Costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to research and development expense as incurred. These costs include direct salary costs for research and development employees including stock-based compensation, cost for materials used in research and development activities and costs for outside services. Research and development expenses are expected to continue to increase as we develop version 2.0 of our TGS and our bicompartmental implant system and research of potential future products.
A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Form 10-K, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” There have been no changes to those policies for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense was $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $2.9 million, or 85%, was primarily due to an increase in sales, marketing and operations costs associated with the production and commercialization of our products, an increase in general and administrative costs to support growth and costs associated with operating as a public company and costs associated with the accrual for employee bonus compensation plans covering substantially all of the employees of the Company. We expect our selling, general and administrative expense to continue to increase substantially due to our planned increase in the number of employees necessary to support the sales and marketing efforts associated with the growing commercialization of MAKOplasty, the anticipated commercial launch of version 2.0 of our TGS in the first half of 2009, subject to regulatory clearances or approvals, continued growth in operations and the costs associated with operating as a public company.
Research and Development. Research and development expense was $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $927,000, or 42%, was primarily due to an increase in research and development activities associated with on-going development of version 2.0 of our TGS and the MAKO RESTORIS and bicompartmental implant systems and costs associated with the accrual for employee bonus compensation plans. We expect our research and development expense to continue to increase as we continue to expand our research and development activities, including the development of version 2.0 of our TGS and our bicompartmental implant systems and research of potential future products.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $483,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $344,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $139,000, or 40%, was primarily due to an increase in depreciation of property and equipment as a result of purchases made during 2008 and 2007.
Interest and Other Income. Interest income was $241,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $308,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease of $67,000, or 22%, was primarily due to lower yields realized on our cash, cash equivalents and investments for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared with the same period of 2007.
Interest and Other Expenses. Interest and other expenses were $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $77,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Through February 2008, interest and other expense consisted primarily of the amortization of the $590,000 discount associated with a deferred payment to IBM of $4.0 million which had been fully amortized and paid upon the completion of our IPO in February 2008.
Income Taxes. No income taxes were recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, due to net operating losses in each period. In addition, no current or deferred income taxes were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as all income tax benefits were fully offset by a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Revenue was $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $355,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and was primarily generated from the sale of implants and disposable products utilized in MAKOplasty procedures. The increase in revenue of $1.6 million was primarily due to an increase in MAKOplasty procedures performed during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There were 401 procedures performed during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 71 procedures performed during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was also attributable to a $316,000 increase in other revenue, which consists primarily of service revenue on extended warranty services and net royalty revenues.
20
Table of Contents
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue was $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $291,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in cost of revenue of $1.9 million was primarily due to an increase in MAKOplasty procedures performed, a $595,000 write-off of obsolete and discontinued inventory in 2008 primarily due to the launch of our RESTORIS implant system and the anticipated launch of version 2.0 of our TGS, the establishment of warranty accruals on sales of eight TGS units and royalties incurred on sales of eight TGS units during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expense was $16.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $8.3 million, or 108%, was primarily due to an increase in sales, marketing and operations costs associated with the commercialization of our products and an increase in general and administrative costs to support growth and costs associated with operating as a public company. Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 also included $1.4 million of stock-based compensation expense compared with $661,000 for the same period of 2007. The increase in stock-based compensation expense was primarily due to additional option and restricted stock grants made in 2008 and 2007.
Research and Development. Research and development expense was $9.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $5.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $3.9 million, or 72%, was primarily due to an increase in research and development activities associated with on-going development of versions 1.2 and 2.0 of our TGS and the MAKO implant systems; and a nonrecurring charge of $949,000 associated with the vesting in full, upon completion of our IPO in February 2008, of restricted common stock issued pursuant to business consultation agreements entered into in December 2004.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $915,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase of $415,000, or 45%, was primarily due to an increase in depreciation of property and equipment as a result of purchases made during 2008 and 2007.
Interest and Other Income. Interest income was $642,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $860,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease of $218,000, or 25%, was primarily due to lower yields realized on our cash, cash equivalents and investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared with the same period of 2007.
Interest and Other Expenses. Interest and other expenses were $110,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $229,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Through February 2008, interest and other expense consisted primarily of the amortization of the $590,000 discount associated with a deferred payment to IBM of $4.0 million which had been fully amortized and paid upon the completion of our IPO in February 2008. Interest and other expense also included the write down of our variable auction rate securities in the first quarter of 2008 as discussed below under the caption, “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and in Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 3, Short-Term Investments and Long-Term Investments.
Income Taxes. No income taxes were recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, due to net operating losses in each period. In addition, no current or deferred income taxes were recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as all income tax benefits were fully offset by a valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
(in thousands) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | 2008 | | 2007 | |
Cash used in operating activities | | $ | (21,702 | ) | $ | (9,668 | ) |
Cash used in investing activities | | | (3,587 | ) | | (6,268 | ) |
Cash provided by financing activities | | | 46,489 | | | 27,879 | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 21,200 | | $ | 11,943 | |
21
Table of Contents
We have incurred net losses and negative cash flow from operating activities for each period since our inception in November 2004. As of September 30, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of $69.4 million and financed our operations principally through the sale of Series A, Series B and Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and the completion of the IPO of our common stock. Through September 30, 2008, we received net proceeds of $52.2 million from the issuance of Series A, Series B and Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock. In February 2008, we completed our IPO of common stock, issuing a total of 5.1 million shares at an issue price of $10.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds to us, after expenses, of approximately $43.7 million. In conjunction with the closing of the IPO, in February 2008, all of our outstanding Series A, Series B and Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock was converted into 10,945,080 shares of common stock, as adjusted for a one-for-3.03 reverse stock split, which has been retroactively reflected in the accompanying condensed financial statements.
As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $30.9 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Our cash and short-term investment balances are held in a variety of interest bearing instruments, including certificates of deposit.
As of September 30, 2008, we held $1,025,000 par value of variable auction rate securities issued by two separate funds. In February 2008, the auction rate securities experienced failed auctions that limited the liquidity of these securities. Based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction failures will continue. Historically, the fair value of auction rate securities approximated par value due to the frequent resets through the auction rate process. The uncertainty in the credit markets affected our holdings in auction rate securities and the liquidity and fair value of these investments has been negatively impacted. An other-than-temporary impairment charge of $63,000 was recorded in the first quarter of 2008 to reduce the value of our auction rate securities to the new fair value. As of September 30, 2008, the auction rate securities were recorded at the estimated fair value of $987,000. In addition, as a result of the unresolved liquidity concerns, we reclassified our auction rate securities from short-term investments to long-term investments in 2008. Our investment firm has informed us that it intends to redeem our auction rate securities in early 2009 at par value. Based on current market conditions and the uncertainty of future conditions, however, we believe long-term classification remains appropriate. The carrying value of the securities are fully collateralized by assets held by the funds and were rated AAA prior to the failed auctions of the securities.
In October 2008, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for an equity financing of up to $60 million, with initial gross proceeds of $40 million, which we closed on October 31, 2008, and conditional access to an additional $20 million called the Second Closing. In connection with the financing, we issued and sold to the participating investors 6,451,613 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $6.20 per share and issued warrants to the participating investors to purchase 1,290,323 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.44 per share. The warrants will become exercisable in 180 days and have a seven-year term. Subject to the satisfaction of certain business related milestones before December 31, 2009, and approval of the Second Closing by our stockholders, we will have the right to require certain participants in the financing to purchase an additional $20 million of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock. At the initial closing, the investors that agreed to provide the additional $20 million investment received warrants to purchase an additional 322,581 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.20 per share. For more information regarding the equity financing, see Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 8 to the Condensed Financial Statements.
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities primarily reflects the net loss for those periods, which was reduced in part by depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, inventory write-downs and accrued interest. Net cash used in operating activities was also affected by changes in operating assets and liabilities. Included in changes in operating assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are approximately $5.5 million of increases to the deferred revenue balance compared to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This was partially offset by approximately $2.0 million and $354,000 of increases to the deferred cost of revenue balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increases to the deferred revenue and deferred cost of revenue balances are primarily related to unit sales of our TGS during the period. Deferred revenue and deferred cost of revenue related to unit sales of our TGS will be recognized in the statements of operations upon satisfaction of all related revenue recognition criteria.
22
Table of Contents
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to the payment of the $4.0 million deferred license fee due to IBM upon completion of our IPO, as discussed under the caption “Contractual Obligations,” to purchases of $1.6 million of property and equipment as we invest in the infrastructure of our growing company and to $2.0 million of purchases of investments, which was partially offset by proceeds of $4.0 million from sales and maturities of investments. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to the purchases and proceeds of investments as we manage our investment portfolio to provide interest income and liquidity, purchases of $1.2 million of property and equipment and $450,000 for the acquisition of intangible assets.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by our financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was primarily attributable to net proceeds received in connection with our IPO in February 2008 and the issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in February 2007, respectively.
Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
To date, we have not achieved profitability. We anticipate that we will continue to incur substantial net losses for at least the next several years as we expand our sales and marketing capabilities in the orthopedic products market, develop and commercialize version 2.0 of our TGS and our bicompartmental implant system and continue to develop the corporate infrastructure required to sell and market our products and operate as a public company. We also expect to experience increased cash requirements for inventory and property and equipment in conjunction with the anticipated commercial launch of version 2.0 of our TGS and bicompartmental implant system in the first half of 2009, subject to regulatory clearances or approvals.
We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances, together with the net proceeds of the financing transaction as discussed Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 8 to Condensed Financial Statements, and interest income we earn on these balances will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. To the extent our available cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances are insufficient to satisfy our operating requirements after that period, we will need to seek additional sources of funds, including selling additional equity or debt securities or entering into a credit facility. The sale of additional equity and debt securities may result in dilution to our current stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights senior to those of our common stock and could contain covenants that could restrict our operations. We may require additional capital beyond our currently forecasted amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to reduce the scope of, delay or eliminate some or all of our planned research, development and commercialization activities, which could materially harm our business and results of operations.
We are in the process of developing version 2.0 of our TGS. If completion of version 2.0 of our TGS unit is unsuccessful or delayed, or regulatory clearances or approvals are denied or delayed, it could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position and we may be unable to recognize any revenue associated with sales of our TGS. No right of return exists on sales of prior versions of our TGS if we are unable to complete and deliver version 2.0 of our TGS as anticipated.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of medical devices, such as version 2.0 of our TGS and bicompartmental implant system, we are unable to estimate the exact amounts of capital outlays and operating expenditures necessary to complete the development of the products and successfully deliver commercial products to the market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited to the following:
23
Table of Contents
| • | the revenue generated by sales of our current and future products; |
| • | the expenses we incur in selling and marketing our products; |
| • | the costs and timing of regulatory clearance or approvals for upgrades or changes to our products; |
| • | the rate of progress and cost of on-going development activities; |
| • | the success of our on-going research and development efforts; |
| • | the emergence of competing or complementary technological developments; |
| • | the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent or license claims and other intellectual property rights, or participating in litigation-related activities; |
| • | the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing, or other arrangements that we may establish; and |
| • | the acquisition of businesses, products and technologies, although we currently have no understandings, commitments or agreements relating to any material transaction of this type. |
Contractual Obligations
In March 2006, we entered into a license agreement with IBM in exchange for a payment of $2.0 million upon execution of the agreement and a payment of $4.0 million in the form of a deferred license fee to IBM upon, among other things, the closing of the IPO of our common stock. In February 2008, upon closing of our IPO, the Company paid the $4.0 million deferred license fee due to IBM.
At September 30, 2008, we were committed to make future purchases for inventory related items under various purchase arrangements with fixed purchase provisions aggregating approximately $5.7 million.
Other than as described above and scheduled payments through September 30, 2008, there have been no significant changes in our contractual obligations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the contractual obligations described in our Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, or SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, provides a consistent framework for measuring fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and expands fair value financial statement disclosure requirements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. It only applies to accounting pronouncements that already require or permit fair value measures, except for standards that relate to share-based payments.
SFAS 157’s valuation techniques are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. SFAS 157 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:
| • | Level 1 Inputs– Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
| • | Level 2 Inputs– Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. |
| • | Level 3 Inputs– Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers. |
The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
24
Table of Contents
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, or SFAS 159, and have not elected to use fair value measurement on any assets or liabilities under this statement. We have determined that the adoption of SFAS 159 had no effect on our results of operations and financial position.
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted EITF Issue No. 07-03, Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities, or EITF 07-03. EITF 07-03 requires that nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed. Entities should continue to evaluate whether they expect the goods to be delivered or services to be rendered. If an entity does not expect the goods to be delivered or services to be rendered, the capitalized advance payment should be charged to expense. We have determined that the adoption of EITF 07-03 had no effect on our results of operations and financial position.
In June 2008, the EITF issued Issue No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 addresses the determination of whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock, if an instrument (or an embedded feature) that has the characteristics of a derivative instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock, it is still necessary to evaluate whether it is classified in stockholders’ equity (or would be classified in stockholders’ equity if it were a freestanding instrument). In addition, for some instruments that are potentially subject to the guidance in EITF Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, but do not have all the characteristics of a derivative instrument under paragraphs 6 through 9, it is still necessary to evaluate whether it is classified in stockholders’ equity. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that EITF 07-05 will have on its financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (“FSP 157-3”) which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not active. FSP 157-3 is effective immediately and applies to prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued, including interim or annual periods ending on or before September 30, 2008. The implementation of FAS 157-3 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Other than as described above, there have been no significant changes in Recent Accounting Pronouncements during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the Recent Accounting Pronouncements described in our Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments that have maturities or interest reset dates of less than one year. The goals of our cash investment policy are the security of the principal invested and fulfillment of liquidity needs, with the need to maximize value being an important consideration. To achieve our goals, we maintain a portfolio of cash equivalents and investments in a variety of securities. The securities in our investment portfolio are not leveraged, are classified as available for sale and are generally short-term in nature. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Because of the short-term maturities of our investments, we do not believe that a variation in market rates would have any material impact on the value of our investment portfolio.
25
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2008, we held $1,025,000 par value of variable auction rate securities issued by two separate funds. In February 2008, the auction rate securities experienced failed auctions that limited the liquidity of these securities. Based on current market conditions, it is likely that auction failures will continue. Historically, the fair value of auction rate securities approximated par value due to the frequent resets through the auction rate process. The uncertainty in the credit markets affected our holdings in auction rate securities and the liquidity and fair value of these investments has been negatively impacted. An other-than-temporary impairment charge of $63,000 was recorded in the first quarter of 2008 to reduce the value of our auction rate securities to the new fair value. As of September 30, 2008, the auction rate securities were recorded at the estimated fair value of $987,000. In addition, as a result of the unresolved liquidity concerns, we reclassified our auction rate securities from short-term investments to long-term investments in 2008. Our investment firm has informed us that it intends to redeem our auction rate securities in early 2009 at par value. Based on current market conditions and the uncertainty of future conditions, however, we believe long-term classification remains appropriate. The carrying value of the securities are fully collateralized by assets held by the funds and were rated AAA prior to the failed auctions of the securities.
Item 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, our management evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or the Certifying Officers, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2008. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, our Certifying Officers concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2008 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and therefore can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
26
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGALPROCEEDINGS.
The information with respect to SensAble Technologies, Inc. set forth in Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 5, Commitments and Contingencies, of this report is incorporated into this item by this reference.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Form 10-K.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Our IPO was effected through a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-146162) that was declared effective by the SEC on February 14, 2008. We registered 5,100,000 shares of our common stock with an aggregate offering price of $51 million, all of which shares we sold. The offering was completed after the sale of all 5,100,000 shares. J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated were the joint book-running managing underwriters of the IPO and Cowen and Company and Wachovia Securities acted as co-managers. The underwriters elected not to exercise their over-allotment option. We paid $3.6 million of the proceeds in underwriting discounts and commissions and incurred an additional $3.7 million of expenses. None of the expenses were paid, directly or indirectly, to directors, officers or persons owning 10% or more of our common stock, or to our affiliates.
We currently intend to use the proceeds from the IPO, net of the payment of the $4.0 million IBM deferred license fee and the underwriting discounts and commissions, as set forth below. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 5, Commitments and Contingencies, and Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of this report for more information regarding payment of the IBM license fee.
| • | Approximately $14.0 - $20.0 million for the expansion of sales and marketing activities; |
| • | Approximately $12.0 - $18.0 million for continuation of research and development activities; and |
| • | The remainder to fund working capital and other general corporate purposes, including the expenses associated with the IPO. |
Management has broad discretion over the uses of the proceeds of the IPO. Except for payment of the IBM deferred license fee, we did not use any material amount of the IPO proceeds during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Since April 1, 2008, we have used approximately $5.5 million of the proceeds for sales and marketing activities, $5.6 million for research and development activities and $4.0 million for working capital and general corporate purposes. The remainder of the IPO proceeds is invested in highly liquid, short-term, interest-bearing funds.
27
Table of Contents
Item 6. EXHIBITS.
Exhibit
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350 |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | MAKO Surgical Corp. |
Date: November 7, 2008
| | By: | /s/ Fritz L. LaPorte
|
| | | Fritz L. LaPorte Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350 |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350 |
29