended March 31, 2014 and 10.0% for each of the twelve months ended March 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (“Mandatory Amortization”), with the remaining principal due upon maturity. The Term Loan A Repayment of $238.9 million was equal to this Mandatory Amortization. As a result of the refinancing described above, the Company has no required repayments of principal for Term Loan A until its maturity on March 29, 2017.
Quarterly repayments of the principal for Amended Term Loan B will total 1.0% per year with the remaining principal due upon maturity.
Any outstanding principal under the Revolving Credit Facility will be due upon maturity.
Guarantee and Security
The loans under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured primarily through pledges of the capital stock in certain of our subsidiaries.
Certain Covenants and Events of Default
The Amended Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to:
• | incur additional indebtedness; |
• | create liens; |
• | enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
• | engage in mergers or consolidations; |
• | sell or transfer assets; |
• | pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock; |
• | make investments, loans or advances; |
• | prepay certain subordinated indebtedness; |
• | engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
• | amend material agreements governing certain subordinated indebtedness and |
• | change our lines of business. |
Our Amended Credit Agreement prohibits us from paying dividends and distributions or repurchasing our capital stock except for limited purposes, including, but not limited to payments in connection with: (i) redemption, repurchase, retirement or other acquisition of our equity interests from present or former officers, managers, consultants, employees and directors upon the death, disability, retirement, or termination of employment of any such person or otherwise in accordance with any stock option or stock appreciation rights plan, any management or employee stock ownership plan, stock subscription plan, employment termination agreement or any employment agreements or stockholders’ agreement, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $10.0 million in any fiscal year plus the amount of cash proceeds from certain equity issuances to such persons, and the amount of certain key-man life insurance proceeds, (ii) franchise taxes, general corporate and operating expenses not to exceed $3.0 million in any fiscal year, and fees and expenses related to any unsuccessful equity or debt offering permitted by the Amended Credit Agreement, (iii) tax liabilities to the extent attributable to our business and our subsidiaries and (iv) dividends and other distributions in an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (a) the greater of (i) $250,000,000 and (ii) 6.75% of our consolidated total assets, (b) the available amount (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement), (c) the available equity amount (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) and (d) the incremental dividend amount (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may make unlimited dividends and distributions provided that after giving pro forma effect thereto, our total leverage ratio does not exceed 2.0. As of June 30, 2013, we have the ability to make dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock totaling $482.8 million, subject to Board approval.
The share repurchase programs approved in May 2012, September 2012 and May 2013 were authorized by the Board of Directors pursuant to item (iv) above. Our special dividend of $2.00 per share to common
47
stockholders, approved on March 30, 2012, was authorized by the Board of Directors pursuant to a one-time exception to the restriction on dividends. Any future declarations of quarterly cash dividends will be authorized pursuant to item (iv) above.
In addition, our financial covenant requirements include a total leverage ratio test and an interest coverage ratio test. Under our total leverage ratio test, we covenant not to allow the ratio of our consolidated total debt (as defined in our Amended Credit Agreement) to an adjusted EBITDA reflecting financial covenants in our Amended Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA”) to exceed certain prescribed levels set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. Under our interest coverage ratio test, we covenant not to allow the ratio of our Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA to our consolidated interest expense (as defined in our Amended Credit Agreement) to be less than certain prescribed levels set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. Each of our financial ratios is measured at the end of each fiscal quarter.
Our Amended Credit Agreement provides us with a right to cure in the event we fail to comply with our leverage ratio test or our interest coverage test. We must exercise this right to cure within ten days of the delivery of our quarterly certificate calculating the financial ratios for that quarter.
If we fail to comply with these covenants and are unable to cure, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful or feasible. Our Amended Credit Agreement restricts our ability to sell assets. Even if we could consummate those sales, the proceeds that we realize from them may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. Furthermore, if an event of default were to occur with respect to our Amended Credit Agreement, our creditors could, among other things, accelerate the maturity of our indebtedness.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we were in compliance with all of our covenant requirements. Our covenant requirements and actual ratios as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:
June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Financial Ratio | Covenant Requirement | Actual Ratio | Covenant Requirement | Actual Ratio | |||
Leverage Test (Maximum) | 4.00 | 2.50 | 4.00 | 2.38 | |||
Interest Coverage (Minimum) | 3.00 | 10.57 | 3.00 | 9.03 |
48
Set forth below is a reconciliation from EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA to our net income for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 171,045 | $ | 151,918 | |||
Interest expense | 50,182 | 54,826 | |||||
Income tax expense | 110,828 | 98,673 | |||||
Amortization of intangible assets(1) | 39,306 | 39,542 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets | 37,922 | 32,254 | |||||
EBITDA | 409,283 | 377,213 | |||||
EBITDA Adjustments: | |||||||
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 16,656 | 17,544 | |||||
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 17,286 | 20,474 | |||||
Restructuring and conversion costs(4) | 15,557 | 6,146 | |||||
Debt extinguishment costs(5) | 7,968 | 16,652 | |||||
Equity issuance and related offering costs(6) | 4,040 | 4,486 | |||||
Other(7) | 14,123 | 11,967 | |||||
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 75,630 | 77,269 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 484,913 | 454,482 | |||||
Advisor and financial institution share-based compensation expense(8) | 5,278 | 3,807 | |||||
Other(9) | 5,645 | 4,190 | |||||
Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 495,836 | $ | 462,479 |
____________
(1) | Represents amortization of intangible assets as a result of our purchase accounting adjustments from our merger transaction in 2005 and various acquisitions. |
(2) | Represents share-based compensation expense for equity awards granted to employees, officers and directors. Such awards are measured based on the grant date fair value and recognized over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period. |
(3) | Represents acquisition and integration costs resulting from various acquisitions, including changes in the estimated fair value of future payments, or contingent consideration, required to be made to former shareholders of certain acquired entities. Approximately $11.8 million and $11.4 million were recognized as charges against earnings due to net increases in estimated fair value of contingent consideration during the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. |
(4) | Represents organizational restructuring charges, conversion and other related costs incurred resulting from the expansion of our Service Value Commitment, the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities. As of June 30, 2013, we have recognized approximately 19% of costs related to the expansion of the Service Value Commitment, which is expected to be completed in 2015. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 91% and 99% of costs related to the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities, respectively, have been recognized. The remaining costs for the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities largely consist of the amortization of transition payments that have been made in connection with these two consolidations for the retention of advisors and financial institutions that are expected to be recognized into earnings by December 2014. |
(5) | Represents expenses incurred resulting from the early extinguishment and repayment of amounts outstanding under our Previous Credit Agreement and Original Credit Agreement for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, including the write-off of $8.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively, of unamortized debt issuance costs that have no future economic benefit, as well as various other charges incurred in connection with the establishment of the Amended Credit Agreement and the Previous Credit Agreement, respectively. |
(6) | Represents equity issuance and offering costs incurred in the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, related to the closing of the secondary offering in the second quarter of 2012. In addition, results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include a $3.9 million |
49
charge for the late deposit of withholding taxes related to the exercise of certain non-qualified stock options in connection with the 2010 initial public offering (See Note 9 in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements).
(7) | Generally, represents certain excise and other taxes. Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include approximately $7.0 million, respectively, for consulting services and technology development aimed at enhancing our performance in support of our advisors while operating at a lower cost under the Program. In addition, results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, include asset impairment charges of $4.8 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for certain fixed assets related to internally developed software that were determined to have no estimated fair value. Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2013 include $2.7 million of severance and termination benefits related to a change in management structure that have been excluded from the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA. |
(8) | Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA excludes the recognition of share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period under the Black-Scholes valuation model, as defined under the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement. |
(9) | Represents other items that are adjustable in accordance with our Amended Credit Agreement to arrive at Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA including employee severance costs, employee signing costs, and employee retention or completion bonuses. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into various off-balance-sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business, primarily to meet the needs of our advisors’ clients. These arrangements include firm commitments to extend credit. For information on these arrangements, see Notes 9 and 14 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to our commitments and obligations as of June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | < 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | > 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Leases and other obligations(1)(2) | $ | 419,853 | $ | 33,923 | $ | 78,000 | $ | 60,798 | $ | 247,132 | |||||||||
Senior secured term loan facilities(3) | 1,540,515 | 10,838 | 21,677 | 481,052 | 1,026,948 | ||||||||||||||
Commitment fee on revolving line of credit(4) | 4,350 | 1,159 | 2,321 | 870 | — | ||||||||||||||
Variable interest payments(5): | |||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan A | 58,534 | 12,798 | 30,969 | 14,767 | — | ||||||||||||||
Amended Term Loan B | 248,214 | 35,491 | 73,744 | 97,404 | 41,575 | ||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 2,271,466 | $ | 94,209 | $ | 206,711 | $ | 654,891 | $ | 1,315,655 |
_________________
(1) | In June 2013, we entered into a long-term contractual obligation with a third-party service provider to enhance the quality, speed and cost of processes that support us by outsourcing certain functions. The table above includes the minimum payments due over the duration of the contract. The contractual obligation may be canceled, subject to a termination penalty that is approximately equal to the initial annual minimum payment. The termination penalty steps down ratably through the passage of time. Minimum payments have not been reduced by this termination penalty. |
(2) | Minimum payments for applicable leases have not been reduced by minimum sublease rental income of $4.4 million that is due in the future under noncancelable subleases. Note 9 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements provides further detail on operating lease obligations and obligations under noncancelable service contracts. |
(3) | Represents principal payments under our Amended Credit Agreement. See Note 8 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
(4) | Represents commitment fees for unused borrowings on our Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 8 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
50
(5) | Our senior secured term loan facilities bear interest at floating rates. Variable interest payments are shown assuming the applicable LIBOR rates at June 30, 2013 remain unchanged. See Note 8 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
Our acquisitions of NRP, Concord and Veritat involve the potential payment of contingent consideration dependent upon the achievement of certain revenue, gross-margin and assets under management milestones. The table above does not reflect any such obligations, as the amounts are uncertain. See Note 4 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the amount of future contingent consideration we could be required to pay in connection with these acquisitions.
As of June 30, 2013, we have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $21.2 million, which we have netted against income taxes receivable in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. This amount has been excluded from the contractual obligations table because we are unable to reasonably predict the ultimate amount or timing of future tax payments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We use fair value measurements to record certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value and to determine fair value disclosures.
We use prices obtained from an independent third-party pricing service to measure the fair value of our trading securities. We validate prices received from the pricing service using various methods, including comparison to prices received from additional pricing services, comparison to available market prices and review of other relevant market data including implied yields of major categories of securities.
At June 30, 2013, we did not adjust prices received from the independent third-party pricing service. For certificates of deposit and treasury securities, we utilize market-based inputs including observable market interest rates that correspond to the remaining maturities or next interest reset dates.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have disclosed in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and in “Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, those accounting policies that we consider to be significant in determining our results of operations and financial condition. There have been no material changes to those policies that we consider to be significant since the filing of our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting principles used in preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements conform in all material respects to GAAP.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting standards and pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
We maintain trading securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased in order to facilitate client transactions, to meet a portion of our clearing deposit requirements at various clearing organizations, and to track the performance of our research models. These securities include mutual funds, debt securities issued by the U.S. government, money market funds, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit and equity securities.
Changes in the value of our trading inventory may result from fluctuations in interest rates, credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices and the correlation among these factors. We manage our trading inventory by product type. Our activities to facilitate client transactions generally involve mutual fund activities, including dividend reinvestments. The balances are based upon pending client activities which are monitored by our broker dealer support services department. Because these positions arise from pending client transactions, there are no specific trading or position limits. Positions held to meet clearing deposit requirements consist of U.S. government securities. The amount of securities deposited depends upon the requirements of the clearing organization. The
51
level of securities deposited is monitored by the settlement area within our broker dealer support services department. Our research department develops model portfolios that are used by advisors in developing client portfolios. We currently maintain approximately 180 accounts based on model portfolios. At the time the portfolio is developed, we purchase the securities in that model portfolio in an amount equal to the account minimum for a client. Account minimums vary by product and can range from $10,000 to $250,000 per model. We utilize these positions to track the performance of the research department. The limits on this activity are based at the inception of each new model.
At June 30, 2013, the fair value of our trading securities owned were $9.0 million. Securities sold, but not yet purchased were $0.2 million at June 30, 2013. See Note 4 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding the fair value of trading securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased associated with our client facilitation activities. See Note 5 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding the fair value of securities held to maturity.
We do not enter into contracts involving derivatives or other similar financial instruments for trading or proprietary purposes.
We also have market risk on the fees we earn that are based on the market value of advisory and brokerage assets, assets on which trail commissions are paid and assets eligible for sponsor payments.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to risk associated with changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2013, all of the outstanding debt under our Amended Credit Agreement, $1.5 billion, was subject to floating interest rate risk. While our senior secured term loans are subject to increases in interest rates, we do not believe that a short-term change in interest rates would have a material impact on our income before taxes.
The following table summarizes the impact of increasing interest rates on our interest expense from the variable portion of our debt outstanding at June 30, 2013 (in thousands):
Outstanding at | Annual Impact of an Interest Rate Increase of | |||||||||||||||||||
Variable Interest | 10 Basis | 25 Basis | 50 Basis | 100 Basis | ||||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Term Loans | Rates | Points | Points | Points | Points | |||||||||||||||
Term Loan A(1) | $ | 459,375 | $ | 459 | $ | 1,148 | $ | 2,297 | $ | 4,594 | ||||||||||
Amended Term Loan B(2) | 1,081,140 | — | — | 1,064 | 6,449 | |||||||||||||||
Variable Rate Debt Outstanding | $ | 1,540,515 | $ | 459 | $ | 1,148 | $ | 3,361 | $ | 11,043 |
_______________________
(1) | The variable interest rate for our Term Loan A is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.20%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
(2) | The variable interest rate for Amended Term Loan B is comprised of two components: the first component is based on fifty percent of the outstanding loan balance with interest calculated at the greater of the three-month LIBOR of 0.28% or 0.75%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%; the second component is based on fifty percent of the outstanding loan balance with interest calculated at the greater of the six-month LIBOR of 0.42% or 0.75%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
We offer our advisors and their clients two primary cash sweep programs that are interest rate sensitive: our insured cash programs and money market sweep vehicles involving multiple money market fund providers. Our insured cash programs use multiple non-affiliated banks to provide up to $1.5 million ($3.0 million in joint accounts) of FDIC insurance for client deposits custodied at the banks. While clients earn interest for balances on deposit in the insured cash programs, we earn a fee. Our fees from the insured cash programs are based on prevailing interest rates in the current interest rate environment. Changes in interest rates and fees for the insured cash programs are monitored by our fee and rate setting committee (the “FRS committee”), which governs and approves any changes to our fees. By meeting promptly after interest rates change, or for other market or non-market reasons, the FRS committee balances financial risk of the insured cash programs with products that offer competitive client yields. However, as short-term interest rates hit lower levels, the FRS committee may be compelled to lower fees.
52
The average Federal Reserve effective federal funds rate ("FFER") for June 2013 was 0.12%. The following table reflects the approximate annual impact to asset-based revenues on our insured cash programs (assuming that client balances at June 30, 2013 remain unchanged) of an upward or downward change in short-term interest rates of one basis point (dollars in thousands):
Federal Reserve Effective Federal Funds Rate | Annualized Increase or Decrease in Asset-Based Revenues per One Basis Point Change | ||||
0.00% - 0.25% | $ | 1,700 | |||
0.26% - 1.25% | 800 | ||||
1.26% - 2.25% | 700 |
The actual impact to asset-based revenues, including a change in the FFER of greater than 2.25%, may vary depending on the FRS committee's strategy in response to a change in interest rate levels, the significance of a change, and actual balances at the time of such change.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower’s, issuer’s or counterparty’s ability to meet its financial obligations under contractual or agreed upon terms. We bear credit risk on the activities of our advisors’ clients, including the execution, settlement, and financing of various transactions on behalf of these clients.
These activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. Our credit exposure in these transactions consists primarily of margin accounts, through which we extend credit to clients collateralized by cash (for purposes of margin lending, cash is not used as collateral) and securities in the client’s account. Under many of these agreements, we are permitted to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral and use these securities to enter into securities lending arrangements or to deliver to counterparties to cover short positions.
As our advisors execute margin transactions on behalf of their clients, we may incur losses if clients do not fulfill their obligations, the collateral in the client’s account is insufficient to fully cover losses from such investments and our advisors fail to reimburse us for such losses. Our loss on margin accounts is immaterial and did not exceed $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. We monitor exposure to industry sectors and individual securities and perform analyses on a regular basis in connection with our margin lending activities. We adjust our margin requirements if we believe our risk exposure is not appropriate based on market conditions.
We are subject to concentration risk if we extend large loans to or have large commitments with a single counterparty, borrower, or group of similar counterparties or borrowers (e.g. in the same industry). Receivables from and payables to clients and stock borrowing and lending activities are conducted with a large number of clients and counterparties and potential concentration is carefully monitored. We seek to limit this risk through careful review of the underlying business and the use of limits established by senior management, taking into consideration factors including the financial strength of the counterparty, the size of the position or commitment, the expected duration of the position or commitment and other positions or commitments outstanding.
Operational Risk
Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in our technology or financial operating systems and inadequacies or breaches in our control processes. We operate in diverse markets and are reliant on the ability of our employees and systems, as well as third-party service providers and their systems, to process a large number of transactions effectively. These risks are less direct and quantifiable than credit and market risk, but managing them is critical, particularly in a rapidly changing environment with increasing transaction volumes and in light of increasing reliance on third party service providers. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems or improper action by employees, advisors or third party service providers, we could suffer financial loss, data loss, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. Business continuity plans exist for critical systems, and redundancies are built into the systems as deemed appropriate. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, we have developed and continue to enhance specific policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout our organization and within various departments. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational policies and procedures are being followed and that our employees and advisors operate within established corporate policies and limits.
53
Risk Management
We have established various committees of the Board of Directors to manage the risks associated with our business. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, appointing, overseeing and replacing, if necessary, the independent auditor and assisting the Board in overseeing:
•the integrity of our financial statements;
•the integrity of our accounting and financial reporting processes;
•our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
•the independent auditor's qualifications and independence; and
•the performance of our independent auditor and internal audit function.
In addition, the Audit Committee prepares the Audit Committee report required by the SEC to be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or our proxy statement.
Our Compensation and Human Resources Committee was established for the primary purpose of:
• | overseeing our efforts to attract, retain and motivate members of our senior management team in partnership with the Chief Executive Officer; |
• | carrying out the Board’s overall responsibility relating to the determination of compensation for all executive officers to achieve the proper risk-reward balance and not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking; |
• | overseeing all other aspects of our compensation and human resource policies; and |
• | overseeing our management resources, succession planning and management development activities. |
As mandated by the Audit Committee, we also have established a Risk Oversight Committee comprised of a group of our senior-most executives to oversee the risk management activities of the Company.
In addition to various committees, we have written policies and procedures that govern the conduct of business by our advisors, our employees, our relationship with advisors' clients and the terms and conditions of our relationships with product manufacturers. Our client and advisor policies address the extension of credit for client accounts, data and physical security, compliance with industry regulation and codes of ethics to govern employee and advisor conduct among other matters.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Disclosure Committee, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
54
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the information regarding the Company’s risks, as set forth under Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the following revised risk factors, each of which appeared in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, but have been revised to reflect events that occurred during the current reporting period:
Anti-takeover provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could prevent or delay a change in control of our company.
Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain certain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable, including the following:
• | the division of our board of directors into three classes and the election of each class for three-year terms; |
• | the sole ability of the board of directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors; |
• | advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations; |
• | limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings and to take action by written consent; |
• | the approval of holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote generally on the making, alteration, amendment or repeal of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws will be required to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws, or amend or repeal certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation; |
• | the required approval of holders of at least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote at an election of the directors to remove directors and the inability to remove directors other than for cause; and |
• | the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock, without stockholder approval, which could be used to institute a rights plan, or a poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership or a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors. |
The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover measures could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common stock in the acquisition.
We rely on outsourced service providers to perform key functions.
We rely on outsourced service providers to perform certain key technology, processing and support functions. For example, we have an agreement with Thomson Reuters BETA Systems, a division of Thomson Reuters, under which they provide us operational support, including data processing services for securities transactions and back office processing support. Our use of third party service providers may decrease our ability to control operating risks and information technology systems risks. Any significant failures by our service providers could cause us to incur losses and could harm our reputation. If we had to change these service providers, we would experience a disruption to our business. Although we believe we have the resources to make such transitions with minimal disruption, we cannot predict the costs and time for such conversions. We cannot provide any assurance that the disruption caused by a change in our service providers would not have a material adverse effect on our business. We are transitioning additional business processes to third party service providers in connection with the Service Value Commitment, which increases our reliance on outsourced providers and the related risks described above. To the extent we outsource selected services or selected functions to third party service providers in foreign jurisdictions, we could be exposed to risks inherent in conducting business outside of the United States, including international economic and political conditions, and the additional costs associated with complying with foreign laws and fluctuations in currency values.
55
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below sets forth information regarding repurchases on a monthly basis during the second quarter of 2013:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Weighted Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs(1) | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs | |||||||||
April 1, 2013 through April 30, 2013 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 81,983,490 | |||||||
May 1, 2013 through May 31, 2013(2) | 77,951 | $ | 37.03 | 77,951 | $ | 79,098,165 | |||||||
June 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013 | 1,350,625 | $ | 36.99 | 1,350,625 | $ | 29,162,931 | |||||||
April 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013 | 1,428,576 | $ | 36.99 | 1,428,576 | $ | 29,162,931 |
____________________
(1) | See Note 10 of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
(2) | In May 2013, the Board authorized the Company to repurchase up to an additional $200.0 million of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which was signed into law on August 10, 2012, added a new subsection (r) to Section 13 of the Exchange Act, which requires us to disclose whether we or any of our “affiliates” has engaged during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 in certain activities, including any transaction or dealing with the Government of Iran that is not conducted pursuant to a specific authorization of the U.S. government. Because the SEC defines the term “affiliate” broadly, it includes any entity controlled by us as well as any person or entity that controls us or is under common control with us (“control” is also construed broadly by the SEC). Neither we nor our controlled affiliates have knowingly engaged in any transaction or dealing reportable under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013.
Funds affiliated with Hellman & Friedman LLC (“H&F”) own a minority interest in the Company. H&F has provided us with disclosure for Gaztransport & Technigaz S.A.S, another of its minority-owned portfolio companies, which may be considered an affiliate of H&F under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act. Such disclosure is included in, and the Company hereby incorporates by reference herein, Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
56
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (File Number 333-167325) on July 9, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference) | ||
3.2 | Certificate of Ownership and Merger (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File Number 001-34963) on June 19, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference) | ||
3.3 | Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A (File Number 001-34963) on August 8, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference) | ||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) | ||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) | ||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) | ||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) | ||
99.1 | Disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (filed herewith) | ||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | ||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | ||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation | ||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label | ||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation | ||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | |||
Date: | July 31, 2013 | By: | /s/ MARK S. CASADY |
Mark S. Casady | |||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: | July 31, 2013 | By: | /s/ DAN H. ARNOLD |
Dan H. Arnold | |||
Chief Financial Officer |
58